WEBVTT - I'm Feeling Pretty Thrivey

0:00:09.220 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:13.100 --> 0:00:15.090
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:15.140 --> 0:00:17.349
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:17.530 --> 0:00:18.890
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:19.070 --> 0:00:24.579
<v Speaker 4>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:30.690 --> 0:00:35.690
<v Speaker 3>So in light of the Shane Gillis controversial Saturday Night

0:00:35.750 --> 0:00:39.630
<v Speaker 3>Live monologue in which he hatefully attacked women and did

0:00:39.770 --> 0:00:42.810
<v Speaker 3>so much damage across the country to the fairer sex.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Here's Jimmy Kimmel commenting on Trump's new White House press secretary.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.460
<v Speaker 5>I want to introduce you to the new kid.

0:00:49.909 --> 0:00:50.659
<v Speaker 3>In Trump land.

0:00:50.700 --> 0:00:53.980
<v Speaker 5>It was the first day of kindergarten for the new

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 5>White House press secretary, Katie Zachariah. In order to keep

0:00:57.460 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 5>him awake and interested, every six months they bring in

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.580
<v Speaker 5>a new fawning blonde adult.

0:01:02.220 --> 0:01:03.590
<v Speaker 3>To add to the rotation.

0:01:04.430 --> 0:01:06.610
<v Speaker 5>Things did not get off to a great start for

0:01:06.790 --> 0:01:10.369
<v Speaker 5>Malibu Katie today. Her first briefing was brief. It was

0:01:10.430 --> 0:01:12.790
<v Speaker 5>only 14 minutes long, but even in that short time,

0:01:12.810 --> 0:01:15.410
<v Speaker 5>she accomplished exactly what she was brought in to do,

0:01:15.690 --> 0:01:18.459
<v Speaker 5>which is slobber a whole tube of lip gloss all

0:01:18.540 --> 0:01:20.290
<v Speaker 5>over the president's Behind.

0:01:20.830 --> 0:01:22.650
<v Speaker 3>And really, that's all it takes nowadays.

0:01:23.330 --> 0:01:25.590
<v Speaker 5>All it takes is that and dressing like you're about

0:01:25.630 --> 0:01:28.670
<v Speaker 5>to announce pre-boarding on a Delta Airlines flight.

0:01:29.860 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Commenting on a woman's appearance. Insulting her intelligence over and

0:01:34.459 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>over again.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:35.100
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:01:35.300 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God. Calling her a prostitute for the president. Yes. Man,

0:01:39.540 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I am. So since Saturday, which I watched the Shane

0:01:43.819 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Gillis thing live. and then played it for my kids,

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.540
<v Speaker 3>and I didn't even consider that this would turn into

0:01:51.580 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a controversy. Has it really? That's how it landed with me.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.580
<v Speaker 3>But since it has become a controversy and the hateful, misogynistic, well,

0:02:02.620 --> 0:02:04.650
<v Speaker 3>they talked about it on The View for an hour yesterday.

0:02:04.670 --> 0:02:07.090
<v Speaker 3>It's the number one daytime TV show. Oh, my God.

0:02:07.110 --> 0:02:09.630
<v Speaker 3>About how awful it was and how hurtful it was.

0:02:10.810 --> 0:02:13.450
<v Speaker 3>So many people have brought up the various Saturday Night

0:02:13.530 --> 0:02:19.089
<v Speaker 3>Live bits where they insult... Every white male in America

0:02:19.270 --> 0:02:21.989
<v Speaker 3>or every Republican voter or everyone in the South, whatever,

0:02:22.030 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 3>and a perfectly comfortable calling you a Nazi, a racist, whatever.

0:02:29.300 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's just funny because the crowd laughs like crazy.

0:02:32.419 --> 0:02:34.780
<v Speaker 3>But the saying women dress like whores at the gym,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.530
<v Speaker 3>which many women do, is somehow out of bounds, which,

0:02:38.710 --> 0:02:38.870
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:02:39.850 --> 0:02:44.149
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, it's the permanently aggrieved set. It's the always

0:02:44.270 --> 0:02:45.130
<v Speaker 4>offended set.

0:02:45.230 --> 0:02:46.170
<v Speaker 3>Shut up. I don't care.

0:02:46.230 --> 0:02:49.650
<v Speaker 4>That's the only proper response to these people. Please, it's

0:02:49.710 --> 0:02:50.809
<v Speaker 4>a power grab.

0:02:51.230 --> 0:02:53.130
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to... You're a bad person. You have to

0:02:53.169 --> 0:02:53.809
<v Speaker 3>be quiet now.

0:02:53.910 --> 0:02:55.970
<v Speaker 4>That's what every single message is.

0:02:56.350 --> 0:02:58.430
<v Speaker 3>Shane Gillis is on podcasts all the time. I don't

0:02:58.450 --> 0:03:00.890
<v Speaker 3>know if he's done one since Saturday. I'd like to

0:03:00.910 --> 0:03:03.330
<v Speaker 3>know what he thinks of this. I would guess he's

0:03:03.370 --> 0:03:06.450
<v Speaker 3>not digging it, really, just because he tries to be

0:03:06.630 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>not really political. He doesn't want to be... And why

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.730
<v Speaker 3>would you want to be coded one way or the other?

0:03:13.770 --> 0:03:16.270
<v Speaker 3>But he certainly doesn't want to get coded Republican. And

0:03:16.310 --> 0:03:17.989
<v Speaker 3>then all of a sudden, oh, you're going to see

0:03:18.010 --> 0:03:19.910
<v Speaker 3>the Trump comic, you know, that sort of thing, how

0:03:19.970 --> 0:03:22.530
<v Speaker 3>everybody puts you in a camp and then that's where

0:03:22.570 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>you are for the rest of your life.

0:03:24.540 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I would counsel Mr. Gillis as if he

0:03:26.900 --> 0:03:30.350
<v Speaker 4>needs my counsel. You can't win with these people. So

0:03:30.410 --> 0:03:33.210
<v Speaker 4>don't adjust what you're doing one iota. They're going to

0:03:33.270 --> 0:03:36.230
<v Speaker 4>label you no matter what you do. Again, it's an

0:03:36.330 --> 0:03:37.550
<v Speaker 4>effort to silence.

0:03:37.630 --> 0:03:40.030
<v Speaker 3>That's what all of it is. I like one of

0:03:40.070 --> 0:03:42.030
<v Speaker 3>his jokes where he says, I know what I look like.

0:03:42.310 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I know what I look like. I know my body

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>type screams. Let's wait until the body cam video comes out. See,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>that's the thing.

0:03:50.900 --> 0:03:52.460
<v Speaker 4>That's the brilliant part of a lot of those jokes

0:03:52.500 --> 0:03:54.830
<v Speaker 4>was he always ended up being the butt of the joke.

0:03:55.010 --> 0:03:55.130
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.050
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm a fool, I'm flabby, I am actually

0:03:59.350 --> 0:04:02.170
<v Speaker 4>gaping at the women at the gym, whatever. He was always,

0:04:02.290 --> 0:04:05.350
<v Speaker 4>but see, that proves it. You can't win with these people.

0:04:05.650 --> 0:04:09.940
<v Speaker 4>They're professional scolds. They're 24-7 scolds.

0:04:10.090 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Screw them. Just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right.

0:04:12.580 --> 0:04:14.590
<v Speaker 3>And in this case, they're not. They're idiots. Shut up.

0:04:14.780 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't care. Shut up. I don't care. That's the response.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if a lot of the podcasts who have

0:04:20.900 --> 0:04:22.790
<v Speaker 3>him on all the time are all of a sudden

0:04:22.810 --> 0:04:24.700
<v Speaker 3>going to think, ah, we better not have Shane Gillis on.

0:04:27.620 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of our crowd thinks he's a right-winger misogynist. Yeah,

0:04:33.180 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>I wonder. I wonder.

0:04:34.740 --> 0:04:39.730
<v Speaker 4>I'm so not in that world that the so-called controversy

0:04:39.750 --> 0:04:42.130
<v Speaker 4>to me sounds like, please, where is it?

0:04:43.130 --> 0:04:47.390
<v Speaker 3>Stop it. I don't know. I'm just tired of these people.

0:04:47.490 --> 0:04:50.690
<v Speaker 3>I know their game. As I've said, but you know

0:04:50.730 --> 0:04:53.669
<v Speaker 3>how these things get coded like masks or vaccines or

0:04:53.770 --> 0:04:57.469
<v Speaker 3>people or sports. But there's nothing you can do about it.

