WEBVTT - Quick, Open Twitter, Save the Painting!

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:06.090
<v Speaker 1>Sam Lincoln Radio Studio. The George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:06.150 --> 0:00:08.350
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:08.530 --> 0:00:09.930
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:10.070 --> 0:00:15.620
<v Speaker 2>And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And finally, KFC has partnered with cereal brand Surreal to

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.260
<v Speaker 3>introduce a new Kentucky fried chicken flavored cereal. This news

0:00:29.340 --> 0:00:31.820
<v Speaker 3>first reported at the United Nations.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>We have big things are happening.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.010
<v Speaker 2>Finally, KFC just released a new cereal that tastes like

0:00:40.050 --> 0:00:40.730
<v Speaker 2>fried chicken.

0:00:41.909 --> 0:00:44.550
<v Speaker 1>And they recommended topping it with gravy instead of milk.

0:00:46.190 --> 0:00:47.750
<v Speaker 1>They even have a good slogan for it. Make your

0:00:47.810 --> 0:00:51.989
<v Speaker 1>arteries snap, crackle and pop. The gravy's a joke, but

0:00:52.430 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>KFC flavored cereal. I will 100% try that. First time

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I see it, I will. A bowl full of chicken, yes.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.100
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Armstrong and Getty Show. Joe Getty, he's

0:01:03.140 --> 0:01:04.860
<v Speaker 1>half of the name of the show. So, you know,

0:01:04.900 --> 0:01:06.980
<v Speaker 1>you paid for the whole thing. You should get the

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.380
<v Speaker 1>whole thing.

0:01:09.660 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>You know this about me. I'm a conscientious objector when

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.830
<v Speaker 2>it comes to stunt foods. I won't acknowledge their existence.

0:01:15.420 --> 0:01:18.770
<v Speaker 2>I'm against them in principle. It's part of the degeneration

0:01:18.790 --> 0:01:20.650
<v Speaker 2>of Western society. Stump foods.

0:01:21.430 --> 0:01:22.730
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's a stump food, if they're

0:01:22.750 --> 0:01:23.690
<v Speaker 1>actually going to sell it.

0:01:26.630 --> 0:01:29.370
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was listening to whichever joke included the

0:01:29.450 --> 0:01:32.410
<v Speaker 2>gravy reference. I thought, well, do you just eat chicken then?

0:01:33.310 --> 0:01:38.060
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Hey, we were just for during news. We are

0:01:38.230 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on that topic of wine. Another one of your really

0:01:42.740 --> 0:01:46.660
<v Speaker 1>big been around for generations. Wineries announced they're closing down.

0:01:47.970 --> 0:01:51.700
<v Speaker 1>And so I have a theory on that. We all

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>know young people are drinking less, but did wine have

0:01:55.380 --> 0:01:58.900
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happen to it that happened to golfing

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.810
<v Speaker 1>and Harleys, where it got really, really popular for a while,

0:02:04.710 --> 0:02:07.890
<v Speaker 1>and then just for whatever reasons of changing tastes and attitudes,

0:02:08.190 --> 0:02:09.370
<v Speaker 1>it got less popular?

0:02:09.389 --> 0:02:13.869
<v Speaker 2>Boy, you know, that's an interesting theory. I will tell you,

0:02:13.930 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>golf is... every bit as popular now, like watching golf

0:02:18.380 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 2>on TV, the tiger days, those are gone. But in

0:02:20.740 --> 0:02:23.730
<v Speaker 2>COVID just every golf club in America filled up.

0:02:24.010 --> 0:02:24.530
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:02:25.410 --> 0:02:29.630
<v Speaker 2>Huge waiting lists. Um, but you know, that's an interesting question. Uh,

0:02:30.610 --> 0:02:36.490
<v Speaker 2>I just, I think alcohol consumption is so just notably,

0:02:37.150 --> 0:02:40.740
<v Speaker 2>shockingly down among, you know, the under 40 crowd. It's

0:02:40.750 --> 0:02:43.579
<v Speaker 2>just killing the industry. Whether there was some sort of

0:02:43.620 --> 0:02:47.220
<v Speaker 2>artificial bubble. I know that's true of bourbon. I'm aware

0:02:47.260 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of the bourbon craze where it used to be the

0:02:50.780 --> 0:02:54.530
<v Speaker 2>bottom shelf whiskey. It's corn liquor. And all of a sudden,

0:02:54.590 --> 0:02:56.809
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and I don't want to be too

0:02:56.870 --> 0:02:59.450
<v Speaker 2>harsh in case some of my bourbon enthusiasts friends are listening,

0:02:59.490 --> 0:03:02.050
<v Speaker 2>but everybody started acting like he was the nectar of

0:03:02.070 --> 0:03:06.850
<v Speaker 2>the gods, and it's just not. And so finally, everybody

0:03:06.910 --> 0:03:10.460
<v Speaker 2>figured that out, and now there's bourbon companies that, you know,

0:03:10.500 --> 0:03:14.139
<v Speaker 2>geared up for the bourbon craze. They have 10 years

0:03:14.380 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 2>of stock sitting in their warehouses and barrels, and they

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:18.660
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what to do with it.

0:03:19.540 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:03:19.660 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:20.230 --> 0:03:23.750
<v Speaker 1>So that's tough for the whole wine thing. We've talked

0:03:23.790 --> 0:03:25.669
<v Speaker 1>about this many times before, but I don't remember if

0:03:25.710 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there are stats on this. Did a lot of, did

0:03:27.940 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but enough people start smoking pot instead?

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>That's got to be a factor.

