WEBVTT - Previewing Election Night with John Thomas and Steve Hilton

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And we continue at one five in the afternoon on

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the John Phillips Show, Mister Randy Weggs across the Glass, John.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It is election day. People have until eight o'clock to

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>turn their ballots in, and as of about fifteen minutes ago,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the latest update to the ballot Tracker, nineteen percent of

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Californians have cast their ballot. Early eighty percent of Californians

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>either are going to vote today or most likely not going.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>To do it.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>And we have some breaking news regarding Los Angeles Congressman

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Gomez. The House Ethics Committee is investigating Congressman Jimmy

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Gomez over sexual misconduct allegations. What's notable here is Jimmy

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Gomez was one of the campaign chairs of the former

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>front runner in this governor's race, Eric Swallwell, it's not California,

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>but this is a story that went all over the

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>place this weekend. Morris Katz, a top advisor to embattled

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Maine Senate candidate Graham Plattner, admitted in a blog post

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that he also sent explicit material to people in the past.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Quote I've sent nudes and I've received nudes end quote.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is the person that said that Platner was

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sending nudes, or at least sending explicit text, saying I

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>also have done some nudes.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they're all doing it. What's Tom Steyer up to?

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I sure hope he doesn't make the top two, because

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get in trouble if we play this drop

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>this much.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Steyer. I'm about to write the.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Team eight hundred two two two five two two two

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>East jelphone number one eight hundred two two two five

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to two two two. Can you guess what I'm naming

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the twelve o'clock hour podcast.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I have an idea.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It is our pleasure to welcome our next guest to

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the program. He is a Republican political strategist too. You

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>can follow on exit the Thomas Guide, John Thomas.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome, Hey John, good to be with you.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So on election day here, as people are still standing

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in line, voting at voting centers up and down the state,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>filling out their ballots, taking it to the post office,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>getting it postmarked today, what is your read on the

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>gubernatorial election?

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Gosh, well, first of all, what a wild ride it

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>has been, and pretty pathetic, honestly that this is the

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>best cast of Democratic characters that the Democratic Party in

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the state is blue as California could put up. But

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>what I'm watching is, look, it appears to be Howvierbasara

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 4>will take the top slot. That seems to be pretty

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 4>safe at this point. He's kind of taken over for swallwell,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>and it appears as Steve Hilton will get into a

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 4>second place. But you know, depending upon the polling, depending

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 4>on the turnout model you see, Tom Steier could be

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>interchangeable for either of those two. So those are the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 4>things you know, I'm watching. And the other thing that's

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 4>fascinating here, John, is that that moderate Democrats have no

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 4>appeal in a state like California. Matt Mahan came out

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 4>with all this fanfare from the tech pros and those

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 4>in northern California, and he's sitting at what three four

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 4>percent in polling, even though he spent tens of millions

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 4>of dollars.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems as if the Las Vegas odds makers have

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it at Besera over ninety percent, they have Hilton at

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent, and they have Styre at what was

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at Randy twenty percent according to Calshi. Right now, Tom

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Steyer has a thirty four percent chance of it just

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>went up to thirty five percent chance of advancing. What

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that? Why do you think Las

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Vegas and the people who are placing the bets have

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hilton so far above Tom Steyer in terms of

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the odds.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's a pretty safe bet actually, because

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 4>typically in these kinds of contests you generally see coalescing

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 4>where particular party kind of coalesces around one top candidate.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>And although Chad Bianco I like him, he's a good candidate,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Steve Hilton really has become kind of the definitive Trump

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 4>endorsed Republican in the state, and I think, look, he

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of checks all the boxes that the base would

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 4>need to kind of get the joke here. Donald Trump

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 4>has repeatedly pronounced his endorsement. The Democrats have sent out

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 4>mailers attacking Steve Hilton, but basically trying to attacking him

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 4>to Republicans and coalesces his vote. And then, of course,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean I can't I don't think I've gone a

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>day or more that Steve Hilton hasn't been on a

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Fox News hit where you really can't say the.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Same for Chad Bianco.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 4>So I think the bet on Hilton is that the

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Republicans kind of come home, they coalesce, which I think

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>is safe. And you know, Sires again a little bit

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>of a wildcard there, but I think.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 3>It is pretty safe bet on Hilton at this point.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say that it is Besarah versus Hilton, that

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that is what the November ballot looks like. What do

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you think Hilton's chances are at winning that election?

