WEBVTT - Wisdom Over Wealth

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.800
<v S1>It's often said that wisdom may create wealth, but wealth

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:18.240
<v S1>rarely creates wisdom. Hi, I'm Rob West. What's more valuable?

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.480
<v S1>Wisdom or wealth? Before you answer, consider that wealth is fleeting,

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.360
<v S1>but wisdom is never lost. John Cortinas joins us today

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.720
<v S1>to talk about why wisdom over wealth is always the

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.040
<v S1>right choice. And then it's on to your calls at

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:39.080
<v S1>800 525 7000. That's 800 525 7000. This is faith

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:47.840
<v S1>and finance. Live biblical wisdom for your financial journey. Well,

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.200
<v S1>I've been looking forward to having John Cortinas back on

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.159
<v S1>the program. He's the director of partnership and growth at

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.280
<v S1>the MacLellan Foundation and the author of True Riches What

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.560
<v S1>Jesus Really Said About Money and Your Heart. John, it's

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:00.640
<v S1>great to have you back.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:01.760
<v S2>Good to be with you, Rob.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.960
<v S1>Thanks, John. Many listeners may not realize that you wrote

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.880
<v S1>a study for us last year on the book of

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:12.280
<v S1>Ecclesiastes titled Wisdom Over Wealth, which is available at faith.com/shop

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:17.360
<v S1>for both individuals, small groups, also churches. We've received such

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.559
<v S1>encouraging feedback from people who have been struck by Ecclesiastes

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.600
<v S1>lessons on wealth, wisdom, and what truly matters. So before

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.720
<v S1>we talk about the study itself, I'd love to know

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.319
<v S1>about the process. What did that look like for you

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.200
<v S1>as you walked through Ecclesiastes personally?

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.440
<v S2>Um, you know, it's a, it's a mysterious book. It's

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.280
<v S2>a meaningful book. There's a lot of wisdom in there.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.959
<v S2>And so we've titled this study Wisdom Over Wealth 12

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.320
<v S2>lessons from Ecclesiastes on Money. And it has been a

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.320
<v S2>joy and transformative for me to get into that book.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.960
<v S2>As you know, God's Word always has power.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.800
<v S1>It sure does. And to your point, Ecclesiastes is one

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.090
<v S1>of those books we can easily overlook because at first

0:01:59.090 --> 0:02:03.090
<v S1>glance it can feel difficult or even discouraging. But when

0:02:03.090 --> 0:02:05.810
<v S1>we slow down and let the preacher speak, we discover

0:02:05.850 --> 0:02:11.210
<v S1>a deeply hopeful message. Life is brief, wealth is limited. Achievement,

0:02:11.210 --> 0:02:14.730
<v S1>pleasure and possessions can't bear the weight of our souls.

0:02:14.730 --> 0:02:18.370
<v S1>But God alone can. And that's really the heart behind

0:02:18.370 --> 0:02:22.330
<v S1>wisdom over wealth. 12 lessons from Ecclesiastes on Money. The

0:02:22.330 --> 0:02:27.609
<v S1>study explores themes like contentment and work and generosity, even enjoyment,

0:02:27.610 --> 0:02:30.530
<v S1>wisdom and the fear of the Lord. It reminds us

0:02:30.530 --> 0:02:33.929
<v S1>that money is a gift to steward, not a treasure

0:02:33.930 --> 0:02:38.290
<v S1>to worship. And we can receive God's provision with gratitude.

0:02:38.290 --> 0:02:40.769
<v S1>We can enjoy it in its proper place and hold

0:02:40.770 --> 0:02:44.169
<v S1>it with open hands, because our ultimate treasure is not

0:02:44.169 --> 0:02:46.810
<v S1>under the sun. It is in the God who made

0:02:46.810 --> 0:02:49.850
<v S1>us and sustains us and gives meaning to all we do.

0:02:49.850 --> 0:02:53.369
<v S1>So in the study, you actually illustrate the importance of

0:02:53.370 --> 0:02:57.730
<v S1>wisdom over wealth with a really powerful story. I'd love

0:02:57.730 --> 0:02:59.609
<v S1>for you to unpack that for our listeners.

0:02:59.889 --> 0:03:03.570
<v S2>Would love to do it. Yes. That story you just referenced,

0:03:03.570 --> 0:03:06.850
<v S2>this was a real life experience or conversation I had,

0:03:06.889 --> 0:03:09.210
<v S2>and it was with somebody who was a part of

0:03:09.210 --> 0:03:12.930
<v S2>three siblings, and each of them had a substantial inheritance

0:03:12.930 --> 0:03:16.010
<v S2>that they received. That was in today's dollars, about a

0:03:16.010 --> 0:03:20.490
<v S2>million bucks. And so a lot of money at age 18. Okay. And, uh,

0:03:20.570 --> 0:03:23.650
<v S2>it's amazing. The first one was kind of like a

0:03:23.650 --> 0:03:27.090
<v S2>prodigal son story. So really sad. Um, they, they did

0:03:27.090 --> 0:03:29.570
<v S2>not go down the right path and it was squandered

0:03:29.570 --> 0:03:33.090
<v S2>and they ended up in a very poor position, uh,

0:03:33.090 --> 0:03:38.330
<v S2>metaphorically and literally. Yeah. The second sibling, there was some mismanagement,

0:03:38.330 --> 0:03:41.130
<v S2>but also a little bit more maybe good decision making

0:03:41.170 --> 0:03:43.690
<v S2>as well. And they ended up in a house that

0:03:43.690 --> 0:03:45.490
<v S2>at least they had, but the rest of the money

0:03:45.530 --> 0:03:49.690
<v S2>kind of went away because expenses exceeded income. And so

0:03:49.690 --> 0:03:52.210
<v S2>then here comes the third. And the third child in

0:03:52.210 --> 0:03:56.420
<v S2>this family started having lunch with, uh, wise, godly leaders

0:03:56.420 --> 0:03:59.260
<v S2>in their community and just asking, look, here's my story.

0:03:59.260 --> 0:04:01.300
<v S2>Here's what happened to my siblings. I don't want it

0:04:01.300 --> 0:04:05.380
<v S2>to happen to me. They actually hired a Christian financial advisor,

0:04:05.740 --> 0:04:07.860
<v S2>and I was one of those lunches. And it was

0:04:07.900 --> 0:04:10.620
<v S2>such a privilege to talk to this young person who

0:04:10.620 --> 0:04:13.380
<v S2>was saying, look, I don't want what's happened to my

0:04:13.380 --> 0:04:15.780
<v S2>older siblings to be my story as well. I want

0:04:15.820 --> 0:04:18.580
<v S2>to honor God. I want to learn what investing looks like.

0:04:19.220 --> 0:04:22.020
<v S2>And ultimately, there's a happy ending for this person because

0:04:22.020 --> 0:04:25.780
<v S2>they finished a college degree, they learned about generosity, they

0:04:25.779 --> 0:04:28.220
<v S2>learned about investing, and their life is one that is

0:04:28.220 --> 0:04:29.700
<v S2>glorifying God today.

0:04:30.100 --> 0:04:32.260
<v S1>And John, I couldn't agree more. I mean, what a

0:04:32.260 --> 0:04:36.419
<v S1>picture of this idea that wisdom can generate wealth, but

0:04:36.420 --> 0:04:41.340
<v S1>wealth rarely generates wisdom. This really underscores that, doesn't it?

0:04:41.700 --> 0:04:43.659
<v S2>Yeah. If you look at this story, it's three people

0:04:43.660 --> 0:04:45.700
<v S2>from the same family and they all got the same

0:04:45.700 --> 0:04:48.700
<v S2>wealth input right as they entered adulthood. And there are

0:04:48.700 --> 0:04:52.340
<v S2>three radically different outcomes. And I would argue that the

0:04:52.339 --> 0:04:54.020
<v S2>difference was wisdom.