0:03:33.980 --> 0:03:34.500
<v Speaker 1>I would think so.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.860
<v Speaker 2>Two percent or seven percent. I have no idea, but

0:03:37.020 --> 0:03:40.170
<v Speaker 2>it's a factor for sure. I just want to tell

0:03:40.190 --> 0:03:45.630
<v Speaker 2>the good folks in Napa Valley, Sonoma, Paso Robles, Amador County,

0:03:46.250 --> 0:03:49.980
<v Speaker 2>all over. California's wine regions, by God, we did our

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:55.140
<v Speaker 2>best last night to support y'all. We struck a blow, okay?

0:03:55.380 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic. Maybe you can keep a winery open on your own.

0:03:58.660 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm accepting offers, yeah.

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>This is where you have been missed over the last

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.780
<v Speaker 1>couple of days on this topic, because I am— actually, the

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.490
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal editorial board seemed to agree with me

0:04:12.540 --> 0:04:16.419
<v Speaker 1>on Monday— all this UN talk and the white tie dinner,

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>dinner that Trump's having with sheep, mostly fluff. Very, very,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.340
<v Speaker 1>very little comes out of these things. Tell me I'm wrong.

0:04:25.380 --> 0:04:27.700
<v Speaker 2>Well, one at a time, the UN, I would just

0:04:27.820 --> 0:04:32.700
<v Speaker 2>like to hang on. Let me flip to it. I

0:04:32.730 --> 0:04:38.510
<v Speaker 2>just hear me lay my libertarian Argentinian dog cloning hero.

0:04:39.130 --> 0:04:40.290
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you've quoted.

0:04:40.610 --> 0:04:42.490
<v Speaker 1>I haven't today. I forgot about that. Yes, that's a,

0:04:42.510 --> 0:04:44.940
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. He, uh, He said basically what

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.779
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying about the U.N. yesterday.

0:04:47.540 --> 0:04:51.820
<v Speaker 2>I've got it. Let's see. Well, he said that the U.N.

0:04:51.860 --> 0:04:54.589
<v Speaker 2>has broken its covenant. It's not what it claimed to be.

0:04:54.830 --> 0:04:57.310
<v Speaker 2>A bunch of noble words. That's to say it has

0:04:57.350 --> 0:05:01.030
<v Speaker 2>become a useless organization whose only purpose is to sustain

0:05:01.070 --> 0:05:07.710
<v Speaker 2>a cast of fatally arrogant parasites masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats. Booyah!

0:05:09.110 --> 0:05:13.469
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's, you know, that's exciting language and everything

0:05:13.490 --> 0:05:15.250
<v Speaker 1>like that, but it's also just very, very true.

0:05:16.529 --> 0:05:18.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know the funny thing, I was thinking

0:05:18.710 --> 0:05:20.490
<v Speaker 2>of how great the speech was, and he went on

0:05:20.529 --> 0:05:24.050
<v Speaker 2>and on. He absolutely blasted COVID shutdowns, which I thought

0:05:24.070 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>was wonderful. Then it occurred to me, these, again, to

0:05:28.300 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>quote him, fatally arrogant parasite, being as well-intentioned bureaucrat, they

0:05:33.460 --> 0:05:35.380
<v Speaker 2>hear that stuff and they laugh, and they go back

0:05:35.420 --> 0:05:36.990
<v Speaker 2>to their cocktail parties. Right.

0:05:38.110 --> 0:05:40.340
<v Speaker 1>And the number of people that heard that speech would

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.820
<v Speaker 1>be less than 1% would be my guess.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.750
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. Tech. I almost dropped my phone. Yeah, very,

0:05:48.790 --> 0:05:53.030
<v Speaker 2>very small. And the welcome my good close pal Xi

0:05:53.070 --> 0:05:55.230
<v Speaker 2>Jinping to this white pie dinner thing.

0:05:55.250 --> 0:05:55.310
<v Speaker 6>Ah.

0:05:57.980 --> 0:06:01.420
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of percentages, will that make 1% of a difference

0:06:01.460 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 2>in the relationship with China going forward?

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>God, I don't think so. I just find it hard

0:06:04.900 --> 0:06:08.190
<v Speaker 1>to believe. They've got a 100-year plan of things they're

0:06:08.230 --> 0:06:09.930
<v Speaker 1>going to do, and they're going to keep doing them.

0:06:10.010 --> 0:06:15.210
<v Speaker 1>And whether they have roasted sea bass, I think they're having,

0:06:15.330 --> 0:06:18.310
<v Speaker 1>or something different, or Trump meets him on the tarmac,

0:06:18.380 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>or meets him in front of the White House, none

0:06:19.740 --> 0:06:22.150
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff I can imagine matters at all.

0:06:23.650 --> 0:06:27.890
<v Speaker 2>I recommend a nice California Sauvignon Blanc with that sea bass. But, yeah,

0:06:27.930 --> 0:06:30.290
<v Speaker 2>the idea that Xi Jinping would go to the Politburo

0:06:30.750 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and say, you know, that whole we've got to take

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.620
<v Speaker 2>over the globe and subjugate the U.S. and instill communism

0:06:37.660 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>all over the world. We've got to forget about that

0:06:39.339 --> 0:06:42.339
<v Speaker 2>because that Donald Trump was really nice to me. I mean,

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>come on.

0:06:43.620 --> 0:06:49.380
<v Speaker 1>Don't even. So there's that. Trump was again. I had

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:50.510
<v Speaker 1>something else I was going to say.

0:06:50.529 --> 0:06:50.890
<v Speaker 7>I don't remember.

