WEBVTT - Election Night In California Hour 1

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And a very happy election night to you at seven

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>oh five in the West, I am John Phillips here

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with you until nine o'clock in the evening, bringing you

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all the results as soon as the polls close at

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>eight o'clock in the evening, which means you have about

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>fifty five minutes left to vote if you have not

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>cast a ballot yet and you would like to drop

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>off your ballot at a polling location or vote in

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>person at voting center that are still open all over

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the state of California again until eight o'clock at night,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and then who knows how long it'll be after the

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>polls close at eight before we start to get some

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>results in. We'd like to be with you until we

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>know who's going to win and who's going to lose,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but with Shirley Weber and a rabicus, that may take

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. We're keeping an eye on all of the

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>results that are going to be coming in the statewide elections,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>from governor all the way down to state Superintendent of

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Public Instruction mister Frank Motech, who you can listen to

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>weekdays from four to five in the afternoon on talk

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>radio seven ninety k ABC in Los Angeles. Is your

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Voice of business is keeping an eye on all of

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>those races.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>John Phillips, an honor to be with you and Randy

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Wang here tonight for our special election night coverage. I'm

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 2>keeping an eye on the right now the betting markets,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Polly Market, and also the calshiy markets who will advance

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>from the California governor primary tonight. Well looks like the

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>money at the moment is on Javier Bisera or Javier

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Bakaria as I know you call him on your Great show,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>which shows what President Biden called him, right, Steve Hilton

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 2>at seventy four percent, Tom Steyer now at forty percent.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>We're keeping an eye on that. That's according to Polly Market,

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like the Calshi markets also out with

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>their betting tonight. California governor primary advancers put Besera at

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>nearly ninety four percent now, Steve Hilton's seventy three percent

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and Tom Steyer at forty three percent. It's going to

0:01:59.040 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>be a fun night.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And you're also going to be keeping an eye on

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the Lieutenant governor's race, the state controllers race, the Insurance commissioner,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and all the other constitutional offices. Yes, sir, all right.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Mister Randy Wegg, who you can listen to each weekday

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>from noon to three with me on KABC in La

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and KSFO in San Francisco and on the weekends on

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>KMJ in Fresno, is keeping an eye on the LA

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayor's race and all of the ballot initiatives that are

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>also going to be decided today.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it strange that this is the first election where

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 3>we're initially going off with the gambling. This has turned

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 3>into a live sports show.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>Real fun.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>The most the most watched race in America right now

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>is the LA Mayors race and the polls are going

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>to close at eight o'clock. There's going to be an

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>update from the La County Registrar at eight thirty of

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>all the ballots that were mailed in before yesterday, and

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 3>then another update at eight forty five of all the

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>voting that was done in person before yesterday. And if

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>they're on time, we'll actually have result for that race.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 3>And if they're not on time, I can give you

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the gambling markets that say Karen Bass is a ninety

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>one percent chance to advance to the November runoff. Spencer

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Pratt has a seventy seven percent chance to advance the

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 3>November runoff, and Nithia Rahman has a twenty nine percent

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 3>chance to advance the Number runoff. We'll also be looking

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>at the ballot measures, including the sales tax increase in

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>La County, Measure ER and Measure CB in the City

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 3>of Los Angeles, which would allow the City of La

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>if passed, to send tax bills to illegally operating pot stores.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>How that works, nobody knows.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>All this gambling talk makes me want to order a

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>scotch and sit down and play some bokarad You're lucky.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't know how to use these websites yet, because

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be a problem for you.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'd be living under the freeway along with everyone

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>else in California under Gavin Newsom. We're also joined by

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>our pal Phil Teresi, who you can listen to weekdays

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from two to six in the afternoon on Kate M

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Jay in Fresno.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>He is keeping an eye on all of the hot.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Congressional races going on here in the Golden State.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Phil, gentlemen, thank you for including me. I'm very excited

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>to see exactly how much damage Prop fifty does to

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>our elections process in this primary.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, we used to have so many contested congressional seats here.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>At one point in time, it was predicted by Nancy

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi of all people, that the road to the majority

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in Washington would go through California. But now we only

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have a handful of seats that are being contested by

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>both parties.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>And that's exactly it. When they did the redistricting, they

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously went out of their way to target folks they

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>thought were going to be easy. Notice Tom McClintock remains

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 4>unmolested by Prop fifty, but they're going hard after David Valadeo,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Kylie having to jump off to a completely different district,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 4>and it's unfortunately. I think Aunt Nancy might have been

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 4>up to something once you made that prediction.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, speaking of Nancy, there's also a congressional district in

