WEBVTT - Jack Really Loves Poutine.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast.

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Center, Jack Armstrong Show, Katty.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty and now he is Armstrong and Yetty, Hey,

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>how are you doing? Always love talking to Tim Sanderfer.

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 3>We just wrapped up a conversation. If you just tune

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>it in or whatever, grab it via podcast Armstrong and

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Getty on demand about his book, And I mentioned one

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 3>of his previous books, The Permission Society, which he put

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>out in twenty sixteen, was inspired by conversations on this

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>show and honored to have inspired anything good to happen

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>on Earth. It occurs to me if it's a perfect

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>introduction to the freedom loving quote of the day, and

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 3>not yet Michael and then Mailbank, because what we talked

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 3>about at the time that launched the book was and

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 3>I may have come up with this, it doesn't really matter,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>but never use the word permit as a noun unless

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>you think about it as a verb. You're getting a

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 3>permit from the county to do this, that or the other.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>And it ranges from you know, in parts of rural

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Texas where you don't need a permit to do anything

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to in your bluer states and cities, and all famously

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 3>in the communist enclave where Jack makes his home, you

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>need a permit to get a new dishwasher for your kitchen,

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>so they make sure it's up to whatever environmental rules

0:01:52.360 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 3>and REGs rule that that communist enclave. And the rules

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 3>and rags and permits are often well meaning road to

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 3>hell paydle good intentions, right, and some of them are

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>probably either legitimate, even if they go a little too far.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is you get this web of permissions

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>for everything you do every day, every use of your land,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 3>every tool you use, every mode of transportation, and sooner

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 3>or later that web of well meaning rules and rags

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 3>traps you. It becomes the opposite of liberty. And again

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it's well meaning, but it tends to

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>total up, bit by bit by bit until you're just

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 3>not a free person anymore. And I certainly joined with

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Tim and fighting against that sort of thing, which brings

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>us to the freedom loving quote of the day. And

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with a series from Nikita Krushia, who

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>was the premiere of the Soviet Union in the fifties

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and sixties, I think through nineteen sixty four. He took

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>power after Stalin, and it was a huge, huge moment

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 3>in the history of Russia and the Soviet Union. And

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>though he left officer, I think he croaked before I

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 3>was born. It was his doctrines that governed the Cold

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>War to a large extent until Gorbachev and the Deytant

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>and everything came in. Dayton was a different period, but

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>when the Soviet Union crumbled, So Krushev was enormously, enormously influential,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and he was kind of the rule giver that we

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Cold warriors grew up with his philosophy. And what's interesting

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>and handy about Krushev is he was utterly clear and

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>open about his plans. And we'll be hitting some of

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>his quotes for the next couple of week, week or two. Anyway,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll lead with this one. You Americans are so gullible. No,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 3>small doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 3>find you already have communism. We won't have to fight

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>you will, so weaken your economy until you'll fall like

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 3>overrighte fruit fruit into our hands. Mailbag. Obviously one of

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the reasons that's so appropriate is socialism seems to be

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>on the march, particularly among the young in college miseducated

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>in America. These days, Khrushchev's wishes are coming true. And

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>not to be over dramatic, but I will die fighting them.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Drum Us note mail bag at Armstrong and Getty dot com.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's see David and Campbell says some very nice things

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>about the show, Thank you, my brother, and he mentions

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 3>that yesterday we played a clip of AOC try and

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>answer the question about the difference between socialism and communism,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and she doesn't know the difference, and he says, essentially,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and this is under Karl Marx's theory handy to know.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I suppose in socialism, the workers control the state. State

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 3>uses its power to take over major industries and the

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 3>means of production. And as time passes that utopia ends,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 3>the conflict between the classes and the state is no

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 3>longer needed and withers away. Everybody shares and shares alike.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 3>It is truly a utopia. Everyone communicates, there are no

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>need for even rules. This is communism, the ideal state.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 3>And if you seriously think that will ever happen among

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 3>human beings, you need your brain checked, or you need

