WEBVTT - Hour 2: Biblical Theology

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v S1>Hi friend, thank you so much for downloading this podcast

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:06.920
<v S1>and I truly hope you hear something that edifies encourage, equips, enlightens,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.520
<v S1>and then gets you out there in the marketplace of ideas.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:11.440
<v S1>But before you go, I want to tell you about

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.680
<v S1>this month's truth tool. It's called Have You Ever Wondered?

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.720
<v S1>And I absolutely love this topic because if you're like me,

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.600
<v S1>going out into the night sky and looking up and

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.439
<v S1>seeing a million stars, don't you just stop and think

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.560
<v S1>about God? And are you not in a moment of

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.960
<v S1>awe and wonder or looking out over the vast expanse

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.600
<v S1>of an ocean and you start thinking, what is man,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.800
<v S1>that thou art mindful of him? And it makes you

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.240
<v S1>wonder about the magnificence of God? I think that sense

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.480
<v S1>of wonder was put there on purpose, and this wonderful

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.720
<v S1>book includes a composite of multiple authors who have written

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.879
<v S1>from their perspective as a scientist, or a historian, or

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.160
<v S1>a mathematician or an artist, on why they all have

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.599
<v S1>this sense of awe through the work that they do.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.120
<v S1>In other words, the heavens declare the glory. And as

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.440
<v S1>it tells us in Romans, we are really without excuse

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.139
<v S1>because his handiwork is everywhere. And this book invites you

0:01:00.140 --> 0:01:03.540
<v S1>to walk through the chapters written by people who all

0:01:03.540 --> 0:01:06.300
<v S1>have a sense of awe and wonder when it comes

0:01:06.300 --> 0:01:09.100
<v S1>to God through their various disciplines in life. It's an

0:01:09.100 --> 0:01:11.420
<v S1>amazing book and it's yours. For a gift of any amount,

0:01:11.420 --> 0:01:16.260
<v S1>just call 877 Janet 58. That's 877 Janet 58. Ask

0:01:16.260 --> 0:01:19.140
<v S1>for a copy of Have You Ever Wondered? And we'll

0:01:19.140 --> 0:01:20.420
<v S1>send it right off to you as my way of

0:01:20.420 --> 0:01:22.940
<v S1>saying thank you, because we are listener supported radio. Or

0:01:22.940 --> 0:01:25.380
<v S1>you can go online to in the market with Janet Parshall.

0:01:26.540 --> 0:01:29.420
<v S1>When you're also on the website, consider becoming a partial partner.

0:01:29.420 --> 0:01:31.620
<v S1>Those are people who give every single month at a

0:01:31.620 --> 0:01:34.100
<v S1>level of their own choosing. You always get the truth tool,

0:01:34.140 --> 0:01:36.260
<v S1>but in addition to that, you get a weekly newsletter

0:01:36.260 --> 0:01:39.060
<v S1>that includes my writing and an audio piece just for

0:01:39.060 --> 0:01:43.220
<v S1>my partial partners. So 877 Janet 58 or the website

0:01:43.220 --> 0:01:46.860
<v S1>in the market with Janet Parshall. Consider becoming a partial

0:01:46.860 --> 0:01:49.780
<v S1>partner or asking for this month's truth tool. Have you

0:01:49.780 --> 0:01:53.100
<v S1>ever wondered? And now please enjoy the broadcast.

0:01:53.660 --> 0:01:55.180
<v S2>Here are some of the news headlines we're watching.

0:01:55.460 --> 0:01:57.740
<v S3>The conference was over. The president won a pledge.

0:01:57.740 --> 0:01:59.970
<v S4>The Americans worshiping government over God.

0:02:00.290 --> 0:02:03.690
<v S3>Extremely rare safety move by a mage 17 years.

0:02:03.690 --> 0:02:05.770
<v S5>The Palestinians and the Israelis negotiated.

0:02:06.050 --> 0:02:08.250
<v S6>The idea is not bad.

0:02:21.770 --> 0:02:24.770
<v S1>Hi, friends. Welcome to In the Market with Janet Parshall.

0:02:24.810 --> 0:02:26.929
<v S1>How often do you hear me say on this program

0:02:27.250 --> 0:02:31.609
<v S1>that what we aim to do clear transparency. Our agenda

0:02:31.610 --> 0:02:34.570
<v S1>is to help you to think critically and biblically. And

0:02:34.570 --> 0:02:37.050
<v S1>for the record, those are not mutually exclusive postures, by

0:02:37.050 --> 0:02:39.290
<v S1>the way. It's not an either or. It is a both.

0:02:39.290 --> 0:02:42.090
<v S1>And how do I know that? Because the Bible tells

0:02:42.090 --> 0:02:45.090
<v S1>me so. My heart is transformed, my mind is renewed.

0:02:45.090 --> 0:02:48.649
<v S1>But here's what I also know. My job is to gently, lovingly,

0:02:48.650 --> 0:02:52.049
<v S1>consistently push you out into the marketplace of ideas. Because

0:02:52.050 --> 0:02:54.730
<v S1>that is exactly where Jesus told us to go. And

0:02:54.730 --> 0:02:57.310
<v S1>it's a mess out there. And here's what I know

0:02:57.310 --> 0:03:00.390
<v S1>in Your Pilgrim's Progress, as you must necessarily pass through

0:03:00.389 --> 0:03:03.590
<v S1>Vanity Fair if you don't have, as John Bunyan called it,

0:03:03.590 --> 0:03:05.709
<v S1>the map, which is the Word of God, you're going

0:03:05.710 --> 0:03:07.870
<v S1>to get lost. And here's all the data that we

0:03:07.870 --> 0:03:11.269
<v S1>know right now. We are growing more and more biblically illiterate.

0:03:11.310 --> 0:03:13.870
<v S1>I expect the world to act like the world. The

0:03:13.870 --> 0:03:16.670
<v S1>world is doing exactly what the world does without Jesus.

0:03:16.669 --> 0:03:19.150
<v S1>But it is the church where I'm far more concerned,

0:03:19.389 --> 0:03:22.230
<v S1>where we are now getting a very diluted idea of

0:03:22.230 --> 0:03:24.429
<v S1>what the scriptures say. We approach it like it's one

0:03:24.430 --> 0:03:26.669
<v S1>of those buffet restaurants, you know, with the ones with

0:03:26.669 --> 0:03:29.190
<v S1>the glass, and you just walk around and you take

0:03:29.190 --> 0:03:31.230
<v S1>all the desserts you want, you take all the carbs

0:03:31.230 --> 0:03:33.590
<v S1>you want, you skip the vegetables because after all, nobody

0:03:33.590 --> 0:03:35.750
<v S1>likes those. And when you're done, you have a pile

0:03:35.750 --> 0:03:38.950
<v S1>full of calories and not much nutrition. That's the approach

0:03:38.990 --> 0:03:40.430
<v S1>a whole lot of people are taking to the Word

0:03:40.430 --> 0:03:42.350
<v S1>of God right now. They pick and choose. I don't

0:03:42.350 --> 0:03:45.190
<v S1>like this part. It's uncomfortable. I don't understand it. I'm

0:03:45.230 --> 0:03:48.750
<v S1>not sure it's really applying to our world today. By

0:03:48.750 --> 0:03:51.270
<v S1>the way. Maybe there is some legitimacy after all. I

0:03:51.270 --> 0:03:53.430
<v S1>read it in a checkout line at the grocery store

0:03:53.470 --> 0:03:55.980
<v S1>that it was only an oral tradition handed down by

0:03:55.980 --> 0:03:59.060
<v S1>ignorant Bedouins. And by the way, the only eyewitnesses were

0:03:59.060 --> 0:04:02.340
<v S1>500 years after the fact that it was written. And

0:04:02.340 --> 0:04:04.860
<v S1>guess what? The next thing you know, book of Colossians. Boom!

0:04:04.860 --> 0:04:08.420
<v S1>You've been taken captive through vain and hollow philosophies. So

0:04:08.420 --> 0:04:10.940
<v S1>with this, our specifically is designed to do is to

0:04:10.980 --> 0:04:14.660
<v S1>help you think critically and biblically about the Bible. I

0:04:14.700 --> 0:04:16.660
<v S1>have been waiting for this book. It sits on my

0:04:16.660 --> 0:04:19.060
<v S1>desk and I've been arm wrestling with my husband as

0:04:19.060 --> 0:04:21.900
<v S1>to on which desk it will finally sit. I think

0:04:21.900 --> 0:04:24.099
<v S1>he won. He gets to add it to his whole

0:04:24.100 --> 0:04:27.779
<v S1>section of systematic theology, but for right now it's mine

0:04:27.779 --> 0:04:30.180
<v S1>and I treasure it. It is a brand new book

0:04:30.180 --> 0:04:35.660
<v S1>called Biblical Theology, a canonical thematic and ethical approach. Come on,

0:04:35.820 --> 0:04:38.260
<v S1>come back in the room. This is not just for academicians.

0:04:38.460 --> 0:04:40.500
<v S1>This is for you and me to understand how to

0:04:40.500 --> 0:04:45.460
<v S1>understand the whole truth of the Bible historically, contextually, systematically.

0:04:45.460 --> 0:04:47.300
<v S1>And that's what we're going to talk about this hour.