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, I struggle to see a pathway simply because

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>stays like California are so hyper partisan and the numbers,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, aren't really there for Republican However, there are

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 4>a few kind of black Swan glimmers of hope here.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 4>One would be if you look at in terms of

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>independent voters or no party preference. Actually, Steve Hilton is

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 4>leading the field above the Sarah with independence, So people

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of who don't like the status quo, they're looking

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 4>for something else. Uh, So maybe there's an in there.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 4>And then I think the other wildcard is that Besarah

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 4>gets caught up in some kind of Department of Justice handle.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Uh and if that happens, all nets are off.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Who would be your first call to if you were

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hilton and you made it to the November ballot,

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>would beat to Matt Mayhan asking for his endorsement.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Probably, yeah, Mayhan should. I mean, if he's intellectually honest,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>he he should get there.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 3>You try to do that.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>I think I would also go back to I'd go

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 4>to places like you know, Jerry Brown, I'd go to

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Governor Schwarzenegger. You know, I try to coalesce statewide figures

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>that were thought to be a little bit more moderate

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 4>and try to get mods on your side.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Try to try to do that.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 4>It's it's going to be tough because what you're going

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 4>to see, John, because Sarah is thought to be the

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>obvious winner. You're going to see a very quick coalescing

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 4>of every local, state, and national Democratic figure that you

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>can think off top of your head. They're all going

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 4>to rally from Obama, Biden, Clinton, you know, just just

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>the who's who's going to quickly coalesce around Bisera. So

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 4>time is is short if you're Hilton. The other is

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 4>you got to put together a war chest.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>John.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 4>If Hilton has a shot, I mean he's going to

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 4>have to spend over one hundred million dollars and he

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>could potentially do that if he catches fire and small

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 4>donors across the country smell victory, it could be done.

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's still very tough in to say, like.

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>California, newspapers across the nation are going to write the

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>political obituary of Matt Mahon on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, some

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>point in the future. What do you think those obits

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to say, why didn't it work?

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I think I think they're going to say, probably got

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 4>into late, couldn't excite enthusiasm, I didn't have.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 3>You going to say he didn't have enough money.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, Porter's obviously already blaming stire for leaking videos

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>out of I think Porter is going to, you know,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 4>blame misogyny, that it's just, you know, women can't get

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 4>ahead in that state, which is ironic because wasn't a

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Kamala Harris who was a statewide elected official. And there's

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 4>so many others. But I'm not sure that argument that

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 4>blame game really hass the sniff test. But I think

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 4>what you're not going to see, John, I think the

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>most telling you're not going to see the La Times

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and the Sacramento Bee in the New York Times talk

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 4>about the truth, which is that the Democratic Party has

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>shifted so extreme and so far left that they're really

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 4>only interested in socialism and Trump arrangement, and those are

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 4>really the two animating factors of the modern Democratic Party.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think today is the last time we'll ever

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>see Antonio Via goes his name on a ballot?

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But that's a good question.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Statewide, yes, I don't think he can go statewide, But

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, lookal office. If he just had a thirst

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 4>for serving on the Board of Supervisors, La City Council,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 4>I would be terribly shocked to see him run for

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 4>those things. Now, maybe you could argue that's below his

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 4>pay grade, but I get the sense that the man

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 4>just wants to be relevant and he wants to serve.

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 4>So done for statewide, done for probably national office, but

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 4>but local.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't count him out at this point.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Katie Porter has run for statewide office two times, two

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>cycles in a row, and assuming the polls are correct,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>she will lose in the election today. Do you think

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>she's done or do you think she finds another office.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>To run for.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Boy, that's another good one. Well, I wish she were

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 4>done for the sake of the country in Californians. I

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 4>don't actually think she's done. I think this is her

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 4>life's purpose. I think her ego is so large that

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 4>really she will blame misogyny. It's anything but her fault.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think you you're going to see her run

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>again for some kind of state office down ticket, probably

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 4>attorney general I think is the most obvious fit. I mean,

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>look John and these down ticket races particularly well particular statewide,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 4>but down the state wide ticket. The biggest hurdle for

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 4>most of these races Secretary of state, attorney general, treasurer

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 4>is simply name mighty creation. She has name I D

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 4>So I think if she runs for a lesser office,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 4>she can be the only candidate with the most name