0:04:54.460 --> 0:04:57.060
<v S1>That's exactly right. And we're going to explore this right

0:04:57.060 --> 0:04:59.380
<v S1>around the corner. In fact, we'll dive into the book

0:04:59.380 --> 0:05:03.300
<v S1>of Ecclesiastes, where we see this idea that wisdom and

0:05:03.300 --> 0:05:06.420
<v S1>wealth are both good things, but only one of them

0:05:06.420 --> 0:05:10.020
<v S1>can preserve your life. We're talking today with John Cortinas,

0:05:10.060 --> 0:05:13.860
<v S1>our friend, frequent contributor, and the director of Partnership and

0:05:13.860 --> 0:05:18.020
<v S1>growth at the MacLellan Foundation. Wisdom over wealth on Faith

0:05:18.020 --> 0:05:21.180
<v S1>and finance. Today I'm Rob West and back with more

0:05:21.180 --> 0:05:34.940
<v S1>right around the corner. Stay with us. Thanks for joining

0:05:34.940 --> 0:05:38.420
<v S1>us today on Faith and Finance Live. What's more valuable,

0:05:38.420 --> 0:05:41.860
<v S1>wisdom or wealth? We're talking about that today with our

0:05:41.860 --> 0:05:45.140
<v S1>friend John Cortinas. He's the director of partnership and growth

0:05:45.140 --> 0:05:48.659
<v S1>at the MacLellan Foundation and a frequent contributor here. And

0:05:48.660 --> 0:05:51.580
<v S1>the study John wrote for us last year, wisdom Over

0:05:51.580 --> 0:05:55.500
<v S1>Wealth 12 lessons from Ecclesiastes on money is the subject

0:05:55.500 --> 0:05:58.060
<v S1>of our conversation today. By the way, you can pick

0:05:58.100 --> 0:06:02.979
<v S1>up your copy today at faith fi.com/shop. Now, John, before

0:06:02.980 --> 0:06:05.300
<v S1>the break, you told us this story. That's actually a

0:06:05.300 --> 0:06:08.420
<v S1>true story. You were involved in this of three siblings

0:06:08.420 --> 0:06:12.860
<v S1>that each inherited roughly $1 million in today's dollars. They

0:06:12.860 --> 0:06:17.460
<v S1>had three different outcomes. One of them was tragic. Another

0:06:17.460 --> 0:06:19.460
<v S1>didn't turn out the way we would have wanted. And

0:06:19.460 --> 0:06:23.420
<v S1>yet the third was very God honoring. And you really

0:06:23.420 --> 0:06:26.940
<v S1>suggested that the difference was wisdom. So take us into

0:06:26.940 --> 0:06:30.100
<v S1>the book of Ecclesiastes to explore what you witnessed.

0:06:30.220 --> 0:06:33.540
<v S2>Thanks, Rob. Yeah. So if we look at Ecclesiastes 711

0:06:33.540 --> 0:06:37.580
<v S2>and 12, this is what it says. Wisdom, like an inheritance,

0:06:37.580 --> 0:06:40.700
<v S2>is a good thing and benefits those who see the son.

0:06:41.020 --> 0:06:44.140
<v S2>Wisdom is a shelter as money is a shelter. But

0:06:44.140 --> 0:06:47.860
<v S2>the advantage of knowledge is this wisdom preserves those who

0:06:47.860 --> 0:06:48.419
<v S2>have it.

0:06:48.700 --> 0:06:51.710
<v S1>Yeah, a powerful truth. I know you've seen that play

0:06:51.710 --> 0:06:54.950
<v S1>out time and time again now. We're not saying that

0:06:54.990 --> 0:06:56.469
<v S1>wealth is bad, right?

0:06:56.510 --> 0:06:59.550
<v S2>Of course not. Yeah. Scripture is clear that, uh, God

0:06:59.550 --> 0:07:03.070
<v S2>has has given us these things for our enjoyment. As

0:07:03.070 --> 0:07:05.670
<v S2>Paul says, wisdom and wealth are both good, as we

0:07:05.670 --> 0:07:09.190
<v S2>just read in Ecclesiastes, but only one of them preserves

0:07:09.190 --> 0:07:11.790
<v S2>our life. And so if we want to have life,

0:07:12.030 --> 0:07:14.710
<v S2>wisdom has to be ahead of wealth. If you think

0:07:14.710 --> 0:07:17.270
<v S2>about this, when you and I are born, when anybody

0:07:17.270 --> 0:07:20.150
<v S2>is born, we're born without any wisdom, but we've got

0:07:20.150 --> 0:07:22.430
<v S2>a crib to sleep in and there's people taking care

0:07:22.430 --> 0:07:24.430
<v S2>of us. So we've already got some wealth, but we've

0:07:24.430 --> 0:07:26.390
<v S2>got no wisdom yet, and we've got to flip that

0:07:26.390 --> 0:07:27.510
<v S2>as soon as we can.

0:07:27.550 --> 0:07:30.150
<v S1>Yeah, that's exactly right. And I love how our team

0:07:30.150 --> 0:07:33.830
<v S1>worked with you to create visual reminders of the relationship

0:07:33.830 --> 0:07:38.110
<v S1>between wisdom and wealth. The message is clear as wealth grows,

0:07:38.150 --> 0:07:42.310
<v S1>wisdom must grow even faster. Otherwise money can quickly become

0:07:42.310 --> 0:07:44.670
<v S1>dangerous for the soul. Isn't that right?

0:07:44.950 --> 0:07:47.870
<v S2>That's right. You know, if you think about over our lifetimes,

0:07:48.310 --> 0:07:52.270
<v S2>the traditional path wealth grows exponentially. There's compound interest, and

0:07:52.270 --> 0:07:54.910
<v S2>so we can end up with a good deal of wealth.

0:07:54.910 --> 0:07:57.630
<v S2>And yet, if we're not intentional to grow in our wisdom,

0:07:57.630 --> 0:08:00.950
<v S2>the wealth is going to run ahead. And that creates risk.

0:08:01.270 --> 0:08:04.630
<v S2>But the better way would be to prioritize wisdom. Because

0:08:04.630 --> 0:08:07.190
<v S2>as we just read in Ecclesiastes seven, that will give

0:08:07.190 --> 0:08:10.710
<v S2>us preservation. If wisdom is ahead of wealth, our life

0:08:10.710 --> 0:08:11.990
<v S2>can be preserved.

0:08:12.230 --> 0:08:17.030
<v S1>Yeah. And John, this can be pretty pronounced if we

0:08:17.030 --> 0:08:21.230
<v S1>receive an inheritance or have a sudden wealth experience, it

0:08:21.230 --> 0:08:24.790
<v S1>may not necessarily just play out over a lifetimes. Isn't

0:08:24.790 --> 0:08:25.310
<v S1>that true?

0:08:25.710 --> 0:08:28.630
<v S2>That's right. And that's where we can follow the example

0:08:28.630 --> 0:08:31.110
<v S2>of the the young person whose story we just shared

0:08:31.110 --> 0:08:33.189
<v S2>a bit of where, where he said, oh my goodness,

0:08:33.190 --> 0:08:35.470
<v S2>I have all this money, I need some help. I

0:08:35.470 --> 0:08:37.950
<v S2>need to talk to mature believers. I need a Christian

0:08:37.950 --> 0:08:41.030
<v S2>financial advisor to help me navigate this and not blow

0:08:41.070 --> 0:08:41.670
<v S2>things up.

0:08:41.870 --> 0:08:44.750
<v S1>Yeah. Well, I love that you unpack this idea of

0:08:44.750 --> 0:08:48.800
<v S1>obtaining wisdom because that's the natural next question. Then if

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v S1>it's wisdom over wealth, how do I obtain wisdom? What

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:53.840
<v S1>would you share with our audience?

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.280
<v S2>I love that, and the first question I would ask

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.719
<v S2>is what is wisdom? You know, we might think of

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.520
<v S2>a list of best practices or some good ideas or

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.360
<v S2>a checklist I can follow, but I would submit that

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.840
<v S2>wisdom is both a perspective and a person. In first

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.360
<v S2>Corinthians one, Paul refers to Jesus as Christ, the power

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.520
<v S2>of God, and the wisdom of God.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.760
<v S1>MM. Yeah. That's right. And so, you know, as we

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.840
<v S1>think about those in our life, we obviously need to

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.280
<v S1>prioritize wisdom. But I know you've worked with a lot

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.920
<v S1>of matriarchs and patriarchs thinking about transferring wisdom to the

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.400
<v S1>next generation. You're thinking about that in your own family.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.160
<v S1>What counsel would you give them today around this idea?

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.760
<v S2>You know, absolutely. I think there's so much biblical financial

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.080
<v S2>wisdom in Scripture. But again, I would say it's not

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.640
<v S2>a checklist, it's not a list of things that I

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.400
<v S2>need to do. The question that's first and foremost is

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.000
<v S2>do I know Christ? And anybody listening, I'd say, have

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.679
<v S2>you encountered wisdom himself? He's the power of God and

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.960
<v S2>the wisdom of God. We've each got the amazing opportunity

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.359
<v S2>to know Jesus and His wisdom through praying, through diligently

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.120
<v S2>studying His Word, and in doing so again, hearkening back

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.560
<v S2>to that Ecclesiastes passage. He can preserve our life, and

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.199
<v S2>he'll redeem our journey with money through his grace.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.880
<v S1>Yeah. And when it comes to our kids, you know,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.200
<v S1>clearly those who are listening today that are wrestling through

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:24.320
<v S1>this wealth transfer conversation, thinking about passing wisdom before wealth

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.880
<v S1>is really paramount. And if you haven't considered it, perhaps

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.200
<v S1>this is that time to stop and think about that

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.920
<v S1>before you execute your plans. How would you speak into

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.280
<v S1>that dilemma that some are facing right now?

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.560
<v S2>You know, this is such a huge question. The great

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.840
<v S2>wealth transfer, of course, is talked about in media, popular

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.730
<v S2>media all the time. Um, but man, as believers, we

0:10:45.730 --> 0:10:48.770
<v S2>have such an opportunity to open up the conversation earlier.

0:10:48.770 --> 0:10:51.490
<v S2>I would just encourage anybody out there thinking about this.