0:04:47.300 --> 0:04:49.220
<v S1>It is a marvelous book. Let me just picture it

0:04:49.220 --> 0:04:51.980
<v S1>for you. It's about two inches thick. Now, if you're driving,

0:04:52.020 --> 0:04:55.040
<v S1>don't do this. Just use your sanctified imagination. But just

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.080
<v S1>figure the space between two figures as two inches. What

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:03.000
<v S1>that means is it's a huge academic undertaking, the kind

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.000
<v S1>of research that only great academicians and great biblical scholars

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.280
<v S1>can do. And that's exactly who we're going to talk

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:14.440
<v S1>to this hour. One of those wonderful scholars, Doctor Andreas Köstenberger,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.719
<v S1>is with us. He is the theologian in residence at

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.799
<v S1>Fellowship Raleigh. He's an internationally known Bible scholar, a prolific

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.680
<v S1>author of over 60 books, and co-founder of Biblical Foundations.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.480
<v S1>By the way, his website, Biblical Foundations, also features an

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.839
<v S1>abundance of resources and a complete list of publications. But he,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.720
<v S1>along with Gregory Caswell, wrote this book and it was

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.760
<v S1>very much his heart's passion to be able to do it.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.960
<v S1>So first and foremost, Doctor Köstenberger the warmest of welcomes.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.719
<v S1>And let me ask you why you decided to take

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.360
<v S1>such a huge undertaking.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.750
<v S7>Well, Janet, first of all, thanks for that great introduction,

0:05:53.150 --> 0:05:58.029
<v S7>I really appreciate your, uh, just sharing our vision that

0:05:58.070 --> 0:06:01.150
<v S7>that we ought to be whole Bible Christians. You know,

0:06:01.190 --> 0:06:05.710
<v S7>our Bibles contain 66 books. And, uh, so often, as

0:06:05.710 --> 0:06:08.110
<v S7>you mentioned, we we tend to kind of pick and

0:06:08.110 --> 0:06:11.349
<v S7>choose and, and like Paul told the Ephesian elders that

0:06:11.350 --> 0:06:15.590
<v S7>for three years he didn't cease from proclaiming to them

0:06:15.589 --> 0:06:19.029
<v S7>the whole counsel of God. And so, uh, I agree,

0:06:19.070 --> 0:06:22.990
<v S7>it's a daunting task to to write a book about,

0:06:23.029 --> 0:06:26.030
<v S7>you know, the entire Bible. Uh, and that's why it's

0:06:26.029 --> 0:06:29.270
<v S7>so long. It had to be, uh, but our vision

0:06:29.270 --> 0:06:32.589
<v S7>is to to serve as a resource and to serve

0:06:32.589 --> 0:06:35.030
<v S7>as an aid for, for people in our churches to

0:06:35.070 --> 0:06:37.390
<v S7>become whole Bible Christians.

0:06:38.310 --> 0:06:41.390
<v S1>Um, what a beautiful description. And may that be our

0:06:41.390 --> 0:06:45.230
<v S1>goal to be just that whole Christians understanding the whole

0:06:45.230 --> 0:06:47.350
<v S1>counsel of God so we can apply the whole truth

0:06:47.350 --> 0:06:49.469
<v S1>of the whole gospel to the whole world. There's a

0:06:49.470 --> 0:06:51.609
<v S1>synergy here that cannot be missed. So a couple of

0:06:51.650 --> 0:06:54.409
<v S1>questions right out of the gate. I very much appreciated

0:06:54.410 --> 0:06:58.289
<v S1>your opening chapter because you understood and stated quite transparently

0:06:58.290 --> 0:07:02.370
<v S1>the daunting nature of what this is like. So if

0:07:02.370 --> 0:07:03.890
<v S1>we're going to look at this, let me just give

0:07:03.930 --> 0:07:05.690
<v S1>a I'm going to do a flyover for my friends

0:07:05.690 --> 0:07:09.130
<v S1>that this becomes more attractive for them as a resource

0:07:09.130 --> 0:07:12.290
<v S1>that must be in their own library. So when I

0:07:12.290 --> 0:07:14.410
<v S1>looked at this first and it again, it's a study

0:07:14.410 --> 0:07:17.290
<v S1>of the 66 books of the Bible, how do you

0:07:17.290 --> 0:07:22.450
<v S1>picture the average user using this particular book as a concordance,

0:07:22.450 --> 0:07:25.290
<v S1>as a side by side with the Bible, as a

0:07:25.290 --> 0:07:29.130
<v S1>insightful viewing of a passage? Explain the way in which

0:07:29.130 --> 0:07:31.090
<v S1>you laid this out, because you did it with a

0:07:31.090 --> 0:07:34.210
<v S1>methodology so that it would become user friendly. Explain that

0:07:34.210 --> 0:07:35.090
<v S1>if you would, please.

0:07:36.450 --> 0:07:38.770
<v S7>Yeah, that's right. I think there could be multiple ways

0:07:38.770 --> 0:07:42.170
<v S7>people could use it. There might be some who patiently

0:07:42.170 --> 0:07:44.690
<v S7>and slowly read through the whole book cover to cover,

0:07:45.210 --> 0:07:48.990
<v S7>but I think probably more will look at it as

0:07:48.990 --> 0:07:52.870
<v S7>a resource. We have a very detailed table of contents

0:07:52.870 --> 0:07:56.070
<v S7>and we have very thorough indices. And so I think

0:07:56.190 --> 0:08:00.350
<v S7>anyone who say a pastor who preaches a sermon series on, say,

0:08:00.350 --> 0:08:03.790
<v S7>the book of Hosea might just find the, you know,

0:08:03.830 --> 0:08:06.910
<v S7>the 10 or 12 pages in the book that lay

0:08:06.910 --> 0:08:10.830
<v S7>out the major themes in Hosea, the ethical teachings in

0:08:10.870 --> 0:08:15.710
<v S7>that book, and how Hosea fits within the storyline of Scripture.

0:08:15.950 --> 0:08:19.750
<v S7>And it would be, I think, a very good foundation

0:08:19.750 --> 0:08:22.670
<v S7>for them to make sure that they do justice to

0:08:22.710 --> 0:08:26.630
<v S7>that book. So in many cases, people will simply or

0:08:27.470 --> 0:08:30.910
<v S7>serious Bible students or people in the churches, uh, you know,

0:08:30.950 --> 0:08:34.230
<v S7>would simply go to that section in the book that

0:08:34.230 --> 0:08:37.110
<v S7>deals with the book that, that they're currently studying or

0:08:37.110 --> 0:08:38.430
<v S7>they're about to study.

0:08:39.429 --> 0:08:41.189
<v S1>You right in the beginning. And if I may borrow

0:08:41.230 --> 0:08:43.470
<v S1>your words, how do you wrap your brain around a

0:08:43.470 --> 0:08:46.510
<v S1>library of 66 books written over hundreds of years by

0:08:46.510 --> 0:08:49.699
<v S1>dozens of authors. What is the story the Bible sets

0:08:49.700 --> 0:08:51.900
<v S1>out to tell? How do you know that your readings

0:08:51.900 --> 0:08:55.500
<v S1>of Scripture is in keeping with its actual God intended message?

0:08:55.540 --> 0:08:58.660
<v S1>What's more, as an inspired book, the Bible does not

0:08:58.660 --> 0:09:01.620
<v S1>merely aim to impact the knowledge of God and His ways.

0:09:02.100 --> 0:09:05.140
<v S1>It also seeks to draw us into a deep personal

0:09:05.140 --> 0:09:08.660
<v S1>engagement with God and others. So this isn't just a

0:09:08.700 --> 0:09:11.020
<v S1>book you'd have to buy for your first semester class

0:09:11.020 --> 0:09:12.900
<v S1>in college, if you were doing a survey of the

0:09:12.900 --> 0:09:15.540
<v S1>Old Testament. This is designed for you and me to

0:09:15.580 --> 0:09:21.500
<v S1>do a deep dive to better understand this inerrant, transcendent, immutable,

0:09:21.500 --> 0:09:25.580
<v S1>inspired map for Our Pilgrim's Progress. We've got so much

0:09:25.580 --> 0:09:28.380
<v S1>to talk about. And I'm absolutely thrilled and honestly quite

0:09:28.420 --> 0:09:32.140
<v S1>honored that Doctor Andreas Köstenberger would give us one hour

0:09:32.140 --> 0:09:34.500
<v S1>of his time. It's a wonderful book. And by the

0:09:34.500 --> 0:09:36.060
<v S1>time this hour is through, I hope you don't walk,

0:09:36.059 --> 0:09:38.260
<v S1>but you run to get your copy back after this.

0:09:45.340 --> 0:09:47.680
<v S1>Have you ever wondered why music moves us so deeply?

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.320
<v S1>Or why beauty takes our breath away? My Truth Tool

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.720
<v S1>this month is a thought provoking book that explores those

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.960
<v S1>moments of wonder we all encounter. It's called Have You

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.320
<v S1>ever Wondered? Consider how ordinary aspects of life point to

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.680
<v S1>the extraordinary biblical truths. Ask for your copy of. Have

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.319
<v S1>you ever wondered when you give a gift of any

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.079
<v S1>amount to in the market, call eight 7758, that's eight

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.880
<v S1>7758 or go to in the market with Janet Parshall.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.199
<v S1>We are visiting with internationally known Bible scholar and prolific author,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.960
<v S1>Doctor Andreas Köstenberger, and we are discussing a brand new,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.200
<v S1>and I would venture to say, a much beloved, treasured resource.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.079
<v S1>That's what it is going to become. It certainly is

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.679
<v S1>in our house already. It's called biblical theology, a canonical

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.480
<v S1>thematic and ethical approach. And we will break down those

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.840
<v S1>three sections for you. But you start out early in

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.000
<v S1>the book, Doctor Köstenberger, and I'm so glad you did

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.199
<v S1>in defining the words biblical theology. For some people, they

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.309
<v S1>might think that that's redundant. After all, isn't the Bible

0:10:44.309 --> 0:10:47.190
<v S1>Christian theology? So if you break that down for us,

0:10:47.190 --> 0:10:48.150
<v S1>how do you define it?

0:10:50.270 --> 0:10:53.310
<v S7>Yes, that's right. It's more than just theology that is biblical.

