WEBVTT - KNBR's 2026 Dubs Roundtable Show 

0:00:00.350 --> 0:00:03.030
<v Speaker 1>Dub Nation. Welcome to the.

0:00:02.750 --> 0:00:08.539
<v Speaker 2>2026 KNBR Dubs Roundtable featuring Brian Murphy, Marcus Boucher, Adam Cogle,

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:10.420
<v Speaker 2>Derek Papa, and John Dickinson.

0:00:10.460 --> 0:00:13.139
<v Speaker 3>Steph with a good swipe down and steal. Curry the

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 3>trail three.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:14.620
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sir!

0:00:15.060 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Sponsored by O'Donnell Financial, where planning is a process, not

0:00:19.060 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a product.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:20.340
<v Speaker 1>Call 1-866-496-2300.

0:00:20.420 --> 0:00:26.730
<v Speaker 2>The ricochet, take it out to Pajewski, Curry for the lead,

0:00:27.110 --> 0:00:31.010
<v Speaker 2>got it! He's got 12 threes, he's got 48, and

0:00:31.050 --> 0:00:33.949
<v Speaker 2>the Warriors are on top. Live from Harmonic Brewing at

0:00:34.010 --> 0:00:36.770
<v Speaker 2>Thrive City outside of Chase Center, here's your.

0:00:36.670 --> 0:00:38.190
<v Speaker 1>Host, Adam Copeland.

0:00:39.990 --> 0:00:42.709
<v Speaker 4>Live from Harmonic Brewing at Thrive City, it is your

0:00:42.710 --> 0:00:47.110
<v Speaker 4>2026 KMBR Dubs Roundtable. Adam Copeland, Derek Papa, Brian Murphy,

0:00:47.150 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Marcus Boucher, and John Dickinson ahead of the home opener,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.340
<v Speaker 4>the Warriors and the Memphis Grizzlies tonight.

0:00:53.020 --> 0:00:54.860
<v Speaker 3>Come on by. We'd love to see you here at

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:55.860
<v Speaker 3>Harmonic Brewing.

0:00:56.180 --> 0:01:00.790
<v Speaker 4>We're going to need some assistance with the mics. When

0:01:00.810 --> 0:01:03.850
<v Speaker 4>we jump in mid-segment, we always got to navigate the audio.

0:01:04.650 --> 0:01:07.490
<v Speaker 3>What's his first time? Yeah, Tobin. I thought Tobin. Sounds

0:01:07.510 --> 0:01:07.810
<v Speaker 3>like it.

0:01:07.930 --> 0:01:11.130
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, I don't know. First round table for Tobin.

0:01:11.150 --> 0:01:13.030
<v Speaker 4>Murph's trying to get riffs off, but nobody can hear

0:01:13.050 --> 0:01:15.530
<v Speaker 4>him but me. I'm just trying to riff.

0:01:15.550 --> 0:01:15.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Murph.

0:01:15.850 --> 0:01:19.380
<v Speaker 3>Tobin. There he goes. Coast. Derek. Plenty of seats available.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the frequently lightly attended at Dub's round table, dude.

0:01:24.459 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Except for Patrick and Zona. Dude, Patrick and Zona. Yeah, Hawaii.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:27.980
<v Speaker 3>Hawaii veterans.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Aloha.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.300
<v Speaker 3>And my dude over here, judging with a wise, skeptical

0:01:31.459 --> 0:01:33.620
<v Speaker 3>eye over here, my man. He comes and he's like...

0:01:34.260 --> 0:01:37.500
<v Speaker 3>He's a fan, but he'll give you fair criticism, too. Oh, really?

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:37.979
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:01:38.020 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And how about my gent over here? I think he

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:41.260
<v Speaker 3>doesn't even know we're supposed to be here.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 4>He came for other reasons.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>He's here for a beer. He's got a mysterious meeting

0:01:44.500 --> 0:01:46.619
<v Speaker 3>that we're crashing right now. He's swiping.

0:01:46.670 --> 0:01:48.570
<v Speaker 4>He's got AirPods in listening to something else.

0:01:48.770 --> 0:01:52.870
<v Speaker 3>Plenty of seats available at the round table, Cokes.

0:01:52.950 --> 0:01:56.230
<v Speaker 4>Harmonic brewing from Thrive City here. The Dubs tonight at

0:01:56.230 --> 0:01:58.870
<v Speaker 4>7 o'clock against the Memphis Grizzlies. So why don't we

0:01:58.950 --> 0:02:01.210
<v Speaker 4>start just because Derek and I have said, boy, as

0:02:01.270 --> 0:02:04.070
<v Speaker 4>bad as opening night was for the Warriors. A 22-point loss.

0:02:04.410 --> 0:02:06.870
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, that score looks better than it

0:02:06.910 --> 0:02:07.410
<v Speaker 4>actually was.

0:02:07.430 --> 0:02:08.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, it was not good.

0:02:08.150 --> 0:02:11.340
<v Speaker 4>For most of that game. How gifted were we by

0:02:11.510 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Yaxel and Luka going head-to-head? So I'll throw it out

0:02:15.060 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 4>to you guys because we've been having this debate. We

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.900
<v Speaker 4>just discussed it with Marcus Thompson. I kind of like

0:02:18.940 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 4>the crazy, but you guys know me. I'm an S-talker.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:22.019
<v Speaker 3>Shocker.

0:02:22.260 --> 0:02:24.050
<v Speaker 4>I'm down with it. I like that he's like, you

0:02:24.070 --> 0:02:26.070
<v Speaker 4>haven't done anything to me. You've got to prove to me.

0:02:26.330 --> 0:02:30.530
<v Speaker 4>There's a great scene in Survivor Season 20, Heroes vs. Villains.

0:02:30.550 --> 0:02:30.650
<v Speaker 5>Nice.

0:02:30.830 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Where James the Gravedigger, he's this big buff dude, Colby

0:02:34.340 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 4>is back, who was like the first big, bold dude

0:02:36.180 --> 0:02:36.419
<v Speaker 4>in Survivor.

0:02:36.460 --> 0:02:36.780
<v Speaker 3>Do you know this?

0:02:36.900 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Won all the challenges in like season two or whatever.

0:02:38.860 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 4>He goes to the finals. Well, James then goes to

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.540
<v Speaker 4>season 20 with Colby, and Colby comes back. Colby can't

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.530
<v Speaker 4>win anything. He's losing everything. He's not the guy he

0:02:45.590 --> 0:02:47.470
<v Speaker 4>used to be. James is talking to the camera, and

0:02:47.490 --> 0:02:49.190
<v Speaker 4>he goes, I came down to this island because I

0:02:49.230 --> 0:02:52.710
<v Speaker 4>love Colby, man. Now it's like my Superman sucks. I

0:02:52.750 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>feel like that's how Yaxel felt when he had Luka

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:56.460
<v Speaker 4>in his face.

0:02:56.500 --> 0:02:58.940
<v Speaker 3>You guys got to cut that. It's like my Superman sucks.

0:02:58.980 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 3>You got to keep that on your board.

0:03:00.139 --> 0:03:02.559
<v Speaker 4>We got to find that James the Gravedigger, dude.

0:03:02.580 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you know that one, Marcus? I know the reference.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>My Superman sucks? Well, if there was any prediction I

0:03:08.220 --> 0:03:11.050
<v Speaker 3>could make in the 2026-2027 Warriors season, it would be

0:03:11.090 --> 0:03:15.530
<v Speaker 3>that Adam Copeland supported the ish talk. Surprise, surprise. That's

0:03:15.570 --> 0:03:18.630
<v Speaker 3>really the only thing we can guarantee in this season.

0:03:18.650 --> 0:03:19.970
<v Speaker 3>He backed it up, too. I mean, he was one

0:03:20.010 --> 0:03:20.770
<v Speaker 3>for six against him.

0:03:20.790 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, the question really is, do you need

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.460
<v Speaker 4>accomplishments to trash talk, or does having that confidence, is

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>it okay if that's just who you are as a guy?

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.940
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the recently published, lightly read jock blog, 808 KMBR,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.110
<v Speaker 3>what's more lightly attended, a jock blog or a Warriors roundtable?

0:03:38.330 --> 0:03:40.350
<v Speaker 3>Have more people read the blog or come to the roundtable?

0:03:40.450 --> 0:03:43.310
<v Speaker 3>More clicks on the jock blog or more people here.

0:03:43.430 --> 0:03:48.510
<v Speaker 3>There's more people here, Murph. Definitely more people here. You

0:03:48.530 --> 0:03:50.290
<v Speaker 3>can read in peace. You can read it in peace.

0:03:50.310 --> 0:03:51.930
<v Speaker 3>Call it up, Patrick. You can read it in peace. Anyway,

0:03:52.370 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I said, listen, you'd be shocked, right? The gray hair

0:03:55.460 --> 0:03:59.900
<v Speaker 3>on my head and my rule following ways, right? You know,

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you got to tuck in at the golf club, right?

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.540
<v Speaker 3>That kind of stuff. You'd be shocked to hear I

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.010
<v Speaker 3>support Yaxl. And there's two main reasons. I said this

0:04:08.030 --> 0:04:11.690
<v Speaker 3>to Marcus all week. Number one is Luca. And there's

0:04:11.750 --> 0:04:15.570
<v Speaker 3>a there's a this era of basketball is unattractive. And

0:04:15.610 --> 0:04:19.060
<v Speaker 3>it's not just him. It's James Harden. It's Shea Gilgis Alexander.

0:04:19.130 --> 0:04:22.140
<v Speaker 3>And none of us likes it. Nobody likes it. I

0:04:22.140 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>don't even think the fans of their own teams like it.

0:04:24.100 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's a Giants motto.

0:04:27.100 --> 0:04:27.900
<v Speaker 3>Nobody likes it.

0:04:27.980 --> 0:04:28.940
<v Speaker 4>So calling that out.

0:04:30.860 --> 0:04:32.740
<v Speaker 3>Was refreshing, you know? I mean, it was like, I

0:04:32.740 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know if he's the very first guy ever to

0:04:33.940 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>do it. I mean, people have called out Harden and

0:04:35.220 --> 0:04:37.700
<v Speaker 3>all that. But the way he did it in such

0:04:37.750 --> 0:04:39.500
<v Speaker 3>blunt ways. And number two, the other thing I'm going

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.270
<v Speaker 3>to give him credit for is that he backed it

0:04:41.310 --> 0:04:44.270
<v Speaker 3>up with effort. He's playing defense, and he's playing hard

0:04:44.330 --> 0:04:46.909
<v Speaker 3>on defense in the manner, you know, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green,

0:04:46.930 --> 0:04:49.010
<v Speaker 3>those guys set the tone. So I'm giving him those

0:04:49.089 --> 0:04:53.170
<v Speaker 3>two reasons that I will allow this and support it. A,

0:04:53.270 --> 0:04:57.870
<v Speaker 3>call out the BS, Luka, Harden, Shea. B, bust your

0:04:57.930 --> 0:05:00.250
<v Speaker 3>ass on the defensive end of the court. That's my take.

0:05:00.770 --> 0:05:03.070
<v Speaker 4>J.D., you were saying that you were sitting next to

0:05:03.110 --> 0:05:05.820
<v Speaker 4>Marcus Thompson in L.A. Marcus Thompson supported and had a

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 4>great piece about it in The Athletic. He was just

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 4>talking with us about it before we got going in

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 4>the Dubs roundtable. But, J.D., were you on the same

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.940
<v Speaker 4>side as Marcus in this? Were you in support of

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Yaxel Lindeborg?

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.540
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I didn't have an issue with him mixing it

0:05:16.580 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 6>up with him the first time. And I'm not actually

0:05:20.670 --> 0:05:23.130
<v Speaker 6>going as far as Derek. When they went toe-to-toe and

0:05:23.170 --> 0:05:24.729
<v Speaker 6>had to be separated and all that, I thought that

0:05:24.750 --> 0:05:27.789
<v Speaker 6>was great. And I don't even have an issue with

0:05:28.370 --> 0:05:30.370
<v Speaker 6>talking trash to him and saying, hey, you can't score

0:05:30.410 --> 0:05:32.310
<v Speaker 6>on me, something like that. But the two things that

0:05:32.330 --> 0:05:34.830
<v Speaker 6>I had a problem with, one, was Yaxel after the game.

0:05:34.870 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 6>And people missed this because the quote that got everybody

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 6>going was the, I've lost respect for. But Yaxel admitted

0:05:41.500 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 6>the fact that he allowed the whistle that Luka gets

0:05:44.860 --> 0:05:46.940
<v Speaker 6>and the back and forth to take him out of

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 6>his game a little bit in game.

0:05:49.570 --> 0:05:50.410
<v Speaker 3>That can't happen.

0:05:50.610 --> 0:05:52.450
<v Speaker 6>I don't care if it's game one or whatever, like

0:05:52.500 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 6>you can battle whoever you want, say whatever you want,

0:05:55.260 --> 0:05:57.220
<v Speaker 6>but I have an issue with admitting that you got

0:05:57.620 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 6>off kilter in game and kind of got in your

0:05:59.660 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 6>own head. And there was a lot of antics with

0:06:01.260 --> 0:06:04.450
<v Speaker 6>the officials. I thought that were an extension of the

0:06:04.490 --> 0:06:08.090
<v Speaker 6>back and forth with Luca, which was not necessarily a

0:06:08.150 --> 0:06:10.450
<v Speaker 6>good look for a player playing his first NBA game.

0:06:10.470 --> 0:06:12.490
<v Speaker 6>And then the stuff after the game, like, Whoa, like

0:06:12.529 --> 0:06:14.390
<v Speaker 6>talk about putting a target and maybe it's less of

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.700
<v Speaker 6>a target, Murph, because it's Luka, to your point, if

0:06:18.779 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 6>it was another player that was maybe a little bit

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.539
<v Speaker 6>more respected widely, there would be other players in the

0:06:23.580 --> 0:06:25.420
<v Speaker 6>league that are thinking, who the hell is this guy?

0:06:25.779 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Game one, talking all that-ish. And then, yeah, backing it up,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 6>but one for six, Luka against Yaxl. Backing up, Yaxl

0:06:34.339 --> 0:06:37.460
<v Speaker 6>didn't exactly play great. And he also got beat by

0:06:37.620 --> 0:06:40.810
<v Speaker 6>essentially 30. I know it ended up cosmetically being 22,

0:06:40.810 --> 0:06:44.150
<v Speaker 6>but they were down by 35. It wasn't a 22-point game.

0:06:44.170 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 6>So I think there's a lot more like the tenacity,

0:06:48.180 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 6>be unafraid to go up against anybody.

0:06:50.500 --> 0:06:51.779
<v Speaker 3>That's all good in game.

0:06:51.820 --> 0:06:53.539
<v Speaker 6>I don't have a problem with guys mixing it up,

0:06:54.050 --> 0:06:57.370
<v Speaker 6>but Hey, if you're going to, sometimes you write checks

0:06:57.770 --> 0:07:00.330
<v Speaker 6>that you may individually be able to cash, but your

0:07:00.370 --> 0:07:03.250
<v Speaker 6>team can't cash. And I think in some ways you

0:07:03.270 --> 0:07:05.409
<v Speaker 6>have to be a little bit cognizant of that, especially

0:07:05.430 --> 0:07:06.630
<v Speaker 6>as a young player learning to grow.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, and I, what I would say is like, this

0:07:08.740 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>is all fun for one game and it's a fun

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>discussion and it's a good like sports debate and like,

0:07:12.500 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, the rookie against the veteran and, He's the

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 4>greatest scorer in the world. But opening night, they lose

0:07:17.020 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>by 22 like Mark.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:18.660
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:07:18.700 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I look at this and I'm like, dude, what are

0:07:20.260 --> 0:07:23.370
<v Speaker 4>we actually expecting for 81 games this season?

0:07:24.230 --> 0:07:26.010
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'll give you one. I mean, go back to

0:07:26.050 --> 0:07:28.630
<v Speaker 6>just real quick. Go back to the summer league because

0:07:28.830 --> 0:07:31.590
<v Speaker 6>who are they playing tonight? They're playing Memphis. He had

0:07:31.630 --> 0:07:32.590
<v Speaker 6>beef with Cam Boozer.

0:07:33.260 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 3>In the Summer League.

0:07:34.420 --> 0:07:36.260
<v Speaker 6>And so that's the thing that I, like, is this

0:07:36.300 --> 0:07:36.740
<v Speaker 6>going to be an.

0:07:36.740 --> 0:07:38.100
<v Speaker 3>Every night thing? On his way to a title, by

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the way. On his way to a Summer League title.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.910
<v Speaker 6>But it's like, is there going to be beef every

0:07:42.970 --> 0:07:45.630
<v Speaker 6>single night between he and somebody?

0:07:45.950 --> 0:07:51.870
<v Speaker 3>And that's fine. Hopefully. Give you something to do. Could be.

0:07:51.890 --> 0:07:53.870
<v Speaker 4>Marcus, how are you looking at what looks like a

0:07:53.890 --> 0:07:54.750
<v Speaker 4>good season for this team?

0:07:55.500 --> 0:07:57.620
<v Speaker 3>Um, what looks like a good season would be making

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. Now, is that possible? I don't know. They

0:07:59.940 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>look like a playing team right now. So I think

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>they need two things.

0:08:02.500 --> 0:08:05.350
<v Speaker 5>They need Yaxel to not talk as much trash, but

0:08:05.550 --> 0:08:07.330
<v Speaker 5>be good on the actual court. Like Yaxel needs to

0:08:07.370 --> 0:08:09.010
<v Speaker 5>be in the conversation for rookie of the year this

0:08:09.030 --> 0:08:10.990
<v Speaker 5>year for this team to compete. I'd say a guy

0:08:11.010 --> 0:08:13.070
<v Speaker 5>like Brandon Pajemski, he needs to put himself in a

0:08:13.110 --> 0:08:14.950
<v Speaker 5>position where he takes that next step.

0:08:15.010 --> 0:08:16.090
<v Speaker 3>He needs a breakout season.

0:08:16.350 --> 0:08:18.990
<v Speaker 5>So they need those two young guys to contribute early

0:08:19.050 --> 0:08:21.590
<v Speaker 5>and often this season because they're This is an old

0:08:21.770 --> 0:08:24.250
<v Speaker 5>Warriors team that's going to struggle throughout the regular season.