0:10:51.770 --> 0:10:53.970
<v S2>I mean, we're trying to talk to our grade school

0:10:53.970 --> 0:10:56.450
<v S2>children about this now. And so if we start the

0:10:56.450 --> 0:11:00.410
<v S2>conversation about wealth and wisdom and faith and legacy from

0:11:00.410 --> 0:11:03.610
<v S2>a young age, wherever you're at today, open up the

0:11:03.610 --> 0:11:07.569
<v S2>conversational door. Uh, and that will give more time for

0:11:07.570 --> 0:11:09.490
<v S2>things to play out. I'd say the way not to

0:11:09.530 --> 0:11:11.370
<v S2>do it is, is make a will wait for you

0:11:11.370 --> 0:11:13.850
<v S2>to die and hope everybody figures it out. Let's start

0:11:13.850 --> 0:11:14.890
<v S2>the process today.

0:11:15.130 --> 0:11:18.329
<v S1>Yeah, I think the key there is intentionality. Now, John,

0:11:18.370 --> 0:11:22.050
<v S1>we mentioned earlier, this is just one lesson within the

0:11:22.050 --> 0:11:25.130
<v S1>larger study you wrote for Faith VI last year, wisdom

0:11:25.130 --> 0:11:28.890
<v S1>Over Wealth 12 lessons from Ecclesiastes on Money. So for

0:11:28.890 --> 0:11:32.570
<v S1>our listeners, connect this topic to the bigger theme. You

0:11:32.570 --> 0:11:36.569
<v S1>draw from Ecclesiastes and what God's Word teaches about money

0:11:36.570 --> 0:11:38.490
<v S1>and wisdom and eternity.

0:11:39.010 --> 0:11:42.250
<v S2>You know, spending so much time in Ecclesiastes to prepare this,

0:11:42.250 --> 0:11:45.050
<v S2>there are two huge themes that jumped out at me

0:11:45.330 --> 0:11:48.170
<v S2>studying all 12 chapters of that book. And the first

0:11:48.170 --> 0:11:51.130
<v S2>one is not money. Actually, the first one is death.

0:11:51.170 --> 0:11:54.890
<v S2>11 out of the 12 chapters of Ecclesiastes mention death

0:11:54.890 --> 0:11:57.850
<v S2>in one way or another, but I would I would

0:11:57.850 --> 0:12:01.329
<v S2>argue that the author of Ecclesiastes and God is communicating

0:12:01.370 --> 0:12:03.810
<v S2>to us through this book, not to make us sad

0:12:03.809 --> 0:12:06.290
<v S2>as we think about death, but actually to recognize that

0:12:06.290 --> 0:12:08.689
<v S2>life is short. And he's given us the breath in

0:12:08.690 --> 0:12:12.490
<v S2>our lungs today. It's an opportunity to enjoy him, to

0:12:12.530 --> 0:12:17.050
<v S2>glorify him, and to seize the moment for his glory. Uh,

0:12:17.050 --> 0:12:21.530
<v S2>and that actually feeds into the financial wisdom of Ecclesiastes

0:12:21.530 --> 0:12:24.929
<v S2>as well. And so realizing life is short, wanting to

0:12:24.970 --> 0:12:28.050
<v S2>honor God and fear him and obey his commands with

0:12:28.050 --> 0:12:30.770
<v S2>the time we're given on earth, and then trying to

0:12:30.809 --> 0:12:33.650
<v S2>manage our money in accordance with that. And we spend

0:12:33.650 --> 0:12:37.770
<v S2>these 12 lessons unpacking that in this study that we've

0:12:37.770 --> 0:12:38.569
<v S2>put together.

0:12:38.929 --> 0:12:41.890
<v S1>Mhm. Yeah. John, as we begin to tie a bow

0:12:41.890 --> 0:12:45.410
<v S1>on today's message and returning to this idea of wisdom

0:12:45.410 --> 0:12:47.770
<v S1>over wealth, what's the big idea that you'd want to

0:12:47.770 --> 0:12:49.010
<v S1>leave with our listeners today?

0:12:49.450 --> 0:12:52.010
<v S2>I would just point once again to Jesus. It's all

0:12:52.010 --> 0:12:57.130
<v S2>about him. Um, and, uh, he is the source of wisdom.

0:12:57.130 --> 0:12:59.090
<v S2>And so, um, I'm so thankful for what you guys

0:12:59.090 --> 0:13:02.370
<v S2>are doing through this, through Faith VI, through, um, Kingdom

0:13:02.370 --> 0:13:05.010
<v S2>Advisors and putting that message out there that when we

0:13:05.050 --> 0:13:08.130
<v S2>connect our faith and finances, uh, it actually starts to

0:13:08.130 --> 0:13:11.370
<v S2>shape our heart and make us more like Christ. These

0:13:11.370 --> 0:13:14.250
<v S2>are not two areas of our life that should be separate. Uh,

0:13:14.250 --> 0:13:16.410
<v S2>we should bring them together in the short number of

0:13:16.410 --> 0:13:18.490
<v S2>days that we've got for the glory of God.

0:13:18.530 --> 0:13:21.370
<v S1>Yeah, that's exactly right. And I'm grateful for your hard

0:13:21.370 --> 0:13:24.250
<v S1>work on this study, and I'm encouraged by the feedback

0:13:24.250 --> 0:13:27.610
<v S1>we've already received. I look forward to seeing the continued

0:13:27.610 --> 0:13:30.570
<v S1>impact that it will have. John, as we close, what's

0:13:30.570 --> 0:13:34.090
<v S1>your hope and prayer for anybody that picks up that study?

0:13:34.570 --> 0:13:37.730
<v S2>I would say recognize that your life is a gift.

0:13:38.010 --> 0:13:40.490
<v S2>You've been given a brief moment of life. You can

0:13:40.490 --> 0:13:43.900
<v S2>spend it in bitterness, you can spend it complaining, or

0:13:43.900 --> 0:13:46.460
<v S2>you can recognize that God has given you a gift

0:13:46.460 --> 0:13:49.699
<v S2>even in the challenges you face. So seek after him

0:13:50.059 --> 0:13:52.860
<v S2>and make every day count for the glory of God.

0:13:53.220 --> 0:13:55.540
<v S1>Yeah. That's right. Well, that's certainly our objective here on

0:13:55.540 --> 0:13:58.699
<v S1>this program every day to help you see God as

0:13:58.700 --> 0:14:03.780
<v S1>your ultimate treasure and money, a tool to accomplish his purposes. John,

0:14:03.780 --> 0:14:04.940
<v S1>thanks for stopping by.

0:14:04.980 --> 0:14:06.500
<v S2>Thanks so much, Rob. Great to be with you.

0:14:06.620 --> 0:14:09.700
<v S1>That's John Cortinas, director of partnership and growth at the

0:14:09.700 --> 0:14:12.980
<v S1>MacLellan Foundation. You can pick up your copy of Wisdom

0:14:12.980 --> 0:14:18.580
<v S1>Over Wealth 12 lessons from Ecclesiastes on Money at faith.com/shop.

0:14:18.740 --> 0:14:35.620
<v S1>That's faith.com/shop. Your questions are next. 800 525 7000. Stick around. Hey,

0:14:35.620 --> 0:14:38.020
<v S1>thanks for joining us today on Faith and Finance Live.

0:14:38.020 --> 0:14:43.300
<v S1>I'm Rob West. Boy, what a just overwhelming, uh, opportunity

0:14:43.340 --> 0:14:46.380
<v S1>we've had to see you respond during these 48 hours

0:14:46.380 --> 0:14:48.620
<v S1>of impact the last couple of days. Thank you for

0:14:48.620 --> 0:14:52.340
<v S1>your generous gifts as you've come alongside us to support

0:14:52.340 --> 0:14:56.620
<v S1>directly the incredible work of the Moody Global Campus, uh,

0:14:56.620 --> 0:15:01.620
<v S1>Lord willing that we would see many more, uh, courses

0:15:01.620 --> 0:15:05.340
<v S1>translated into the native tongue of pastors across the globe,

0:15:05.340 --> 0:15:07.740
<v S1>moving into Kenya, moving into other parts of the world,

0:15:07.740 --> 0:15:10.820
<v S1>meeting the need for these many people, groups that are

0:15:10.820 --> 0:15:14.860
<v S1>asking for Bible training in their language, meeting the need for,

0:15:14.900 --> 0:15:18.060
<v S1>for oral learners. Uh, you all are just incredible. And

0:15:18.060 --> 0:15:19.980
<v S1>we are so grateful to so many of you who

0:15:19.980 --> 0:15:22.300
<v S1>stepped in with a monthly or a one time gift.

0:15:22.500 --> 0:15:24.460
<v S1>Just amazing to see what the body of Christ can

0:15:24.460 --> 0:15:27.660
<v S1>do together. Well, today we're back to regular programming, which

0:15:27.660 --> 0:15:30.380
<v S1>means we want to help you think about managing God's

0:15:30.380 --> 0:15:32.820
<v S1>money God's way. I mean, that was on full display

0:15:33.020 --> 0:15:35.260
<v S1>the last couple of days during this hour as you

0:15:35.260 --> 0:15:38.310
<v S1>were giving. That's one way we honor the Lord as

0:15:38.310 --> 0:15:41.630
<v S1>we recognize the grace that has been extended to us.