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco where there is a hotly contested race, the

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>race to determine who will replace Nancy Pelosi as the

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>congress person from San Francisco, and she endorsed in that

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>race against Scott Wiener, who is the state senator and

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>believed to be the front runner.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>She's anti Weiener, and pro Connie Chan.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 4>While I can't say that I'm enthusiastic about either one,

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm privately hoping that Wiener wins, just so we have

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 4>an excuse to keep dropping that name.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, we are radio people, so that's what's going on

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. We're keeping an eye on all of that

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for you. The Pauls again are now open for another

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>forty nine minutes. So if you want to vote, you

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>want to cast your ballot on any of the races

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 1>that we mentioned or some that we did not mention,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you have less than an hour to do so, so

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure you get your ballot turned in if you

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>want to have your voice heard in this election. All right.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Joining us right now to talk about all of this

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is a woman whose voice is very familiar on the

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>airwaves of KSFO in San Francisco KABC in LA. She's

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the host of the Howard Jarvis radio program. She's also

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a columnist in the Southern California News Group.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Susan Shelley.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Welcome, Thank you, John. Great to be with you.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>So let's start out with the governor's race. Essentially, it

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>looks like Javier Besserra is the likely first place finisher

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and there's a toss up going on right now for

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the second slot involving Steve Hilton and Tom Steyer. We've

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seen some reports from CNN and other shops saying that

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Styer is doing better than expected in Los Angeles County.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 5>Your thoughts, well, if it's Styer and Hilton in the

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 5>governor's race, it's going to be a titanic battle over

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 5>Proposition thirteen because Ve Hilton has vowed to protect Prop thirteen,

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 5>he's endorsed by Howard Jarvis, and.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 6>Steyer has vowed to destroy Prop thirteen. So if you

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 6>care about your property taxes in California, that's going to

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 6>be quite a race to watch.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 5>If that's what happens.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And if the race is Besarah versus Hilton, Besarah would

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly have a huge advantage in that contest.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, he would have a huge advantage in that the

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 6>political machine and all of the major political donors, all

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 6>the associations and unions in California will back him. However,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 6>he's got some legal problems and there's no getting around

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 6>the fact that three people tied to tied to watching

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 6>his campaign account his dormant campaign account, and you know

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 6>that's another whole story that we can educate people about

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 6>someday why he has a dormant campaign account. They've been

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 6>they've pleaded guilty to conspiracy wirefraud. This is not a

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 6>good situation for him, and that could certainly we blow

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 6>up between now and November.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>We do not know how any of the ballots that

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have been cast, how the voters voted on those ballots,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but we do know who has turned them in so far,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and we know that Republican voters have turned their ballots

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in at a higher clip than they did four years ago,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats are underperforming where they were four years ago.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that?

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of it is that people were

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 6>waiting to see who they were going to vote for

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 6>because it was such an unusual governor's race. Eric Swalwell

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>dropping out and he was the front runner, and all

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 6>of these others being urged to drop out, and then

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 6>one of the people who was being urged to drop

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 6>out was the Sarah who's now in the league position.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 6>So I don't know if the chair of the California

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 6>Democratic Party survived that effort to try to drive out

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 6>people from the race. Everybody else stayed in. Eric Walwell

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 6>is still on the ballot. Who knows how that will

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 6>play in do it as people vote for a familiar name.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 6>It's just really hard to predict this, and I think

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of Democrats were confused and waiting, and no

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 6>one was really pushing them very hard with balla harvesting

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 6>and the other types of tactics that they used to

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 6>get that vote out.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Early on the Republican side of the aisle, we saw

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>consolidation occur, primarily when President Trump came out and endorse

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hilton. That's when we saw Hilton start to pop

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in the polls, and that's when we started to see

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Bianco falling off. We've also seen in recent days consolidation

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>going on on the Democratic side, where after Eric Swallwell

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>dropped out of the race, we saw Javier Bessera on

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the rise, and we saw Tom Steyer move into that

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>second place slot. We also saw Katie Porter, who had

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been pulling in the double digits, slip down to the

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>single digits, and Antonio via Rigosa, who pulled just below

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ten percent at one point in the race, is now

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>near an asterisk. What do you make that.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 6>I have to say that when you look at the

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 6>actual ballot, not the polling questions, but the ballot that

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 6>the voters have to confront with sixty one names on it.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 6>Searching for the one that you want to vote for

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 6>is a ten minute project by itself. So I'm not

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 6>sure that these polls are completely accurate. It could be

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 6>that some of the candidates that we think aren't going

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 6>to do well will do better, or it could be

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 6>that everybody drops to zero except the Sarah because all

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 6>the Democrats got on board at the last minute. I

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 6>have found this particular election to be just incredibly difficult

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 6>to predict.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The betting markets have Karen Bass, the incumbent mayor of

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, seeking another four year term, and Spencer Pratt,

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of The Hills reality show star who's home burned down

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Pacific Palisades. They have those two candidates making

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it to the November ballot. Is that what you expect

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to see?

