WEBVTT - John Thomas on the State of the Governor's Race

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And we continue at two five in the afternoon on

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The John Phillips Show Live from Las Vegas, Nevada. Mister

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Randy Wiggs in Culver City.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>You really can't make this one up. An employee for

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 2>the nonprofit in LA People Assisting the Homeless was arrested

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 2>for dealing drugs in MacArthur Park. And John, you want

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to know what job this employee had at People Assisting

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the Homeless?

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I can't wait to find out.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Passing out needles, of course. So he was giving away

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the needles and selling the Fentinel at the same time.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a barber Ferrara special to me. I have

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>no idea eight hundred two two two five two two

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>two is telephone number one. Eight hundred two two two

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>five two two two. It is our pleasure to welcome

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>our next guest to the program. He is a republic

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>political strategist. So you can follow on exit the Thomas Guide,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>John Thomas, Welcome.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Hey John, thanks for having me on.

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks so much for stopping by. Let's get into

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the gubernatorial election here first, because I've got to tell

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you one of the things, one of the reasons that

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we all study history in school is because history tends

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>to repeat itself, and you want to learn from your

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>mistakes and you want to try not to repeat them

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in this election. The Democrats were almost entirely willing to

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>get behind Eric Swalwell when he was a candidate for

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>governor because they thought he would have the best chance

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at finishing in first place and keeping a Democrat walkout

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from happening on the November ballot. He didn't really know

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>much about California politics, he didn't really seem interested in

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>learning about California politics, but he was well known because

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>he is a foil to Donald Trump, and that was

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>good enough for them. And then all the negative stories

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>broke about all the rape allegations and sexual harassment and

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mistreating people, misusing money, the whole thing. And we find

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>out the guy's a complete dirtbag. Even Stephen Klubek kicked

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>him out of his house. And what do the Democrats do.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Instead of trying to learn from their mistake and figure

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out where they went wrong in their evaluation of this candidate,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they jump headfirst in with Javier Bessera, a guy with

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>more red flags and a golf course, a guy who

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration is saying was the worst pick that

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe made his entire four years as president. He is

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy whose chief of staff is cutting a deal

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>with the FEDS after he was accused of stealing and

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>not paying the irs. Dana Williamson is being charged by

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the fires with a crime, and it looks like she's

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cutting a deal with them, and it seems like they

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to care or seem to be too concerned

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with all of these storm clouds on the horizon, and

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it's looking to me like Eric Swalwell two point zero

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's incredible. First of all, the fact that in

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the state is deeply blue as California, that candidates like

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Swallwell and Javier Butsera are the best they have to

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>offer is really quite pathetic and shocking. And the second

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>is I hear what you're saying, John about history, that

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 3>they should learn from it. But let's also look at

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the recent presidential election where they coued Joe Biden and

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>slammed in his vice president without having without having the

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>proper thought of perhaps forcing Joe Biden to have a

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>competitive primary and perhaps find a more viable national democrat

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 3>rather than be incompetent and idiotic and feckless Kamala Harris

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>who ended up obviously losing to President Trump. So this

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>is somewhat consistent. And I also think that Democrats are

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>so blinded by their identity politics that also causes them

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>often to not look beyond the surface. And so they're

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>going to get Hobby Air Besera taking over at a

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 3>time that California is in deep, deep crisis. So not

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>only do you need a competent Democrat, but you need

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat who isn't corrupt, And so it looks like

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be. California may be quite frankly longing

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>for the days of Gavin Newsom, because at least he's

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 3>just your standard issue San Francisco limbal Jabber. Besara is

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>like just Joe Biden a few years younger.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, when you look at the possibilities of what could happen,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>we know that everyone in this guy's inner circle is

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>now in trouble with the Feds. So it is an

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>entirely within the realm of possibilities that this guy could

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>get indicted after the primary, and then suddenly you have

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>someone who might go to federal prison as your nominee.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you do then my guess is they stand

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>behind him because they rather deal with a democratic criminal

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>than a republican. What do you do if he gets elected,

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes governor, and then gets indicted. You have a guy

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>who is essentially impotent as governor, won't be able to

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do any of the things that you want him to

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>do because he'll be under a federal cloud. All of

