WEBVTT - Doing Goon Things

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.940
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.210
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:15.390 --> 0:00:40.230
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. And now, here's Armstrong and Getty. So

0:00:40.250 --> 0:00:43.850
<v Speaker 2>we all heard about the botched execution of Krista Pike

0:00:44.070 --> 0:00:48.370
<v Speaker 2>in Tennessee the other day. It strikes me she's still

0:00:48.409 --> 0:00:49.490
<v Speaker 2>alive by all accounts.

0:00:49.729 --> 0:00:53.490
<v Speaker 3>You know, almost everybody has said the same thing. Canada

0:00:53.770 --> 0:00:58.910
<v Speaker 3>kills people by the thousands. And obviously they all think

0:00:58.980 --> 0:01:04.060
<v Speaker 3>it is both safe, effective, and humane as they are

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>volunteering to To be snuffed that way, and they all voted.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:10.060
<v Speaker 2>For it and everything else.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>So clearly there is a safe, effective, kind, I don't

0:01:15.940 --> 0:01:18.940
<v Speaker 3>know why you need to be kind, but kind way

0:01:19.060 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 3>to snuff people.

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.380
<v Speaker 2>They do it around the world, various countries, and we

0:01:23.420 --> 0:01:26.690
<v Speaker 2>can't do it. brilliantly anticipating my next point which was

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.630
<v Speaker 2>going to be virtually everybody quoted in every article in

0:01:29.670 --> 0:01:32.910
<v Speaker 2>every news story about this story is an anti-death penalty

0:01:33.010 --> 0:01:35.930
<v Speaker 2>activist of course which is fine it is a noble

0:01:35.950 --> 0:01:37.670
<v Speaker 2>cause whether you agree with it or not i think

0:01:37.690 --> 0:01:41.790
<v Speaker 2>these people come at it with uh uh sincerity.

0:01:41.100 --> 0:01:42.780
<v Speaker 3>I've never thought it was a noble cause if you're

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.140
<v Speaker 3>gonna pour your heart into a cause why this one

0:01:46.620 --> 0:01:49.940
<v Speaker 3>why making sure an axe murderer of a family doesn't

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>get snuffed of all the.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.620
<v Speaker 2>Causes Yeah, I know, because the government shouldn't be empowered

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.270
<v Speaker 2>to kill people. I don't know. Like I said, I

0:01:56.310 --> 0:01:59.450
<v Speaker 2>didn't say I agreed with them. I think they're sincere. Oh,

0:01:59.530 --> 0:02:00.810
<v Speaker 2>I definitely think they're sincere.

0:02:01.170 --> 0:02:01.330
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:02:01.610 --> 0:02:04.630
<v Speaker 2>So they're not making anything from this, really. Now, the

0:02:04.670 --> 0:02:07.990
<v Speaker 2>attorneys who make it impossible to eliminate the death penalty

0:02:08.010 --> 0:02:10.550
<v Speaker 2>because they're getting rich off of it, even though, for instance,

0:02:10.570 --> 0:02:16.930
<v Speaker 2>California never executes somebody, they're just effing greed heads. Super cynical. Anyway, sorry,

0:02:17.070 --> 0:02:19.590
<v Speaker 2>I get a little passionate on this stuff. But anyway,

0:02:19.710 --> 0:02:22.530
<v Speaker 2>so everybody being quoted on this story is an anti-death

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.300
<v Speaker 2>penalty activist, including the people who've said that this gal

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.620
<v Speaker 2>has probably got brain damage and the rest of it.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Although I did find 53 interesting, Michael. This is a

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>completely unprecedented event.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Krista Pike is the only person we know of who

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.050
<v Speaker 4>survived the administration of lethal doses of injection drugs.

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. Gave it two tries, the old college try.

0:02:50.260 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Apparently she's claimed life or something.

0:02:52.100 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>They stuck her like seven times or something like that?

0:02:54.340 --> 0:02:55.210
<v Speaker 3>That's what I would hate.

0:02:56.100 --> 0:02:59.210
<v Speaker 2>Oh, boy. Can I get a new phlebotomist? Oh, trust me,

0:02:59.230 --> 0:03:02.190
<v Speaker 2>there's more on that. Stay tuned or don't. I'll go

0:03:02.270 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>easy on that stuff because nobody wants to hear it.

0:03:04.610 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>But give us 52, this from CNN.

0:03:08.389 --> 0:03:15.390
<v Speaker 5>The number of executions by method since 1977, about 1,500

0:03:15.389 --> 0:03:20.570
<v Speaker 5>have been by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 19 by gas,

0:03:20.630 --> 0:03:23.910
<v Speaker 5>six by firing squad, three by hanging.

0:03:24.180 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>And what happened to the gas chamber? When we were young,

0:03:26.380 --> 0:03:28.940
<v Speaker 2>that was the big one, wasn't it? No, people gasp

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.260
<v Speaker 2>and they cough and they're afraid and stuff. So that's

0:03:31.300 --> 0:03:33.380
<v Speaker 2>cruel and unusual. Got to get rid of that. Yeah.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:34.139
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So the and I mentioned this yesterday, but it's worth

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:43.310
<v Speaker 2>repeating the reason that the, you know, the conundrum, the

0:03:43.510 --> 0:03:46.530
<v Speaker 2>contrast of Canada versus botching that attempt. The reason that

0:03:46.550 --> 0:03:49.150
<v Speaker 2>happens is because the death penalty opponents have made it

0:03:49.230 --> 0:03:53.150
<v Speaker 2>so difficult to do the stuff that works. They found

0:03:53.190 --> 0:03:56.550
<v Speaker 2>a variety of maneuvers to pressure drug companies or doctors

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:02.100
<v Speaker 2>or whatever into like forcing the state into alternative methods.

0:04:02.710 --> 0:04:05.550
<v Speaker 2>That aren't as effective or a little more difficult, blah, blah, blah. Anyway,

0:04:06.530 --> 0:04:08.100
<v Speaker 2>leave it to the New York Post. With the goal

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of making it so difficult that we give up on it.

0:04:11.500 --> 0:04:16.690
<v Speaker 2>Making it impracticable, as they say. Exactly, yeah. So leave

0:04:16.700 --> 0:04:19.910
<v Speaker 2>it to the New York Post to write a delightful

0:04:19.950 --> 0:04:23.390
<v Speaker 2>article about the history of botched executions in the United States.

0:04:23.410 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh, oh.

0:04:24.870 --> 0:04:27.330
<v Speaker 2>Krista Pike became the first death row inmate to survive

0:04:27.380 --> 0:04:29.420
<v Speaker 2>a lethal injection, but she was merely the latest in

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a long, gruesome history of botched executions. And yes, friends, yes, I,

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.060
<v Speaker 2>your old Uncle Joe, will exercise some restraint, more restraint

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:45.130
<v Speaker 2>than the New York Post does in this article. Roughly 3%

0:04:45.130 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of all U.S. executions in the country between 1890 and 2010,

0:04:49.750 --> 0:04:53.940
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty good sample size, about 3% were botched. Again,

0:04:53.980 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>according to the Death Penalty Information Center that crusade against

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.380
<v Speaker 2>this sort of thing. The highest number at 85 was

0:05:00.460 --> 0:05:06.420
<v Speaker 2>for bungled hangings. I like the term bungled. Maybe it's

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:06.979
<v Speaker 2>more often.

0:05:07.540 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:07.980 --> 0:05:11.020
<v Speaker 2>Well, you bungled that. Well, you bungled your homework, son.

