WEBVTT - Annnnnd They're Off!!

0:00:07.860 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.980
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 3>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.210
<v Speaker 4>Thank God politics is stupid, and it gets stupider the

0:00:31.250 --> 0:00:33.589
<v Speaker 4>closer you get to an election. I'm looking up at

0:00:33.610 --> 0:00:34.949
<v Speaker 4>a clip of AOC.

0:00:35.030 --> 0:00:35.450
<v Speaker 2>She's in.

0:00:36.729 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Michigan campaigning for El-Sayed, talking about how this administration doesn't

0:00:41.020 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 4>want women to go to college. Because, of course, that's

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:44.140
<v Speaker 4>a thing.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Whatever. What the hell are you talking about? I know.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.449
<v Speaker 2>What a load of crap. Quit campaigning with a Muslim

0:00:52.510 --> 0:00:55.530
<v Speaker 2>Brotherhood Islamist. You communist?

0:00:56.310 --> 0:00:56.650
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:00:58.450 --> 0:00:58.850
<v Speaker 2>Damn it.

0:00:59.450 --> 0:00:59.810
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:01:01.510 --> 0:01:02.250
<v Speaker 4>We've been talking about.

0:01:03.350 --> 0:01:06.390
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. Go ahead. Let me frame it like this.

0:01:07.209 --> 0:01:11.210
<v Speaker 2>There are a handful of stories before us, political stories.

0:01:12.310 --> 0:01:16.130
<v Speaker 2>Although one leaves the boardroom and goes straight to the bedroom.

0:01:16.330 --> 0:01:18.430
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. I hate when you use that voice.

0:01:18.850 --> 0:01:19.330
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.530
<v Speaker 2>Because it makes me want to take a shower.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 5>In what way?

0:01:22.660 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, stay tuned for that. We have a handful

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.900
<v Speaker 2>of stories that I think could be loosely described as

0:01:32.780 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>folks normally in the Trump camp seem awfully hostile in

0:01:38.660 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>ways that we're not familiar with. From Sean Hannity to

0:01:43.810 --> 0:01:47.370
<v Speaker 2>various other Fox News folks to congressmen and senators.

0:01:47.590 --> 0:01:50.890
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Brit Hume and others coming out hardcore against Trump's

0:01:50.950 --> 0:01:52.169
<v Speaker 4>Russia policy, for instance.

0:01:53.490 --> 0:01:55.130
<v Speaker 2>And we've gone into that in a fair amount of

0:01:55.150 --> 0:01:56.410
<v Speaker 2>detail if you're just tuning in.

0:01:57.020 --> 0:01:59.940
<v Speaker 4>And then, so, Katie Zacharias, she's the new White House

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.050
<v Speaker 4>press spokesman. I shouldn't know her name. Well, maybe I should,

0:02:03.070 --> 0:02:04.790
<v Speaker 4>because I do this for a living, but you shouldn't

0:02:04.830 --> 0:02:07.110
<v Speaker 4>know her name. Nobody should know the name of the

0:02:07.130 --> 0:02:10.130
<v Speaker 4>White House press spokesman. You shouldn't have conversations about them.

0:02:10.450 --> 0:02:13.459
<v Speaker 4>It's just, we're too into politics. But anyway, that ship

0:02:13.500 --> 0:02:17.179
<v Speaker 4>has sailed. So, she debuts the other day, and.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.299
<v Speaker 4>Critical reception from the people that were going to hate

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>her no matter who she was. I mean, she could

0:02:26.180 --> 0:02:30.390
<v Speaker 4>have been a combination of Walter Cronkite and Thomas Jefferson

0:02:30.450 --> 0:02:34.130
<v Speaker 4>and George Clooney. And MSNBC would have talked about how

0:02:34.210 --> 0:02:36.770
<v Speaker 4>what an embarrassment she was. So, you know, that's that.

0:02:37.330 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>All men, by the way, ladies, Jack misogynist, go on.

0:02:41.380 --> 0:02:43.380
<v Speaker 4>I just didn't think much about this story at all.

0:02:43.669 --> 0:02:45.609
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't super impressed with her, but it was day one.

0:02:45.850 --> 0:02:47.809
<v Speaker 4>So anyway, she goes on Sean Hannity.

0:02:47.830 --> 0:02:51.230
<v Speaker 2>She would have gone with Barbara Walters, Mother Teresa, and

0:02:51.470 --> 0:02:52.900
<v Speaker 2>Abigail Adams.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:54.420
<v Speaker 6>I'm just observing.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:03:01.380
<v Speaker 2>Just asking questions. I'm just asking questions. Anyway, you were saying?

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.590
<v Speaker 4>I just snorted. I just snorted like a pig.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

0:03:07.750 --> 0:03:12.530
<v Speaker 4>So this this this beleaguered new White House press spokesperson

0:03:12.830 --> 0:03:15.559
<v Speaker 4>is getting beat up by mainstream and left media goes

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>on Sean Hannity last night. And she had to think

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.190
<v Speaker 4>she was going to get the full on Fox Hannity treatment. Where,

0:03:23.389 --> 0:03:26.130
<v Speaker 4>you know, hey, congratulations on being the new White House

0:03:26.190 --> 0:03:32.100
<v Speaker 4>press spokesman. Good to see you up there. What's Donald

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.279
<v Speaker 4>Trump got planned this weekend? And she lays out some

0:03:34.300 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 4>stuff or whatever. And it's a softball fun fest.

0:03:37.620 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>And everything's great.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 4>But no, Sean Hannity interviews her like she just went

0:03:43.860 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 4>on Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC for some reason. And I

0:03:47.780 --> 0:03:51.830
<v Speaker 4>don't know why. And this is how it opened.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.140
<v Speaker 7>You had your first moment as press secretary. It's been

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.860
<v Speaker 7>widely panned. I'm sure you're aware. It only lasted 14 minutes.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.260
<v Speaker 6>You only took three questions.

0:04:02.820 --> 0:04:07.580
<v Speaker 7>Questions about your legal background, calling yourself a lawyer. You

0:04:07.620 --> 0:04:09.860
<v Speaker 7>went to Pepperdine Law School, but you did not pass

0:04:09.940 --> 0:04:11.500
<v Speaker 7>the bar exam, correct?

0:04:12.100 --> 0:04:12.500
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:14.140
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.990
<v Speaker 6>What happened? How did you feel it went personally?

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 8>Well, Sean, I want to give some background, and it's

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 8>nice to be on here with you and such a

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.620
<v Speaker 8>privilege to serve as President Trump's new press secretary. I

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 8>was given the offer last Wednesday, or I got a

0:04:29.140 --> 0:04:31.739
<v Speaker 8>phone call last Wednesday. I flew out to D.C.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 6>On Thursday.

0:04:32.620 --> 0:04:35.580
<v Speaker 8>I had a meeting on Friday, was offered the job,

0:04:35.790 --> 0:04:40.370
<v Speaker 8>flew home to California on Saturday, flew back to Washington

0:04:40.670 --> 0:04:43.690
<v Speaker 8>on Sunday, was asked to start on Monday, Sean, which

0:04:43.790 --> 0:04:46.730
<v Speaker 8>is Columbus Day. And so it's a federal holiday and

0:04:47.410 --> 0:04:50.570
<v Speaker 8>have a press briefing at 930 in the morning on Tuesday.

0:04:50.650 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 8>So what I feel is I really stepped up and

0:04:54.820 --> 0:04:57.220
<v Speaker 8>to the plate to do the press conference, Sean, with

0:04:57.700 --> 0:05:00.700
<v Speaker 8>very little prep time. I received briefing materials in the morning.

0:05:00.870 --> 0:05:04.130
<v Speaker 4>So I didn't think that was a good look. Obviously,

0:05:04.450 --> 0:05:07.670
<v Speaker 4>him starting out with his widely panned He didn't need

0:05:07.710 --> 0:05:11.170
<v Speaker 4>to couch it that way. Widely panned by mainstream media

0:05:11.250 --> 0:05:14.270
<v Speaker 4>and left-leaning. He didn't need to do that at all.

0:05:14.570 --> 0:05:16.289
<v Speaker 4>Why did he do that? He didn't need to bring

0:05:16.350 --> 0:05:18.350
<v Speaker 4>up the whole lawyer thing at all.