0:10:53.309 --> 0:10:57.030
<v S7>It is actually the theology of the biblical writers themselves.

0:10:57.070 --> 0:11:00.590
<v S7>And so, you know, sometimes what we do as Christians

0:11:00.590 --> 0:11:04.469
<v S7>is we already have our own convictions and we we sometimes,

0:11:04.750 --> 0:11:08.469
<v S7>you know, tend to read them into Scripture. But but ideally,

0:11:08.470 --> 0:11:11.710
<v S7>we would listen to the text itself and we would

0:11:11.710 --> 0:11:16.189
<v S7>draw out what the biblical authors themselves believed. We would

0:11:16.190 --> 0:11:20.430
<v S7>try to listen to what the authors themselves believed and

0:11:20.429 --> 0:11:25.069
<v S7>intended to communicate to their original readers and also to us.

0:11:25.470 --> 0:11:29.070
<v S7>And so in that sense, biblical theology is really the

0:11:29.070 --> 0:11:31.830
<v S7>proper place to start for us, because we want to

0:11:31.830 --> 0:11:34.310
<v S7>know what the Bible says to us. We want the

0:11:34.309 --> 0:11:37.390
<v S7>Bible to engage us and to inform us, even to

0:11:37.429 --> 0:11:41.190
<v S7>change and transform us, rather to simply engage in this

0:11:41.230 --> 0:11:44.290
<v S7>kind of circular reasoning where we find what we're looking for.

0:11:45.250 --> 0:11:47.410
<v S1>Beautifully answered. In other words, this is what sets it

0:11:47.410 --> 0:11:50.170
<v S1>apart from war and peace. All right. There's this is again,

0:11:50.170 --> 0:11:52.650
<v S1>a living book designed to change us, not tell us

0:11:52.650 --> 0:11:55.410
<v S1>a good story, although the Bible certainly has many of those.

0:11:55.410 --> 0:11:57.210
<v S1>But it is designed to change us. Let me go

0:11:57.210 --> 0:11:59.689
<v S1>back to something you said, and forgive me if some

0:11:59.690 --> 0:12:02.210
<v S1>of the questions seem pretty rudimentary, but I think going

0:12:02.210 --> 0:12:06.130
<v S1>back and reestablishing a firm foundation is paramount, particularly when

0:12:06.130 --> 0:12:08.330
<v S1>one is going to do a deep dive. So you

0:12:08.330 --> 0:12:12.250
<v S1>said the theology of the writers themselves. I believe that 100%.

0:12:12.250 --> 0:12:14.730
<v S1>But I know there are people listening, some all across

0:12:14.730 --> 0:12:16.850
<v S1>the country, who might say, but wait a minute. The

0:12:16.850 --> 0:12:21.490
<v S1>individuality of the author here is secondary to the inspiration

0:12:21.690 --> 0:12:23.929
<v S1>of the Holy Spirit. So how can it be the

0:12:23.929 --> 0:12:28.770
<v S1>theology of the writers themselves? Weren't they simply scribes? If

0:12:28.770 --> 0:12:31.290
<v S1>you can put it that way, for the Holy Spirit?

0:12:33.170 --> 0:12:35.890
<v S7>Well, it's not an either or, Janet, as you know.

0:12:35.929 --> 0:12:39.370
<v S7>It's it's a both and and of course. Yeah. In

0:12:39.370 --> 0:12:41.960
<v S7>the end we have a high view of Scripture. We

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v S7>believe that Scripture is inspired and inerrant, but at the

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:50.640
<v S7>same time, God used the individual personalities and interests and

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.560
<v S7>and style of of of the individual authors. You know,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.199
<v S7>when you look at the 12 apostles, for example, in

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.240
<v S7>in the Gospels, uh, you just see how Jesus, uh,

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.560
<v S7>you know, picked people who are very different from each other.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.600
<v S7>And so, uh, you see that reflected in the way

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.280
<v S7>they wrote, and you have to look no further than

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.520
<v S7>the Gospels. And when you look at Matthew, Mark, Luke,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.839
<v S7>and John, especially John, you know, they each, uh, tell

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.640
<v S7>the same story, uh, about, uh, Jesus in history, uh,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.880
<v S7>you know, coming to earth and, and, and engaging in

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.079
<v S7>the three year ministry and then, uh, dying and then

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.400
<v S7>being buried and rising from the dead. But, uh, they

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.160
<v S7>don't tell it all exactly the same way. And so

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.480
<v S7>that's a great example, I think, of what biblical theology

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.900
<v S7>Theologies can do. It can help us discover the distinctive

0:13:43.420 --> 0:13:50.220
<v S7>interests and ways to the different biblical writers communicated eternal truth.

0:13:51.660 --> 0:13:53.740
<v S1>Let me linger, because I think your example of the

0:13:53.780 --> 0:13:58.220
<v S1>Gospels is readily understood. So the doctor Luke, would observe things,

0:13:58.220 --> 0:14:01.700
<v S1>for example, that John would not. Now, that doesn't set

0:14:01.740 --> 0:14:05.220
<v S1>up a paradigm for conflict. It's perspective. But it all

0:14:05.220 --> 0:14:08.060
<v S1>leads to the same conclusion. Is that an oversimplification or

0:14:08.059 --> 0:14:08.900
<v S1>is that correct?

0:14:10.500 --> 0:14:12.780
<v S7>Yeah, no, that's a great example. And so for instance,

0:14:12.780 --> 0:14:17.020
<v S7>you find that Luke is very interested in in socioeconomic matters.

0:14:17.020 --> 0:14:21.020
<v S7>He talks about poverty a great deal. He emphasizes emphasizes

0:14:21.020 --> 0:14:26.260
<v S7>those who are marginalized in society, such as widows. And John,

0:14:26.300 --> 0:14:28.979
<v S7>on the other hand, has very little interest in economics.

0:14:28.980 --> 0:14:33.980
<v S7>He focuses more on our eternal destiny and the importance

0:14:33.980 --> 0:14:37.900
<v S7>of believing in Jesus for eternal life. And so, uh,

0:14:37.930 --> 0:14:41.170
<v S7>you know, of course, both are part of a gospel message. Uh,

0:14:41.170 --> 0:14:44.130
<v S7>but if we just read Luke or John, I think

0:14:44.130 --> 0:14:47.850
<v S7>we would, uh, miss, uh, kind of important, uh, entailment

0:14:47.850 --> 0:14:50.690
<v S7>of Jesus coming. But that is why it is so

0:14:50.690 --> 0:14:54.050
<v S7>important for us to study all four gospels and by extension,

0:14:54.050 --> 0:14:58.530
<v S7>to study all 66 books of Scripture. Because every book

0:14:58.570 --> 0:15:01.130
<v S7>has a reason for being in the canon, we believe

0:15:01.170 --> 0:15:04.770
<v S7>God chose those books for us to have in our scriptures,

0:15:04.770 --> 0:15:07.250
<v S7>and so we need to do justice to the entire

0:15:07.250 --> 0:15:08.970
<v S7>library of books that we have.

0:15:09.490 --> 0:15:12.130
<v S1>Yes. Excellent. You say in the book that and I'm

0:15:12.130 --> 0:15:17.330
<v S1>particularly intrigued by this, that in North American conservative evangelicalism

0:15:17.330 --> 0:15:20.130
<v S1>and you write, there's a new type of biblical theology

0:15:20.130 --> 0:15:23.330
<v S1>that's begun to flourish based on a high view of

0:15:23.330 --> 0:15:27.690
<v S1>Scripture and grounded in both historical research and literary study. Now,

0:15:27.690 --> 0:15:31.850
<v S1>that excites me. Why do you think this this reinvigoration

0:15:31.850 --> 0:15:33.210
<v S1>is taking place right now?

0:15:35.050 --> 0:15:39.110
<v S7>Well, I think there's a tremendous emphasis on story and

0:15:39.110 --> 0:15:42.070
<v S7>to some extent that comes from postmodernism, but I think

0:15:42.110 --> 0:15:46.990
<v S7>it works very well because the Bible is the metanarrative,

0:15:47.150 --> 0:15:49.390
<v S7>the mother of meta narratives. I think it is the

0:15:49.390 --> 0:15:53.630
<v S7>story that explains all other stories. And so that is

0:15:53.630 --> 0:15:55.950
<v S7>why in our book, we place a great deal of

0:15:55.950 --> 0:15:59.590
<v S7>emphasis on the overall storyline of the Bible. You know,

0:15:59.630 --> 0:16:01.910
<v S7>I think it's so easy sometimes for us to get

0:16:01.950 --> 0:16:04.590
<v S7>hung up and, and, you know, in some of the

0:16:04.590 --> 0:16:07.630
<v S7>details of Scripture and I think biblical theology, what's so

0:16:07.630 --> 0:16:10.750
<v S7>beautiful about it is that it focuses on synthesis. It

0:16:10.750 --> 0:16:15.510
<v S7>focuses on connections between the different books and different parts

0:16:15.510 --> 0:16:18.150
<v S7>of Scripture the Old Testament, the New Testament, you know,

0:16:18.190 --> 0:16:22.350
<v S7>the storyline, the progressive way in which God has revealed

0:16:22.350 --> 0:16:25.950
<v S7>himself to his people in history. And so I think

0:16:25.950 --> 0:16:29.950
<v S7>that's one reason why I think biblical theology resonates very

0:16:29.950 --> 0:16:31.750
<v S7>deeply with our culture today.