0:15:41.790 --> 0:15:44.390
<v S1>And then as a natural overflow of that, we take

0:15:44.430 --> 0:15:47.390
<v S1>what has been entrusted to us that does not belong

0:15:47.470 --> 0:15:50.150
<v S1>to us. It belongs to God. But we return a

0:15:50.190 --> 0:15:52.430
<v S1>portion of it into God's economy. We can do that

0:15:52.430 --> 0:15:54.910
<v S1>through our our charitable giving. We can do that through

0:15:54.910 --> 0:16:00.670
<v S1>our strategic investments. Investments are how we support business, which

0:16:00.670 --> 0:16:05.070
<v S1>is God's design for wealth creation. You know, the economic

0:16:05.070 --> 0:16:08.870
<v S1>system that we operate in starts with creator. God created

0:16:08.990 --> 0:16:12.390
<v S1>us in his image to keep and cultivate, uh, to

0:16:12.430 --> 0:16:15.470
<v S1>be a blessing, to take the latent potential of his

0:16:15.470 --> 0:16:18.910
<v S1>creation and put it to work for the flourishing of others.

0:16:18.910 --> 0:16:21.390
<v S1>And we do that each day in part as we

0:16:21.390 --> 0:16:23.190
<v S1>manage God's money. And so we want to help you

0:16:23.190 --> 0:16:25.830
<v S1>do that today. We recognize you have questions, so we

0:16:25.830 --> 0:16:28.830
<v S1>want to come alongside you and help you answer those questions.

0:16:28.830 --> 0:16:31.590
<v S1>But if you have something on your mind today, financially,

0:16:31.590 --> 0:16:38.470
<v S1>call right now (800) 525-7000. That's 805 257000. You can call

0:16:38.510 --> 0:16:42.190
<v S1>right now. In the news today. Inheriting a family home

0:16:42.390 --> 0:16:47.630
<v S1>can bring both financial opportunity and difficult decisions. When siblings

0:16:47.630 --> 0:16:51.550
<v S1>or other relatives inherit property together, they often have to

0:16:51.590 --> 0:16:54.710
<v S1>decide whether to sell, rent or keep the home while

0:16:54.710 --> 0:16:59.710
<v S1>continuing to cover property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. These

0:16:59.710 --> 0:17:03.310
<v S1>decisions are becoming more common as trillions of dollars in

0:17:03.310 --> 0:17:07.750
<v S1>wealth are expected to pass between generations in the coming decades.

0:17:07.990 --> 0:17:11.990
<v S1>Rising home values have made real estate and especially significant

0:17:11.990 --> 0:17:17.630
<v S1>part of many inheritances. Experts say disagreements can arise when

0:17:17.710 --> 0:17:21.790
<v S1>heirs have different financial needs or emotional attachments to a property.

0:17:21.990 --> 0:17:27.750
<v S1>Delaying a decision can also become costly because expenses continue

0:17:27.790 --> 0:17:33.070
<v S1>even while the family considers its options. Tax considerations matter

0:17:33.070 --> 0:17:36.950
<v S1>as well. Inherited property receives a new cost basis based

0:17:36.950 --> 0:17:40.270
<v S1>on its fair market value at the owner's death, making

0:17:40.310 --> 0:17:45.030
<v S1>a timely appraisal really important. Financial and estate planning professionals

0:17:45.030 --> 0:17:50.630
<v S1>recommend discussing plans for family property well in advance, clear instructions,

0:17:50.630 --> 0:17:54.190
<v S1>appropriate wills or trusts, perhaps a transfer on death deed

0:17:54.190 --> 0:17:57.670
<v S1>if your state allows it, and a defined timeline for

0:17:57.710 --> 0:18:02.270
<v S1>making decisions can help reduce conflict control costs and protect

0:18:02.270 --> 0:18:05.629
<v S1>the property's value. Listen, I know this can get complicated,

0:18:05.630 --> 0:18:08.190
<v S1>but hopefully, as you think through this, have a plan

0:18:08.190 --> 0:18:12.190
<v S1>in advance. Communicate clearly. You can make sure you're operating

0:18:12.230 --> 0:18:16.070
<v S1>as a steward in an orderly way, including the passing

0:18:16.109 --> 0:18:18.909
<v S1>of the family home, what is often the largest asset.

0:18:19.109 --> 0:18:23.109
<v S1>All right, let's dive into your questions today. 800 525

0:18:23.150 --> 0:18:25.270
<v S1>7000 is the number to call. We're going to begin

0:18:25.270 --> 0:18:28.629
<v S1>in Chicago. And Mike, you'll be first up. Go ahead sir.

0:18:29.990 --> 0:18:33.510
<v S3>Thank you for taking my call. Um, so this year

0:18:33.510 --> 0:18:36.920
<v S3>I turned 73. And of course, I have to meet

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.840
<v S3>my required minimum distributions out of my IRA accounts. And

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.440
<v S3>part of that will be charitable giving. And and then

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.040
<v S3>of course, every month I also give charitably with my

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.200
<v S3>monthly income. So what I'm wondering, my question is, is

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.880
<v S3>there any advantage to giving a larger percentage of their

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:04.000
<v S3>charitable giving to my IRA distributions? If at the end

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.080
<v S3>of the year, the total amount of my charitable contributions

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.360
<v S3>are the same? I hope my question makes sense to you.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:16.480
<v S1>But yeah, absolutely it does. And I think yes, for

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.680
<v S1>many people, there is a tax advantage to making more

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.600
<v S1>of their charitable giving directly from the IRA through what

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.680
<v S1>you have probably become familiar with is the qualified charitable distribution.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:33.800
<v S1>And here's why the QCD satisfies that required minimum distribution

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.080
<v S1>that you now have at age 73, and it's excluded

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:43.600
<v S1>from your taxable income rather than included in income and

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.800
<v S1>then offset by a charitable deduction. Um, so what you're

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.000
<v S1>doing is you're keeping your adjusted gross income lower, which

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.719
<v S1>can have additional benefits, uh, you know, that can reduce

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.720
<v S1>or avoid what's called Irma. Um, which is the additional

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.160
<v S1>premium you could have on your Medicare Part B and

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:06.600
<v S1>part D, two years after your income goes up. So

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v S1>assuming your income was going to go up your taxable income,

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.479
<v S1>you know, when you turn 73, well, two years later,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.440
<v S1>you could have higher premiums to the tune of hundreds

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.760
<v S1>of dollars a month for Medicare. Well, you avoid that

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v S1>by keeping your adjusted gross income lower and doing more

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.840
<v S1>of this through, uh, you know, your QCD, which means

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.320
<v S1>none of your potentially RMD is added to your taxable

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.409
<v S1>income as is a real benefit. It reduces the amount

0:20:33.410 --> 0:20:37.369
<v S1>of Social Security benefits that are subject to tax. Um,

0:20:37.410 --> 0:20:41.450
<v S1>it also can lower your state income taxes in some cases. So,

0:20:41.650 --> 0:20:44.609
<v S1>you know, I like this idea, especially if you don't

0:20:44.609 --> 0:20:47.210
<v S1>need the money from the R&amp;D. And a lot of

0:20:47.210 --> 0:20:49.449
<v S1>people are in that position where they're saying, listen, if

0:20:49.450 --> 0:20:51.770
<v S1>it wasn't for the required minimum, I'd just leave it

0:20:51.770 --> 0:20:54.930
<v S1>right there. My income is covered elsewhere. Well, if that's

0:20:54.930 --> 0:20:58.010
<v S1>the case, why not do your charitable giving out of

0:20:58.010 --> 0:21:01.770
<v S1>the IRA? Remember, it went in and you got a deduction.

0:21:01.770 --> 0:21:05.929
<v S1>Normally it comes out as income that's taxable. The only

0:21:05.930 --> 0:21:09.409
<v S1>way to get it out is through that qualified charitable distribution.

0:21:09.410 --> 0:21:12.209
<v S1>So I'd keep your after tax money right there in

0:21:12.210 --> 0:21:14.729
<v S1>your checking and savings and do as much through the

0:21:14.730 --> 0:21:17.090
<v S1>IRA as possible. But does that make sense though?

0:21:18.330 --> 0:21:21.770
<v S3>It does. I think I just don't understand how that

0:21:21.770 --> 0:21:25.090
<v S3>changes my overall income at the end of the year,

0:21:25.090 --> 0:21:30.090
<v S3>my overall taxable income when I. Isn't real clear how

0:21:30.090 --> 0:21:32.170
<v S3>it changes my overall taxable income at the end.

0:21:32.210 --> 0:21:35.450
<v S1>Okay. Yeah, let me address that because that's an important distinction.

0:21:35.450 --> 0:21:37.689
<v S1>I've got to take a break here, Mike, but if

0:21:37.690 --> 0:21:39.810
<v S1>you don't mind holding and if you can't, you can

0:21:39.810 --> 0:21:42.689
<v S1>hang up and listen. I'll talk about the overall tax

0:21:42.690 --> 0:21:45.369
<v S1>picture and how you think about that in light of

0:21:45.369 --> 0:21:49.530
<v S1>the qualified charitable distribution. This is faith and finance live. Mary.