0:05:19.089 --> 0:05:20.589
<v Speaker 2>And he did that. I think he did. I think

0:05:20.630 --> 0:05:23.029
<v Speaker 2>he did. It would have been strange. Well, okay.

0:05:23.050 --> 0:05:24.650
<v Speaker 4>Wait till you see the way he gets into it then,

0:05:24.710 --> 0:05:25.010
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

0:05:28.140 --> 0:05:30.390
<v Speaker 4>I've watched enough Hannity. He wouldn't have brought that up.

0:05:30.540 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 2>He didn't need to bring that up.

0:05:31.660 --> 0:05:34.660
<v Speaker 4>He would have just done the happy, happy, joy, joy thing.

0:05:35.310 --> 0:05:37.820
<v Speaker 4>Isn't this great? What's coming up this weekend? And let

0:05:37.860 --> 0:05:40.060
<v Speaker 4>her get out of there with a smile on her face.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.500
<v Speaker 2>My theory is correct, but I'm going to withhold my theory.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear one more clip.

0:05:44.660 --> 0:05:46.140
<v Speaker 4>Now, I don't think it was a good idea for

0:05:46.190 --> 0:05:47.890
<v Speaker 4>her to say I didn't have time to get ready.

0:05:47.930 --> 0:05:50.470
<v Speaker 4>You know, basically that sort of thing. I didn't I

0:05:50.470 --> 0:05:52.070
<v Speaker 4>didn't think that was the best move for her. But anyway,

0:05:52.089 --> 0:05:52.700
<v Speaker 4>he follows up.

0:05:54.350 --> 0:05:56.570
<v Speaker 7>Am I hearing that you think the staff should have

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 7>prepped you better?

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.580
<v Speaker 8>Well, I believe that in that time I could have

0:06:01.620 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 8>just given a brief intro and said I'm only here

0:06:04.540 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 8>to introduce myself and I want to engage with the

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.790
<v Speaker 8>press corps. I'm someone who wants to build relationships with

0:06:11.870 --> 0:06:14.490
<v Speaker 8>every single one of you. I, however, have been on

0:06:14.510 --> 0:06:18.470
<v Speaker 8>the job for one day and I now need to,

0:06:18.510 --> 0:06:21.729
<v Speaker 8>you know, instead of taking questions, probably should have You know,

0:06:21.990 --> 0:06:22.590
<v Speaker 8>step to side.

0:06:22.630 --> 0:06:24.450
<v Speaker 6>However, I was able to ask.

0:06:24.550 --> 0:06:26.570
<v Speaker 8>I was able to deliver breaking news, which I do

0:06:26.610 --> 0:06:29.570
<v Speaker 8>believe was the right thing to do as the press secretary, Sean.

0:06:30.980 --> 0:06:36.099
<v Speaker 4>So are you blaming the staff then? Then they get

0:06:36.140 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>into the lawyer stuff.

0:06:38.660 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 7>You took the bar exam, but you didn't pass the

0:06:41.500 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 7>bar exam, correct?

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Sean. Did you ever take it a second time?

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:52.010
<v Speaker 8>So for background, I graduated Pepperdine, got married in the

0:06:52.070 --> 0:06:56.060
<v Speaker 8>same week, and we had all intended to.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Move out to China.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 8>I had already pre-registered for the bar exam. And during

0:07:01.260 --> 0:07:04.850
<v Speaker 8>basically during the summer, I knew I would be living

0:07:04.890 --> 0:07:07.810
<v Speaker 8>in China and the results of the bar were inconsequential.

0:07:08.010 --> 0:07:10.390
<v Speaker 8>And I sat for it because I didn't want to

0:07:10.410 --> 0:07:13.550
<v Speaker 8>have a withdrawal status. And then I moved over to

0:07:13.610 --> 0:07:15.850
<v Speaker 8>China and where I did get a job in an

0:07:15.950 --> 0:07:18.050
<v Speaker 8>international practice of a Chinese law firm.

0:07:18.770 --> 0:07:18.950
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:07:18.970 --> 0:07:21.690
<v Speaker 6>But did you ever take the bar exam a second time?

0:07:22.010 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I did not, Sean.

0:07:22.450 --> 0:07:22.890
<v Speaker 6>Or a third time?

0:07:23.870 --> 0:07:23.970
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:07:24.090 --> 0:07:24.970
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:07:26.030 --> 0:07:28.230
<v Speaker 4>And I think he probably knew that, but he decided

0:07:28.250 --> 0:07:31.340
<v Speaker 4>to ask her anyway. And then it goes, do you

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 4>want more of this?

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:32.900
<v Speaker 6>Sure.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:33.540
<v Speaker 4>Okay, here we go.

0:07:34.740 --> 0:07:37.620
<v Speaker 7>You said you consulted with many people, and they advised

0:07:37.660 --> 0:07:39.930
<v Speaker 7>you that it was okay to call yourself a lawyer

0:07:39.990 --> 0:07:41.930
<v Speaker 7>but not an attorney, correct?

0:07:42.410 --> 0:07:42.710
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.500
<v Speaker 7>Why not just say I went to Pepperdine Law School

0:07:45.670 --> 0:07:48.510
<v Speaker 7>and then took a different career path and I took

0:07:48.530 --> 0:07:51.090
<v Speaker 7>the bar once and didn't pass it. Why get into

0:07:51.130 --> 0:07:54.150
<v Speaker 7>this long drawn out definition between the difference between a

0:07:54.210 --> 0:07:56.900
<v Speaker 7>lawyer and an attorney? Because I don't think most people

0:07:56.940 --> 0:07:59.020
<v Speaker 7>see much of a distinction. Why don't you just say

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 7>I never practiced law?

0:08:01.790 --> 0:08:04.750
<v Speaker 8>Well, Sean, when I moved back from the United States,

0:08:04.930 --> 0:08:07.010
<v Speaker 8>I didn't retake the bar. I had four kids in

0:08:07.070 --> 0:08:09.110
<v Speaker 8>six years. It was never my intent to go into

0:08:09.150 --> 0:08:13.190
<v Speaker 8>the practice of law. When I went to go engage

0:08:13.250 --> 0:08:16.810
<v Speaker 8>in media and give legal analysis, I consulted attorneys and

0:08:16.850 --> 0:08:19.670
<v Speaker 8>legal professionals as to whether or not they agreed that

0:08:19.730 --> 0:08:22.410
<v Speaker 8>I could be labeled a lawyer, both because I had

0:08:22.450 --> 0:08:25.660
<v Speaker 8>a valid jurist doctor from a good law school, a

0:08:25.710 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 8>reputable law school, Pepperdine Law School, and because in conjunction

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.860
<v Speaker 8>with the fact that I did have actual substantive legal experience,

0:08:33.140 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 8>I wasn't providing any legal analysis, Sean, or, excuse me,

0:08:36.620 --> 0:08:39.459
<v Speaker 8>legal advice. I wasn't being paid for legal advice. I

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 8>was giving a general review of the legal circumstances surrounding it.

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:50.140
<v Speaker 2>You know, my theory, my alternate theory, either they want

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.530
<v Speaker 2>to force her out, they've decided she's a loser. I

0:08:52.570 --> 0:08:53.670
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's probably true.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 4>Or Hannity, by the way, his body language, facial language,

0:09:01.110 --> 0:09:07.530
<v Speaker 4>the grim, serious. I'm grilling someone, not the I mean,

0:09:07.630 --> 0:09:10.110
<v Speaker 4>and I've seen Hannity do this for decades. He has

0:09:10.130 --> 0:09:10.790
<v Speaker 4>the White House.

0:09:10.990 --> 0:09:12.569
<v Speaker 2>Hey, how you doing? Good to see you.

0:09:12.910 --> 0:09:14.589
<v Speaker 4>Saw you today. You know, he has a smile on

0:09:14.630 --> 0:09:17.450
<v Speaker 4>his face and they're having a friendly conversation. He didn't

0:09:17.490 --> 0:09:19.890
<v Speaker 4>have that look or posture at all with this woman.