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the possibilities that they have coming up with Javier Bessera

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are bad. And let's say he doesn't get indicted, You're

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>going to end up with a guy who, based on

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>past performance, will likely be a very poor governor, and

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to rely on that guy to lead the state.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, particularly the time of broad economic crisis within the state. Yeah,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you're exactly right. I think the other kind of story here,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>as it relates to the candidates, John, is that although

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that the Democratic establishment thought too deeply

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 3>about their backing of Javier Sarah other than he's not

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Tom Steyer and Tom you can't doesn't play well with

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the Democratic establishment. I think really it's the establishment trying

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to run more broadly from all the other candidates, John,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean they, yes, Javier may be a bad governor

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>in effective governor. But the establishment hates Katie Porter. They

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 3>can't stand to be in a room with Katie Porter.

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>They would take somebody who's incompetent over any day of

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the week. And quite frankly, a similar similar thing with Stier.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>So I wonder if it's more that the Sarah was

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>just the best the least bad alternative in a time

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 3>when they got caught flat footed because Swallow was obviously

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>bounced out.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You debate a lot of Democratic strategists on cable, on radio,

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>different forums. When the cameras are on and you're talking

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to them about Katie Porter, what do they say.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I have yet to meet a single Democratic strategist, state, local,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>or national that thinks highly of her. It's really they

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 3>all just want her to go home, go back to teaching,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 3>or whatever she wants to do. They personally detest her,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think they're all going to be actually, I

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>know they're all going to be quite relieved when she

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>very likely will not prevail in this race. And what

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>is that Two back to back losses and her old

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>seat was kind of carved away, So they're all relieved.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>The only person I know I believe that likes Katie

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Porter would be Elizabeth Warren. I think she's her protege.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But outside of that, Katie's finding herself without a home.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>What I talk to Democrats, not only do they not

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like her, they all seem to have unique Katie Porter

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>stories where she did something to them, She was nasty

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to them, she was nasty to someone in front of them,

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>she did something vulgar, whatever. They all have stories, every

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>single one that I talked to.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. You know, it's interesting because politics is

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>a team sport. It doesn't mean that you can't ruffle feathers.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>So President Trump goes toe to toe with people all

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the time, but he also is very loyal and knows

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>how to get along with people to get things done.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Katie Porter doesn't get along with anybody. She's in it

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>for herself, and that's simply it. You know, her whole

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 3>thing during Congress was to try to make a rocket

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>to try to embarrass a CEO that would come in

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 3>front of oversight. And then she used that clip to

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 3>get her on MSNBC simply so that she could take

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>that clip and put it in her email machine and

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>keep dumb low information voters keep giving her five dollars

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a month, and that worked pretty effectively to put together

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a just But the problem is, John, it's one thing

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>to run for Congress. The electric doesn't get to know

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 3>you that well because it's pretty much your TV ads

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 3>and your mail pieces. But when you run for governor

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>in a big state like this, yes, paid advertising is important,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 3>but you've got to build traditional coalitions. And if you

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>have flashed and burned everybody along the way, there's going

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to be nobody there to stand with you. And that's

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>why she's in bloating.

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, what do you make of the fact that

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be no genuine interest at all within

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party electorate for Matt Mayhan, who is by

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>all accounts the sanest of all of the Democratic candidates

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>running for governor. He certainly wants to do something about crime,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do something about the homeless problem. He

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to spend the state into bankruptcy. But he's

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with them on all the social issues that they care about.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>He hates Donald Trump, and it doesn't matter. They're not

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>buying that product.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 3>That actually is the most interesting story that I don't

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 3>think is being covered about the scubatorial race, which is

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that moderate Democrats are completely rejected by both the establishment

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>and the electorate in blue states like California. That is

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 3>just shocking that they're looking for positions at the extremes.

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>And Matt Mahon, it's just I mean, he's floundered. The

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 3>only people that have gotten excited about him are kind

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>of quite frankly, the ultra wealthy and Silicon Valley elites.

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Like that's about it. He never was resonant with the electorate.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think, in part John, it's because intensity in

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 3>these races is generated with Democrats at the extreme, who

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 3>is the most anti Trump, who is the most woke?