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to get the hell out of the way and let

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the adults run things. It's a good explanation encapsulated there.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>David appreciate it. Then this from Tim, I love this.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>He says, Remember, there's a merit system in communism. People

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 3>become really talented at telling on each other. The power

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>is in control, controlling the systems. The people who get

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>control of the systems, the stores, the gas stations, et cetera,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 3>have the opportunity for corruption that of course comes in communism,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>and these are the coveted positions. Of course, it doesn't

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 3>matter whether someone's a zell At or real communists. They will,

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 3>for the purposes of survival in advancement, become really good

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>at telling on people, really good at putting people in trouble,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 3>so they can continue to have that power. That's what

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>happens in communism. That's why it always fails. That's how

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Russia became a criminal gang with the toughest criminal in charge.

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 3>The commissars get rich, and it doesn't matter anymore if

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the system fails, as long as they stay rich. The

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>people that run the store have the food, the people

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>that run the gas station have fuel. The people that

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 3>supervise the distribution of benefits have benefits, and that's all

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>that matters. You know, I'm going to depart from the

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>plan here of mail bag and Michael do me a favor.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's play Oh where is it?

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Ah?

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>This is instructive. This is the late Charlie Kirk debating

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Hassan Piker, and to put up with them yell over

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>each other for a minute because they get into a

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit of substance. In number forty.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Four, why don't you give ninety five percent of your

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 4>money away and go live on a communey?

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 5>Do you really think that that's how worse?

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 6>Do you really think?

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Why not worse? Goel? You preach because I every single

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 4>pass you uninterrupted for five minutes. Hassan, Let okay, go ahead,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>sorry live You're right what I practice it made me

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 4>free market capitalist, I employ people, I took a risk.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 4>I have my own startup business. Every single day I

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 4>practice what I preach. He wants other people to contribute

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 4>to what he considers to be a good idea, what

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 4>he considers will make the world a better place. That

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>you have the freedom to go live as a socialist,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Go do it. Hassan, what's stopping you?

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So here's what we'll take it.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 7>In the last point. The last point I will make

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 7>is this.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Here's why that conversation is absolutely preposterous. If I gave

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 5>away the measly earnings that I had and gave gave

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 5>away ninety five percent, how much you make that one

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 5>necessarily even pushed the needle.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>So Hassan Piker's next sentence ought to be so for

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>my system to work, I needed because I know it's

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 3>right to control everybody else and make them give away

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 3>what they earn. My system depends entirely not on individual

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>initiative or consent, or taking risk or investing or building something.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 3>My system depends entirely on controlling people and taking from them.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I understand taxation is a similar thing, but

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 3>there's no taxation without the consent of the legislature, at

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>least in theory in our country. But Hassan Piker, the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>darling and left admitted there I need to control everyone

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 3>for this system to work. It's a great truism and

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 3>piece of wisdom. There are only two ways to get

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>somebody to work. Number one award or number two the

0:08:54.840 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>fear of punishment, and because socialism eliminates reward for effort,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 3>reward for innovation, reward for risk, reward for outworking everybody else,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>people quickly decide, obviously, I'm not gonna work. I'm gonna

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>get what I get whether I work or not. So

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to work. Okay, So we've removed reward.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 3>What's left fear of punishment. Hassan Piker's entire system requires

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 3>control and punishment of anybody who doesn't go along with

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>his nefarious plans. Getting back to mailbag, Joe Schmoe of

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Bonnie Lake, Washington rights, that's how he signs it.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 3>On the topic of the WNBA and the two women

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>who used to play in the NBA, mister Cantner and

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 3>mister White, is that right, yep, yeah right, I'm miss

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 3>miss miss cant and miss White. Because they say they're women,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that makes them women. Trans women are women. But Joe

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 3>makes a good point. All the WNBA has to do

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 3>is not draft these guys or any other ex NBA

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 3>player because they have to be drafted in order to play.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Because they're not really presenting his trans the trans community

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 3>will not be upset that they didn't get drafted, although

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 3>White actually bought a really nice blonde wig. He looks

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>very comely in it, and three granted to presenting trans

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>female with great basketball skills. Were to try out and

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 3>then not get drafted, the league would then have a problem.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 3>So how far. But again, Joe, it's like we were

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about yesterday. If they were sincerely transgender, well who's

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>what do we go to the sincere police, the Sincerity League?

