WEBVTT - There's A Moron

0:00:08.430 --> 0:00:12.250
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:12.289 --> 0:00:14.270
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:14.330 --> 0:00:16.529
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:16.710 --> 0:00:18.070
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:18.230 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 4>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 3>And you boys ought to be awfully proud to know

0:00:32.979 --> 0:00:37.580
<v Speaker 3>that you're the first ever Milwaukee Brewer team. to be

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:47.420
<v Speaker 3>world champion. So this is a non-sports comment about the

0:00:47.460 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee Brewers winning the World Series last night. Pat Murphy,

0:00:50.140 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 3>their manager, got his first full-time Major League Baseball managing

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>job at age 64.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:57.780
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:00:58.700 --> 0:01:03.250
<v Speaker 3>And was National League Manager of the Year that year

0:01:03.370 --> 0:01:05.970
<v Speaker 3>and the next year and won the World Series last night.

0:01:06.830 --> 0:01:07.130
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:01:08.110 --> 0:01:12.089
<v Speaker 3>But he'd been chasing that job his entire post-playing career,

0:01:12.550 --> 0:01:14.590
<v Speaker 3>and they get it until he was in his mid-60s.

0:01:15.170 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Rejected over and over again. Wow. And that's never too late.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Or something.

0:01:21.620 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Until it is.

0:01:23.060 --> 0:01:23.539
<v Speaker 2>Until it is.

0:01:24.060 --> 0:01:26.779
<v Speaker 3>Oh, so exciting. Or it's idiotic to take your golden

0:01:26.819 --> 0:01:28.940
<v Speaker 3>years and continue to chase a dream that clearly is

0:01:28.980 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>not meant for you.

0:01:29.819 --> 0:01:32.940
<v Speaker 2>The trick is knowing which.

0:01:33.110 --> 0:01:34.509
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:01:34.970 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Like Churchill said, never, never, never give up. Unless

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.420
<v Speaker 2>you're one of those American Idol contestants who suck and

0:01:44.459 --> 0:01:46.980
<v Speaker 2>you really ought to. Yeah, you're never going to be

0:01:47.340 --> 0:01:49.500
<v Speaker 2>an accounting. It's an honorable profession.

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.180
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to make your living as a professional singer,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.070
<v Speaker 3>which is fine. Do something else. That's the problem with

0:01:55.270 --> 0:01:58.390
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those things is that the saying of

0:01:59.110 --> 0:02:02.270
<v Speaker 3>if you're going the wrong direction, the best thing you

0:02:02.310 --> 0:02:04.690
<v Speaker 3>can do is turn around and go the other direction.

0:02:05.450 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yes, that's progress.

0:02:07.860 --> 0:02:08.100
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, that's the trick in knowing, though. If you

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.609
<v Speaker 2>are a Pat Murphy, never, never, never give up.

0:02:16.750 --> 0:02:20.270
<v Speaker 3>So we'll go big a little bit later, maybe even

0:02:20.290 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>this hour, on the Alaska story. So the New York

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Times breaks the story that the extra Dan Sullivan, you know,

0:02:26.380 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>it's always good to keep an extra around in case

0:02:29.220 --> 0:02:29.660
<v Speaker 3>you need it.

0:02:29.700 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Decoy Dan!

0:02:30.940 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 3>In Alaska was on purpose. Yeah, no freaking kidding. But

0:02:34.090 --> 0:02:36.090
<v Speaker 3>so the New York Times, that was an exclusive. Here's

0:02:36.110 --> 0:02:39.550
<v Speaker 3>their big exclusive today. NVIDIA chief seen as target of

0:02:39.630 --> 0:02:43.130
<v Speaker 3>Chinese spy plot. So, oh, Wang with the cool leather

0:02:43.169 --> 0:02:45.630
<v Speaker 3>jackets running the most valuable company in the world. And

0:02:45.669 --> 0:02:49.290
<v Speaker 3>more importantly than that, NVIDIA has the best chips in

0:02:49.330 --> 0:02:53.250
<v Speaker 3>the world that everybody wants, including China, for, you know,

0:02:53.290 --> 0:02:55.150
<v Speaker 3>the big AI wars that are going to take over

0:02:55.190 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the world. And it turns out this very attractive Chinese

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.420
<v Speaker 3>woman named Alice Wang. Hey, China, get some more names.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:07.350 --> 0:03:10.290
<v Speaker 3>You need more names. Everybody's named Li and Wang. You

0:03:10.330 --> 0:03:13.980
<v Speaker 3>can't have... It's hard to follow these stories. Sounds like

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>racism to me, round eye. They're not relatives or married

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>or anything like that. He was just... It just keeps

0:03:19.460 --> 0:03:25.220
<v Speaker 3>saying a close relationship. All right. Whatever that is. Turned

0:03:25.310 --> 0:03:30.630
<v Speaker 3>out she's a Chinese citizen. She had been funneling intelligence

0:03:30.710 --> 0:03:35.070
<v Speaker 3>information to Beijing. Don't trust China. For a long time.

0:03:35.900 --> 0:03:37.700
<v Speaker 3>And they're not exactly sure what.

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Mr.

0:03:39.100 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Wang, one of the most powerful figures in the AI revolution,

0:03:44.380 --> 0:03:50.340
<v Speaker 3>was unaware of this, obviously. The White House was tipped

0:03:50.470 --> 0:03:53.610
<v Speaker 3>off on this last year. Trump was briefed about the

0:03:53.650 --> 0:03:57.070
<v Speaker 3>intelligence findings, which have not previously been reported in the media,

0:03:57.430 --> 0:03:59.930
<v Speaker 3>and chose not to do anything with the information. Now,

0:03:59.950 --> 0:04:01.990
<v Speaker 3>this is the New York Times take on this, although

0:04:02.030 --> 0:04:02.970
<v Speaker 3>it rings true to me.

0:04:03.740 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Mr.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.540
<v Speaker 3>Trump has been wary of disrupting NVIDIA's chip sales, which

0:04:08.580 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>are driving the economy in the stock market.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:16.609
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. Well, letting a guy know, hey, your squeeze

0:04:16.730 --> 0:04:20.010
<v Speaker 2>is not what she seems to be, probably wouldn't disrupt

0:04:20.850 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the market, would it? I mean, I don't get the

0:04:26.580 --> 0:04:30.180
<v Speaker 2>part that would be that disruptive, but clearly I'm missing something.

0:04:32.470 --> 0:04:36.130
<v Speaker 2>His girlfriend is funneling secrets to the Chinese government.

0:04:38.089 --> 0:04:41.090
<v Speaker 3>You don't think that might change stock market thinking about

0:04:41.170 --> 0:04:44.849
<v Speaker 3>how valuable and unique NVIDIA chips are if you feel

0:04:44.870 --> 0:04:49.130
<v Speaker 3>like China now has that technology and can start selling

0:04:49.190 --> 0:04:49.700
<v Speaker 3>them too?

0:04:49.950 --> 0:04:50.460
<v Speaker 4>Sure, yeah.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd want to know a lot more about how significant

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.700
<v Speaker 2>the leaks were, but my takeaway, as if I needed

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:01.770
<v Speaker 2>to take this away, is any Chinese citizen or any

0:05:02.310 --> 0:05:05.630
<v Speaker 2>human who has family they care about who is a

0:05:05.690 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Chinese citizen, is a potential tool of the Chinese Communist Party. Always,

0:05:10.660 --> 0:05:11.659
<v Speaker 2>every day, never forget.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>So this New York Times article is based on interviews

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:15.900
<v Speaker 3>with people briefed on the surveillance who spoke on the

0:05:15.940 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>condition of anonymity, as usual. American officials had already suspected

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.380
<v Speaker 3>that Ms. Wang was helping China evade constraints on its

0:05:24.420 --> 0:05:28.430
<v Speaker 3>ability to gain access to advanced AI chips, which ain't good.