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 4>might and kind of slide in. Yet the other thing

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 4>she could do is pivot to run for a local

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 4>prosecutorial agency or board of supervisors in Orange County.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I have a.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Feeling she feels that's below her ego level. So I

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 4>would bet, if you had a gun in my head,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>that she's going to run for attorney general and that

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 4>social land.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>She seems to really hate Tom Steyer, who she blames

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for producing that video that caused her campaign aim to implode.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get the impression that that's just something

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in her life she's never going.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>To get over.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 4>I think Katie's known to hold grudges, particularly against men,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the sense I've got there. But look, whether or not

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 4>it was Styre who leaked it, that's that's the nature

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 4>of these high profile races, is that if it's not

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be Stire, it's going to be one of

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 4>your other opponents. So I think she needs get over it.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 4>If I were bounceling her, John, I'd say, look, this

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 4>is a this is a sport. You entered the arena,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 4>you're going to get smacked. Stop blaming If it wasn't Tire,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 4>be somebody else who leaked it, stop blaming others, and

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 4>how about not screaming at your staff and try being

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 4>a nice person.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>That's the place to start.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the possibilities is that we could end up

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Steyer versus Javier or Bessira, an all Democratic

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>top of the ticket Republican lockout. Does the Democratic Party

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>want that or do they want one Democrat and one

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Republican so they can check the box and move on.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it'd be a nightmare. For the Democrats have two

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Dems at the top of the decade, because if you

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 4>have a Democrat like the Sarah and then you have Hill,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 4>it kind of got just got to go through the motions.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Bessara is what is considered by the

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 4>establishment kind of a safe choice. And by the way,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 4>I think he's safe because it's not because he's competent.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a total idiot and useless. It's because

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>he's manipulable, like special interests and unions in particular, the

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 4>state can own him and tell him what they want

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 4>to do, and that'll be doun. They won't be well run,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>but the money.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Will flow where it needs to flow for the interests.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 4>The problem with the Stire Besarah matchup is the establishment

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Democrats do not want Tom Steyer to be to be

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the governor. And if Stire's in this race, I could

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>see a scenario where Stire is the next governor. So

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 4>no Democrats want this to be an R and a

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 4>D for sure.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the LA mayor's race. Who do

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you think is going to get a ticket to move

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on in November?

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, it appears to be obviously Karen Bath although amazingly.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, she is so badly damaged and weakened for

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 4>an incumbent, it's really too bad. I think we haven't

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>seen a stronger candidate kind of step up because I

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 4>think that's been one of those cycles. She could have

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 4>been defeated and then it appears to be Pratt. At

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 4>this point, you know, we'll go to a runoff between

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 4>the two of them, and then I think it again

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 4>becomes more of a partisan game. At that point, again,

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 4>I struggle to see a path for Pratt. I give

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 4>him kudos for throwing his hat in the ring. I

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 4>think he's run a good race, but you know, I

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 4>just see how you escape the mechanics that is La

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 4>City in an R and D contest.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of him as a candidate, because

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I've had him on the show twice and I have

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>been thoroughly impressed each time he's appeared on the program.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Based on the email and the calls that we get,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the audience seems to agree. He seems to have found

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>lightning in a bottle in this race. I just don't know,

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>given the politics of Los Angeles, if it'll be enough

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to win the seat, but he certainly has performed well

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to my eye, Well.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 4>He's certainly outperformed where I thought he'd be when you

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 4>first saw him get in, and he's really captured what

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I would say John is the most valuable thing in politics,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 4>which is he's authentic and he's credible when he delivers

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 4>his message about erring to change LA, that LA's hit

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 4>rock bottom, that it's incompetent. I believe that he believes

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 4>them because he suffered the consequences he and his family

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 4>did by having his home burned down, et cetera. So

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 4>that level of raw authenticity is so rare. Donald Trump

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 4>had it, but you don't see it lot. And so

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 4>he's captured that, and then he's poured terrooscene all over

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 4>it to get more attention, and so far it's worked,

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 4>and now he's early on. He kind of coalesced kind

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 4>of the maggot influencers. He's a fixture on right wing

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 4>media outlets. So I think the Republicans are kind of

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 4>understanding that, and Pratt is trying to reach out beyond

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 4>the base. I think it's just it's going to be

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 4>difficult for him. I think to beat to Bath simply,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 4>I said, because of the partisan dynamics. I think the