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And Mahon's positions don't generate any excitement or intensity right now.

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 3>He's not partisan enough, and so forget this the race

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 3>of in California. I think as we project as we

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 3>look into the midterm cycle, and then of course as

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>we look into the next presidential cycle, this may be

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 3>foreshadowing of what the Democratic primary race looks like, that

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 3>a moderate governor from some flyover state may not actually

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 3>be quite viable in twenty twenty eight. They may be

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 3>looking for somebody more like an AOC to carry the torch.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, this is horrendous news for Josh Shapiro or

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Ram Emmanuel or Andy Bashar. I can't see that type

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of candidate winning a Democratic primary right now.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I struggle to see it. You know, I know, the

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the Democratic elites, the donors will probably

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>give them plenty of money, so you know, you can't

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 3>totally discount it, but I struggle to see it. They're

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 3>going to splice up what ever, small flights of the

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 3>electric but really they're just not going to generate a

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of attension because primary is about generating attention and intensity,

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 3>and you know, somebody like AOC John, you know, probably

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>starts out with I don't know, mid mid to high

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>twenties and in support, and her voters are are not

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 3>leaving her. So all she has to do is hang

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 3>on to her voters and maybe pick up a couple

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>points here or there, and heck, she can ride this

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 3>thing out. So it's this really bad news for Democrats,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's good news for Republicans if they're thinking about

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 3>breaking the historical trend of you know, holding the White

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 3>House after two terms in power.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Biserah has seen enough of a bump

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to prevent the Democrats from being locked off the November ballot.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I do, yeah, I mean, look, strange things do happen.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 3>But I've been I look at pullings a snapshot in time,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>of course, but I really are looking kind of at

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 3>consolidation trends, and it seems to be the Democrats are

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of getting in line broadly behind the Sarah. His

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 3>and Styre has been falling back, and interestingly, his attacks

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>and whatnot kind of uh, He's resaturation point, whereas advertising

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>really has marginal utility for each dollar that he spends,

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 3>and in fact, you know, every time it's just paid

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>for by time Tom sire, it reinforces kind of the

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Democratic electorates to stained for rich guys. So Tom seems

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>to be falling back far enough. If he were closing

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 3>at a faster rate, I would say, hey, maybe there

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 3>could be two Republicans. But you know, President Trump's endorsement

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of Steve Hilton seems to consolidate the Republicans, and the

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of Democrats are getting in line more broadly with

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the Sarah. So I think it will be an R

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 3>and D going in and and but look, I think

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the big wildcard is what you said, John does some

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 3>bad doj News break about Hoavier with Sarah, you know,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>in a runoff, because that could tilt this thing in

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 3>some kind of black Swan event towards Steve Hilton.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think Tom Steyer does next? Because he

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ran for president, spend a ton of money and lost,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he's running for governor spending a ton of money, gonna lose.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he just goes away at this point

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>or do you think he spends the rest of his

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>life running to win something.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>You know. I was thinking about this this morning actually,

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>And on the one hand, it's completely idiotic about how

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 3>much money this guy has wasted in just perennially running

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and losing. On the other hand, well, I completely disagree

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>with his policies and world viewpoint I actually kind of

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>respect it in a way, John, that he's a man

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 3>in the arena. You know, he gets in the fight.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 3>At least he has no shot, but at least he's

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>he's trying to do something, you know, juxtaposed to other

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>billionaires like Rick Caruso who just don't have the you know,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the stuff to go through it again. But so I

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>tend to think his days in electoral politics, Tom says

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 3>are over but I think he's going to turn this

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>and leverage it into some kind of appointment if the

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Democrats take the White House. I just I just have

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 3>to think that he's going to convert you know, not

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>just the name might but also he's given a lot

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>of influencers within the Democratic Party a lot of money,

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>so he's going to try to try to convert that

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 3>into an appointment if Tom Steyer runs for president again.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I guess I'll eat my hat, but

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess at that point he just loves burning money.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I really have no one there no other explanation for it.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>What the hell is going on with Rick Caruso. You

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned his name. He got behind Matt Mayhan in a

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>big way. Matt Mayhan is not going to win this election.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And now it looks like Carusell might get in trouble

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because there is coordination between one of the independent groups