0:08:24.530 --> 0:08:27.650
<v Speaker 5>So whether it's the trash talk or the lack of

0:08:27.770 --> 0:08:30.170
<v Speaker 5>size and lack of performance night in, night out, this

0:08:30.210 --> 0:08:31.610
<v Speaker 5>is not going to be the most interesting team in

0:08:31.630 --> 0:08:32.010
<v Speaker 5>the world.

0:08:32.070 --> 0:08:35.069
<v Speaker 3>So what is successful? Making the playoffs. Will that happen?

0:08:35.350 --> 0:08:37.190
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. It's a tough task.

0:08:37.230 --> 0:08:39.630
<v Speaker 4>Trash talk is fun when Draymond's winning. When you're going

0:08:39.670 --> 0:08:42.010
<v Speaker 4>after titles and stuff. But Derek, it's not all that

0:08:42.050 --> 0:08:43.910
<v Speaker 4>fun when Draymond's running his mouth and you're running out

0:08:43.929 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>of games and you're losing games by 25 points. It's

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 4>not cute.

0:08:47.860 --> 0:08:49.420
<v Speaker 3>It's not fun when you're getting ran out of the

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 3>gym by the Snowtime Lakers. Exactly.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 7>And that's my thing, though, is it's his first game

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.710
<v Speaker 7>in the NBA, and he's talking this way to Luka.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.030
<v Speaker 7>And I understand, like, everything he said, I agree with.

0:09:00.390 --> 0:09:02.550
<v Speaker 7>I don't like Luka Doncic. I hate that he bitches

0:09:02.590 --> 0:09:05.350
<v Speaker 7>all the time about everything in an NBA game. But

0:09:05.370 --> 0:09:08.150
<v Speaker 7>at the same time, Yaxel, just because you feel that

0:09:08.190 --> 0:09:11.170
<v Speaker 7>way doesn't mean you need to vocalize that postgame. Now,

0:09:11.230 --> 0:09:13.290
<v Speaker 7>we talked about with Marcus Thompson. There's been many guys

0:09:13.330 --> 0:09:15.250
<v Speaker 7>early in their careers that did trash talk with veterans.

0:09:15.550 --> 0:09:17.830
<v Speaker 7>Draymond did it his rookie year. Richard Sherman did it

0:09:17.870 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 7>his rookie year. But those guys did it when they

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.620
<v Speaker 7>accomplished something. He axled just that foot on an NBA court,

0:09:23.860 --> 0:09:25.860
<v Speaker 7>and he's talking to Luka? I just thought it was

0:09:25.980 --> 0:09:28.460
<v Speaker 7>a little much. And I know that the words were...

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.380
<v Speaker 7>I lost all respect for him. Maybe that was a

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.230
<v Speaker 7>little much. Maybe he didn't really feel that way. But

0:09:32.470 --> 0:09:35.309
<v Speaker 7>when you put that in print, that's something. That's saying,

0:09:35.330 --> 0:09:38.170
<v Speaker 7>I don't respect you, and I never played you before.

0:09:38.190 --> 0:09:40.580
<v Speaker 7>This is my first time playing in the NBA. I

0:09:40.820 --> 0:09:42.100
<v Speaker 7>just thought, and I know a lot of people like

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 7>Jason Kidd was on Inside the NBA last night and said,

0:09:44.580 --> 0:09:45.300
<v Speaker 7>I thought it was a little much.

0:09:46.220 --> 0:09:47.580
<v Speaker 3>It is a little much.

0:09:47.700 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 7>There's nothing wrong with trash talk your first game going

0:09:50.260 --> 0:09:52.070
<v Speaker 7>up against Luka Doncic, but when you say I lost

0:09:52.110 --> 0:09:54.850
<v Speaker 7>all respect for him, I thought that was way out.

0:09:54.790 --> 0:09:56.790
<v Speaker 3>Of bounds for me, honestly. I had a passage in

0:09:56.809 --> 0:10:02.089
<v Speaker 3>the jock. Here it is. Six-time All-NBA first-teamer. Two-time NBA

0:10:02.130 --> 0:10:02.970
<v Speaker 3>scoring champ.

0:10:03.050 --> 0:10:04.070
<v Speaker 4>Reigning scoring champ, too.

0:10:04.270 --> 0:10:08.530
<v Speaker 3>Five-time top eight MVP vote getter versus a guy who's

0:10:08.570 --> 0:10:12.830
<v Speaker 3>played 29 career NBA minutes and has a career minus

0:10:12.830 --> 0:10:15.730
<v Speaker 3>21 in the plus minus. Yeah, but one of those

0:10:15.770 --> 0:10:19.380
<v Speaker 3>guys you just mentioned doesn't have a summer league MVP. Yeah,

0:10:19.410 --> 0:10:22.900
<v Speaker 3>that's true. Or a national champion. Obviously, there's nuances to it. JD,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.620
<v Speaker 3>you made good points. Derek, you made good points, too.

0:10:24.660 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 3>But it's sort of like... You know, in this world

0:10:26.340 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 3>we live in, maybe you look at it this way.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.740
<v Speaker 3>You know, we just had Raymond out here telling us,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.179
<v Speaker 3>trying to remind us that the Warriors won four championships.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 3>And I love Raymond and all that. But but let's

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 3>be honest, they're they're they're heading into a new uncertain era.

0:10:38.500 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Yaxel is, you know, by doing so much so

0:10:41.260 --> 0:10:43.100
<v Speaker 3>soon is giving them a little bit of an early

0:10:43.179 --> 0:10:45.740
<v Speaker 3>identity for the post Steph Curry years. I don't know.

0:10:45.780 --> 0:10:47.940
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're reaching after one game. I believe we

0:10:47.980 --> 0:10:50.449
<v Speaker 3>sat here a year ago. Didn't Kuminga have a really

0:10:50.490 --> 0:10:53.330
<v Speaker 3>good opener? Against the Lakers, right? Weren't we fired up

0:10:53.429 --> 0:10:55.130
<v Speaker 3>on Kuminga last year?

0:10:55.390 --> 0:10:55.550
<v Speaker 5>We?

0:10:55.770 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Some of us told you he wouldn't be around in February. Yes.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 3>One of us. I mean, we expected them to lose

0:11:04.460 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>that game, right? I mean, they were underdogs, right? I mean,

0:11:07.700 --> 0:11:09.340
<v Speaker 3>I hate to say it, but no pods and no...

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Charles Bassey. As you know, JD, I'm a Bassey guy.

0:11:12.420 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 3>As you know, JD. By the way, I'm not even joking.

0:11:16.020 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I am a Bassey guy. Give me a rebound, man.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.660
<v Speaker 3>Give me a freaking rebound. That's why I support another

0:11:22.730 --> 0:11:24.350
<v Speaker 3>controversy of Lightning Rod, Angel Reese.

0:11:24.630 --> 0:11:27.230
<v Speaker 5>It's a great line, too. He made that comment on

0:11:27.270 --> 0:11:29.570
<v Speaker 5>the show the other day. Angel Reese is like the

0:11:29.610 --> 0:11:30.830
<v Speaker 5>Charles Bassey.

0:11:30.450 --> 0:11:31.270
<v Speaker 3>Of the WCS.

0:11:31.390 --> 0:11:31.870
<v Speaker 2>Oh, wow.

0:11:32.050 --> 0:11:34.370
<v Speaker 3>The disrespect. Except for when the word came out, Bassey

0:11:34.410 --> 0:11:36.580
<v Speaker 3>was out, and Marcus sent a text to our group

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 3>that Angel Reese greater than Charles Bass. It's true. It's true.

0:11:39.820 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Give me Angel Reese. I wrote back. I said, maybe

0:11:41.500 --> 0:11:45.190
<v Speaker 3>my guy Bassey's made a cardboard. Don't get him wet.

0:11:45.250 --> 0:11:47.910
<v Speaker 3>He's a baby, baby, baby Larry Smith is what he is.

0:11:48.530 --> 0:11:51.550
<v Speaker 4>You bring up a good point, though, Murph, about Raymond

0:11:51.590 --> 0:11:53.410
<v Speaker 4>talking about, hey, don't forget they won four titles. And

0:11:53.450 --> 0:11:54.729
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of where we are. And Derek and I

0:11:54.750 --> 0:11:56.830
<v Speaker 4>have been talking about this all this week leading up

0:11:56.850 --> 0:11:58.810
<v Speaker 4>to it. At some point, it was funny because Derek

0:11:58.850 --> 0:12:01.610
<v Speaker 4>actually first ever said this to me a year and

0:12:01.630 --> 0:12:03.570
<v Speaker 4>a half ago, two seasons, whatever it was when they

0:12:03.610 --> 0:12:05.690
<v Speaker 4>got Jimmy Butler. Because I really wanted him to get

0:12:05.730 --> 0:12:07.850
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy Butler. At one point, there was talk about trading

0:12:07.870 --> 0:12:10.209
<v Speaker 4>for Durant at the trade deadline, and the Warriors couldn't

0:12:10.230 --> 0:12:12.460
<v Speaker 4>score 100, and Steph was like, I don't know what

0:12:12.500 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 4>we're going to do about the offense. I'm not really sure.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:15.859
<v Speaker 4>They get Jimmy Butler, and they went from the 10

0:12:15.860 --> 0:12:17.699
<v Speaker 4>seed all the way up to the final weekend having

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 4>a chance to play for the 4 seed. They had

0:12:19.420 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 4>really vaulted themselves until Steph got hurt.

0:12:21.950 --> 0:12:22.550
<v Speaker 3>In the postseason.

0:12:22.590 --> 0:12:24.410
<v Speaker 4>But Derek said, you know, if they don't get anybody,

0:12:24.429 --> 0:12:26.690
<v Speaker 4>like at what point are we just like enjoying what this,

0:12:26.910 --> 0:12:29.610
<v Speaker 4>this generation was? Because if Steph wants to be here,

0:12:29.690 --> 0:12:31.380
<v Speaker 4>he didn't make it a big deal about his contract.

0:12:31.660 --> 0:12:33.140
<v Speaker 4>Steve Kerr wants to be here. And we'll talk about

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 4>all these things in more specificity. But I think the

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.660
<v Speaker 4>question we have to ask about this season and, and

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.710
<v Speaker 4>moving forward is, are we still setting the same expectations

0:12:41.750 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>or have we moved past that championship situation.

0:12:44.990 --> 0:12:46.870
<v Speaker 3>I think we're in the presence of greatness. I'm going

0:12:46.890 --> 0:12:48.930
<v Speaker 3>to give Raymond the mic. What was the record with

0:12:48.970 --> 0:12:51.510
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Butler in the, what was it, in one? Two

0:12:51.530 --> 0:12:54.729
<v Speaker 3>seasons ago. Fourth best record in the NBA when he's

0:12:54.910 --> 0:12:55.830
<v Speaker 3>on the court with Steph?

0:12:55.990 --> 0:12:56.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:56.630 --> 0:12:58.500
<v Speaker 3>Raymond? From the time you got him to the time

0:12:58.510 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 3>he got hurt, fourth best record in the NBA, not

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>just the West? That's what I'm saying. They went from

0:13:02.420 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the 10th seed and had a chance to play for

0:13:03.660 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the four in that final weekend. Yeah, and then they

0:13:05.500 --> 0:13:09.110
<v Speaker 3>took out the Rockets. I brought that up before you

0:13:09.140 --> 0:13:11.870
<v Speaker 3>were here. The ageless Raymond Ritter. I knew that, Raymond.

0:13:11.910 --> 0:13:12.270
<v Speaker 3>I knew that.

0:13:12.290 --> 0:13:14.090
<v Speaker 4>We'll take a quick break. We're live from Harmonic Brewing

0:13:14.110 --> 0:13:16.770
<v Speaker 4>for our Dubs Roundtable. Are we still setting the same

0:13:16.790 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 4>championship standards for the Golden State Warriors? Are we grading

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.500
<v Speaker 4>them by those expectations, or have we moved past that?

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.060
<v Speaker 3>Did you see that picture of Raymond Ritter and Jim

0:13:24.100 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Hill from opening night?

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:25.220
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:13:25.870 --> 0:13:29.250
<v Speaker 3>One of the sports picture of 2026. Oh, my God.

0:13:29.390 --> 0:13:30.209
<v Speaker 3>Jim Hill from Rocky.

0:13:31.130 --> 0:13:33.690
<v Speaker 4>More on Jim Hill and the 2026 Warrior season.

0:13:33.710 --> 0:13:34.310
<v Speaker 3>The legend, Jim Hill.

0:13:34.330 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>We'll do it next from Harmonic Brewing, our Dubs Roundtable

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 4>on the Sports Leader.

0:13:40.420 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the 2026 KNBR Dubs Roundtable, sponsored by O'Donnell Financial.

0:13:46.340 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to Harmonic Brewing at Thrive City and your.

0:13:49.420 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Host, Adam Cochran.

0:13:54.110 --> 0:13:57.809
<v Speaker 4>We're live from Harmonic Brewing for our 2026 KNBR Dubs

0:13:57.890 --> 0:14:01.030
<v Speaker 4>Roundtable opening night at home tonight for the Warriors against

0:14:01.070 --> 0:14:03.969
<v Speaker 4>the Memphis Grizzlies at 7 o'clock. Adam Copeland, Derek Papa,

0:14:04.010 --> 0:14:07.330
<v Speaker 4>Brian Murphy, Marcus Boucher, and John Dickinson with you ahead

0:14:07.390 --> 0:14:10.250
<v Speaker 4>of that 7 o'clock tip. I want to get into

0:14:10.270 --> 0:14:11.670
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about what Murph was just talking about,

0:14:11.710 --> 0:14:13.210
<v Speaker 4>about reasonable expectations.

0:14:13.230 --> 0:14:15.030
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I thought it was the Jim Hill picture.

0:14:15.050 --> 0:14:15.950
<v Speaker 4>You want to get back to Jim Hill?

0:14:16.630 --> 0:14:19.110
<v Speaker 3>We can do a whole roundtable on Jim Hill. I'm

0:14:19.150 --> 0:14:20.620
<v Speaker 3>here for it, but go ahead.

0:14:20.650 --> 0:14:22.940
<v Speaker 4>We can also talk about that new movie, Playing Rocky,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:23.610
<v Speaker 4>or whatever it is.

0:14:23.620 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Did anybody see it?

0:14:25.020 --> 0:14:25.180
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Has it gone out yet? I don't think so.

0:14:26.940 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 4>This is the new thing where Derek and I talk about,

0:14:28.860 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 4>they don't make a biopic on somebody. They're like, here's

0:14:31.460 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 4>how we made the Michael Jordan show.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:34.950
<v Speaker 3>It's not Cradle of the Great. I haven't seen that

0:14:35.050 --> 0:14:35.430
<v Speaker 3>one either.

0:14:35.450 --> 0:14:35.730
<v Speaker 1>Air?

0:14:35.910 --> 0:14:36.470
<v Speaker 3>Air's pretty good.

0:14:36.530 --> 0:14:37.010
<v Speaker 4>Air's good.

0:14:37.050 --> 0:14:38.890
<v Speaker 3>I like Air. Don't tell me you guys are like Gaga,

0:14:38.910 --> 0:14:41.850
<v Speaker 3>like Connell is for that Elizabeth Holmes documentary. I haven't

0:14:41.870 --> 0:14:43.820
<v Speaker 3>seen it yet. Three hours for a doc, it's a

0:14:43.820 --> 0:14:44.180
<v Speaker 3>little much.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:44.940
<v Speaker 4>He's seen it twice.

0:14:45.620 --> 0:14:47.730
<v Speaker 3>Three hours. It's the axle of docs.

0:14:49.570 --> 0:14:49.850
<v Speaker 1>Nice.

0:14:49.890 --> 0:14:53.410
<v Speaker 3>Could have used an edit probably. What were you saying before?

0:14:53.550 --> 0:14:57.010
<v Speaker 3>Don't you pat me on the head, dude. Don't you

0:14:57.030 --> 0:14:57.970
<v Speaker 3>tell me to get on with it.

0:14:58.370 --> 0:15:00.750
<v Speaker 4>I guess the question is really, are we still judging

0:15:00.770 --> 0:15:02.530
<v Speaker 4>the Warriors by championship expectations?

0:15:02.910 --> 0:15:03.730
<v Speaker 3>Or have we moved past that?

0:15:03.750 --> 0:15:06.130
<v Speaker 4>Because I think what's so frustrating, and we'll talk about

0:15:06.150 --> 0:15:08.870
<v Speaker 4>the ends of other dynasties in Bay Area history, but

0:15:09.170 --> 0:15:12.530
<v Speaker 4>when the Giants dynasty ended, Buster Posey retired, right? They

0:15:12.550 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 4>didn't have the pitching staff anymore. We look at Steph Curry,

0:15:15.100 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 4>and I think a lot of us believe with the

0:15:17.100 --> 0:15:19.740
<v Speaker 4>right pieces around him, he could still be the focal

0:15:19.780 --> 0:15:22.900
<v Speaker 4>point of a contending team in the NBA. But none

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 4>of that's happening. He's kind of accepted that none of

0:15:25.300 --> 0:15:27.900
<v Speaker 4>that is happening. So I don't really know. They're kind

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:29.450
<v Speaker 4>of in this in-between here where it's the end of

0:15:29.490 --> 0:15:33.430
<v Speaker 4>a dynasty, but they've still decided to commit both to Steph, Draymond,

0:15:33.470 --> 0:15:35.470
<v Speaker 4>and then on the coaching side, Steve Kerr. So what

0:15:35.510 --> 0:15:38.310
<v Speaker 4>are reasonable and fair expectations? Marcus, we can start with you.

0:15:38.490 --> 0:15:41.570
<v Speaker 5>The expectation is to be a playing team, and hopefully

0:15:41.630 --> 0:15:43.670
<v Speaker 5>you can avoid the playing bracket and make yourself a

0:15:43.770 --> 0:15:46.100
<v Speaker 5>top six contender in the West, and you can skip

0:15:46.220 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 5>all the BS that they had to go through last

0:15:47.820 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 5>year when they won the first playing game and then

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.580
<v Speaker 5>got knocked out in the second one. Because we have

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.180
<v Speaker 5>seen a healthy Steph Curry, Jimmy Butler, and Draymond Green

0:15:55.300 --> 0:15:57.859
<v Speaker 5>in a playoff series before. They knocked out the Houston Rockets.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 5>They get hurt. They lose the next series. So what

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.140
<v Speaker 5>we were just talking about last segment, we have seen success.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 5>My question is, how do they get there? How do

0:16:05.340 --> 0:16:07.300
<v Speaker 5>they get there throughout the regular season with the way

0:16:07.340 --> 0:16:09.490
<v Speaker 5>the roster is set up right now, with Jimmy Butler

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.390
<v Speaker 5>being out, Moses Moody being out, with this Kristaps Porzingis situation?