0:09:20.390 --> 0:09:26.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, second possibility is the administration said, hey, you go

0:09:26.090 --> 0:09:29.370
<v Speaker 2>on Hannity, and Hannity, ask her the hard questions. Let's

0:09:29.410 --> 0:09:30.929
<v Speaker 2>get this out of the way. Let's get all this

0:09:30.970 --> 0:09:33.580
<v Speaker 2>settled so it's old news. That technique.

0:09:33.620 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Boy, she sure, her body language and facial expression was

0:09:37.140 --> 0:09:39.370
<v Speaker 4>caught off guard, is the way I read it.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.859
<v Speaker 2>Then would you like to, oh, go ahead, sorry.

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Like, I showed up on Hannity not expecting to be asked,

0:09:44.900 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 4>why'd you only take three questions? Why didn't you take

0:09:47.220 --> 0:09:49.790
<v Speaker 4>the test again? Why did blah, blah, blah, this, that, and.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.100
<v Speaker 4>I don't think she showed up on that show thinking that.

0:09:52.450 --> 0:09:55.750
<v Speaker 2>Because she would have been in on the technique if

0:09:55.809 --> 0:09:57.300
<v Speaker 2>it was Let's Hang a Lantern on it.

0:09:57.370 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 4>You would think. And again, I've watched enough Hannity. to

0:10:00.220 --> 0:10:02.479
<v Speaker 4>know how he would have approached. He's really good at

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 4>this sort of thing. How he would have approached. Why

0:10:04.940 --> 0:10:07.580
<v Speaker 4>don't you tell the people an explanation for you? You

0:10:07.620 --> 0:10:10.820
<v Speaker 4>didn't take the test again because you and your husband

0:10:10.860 --> 0:10:12.620
<v Speaker 4>were in China and you were helping other guys. You know,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:14.290
<v Speaker 4>he would have led her along.

0:10:14.850 --> 0:10:15.070
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:10:15.110 --> 0:10:15.970
<v Speaker 2>He didn't do that at all.

0:10:16.590 --> 0:10:16.830
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:10:16.970 --> 0:10:21.059
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Or has he turned around? On the Trump administration.

0:10:21.460 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:10:22.420 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>I can't imagine. I know Katie had the same reaction

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.100
<v Speaker 4>I did when you watch. It's like, whoa, what's going

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.380
<v Speaker 4>on here? Why is he doing this?

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:35.059
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a theory?

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.870
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:10:37.910 --> 0:10:40.290
<v Speaker 9>I think it came from Trump because of her performance.

0:10:40.370 --> 0:10:43.350
<v Speaker 9>But you're right with her. The look on her face

0:10:43.390 --> 0:10:46.089
<v Speaker 9>was like, oh, this is not what I was thinking

0:10:46.130 --> 0:10:46.530
<v Speaker 9>was coming.

0:10:47.100 --> 0:10:50.089
<v Speaker 4>All right. Joan, I've had that experience before. You're not

0:10:50.170 --> 0:10:56.950
<v Speaker 4>expecting the you're being interrogated treatment in some in some quarters.

0:10:59.470 --> 0:11:01.569
<v Speaker 4>There's no way that would be the case, would it?

0:11:01.590 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Where Trump would say, I don't know, Trump thought she was.

0:11:06.860 --> 0:11:09.420
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know the distinction between attorney and lawyer. I've

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.349
<v Speaker 4>known that for a total of 48 hours now. But

0:11:12.630 --> 0:11:15.570
<v Speaker 4>Trump thought she was an attorney or he wouldn't have

0:11:15.610 --> 0:11:17.990
<v Speaker 4>turned around at the rope line, said, which where'd you

0:11:18.030 --> 0:11:20.550
<v Speaker 4>pass the bar or where'd you take the bar? And

0:11:20.890 --> 0:11:23.650
<v Speaker 4>when when she made up an answer, I could I

0:11:23.700 --> 0:11:28.540
<v Speaker 4>could tell he thought, OK. OK, we're BS in here. OK, well, it.

0:11:28.580 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Sounds given the timetable that she described. That the hiring

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>procedure may have been she was on Fox News, she

0:11:39.370 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>said she's an attorney and she's hot. Given the four

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.990
<v Speaker 2>to five day period it all unfolded in, maybe they

0:11:50.090 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't know. But if Hannity has taken one criticism through

0:11:54.300 --> 0:11:56.540
<v Speaker 2>the years, some of it justified, some of it not.

0:11:57.130 --> 0:11:59.780
<v Speaker 2>is he is friendly to the Trump administration to the

0:11:59.820 --> 0:12:02.500
<v Speaker 2>point of being, you know, part of it in the

0:12:02.540 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 2>way that every mainstream media is with the Democrats. Oh, yeah.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.500
<v Speaker 4>The New York Times is with the Democrats. We never

0:12:09.540 --> 0:12:11.950
<v Speaker 4>did get around playing that David Brooks thing from the

0:12:11.970 --> 0:12:15.470
<v Speaker 4>New York Times where he talked about the Democrats at

0:12:15.510 --> 0:12:19.750
<v Speaker 4>a party with politicians. They're over with the politicians hanging out,

0:12:19.790 --> 0:12:20.630
<v Speaker 4>laughing and joking.

0:12:21.150 --> 0:12:21.290
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:12:21.350 --> 0:12:24.089
<v Speaker 4>And that didn't used to be the case where they're

0:12:24.130 --> 0:12:27.870
<v Speaker 4>like friendly and everything like that. Um, it used to

0:12:27.910 --> 0:12:30.390
<v Speaker 4>be more of a, you know, we're, we're separate here.

0:12:30.429 --> 0:12:32.620
<v Speaker 4>We have a role to hold your feet to the fire.

0:12:32.980 --> 0:12:36.690
<v Speaker 4>So to your point, um, Lots of media does that

0:12:36.710 --> 0:12:38.750
<v Speaker 4>with the Democrats. But Hannity used to be that for Trump.

0:12:38.950 --> 0:12:39.550
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:12:39.570 --> 0:12:43.210
<v Speaker 4>He was a surrogate for for the administration. And he

0:12:43.230 --> 0:12:46.309
<v Speaker 4>would have helped along this new White House press secretary,

0:12:46.630 --> 0:12:48.770
<v Speaker 4>you know, introducing her to the world.

0:12:48.820 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>And so I understand that's our question. What is going

0:12:51.580 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>on there? It's not about Katie Zachariah, because you don't

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>need to be a lawyer to be a great press secretary.

0:12:56.300 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>It has nothing to do with the job. And I'm

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 2>sure she'll grow into the job and do just fine.

0:13:01.140 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the entire mainstream media is referring

0:13:04.100 --> 0:13:08.460
<v Speaker 2>to Abdul Muslim Brotherhood Al-Sayed as a doctor, even though

0:13:08.780 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>he did not pass the medical test. He did not

0:13:12.020 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>get licensed. It's virtually the same. I mean, same enough

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>as getting barred. So, yeah, they're utterly hypocritical. And this

0:13:20.700 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>is not about her and her credentials. It's just something's

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>going on here. Plus, speaking of Fox News.

0:13:25.900 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Is there any chance because this is my theory you

0:13:28.300 --> 0:13:30.260
<v Speaker 4>said I should share on the air. Is there any

0:13:30.340 --> 0:13:34.500
<v Speaker 4>chance that Hannity thinks the Trump era is over? He's

0:13:34.540 --> 0:13:38.540
<v Speaker 4>in the 20s in some polls. This whole oil thing

0:13:38.580 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 4>that Fox has turned on a lot of Fox, their

0:13:41.380 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 4>senior analyst and other hosts have turned on. Is there

0:13:43.780 --> 0:13:46.809
<v Speaker 4>any chance Hannity's gone off the reservation and thinks J.D.

0:13:46.809 --> 0:13:49.170
<v Speaker 2>'s the next guy? I'm in that camp. I call

0:13:49.190 --> 0:13:50.490
<v Speaker 2>that a dark horse theory.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:53.660
<v Speaker 4>What's your lead horse theory?

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.579
<v Speaker 2>It's a long-ish shot. I think it's a very long shot, yes.

0:13:58.660 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 4>But what's your lead theory?