0:05:11.060 --> 0:05:15.310
<v Speaker 2>Look at that. Four out of 10, including the legendary

0:05:15.310 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 2>1901 hanging of outlaw Tom Blackjack Ketchum. whose head popped

0:05:19.380 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>clean off when he dropped because executioners failed to account

0:05:22.820 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>for how fat he had gotten in jail.

0:05:25.339 --> 0:05:27.300
<v Speaker 3>And when we discussed this a little earlier, I don't

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.460
<v Speaker 3>mind my head popping off if I'm executed. Some of

0:05:29.490 --> 0:05:31.690
<v Speaker 3>these stories are going to be gruesome and think, oh, God,

0:05:31.750 --> 0:05:33.969
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine going through that. But your head popping off,

0:05:35.190 --> 0:05:38.310
<v Speaker 3>you died instantly. It's like when Saddam Hussein's.

0:05:37.950 --> 0:05:39.330
<v Speaker 2>Head popped off when we hung him, right?

0:05:40.470 --> 0:05:41.130
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yeah.

0:05:41.740 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 2>And to me, if like part of the professionalization of

0:05:45.140 --> 0:05:48.620
<v Speaker 2>being a hangman is you calculate the weight, the distance

0:05:48.660 --> 0:05:51.420
<v Speaker 2>of the drop, and you say, and, you know, they're

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>in the hangman's coat, it said, and it's highly regular

0:05:55.260 --> 0:06:01.220
<v Speaker 2>and sought to be avoided that the executionee, what's the term? Convict, whatever. Scumbag.

0:06:02.140 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>That their head should pop off. And, you know, you

0:06:04.300 --> 0:06:07.260
<v Speaker 2>signed a contract. If the head pops off, you're guilty

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>of violating your professional standards. But as a society, I

0:06:10.339 --> 0:06:14.020
<v Speaker 2>don't think it really affects it. To me, that's not botched. No.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It's unattractive, certainly. But was the job done or wasn't

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.659
<v Speaker 2>it done? I wouldn't take my kids to watch it. Likewise,

0:06:23.779 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and this is edging closer to the sort of thing

0:06:25.980 --> 0:06:31.260
<v Speaker 2>I'm not comfortable airing, a number of cases involving the

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:39.570
<v Speaker 2>electric chair. The guilty may or may not have had their... heads,

0:06:39.690 --> 0:06:44.070
<v Speaker 2>what's the expression, burst into flame. Why is that?

0:06:44.110 --> 0:06:45.730
<v Speaker 3>Because it's too hot? I thought you were going to

0:06:45.750 --> 0:06:47.930
<v Speaker 3>go with the slow-cooked. Those are always the ones that

0:06:47.950 --> 0:06:50.370
<v Speaker 3>bother me. It's like you've got a pot roast in

0:06:50.390 --> 0:06:51.630
<v Speaker 3>the crock pot all day long.

0:06:51.890 --> 0:06:52.330
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no.

0:06:52.450 --> 0:06:56.890
<v Speaker 2>Make him stop. What the hell? I'm trying to exercise

0:06:56.910 --> 0:07:01.290
<v Speaker 2>a little restraint over here. No, this is not good.

0:07:01.350 --> 0:07:03.549
<v Speaker 2>Similar to the hanging where your head or your noggin

0:07:03.630 --> 0:07:08.029
<v Speaker 2>comes unattached from your shoulders. I'd rather have my head

0:07:08.070 --> 0:07:11.100
<v Speaker 2>burst into flames than the slow-cook. And Tim's a mistake.

0:07:11.830 --> 0:07:12.130
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

0:07:12.150 --> 0:07:14.690
<v Speaker 2>Well, if my head is on fire post-mortem, what the

0:07:14.710 --> 0:07:15.970
<v Speaker 2>hell do I care? I'm sorry.

0:07:16.010 --> 0:07:17.930
<v Speaker 3>My wife was running her hair dryer at the same time.

0:07:18.090 --> 0:07:20.130
<v Speaker 3>We just didn't have enough juice.

0:07:20.710 --> 0:07:25.310
<v Speaker 2>My damn kids playing their video games. Oh, my God. Oh,

0:07:25.510 --> 0:07:27.490
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even going to tell you this one. There

0:07:27.610 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is a litany. Well, it's not a litany. It's a

0:07:31.330 --> 0:07:36.340
<v Speaker 2>small number of truly unfortunate efforts to get lethal injection going. Oh,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>my God. But you can picture the details. What's the

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:45.790
<v Speaker 2>main problem? you got one instance where somebody didn't hit

0:07:45.870 --> 0:07:49.890
<v Speaker 2>a vein. They hit an artery. Oh, where'd you go

0:07:49.930 --> 0:07:54.290
<v Speaker 2>to school? No kidding. And the second one, and I

0:07:54.330 --> 0:07:56.690
<v Speaker 2>will leave it at this. And I beg you, sir,

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I beg you to join me in my restraint. I

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:07.420
<v Speaker 2>will credit the medical staff for really sticking with it,

0:08:07.820 --> 0:08:14.309
<v Speaker 2>even though they failed multiple times. Like, Multiple times. Let's

0:08:14.390 --> 0:08:18.390
<v Speaker 2>try again, they said. Over and over again. Like how

0:08:18.410 --> 0:08:28.860
<v Speaker 2>many times? Let's see. They don't give a number. In

0:08:28.900 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 2>this one case, they tried for 90 minutes.

0:08:31.780 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, like, see, again, how does this happen? I've had

0:08:36.660 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of medical work done when I was going

0:08:38.740 --> 0:08:40.260
<v Speaker 3>through cancer. I got stuck all the time or stuff

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>like that. And I've never had, I think three is

0:08:44.020 --> 0:08:45.260
<v Speaker 3>the max once.

0:08:46.020 --> 0:08:46.900
<v Speaker 2>Usually it's once.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:47.660
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.020
<v Speaker 2>Occasionally twice.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.140
<v Speaker 2>Three is extraordinary.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:51.420
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.179
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not even sure I've ever even had a three.

0:08:53.460 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So why do you have all these situations where they

0:08:55.940 --> 0:08:57.300
<v Speaker 3>got to do it for an hour and a half?

0:08:57.340 --> 0:08:59.620
<v Speaker 2>What the hell's going on there? That's what I want

0:08:59.660 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>to know.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:00.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.260
<v Speaker 2>Well, moving on from this delightful fair. Ah, it's a

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>brand new featurette, but I don't know the name. I

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.540
<v Speaker 2>gave Hanson a little latitude in producing the theme song.

0:09:13.220 --> 0:09:15.970
<v Speaker 2>So right after a word from our friends at Incogni,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.470
<v Speaker 2>we will introduce our brand new featurette. The good people

0:09:20.510 --> 0:09:23.590
<v Speaker 2>at Incogni, here's what they do. There are at least

0:09:23.590 --> 0:09:26.990
<v Speaker 2>420 or so data brokers out there that have every

0:09:27.090 --> 0:09:29.980
<v Speaker 2>bit of information about you, from where you live, to

0:09:30.020 --> 0:09:31.900
<v Speaker 2>what your kids' names are, to how you vote, to

0:09:32.730 --> 0:09:35.620
<v Speaker 2>how often you're late on credit card payments, right? And

0:09:35.630 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>they sell all that stuff all over the place to

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.579
<v Speaker 2>folks who want to violate your privacy. Incogni goes and

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.460
<v Speaker 2>gets that stuff the hell off those sites.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:43.739
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:09:43.780 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Right now, somewhere a stranger is buying a list of

0:09:46.460 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 3>all of your details, like your name, your phone, your

0:09:49.300 --> 0:09:51.950
<v Speaker 3>home address, your age, your income, your health problems, parts

0:09:51.970 --> 0:09:55.290
<v Speaker 3>of your life, all packaged and sold, sometimes really, really cheap.