0:05:30.140 --> 0:05:33.050
<v Speaker 3>But the revelation that she was feeding information directly to

0:05:33.089 --> 0:05:36.390
<v Speaker 3>Beijing raised more troubling possibilities, including that Mr. Wang had

0:05:36.430 --> 0:05:39.310
<v Speaker 3>insights into Mr. Trump's thinking on an issue of vital

0:05:39.350 --> 0:05:42.550
<v Speaker 3>importance to both nations. One likely to come up when

0:05:42.570 --> 0:05:44.529
<v Speaker 3>the president visits China next month.

0:05:45.330 --> 0:05:48.010
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my gosh. The number of contacts he's had with

0:05:48.110 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the whole leadership team. Yeah.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:50.650
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:05:52.730 --> 0:05:52.950
<v Speaker 2>Mr.

0:05:52.970 --> 0:05:56.490
<v Speaker 3>Wang has not received a defensive briefing warning sometimes given

0:05:56.529 --> 0:05:59.250
<v Speaker 3>to Americans who are being targeted by foreign intelligence services.

0:05:59.310 --> 0:06:01.830
<v Speaker 3>People briefed with the surveillance. So the New York Times

0:06:01.940 --> 0:06:05.620
<v Speaker 3>is beyond hinting that the Trump administration could have done

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.219
<v Speaker 3>more to warn Wang, Mr. Wang, not Mrs. Wang, because

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they're both named Wang or go with first names. That'd

0:06:13.460 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>be a good idea.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.070
<v Speaker 3>And I mentioned last week, I guess, for the super

0:06:17.110 --> 0:06:20.670
<v Speaker 3>cool and hip people, you only call him by his

0:06:20.690 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 3>first name anyway. He's one of those first-name people like Elon.

0:06:24.339 --> 0:06:27.850
<v Speaker 2>I find that so annoying, but go ahead.

0:06:29.270 --> 0:06:36.910
<v Speaker 3>NVIDIA said that the company employed Ms. Wang was like

0:06:37.050 --> 0:06:40.270
<v Speaker 3>any other regional customer that had previously investigated and bugged

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.980
<v Speaker 3>claims that the blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So NVIDIA

0:06:43.020 --> 0:06:46.820
<v Speaker 3>is denying this, I guess, which you do, especially if

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 3>you don't want the stock to drop all of a sudden,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:54.089
<v Speaker 3>I suppose. Anyway, it'll be interesting to see more information

0:06:54.130 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>that comes out on that whole story. It's very troubling

0:06:58.980 --> 0:07:01.859
<v Speaker 3>and has been for a very long time that the

0:07:01.900 --> 0:07:06.890
<v Speaker 3>United States is far and away the innovator in practically everything.

0:07:07.900 --> 0:07:13.050
<v Speaker 3>golf club technology computers cell phones computer chips we're the

0:07:13.150 --> 0:07:14.970
<v Speaker 3>best at everything ai.

0:07:14.730 --> 0:07:17.850
<v Speaker 2>Everything jets yes fighter jets all.

0:07:17.750 --> 0:07:20.530
<v Speaker 3>Kinds of weapons systems we're the best at that in

0:07:20.570 --> 0:07:23.210
<v Speaker 3>the world by far because of our system where the

0:07:23.270 --> 0:07:26.710
<v Speaker 3>smart people come here and less regulation and blah blah

0:07:26.730 --> 0:07:29.650
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah but then we let our number one

0:07:29.710 --> 0:07:32.630
<v Speaker 3>enemy on earth steal it right away skip all the

0:07:32.670 --> 0:07:35.670
<v Speaker 3>hard part and have exactly the same thing. They got

0:07:35.690 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>a fighter jet that is same as our fighter jet.

0:07:37.910 --> 0:07:40.010
<v Speaker 3>We should have been, we should have had the dominant

0:07:40.090 --> 0:07:42.530
<v Speaker 3>fighter plane on planet earth for.

0:07:42.530 --> 0:07:45.030
<v Speaker 2>Decades before anybody could catch up to us. Nope.

0:07:45.370 --> 0:07:47.590
<v Speaker 3>They stole all the technology and caught up to us

0:07:47.630 --> 0:07:47.970
<v Speaker 3>right away.

0:07:48.470 --> 0:07:53.420
<v Speaker 2>Our naivete, our naivete in engaging with China from the

0:07:53.450 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Nixon administration on and getting addicted to cheap Chinese crap

0:07:57.920 --> 0:07:59.860
<v Speaker 2>in our markets and our households and our lives is,

0:08:00.150 --> 0:08:03.410
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the great geopolitical miscalculations in human history.

0:08:04.190 --> 0:08:07.110
<v Speaker 2>And it was absolutely deliberately planned by the Chinese from

0:08:07.150 --> 0:08:10.420
<v Speaker 2>the beginning. Read the 100-Year Marathon by Michael Pillsbury. Is

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:10.700
<v Speaker 2>that it?

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's... Whoops.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, whoops.

0:08:16.100 --> 0:08:18.740
<v Speaker 3>So NVIDIA's got the best, fastest chips that drive the

0:08:18.780 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>whole AI thing, and now hopefully China doesn't have a

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of the information you need to make the same chips.

0:08:25.500 --> 0:08:28.850
<v Speaker 2>And she tried to reach Nelson through his... I'm not

0:08:28.900 --> 0:08:31.750
<v Speaker 2>saying it. It's unfortunate and childish.

0:08:31.890 --> 0:08:32.429
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you're right.

0:08:32.450 --> 0:08:32.690
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:08:32.890 --> 0:08:33.150
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:08:33.350 --> 0:08:33.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:33.929 --> 0:08:34.290
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:08:34.610 --> 0:08:34.870
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:35.110 --> 0:08:38.790
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wow. Wow. Hey, there's this hot young girl who's

0:08:38.910 --> 0:08:40.290
<v Speaker 2>really Chinese citizen.

0:08:40.910 --> 0:08:43.090
<v Speaker 3>Really, really took a shine into you.

0:08:43.970 --> 0:08:46.750
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly, weirdly, she's the Chinese, as it turns out. Isn't

0:08:46.770 --> 0:08:49.099
<v Speaker 2>that funny? She's such a sweetheart. I can't wait till

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:50.860
<v Speaker 2>you meet her. Oh, Lord.

0:08:51.420 --> 0:08:52.500
<v Speaker 3>God dang it, people.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 2>There's not some nice statuette Swedish blonde you're interested in or.

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.180
<v Speaker 3>You're kind of a, you know, a silver haired fox

0:09:03.460 --> 0:09:06.290
<v Speaker 3>guy anyway. And you're one of the most richest people

0:09:06.390 --> 0:09:09.030
<v Speaker 3>on earth. Can't you get a girlfriend who's not a

0:09:09.070 --> 0:09:11.370
<v Speaker 3>Chinese spy? Yeah.

0:09:12.530 --> 0:09:16.510
<v Speaker 2>You'd think, you know, his dating pool would be fairly extensive.

0:09:16.710 --> 0:09:16.950
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:17.530 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>How about weed out Chinese spies?

0:09:21.450 --> 0:09:24.550
<v Speaker 2>Boy, Eric Swalwell is nodding sadly in his home right

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>now listening to us. Tell me about it, he's thinking.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.700
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying, yeah. I mean, come on. Your Bumble profile,

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:39.630
<v Speaker 3>you should just put on there, Jensen, like turn-offs, turn-offs,

0:09:39.730 --> 0:09:40.890
<v Speaker 3>communist party members.