0:16:32.350 --> 0:16:34.550
<v S1>Wow. You made me think of something. So let me

0:16:34.550 --> 0:16:36.530
<v S1>just pull over to the side of the road for

0:16:36.530 --> 0:16:39.970
<v S1>a moment. You have a very impressive curriculum vitae. You

0:16:39.970 --> 0:16:43.330
<v S1>are known as an international Bible scholar, as somebody who

0:16:43.330 --> 0:16:46.729
<v S1>has studied and studied and studied and quite literally plumbed

0:16:46.730 --> 0:16:50.210
<v S1>the depths of Scripture at this point. Is it all

0:16:50.490 --> 0:16:52.810
<v S1>old to you? Do you know it all or in

0:16:52.810 --> 0:16:55.730
<v S1>the vibrancy of this word? Are you still discovering new

0:16:55.730 --> 0:16:57.410
<v S1>things in your own personal study?

0:16:59.090 --> 0:17:05.130
<v S7>Oh, absolutely. I almost every day and I immersed in Scripture,

0:17:05.170 --> 0:17:09.730
<v S7>I discover new things every day. I remember, uh, just

0:17:09.730 --> 0:17:13.450
<v S7>yesterday looking at Luke's gospel where, uh, you know, Jesus

0:17:13.490 --> 0:17:16.690
<v S7>is entering Jerusalem at the triumphal entry, and the disciples

0:17:16.690 --> 0:17:21.250
<v S7>are saying, uh, peace in heaven and glory to God

0:17:22.330 --> 0:17:25.250
<v S7>in the highest. And I was thinking, wait a minute,

0:17:25.250 --> 0:17:28.250
<v S7>that sounds just like the birth narrative, where it said,

0:17:28.290 --> 0:17:30.250
<v S7>you know, peace on earth and glory to God in

0:17:30.250 --> 0:17:33.010
<v S7>the highest. So you see those connections. And, you know,

0:17:33.050 --> 0:17:35.600
<v S7>for some reason I never picked it up before. So

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.320
<v S7>you're right. It's an exciting journey of discovery.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.480
<v S1>Yes, and very much an alive text. When we come back,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.760
<v S1>I do want to look at those three subtexts canonical,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.960
<v S1>thematic and ethical, and how that ties in to biblical theology.

0:17:50.000 --> 0:18:01.440
<v S1>Back after this. Doctor Andreas Köstenberger is with us, theologian

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.600
<v S1>in residence at Fellowship Raleigh. He is also, by the way,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.600
<v S1>the author of over 60 books and the co-founder of

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.440
<v S1>Biblical Foundations. I have a link to his website at

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:16.080
<v S1>Biblical Foundations, but I'm particularly excited to have this conversation

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:21.480
<v S1>today with Doctor Köstenberger because he and his co-author, Gregory Carswell,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.720
<v S1>have created what I think is going to be one

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:27.680
<v S1>of those irreplaceable resources in your legacy library. It's an

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:32.100
<v S1>overview of the entire Bible, all 66 books, and it's

0:18:32.100 --> 0:18:37.580
<v S1>entitled Biblical Theology A Canonical Thematic and Ethical Approach. Now,

0:18:37.980 --> 0:18:41.100
<v S1>Doctor Köstenberger, I think some of us understand the canonical part.

0:18:41.100 --> 0:18:43.460
<v S1>I think some of us might understand the thematic part.

0:18:43.740 --> 0:18:45.540
<v S1>It's the ethical part that I think is going to

0:18:45.540 --> 0:18:47.620
<v S1>be interesting to some people. But would you take those

0:18:47.619 --> 0:18:50.500
<v S1>three words in order? I don't want to presume anything.

0:18:50.540 --> 0:18:53.260
<v S1>People are at various levels of study. And by the way,

0:18:53.300 --> 0:18:54.660
<v S1>let me just tell you that this is the kind

0:18:54.660 --> 0:18:59.100
<v S1>of book that could become your semester Bible survey class.

0:18:59.100 --> 0:19:01.859
<v S1>It's that big, that important. And I think that rich.

0:19:01.900 --> 0:19:04.619
<v S1>But those three words, if you break them down for us, please.

0:19:06.340 --> 0:19:10.100
<v S7>Yes. So canon refers to the library of the 66

0:19:10.100 --> 0:19:13.260
<v S7>books of Scripture that the early church chose to include

0:19:13.260 --> 0:19:17.740
<v S7>in our US inspired collection our library of of of

0:19:17.900 --> 0:19:22.340
<v S7>the Bible. And so what we do, uh, as a

0:19:22.340 --> 0:19:26.419
<v S7>canonical approach, is we study, uh, each of those book

0:19:26.420 --> 0:19:30.810
<v S7>by book, uh, starting with Genesis ending in Revelations. So

0:19:31.010 --> 0:19:36.290
<v S7>it could be a great resource just for the canonical, uh, portion. Uh,

0:19:36.290 --> 0:19:38.450
<v S7>and then, uh, for each book, we look at the

0:19:38.450 --> 0:19:45.209
<v S7>major themes and then we synthesize, uh, the. Uh, contributions, uh, for,

0:19:45.250 --> 0:19:47.929
<v S7>for instance, the Five Books of Moses or for the

0:19:47.970 --> 0:19:51.770
<v S7>Gospels and, um. And so that would be, uh, our

0:19:52.290 --> 0:19:59.410
<v S7>canonical approach, uh, thematic uh, refers to, uh, the, uh,

0:19:59.410 --> 0:20:03.810
<v S7>themes that we determine inductively just by repeated reading of

0:20:03.850 --> 0:20:06.530
<v S7>that book. For example, uh, as you look at first

0:20:06.530 --> 0:20:10.889
<v S7>and second Timothy and Titus, the so-called pastoral epistles, uh,

0:20:10.930 --> 0:20:15.489
<v S7>we feature six major themes, uh, God and Christ, who

0:20:15.490 --> 0:20:20.810
<v S7>are called our savior, uh, teaching, especially scripture. Uh, the

0:20:20.810 --> 0:20:25.850
<v S7>church is the household of God, uh, Christian virtues, the

0:20:25.850 --> 0:20:31.469
<v S7>end times, um, and salvation. So we feel in some

0:20:31.470 --> 0:20:34.630
<v S7>cases those are themes that are unique and that are

0:20:34.630 --> 0:20:38.550
<v S7>distinctive of just those particular books. That's their contribution to

0:20:38.590 --> 0:20:42.350
<v S7>the canon as a whole. And then finally, ethical. Ethical

0:20:42.350 --> 0:20:46.629
<v S7>has to do with the moral teachings of Scripture. You know, Janet, Bible,

0:20:46.670 --> 0:20:49.750
<v S7>the Bible is not just written for our information, but

0:20:49.750 --> 0:20:54.230
<v S7>it's written for application. It's not just written to inform believers,

0:20:54.230 --> 0:20:56.950
<v S7>but it's written to tell us how to live. And

0:20:56.950 --> 0:21:00.750
<v S7>so embedded in our book is an entire biblical ethic,

0:21:00.750 --> 0:21:04.230
<v S7>which I believe is a first for biblical theologies.

0:21:05.109 --> 0:21:07.389
<v S1>I do too. And that's why I wanted to linger

0:21:07.390 --> 0:21:09.629
<v S1>for a moment. You used the word postmodernism earlier. Let

0:21:09.630 --> 0:21:11.470
<v S1>me go back to that word. You know, I think

0:21:11.470 --> 0:21:13.989
<v S1>there are people out in the marketplace of ideas who

0:21:13.990 --> 0:21:17.550
<v S1>would say, okay, I understand the canonical aspect. I don't

0:21:17.550 --> 0:21:20.430
<v S1>dispute your thematic aspects, but when you get to the

0:21:20.430 --> 0:21:24.070
<v S1>ethical part, when you get to the transformative nature of Scripture,

0:21:24.390 --> 0:21:26.270
<v S1>therein lies the rub. If I can borrow from the

0:21:26.270 --> 0:21:29.100
<v S1>great Bard, So I don't mind your historicity. I don't

0:21:29.100 --> 0:21:31.820
<v S1>mind your canonical approach. But when you tell me now

0:21:31.820 --> 0:21:35.180
<v S1>what this book has to say about changing me, I

0:21:35.220 --> 0:21:37.820
<v S1>have a problem. So it begs a whole, you and

0:21:37.820 --> 0:21:39.899
<v S1>I could do ten hours on just this ethical aspect,

0:21:39.900 --> 0:21:42.060
<v S1>but let me just dig into a couple here, particularly

0:21:42.060 --> 0:21:44.740
<v S1>for those who think they've stumbled onto this conversation and

0:21:44.740 --> 0:21:47.979
<v S1>may be questioning the legitimacy, the historicity, the validity of

0:21:47.980 --> 0:21:50.900
<v S1>God's Word. So is it safe to say that when

0:21:50.900 --> 0:21:54.180
<v S1>we look at the moral teachings, the ethical changes that

0:21:54.180 --> 0:21:56.940
<v S1>are brought about in each and every human being, if

0:21:56.940 --> 0:21:59.660
<v S1>they apply the word of God, can we say that

0:21:59.660 --> 0:22:02.740
<v S1>there's an expiration date? One of the arguments in postmodernism

0:22:02.740 --> 0:22:04.460
<v S1>is that was meant for a different day and time.

0:22:04.460 --> 0:22:07.500
<v S1>It has no relevancy to the 21st century. Can we

0:22:07.500 --> 0:22:10.180
<v S1>say that about and I'm not talking about the mosaic,

0:22:10.220 --> 0:22:14.379
<v S1>the mosaic law. I'm talking about the general transcendent expected

0:22:14.380 --> 0:22:18.100
<v S1>rules of deportment and honoring a holy God. Does that

0:22:18.100 --> 0:22:19.300
<v S1>have a time date on it?