0:06:51.029 --> 0:06:54.450
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the Iranians. So this is fairly new information. One

0:06:54.470 --> 0:06:58.470
<v Speaker 1>of your top Iranian dudes, because they're there in New

0:06:58.510 --> 0:07:02.410
<v Speaker 1>York and getting interviewed around the whole United Nations thing

0:07:02.450 --> 0:07:04.969
<v Speaker 1>this week. One of your top Iranians just said the

0:07:05.310 --> 0:07:08.290
<v Speaker 1>United States has four to five days to follow through

0:07:08.510 --> 0:07:11.150
<v Speaker 1>on the things we've demanded, which sounded more like a

0:07:11.210 --> 0:07:13.430
<v Speaker 1>threat than anything anybody's heard out of Iran in a

0:07:13.450 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>long time. We have four to five days to follow

0:07:15.890 --> 0:07:18.340
<v Speaker 1>through on the things you want or what? He didn't say.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God. I'm sure they're going to send their

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.100
<v Speaker 2>latest batch of missiles that they've hastily constructed toward our

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.180
<v Speaker 2>military bases. I hope we've hardened our defenses somehow to

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:30.060
<v Speaker 2>protect our guys.

0:07:30.290 --> 0:07:30.550
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:07:31.420 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, that one feels like it's on hold, too.

0:07:34.500 --> 0:07:39.660
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where's the progress directionally? Well, I guess the

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.170
<v Speaker 2>answer is that we're still choking their economy, and it's

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.270
<v Speaker 2>getting worse and worse, and you just kind of wait

0:07:45.290 --> 0:07:46.390
<v Speaker 2>for that to play out.

0:07:47.050 --> 0:07:48.850
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to get into some polling a

0:07:48.890 --> 0:07:51.989
<v Speaker 1>little bit later from one of your top internal pollsters

0:07:52.010 --> 0:07:54.970
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Halpern actually said he got the permission to

0:07:55.030 --> 0:07:59.850
<v Speaker 1>print out yesterday. Republicans view of the war with Iran

0:08:00.030 --> 0:08:04.550
<v Speaker 1>is really in the toilet. And this is like this

0:08:04.710 --> 0:08:08.250
<v Speaker 1>is like what the bailout was for Obama in the

0:08:08.290 --> 0:08:11.420
<v Speaker 1>rise of the Tea Party level. People are unhappy in

0:08:11.460 --> 0:08:13.700
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, the war with Iran for all kinds

0:08:13.740 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons. I mean, it is just really gone

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff in recent weeks. It was already unpopular,

0:08:19.180 --> 0:08:21.060
<v Speaker 1>but it's gotten way more unpopular.

0:08:22.150 --> 0:08:25.690
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. I'll be interested to hear the results of

0:08:25.730 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 2>that poll, and particularly if they drill down a little

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 2>bit into the why's people believe what they believe, because

0:08:31.620 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>not everybody has a radio show slash podcast. And, you know,

0:08:35.300 --> 0:08:37.860
<v Speaker 2>their actual view might be a little nuanced, but when

0:08:37.900 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>you're just asked thumbs up or thumbs down, and you

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.850
<v Speaker 2>just hate the way the wars, the prosecutor, how it's going,

0:08:43.870 --> 0:08:46.350
<v Speaker 2>you're going to say thumbs down, even if you agree

0:08:46.390 --> 0:08:49.620
<v Speaker 2>that Iran can't get a nuke. So, Yeah. Wow. I'd

0:08:49.660 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>heard the numbers were pretty miserable, but yeah.

0:08:52.460 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the percentage of people who think there is no

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>plan for ending this, for instance, it's like 80 percent

0:09:00.940 --> 0:09:05.900
<v Speaker 1>of Republicans. And I think the the constant I'm going

0:09:05.940 --> 0:09:09.420
<v Speaker 1>to obliterate them. Then you back off at midnight tonight.

0:09:09.460 --> 0:09:11.500
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to then an hour before you stop. I

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.780
<v Speaker 1>think that over time, the cumulative effect of that is, OK,

0:09:14.940 --> 0:09:17.540
<v Speaker 1>this is just ridiculous is where we've landed.

0:09:18.630 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, clearly I have chatted with conservatives from very,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>very Trumpy to kind of never Trumpy. And everybody has

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.170
<v Speaker 2>precisely the same reaction to that stuff. Just rolling their

0:09:31.250 --> 0:09:32.969
<v Speaker 2>eyes and shaking their heads and saying, what the hell

0:09:33.030 --> 0:09:33.450
<v Speaker 2>is that?

0:09:34.010 --> 0:09:34.610
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:34.670 --> 0:09:34.890
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:35.610 --> 0:09:38.610
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, I don't even really have a guess what

0:09:38.670 --> 0:09:40.930
<v Speaker 1>kind of an adult, you know, who's been around the

0:09:40.970 --> 0:09:44.730
<v Speaker 1>world and particularly a business guy who's had so many

0:09:44.770 --> 0:09:48.100
<v Speaker 1>negotiations in his life, goes around making threats like that

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.660
<v Speaker 1>all the time and then not following through. It's just,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm as mystified by that as practically anything any president

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has ever done.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess we could get into psychoanalyzing him, but that's,

0:09:58.740 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>you know. a muddy, mucky field you get stuck in.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.380
<v Speaker 2>Is it because when you're doing a hotel, if you

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>intimidate the plumbing contractor once, you don't have to deal

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.220
<v Speaker 2>with them again? You're on to another project? I don't know.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.580
<v Speaker 2>But it's odd. And I get that people are disgusted,

0:10:17.059 --> 0:10:21.130
<v Speaker 2>even if, again, they're hardcore that the mullahs can't have

0:10:21.190 --> 0:10:23.420
<v Speaker 2>a nuke, which I think most of humanity agrees on.