0:09:41.670 --> 0:09:41.890
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:09:41.929 --> 0:09:42.030
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:43.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Don't even call.

0:09:44.059 --> 0:09:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:44.580 --> 0:09:45.780
<v Speaker 2>Don't swipe. Whatever.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how it works.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm married.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 3>People are putting no MAGA on there or whatever for

0:09:49.500 --> 0:09:52.250
<v Speaker 3>their profiles. He needs to put on there no communist spies.

0:09:52.970 --> 0:09:55.130
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Dang it. It's an oversight. What are you going

0:09:55.150 --> 0:09:57.550
<v Speaker 2>to do? He's busy running the company. Oh, speaking of

0:09:57.630 --> 0:10:00.910
<v Speaker 2>foreigners on the run, have you followed the bullshit? story

0:10:01.130 --> 0:10:06.740
<v Speaker 2>out of Brazil? They just had, you know, we are

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.980
<v Speaker 2>so headed for this with the lawfare culture that's going

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.500
<v Speaker 2>on right now. The guy almost wins the presidency a

0:10:14.740 --> 0:10:20.900
<v Speaker 2>couple of nights ago. But the winners, the left-wing strongman,

0:10:22.020 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>what's his name, Lalo or Taco or whatever his name is,

0:10:29.429 --> 0:10:32.250
<v Speaker 2>while he's a left-wing strongman, he's going to arrest Bolsonaro

0:10:32.309 --> 0:10:34.830
<v Speaker 2>and charge him with all sorts of crimes, real and imagined.

0:10:35.150 --> 0:10:37.110
<v Speaker 3>So you lose the election, you have.

0:10:36.990 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>To flee overland to, what was it, Ecuador, and then

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>he jumped on a private jet and now he's in

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.189
<v Speaker 2>Miami because he's friendly with the Trump family. So you

0:10:48.210 --> 0:10:51.470
<v Speaker 2>lose the election, you have to flee the country. And

0:10:51.490 --> 0:10:55.350
<v Speaker 2>we're close to that. There are folks, we reported this

0:10:55.370 --> 0:10:58.310
<v Speaker 2>a week or so ago, all over D.C., everybody involved

0:10:58.350 --> 0:11:00.930
<v Speaker 2>in the administration is getting lawyered up for when and

0:11:01.010 --> 0:11:04.030
<v Speaker 2>if the Democrats take the House and the Senate because

0:11:04.110 --> 0:11:09.570
<v Speaker 2>it's going to become lawfare mania again. I accuse the

0:11:10.030 --> 0:11:13.990
<v Speaker 2>Democrats of really starting the modern lawfare, trying to prosecute

0:11:14.300 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 2>trump for ridiculous imagined crap and then the trump administration

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is gleefully joined in the fray and is prosecuting everybody

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.500
<v Speaker 2>that's in their sights including ridiculously and comey's a villain

0:11:26.540 --> 0:11:30.420
<v Speaker 2>but this latest one indicting comey it's just it's a

0:11:30.660 --> 0:11:34.190
<v Speaker 2>joke um and so how how far till we're in

0:11:34.309 --> 0:11:37.470
<v Speaker 2>banana republic zones and and and but you know throwing

0:11:37.490 --> 0:11:42.229
<v Speaker 2>people in jail you don't hold a uh hey it

0:11:42.270 --> 0:11:45.780
<v Speaker 2>was a great effort sorry we lost rally or speech

0:11:45.820 --> 0:11:47.420
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, you flee for your lives.

0:11:48.860 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

0:11:49.179 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know.

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.740
<v Speaker 3>We can dig into the economic numbers that came out today.

0:11:53.820 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I guarantee you Donald Trump and the Republicans are happy

0:11:55.980 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>about because pretty strong overall GDP growth.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.100
<v Speaker 2>But did they exceed expectations?

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.610
<v Speaker 3>And plenty of other stuff that we can get into.

0:12:04.620 --> 0:12:04.970
<v Speaker 2>Stay here.

0:12:06.490 --> 0:12:07.730
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:12:13.530 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show. Apple's new foldable iPhone is

0:12:19.670 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>cracking after just days or hours of use. The situation

0:12:23.380 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>is so bad, several teenagers actually looked up from their phones.

0:12:31.100 --> 0:12:33.980
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of things cracking, that's going to be a huge

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>problem if that turns out to be like an actual

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.850
<v Speaker 3>problem and not just a very rare. They misused it

0:12:41.900 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:12:43.070 --> 0:12:48.270
<v Speaker 2>Do we have a term for the, because this could

0:12:48.290 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>be an actual problem and an issue that Apple has

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.580
<v Speaker 2>to grapple with, or it could be incredibly rare, utterly insignificant,

0:12:54.620 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>but because it's tied to the hot thing, it gets

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:03.020
<v Speaker 2>lots of clicks. Is there a remora? Is that the

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:08.530
<v Speaker 2>fish that latches onto a shark? It's like a parasite story. Yeah,

0:13:08.550 --> 0:13:09.729
<v Speaker 2>there should be a term for that.

0:13:12.380 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>My son's MacBook Air, which is fairly old, got a

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.670
<v Speaker 3>cracked screen somehow. He doesn't seem to understand, know how

0:13:22.750 --> 0:13:26.709
<v Speaker 3>that happened. I try to remind them. I do this.

0:13:26.809 --> 0:13:29.069
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of us do this. You have

0:13:29.090 --> 0:13:32.020
<v Speaker 3>these things that your phone is the best example. They're

0:13:32.059 --> 0:13:34.660
<v Speaker 3>so expensive. You get so used to carrying them around

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.310
<v Speaker 3>all the time. You treat them like they're You know,

0:13:37.610 --> 0:13:39.850
<v Speaker 3>like a $ 5 Atom or whatever, and toss it on

0:13:39.870 --> 0:13:40.690
<v Speaker 3>the bed or whatever.

0:13:40.710 --> 0:13:42.670
<v Speaker 2>Like a comb.

0:13:42.710 --> 0:13:46.670
<v Speaker 3>Not like it's a $ 1, 000 computer that you're carrying around. Anyway,

0:13:46.690 --> 0:13:48.689
<v Speaker 3>the screen got cracked on his MacBook, and so I

0:13:48.730 --> 0:13:52.390
<v Speaker 3>took it to the local repair person to fix it.

0:13:52.390 --> 0:13:53.890
<v Speaker 3>$ 450 to fix it. They got to put a new

0:13:53.929 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>screen up. $ 450. So it's right on that edge of, well,

0:13:57.890 --> 0:14:00.530
<v Speaker 3>is it better to just get a new one? because

0:14:00.550 --> 0:14:03.690
<v Speaker 3>it's older, and it's right on the cusp, but I thought, geez,

0:14:03.710 --> 0:14:05.870
<v Speaker 3>that's an expensive repair. What would it cost to fix

0:14:05.910 --> 0:14:07.490
<v Speaker 3>those duos? I can't imagine.

0:14:08.090 --> 0:14:12.940
<v Speaker 2>Well, with those expensive chips these days, we know computers

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.820
<v Speaker 2>are really, really high, and thanks to old Jensen Wang

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.700
<v Speaker 2>and his hot commie girlfriend, it might get worse or better.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.510
<v Speaker 3>This guy, it's a one guy rented out a space

0:14:24.550 --> 0:14:26.890
<v Speaker 3>in a strip mall that probably used to be a

0:14:26.910 --> 0:14:31.270
<v Speaker 3>yogurt stand or whatever, and Uh, he fixes people's iPhones

0:14:31.330 --> 0:14:33.630
<v Speaker 3>and computers. And I said, do you stay pretty busy?