0:04:58.810 --> 0:05:01.450
<v Speaker 3>Because the scolds will scold scolds going to scold. That's

0:05:01.470 --> 0:05:03.990
<v Speaker 3>what I say. Oh, speaking of scolding. Yeah.

0:05:04.089 --> 0:05:09.180
<v Speaker 4>Katie Zachariah's debut was a little rough. She sounded really nervous.

0:05:09.210 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 4>She misspoke a couple of times. But number one, it's

0:05:11.980 --> 0:05:14.659
<v Speaker 4>her first day in an incredibly high pressure.

0:05:14.700 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Where's her law degree?

0:05:16.390 --> 0:05:19.430
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, that's the other thing. She graduated from Pepperdine

0:05:19.470 --> 0:05:21.620
<v Speaker 4>Law but did not pass the bar. She only took

0:05:21.740 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 4>one hack at it. Then she and her husband got

0:05:23.900 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>married and moved to China and decided not to come back.

0:05:26.980 --> 0:05:32.390
<v Speaker 4>And she's called herself a lawyer at times. I don't

0:05:32.430 --> 0:05:33.290
<v Speaker 4>really care.

0:05:33.310 --> 0:05:37.990
<v Speaker 3>Well, Trump thought she was a lawyer because he was

0:05:38.130 --> 0:05:41.100
<v Speaker 3>asked the– So the press got on this fast. We

0:05:41.140 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>should have gotten the clip. We got on this fast,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>like moments after her first appearance the other day. Trump

0:05:46.500 --> 0:05:49.250
<v Speaker 3>was asked on the rope line, hey, where where did

0:05:49.290 --> 0:05:50.990
<v Speaker 3>she get her? Where did she pass the bar? What

0:05:51.029 --> 0:05:52.570
<v Speaker 3>state she passed the bar? And Trump turns to me, said,

0:05:52.610 --> 0:05:53.990
<v Speaker 3>where did you pass the bar? They want to know.

0:05:54.790 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 3>And she said something about China that made no sense.

0:05:58.010 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>After I went to China. Yeah. Which is not an answer.

0:06:02.029 --> 0:06:04.190
<v Speaker 3>to where did you pass the bar and trump just

0:06:04.210 --> 0:06:06.950
<v Speaker 3>said after she went to china so but then i'll

0:06:06.970 --> 0:06:09.070
<v Speaker 3>bet he was thinking because he knows how these things

0:06:09.089 --> 0:06:13.070
<v Speaker 3>work i bet he thought uh-oh what's going on here it's.

0:06:12.970 --> 0:06:14.970
<v Speaker 4>Not a good look absolutely not a good you don't

0:06:15.010 --> 0:06:16.370
<v Speaker 4>have to be a lawyer to be a white house

0:06:16.390 --> 0:06:20.580
<v Speaker 4>press secretary i'm thinking probably most of them not hardly

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>any of them ever have been i don't know if

0:06:22.020 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 4>any of them have ever been a lawyer you don't

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.500
<v Speaker 4>need to be a lawyer you usually come out of

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.210
<v Speaker 4>the media Has nothing to.

0:06:27.190 --> 0:06:27.750
<v Speaker 3>Do with the job.

0:06:27.810 --> 0:06:29.630
<v Speaker 4>It's just, again, it's not a great look if you're

0:06:29.650 --> 0:06:31.390
<v Speaker 4>calling yourself a lawyer for years and years and you

0:06:31.420 --> 0:06:32.150
<v Speaker 4>never pass the bar.

0:06:32.500 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And one of her old professors, just to stand up

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 3>for the lovely, what's her name? I haven't even memorized

0:06:37.700 --> 0:06:42.020
<v Speaker 3>her name yet. One of her old professors at Pepperdine said,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.980
<v Speaker 3>all I remember about her is she was a good student.

0:06:44.020 --> 0:06:46.860
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, many great legal minds never took

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.990
<v Speaker 3>the bar. Right. Including judges.

0:06:49.170 --> 0:06:49.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:49.830 --> 0:06:51.470
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to be a great legal mind to

0:06:51.510 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 3>be the White House press secretary, by the way. We're

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.339
<v Speaker 3>we're like jumping to some sort of thing that doesn't exist.

0:06:56.779 --> 0:06:56.940
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:06:56.980 --> 0:06:57.340
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:57.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 4>And the other thing was she was juggling her family's

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>move to Washington, had less than 24 hours to prepare.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 4>She got her briefing materials that morning, according to a

0:07:07.420 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 4>senior administration official. And several former press secretaries have come

0:07:12.380 --> 0:07:13.020
<v Speaker 4>out and said.

0:07:13.860 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Why did they throw her out there on her first day?

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:17.790
<v Speaker 3>You got to ease into that job.

0:07:17.830 --> 0:07:21.950
<v Speaker 4>That's a hard job. Well, but here's here's my here's

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.420
<v Speaker 4>my go ahead.

0:07:23.660 --> 0:07:27.060
<v Speaker 3>You've got a well. I'm not looking for scandal around this.

0:07:27.260 --> 0:07:30.179
<v Speaker 3>I don't really care. But according to the Wall Street Journal,

0:07:30.380 --> 0:07:33.990
<v Speaker 3>the bigger story is, did she pass herself off as

0:07:34.030 --> 0:07:37.350
<v Speaker 3>an attorney in China? It would seem that the Chinese

0:07:37.530 --> 0:07:40.710
<v Speaker 3>thought she was an attorney. You don't need to have

0:07:40.790 --> 0:07:43.970
<v Speaker 3>a U.S. pass the bar to do this in China

0:07:43.990 --> 0:07:46.650
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. But she may have been portraying herself. So

0:07:46.730 --> 0:07:51.540
<v Speaker 3>Mark Halpern wrote today, the whole... Did she pass the

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 3>bar at Pepperdine is not a story. Some of this

0:07:53.860 --> 0:07:57.140
<v Speaker 3>other stuff might turn into a story. So keep your

0:07:57.220 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>eye on that, I guess. That's funny. I didn't at all.

0:07:59.420 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 4>I didn't really take that from the journal article. But anyway,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.900
<v Speaker 4>what I was going to say is this just illustrates

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.730
<v Speaker 4>the the obsession, the self-obsession in Washington, D.C. Why are

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:16.110
<v Speaker 4>we all talking about this? The person who walks out. says, yeah,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:21.530
<v Speaker 4>the president's new agriculture policy is expected to bring more soybeans, blah, blah, blah.

0:08:21.750 --> 0:08:22.550
<v Speaker 3>What does that have to do?

0:08:22.790 --> 0:08:25.030
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you had to be such a politics junkie

0:08:25.450 --> 0:08:28.770
<v Speaker 4>not terribly long ago to have any clue who Ari

0:08:28.870 --> 0:08:32.490
<v Speaker 4>Fleischer was or any of the many folks whose names

0:08:32.550 --> 0:08:34.890
<v Speaker 4>don't leap to mind for the reasons I'm describing.

0:08:34.990 --> 0:08:38.130
<v Speaker 3>You're 100% right, and I retract everything I said and

0:08:38.170 --> 0:08:42.030
<v Speaker 3>wish I hadn't brought it up because who freaking cares? Yeah, okay. Well,

0:08:42.050 --> 0:08:44.230
<v Speaker 3>that was a very long segment that was intended to

0:08:44.270 --> 0:08:48.010
<v Speaker 3>be Who cares about this story? And I ruined it.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.220
<v Speaker 3>And I take full responsibility.

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.620
<v Speaker 3>I take 85% responsibility. Wow. I'm going to leave 15%

0:08:55.620 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of responsibility on the table for anybody who wants to

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>grab it.

0:08:58.980 --> 0:09:01.950
<v Speaker 4>Michael, if you could transcribe that, print that out. Michael

0:09:01.970 --> 0:09:03.420
<v Speaker 4>took the 15%.

0:09:03.420 --> 0:09:03.730
<v Speaker 3>And Mr.