0:14:00.940 --> 0:14:01.860
<v Speaker 2>He hates her?

0:14:01.980 --> 0:14:03.180
<v Speaker 4>Ainsley was supposed to get the job?

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.689
<v Speaker 2>Oh, why Hannity did it? No, I think the White

0:14:07.730 --> 0:14:11.069
<v Speaker 2>House may feel a little betrayed and embarrassed and said,

0:14:11.970 --> 0:14:13.809
<v Speaker 2>put her through the ringer, and if she survives, it

0:14:13.850 --> 0:14:15.410
<v Speaker 2>will keep her. If she doesn't, we won't.

0:14:15.530 --> 0:14:18.429
<v Speaker 4>I didn't think your answers were particularly good. Well, I

0:14:18.429 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 4>didn't have much time to prepare. And when I took

0:14:21.780 --> 0:14:24.030
<v Speaker 4>the test, I was getting married the next week. I mean,

0:14:24.050 --> 0:14:25.510
<v Speaker 4>there's just a lot of that.

0:14:25.550 --> 0:14:29.730
<v Speaker 2>Come on. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, she's the Marion type

0:14:29.770 --> 0:14:31.990
<v Speaker 2>and the having the kids type. And that's sweet. And

0:14:32.030 --> 0:14:34.830
<v Speaker 2>she seems like a nice lady. Kimberly Guilfoyle, on the

0:14:34.890 --> 0:14:38.970
<v Speaker 2>other hand. Look out.

0:14:39.010 --> 0:14:42.010
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. As he desperately.

0:14:41.490 --> 0:14:43.570
<v Speaker 2>Tries to have a little fun on a Friday.

0:14:43.610 --> 0:14:46.690
<v Speaker 4>If this dirt about Kimberly Guilfoyle is true, it's something.

0:14:46.890 --> 0:14:47.270
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned.

0:14:47.370 --> 0:14:47.530
<v Speaker 1>Woo.

0:14:49.610 --> 0:15:00.950
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and Getty.

0:15:00.970 --> 0:15:02.810
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:15:02.830 --> 0:15:06.620
<v Speaker 4>OK, we're in we're in the high school gossip territory

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.980
<v Speaker 4>here that we were trying to figure out why Sean

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.380
<v Speaker 4>Hannity tried to embarrass Trump's new White House press secretary

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.820
<v Speaker 4>in a way that he never does with Republicans or

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 4>that's not his thing. And so we got one text

0:15:19.020 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 4>about that. So Sean Hannity, if you don't know, is

0:15:21.230 --> 0:15:26.170
<v Speaker 4>married to, what's Ainsley's last name? Is Ainsley her last name?

0:15:26.830 --> 0:15:28.630
<v Speaker 4>Or does she have one name like Madonna?

0:15:29.550 --> 0:15:31.460
<v Speaker 2>Ainsley Hurd. Ainsley Hurd.

0:15:32.790 --> 0:15:35.420
<v Speaker 4>Who's on Fox and Friends. Anyway, so Sean Hannity married

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 4>one of the hot blondes on Fox and Friends. So

0:15:37.660 --> 0:15:41.980
<v Speaker 4>somebody texted, guaranteed at some point this Katie Zachariah S-talk

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 4>handed his girlfriend on Fox News and it got back

0:15:44.540 --> 0:15:48.140
<v Speaker 4>to him. Which is a decent theory. Yeah, I believe that.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:50.260
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.350
<v Speaker 4>Two different hot blondes of the same age.

0:15:52.850 --> 0:15:56.710
<v Speaker 2>I see the dynamics because Ainsley is sweet and she's

0:15:56.750 --> 0:15:59.390
<v Speaker 2>pretty and she loves Jesus. She does not come off

0:15:59.430 --> 0:16:02.270
<v Speaker 2>as an intellectual giant. And I could see, you know,

0:16:02.530 --> 0:16:06.190
<v Speaker 2>a Katie Zachariah. I went to Pepperdine Law, graduated from

0:16:06.210 --> 0:16:11.430
<v Speaker 2>Pepperdine Law. I have a jurist. Maybe saying not the

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.180
<v Speaker 2>brightest bulb in the chandelier. Anyway, and it getting back

0:16:15.220 --> 0:16:15.940
<v Speaker 2>to Sean.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:16.660
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:16:16.940 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:17.660 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I also wonder, maybe you guys mentioned this. I'm not sure.

0:16:20.100 --> 0:16:23.620
<v Speaker 9>But if maybe Ainsley was up for this position as well.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.700
<v Speaker 9>And this Katie Zachariah girl got it.

0:16:26.820 --> 0:16:28.380
<v Speaker 2>It's possible. I don't know.

0:16:29.290 --> 0:16:31.470
<v Speaker 4>Um, Hanson actually figured it out and I don't know

0:16:31.490 --> 0:16:34.650
<v Speaker 4>if we have the clip or not. Um, at the

0:16:34.810 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>very beginning of this interview that Hannity did last night,

0:16:38.460 --> 0:16:41.700
<v Speaker 4>he mentions very briefly. I know you did an interview

0:16:41.740 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 4>with the Jack post. How do you say that guy's name?

0:16:44.100 --> 0:16:45.860
<v Speaker 4>Posobiec or Posobiec?

0:16:45.900 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Posobiec, yeah, whatever. Uh, Jack Posobiec earlier. Oh, that's what

0:16:51.940 --> 0:16:52.300
<v Speaker 2>it was.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 4>He was supposed to have the first exclusive interview with

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.450
<v Speaker 4>the White House press secretary. And she went on some

0:16:59.730 --> 0:17:04.450
<v Speaker 4>other lesser dudes show first. And because I went to Posobiec.

0:17:04.490 --> 0:17:04.830
<v Speaker 2>Here it is.

0:17:05.550 --> 0:17:08.330
<v Speaker 7>I saw you were on with Jack Posobiec, I guess,

0:17:08.450 --> 0:17:09.169
<v Speaker 7>earlier tonight.

0:17:09.770 --> 0:17:12.070
<v Speaker 6>And you called it a conspiracy theory as.

0:17:12.090 --> 0:17:13.189
<v Speaker 1>It relates to.

0:17:13.210 --> 0:17:16.770
<v Speaker 4>So that was... That's what happened. She went on some

0:17:16.890 --> 0:17:19.270
<v Speaker 4>other dude's show after she'd agreed to come on Hannity

0:17:19.310 --> 0:17:23.490
<v Speaker 4>first because Posobiec's got an exclusive sit-down with White House

0:17:23.530 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Press Secretary.

0:17:25.230 --> 0:17:25.690
<v Speaker 2>Oh, wow.

0:17:25.730 --> 0:17:27.900
<v Speaker 4>He's letting her know, no, this is how it works

0:17:27.940 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>around here. This is how it works around here.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm the guy.

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:31.580
<v Speaker 4>What a big baby.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:47.369
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:51.530 --> 0:17:53.650
<v Speaker 4>See, the mainstream media, I'm looking up at ABC News,

0:17:53.690 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 4>is getting away with presenting the White House press spokesman

0:17:58.700 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 4>law degree thing like it matters.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.980
<v Speaker 2>It's like complaining that my landscaper didn't pass the bar.

0:18:08.060 --> 0:18:09.419
<v Speaker 2>What does that have to do with anything?

0:18:09.740 --> 0:18:12.810
<v Speaker 4>Or doesn't have a motorcycle license. Wait a second, your

0:18:12.850 --> 0:18:15.330
<v Speaker 4>landscaper doesn't have a motorcycle license? Does he need a

0:18:15.350 --> 0:18:16.129
<v Speaker 4>motorcycle license?

0:18:16.510 --> 0:18:16.710
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:18:17.730 --> 0:18:21.330
<v Speaker 2>No, he doesn't. He owns a motorcycle, but that's not

0:18:21.410 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>relevant to what we're... Anyway, so here's one of your

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.540
<v Speaker 2>facts of politics. It's like the facts of life that

0:18:27.580 --> 0:18:29.899
<v Speaker 2>people never talk about, but it's important to remember.

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:30.260
<v Speaker 9>Probably.