0:22:21.420 --> 0:22:24.140
<v S7>Uh, not at all. And, uh, Janet, I totally get

0:22:24.140 --> 0:22:26.800
<v S7>your drift here. And I think that's very important to understand.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.800
<v S7>And in our book we particularly focus on the love

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.440
<v S7>of God, the love of God for us, uh, people

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.399
<v S7>as as sinners and and redemption. He provides in Christ.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.639
<v S7>And and as we read in Scripture, God is love

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.920
<v S7>and and and we love because God first loved us.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.000
<v S7>So at the heart of the biblical narrative, we believe

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.960
<v S7>is a loving God who wants us to reciprocate that

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.760
<v S7>love by loving him. Uh, like Jesus said, the first

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.760
<v S7>and greatest commandment, and then to love others the way

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.760
<v S7>Jesus loved us. So that would be probably the most

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.920
<v S7>important example I could give you in the short time

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.520
<v S7>we have, you know, for how, uh, the biblical message

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.040
<v S7>is transcendent and not merely subjective.

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.479
<v S1>Um, beautifully stated. Does the word of God, uh, again,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.360
<v S1>some rudimentary questions here. If it is about the love

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.480
<v S1>of God and most assuredly is God is the only

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.740
<v S1>one of whom it is said, is love. so that

0:23:24.780 --> 0:23:26.660
<v S1>in and of itself should stop us in our tracks.

0:23:26.660 --> 0:23:30.260
<v S1>But is the book designed to reveal the characteristics of

0:23:30.260 --> 0:23:32.500
<v S1>God so that we might know him better or. Again,

0:23:32.500 --> 0:23:35.420
<v S1>I asked for the seeker. Is that experiential? We don't.

0:23:35.460 --> 0:23:37.980
<v S1>We only know him by experiencing him. We can't know

0:23:37.980 --> 0:23:39.380
<v S1>him through his revealed word.

0:23:41.420 --> 0:23:45.060
<v S7>Yeah. Of course. Um, all of Scripture is, is, uh,

0:23:45.220 --> 0:23:49.340
<v S7>presupposing the existence of God and the fact that he's

0:23:49.340 --> 0:23:53.780
<v S7>the creator, he's the sovereign ruler of the universe. And so, uh,

0:23:53.820 --> 0:23:58.340
<v S7>you know, that increasingly, uh, that is what, uh, our

0:23:58.340 --> 0:24:03.660
<v S7>culture is denying. And so, uh, you know, that is

0:24:03.660 --> 0:24:08.220
<v S7>where we need to to dialogue. We need to, uh,

0:24:08.260 --> 0:24:12.780
<v S7>explain to people that that there is, in fact, a,

0:24:13.020 --> 0:24:15.740
<v S7>a God who created the universe and who who has

0:24:15.740 --> 0:24:19.500
<v S7>a design, a design for, for male and female. And

0:24:19.500 --> 0:24:23.490
<v S7>he also has, uh, he's holy. And so he has

0:24:23.490 --> 0:24:26.210
<v S7>expectations how he wants his people to live. And so

0:24:26.210 --> 0:24:29.850
<v S7>that is what we break down in our ethical dimension

0:24:29.850 --> 0:24:30.490
<v S7>of our book.

0:24:31.730 --> 0:24:35.369
<v S1>Absolutely fascinating. The book is called Biblical Theology a canonical

0:24:35.609 --> 0:24:39.130
<v S1>thematic and ethical approach. I can't believe we're halfway through

0:24:39.130 --> 0:24:41.290
<v S1>our conversation. We're going to get into the way in

0:24:41.290 --> 0:24:43.690
<v S1>which the book is laid out. Remember, you could spend

0:24:43.690 --> 0:24:45.770
<v S1>the rest of your life reading this book and you'd

0:24:45.770 --> 0:24:47.730
<v S1>still want more. There's a lot here. We're going to

0:24:47.730 --> 0:24:59.090
<v S1>continue with Doctor Köstenberger right after this. The Bible says

0:24:59.090 --> 0:25:01.410
<v S1>the Word of God illuminates our walk through life. It's

0:25:01.410 --> 0:25:03.410
<v S1>a lamp to our feet and a light to our path.

0:25:03.410 --> 0:25:05.930
<v S1>Without it, we stumble and fall in the market with

0:25:05.930 --> 0:25:07.810
<v S1>Janet Parshall is designed to help you look at the

0:25:07.810 --> 0:25:10.130
<v S1>headlines of the day through the lens of Scripture. When

0:25:10.130 --> 0:25:12.170
<v S1>you become a partial partner, you help to make this

0:25:12.170 --> 0:25:16.090
<v S1>broadcast possible, and as a partial partner, you'll receive exclusive benefits.

0:25:16.090 --> 0:25:19.090
<v S1>So why not become a partial partner today? Call 877

0:25:19.090 --> 0:25:22.430
<v S1>Janet 58 or go to in the market with Janet Parshall.

0:25:26.150 --> 0:25:28.709
<v S1>I've discovered a new resource that is going to remain

0:25:28.710 --> 0:25:31.230
<v S1>in the partial library, and I strongly recommend it be

0:25:31.230 --> 0:25:34.470
<v S1>a part of your library as well. It's called biblical Theology,

0:25:34.710 --> 0:25:38.990
<v S1>a canonical thematic and ethical approach. It is co-authored by

0:25:38.990 --> 0:25:42.910
<v S1>Gregory Caswell and our guest, Doctor Andreas Köstenberger, who is

0:25:42.910 --> 0:25:46.629
<v S1>the theologian in residence at Fellowship Raleigh. He's an internationally

0:25:46.630 --> 0:25:49.830
<v S1>known Bible scholar, a prolific author of over 60 books,

0:25:49.830 --> 0:25:54.950
<v S1>and the co-founder of Biblical Foundations at that website, Biblical Foundations. Org,

0:25:54.990 --> 0:25:57.590
<v S1>which I have linked on our information page. There is

0:25:57.590 --> 0:26:00.830
<v S1>a plethora of resources and a complete list of publications,

0:26:00.830 --> 0:26:03.429
<v S1>and prolific is the operative word when it comes to

0:26:03.430 --> 0:26:06.550
<v S1>the writings of Doctor Köstenberger. If you are just joining us,

0:26:06.550 --> 0:26:09.990
<v S1>the warmest of welcomes. But I simply do want to

0:26:10.030 --> 0:26:12.510
<v S1>encourage you to listen to the first half, because Doctor

0:26:12.510 --> 0:26:16.190
<v S1>Köstenberger enters some rudimentary questions and does a flyover of

0:26:16.190 --> 0:26:19.980
<v S1>this book. It is a look at all 66 books

0:26:19.980 --> 0:26:22.580
<v S1>of the Bible. He breaks it into two parts the

0:26:22.580 --> 0:26:25.940
<v S1>Old Testament and the New Testament, and as the subtitle suggests,

0:26:25.940 --> 0:26:28.500
<v S1>he not only looks at the books that are inspired

0:26:28.500 --> 0:26:31.740
<v S1>and in those 66 books, but also the major themes

0:26:31.740 --> 0:26:34.060
<v S1>that are in the Bible and also the moral teachings

0:26:34.060 --> 0:26:36.619
<v S1>we find in Scripture as well. Let me see if

0:26:36.619 --> 0:26:38.500
<v S1>I can go to the fact that you broke the

0:26:38.500 --> 0:26:40.860
<v S1>book up into part one and part two. And again,

0:26:41.180 --> 0:26:43.260
<v S1>on one level, this is a rudimentary question. On the

0:26:43.260 --> 0:26:46.780
<v S1>other hand, it's very emblematic of the deconstruction of faith

0:26:46.780 --> 0:26:49.140
<v S1>that's going on out there, sadly, in the church capital

0:26:49.180 --> 0:26:52.540
<v S1>C universal today. It's a foolish conversation, but it's emerged

0:26:52.540 --> 0:26:55.380
<v S1>and it's been picked up. And ideas have consequences and

0:26:55.380 --> 0:26:58.700
<v S1>foolish ideas have foolish consequences. The suggestion has been made

0:26:58.700 --> 0:27:01.900
<v S1>that we should disconnect the old from the New Testament.

0:27:02.180 --> 0:27:04.180
<v S1>Aside from the fact that you labeled it part one

0:27:04.180 --> 0:27:07.460
<v S1>and part two. I see no disconnect whatsoever. In your

0:27:07.460 --> 0:27:10.540
<v S1>book Biblical theology, there is a linkage, is there not

0:27:10.540 --> 0:27:14.020
<v S1>between the two? Do we consider one to be old,

0:27:14.020 --> 0:27:16.540
<v S1>one to be new, not just by the descriptor of

0:27:16.540 --> 0:27:20.000
<v S1>the timeline, but its application to our life is one

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.040
<v S1>a picture of an angry God, the other a picture

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.399
<v S1>of a Savior with children on his lap. So we

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.480
<v S1>want to get rid of the God of Judgment and

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.560
<v S1>just go to the gentle, meek Jesus instead. In other words,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.439
<v S1>there's a profundity in this question because, as I alluded

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.679
<v S1>to at the start of our conversation, this goes to

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.439
<v S1>the a la carte part of Scripture. Doctor Kastenberger I

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.080
<v S1>don't see anywhere in his word where I'm given permission

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.480
<v S1>to have a pick and choose approach to Scripture, whether

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.520
<v S1>that's the old and new or any passage I find

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.760
<v S1>anywhere in the Bible with which I find a problem

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.400
<v S1>in terms of its personal application. Talk to me about this.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.280
<v S7>Absolutely, yes. We certainly don't think we should ditch the

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.160
<v S7>Old Testament. We wouldn't have 350 pages on the Old

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.280
<v S7>Testament in our book. And certainly my collaborator Greg, he

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.760
<v S7>would vehemently argue that the Old Testament, uh, is foundational. Uh,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.240
<v S7>that is where we have, uh, you know, uh, major

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:17.150
<v S7>messianic prophecies, uh, that the, uh, the, the New Testament

0:28:17.150 --> 0:28:20.590
<v S7>Gospels pick up on. And, you know, I invite the

0:28:20.590 --> 0:28:23.950
<v S7>readers especially. We have an entire chapter on the New

0:28:23.950 --> 0:28:27.430
<v S7>Testament use of the Old Testament. Uh, chapter seven, where

0:28:27.430 --> 0:28:30.470
<v S7>we draw the connection between the two. And then, uh,

0:28:30.470 --> 0:28:33.230
<v S7>the section on the New Testament shows how all four

0:28:33.230 --> 0:28:41.150
<v S7>Gospels are just deeply and thoroughly grounded in Old Testament prediction, typology, symbolism,

0:28:41.670 --> 0:28:45.630
<v S7>and so forth. So obviously, you know, people need to really, uh,

0:28:45.750 --> 0:28:48.910
<v S7>get the book in the short time we have, we

0:28:48.910 --> 0:28:52.190
<v S7>can't fully unpack the relationship between The Testaments. But those

0:28:52.190 --> 0:28:55.990
<v S7>are all very important questions for biblical theology to address.