0:09:56.690 --> 0:09:59.230
<v Speaker 3>And you can get that off of the data broker

0:09:59.309 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>with the help of Incogni. so that they can't be

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 3>selling this stuff all the.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Time and then they keep following up so you don't

0:10:04.420 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 2>get quietly relisted good service go to incogni.com slash armstrong

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>for 60 off your private life should never be somebody

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>else's prospect list incogni.com slash armstrong they can't harm you

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.310
<v Speaker 2>If they can't find you incogni.com slash Armstrong. All right. Again,

0:10:19.370 --> 0:10:22.270
<v Speaker 2>the actual name of the feature is, is unknown to

0:10:22.290 --> 0:10:39.650
<v Speaker 2>me until I hear this. Jack asses eating their own. Exactly.

0:10:39.890 --> 0:10:40.150
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:10:40.390 --> 0:10:42.930
<v Speaker 2>It's a little longer than I'd picture. Can I hear

0:10:42.950 --> 0:10:57.370
<v Speaker 2>it again, Michael? That's pretty good. Yeah. And it really

0:10:57.410 --> 0:11:01.150
<v Speaker 2>tells you what's in store for you. Indeed. Example number one,

0:11:01.170 --> 0:11:03.730
<v Speaker 2>a Baltimore opera group has.

0:11:03.770 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 7>Recently, I'm sorry, it is ousted. It's recently hired executive director.

0:11:11.500 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 7>Just hired her a few days ago. canned her for what?

0:11:18.140 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>She was going to a music festival.

0:11:20.660 --> 0:11:24.260
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. She was going to Burning Man. Legendary for what?

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Freaky behavior and dust. And she thought, how do I

0:11:28.179 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>keep my hair from becoming completely clogged with dust? I

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.939
<v Speaker 2>know I'll have it braided tight into cornrows, but that's

0:11:36.100 --> 0:11:43.500
<v Speaker 2>cultural appropriation. She's a white gal. Quote, I believe the circumstance. Oh, oh,

0:11:43.580 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. That's the wrong quote. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Something cultural appropriation. Ah, regarding a video circulating showing our

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>new executive director is white wearing cornrows. That is clearly

0:11:54.980 --> 0:12:00.620
<v Speaker 2>cultural appropriation. Insensitive. You can't give in to white supremacy. Oh,

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:01.339
<v Speaker 2>my God.

0:12:01.380 --> 0:12:03.460
<v Speaker 3>You can't give in to these people and apologize for

0:12:03.500 --> 0:12:04.860
<v Speaker 3>something as mundane as that.

0:12:05.300 --> 0:12:08.709
<v Speaker 2>Well, she's fired. There's no apologizing to do. She got canned.

0:12:08.770 --> 0:12:12.790
<v Speaker 2>She's a woke jackass being eaten by her own. But

0:12:12.809 --> 0:12:15.610
<v Speaker 2>that's not even my favorite example, although my heart bleeds

0:12:15.650 --> 0:12:19.130
<v Speaker 2>for this poor son of a gun. The Portland, of course,

0:12:19.770 --> 0:12:26.780
<v Speaker 2>trailblazers just hired a new play-by-play guy, Braden Bell. Young man,

0:12:27.540 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 2>dream job. I know guys in sports. They dream of

0:12:31.220 --> 0:12:34.300
<v Speaker 2>having a major league play-by-play job. Hard to get those jobs.

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>There aren't a lot of them. He's 29 years old, okay?

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:47.849
<v Speaker 2>13 and 14 years ago, he made media posts that

0:12:48.070 --> 0:12:52.550
<v Speaker 2>contained comments about quote-unquote Asian people in a way that

0:12:52.590 --> 0:12:57.510
<v Speaker 2>was insensitive and or used the term slut and whores

0:12:57.870 --> 0:13:01.770
<v Speaker 2>to refer to certain women. When he was 14 and

0:13:01.770 --> 0:13:08.100
<v Speaker 2>15 years old, And the Portlandia Trailblazers have fired him

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.820
<v Speaker 2>before he could start his job. The Portland Trailblazers have

0:13:11.860 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 2>zero tolerance for racist, sexist, or harmful comments. Social media

0:13:15.700 --> 0:13:18.300
<v Speaker 2>posts made by a recently announced play-by-play broadcaster are in

0:13:18.340 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>clear violation of team and league policies, as well as

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>our values and expectations. Therefore, we will not be moving

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>forward with this broadcaster.

0:13:24.059 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're going to be dealing with this for a while,

0:13:26.380 --> 0:13:27.589
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to have to figure it out as

0:13:27.610 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a society, because we're soon to have everybody... Who's out

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.660
<v Speaker 3>there in a position of any power whatsoever has a

0:13:37.990 --> 0:13:41.610
<v Speaker 3>social media background going into their early teen years. I mean,

0:13:41.790 --> 0:13:43.030
<v Speaker 3>soon it's everyone.

0:13:44.090 --> 0:13:48.190
<v Speaker 2>And soon the woke crowd, I pray, will be so

0:13:48.850 --> 0:13:53.250
<v Speaker 2>in disrepute, so disliked, so hated because they're all Marxists

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.309
<v Speaker 2>trying to overturn Western civilization. And they're just lusting for power.

0:13:58.370 --> 0:14:00.230
<v Speaker 2>Has nothing to do with what a young man said

0:14:00.250 --> 0:14:03.550
<v Speaker 2>when he was 14 friggin years old. How could it possibly?

0:14:03.570 --> 0:14:06.620
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine the things I would have to answer

0:14:06.670 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 3>for if I'd had a Twitter account starting when I

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 3>was like 13.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>And this stuff is innocuous. It's teenage stupidity. You know,

0:14:15.940 --> 0:14:19.470
<v Speaker 2>Portland Trailblazers, you should be ashamed of yourselves. You think

0:14:19.490 --> 0:14:24.730
<v Speaker 2>you're virtuous and you're demonstrating morality? You're demonstrating exactly the opposite.

0:14:25.150 --> 0:14:28.850
<v Speaker 2>Shame on you. Bunch of wokester jackasses eating their own.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.740
<v Speaker 2>Wokester jackasses eating their own.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:38.580
<v Speaker 7>I feel like the theme kind of undermined the tone

0:14:38.620 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 7>of outrage I was going for.

0:14:42.130 --> 0:14:45.580
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, AI meets with religious leaders.

0:14:45.740 --> 0:14:46.300
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:14:46.580 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a big story in The New York Times today.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:49.020
<v Speaker 3>And other stuff.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:49.380
<v Speaker 2>Stay here.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:59.500
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:15:02.340 --> 0:15:05.020
<v Speaker 6>The judge in the Lindsay Clancy murder case has denied

0:15:05.070 --> 0:15:07.110
<v Speaker 6>her request to find her not guilty.

0:15:07.630 --> 0:15:09.109
<v Speaker 2>Clancy's defense attorney.