0:16:13.490 --> 0:16:13.670
<v Speaker 3>Who?

0:16:13.850 --> 0:16:16.670
<v Speaker 5>Like, there are so many questions. Right now, it's all

0:16:16.730 --> 0:16:21.110
<v Speaker 5>about the young guys developing. Pods, Yaxel, Guy Santos, see

0:16:21.130 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 5>if they can tread water until January. and then maybe

0:16:23.900 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 5>you go full throttle, make a trade, and maybe then

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:27.580
<v Speaker 5>you change your expectations.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe you, dude.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 4>The Yankees broke this guy.

0:16:29.820 --> 0:16:32.060
<v Speaker 3>Play-in tournament? That's what you're going to do?

0:16:32.060 --> 0:16:32.990
<v Speaker 4>That's accepting for you now?

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.250
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Steph Curry already gave us the soundbite of

0:16:35.270 --> 0:16:36.690
<v Speaker 5>the season before the season started.

0:16:36.710 --> 0:16:38.890
<v Speaker 3>He's like, really? Is that bad? That's how bad it is?

0:16:39.050 --> 0:16:40.990
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's how bad it is.

0:16:41.050 --> 0:16:42.630
<v Speaker 3>You won 37 games last year, and you ran back

0:16:42.670 --> 0:16:43.330
<v Speaker 3>the same roster.

0:16:43.490 --> 0:16:46.670
<v Speaker 6>I think the expectation should be playoffs, whether you have

0:16:46.700 --> 0:16:48.260
<v Speaker 6>to get in, be in the play-in or not.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Playoffs?

0:16:48.860 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 6>They're more likely to be– I mean, I don't think

0:16:51.620 --> 0:16:53.900
<v Speaker 6>there's any shot they can be a top six team

0:16:54.100 --> 0:16:55.620
<v Speaker 6>with Jimmy Butler missing half of the year.

0:16:55.860 --> 0:16:57.340
<v Speaker 3>To me, it's can you be in.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.210
<v Speaker 6>The top 10 and then get Jimmy Butler and Moses

0:17:00.270 --> 0:17:04.129
<v Speaker 6>Moody back and be better in the second half than

0:17:04.150 --> 0:17:05.990
<v Speaker 6>you were in the first half? And that team is

0:17:06.030 --> 0:17:08.510
<v Speaker 6>good enough to win the two play in games that

0:17:08.550 --> 0:17:12.510
<v Speaker 6>get you maybe in the in the Western Conference at

0:17:12.550 --> 0:17:12.930
<v Speaker 6>that point.

0:17:13.490 --> 0:17:14.859
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're all on the same page here in

0:17:14.890 --> 0:17:18.100
<v Speaker 3>the sense that the only hope is the Jimmy Butler return.

0:17:18.300 --> 0:17:21.619
<v Speaker 3>Like right now, like you said, your initial question was

0:17:21.660 --> 0:17:25.540
<v Speaker 3>what's a realistic expectation? The realistic expectation is, and I

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.300
<v Speaker 3>think we're all in agreement unless somebody has a different

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 3>take on this, can you be 500 when Jimmy comes back?

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Can you be 500? Like tonight, you got to win

0:17:33.780 --> 0:17:37.060
<v Speaker 3>tonight to get to one and one, right? J.D., I confess,

0:17:37.100 --> 0:17:38.859
<v Speaker 3>I did not prep this. What's the schedule look like

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.010
<v Speaker 3>the next, like, week to 10 days. It's tough.

0:17:41.350 --> 0:17:43.790
<v Speaker 6>It's Memphis tonight, which is by far the most winnable.

0:17:43.830 --> 0:17:47.190
<v Speaker 6>They play in Phoenix tomorrow, and that's already a game

0:17:47.210 --> 0:17:49.410
<v Speaker 6>where don't expect Steph and don't expect Draymond to play.

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 6>So that's almost a plan. You're already planning losses the

0:17:53.660 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 6>third game.

0:17:54.100 --> 0:17:57.100
<v Speaker 3>Of the year. I'm asking at Denver, is there a

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>chance they could slip into a very early negative spot?

0:17:59.980 --> 0:18:01.739
<v Speaker 3>There's a chance they could be 0-6 if they don't

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.540
<v Speaker 3>win tonight. Just keeping it a box.

0:18:03.580 --> 0:18:05.690
<v Speaker 4>But there's a chance they could be 1-5 if they do.

0:18:07.390 --> 0:18:08.950
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, that plays a factor.

0:18:08.970 --> 0:18:09.189
<v Speaker 2>Also true.

0:18:09.650 --> 0:18:11.469
<v Speaker 3>Negative– like, you know, we just talk about– it's not

0:18:11.550 --> 0:18:14.510
<v Speaker 3>apples to apples, but how the Giants season started was–

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.460
<v Speaker 3>I still go back to that double walk-off in Philadelphia.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like, did they ever recover from that? Like, if

0:18:18.619 --> 0:18:22.869
<v Speaker 3>they start one and five– Oh, man. I mean, all

0:18:22.890 --> 0:18:26.610
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, the Giants didn't even do that. They

0:18:26.630 --> 0:18:29.790
<v Speaker 3>were 2-4. I remember Tony got his win in San

0:18:29.810 --> 0:18:31.350
<v Speaker 3>Diego on the Monday. He got two wins in San Diego.

0:18:31.369 --> 0:18:33.350
<v Speaker 4>By the way, after that double walk-off in Philly, they

0:18:33.390 --> 0:18:35.590
<v Speaker 4>got swept by the Rays. Those look like good losses now.

0:18:35.609 --> 0:18:38.210
<v Speaker 3>They do, but I don't know. Yeah, on hindsight now?

0:18:38.250 --> 0:18:39.850
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't at least one of them a walk-off?

0:18:39.890 --> 0:18:40.860
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's Tampa.

0:18:40.910 --> 0:18:43.580
<v Speaker 3>No, both Sunday. There were two walk-offs in Tampa, too.

0:18:43.580 --> 0:18:43.739
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:45.660
<v Speaker 4>In Philly, and then Tampa walked off on them.

0:18:45.700 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I think Friday and Sunday they got walked off in Tampa.

0:18:47.540 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Those are good walk-offs, though. Will the Grizzlies walk off

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the Warriors tonight? Man, it's tough. And, you know, I

0:18:54.460 --> 0:18:55.780
<v Speaker 3>know you want to get I'm sort of getting ahead

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.030
<v Speaker 3>to your next topic, which is how do dynasties end?

0:18:59.330 --> 0:19:01.870
<v Speaker 3>You know, and that's I remember talking. I was covering

0:19:01.890 --> 0:19:03.770
<v Speaker 3>the 49ers in the 90s and Bart Oates. They got

0:19:03.810 --> 0:19:05.470
<v Speaker 3>the center from the New York Giants. Bart Oates, he

0:19:05.490 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>came over. And he said, you know, he goes, you know,

0:19:08.340 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't happen. What's happening here doesn't happen, and it

0:19:10.900 --> 0:19:12.220
<v Speaker 3>will end one day. I go, what do you mean?

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>He goes, you had Steve Young replace Joe Montana. He goes,

0:19:14.820 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't happen. Well, it did happen when Aaron Rodgers

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.900
<v Speaker 3>replaced Brett Favre, right? That was about the only other time.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.379
<v Speaker 3>He goes, and once Steve's done, it's over. And I

0:19:21.380 --> 0:19:23.940
<v Speaker 3>was like, really? Okay. I always remembered that. He was right,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.350
<v Speaker 3>by the way. It was over. So, I mean, are

0:19:26.940 --> 0:19:29.790
<v Speaker 3>we just kind of facing the reality? Then we get

0:19:29.830 --> 0:19:32.130
<v Speaker 3>to the big macro that everybody wants. What could Dunleavy

0:19:32.170 --> 0:19:35.209
<v Speaker 3>have done? to bring Steph a championship. And I know

0:19:35.250 --> 0:19:36.830
<v Speaker 3>we could do the untitled round table on that topic.

0:19:36.850 --> 0:19:38.810
<v Speaker 4>We're going to do the Dunleavy thing and the Dynasty thing,

0:19:38.830 --> 0:19:40.350
<v Speaker 4>because I think that's a really good discussion. What did

0:19:40.369 --> 0:19:40.990
<v Speaker 4>you have, Derek?

0:19:41.010 --> 0:19:42.109
<v Speaker 7>Well, I was going to say, like, how can we

0:19:42.130 --> 0:19:44.949
<v Speaker 7>have expectations that they're going to make the postseason or

0:19:45.150 --> 0:19:47.909
<v Speaker 7>maybe even play in when, I know Steph says in

0:19:48.130 --> 0:19:49.429
<v Speaker 7>media day, like, playoffs.

0:19:49.570 --> 0:19:51.140
<v Speaker 3>You guys know. think we're going to make the playoffs?

0:19:51.500 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 7>When Steve Kerr himself says, guys, this is process over expectations.

0:19:56.020 --> 0:19:59.070
<v Speaker 7>And he was pretty honest in that interview with Logan

0:19:59.090 --> 0:20:01.330
<v Speaker 7>Murdoch in the ringer about, guys, this is what it

0:20:01.390 --> 0:20:03.689
<v Speaker 7>is at this point. Like, we can make trades and

0:20:03.730 --> 0:20:06.590
<v Speaker 7>our fans will be happy. and for right now, but

0:20:06.630 --> 0:20:08.910
<v Speaker 7>the next 15 years will be miserable. And I'm like, well,

0:20:08.930 --> 0:20:11.030
<v Speaker 7>I don't care about the next 15 years. I care

0:20:11.050 --> 0:20:13.850
<v Speaker 7>about right now. I understand you have to be smart

0:20:13.869 --> 0:20:16.369
<v Speaker 7>about the future and everything, but the team itself is

0:20:16.390 --> 0:20:18.709
<v Speaker 7>telling you we're not the same old team. Steve was

0:20:18.790 --> 0:20:21.730
<v Speaker 7>honest last year saying we're a fading dynasty. We can't

0:20:21.750 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 7>compete with the likes of OKC or the Spurs or

0:20:24.859 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 7>the Nuggets. And that's the same case this year where

0:20:27.460 --> 0:20:30.190
<v Speaker 7>even Draymond's saying it's process over expectations.

0:20:30.270 --> 0:20:31.790
<v Speaker 4>Well, and if we're questioning whether or not the roster

0:20:31.810 --> 0:20:34.030
<v Speaker 4>is good enough, it brings us to the guy responsible

0:20:34.070 --> 0:20:36.590
<v Speaker 4>for putting it together. And that's Mike Dunleavy Jr. We

0:20:36.630 --> 0:20:38.609
<v Speaker 4>got to talk about him. Has he been too conservative

0:20:38.910 --> 0:20:41.470
<v Speaker 4>or has he done a good job protecting the franchise's future?

0:20:41.730 --> 0:20:43.869
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss that when we come on back to Harmonic Brewing.

0:20:43.930 --> 0:20:45.030
<v Speaker 4>Adam Copeland, Derek Papa.

0:20:45.230 --> 0:20:45.850
<v Speaker 3>It's filling up.

0:20:45.930 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Brian Murphy, Marcus Boucher, John Dickinson from Harmonic Brewing, our

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.260
<v Speaker 4>2026 Dubs Roundtable.

0:20:51.580 --> 0:20:55.380
<v Speaker 3>Plenty of good seats still available. We'll come back. Go

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>to StubHub, see what you can find.

0:20:56.690 --> 0:20:59.470
<v Speaker 4>Good seats still available here with you until 4.30. More

0:20:59.510 --> 0:21:01.630
<v Speaker 4>on Mike Denlevy and the team he's built next, only

0:21:01.650 --> 0:21:02.450
<v Speaker 4>here on the Sports Leader.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Now back to the 2026 KNBR Dubs Roundtable, sponsored by

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>O'Donnell Financial, where planning.

0:21:12.810 --> 0:21:14.690
<v Speaker 3>Is a process, not a product.

0:21:14.770 --> 0:21:16.690
<v Speaker 1>Call 1-866-496-2300. Here's Adam Copeland.

0:21:26.290 --> 0:21:29.869
<v Speaker 4>It's the 2026 Dubs Roundtable live from Harmonic Brewing in

0:21:29.890 --> 0:21:33.629
<v Speaker 4>Thrive City. Adam Copeland, Derek Papa, Marcus Boucher, Brian Murphy,

0:21:33.690 --> 0:21:35.890
<v Speaker 4>and John Dickinson with you. The Warriors open their home

0:21:35.910 --> 0:21:40.189
<v Speaker 4>schedule tonight at 7 o'clock. Against the Memphis Grizzlies.

0:21:40.250 --> 0:21:40.629
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they do.

0:21:40.630 --> 0:21:42.330
<v Speaker 4>And as JD says, it's their one chance for a

0:21:42.369 --> 0:21:43.230
<v Speaker 4>win for like a month.

0:21:44.790 --> 0:21:47.950
<v Speaker 3>Maybe a week. JT is famously optimistic. Maybe a week.

0:21:47.990 --> 0:21:49.950
<v Speaker 3>He's a guy who always sees the sunny side of life.

0:21:49.970 --> 0:21:51.470
<v Speaker 4>So, JD, where does it go? You said they get

0:21:51.530 --> 0:21:53.770
<v Speaker 4>Memphis tonight. They go Phoenix tomorrow.

0:21:53.790 --> 0:21:57.419
<v Speaker 3>At Phoenix. Ouch. Nobody's going to play. Ouch. And then

0:21:57.580 --> 0:22:00.540
<v Speaker 3>at Denver on Monday. Ouch. And then they go to

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota for Wednesday. Ouch. I feel good about that one. No,

0:22:04.740 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you don't.

0:22:05.140 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:22:06.780 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>They won there last year without anybody playing. Anthony Edwards

0:22:10.540 --> 0:22:11.869
<v Speaker 3>just went for like 50. They were up 1-0 on

0:22:12.010 --> 0:22:14.270
<v Speaker 3>the Wolves when Jimmy went down, right? Yep.

0:22:14.430 --> 0:22:16.910
<v Speaker 4>Well, but then Murph's guy, Kaminga, took over and had

0:22:16.970 --> 0:22:18.189
<v Speaker 4>four great games that they lost.

0:22:18.250 --> 0:22:20.660
<v Speaker 3>Charles Bassey's my guy. Let's talk about Kaminga. All right.

0:22:20.700 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 4>No, let's not talk about Kaminga, but let's talk about

0:22:23.060 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Mike Dunleavy, though. And how things have gone. I frequently,

0:22:26.619 --> 0:22:30.130
<v Speaker 4>and I do think that Mike Dunleavy at times gets

0:22:30.170 --> 0:22:32.169
<v Speaker 4>a raw deal because the move he made, and we

0:22:32.190 --> 0:22:35.030
<v Speaker 4>talk too much or a lot about him being too conservative,

0:22:35.310 --> 0:22:37.129
<v Speaker 4>but the move he made was for Jimmy Butler. And

0:22:37.150 --> 0:22:39.130
<v Speaker 4>they tried to get another big player at that same

0:22:39.170 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 4>trade deadline a couple of years ago. And the acquisition

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.459
<v Speaker 4>of Jimmy Butler changed the Warriors fortunes for that year.

0:22:44.830 --> 0:22:47.490
<v Speaker 4>Their two-year commitment to him beyond that changed their fortunes

0:22:47.770 --> 0:22:50.060
<v Speaker 4>for what the end of this dynasty could have been. That,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.220
<v Speaker 4>to me, was based on what Joe Laker was willing

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 4>to pay, what they gave up to get him, and

0:22:54.220 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 4>then to actually acquire him was a commitment to, we

0:22:57.300 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 4>are going to try to win with three players. We

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 4>know we need another scorer and another guy who can

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 4>defend on the wing. And they committed to Steph Curry

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.290
<v Speaker 4>in the end of this dynasty. Once Jimmy goes down,

0:23:06.570 --> 0:23:09.250
<v Speaker 4>everything changes. So I understand that we've looked at this

0:23:09.330 --> 0:23:12.130
<v Speaker 4>offseason and last as like, well, they haven't really done

0:23:12.150 --> 0:23:14.550
<v Speaker 4>much of anything, and I think that's true. That said,

0:23:14.590 --> 0:23:17.070
<v Speaker 4>they kind of were already pot committed on Jimmy Butler.

0:23:17.109 --> 0:23:19.340
<v Speaker 4>So unless there was another player that they could legitimately

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>have acquired, and maybe LeBron's that guy, but Steve Kerr

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.580
<v Speaker 4>says he was never coming here. Never close. Other than that, again,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.340
<v Speaker 4>people wanted Giannis. Why would Giannis want to commit long-term here,

0:23:28.380 --> 0:23:30.340
<v Speaker 4>knowing that Steph's gone forever? in a couple of years,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.179
<v Speaker 4>and maybe it would take too many draft picks to

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 4>get him. I'm not sure where else you would have gone.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 4>What I would ask is, has Mike Dunleavy been too conservative,

0:23:37.540 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 4>or has he done a good job of both trying

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.699
<v Speaker 4>to win now, though it's kind of blown up, but

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 4>he's also protected the franchise's future?

0:23:45.210 --> 0:23:47.690
<v Speaker 7>I think he struck out on a lot of big swings, honestly,

0:23:47.750 --> 0:23:49.730
<v Speaker 7>and I think that he's always trying. It's just that

0:23:49.770 --> 0:23:52.109
<v Speaker 7>right now, no one wants to play for this team.

0:23:52.510 --> 0:23:55.100
<v Speaker 7>I think that they look at What's this team going

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 7>to be like once Steph Curry retires? So, yeah, I know, like,

0:23:58.380 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 7>Steve was pretty honest the other day in the article

0:24:00.100 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 7>saying that LeBron James is never coming here. And maybe

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.670
<v Speaker 7>there was an opportunity to get Anthony Davis or Jalen Brown,

0:24:05.690 --> 0:24:06.429
<v Speaker 7>but they don't want to do that.