0:28:56.030 --> 0:28:58.990
<v S7>And so you asked exactly the right question. And we're

0:28:58.990 --> 0:29:00.630
<v S7>trying to do that in the book.

0:29:01.230 --> 0:29:04.510
<v S1>Yeah. I'm so glad that you again devoted an entire

0:29:04.510 --> 0:29:07.830
<v S1>chapter to this. And again, there's so much here. It's

0:29:07.830 --> 0:29:10.550
<v S1>like it's like you and I having one hour and

0:29:10.550 --> 0:29:13.150
<v S1>trying to digest a semester's class, and we wouldn't even,

0:29:13.350 --> 0:29:15.050
<v S1>we wouldn't be able to do it in a semester.

0:29:15.090 --> 0:29:17.010
<v S1>It'd be a year long class. So I want my

0:29:17.010 --> 0:29:19.970
<v S1>friends to understand the depth and the width and the

0:29:20.210 --> 0:29:24.170
<v S1>absolute richness in this new book, biblical theology. I'm giving

0:29:24.170 --> 0:29:26.570
<v S1>you a flyover. I want to get you excited about

0:29:26.570 --> 0:29:27.890
<v S1>this book. I want you to go out and get

0:29:27.890 --> 0:29:30.690
<v S1>your own. And when you see this treasure of a book,

0:29:30.690 --> 0:29:33.010
<v S1>you're going to understand that there's no way to summarize

0:29:33.010 --> 0:29:35.130
<v S1>in an hour what's in this book, any more than

0:29:35.170 --> 0:29:37.670
<v S1>Doctor Köstenberger could summarize what's in the Bible in one

0:29:37.670 --> 0:29:39.730
<v S1>hour as well. So I'm lingering at some of these

0:29:39.730 --> 0:29:42.650
<v S1>spots on purpose, so that you could hear Doctor Köstenberger

0:29:43.210 --> 0:29:46.050
<v S1>and understand the continuity of Scripture here, which is, I think,

0:29:46.050 --> 0:29:48.450
<v S1>not to be missed. It's one of the one of

0:29:48.450 --> 0:29:50.530
<v S1>the blessings of the Word of God. So let me

0:29:50.530 --> 0:29:52.610
<v S1>go back to the idea of the linkage between the two,

0:29:52.650 --> 0:29:54.290
<v S1>if it weren't important. And by the way, I love

0:29:54.290 --> 0:29:56.489
<v S1>the study of types in Scripture, I just those are

0:29:56.490 --> 0:29:58.890
<v S1>the neon signs that God uses to tell us and

0:29:58.890 --> 0:30:00.530
<v S1>tell us and tell us again. So we can't say

0:30:00.530 --> 0:30:04.210
<v S1>we ain't been told. That's profound theology, according to Janet Parshall.

0:30:04.250 --> 0:30:07.410
<v S1>So going back to this idea of the linkage between

0:30:07.410 --> 0:30:10.170
<v S1>the two, if the Old Testament weren't significant, why would

0:30:10.170 --> 0:30:11.810
<v S1>Jesus reference it so much?

0:30:14.270 --> 0:30:17.390
<v S7>Absolutely. You're exactly right. You have to look no further

0:30:17.390 --> 0:30:21.310
<v S7>than Jesus and the four evangelists as well. Um, and

0:30:21.310 --> 0:30:22.830
<v S7>I think you know what we do in the book.

0:30:22.830 --> 0:30:26.150
<v S7>Greg and I both we have sections where, uh, Greg

0:30:26.190 --> 0:30:28.990
<v S7>talks about major themes in the Old Testament, and then

0:30:28.990 --> 0:30:31.790
<v S7>I talk about major themes in the New Testament, and

0:30:31.790 --> 0:30:34.870
<v S7>then we synthesize that in terms of the storyline of

0:30:34.870 --> 0:30:37.590
<v S7>Scripture and the major biblical themes. So we want to

0:30:37.590 --> 0:30:41.190
<v S7>make sure we don't just, uh, you know, submerge the

0:30:41.190 --> 0:30:43.510
<v S7>Old Testament in the new, but we want to do

0:30:43.550 --> 0:30:47.590
<v S7>justice to the Old Testament as a very important book

0:30:47.590 --> 0:30:50.750
<v S7>in its own right, with its own distinctive themes and

0:30:50.750 --> 0:30:54.310
<v S7>its own contribution to the library of Scripture.

0:30:54.870 --> 0:30:58.150
<v S1>Yes. Amen to that. So early on in my marriage,

0:30:58.150 --> 0:30:59.990
<v S1>I knew that I had married the right fella. When

0:30:59.990 --> 0:31:02.790
<v S1>our first Christmas together, he asked for his Christmas present

0:31:02.790 --> 0:31:06.830
<v S1>to be Schaefer's Systematic Theology, which is a multi-volume series,

0:31:06.830 --> 0:31:08.990
<v S1>by the way, and he went through the entire thing

0:31:09.030 --> 0:31:11.350
<v S1>at the beginning of the book. You talk about using

0:31:11.350 --> 0:31:16.100
<v S1>a paradigm of exegesis to biblical theology, to systematic theology.

0:31:16.140 --> 0:31:20.140
<v S1>What is the distinctive between biblical theology and systematic theology?

0:31:22.140 --> 0:31:24.700
<v S7>Great question. And I think that distinction is very important.

0:31:24.700 --> 0:31:27.860
<v S7>So biblical theology is essentially inductive meaning we come to

0:31:27.900 --> 0:31:32.220
<v S7>it with no theological system as such. And as much

0:31:32.220 --> 0:31:37.540
<v S7>as possible, we're opening ourselves up to discovering in Scripture

0:31:37.740 --> 0:31:41.300
<v S7>what the authors themselves wanted to communicate. And so we

0:31:41.300 --> 0:31:45.460
<v S7>look at the historical setting, we look at the literary context,

0:31:45.460 --> 0:31:48.060
<v S7>and we look at the theological message is what I

0:31:48.100 --> 0:31:52.700
<v S7>call a triadic hermeneutic of history, literature and theology. And so,

0:31:52.820 --> 0:31:55.300
<v S7>as much as possible, we make some sort of a

0:31:55.340 --> 0:31:58.900
<v S7>cumulative case that that we look at each book, book

0:31:58.900 --> 0:32:01.420
<v S7>by book in its own right. And only after we've

0:32:01.420 --> 0:32:04.660
<v S7>done that, we try to synthesize the biblical message on

0:32:04.660 --> 0:32:09.060
<v S7>a thematic level, on an ethical level, and ultimately on

0:32:09.060 --> 0:32:12.000
<v S7>a storyline of scripture level. So that is why the

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.120
<v S7>book is so long. Because imagine if you have to

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.560
<v S7>do that for all 66 books of Scripture.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.000
<v S1>Mhm. Mhm. Absolutely. Wow. So let me go back to

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.360
<v S1>the Gospels because you talk about you've talked about that

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.120
<v S1>before and you broke down. In fact one entire chapter

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.360
<v S1>in the book, Biblical Theology is entitled The Gospels. When

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.240
<v S1>you go to the New Testament. I thought that was

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.959
<v S1>this was interesting. You talk about the order of the

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.760
<v S1>books in the canon. In the New Testament. You talk

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.640
<v S1>about the relationship between the Testaments. We just touched on that.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.680
<v S1>Then you delineate the Gospels, the book of Acts, the

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.360
<v S1>letters of Paul, the general epistles, and the apocalypse, which

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.920
<v S1>I found absolutely logical and fascinating that it would be

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.719
<v S1>in that order if I were if I just landed

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.080
<v S1>here from another planet. And I said, what are these gospels?

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.520
<v S1>Why do they have that name? And why these four

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.800
<v S1>books in particular? Why are they so interconnected and so linked?

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:02.640
<v S1>What would you say?