0:14:33.650 --> 0:14:35.690
<v Speaker 3>And he said, I am swamped all the time. Oh,

0:14:35.710 --> 0:14:39.180
<v Speaker 3>but he can charge pretty much whatever the hell he wants. And, uh,

0:14:39.190 --> 0:14:41.010
<v Speaker 3>he's on the West side of my town. He just,

0:14:41.150 --> 0:14:44.500
<v Speaker 3>everybody in that end, probably he's the most convenient guy. And, uh,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.260
<v Speaker 3>And what a skill to have. And I said, did

0:14:47.300 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you learn all this pretty much just by screwing around

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.820
<v Speaker 3>with stuff? He said, yeah, just pretty much self-taught. Just

0:14:53.140 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I was interested in it. And then I'd start buying

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.100
<v Speaker 3>parts and switching them out. And you learn by doing

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and everything like that. And I said, man, AI is

0:14:58.200 --> 0:14:59.820
<v Speaker 3>not going to replace you. And he said, nope, not

0:14:59.860 --> 0:15:01.980
<v Speaker 3>a chance. I'll be able to do this the rest

0:15:02.020 --> 0:15:02.540
<v Speaker 3>of my life.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:15:03.740 --> 0:15:04.260
<v Speaker 2>Good for him.

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I love that.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That's an American success.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.020
<v Speaker 3>What a cool talent to have. I mean, that is

0:15:09.060 --> 0:15:11.500
<v Speaker 3>something that will be in demand. Be like being somebody

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.230
<v Speaker 3>who could like, uh, you know, like a farrier back

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.930
<v Speaker 3>in the 1800s, shoe a horse or something like that.

0:15:16.950 --> 0:15:19.210
<v Speaker 3>You are needed. Every town needs you.

0:15:19.850 --> 0:15:23.350
<v Speaker 2>Right. Right. And, and I could totally see, you know, he's,

0:15:23.410 --> 0:15:27.430
<v Speaker 2>he's charging 79 bucks for a iPhone repair or whatever.

0:15:28.130 --> 0:15:30.340
<v Speaker 2>I could totally see him thinking, I'm going to tell

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>this guy 89. Let's try 99, you know, and just

0:15:34.780 --> 0:15:37.980
<v Speaker 2>see what the market will bear. I show up, is

0:15:38.060 --> 0:15:40.630
<v Speaker 2>it $ 79 or $ 89? I don't care. Tell me how

0:15:40.650 --> 0:15:43.570
<v Speaker 2>much it is. Exactly. I mean, unless he went like nuts,

0:15:43.590 --> 0:15:47.210
<v Speaker 2>that's $ 450 to replace it. You know, then you'd notice.

0:15:47.250 --> 0:15:50.300
<v Speaker 2>But it's definitely there. You need it fixed. It's in

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:50.540
<v Speaker 2>the last.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>You probably really need it fixed. Unless you're somebody who

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>has like multiple computers and you use this one sometimes

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to this is the thing I use every day. Yeah,

0:16:00.450 --> 0:16:02.290
<v Speaker 3>what a great business to be in. I got to

0:16:02.310 --> 0:16:03.710
<v Speaker 3>teach one of my kids to learn how to fix

0:16:03.810 --> 0:16:06.910
<v Speaker 3>iPhones and computers. As I was walking over to the

0:16:06.950 --> 0:16:09.190
<v Speaker 3>place yesterday, I walked by a car in the street

0:16:09.210 --> 0:16:11.310
<v Speaker 3>that had this, had a whole bunch of bumper stickers.

0:16:11.670 --> 0:16:14.380
<v Speaker 3>People tend to either be bumper sticker person or not

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>bumper sticker person. Not a lot of people with one

0:16:17.500 --> 0:16:20.580
<v Speaker 3>or two bumper stickers. You either have zero or eight

0:16:20.900 --> 0:16:23.170
<v Speaker 3>for some reason. I don't know what that is. And

0:16:23.210 --> 0:16:25.050
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in a household where my dad kind

0:16:25.070 --> 0:16:27.530
<v Speaker 3>of looked down on bumper sticker people, so I've never

0:16:27.550 --> 0:16:29.670
<v Speaker 3>been a bumper sticker person. If you grew up in

0:16:29.690 --> 0:16:32.630
<v Speaker 3>a household where, absolutely, you fly your flag of what

0:16:32.670 --> 0:16:35.390
<v Speaker 3>you believe on the bumper of your car, you probably

0:16:35.430 --> 0:16:37.790
<v Speaker 3>do that as an adult, too, I guess. I don't know.

0:16:37.820 --> 0:16:40.220
<v Speaker 2>Boy, just my kids' colleges, that's the only things we've

0:16:40.390 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>ever had. Window sticker.

0:16:45.180 --> 0:16:48.740
<v Speaker 3>This bumper sticker said, billionaires are a threat.

0:16:50.860 --> 0:16:51.060
<v Speaker 1>You.

0:16:51.900 --> 0:16:53.820
<v Speaker 2>are a moron. That's funny.

0:16:53.860 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what I said to my son as we

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.420
<v Speaker 3>walked by a car. Well, there's a moron.

0:17:00.850 --> 0:17:03.770
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that nice? An America's son, a moron can afford

0:17:03.810 --> 0:17:07.250
<v Speaker 2>a car.

0:17:07.550 --> 0:17:11.209
<v Speaker 3>That tiny bumper sticker announced so much about them. Oh,

0:17:11.230 --> 0:17:14.190
<v Speaker 3>but I could guess correctly like a hundred different things

0:17:14.270 --> 0:17:14.970
<v Speaker 3>about that person.

0:17:15.430 --> 0:17:15.810
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:17:16.030 --> 0:17:16.290
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:17:16.630 --> 0:17:19.770
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you could. Based on that one bumper sticker. So,

0:17:20.270 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>conservatism is dead. In other news, rain is expected. Yeah, man,

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you look at some recent polls.

0:17:27.380 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I ain't going to like this, am I?

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>The francification of America. Put on your beret, folks, and

0:17:34.060 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 2>stay tuned. Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:35.980 --> 0:17:43.140
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.109
<v Speaker 3>Somewhere between 28 and 38, I would guess, based on

0:17:51.150 --> 0:18:00.530
<v Speaker 3>the pictures. Jensen's Chinese spy girlfriend. He's 64. She's pretty young.

0:18:00.790 --> 0:18:03.230
<v Speaker 3>Very attractive. New York Times has a lot of pictures

0:18:03.250 --> 0:18:05.369
<v Speaker 3>of them, like, walking out of bars at night and

0:18:05.410 --> 0:18:06.050
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that.

0:18:06.650 --> 0:18:07.330
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

0:18:07.730 --> 0:18:10.710
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So the guy running the most valuable company in

0:18:10.730 --> 0:18:13.100
<v Speaker 3>the world with the most exclusive chips had a Chinese

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 3>spy girlfriend, it appears. And she sent an info back to...

0:18:17.230 --> 0:18:19.429
<v Speaker 3>the communist party fantastic.

0:18:20.430 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Michael play me a clip 55 would you please this

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 2>this fellow is the president of the united states.

0:18:25.740 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Republicans win the house of representatives and the senate that's

0:18:30.660 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and remember house and senate i am going to give

0:18:34.940 --> 0:18:39.850
<v Speaker 4>all adult citizens in the united states five thousand dollars.