0:18:30.420 --> 0:18:35.060
<v Speaker 2>Probably. Politicians count on the fact that something that happened

0:18:35.100 --> 0:18:38.620
<v Speaker 2>the last administration is like so yesterday's news because there's

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>so much going on right now. And then we're talking

0:18:41.060 --> 0:18:44.459
<v Speaker 2>about the next elections, the midterm, the 2020. And so

0:18:44.500 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 2>they can get away with horrendous crap because if it

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.270
<v Speaker 2>doesn't come to light for a little while, nobody cares

0:18:50.330 --> 0:18:54.210
<v Speaker 2>about it. Well, there's some horrendous crap that took place

0:18:54.230 --> 0:18:57.530
<v Speaker 2>during the Biden administration having to do with people being

0:18:57.690 --> 0:18:59.990
<v Speaker 2>debanked that I want to get to.

0:19:00.010 --> 0:19:00.270
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:01.090 --> 0:19:05.450
<v Speaker 2>Utterly horrific abuse of power of the executive branch.

0:19:05.590 --> 0:19:06.730
<v Speaker 4>I remember when that was a thing.

0:19:07.450 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Oh man, more and more is coming out about it.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 2>So we'll get to that. This is of no significance

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.899
<v Speaker 2>except gossip lines and it's fun. Now, originally my premise

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.570
<v Speaker 2>in including this was I wondered whether there is a

0:19:24.660 --> 0:19:27.210
<v Speaker 2>movement in Fox news and in some quarters to think,

0:19:27.270 --> 0:19:30.650
<v Speaker 2>all right, Trump's about to be a lame duck. His

0:19:30.670 --> 0:19:34.500
<v Speaker 2>approval ratings are super low. It's now safe to criticize him.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 2>And they're kind of like enthused about that. I don't know.

0:19:39.100 --> 0:19:39.980
<v Speaker 2>That may be.

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:40.460
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:47.710
<v Speaker 2>According to Lisa Kennedy, Montgomery Kennedy from Fox News MTV

0:19:47.750 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 2>back in the day, very clever, very smart gal. She's

0:19:52.940 --> 0:19:56.020
<v Speaker 2>on The Five a lot and a bunch of different shows. Yeah, yeah.

0:19:56.380 --> 0:20:01.030
<v Speaker 2>So she's claiming ousted ambassador Kimberly Guilfoyle openly bragged about

0:20:01.050 --> 0:20:06.150
<v Speaker 2>her sex life while at Fox News. And wait, there's more.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:13.090
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy initially bonded with the embattled ex-diplomat over their shared

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.929
<v Speaker 2>disdain for California Governor Gavin Newsom. Isn't Kennedy a Californian?

0:20:18.650 --> 0:20:18.969
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:20:19.470 --> 0:20:21.430
<v Speaker 2>I think she is, yeah. In fact, I think she

0:20:21.470 --> 0:20:23.850
<v Speaker 2>listened to us at one point, then got tired of it. Anyway,

0:20:25.150 --> 0:20:26.649
<v Speaker 2>so they bonded over Hayden Gabby.

0:20:27.350 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 4>Got tired of it.

0:20:28.550 --> 0:20:30.650
<v Speaker 2>No, then she moved to the East Coast and became

0:20:30.670 --> 0:20:34.310
<v Speaker 2>a big star. But she became less and less comfortable

0:20:34.350 --> 0:20:38.740
<v Speaker 2>the more they became acquainted At one point, Guilfoyle flaunted

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.140
<v Speaker 2>a relationship with a man she referred to as Lex

0:20:41.260 --> 0:20:46.300
<v Speaker 2>Luthor and described as a lovesick cash cow, according to Kennedy.

0:20:47.210 --> 0:20:49.730
<v Speaker 2>Kimberly showed me and several of our friends pictures of

0:20:49.770 --> 0:20:53.830
<v Speaker 2>his Amex black card front and back. The images were

0:20:53.869 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>matched with a corresponding picture of the card holder's private parts.

0:20:58.580 --> 0:20:59.219
<v Speaker 2>Either one of.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 4>Those is lame. Together, it's super duper lame. But the

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 4>whole look at my boyfriend, how rich my boyfriend is.

0:21:05.980 --> 0:21:07.950
<v Speaker 4>Here's a picture of his credit card.

0:21:08.540 --> 0:21:08.780
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.860
<v Speaker 2>Front and back. I totally get to use it anytime

0:21:11.940 --> 0:21:12.260
<v Speaker 2>I want.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 4>And you think that makes me think you're cool.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:16.220
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 4>That you go around showing people your boyfriend's credit card

0:21:19.260 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>because that's why you're dating him. I think you're misreading

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 4>the room on how people look at you now.

0:21:25.020 --> 0:21:25.300
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:21:25.340 --> 0:21:28.270
<v Speaker 2>He was certainly misreading Kennedy, who's a mom and seems

0:21:28.290 --> 0:21:31.669
<v Speaker 2>like a very nice person. But not only that, Jack,

0:21:31.850 --> 0:21:35.379
<v Speaker 2>but according to Kennedy, it was triple lame because there

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 2>were at least three sets of these credit card slash

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.300
<v Speaker 2>penis pairings.

0:21:41.980 --> 0:21:44.139
<v Speaker 4>So she'd show a picture. If you don't know what

0:21:44.180 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 4>the black card is, that's for super wealthy people. I mean,

0:21:47.859 --> 0:21:51.310
<v Speaker 4>the black card is a Seinfeld claims that they invented

0:21:51.350 --> 0:21:52.630
<v Speaker 4>it for him.

0:21:53.030 --> 0:21:56.169
<v Speaker 2>But I went to the Amex offices and applied for one.

0:21:56.550 --> 0:21:58.209
<v Speaker 2>A couple of goons came out of the backyard and

0:21:58.230 --> 0:22:01.310
<v Speaker 2>started hitting me with sticks and made me flee out

0:22:01.350 --> 0:22:03.730
<v Speaker 2>into the street. It's very exclusive.

0:22:03.790 --> 0:22:06.149
<v Speaker 4>If I remember it right, the black card thing is

0:22:06.210 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>like you call up an airline, a restaurant, a concert,

0:22:09.980 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 4>anything with the black card, they get you in right

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 4>away ahead of everyone else because you're guaranteed to spend

0:22:15.300 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 4>so much money all the time. Anyway, and I knew

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.100
<v Speaker 4>a woman. who was a friend of a friend, but

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 4>I knew her personally. I heard her say this once.

0:22:24.140 --> 0:22:26.060
<v Speaker 4>She only dated guys with black cards. She would figure

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>out if they had a black card or not, and

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.990
<v Speaker 4>she was very hot. But only date guys with black cards.

0:22:31.830 --> 0:22:32.090
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

0:22:32.430 --> 0:22:32.889
<v Speaker 2>So anyway.

0:22:32.910 --> 0:22:35.990
<v Speaker 4>And again, and you saying that out loud, you think

0:22:36.030 --> 0:22:38.870
<v Speaker 4>that makes me think you're a good person or cool

0:22:38.930 --> 0:22:41.860
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. That you have a financial bar men have

0:22:41.890 --> 0:22:46.460
<v Speaker 4>to meet before you're willing to date. One could say

0:22:46.500 --> 0:22:48.859
<v Speaker 4>that that makes you a bit of a prostitute, but.

0:22:50.700 --> 0:22:55.659
<v Speaker 2>Prostitute gold digger she ain't going with no broke broke

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.500
<v Speaker 2>mayor right anyway uh so anyway back to uh miss

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>gilfoyle kennedy revealed that gilfoyle's alleged sex as sexual escapades

0:23:03.740 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 2>earned her cryptic nicknames sea biscuit and uso inside the

0:23:08.180 --> 0:23:11.340
<v Speaker 2>network all right katie we need help with this sea

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.020
<v Speaker 2>biscuit i mean she allegedly has a bit of a

0:23:16.010 --> 0:23:17.210
<v Speaker 2>Long face?

0:23:17.590 --> 0:23:22.290
<v Speaker 4>Or is it about she likes guys with horse-related genitalia

0:23:22.310 --> 0:23:23.530
<v Speaker 4>because she's going around showing pictures?