0:21:49.570 --> 0:21:51.970
<v S1>Roger coming your way as well right after the break.

0:21:52.010 --> 0:21:56.250
<v S1>800 525 7000. Call right now. We'll be right back.

0:22:08.650 --> 0:22:10.409
<v S1>Great to have you with us today on Faith and

0:22:10.410 --> 0:22:13.530
<v S1>Finance Live. I'm Rob West taking your calls and questions

0:22:13.530 --> 0:22:17.650
<v S1>at 800 525 7000. Uh, before the break, we were

0:22:17.650 --> 0:22:20.650
<v S1>talking to Mike in Chicago. He's turning 73, which means

0:22:20.650 --> 0:22:23.970
<v S1>he's now going to have a required minimum distribution based

0:22:23.970 --> 0:22:26.770
<v S1>on his age and his account balance. That's going to

0:22:26.770 --> 0:22:30.369
<v S1>run him about 21,000 that the IRS says he has

0:22:30.369 --> 0:22:33.130
<v S1>to take out for that first year. He and his

0:22:33.130 --> 0:22:37.570
<v S1>wife two typically substantially more than that as charitable giving

0:22:37.609 --> 0:22:40.690
<v S1>to ministry, which they do from after tax dollars. So

0:22:40.690 --> 0:22:44.649
<v S1>normally they'd write a check from checking or savings and

0:22:44.650 --> 0:22:47.770
<v S1>just make that gift direct. And he's wondering what is

0:22:47.770 --> 0:22:51.770
<v S1>the overall benefit from the tax picture to doing the

0:22:51.770 --> 0:22:58.490
<v S1>full 21,000 from my IRA to cover the required minimum

0:22:58.970 --> 0:23:02.570
<v S1>and then do the balance out of checking or savings? Um,

0:23:02.570 --> 0:23:04.770
<v S1>you know, how does that help me at all? Um,

0:23:04.770 --> 0:23:09.490
<v S1>and essentially, you know, without the QCD, you take the

0:23:09.490 --> 0:23:13.610
<v S1>full 21,000 required minimum into taxable income. So let's say

0:23:13.609 --> 0:23:17.490
<v S1>you give 40,000 from savings. The tax return now includes

0:23:17.490 --> 0:23:21.610
<v S1>21 grand of IRA income. You may get a charitable

0:23:21.609 --> 0:23:25.250
<v S1>deduction only if you itemize. You probably do since you're

0:23:25.290 --> 0:23:30.500
<v S1>giving a Is substantial, but your AGI is $21,000 higher

0:23:30.700 --> 0:23:35.500
<v S1>with the QCD. You send the entire 21,000 of RMD

0:23:35.820 --> 0:23:40.540
<v S1>directly to charity. You give only the remaining amount. In

0:23:40.540 --> 0:23:43.300
<v S1>my example, if you're going to give 4000 total, you

0:23:43.300 --> 0:23:47.620
<v S1>give the remaining 19 from savings. The total charitable giving

0:23:47.619 --> 0:23:52.900
<v S1>still 40. But that 21000 never appears in your taxable income.

0:23:53.060 --> 0:23:56.179
<v S1>So what changed? Well, the charity still received the total.

0:23:56.220 --> 0:24:01.020
<v S1>The 40 you used 21000 less from savings because the

0:24:01.020 --> 0:24:04.700
<v S1>IRA funded that portion. And the tax benefit is that

0:24:04.700 --> 0:24:10.139
<v S1>the 21000 never became taxable income. You might say, but

0:24:10.140 --> 0:24:13.300
<v S1>don't I lose the charitable deduction? Well, maybe. But that's

0:24:13.340 --> 0:24:17.140
<v S1>often not the problem. Uh, and even if you itemize,

0:24:17.540 --> 0:24:21.340
<v S1>you give up a charitable deduction on 21,000. But in

0:24:21.340 --> 0:24:24.220
<v S1>exchange for that, you don't ever recognize it as income.

0:24:24.220 --> 0:24:27.020
<v S1>And remember, that deduction is only on a portion of it,

0:24:27.020 --> 0:24:30.500
<v S1>never on the whole thing. So the real advantage of

0:24:30.500 --> 0:24:35.300
<v S1>the QCD is keeping your adjusted gross income lower, to

0:24:35.420 --> 0:24:37.940
<v S1>not pay the tax on any portion of it, which

0:24:37.940 --> 0:24:41.780
<v S1>you would otherwise have to do. Avoid the Irma. Avoid

0:24:41.780 --> 0:24:45.940
<v S1>the additional taxation of Social Security benefits. Does that is

0:24:45.940 --> 0:24:47.020
<v S1>that clear though, Mike?

0:24:48.580 --> 0:24:51.260
<v S3>Yeah it is. I'm going to think about it a

0:24:51.260 --> 0:24:53.940
<v S3>little bit. I'm going to listen to your explanation again.

0:24:53.980 --> 0:24:59.340
<v S3>I do appreciate it. Yeah. I do appreciate uh, uh, yeah,

0:24:59.340 --> 0:25:02.980
<v S3>it's just, uh, so at the end of the year, I'll,

0:25:03.260 --> 0:25:06.300
<v S3>I'll do my income tax as basically as though I

0:25:06.300 --> 0:25:10.340
<v S3>didn't even receive a required minimum distribution, basically.

0:25:10.380 --> 0:25:11.020
<v S1>Exactly.

0:25:11.100 --> 0:25:15.379
<v S3>Yeah, yeah, yeah. But then I'll have, but, but then

0:25:15.380 --> 0:25:19.020
<v S3>I'll have less charitable giving than I normally have. So

0:25:19.020 --> 0:25:20.260
<v S3>I'll have no uh.

0:25:20.740 --> 0:25:24.429
<v S1>You really wouldn't because here's the reality. you could still

0:25:24.430 --> 0:25:27.710
<v S1>give the same amount. It's just that, you know, let's pick.

0:25:27.750 --> 0:25:29.990
<v S1>So in my example, we were given 40. Maybe it's

0:25:29.990 --> 0:25:31.550
<v S1>more than that. But let's say you were planning to

0:25:31.550 --> 0:25:35.430
<v S1>give 40,000 to charity. Normally you'd do that out of

0:25:35.430 --> 0:25:39.710
<v S1>savings or checking with after tax dollars. I'm just saying

0:25:39.710 --> 0:25:42.510
<v S1>if your required minimums 21 and you don't need that

0:25:42.510 --> 0:25:46.149
<v S1>money for to live on, let's give. 21 of the

0:25:46.150 --> 0:25:49.630
<v S1>40 through the qualified charitable distribution. And the benefit is

0:25:49.869 --> 0:25:52.750
<v S1>we never recognize that as income, meaning we don't have

0:25:52.750 --> 0:25:55.150
<v S1>to pay tax on it. And then let's make up

0:25:55.150 --> 0:25:59.150
<v S1>the difference. In my example, an additional 19,000, and you

0:25:59.150 --> 0:26:03.030
<v S1>write that check from checking instead of the 40. And

0:26:03.030 --> 0:26:05.630
<v S1>so the ministry still gets 40. They're just getting it

0:26:05.630 --> 0:26:08.470
<v S1>in two checks, one check from the IRA, one check

0:26:08.470 --> 0:26:12.350
<v S1>from you. And your real benefit is you satisfied the

0:26:12.350 --> 0:26:15.630
<v S1>IRS requirement of the required minimum, but you didn't add

0:26:15.630 --> 0:26:19.270
<v S1>a dime to your taxable income, which has multiple benefits.

0:26:19.950 --> 0:26:23.390
<v S3>Okay. You said even had Benefits in coming years as

0:26:23.390 --> 0:26:26.270
<v S3>far as my Social Security, Medicare premiums.

0:26:26.310 --> 0:26:28.990
<v S1>Yeah. And your Medicare taxation. Exactly.

0:26:29.750 --> 0:26:33.950
<v S3>Okay. Okay. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate your

0:26:33.990 --> 0:26:37.750
<v S3>I appreciate your answer. It's a complicated answer, but it is.

0:26:37.790 --> 0:26:39.870
<v S1>No, I totally get it. And a lot of people

0:26:39.869 --> 0:26:41.189
<v S1>look at it and say, wait a minute, don't I

0:26:41.190 --> 0:26:45.430
<v S1>get a deduction on that, that charitable contribution from the IRA? No,

0:26:45.430 --> 0:26:48.350
<v S1>but you get something even better. It's just never counted

0:26:48.350 --> 0:26:50.950
<v S1>as income. It wasn't counted as income. When you put

0:26:50.950 --> 0:26:53.510
<v S1>it in, you got a deduction and it's not going

0:26:53.550 --> 0:26:56.110
<v S1>to count as income coming out, which means you just

0:26:56.109 --> 0:26:59.390
<v S1>got all that tax free growth. Um, and you know,

0:26:59.430 --> 0:27:02.030
<v S1>you got a deduction in the very beginning. So it's

0:27:02.030 --> 0:27:04.270
<v S1>a real win win. But it takes a little bit

0:27:04.270 --> 0:27:07.389
<v S1>of mental gymnastics to get there. Hey God bless you Mike.