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 7>Yes? I do.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 6>A lot of people said that Spencer Pratt had a

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 6>social media campaign, but when when you looked at the

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 6>fundraising in the last reported period, which was mid April

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 6>to mid May, he raised almost three million dollars to

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 6>Karen Bass's about two hundred and eighty thousand dollars.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 7>That's real.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 6>When people are donating at that level, even when they're

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 6>afraid of the government retaliating against those businesses, which they

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 6>are in Los Angeles, When they're donating at that level,

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 6>something real is going on. And I think he's been

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 6>out in the community. He's been working very hard on

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 6>retail politics, not a social media campaign, a lot of interviews,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 6>You've done interviews with him. I think he's worked very

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 6>hard at this and I think he could win.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 3>The thing that.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Is so odd to me about that race is typically,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when you see an incumbent running for reelection, the focus

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is on the incumbent, the focus is on their performance.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>We know the iconic line, are you better off now

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>than you were four years ago? But in this race,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they've taken the heat off of Karen

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and the focus is entirely on Spencer Pratt. I had

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>John Thomas, the political consultant, on earlier today and I

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>asked him, do you think that's because of political bias

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that's just because he's a more

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting person? And people are going to read a story

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>about Spencer Pratt, but maybe not read one about Karen Bass.

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, to me, he's been telling the truth,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 6>and we've been missing the truth in Los Angeles for

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 6>quite a while. When you hear people in the government

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 6>say everything's fine, except we just need one more tax

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 6>increase for more of these same homeless contracts, and they say, oh,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 6>these are our unhoused neighbors. Nobody's a drug addict, They're

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 6>just it's the price of housing in Los Angeles. And

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 6>people have a right to live in a free apartment

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 6>at the beach because that's their home. Everybody in Los

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 6>Angeles knows something's really wrong, and when no one in

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 6>the government is saying it, and then you get someone

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 6>like Spencer Pratt who puts his name on a ballot

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 6>and calls it the way people are seeing it, it's

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 6>tremendously powerful. And that's what I think is driving the

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 6>success of his campaign. He is telling the truth about

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 6>so many problems, corruption, drug addictions, incompetence, city city offices.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 6>This business of not rebuilding the Palisades is so it's

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 6>so emblematic of what everyone has experienced in Los Angeles.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 6>Ask anyone who's ever tried to build a gazebo in

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 6>the back yard what it's like to deal with Los Angeles,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 6>and I think he's resonating for that reason.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Susan Shelley, host of the Howard Jarvis radio program, columnist

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>in the Southern California news group. You can reader in

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the pages of the OC Register, the Riverside Press Enterprise,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the LA Daily News. Thanks so much for stopping by.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you all right, Frank, you're keeping an eye on

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all of the statewide contests. One of the statewide contests

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that you are watching closely this evening when the polls

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>close at eight, is to see who will become California's

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>next attorney general. We know that Rob Bonta is seeking

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>another four year term the city attorney for Huntington Beach.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The Republican candidate is running against him in that race.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He's been actively campaigning statewide and it looks like those

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>two candidates could end up in a runoff. It was

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>widely expected before he filed for reelection that Rob Bonta

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>would run for governor and not attorney general. But at

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the eleventh hour, despite the fact that Kamala Harris didn't

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>get into the race for governor and Alex Padia decided

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to take a pass Rob Bonta decided to run for

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>reelection instead, surprising a lot of people.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Very well put Democrat incment. Rob Bonta facing that challenge

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>from Republican Michael Gates for the role of California's Attorney General,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 2>will be watching that race very very closely. Michael Gates

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>is part of the Golden Ticket slate of candidates that

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>was organized by Steve Hilton, the front running Republican candidate

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 2>who will be watching tonight and the governor's race. Gates

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is a former trial attorney who served as the Huntington

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Beach City Attorney. As you well know John Deputy US

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Attorney as well. He's raised the less than half of

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>what Bonda raised to keep his seat according to the

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>latest reports I've seen, and it looks like Bonda's predecessor,

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>by the way, was Javi or Bessera. So he's running

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 2>for governor and right now, according to the Benning markets,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in the lead at the moment. So it's going to