0:09:03.780 --> 0:09:08.710
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong signed that statement at the next break. Talked about

0:09:08.750 --> 0:09:14.870
<v Speaker 4>this briefly last hour. San Francisco Playground. There's probably human

0:09:14.929 --> 0:09:18.030
<v Speaker 4>feces all over the place. That's gotten worse in the Tenderloin,

0:09:18.330 --> 0:09:20.390
<v Speaker 4>according to a new report. But we're not here to

0:09:20.410 --> 0:09:20.730
<v Speaker 4>talk about poop.

0:09:20.770 --> 0:09:21.810
<v Speaker 3>That's not possible.

0:09:22.270 --> 0:09:22.790
<v Speaker 2>It is possible.

0:09:23.030 --> 0:09:25.670
<v Speaker 3>To get worse? Where there's a will, there's a way, Jack.

0:09:26.050 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 3>How could it be worse?

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.380
<v Speaker 4>At the Bums and Junkies meeting, they said, look, folks,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 4>we're doing a good job of pooping in the streets.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:41.699
<v Speaker 3>But not good enough. Right? So San Francisco Playground, Stranger....

0:09:42.210 --> 0:09:46.150
<v Speaker 4>Wanders up and chatting with an open ai employee who

0:09:46.210 --> 0:09:49.350
<v Speaker 4>is there with their child stranger regularly shows up with

0:09:49.370 --> 0:09:52.370
<v Speaker 4>the child and makes small talk and one thing leads

0:09:52.410 --> 0:09:55.569
<v Speaker 4>to another starts asking the open ai employee about their

0:09:55.630 --> 0:09:58.830
<v Speaker 4>work and turns out stranger was a spy one of

0:09:59.090 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 4>several scenarios employees of ai companies have been presented with

0:10:03.260 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 4>in attempts to raise their vigilance against attempts to steal

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.059
<v Speaker 4>corporate secrets in training sessions open ai has warned employees

0:10:11.100 --> 0:10:15.189
<v Speaker 4>that outsiders including competitors and state-sponsored actors could try to

0:10:15.210 --> 0:10:19.010
<v Speaker 4>get access to company information and company leaders are teaching

0:10:19.050 --> 0:10:22.350
<v Speaker 4>them might be people offering money, people overhearing you in

0:10:22.390 --> 0:10:26.870
<v Speaker 4>cafes listening in, or even trying to seduce open AI employees,

0:10:26.910 --> 0:10:28.490
<v Speaker 4>the old fang-fang treatment.

0:10:28.510 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Computer geeks. Yeah, yeah. Some hottie comes on to a

0:10:32.380 --> 0:10:33.940
<v Speaker 3>computer geek, you got him right where you want him.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Probably not super sexually experienced. Anyway. Although you can get

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 3>a fair number of chicks if you're worth $ 150 million,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of them are.

0:10:47.260 --> 0:10:47.900
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Wow.

0:10:47.940 --> 0:10:52.300
<v Speaker 4>It sounds to me like you're suggesting that women will

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.210
<v Speaker 4>alter their standards based on a man's finances.

0:10:55.790 --> 0:10:56.670
<v Speaker 3>That's shocking.

0:10:57.510 --> 0:11:00.890
<v Speaker 4>Here's a financial story worth taking a look at. The

0:11:00.910 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 4>housing market, the crazy kind of constipated housing market is

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.030
<v Speaker 4>about to loosen up.

0:11:08.650 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Ew. I so regret that metaphor. Why did you need to?

0:11:12.110 --> 0:11:14.170
<v Speaker 3>I really do. Why did you need to turn? Yeah, Katie,

0:11:14.250 --> 0:11:16.730
<v Speaker 3>I agree. Hey, wipe that look on your face, sister.

0:11:17.220 --> 0:11:21.020
<v Speaker 6>I miss who I was before you said that.

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Why take an economic story and turn it toilet related?

0:11:24.059 --> 0:11:27.340
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand that. It was stopped up. The housing

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.660
<v Speaker 3>market's not moving. It's not getting better. It's off the

0:11:29.700 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>top of my head. I just big shovel digging hole.

0:11:34.510 --> 0:11:38.589
<v Speaker 4>But will the laxative of lower rates.

0:11:39.929 --> 0:11:43.589
<v Speaker 3>Stop him? All right. All right. Here's the actual story.

0:11:43.710 --> 0:11:46.449
<v Speaker 3>All right. I feel like.

0:11:48.330 --> 0:11:51.430
<v Speaker 4>I feel like perhaps the other side of the break

0:11:51.490 --> 0:11:54.660
<v Speaker 4>is the time to actually talk about this. Very interesting

0:11:54.700 --> 0:11:57.380
<v Speaker 4>story about the housing markets. We are all homed, are

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.510
<v Speaker 4>we not? The housing market matters to all of us.

0:11:59.540 --> 0:12:01.059
<v Speaker 4>We'll have that for you momentarily.

0:12:02.860 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>All right. Speaking of finances, we got something to tell

0:12:04.900 --> 0:12:08.170
<v Speaker 3>you about with Blue Collar Dollar. This is for anybody

0:12:08.309 --> 0:12:11.270
<v Speaker 3>out there is making a living doing regular work, regular

0:12:11.290 --> 0:12:14.189
<v Speaker 3>guy stuff and doesn't like fancy stuff. And a lot

0:12:14.210 --> 0:12:17.020
<v Speaker 3>of the investment stuff you hear about, it just doesn't

0:12:17.059 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>seem like they understand your crowd. Well, Blue Collar Dollar does.

0:12:21.140 --> 0:12:24.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're talking down to earth talk for folks from

0:12:24.580 --> 0:12:28.330
<v Speaker 4>folks who value your time about your retirement, your financial plans.

0:12:28.780 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 4>They want to do a free consultation with you. It's

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.420
<v Speaker 4>complimentary if you've saved 250 grand or more. No obligation

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:35.059
<v Speaker 4>at all.

0:12:35.140 --> 0:12:36.620
<v Speaker 3>It just takes a couple of minutes and they make

0:12:36.660 --> 0:12:38.830
<v Speaker 3>it super easy. Dial pound 250 on your cell phone

0:12:38.850 --> 0:12:42.010
<v Speaker 3>and at the prompt say blue collar dollar. It's pound 250.

0:12:42.010 --> 0:12:43.210
<v Speaker 3>Then say blue collar dollar.

0:12:43.630 --> 0:12:43.790
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:12:43.830 --> 0:12:47.390
<v Speaker 4>Take control of your financial future. Call blue collar dollar

0:12:47.490 --> 0:12:50.850
<v Speaker 4>pound 250. Get ready to say blue collar dollar.

0:12:51.230 --> 0:12:53.010
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty are not clients of Talon. They are

0:12:53.030 --> 0:12:55.670
<v Speaker 1>paid endorsers and receive compensation for this endorsement, which creates

0:12:55.690 --> 0:12:58.589
<v Speaker 1>a financial incentive to promote Talon. Advisory services are offered

0:12:58.610 --> 0:13:03.030
<v Speaker 1>through Talon, LLC, and SEC-registered investment advisor. Learn more at bluecollardollar.com.

0:13:04.850 --> 0:13:16.620
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:18.940 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 7>President Trump is expressing doubts about live streaming the execution

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 7>of the Fort Hood shooter, who is, after all, in

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 7>a wheelchair. I mean, the least they can do is

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 7>give him a head start.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there you go. We have an update on that story.

0:13:36.500 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to a podcast yesterday where they were

0:13:38.460 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about this, the televising, the execution. The guy is

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.979
<v Speaker 3>in a wheelchair, paralyzed because of the, did he get shot? Yeah.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:48.500
<v Speaker 3>Too bad he didn't die at the time would have

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.740
<v Speaker 3>saved us all this trouble. But anyway, how do you

0:13:51.780 --> 0:13:54.460
<v Speaker 3>do that in a way that doesn't look extra gruesome?

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.370
<v Speaker 3>Do you leave him in a wheelchair and execute a

0:13:57.410 --> 0:13:59.690
<v Speaker 3>guy sitting in a wheelchair? Do some people come out

0:13:59.730 --> 0:14:01.630
<v Speaker 3>and lift him out of the wheelchair since he can't

0:14:01.690 --> 0:14:04.390
<v Speaker 3>walk on his own and like set him in a chair?

0:14:04.450 --> 0:14:06.970
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't look good either. Anyway, none of that matters.

0:14:07.330 --> 0:14:09.590
<v Speaker 3>As Donald Trump has just announced, this is breaking news.