0:18:43.290 --> 0:18:44.550
<v Speaker 3>I hate to be negative, but I think at this

0:18:44.609 --> 0:18:46.210
<v Speaker 3>point you could say, and I will ship an elephant

0:18:46.490 --> 0:18:47.250
<v Speaker 3>to everyone's home.

0:18:47.630 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>You'll have it by Tuesday. Oh, I've always wanted an elephant.

0:18:49.470 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>There's no way the Republicans are going to take the house.

0:18:52.980 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, and nobody's going to get $ 5, 000. Putting aside the

0:18:56.940 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>ridiculousness of that proposition, he sounds slurry to me in that.

0:19:02.740 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>What are you insinuating?

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:06.699
<v Speaker 2>Age finally catching up with him.

0:19:07.590 --> 0:19:08.970
<v Speaker 3>Every once in a while he does, and I think

0:19:09.050 --> 0:19:11.989
<v Speaker 3>it's a teeth thing. He's done that for years, where

0:19:12.010 --> 0:19:14.310
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden he gets the big, he's really slurred.

0:19:14.550 --> 0:19:17.070
<v Speaker 3>I think his teeth slide looser. I don't know what happened.

0:19:17.109 --> 0:19:19.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it could be a dentures thing. I don't know. Anyway,

0:19:20.710 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll all keep an eye out for that. We will. Well, yes.

0:19:26.210 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I had to do something as a transition. Jason Riley,

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 2>great columnist for the Wall Street Journal. His column this

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>week was Hispanics ditch Trump for the same reason as

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.340
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. which is a bit of a harsh headline,

0:19:39.380 --> 0:19:42.900
<v Speaker 2>but what he's talking about is while there are some

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.670
<v Speaker 2>signs that the manner in which the ICE crackdown has

0:19:46.730 --> 0:19:51.690
<v Speaker 2>been conducted has cost votes in the Hispanic community, it's

0:19:51.750 --> 0:19:56.170
<v Speaker 2>not the factor. And this is so interesting. It goes

0:19:56.230 --> 0:19:59.290
<v Speaker 2>against so much of the popular narrative from the lame

0:19:59.470 --> 0:20:03.710
<v Speaker 2>stream media. But a Pew Research Center survey this month

0:20:03.859 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 2>asked Hispanic voters to name their top issues. Immigration ranked

0:20:06.900 --> 0:20:12.890
<v Speaker 2>fifth after the economy. health care, education, and the future

0:20:12.990 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of democracy, whatever that means. Moreover, issues around race and

0:20:17.859 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 2>ethnicity ranked second from the bottom in their list of concerns,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>which stands to reason, Jason points out, because that's not

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.900
<v Speaker 2>what attracted them to Trump in the first place. It's

0:20:30.020 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>kitchen table, how's the economy, how's my job issues. And

0:20:35.540 --> 0:20:38.580
<v Speaker 2>they went way to Trump because they perceived him as

0:20:38.660 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>a good manager of the economy. And now that they're

0:20:42.260 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>frustrated by inflation and taxes and energy prices, they're going away.

0:20:46.900 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 2>That's virtually all you need to know.

0:20:50.290 --> 0:20:52.910
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just so hard for people who are,

0:20:53.630 --> 0:20:57.169
<v Speaker 3>like the media particularly, most of whom grew up in

0:20:57.210 --> 0:21:00.909
<v Speaker 3>a family that voted D for every race, local to

0:21:00.950 --> 0:21:05.449
<v Speaker 3>president their entire lives, and now they have also. Uh, uh,

0:21:05.850 --> 0:21:08.770
<v Speaker 3>and then they have their view of whatever Republican voters are.

0:21:08.950 --> 0:21:10.770
<v Speaker 3>I think it's so hard for those people to imagine

0:21:10.810 --> 0:21:13.970
<v Speaker 3>people that like, I don't care which who's going to

0:21:13.990 --> 0:21:16.220
<v Speaker 3>make the groceries cheaper or the gas lower. I, I,

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>or I don't care at all. I don't ever think

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.980
<v Speaker 3>about it. I don't even know what you're talking about.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 3>There are lots and lots of voters like that. Well,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>you add to that, cause I think you're absolutely right. Uh,

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 3>you add to that the fact that.

0:21:26.300 --> 0:21:33.429
<v Speaker 2>Nobody is close to as just, uh, uh, fixated on, uh,

0:21:34.130 --> 0:21:38.260
<v Speaker 2>ethnic issues because hispanic isn't a race anyway nobody's as

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:44.060
<v Speaker 2>fixated on racial issues as white college miseducated uh people

0:21:44.260 --> 0:21:49.190
<v Speaker 2>particularly women the hispanic people in the survey are like

0:21:49.390 --> 0:21:51.550
<v Speaker 2>what i don't have time to worry about that crap

0:21:51.869 --> 0:21:53.890
<v Speaker 2>i'm trying to feed my kids by the way their

0:21:53.970 --> 0:21:56.730
<v Speaker 2>schools suck and what was what was the other one

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 2>our democracy seems to be really corrupt and everybody's making

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.220
<v Speaker 2>money that's what i care about not being called latinx

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.060
<v Speaker 2>or not my guess.

0:22:06.900 --> 0:22:09.609
<v Speaker 3>Would be if you're from mexico or some other corrupt

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.730
<v Speaker 3>country you really hate the sniff of corruption right when

0:22:13.750 --> 0:22:15.470
<v Speaker 3>you're in the united states they go i've seen this

0:22:15.510 --> 0:22:16.510
<v Speaker 3>before no.

0:22:16.369 --> 0:22:20.149
<v Speaker 2>It's like right it's like cubans watching socialism and communism

0:22:20.190 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>come in they are a Especially acutely aware of that.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 2>And folks from the Soviet bloc, too. Which brings us to,

0:22:27.380 --> 0:22:30.550
<v Speaker 2>gosh dang it, I don't want to be discouraging. I

0:22:30.570 --> 0:22:32.490
<v Speaker 2>don't want people to tune in and think, wow, I'm

0:22:32.650 --> 0:22:35.510
<v Speaker 2>sad now. Exhausted. Sure glad I tuned in.

0:22:36.609 --> 0:22:37.449
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no kidding.

0:22:38.310 --> 0:22:41.469
<v Speaker 2>How do I present this? I could lie. That's what

0:22:41.510 --> 0:22:46.629
<v Speaker 2>I'll do. I'll lie. Wall Street Journal had this dealio.

0:22:47.310 --> 0:22:51.109
<v Speaker 2>Conservatives and liberals agree on many of these policies. Do you, too?

0:22:51.470 --> 0:22:53.369
<v Speaker 2>Take our quiz to find out how your view of

0:22:53.410 --> 0:22:56.090
<v Speaker 2>these ideas compares with those of people in our latest survey.

0:22:56.109 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>What a good quiz. And so, yeah, I took the quiz. First,

0:23:00.020 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>they asked me, what do you most identify as? Very liberal,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.739
<v Speaker 2>somewhat liberal, moderate, somewhat conservative, or very conservative? I told them,

0:23:07.900 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>very conservative.

0:23:08.780 --> 0:23:09.780
<v Speaker 3>That's what you consider yourself?

0:23:10.859 --> 0:23:11.060
<v Speaker 2>Uh, yeah.

0:23:11.530 --> 0:23:11.670
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:11.690 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think so. At least how I define it.

0:23:14.650 --> 0:23:15.810
<v Speaker 2>But here's the.

0:23:16.109 --> 0:23:17.430
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what I consider myself.

0:23:18.990 --> 0:23:21.210
<v Speaker 2>I don't think about it that much.