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the campaign, or at least an allegation of that,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're looking into that right now, So people might

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble over that. He's getting behind a challenger

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to Brad Sherman, the longtime congressman from the San Fernando Valley,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>who is attacking him from the left. He has certainly

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten behind other candidates that make no sense to me.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He won't endorse or hasn't endorsed Spencer Pratt, who is

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>catching fire right now in that La mayor's race. He's

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>only going after Nitia Rahman, So I assume he's going

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to endorse Karen Bass in the general election if it's

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bass and Pratt. As soon as he started taking advice

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>from Democratic consultants, A, what he did made no sense

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to anyone, and B he went from being the guy

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Midas touch to being a guy who can't

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>win anything.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really interesting. You know, when you expect Rick

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>to step up and use his voice to do the

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 3>right thing, like endorsing Spencer Pratt, he remained silent when

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 3>he has no business getting involved in a race like

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 3>the one against Brad Sherman. He speaks up and he's

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 3>backing a loser because he didn't run for mayor and

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 3>he didn't run for governor. And it was such a

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 3>bizarre lead up by the way right he was on

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>an electoral tour essentially saying an announcement is coming and

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 3>then only to pull the trigger and pull back. Was odd,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 3>and that meant that if Rick Crusoe endorsed in the

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 3>race for governor, politically speaking, he needed to back a winner.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 3>He could not take a long shot. And so the

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>fact that he got all in, I mean all in

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 3>behind Matt Mayhan. And I saw some messaging Johnny put

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 3>out on Twitter where it was a little disingenuous, where

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 3>he was saying, oh, Matt Mayhem on the rise, he's overtaking.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 3>He was in fifth place at the time. I mean,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>there was just no there was no bad way at

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>that time. It's look, I think any shred of political

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>capital that Rick Caruso had after this coming election cycle

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 3>is probably gone. I thought what he could have become

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 3>when he decided not to run, although I do think

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 3>he should have given it a shot in the LA

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>mayor's race. But when he decided not to run, I thought,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 3>perhaps he could be like an elder statesman, the voice

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 3>of reason who just did the right thing by getting

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>behind the right people at the right time. And it's

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 3>it's a hodgepot. I think it's bad political advice and instincts,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>a desire to be liked, and what's the end of

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>happening is his political capitals eroding, and people who should

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 3>be listening to Rick's advice are just going to discount it.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 3>And he's been more and more irrelevant as time goes on.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>John Thomas, Republican political strategist, so you can follow on

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>exit the Thomas Guide. Thanks so much for stopping by.

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Thanks thanks John, you too.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Eight hundred two two two five two two two is

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a telephone number one eight hundred two two two five

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>two two two. If you'd like to email the show,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you can do so at Johnny Don't Like Show gmail

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's Johnny Don't Like Show at gmail dot

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>com and Randy. The Long Weekend is almost here. If

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to start listening to us after we sign

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>off for three, that's easy to do.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 2>All you gotta do is download our podcast quite frankly.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Search for The John Phillips Show wherever you get your podcasts,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 2>quite frankly, whether it's the Apple podcast.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>App, quite frankly, whether it is.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 2>On Spotify, quite frankly, iHeartRadio, quite frankly. Search for the

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>John Phillips Show, hit subscribe. You could download all the

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 2>episodes right frankly. You can also do a George gascone.

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Who Google on YouTube quite frankly.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And look for us on the Cumulus News Talk channel.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>You go to YouTube dot com slash at Cumulus News

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Talk subscribe to that. That's where all of the Cumulus

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>News Talk stations post the podcast, and ours are the

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>most popular on there, and we like to keep it

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that way, so you can check that out by subscribing

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 2>at YouTube dot com slash at Cumulus News Talk. But

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>no matter which way you listen, there are so many

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 2>different ways to enjoy this podcast.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, And on election night, we're doing double duty.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes, we are, absolutely, absolutely.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be broadcasting live on June second, from seven

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>to nine pm election results. If there are anyone the

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>polls close at eight o'clock, we'll have them for you,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's going to be a triple simulcast. We're gonna

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>be live on KABC, We're gonna be live on KSFO,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna be live on the Big KMJ in Fresnow.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's more drama going on right now in the