0:10:24.470 --> 0:10:24.790
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

0:10:25.130 --> 0:10:28.939
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking up at the TV. They're reviewing that Elizabeth

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Holmes documentary we were talking about last hour. Man, that

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.020
<v Speaker 1>looks good. I just saw all the reviews of that.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:39.260
<v Speaker 1>People say it's fantastic. And we played the clip from

0:10:39.340 --> 0:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>it a couple of weeks ago, but I hadn't watched

0:10:41.620 --> 0:10:45.350
<v Speaker 1>the video. The video. Holy crap. What is the deal

0:10:45.390 --> 0:10:45.670
<v Speaker 1>with her?

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.589
<v Speaker 2>She looks like she's possessed, doesn't she?

0:10:48.710 --> 0:10:49.090
<v Speaker 1>She does.

0:10:49.110 --> 0:10:53.230
<v Speaker 2>She's got her eyes wide and giving you that insane

0:10:53.350 --> 0:10:55.630
<v Speaker 2>look constantly. She never blinks.

0:10:56.110 --> 0:10:59.050
<v Speaker 1>She looks like she thinks she can control you with

0:10:59.090 --> 0:10:59.729
<v Speaker 1>her eyeballs.

0:11:00.690 --> 0:11:01.070
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:11:02.230 --> 0:11:02.610
<v Speaker 7>Yes.

0:11:03.290 --> 0:11:06.210
<v Speaker 1>And apparently she can because she met with people around

0:11:06.270 --> 0:11:10.150
<v Speaker 1>the world and raised billions of dollars on a phony thing.

0:11:10.190 --> 0:11:12.089
<v Speaker 1>So maybe she could look at you with those big

0:11:12.230 --> 0:11:14.250
<v Speaker 1>eyes and get you to do all kinds of weird stuff.

0:11:14.340 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:11:15.990 --> 0:11:17.670
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I'd just find it off-putting.

0:11:18.660 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it would have creeped me out. I'd have been like,

0:11:20.059 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>why are you looking at me like that?

0:11:22.140 --> 0:11:24.860
<v Speaker 2>I'd have found myself looking away a lot. Oh, right. Yeah.

0:11:25.090 --> 0:11:27.390
<v Speaker 1>Somebody who has too much eye contact and you're like,

0:11:27.510 --> 0:11:30.700
<v Speaker 1>I gotta, I gotta look away. You're weirding me out here.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.420
<v Speaker 2>You know, you make a good point, though, because in

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.900
<v Speaker 2>the documentary, she comes off as completely Looney Tunes, and

0:11:36.980 --> 0:11:41.459
<v Speaker 2>she was duping, allegedly, you know, like super heavyweights of

0:11:41.500 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>world diplomacy and industry.

0:11:43.710 --> 0:11:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, it wasn't that she went out

0:11:47.950 --> 0:11:51.090
<v Speaker 1>there and she fooled dumb people like with a Ponzi

0:11:51.110 --> 0:11:53.530
<v Speaker 1>scheme or something like that. She was convincing some of

0:11:53.550 --> 0:11:55.650
<v Speaker 1>the smartest people in the world so she can look

0:11:55.690 --> 0:11:57.650
<v Speaker 1>at you with those big eyes. Anyway, I'm going to

0:11:57.670 --> 0:11:59.170
<v Speaker 1>watch that documentary the moment it hits.

0:12:00.990 --> 0:12:05.090
<v Speaker 2>Time to me is more like coming on to men

0:12:05.290 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>in high-dollar hotels and then rolling them when they get.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:09.180
<v Speaker 1>To the room.

0:12:10.179 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 2>She strikes me as more like that than bilking former

0:12:13.420 --> 0:12:16.350
<v Speaker 2>secretaries of state out of millions of dollars. But go figure. Yeah,

0:12:16.490 --> 0:12:17.569
<v Speaker 2>it'll be an interesting watch.

0:12:17.850 --> 0:12:19.770
<v Speaker 1>So you're back in the studio tomorrow, correct?

0:12:20.750 --> 0:12:22.530
<v Speaker 2>That is correct, yeah. One more day of golf today

0:12:22.670 --> 0:12:26.170
<v Speaker 2>at the scenic and gorgeous Monterey Peninsula Country Club, and

0:12:26.220 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 2>then back to work.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:29.980
<v Speaker 1>And is this the sort of place other people can play,

0:12:30.020 --> 0:12:32.359
<v Speaker 1>or is this not someplace you've got to know somebody?

0:12:33.260 --> 0:12:35.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've got to be a guest of a member.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.110
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah. And how exclusive is it? Is this

0:12:39.150 --> 0:12:41.110
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing like when you tell other golfers,

0:12:41.130 --> 0:12:42.550
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh my God, you get to play there?

0:12:43.510 --> 0:12:44.809
<v Speaker 1>A little bit, yeah. Oh, cool.

0:12:45.370 --> 0:12:45.550
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:45.910 --> 0:12:47.010
<v Speaker 1>And then do you lord it over them?

0:12:47.030 --> 0:12:47.150
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:49.450 --> 0:12:53.050
<v Speaker 2>No, I act as if it's no big deal, which

0:12:53.130 --> 0:12:55.010
<v Speaker 2>is the best kind of lording it over them.

0:12:55.230 --> 0:12:56.130
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:12:56.390 --> 0:12:57.410
<v Speaker 2>Take that, little people.

0:12:57.460 --> 0:13:01.540
<v Speaker 1>Take that. Okay, perfect. Well, thanks for calling in. We

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:02.380
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you tomorrow.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:04.980
<v Speaker 2>Of course. Sorry to abandon the show in a time

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 2>of need. If you need, I'll see you tomorrow.