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 4>real long term coat tails of Pratt here is that

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 4>if you're a reality celebrity or a celebrity and you're

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 4>in a different state and you're watching this John as

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 4>we go into the next presidential cycle, you may think, hey,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>you know what, I'm going to throw my hat in

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the ring and run because now Pratt has trailblazed the

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 4>blueprint for people who are celebrities to get up enthusiasm

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 4>and become viable political candidates.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Usually, when an incumbent is running for reelection, the focus

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of the news media is on the performance of the

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>incumbent and not the challenger. This time around, in this race,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the focus has been on Spencer. Pratt has

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>been on things that he has done or said at

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>some point in the past, on the character that he

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>played on the television show whatever. The focus is on

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>him and not on Bess. Do you think that's because

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of media bias or do you think they're doing it

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's a more interesting person than her.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's both, you know, Pratt, I mean, Karen

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 4>is the most boring candidate you know. You can remember

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 4>she really is a placeholder candidate. I mean she kind

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 4>of checks the identity box that the Democratic candidate should.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 4>She had a when she was a member of Congress,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 4>I think she was one of the least remarkable members there.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 4>And as mayor, I mean, I really can't think of

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 4>anything she's done. The only thing she's I can think

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 4>of things she's messed up or not done. But Pratt

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 4>has kind of sucked all the oxygen out of the

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 4>room because he's interesting. It is an interesting story that

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 4>a reality show celebrity could potentially be the next mayor.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 4>And then, of course, remember the local media doesn't want

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 4>to fixate on how bad their favorite Democratic choice was

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 4>because remember they also backed her over Rick Caruso last

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 4>go around, and so of course they don't want to

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 4>look like they were wrong in recommending people to vote

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 4>for Bass over Crusoe.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Last question before you go.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, the former Speaker of the House, announced that

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>she is not running for reelection. She's retiring from public office.

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Wiener, the state senator from San Francisco who generates

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention, much of it negative, He announced

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to run for Congress before she

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>said she was going to retire. She didn't like that clearly.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Now she's endorsed Connie chan who is a liberal member

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors who's running against

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Scott Wiener. Why do you think Pelosi did that? Do

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you think it's still sour grapes from him announcing his

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>candidacy before she retired. Do you think that she thinks

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's too far to the left. What do you think

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is going on there?

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't think it's that she thinks he's too

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 4>far to the left. I've dealt with this dynamic many

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 4>times in my career, John, where a long time incumbent

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 4>wants to feel that they're in control.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>Of their successor.

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>So I really think that at the core of it

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 4>is that she's upset that he pulled the trigger and

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 4>ran for her seat without her blessing and her go ahead,

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 4>and she's just kind of never, you know, never looked back.

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And look.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is Weiener probably figured through the whether

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 4>he can talk to her explicitly or her people, that

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't going to get her support. Otherwise he would

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 4>have waited and probably you know, jen reflective kissed the

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 4>ring in due time. But he decided to get out there,

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, fourhand to try to become a viable, viable contender.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>But uh yeah, I think really, at the core of it,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a petty thing that Pelosi doesn't give a rip

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 4>about viability. She's just upset that she wasn't in charge

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 4>of controlling who's going to take over her seat.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>John Thomas, Republican political strategist. You can follow him on

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>x at The Thomas Guide. And John, you're going to

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>come back and join us later on in the week

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and go over all the results with us.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can't wait. And thanks for all your election coverage. Sean.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, John Thomas, everyone, thanks so much for stopping by.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Eight hundred two two two five two two two is

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>telephone number one eight hundred two two two five two

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>two two. If you'd like to email the show, you

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>can do so at Johnny don't Like show at gmail

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's Johnny Don't Like Show at gmail dot com.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And Randy, if you missed yesterday's interview with Spencer Pratt

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and you want to send it to people who are

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>voting in Los Angeles, that's easy to do. All you

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>got to do is search for the John Phillips Show

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, and that could be the

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast app. iHeart Spotify, search for the John Phillips Show,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hit subscribe, you can download all the episodes.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 2>You could do a Google on the YouTube.