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>gubernatorial election involving paid influencers.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>Tom Steyer has been getting a lot of flak for

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 2>straight up paying social media influencers to endorse his campaign,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the influencers have not been disclosing

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that they've been paid to support Tom Steyer.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just Steyer doing this.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Apparently Nithia Rahman is doing this in the La mayors race.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>For more, here is CBSLA Well.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 5>To right, there's new scrutiny over political campaigns and social

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 5>media influencers.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Politicians are writing.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Beache starting to understand why the radio buys are so

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 2>low for political because you can really skirt the rules

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to social media.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, though, If you are an influencer

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>who talks about fashion or rap, music or fill in

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the blank, and then suddenly you stop talking about rap

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or fashion or whatever and you start shilling for Tom Steyer,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think your audience has any interest in that

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>No, it's an obvious cash grab and maybe they're cool

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>with that. Hey, I'm ripping off Tom Steyer's campaign. I'm

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 2>not saying it's a good strategy. I'm just saying that

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>this is what the consultants think you got to do.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Now, politicians are writing big checks for endorsements from influencers

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 5>CBSLA political reporter Time.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>We imagine if that was legal in radio, Oh, the

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that would be going to these stations

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>would be unreal.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 5>CBSLA political reporter Tom wait Us, hear Tom. The big

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 5>issue not all these payments are being disclosed, that's right.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 6>And you know, here's the thing. We spoke with one

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 6>influencer tonight. Really nice guy, just try to make a living,

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 6>not really you being in the political world, right, They

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 6>don't know a lot about sort of disclosure laws, and

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 6>so I think that's part of it. So paying influencers

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 6>for a product or campaign endorsement, it's nothing new, but

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 6>the payments are getting more scrutiny after a Democrat for governor,

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 6>Tom Steyer, dropped a staggering one hundred thousand dollars on

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 6>a Texas based influencer to promote his campaign.

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>WHOA. Now, you do the radio show from noon to

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>three and then again later on in the afternoon. Let's

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>say you had your own podcast where you talked about

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>cooking and it had nothing to do with the radio station.

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You could theoretically sell your endorsement on your podcast legally

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking to one of these candidates. Correct. I think our

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>contract doesn't allow that. Let's say it did. How much

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>money would it take for you to endorse Katie Porter

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on your cooking podcast? Well we could make ESTRONI together.

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 5>Sorry for the noise, I'm cutting carrots.

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Look, I a thousand.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I am a shill for a lot of things, but

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I could ever be a shill for

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 2>a politician. What about if she offered one hundred thousand dollars, Hey.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's randy for Katie Porter.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you like politicians that scream at their assistance? Then

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 2>you will love Katie Porter out of my shop?

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>How about this twenty five thousand dollars? But she'd sleep

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with you too.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna make people want us to play that call again.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll do it in the last segment. What the hell?

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a holiday weekend. The street is tom st I

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>do like money, so there is that.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>But would but would anybody be able to take me

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>seriously in the job that I have here and on

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>my five o'clock show if they know that I'm getting

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>paid to promote these candidates?

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you care? Because the people who are interested

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in making sooufles aren't listening to this show. That is true.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 7>Word on the street is Tom Steyer is actually playing

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 7>to slash utility bills by twenty five percent.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 6>So Cow based influencer Javier Knight on TikTok giving a

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 6>thumbs up to Democrat Tom Steyer in his bid for

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 6>governor California has a solution. What isn't said in this

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 6>video is that Styer's campaign paid Night close to three

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 6>thousand dollars. Knight did write two captions stating the video

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 6>is in partnership with the Styer campaign. Night spoke with us,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 6>telling CBSLA.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 2>He was s I want to get a shirt that

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>says Tom Steyer paid me three thousand dollars and all

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 2>I got was this T shirt.

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So I've never heard any of these influencers that they're

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>all paying off. And then a friend of mine who

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>used to work at our then sister station, WABC, called

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>me and one of the influencers that's at the center

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of this used to be a salesman at WABC who's

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>now an online influencer and apparently is supporting Beserah for

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>money that tracks.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 6>Night spoke with us, telling CBSLA he was surprised when

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 6>he got the offer from the Styer campaign because most

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 6>of his content is comedy and lifestyle.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one for policies.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 7>I don't lean right, don't lean lamp, working to every

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 7>American trying to live the American dream.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And hey, if this guy wants to get me three

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars, sure he'll buy my not vote.