0:13:06.340 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the time of need during the UN conference. Yeah,

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the best way to lord it over someone. Oh, yeah, yeah,

0:13:12.340 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I play there. I play there a lot. Yeah, why?

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to play there? Oh, I'm sorry you haven't.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the kind of people that probably play at

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.540
<v Speaker 1>that golf course mostly, the suit and tie crowd, if

0:13:25.580 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you think financial planning is only for those people, you

0:13:28.580 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>should think again. We want to tell you about blue-collar dollar,

0:13:31.500 --> 0:13:35.420
<v Speaker 1>small business owners, farmers, hardworking people who build this country

0:13:35.460 --> 0:13:38.020
<v Speaker 1>that get ignored by Wall Street, but making good money,

0:13:38.610 --> 0:13:41.110
<v Speaker 1>just it's a different crowd. We all know that. I

0:13:41.150 --> 0:13:43.990
<v Speaker 1>grew up with this crowd. A blue collar dollar really

0:13:44.050 --> 0:13:46.750
<v Speaker 1>changes the game, providing high level retirement strategies for the

0:13:46.809 --> 0:13:49.090
<v Speaker 1>men and women who do the heavy lifting. No jargon,

0:13:49.130 --> 0:13:51.610
<v Speaker 1>no corporate fluffer. If you're over 55 and you've put

0:13:51.650 --> 0:13:55.489
<v Speaker 1>aside at least $ 250, 000 for retirement, blue collar dollar has

0:13:55.550 --> 0:13:57.750
<v Speaker 1>an offer for you. Pick up your phone right now,

0:13:57.890 --> 0:14:01.010
<v Speaker 1>dial pound 250 and say the keyword blue collar dollar

0:14:01.510 --> 0:14:04.550
<v Speaker 1>for your complimentary financial review from a licensed talent advisor.

0:14:04.570 --> 0:14:07.470
<v Speaker 1>That's pound 250 blue collar dollar.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Paid endorsement. Armstrong and Getty are not talent clients and

0:14:09.820 --> 0:14:11.980
<v Speaker 2>receive compensation for promoting talent, creating a conflict of interest.

0:14:12.020 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Investment advisory services offered through Talent LLC and SEC Registered

0:14:14.460 --> 0:14:14.980
<v Speaker 2>Investment Advisor.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>For more additional disclosures, visit bluecollar.com, paid for by Epic Financial.

0:14:19.180 --> 0:14:24.450
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:14:27.250 --> 0:14:33.270
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show. Well, it's become the most

0:14:33.370 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>famous bar in America, The Last Ditch, there in Greenfield, Massachusetts.

0:14:37.750 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the lesbian bar that drops its mask mandate and

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.860
<v Speaker 1>people go crazy there, some of the patrons. It's gotten

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.780
<v Speaker 1>a ton of attention in the last couple of days. Well,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the free press has got a great piece on it

0:14:50.970 --> 0:14:53.410
<v Speaker 1>today that we'll have to get to later this hour.

0:14:53.870 --> 0:14:57.070
<v Speaker 1>Such an interesting story about the woke crowd and them

0:14:57.190 --> 0:15:00.620
<v Speaker 1>eating themselves. Again, later this hour. Also, we got a

0:15:00.660 --> 0:15:02.220
<v Speaker 1>great guest. We're going to talk to Bill Gertz about

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>China coming up. We've talked to him before. He's really good,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't heard his act on Trump and Xi

0:15:07.780 --> 0:15:11.670
<v Speaker 1>and the real particulars of the issues between the United

0:15:11.690 --> 0:15:15.710
<v Speaker 1>States and China. This is from Bill Maher. He had

0:15:15.770 --> 0:15:18.350
<v Speaker 1>Terry Bradshaw on his show. If you're old enough, you

0:15:18.370 --> 0:15:21.870
<v Speaker 1>remember Terry Bradshaw was Tom Brady before Tom Brady was

0:15:21.910 --> 0:15:24.110
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. He won four Super Bowls back in the 70s.

0:15:24.150 --> 0:15:26.950
<v Speaker 1>Terry Bradshaw is a quarterback. Anyway, Bill Maher was talking

0:15:26.970 --> 0:15:28.790
<v Speaker 1>to him about Football then and now.

0:15:29.410 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 7>You took hits that no quarterback today takes.

0:15:33.340 --> 0:15:35.450
<v Speaker 1>It was a different game in the 70s.

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 7>That's why I'm against comparing statistics. You cannot, as great

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.570
<v Speaker 7>as the quarterbacks are today, they don't, and I'm glad

0:15:42.590 --> 0:15:44.970
<v Speaker 7>that they protect them more, but they just did not

0:15:45.070 --> 0:15:45.670
<v Speaker 7>live in the world.

0:15:45.690 --> 0:15:47.330
<v Speaker 1>But don't sit here and tell me that they're better

0:15:47.390 --> 0:15:48.050
<v Speaker 1>than we were in.

0:15:48.030 --> 0:15:50.450
<v Speaker 4>The 70s or the 60s, because they didn't play under

0:15:50.470 --> 0:15:52.230
<v Speaker 4>the same rules where you got slapped on the face,

0:15:52.250 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 4>body slapped. and knocked all over the place. You couldn't throw.

0:15:55.900 --> 0:15:57.980
<v Speaker 4>They played bump and run. You couldn't just stand back

0:15:58.020 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 4>there and throw it all. Oh, he's the greatest player

0:15:59.820 --> 0:16:02.060
<v Speaker 4>to ever play. No, he isn't the greatest player. He's

0:16:02.140 --> 0:16:05.420
<v Speaker 4>maybe the greatest of his decade, but not ever.