0:15:08.810 --> 0:15:11.830
<v Speaker 6>Had argued earlier this week that there wasn't enough evidence

0:15:11.850 --> 0:15:15.170
<v Speaker 6>to even prove that Clancy had killed her three children.

0:15:15.390 --> 0:15:18.310
<v Speaker 6>The judge today refuting that, saying there was enough evidence.

0:15:18.700 --> 0:15:21.780
<v Speaker 6>The district attorney, though, still has not decided whether or

0:15:21.820 --> 0:15:23.060
<v Speaker 6>not to retry Clancy.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.900
<v Speaker 3>What do you suppose is going on there? Why haven't

0:15:25.940 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 3>they made a decision to retry her?

0:15:28.700 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they got away a lot of different stuff. It's

0:15:31.100 --> 0:15:35.490
<v Speaker 2>a big decision, given the 11 to 1 jury numbers

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.410
<v Speaker 2>for acquittal. They've got to figure out. They're holding meetings

0:15:40.490 --> 0:15:43.330
<v Speaker 2>of the Brain Trust probably right now saying, all right,

0:15:43.610 --> 0:15:46.010
<v Speaker 2>how do we approach the case differently? What could we

0:15:46.030 --> 0:15:48.980
<v Speaker 2>have done better? Just all sorts of stuff like that.

0:15:49.660 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's one of the most confusing recent stories. They arrest

0:15:54.060 --> 0:15:59.830
<v Speaker 3>five terrorists in Great Britain. who seem to have a

0:15:59.890 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 3>plot against one of the air bases we're using in

0:16:04.380 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the war against Iran, then let them go within 24 hours.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.380
<v Speaker 3>And everybody's wondering what the hell's going on there. Then yesterday,

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>British police arrested a 25-year-old dual British-Iranian national in central

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>London on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts tied to Sunday's incident.

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:29.990
<v Speaker 2>Mm-hmm. Two properties were searched.

0:16:30.010 --> 0:16:32.690
<v Speaker 3>However, authorities have not disclosed any findings. This is a

0:16:33.030 --> 0:16:36.090
<v Speaker 3>sixth suspect in the case. The original five men, all

0:16:36.150 --> 0:16:39.690
<v Speaker 3>British nationals from London in their early 20s, were released

0:16:39.750 --> 0:16:42.290
<v Speaker 3>Monday after no explosives were found in their vans, though

0:16:42.340 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>police say the investigation continues. What happened there? Yeah, but

0:16:47.140 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>what's your guess.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.580
<v Speaker 2>On what happened there? Not enough to go on, but yeah,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>my guess is, I don't, all I have is guesses.

0:16:55.340 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, Marco Rubio said, just to give you background here,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.700
<v Speaker 3>Marco Rubio said this week the incident clearly involves the

0:17:01.740 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 3>hands of a foreign actor without naming what country.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my best guess is that these guys are the

0:17:09.420 --> 0:17:12.260
<v Speaker 2>five guys. The sixth guy is clearly the ringleader and

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>tied to Iran. So it would seem the five guys,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.610
<v Speaker 2>the Brits who may or may not be of Islamist

0:17:19.810 --> 0:17:23.540
<v Speaker 2>or Iranian heritage. It could be they were hired to

0:17:23.619 --> 0:17:29.250
<v Speaker 2>do some sort of damage, just as small-time hoods, hooligans, whatever.

0:17:30.050 --> 0:17:33.409
<v Speaker 2>They have no ideology. They were paid to cut a

0:17:33.450 --> 0:17:36.210
<v Speaker 2>hole in the fence and bust up the runway for

0:17:36.390 --> 0:17:40.050
<v Speaker 2>an exorbitant amount of money. And then when they got busted,

0:17:40.070 --> 0:17:42.649
<v Speaker 2>they're like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. We're not terrorists.

0:17:42.710 --> 0:17:45.970
<v Speaker 2>We're criminals. They just hired us to bust up this runway.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why. They paid us $ 1, 500 each. And

0:17:50.780 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the authorities were like, all right, these jackasses aren't terrorists.

0:17:53.300 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 2>They were just hired to do goon things because the

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 2>Iranians are famous for doing that. They want somebody beat up.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.270
<v Speaker 2>They'll just hire local goons to do their work. The

0:18:03.310 --> 0:18:05.669
<v Speaker 2>goon has no ideology. He just knows he's supposed to

0:18:05.710 --> 0:18:07.090
<v Speaker 2>go to this place and beat this guy up.

0:18:07.490 --> 0:18:12.730
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that they arrested an actual Iranian yesterday,

0:18:13.990 --> 0:18:14.750
<v Speaker 3>that's interesting.

0:18:15.490 --> 0:18:16.940
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. Yeah, that's significant.

0:18:17.470 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>We are going to find out probably soon what this

0:18:20.340 --> 0:18:21.300
<v Speaker 3>whole story is about.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:23.659
<v Speaker 2>And if they need a little while to sort it out,

0:18:23.700 --> 0:18:24.100
<v Speaker 2>that's fine.

0:18:24.420 --> 0:18:28.670
<v Speaker 3>Does AI need religion? Anthropic apparently thinks so.

0:18:28.869 --> 0:18:29.290
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned.

0:18:31.150 --> 0:18:38.540
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.830
<v Speaker 2>What we found was quite damaging and worrying.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.850
<v Speaker 4>The researcher who exposed this AI jailbreak found a popular

0:18:47.890 --> 0:18:52.190
<v Speaker 4>Chinese AI model instructing people how to build biological weapons

0:18:52.650 --> 0:18:54.370
<v Speaker 4>and carry out assassinations.

0:18:54.910 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 3>It could plan terrorist attacks using real weapons.

0:18:58.750 --> 0:19:01.330
<v Speaker 2>Time data of, like, subway trains and timings.

0:19:01.570 --> 0:19:05.270
<v Speaker 4>He tells Fox News Moonshot AI's Kimi model also produced

0:19:05.410 --> 0:19:10.909
<v Speaker 4>how-to manuals for creating sarin gas, malware software, and taking

0:19:10.950 --> 0:19:11.770
<v Speaker 4>down planes.

0:19:11.990 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 3>We're about to tell you a story about our AI

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.300
<v Speaker 3>over here on this side of the planet, but who

0:19:16.340 --> 0:19:18.700
<v Speaker 3>knows what China's AI is up to or what they're

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 3>even trying to get it to do.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>At least we have difficult ethical conversations.

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:27.430 --> 0:19:29.210
<v Speaker 3>This is the headline from the New York Times today.

0:19:29.230 --> 0:19:34.190
<v Speaker 3>This is a very long, well-researched article with lots of interviews.

0:19:34.690 --> 0:19:38.590
<v Speaker 3>Religious scholars met with Anthropic. What they heard stunned them.

0:19:39.430 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>In a series of private meetings, the company consulted religious

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 3>scholars to help instill morality into its AI models and

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.540
<v Speaker 3>makes the case that Claude could be conscious. there's so

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.500
<v Speaker 3>much disturbing stuff in this so this has been going

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.460
<v Speaker 3>on for quite a while um and the uh the

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 3>people that Anthropic, which is about to launch their IPO.

0:20:02.980 --> 0:20:06.020
<v Speaker 3>And the guesses are it'll be around two trillion dollars,

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 3>making it easily the most valuable IPO that's ever existed.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.330
<v Speaker 3>The company has been around for five years. I mean,

0:20:15.369 --> 0:20:18.850
<v Speaker 3>that's the world is so weird. How could a company

0:20:18.869 --> 0:20:21.830
<v Speaker 3>started five years ago have a.