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You can get the free KABC app, the free KSFO app,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or even the KMJ now app. Because we're on in

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the Central Valley Saturdays at noon, so many different ways

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to listen live to what we're doing every single day

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>from noon to three. With the magic of streaming and

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with podcasts, you can share them with your friends, and

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to them on your time, and you

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can listen to them while you're doing something else. A

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people listen to podcasts while they're at work.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Some people listen to podcasts while they're exercising. Some people

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might even listen to podcasts while they're on the couch

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>watching heated rivalry with a big ol Martini.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Why do you have to watch porn in the living room?

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>And coming up later tonight, we're gonna be live in

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Fresno. We're gonna be live

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and statewide from seven to nine pm with our election coverage.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We will have all the rest else as they come

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>in as the polls close at eight o'clock, everything that

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we can report will bring to you right then and there.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>John and I will be here, joined by Frank Motech

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of KABC and Philteresi of KATE MJ. We'll have some

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>special guests on the phone as well, so stick with

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>us live statewide seven to nine. We'll be covering all

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the races, the LA mayors race, the congressional races, the

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ballot measures, and of course the governor's race between Javier Bessera,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hilton and this guy.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Steyer. I'm about to ride the team, all right.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which pleasure, it is our pleasure to welcome

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>our next guest to the program. He is a Republican

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>candidate for governor. You can get him online at goldentogether

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>dot com and follow him on exit Steve Hilton X.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Steve Hilton, Welcome.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 5>What is great to be with you. I'm very excited

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 5>about your election night coverage. Are you going to get

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 5>some food in and drinks so you're going to be

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 5>staying there for the next month? What the risk while

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 5>they finally count the votes? What do you think?

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh, well, there's good. Definitely going to be no booze

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>tonight because we're still governed by the FCC.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh my goodness. Well, let's know what kind of party

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 5>is that we should come down to where we are

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 5>at Huntington Beach.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, So it's looking good for you. The polls

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>have you in the top too. Many of the polls

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and the betting markets have you as a heavy favorite tonight,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a seventy five percent favorite of making the runoff. How

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>do you feel going into today?

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting. I do feel confident, John. I think we've

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 5>really earned our spot there in the top two. We've

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 5>been working very hard getting a lot of support. Feel

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 5>the energy, just like you see with Spencer in LA

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 5>I feel that all over the state, and I think

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 5>it's mutually reinforcing. There's a sense that something's happening in

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 5>California and people are looking to these two outsiders. Obviously,

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 5>we're very different in a very different race. I don't

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 5>want to overstate the similarity, but we are too outside.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 5>It's never run for office before, coming into shake up

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 5>a completely broken, corrupt and failed system, and there's an

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 5>energy there and I feel good about that. However, you know,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 5>some of these poles have been very tight of late,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 5>and I don't know, I don't know which ones are right.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Most of them, I'm still in the top two, some

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 5>of them leading, some of them in the numbers two slot.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 5>There was one pole over the weekend that had me

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 5>number three, just to Tom Sire as one point behind

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Tom Sire And my attitude is that's the one I'm

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 5>going to believe because we cannot take this for granted. Honestly,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 5>We've got a really good chance to kick out these

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Democrats in November. We've got everything going for us this year.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 5>We've got the fact that people are so done with

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 5>all the chaos and the crime and the corruption, and

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 5>these fraud stories are driving people crazy. We pay so

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 5>much in tax and then we find out what they're

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 5>doing with our money, the gas prices, you know, just

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 5>it's reached a point where people are just furious. And

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 5>you see in the numbers fifty six percent of Californians

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 5>think the state is going in the wrong direction and

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 5>we need change. So that's our opportunity to win in November,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 5>as well as the fact that either of these Democrat

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 5>candidates or a disaster. You've got Javier Bassera, who you know,

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 5>his own colleagues and the Biden administration thought was completely useless.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, how useless do you have to be if

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 5>the Joe Biden team think you're incompetent. I mean, this

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 5>guy is absolutely the living embodiment of more of the same.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 5>At a time when the California needs changed, all you've

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 5>got Stayer who's just a total disaster, pandering to every

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 5>left wing group and activists and the unions. He's going

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 5>even further to the left, even further in the direction

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 5>the California says it doesn't want. So I think these

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 5>are very beatable candidates. Plus we've got voter idea on

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 5>the ballot in November that'll help us get a big turnout.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 5>In other words, it's a really golden opportunity this year.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 5>So let's not let it slip through our fingers by

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 5>being unfocused about this. The reality of this race. You've

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 5>got three people pretty close going for two slots, and