0:16:05.500 --> 0:16:08.860
<v Speaker 1>I don't ever use ever. Yeah, well, that's true about

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.660
<v Speaker 1>all the sports comparisons over time. Everything, the ball in

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.780
<v Speaker 1>baseball or the way they, the three-point line in the

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>NBA or the way they call fouls and then the football,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.530
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different stuff. But anyway, Terry Bradshaw goes on.

0:16:22.190 --> 0:16:25.750
<v Speaker 1>Now we have high death. We have where we can,

0:16:26.020 --> 0:16:26.460
<v Speaker 1>where we have.

0:16:26.460 --> 0:16:29.490
<v Speaker 4>20 tape machines, 30 cameras.

0:16:29.990 --> 0:16:30.870
<v Speaker 1>Let's slow it down.

0:16:31.050 --> 0:16:33.910
<v Speaker 4>We're even under the ball where they fall down, and

0:16:33.930 --> 0:16:35.590
<v Speaker 4>we got in slow-mo.

0:16:36.290 --> 0:16:36.460
<v Speaker 6>Ah!

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh, my God! That looks like his jersey moved!

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 6>And they go.

0:16:43.220 --> 0:16:45.660
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't the fact that we have a perfect game,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 4>which is what they're trying to get. What made it

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.700
<v Speaker 4>great was collision and pass interference and bad calls and

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>the fans being mad.

0:16:53.020 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:16:55.940 --> 0:16:59.820
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. I'm against the replays constantly,

0:16:59.860 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but everybody else seems to like it. Yesterday was a

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.470
<v Speaker 1>major moment in NFL history, and then I will move

0:17:05.550 --> 0:17:07.590
<v Speaker 1>off sports because I know it makes some of you mad,

0:17:07.630 --> 0:17:12.830
<v Speaker 1>but it was 25 years ago yesterday that Drew Bledsoe,

0:17:12.930 --> 0:17:17.290
<v Speaker 1>who was the starting quarterback for the Patriots, got blasted

0:17:17.330 --> 0:17:20.149
<v Speaker 1>and hurt. So they had to put in their backup

0:17:20.340 --> 0:17:25.139
<v Speaker 1>some sixth-round draft pick, Tom Brady, and Which is the

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.780
<v Speaker 1>only reason Tom Brady got to play is because Drew

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.899
<v Speaker 1>Bledsoe got hurt and they put in Tom Brady and

0:17:30.140 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they went on to win. I think they won the

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl that year and then Tom Brady won seven

0:17:33.859 --> 0:17:38.750
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls. So much for people being able to evaluate

0:17:38.930 --> 0:17:41.970
<v Speaker 1>talent if you got Tom Brady on the sideline waiting.

0:17:43.830 --> 0:17:47.550
<v Speaker 1>Game tonight, by the way, Falcons-Packers. I have to pick

0:17:47.770 --> 0:17:49.570
<v Speaker 1>a team to win that game because I'm in a

0:17:49.630 --> 0:17:52.030
<v Speaker 1>pool now and I'm actually winning the pool with a

0:17:52.050 --> 0:17:55.010
<v Speaker 1>bunch of my family. I'm winning after two weeks. I

0:17:55.030 --> 0:17:58.909
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything. I know some, but just like a

0:17:59.130 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of teams and barely. I don't watch any games. Like,

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.340
<v Speaker 1>I'll guess tonight based on nothing. I couldn't name a

0:18:05.420 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>single player on either team, and I will pick one.

0:18:07.660 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I'm currently winning. We're going to learn more

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>about the relationship between China and U.S. And is it

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>going the right way or the wrong way? Or is

0:18:14.780 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it going to get any better because of the dinner

0:18:16.500 --> 0:18:18.610
<v Speaker 1>tonight with Trump and Xi? I doubt it. We'll talk

0:18:18.619 --> 0:18:21.050
<v Speaker 1>to Bill Gertz next. He's super interesting if you haven't

0:18:21.070 --> 0:18:22.949
<v Speaker 1>heard him. If you miss him, get the podcast Armstrong

0:18:23.010 --> 0:18:23.710
<v Speaker 1>and Getty on demand.

0:18:24.410 --> 0:18:25.570
<v Speaker 8>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:25.590 --> 0:18:31.970
<v Speaker 6>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:35.230 --> 0:18:37.990
<v Speaker 5>Not content to wait at the White House, President Trump

0:18:38.090 --> 0:18:41.770
<v Speaker 5>choppered to Joint Base Andrews this afternoon to greet Chinese

0:18:41.850 --> 0:18:45.890
<v Speaker 5>President Xi Jinping. It's the first time a U.S. president

0:18:45.930 --> 0:18:48.550
<v Speaker 5>has made that gesture for a foreign head of state

0:18:48.930 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 5>since 1962. We're doing very well with China.

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.419
<v Speaker 1>President Xi and I have a good relationship. We're doing

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.820
<v Speaker 1>very well with China. And that being the first time

0:18:58.900 --> 0:19:04.020
<v Speaker 1>in 60-whatever years... that a president has met the Chinese

0:19:04.060 --> 0:19:06.619
<v Speaker 1>leader on the tarmac, that and $ 5 will get you

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a cup of coffee. Who cares? Anyway, the chairman of

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:15.820
<v Speaker 1>the Armed Services Committee, his name is Wicker, said, Mr. President,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.899
<v Speaker 1>during every minute of dialogue, our commander-in-chief should keep in

0:19:18.940 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mind that his guest is a brutal, unelected, and oppressive

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dictator who seeks to dominate his neighbors and whose massive

0:19:26.020 --> 0:19:30.450
<v Speaker 1>military arsenal is aimed directly at the United States of America. Yeah,

0:19:30.470 --> 0:19:34.370
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that we give Xi such a royal treatment,

0:19:34.430 --> 0:19:36.650
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that all of that is very true.