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Is there a medical test? The whole thing's just absurd.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>We're calling their bluff. Go get them, ladies. On the

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 3>topic of Iran, which continues to be a mere full

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>of quag don in San Jose writes, I don't understand

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>what Trump keeps opening the door for negotiations quote unquote

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>with the Ran. It only invites more nonsense requests from them.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>So we thought saw this last weekend. Why don't we

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 3>just give them a declaration like the pot Stem Declaration

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 3>of World War Two. It's simple, give up all striving

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 3>for nuclear weapons, turnover existing nuclear refinement, open the straits

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 3>of hermuvese. There'll be no tolls or threats against the

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 3>chipping give up on all terrorism and sport terrorist groups.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 3>There should be one more recognized Israel. Maybe that's one

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 3>too many. Well down, the problem isn't I have a

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 3>feeling you know this? An order without a sanction is

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a suggestion. It's a request. What's the or else? Or else? Well,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you know what? Oh, Jim wrights Jim and Houston rights

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the Mullahs and the IRGC or Lucy van Pelt. Trump

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>is Charlie Brown, the dealed open Hermos is the football,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>over and over and over. Trump acts as if the

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Mulas have no cards. In fact, they have a straight

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh clever, Jim clever, get it poker reference. Very nice.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a good point. What was the other thing I

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>was going to say that seemed important at the time. Oh, well,

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 3>we don't know what levers do. Oh oh, I was

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna say. The strategy right now appears to be just

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 3>choking financially till they give out. Whether that will ever

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>have the machine gunned forty fifty thousand of their own

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>citizens in the street. I don't think they care if

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 3>those people are a little hungry. Let's see why don't

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 3>we call it good. We're going to come back with

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of stories, from the really impactful to the

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 3>completely idiotic. Run through get you caught up on what's

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world. It's the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Glad you're here, Stay with.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Us, The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Michael, Sorry, I meant to ask for this. Can

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>you hit me with clip number twenty one? This is

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the flower of American womanhood known as Royce White, who

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 3>played in the WNBA or in the NBA and wants

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>to play in the WNBA.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 8>And I'm transgender. I'm a woman, I'm I identify as

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 8>sometimes identifying as a woman for purposes of basketball professional basketball.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 8>So I'll be declaring for the WNBA draft in twenty

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 8>twenty seven as well.

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>So we all know that that's going on. And I

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 3>want to explain something because I don't think most people

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>understand this, and you really have to understand it. And

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 3>it discourages and shocks me the lack of curiosity in

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the media, including the conservative media, about

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>where this stuff is coming from, the whole transgender thing,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and this is foundational to all of it. It has

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 3>to do at the critical theory school of philosophy. A

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>handful of French guys, if you know their names, you

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>know you know them. But in the nineteen sixties who

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>came up with this idea that we need to get

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Marxism in. But the Workers of the World unit didn't

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>really work. And so the point of critical theory you

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>have to understand is there are no truths. There are

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 3>no there is no reality that we all can agree on.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>It's entirely cultural and entirely opinion. There is nothing you

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>can say that critical theory won't try to tear apart.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 3>They criticize it. That's where the name comes from. They

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>problematize it. You've heard that term. Probably They ask all

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>these wacky, half rhetorical questions to get you to back

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>off something as simple as only women can have babies.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I was going to go into detail

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 3>on something leading to it, but I'll just cut to

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the bottom line. So eliminating any binaries there are men

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>there are women is at the heart of critical theory,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>and so they cannot admit. Why don't they just back