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 5>I just want to emphasize to everyone listening who hasn't

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 5>yet voted, if you have still got in your mind

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 5>the idea that somehow we could get two Republicans in

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 5>the top two, we can. You know, Steve Hilton is

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 5>going to be fine. He's kind of leading, and let's

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 5>give our vote to Chad Bianco, so maybe we can

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 5>get him in the top two and then we guarantee

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 5>the change. I understand that, but we're past that now.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 5>It's too late for that. He's too far behind. There's

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 5>a point even debating how why. It's nothing personal. I

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 5>like Chad, we get along, we agree on most things.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 5>It's not really about that anymore. It's just about the math.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 5>I hate that about this top two system, but that's

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 5>the reality. There's only one candidate for change who's got

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 5>the possibility of making into the top two, and that

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 5>is me. A vote for anybody else actually pushes us

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 5>towards the calamity of two Democrats in the top two.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the palls earlier. We also have real hard

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers in terms of what ballots have been returned from

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>voters who have filled out their ballot and sent it

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in in twenty twenty two, at this point in the election,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on the morning of election day, fifty four percent of

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the ballot's return we're Democratic, twenty seven percent, Republican nineteen

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>no party preference or third parties. This cycle, it's forty

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>eight percent down thirty two percent Republican, twenty percent no

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>party preference, are independent, meaning Democrats are underperforming by six percent,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are overperforming by five percent, and independents are over

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>performing by one percent compared to where things were in

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. What do you make of that and

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think that reflects what you're experiencing as you

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>campaign up and down the state in terms of enthusiasm.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, I think that's exactly right. There's an excitement

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 5>about the elections this year on the Republican side. I

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 5>think it's a combination of the fact that I've been

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 5>running around the state like a crazy person and campaigning

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 5>in a way that no one has the governor for

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 5>a long time, and of course Spencer in Los Angeles,

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 5>he's had such a huge impact, and I think, as

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 5>I said, it's mutually reinforcing. I go. I'm in LA

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 5>a lot, obviously, because it's a huge part of the state.

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 5>I'm running statewide, but Los Angela's county is nearly a

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 5>quarter of the vote, and it's very, very important. I've

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 5>got a lot of big supporters, there lots of events

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 5>in LA and there's a massive overlap with Spencer's supporters

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 5>in La so I think there's something that is exciting

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the Republicans in this year's elections. Meanwhile, the Democrats are

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 5>not excited about their choices, and that's why they've left

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 5>it a bit late. It doesn't mean they won't catch

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 5>up and get out and vote in the remaining oles

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 5>that we have until eight pm tonight, but I think

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 5>it's a very positive sign that the enthusiasm seems to

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 5>be much higher on our side.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It really goes to show you how neglecting to run

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a candidate for big city mayorships like Los Angeles, San Francisco,

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>San Diego, Oakland hurts the Republican candidates up and down

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the ballot because you need to have enthusiasm in these

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>big cities because those are your population centers exactly.

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 5>And look at the impact that he's had way beyond

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Los Angeles, not just in California, but across the country,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 5>and it shows you what you can do with good

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 5>creative campaigning. It's an incredibly exciting model. And I think

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 5>the point you make is exactly right, and it goes

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 5>back to something I've said for a long time. It's

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 5>also something I law Ingram actually to someone who I

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 5>was just speaking to about it last night on Fox

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 5>makes this point that we cannot have this sort of

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 5>sense of no go areas for Republicans where we just

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 5>abandon places because we assume that there there's never going

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 5>to be any support there. That's really wrong. And actually

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 5>it's typically the places that have been most run for

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 5>by Democrats with most entrenched Democrat power, that most need

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 5>the kind of common sense policies that Republicans would offer.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 5>So you could argue that we really need Republican candidates

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 5>to fight hard in those places. And I think that

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 5>this is a very important year from that point of

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 5>view to remind us of that.

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Bisara campaign is calling on Tom Steyer

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to take down and ad that suggests that if Javier

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Besserra is the Democratic nominee, he could be indicted by

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the Feds. We know that his longtime chief of staff,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>John McCluskey is kind of deal with the Feds after

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he was being charged with corruption and tax evasion. We

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>know that Dana Williamson, who was the chief of staff

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of Gavin Newsom, who has worked with Javier Bessera over

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the years, is a very close trusted aid. She is

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>also in the process of cutting a deal with the FEDS,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as is a third confidant of Bessara's. What do you

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>make of that ad and do you think that there

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is a chance that Bessarah could be indicted by the Feds?