0:19:37.150 --> 0:19:40.070
<v Speaker 1>We welcome to the Armstrong and Getty Show Bill Gertz

0:19:40.130 --> 0:19:42.369
<v Speaker 1>again to talk about China. He's a columnist and reporter

0:19:42.410 --> 0:19:46.030
<v Speaker 1>with The Washington Times and knows a lot about this topic. Bill,

0:19:46.050 --> 0:19:47.630
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:19:48.690 --> 0:19:49.850
<v Speaker 6>Hi, good to be on the program.

0:19:50.310 --> 0:19:52.270
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we should have invited Xi and treat

0:19:52.310 --> 0:19:54.770
<v Speaker 1>him like this, or is it possible you get something

0:19:54.810 --> 0:19:55.090
<v Speaker 1>out of it?

0:19:56.710 --> 0:20:00.389
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm very skeptical of the idea of allowing a

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:04.980
<v Speaker 6>brutal communist dictator. I agree with Senator Wicker. This is

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.410
<v Speaker 6>a longstanding thing. I think the president is trying to

0:20:09.230 --> 0:20:14.510
<v Speaker 6>take a page out of the playbook. of Teddy Roosevelt,

0:20:14.630 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 6>talk softly and carry a big stick. He's trying to

0:20:17.670 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 6>schmooze the Chinese leader, and there's lots of differences, and

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 6>mostly over trade, and also, again, the military, and of course,

0:20:26.340 --> 0:20:30.700
<v Speaker 6>the human rights violations. And hey, let's not forget, China

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.980
<v Speaker 6>unleashed the COVID virus on the world and killed six,

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.070
<v Speaker 6>seven million people, and they've never been held accountable to

0:20:37.109 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 6>that So, yeah, it's a mixture of trying to schmooze

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.899
<v Speaker 6>this leader with pageantry. I don't expect much substance to

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 6>come from the summit.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, neither do I. And Senator Wicker specifically mentioned the

0:20:50.300 --> 0:20:54.420
<v Speaker 1>very recent occurrence of China's helping Iran. We're at war

0:20:54.460 --> 0:20:58.129
<v Speaker 1>with Iran. China's helping the opponent. I hope that comes up.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:04.380
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that was a good point. He basically confirmed what

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.900
<v Speaker 6>was on background in news reports that China had provided

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.490
<v Speaker 6>satellite imagery to Iran that was used by Iran to

0:21:12.530 --> 0:21:16.610
<v Speaker 6>conduct missile attacks on U.S. facilities in the Middle East.

0:21:16.770 --> 0:21:20.989
<v Speaker 6>So clearly, we're at war with Iran. They're helping Iran.

0:21:21.490 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 6>And why should we be giving this dictator all this

0:21:25.060 --> 0:21:28.740
<v Speaker 6>lavish praise and a White House state dinner tonight?

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a minor point, but I've never understood why

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.610
<v Speaker 1>our national media refers to these people as presidents, why

0:21:35.630 --> 0:21:38.909
<v Speaker 1>you refer to President Putin as president or President Xi

0:21:38.950 --> 0:21:42.899
<v Speaker 1>as president. An act like that is a meaningful term.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Why do we even do that?

0:21:45.070 --> 0:21:48.609
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's really interesting. Yeah, it's, you know, from a

0:21:48.670 --> 0:21:52.780
<v Speaker 6>news perspective, as a newspaper reporter, the problem comes with

0:21:52.859 --> 0:21:57.060
<v Speaker 6>the Associated Press and other outlets that set the agenda

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 6>for how to describe foreign leaders. It's called the newspaper style.

0:22:02.180 --> 0:22:06.670
<v Speaker 6>And clearly, Xi Jinping should be referred to as the

0:22:07.950 --> 0:22:11.790
<v Speaker 6>general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, the chairman of

0:22:11.850 --> 0:22:15.990
<v Speaker 6>the Central Military Commission, and then lastly, as president of China.

0:22:16.970 --> 0:22:19.700
<v Speaker 1>So the style book says whatever they call themselves, we're

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:21.500
<v Speaker 1>supposed to call them that? Is that the rule?

0:22:23.510 --> 0:22:26.550
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, I mean, the style book is, it's very,

0:22:27.109 --> 0:22:29.390
<v Speaker 6>you know, I mean, they can do a lot of things.

0:22:29.470 --> 0:22:32.170
<v Speaker 6>It has a lot of political power. If you control

0:22:32.210 --> 0:22:34.690
<v Speaker 6>the language, you can control the narrative on a lot

0:22:34.730 --> 0:22:34.990
<v Speaker 6>of these.

0:22:35.550 --> 0:22:38.970
<v Speaker 1>Heck yeah, obviously that gives him some legitimacy. It kind

0:22:38.990 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of puts in people's minds who don't really pay that

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.220
<v Speaker 1>close attention that, you know, he runs for office and

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.260
<v Speaker 1>is elected by the people like our president.

0:22:47.260 --> 0:22:49.740
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and the problem with China is that it is

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.969
<v Speaker 6>not a normal state. like Japan or Germany. It's a

0:22:55.930 --> 0:23:01.389
<v Speaker 6>communist party-run state. So the Chinese Communist Party has basically

0:23:01.490 --> 0:23:05.169
<v Speaker 6>converted all government elements, whether it's their foreign ministry or

0:23:05.770 --> 0:23:10.250
<v Speaker 6>their commerce ministry. It's all tightly controlled by a political party.