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 3>down on the women's sports thing you're asking yourself? I mean,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>because anybody with half a brain can see and understand immediately,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>or it doesn't even need to see anything to know.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>The reason title line exists. The reason women's sports exist

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>is because men, elite athletes are much bigger and stronger

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 3>and faster and more violent. And if women are going

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 3>to enjoy sports, it ought to be for women. And

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight percent of the planet, if you explain it

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>to them, believes that. But they can't admit that there's

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>something foundational that we all can agree on, because then

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 3>critical theory collapses. And I know it seems insane, but

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 3>that is what underpins all of what's going on at

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the teachers' colleges and has infected a radical gender theory,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the genderbread man. Little boys and girls can choose whether

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 3>they're boys and girls, and then they try to confuse

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>you what's gender, what sex? And all that crap. At

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the heart is critical theory that says there are no

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 3>universal truths. All there are are cultural truths, and or

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Well would leap out of his grave if he could

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>and point out, dudes, That's what I was trying to

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>warn you about, is that if there are no truths,

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>the party can tell you what the truth is and

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to accept it, and you can't say, well,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't square with reality, because reality is just what

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the party tells you it is, so critical theory and

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the people pushing it, whether they know they are or not,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 3>they just think they're enlightened and that these nice trans

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 3>people deserve to be able to play in girls sports.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>They're just trying to push critical theory. The greatest example

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 3>is the two plus two is five thing, which is

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 3>actually straight out. In nineteen eighty four, the critical theory

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 3>crowd and there was a giant Twitter war which got

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>James Lindsay fired up to begin with, because he's a mathematician,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 3>as I recall, saying, no, two plus two doesn't equal

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 3>four in every society. In some societies it equals five

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 3>straight out or well, straight out of critical theory. That's

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 3>why they can't give up on this crap anyway. A

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 3>bunch of stuff to get to in a couple of minutes.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>We've got David Drucker to kind of parse some of

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>the politics of our time. Jack's gonna check in a bit,

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us, don't go away.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty, The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 9>Abolishing ice, Yes, a one year data center moratorium, Yes,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 9>breaking up a big ag Yes, public grocery yes, right

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 9>to repair yes, Legalizing cannabis Yes. Overturning Citizens United, Yes,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 9>a worker's Bill of Rights, yes, a free Palestine, yes, delightful.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Hassan Piker interviewing and quizzing the delightful Francesca Hong, who

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 3>is involved in a primary for the governorship in Wisconsin.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually today as we speak, be interesting to see how

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 3>that pans out. We're joined by David Drucker, senior writer

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>for The Dispatch, longtime friend of the Armstrong and Getty Show,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>and David, I will reserve it to myself to rant

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>that these people are lunatics and their policies will never work.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>But first of all, welcome, it's good to talk to you.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, good to be back.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 3>And the thing I wanted to talk to you about,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and I'm so interested in this, the nature of the

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 3>primary system and the fact that a super energized, fairly

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>small segment of either one of the political parties can

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 3>win primary after primary for the primary. And the conventional

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 3>wisdom is, yeah, that's true, because it's the hardcore that

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 3>turn out, but then it makes it harder to win

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the general. But I've observed over and over again, and

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>this is what I really wanted to ask you about.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Folks who just just strant about how horrific these policies

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>are in the primaries, then say, well, of course I'll

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 3>support her. So is it not true that the super energized,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>fairly smallish base of the party now runs both parties

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 3>because the districts are so polarized.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean there's something to that. I think there's

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 7>some nuance there. But you know, with the proliferation of

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 7>jerrymanner districts, right, we've had jerrymandered districts since the beginning

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 7>of the Republic, but particularly after the mid decade redistricting

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 7>that we saw over the past year, there are fewer

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 7>and fewer competitive house districts, and so when you're comparing,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 7>for instance, midterm elections you know, six and twenty ten

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 7>in twenty eighteen to what might happen in twenty twenty six,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 7>you have to take into account it just isn't as

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 7>much competitive territory for Democrats to be in a position