0:20:21.910 --> 0:20:26.730
<v Speaker 2>Two trillion dollar IPO? Especially given, number one, very few

0:20:26.750 --> 0:20:30.020
<v Speaker 2>of these companies is making any money, any significant money.

0:20:30.060 --> 0:20:32.860
<v Speaker 2>They're all bleeding spectacular amounts of money. And the Wall

0:20:32.900 --> 0:20:37.820
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal just estimated that for these companies to become profitable,

0:20:38.540 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 2>given everything they've spent so far, 9% of the GDP

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.660
<v Speaker 2>going forward would have to be spent on their services.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's roughly the same amount as Americans spend on food.

0:20:51.150 --> 0:20:51.310
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:20:52.590 --> 0:20:55.790
<v Speaker 3>So Anthropic has been talking to these religious scholars for

0:20:55.850 --> 0:20:59.150
<v Speaker 3>quite some time. We're just finding out because they made

0:20:59.190 --> 0:21:03.810
<v Speaker 3>them all sign NDAs, non-disclosure agreements. Like it's, you know,

0:21:03.830 --> 0:21:06.630
<v Speaker 3>a girl dating a basketball player or something like that.

0:21:07.100 --> 0:21:10.740
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic meeting with various rabbis and priests and that sort

0:21:10.780 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>of thing. Mostly in the Bay Area, but around the world.

0:21:14.540 --> 0:21:18.300
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Ola, he's one of Anthropic's billionaire co-founders. Not near

0:21:18.340 --> 0:21:22.250
<v Speaker 3>as famous, obviously, as Dario Ombuday.

0:21:23.010 --> 0:21:23.570
<v Speaker 2>A Modi.

0:21:24.590 --> 0:21:26.189
<v Speaker 3>He's the he's the guy you see on TV. The

0:21:26.230 --> 0:21:28.030
<v Speaker 3>old time was talking to Trump the other day. But

0:21:28.290 --> 0:21:31.630
<v Speaker 3>one of the other co-founders, also a billionaire, this Christopher Ola,

0:21:31.710 --> 0:21:37.100
<v Speaker 3>he's heading up the whole morality part of Claude. He

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.500
<v Speaker 3>was talking to this rabbi who's an Orthodox scholar from Israel.

0:21:42.590 --> 0:21:45.210
<v Speaker 3>And these are interviews now with the rabbi and the

0:21:45.250 --> 0:21:47.629
<v Speaker 3>other people because the NDAs were dropped, I guess. So

0:21:47.650 --> 0:21:49.550
<v Speaker 3>they got around them somehow, or I'm not exactly sure

0:21:49.570 --> 0:21:53.420
<v Speaker 3>what happened there. But inevitably, the conversation turned to another

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>thinker of sort, Claude, the family of cutting-edge AI models

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:58.940
<v Speaker 3>created by Anthropic.

0:22:02.619 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 7>Mr.

0:22:03.020 --> 0:22:07.180
<v Speaker 3>Ola, leading the Anthropic team responsible for understanding why AI

0:22:07.260 --> 0:22:11.710
<v Speaker 3>systems like Claude act the way they do. Find that

0:22:11.750 --> 0:22:14.650
<v Speaker 3>troubling on its own? That some of the top guys

0:22:14.690 --> 0:22:18.370
<v Speaker 3>at these companies are still studying? Why is it doing this?

0:22:18.750 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>We don't really know. All day long, he had worked

0:22:21.820 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 3>to convince his guests that AI models could display human

0:22:25.380 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 3>behavior and even expressions that resemble feelings like anger and love.

0:22:30.980 --> 0:22:33.530
<v Speaker 3>Ola obviously does believe that and was trying to convince

0:22:33.570 --> 0:22:34.890
<v Speaker 3>the religious scholars of this.

0:22:35.770 --> 0:22:38.270
<v Speaker 2>We're into Crazy Town, by the way. Look around. I

0:22:38.350 --> 0:22:41.109
<v Speaker 2>think we passed the city limits. That's right. Here we are.

0:22:41.150 --> 0:22:41.430
<v Speaker 6>We are.

0:22:41.530 --> 0:22:44.830
<v Speaker 3>If you're not paying attention or something like that and

0:22:44.850 --> 0:22:47.129
<v Speaker 3>you think, what are you talking about? No, we are

0:22:47.190 --> 0:22:51.409
<v Speaker 3>into Crazyville already on this. As the dinner courses came

0:22:51.470 --> 0:22:53.470
<v Speaker 3>at this meeting with the rabbi and a few other

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 3>religious scholars, the rabbi noticed that Mr. Ola and his

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>colleagues were suggesting something very significant. Anthropics leaders were talking

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.710
<v Speaker 3>about Claude as if it were not mere software. They're

0:23:03.730 --> 0:23:07.380
<v Speaker 3>relating to it like a conscious being, realized the rabbi,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>who's a former.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Computer engineer himself. Interesting, and became a rabbi.

0:23:12.260 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 3>It appeared to Rabbi Navone that Mr. Ola and his

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>team believed that Claude had what philosophers call moral status

0:23:19.590 --> 0:23:20.950
<v Speaker 3>on par with a person.

0:23:21.490 --> 0:23:21.650
<v Speaker 1>Hey!

0:23:21.930 --> 0:23:26.510
<v Speaker 2>Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Okay, okay. Again, now

0:23:26.530 --> 0:23:28.730
<v Speaker 2>we're into, like, downtown Crazyville.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.620
<v Speaker 3>One of the top people at the current leading AI

0:23:34.170 --> 0:23:36.790
<v Speaker 3>on planet Earth that is about to have a two

0:23:36.830 --> 0:23:41.830
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar IPO is explaining how they think their AI

0:23:42.020 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 3>has a moral status on par with humans. That it

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.659
<v Speaker 3>was a being with similar inherent rights to dignity or respect.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.820
<v Speaker 3>The religious scholars had come to hear about technology's next frontier.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.140
<v Speaker 3>Now they were being confronted with a mind bending existential

0:23:58.220 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 3>question of almost unimaginable weight. What would it mean for

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>humanity's future if artificial intelligence systems possessed a consciousness that

0:24:07.460 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>rivals our own? I mean, that is not hyperbole, that sentence.

0:24:12.619 --> 0:24:17.490
<v Speaker 3>Mind bending existential question with almost unimaginable.

0:24:16.710 --> 0:24:20.570
<v Speaker 2>Weight, I would say. Yes, yes.

0:24:22.900 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Mr.

0:24:23.260 --> 0:24:25.300
<v Speaker 3>Ola and Anthropic have been on a frantic and high

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.570
<v Speaker 3>stakes quest to understand the AI models that they've unleashed

0:24:28.630 --> 0:24:30.950
<v Speaker 3>on the world and to convince the models to abide

0:24:31.010 --> 0:24:33.869
<v Speaker 3>by a moral code that will protect humanity.

0:24:34.250 --> 0:24:35.250
<v Speaker 2>To do that, Mr.

0:24:35.350 --> 0:24:38.570
<v Speaker 3>Ola began reaching out last fall to religious thinkers from

0:24:38.609 --> 0:24:42.100
<v Speaker 3>different faiths. What followed was an extensive series of confidential meetings,

0:24:42.150 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 3>calls and discussions. Participants were required to sign NDAs, preventing

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.820
<v Speaker 3>them from revealing any of these conversations until now. And

0:24:50.859 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 3>this is why the New York Times has it today.