0:24:06.450 --> 0:24:08.590
<v Speaker 3>They don't want to give up the draft capital. So,

0:24:09.230 --> 0:24:09.910
<v Speaker 3>I think it's where.

0:24:10.900 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 7>Mike Dunleavy has been able to do what he really

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.859
<v Speaker 7>wants to do with his team because Joe Lacob, equal parts,

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 7>wants to build the future but also wants to win

0:24:17.900 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 7>right now.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.330
<v Speaker 3>So I think he's in a possible situation, honestly. Yeah,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.470
<v Speaker 3>I agree that Cope said he gets a little bit

0:24:23.490 --> 0:24:25.590
<v Speaker 3>of a raw deal because the Jimmy Butler was the swing.

0:24:25.690 --> 0:24:26.970
<v Speaker 4>And it was a great swing.

0:24:27.050 --> 0:24:30.030
<v Speaker 3>It was a great swing. And I know he's easy

0:24:30.290 --> 0:24:32.870
<v Speaker 3>to rip him for Kristaps. I get it. But that

0:24:32.890 --> 0:24:35.540
<v Speaker 3>was the Kaminga deal, right? Yeah. But you didn't have

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 3>to re-sign him. Well, this is true. I'm just talking

0:24:37.740 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 3>about originally getting him. Okay. But originally getting him for

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.180
<v Speaker 3>Kaminga when the market told us what the league thought

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 3>of Kaminga, right? What did he wind up signing for? Minnesota.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Not much, right? Less than Porzingis.

0:24:48.660 --> 0:24:48.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:48.869 --> 0:24:51.490
<v Speaker 3>So getting Porzingis. But re-signing Porzingis, I think, was a

0:24:51.650 --> 0:24:54.790
<v Speaker 3>factor of them. not being able to get anybody else really.

0:24:54.930 --> 0:24:57.730
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, of course he's open for massive criticism on that.

0:24:57.770 --> 0:25:00.210
<v Speaker 3>There's no question about that. He, he has to wear

0:25:00.290 --> 0:25:02.410
<v Speaker 3>that one. I think Lake was playing the long game

0:25:02.430 --> 0:25:04.980
<v Speaker 3>here saying, listen, I'll take the, I'll take the round.

0:25:05.020 --> 0:25:07.820
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the venom from the round table in October, 2026.

0:25:07.820 --> 0:25:11.500
<v Speaker 3>And you guys will see in Lake Cubs view that

0:25:11.619 --> 0:25:13.540
<v Speaker 3>by keeping our picks in our cap room, that in

0:25:13.619 --> 0:25:16.429
<v Speaker 3>four years, we will be a contender, not a, you know,

0:25:16.770 --> 0:25:19.050
<v Speaker 3>I think he's playing the long game is what I think.

0:25:19.650 --> 0:25:21.750
<v Speaker 3>That's at least my read, and I do give Dunleavy

0:25:22.010 --> 0:25:24.170
<v Speaker 3>credit for the Butler move, but of course, as Marcus

0:25:24.190 --> 0:25:26.050
<v Speaker 3>points out, criticism for re-signing Porzingis.

0:25:26.090 --> 0:25:28.110
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I'll say this. I think we all agree

0:25:28.150 --> 0:25:30.350
<v Speaker 5>with the Jimmy Butler trade. I'm one of the guys

0:25:30.390 --> 0:25:32.330
<v Speaker 5>that was screaming for them to make a move, and

0:25:32.350 --> 0:25:33.750
<v Speaker 5>they went out and they made the move, and it

0:25:33.810 --> 0:25:36.430
<v Speaker 5>turned out to be successful leading up to those injuries

0:25:36.550 --> 0:25:39.389
<v Speaker 5>with this veteran roster. I guess my bigger problem is

0:25:39.910 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 5>how reluctant Mike Dunleavy was to even think about moving

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy Butler this offseason. And I thought maybe there was

0:25:45.740 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 5>a possibility where we saw Paul George in kind of

0:25:48.300 --> 0:25:50.820
<v Speaker 5>a salary dumping trade to get Jalen Brown. Maybe the

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.020
<v Speaker 5>Warriors could have worked out a similar type deal. Maybe

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.330
<v Speaker 5>that leads to LeBron James. Maybe I'm just talking too

0:25:55.369 --> 0:25:58.450
<v Speaker 5>much fantasy baseball and all these makeup scenarios in my head.

0:25:58.670 --> 0:25:59.990
<v Speaker 5>But I think that's why a lot of Warriors fans

0:26:00.030 --> 0:26:02.650
<v Speaker 5>are frustrated because they look at the results of last year.

0:26:02.970 --> 0:26:05.650
<v Speaker 5>They know that Jimmy Butler's not showing up until 2027.

0:26:05.650 --> 0:26:06.969
<v Speaker 5>And you're looking at a roster that won 37 games

0:26:08.030 --> 0:26:10.830
<v Speaker 5>And besides the loss of Kaminga and the addition of Yaxel,

0:26:11.109 --> 0:26:12.380
<v Speaker 5>it's the same roster. Whoa.

0:26:12.650 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 4>George is Yang.

0:26:13.730 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Whatever his name is. George is Yang. Drop the S.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.100
<v Speaker 3>George is Yang. Drop the S. Veteran presence, JD. What

0:26:21.180 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>are they calling him? The minivan. They're calling him the minivan.

0:26:23.500 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 4>The minivan. Because he's taking these kids to school.

0:26:24.980 --> 0:26:27.659
<v Speaker 3>Not to be confused with Murph, you'll remember the custodian

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.540
<v Speaker 3>or the janitor, right? Brian Cardinal. He does remember Brian Cardinal.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:31.830
<v Speaker 7>U of A?

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:33.420
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.109
<v Speaker 4>Am I wrong on that? My bad. Purdue, maybe. Dude,

0:26:37.130 --> 0:26:39.230
<v Speaker 4>he looks like a Boilermaker, man. He looks like a

0:26:39.250 --> 0:26:42.110
<v Speaker 4>guy playing on day three of the tournament. You know

0:26:42.130 --> 0:26:43.450
<v Speaker 4>what I mean?

0:26:43.470 --> 0:26:45.990
<v Speaker 3>Brian Cardinal could have been a Snowtime Laker, yeah. He

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.100
<v Speaker 3>could have been. Brian Cardinal's college. Dang it. Now you

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:49.580
<v Speaker 3>got me going.

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:50.660
<v Speaker 4>I know I thought you were there.

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, back to the next topic.

0:26:52.460 --> 0:26:52.859
<v Speaker 1>Where are you?

0:26:52.900 --> 0:26:57.889
<v Speaker 3>So everybody hates Dunleavy, right? If he– Yeah, back to that, Murph.

0:26:59.810 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>He's an extraordinarily unpopular, by the way, Brian Cardinal, part

0:27:03.619 --> 0:27:06.169
<v Speaker 3>of the 2011 Mavs, who won a championship. Purdue! Wow,

0:27:06.619 --> 0:27:09.260
<v Speaker 3>that's incredible knowledge. I love it. He looks like he's

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a boil. He definitely does.

0:27:11.020 --> 0:27:13.369
<v Speaker 6>Dude, he looked like a boilermaker. He definitely was. You

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.150
<v Speaker 6>may be confusing him with Chandler Parsons.

0:27:15.609 --> 0:27:18.790
<v Speaker 3>Chandler Parsons. Another wide forward, dude. Yeah. Kind of. Back

0:27:18.830 --> 0:27:21.710
<v Speaker 3>to Shaq's nickname, the Snowtime Lakers. Get Brian Cardinal. He

0:27:21.730 --> 0:27:25.510
<v Speaker 3>went to Arizona, right? No, he went to Florida. Who's that?

0:27:25.609 --> 0:27:29.030
<v Speaker 3>Chandler Parsons. So anyway, yeah, I would say Dunleavy right now.

0:27:29.150 --> 0:27:32.210
<v Speaker 3>Extraordinarily unpopular. Hey, it's like the guy who follows, you know,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:34.900
<v Speaker 3>Bill Walsh or the guy who, although Seifert won two

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowls. But I'm just saying, how smart is Bob Myers,

0:27:37.660 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 3>by the way? Just slipping out the side door. He

0:27:41.580 --> 0:27:43.940
<v Speaker 3>looked relaxed and has a full head of hair in

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:44.980
<v Speaker 3>the commander's box.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:45.740
<v Speaker 4>One, four, and one.

0:27:45.820 --> 0:27:48.580
<v Speaker 3>High five. Well, he hired Bob Chesney, too. I want

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.340
<v Speaker 3>to say that. Let's just put that out there in

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:51.610
<v Speaker 3>the universe right now, buddy.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:51.850
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:27:52.770 --> 0:27:54.950
<v Speaker 3>We can do that roundtable if you want.

0:27:55.210 --> 0:27:58.369
<v Speaker 5>Bob Chesney at UCLA and LeBron James in Philly.

0:27:58.609 --> 0:28:02.130
<v Speaker 3>Yes. And Jalen Brown. He's pulling all the shit. Jalen Brown.

0:28:02.270 --> 0:28:05.330
<v Speaker 6>Some have him tabbed to lead the new expansion franchise

0:28:05.369 --> 0:28:06.590
<v Speaker 6>in Vegas at some point.

0:28:06.830 --> 0:28:07.149
<v Speaker 1>Really?

0:28:07.170 --> 0:28:10.869
<v Speaker 3>By the way. Do you think if Bob Myers stayed,

0:28:11.810 --> 0:28:12.630
<v Speaker 3>it would be different here?

0:28:13.170 --> 0:28:15.230
<v Speaker 4>No, I think Bob Myers left because Bob Myers is

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:16.100
<v Speaker 4>smarter than anything.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>He saw the writing on the wall.

0:28:17.780 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Bob Myers knows so much about everything that

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to building a team or how to

0:28:23.100 --> 0:28:26.220
<v Speaker 4>run an organization, that he knew staying here is not

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.540
<v Speaker 4>good for, there's nothing I can do to change where

0:28:28.580 --> 0:28:29.020
<v Speaker 4>this is going.

0:28:29.140 --> 0:28:32.390
<v Speaker 7>And also, what do we see draft day? Joe Lacob

0:28:32.570 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 7>undermining Mike Dunleavy Jr.

0:28:34.220 --> 0:28:36.020
<v Speaker 3>No matter how much they joke about it. Bob Myers

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:37.900
<v Speaker 3>wanted to get the hell out of here. You think

0:28:37.940 --> 0:28:42.410
<v Speaker 3>that interaction was... Oh, yeah. I can't presume to know.

0:28:42.450 --> 0:28:43.090
<v Speaker 1>Make a trade.

0:28:43.110 --> 0:28:45.310
<v Speaker 3>Make a trade. What I'll say is this. What I'll

0:28:45.330 --> 0:28:46.910
<v Speaker 3>say is this. It's not. And I'm with you. Answer

0:28:46.930 --> 0:28:47.270
<v Speaker 3>the phone.

0:28:47.310 --> 0:28:49.820
<v Speaker 4>I don't try to pretend to know and psychoanalyze anything

0:28:49.860 --> 0:28:51.860
<v Speaker 4>like that. But when you see something like that, and

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.459
<v Speaker 4>then they're asked about it, and the whole response to

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 4>it is, oh, we were.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Joking about a golf game.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>No, come on.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.580
<v Speaker 4>They did a throwaway sort of. There was nothing. It

0:29:00.620 --> 0:29:03.290
<v Speaker 4>wasn't about we have very intense conversations all the time.

0:29:03.550 --> 0:29:05.390
<v Speaker 4>This is just something that's in the heat of the moment.

0:29:05.410 --> 0:29:07.270
<v Speaker 4>They didn't go through that. They did a little joke

0:29:07.310 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 4>and tried to brush it off.

0:29:08.090 --> 0:29:10.250
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they did. In the revisionist history, by the way,

0:29:10.350 --> 0:29:13.310
<v Speaker 3>who wanted Yaxel and who didn't in the revisionist history?

0:29:13.350 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody wanted Yaxel at this point. But no,

0:29:15.050 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in that argument, between Laker and Dunleavy, who

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 3>wanted Yaxel?

0:29:19.460 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 6>I think they both wanted Yaxel, but I think Joe wanted...

0:29:23.370 --> 0:29:26.290
<v Speaker 6>a trade back to get Yaxl and another asset. Oh,

0:29:26.310 --> 0:29:27.870
<v Speaker 6>he thought Yaxl was going to stick around. That would

0:29:27.910 --> 0:29:29.950
<v Speaker 6>be the hypothetical.

0:29:30.090 --> 0:29:32.530
<v Speaker 3>It would be, hey, get something and get Yaxl. I

0:29:32.570 --> 0:29:35.050
<v Speaker 3>work with a guy who traffics in conspiracy theories. He's

0:29:35.090 --> 0:29:37.470
<v Speaker 3>a big conspiracy theory guy. I brought my tinfoil. We

0:29:37.510 --> 0:29:38.010
<v Speaker 3>can get into it.

0:29:38.450 --> 0:29:40.380
<v Speaker 4>Marcus, what's your number one? What are you hot on

0:29:40.420 --> 0:29:41.380
<v Speaker 4>right now, conspiracy wise?

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.580
<v Speaker 3>Traylon Burke scored a touchdown against the Niners on Monday night.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.370
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that wasn't out there on social media.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.490
<v Speaker 5>No, I didn't fully go out there.

0:29:49.690 --> 0:29:50.810
<v Speaker 3>I brought it up. I brought it up.

0:29:50.810 --> 0:29:53.910
<v Speaker 4>Apparently, the second the ball breaks the line, it breaks

0:29:53.930 --> 0:29:54.290
<v Speaker 4>the plan.

0:29:54.490 --> 0:29:55.710
<v Speaker 3>But he didn't have control of the ball. I'm not

0:29:55.750 --> 0:29:58.810
<v Speaker 3>buying that one. The ball was juggling in his hands.

0:29:58.890 --> 0:29:59.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:59.310 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Is this guy still rooting for Vegas?

0:30:00.380 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It's clearly not a touchdown. Is this guy still rooting

0:30:02.540 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 3>for Vegas? Hey, Raiders could help the Niners out with

0:30:05.020 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Rams on Sunday. That's right. Big game this weekend. Anyway.

0:30:07.660 --> 0:30:10.260
<v Speaker 3>That's a big if. So is Dunleavy the least popular

0:30:10.340 --> 0:30:12.940
<v Speaker 3>GM right now, or is it Buster? I think it's Buster. Yeah,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.070
<v Speaker 3>it's Buster. It's still Buster. Buster's lower than Dunleavy? Yeah.

0:30:16.090 --> 0:30:16.450
<v Speaker 3>I think so.

0:30:16.470 --> 0:30:16.540
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:30:16.550 --> 0:30:17.150
<v Speaker 5>Is he?

0:30:18.190 --> 0:30:18.950
<v Speaker 3>You know why?

0:30:18.990 --> 0:30:21.930
<v Speaker 4>Because Buster is, one, he's the legacy guy of the franchise.

0:30:21.950 --> 0:30:23.790
<v Speaker 3>I think Dunleavy's less popular. Here's the other thing. I

0:30:23.830 --> 0:30:25.450
<v Speaker 3>don't know, man. People are pissed.

0:30:25.530 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 5>It feels like there's a future with the Giants.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.220
<v Speaker 3>There's a paper future, but the thing that people do.

0:30:33.260 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Miscast is the fact that the Giants have been the

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:41.020
<v Speaker 6>Warriors in the time since they won their last championship.

0:30:41.550 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>The Warriors have been far better than the Giants. Oh,

0:30:44.660 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 3>without question.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 6>As much as everybody's disappointed and it feels like failure,

0:30:48.500 --> 0:30:51.140
<v Speaker 6>and the Warriors may be having their Giants year this year.

0:30:51.260 --> 0:30:53.100
<v Speaker 4>I'd kill for one of those Yankees wildcard series losses.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.510
<v Speaker 6>But, like, could you imagine if you, you know, got

0:30:55.550 --> 0:30:57.650
<v Speaker 6>into the playoffs a couple of these last five years?

0:30:57.750 --> 0:30:59.070
<v Speaker 3>I mean, people would be going crazy.

0:30:59.170 --> 0:30:59.510
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:59.550 --> 0:31:04.190
<v Speaker 3>You'd be running around hogs out. I'd be dropping trout.

0:31:04.210 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree. I just feel like Dunleavy.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:07.420 --> 0:31:11.060
<v Speaker 3>I honestly feel like they're playing. Give me an 83-win

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 3>playoff team. You'd be running down Terry Francois. Speedo. Skinny

0:31:16.940 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 3>dipping in the cove. I honestly feel like their playing

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.900
<v Speaker 3>careers color what people think of them. Because Dunleavy was

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 3>an unpopular player.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:23.220
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:31:24.020 --> 0:31:25.500
<v Speaker 3>One of the most hated Warriors players of all time.

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:27.180
<v Speaker 3>And he was the number three pick, right? So he

0:31:27.500 --> 0:31:30.940
<v Speaker 3>was an unpopular player who's shepherding them into the abyss.

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:31.370
<v Speaker 4>Exactly.

0:31:31.380 --> 0:31:34.450
<v Speaker 3>Whereas Buster at least has his defenders who say, wow.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Buster Pose.

0:31:36.990 --> 0:31:38.130
<v Speaker 4>His number's going to hang up there.

0:31:38.170 --> 0:31:40.770
<v Speaker 3>Whereas Dunleavy, he shows his face and people get pissed.

0:31:40.850 --> 0:31:43.850
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean? So anyway, well, listen, he's

0:31:43.870 --> 0:31:46.010
<v Speaker 3>in a pickle now, man. He's in a pickle because

0:31:46.570 --> 0:31:49.570
<v Speaker 3>this squad is troubled. Okay, so how dramatic is this?

0:31:49.590 --> 0:31:51.290
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't been aggressive enough, by the way. I'm going

0:31:51.470 --> 0:31:53.950
<v Speaker 3>to answer that original question. Just briefly.

0:31:54.070 --> 0:31:55.870
<v Speaker 6>He has not been aggressive enough.

0:31:55.910 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 3>So where should they have been more aggressive?

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 4>The Kaminga thing definitely was a hang-up in the strategic

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 4>move to try to get more money on his deal

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 4>to move him for something like Porzingis. Well, That's a

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Bob Myers-like move. It just wasn't big enough.