0:14:09.929 --> 0:14:13.189
<v Speaker 3>The execution of the Fort Hood terrorist Nadal Hassan will

0:14:13.230 --> 0:14:18.429
<v Speaker 3>not be live streamed. Will not. Be watchable. Right, right. Well,

0:14:18.500 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>it was a ridiculous idea, and it was never going

0:14:20.860 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to happen. So now it's official. But that is, you've

0:14:22.780 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>got to admit, that is a visual nightmare, kind of. No,

0:14:27.900 --> 0:14:29.420
<v Speaker 3>it could be stage managed. You don't think so? How

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 3>would you do it? FDR got away with it for

0:14:30.900 --> 0:14:35.570
<v Speaker 3>an entire administration or two. Stage managed. You lift him

0:14:35.620 --> 0:14:37.150
<v Speaker 3>out of it, put him in the chair before you

0:14:37.170 --> 0:14:39.250
<v Speaker 3>go to the live stream? Exactly. Okay.

0:14:39.270 --> 0:14:40.030
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:14:40.390 --> 0:14:42.310
<v Speaker 3>Mm-hmm. All right.

0:14:42.890 --> 0:14:45.770
<v Speaker 4>So back to the housing market.

0:14:45.790 --> 0:14:51.730
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting right now. The constipated housing market? That's it. Yep.

0:14:51.790 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>That's the one. The interest rates are going to loosen

0:14:54.900 --> 0:15:00.020
<v Speaker 3>things up so much I'm going to need a diaper. Oh, okay. Wow. Wow, Katie.

0:15:00.140 --> 0:15:02.300
<v Speaker 3>Now who's the bad guy? I think he's out of

0:15:02.340 --> 0:15:04.700
<v Speaker 3>control today. Are you all right?

0:15:06.340 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:15:06.540 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I thought we got past that.

0:15:08.380 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. You've got like a you're a maniac. So the

0:15:14.220 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 4>housing market's weird. It's long been a hobby of mine

0:15:16.340 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 4>to follow real estate. I bought and sold a bunch

0:15:18.380 --> 0:15:18.580
<v Speaker 4>of houses.

0:15:18.660 --> 0:15:23.370
<v Speaker 3>I'm just really interested in it. I've never seen anything

0:15:23.390 --> 0:15:23.710
<v Speaker 3>like this.

0:15:24.170 --> 0:15:27.630
<v Speaker 4>There is a wide gap between the number of sellers

0:15:27.770 --> 0:15:30.450
<v Speaker 4>and buyers in the housing market right now. You got

0:15:30.470 --> 0:15:32.670
<v Speaker 4>a million and a half Americans trying to sell their homes.

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.260
<v Speaker 4>and only about 929 who are buying. So that should

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>mean housing prices would drop, especially because higher interest rates

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 4>put pressure downward.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:44.460
<v Speaker 3>On housing prices.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.850
<v Speaker 4>Because look, if all I can afford is $ 3, 000 a month,

0:15:48.290 --> 0:15:50.010
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't really matter to me how much of that

0:15:50.090 --> 0:15:51.770
<v Speaker 4>is the price and how much of that is the

0:15:51.830 --> 0:15:54.190
<v Speaker 4>interest rate. That's all the money I got, for instance.

0:15:54.450 --> 0:15:58.030
<v Speaker 4>So it puts downward pressure on houses. And so housing

0:15:58.620 --> 0:16:03.550
<v Speaker 4>prices should be tumbling, but they're not. They're starting to

0:16:03.630 --> 0:16:07.750
<v Speaker 4>show weakness as about a third of folks who had

0:16:07.790 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 4>the old ultra cheap mortgages don't have the, I'm sorry,

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 4>but today more than a third of outstanding home loans

0:16:15.780 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 4>have a rate above 5%. So at least a third

0:16:20.460 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 4>of them aren't the ultra cheapos and those are more

0:16:25.780 --> 0:16:29.330
<v Speaker 4>likely to be sold. But here's the really, really weird part.

0:16:30.990 --> 0:16:33.460
<v Speaker 4>The number of people who put their house on the

0:16:33.500 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 4>market then say, never mind, is at an all-time high.

0:16:38.100 --> 0:16:40.700
<v Speaker 4>If they can't get the price they want, they just say, yeah,

0:16:40.740 --> 0:16:43.420
<v Speaker 4>we'll stay, I guess.

0:16:43.610 --> 0:16:45.850
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting situation to be in.

0:16:46.370 --> 0:16:50.470
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, other than divorces and job transfers and death and

0:16:50.510 --> 0:16:53.430
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing. People are just not selling in

0:16:53.470 --> 0:16:56.110
<v Speaker 4>the normal ways and in the normal intervals, at least

0:16:56.170 --> 0:16:56.670
<v Speaker 4>for now.

0:16:56.770 --> 0:16:58.770
<v Speaker 3>Isn't people just wanting to see what they could get

0:16:58.810 --> 0:17:00.470
<v Speaker 3>for it? And if they got enough money, they'd go

0:17:00.490 --> 0:17:03.230
<v Speaker 3>ahead and move? Because I've never moved just for the

0:17:03.250 --> 0:17:06.850
<v Speaker 3>hell of it. So I don't know what that is.

0:17:06.869 --> 0:17:10.649
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think people do have a certain expectation what

0:17:10.690 --> 0:17:13.910
<v Speaker 4>their house is worth, and often it's unrealistic. But especially

0:17:13.990 --> 0:17:16.250
<v Speaker 4>since housing prices have been pretty high for a pretty

0:17:16.290 --> 0:17:20.649
<v Speaker 4>long time, if you bought three, four years ago and–

0:17:21.850 --> 0:17:24.750
<v Speaker 4>You realize nobody can give you anything close to what

0:17:24.790 --> 0:17:26.070
<v Speaker 4>you thought you might be able to get.

0:17:26.090 --> 0:17:28.450
<v Speaker 3>You just stay put. Every move I've ever made in

0:17:28.470 --> 0:17:33.290
<v Speaker 3>my life, though, is job, school district, something. It was

0:17:33.310 --> 0:17:35.090
<v Speaker 3>a reason, wasn't it? Just like list it and if

0:17:35.130 --> 0:17:36.450
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't sell, we'll just stay here, I guess.

0:17:37.010 --> 0:17:40.149
<v Speaker 4>Right. So you've got this huge oversupply of houses for

0:17:40.230 --> 0:17:42.330
<v Speaker 4>sale and an undersupply of buyers. I mean, come on,

0:17:42.350 --> 0:17:44.410
<v Speaker 4>supply and demand. Econ 101, right?

0:17:44.450 --> 0:17:45.369
<v Speaker 3>Except it's not happening.

0:17:45.970 --> 0:17:49.050
<v Speaker 4>In September, 6% of sellers pulled their property off the

0:17:49.070 --> 0:17:52.570
<v Speaker 4>market after failing to get an acceptable offer. In Chicago,

0:17:52.630 --> 0:17:54.709
<v Speaker 4>it was 18% of homes.

0:17:55.890 --> 0:17:58.450
<v Speaker 3>Every state's different. Every town's different. And then even within

0:17:58.510 --> 0:18:00.590
<v Speaker 3>a town, you can have different markets going on within

0:18:00.609 --> 0:18:03.469
<v Speaker 3>the same town. So it's all anecdotal evidence, you know,

0:18:03.530 --> 0:18:05.710
<v Speaker 3>for individuals. But, man, there's a lot of signs in

0:18:05.730 --> 0:18:07.710
<v Speaker 3>my town. And there weren't any a couple of years

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.780
<v Speaker 3>ago when I was looking. It'd be like one every

0:18:10.820 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks, and it would last three days. Now

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>they're all– there was one corner I drove by the

0:18:14.500 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 3>other day. There must have been eight signs there competing

0:18:16.940 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 3>to try to get you to go that way and

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:19.660
<v Speaker 3>go look at the house.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:18:20.220 --> 0:18:22.380
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so check your local numbers, obviously.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.700
<v Speaker 4>In Austin, for instance, home values are down 27% from

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:27.620
<v Speaker 4>their peak in 2022.

0:18:27.619 --> 0:18:31.780
<v Speaker 3>Whoa. Yeah. That's what I've been waiting for. I don't

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>live in Austin. We've got a lot more on the way.