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, I do, and I made that point on the

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 5>debate stage. I think it was the final debate. But

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 5>what was interesting is when I said to Bessarah, I

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 5>laid out the facts of this case. I mean, I

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 5>don't want to take up time going into it now,

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 5>but it's pretty clear to me that this entire scheme

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 5>that led to the federal indictments of Williamson and Shaw

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 5>McCluskey was created in order that he Bessarah could take

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 5>his guy Sean McCluskey with him to Washington, d C.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 5>When he was appointed to the federal administration by Joe Biden.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 5>That was the whole point of it. So the idea

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 5>that he didn't know about it just stretches credulity to

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 5>the point where it breaks. And I pointed out on

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 5>the debate stage, you shouldn't be in this race heavier,

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 5>you should be preparing your criminal defense. And then Katie

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Porter weighed in and basically agreed with me, and she

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 5>makes the same point. She said very clearly that you've

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 5>got Dana Williamson in particular, who she thinks is very

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 5>likely to have told as part of her plea deal

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 5>the authorities that the Sarah knew. So I think Styer's

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 5>got a fair point actually on this, But we'll see

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 5>what happens. I mean, it does feel as if Styre

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 5>is but this and other things that he's doing and

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 5>the enormous amounts of money he's spending do seem to

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 5>be having an effect. I mean, he seems to be

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 5>rising and catching up. And for example, a poll that

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 5>the California Post did last week had me and Stire

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 5>tied on twenty five percent and the Sarah Quando a

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 5>long way behind. So I've just seen a couple of

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 5>posts on social media as well that from exit polling

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 5>in Los Angeles late breaking, the Democrats are going overwhelmingly

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 5>for Stiants. So I don't know. I mean, if I

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 5>don't know whether this ad or his other stuff is working, it,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 5>certainly he's spent enough money on it.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>That tweet was from Michael Trehillo, who is Vera Ragosa

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>aided staffer who despises Javier Bsra, So I think there's

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a rivalry between those two camps going on. Let's talk

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about some of these stories about Bisera that have come

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>out in Politico. Former Biden administration officials have been planning

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hit pieces on him, saying that when he was in

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, he would show up to meetings completely unprepared,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and when Biden would ask him questions at cabinet meetings,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he frequently didn't have the answers to anything that he

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was asked, and that his performance was embarrassing. And Susan

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Rice and Michael Rosa, who worked for the first Lady

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Jill Biden, they were certainly not impressed with him. I

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>guess there are text message threads among a lot of

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden lums where they cannot believe that this guy is

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in a position where he has an opportunity to become

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the governor of California. We also know that the opinions

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of him coming from the House of Representatives, where he

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>served for a very long time, are also low. We

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>know that Nancy Pelosi doesn't like him, doesn't regard him

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>as being someone who is trustworthy. What do you make

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that the people who have worked with

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>him the most through the years have such a low

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>opinion of him.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that that's going to translate into a

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 5>low opinion of the voters if he's the candidate. I mean,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 5>as I keep putting it, he's a target rich environment.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 5>And let's just run through. I mean, we've already had

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 5>the corruption case that we've discussed in terms of his

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 5>basic competence and the opinions of those who know him best.

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's going to be a lot more that

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 5>came from. And the record at the HHS is a

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 5>complete disaster the more you look at it. I'm for example,

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 5>let's just take a couple of examples. I mean, there's

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 5>the famous one. Got a lot of airplay during the debates.

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Antonio Vierracosa particularly focused on this, and of course, you

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 5>know it'll be an absolutely core part of the campaign

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 5>against Besserah is this business of the migrant children. And

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 5>the story is that he lost migrant children. I think

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 5>that underplays it. What actually happened was he had a

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 5>large number of unaccompanied migrant children as part of Biden's

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 5>open border disaster in his custody in the custody of

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.719
<v Speaker 5>his department, and the number eighty five thousand is often

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 5>thrown around, the real number is much higher than that.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 5>In fact, the New York Times reporter who broke the

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 5>original story and got a Pulitzer for it, updated her

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 5>piece in line with the debates and just published a

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of, you know, a guide to what the story was.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 5>She said, the total numbers two hundred and fifty thousand,