0:32:06.420 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 6>Here's the thing, and I push back at the, well,

0:32:08.380 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 6>what could they have done? Well, here's what they could

0:32:10.180 --> 0:32:12.890
<v Speaker 6>have done. They could have looked to, okay, maybe you

0:32:12.930 --> 0:32:15.950
<v Speaker 6>can't get a star, but why would you also look

0:32:15.970 --> 0:32:17.990
<v Speaker 6>at the team that you currently have and running it

0:32:18.050 --> 0:32:20.290
<v Speaker 6>back and say, that's not good enough. We want to

0:32:20.330 --> 0:32:24.510
<v Speaker 6>be in between where you are now and championship contention,

0:32:24.550 --> 0:32:26.820
<v Speaker 6>which might be a team that actually could contend for

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.300
<v Speaker 6>a six seed, which this team can't do. We all

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 6>agree on this panel. So that doesn't mean you mortgage

0:32:31.780 --> 0:32:34.340
<v Speaker 6>the entire future. That's another thing that's sort of this

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 6>revisionist history. Well, if you try to be the six seed,

0:32:36.500 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 6>you're going to mortgage your entire future. Not necessarily. There

0:32:39.500 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 6>are trades that could be made where you add draft capital,

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 6>maybe a couple of picks, not four or five or

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 6>the next 10 drafts to bring in players that are

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot better as your two, three, four players than

0:32:51.540 --> 0:32:55.140
<v Speaker 6>the guys that you currently have in maybe Pajemski and Yaxel.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 6>There's an in-between ground here that I think we don't

0:32:58.340 --> 0:33:01.780
<v Speaker 6>discuss enough as it relates to this Warriors team ability

0:33:01.900 --> 0:33:06.310
<v Speaker 6>to be just more relevant and competitive on a night-in-night-out basis.

0:33:06.370 --> 0:33:08.650
<v Speaker 6>Nobody's saying they can win a championship. They know they

0:33:08.690 --> 0:33:12.070
<v Speaker 6>can't win a championship. It's can you be more interesting

0:33:12.170 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 6>night-to-night beyond Steph and Draymond and Yaxel trying to to

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 6>go at it with Luka Doncic on the first night

0:33:18.900 --> 0:33:19.620
<v Speaker 6>of his NBA career.

0:33:19.940 --> 0:33:22.030
<v Speaker 4>We are live from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City. The

0:33:22.050 --> 0:33:25.590
<v Speaker 4>Warriors and the Memphis Grizzlies tonight at 7 o'clock. The

0:33:25.630 --> 0:33:28.770
<v Speaker 4>get-in price is dropping now because we're only here for

0:33:28.770 --> 0:33:31.610
<v Speaker 4>45 minutes. The get-in price is like pennies on the dollar.

0:33:31.630 --> 0:33:33.780
<v Speaker 3>Marcus knows where this story is going. So do you

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.660
<v Speaker 3>probably because I only have a finite number of stories.

0:33:35.700 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 3>But when we count the attendance at the Warriors roundtable,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 3>This is like when, right out of college, we had

0:33:44.180 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 3>a Halloween party in Berkeley. My buddies were renting a

0:33:46.060 --> 0:33:47.350
<v Speaker 3>pad in Berkeley. We thought it was going to be

0:33:47.370 --> 0:33:52.250
<v Speaker 3>a huge bash. Nobody came. Nobody came. Two of my

0:33:52.270 --> 0:33:56.590
<v Speaker 3>buddies came for Halloween as girls. That was their costume?

0:33:57.350 --> 0:34:01.580
<v Speaker 3>And when we reflected on how bad the party was,

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:03.820
<v Speaker 3>we wondered if we could have counted those two dudes

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.630
<v Speaker 3>as chicks. That was a total loss. So do we

0:34:08.770 --> 0:34:12.270
<v Speaker 3>count the social media guys as the girls at the

0:34:12.310 --> 0:34:16.530
<v Speaker 3>costume party? hair on Austin Scott. I'll tell you what.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 4>John Joe Curley counts as two.

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.180
<v Speaker 3>So do we count them in the full attendance the

0:34:21.219 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 3>way we counted my two buddies Sandro and George who

0:34:23.420 --> 0:34:24.300
<v Speaker 3>came dressed as chicks?

0:34:24.380 --> 0:34:27.739
<v Speaker 4>I would say that the social media guys don't get

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:28.300
<v Speaker 4>credit because.

0:34:28.180 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 3>They're getting paid. But the John Joe does. We do

0:34:31.300 --> 0:34:34.490
<v Speaker 3>get credit for him. Should we have counted those two dudes,

0:34:34.550 --> 0:34:36.150
<v Speaker 3>Sandro and George, who came dressed as chicks?

0:34:36.210 --> 0:34:36.390
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:34:37.650 --> 0:34:39.900
<v Speaker 3>In what way are you talking about? I'll allow it.

0:34:40.170 --> 0:34:41.890
<v Speaker 3>What way are you talking about? Well, we were like,

0:34:41.950 --> 0:34:42.910
<v Speaker 3>how many girls can we know?

0:34:42.950 --> 0:34:43.420
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no.

0:34:43.430 --> 0:34:45.610
<v Speaker 3>You don't want to know. Is there more to the story?

0:34:45.730 --> 0:34:48.069
<v Speaker 3>That was it. We pulled the plug on the party

0:34:48.090 --> 0:34:48.780
<v Speaker 3>and went to the city.

0:34:48.950 --> 0:34:51.379
<v Speaker 4>And I thought the other one, and maybe we won't

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:52.580
<v Speaker 4>go super fan of the sandwich.

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.779
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was the. Oh, dude. No, no, no, no, no, no, no.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 3>We won't do that. We're going to talk Warriors basketball. Yeah, yeah.

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.460
<v Speaker 3>Beat the Grizzlies. Beat the Grizzlies, baby. I've got 12

0:35:02.460 --> 0:35:05.970
<v Speaker 3>inches left here. Yeah, that was no. The six foot.

0:35:06.050 --> 0:35:07.830
<v Speaker 3>Can they stop Ty Jerome?

0:35:08.070 --> 0:35:08.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:08.670 --> 0:35:09.029
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:35:09.050 --> 0:35:10.730
<v Speaker 3>Forever Warrior, right?

0:35:10.810 --> 0:35:11.070
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:11.230 --> 0:35:12.950
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Forever Warrior. We did 45 the other night.

0:35:12.969 --> 0:35:13.089
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:13.110 --> 0:35:14.509
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about that on the air. And a

0:35:14.530 --> 0:35:16.610
<v Speaker 3>listener texted in and said, you mean Forever Warrior? I

0:35:16.650 --> 0:35:19.450
<v Speaker 3>had forgotten. I truly had forgotten. He was among the

0:35:19.489 --> 0:35:21.490
<v Speaker 3>most hated Warriors of this decade.

0:35:21.530 --> 0:35:21.850
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:35:21.870 --> 0:35:22.569
<v Speaker 3>By the fan base.

0:35:22.670 --> 0:35:22.910
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:35:22.969 --> 0:35:24.609
<v Speaker 3>Hated him. Did I miss that?

0:35:24.630 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 6>He was the Steve Kerr Nepo guy before Brandon Pajemski was.

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.700
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Because Kerr played him a ton, and he was

0:35:32.739 --> 0:35:36.299
<v Speaker 3>a two-way, and everybody hated him. Is Kerr like Farhan

0:35:36.340 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 3>now with Mauricio Dobon and all the guys that he fostered,

0:35:39.940 --> 0:35:43.870
<v Speaker 3>Connor Joe, who wound up playing decently elsewhere? Kerr's like, see?

0:35:44.150 --> 0:35:46.609
<v Speaker 3>The flip side to that argument, though, I will say,

0:35:46.830 --> 0:35:51.270
<v Speaker 3>he loves George and Yang. Well, the angle score 45

0:35:51.270 --> 0:35:52.890
<v Speaker 3>for the Grizz.

0:35:53.110 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's Georges. Adam Copeland, Derek Papa, Marcus Boucher,

0:35:58.180 --> 0:36:03.379
<v Speaker 4>Brian Murphy, and John Dickinson. From Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City.

0:36:03.620 --> 0:36:05.259
<v Speaker 4>When we come on back, we got to talk about this.

0:36:05.300 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Murph teased it a bit earlier. When we view this team,

0:36:07.660 --> 0:36:09.729
<v Speaker 4>we just talked about the expectations. And really, we're talking

0:36:09.770 --> 0:36:12.940
<v Speaker 4>like making the playoffs, right? Nobody's talking... about a championship.

0:36:13.340 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 4>Are we spending too much time worrying about whether Steph

0:36:15.340 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Curry can win another one that we're forgetting to appreciate

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.419
<v Speaker 4>the fact that we still get to watch him? How

0:36:20.460 --> 0:36:22.380
<v Speaker 4>will this warrior dynasty end? And when it comes to

0:36:22.420 --> 0:36:24.700
<v Speaker 4>like the 49ers or the 80s or the Giants of

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 4>the 2010s, compared to this, who's handled the end of

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.980
<v Speaker 4>a dynasty the best? We'll talk about it next from

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.299
<v Speaker 4>our 2026 Dubs Roundtable at Harmonic Brewing, only here on

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 4>the Sports Leader.

0:36:38.820 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Now back to the 2026 KNBR Dubs Roundtable, sponsored by

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.250
<v Speaker 2>O'Donnell Financial, where planning.

0:36:44.969 --> 0:36:48.850
<v Speaker 1>Is a process, not a product. Call 1-866-496-2300. Here's Adam Copeland.

0:36:56.660 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Live from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City, just outside of

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Chase Center.

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 3>That clapping you hear is Murph. Wait, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 3>She works here.

0:37:09.300 --> 0:37:10.190
<v Speaker 4>She doesn't count either.

0:37:10.210 --> 0:37:14.270
<v Speaker 3>Well, as I said, 12. And of the 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

0:37:14.270 --> 0:37:19.410
<v Speaker 3>Five workers. Hey, we're pulling a positive. Hell yeah. Does

0:37:19.450 --> 0:37:22.109
<v Speaker 3>that last work for us, too? Yeah, she works for us.

0:37:22.130 --> 0:37:24.330
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm not a fan of the attendance police thing.

0:37:24.590 --> 0:37:26.469
<v Speaker 6>I'm not a fan of that. Because you know what?

0:37:26.630 --> 0:37:29.509
<v Speaker 6>Last year, this was a 4-6 event, and it did

0:37:29.610 --> 0:37:33.770
<v Speaker 6>very well in terms of attendance. So for future reference,

0:37:34.170 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 6>let's pick a night where we can do it 4-6.

0:37:36.090 --> 0:37:37.859
<v Speaker 6>And we don't need to be doing the whole thing

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.290
<v Speaker 6>where we're laughing about attendance and making a joke of it.

0:37:40.300 --> 0:37:44.819
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving the thumbs up right there to those guys. Absolutely. No, yeah.

0:37:44.940 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead. So you don't support Anthony Davis' criticism of

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.620
<v Speaker 3>the Wizard fan base? Dress like a CNN?

0:37:51.500 --> 0:37:53.819
<v Speaker 6>He can have that. I'm just saying, let's not make

0:37:53.860 --> 0:37:56.180
<v Speaker 6>a mockery of our event. By the way, good to

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.690
<v Speaker 6>see you. Yeah, great to see you. Let's not make

0:37:59.750 --> 0:38:02.830
<v Speaker 6>a mockery of this event by comparing a 3.30 crowd

0:38:02.910 --> 0:38:06.350
<v Speaker 6>to a 5.30 crowd from a year ago.

0:38:06.390 --> 0:38:09.859
<v Speaker 3>It's a body clock event, dude. I'm saying perhaps we

0:38:09.900 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 3>could better use of the slides that we have on YouTube.

0:38:14.180 --> 0:38:16.620
<v Speaker 3>How many times do we have that slide up of us?

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.219
<v Speaker 3>Come to the YouTube thing. Let's be honest. How many

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.260
<v Speaker 3>radio events did you go to growing up as a listener?

0:38:22.500 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 3>All of them. I'll tell you what, dude.

0:38:24.460 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 4>I went to a handful on A's postgame where I

0:38:27.219 --> 0:38:28.780
<v Speaker 4>sat there with Marty and Billy North.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Nice. Look at you. That's incredible. And Marty was like,

0:38:32.140 --> 0:38:34.330
<v Speaker 3>why don't you wear my ring? Wear fans.

0:38:34.510 --> 0:38:37.069
<v Speaker 4>No, it was somewhere in Oakland or Berkeley. My mom

0:38:37.110 --> 0:38:38.509
<v Speaker 4>and I went a couple times, me and Mama Susie.

0:38:38.530 --> 0:38:40.810
<v Speaker 4>And Billy North actually told me a story. It's crazy.

0:38:40.830 --> 0:38:43.190
<v Speaker 4>Billy North was on the A's win in 72, 3,

0:38:43.190 --> 0:38:45.450
<v Speaker 4>and 4. And Billy North, I think, was not on

0:38:45.489 --> 0:38:47.770
<v Speaker 4>the 72. I think he wasn't on the 72 team,

0:38:47.830 --> 0:38:51.009
<v Speaker 4>but he was on the 73 team. Charlie Finley was

0:38:51.130 --> 0:38:53.350
<v Speaker 4>so cheap that when they got their ring.

0:38:53.390 --> 0:38:56.180
<v Speaker 3>How cheap was he? He was so cheap.

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 4>He didn't give them a ring for 72. When they

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.980
<v Speaker 4>got their 73 ring, it has both years one on

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 4>each side.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.589
<v Speaker 3>Hey, that sounds like James Dolan. That sounds like James Dolan.

0:39:05.690 --> 0:39:08.069
<v Speaker 4>So Billy North's like, I wasn't even on this team,

0:39:08.090 --> 0:39:09.790
<v Speaker 4>but I got a ring that has two years on it,

0:39:09.790 --> 0:39:10.890
<v Speaker 4>which is kind of fun.

0:39:11.070 --> 0:39:13.700
<v Speaker 3>So you went to A's postgame. I was a dork.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.020
<v Speaker 3>I was a dork all the time.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 6>I went to live events where I could get. I

0:39:17.460 --> 0:39:20.020
<v Speaker 6>remember getting a Mitch Richmond. There was some live, like,

0:39:20.380 --> 0:39:23.450
<v Speaker 6>meet Mitch Richmond and listen to a show. And he'd

0:39:23.489 --> 0:39:25.930
<v Speaker 6>sign a poster. Murph, why don't.

0:39:25.730 --> 0:39:30.100
<v Speaker 3>You tell your Alex? Bennett story? Murph's got a story.

0:39:30.140 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Alex Bennett went to Alex Bennett Live 105 morning show.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.100
<v Speaker 3>I'm young enough. Pardon me, the quake, not Live 105.

0:39:37.100 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm young enough and old enough to probably have hopped

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.630
<v Speaker 6>in on one of your shows. giant opening day pregame

0:39:42.650 --> 0:39:45.610
<v Speaker 6>shows in like 2005. I love it.

0:39:45.610 --> 0:39:46.190
<v Speaker 5>2006.

0:39:46.190 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 3>That's incredible. That's incredible.

0:39:48.090 --> 0:39:48.740
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Me and a bunch of geeky buddies formed a social

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 3>group that we thought was cool called Locust 409. Don't

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.370
<v Speaker 3>even ask. Our deal was to wear coats, ties, blue jeans,

0:39:56.430 --> 0:39:59.660
<v Speaker 3>and Ray-Bans or Wayfarers or Varnays and go to movies

0:39:59.739 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and just stone face and just like never. So we

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.380
<v Speaker 3>said we're going to go stone face to Alex Bennett's

0:40:05.460 --> 0:40:08.549
<v Speaker 3>Quake morning show. We skipped like first period, drove in there.

0:40:09.170 --> 0:40:12.230
<v Speaker 3>We piled into his tiny studio, and dude, he just

0:40:12.270 --> 0:40:14.589
<v Speaker 3>looked up. He goes, look at these guys. And then

0:40:14.630 --> 0:40:16.430
<v Speaker 3>he just went, never acknowledge us for the rest of

0:40:16.450 --> 0:40:17.390
<v Speaker 3>the day.

0:40:17.550 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Iced us, stoned us.

0:40:19.460 --> 0:40:22.260
<v Speaker 3>We looked like the biggest freaking losers of all time.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.899
<v Speaker 3>And we slinked out of there, bro. Maybe hit Mel's

0:40:24.940 --> 0:40:25.420
<v Speaker 3>for breakfast.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.460
<v Speaker 4>Well, maybe you come to one of our events. You'll

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.660
<v Speaker 4>have a story like that, too. We are live from

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:30.380
<v Speaker 4>Harmonic Brewing.

0:40:30.420 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Patrick and Zona got Warriors tickets. They did. They won

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.390
<v Speaker 3>a trip to Hawaii through us. Yes, they did.

0:40:35.630 --> 0:40:37.950
<v Speaker 4>We are live at Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City ahead

0:40:37.969 --> 0:40:40.489
<v Speaker 4>of the Warriors. Home opening night. I want to get

0:40:40.510 --> 0:40:42.530
<v Speaker 4>into this discussion about the end of dynasties.

0:40:42.690 --> 0:40:42.770
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:40:42.830 --> 0:40:44.330
<v Speaker 4>Because I think part of where we are with Steph

0:40:44.370 --> 0:40:46.890
<v Speaker 4>Curry and, like, if you're a realist about where the

0:40:46.930 --> 0:40:49.170
<v Speaker 4>Warriors are, you're looking at this going, hey, Steph kind

0:40:49.190 --> 0:40:49.969
<v Speaker 4>of told you where they were.

0:40:49.989 --> 0:40:50.550
<v Speaker 3>Steve Kerr.

0:40:50.670 --> 0:40:52.490
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why we wouldn't listen to his honesty.

0:40:52.630 --> 0:40:54.009
<v Speaker 4>We know what kind of coach he is.

0:40:54.310 --> 0:40:54.529
<v Speaker 1>It's over.