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>be a very interesting night. As we've tracked all the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>state wide races here at this desk, the Attorney General race,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Superintendent of Public Instruction will have the State treasurer race

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as of course, the Lieutenant Governor and all

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 2>important insurance Commissioner, which takes on added significance given the

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>firestorm horrific disaster. They're calling it a second disaster given

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the slow pace of recovery. So the state insurance Commissioner

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>races something else will be watching very closely.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. We have about forty more minutes, just under

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes for the polls to be open here in

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the state of California. If you have not voted and

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you would like to cast your ballot, you better hurry

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>up and do so because the polls are closing fast.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We are live on election night. My name is John Phillips,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>joined in studio by Randy Wang, Frank Motech and remote

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>from Fresno, our colleague Phil Teresi on loan from KMJ

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in Fresno. We'll be back in moments. Don't you go anywhere,

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And we continue at seven twenty four on this election night.

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>My name is John Phillips, joined in studio by Randy Wang,

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Frank mootech and in Fresno, our colleague in Pale, Phil Teresi,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>who is joining us as well. All right, Randy, you

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are keeping an eye on the voting centers in Los

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Angeles County in terms of which ones are busy which

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ones are not busy. We have a little over a

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>half hour left of voting. What are you seeing?

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm seeing a lot of procrastinators.

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 2>John.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing. You've been able to vote in this

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 3>election for about a month, and I have been looking

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 3>at this website all day locator dot lavote dot gov

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 3>all the voting centers in the largest county in California.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>One out of every four voters lives in LA County.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 3>And the way this chart works is if it's green,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 3>that means there is no wait, or it's fifteen minutes

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 3>or less, And up until about five minutes ago, nearly

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 3>every single one of these places is green. But here

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 3>we are with thirty five minutes left to be able

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 3>to vote, and there's a ton of places now that

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>are getting a little busy because people waited till the

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>last possible minute to vote. What is this a college

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 3>term paper? Now, most of the places are still easy,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 3>so like, for instance, if you are waiting in an

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 3>hour plus line in West Hollywood at the Aquatic Recreation Center,

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 3>you can go over to the Fairfax Senior Citizen Center

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>less than a mile over on Melrose, and there's no wait.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 3>So look it up for yourself. If you're standing in

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>a long line because you waited till the last minute,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 3>you got a locator dot lavote dot gov. You can

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>vote at any voting center, not just the one in

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 3>your neighborhood, or you could drop that ballot in a box.

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>But if you wore a speedo to go vote, you're

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>probably more comfortable at the Aquatic Center than the Senior Center.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 3>And you probably went to Tom Steyer's party last night.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's check in with Phil Teresi in Fresno. Phil,

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the congressional races that you're watching very closely.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>There is David Valadeo, the incumbent Republican congressman who is

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>seeking a two year term in the House of Representatives.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are having a primary to see which Democratic

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>candidate there's a more moderate candidate in that race, a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more liberal candidate in that race, who will face off

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>with the incumbent Republican in November.

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that it's entirely possible that Randy Vegas,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 4>by accepting the endorsements of AOC and Bernie Sanders in

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 4>a congressional district that, with a single exception and has

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>gone to David Valadeo for thirteen years running, may have

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 4>shot himself in the foot, Doctor jas Meat Baines out

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 4>of the Assembly. She conducts herself well, She's got the

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 4>local party endorsement, she's got the state party endorsement, and Vegas.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 4>While I think that he is credible in his role

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 4>as a school board member, probably has aired a little

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 4>too far to the left. Certainly the way that the

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 4>money has gone in this race, We've seen a lot

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 4>of outside cash come in in favor of the aegis,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I think with the intention of giving an inferior candidate

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 4>to Valadeo for the general election. But David's got a

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 4>reputation for incredible constituent service, and he has continuously won

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 4>a district that has gone left in every presidential election

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 4>by thirteen and fifteen points. I don't think Valadeo has

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 4>a question of will he hang on to the job.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 4>I think the question at this point is is he

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 4>going to spend a little money keeping it away from

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Viegas or a lot of money keeping it away from Bains.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Now Baines portrays herself as a moderate candidate. Is she

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>an actual blue dog Democrat or is she just not

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a Bernie type.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Would I would say the latter. She's not full blown

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 4>AOC Green Party wingnut. I wouldn't go so far as

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 4>to describe Baines as a socialist. But she's not a

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 4>moderate and she's not a blue dog. This is not

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 4>somebody who would fall into line with Jack Kennedy's policies

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 4>if he were alive.