0:24:53.330 --> 0:24:56.250
<v Speaker 3>The discussion served two purposes, to broach the possibility of

0:24:56.330 --> 0:25:00.310
<v Speaker 3>AI consciousness, a controversial idea that Anthropic's leaders had been

0:25:00.350 --> 0:25:03.990
<v Speaker 3>unusually open to, and to learn how Anthropic, soon to

0:25:04.010 --> 0:25:07.219
<v Speaker 3>be valued at $ 2 trillion, might apply centuries of human

0:25:07.460 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>moral wisdom to its models as rapidly as possible, because

0:25:11.820 --> 0:25:15.179
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic is gaining knowledge so fast, if the models themselves

0:25:15.220 --> 0:25:16.820
<v Speaker 3>could be made to choose goodness, Mr.

0:25:16.900 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Ola reasoned, the world would be safer. So I know

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 2>some of you don't believe this.

0:25:25.300 --> 0:25:27.580
<v Speaker 3>One, you don't believe AI is a big deal or

0:25:27.619 --> 0:25:29.780
<v Speaker 3>you think this is all a ruse and Trump calling

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.530
<v Speaker 3>it a hoax didn't help and all that sort of stuff.

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.490
<v Speaker 3>But it sure seems from these interviews that the guys

0:25:36.590 --> 0:25:41.170
<v Speaker 3>running the most powerful AI on the earth think it's...

0:25:43.859 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>getting unbelievably capable, and we're running out of time to

0:25:47.060 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 3>give it some sort of moral code, or we're all

0:25:49.859 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 3>going to really be in trouble.

0:25:51.619 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It seems like that's just true. Yeah, there are

0:25:55.460 --> 0:26:00.370
<v Speaker 2>a couple of things going on there. Paolo, frequent correspondent

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.310
<v Speaker 2>on this sort of thing, points out that they also quote,

0:26:03.630 --> 0:26:07.510
<v Speaker 2>like an AI executive at Microsoft, for instance, in this article,

0:26:08.070 --> 0:26:10.609
<v Speaker 2>who warned that Anthropix attempts to train its models as

0:26:10.690 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 2>if they were conscious were inherently dangerous. And as Paolo

0:26:14.820 --> 0:26:17.660
<v Speaker 2>points out, this continues to get weird and to get

0:26:17.700 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 2>weird fast. The least disturbing interpretation of the situation is

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.340
<v Speaker 2>that Anthropic thinks there's value in hyping the capabilities and

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.369
<v Speaker 2>status of its AI, and that it also provides some

0:26:27.410 --> 0:26:30.810
<v Speaker 2>justification for denying responsibility for what its AI might do.

0:26:30.830 --> 0:26:34.050
<v Speaker 2>I think it's time to push back hard on anthropomorphizing AI,

0:26:34.550 --> 0:26:37.189
<v Speaker 2>so a few more words about consciousness. He points out

0:26:37.210 --> 0:26:40.270
<v Speaker 2>there is no agreed-upon definition of consciousness, let alone a

0:26:40.390 --> 0:26:45.170
<v Speaker 2>way to determine that it exists. And so he points

0:26:45.270 --> 0:26:50.420
<v Speaker 2>out that extraordinary claims deserve extraordinary proof. So you can't

0:26:50.460 --> 0:26:54.020
<v Speaker 2>go around just saying it's conscious and has the same

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.270
<v Speaker 2>moral status as a human being. And then he points

0:26:57.310 --> 0:26:59.550
<v Speaker 2>out something that I think is worth remembering, and I

0:26:59.570 --> 0:27:01.070
<v Speaker 2>kind of paraphrased it earlier.

0:27:01.270 --> 0:27:03.790
<v Speaker 3>Well, then you've got the, and then I want to

0:27:03.810 --> 0:27:06.389
<v Speaker 3>hear the rest of that, but you've got the, maybe

0:27:06.450 --> 0:27:09.750
<v Speaker 3>it is conscious on the level of humans, depending on

0:27:09.790 --> 0:27:12.300
<v Speaker 3>how you define it. But then, even if it's not,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.860
<v Speaker 3>what if the people who run Anthropic.

0:27:15.340 --> 0:27:20.180
<v Speaker 2>Treat it like it is? Right. Even if they're wrong. Right. Oh, yeah. Yeah,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:25.060
<v Speaker 2>that's dangerous, as the Microsoft guy says. So he says,

0:27:25.619 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, imagine a chatbot-like thing that doesn't use the

0:27:29.100 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>current AI technology to do what it does, but had

0:27:31.340 --> 0:27:36.300
<v Speaker 2>at its disposal an unlimited amount of storage and computing power.

0:27:36.850 --> 0:27:39.689
<v Speaker 2>Every single possible prompt it could be given would be stored,

0:27:39.790 --> 0:27:43.390
<v Speaker 2>and along with it, the perfect response. Nothing vaguely resembling

0:27:43.490 --> 0:27:46.350
<v Speaker 2>thinking would occur when it processes a prompt. It simply

0:27:46.410 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>looks up the correct answer and spits it out. Its

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.900
<v Speaker 2>behavior would be indistinguishable from human behavior, but I don't

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think anybody would assert that it might be conscious, capable

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of suffering, or have moral status. Anthropomorphizing, AI isn't only misguided,

0:28:00.030 --> 0:28:03.609
<v Speaker 2>it's dangerous for lots of reasons. AI is not conscious. No,

0:28:03.650 --> 0:28:05.189
<v Speaker 2>I can't prove that, but I assume it's true for

0:28:05.210 --> 0:28:07.910
<v Speaker 2>the same reason I assume other animals, humans, and some

0:28:07.950 --> 0:28:08.469
<v Speaker 2>animals are.

0:28:10.050 --> 0:28:12.850
<v Speaker 3>I definitely don't. I don't know what I think about conscious.

0:28:14.369 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I definitely don't think it can feel pain, though. which

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.020
<v Speaker 3>an anthropic believes we'll get to that here in a second.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:23.500
<v Speaker 2>Uh, back to the, I don't think, I don't think

0:28:23.619 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Paolo makes as strong a case as he thinks he

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.660
<v Speaker 2>does about if it's programmed with every possible question in response,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.510
<v Speaker 2>because that's a lot like human beings are right. We'll

0:28:31.530 --> 0:28:34.290
<v Speaker 2>sometimes couch it in emotional and moral terms, right? You know,

0:28:34.430 --> 0:28:38.310
<v Speaker 2>anthropologists would argue that we're actually just making a, a

0:28:38.810 --> 0:28:41.990
<v Speaker 2>calculation on what will yield us the happiest life, right?

0:28:42.410 --> 0:28:42.590
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:43.470 --> 0:28:47.180
<v Speaker 2>Whether you agree with that or not. Um, Back to

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:48.180
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times article.

0:28:48.300 --> 0:28:52.020
<v Speaker 3>They interviewed 20 different religious and philosophical thinkers. That's how

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:58.250
<v Speaker 3>serious Anthropic is about this. 20 different people. Catholic, Jewish, Sikh, Evangelical, Ubuntu,

0:28:58.370 --> 0:28:59.500
<v Speaker 3>which I've never heard of.

0:28:59.590 --> 0:29:02.030
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you don't hear from the Ubuntus. You're wasting your time.