0:40:54.570 --> 0:40:56.779
<v Speaker 4>He's like, this is a fading dynasty, and we're not

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.060
<v Speaker 4>going to mortgage the entirety of the future to build

0:40:59.100 --> 0:41:01.540
<v Speaker 4>around a 39-year-old. I understand that logic as well. They

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:03.700
<v Speaker 4>already kind of did in trying to bring in. Jimmy

0:41:03.739 --> 0:41:05.779
<v Speaker 4>Butler it's the risk you run when you have an

0:41:05.940 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 4>aging roster so Murph I kind of want to I

0:41:08.620 --> 0:41:10.980
<v Speaker 4>want to ask you first because you covered the Niners

0:41:11.060 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 4>you were here for the Niners dynasty and I would

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 4>comp what the Warriors did in this run to what

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.550
<v Speaker 4>the Niners did in the 80s simply because of won

0:41:19.570 --> 0:41:23.650
<v Speaker 4>the championship number but also how irrelevant those two franchises

0:41:23.670 --> 0:41:26.029
<v Speaker 4>had been in the context of their leagues prior to

0:41:26.070 --> 0:41:28.549
<v Speaker 4>those dynastic runs and how it changed really I mean

0:41:28.570 --> 0:41:30.910
<v Speaker 4>the Warriors are a are a crown jewel franchise of

0:41:30.950 --> 0:41:34.410
<v Speaker 4>the nba now the 49ers always have been since the

0:41:34.650 --> 0:41:37.970
<v Speaker 4>1980s dynasty we've also seen the san francisco giants dynasty

0:41:38.010 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 4>through the 2010s what i'd ask is in the bay

0:41:40.900 --> 0:41:45.180
<v Speaker 4>area we've seen in different franchises in different sports you

0:41:45.219 --> 0:41:48.140
<v Speaker 4>mentioned the a72 34 even what have we learned as

0:41:48.180 --> 0:41:50.899
<v Speaker 4>fans about the end of a dynasty and also who's

0:41:50.940 --> 0:41:52.660
<v Speaker 4>handled it the best and what is the best way

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:53.819
<v Speaker 4>do we have any idea Well.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Let me throw out another one. The La Russa, Jose.

0:41:56.180 --> 0:41:57.980
<v Speaker 3>There you go. That's another one. Ricky McGuire.

0:41:58.000 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 4>They went to three, but they won one.

0:41:59.500 --> 0:42:02.540
<v Speaker 3>How'd those 90s look, by the way? Not great. Not great.

0:42:02.660 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 3>From 93 all the way to 2000. So I alluded

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:08.339
<v Speaker 3>to it earlier, and it gets back to, you know,

0:42:08.580 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 3>can you have a miracle? Is there a rabbit out

0:42:10.540 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 3>of a hat? Is there an Aaron Rodgers to succeed

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.590
<v Speaker 3>Brett Favre? Is there a Steve Young to succeed?

0:42:15.610 --> 0:42:16.570
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Luck to Peyton Manning.

0:42:16.690 --> 0:42:18.550
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. To succeed. Exactly.

0:42:18.590 --> 0:42:18.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:42:18.850 --> 0:42:23.569
<v Speaker 3>To succeed– Joe Montana. So, you know, the analogy would

0:42:23.590 --> 0:42:25.710
<v Speaker 3>be like, is there a Steph Curry to, is there

0:42:25.830 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Edwards, the Warriors getting Anthony Edwards or something like that. So,

0:42:29.780 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't happen, right? It happened twice. It happened to

0:42:31.900 --> 0:42:33.739
<v Speaker 3>the Packers, it happened to the Niners. Other than that,

0:42:33.780 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it just doesn't I've alluded to this various times on

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 3>the air over the years. Kobe Bryant, Lakers, whoever you want.

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.490
<v Speaker 3>The Bulls are still waiting. Yes, exactly. They're still waiting.

0:42:42.510 --> 0:42:45.390
<v Speaker 3>So I actually, and I admit, I'm at a different

0:42:45.410 --> 0:42:47.250
<v Speaker 3>stage of life. I've had a lot of championships on

0:42:47.290 --> 0:42:50.390
<v Speaker 3>my teams. I'm less pissed than the 30 and under crowd,

0:42:50.630 --> 0:42:53.270
<v Speaker 3>which is like, come on, man. I need more. This

0:42:53.330 --> 0:42:55.299
<v Speaker 3>is slipping away. We're never going to recapture it and

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 3>all that. So I understand. It's the natural order of things.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.420
<v Speaker 3>It just is. It's the natural order of things. It's

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 3>impossible unless you get Steve in. and Joe, and Steve

0:43:04.380 --> 0:43:06.100
<v Speaker 3>only got the one. I love you, Steve, but he

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 3>only got the one, right? Aaron Rodgers only got the one, right?

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't like they dominated for the next thing. You know,

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees come to mind, right, with, you know, Barra

0:43:14.620 --> 0:43:16.859
<v Speaker 3>and Ruth and Barra, but there's even those, there was

0:43:16.890 --> 0:43:19.870
<v Speaker 3>a separation between those eras. I guess it's a long

0:43:19.910 --> 0:43:23.090
<v Speaker 3>way of saying I forgive the Warriors more than the

0:43:23.170 --> 0:43:26.270
<v Speaker 3>fan base I see on social media. I understand how

0:43:26.330 --> 0:43:28.489
<v Speaker 3>hard it is, how impossible it is to keep this

0:43:28.530 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 3>thing going. I'm not as– I mean, again, macro. Four

0:43:33.100 --> 0:43:37.779
<v Speaker 3>championships from this team, this franchise, is unthinkable and unspeakable.

0:43:37.820 --> 0:43:42.210
<v Speaker 3>It's orgasmic. It's unbelievable. It's freaking like, it's the greatest

0:43:42.250 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 3>thing of all time. We got four championships. And to

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.049
<v Speaker 3>be honest, like I said earlier today, when Laker was

0:43:47.090 --> 0:43:50.180
<v Speaker 3>playing the long game, maybe by hanging onto those picks

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 3>in the cap room, maybe they will be good in 28, 29, 30.

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.900
<v Speaker 3>You know, at least they have a chance to be

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 3>good in 28, 29, 30. So you've kept your line.

0:43:59.900 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 3>I am less for, I am more forgiving than the

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 3>algorithm that I am on shows me from where your chance.

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:08.700
<v Speaker 4>Fair enough. JD, you had a thought on that?

0:44:08.739 --> 0:44:15.050
<v Speaker 3>Well, More, to use your term, orgasmic. The four championships.

0:44:15.290 --> 0:44:21.250
<v Speaker 6>For you, the four championships or that 83-win Giants.

0:44:21.290 --> 0:44:23.189
<v Speaker 3>The 31-29 60-game.

0:44:22.590 --> 0:44:24.790
<v Speaker 6>Season next year after the lockout where they get in

0:44:24.870 --> 0:44:27.469
<v Speaker 6>is they allow some extra teams in and they get in.

0:44:28.290 --> 0:44:32.569
<v Speaker 6>The four championships for the Giants or the 31-29 eight seed,

0:44:32.590 --> 0:44:36.390
<v Speaker 6>which won't exist anymore, Giants, that get into the postseason.

0:44:37.390 --> 0:44:39.819
<v Speaker 3>Which is more of the rundown. I don't follow.

0:44:39.890 --> 0:44:42.180
<v Speaker 6>He's asking, he's asking like, which one gets you more

0:44:42.219 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 6>in the Terry Francois? He's more asking like, what are

0:44:44.580 --> 0:44:47.820
<v Speaker 6>you more excited about? Which one gets you hot? He's asking,

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 6>what would get you hot?

0:44:50.110 --> 0:44:51.270
<v Speaker 3>Warriors from 2015 to 2022 got me hot.

0:44:51.350 --> 0:44:53.270
<v Speaker 4>He said, he said, no, because you're in a different

0:44:53.290 --> 0:44:55.350
<v Speaker 4>stage in your fandom. You've seen titles and you're not

0:44:55.410 --> 0:44:57.230
<v Speaker 4>as pissed as the Warriors. Is there, is there a

0:44:57.250 --> 0:44:58.730
<v Speaker 4>team that still makes you feel that way?

0:44:58.750 --> 0:44:59.810
<v Speaker 3>I No, no, no.

0:44:59.950 --> 0:45:01.910
<v Speaker 6>It's just would you feel like how are you going

0:45:01.930 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 6>to feel with that 31 and 29 Giants?

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 4>I guess he's asking like when the Giants season starts.

0:45:08.460 --> 0:45:10.859
<v Speaker 4>He's riffing on a short year because the lockout.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not following. You know what? Forget it. I just

0:45:13.380 --> 0:45:16.219
<v Speaker 3>spoke right now. Forget it. It missed. He lost me too.

0:45:16.300 --> 0:45:17.219
<v Speaker 3>It missed. All right.

0:45:17.450 --> 0:45:17.910
<v Speaker 4>Lost you.

0:45:18.590 --> 0:45:19.830
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll step in and I'll say this. Well, it's

0:45:19.850 --> 0:45:23.060
<v Speaker 3>a good thing there's five people here. That's on me, JD.

0:45:23.070 --> 0:45:26.130
<v Speaker 3>That's on me. It's my second shift today, dude. It's

0:45:26.250 --> 0:45:28.410
<v Speaker 3>my second shift. Cubs, going back to your original question.

0:45:28.469 --> 0:45:30.489
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the fact that we're still saying the word

0:45:30.570 --> 0:45:34.010
<v Speaker 5>dynasty in 2026 is a testament to what Steph said.

0:45:34.290 --> 0:45:36.830
<v Speaker 5>what Steve Kerr and what Draymond Green have done here.

0:45:37.130 --> 0:45:38.930
<v Speaker 5>And to me, honestly, it felt like this dynasty was

0:45:38.969 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 5>dying out once Klay Thompson left and once we got

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.500
<v Speaker 5>his departure. But we've also been talking about this topic

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.460
<v Speaker 5>going back to the 2022 NBA Finals. Everybody was saying

0:45:46.500 --> 0:45:49.259
<v Speaker 5>the dynasty was dead before that even happened.

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:50.969
<v Speaker 3>We're now four years removed.

0:45:51.130 --> 0:45:54.029
<v Speaker 5>Now, because Steph is still here, because Draymond's still here,

0:45:54.230 --> 0:45:56.810
<v Speaker 5>because Steve Kerr is still here, you still have that feeling,

0:45:57.290 --> 0:46:00.660
<v Speaker 5>that nostalgia feeling of winning championships. So you want to

0:46:01.010 --> 0:46:02.420
<v Speaker 5>maybe talk yourself into believing that.

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's also about Steph's ability.

0:46:03.620 --> 0:46:05.650
<v Speaker 4>It's also about what we believe Steph to be capable of,

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 4>which is why with Jimmy Butler on the floor, if

0:46:07.580 --> 0:46:09.819
<v Speaker 4>he were healthy coming into this year, were healthy last year,

0:46:10.140 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a different finish to the season. We

0:46:11.700 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 4>saw it two years ago. But I think that that's

0:46:13.940 --> 0:46:16.180
<v Speaker 4>kind of the philosophical question we're asking is, are we

0:46:16.219 --> 0:46:20.140
<v Speaker 4>capable of enjoying a legendary player's final years without demanding

0:46:20.469 --> 0:46:22.090
<v Speaker 4>we recreate his greatest moments?

0:46:22.370 --> 0:46:24.430
<v Speaker 7>I told you a long time ago, I'm okay with

0:46:24.469 --> 0:46:26.770
<v Speaker 7>the way things are going right now as far as

0:46:27.090 --> 0:46:29.169
<v Speaker 7>I know it's coming to an end. And I don't

0:46:29.250 --> 0:46:31.770
<v Speaker 7>need to see another championship. I remember going to games

0:46:31.790 --> 0:46:33.589
<v Speaker 7>with my dad where he was on the mic, and

0:46:33.610 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 7>they were terrible, the Chris Cohan Lakers. It's a great timeout.

0:46:37.700 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 7>I thought the pinnacle was We Believe. Yeah, We Believe

0:46:41.540 --> 0:46:43.819
<v Speaker 7>was special. That was big for me. So when they

0:46:43.890 --> 0:46:45.910
<v Speaker 7>won 10 years ago for the first time, I was ecstatic.

0:46:45.950 --> 0:46:47.170
<v Speaker 7>And then when they kept winning, I was like, oh,

0:46:47.190 --> 0:46:49.310
<v Speaker 7>my God, I never– Never thought I would dream of this.

0:46:49.330 --> 0:46:51.649
<v Speaker 7>You don't remember 75, do you?

0:46:51.670 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. But what makes me upset today is to see

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry in the fourth quarter of a 20-point loss

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:01.660
<v Speaker 3>shake his head.

0:47:02.020 --> 0:47:05.140
<v Speaker 7>I still love seeing Steph Curry play. It's still a

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.969
<v Speaker 7>big effing deal every time Steph Curry steps on the court.

0:47:08.330 --> 0:47:10.430
<v Speaker 7>but it sucks when he doesn't have a team around him.

0:47:10.770 --> 0:47:13.109
<v Speaker 7>And it just, it makes me upset that, you know,

0:47:13.150 --> 0:47:15.630
<v Speaker 7>Mike Dunleavy, he does these interviews with Joe Lake up

0:47:15.670 --> 0:47:17.710
<v Speaker 7>and saying like, you guys should have listened to the

0:47:17.730 --> 0:47:19.589
<v Speaker 7>calls we made in the off season. We were calling

0:47:19.610 --> 0:47:21.810
<v Speaker 7>about this guy. We're calling about that guy. We'll land

0:47:21.850 --> 0:47:22.690
<v Speaker 7>somebody for Steph.

0:47:22.770 --> 0:47:23.250
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing.

0:47:23.370 --> 0:47:25.569
<v Speaker 6>If it wouldn't be a problem, I feel like for

0:47:25.590 --> 0:47:27.870
<v Speaker 6>a majority of warrior fans, if they could actually put

0:47:27.910 --> 0:47:30.850
<v Speaker 6>together a 45 win team, the problem is they don't

0:47:30.890 --> 0:47:32.049
<v Speaker 6>have a 45 win team.

0:47:32.110 --> 0:47:34.090
<v Speaker 3>They have a 35 win. So are they, so are

0:47:34.130 --> 0:47:35.850
<v Speaker 3>they like, they don't have to win a championship.

0:47:35.950 --> 0:47:38.770
<v Speaker 6>I really believe most, The majority of Warrior fans are

0:47:39.050 --> 0:47:42.129
<v Speaker 6>actually aligned with Murph in the sense that, hey, seeing

0:47:42.150 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 6>them win championships used to be a downtrodden franchise. Everybody's

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:48.940
<v Speaker 6>feeling good. I think a lot of people would feel

0:47:48.980 --> 0:47:52.100
<v Speaker 6>like Derek in terms of, let's ride it out with

0:47:52.140 --> 0:47:55.899
<v Speaker 6>Steph and enjoy Steph if they were just a competitive team.

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:58.020
<v Speaker 6>Nobody's saying they have to win a title. Just be

0:47:58.080 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 6>a team that can get into the top six. Be

0:47:59.820 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 6>a team that can make the playoffs or win a

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.779
<v Speaker 6>round individually. They're not close to that right now. And

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.569
<v Speaker 6>then they're also, I think, using the excuse of, well,

0:48:09.590 --> 0:48:11.170
<v Speaker 6>this guy's hurt and that guy's out.

0:48:11.270 --> 0:48:15.509
<v Speaker 3>And Jimmy, you knew this in the offseason. Jumping right here, though,

0:48:15.550 --> 0:48:18.089
<v Speaker 3>getting to my point, though, the thing that gives me

0:48:18.130 --> 0:48:20.870
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of hope is that they aren't tanking

0:48:20.890 --> 0:48:24.370
<v Speaker 3>for the next 10 years. They could be good. They

0:48:24.410 --> 0:48:26.390
<v Speaker 3>got cap room and they got draft picks. They do.

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:28.020
<v Speaker 3>So they got a chance to get good.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 6>They also keep kicking the can down the line a

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.770
<v Speaker 6>little bit in terms of when they're willing to look

0:48:32.830 --> 0:48:35.900
<v Speaker 6>to make a move that will include driving. They do

0:48:35.940 --> 0:48:39.230
<v Speaker 6>have cap space next year, but are they going, are they,

0:48:40.219 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 6>are they going to actually use that?

0:48:41.460 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to compare it to the Giants farm system,

0:48:43.500 --> 0:48:45.259
<v Speaker 3>but it's kind of like, you know, the Giants have

0:48:45.300 --> 0:48:48.310
<v Speaker 3>a chance to be good in 2029, right? And the Warriors,

0:48:48.510 --> 0:48:50.970
<v Speaker 3>you know, but the Giants have far more on paper.

0:48:50.989 --> 0:48:51.969
<v Speaker 3>They also know what they have.

0:48:51.989 --> 0:48:56.430
<v Speaker 4>These are the NBA draft is so top heavy. It's

0:48:56.610 --> 0:48:58.470
<v Speaker 4>not like the NFL where you can turn your franchise

0:48:58.510 --> 0:49:01.589
<v Speaker 4>around in a couple of drafts like that. The Warriors are.

0:49:01.510 --> 0:49:04.710
<v Speaker 6>Kind of selling hope on that future without the names.

0:49:04.810 --> 0:49:07.170
<v Speaker 6>The Giants at least have the names that everybody can point.

0:49:07.750 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 6>And the scouts that say these guys are among their class.

0:49:10.420 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 6>So in fairness to the Giants, the Giants have a

0:49:12.060 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 6>little more going. Just a quick look here. Kobe Bryant's

0:49:13.860 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 6>last three years, 27 wins.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:21.420
<v Speaker 3>21 wins, 17 wins. Yeah. is what happens.

0:49:21.500 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 4>And that's part of what we're talking about with the

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 4>end of a dynasty. If you're going to commit to

0:49:24.700 --> 0:49:26.620
<v Speaker 4>a player like this who wants to be here. for

0:49:26.660 --> 0:49:28.700
<v Speaker 4>this run and is not willing to mortgage the future

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.250
<v Speaker 4>in its entirety. It's that line from Tony Stark in

0:49:31.270 --> 0:49:33.049
<v Speaker 4>Avengers Endgame where he says, part of the journey is

0:49:33.090 --> 0:49:34.890
<v Speaker 4>the end. That's kind of the way this thing goes.