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Today, and with the House of Representatives so closely divided,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>if it comes down to one or two seats to

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>determine who is in control of Congress, this seat could

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>really matter in terms of the national scene.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh absolutely. Valadeo's delivered for Republicans consistently, and his fundraising

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>reflects that there's a lot of faith in his ability,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that he is not a gold star

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 4>MAGA Republican. But in the case of David Valadeo, being

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 4>a little more moderate, being willing to reach across the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 4>aisle serves him well. One of the other opportunities to

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 4>flip is actually one district over D twenty one, where

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Jim Costa is the incumbent and has been there for

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 4>decades and he's got too serious. Republicans after that seat,

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Lieutenant Colonel Lorenzo Rios out of Clovis and Kyle Kirkland

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 4>here in Fresno. And in both cases there's an opportunity

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 4>for Republicans to snag that seat if they rise to

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 4>the occasion.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, and of course, the polls close in a

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>half hour. Hopefully we'll have some results to bring to you,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some numbers to talk about in a little over half

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>an hour. It's election night, John Phillips joined by Randy Wang,

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Frank Motech, Phil Teresi. Don't go anywhere, and we continue

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at seven point thirty five in the evening, with about

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minutes left of the polls being open here

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the state of California. It's John Phillips, Randy Wang,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank Motech, Phil Teresi. Now, one of the things that

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you notice when you open up your ballot when it

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was sent to you in the mail, was how many

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>names were on that ballot, particularly in the race for governor.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Sixty one names. In fact, it was a full page

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>front and back on my eleven page ballot because La

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 3>County had an insane amount of judges. But there are

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 3>a lot of names running. We talk about the top

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>four or five, maybe the top eight that'll be in

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a debate. But it's very possible that some of these

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 3>names could get a few votes here or there, including

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 3>disgraced former Congressman Eric Swawell who is still on the ballot,

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Boring Betty E that is still on the ballot. But

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 3>there may be voters out there John that just decide

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 3>screw it, I don't care. I'm voting for Barack di

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Obama Shaw Or there is one guy and this is

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 3>his actual name. Now he's a no party preference candidate.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 3>His name is Living for God and Country DeMott Episcopal.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Or if you really want to enjoy yourself, cast your

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 3>vote for thunder Parlay.

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what club they dance in. All right, It

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is our pleasure to welcome our next guest to the program.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>He is a columnist and founder of the Recall of

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>District Attorney Chase A. Boudin in the City and County

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco. He's also host of the Really San

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco podcast. You can get him online at Richie Greenberg

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>dot org and follow him on Exit Greenberg Nation. Richie Greenberg, welcome,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 7>For inviting me tonight on the special special evening for

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 7>all of us.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>There is a hotly contested congressional race going on right

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>now in San Francisco to determine who will replace Nancy Pelosi.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Felosi had stayed out of the race for quite some time,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not endorsing any candidate, until very recently when she came

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>out in support of Connie Chan, san Francisco supervisor, who

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is running against Scott Wiener, the state Senator from San

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and front runner in the race, and Nancy Pelosi

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe has a lot of love for Wiener,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because she'd not only let her name to Connie Chan,

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but she's been out and about campaigning on her behalf.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's exactly right. You know, with all of this

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 7>excitement that we're seeing up and down this state here,

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 7>it's a very exciting, very exciting election cycle. I don't

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 7>know if you agree, but there's just a lot of

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 7>buzz out there and in San Francisco specifically because of

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 7>that the congressional race. I would not say to replace

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Nancy Pelosi. I would say to succeed her, because there's

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 7>really no replacing her. She's been in power for nearly

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 7>forty years, thirty seven thirty eight years or so, and

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 7>she's one of a kind. Love her or hate her.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, it was very interesting to see that come

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 7>out just a few days ago last week, that Pelosi

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 7>went ahead and made that announcement to endorse Connie Chan.

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 7>I believe that Conye Chan really needed it because even

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 7>though she is known within the city, she's a member

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 7>of the eleven member for the supervisors that's our city council.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 7>She's sort of a boring person, I'm sorry to say.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 7>She's not that that controversial. She's not that well liked

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 7>or hated. She's just there as a member. She's not

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 7>a firebrand, she's not, you know. So she's she needed

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 7>the help, and I think this strategically placed the endorsement

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 7>from Pelosi because, as you said, uh, Scott Wiener is

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 7>one of those really, really controversial individuals that has made

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 7>his mark in Sacramento with all of those pieces of

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 7>legislation that we were proposed and many of them passed

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 7>that have such a niche a niche effect on LGBTQ

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 7>and a few other issues. But he's made a lot

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 7>of people angry all up and down the city of

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 7>the state. So unfortunately, polls show that he is probably

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 7>going to win even in November. But you need to

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 7>put up a fight somewhere. And there was a second

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 7>and third place neck and neck uh in the polling,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 7>which was Connie Chan. And this ds a completely uh

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 7>just out of his mind, AOC type of socialist Marxist

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 7>psychot or he pronounces it shoycut shoycout chakra batti.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 3>You don't even let John try to pronounce that one.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I get yeah, yeah.