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 7>to flip. And so, you know, then you get to

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 7>this question of how much influence therefore have the wings

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 7>of the parties accrued, And they've definitely accrued some more

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 7>influence than they used to have, because it's harder to

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 7>make the argument that we need to nominate a pragmatist

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 7>or somebody with broad appeal when the winner of the

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 7>primary essentially is the winner of the general election. And

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 7>then you're looking at these competitive seats and states where

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 7>progressives and socialist candidates are making in roads. And I

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 7>think part of that has to do with the fact

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 7>that the Democratic Party is going through its own anti

0:20:55.960 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 7>establishments civil war, much as the Republican Party did did

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 7>during Barack Obama's presidency. And you know, these the Demograts

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 7>have not gone through something like this in quite some

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 7>time because they were not unified by Obama. They were, well,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 7>they were first unified by opposition to George W. Bush,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 7>which turned into NIF unification around Barack Obama, which turned

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 7>into unification around opposition to Donald Trump. And now they're

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 7>finally sort of going through the the sort of periodic

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 7>upheaval that parties go through. I think the question though,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 7>in this case is where do they land because some

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 7>of these candidates handed its unlike Democrats in the past,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 7>are rather extreme. When you just go through that checklist

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 7>there where you play this the clip and and you know,

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 7>usually what happens is either these things succeed with voters

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 7>and therefore they get to declare victory the wing the

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 7>wingers do, or they start losing some some winnable, uh

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 7>coveted general elections, and it it resuscitates the so called

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 7>establishment wing of the party that is focused on winning.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 7>That's what happened in large part with a lot of Republicans,

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 7>at least in congressional races prior to Donald Trump, where

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 7>Republicans Senate candidates in particular were blowing these winnable races,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 7>and the party got more aggressive, took more control over

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 7>these primaries and started nominating broadly acceptable candidates. They started

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 7>winning again, and that kind of put that thing to bet.

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Right now, you're a lot closer to this than we are.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I see the Democratic establishment as as very old and

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>very comfortable with their own control of the party. And

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 3>what does the next generation of the Democratic establishment look like?

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 7>We don't know a good question. First of all, I

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 7>think the Democratic establishment doesn't quite know what to do

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 7>about the insurgents in their midst. I think that they're

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 7>afraid to challenge them very publicly. I think they've been

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.239
<v Speaker 7>challenging them subtly and quietly and in back you know,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 7>and in back rooms. Strategy sessions. And we've seen that

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 7>with you know, certain pack money being spent and endorsements

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 7>being made, But they still haven't reached the point where

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 7>they recognize these candidates as a problem, and they haven't

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 7>reached a point where fear of their own base is

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 7>superseded by fear of losing and perpetuating Republican control of

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 7>the White House and of Congress. And so the first

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 7>step is, like, when does the party itself tre to

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 7>reassert control and actually wage the kind of aggressive warfare

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 7>that the progressive base and these you know, Democratic Socialists

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 7>of America candidates have been waging, right, And then that'll

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 7>tell us a lot about who the next sort of

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 7>iteration of the democratic establishment is. Whether it's the same

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 7>people they just finally got off their bus and started fighting,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 7>or whether it's somebody.

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 3>New right right, let's you know, let's stay on a

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 3>somewhat philosophical level. I find it more fun than the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>headlines of the day. So you look across at the

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Republican Party and Trump's enormous influence blah blahah. Everybody knows that, right,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Given the fact that the Republican Party has been dealing

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 3>with that, the Democrats have been dealing with what we've

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 3>been describing. What is a political party anymore if it

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>is merely the executive branch of whatever whims of the

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>head guy is. I mean, you don't have a platform

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 3>until you ask your candidate what do you want our

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 3>platform to be? Are both parties getting tired of that

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 3>whip sawing back and forth enough that they'll assert themselves

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and say, a party is a thing, here's what we are.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well that's a big it's a broader question, and

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 7>I think you know, from the time being, the answer

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 7>is no. I mean, I joke all the time, but