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Good.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it surprising to anybody that this campaign has a

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>ceiling and all the money that he's spending. Did you

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 2>see that chart, by the way, of how much Tom

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 2>Steyer has spent on local TV in Los Angeles?

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, And let me tell you, at least with

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the influencers, all of this is being wasted because this

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>program is a broadcast. It's meant for a broad audience.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Podcasting is narrow casting. You're talking to people with very

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>specific interests. The podcast I listen to, I listen to

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a podcast about the Angels losing. They don't talk about baseball,

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't talk about sports, they don't talk about these

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>broad categories. They talk about one team and one team only,

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. And if I tune in and instead

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of hearing about the Angels losing, I hear about Tom

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Steyer and how great he is, I'm gone.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>This report that we're playing is from CBSLA KCBS in

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles. To this point, Tom Steyer has spent ten

0:27:54.600 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>point seven million dollars on ADS on just that shown.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And he spent a ton on the rest of them too.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Eight point five million dollars on ABC seven Los Angeles,

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 2>zero dollars on KABC, Thank you very much, eight point

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 2>one million dollars on NBC four, five point five million

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 2>dollars on KPIX, five point three on KCRA, four point

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 2>one on NBC in the Bay Area, three point nine

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 2>on Fox eleven, three point nine on KTLA. There's so

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 2>much money that's directly going to all these TV stations.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that the one TV station that he's

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not really spending much on is KRON in the Bay Area.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. No love for KRON four. It's up with that,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Tom Styer.

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 7>Could it be ignorant of me to just be like, yeah,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 7>I'll take the money. And but at the same time,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 7>when someone's throwing a big pile of money at you,

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 7>and you got to make this book.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Influencers got to make rent. So whether they're pushing collagen

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 2>peptides or Tom Styer.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>They are for sale.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 7>When someone's throwing a big pile of money at you

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 7>and you got to make bills and pay rent and

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 7>that's what you do for a living.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna take it.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Knight's check was small potatoes compared to what Styer paid

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 6>influencer Carlos Eduardo Espina.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Second thing, do you support ice? Hell no. The really

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>funny part is him trying to relate to these podcasters

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and these influencers.

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 3>He is.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 2>The best way to describe Tom Steyer in this campaign

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 2>for governor is a term that the kids use.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Delulu.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 6>As first reported by The New York Times, a Spina

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 6>based in Texas, was paid one hundred thousand dollars to

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 6>promote Stier's campaign to his more than fourteen million followers. Initially,

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 6>there was no clear disclosure from a Spina that he

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 6>was being paid.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>You would think you'd yeah, that would get your life

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>is pulled if you are a radio station. None of

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 2>this is allowed in this profession, but it is the

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>wild wild West in social media. And even if we

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>have laws in California where you have to disclose it,

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 2>who's enforcing that?

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 8>You would think you would see the potential pr problem

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 8>coming on this and getting out in front of it.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 8>And it's probably just as simple as you know, the

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 8>influencer saying, Hey, YO, just to be clear, I'm getting

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 8>paid to do this, but I am taking the money

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 8>because I really believe in the guy.

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 6>Sire's campaign says they are following all applicable laws and

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 6>they are compensating creators in part because they see them

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 6>as small business owners and deserve to be paid for

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 6>their time and production. The Stier campaign is hardly alone

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 6>in paying influencers to promote their candidacies, but Stire's seemingly

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 6>unlimited wealth and reach has added to the scrutiny.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you the amount of ads he's bought, the

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>amount of influencers he's bought, it's a turn for a

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>large portion of the electric because it just reminds everybody

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that this guy has way too much money.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like they have a longstanding relationship with

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy. It's not like they had worked with him

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the past and were really impressed with him, and

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're getting behind him. I'm sure they'd never

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>heard of the guy until he showed up with a check.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 6>But Styr's seemingly unlimited wealth and reach has added to

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 6>the scrutiny.