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 7>Really, it's at least I say psycot like psychotic shoycott

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 7>chakra batti.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 5>Who who has.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 7>Spent millions of his own money. It's kind of like

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 7>Tom Steyer. This guy's a self hating uh, you know,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 7>send a millionaire who's just running along. He got uh

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 7>the endorsement from Rashida Tleban, from uh ilhan Omar and others.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 7>He had Hassan Piker at one of his campaign rallies,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 7>so it was that kind of a nutcase. But was

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 7>was pretty much pulling right neck and neck with Connie Chan.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 7>So this endorsement from uh Nancy Pelosi will most likely

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 7>help her and differentiate her from psychot and put those

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 7>two going through tonight's primary into the final in November.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that Nancy Pelosi doesn't like Scott Wiener

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because clearly she is not fond of the boy.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, look at what all the work has

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 7>garnered for Pelosi. She has a incredible rolodex, a database

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 7>of all those people that she can go to for fundraising,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 7>for caucusing, for getting things done in Washington, d C.

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Whatever favors need to be pulled for all of that. Right, So,

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 7>clearly Scott Wiener is not someone that could step into

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 7>her shoes in some format that would make her donors,

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 7>the party's donors, the Democrat Party pleased. Right, So he

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 7>has his own agenda. He is viewed at is viewed

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 7>as at being the local leader of the lgbt Q

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 7>I A two plus members of the community, and you know,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 7>they just don't mesh that well. So I believe that

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 7>that is the reason why that they want to have

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 7>someone in Washington that can just step in in place

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 7>of and to succeed Pelosi. And Connie chan who has

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 7>been with Pelosi in a lot of these events and

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 7>mixers in the last year or so, sort of grooming

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Connie Chan. I'm not sure, but you know, she makes

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 7>the most sense in a sense, rather than this Shykat Chakrabati.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 7>I like seeing his name and Scott Wiener.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi was widely expected to come in with Gavin

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Newsom and Kamala Harris and Jerry Brown and Adam Schiff

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and others and all get behind a candidate for governor.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>They did not do that.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think Nancy Pelosi stayed out of that race?

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's this is a very interesting infighting

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 7>election cycle. You've got the Democrats that are in disarray,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 7>who are trying to fight off advancing Republicans, as we

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 7>see in LA with Spencer Pratt, with Steve Hilton and

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 7>Chad Bianco. So it's interesting to see that they don't

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 7>want to help either ruin or I think it's just

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 7>ruining for the most part. Newsom, as we know, is

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 7>very problematic. I don't think that an endorsement from him

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 7>would be very help full. Adam Shift similarly, and you know,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 7>if they were behind Eric Swalwell, that was quite a

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 7>shocker of a crash and burn. So you know, let

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 7>them do what they can do. Now, let's see where

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 7>the chips fall after tonight, see which of the Democrats

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 7>can move forward. You know, we've got Javie Rassara most

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 7>likely going to make it through tonight. Still up in

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 7>the air. What's going to happen with Steve Hilton. I'm

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 7>hoping he will make it forward. He came to San

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 7>Francisco and did a brilliant town hall, So I think

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 7>that that's what the reason is that let's see what

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 7>happens after tonight.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Richie Greenberg columnist and founder of the Recall of District

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Attorney Chase of Boudin Movement and host of the Really

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco podcast. You can get him online at Richie

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Greenberg dot org and follow him on x at Greenberg Nation.

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Richie Greenberg, thanks so much for stopping by my pleasure.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we have about fifteen more minutes for the

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>polls to be open here in the state of California.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If you want to vote, you have well fifteen minutes

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to do so, so you better hurry up. All right,

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our colleague Phil Teresi in Fresno, because

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Phil Ritchie just talked about the opening that's right now

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going on in San Francisco. Given the fact that Nancy

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi is retiring, you're taking a look at all the

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>congressional races on the ballot here, and we'll be going

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over those results as soon as the polls close at eight.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But not long ago, the state of California had Nancy

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi as the Democratic leader and Kevin McCarthy as the

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House, two of the most important positions

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Congress of the United States. And then Kevin

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy was knocked out a speaker. He resigned from his