0:27:07.390 --> 0:27:09.669
<v S1>We appreciate you being on the program today. Let's go

0:27:09.670 --> 0:27:12.430
<v S1>to Michigan. Similar question from Susan. Go ahead.

0:27:13.350 --> 0:27:17.550
<v S4>Oh yes. I hope I can articulate this adequately, but

0:27:17.590 --> 0:27:21.270
<v S4>here's my question. Okay. I learned last year that if

0:27:21.270 --> 0:27:26.390
<v S4>I gave my minimum distribution directly to charity, then they

0:27:26.390 --> 0:27:30.550
<v S4>get the whole thing. And I really like that. But, um,

0:27:30.630 --> 0:27:33.830
<v S4>here's what I was wondering. Can I give that, um,

0:27:33.869 --> 0:27:37.669
<v S4>minimum distribution, like right now in the middle of the

0:27:37.670 --> 0:27:41.430
<v S4>year because like I'm giving, uh, churches and things like

0:27:41.430 --> 0:27:44.790
<v S4>that something every month, but I would rather just give

0:27:44.830 --> 0:27:46.629
<v S4>like a big fat thumb.

0:27:47.070 --> 0:27:47.470
<v S3>Yeah.

0:27:47.590 --> 0:27:50.470
<v S4>Uh, what can I do that.

0:27:50.910 --> 0:27:54.670
<v S1>You sure can. Yeah. You can make qualified charitable distributions

0:27:54.869 --> 0:27:57.510
<v S1>at any time during the year, so you don't have

0:27:57.510 --> 0:27:59.830
<v S1>to wait until the end of the year. Uh, and

0:27:59.830 --> 0:28:02.710
<v S1>you also don't have to spread them out. So essentially,

0:28:02.710 --> 0:28:06.230
<v S1>any time during the calendar year, you can make one

0:28:06.230 --> 0:28:10.470
<v S1>QCD or several Qcds throughout the year. The only requirement

0:28:10.470 --> 0:28:14.230
<v S1>is that you have to have completed at least your

0:28:14.230 --> 0:28:19.190
<v S1>required minimum by December 31st, so to count for that

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.359
<v S1>tax year and toward that year's RMD, the funds have

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.840
<v S1>to leave the IRA and be received by the charity

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.280
<v S1>by year end. But if you want to do that

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.680
<v S1>starting in January and do it every month and get

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.480
<v S1>it done by December 31st, great. If you want to

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.359
<v S1>wait and do it, you know, the last couple of

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.080
<v S1>weeks of December, don't cut it too close. But as

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.280
<v S1>long as that money has been received by the charity

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.920
<v S1>by year end, it's going to count toward that year's, uh,

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.640
<v S1>required minimum. But they don't really care how many checks

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v S1>you write that in and over what period of time

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.040
<v S1>during that calendar year.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:58.240
<v S4>Okay. And, um, I guess I don't know exactly what

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.720
<v S4>my actual minimum distribution will be, but I can kind

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.960
<v S4>of guess what it was. I know what it was

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.360
<v S4>last year. So just kind of do it that way.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.720
<v S1>It's going to be a little higher. Yeah. Normally what

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:14.080
<v S1>happens is your IRA custodian, the company that sends you

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.680
<v S1>your statement like Fidelity or Schwab or Vanguard, they typically count.

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.480
<v S1>Calculate your R&amp;D each year and make it available online

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.120
<v S1>or on your annual statement. So you're going to want

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.160
<v S1>to look at your, uh, you know, if you want

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.200
<v S1>to do it yourself, you could look at your year

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:33.680
<v S1>end account balance. So your December 31st account balance from

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.280
<v S1>the previous year, and then you would look at your

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:42.880
<v S1>IRS life expectancy table from the uniform lifetime table@irs.gov. And

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.960
<v S1>basically it's the prior year balance divided by the life

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.240
<v S1>expectancy factor. Um, but again, I would look to your

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.640
<v S1>IRA custodian because they should provide that number for you.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.520
<v S4>Okay. All right. Thank you so much.

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:03.040
<v S1>Okay. Hey, listen, I love this conversation, folks. And by

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.080
<v S1>the way, you know, we've been talking about the Moody

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:09.320
<v S1>Global campus. We've been talking about translating these incredible Moody

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.720
<v S1>Bible Institute courses into the native tongue of people groups

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.240
<v S1>all over the world. If you want to support that,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.850
<v S1>one of the great ways to do that is through

0:30:18.850 --> 0:30:22.130
<v S1>a qualified charitable distribution. It comes right out of your IRA,

0:30:22.370 --> 0:30:25.850
<v S1>goes to Moody Bible Institute to fund the training of

0:30:25.850 --> 0:30:29.850
<v S1>the next generation of pastors all over the globe. Just

0:30:29.850 --> 0:30:34.130
<v S1>go to Moody stewardship.org to learn more. A wonderful opportunity.

0:30:34.130 --> 0:30:36.890
<v S1>The team would be delighted to talk you through it again.

0:30:36.890 --> 0:30:43.490
<v S1>That website, Moody stewardship.org, and a qualified charitable distribution is

0:30:43.490 --> 0:30:47.690
<v S1>a great way to give. Never recognize any taxable income

0:30:47.690 --> 0:30:50.810
<v S1>and get more into God's kingdom. This is faith and

0:30:50.810 --> 0:30:53.570
<v S1>finance live. I'm Rob West. We're taking your questions right

0:30:53.570 --> 0:31:06.330
<v S1>after this at 800 525 7000. Great to have you

0:31:06.330 --> 0:31:09.410
<v S1>with us today on Faith and Finance Live. I'm Rob West. Well,

0:31:09.490 --> 0:31:12.210
<v S1>here in our final segment today, Jerry Boyer is here.

0:31:12.250 --> 0:31:15.690
<v S1>Jerry Jerry joins us each Friday. And we talk markets.

0:31:15.690 --> 0:31:19.410
<v S1>We talk corporate engagement. Today Jerry the market up slightly.

0:31:19.410 --> 0:31:24.930
<v S1>But S&amp;P 500 another record uh strongest week since April.

0:31:24.930 --> 0:31:27.770
<v S1>I read earlier today. And that's just kind of been

0:31:27.770 --> 0:31:29.610
<v S1>the order of the day. And and I know you

0:31:29.610 --> 0:31:31.810
<v S1>and I were talking this morning and it sounds like

0:31:32.010 --> 0:31:35.810
<v S1>perhaps this is a reaction to what we used to

0:31:35.810 --> 0:31:38.770
<v S1>see move the markets, which was all about the fed. Right?

0:31:39.250 --> 0:31:41.210
<v S5>Yeah. It looks that way to me. Uh, why does

0:31:41.210 --> 0:31:43.930
<v S5>it look that way to me? Because, um, when you

0:31:43.930 --> 0:31:48.290
<v S5>have bad economic news, especially in regards to employment markets,

0:31:48.890 --> 0:31:53.370
<v S5>the fed tends to be dominated by a Keynesian economic framework,

0:31:53.610 --> 0:31:56.250
<v S5>which says that, you know, the way to get unemployment

0:31:56.250 --> 0:31:59.050
<v S5>down is to create new money, pump it into the

0:31:59.050 --> 0:32:02.330
<v S5>system to stimulate things. Right. Uh, so if we have

0:32:02.330 --> 0:32:05.850
<v S5>a situation where employment is not doing well and today's

0:32:05.850 --> 0:32:09.330
<v S5>jobs report was pretty bad, well, then maybe the Fed's

0:32:09.330 --> 0:32:11.450
<v S5>going to be easier. It's not going to tighten the

0:32:11.450 --> 0:32:15.180
<v S5>money supply like everyone's been expecting. um, or maybe probably

0:32:15.180 --> 0:32:18.060
<v S5>not tighten it as much. So that's the theory. So

0:32:18.060 --> 0:32:19.540
<v S5>what does the data say? Well, if you look at

0:32:19.540 --> 0:32:22.340
<v S5>the fed funds futures market is basically where people can

0:32:22.380 --> 0:32:25.020
<v S5>kind of quote unquote bet on what the interest rate

0:32:25.020 --> 0:32:27.420
<v S5>will be by the end of the year. It looks

0:32:27.420 --> 0:32:31.500
<v S5>like less hiking, less tightening of the money supply. There's that, uh,

0:32:31.500 --> 0:32:35.940
<v S5>in addition, um, the Dow, as opposed to the Nasdaq,

0:32:35.980 --> 0:32:39.380
<v S5>Dow is kind of like regular stocks. Uh, Nasdaq is

0:32:39.380 --> 0:32:42.860
<v S5>tech stocks a little bit more speculative. That tends to

0:32:42.860 --> 0:32:46.100
<v S5>move more when there's easy money. So today the Dow

0:32:46.100 --> 0:32:48.980
<v S5>is up a third of a percent. But the Nasdaq

0:32:48.980 --> 0:32:51.660
<v S5>is up one and a third percent. Right. So that

0:32:51.660 --> 0:32:54.860
<v S5>indicates that it's the easy money speculative part of the

0:32:54.860 --> 0:32:57.940
<v S5>market that's moving. The other thing is gold's up, which

0:32:57.940 --> 0:33:00.700
<v S5>suggests that the Fed's maybe not going to tighten or

0:33:00.700 --> 0:33:03.820
<v S5>not tighten as much. And the dollar is down. So

0:33:03.860 --> 0:33:07.220
<v S5>it all kind of amounts to the same thing. Easier money. Why?