0:18:35.510 --> 0:18:41.650
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:44.220 --> 0:18:48.219
<v Speaker 8>He posted AI-generated video that shows him chasing and hugging

0:18:48.290 --> 0:18:51.090
<v Speaker 8>a tiger, a video that appears to be a reference

0:18:51.170 --> 0:18:53.429
<v Speaker 8>to an incident this weekend where a man in the U.K.

0:18:53.470 --> 0:18:56.929
<v Speaker 8>was killed by a tiger after entering its enclosure at

0:18:56.950 --> 0:18:57.670
<v Speaker 8>a wildlife park.

0:18:58.130 --> 0:18:58.410
<v Speaker 4>Really?

0:18:58.450 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 3>It appears to be a reference to that? Hmm, it

0:19:00.540 --> 0:19:04.580
<v Speaker 3>does appear that way. Is that a report on a meme? Yes,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.460
<v Speaker 3>that was a news report on a meme. I would say,

0:19:07.500 --> 0:19:10.020
<v Speaker 3>you talked the other day that you feel like we're

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.369
<v Speaker 3>in a September 10th moment, people regularly... quote how we

0:19:14.390 --> 0:19:16.890
<v Speaker 3>were into shark attacks was the big story right before

0:19:16.930 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>september 11th we weren't paying attention to the world our

0:19:19.859 --> 0:19:24.580
<v Speaker 3>news our mainstream news which few people watch anymore so

0:19:24.660 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's not an indication of anything but our mainstream

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.250
<v Speaker 3>news our big evening newscasts are dumber than they've ever

0:19:30.290 --> 0:19:32.590
<v Speaker 3>been ever and i mean i feel like it's gone

0:19:32.630 --> 0:19:34.530
<v Speaker 3>off a cliff just in the last couple of weeks

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.510
<v Speaker 3>with celebrity stories and YouTube videos of the day and

0:19:38.530 --> 0:19:41.550
<v Speaker 3>all that sort of stuff, before they get to, you know,

0:19:41.550 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>President Zelensky and the new diesel policy, will be six stories,

0:19:46.140 --> 0:19:50.740
<v Speaker 3>six celebrity story or memes in before they get to that.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.020
<v Speaker 3>Something's going on there. So that might just be the

0:19:55.140 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>state of media and have nothing to do with anything else.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.750
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't watch the news. That's a

0:20:00.790 --> 0:20:01.690
<v Speaker 3>wise decision, son.

0:20:01.730 --> 0:20:03.030
<v Speaker 4>It might have more to do with the state of

0:20:03.050 --> 0:20:07.110
<v Speaker 4>the audience, honestly, because I have a feeling the purveyors

0:20:07.230 --> 0:20:11.510
<v Speaker 4>of the news is they have technology to figure out

0:20:11.550 --> 0:20:13.510
<v Speaker 4>what their viewers want and what they don't, what they

0:20:13.770 --> 0:20:16.310
<v Speaker 4>stay tuned through and what they tune out of. And

0:20:16.350 --> 0:20:20.170
<v Speaker 4>I think they've realized their audience wants fluff. So they're

0:20:20.210 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 4>giving them fluff.

0:20:21.540 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Could be. That's not good. So we've talked about this before.

0:20:28.420 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 3>The headline is Gen Z is the most depressed generation

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.409
<v Speaker 3>we've maybe ever had. Uh, we'll get into that in

0:20:37.470 --> 0:20:40.430
<v Speaker 3>a second, but it's all about the Gallup life evaluation index,

0:20:40.470 --> 0:20:42.389
<v Speaker 3>which we've talked about over the years. It gives you

0:20:42.450 --> 0:20:51.450
<v Speaker 3>three categories to choose from. Are you suffering, struggling, or thriving?

0:20:52.190 --> 0:20:54.530
<v Speaker 3>Those are your three options. You got three options, two

0:20:54.570 --> 0:20:59.490
<v Speaker 3>of them quite negative suffering and struggling. And then one

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 3>of them seems overly positive. I feel like there's a,

0:21:02.580 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 3>there's something, it should be something between one and two.

0:21:05.380 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I think struggling is just one shade too dark. I don't,

0:21:09.980 --> 0:21:13.620
<v Speaker 3>I don't find that necessarily, but it's a thriving one

0:21:13.770 --> 0:21:17.150
<v Speaker 3>shade too positive. I mean, I gotta be doing pretty

0:21:17.210 --> 0:21:21.710
<v Speaker 3>well before I'm thriving today. Oh my God. I'm kicking ass.

0:21:22.690 --> 0:21:26.330
<v Speaker 3>Maybe keeping your head above water. Surviving is the middle one. Okay.

0:21:26.350 --> 0:21:30.550
<v Speaker 3>I'm all right. But anyway, the choices are thriving, struggling

0:21:30.570 --> 0:21:31.050
<v Speaker 3>and suffering.

0:21:31.070 --> 0:21:31.869
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:21:32.930 --> 0:21:34.870
<v Speaker 3>Where would you place yourself on the ladder today?

0:21:36.180 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Today, I'm struggling a little bit. Yesterday, I was thriving.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.070
<v Speaker 4>That's another thing up too late watching baseball.

0:21:42.570 --> 0:21:45.290
<v Speaker 3>That's another problem of the if it switches day to

0:21:45.310 --> 0:21:48.109
<v Speaker 3>day or within the day, then what does any polling

0:21:48.170 --> 0:21:52.430
<v Speaker 3>about it mean at all? In general, though, I'm feeling

0:21:52.470 --> 0:21:55.869
<v Speaker 3>pretty thriving. Thank you for asking. But anyway, Gen Z

0:21:55.930 --> 0:22:00.430
<v Speaker 3>has seen their life satisfaction plummet compared to their millennial

0:22:00.530 --> 0:22:05.460
<v Speaker 3>predecessors a generation ago. This would be your 18 to 29-year-olds.

0:22:05.550 --> 0:22:06.990
<v Speaker 3>Remember back in the day, we used to talk about

0:22:07.030 --> 0:22:10.370
<v Speaker 3>millennials and how they ruined bedspreads and mayonnaise and all

0:22:10.430 --> 0:22:14.050
<v Speaker 3>different things. When they were 18 to 29, now they're older.

0:22:14.470 --> 0:22:17.970
<v Speaker 3>And obviously, that's the way life works in time, in

0:22:17.990 --> 0:22:19.990
<v Speaker 3>case you weren't aware of that. But now, we're talking

0:22:20.010 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 3>about Gen Z is 18 to 29. And over a

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 3>quarter of them, 27%, are being treated for depression, which

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.429
<v Speaker 3>seems like a very high number. But doesn't that... more

0:22:33.470 --> 0:22:36.450
<v Speaker 3>to do with your parents than i don't know anyway

0:22:36.470 --> 0:22:37.550
<v Speaker 3>uh when.

0:22:37.369 --> 0:22:41.030
<v Speaker 4>Their whole world surrounds them with negativity and anger all

0:22:41.090 --> 0:22:41.870
<v Speaker 4>the time.

0:22:41.890 --> 0:22:48.169
<v Speaker 3>Less than half now describe themselves as thriving which is

0:22:48.230 --> 0:22:53.629
<v Speaker 3>down a fair amount from 2008 uh adults describe themselves

0:22:53.710 --> 0:22:56.350
<v Speaker 3>as drifting away from friends and partners and experiencing less

0:22:56.510 --> 0:22:59.500
<v Speaker 3>joy while less than a third said they had reached

0:22:59.580 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 3>most of their goals in the last year. I don't

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.620
<v Speaker 3>remember when I was 20 in my twenties ever setting goals. Really?

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh, they're like in incremental on the road to success,

0:23:11.580 --> 0:23:12.020
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:12.380
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:23:12.820 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 3>I just, I don't remember having specific goals that I

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:16.820
<v Speaker 3>could have looked back over the year. Did you reach

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.330
<v Speaker 3>your goals this year as a 22 year old? I

0:23:18.330 --> 0:23:20.729
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I guess I kind of had a lot

0:23:20.770 --> 0:23:23.030
<v Speaker 3>of fun, which I was hoping to do. So kept

0:23:23.070 --> 0:23:29.510
<v Speaker 3>my job. Yeah. Um, The social isolation of COVID-19 during

0:23:29.550 --> 0:23:33.330
<v Speaker 3>their formative developmental years has left a lasting impact, according

0:23:33.390 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>to the researchers. They think it all turned around COVID

0:23:36.390 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and has never gone back, really, which is pretty interesting.