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Bakersfield area congressional seat. He was replaced by another Republican

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of Vince Vaughn. Nancy Pelosi resigned as speaker, got out

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a leadership, but stuck around in the Congress. And even

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>though she wasn't in leadership, she was still one of

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>those voices that was very strong privately in the Democratic

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Party and getting Joe Biden to step down as the

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominee back in the twenty twenty four election. And

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.239
<v Speaker 1>now the state of California after this term won't have

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>either one of them.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's I think that it's been quite a loss

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 4>on both sides in terms of fundraising power and quiet authority.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean Pelosi and McCarthy are about as different as

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 4>two members of Congress could possibly be, god knows as speakers.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 4>They had absolutely different experiences. But the secret sauce for

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 4>both of them, and I think that probably no small

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 4>part of why both of them got to bite at

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 4>that apple is their fundraising prowess, and I don't see

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 4>anybody coming up in the Congress right now that's able

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 4>to match it at quite that level. I think that

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 4>you've got some interesting possibilities if Kevin Kylie is able

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 4>to lock into this new district. Kylie's got a interesting

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 4>appeal that I think could serve really well Inland California.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of rock stars that are going to

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 4>pull that kind of money down that, there's nobody in

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the race for Polos seat, not Connie Chance, certainly not

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Scott Wiener that's going to have that kind of fundraising power.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 4>James Gallagher and his effort in the special election that

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 4>may change things. His credibility in Sacramento is legendary, and

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 4>it's possible that he's going to be able to bring

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 4>some of that, but I think that the standard on

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 4>both parties, unfortunately, is a little bit diminished right now.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 4>In terms of that soft power.

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we have about twelve more minutes of the

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>polls being open here in the state of California. That's

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when the polls close. That's when the results could theoretically

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>start to come in. It's CALIFORNI you so don't bet

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on it, but.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Emphasis on theoretical you actually have a better bet if

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you bet.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Whatever the case, We're

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be here with you all the way until

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock. Don't you go anywhere. This is our special

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>coverage of election twenty twenty six. It's John Phillips, Randy Wang,

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank Motech, Phil Teresi, Don't you go anywhere, And we

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>continue at seven fifty one in the evening. It's John Phillips,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Randy Wing, Frank Motech, Phil Teresi, here with you until

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock in the evening. There is nine more minutes

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>left of voting here in the state of California. If

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in line, they'll let you stay there and cast

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>your ballot. So if you do want to vote, you

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>better get on that right away.

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 3>It's like you're trying to get a funnel cake right

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 3>when Magic Mountain closes.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that, all right. There are a number

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>of ballot initiatives in the San Francisco Bay area that

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're keeping an eye on, Randy, that will have hopefully

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>results coming in in just a few minutes.

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've got the Chronicles website up, so hopefully we'll

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 3>see something when the polls closed. Turnout has been higher

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>in San Francisco. So Measure A we talked about this

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>one on the show yesterday. That is the earthquake bond

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 3>that is supposed to help retrofit firehouses, build those high

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>pressure pumps, but also helps repair a bart storage yard

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 3>and build some affordable housing because why not. Measure C

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 3>would lower the gross receipts tax for small businesses who

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 3>only make up to seven and a half million dollars.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Measure D would raise the gross receipts tax for any

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 3>overpaid CEO company where the CEO of a company makes

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>more than one hundred times the average salary of their

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 3>regular employees. Here's what's bizarre. If Prop C and Prop

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 3>D both pass, whichever one gets more votes cancels the

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 3>other one out. So either grosser receipts taxes are going

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 3>up or they're going going down or they're staying the same. Meanwhile,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 3>in Alameda County, we are looking at Measure E. This

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 3>is the one hundred and ninety two dollars parcel tax

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 3>that's supposed to go to public safety. But like every

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 3>parcel tax, they can use the money for whatever they want,

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 3>and that's what they've done over and over and over again.

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>They also have a DA's race in Alameda County with

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a familiar face on the ballot.

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the current District Attorney Ursula Jones Dixon, who was

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 3>appointed to that position after she took over for recalled

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 3>DA Pamela Price, is up against recalled DA Pamela Price,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 3>and she's got some getting even to do.