0:49:35.110 --> 0:49:37.230
<v Speaker 4>So what I would ask now is, when we saw

0:49:37.270 --> 0:49:39.430
<v Speaker 4>the way, and Murphy would know this better than anybody,

0:49:39.450 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 4>you talk about going from Joe Montana to Steve Young,

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 4>also ownership changed. And there was a weird thing with

0:49:44.420 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 4>the 49ers on that front, right? I mean, there's the

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:50.569
<v Speaker 4>Eddie DiBartolo situation. With the San Francisco Giants, the paying

0:49:50.590 --> 0:49:52.910
<v Speaker 4>off the stadium changed. And then there was a whole

0:49:52.950 --> 0:49:55.290
<v Speaker 4>bunch of other factors, but you didn't have the talent there.

0:49:55.530 --> 0:49:57.969
<v Speaker 4>There wasn't a Barry Bonds sitting there waiting to try

0:49:57.989 --> 0:49:59.569
<v Speaker 4>to win a title like there is with Steph Curry.

0:49:59.590 --> 0:50:02.140
<v Speaker 4>And we believe, even in Bonds' final year, he hits

0:50:02.140 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 4>28 home runs, right? Like, so we even knew then, like,

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 4>this is still a guy who's an ample piece for

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 4>anybody who wants to use him. If Steph were on

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.740
<v Speaker 4>another team... we'd think he was capable of still competing

0:50:10.780 --> 0:50:13.410
<v Speaker 4>for a title. So that's the difference here is, how

0:50:13.450 --> 0:50:15.779
<v Speaker 4>have the Warriors handled this? Do we believe there's any

0:50:15.890 --> 0:50:17.830
<v Speaker 4>one right way to handle it? And are they doing

0:50:17.870 --> 0:50:19.930
<v Speaker 4>right by Steph and the fans in his final years?

0:50:20.070 --> 0:50:22.110
<v Speaker 3>Also, we have to factor in, what does Steph want?

0:50:22.850 --> 0:50:25.370
<v Speaker 3>Does that matter in all this? What does he want, right?

0:50:25.450 --> 0:50:29.490
<v Speaker 3>And I think, by his actions, He wants to ride

0:50:29.570 --> 0:50:31.250
<v Speaker 3>off gently into the sunset here, doesn't he?

0:50:31.270 --> 0:50:31.930
<v Speaker 4>I think so, too.

0:50:32.030 --> 0:50:34.650
<v Speaker 3>I'm not misreading that, right? I mean, he loves what

0:50:34.670 --> 0:50:37.330
<v Speaker 3>he's done here. He loves his legacy. I think he

0:50:37.370 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 3>likes living here in the Bay. I don't know if

0:50:38.660 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 3>that matters. I don't know how much. He's selling all

0:50:41.460 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of his property. I know. He did liquidate. Somebody asked me.

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:45.620
<v Speaker 3>We were joking about that. There was a shot. He

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 3>always buys more, though. I was worried. Marcus was like, no, man.

0:50:49.660 --> 0:50:52.540
<v Speaker 3>He's just working the numbers. He just shuffles it. Because

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 3>when he was selling all those buildings in August, I

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 3>was like, wait a minute. Is he grooming it? Nah, bro.

0:50:56.180 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 3>You don't understand, man. This is above us. This is

0:50:58.910 --> 0:51:01.310
<v Speaker 3>money we don't understand. He's playing chess. You don't even realize.

0:51:01.330 --> 0:51:03.370
<v Speaker 4>We're not in that game, bro. He's playing a game

0:51:03.390 --> 0:51:03.670
<v Speaker 4>we don't know.

0:51:03.670 --> 0:51:05.110
<v Speaker 3>I was just happy I got a spot here, a

0:51:05.150 --> 0:51:07.890
<v Speaker 3>spot for $ 12. 39 in Lot A, dude. You know what

0:51:07.950 --> 0:51:10.029
<v Speaker 3>I mean? Like, I was pumped on that. Steph's like, bro,

0:51:10.090 --> 0:51:11.970
<v Speaker 3>I'm at a different level. Because there was a shot

0:51:11.989 --> 0:51:13.460
<v Speaker 3>of him in the fourth quarter, or I don't know

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.259
<v Speaker 3>how late you guys watched it, on Tuesday night, where

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:16.799
<v Speaker 3>he was just staring. Survivor was on.

0:51:16.820 --> 0:51:17.460
<v Speaker 4>Survivor was on.

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 3>I saw it. I saw it. So anyway, what does

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:24.969
<v Speaker 3>Steph want? That's a role in all this. Is he okay?

0:51:25.130 --> 0:51:27.730
<v Speaker 3>He's told us publicly. I don't know if privately he's

0:51:27.750 --> 0:51:31.310
<v Speaker 3>saying different things. Publicly, his comments have been, I want

0:51:31.350 --> 0:51:34.739
<v Speaker 3>to be here. I re-sign here. I want to finish

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 3>this thing. And then they use that word, which I

0:51:36.500 --> 0:51:40.060
<v Speaker 3>can't believe it's taken us this long. What's the time here? 4.07? re-imagine.

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:42.540
<v Speaker 3>I want to re-imagine the Warriors, right?

0:51:43.340 --> 0:51:46.860
<v Speaker 4>As John Lennon frequently said, dude, re-imagine.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Did you say John London?

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:49.820
<v Speaker 4>John Lennon.

0:51:50.100 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, John Lennon. I thought you said John London. Maybe

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.380
<v Speaker 3>you went to a John London. I think I went

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 3>to one of his. Before yours, did you play gay

0:51:58.060 --> 0:52:03.990
<v Speaker 3>bar or steakhouse? Never did that. That was a game

0:52:04.050 --> 0:52:08.509
<v Speaker 3>in the morning game. Should bring that back. Underrated bit.

0:52:08.550 --> 0:52:11.410
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we should revisit this history, bring back London.

0:52:11.550 --> 0:52:13.569
<v Speaker 4>Legit, might be a bit we got to revisit there.

0:52:13.810 --> 0:52:14.590
<v Speaker 4>That might be a dirty word.

0:52:14.610 --> 0:52:16.299
<v Speaker 3>I know some other hosts that have stole that bit.

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 3>We should probably do that. Anyway, so, I mean, again,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:22.260
<v Speaker 3>just to get back to my original point, which I'm restating,

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:28.590
<v Speaker 3>is I am... It was a steakhouse. More for... Miller

0:52:28.670 --> 0:52:35.540
<v Speaker 3>and Lux. Yeah, what do you call it? I don't know. Hardys. Cope,

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 3>save it, Cope. Save it. Take us out, Cope. Take

0:52:39.060 --> 0:52:40.799
<v Speaker 3>us out. You want to take a break?

0:52:40.820 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 4>All right. I don't even know how many more breaks

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 4>we have. We'll be with you until about 4.30.

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Shane, what do we got left? Do we know? Don,

0:52:45.739 --> 0:52:47.379
<v Speaker 3>what do we got? Come on, Danny. Do your job.

0:52:47.580 --> 0:52:47.959
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:49.779
<v Speaker 4>I texted Danny. I don't know if he's texting me back.

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Do your freaking job, Don. Oh, he said check my phone.

0:52:53.300 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Check with Candace.

0:52:54.380 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 4>All right, we do have to take a quick break.

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:59.140
<v Speaker 4>Adam Copeland, Derek Papa, Brian Murphy, Marcus Boucher, and John

0:52:59.180 --> 0:53:00.980
<v Speaker 4>Dickinson with you. When we come on back, we'll talk

0:53:01.020 --> 0:53:04.180
<v Speaker 4>more about Steph's final years. Also, Steve Kerr decided to

0:53:04.219 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 4>come back for this as well. We haven't talked at

0:53:05.739 --> 0:53:08.529
<v Speaker 4>all about Steve Kerr's thoughts. He gave an interesting interview

0:53:08.550 --> 0:53:10.590
<v Speaker 4>to The Ringer the other day with Logan Murdoch and

0:53:10.610 --> 0:53:13.030
<v Speaker 4>kind of talked about what his focus is on this season,

0:53:13.310 --> 0:53:15.710
<v Speaker 4>how they're managing this thing. And it's kind of curious,

0:53:15.730 --> 0:53:17.250
<v Speaker 4>and I think it raises the question as to whether

0:53:17.270 --> 0:53:19.750
<v Speaker 4>or not this is the best thing for this franchise

0:53:19.770 --> 0:53:22.110
<v Speaker 4>and where they are moving forward. What does the long-term

0:53:22.150 --> 0:53:23.330
<v Speaker 4>and the future hold for the Warriors?

0:53:23.550 --> 0:53:24.189
<v Speaker 3>We'll do that next.

0:53:24.270 --> 0:53:28.230
<v Speaker 4>It's our 2026 Dubs Roundtable from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City,

0:53:28.270 --> 0:53:29.350
<v Speaker 4>only here on the Sports Leader.

0:53:33.630 --> 0:53:39.390
<v Speaker 2>This is the 2026 KNBR Dubs Roundtable, sponsored by O'Donnell Financial.

0:53:39.570 --> 0:53:42.450
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to Harmonic Brewing at Thrive City and.

0:53:42.430 --> 0:53:43.910
<v Speaker 1>Your host, Adam Coker.

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.930
<v Speaker 3>We are live from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City.

0:53:47.010 --> 0:53:49.330
<v Speaker 4>Warriors home opener tonight as people are starting to show

0:53:49.390 --> 0:53:51.810
<v Speaker 4>up here in Thrive City. 7 o'clock tonight, the Warriors

0:53:51.850 --> 0:53:54.430
<v Speaker 4>and the Memphis Grizzlies. Dubs have a tough schedule.

0:53:54.469 --> 0:53:54.970
<v Speaker 3>A back-to-back.

0:53:55.010 --> 0:53:56.110
<v Speaker 4>This is the front end of it as they go

0:53:56.130 --> 0:53:59.250
<v Speaker 4>to Phoenix tomorrow to take on the Phoenix Suns.

0:53:59.330 --> 0:54:02.140
<v Speaker 3>No Steph. No Steph. Is that guaranteed?

0:54:02.410 --> 0:54:03.140
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it is. Anybody else? I mean, this kind

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:12.740
<v Speaker 3>of brings us to the Steve Kerr question. Steve Kerr pretty.

0:54:12.610 --> 0:54:16.250
<v Speaker 4>Openly told everybody, temper your expectations, especially early in the season.

0:54:16.870 --> 0:54:20.390
<v Speaker 4>I understand that based on the construction of the roster

0:54:20.410 --> 0:54:22.030
<v Speaker 4>and the age of the roster, and it's a situation

0:54:22.070 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 4>they're in, that they have to manage it differently. it

0:54:24.219 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 4>would be foolish to just go about it and say

0:54:25.660 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 4>we're rolling everything out. They don't have the depth. They

0:54:28.020 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 4>don't have the size. They don't have the age or

0:54:29.739 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 4>the youth in order to carry them for the front

0:54:31.739 --> 0:54:33.900
<v Speaker 4>part of the season. The tough part about that is

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:36.900
<v Speaker 4>everybody's thought, and you said it earlier, Murph, is if

0:54:36.940 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 4>we get to January and they're 500, we're like, okay,

0:54:41.180 --> 0:54:43.900
<v Speaker 4>that's probably a positive thing because now you're looking at

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 4>a potential return for Jimmy Butler, who knows about Moses Moody,

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.500
<v Speaker 4>and they're saying he's making strides, but who knows about

0:54:49.820 --> 0:54:52.050
<v Speaker 4>whether or not he's an actual impact when he comes back.

0:54:52.340 --> 0:54:55.250
<v Speaker 4>The question I have then is about It's not the expectations.

0:54:55.330 --> 0:54:57.910
<v Speaker 4>It's how Steve Kerr is managing this thing, what the

0:54:57.950 --> 0:55:00.430
<v Speaker 4>beginning of the season looks like. If they dig themselves

0:55:00.469 --> 0:55:02.969
<v Speaker 4>a hole, will they still be talented enough when those

0:55:03.010 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 4>guys return? We'll start with you, Jake.

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and the problem is you don't want to dig

0:55:07.060 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 6>a hole, but yet you're also, by resting Steph in

0:55:10.460 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 6>the third game of.

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 3>The season, how can you not dig yourself a hole?

0:55:15.100 --> 0:55:18.890
<v Speaker 6>And I go back to just briefly on last year,

0:55:19.430 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 6>they had the exact same schedule layout last year, as

0:55:22.910 --> 0:55:23.530
<v Speaker 6>they do this year.

0:55:23.550 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 3>They started in L.A. They had a night off. A

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.620
<v Speaker 3>year ago, we were here for the home opener on

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:30.860
<v Speaker 3>the 23rd, and then they went up to Portland on

0:55:30.900 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the 24th, and they played the Vets. They were 2-0.

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:37.700
<v Speaker 3>They had beaten Denver in overtime. They had beaten the Lakers.

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 3>They were 2-0. They went up to Portland.

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 6>It was the third game in four nights to begin

0:55:41.700 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 6>the season, and they played the Vets, and they got

0:55:43.739 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 6>blasted in Portland. And Steve Kerr, after that game, had said,

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:48.780
<v Speaker 6>you know what? We thought about giving those guys the

0:55:48.820 --> 0:55:51.589
<v Speaker 6>night off. Night three of the season, by the way.

0:55:51.810 --> 0:55:55.660
<v Speaker 3>Game three. Didn't do it, probably should have. Game three.

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Not off from what?

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:58.700
<v Speaker 6>Game three, because it was a back-to-back and it was

0:55:58.739 --> 0:56:00.879
<v Speaker 6>a third and four nights. And Steve, within the last week,

0:56:00.900 --> 0:56:05.310
<v Speaker 6>had said, hey, be mindful of the schedule, fans. Be

0:56:05.390 --> 0:56:09.509
<v Speaker 6>mindful of, because you may not see your favorite star

0:56:09.650 --> 0:56:12.009
<v Speaker 6>or veteran player or core member of the Warriors, and

0:56:12.050 --> 0:56:14.450
<v Speaker 6>that let everybody know. to say, oh, well, that game

0:56:14.489 --> 0:56:17.930
<v Speaker 6>in Phoenix on Saturday the 24th, you can write that

0:56:18.030 --> 0:56:18.350
<v Speaker 6>one off.

0:56:18.370 --> 0:56:19.750
<v Speaker 3>So that's the predicament.

0:56:19.790 --> 0:56:22.109
<v Speaker 6>And that's where I think it goes back to, did

0:56:22.130 --> 0:56:24.710
<v Speaker 6>they do enough in the offseason with this roster? And

0:56:24.730 --> 0:56:28.010
<v Speaker 6>I think the answer is no, because they are not

0:56:28.230 --> 0:56:30.610
<v Speaker 6>set up to be able to survive and get to

0:56:30.610 --> 0:56:32.790
<v Speaker 6>500 with the roster that they have and all the

0:56:32.830 --> 0:56:36.910
<v Speaker 6>parameters of Porzingis is already dealing with this health issue.

0:56:37.300 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Write him off. Can't count on him. Horford needs a

0:56:39.540 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 6>back-to-back off. Steph needs a back-to-back off. Draymond needs a

0:56:41.940 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 6>back-to-back off.

0:56:42.660 --> 0:56:42.779
<v Speaker 2>OK.

0:56:43.810 --> 0:56:46.770
<v Speaker 6>If you're planning that into the mix here to begin

0:56:46.810 --> 0:56:49.529
<v Speaker 6>the year, well, you got to add other talent that

0:56:49.550 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 6>maybe doesn't help you win a championship, but can help

0:56:51.980 --> 0:56:54.799
<v Speaker 6>you get through the regular season at 500 until Jimmy

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.540
<v Speaker 6>Butler and others come back. And to me, they've just

0:56:57.620 --> 0:57:01.770
<v Speaker 6>fallen woefully short in the attempt to do that. And

0:57:01.850 --> 0:57:05.190
<v Speaker 6>so they set themselves up. You can't win tonight. You're like,

0:57:05.210 --> 0:57:06.989
<v Speaker 6>where's the first win going to be? And how do

0:57:07.030 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 6>you survive? So it's like 500 is Honestly, 500 by

0:57:11.060 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 6>the time Jimmy comes back in the middle of the,

0:57:13.100 --> 0:57:14.859
<v Speaker 6>that feels pie in the sky.

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Given all the.

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 6>Different rules they have with how they have to operate

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:20.460
<v Speaker 6>with this roster on a night-in-night-out basis.

0:57:20.540 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 4>But kind of less about the day-to-day of it and

0:57:22.260 --> 0:57:24.340
<v Speaker 4>really more about the philosophy of it, right? Like Steve

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:27.070
<v Speaker 4>did the interview, Kerr did with the ringer earlier this week,

0:57:27.110 --> 0:57:29.310
<v Speaker 4>and he talked about how it took several weeks to

0:57:29.590 --> 0:57:30.530
<v Speaker 4>consider his future.

0:57:30.900 --> 0:57:33.380
<v Speaker 3>He discussed it with his family and team leadership, but

0:57:33.420 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 3>we didn't know.

0:57:34.140 --> 0:57:35.440
<v Speaker 4>I think we all kind of thought that was it

0:57:35.460 --> 0:57:37.390
<v Speaker 4>when he did that goodbye sort of to Stefan Draymond

0:57:37.430 --> 0:57:37.850
<v Speaker 4>on the sideline.

0:57:37.870 --> 0:57:40.410
<v Speaker 3>I think he thought Laker was done with it. Yeah.

0:57:40.450 --> 0:57:41.930
<v Speaker 6>I think he thought Laker was done with it, and

0:57:41.950 --> 0:57:43.690
<v Speaker 6>then they got together, and Laker was like, I'm not

0:57:43.730 --> 0:57:44.130
<v Speaker 6>done with it.

0:57:44.130 --> 0:57:46.010
<v Speaker 4>But what's interesting is I feel like for Steve, it

0:57:46.030 --> 0:57:47.970
<v Speaker 4>had to be the perfect situation for him because he's

0:57:48.010 --> 0:57:49.610
<v Speaker 4>earned that right, and he knows I'm not going to

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:50.090
<v Speaker 4>do something.

0:57:50.430 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 3>That I don't want to do.

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:53.460
<v Speaker 4>So he also acknowledged the possibility that he and Stefan

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Draymond all kind of walk away at the same time.

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 4>He's also talked about a renewed approach in practice methods,

0:57:58.360 --> 0:58:01.500
<v Speaker 4>offensive adjustments, and a greater emphasis on teaching fundamentals. So

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.820
<v Speaker 4>the question I have about Steve Kerr and where this

0:58:03.860 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 4>team is right now is, is his decision about loyalty

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 4>to Stefan Draymond, belief in the roster, or a personal

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 4>desire to compete and prove he can still coach?