0:23:23.990 --> 0:23:27.379
<v Speaker 2>Or she's fast, as they used to say back in

0:23:27.390 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the day?

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 4>Nobody has said that since 1948. Well, I'm speculating. I

0:23:32.460 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 4>heard she's fast, Jimmy. She's a little fast, Jimmy. How

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 4>about U.S.O.? Oh, wait a minute. So she, like the

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:46.670
<v Speaker 4>USO shows would go entertain the troops? I have no idea.

0:23:46.770 --> 0:23:51.130
<v Speaker 2>I'm going for something, speaking of really old references, something like.

0:23:51.070 --> 0:23:54.690
<v Speaker 4>Your sister swims after troop ships. Why do you think

0:23:54.710 --> 0:23:57.220
<v Speaker 4>you're talking to Bob Hope? You're not talking to Bob Hope.

0:23:57.460 --> 0:24:00.139
<v Speaker 6>What is that? Is that the olden days? Oh, beautiful.

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.060
<v Speaker 2>USO. Somebody help me, though.

0:24:04.350 --> 0:24:06.580
<v Speaker 4>But what's with the pictures? Why would they call her USO?

0:24:06.730 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And somebody, anybody. We've got a sweet guy. Demand we speculate.

0:24:10.140 --> 0:24:12.980
<v Speaker 4>Who's letting a woman take a picture of their junk?

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.020
<v Speaker 4>Or are they sending pictures of their junk to her?

0:24:15.340 --> 0:24:16.109
<v Speaker 4>So she's got them in.

0:24:16.700 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Does not specify.

0:24:17.900 --> 0:24:19.540
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.470
<v Speaker 4>And she shows them to her friends again. And you think,

0:24:23.030 --> 0:24:26.010
<v Speaker 4>I think it's cool that you're showing me a picture

0:24:26.250 --> 0:24:30.730
<v Speaker 4>of your boyfriend, your rich boyfriend's penis. Why would you

0:24:30.770 --> 0:24:32.149
<v Speaker 4>think I think that's cool?

0:24:33.470 --> 0:24:37.470
<v Speaker 2>So Kennedy went on. In fact, Kimberly talked about sex

0:24:37.510 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>so cavalierly, she made Samantha from Sex and the City

0:24:40.630 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 2>seem like Greta Thunberg.

0:24:42.130 --> 0:24:43.540
<v Speaker 4>That's a funny one.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Former Fox Business host described Guilfoyle as both, quote, insanely

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:56.810
<v Speaker 2>charming and a status-chasing monster afflicted by, quote, unrelenting narcissism. I.

0:25:00.090 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, you go from Gavin Newsom, mayor with, you know,

0:25:05.630 --> 0:25:11.540
<v Speaker 4>clearly governor, president vibes to the Trump orbit and engaged

0:25:11.580 --> 0:25:12.100
<v Speaker 4>to a Trump.

0:25:12.619 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Kind of seems like maybe you are.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yes.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.300
<v Speaker 4>Status seeking something or other.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Katie, what do you have?

0:25:20.980 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 9>So USO, obviously standing for United Service Organizations, apparently is

0:25:25.770 --> 0:25:28.290
<v Speaker 9>an insult to a woman because it's a sexual innuendo

0:25:28.330 --> 0:25:30.850
<v Speaker 9>suggesting that she's been involved with a lot of men,

0:25:30.930 --> 0:25:34.030
<v Speaker 9>particularly military men or men in.

0:25:33.970 --> 0:25:37.330
<v Speaker 2>A particular powerful group. Okay.

0:25:37.350 --> 0:25:41.490
<v Speaker 9>And Seabiscuit, I'm not really seeing a whole lot of

0:25:41.530 --> 0:25:42.330
<v Speaker 9>context on that.

0:25:42.350 --> 0:25:43.530
<v Speaker 4>It's got to be the horse.

0:25:44.270 --> 0:25:47.189
<v Speaker 9>They're talking about sexual escapades, though. So I don't see

0:25:47.310 --> 0:25:51.070
<v Speaker 9>anything in regards to her. Horse-like facial features.

0:25:51.130 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Come up with better nicknames. That's inappropriate.

0:25:54.580 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to have nicknames, if you're going to

0:25:56.220 --> 0:25:58.940
<v Speaker 4>have derogatory nicknames for coworkers, you've got to come up

0:25:58.980 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 4>with better ones.

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, no, no, no, no, no. It has to be veiled.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.649
<v Speaker 2>It has to be veiled so you can use it openly.

0:26:04.670 --> 0:26:07.690
<v Speaker 4>So veiled that nobody could possibly figure out what it means? Yes.

0:26:08.510 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it's an insider thing. But even if we

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 2>know the whole story. Famously, and this is a great story.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>At one point, all of the Rolling Stones referred to

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Mick Jagger as Brenda. And they would have open conversations

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.970
<v Speaker 2>about how bitchy Brenda was, including in front of Mick Jagger.

0:26:27.850 --> 0:26:32.970
<v Speaker 2>So that's a nickname. Anyway, where were we? One speculation

0:26:33.109 --> 0:26:33.970
<v Speaker 2>is she was being called.

0:26:34.890 --> 0:26:38.290
<v Speaker 9>She was being called Seabiscuit in reference to the racehorse,

0:26:38.410 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 9>implying that she was frequently ridden.

0:26:40.619 --> 0:26:42.500
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's it.

0:26:42.540 --> 0:26:42.980
<v Speaker 7>You laugh.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:43.859
<v Speaker 1>I laugh.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 4>That's the ding.

0:26:47.140 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 2>We have a winner. Put the roses around the neck

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:55.790
<v Speaker 2>of whoever came up with that because they won. Yes, yes, yes. Wow.

0:26:56.210 --> 0:27:04.050
<v Speaker 2>Let's hate, hate. Hey, it's for horses, Joe. Oh, boy.

0:27:04.290 --> 0:27:06.130
<v Speaker 4>She was infrequently ridden.

0:27:06.770 --> 0:27:13.090
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my. That's a tawdry nickname. It's just terrible. So

0:27:13.130 --> 0:27:18.430
<v Speaker 2>let's be fair, both sides. Guilfoyle told the New Yorker

0:27:18.490 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 2>at the time.

0:27:18.890 --> 0:27:20.820
<v Speaker 4>It's true, I did that. Is that what she told

0:27:20.859 --> 0:27:21.300
<v Speaker 4>the New Yorker?

0:27:21.700 --> 0:27:24.460
<v Speaker 2>No, she says, I've never engaged in any workplace misconduct

0:27:24.500 --> 0:27:29.630
<v Speaker 2>of any kind. And let's see. She denied any wrongdoing

0:27:29.670 --> 0:27:32.100
<v Speaker 2>in her farewell statement. These allegations are false, and I

0:27:32.130 --> 0:27:35.020
<v Speaker 2>intend to vigorously defend my name, my reputation, my integrity.

0:27:36.859 --> 0:27:39.419
<v Speaker 2>I have dedicated my professional life to fighting for justice,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.540
<v Speaker 2>standing up for what is right, and defending the values

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.460
<v Speaker 2>that make America exceptional. I will not allow false accusations

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.710
<v Speaker 2>to define my decades of public service. And they're off. No.

0:27:49.270 --> 0:27:52.210
<v Speaker 2>What was the code on the back of that card again?

0:27:52.230 --> 0:27:52.310
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:53.369 --> 0:27:53.729
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:27:54.170 --> 0:27:55.830
<v Speaker 2>That is so gross.

0:27:56.770 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes. The whole, look at, here's the front and back

0:28:00.910 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 4>of his card. Because he lets me use it. And again,

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.859
<v Speaker 4>you think, I think that that's cool, that that's the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 4>way you live your life.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.659
<v Speaker 2>All right. That's funny that you would have that view. Clearly.

0:28:13.940 --> 0:28:14.140
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:15.859
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.790
<v Speaker 4>Man, D.G. Jr.

0:28:19.910 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Dodged a bullet there. I think, yeah, maybe.

0:28:24.859 --> 0:28:27.109
<v Speaker 4>They may not have dodged the bullet. There's still the whole,

0:28:27.190 --> 0:28:30.010
<v Speaker 4>does she have stories to tell? She gotta have stories

0:28:30.070 --> 0:28:32.310
<v Speaker 4>to tell. It's whether or not she tells them or not.