0:33:07.620 --> 0:33:11.300
<v S5>Because markets are saying, hey, the central bank, they don't

0:33:11.300 --> 0:33:15.020
<v S5>follow classical economics. For the most part, they follow Keynesian economics,

0:33:15.020 --> 0:33:17.100
<v S5>and they're not going to raise rates if the labor

0:33:17.100 --> 0:33:20.980
<v S5>market is is is weak. Now, I don't think that's

0:33:20.980 --> 0:33:22.700
<v S5>the way they should think about it. I think the

0:33:22.700 --> 0:33:25.860
<v S5>fed should tighten the money supply when there's inflation and

0:33:25.860 --> 0:33:28.740
<v S5>loosen the money supply when there's deflation. In other words,

0:33:28.740 --> 0:33:31.820
<v S5>it pretty much should have one mandate, one job, protect

0:33:31.820 --> 0:33:35.100
<v S5>the value of the currency. But for a long time,

0:33:35.100 --> 0:33:38.100
<v S5>it really thinks it has two jobs. One is to

0:33:38.140 --> 0:33:40.580
<v S5>fight inflation by slowing the economy down, and the other

0:33:40.580 --> 0:33:43.380
<v S5>is to fight slowing down the economy by creating inflation.

0:33:43.540 --> 0:33:45.500
<v S5>And you can never win that. You just go back

0:33:45.500 --> 0:33:49.180
<v S5>and forth between these two conflicting mandates, which is basically

0:33:49.180 --> 0:33:51.700
<v S5>the history of, um, you know, the last 100 years

0:33:51.740 --> 0:33:54.420
<v S5>going back to the Great Depression of fed policy.

0:33:54.860 --> 0:33:58.219
<v S1>Yeah. And they're actually making their job harder with the

0:33:58.220 --> 0:33:59.900
<v S1>second part of that mandate, right?

0:34:01.100 --> 0:34:04.180
<v S5>Yes, exactly. Uh, because if they, if they stimulate the

0:34:04.180 --> 0:34:07.100
<v S5>economy with easy money, well, then they're going to get inflation.

0:34:07.500 --> 0:34:09.700
<v S5>You know, what we're seeing is inflation doesn't seem to

0:34:09.739 --> 0:34:13.299
<v S5>have been beaten. right. So the fed ought to be

0:34:13.340 --> 0:34:16.299
<v S5>fighting inflation. That should be its one focus. As to

0:34:16.340 --> 0:34:19.340
<v S5>the jobs market, well, the jobs market is driven by

0:34:19.340 --> 0:34:22.739
<v S5>some regulatory problems and trade problems. We do not have

0:34:22.739 --> 0:34:25.780
<v S5>a lot of we don't have much of a manufacturing renaissance.

0:34:25.780 --> 0:34:29.100
<v S5>I understand we've seen press releases where the president is

0:34:29.100 --> 0:34:31.899
<v S5>saying $1 trillion, probably the biggest ever. No one's ever

0:34:31.900 --> 0:34:35.140
<v S5>seen numbers this big before of foreign investment. That's fine.

0:34:35.140 --> 0:34:38.859
<v S5>But when we actually count the people getting manufacturing jobs,

0:34:39.020 --> 0:34:41.299
<v S5>it's not that high. And the reason it's not that

0:34:41.340 --> 0:34:44.140
<v S5>high is people are not going to do a lot

0:34:44.140 --> 0:34:48.620
<v S5>of hiring or building factories, even in a situation where

0:34:48.620 --> 0:34:50.859
<v S5>they don't know what the terms of trade are going

0:34:50.860 --> 0:34:52.980
<v S5>to be. They don't know whether we're in a trade

0:34:52.980 --> 0:34:56.620
<v S5>war or not, practically from hour to hour. One bright

0:34:56.620 --> 0:35:00.700
<v S5>spot we saw in the jobs report today was construction,

0:35:00.700 --> 0:35:03.620
<v S5>and that's almost certainly due to the AI build out.

0:35:03.660 --> 0:35:05.660
<v S5>Now I know that's a fight right now. We got

0:35:05.660 --> 0:35:08.020
<v S5>a culture war over AI like we do over every

0:35:08.020 --> 0:35:12.430
<v S5>other thing other. Um. But all I'm saying is pretty

0:35:12.430 --> 0:35:15.710
<v S5>much the only thing really rolling in this economy right now.

0:35:15.989 --> 0:35:19.469
<v S5>It's not manufacturing, it's not services so much and it's

0:35:19.469 --> 0:35:22.310
<v S5>not spending because spending is not what really rolls the economy.

0:35:22.310 --> 0:35:25.270
<v S5>It's the result of productivity, not the cause. It doesn't

0:35:25.270 --> 0:35:30.190
<v S5>cause spending doesn't cause um, prosperity. Spending is the result

0:35:30.190 --> 0:35:33.790
<v S5>of prosperity. The thing that's really moving right now is AI.

0:35:33.830 --> 0:35:36.230
<v S5>There's a huge amount of capital expenditure. And like David

0:35:36.630 --> 0:35:39.430
<v S5>and I talked about at the conference call, um, the

0:35:39.430 --> 0:35:44.910
<v S5>last one, um, almost all new capital expenditures on AI. Um,

0:35:44.950 --> 0:35:47.590
<v S5>people say, well, that's a bubble. Well, yeah, well, if

0:35:47.830 --> 0:35:49.710
<v S5>you're going to spend it on something, and if you're

0:35:49.710 --> 0:35:52.589
<v S5>not going to build regular factories because you don't know

0:35:52.590 --> 0:35:55.910
<v S5>whether there's a trade war, because factories depend on imports

0:35:55.910 --> 0:35:58.870
<v S5>of commodities and exports of finished goods, you got to

0:35:58.870 --> 0:36:01.550
<v S5>spend it somewhere. You got to invest it somewhere. So

0:36:01.590 --> 0:36:05.550
<v S5>that's causing money to flow into, say, data center build outs.

0:36:05.830 --> 0:36:09.150
<v S5>And I'm all I'm all for it. I'm in western Pennsylvania.

0:36:09.390 --> 0:36:13.390
<v S5>We're seeing job growth here, and I like it. But really,

0:36:13.390 --> 0:36:16.230
<v S5>I would also like factories. I would like the market

0:36:16.230 --> 0:36:20.629
<v S5>to decide where the money goes. And what's pretty clear

0:36:20.630 --> 0:36:24.910
<v S5>is the administration favors AI. And although it says it

0:36:24.910 --> 0:36:31.109
<v S5>favors manufacturing, it's, um, uncertainty and instability in and around

0:36:31.270 --> 0:36:36.029
<v S5>trade patterns really creates an anti manufacturing environment, even if

0:36:36.030 --> 0:36:38.430
<v S5>they intend to create a manufacturing environment.

0:36:38.989 --> 0:36:42.910
<v S1>Jerry we've been touting the great, uh, results from the

0:36:42.950 --> 0:36:45.629
<v S1>earnings as of late. Most of this year. It's been

0:36:45.630 --> 0:36:48.430
<v S1>stronger than expected. Uh, you know, you just said most

0:36:48.430 --> 0:36:51.950
<v S1>of the AI boom right now is on the CapEx side.

0:36:51.950 --> 0:36:54.270
<v S1>So that means, you know, it's what's to come in

0:36:54.270 --> 0:36:58.149
<v S1>the future largely, do you think the productivity enhancements are

0:36:58.150 --> 0:37:00.910
<v S1>in part why the earnings have been so good? Or

0:37:00.910 --> 0:37:03.750
<v S1>is that really something that is more forward looking? And

0:37:03.750 --> 0:37:05.190
<v S1>we've yet to realize that.

0:37:05.390 --> 0:37:08.520
<v S5>I think about half and half. There's clearly productivity gains.

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:12.040
<v S5>We're not seeing them in the traditional productivity numbers, but

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.879
<v S5>it might be hard to analyze this. I remember was

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.759
<v S5>a Nobel Prize winning economist, New York Times guy. I

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.920
<v S5>can't remember his name now, said I see productivity numbers

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.160
<v S5>every place from the internet, every place, but in the

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.040
<v S5>productivity numbers. Right. Well, the internet turned out to make

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.239
<v S5>us productive. Right. A lot of people listening to you

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.680
<v S5>right now aren't on. Some weren't a lot on terrestrial radio,

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.880
<v S5>but people are also listening on podcasts. Right. And it

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.520
<v S5>did make us more productive. And AI is clearly making

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.359
<v S5>us more productive. It's a little hard to measure that,

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.000
<v S5>but it seems real. But I will say, when companies

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.760
<v S5>come out and say, hey, we're cutting jobs because of AI,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.359
<v S5>I think they're mostly saying we're not going to hire

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.600
<v S5>as many people in the future because of AI. I'm

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.320
<v S5>not saying a lot of active cutting. So I think

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.560
<v S5>most of the productivity productivity gains from AI are in

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.920
<v S5>the future. And that's going to vary from business to business.