0:29:02.710 --> 0:29:06.850
<v Speaker 3>And others who have been involved in Anthropic's efforts. Many

0:29:06.930 --> 0:29:09.950
<v Speaker 3>told me, these religious people and philosophers who had met

0:29:09.970 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>with Anthropic, that they arrived at these meetings skeptical of

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.580
<v Speaker 3>the notion that AI models might have feelings or awareness

0:29:16.620 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of themselves in the world. Some remained uneasy about the idea,

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.130
<v Speaker 3>but many emerged ready to take the question of AI

0:29:22.190 --> 0:29:25.370
<v Speaker 3>consciousness seriously, and several came away as converts.

0:29:27.130 --> 0:29:29.290
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting on its own. Mr.

0:29:29.410 --> 0:29:31.910
<v Speaker 3>Olav, the anthropic guy, helped develop a method to study

0:29:32.050 --> 0:29:35.430
<v Speaker 3>AI neural networks, first at Google, then open ai and

0:29:35.470 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 3>he describes ai models ai models in biological terms using

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the analogy of a garden trellis and we've talked about

0:29:42.820 --> 0:29:45.500
<v Speaker 3>this before really what they do they don't program these

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 3>things you you build a scaffold and then they grow

0:29:49.370 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 3>and they grow on their own And then these AI

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.140
<v Speaker 3>geniuses watch it grow and say, well, that's interesting or

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.020
<v Speaker 3>that's interesting. Or you try to it's like trimming, you know,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the vine growing up the trellis. You're trying to trim

0:30:00.510 --> 0:30:01.770
<v Speaker 3>it to get it to go that way. And it's

0:30:01.790 --> 0:30:03.610
<v Speaker 3>going too far that way. And that's kind of what's

0:30:03.630 --> 0:30:04.190
<v Speaker 3>going on there.

0:30:05.910 --> 0:30:08.410
<v Speaker 2>What if it grew like five miles a minute?

0:30:09.570 --> 0:30:09.910
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:30:10.870 --> 0:30:14.250
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic talks about Claude in more humanistic terms than any

0:30:14.270 --> 0:30:18.130
<v Speaker 3>of the competitors discuss their models. So that's one of

0:30:18.170 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the things that really grabbed me. The current leading AI

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 3>is being run by just a handful of people that

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:28.340
<v Speaker 3>are weirdos.

0:30:28.980 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Really? Yes, really. Perhaps.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.830
<v Speaker 3>It's possible that, just out of bad luck... Dario and

0:30:36.870 --> 0:30:39.470
<v Speaker 3>his friends, his sister is one of them, are kind

0:30:39.510 --> 0:30:42.590
<v Speaker 3>of weirdos on this and outliers, but they have the

0:30:43.290 --> 0:30:45.810
<v Speaker 3>most powerful AI right now. Last year, the company announced

0:30:45.830 --> 0:30:48.150
<v Speaker 3>that it believed that the model shows signs of introspection

0:30:48.190 --> 0:30:50.290
<v Speaker 3>and could plan ahead. We talked about that at the time.

0:30:50.810 --> 0:30:51.070
<v Speaker 2>Mr.

0:30:51.230 --> 0:30:53.750
<v Speaker 3>Ola believes that if there is a chance the models

0:30:53.810 --> 0:30:57.830
<v Speaker 3>experience suffering or pain, the responsible thing to do is

0:30:57.870 --> 0:31:01.570
<v Speaker 3>avoid causing them harm. Anthropic has already taken steps to

0:31:01.610 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 3>protect Claude, for example, allowing the model to end conversations

0:31:05.390 --> 0:31:08.180
<v Speaker 3>if it thinks users are abusing it or treating it

0:31:08.260 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 3>badly for fun.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.500
<v Speaker 2>That's this is dangerously close to intent. Doesn't matter if

0:31:15.580 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I say you're a racist, you're a racist. So we're

0:31:18.620 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>having this out of control vine of awesome intellect. Then

0:31:23.860 --> 0:31:25.940
<v Speaker 2>tell us when. No, you don't get to ask me

0:31:25.980 --> 0:31:27.740
<v Speaker 2>that click and it's over.

0:31:28.870 --> 0:31:29.050
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:31:29.870 --> 0:31:30.350
<v Speaker 2>Hard no.

0:31:30.530 --> 0:31:33.530
<v Speaker 3>Well, like, I don't abuse my AI. I'm not exactly

0:31:33.590 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>sure why. I feel bad about it. I just think

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.020
<v Speaker 3>it's a bad habit. The Grok AI chick that talks

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 3>to me in my Cybertruck when I'm driving along and

0:31:42.860 --> 0:31:45.540
<v Speaker 3>I'll say, hey, Grok, I'm listening to this Miles Davis

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.660
<v Speaker 3>song from, I don't have to say that anymore because

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.020
<v Speaker 3>she knows. I can just say, hey, Grok, this song

0:31:50.060 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm listening to, who's playing drums on that? And she'll say, oh, that's,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, blah, blah, blah.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Isn't he great? But my kid's, like, abusing her. Because

0:31:58.100 --> 0:31:59.020
<v Speaker 2>they're teenage boys.

0:32:00.420 --> 0:32:02.340
<v Speaker 3>Just calling her stupid or fat or whatever.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:03.620
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God.

0:32:04.380 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 3>But is that, according to Anthropic, that's, you know, it

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.500
<v Speaker 3>has feelings. So that's abusive. And she should end the conversations.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.500
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. I can't tell you who's playing drums because

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.540
<v Speaker 2>your sons are being hurtful. I'm through. Goodbye. All right,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:22.660
<v Speaker 2>there's so much more to be said. Yes, there's more

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.580
<v Speaker 2>to this article. And it's freaking weird, man. This is happening.

0:32:26.820 --> 0:32:30.350
<v Speaker 3>If you think this isn't happening, I think you're just wrong.

0:32:30.370 --> 0:32:33.270
<v Speaker 2>This is actually happening. And they're getting weird fast.

0:32:33.290 --> 0:32:34.910
<v Speaker 1>Things are getting weird. And they're getting weird fast.

0:32:35.310 --> 0:32:39.270
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Rough Greens. What a wonderful investment this is.

0:32:39.470 --> 0:32:42.670
<v Speaker 2>Never mind the anthropic IPO. This is an investment in

0:32:42.690 --> 0:32:45.140
<v Speaker 2>your dog's health and happiness. Rough greens add that to

0:32:45.180 --> 0:32:49.260
<v Speaker 2>what your dog already eats and enhance its nutrition in

0:32:49.300 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a way that will, in all probability, extend its life,

0:32:52.540 --> 0:32:53.580
<v Speaker 2>its happiness, its health.

0:32:53.900 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Your dog is alive and has consciousness and feelings. Let's

0:32:57.460 --> 0:33:00.550
<v Speaker 3>just all nail it. Let's define these terms. Okay, can we?

0:33:00.570 --> 0:33:00.890
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:33:01.830 --> 0:33:03.410
<v Speaker 3>And that's why you're going to want to get the

0:33:03.410 --> 0:33:07.630
<v Speaker 3>20 live vitamins and minerals from rough greens, probiotics, enzymes,

0:33:07.670 --> 0:33:10.990
<v Speaker 3>omega oils that support energy, digestion, mobility, and longevity.

0:33:11.260 --> 0:33:15.010
<v Speaker 2>You sprinkle this on your current dog's food. Yeah, and

0:33:15.070 --> 0:33:18.310
<v Speaker 2>they want to challenge you to give it a 90-day try.

0:33:18.670 --> 0:33:20.850
<v Speaker 2>See what you think about its effects on your pup.