0:23:40.060 --> 0:23:42.419
<v Speaker 4>I think it's been exacerbated by a lot of things

0:23:42.740 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 4>happening in the world right now and the education system

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.540
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that people are looking for satisfaction where

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 4>they'll never find it, namely online.

0:23:50.060 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 2>So....

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.900
<v Speaker 3>That age group back in 2010 would have been millennials.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.870
<v Speaker 3>Now they've gotten older, as I pointed out, the whole

0:23:56.910 --> 0:24:02.650
<v Speaker 3>way time works thing. So back then, 64% of millennials

0:24:02.670 --> 0:24:06.430
<v Speaker 3>when they were 18 to 29 described themselves as thriving.

0:24:06.430 --> 0:24:06.670
<v Speaker 2>64%.

0:24:06.670 --> 0:24:15.020
<v Speaker 3>Gen Z, 44%. 20 points lower. That seems like a lot. Yeah, yeah.

0:24:15.140 --> 0:24:19.419
<v Speaker 3>Most of that decline since 2020 happened since COVID, whatever

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>COVID did to us. It was big, no doubt, absolutely huge.

0:24:23.780 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 4>I didn't mean to suggest that it wasn't, but it's

0:24:27.109 --> 0:24:33.430
<v Speaker 4>not the only thing. Plus, we're celebrating pathologizing every mood.

0:24:33.790 --> 0:24:34.230
<v Speaker 3>True.

0:24:35.450 --> 0:24:39.030
<v Speaker 4>In a way, societally, I mean, it's just absolutely rampant

0:24:39.170 --> 0:24:41.110
<v Speaker 4>among young people. I see it all the time. In fact,

0:24:41.470 --> 0:24:44.220
<v Speaker 4>they're like the proverbial fish that doesn't realize they're wet.

0:24:44.780 --> 0:24:50.030
<v Speaker 4>They're all so into their mental struggles. Everybody talks about

0:24:50.070 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 4>it all the time.

0:24:51.670 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Right. Yeah. Gen X is the crowd that has stayed

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 3>the steadiest. That's what we are, Gen X. Oh, yes.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.130
<v Speaker 3>Old Steady Joe, they called me back in the day.

0:25:04.230 --> 0:25:09.510
<v Speaker 3>We've hung around in the mid to high 40s since 2008.

0:25:09.510 --> 0:25:11.070
<v Speaker 3>Gone up a little, gone down a little, just kind

0:25:11.090 --> 0:25:13.859
<v Speaker 3>of hanging around in that area. Just saying, yeah, okay.

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.060
<v Speaker 3>Not so bad. Things haven't changed much.

0:25:16.630 --> 0:25:18.889
<v Speaker 4>I would argue, and I don't get credit for this,

0:25:19.210 --> 0:25:23.540
<v Speaker 4>we're all the results of our upbringing in the world

0:25:23.580 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 4>we grew up in, as are the Gen Z kids

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.020
<v Speaker 4>and the millennials and the rest of them. But correct

0:25:30.060 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 4>me if I'm wrong, the Gen X official motto is,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 4>but what are you going to do? I mean, that's

0:25:37.220 --> 0:25:40.420
<v Speaker 4>our zeitgeist, or not zeitgeist, but that's our thing.

0:25:40.460 --> 0:25:44.310
<v Speaker 3>What are you going to do? Ups, downs, good times,

0:25:44.350 --> 0:25:45.990
<v Speaker 3>bad times, etc., etc. You know what?

0:25:46.060 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 4>This is a perfect time to read this. Eric crafted

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.420
<v Speaker 4>this email to us. And he's talking about the people

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 4>who are permanently angry about one thing or another.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.859
<v Speaker 3>The professional scolds that I was describing.

0:26:02.910 --> 0:26:04.469
<v Speaker 4>He says, I may have influenced a woman or two

0:26:04.530 --> 0:26:06.370
<v Speaker 4>out of it simply by laying out what it looks

0:26:06.470 --> 0:26:09.609
<v Speaker 4>like in her 40s versus in her 20s. Essentially, I'd ask,

0:26:09.990 --> 0:26:12.060
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to burn through your 20s pissed off

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and angry, then end up a lonely cat lady in

0:26:14.619 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 4>your 40s? Or do you want to embrace your youth

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 4>joyfully because your youth will.

0:26:18.859 --> 0:26:20.380
<v Speaker 3>Never return once it departs?

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.139
<v Speaker 4>This choice, and it is a choice, is critical to

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 4>at least think about.

0:26:26.940 --> 0:26:28.870
<v Speaker 3>True dad about the youth never returning.

0:26:29.890 --> 0:26:30.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:30.850 --> 0:26:32.590
<v Speaker 4>But it is a choice. Do you really want to

0:26:32.609 --> 0:26:35.210
<v Speaker 4>spend your 20s all angry and pissed off and screaming

0:26:35.250 --> 0:26:35.730
<v Speaker 4>in the streets?

0:26:35.869 --> 0:26:36.090
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:26:36.109 --> 0:26:37.030
<v Speaker 3>Really? I didn't.

0:26:38.369 --> 0:26:41.090
<v Speaker 4>So here are your questions. These kids are the result

0:26:41.130 --> 0:26:42.189
<v Speaker 4>of the education system, though.

0:26:42.290 --> 0:26:42.470
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:26:42.630 --> 0:26:44.469
<v Speaker 3>Here are your questions in case you just want to

0:26:44.609 --> 0:26:47.940
<v Speaker 3>judge for yourself on the whole thriving. Are you supposed

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 3>to imagine a ladder with 10 steps, zero to 10,

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 3>where zero represents the worst possible life? What, on fire?

0:26:57.500 --> 0:27:00.310
<v Speaker 3>What is the worst possible life?

0:27:01.010 --> 0:27:05.470
<v Speaker 4>On fire as the firing squad gets ready to shoot. Actually,

0:27:05.510 --> 0:27:06.930
<v Speaker 4>that would put me out of my misery.

0:27:07.230 --> 0:27:10.790
<v Speaker 3>On fire, in line behind somebody writing a check at

0:27:10.830 --> 0:27:15.010
<v Speaker 3>the grocery store. That's a good one. I don't know.

0:27:15.369 --> 0:27:17.530
<v Speaker 3>Imagine the worst possible life, which you got to admit

0:27:17.570 --> 0:27:20.810
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a funny scenario. At zero. I'm currently

0:27:20.850 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>being eaten by a tiger. While on fire. And 10

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 3>represents the best possible life of winning the lottery while

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm having sex, I guess is what today. I hear

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.660
<v Speaker 3>the winning numbers read to me while I'm having sex.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.369
<v Speaker 3>That's my best possible life. I don't know. But where are,

0:27:37.490 --> 0:27:40.730
<v Speaker 3>which step are you standing on today? On which step

0:27:40.750 --> 0:27:42.629
<v Speaker 3>of the ladder would you say you personally feel you

0:27:42.670 --> 0:27:47.310
<v Speaker 3>stand on at this time? Like at this very moment.

0:27:47.390 --> 0:27:49.820
<v Speaker 3>I'm at work. I like work. Because I think I'd

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 3>be on a different step maybe later today. I don't know.

0:27:52.590 --> 0:27:53.890
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I would or not. I'd have

0:27:53.910 --> 0:27:55.609
<v Speaker 3>to think about it. Somebody called me and asked me

0:27:55.630 --> 0:28:00.830
<v Speaker 3>at 3 this afternoon. Where would I put myself? I'd

0:28:00.869 --> 0:28:04.570
<v Speaker 3>probably be like a 7 or an 8, actually. Yeah,

0:28:04.590 --> 0:28:07.450
<v Speaker 3>I would agree. Speaking for myself, yeah, pretty close.

0:28:09.190 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm really not superstitious, but I don't like pronouncing everything's

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:15.140
<v Speaker 4>going great.

0:28:16.859 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't feel like a good idea.

0:28:20.570 --> 0:28:20.970
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:28:20.990 --> 0:28:22.689
<v Speaker 3>I have a bit of that, too. But didn't we

0:28:22.730 --> 0:28:24.629
<v Speaker 3>learn last week? Was that from Tom Brady? I think

0:28:24.670 --> 0:28:27.250
<v Speaker 3>it was Tom Brady that he broke out of that trap.