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm half serious that these parties have deteriorated and self immolated,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 7>and they're basically now in many ways, nothing more than

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 7>ballid access organizations. They don't really have anything that they're

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 7>willing to fight for beyond you know, whatever their philosophical

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 7>region of control wants at any given time, right, and

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 7>we've seen that at the presidential level in particular. You know,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 7>whoever the nominee is, that person's in charge of the party,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 7>that person determines the party's agenda, and you know, when

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 7>a candidate comes along that is that is unacceptable. The

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 7>line really has to cross and we see this from

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 7>time to time, right where the line will be crossed

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 7>and the parties will say, nope, you don't get our support,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 7>and you still see things like that. But you're right

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 7>to point this out. Part of the problem, even though

0:25:52.600 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 7>everybody hates political parties, is that parties have grown weaker

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 7>as polarization has increased, and we probably are politics in

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 7>this country. The things that people think they don't like

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 7>about our polly top politics would improve if the parties

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 7>actually strengthened and began to take, you know, reassert control

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 7>over their platforms and their candidates and things of that

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 7>nature the.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Way they used to mm hmm.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 3>A little less democracy maybe, at least at the primary level.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 3>David Drucker, senior writer with The Dispatch, is with us. David,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 3>what's the most interesting story in politics going on right

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 3>now that you think people ought to be paying attention to?

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, I don't know if they're probably already

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 7>paying attention if you're you know, a political junkie, but

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 7>I think what's going on in Michigan is probably the

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 7>most interesting story in politics. And whether a duel Elsi

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 7>ed gets elected Senate gets elected to the Senate in

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 7>a swing state like Michigan, because it's going to have

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 7>it's going to I think it's going to tell us

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 7>a lot about where certain you know voters are. But

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 7>also I think it's gonna if else I had wins,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 7>the progressive wing of the Democratic Party is going to

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 7>have an argument to make. I don't necessarily think it

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 7>would be true anyway, but they're going to be able

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 7>to say, don't tell us a winger can't win the presidency,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 7>can't win the key states in the electoral college voting.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 7>We just won Michigan. And if he loses to a Republican,

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 7>and a Republican hasn't won a US Senate seat in

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 7>Michigan since the nineties, and of course it's a very

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 7>bad environment from GOP. And if l say it loses,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 7>then you know, the the normal way the Democratic Party,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 7>in the pragmatic wing, it's going to be able to see

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 7>we told you so. And I think that could have

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 7>a huge influence over the course of the twenty twenty

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 7>eight Democratic presidential primary. By the way, may also forestall

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 7>any possibility of Democrats winning control of the Senate. If

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 7>they lose a Senate seat they control in Michigan, right.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Final question, David, how blue is Wisconsin? Now? Is

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>it possible Francesca hon gets the nomination?

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 6>It's not blue.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's a swing state. It's a narrowly divided state.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, she could very well get the nomination for all

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 7>the reasons we just discussed, right, But then she may

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 7>She may it elected governor in an environment that favors

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 7>Republicans and the favors Democrats in the way that this one,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 7>you know does at the moment. But I think she's

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 7>also vulnerable in a general election. And you know, and

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 7>also there are plenty of Democrats still running in competitive

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 7>seats and states, and they're all going to get a

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 7>lot more between Elsie ed winning the Democratic nomination of

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 7>Michigan and the Pong is the nominee and in wisconsin's

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 7>the governor. And you've got some other DSA candidates that

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 7>have succeeded in these primaries. It's a it's much more

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 7>for Democrats in places that matter to answer for than

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 7>just what about mom Donnie in New York City?

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Right right. David Drucker, Senior writer with The Dispatch, David,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>always stimulating, Thanks so much for the time yep, anytime.