0:23:21.270 --> 0:23:23.870
<v Speaker 3>I don't either. It depends on the issue. I'd rather

0:23:24.510 --> 0:23:25.929
<v Speaker 3>nail down an issue. I'll tell you where I am

0:23:25.990 --> 0:23:26.859
<v Speaker 3>on the spectrum on that one.

0:23:27.290 --> 0:23:32.670
<v Speaker 2>Well, and interestingly, that was kind of my takeaway from

0:23:33.170 --> 0:23:38.449
<v Speaker 2>this quiz. Ultimately, it defined me as... Pretty conservative or

0:23:38.510 --> 0:23:41.490
<v Speaker 2>somewhat conservative or something, and I don't know why. But

0:23:41.580 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>so let's all go through this together, folks, and we'll

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>take this on your behalf.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:46.700
<v Speaker 3>Do you support?

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:52.060
<v Speaker 2>Jack, you will be our chairman. If there's a disagreement,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.980
<v Speaker 2>you will decide. Do you support or oppose capping credit

0:23:56.020 --> 0:24:00.550
<v Speaker 2>card interest rates at 10%? No, absolutely no. That's a

0:24:00.609 --> 0:24:03.010
<v Speaker 2>horrible idea. I'm sorry. We're never going to get through

0:24:03.030 --> 0:24:06.110
<v Speaker 2>this because I have so many gripes. Here are your choices.

0:24:06.790 --> 0:24:08.929
<v Speaker 2>See if you and Katie, I'd love to hear your opinion, too.

0:24:10.810 --> 0:24:14.129
<v Speaker 2>Do you support or oppose this? It's a top priority

0:24:14.170 --> 0:24:18.270
<v Speaker 2>for me. I generally support it. I generally oppose it.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Or I find this concerning. Do they have one lower

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.219
<v Speaker 2>than that? Is there a no effing way? I have

0:24:25.300 --> 0:24:29.380
<v Speaker 2>contempt for any moron who would think this is... I'm sorry,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.050
<v Speaker 2>I used the N-word. I don't get why.

0:24:32.710 --> 0:24:33.430
<v Speaker 3>I find this.

0:24:33.369 --> 0:24:37.350
<v Speaker 2>Concerning is more than I generally oppose it.

0:24:39.230 --> 0:24:42.189
<v Speaker 3>Okay. You are, you're slicing it then, but you're right. Um,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.260
<v Speaker 3>did you just call more on the M word?

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.540
<v Speaker 2>I did. And I apologize for using it. People need

0:24:47.580 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>to learn about economics to understand it as the wonderful book,

0:24:51.020 --> 0:24:54.419
<v Speaker 2>the rift of the, the rift of the national voter, uh,

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 2>as some pronounce it, the myth of the rational voter

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:02.220
<v Speaker 2>pointed out, um, People systematically misunderstand certain aspects of economics

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>like way more than random. Oh, yeah, yeah.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I can easily see how a person would say, yeah,

0:25:06.619 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 3>they should crap that. And I think you could explain

0:25:08.940 --> 0:25:11.790
<v Speaker 3>to them quite quickly why that's a terrible idea. And

0:25:11.810 --> 0:25:15.370
<v Speaker 3>then they say, OK, I get it. But just back

0:25:15.410 --> 0:25:17.950
<v Speaker 3>on the moron thing. So you just you just didn't

0:25:17.970 --> 0:25:19.830
<v Speaker 3>want to call them a moron or as moron become

0:25:19.869 --> 0:25:21.729
<v Speaker 3>a word like retarded where we're not supposed to say

0:25:21.770 --> 0:25:22.129
<v Speaker 3>it anymore.

0:25:22.250 --> 0:25:24.909
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, no. OK. It was just me realizing,

0:25:24.950 --> 0:25:28.100
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, Joe, your premise, you jackass. is that

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm the moron here, ironically.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>He had four fingers pointing back at you.

0:25:33.220 --> 0:25:38.740
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't. Look at that. My whole premise is

0:25:38.780 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>that these attitudes are really widespread, and it's a problem.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>For instance, we're going to start the show with a

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.109
<v Speaker 2>showstopper right here. All right, so I went ahead and

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.810
<v Speaker 2>said I find this concerning. Capping the maximum interest on

0:25:54.850 --> 0:25:58.969
<v Speaker 2>credit cards is broadly popular across all ideological groups, and

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>opposition to the idea is muted. Overall, 79% of Americans

0:26:04.100 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>support this, and 15% oppose it. And there is no,

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>virtually no difference between the very liberal and the very

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 2>conservative as to opposition.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:20.170
<v Speaker 3>So that is an indicator of how we don't teach

0:26:20.290 --> 0:26:22.889
<v Speaker 3>basic economics in school at all. That's what that is.

0:26:23.460 --> 0:26:26.050
<v Speaker 2>Let's plunge on. Do you support or oppose capping child

0:26:26.109 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>care costs? Oh, my God. Overall, 74% of Americans support this.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.500
<v Speaker 3>God, is there any sort of cost thing that you

0:26:34.540 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 3>would cap that is a good idea? I can't think

0:26:36.660 --> 0:26:37.740
<v Speaker 3>of one off the top of my head.

0:26:38.150 --> 0:26:38.909
<v Speaker 2>No, not really.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:39.540
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 2>It's a very special circumstance.

0:26:41.700 --> 0:26:44.430
<v Speaker 3>It makes things more expensive. I understand you want things cheaper,

0:26:44.450 --> 0:26:46.710
<v Speaker 3>but that's not what you're going to get with this, people.

0:26:47.210 --> 0:26:50.210
<v Speaker 3>You're either going to get less apartments, which will make

0:26:50.230 --> 0:26:52.489
<v Speaker 3>the rents higher. Well, if they can't raise the rent,

0:26:52.510 --> 0:26:53.869
<v Speaker 3>they can't raise the rent. But there won't be any

0:26:53.890 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 3>apartments to get.

0:26:55.420 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. Or massive redistribution of income. I mean, if you

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 2>cap child care costs, they're going to have to be

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.940
<v Speaker 2>heavily subsidized by the government because... As I've said many times,

0:27:08.460 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you really want the low bidder caring for your baby. Really?

0:27:14.020 --> 0:27:17.300
<v Speaker 2>Let's think about this. It's very popular.

0:27:17.380 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 3>And then the credit card thing. Well, the credit card

0:27:18.980 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>companies will just stop giving out credit to people.

0:27:22.140 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you support or oppose limiting rent increases to 5%

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 2>above the rate of inflation? 65% of Americans support it.

0:27:32.609 --> 0:27:35.700
<v Speaker 3>What was that one on the child care costs like 80%?

0:27:35.700 --> 0:27:37.150
<v Speaker 2>Seventy four percent.

0:27:37.190 --> 0:27:39.390
<v Speaker 3>Three quarters. That is that is really something.

0:27:39.970 --> 0:27:40.330
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:27:40.410 --> 0:27:42.649
<v Speaker 3>This is this is all kind of the same when

0:27:42.690 --> 0:27:46.910
<v Speaker 3>I was 20. But didn't somebody come along and no

0:27:46.950 --> 0:27:48.310
<v Speaker 3>life experience or I don't know.

0:27:48.390 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, right, right. Are we are we too hip

0:27:52.260 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 2>for the room, friends? I feel like we've explained why

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.790
<v Speaker 2>price controls backfire. many times, I don't want to move

0:28:02.830 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 2>too swiftly for people who are not familiar with the concepts,

0:28:06.220 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>but why would you bring something to market unless it

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.500
<v Speaker 2>exceeds your costs by enough to make it worth going

0:28:15.580 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to the trouble? How is that? So if the government says,

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.710
<v Speaker 2>you know what? We're capping childcare costs at $ 20 an hour.