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.520
<v S7>Yeah, I think that's a great biblical theological way to

0:33:08.710 --> 0:33:11.230
<v S7>look at the New Testament, to look at the major

0:33:11.230 --> 0:33:13.750
<v S7>building blocks. And so if you look at it that way,

0:33:13.950 --> 0:33:17.790
<v S7>the four gospels lay the foundation, right? They are centered

0:33:17.790 --> 0:33:20.670
<v S7>on one person, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is really

0:33:20.670 --> 0:33:23.790
<v S7>also the center of the entire Bible. Uh, the Old

0:33:23.830 --> 0:33:26.990
<v S7>Testament builds up to Jesus and then the the rest

0:33:26.990 --> 0:33:30.910
<v S7>of the New Testament explicates what salvation in Christ means

0:33:30.910 --> 0:33:33.870
<v S7>practically for us as Christians. You know, for how we

0:33:33.870 --> 0:33:37.710
<v S7>ought to live. And so the Gospels are properly, uh,

0:33:37.710 --> 0:33:40.390
<v S7>at the heart of Scripture and at the beginning of

0:33:40.390 --> 0:33:43.990
<v S7>the New Testament, and they exhibit the new covenant that

0:33:43.990 --> 0:33:49.070
<v S7>Jesus established with the 12, the, uh, the representatives of

0:33:49.070 --> 0:33:51.990
<v S7>the church. And then after that you have the book

0:33:51.990 --> 0:33:55.950
<v S7>of acts, which is essentially the narrative of how the

0:33:55.950 --> 0:34:02.390
<v S7>apostles preached the resurrected Christ, the risen Jesus. And thousands

0:34:02.390 --> 0:34:07.850
<v S7>of people responded and converted. And so early Christianity just

0:34:07.850 --> 0:34:10.330
<v S7>grew by leaps and bounds. And then you have the letters.

0:34:10.330 --> 0:34:15.410
<v S7>The letters basically apply the gospel message to ordinary, everyday Christians.

0:34:15.450 --> 0:34:19.450
<v S7>And finally you have the the second coming that's, uh,

0:34:20.250 --> 0:34:24.210
<v S7>foretold in revelation, in the apocalypse. And so you have

0:34:24.210 --> 0:34:28.210
<v S7>the New Testament, like a beautiful rainbow, uh, beginning with

0:34:28.210 --> 0:34:31.650
<v S7>the first coming and ending with the second coming of Jesus.

0:34:31.690 --> 0:34:34.730
<v S7>And so even when you look at the whole Bible,

0:34:34.730 --> 0:34:39.890
<v S7>Genesis and Revelation are just perfectly corresponding bookends, you know,

0:34:39.930 --> 0:34:43.450
<v S7>from creation to new creation and from the garden to

0:34:43.489 --> 0:34:46.810
<v S7>the new Jerusalem. And so, uh, I commend to people

0:34:46.850 --> 0:34:51.489
<v S7>both biblical theology and looking at, at the Bible more synthetically,

0:34:51.530 --> 0:34:55.770
<v S7>you know, how the different parts all fit perfectly within

0:34:55.770 --> 0:34:58.850
<v S7>the whole library of the 66 books of Scripture.

0:34:59.690 --> 0:35:02.129
<v S1>Wow. Hearkening back to the question I asked you before

0:35:02.130 --> 0:35:06.640
<v S1>about the linkage between the Testaments, this raises another interesting question.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.239
<v S1>And if you look at some of the data and

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.440
<v S1>I'm fascinated by data, maybe it's because I'm here in Washington,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.200
<v S1>but it's also revelatory, I think sometimes of the condition

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.319
<v S1>of the church. So if you look at some of

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.160
<v S1>the research, for example, that Barnes has done, there are

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.040
<v S1>a growing number of Christians who don't think that Jesus

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.440
<v S1>was in the beginning, where the word was and the

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.560
<v S1>word was with God, that somehow he is a created

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.640
<v S1>being after the fact. If we disconnect the old and

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.560
<v S1>the New Testament, are we not just cutting out the

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.680
<v S1>prophecy and the foretelling and the types and the archetypes?

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:41.319
<v S1>But are we not also negating the fact that the

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.880
<v S1>triune nature of God is manifest early on in Scripture,

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:47.799
<v S1>and Jesus is present from the beginning, all the way

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:48.760
<v S1>through to the end?

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:55.640
<v S7>Absolutely. It's really a mistake to, in my Old Testament collaborator,

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.600
<v S7>really helped me understand that even better. The idea that

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.480
<v S7>God in the Old Testament is the Triune God. It

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.299
<v S7>is not just God the got the father. And so

0:36:05.300 --> 0:36:07.860
<v S7>you're exactly right. You know, in the Gospel of John

0:36:07.860 --> 0:36:11.100
<v S7>makes that clear than probably any other book in Scripture

0:36:11.100 --> 0:36:15.700
<v S7>that Jesus preexisted with God at the very beginning already

0:36:15.739 --> 0:36:19.100
<v S7>at creation. And it is through Jesus, the word that

0:36:19.100 --> 0:36:20.419
<v S7>everything was created.

0:36:21.380 --> 0:36:24.779
<v S1>Amen and amen. The book is called Biblical Theology. It

0:36:24.780 --> 0:36:28.219
<v S1>is an absolutely fabulous, must have resource for your own

0:36:28.219 --> 0:36:32.100
<v S1>personal study. Pastors obviously overflowing with richness for you as well.

0:36:32.300 --> 0:36:35.299
<v S1>But it's also for the individual student who is serious

0:36:35.300 --> 0:36:37.940
<v S1>about Scripture. And I just poked my head outside my

0:36:37.940 --> 0:36:40.180
<v S1>front door today. I think the time to get serious

0:36:40.180 --> 0:36:43.860
<v S1>about Scripture is now. Let's get started back after this.

0:36:57.020 --> 0:36:59.739
<v S1>We're talking about a brand new resource that should be

0:36:59.739 --> 0:37:01.660
<v S1>right there in your desks. When you're in your private

0:37:01.700 --> 0:37:04.690
<v S1>time in the word, it's called biblical theology. A canonical

0:37:04.690 --> 0:37:07.890
<v S1>thematic and ethical approach. It is co-authored by our guest,

0:37:07.890 --> 0:37:12.089
<v S1>Doctor Andreas Köstenberger, who is a world renowned theologian and

0:37:12.090 --> 0:37:14.290
<v S1>scholar in the Bible. By the way, it's clearly written.

0:37:14.290 --> 0:37:17.210
<v S1>It's an analysis of all 66 books of the Bible.

0:37:17.370 --> 0:37:21.250
<v S1>There's an emphasis on the coherent, unified framework of Scripture.

0:37:21.450 --> 0:37:25.530
<v S1>It helps you and me thoughtfully interpret the scriptures. And

0:37:25.530 --> 0:37:28.850
<v S1>it's ideal for, as I said before, not just academicians,

0:37:28.850 --> 0:37:30.770
<v S1>if you want to go that route, but pastors and

0:37:30.770 --> 0:37:33.170
<v S1>people like, I hope you and me who are serious

0:37:33.170 --> 0:37:36.210
<v S1>students of the word as well. So at the end

0:37:36.210 --> 0:37:38.890
<v S1>of the book, you call it conclusion appropriately, but you

0:37:38.890 --> 0:37:42.569
<v S1>use two very trendy words right now, and I'd love

0:37:42.570 --> 0:37:44.810
<v S1>for you to talk about it in its application to

0:37:44.810 --> 0:37:49.089
<v S1>a conversation about biblical theology. You talk about unity and

0:37:49.090 --> 0:37:54.170
<v S1>diversity in biblical theology. Unity and diversity. Break that down

0:37:54.170 --> 0:37:56.410
<v S1>for our friends. I thought this was a fascinating chapter.

0:37:57.930 --> 0:38:01.350
<v S7>Yes. You know, this has been a long standing debate

0:38:01.469 --> 0:38:05.710
<v S7>in biblical theological circles how you navigate the tension between

0:38:05.710 --> 0:38:09.230
<v S7>the two. Because, of course, as, uh, people with a

0:38:09.230 --> 0:38:12.390
<v S7>high view of Scripture, we naturally believe that Scripture is

0:38:12.390 --> 0:38:16.110
<v S7>unified and it is unified because God is one and

0:38:16.110 --> 0:38:19.670
<v S7>God is unified. He's not contradictory. And so the very

0:38:19.670 --> 0:38:24.109
<v S7>fact that God inspired Scripture already tells us that, uh,

0:38:24.110 --> 0:38:27.270
<v S7>in the end, Scripture will be unified. It will not be,

0:38:27.310 --> 0:38:29.470
<v S7>you know, it will not be found to contradict itself.

0:38:29.469 --> 0:38:31.989
<v S7>But at the same time, uh, you look at, as

0:38:31.989 --> 0:38:34.750
<v S7>I mentioned, the four gospels, for example, or, you know,

0:38:34.790 --> 0:38:38.670
<v S7>Kings and Chronicles or, uh, the letters in the New Testament.

0:38:38.670 --> 0:38:40.670
<v S7>And you see, there's a certain amount of diversity. We

0:38:40.670 --> 0:38:43.430
<v S7>talked about that at the beginning of the interview, the

0:38:43.430 --> 0:38:46.470
<v S7>fact that that the 12 apostles each had their own

0:38:46.830 --> 0:38:51.950
<v S7>personalities and their own personal style. And so I think, uh,

0:38:52.830 --> 0:38:55.630
<v S7>you know, I've heard it said that that, uh, the

0:38:55.750 --> 0:38:59.390
<v S7>measure of a of a good biblical theology is the

0:38:59.530 --> 0:39:03.890
<v S7>way it is able to handle legitimate diversity in Scripture,

0:39:03.890 --> 0:39:07.930
<v S7>rather than just kind of like streamlining or flattening it. Uh,

0:39:07.930 --> 0:39:11.490
<v S7>just in a legitimate desire to to emphasize the unity

0:39:11.489 --> 0:39:15.450
<v S7>of Scripture. You you don't do justice to its diversity.

0:39:15.489 --> 0:39:19.210
<v S7>So we're trying to to navigate that tension and to

0:39:19.210 --> 0:39:22.529
<v S7>do justice to both the unity and the diversity of Scripture.