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Vote for Nithia Rahmen.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Here's well known actor, writer, and comedian Adam Conover promoting

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 6>LA mayoral candidate Nithia Ramen. What he doesn't say in

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 6>the clip is that a company registered to him was

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 6>paid just over one thousand dollars from the Ramen campaign.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That's shady. Nithia talk about corrupt politics just buying people

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to endorse you.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 6>While makers say influencers new to politics need to brush

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 6>up on campaign disclosure laws.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 4>For the folks who are making a thousand bucks or

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>ten thousand bucks or one hundred thousand dollars, you know,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 4>at that point, yes, the responsibility is on you as

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the person entering into that contract.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>It makes me question, because Tom Steyer has done a

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of interviews on a lot of different podcasts, how

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>many of them were interviews because it went through the

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>traditional process of he's booked because he's somebody running for office,

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>and how many were paid interviews?

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, think about this, Think about the candidates who have

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the resources to buy celebrity endorsements, and think about how

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>well those candidates have done. Remember in the last presidential

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>campaign when Kamala Harris went out and bought who was it,

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce someone like that where they had a big free

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>concert in Houston and everyone showed up to see the

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>singer do the concert, but it was there was a

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>financial transaction that took place. There was like a million

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more that the campaign paid the artist to

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>come show up and perform at the campaign rally. And

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad look because that becomes the story. Whatever

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of money you paid the influencer is what's going

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to be printed in the paper, and that's what people

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to see. And it's a bad look. And

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>she lost. And Tom Steyer, who's buying all the influencers,

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna lose, and so is Nitya Ramin.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>To understand what your responsibilities are in California.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Finding these payments can be tricky.

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 6>The payments are often buried under layers of campaign finance disclosures,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 6>and in some cases, the influencers create their own companies,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 6>so the payments from the politicians are not paid directly

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 6>to the influencers.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Pat Well, I hope they watched a report too. Tom

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 5>get an education. Thank you.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Elections are changing right before our eyes. It's AI videos

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and paid influencer endorsements.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>One hundred two two two five two two two is

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>telephone number one eight hundred two two two five two

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>two two. If you'd like to email the show, you

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>can do so at Johnny don't like show at gmail

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's Johnny don't like show at gmail dot com.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to take a peek at my ballot,

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I see here that we have a bunch of emails

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>asking for my ballot. You can get that online at

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>KABC dot com, KSFO dot com. It's right there on

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the front page. And you can see how I'm voting.

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean you should vote the same way. It's

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just how I'm gonna fill my ballot out. But you

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>make up your own mind. You're all big boys and girls.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go to the phones and welcome Brianbrian.

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 9>Hello, Hey, Hey, John here Randy. Love the show. And

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 9>I pulled up your ballot John, and uh, it looks good.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 9>And I understand the concept of voting for Bianco. I

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 9>think it makes sound strategy. But why do you think

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 9>the Republicans didn't get better organized and try and come

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 9>up with something like, if your name starts with a

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 9>three AM, you vote for Bianco. If it's end through Z,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 9>a vote for Hilton. Some like that, where you give

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 9>a little more structure to what you're telling your voters

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 9>to do.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Well. For whatever reason, a lot of people in the

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party are not playing for a Democratic lockout in November.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That is not their goal. What they want is they

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>want Steve Hilton on the ballot with a Democrat because

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>they think that if they play for the top two,

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>then there's a chance that they could get locked out

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>themselves and there would be two Democrats on the November ballot,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and then that would hurt candidates who are running for

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Congress or state Assembly or other down ballot races. My

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>point is is this Gopher broke. If you have an

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity at winning the seat by going for a Democratic lockout,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then that's your play. If you're putting a Republican candidate

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on the November ballot against a Democrat with less than

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a one percent chance at winning, then you're essentially giving

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>them the seat for another four years. I think the

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>state is currently in a crisis level and we need

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to do everything we can to block the Democrats from

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping that seat for another four years, even though the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>legislature would be hostile. You can appoint judges, you can

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>appoint people to the Public Utilities Commission, you can appoint

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>people to parole boards. You could appoint people to fix

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine to one to one system. A lot of

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good can happen if you have a competent governor, which

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had in this state in a very long time.

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the call, Sir,