0:28:27.290 --> 0:28:31.090
<v Speaker 3>He thought it was holding him back. The idea that

0:28:31.109 --> 0:28:33.530
<v Speaker 3>he has to kind of have a negative attitude to

0:28:34.350 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>like to stay on track. And he flipped it around

0:28:38.140 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 3>where he's always picturing everything is going great and it's

0:28:40.820 --> 0:28:43.150
<v Speaker 3>going to go great. And that was like his key

0:28:43.190 --> 0:28:46.370
<v Speaker 3>to success in life or something. Which is interesting because

0:28:46.550 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>I have always said, I used to believe this a

0:28:49.340 --> 0:28:52.100
<v Speaker 3>thousand percent when I was in school. If I don't

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.940
<v Speaker 3>worry about my test score, I'm going to get a

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.060
<v Speaker 3>bad score. So I need to like be really concerned.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I did very well on this test.

0:28:58.580 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Then I'd get a B back, which is what I

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 3>was always hoping for. But if I thought I did

0:29:04.300 --> 0:29:05.740
<v Speaker 3>pretty good in that test, that's when I'm going to

0:29:05.780 --> 0:29:12.330
<v Speaker 3>get the C minus. Which is obviously... Well, there's no

0:29:12.390 --> 0:29:16.469
<v Speaker 3>cause and effect there. And the bit of a weird self-defeating,

0:29:16.570 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, you got the whole Ben Franklin pessimist thing,

0:29:18.910 --> 0:29:20.950
<v Speaker 3>you know. I don't know what is best. I'm going

0:29:20.970 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to listen to Tom Brady. How many Super Bowl rings

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:23.580
<v Speaker 3>did Ben Franklin win?

0:29:23.860 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Zero.

0:29:24.420 --> 0:29:29.300
<v Speaker 3>Over. Not a one. Anyway, if I were you, where

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 3>would you be on the, which step are you on, Michael?

0:29:31.660 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Zero to ten. Worst life you can possibly imagine on

0:29:34.260 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>fire while being eaten by a tiger. Or ten. I'd

0:29:37.780 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 3>say seven. You're a seven? How about you, Katie? Yeah,

0:29:41.180 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm between a seven and an eight. OK, so we're

0:29:42.620 --> 0:29:46.780
<v Speaker 3>all thriving. Every one of us. And then the other question,

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.420
<v Speaker 3>by the way, is on which step do you think

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:54.070
<v Speaker 3>you will stand on five years from today? That also

0:29:54.110 --> 0:29:56.290
<v Speaker 3>be a seven or eight. I'm just afraid someone's going

0:29:56.310 --> 0:30:00.150
<v Speaker 3>to push the ladder over. Somebody who's got like a two.

0:30:01.380 --> 0:30:03.860
<v Speaker 3>They don't like you being on seven or eight. Exactly.

0:30:03.900 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 4>That's socialism. They don't want to be at the top

0:30:06.540 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 4>of the ladder. They just want to chop the ladder

0:30:08.260 --> 0:30:09.940
<v Speaker 4>down so nobody gets higher than a four.

0:30:10.980 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of an interesting one. In five years, what

0:30:14.290 --> 0:30:15.450
<v Speaker 3>step do you think you're going to be on? I

0:30:15.470 --> 0:30:18.510
<v Speaker 3>think that says a lot about your personality, probably more

0:30:18.550 --> 0:30:22.350
<v Speaker 3>than reality, that if you have a really bad number

0:30:22.390 --> 0:30:26.430
<v Speaker 3>for what you expect in five years, expect things to

0:30:26.470 --> 0:30:29.610
<v Speaker 3>be pretty good. I hope they will be, I guess.

0:30:29.670 --> 0:30:30.090
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:30:30.350 --> 0:30:32.090
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of time between now and then.

0:30:32.470 --> 0:30:34.870
<v Speaker 3>Wow. So what are you going with? Could be feast,

0:30:34.930 --> 0:30:39.729
<v Speaker 3>could be famine. You're actually unwilling, superstitious-wise, to predict you're

0:30:39.750 --> 0:30:43.470
<v Speaker 3>going to be doing well in five years? Oh, yeah. Well, no,

0:30:43.550 --> 0:30:46.770
<v Speaker 3>not superstition. It's a ridiculous question to me. So that's

0:30:47.270 --> 0:30:49.430
<v Speaker 3>what you'd tell Gallup? That's a ridiculous question. Get out

0:30:49.450 --> 0:30:51.100
<v Speaker 3>of here. Yeah, yeah.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.940
<v Speaker 4>I'll answer for right now, but no, there's way too

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:54.540
<v Speaker 4>much that's going to happen between now and then. I

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:56.020
<v Speaker 4>can't possibly predict that.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. Too little data.

0:31:01.860 --> 0:31:04.220
<v Speaker 6>Do you think since they're asking Gen Z, they're talking

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.730
<v Speaker 6>more about like careers and will you have a house

0:31:06.850 --> 0:31:07.630
<v Speaker 6>and all that stuff?

0:31:08.010 --> 0:31:10.490
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. You get to make your own criteria.

0:31:10.570 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing. I feel like I'm going to be

0:31:12.100 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 3>a seven or eight in five years.

0:31:14.020 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 4>For a guy of my age, which is your age, too,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.540
<v Speaker 4>it entirely depends on health. I mean, that's like the

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.810
<v Speaker 4>only question confronting me. My golf game might be slightly

0:31:24.850 --> 0:31:27.700
<v Speaker 4>better or slightly worse. I hope my wife will still

0:31:27.740 --> 0:31:28.070
<v Speaker 4>love me.

0:31:28.090 --> 0:31:30.350
<v Speaker 3>I certainly love her. But for whatever reason, your personality

0:31:30.390 --> 0:31:33.270
<v Speaker 3>is always you hesitate to give a prediction on something

0:31:33.350 --> 0:31:38.060
<v Speaker 3>like you'll be penalized somehow if you do not. Somebody's

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:39.460
<v Speaker 3>going to come to your house and knock on the

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.190
<v Speaker 3>door five years from now. You said you were going

0:31:41.210 --> 0:31:45.770
<v Speaker 3>to be a seven. Look at you. You lost your foot.

0:31:45.790 --> 0:31:48.510
<v Speaker 3>Look at this idiot. Everybody gather around. Look at this.

0:31:49.810 --> 0:31:53.650
<v Speaker 3>Everybody gather around. No, it's not that.

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 4>It's that I have very, very strong opinions on stuff

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.940
<v Speaker 4>I'm very confident about. But stuff that I don't feel

0:31:58.980 --> 0:32:00.980
<v Speaker 4>like I know enough, I don't have an opinion.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.260
<v Speaker 3>One of those undecided that gets pulled. Which is a

0:32:05.380 --> 0:32:08.450
<v Speaker 3>reasonable stance, actually. It's not much fun, but it's a

0:32:08.490 --> 0:32:10.830
<v Speaker 3>reasonable stance to say, how would I possibly know? I

0:32:11.210 --> 0:32:11.810
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:32:12.850 --> 0:32:13.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:13.590 --> 0:32:15.930
<v Speaker 3>You can't make me answer a question if I don't

0:32:15.970 --> 0:32:16.830
<v Speaker 3>know the answer.

0:32:17.170 --> 0:32:17.870
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man.

0:32:17.910 --> 0:32:19.630
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm with Joe, though, on the whole. I'm

0:32:19.670 --> 0:32:21.780
<v Speaker 6>not going to say everything's great. Like, people ask me

0:32:21.980 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 6>all the time, so how's Van sleeping?

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Our baby. And I'm like, um... Last night was great.

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 6>But I'm not going to say, oh, he's doing great,

0:32:29.700 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 6>because the second I say that, we're going to have three.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Middle of the night wake ups with just screaming. Happens

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 3>with traffic, happens with everything else, too.

0:32:37.530 --> 0:32:39.110
<v Speaker 4>Zach, I was just going to say, and look, I

0:32:39.190 --> 0:32:43.590
<v Speaker 4>am like deliberately studiously not superstitious. But what percentage of

0:32:43.630 --> 0:32:47.390
<v Speaker 4>human beings, if their spouse or buddy or whatever says, man,

0:32:47.470 --> 0:32:49.990
<v Speaker 4>traffic is great today, thinks, oh, no.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.690
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, same here. It's a truism in golf. Boy, I'm

0:32:54.710 --> 0:32:55.590
<v Speaker 3>playing well today.