0:58:12.260 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 3>He loves coaching, just real short.

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 6>He loves coaching, and I do think there is a

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:19.300
<v Speaker 6>part of him, and it's a big part, that feels

0:58:19.380 --> 0:58:23.110
<v Speaker 6>indebted to those guys. Hey, I don't want to ride

0:58:23.230 --> 0:58:25.130
<v Speaker 6>off and be chilling at home while you guys are

0:58:25.150 --> 0:58:27.700
<v Speaker 6>taking the lumps. We'll take all the lumps together. And

0:58:27.780 --> 0:58:32.220
<v Speaker 6>also the chance of being able to be better than

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:35.900
<v Speaker 6>expected is greater with me being a part of it

0:58:36.060 --> 0:58:36.500
<v Speaker 6>with you guys.

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Like maybe we can figure it out. Maybe they won't.

0:58:38.900 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 6>And all things are pointing toward maybe they can't figure

0:58:41.220 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 6>it out. It's an insurmountable deficit in terms of talent.

0:58:44.780 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 6>But together, we've got at least a shot. So I'm

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:48.070
<v Speaker 6>going to ride with you guys as long as Joe

0:58:48.090 --> 0:58:48.490
<v Speaker 6>Lake will have.

0:58:48.530 --> 0:58:49.470
<v Speaker 4>How do you guys see it? Why is he back?

0:58:49.490 --> 0:58:52.430
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, in describing the whole back-to-back situation,

0:58:52.490 --> 0:58:54.670
<v Speaker 3>where's Pat Spencer when you need him? Where's Pat Spencer?

0:58:54.710 --> 0:58:56.850
<v Speaker 3>He's gone. In Phoenix, right? Is he in Phoenix? Yeah,

0:58:56.890 --> 0:58:59.270
<v Speaker 3>he got a contract. He'll be playing tomorrow night. So

0:58:59.330 --> 0:59:01.590
<v Speaker 3>literally the guy they need tomorrow night is on the

0:59:01.670 --> 0:59:04.250
<v Speaker 3>other team. Pat Spencer's cooking tomorrow night. Well, I mean,

0:59:04.290 --> 0:59:05.950
<v Speaker 3>Marcus Thompson was on our show and gave sort of

0:59:06.010 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 3>a slightly sarcastic but not that sarcastic answer. money, as

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:14.050
<v Speaker 3>Gene Simmons would say, people who like money, people who

0:59:14.070 --> 0:59:14.610
<v Speaker 3>don't like money.

0:59:15.170 --> 0:59:16.130
<v Speaker 4>That person is a liar.

0:59:16.170 --> 0:59:18.390
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly. I mean, Steve had the chance to make

0:59:18.690 --> 0:59:20.990
<v Speaker 3>two years $ 38 million or whatever it is. So let's

0:59:21.030 --> 0:59:22.890
<v Speaker 3>be honest here. We all would take that. I don't

0:59:22.930 --> 0:59:26.330
<v Speaker 3>care about the money. They say that's bull. I think

0:59:26.350 --> 0:59:27.810
<v Speaker 3>JD's right. I think he loves coaching. I think it's

0:59:27.830 --> 0:59:30.530
<v Speaker 3>what he does. I think it's a combination of all

0:59:30.550 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 3>these things. A, hey, he looks at his wife and says, hey,

0:59:33.260 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 3>we got this great house in Presidio Heights. My kids

0:59:36.020 --> 0:59:38.620
<v Speaker 3>are all gone. Two years, $ 38 million to be around

0:59:38.740 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry and And, you know, in this environment in here.

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:45.900
<v Speaker 3>And also, you know, maybe surprise some people. And it's

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.420
<v Speaker 3>what I do. You know, it's what I do. We

0:59:48.460 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 3>do radio. You know, he does coaching, right? So it's

0:59:51.890 --> 0:59:54.950
<v Speaker 3>a nice combination for him and a sense of loyalty

0:59:54.990 --> 0:59:57.030
<v Speaker 3>to the whole thing. Like, I think his feelings for

0:59:57.050 --> 1:00:00.370
<v Speaker 3>Steph are so profound that, you know, let's do this together.

1:00:00.490 --> 1:00:01.450
<v Speaker 3>Let's go out.

1:00:01.490 --> 1:00:02.510
<v Speaker 4>How do you walk away from that?

1:00:02.530 --> 1:00:04.170
<v Speaker 3>I think all three of those things. You got money.

1:00:04.830 --> 1:00:07.320
<v Speaker 3>You got your calling in life. And you got Steph.

1:00:07.510 --> 1:00:09.020
<v Speaker 3>And I think in that sense, it makes sense.

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:09.820
<v Speaker 4>Now, you know.

1:00:11.010 --> 1:00:13.900
<v Speaker 3>If he pulls off, if he's 500 in January, you know,

1:00:14.060 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 3>coach of the year. It's like what Murph always says

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:16.820
<v Speaker 3>about himself.

1:00:16.860 --> 1:00:18.420
<v Speaker 4>He's like, I got my money, I got my family,

1:00:18.440 --> 1:00:19.540
<v Speaker 4>and I got my Walter.

1:00:19.860 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 3>And I got my Walter. And my John Joe Curley. Wally. Wally, dude, Wally.

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 3>You got your guy Wally.

1:00:25.430 --> 1:00:27.090
<v Speaker 4>I like Walt Disney when you guys go that route.

1:00:27.130 --> 1:00:29.110
<v Speaker 3>That's my guy. I'm a Walter Cronkite kind of guy.

1:00:29.230 --> 1:00:31.610
<v Speaker 3>We got to break. Your thought, Marcus, before we go.

1:00:31.650 --> 1:00:32.669
<v Speaker 3>Real quick, I'm with Murph.

1:00:32.690 --> 1:00:34.910
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Steve's back because he's going to ride this

1:00:35.090 --> 1:00:36.950
<v Speaker 5>until the Steph Wills fall off.

1:00:37.570 --> 1:00:38.150
<v Speaker 3>It's that simple.

1:00:38.170 --> 1:00:40.130
<v Speaker 5>When you've got a player like Steph Curry, You're going

1:00:40.150 --> 1:00:43.170
<v Speaker 5>to be here for Steph. It's that blank and simple.

1:00:43.250 --> 1:00:45.130
<v Speaker 5>Can they still win? They saw it a couple years

1:00:45.170 --> 1:00:46.770
<v Speaker 5>ago when they took out the Rockets in the playoffs.

1:00:47.070 --> 1:00:50.250
<v Speaker 5>That maybe gives Steph, Steve, and Jimmy Butler some hope,

1:00:50.290 --> 1:00:52.370
<v Speaker 5>some optimism. But at some point, you also got to

1:00:52.390 --> 1:00:52.930
<v Speaker 5>be realistic.

1:00:53.410 --> 1:00:56.130
<v Speaker 7>Steve's still coaching this team because he's looking at Draymond

1:00:56.170 --> 1:00:58.310
<v Speaker 7>Green and Steph Curry in that playing game. And he's like,

1:00:58.390 --> 1:00:59.950
<v Speaker 7>I love you guys so much. I can't walk away

1:00:59.990 --> 1:01:01.780
<v Speaker 7>from this. I can't leave you guys with the burden of,

1:01:02.090 --> 1:01:04.350
<v Speaker 7>this franchise right now. At the same time, you could

1:01:04.430 --> 1:01:07.830
<v Speaker 7>question why Steve will come back, because I remember this

1:01:07.890 --> 1:01:10.650
<v Speaker 7>time last year, where, you know, they were playing pretty well,

1:01:10.670 --> 1:01:12.950
<v Speaker 7>and then things went kind of in the tubes, and honestly,

1:01:12.990 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 7>it's because he hated coaching Kaminga, and there were times

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:18.540
<v Speaker 7>where I was wondering, is he coaching with joy anymore?

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:21.000
<v Speaker 7>Once they traded him away, I think he was rejuvenated,

1:01:21.300 --> 1:01:23.340
<v Speaker 7>and he probably was questioning that during the whole process

1:01:23.380 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 7>of this offseason, do I do the contract or not?

1:01:25.860 --> 1:01:27.460
<v Speaker 7>I think he likes the challenge, but it really is

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:30.420
<v Speaker 7>about being there until this thing ends with Steph Curry

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 7>and Draymond Green.

1:01:31.140 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're nearing the end of it. Whether that's next year,

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:34.620
<v Speaker 4>two years, we'll see.

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:35.700
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I thought you meant the round table.

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the round table.

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:38.919
<v Speaker 3>Almost, Murph. Maybe the last round table.

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:40.700
<v Speaker 4>Plenty more to come. When we come on back, we'll

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:41.980
<v Speaker 4>put this thing to bed. We'll get you a note

1:01:42.020 --> 1:01:44.180
<v Speaker 4>to self to wrap up the Dubs round table. Live

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:47.090
<v Speaker 4>from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City, the Dubs 2026 round table,

1:01:47.430 --> 1:01:49.850
<v Speaker 4>only here on the Sports League.

1:01:50.490 --> 1:01:53.970
<v Speaker 1>Time for dirty work to put the show to bed.

1:01:54.370 --> 1:01:55.310
<v Speaker 1>Are you crazy?

1:01:55.330 --> 1:01:56.410
<v Speaker 3>I don't need a bed.

1:01:57.170 --> 1:01:58.990
<v Speaker 1>On The Sports Leader.

1:01:59.030 --> 1:02:01.170
<v Speaker 3>Now you will go to sleep or I will put

1:02:01.190 --> 1:02:09.090
<v Speaker 3>you to sleep. I'm a fool to do your dirty work.

1:02:09.870 --> 1:02:15.610
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah. I don't want to do your dirty work.

1:02:17.750 --> 1:02:19.260
<v Speaker 3>It's not Dirty Work.

1:02:19.340 --> 1:02:21.460
<v Speaker 4>It's what would be, I guess, the end of Dirty Work,

1:02:21.500 --> 1:02:24.060
<v Speaker 4>but Dub's Roundtable from Harmonic Brewing in Thrive City. It

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:25.720
<v Speaker 4>just always sounds good on a Friday. It sounds good

1:02:25.760 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 4>every night.

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:26.580
<v Speaker 1>Hell, yeah.

1:02:26.620 --> 1:02:28.340
<v Speaker 4>It's nice. Do you know what Danny Dunn has done?

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:31.260
<v Speaker 4>He's gone through and he's found a bunch of different versions. Dude,

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:35.189
<v Speaker 4>there's a Pointer Sisters version of Dirty Work. It's not bad.

1:02:35.210 --> 1:02:35.870
<v Speaker 3>Of course not.

1:02:35.970 --> 1:02:37.330
<v Speaker 4>It's Pointer Sisters. If you want to dig any of

1:02:37.370 --> 1:02:39.850
<v Speaker 4>those up, Danny, and play any of those underneath this, man.

1:02:40.270 --> 1:02:44.300
<v Speaker 4>He's found a couple of different... The Homer Simpson version?

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>There's a Homer Simpson version. There's, of course... Tony Soprano

1:02:47.260 --> 1:02:47.590
<v Speaker 4>singing it.

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>That is iconic. We have the show with him.

1:02:50.900 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Iconic, iconic. Danny's done a great job finding other versions.

1:02:53.540 --> 1:02:55.500
<v Speaker 3>What's the show on HBO where they do the rendition

1:02:55.540 --> 1:02:59.940
<v Speaker 3>of it? Danny knows. I forget. Derek, I've got to

1:02:59.980 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>have a little beef with you here. I've got beef

1:03:02.420 --> 1:03:05.050
<v Speaker 3>with you, buddy. Pointer Sisters is not raining men. That's

1:03:05.070 --> 1:03:08.229
<v Speaker 3>the Weather Girls. Oh, my bad. Pointer Sisters, way, way,

1:03:08.290 --> 1:03:13.030
<v Speaker 3>way above that. Honestly, I'm so excited. Don't mess with me. Ruth, June,

1:03:13.070 --> 1:03:16.740
<v Speaker 3>and Anita are elites. They're royalty. They don't require crap

1:03:16.780 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>like that. That's all right.

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:18.180
<v Speaker 4>Good Lord.

1:03:18.260 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey, crap like that. My God. Note to self. Note

1:03:21.660 --> 1:03:22.020
<v Speaker 3>to self.

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:22.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>There you go. I'd be kind of pissed. I just

1:03:25.180 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>couldn't let that lie.

1:03:26.140 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I'd be kind of pissed if the weather girls didn't do.

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:31.390
<v Speaker 3>It's random. The Pointer Sisters are freaking. And they're from

1:03:31.450 --> 1:03:33.250
<v Speaker 3>right there, by the way. Just right there.

1:03:33.270 --> 1:03:33.450
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:03:33.470 --> 1:03:35.430
<v Speaker 4>We got to get out of here for our 2026

1:03:35.430 --> 1:03:38.550
<v Speaker 4>Dubs roundtable at 430 here. How about Jack Loader coming

1:03:38.590 --> 1:03:38.990
<v Speaker 4>up with Stan?

1:03:39.010 --> 1:03:40.910
<v Speaker 3>Loader. Everybody listen to Loader.

1:03:40.970 --> 1:03:41.189
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:03:41.230 --> 1:03:41.410
<v Speaker 2>Hold on.

1:03:41.430 --> 1:03:42.330
<v Speaker 4>Is this it? Is this it?

1:03:43.870 --> 1:03:44.970
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is it. It's the Pointer Sisters.

1:03:45.090 --> 1:03:46.590
<v Speaker 4>It's the Pointer Sisters, dude.

1:03:46.630 --> 1:03:48.350
<v Speaker 3>Check this out. Check this out real quick. They're undefeated.

1:03:48.370 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>It's raining men. Sing it there. This sounds fantastic, right?

1:03:58.010 --> 1:04:01.420
<v Speaker 3>This is facts. This is phenomenal. Everybody listen to the

1:04:01.460 --> 1:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Pointer Sisters more. This is phenomenal. That's my advice to you.

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Good work by Danny Dunn. Hey, Danny, why don't we

1:04:05.940 --> 1:04:07.560
<v Speaker 4>start with you, Danny? We'll go back to the KMBR

1:04:07.580 --> 1:04:09.100
<v Speaker 4>studios while we put it to bed. Danny, you got

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:09.950
<v Speaker 4>a note to sell for us?

1:04:10.180 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Note to sell.

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, note to sell. Murph is a big Charles Bassey guy. Marcus,

1:04:17.300 --> 1:04:19.520
<v Speaker 4>we'll start with you next. We'll go to you next.

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:20.020
<v Speaker 4>Note to self.

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Note to self.

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:23.340
<v Speaker 5>I thought this was a Valkyries roundtable, so I showed

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 5>up wearing Valks gear. But an additional note to self,

1:04:26.260 --> 1:04:29.150
<v Speaker 5>Brandon Pujemski is probable to play tonight.

1:04:29.290 --> 1:04:29.650
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no.

1:04:29.790 --> 1:04:32.990
<v Speaker 5>If the Warriors want to sniff the postseason, sniff the playoffs,

1:04:33.250 --> 1:04:36.670
<v Speaker 5>they need a Casey Schmidt-type breakout season from Brandon Pujemski.

1:04:36.810 --> 1:04:37.410
<v Speaker 3>Oh, all right.

1:04:37.770 --> 1:04:38.050
<v Speaker 4>Murph?

1:04:38.430 --> 1:04:41.990
<v Speaker 3>Note to self, based on the way that JD laid

1:04:42.030 --> 1:04:46.440
<v Speaker 3>out the schedule, tonight, ladies and gentlemen, must win. Must

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:49.450
<v Speaker 3>win tonight. There you go. Note to self. Derek, note

1:04:49.470 --> 1:04:52.130
<v Speaker 3>to self. Note to self. Murph's Halloween parties suck.

1:04:52.390 --> 1:04:52.550
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:04:55.090 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Was it?

1:04:55.630 --> 1:04:56.110
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:04:56.490 --> 1:05:00.610
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, tough deal. All right, note to self, J.D. And

1:05:00.690 --> 1:05:04.510
<v Speaker 3>note to self, only one Murph in a Speedo reference

1:05:04.570 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>per show. Two is going to the well, two off.

1:05:07.020 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Only one.

1:05:07.260 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have to watch a bunch of guys

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:11.620
<v Speaker 3>in Speedos here on my phone. I know that sounds weird, right?

1:05:11.660 --> 1:05:12.360
<v Speaker 3>That sounds weird.

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>All right.

1:05:12.820 --> 1:05:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Shout out Navy versus George Washington on YouTube in about

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:18.610
<v Speaker 3>one minute. George Washington's still alive?

1:05:18.850 --> 1:05:19.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:19.230 --> 1:05:19.810
<v Speaker 4>No, G-Dub.

1:05:19.990 --> 1:05:23.870
<v Speaker 3>They should win if they're playing one guy. They should win, right?

1:05:24.190 --> 1:05:25.630
<v Speaker 3>It's raining, man. Come on, Copes.

1:05:26.030 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Note to self. Shout out Raymond Ritter, dude. Hooking up

1:05:30.340 --> 1:05:32.439
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Gazzona with tickets. Hooking us up with gear here.

1:05:32.780 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 4>And thanks to the Warriors for all they've done. And

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 4>thanks to Harmonic Brewing for being our partner all season long.

1:05:37.440 --> 1:05:40.100
<v Speaker 4>JD will be here all year long with Dubs OT.

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:41.820
<v Speaker 4>That is going to do it for our 2026. That's sad.

1:05:42.580 --> 1:05:45.070
<v Speaker 4>Debs Roundtable, thanks to everybody who came out and joined

1:05:45.090 --> 1:05:48.590
<v Speaker 4>us and for tuning in on the YouTube chat, on

1:05:48.610 --> 1:05:51.810
<v Speaker 4>the stream, and listening on the podcast page. You got

1:05:51.970 --> 1:05:55.690
<v Speaker 4>Stanford football against the NC State Wolfpack from the farm

1:05:55.750 --> 1:05:59.090
<v Speaker 4>at Stanford Stadium. That's coming up next, only here on

1:05:59.130 --> 1:05:59.780
<v Speaker 4>the Sports Leader.

1:06:00.070 --> 1:06:04.700
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to do your dirty work no more.

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:09.780
<v Speaker 4>I'm a fool to do your dirty work.

1:06:09.900 --> 1:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.