0:28:24.190 --> 0:28:24.630
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:28:25.330 --> 0:28:31.110
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Justice. You say who's bringing childcare for that rate. Well, right.

0:28:31.190 --> 0:28:32.669
<v Speaker 3>And I know as a guy who has paid for

0:28:32.690 --> 0:28:35.449
<v Speaker 3>a lot of childcare over the last five years, um,

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.980
<v Speaker 3>I pay more than that for better people. So now

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.660
<v Speaker 3>those better people are going to find something else to do,

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:45.900
<v Speaker 3>most likely. And you're going to end up with the

0:28:45.940 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>people that are only worth probably $ 15 an hour, but

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.890
<v Speaker 3>are now getting paid more because there's nobody else out there.

0:28:52.570 --> 0:28:54.710
<v Speaker 2>There's a little bit more sanity when it comes to

0:28:55.510 --> 0:28:59.690
<v Speaker 2>supporting or opposing raising the minimum wage to $ 20. Overall, 57%

0:28:59.690 --> 0:29:07.380
<v Speaker 2>of Americans support this and 39% oppose it. Interesting. So

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:08.540
<v Speaker 2>we're very conservative.

0:29:09.580 --> 0:29:10.340
<v Speaker 3>Health care.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was interesting. Do you support or oppose

0:29:14.460 --> 0:29:16.790
<v Speaker 2>banning surprise medical bills? I'm not sure why this is

0:29:16.830 --> 0:29:18.770
<v Speaker 2>on the quiz, because my understanding of the issue is

0:29:18.870 --> 0:29:22.260
<v Speaker 2>it's you go in to get your knee fixed. And

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>three weeks later, you get a bill from a guy

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you've never heard of, you never saw, who allegedly looked

0:29:27.860 --> 0:29:32.430
<v Speaker 2>at your scan or something. And they're outside your network.

0:29:32.810 --> 0:29:34.390
<v Speaker 2>And all of a sudden, you got an $ 800 bill.

0:29:34.410 --> 0:29:36.990
<v Speaker 2>You don't know what the hell it is. I don't

0:29:37.070 --> 0:29:39.910
<v Speaker 2>see that as a conservative or liberal technology.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>It's so complicated when you get to health care. We

0:29:42.260 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 3>had this conversation yesterday, Henry and I. We needed a

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.700
<v Speaker 3>doctor's appointment. And so I did urgent care, which has

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:54.930
<v Speaker 3>now become like a– Now they have urgent care all day,

0:29:55.100 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 3>every day. It used to be after hours. Now it's

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.380
<v Speaker 3>just a different hospital. They moved my doctor out of

0:30:00.420 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 3>this place to a different place, the actual doctor making

0:30:02.740 --> 0:30:04.740
<v Speaker 3>an appointment. Now it's urgent care all day, every day.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.230
<v Speaker 3>And it seems to be for poorer people to have

0:30:08.370 --> 0:30:10.430
<v Speaker 3>a place to go to the doctor, which I assume

0:30:10.490 --> 0:30:12.870
<v Speaker 3>is picked up by the taxpayer to a great extent

0:30:13.190 --> 0:30:15.010
<v Speaker 3>for people who don't have any insurance. And it's just

0:30:15.050 --> 0:30:17.350
<v Speaker 3>a different thing. And I don't even know what's going

0:30:17.470 --> 0:30:18.230
<v Speaker 3>on here at this point.

0:30:18.670 --> 0:30:21.980
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a no point. It's a walk-in doctor. Oh, my.

0:30:22.970 --> 0:30:26.430
<v Speaker 3>But it's not like the kind where they have just

0:30:26.810 --> 0:30:29.790
<v Speaker 3>prices on the board. I like those. I did one

0:30:29.810 --> 0:30:33.550
<v Speaker 3>of those in Salina, Kansas, actually, where Trump is speaking Saturday,

0:30:33.850 --> 0:30:35.630
<v Speaker 3>when my son had something. They had one of those,

0:30:36.110 --> 0:30:38.470
<v Speaker 3>whatever they call those. It was like a standalone thing.

0:30:38.870 --> 0:30:41.150
<v Speaker 3>And it just had a price, and you could decide

0:30:41.170 --> 0:30:42.890
<v Speaker 3>to do it or not. But this is like the

0:30:42.950 --> 0:30:46.700
<v Speaker 3>whole complicated, you don't get billed, goes through insurance or

0:30:46.780 --> 0:30:51.370
<v Speaker 3>doesn't or something. It's all such a mess. Uh, getting

0:30:51.410 --> 0:30:52.850
<v Speaker 3>back to the thread of the thing. Oh, we don't

0:30:52.910 --> 0:30:53.430
<v Speaker 3>have much time.

0:30:53.450 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you support or oppose capping prescription drug prices? 87%

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.620
<v Speaker 2>of Americans support this, uh, nevermind making it worth it

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.580
<v Speaker 2>to innovate new treatments and that sort of thing. Don't

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>really have time to get into that. Um, do you

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:11.180
<v Speaker 2>support or oppose requiring insurance companies to cover services and

0:31:11.220 --> 0:31:16.340
<v Speaker 2>medications prescribed by your doctor? Uh, 88% of Americans, uh,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>support this. Um, It's going to drive the insurance companies

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>out of business, though, because your doctor, wanting to avoid

0:31:23.420 --> 0:31:27.590
<v Speaker 2>a suit for malpractice, will say, all right, you got

0:31:27.630 --> 0:31:29.810
<v Speaker 2>a sore throat? Go get an x-ray, I guess.

0:31:30.990 --> 0:31:32.770
<v Speaker 3>I have trouble weighing in on anything when you get

0:31:32.790 --> 0:31:34.910
<v Speaker 3>into the medical world. As our friend Craig has told

0:31:34.970 --> 0:31:38.219
<v Speaker 3>us over and over, it's already practically socialized medicine. We

0:31:38.260 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 3>have so much government intervention and wealth redistribution. Right.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Fifty-nine percent of Americans support passing Medicare for all.

0:31:47.190 --> 0:31:50.230
<v Speaker 2>You know, immigration, we're a much more conservative country. But

0:31:50.270 --> 0:31:54.450
<v Speaker 2>in terms of economics, the real reasons, well, together with immigration,

0:31:54.490 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 2>that France became the horrifying bankrupt mess that it is,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority of Americans want to become more like France.

0:32:04.020 --> 0:32:07.300
<v Speaker 3>So if you're a kind of regular guy, regular woman,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.580
<v Speaker 3>but you've saved up some money, you've done pretty well

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 3>in life, Blue Collar Dollar is for you. Our friends

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.180
<v Speaker 3>at Blue Collar Dollar, great name for a great service

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 3>for anyone looking for down-to-earth, straight talk about financial planning.

0:32:19.060 --> 0:32:22.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just not the jet set that is worried

0:32:22.090 --> 0:32:26.180
<v Speaker 2>about inflation, taxes, stock market swings, and government policy. We

0:32:26.340 --> 0:32:27.660
<v Speaker 2>all are. Why don't you make the call to Blue

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Collar Dollar, have a real conversation about your financial future

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>without the pretension?

0:32:31.420 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 3>A couple of minutes is all it takes, and it's

0:32:33.790 --> 0:32:37.410
<v Speaker 3>complimentary if you've saved $ 250, 000 or more. There's no obligation

0:32:37.430 --> 0:32:38.230
<v Speaker 3>at all to give them a call.

0:32:39.030 --> 0:32:39.830
<v Speaker 2>Here's how you do it.