0:32:55.850 --> 0:32:56.570
<v Speaker 2>Doomed!

0:32:56.770 --> 0:33:00.910
<v Speaker 3>Doomed! You were playing great today. Say goodbye to your

0:33:00.950 --> 0:33:04.540
<v Speaker 3>golf ball. It's about to go into a lake. Yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:33:04.620 --> 0:33:04.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:05.620
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Human beings, what are you going to do? So a

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.700
<v Speaker 3>word from our friends. You weren't thriving until somebody scammed you.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:12.010
<v Speaker 3>How about that for a transition?

0:33:12.910 --> 0:33:15.090
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's good, because you thought it was actually your

0:33:15.130 --> 0:33:17.570
<v Speaker 4>bank on the line. They had your name and address,

0:33:17.630 --> 0:33:19.990
<v Speaker 4>the last four digits of your social. You're thinking, all right,

0:33:20.030 --> 0:33:22.750
<v Speaker 4>it's totally my bank. Here's all my private info.

0:33:22.970 --> 0:33:23.670
<v Speaker 3>It's not your bank.

0:33:23.730 --> 0:33:25.770
<v Speaker 4>It's a scammer who bought your info from one of

0:33:25.810 --> 0:33:27.190
<v Speaker 4>those damn data brokers.

0:33:27.290 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Lots of data brokers have all your info, including your

0:33:29.780 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>social security address, all the different things, and they sell

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it to people for practically nothing. You've got to get

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.060
<v Speaker 3>it off the websites. Incogni can do that. I like

0:33:37.100 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Incogni is sending removal requests to 420-plus

0:33:39.820 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 3>data brokers every and people search sites for me. It

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.110
<v Speaker 3>follows up so my info doesn't sneak back on there.

0:33:46.650 --> 0:33:47.850
<v Speaker 3>You will thrive if.

0:33:47.810 --> 0:33:51.450
<v Speaker 4>You go to incogni.com slash Armstrong and get 60% off.

0:33:51.510 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 4>It's I-N-C-O-G-N-I like incognito. Incogni.com slash Armstrong. Super easy to

0:33:58.220 --> 0:34:01.570
<v Speaker 4>sign up. Incogni.com slash Armstrong.

0:34:01.610 --> 0:34:01.900
<v Speaker 3>Do this.

0:34:01.980 --> 0:34:03.790
<v Speaker 4>Protect your stuff. They can't scam you if they can't

0:34:03.850 --> 0:34:05.730
<v Speaker 4>find you. Bastards again, I say.

0:34:05.970 --> 0:34:09.410
<v Speaker 3>So J.D. Vance made a joke, a gay joke, and

0:34:09.530 --> 0:34:12.290
<v Speaker 3>I saw two different takes on that, one positive, one negative,

0:34:12.310 --> 0:34:14.529
<v Speaker 3>that I thought were really interesting for discussion. Maybe we'll

0:34:14.550 --> 0:34:17.110
<v Speaker 3>get to that in hour three. Among other things, stay here.

0:34:18.710 --> 0:34:36.340
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.690
<v Speaker 7>Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation that may require some Californians

0:34:42.790 --> 0:34:47.330
<v Speaker 7>to pay slavery reparations. To get reparations, you just have

0:34:47.350 --> 0:34:49.350
<v Speaker 7>to prove you've been married to Kimberly Guilfoyle.

0:34:52.469 --> 0:34:57.940
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Where the hell did that punchline come from? Fox

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:59.660
<v Speaker 3>taking a shot at Guilfoyle like that.

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:00.020
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:35:01.739 --> 0:35:03.420
<v Speaker 3>OK, so next hour.

0:35:04.989 --> 0:35:09.790
<v Speaker 4>Want to get into the absolutely laughable effort at reparations

0:35:09.870 --> 0:35:15.140
<v Speaker 4>that Gavi continues to embrace. I think positioning himself for

0:35:15.180 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 4>his run for the presidency because he's got to do

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.460
<v Speaker 4>well in South Carolina among the black voters.

0:35:20.860 --> 0:35:24.860
<v Speaker 3>But it is everything about it just stinks. It's illegal.

0:35:25.300 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 3>It's illogical. It's unconstitutional. I don't know if you were

0:35:31.420 --> 0:35:33.750
<v Speaker 3>here when we talked about the law he signed, what,

0:35:33.770 --> 0:35:35.089
<v Speaker 3>a week or two ago? I think you were gone.

0:35:35.110 --> 0:35:35.670
<v Speaker 4>I was indeed, yeah.

0:35:35.750 --> 0:35:36.950
<v Speaker 3>Were you here on the golf trip? I thought you

0:35:36.969 --> 0:35:38.950
<v Speaker 3>were on the golf trip. Anyway, the thing he signed

0:35:38.969 --> 0:35:42.899
<v Speaker 3>where corporations have to disclose any ties they or any

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.980
<v Speaker 3>suppliers to their company may have had to slavery back

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:51.830
<v Speaker 3>in the day. Right. The question that isn't answered enough

0:35:51.890 --> 0:35:53.989
<v Speaker 3>with so many of these things is tell me the

0:35:54.310 --> 0:35:57.430
<v Speaker 3>one human being that's helped by this one. Give me

0:35:57.650 --> 0:36:00.270
<v Speaker 3>one and make the argument one human on Earth that's

0:36:00.290 --> 0:36:00.870
<v Speaker 3>helped by this.

0:36:02.090 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's like two thirds of Congress was considering

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 4>reconstituting slavery and you were trying to gin up cotton,

0:36:11.060 --> 0:36:15.620
<v Speaker 4>gin up, you know, opposition to it. I could see

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.780
<v Speaker 4>being like, no, let's take a look at the history

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 4>of it and all.

0:36:18.219 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 3>But no, we're not going to have slaves. We're good.

0:36:21.300 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 3>No slaves.

0:36:22.100 --> 0:36:22.299
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 3>You have my assurance.

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.710
<v Speaker 4>So, but yeah, but yeah, it's just, so if, if

0:36:27.750 --> 0:36:34.150
<v Speaker 4>your parent company in 1906, that doesn't exist anymore, but you're,

0:36:34.210 --> 0:36:36.570
<v Speaker 4>you know, a paint company or a tire company or whatever,

0:36:36.610 --> 0:36:38.989
<v Speaker 4>and you happen to still exist, you've evolved 18 times.

0:36:39.030 --> 0:36:44.210
<v Speaker 4>But if in 1906, they did business, we'll stick with tires.

0:36:44.770 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 4>With a rubber company that was the offshoot of a

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 4>corporation that once bought cotton from Mississippi.

0:36:54.180 --> 0:36:54.419
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 3>You've got to disclose that to the state of California.

0:36:57.219 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 4>To aid, to your point, Jack, to help with the,

0:37:00.750 --> 0:37:02.469
<v Speaker 4>you know, to make sure the people who.

0:37:04.580 --> 0:37:06.820
<v Speaker 3>Idiotic. You got to put a plaque in your lobby

0:37:06.860 --> 0:37:09.339
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. Like the signs that say this

0:37:09.380 --> 0:37:11.940
<v Speaker 3>building contains chemicals that have been known to cause cancer

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 3>in pregnant women. You know, that kind of California. Right.

0:37:14.410 --> 0:37:14.589
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:37:14.969 --> 0:37:16.290
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:18.230 --> 0:37:23.570
<v Speaker 4>All right. Land disclosure plaques, that sort of thing. Virtue

0:37:23.650 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 4>signaling nonsense as the state is going bankrupt, squandering hundreds

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:34.370
<v Speaker 4>of billions of dollars, taxpayer monies. It's just it's a kleptocracy. But,

0:37:34.430 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, Gavi's like, yes, stupid. That's why I do

0:37:37.260 --> 0:37:40.060
<v Speaker 4>this stuff to distract you from the stuff that matters.

0:37:40.900 --> 0:37:42.420
<v Speaker 3>I look forward to talking about that. Also, you get

0:37:42.460 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the most expensive. Politics race in the country in Texas

0:37:50.219 --> 0:37:57.260
<v Speaker 3>between the communist wokester and he probably crook Republican. Nice choice.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.820
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, J.D. Vance made a gay joke about the

0:38:01.060 --> 0:38:03.540
<v Speaker 3>Democrat yesterday that we should check in on and see

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 3>what we think of that. Good Lord.

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.