0:28:33.550 --> 0:28:33.950
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:34.290 --> 0:28:36.429
<v Speaker 4>Her, this is what I said Mark Halpern wrote the

0:28:36.450 --> 0:28:38.690
<v Speaker 4>other day, she has no idea how much her life

0:28:38.710 --> 0:28:41.170
<v Speaker 4>has just changed. I think that's probably true. I gotta

0:28:41.190 --> 0:28:42.410
<v Speaker 4>believe her run is over.

0:28:44.900 --> 0:28:49.740
<v Speaker 2>She's, well, what do you mean? Not with Greek shipping magnates.

0:28:49.900 --> 0:28:52.660
<v Speaker 4>Why not? She's aged out of that. There's younger versions.

0:28:53.540 --> 0:28:55.340
<v Speaker 4>I think she can pull that off when she was younger,

0:28:55.380 --> 0:28:57.140
<v Speaker 4>but I think that's done now.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know that much about that line of work.

0:29:00.030 --> 0:29:02.740
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you're probably right. Maybe she's like that Tesla

0:29:02.770 --> 0:29:07.050
<v Speaker 2>Roadster you were describing earlier. I don't know. I won't

0:29:07.090 --> 0:29:08.270
<v Speaker 2>put too fine a point on that.

0:29:08.390 --> 0:29:09.460
<v Speaker 4>You'll have to go back to hour one.

0:29:09.470 --> 0:29:11.709
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what that means. I think you

0:29:11.750 --> 0:29:13.890
<v Speaker 2>do know what that means. I have to think about

0:29:13.930 --> 0:29:19.130
<v Speaker 2>it for a second. So, SimpliSafe home security embraced, loved

0:29:19.190 --> 0:29:21.969
<v Speaker 2>by more than 6 million people who entrust SimpliSafe with

0:29:21.990 --> 0:29:25.460
<v Speaker 2>their home security. And you ought to join them. Why,

0:29:25.500 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>you might be asking? Well, for one thing, smart AI-powered

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>cameras watch for potential threats and alert a live U.S.-based, hello,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.510
<v Speaker 2>security specialist ready to intervene. Agent intervenes in under 30 seconds,

0:29:36.570 --> 0:29:39.310
<v Speaker 2>speaking through the camera to stop any intruder in their tracks,

0:29:39.390 --> 0:29:43.110
<v Speaker 2>calling for urgency. 911 dispatch when it's needed most. Love it.

0:29:44.450 --> 0:29:46.910
<v Speaker 4>You got kids. You got stuff. You got you in

0:29:46.930 --> 0:29:49.270
<v Speaker 4>your house at night. All kinds of reasons to protect

0:29:49.290 --> 0:29:52.570
<v Speaker 4>your home, obviously. And you'll stay with SimpliSafe because you

0:29:52.610 --> 0:29:54.950
<v Speaker 4>like it. And they know that. And they trust that

0:29:54.970 --> 0:29:56.860
<v Speaker 4>they're good enough. You'll stay with it. I'm with SimpliSafe

0:29:56.930 --> 0:29:59.540
<v Speaker 4>today because I like it, not because I'm locked into

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 4>a contract. There are no long-term contracts.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:30:02.140 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You couldn't talk me out of it. Go to SimpliSafe.com

0:30:05.700 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 2>slash Armstrong. You save 60% off with professional monitoring when

0:30:09.820 --> 0:30:14.210
<v Speaker 2>you visit SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. Be sure to Write in

0:30:14.250 --> 0:30:16.710
<v Speaker 2>the A &amp; G show in the checkout survey. Help

0:30:16.750 --> 0:30:20.850
<v Speaker 2>support the show. SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. SimpliSafe. Ahead of crime

0:30:20.910 --> 0:30:23.710
<v Speaker 2>in real time. And they're coming down the homestretch because

0:30:23.750 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 2>she's frequently ridden. Oh, see, that's an old-timey insult. But

0:30:29.020 --> 0:30:29.380
<v Speaker 2>a good one.

0:30:30.300 --> 0:30:33.260
<v Speaker 4>Again, the clip-clop from Michael so we know exactly what

0:30:33.380 --> 0:30:34.220
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about here.

0:30:34.620 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Theater of the mind.

0:30:38.180 --> 0:30:40.979
<v Speaker 4>If you're a Billy Joel fan, he had some... Perhaps

0:30:41.060 --> 0:30:44.180
<v Speaker 4>pretty bad news yesterday about his health situation. Among other

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 4>things we'll get to coming up.

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:45.580
<v Speaker 2>Stay here.

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:51.540
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and Getty.

0:30:59.860 --> 0:31:01.550
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 10>Music legend Billy Joel, the piano man, tells The Hollywood

0:31:07.580 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 10>Reporter he doesn't know.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>If he'll ever tour again.

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.140
<v Speaker 10>He says his health is good, but he still needs

0:31:12.180 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 10>to take a series of tests before he can return

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.350
<v Speaker 10>to the stage or even drive. The 77-year-old performer abruptly

0:31:18.390 --> 0:31:21.330
<v Speaker 10>canceled his concerts last year after being diagnosed with a

0:31:21.390 --> 0:31:25.350
<v Speaker 10>neurological disorder that affects hearing, vision, and balance.

0:31:25.450 --> 0:31:28.330
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was just reading about this yesterday. Billy Joel,

0:31:28.370 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 4>that medical problem that he's got in his brain, he's

0:31:31.630 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 4>going to He says he has to give up driving,

0:31:34.900 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 4>which really hurts because mostly he hates to give up

0:31:38.220 --> 0:31:41.820
<v Speaker 4>riding motorcycles, which he was doing up until recently. And

0:31:41.860 --> 0:31:44.060
<v Speaker 4>he owns over 100 motorcycles. And he said, I'm not

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:44.460
<v Speaker 4>a collector.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:45.060
<v Speaker 2>I'm a writer.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.020
<v Speaker 4>I like riding motorcycles. And he's going to sell about

0:31:48.020 --> 0:31:50.460
<v Speaker 4>70 of them. He's going to keep 30. That's still

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 4>plenty for a guy who doesn't ride. And the reason

0:31:53.290 --> 0:31:57.230
<v Speaker 4>that he can't tour anymore is he can't, his brain

0:31:57.290 --> 0:32:00.670
<v Speaker 4>can't handle the noise and the lights and all the

0:32:00.710 --> 0:32:03.500
<v Speaker 4>different sort of stuff that comes with a concert. He

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:08.020
<v Speaker 4>said the doctor told him it's like getting a concussion

0:32:08.100 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 4>for you to do a concert. And it's just not

0:32:10.180 --> 0:32:12.870
<v Speaker 4>good for your brain. So unless they can turn that around,

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.610
<v Speaker 4>he's not going to be able to ever perform again.

0:32:16.190 --> 0:32:22.490
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's too bad. I read some unbelievably interesting stuff

0:32:22.550 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 2>about the quote unquote advances. And I was going to

0:32:26.260 --> 0:32:29.540
<v Speaker 2>get to the debanking thing here. But as long as

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.390
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about this, we'll do that next hour. utterly,

0:32:33.610 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>utterly unforgivable breaches of the executive branch's duty to the

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 2>American people during Biden. Just terrible, unforgivable. But I was

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>reading a bunch of stuff about the progress, and I

0:32:50.700 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 2>use that in quotes for reasons I'll explain, in studying

0:32:54.070 --> 0:32:58.729
<v Speaker 2>Alzheimer's disease and dementia in general. And how we thought

0:32:58.770 --> 0:33:00.870
<v Speaker 2>a couple of things that were progress turned out to

0:33:00.890 --> 0:33:03.710
<v Speaker 2>be dead ends, more or less. Although, as Thomas Edison

0:33:03.730 --> 0:33:07.170
<v Speaker 2>would point out, well, you eliminated something. So that is progress.

0:33:08.430 --> 0:33:10.150
<v Speaker 2>It was just not quite as promising as it seemed.