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>And Frank Botech, you are keeping an eye on all

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the statewide constitutional offices, including the contest to see who

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>will be California's next insurance Commissioner.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I'm sitting here in AWE after

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Randy Wang Ryan read all those names there, the verbal

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>gymnastics with the names of some that looked like the

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>bottom line of an eyechart. So we're had a great

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 2>job on that. Now it's my turn to tackle some

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of these names. Certainly the state insurance commissioner seat very

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>very important given what's happened here in southern California with

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the horrific firestorm disaster last year. The insurance Commissioner, by

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 2>the way, is the person's responsible for regulating what's really

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the nation's largest property insurance market, including not only homeowners insurance,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 2>but auto insurance, health insurance, pet insurance, you name it,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 2>workers comp as well, So a very very important position.

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 2>The candidates that you'll be seeing on the ballot for

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the next five minutes or so include Senator Ben Allen,

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 2>who's being termed out of the state legislature. Senator Allen

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 2>will be leaving the legislature running for insurance Commissioner, Jane Kim,

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 2>head of the California Working Families Party, who was also

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco, by the way, Patrick Wolfe, a financial analyst,

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Steve Bradford, a former state senator assemblyman, and on the

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Republican side, Stacy R. Caden, the longtime insurance agent who's

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>part of the Golden Ticket that Steve Hilton has organized.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 2>She's running for state insurance commissioner. And Merritt Farron, attorney

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 2>who lost his home in the Palasades fire at last year.

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Also on the ballot for State Insurance Commissioner. Will be

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 2>following all the statewide races tonight. Governor, Lieutenant governor, state

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Insurance Commissioner, state treasurer, Secretary of State Controller, and Attorney General.

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Back to you, BILTERSI both Republican candidates. Both of the

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 1>major Republican candidates for governor, Steve Hilton, formerly of Fox News,

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside County, have been campaigning

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>heavily and Republican vote rich portions of the state and

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the Central Valley is at the top of that list.

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Which candidate had the biggest presence in the Central Valley

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this cycle, Oh.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 4>No question at all. Steve Hilton. He made the rounds

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 4>on local radio, local TV, he did multiple town hall events.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Chad Bianco made a respectable showing for a California gubernatorial candidate,

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 4>but he didn't make the same impression as Hilton. And

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 4>looking at social media feedback every time we talk about

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the governor's race, it's a back and forth between the

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Hilton and Bianco's supporters. But I think that for as

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 4>much love as Chad gets, I think Steve Hilton's going

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 4>to carry it and I think that Trump endorsement was

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 4>really only a small piece of it.

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Did any of the Democratic candidates have a visible presence

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Central Valley this cycle?

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 4>We saw Bisera come through for at least one town hall,

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 4>but in terms of really serious efforts to connect with

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 4>valley voters, no, there were no major events from the Democrats,

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, other than Bisera. Katie Porter did come

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 4>through for an early candidate forum, and Katie and left

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 4>again immediately because she's getting no love in the Central Valley.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 3>But she said she loves the tacos in Bakersfield.

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Look after Hilton's Barstow Street taco fiasco, she gets a

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 4>pass on the Bakersfield Crag.

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>When you would mention Katie Porter's name on your radio

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>program on KMJ and Fresno, what kind of reaction would

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you get in the male bag and on social media, Oh, the.

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 4>Boos and the hisses were absolutely mind betting. She is

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 4>not well liked. And it's interesting because a lot of

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 4>the coverage, and I'm sure you saw this, a lot

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 4>of the coverage revolved around, oh, well, a woman can't

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 4>have a strong personality in politics without getting called the

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 4>B word and I never heard our audience go down

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 4>that road. The objection to her was not that she's female.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 4>The objection to her was that she treats her staff

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 4>like garbage, and she's just kind of a belligerent dope.

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's you've just tickled Johnny Pink. His favorite topic

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 3>in this whole race has been Katie Porter.

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, and let me tell you, all you have to

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do is mention her name. And the email is so

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>filthy we can't even read it on the air. But

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>every time you hit the Pinota, candy comes out.

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh, unquestionably, No, she is. She suffers from exactly the

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 4>same personality defect Hillary and Kamala have that it's not

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 4>that it's a female candidate, it's that it's an unlikable

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 4>human being.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, one listener send us an email today suggesting that

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if she loses this race, she could go to the

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>state of Idaho and run for office there because potatoes

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are their biggest export.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Poor Candie.

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we now are about sixty seconds away

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>from the polls closing here in California. If you're not

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>in the parking lot, if you're not in line right now,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not going to get a chance to vote.

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you're right there and you can make that

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty yard dash and get in that line, you'll be okay.

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>If not, you probably missed your opportun tunity to vote.

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>In theory, we're going to have results coming up in

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>just about forty five seconds. We're here live with you

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>until nine o'clock in the evening covering this primary election

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the Golden State. It's John Phillips, Randy Wang,

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Frank Motec, Phil Teresi. Don't you go anywhere