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, all right, thank you, Yeah, let's stay in touch.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Ay.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Quick word from our friends at Blue Collar Dollar. If

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 3>you're our a kind of people, frankly, you work hard,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 3>you value your family, you're a bit of a saver.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>You've accumulated some wealth and you're trying to figure out

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 3>how to guide it all to your financial dreams. But

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 3>you want somebody who gets you and is going to

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 3>talk with you, not at you. We invite you to

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>call our friends at Blue Collar Dollar. If you save

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 3>five hundred thousand dollars or more, why don't you give

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>them a call for a no cost consultation. There's no obligation.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 3>If you don't like what you hear, no harm done.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 3>But we know these people. We love their philosophy, and

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 3>they are good folks, and they love this country. From

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>your mobile phone, dial pounces you fifteen. When prompted, say

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the keywords blue collar Dollar once again. Just but dial

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 3>pound two fifty and say blue collar Dollar just to

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>hear them out. Advisory services offered through Talent LLC and

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>SEC registered investment advisor. Marketing is conducted by its filia

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>company blue Collar Dollar ll SAY registration as an investment

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 3>advisor does not imply a certain level of skill or training.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 3>For more important disclosures. Visit blue Collar dollar dot com again,

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 3>dial pound two fifty and say blue Collar Dollar. I

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>thought it was interesting that The New York Times was

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 3>actually pretty critical of Jessica Hong Francesca Hong rather and

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>her various beliefs and policies. They're merciless. I wonder if

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 3>that's the Democratic establishment kind of raising its head and saying, hey, hey, hey,

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 3>are you people sure you're up on everything she has

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.239
<v Speaker 3>to say. I actually found the coverage in the New

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 3>York Times more clear eyed and critical than in the

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Journal, which was a head scratcher. We'll all

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 3>find out today that the key primary in Wisconsin is today.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess we'll know by tonight what's going on with

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>that one. Jack's going to check in from the vacation

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>trail next day with us Armstrong.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 3>He's the co host, he's on vacation. He's annexing Canada,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 3>one delicious gravy fry at a time. He's Jack Armstrong.

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Hello Jack, how are you?

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 6>But do you suppose we don't put gravy on Prize

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 6>in the United States.

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 3>We do actually in various places. It's often called poutine,

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>which sounds like a euphemism for a lady part to me.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't like that word. Yeah, I've not come

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 6>across it a lot, but it's everywhere I go to eat,

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 6>which I have one of those little, uh motorized things

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 6>to get around. Now, that's what's happened. I've only been

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 6>here three days, and yes, I'm unable to power myself

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 6>with my own legs anymore.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>What are you gonna do? You're gonna get a scooter

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 3>adapted over?

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 6>Interesting. I'm in Bank. I'm a thousand miles from those

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 6>fires in Washington and Oregon. Yeah, and just across the

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 6>border in Canada. And it is so smoky here a

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 6>thousand miles away.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's too bad, because I'm told the scenery, well

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I've seen pictures. This is breathtaking.

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh it is, and luckily I can, you know, still

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 6>see it. But it's not the same as it would

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 6>be for the fires. But man, it is. It is

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 6>really smoky. The scenery is breathtaking, is absolutely fantastic.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Excellent, And are you mostly you guys just hiking and

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 3>looking around and touristy stuff or what you got any

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 3>big adventures planned so far?

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that's exactly well. We went to the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally.

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 6>That's what we did the first two days. Oho, my

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 6>youngest has no interest in that, but my oldest really

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 6>is interested. And we just hung around there for like

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 6>twenty four hours. And that is one of the largest

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 6>gatherings of humanity. I think it's the largest non religious

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 6>gatherings humanity that happens every year. It's about a half

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.479
<v Speaker 6>a million people that show up in this town of

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 6>six thousand people.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing, Like dwarfs the Indy five hundred for instance.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 6>It's many multiples, just insane. It's just so crazy. And uh,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 6>and my kids, I'm glad that he ad. They're fourteen

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 6>and sixteen. They saw some things that opened their eyes.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 6>That's that's for certain. The way there is there was

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 6>there was some There was some stuff to see walking

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 6>the streets. No that about it.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I bet there was. Well, I was just going

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to say for your younger son, Henry, that even if

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 3>you're not at all into motorcycles or whatever, just the

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 3>sheer spectacle of the thing would have to be you know,

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 3>eye opening.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 6>What's interesting is, you know how it is. We've talked

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 6>about this many times, how kids people are born with personalities.