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.879
<v S5>But remember, we've been talking about this for a couple

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:04.840
<v S5>of years now. Some of that comes at the expense

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.840
<v S5>of somebody else. So if AI is creating new software,

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.480
<v S5>you know that companies are like building software internally, then

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.680
<v S5>that means they're not going out to Accenture to build

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.960
<v S5>the software for them. Right, right, right. So some of

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.520
<v S5>it cannibalizes other parts of it. It's not all gain.

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.440
<v S5>I'll take it. But there are some trade offs here.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.439
<v S1>Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense. All right, Jerry, let's turn

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.879
<v S1>the corner here. As you gear up for the next

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.279
<v S1>engagement season, what are some of the big themes your

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:32.960
<v S1>team is preparing to engage on?

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:35.360
<v S5>Well AI is certainly going to be part of it.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.359
<v S5>I actually really like the AI productivity gains, but I

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:42.440
<v S5>don't like the AI productivity gains in creating indecent content

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.600
<v S5>involving children. That doesn't actually seem like productivity to me. Um,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.080
<v S5>and so that's something we've engaged with in the past

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.520
<v S5>and plan to engage with in this upcoming season that, hey,

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.920
<v S5>I'm all for data centers. They're helping us do computer programs,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:00.040
<v S5>helping us organize our spreadsheets and reading X-rays for us, etc., etc.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.240
<v S5>but I don't want them creating, you know, creepy pictures

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.680
<v S5>for creepy people to download and make evil plans against

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:11.760
<v S5>their neighbors. And that's not just evil. It's also stupid

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.719
<v S5>because the backlash, the regulatory and the litigation, and even

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:21.040
<v S5>the criminal law backlash against that is going to be extreme. Uh,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.759
<v S5>and I think AI needs to realize it's hanging on

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.600
<v S5>a thin thread right now in terms of the people

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.880
<v S5>being willing to accept it. Um, and if it's creating content,

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:36.560
<v S5>which is morally abhorrent and legally very risky, then that

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.080
<v S5>just might really affect their ability to build out the

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:40.839
<v S5>good parts of AI. So we're going to engage on

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.640
<v S5>that a lot. We're engaging a lot on companies partnered

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.760
<v S5>with the Southern Poverty Law Center, uh, which has used

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:48.719
<v S5>hate group lists in ways that don't really have to

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.879
<v S5>do with actual hate groups anymore. It's just Christians. You know,

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.680
<v S5>Christians who have standard Christian views are, are, you know,

0:39:55.719 --> 0:40:00.080
<v S5>are called hate groups. So also discrimination against churches, uh,

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.690
<v S5>in employee gift matching. We're going to talk about that

0:40:02.690 --> 0:40:06.729
<v S5>a lot. Discrimination against Christian employee resource groups. That's something

0:40:06.730 --> 0:40:09.170
<v S5>we're we're talking about. We're also going to talk about,

0:40:09.210 --> 0:40:10.810
<v S5>you know, we've talked about the war on energy in

0:40:10.810 --> 0:40:14.009
<v S5>the past. Some green activists have gone after energy companies.

0:40:14.010 --> 0:40:17.529
<v S5>Now they're going after food companies. So the sustainability there

0:40:17.570 --> 0:40:19.090
<v S5>are people out there who don't think there ought to

0:40:19.090 --> 0:40:22.210
<v S5>be 10 billion humans. They think we're at eight. They

0:40:22.210 --> 0:40:24.050
<v S5>think maybe there should be two or 3 or 4,

0:40:24.450 --> 0:40:27.089
<v S5>and they're planning for a future with a lot less

0:40:27.090 --> 0:40:31.370
<v S5>food production. And they're putting pressure on companies to, you know,

0:40:31.410 --> 0:40:35.450
<v S5>go all plant based and no, uh, you know, no

0:40:35.450 --> 0:40:38.569
<v S5>antibiotics and just a whole lot of things that make

0:40:38.570 --> 0:40:42.050
<v S5>it tougher for farmers to actually produce food for us

0:40:42.050 --> 0:40:45.730
<v S5>because they think that's sustainable. We don't think that's sustainable.

0:40:45.969 --> 0:40:48.850
<v S5>We like more people. People come out of the womb,

0:40:48.850 --> 0:40:51.370
<v S5>they're hungry from the very beginning, and they're going to

0:40:51.370 --> 0:40:53.569
<v S5>be hungry for their whole lives, and we don't think

0:40:53.570 --> 0:40:55.649
<v S5>we ought to be. We don't think that companies ought

0:40:55.650 --> 0:40:58.850
<v S5>to be micromanaging how farmers do their thing. So that's

0:40:58.850 --> 0:41:01.089
<v S5>going to be an area we're going to be engaging

0:41:01.210 --> 0:41:04.450
<v S5>a lot as well. Uh, so, and we've already we've

0:41:04.450 --> 0:41:08.130
<v S5>got victories already in the season just started. Microsoft just

0:41:08.130 --> 0:41:11.649
<v S5>told us, hey, our employee match program, our gift match

0:41:11.650 --> 0:41:14.250
<v S5>program is now open to everybody. Anyone who has a

0:41:14.250 --> 0:41:16.250
<v S5>501 C three so they can give to you, they

0:41:16.250 --> 0:41:18.650
<v S5>can give to Moody's. Right? Um, they can give to

0:41:18.690 --> 0:41:20.890
<v S5>their church, they can give to their synagogue. And it

0:41:20.890 --> 0:41:22.650
<v S5>used to be that they had a whole bunch of screens.

0:41:22.650 --> 0:41:24.250
<v S5>It's one of the biggest companies in the world that

0:41:24.250 --> 0:41:27.210
<v S5>just changed that. So that's like, that's two weeks ago.

0:41:27.250 --> 0:41:31.810
<v S5>We're just starting. Uh, so that's good. You know, so

0:41:32.370 --> 0:41:36.090
<v S5>there's a lot going on right now. Um, with these companies.

0:41:36.250 --> 0:41:40.370
<v S5>Last year was incredibly productive. This year so far is

0:41:40.370 --> 0:41:43.170
<v S5>looking to be even more productive in getting companies just

0:41:43.170 --> 0:41:45.969
<v S5>back to focused on your business. Stay out of the

0:41:45.969 --> 0:41:49.529
<v S5>culture war, don't discriminate. We're not saying go out there

0:41:49.530 --> 0:41:52.410
<v S5>and give all your money to, you know, to ministries,

0:41:52.690 --> 0:41:58.290
<v S5>but don't blacklist them. That's crazy. Yeah. Um, just be fair. Um,

0:41:58.330 --> 0:42:01.420
<v S5>and turns out a lot of companies are saying, all right. Yeah,

0:42:01.660 --> 0:42:03.500
<v S5>I think we just want to be fair and they're

0:42:03.500 --> 0:42:04.540
<v S5>responding accordingly.

0:42:05.180 --> 0:42:10.259
<v S1>Perhaps, Jerry, this is the most unknown, understated driver of

0:42:10.260 --> 0:42:13.780
<v S1>the future of our culture that the average Christian doesn't

0:42:13.780 --> 0:42:15.700
<v S1>even know about. It's the work being done right now

0:42:15.700 --> 0:42:18.259
<v S1>in corporate engagement. It's it's a big deal, isn't it?

0:42:18.700 --> 0:42:21.419
<v S5>It is. It's a huge deal. And understated is part

0:42:21.420 --> 0:42:23.380
<v S5>of the cost of doing it. If you take too

0:42:23.380 --> 0:42:25.620
<v S5>many victory marches, they don't want the companies don't want

0:42:25.660 --> 0:42:27.260
<v S5>to participate, don't want to cooperate.

0:42:27.700 --> 0:42:30.299
<v S1>Yeah, that makes sense. Hey, Jerry. Have a great weekend, sir.

0:42:30.340 --> 0:42:31.340
<v S1>We'll talk to you next week.

0:42:31.739 --> 0:42:32.780
<v S5>Same to you. God bless.

0:42:33.020 --> 0:42:35.940
<v S1>All right. That's Jerry Bowyer. He's our resident economist. Joins

0:42:35.940 --> 0:42:39.739
<v S1>us each Friday on this segment. And I apologize. There's

0:42:39.739 --> 0:42:41.420
<v S1>a few questions we didn't get to today. Let's see

0:42:41.420 --> 0:42:44.739
<v S1>if we can get you scheduled to be on next week.

0:42:44.739 --> 0:42:47.660
<v S1>Big thanks to my team today, the amazing tailor, Tara,

0:42:47.660 --> 0:42:50.740
<v S1>Josh and Dan faith in finance lives, a partnership between

0:42:50.739 --> 0:42:53.299
<v S1>Moody Radio and Faith. I have a wonderful weekend and

0:42:53.300 --> 0:42:55.180
<v S1>then come back and join us next week. We'll see

0:42:55.180 --> 0:42:55.940
<v S1>you then. Bye bye.