0:39:23.050 --> 0:39:25.770
<v S1>Yeah. And you do an excellent job. So let me

0:39:25.770 --> 0:39:27.649
<v S1>go back to what you said before about how you

0:39:27.650 --> 0:39:31.129
<v S1>emphasize the love of God. Um, and I'm so glad

0:39:31.130 --> 0:39:33.129
<v S1>that you do, because I don't want to study this

0:39:33.130 --> 0:39:36.009
<v S1>as an academician. I'm drawn to the one who loved

0:39:36.010 --> 0:39:38.490
<v S1>me so much, he gave his life for me. I

0:39:38.530 --> 0:39:40.890
<v S1>was guilty as charged. The wages of sin is death.

0:39:40.930 --> 0:39:43.489
<v S1>A penalty had to be paid. And Jesus steps in

0:39:43.530 --> 0:39:45.730
<v S1>as the great mediator between me and God and says,

0:39:45.730 --> 0:39:48.170
<v S1>I'll pay that price for you. So I'm drawn out

0:39:48.170 --> 0:39:53.569
<v S1>of this incomprehensible message of the ultimate sacrifice. Go to

0:39:53.610 --> 0:39:56.129
<v S1>the end of the book with the apocalypse, because there

0:39:56.130 --> 0:39:57.969
<v S1>are a lot of believers to this day who look

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.960
<v S1>at this book and they let Hollywood be the theologian here.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.480
<v S1>They let the movies teach them the theology. Why, in

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.840
<v S1>your perspective of the New Testament is this whole book

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.759
<v S1>that is the stuff of, um, well, wild fantasies for

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.880
<v S1>some people and outright fear for others. Why do you

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.880
<v S1>think God wanted this part of the book included? He

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.680
<v S1>he is the author. Everything is there for our instruction

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.480
<v S1>and our edification. Why the book of revelation?

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:32.120
<v S7>Yes, well, it is from a canonical standpoint. We need

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:36.799
<v S7>that book for proper closure of the entire canon. If

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:40.480
<v S7>we just imagine if we didn't have revelation, we wouldn't

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.880
<v S7>know how the story ends. We wouldn't have a vision of,

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:49.040
<v S7>of Jesus return of of of the eternal state, heaven.

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:54.320
<v S7>We wouldn't even have a record of the judgment of

0:40:54.320 --> 0:41:00.140
<v S7>of of Satan and his demons. Uh, we wouldn't, uh, have, uh,

0:41:00.780 --> 0:41:05.700
<v S7>proper closure. And so, uh, looking at the book from

0:41:05.739 --> 0:41:09.700
<v S7>a biblical theology standpoint, where you look at the big picture,

0:41:09.940 --> 0:41:11.700
<v S7>I think it's clear to see that the book is

0:41:11.700 --> 0:41:15.660
<v S7>not primarily about those, you know, uh, bizarre end time

0:41:15.660 --> 0:41:19.180
<v S7>scenarios or, you know, the, uh, some of those fine

0:41:19.219 --> 0:41:22.899
<v S7>points that we often, uh, you know, entire denominations are

0:41:22.900 --> 0:41:27.100
<v S7>divided over. You know, it is essentially about, uh, the,

0:41:27.100 --> 0:41:30.419
<v S7>the love of God that that sent Jesus to redeem

0:41:30.860 --> 0:41:34.219
<v S7>humanity and, and those who care to believe in Jesus.

0:41:34.219 --> 0:41:38.700
<v S7>And and in the end, uh, there's consequences. There's judgment.

0:41:38.700 --> 0:41:41.100
<v S7>We're all accountable to God. That's actually what brought me

0:41:41.100 --> 0:41:43.299
<v S7>to the Lord, to be convinced that I would have

0:41:43.300 --> 0:41:45.100
<v S7>to give an account to God one day for the

0:41:45.100 --> 0:41:47.700
<v S7>life I lived. And I knew I couldn't do it, uh,

0:41:47.700 --> 0:41:50.180
<v S7>in my own strength. And so that that that drew

0:41:50.219 --> 0:41:52.700
<v S7>me to Jesus. And and that's how I trusted him.

0:41:53.540 --> 0:41:55.969
<v S1>Wow. Can I linger here? Because that's so interesting. I

0:41:56.010 --> 0:41:58.890
<v S1>just heard a pastor say yesterday that again, we are

0:41:58.890 --> 0:42:01.450
<v S1>drawn to the love of God, but we do ourselves

0:42:01.450 --> 0:42:05.169
<v S1>a disservice, and perhaps we fail to live out our

0:42:05.170 --> 0:42:08.089
<v S1>salvation with fear and trembling. If we ignore the fact

0:42:08.090 --> 0:42:10.890
<v S1>that he's also a holy judge. Let me just linger

0:42:10.890 --> 0:42:12.890
<v S1>on that for a moment, because that might be a

0:42:12.930 --> 0:42:15.009
<v S1>day to day question that a lot of people struggle with,

0:42:15.010 --> 0:42:17.370
<v S1>and it keeps them from diving deep into the Word

0:42:17.370 --> 0:42:20.810
<v S1>of God. So how can God be both a loving father,

0:42:20.810 --> 0:42:23.050
<v S1>loving us so much that he did send his Son?

0:42:23.050 --> 0:42:25.410
<v S1>But also, how can he be a holy judge? Again,

0:42:25.410 --> 0:42:27.370
<v S1>we've used the phrase twice before, but I think it's

0:42:27.410 --> 0:42:30.049
<v S1>apt in this. It's an it's not an either or.

0:42:30.090 --> 0:42:32.290
<v S1>It's a both end. How does that work?

0:42:34.890 --> 0:42:36.810
<v S7>Well, my wife and I talk about that all the

0:42:36.810 --> 0:42:40.130
<v S7>time because she's a forthcoming book also in biblical theology

0:42:40.170 --> 0:42:45.250
<v S7>on sanctification. And so she is reminding me of the

0:42:45.250 --> 0:42:49.370
<v S7>holiness of God, uh, all the time, and also on

0:42:49.370 --> 0:42:52.810
<v S7>the practical need for me to be a holy husband.

0:42:52.850 --> 0:42:56.270
<v S7>And you know, that is a daily challenge to allow

0:42:56.270 --> 0:42:59.230
<v S7>the Holy Spirit to to help me in that area.

0:42:59.230 --> 0:43:02.110
<v S7>But I think Scripture tells us that God is both,

0:43:02.110 --> 0:43:04.830
<v S7>as you said to be. He's he's holy, he's loving,

0:43:04.830 --> 0:43:07.750
<v S7>he's also righteous. And I think the resolution comes in

0:43:07.790 --> 0:43:10.710
<v S7>that he himself paid the penalty for our sin in

0:43:10.710 --> 0:43:13.509
<v S7>the Lord Jesus Christ. Uh, one of my favorite verses

0:43:13.510 --> 0:43:17.230
<v S7>in Romans chapter three. And, you know, starting in verse 21,

0:43:17.350 --> 0:43:20.830
<v S7>it says, God is both just and the justifier of

0:43:20.830 --> 0:43:24.710
<v S7>those who believe in Jesus. Isn't that a just a tremendous,

0:43:24.989 --> 0:43:30.070
<v S7>wonderful verse that the judge himself came down in form

0:43:30.070 --> 0:43:33.390
<v S7>of his son and paid the penalty for sin himself?

0:43:33.910 --> 0:43:37.390
<v S1>Yes. How often does a judge step in and pay

0:43:37.390 --> 0:43:39.549
<v S1>the penalty for the criminal in front of him? Wow,

0:43:39.550 --> 0:43:41.950
<v S1>that's so amazing. One last question, if I may, in

0:43:41.950 --> 0:43:43.870
<v S1>an hour that's gone far too quickly. This is a

0:43:43.870 --> 0:43:46.069
<v S1>seminal work. What is it like for you as a

0:43:46.070 --> 0:43:48.550
<v S1>scholar and an author when you finally put the last

0:43:48.550 --> 0:43:51.830
<v S1>word on and it's now bound, what do you think? Personally,

0:43:51.900 --> 0:43:53.779
<v S1>when you look at a work like this, a sense

0:43:53.780 --> 0:43:55.779
<v S1>of accomplishment? Or do you think, oh, if I had

0:43:55.780 --> 0:43:57.700
<v S1>only included this, that and the other thing?

0:43:59.739 --> 0:44:01.819
<v S7>Well, I think, Janet, thanks for asking. For me, this

0:44:01.820 --> 0:44:05.420
<v S7>is a very personal project. It culminates 30 years of

0:44:05.420 --> 0:44:09.580
<v S7>teaching and writing and research, and I'm grateful for my collaborator,

0:44:09.940 --> 0:44:12.180
<v S7>for Greg as well, to partner with me. I couldn't

0:44:12.180 --> 0:44:15.379
<v S7>have done it myself. But together, I think, you know,

0:44:15.420 --> 0:44:19.259
<v S7>we're both, uh, hoping that this will be helpful resource,

0:44:19.260 --> 0:44:22.940
<v S7>because biblical theology is a great way to study scripture,

0:44:22.980 --> 0:44:25.420
<v S7>and I certainly invite all our listeners to try it

0:44:25.420 --> 0:44:29.540
<v S7>for themselves and to study the Bible. Uh, biblically. Theologically.

0:44:30.100 --> 0:44:32.859
<v S1>Yeah. Amen. And may I echo that the book, again,

0:44:32.900 --> 0:44:37.620
<v S1>is called Biblical Theology a canonical thematic and ethical approach.

0:44:37.940 --> 0:44:39.460
<v S1>Let's be a part of that idea that we want

0:44:39.500 --> 0:44:41.460
<v S1>a higher view of Scripture, and we're going to be

0:44:41.460 --> 0:44:45.260
<v S1>a serious student of Scripture, because a great and loving

0:44:45.260 --> 0:44:48.860
<v S1>God ended for our benefit and our edification. Thank you,

0:44:48.900 --> 0:44:50.780
<v S1>Doctor Köstenberger. See you next time, friends.