0:32:39.850 --> 0:32:40.290
<v Speaker 3>It's easy.

0:32:40.330 --> 0:32:42.270
<v Speaker 2>Simply dial pound 250 on your cell phone and at

0:32:42.290 --> 0:32:45.210
<v Speaker 2>the prompt say Blue Collar Dollar. Dial pound 250, then

0:32:45.250 --> 0:32:47.190
<v Speaker 2>say Blue Collar Dollar. This is just to hear about

0:32:47.210 --> 0:32:49.300
<v Speaker 2>the services and to explore it a little further. You're

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>not signing up for anything. Take control of your financial future, friends.

0:32:52.660 --> 0:32:55.900
<v Speaker 2>Blue Collar Dollar. Dial pound 250, say Blue Collar Dollar.

0:32:56.130 --> 0:32:57.910
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty are not clients of Talon. They are

0:32:57.950 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>paid endorsers and receive compensation for this endorsement, which creates

0:33:00.620 --> 0:33:03.500
<v Speaker 1>a financial incentive to promote Talon. Advisory services are offered

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>through Talon, LLC, and SEC-registered investment advisor. Learn more at bluecollardollar.com.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:18.190
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:33:20.170 --> 0:33:22.350
<v Speaker 5>Well, what's harder and harder and harder as time goes

0:33:22.510 --> 0:33:25.110
<v Speaker 5>on is getting paid for your work. You know, I

0:33:25.170 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 5>used to make money for writing songs but also for

0:33:28.980 --> 0:33:32.460
<v Speaker 5>selling records and you don't sell records anymore so what

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.980
<v Speaker 5>you might make from selling records is is gone in

0:33:36.060 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 5>all the times i've been streamed on youtube or any

0:33:38.820 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 5>of those formats i've never received anything kind of hard

0:33:43.420 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 5>getting paid for what it is that you create you

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 5>can have a hit song back in the day you'd

0:33:48.100 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 5>make a fortune.

0:33:49.780 --> 0:33:52.060
<v Speaker 3>That's Vince Gill, who's had a lot of hit songs

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.100
<v Speaker 3>back in the day when, yeah, you have a hit

0:33:54.180 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 3>album with four or five big songs on it. You're

0:33:56.820 --> 0:34:00.130
<v Speaker 3>set for life. You don't ever have to work again.

0:34:01.030 --> 0:34:06.170
<v Speaker 3>One album, three, four big hits, country music, absolutely. Nothing now.

0:34:06.210 --> 0:34:09.129
<v Speaker 3>You don't make a freaking cent. Well, you make a cent,

0:34:09.190 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 3>but not worth even enough to even mention.

0:34:11.900 --> 0:34:13.260
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that amazing?

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:18.290
<v Speaker 3>What a huge change in a major industry. There's all

0:34:18.370 --> 0:34:21.170
<v Speaker 3>kinds of people that have been living the lifestyles of

0:34:21.190 --> 0:34:24.469
<v Speaker 3>the rich and famous from a couple of hits back

0:34:24.510 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 3>in the day that if that happened now, they'd be

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:29.540
<v Speaker 3>working at the grocery store and it'd be a trivia question.

0:34:30.150 --> 0:34:31.989
<v Speaker 2>I think that occasionally when I see, you know, one

0:34:32.010 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite YouTube stars interviewing musicians, some rock royalty, or,

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, somebody whose name you know, oh, it turns

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.500
<v Speaker 2>out he wrote that tune, that tune, and they're living

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the life of Riley. Today, they would be working part-time

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>at the grocery store to make ends meet, and they're

0:34:49.580 --> 0:34:50.500
<v Speaker 2>rock royalty.

0:34:51.340 --> 0:34:54.070
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they wouldn't be wearing the cool, I'm a former

0:34:54.110 --> 0:34:56.810
<v Speaker 3>rock and roll star outfit. I still live in a

0:34:56.830 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 3>really big house and fly private because of these hit

0:35:00.820 --> 0:35:03.340
<v Speaker 3>songs I had. No, you'd be wearing khakis and comfortable

0:35:03.380 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 3>shoes because you're delivering Amazon packages.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yeah.

0:35:06.739 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:06.940 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>It is quite the change.

0:35:07.820 --> 0:35:09.980
<v Speaker 3>It is wild that that happened in such a short

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>amount of time. I don't know. I don't know what

0:35:14.219 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do about it. And I was going

0:35:15.540 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 3>to transition that into the economic news that came out today.

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.980
<v Speaker 3>The U.S. economy accelerated at its fastest rate in a year, 3.4% growth.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 3>This is good news for Trump and the Republicans on

0:35:25.820 --> 0:35:28.819
<v Speaker 3>the campaign trail. You look at the graph going back

0:35:28.860 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 3>to 2021, and it's a bar graph, and it's a

0:35:31.180 --> 0:35:35.070
<v Speaker 3>dang good quarter looking back over the last several years,

0:35:35.190 --> 0:35:40.030
<v Speaker 3>but driven in large part by all the AI stuff,

0:35:41.250 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>which is either real or it's not. Now, as we

0:35:45.060 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>talked about last week, AI is for real. There could

0:35:49.700 --> 0:35:51.979
<v Speaker 3>be a giant crash, and it doesn't mean AI isn't real.

0:35:52.020 --> 0:35:54.980
<v Speaker 3>My super genius economic friend made this point to me

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.990
<v Speaker 3>a couple weeks ago about the dot-com crash. Yeah, all

0:35:58.010 --> 0:36:00.970
<v Speaker 3>those ridiculous websites that hadn't made any money, they crashed

0:36:00.989 --> 0:36:04.629
<v Speaker 3>and disappeared. The Internet didn't—it wasn't that the Internet wasn't

0:36:04.670 --> 0:36:05.250
<v Speaker 3>a big thing.

0:36:05.270 --> 0:36:06.130
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:06.230 --> 0:36:07.569
<v Speaker 3>It was the biggest thing ever.

0:36:08.450 --> 0:36:12.569
<v Speaker 2>Right. And many, many websites are very profitable. You've heard

0:36:12.610 --> 0:36:14.370
<v Speaker 2>of them. Right.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.660
<v Speaker 3>And AI, there could be a giant AI crash in

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.049
<v Speaker 3>the stock market because of the incestuous chip buying and

0:36:22.090 --> 0:36:23.950
<v Speaker 3>all that sort of stuff. But it doesn't mean AI

0:36:24.010 --> 0:36:25.350
<v Speaker 3>ain't a really, really big thing.

0:36:26.530 --> 0:36:30.290
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. I wish I had the slightest idea.

0:36:30.430 --> 0:36:32.850
<v Speaker 3>No, nobody does. Stock market grew pretty well, and consumer

0:36:32.870 --> 0:36:36.110
<v Speaker 3>spending continues to be strong, driving up the stock market.

0:36:37.130 --> 0:36:39.660
<v Speaker 3>All this talk about affordability and being broke, and that's

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the number one issue in the country, but we're still

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:42.460
<v Speaker 3>spending money?

0:36:45.500 --> 0:36:48.990
<v Speaker 2>I am so mystified by the current economy. I think

0:36:49.050 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 2>everybody is.

0:36:51.150 --> 0:36:51.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:36:51.930 --> 0:36:55.549
<v Speaker 2>So, Abdul, I'll say it is a jihadist. Breaking news.

0:36:55.590 --> 0:36:58.189
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that next hour, among other things. Stick

0:36:58.230 --> 0:36:59.469
<v Speaker 2>around or grab the podcast.

0:36:59.950 --> 0:37:01.010
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.