0:33:10.670 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>But what they're discovering is that there are multiple sorts

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of dementia and wrestling down which is which and which

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.420
<v Speaker 2>is related to the other and what the probable causes

0:33:22.540 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 2>are and whether Something can be done about them is

0:33:25.780 --> 0:33:28.340
<v Speaker 2>a little further away than we hoped like five years ago.

0:33:30.020 --> 0:33:33.550
<v Speaker 2>But they made the point that and, you know, I

0:33:33.590 --> 0:33:35.090
<v Speaker 2>don't know if this is good news or bad news

0:33:35.130 --> 0:33:39.190
<v Speaker 2>or indifferent. But, you know, if you picture, you know, God,

0:33:39.210 --> 0:33:42.470
<v Speaker 2>the father or medical science or whatever, not very long

0:33:42.550 --> 0:33:47.060
<v Speaker 2>ago saying now the machine has this defect. But it

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:51.010
<v Speaker 2>doesn't show up for like 78 years. The answer would be,

0:33:51.330 --> 0:33:54.890
<v Speaker 2>don't worry about it. It's not important. It'll never manifest

0:33:54.950 --> 0:33:57.690
<v Speaker 2>itself or it'll manifest itself so rarely. It's just it's

0:33:57.710 --> 0:34:00.650
<v Speaker 2>not even worth worrying about. It's like somebody saying, you know,

0:34:00.670 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>at about 500,000 miles, your car's seats will probably disintegrate.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.300
<v Speaker 2>You'd be like, who cares? Well, we're living so long

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>now that this stuff is coming to the fore that

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:16.370
<v Speaker 2>mankind has never had to confront. Um, whether we get

0:34:16.410 --> 0:34:17.870
<v Speaker 2>on top of it or not, I do not know,

0:34:17.910 --> 0:34:19.330
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I live, I happen to live in

0:34:19.350 --> 0:34:21.450
<v Speaker 2>a community, a golf course and that sort of thing.

0:34:21.469 --> 0:34:24.109
<v Speaker 2>It's not a retirement community, but it skews a little

0:34:24.190 --> 0:34:27.390
<v Speaker 2>older and boy, the number of people you hear about

0:34:27.430 --> 0:34:31.230
<v Speaker 2>who have memory issues starting or moving on. It's scary.

0:34:31.330 --> 0:34:31.569
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:31.690 --> 0:34:32.490
<v Speaker 2>What are the examples?

0:34:32.550 --> 0:34:35.690
<v Speaker 4>So the other night we ordered Panda Express cause I,

0:34:35.790 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 4>that's my biggest failure as a parent, as I've mentioned

0:34:38.180 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 4>many times, cause I don't know how to cook anything.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.180
<v Speaker 4>So we eat out a lot, way too much. Anyway,

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 4>ordered Panda Express delivered to the house. Comes in this

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:51.380
<v Speaker 4>big box, cool-looking box with these different compartments. I said, wow,

0:34:51.460 --> 0:34:53.060
<v Speaker 4>look at that, this box. It used to come in

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 4>a sack, and now it's got this cool box. And

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.969
<v Speaker 4>my kid said, you're kidding, right? I said, what do

0:34:57.989 --> 0:35:00.510
<v Speaker 4>you mean? They said, you've said that the last three

0:35:00.630 --> 0:35:02.089
<v Speaker 4>times they delivered.

0:35:01.770 --> 0:35:04.090
<v Speaker 2>It in a box. I said, what?

0:35:05.230 --> 0:35:08.250
<v Speaker 4>Yes, this is the third time it's come in a box,

0:35:08.290 --> 0:35:10.910
<v Speaker 4>and you've said, look at this box. It used to

0:35:10.950 --> 0:35:12.250
<v Speaker 4>come in a paper bag, and now it comes in

0:35:12.270 --> 0:35:14.609
<v Speaker 4>this cool box. You said exactly the same thing.

0:35:15.350 --> 0:35:15.710
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:16.210 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 2>You've said for a long time you could hide your

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:18.940
<v Speaker 2>own Easter eggs. Yes.

0:35:20.140 --> 0:35:24.259
<v Speaker 4>I would like to think that it's Einstein-like and that

0:35:24.380 --> 0:35:26.620
<v Speaker 4>I just don't remember things that I don't give a

0:35:26.780 --> 0:35:29.590
<v Speaker 4>crap about. Because I'm pretty good at remembering things I

0:35:29.620 --> 0:35:31.750
<v Speaker 4>care about. I seem to be pretty good at that,

0:35:31.790 --> 0:35:35.109
<v Speaker 4>like historical details or literature or whatever that I want

0:35:35.130 --> 0:35:37.730
<v Speaker 4>to remember. But I don't remember stuff like the box

0:35:37.770 --> 0:35:38.810
<v Speaker 4>the Panda Express came in.

0:35:38.930 --> 0:35:39.370
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:35:39.910 --> 0:35:42.100
<v Speaker 4>It's a little disturbing to me, though. It's disturbing to

0:35:42.140 --> 0:35:42.620
<v Speaker 4>my kids.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead and think the Einstein thing. What's the harm?

0:35:47.219 --> 0:35:52.140
<v Speaker 4>But my son, who's only 16. So we're talking about

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.690
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers who lost last night. Crying shame, isn't it?

0:35:54.730 --> 0:35:57.210
<v Speaker 4>Got swept. I'm wearing my Dodgers hat that I got

0:35:57.250 --> 0:35:58.690
<v Speaker 4>Dodger Stadium and it came out. I said, you know,

0:35:58.710 --> 0:35:59.730
<v Speaker 4>I bought this at the stadium.

0:36:00.570 --> 0:36:01.140
<v Speaker 2>He said, what?

0:36:01.530 --> 0:36:03.210
<v Speaker 4>I said, yeah, I bought this when we went to

0:36:03.250 --> 0:36:05.630
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers game last year. He said, we went to

0:36:05.670 --> 0:36:09.469
<v Speaker 4>a Dodgers game? Yeah, we were at Dodgers Stadium. We

0:36:09.510 --> 0:36:13.150
<v Speaker 4>saw Shohei Otani hit a home run. I bought you

0:36:13.170 --> 0:36:15.370
<v Speaker 4>a hat and I got one. He said, I have

0:36:15.630 --> 0:36:18.470
<v Speaker 4>no memory of that. I said, you've got to be kidding.

0:36:19.050 --> 0:36:20.580
<v Speaker 2>Why did I spend all that money?

0:36:20.860 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 4>We flew to Los Angeles. We went to Dodgers Stadium.

0:36:24.660 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 2>He said, I don't know. Wow, how interesting.

0:36:28.140 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:36:29.550 --> 0:36:32.780
<v Speaker 2>Oh, the Armstrong brain. Yeah, yeah. You know, it's funny,

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 2>speaking of memory and the ability to remember things and not,

0:36:36.300 --> 0:36:39.020
<v Speaker 2>like you just said, there are things I remember, I mean,

0:36:39.060 --> 0:36:44.549
<v Speaker 2>just like encyclopedic on a bunch of topics. I love sports.

0:36:44.910 --> 0:36:47.930
<v Speaker 2>I watch the Super Bowl. I watch the World Series.

0:36:48.110 --> 0:36:50.810
<v Speaker 2>I watch the NHL Finals. You ask me a year

0:36:50.830 --> 0:36:54.860
<v Speaker 2>later who won, I don't remember. I don't remember. It's

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 2>just how I pass the time. I love it. I'm

0:36:56.900 --> 0:36:59.790
<v Speaker 2>entertained by it. But I don't log it for some reason.

0:36:59.830 --> 0:37:00.469
<v Speaker 2>Which is a good thing.

0:37:00.489 --> 0:37:01.210
<v Speaker 4>Used to bother me.

0:37:01.250 --> 0:37:01.710
<v Speaker 2>Now I think.

0:37:01.730 --> 0:37:04.210
<v Speaker 4>If it's not important, I think. If you're making a

0:37:04.610 --> 0:37:05.390
<v Speaker 4>choice somehow.

0:37:05.830 --> 0:37:08.500
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Let me know. Or I'm senile.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 4>We're both senile.

0:37:10.460 --> 0:37:11.379
<v Speaker 2>What are you going to do?

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:13.959
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and Getty.