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, and they're just very, very different. But my

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 6>oldest just, I mean, he just when he's around that

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 6>vibe of just music and noise and people and crowds

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 6>and cars, he just lights up. I mean, it just

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 6>energizes him so much. And my youngest is always, can

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 6>I go sit in the car until this is over?

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 6>And he puts something in his ears so he doesn't

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 6>have to hearing it and he doesn't like to see it.

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 6>So it's just very different. So now we're doing his

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 6>part of the trip more or less, where we're driving

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 6>through mountains and creeks and stopping and it's perfectly quiet,

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 6>and we hike and we see deer and bighorn sheep

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 6>and that sort of thing.

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 3>He likes that wonderful. I was going to say, yeah,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 3>it has to make vacation planning at least somewhat challenging.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 3>But what are you going to do? That's the I.

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 6>Also have the you've probably had this experience. You know,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 6>I didn't go on vacations, really I didn't. I hadn't

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 6>realized this until my kids got older. I didn't only

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 6>go on vacations with the family once I kept turned

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 6>like fourteen, fifteen years old, because I was working. I

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 6>was working all the time so that the family'd go

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 6>on vacation and I work. And then my brother did

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 6>the same when he turned about fifteen, he stayed home.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 6>I think there's a reason for that. Teenagers they are

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 6>not really thrilled about many things. They're just digging. They're

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 6>not digging that much stuff, and they don't want to

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 6>be with their parents. And I was thinking last vacation,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 6>but I'm thinking this vication. You know what next summer,

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, I think I'll go on vacation.

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 6>You stay home and work might be the answer. Yeah.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the very few things I've ever said that

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 3>was worth jotting down was when Judy and I were

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about her relationship with her oldest Kate, and I said, Honey,

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>to leave the nest to take off, you have to

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 3>push against the nest, and that process begins early. It's

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, the berg metaphor kind of fails because they're

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 3>pushing for a very long time before they flap their

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 3>wings and flyway.

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 6>Clearly and modern society. We have probably delayed them growing

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 6>up for better. I was gonna say, for better or worse.

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 6>Probably almost certainly for worse. But the uh oh, like

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, I was, I was, like I said, I was.

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 6>I was working and not doing vacation stuff. I was

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 6>like a I was like a grown man earning money,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 6>buying myself stuff at fifteen. And I think, you know,

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 6>maybe the human body in mind is prepared for that,

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 6>but we don't do it much, is there? And then

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 6>the whole yeah, go ahead, no, go ahead, I was

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 6>gonna say. And then the smart phone thing, the smartphone thing,

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 6>everything has to compete with the smartphone, right, uh, And

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 6>so I have to constantly, Hey, put that away, sitting

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 6>there playing video games when you got like some of

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 6>the greatest scenery on the planet, maybe in the entire

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 6>universe out your window. You don't need to be playing

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 6>some weird game on your phone. But that's the way,

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, you know how it is. We're drawn to

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 6>the next dopamine hit. You don't get a dopamine hit.

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 6>It's enjoyable, but you don't get a dopamine hit from

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 6>looking at a mountain.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Not the same kind anyway. So we got like twenty

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 3>seconds left. Is there another leg to come of the vacation.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh? Yeah, we're driving to Vancouver. Then we're going to

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 6>go over to Vancouver Island Victoria and we'll be there

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 6>for a while. Seattle don a home.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Excellent scenery and junkies. Best of both worlds, exactly, exactly.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy that and stay in touch. We've got a great

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 3>guest of the fabulous Jason Rantz coming up from Seattle.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Read seven seventy am. Longtime friend of the AG Show

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and colleague. He's always bringing the fire. Stay with us,

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>don't go away, Armstrong and Getty