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 5>and it wasn't that they lost them. It was much

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 5>worse than that. But Sarah deliberately pushed these kids out

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 5>of his custody into unvetted hands because he didn't want

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 5>the optics of looking like he was as they accused

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 5>President Trump of having kids in cages, that it was

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 5>purely for pr and then he shoved these kids out.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 5>They went to unvetted locations, many of them, according to whistleblowers,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 5>directly into the hands of child sex traffickers. Kids as

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 5>young as five years old sex trafficked. I mean, these

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 5>are really horrific stories, and they are the direct result

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 5>not of his incompetence but his venality, the fact that

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 5>he just wanted to look good and didn't want these

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 5>kids in his custody. And then you've got the incompetence.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 5>On top of that, his total mismanagement of the pandemic

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 5>in getting everything wrong, I mean the record. Then you've

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 5>got on top of that the fact that this guy

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 5>in a state that wants change. As I mentioned earlier,

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 5>fifty six percent of Californias think going in the wrong

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 5>direction and need change. He's the living embodiment of more

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 5>of the same. He's been a career politician in the

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 5>California machine for thirty six years. He just the other

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 5>day with Alex Michaelson on CNN had basically a repeat

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 5>of Kamala Harris's disaster his moment on the view in

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 5>her presidential campaign when she was asked, oh, is there

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 5>anything you'd have done differently? To Joe Biden, She's kind

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 5>of looked in the air and said, oh, I can't

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, nothing comes to mind. Well, Pasarah had the

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 5>same Alex Michaelson asked him, Look, you've got to state

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 5>where you've got the highest poverty rate, highest on employment rate,

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 5>highest cost of living. Things aren't going well. Is there

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 5>anything you'd have done differently? What does Besara say? Well,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 5>it can't be that bad because lots of people are

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 5>still going to Disneyland. That was his answer. This guy's

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 5>a complete joke. I think that if he is the candidate,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 5>we are going to be able to make a case

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 5>against him that is unanswerable. He is absolutely not fit

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 5>for this job because of his basic competence, his corruption,

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 5>but probably more than anything else, it's just total inability

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 5>to grasp the changes that are needed to get our

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:03.919
<v Speaker 5>state back on track.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's beyond that. He doesn't seem interested. He doesn't

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>seem like any of these subjects. Yes, yeah, because when

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he's asked questions about it, he gives these nebulous answers

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that mean nothing. Well, we're going to roll up our

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sleeves and get the job done. Well, that means nothing.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Scrub it.

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's another one that he likes to say. It

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that if he becomes the guy, if

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>he becomes the Democratic nominee, they're going to run him

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the same way they ran Joe Biden for president.

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 2>They're going to keep him in the basement.

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, exactly. Funnily enough, in one of the debates, I

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 5>remember looking I think at the Permanent College one. I

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 5>just remember looking at him. He was next to me,

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 5>and thinking, who does this guy remind me of? Just

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 5>the way he talks in this ridiculous manner. I thought,

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 5>that's it. He's Joe Biden. That's exactly who he is,

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I think. And you know, he perfectly sort of seems

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 5>like a nice guy. I don't know quite why they

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 5>didn't like him in the house. My interactions and interactions

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 5>with him have been perfectly plumbus. But he's just a

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 5>sort of amiable nonentity like buys. Just think about a bind,

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 5>just complete nonentity, got nothing to say, absolutely, no drive

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 5>to improve anything, no interest in anything except their own

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 5>position within the party machine, and pandering to the various

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 5>groups that might help his career. That's what it's all

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 5>about for him.

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hilton, Republican candidate for governor. You can get him

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>online at goldentogether dot com. You can follow him on

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>X at Steve Hilton X.

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Steve.

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Good luck tonight, and if Las Vegas is right, you're

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be moving on in November. And let me

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you all right, that town was not built on losing.

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, only only if people vote. You've got to go

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 5>and vote for it if you want to change. Thank you, John,

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 5>great to.

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Be with you all right, Steve Hilton, everyone, thanks so

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>much for stopping by, and Randy, we have one more

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>hour and then we're coming back later on. We're here

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>till three, and then I'm here from five to six

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>on KABC, and then Johnny and I are live and

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>statewide from seven to nine pm. All lection results as

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the polls close at eight o'clock, so tune in live

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on KABC, live on KSFO, and live on km Jay

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and Fresno