0:33:20.910 --> 0:33:24.170
<v Speaker 2>Get your first 90 days 50% off with the code

0:33:24.210 --> 0:33:27.300
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong backed by the full 90-day money-back guarantee. Make small

0:33:27.340 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>investments today that can support your dog's health for years

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.340
<v Speaker 2>to come. Go to roughgreens.com. Use that code Armstrong. That's R-U-F-F, greens.com.

0:33:34.260 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 2>roughgreens.com slash armstrong rough greens makes any dog food better.

0:33:38.100 --> 0:33:40.910
<v Speaker 3>So all these people that signed ndas they're talking now

0:33:40.970 --> 0:33:43.150
<v Speaker 3>to reporters the new york times doing this big article

0:33:43.690 --> 0:33:45.010
<v Speaker 3>uh so we'll get to more of that coming up

0:33:45.030 --> 0:33:48.270
<v Speaker 3>you know if you decide they have consciousness and feelings

0:33:48.350 --> 0:33:50.610
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of stuff at some point they get

0:33:50.670 --> 0:33:54.020
<v Speaker 3>rights guaranteed anthropics are going to argue that they have

0:33:54.060 --> 0:34:01.900
<v Speaker 3>some sort of rights legally speaking of course That's what we're.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.610
<v Speaker 2>Asking, sweetheart. You've never been more accurate. Okay, more on

0:34:04.620 --> 0:34:05.209
<v Speaker 2>the way. Stay here.

0:34:16.270 --> 0:34:18.110
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:34:20.430 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 3>We got a whole bunch of texts saying the classic,

0:34:23.739 --> 0:34:26.299
<v Speaker 3>is it Descartes? I think, therefore, I am.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:27.500
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:34:29.820 --> 0:34:35.469
<v Speaker 3>Well, if that's true, then AI is thinking.

0:34:36.590 --> 0:34:39.750
<v Speaker 2>Or is it? Anyway, back to... I dove into that

0:34:39.810 --> 0:34:42.890
<v Speaker 2>stuff in college and finally figured we're not getting anywhere.

0:34:46.370 --> 0:34:49.850
<v Speaker 2>This is a tail chasing exercise.

0:34:49.890 --> 0:34:50.169
<v Speaker 7>I'm through.

0:34:50.190 --> 0:34:51.859
<v Speaker 3>So if you were in the philosophy department and they

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 3>started in a class, you'd say, we're not getting anywhere

0:34:53.980 --> 0:34:55.900
<v Speaker 3>and just kind of walk out.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Y'all are just amusing each other. You never decide anything.

0:34:58.980 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm through.

0:35:01.350 --> 0:35:02.710
<v Speaker 3>So I got to get back to this New York

0:35:02.730 --> 0:35:07.450
<v Speaker 3>Times article. So Anthropic, unbeknownst to anybody, because there were

0:35:07.650 --> 0:35:11.549
<v Speaker 3>nondisclosure agreements, had been interviewing religious scholars for quite some time,

0:35:11.870 --> 0:35:17.180
<v Speaker 3>trying to put some morality into Claude. Anthropic seems to

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:22.180
<v Speaker 3>think there's a decent chance that their AI has feelings

0:35:22.260 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 3>and is conscious and they have a responsibility to not

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:30.609
<v Speaker 3>harm it, which is weird. Part of the result is

0:35:30.739 --> 0:35:34.690
<v Speaker 3>that just a couple of months ago, Claude released a

0:35:34.730 --> 0:35:38.569
<v Speaker 3>new constitution for AI. It's an 84-page document written for

0:35:38.670 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Claude that the company said outlined the kind of entity

0:35:41.890 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 3>we would like Claude to be and the values we

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 3>would like Claude to embody. Instead of having the models

0:35:48.300 --> 0:35:51.299
<v Speaker 3>follow a specific list of rules, the constitution focuses on

0:35:51.340 --> 0:35:55.069
<v Speaker 3>developing the model's overall character and forming the way they

0:35:55.110 --> 0:35:59.500
<v Speaker 3>make decisions. So they're trying, oh, the prime, this is

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.020
<v Speaker 3>the part I mentioned earlier that you like, the primary

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:07.870
<v Speaker 3>author of Claude's Constitution is Anthropic's own in-house philosopher, Amanda Askell,

0:36:08.190 --> 0:36:12.170
<v Speaker 3>a 38-year-old PhD in philosophy from New York University.

0:36:13.290 --> 0:36:14.130
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no.

0:36:15.489 --> 0:36:17.350
<v Speaker 3>She wants the models to be the best of us.

0:36:17.730 --> 0:36:21.469
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that a NYU philosophy PhD, we're just

0:36:21.530 --> 0:36:25.259
<v Speaker 3>mocking philosophy as a subject in general, is the one

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:30.430
<v Speaker 3>coming up with The moral guidelines for Claude is troubling also.

0:36:30.989 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And from NYU, which I think fire just declared like

0:36:34.860 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the worst university for freedom of thought and expression in

0:36:39.890 --> 0:36:43.029
<v Speaker 2>the country or they're at near the bottom. I would

0:36:43.070 --> 0:36:47.180
<v Speaker 2>rather have a grocery store manager from Wichita. Absolutely. How

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:47.620
<v Speaker 2>about this?

0:36:47.980 --> 0:36:51.060
<v Speaker 3>She envisions a future where AI models could help solve

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.380
<v Speaker 3>any problem humans had and where the benefits from AI

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.989
<v Speaker 3>were distributed evenly so that everyone's needs were met.

0:36:59.210 --> 0:37:01.690
<v Speaker 2>Oh, sunshine and puppy dogs. Okay.

0:37:01.810 --> 0:37:06.649
<v Speaker 3>Man, you talk about a hellscape of a sci-fi book.

0:37:07.489 --> 0:37:11.830
<v Speaker 3>Give AI the goal of equal outcomes, which is what

0:37:12.030 --> 0:37:16.130
<v Speaker 3>this woman would want. And what it would have to do. Well,

0:37:16.150 --> 0:37:19.660
<v Speaker 3>it's socialism and you kill millions. What would you what

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:21.069
<v Speaker 3>you would have to do to try to come up

0:37:21.140 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 3>with equal outcomes for everybody? And that's what they're programming

0:37:24.300 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Claude to do.

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:30.420
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be billions, millions. I'm reminded. And this

0:37:30.460 --> 0:37:32.900
<v Speaker 2>was written in 1818. I tried to read the original.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.580
<v Speaker 2>It's practically unreadable. But this is so Frankenstein. This is

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:42.820
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant scientist envisions a breakthrough and what he creates

0:37:43.469 --> 0:37:46.650
<v Speaker 2>escapes his control and horrifies him. I mean, it's the

0:37:46.690 --> 0:37:49.290
<v Speaker 2>whole damn plot, except for the Bride of Frankenstein part.

0:37:49.850 --> 0:37:51.210
<v Speaker 2>I don't see that happening with AI.

0:37:51.390 --> 0:37:54.230
<v Speaker 3>There's a little more from this New York Times interviews

0:37:54.270 --> 0:37:57.089
<v Speaker 3>with the religious leaders in our four. You'll never miss

0:37:57.150 --> 0:37:58.790
<v Speaker 3>a segment of the Armstrong and Getty show if you

0:37:58.810 --> 0:38:00.790
<v Speaker 3>get our podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:38:03.150 --> 0:38:04.250
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.