0:23:10.810 --> 0:23:12.469
<v Speaker 6>And it's not the same.

0:23:12.250 --> 0:23:13.350
<v Speaker 1>As a normal nation.

0:23:13.510 --> 0:23:17.050
<v Speaker 6>And people do not understand. And what we really need

0:23:17.070 --> 0:23:22.650
<v Speaker 6>to understand is the ideology behind the Chinese communist. Xi

0:23:22.690 --> 0:23:27.770
<v Speaker 6>Jinping is a hardcore Marxist-Leninist. He's not going to be

0:23:27.790 --> 0:23:34.570
<v Speaker 6>a normal foreign leader, again, like somebody like Takayuchi from Japan. Basically,

0:23:34.710 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 6>he has an agenda. His agenda is world domination under communism.

0:23:40.380 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 6>And the main obstacle to that agenda is the United States.

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:49.369
<v Speaker 6>And he's working behind the scenes covertly to subvert the

0:23:49.410 --> 0:23:52.930
<v Speaker 6>United States, weaken it, and ultimately destroy it so that

0:23:53.490 --> 0:23:56.990
<v Speaker 6>China has a clear path down the field to take

0:23:57.070 --> 0:23:57.650
<v Speaker 6>over the world.

0:23:58.330 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>You write for The Washington Times. I probably shouldn't bring

0:24:00.890 --> 0:24:03.859
<v Speaker 1>up another newspaper, but George Will, who writes for another

0:24:03.910 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington newspaper, had a great article the other day about

0:24:08.780 --> 0:24:13.300
<v Speaker 1>the realities of if China moves on Taiwan, say, next year.

0:24:14.010 --> 0:24:16.470
<v Speaker 1>as President Xi had told the military to be ready

0:24:16.550 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, there aren't a lot of good options, are there?

0:24:20.730 --> 0:24:23.870
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, I've talked to the commander of the U.S.

0:24:23.930 --> 0:24:28.170
<v Speaker 6>Pacific Command, Admiral Sam Paparo, and he's pretty convinced he

0:24:28.250 --> 0:24:31.530
<v Speaker 6>could defeat the Chinese, but at a great cost. In

0:24:31.590 --> 0:24:38.530
<v Speaker 6>other words, in lives and in resources. But the Taiwan Strait,

0:24:38.970 --> 0:24:44.340
<v Speaker 6>the 100-mile-wide strait separating Taiwan from the mainland, is clearly

0:24:44.390 --> 0:24:48.940
<v Speaker 6>the hottest flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. And yes, Xi Jinping

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.700
<v Speaker 6>has ordered the PLA be ready to take Taiwan by

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.550
<v Speaker 6>next year. Now, that said, and in line with that,

0:24:56.650 --> 0:25:01.190
<v Speaker 6>they've conducted massive military operations over the last three years

0:25:01.250 --> 0:25:06.889
<v Speaker 6>to encircle Taiwan, to practice invasions against the island. And

0:25:07.570 --> 0:25:13.130
<v Speaker 6>it is really a democratic stronghold in Asia. It shows

0:25:13.230 --> 0:25:18.620
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese are that democracy can work within the Chinese culture.

0:25:18.710 --> 0:25:21.220
<v Speaker 6>And this is one of the reasons that China is

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.220
<v Speaker 6>so bent on taking over that island.

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, one of the concerns is that the way they

0:25:28.140 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>do it is a blockade. And then it would be

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.850
<v Speaker 1>basically challenging us, are you going to come break this

0:25:33.890 --> 0:25:35.169
<v Speaker 1>blockade or not?

0:25:37.109 --> 0:25:41.910
<v Speaker 6>Very good question. Yeah, Trump has held his cards close

0:25:41.950 --> 0:25:46.010
<v Speaker 6>to the vest on that. His view is that he

0:25:46.210 --> 0:25:50.090
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't say he should leave the ambiguity. And there is

0:25:50.130 --> 0:25:55.230
<v Speaker 6>a lot of concern, especially in Washington, on both sides

0:25:55.270 --> 0:25:58.300
<v Speaker 6>of the political aisle, by the way, that the U.S.

0:25:58.410 --> 0:26:03.179
<v Speaker 6>could perhaps make a deal with China over Taiwan. And

0:26:04.210 --> 0:26:07.909
<v Speaker 6>three senators, Mitch McConnell and two others, wrote to the

0:26:07.950 --> 0:26:13.290
<v Speaker 6>president recently saying, hey, let's get going with this $ 14

0:26:12.490 --> 0:26:16.260
<v Speaker 6>billion arms package, which the Trump administration has held up

0:26:17.420 --> 0:26:22.420
<v Speaker 6>for Taiwan, basically at the request of the Chinese. So

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.110
<v Speaker 6>at the summit, which is going on right now, Xi

0:26:26.150 --> 0:26:30.430
<v Speaker 6>Jinping is going to press harder on the Trump administration

0:26:30.590 --> 0:26:35.210
<v Speaker 6>not to provide weapons to Taiwan. And that's key. Providing

0:26:35.250 --> 0:26:40.020
<v Speaker 6>those weapons provides a deterrence capability. If you can increase

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.980
<v Speaker 6>the cost to China's military of conducting an operation over

0:26:44.020 --> 0:26:47.060
<v Speaker 6>the Taiwan Strait, they'll think twice about doing it.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.110
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to continue to not allow Chinese electric

0:26:53.170 --> 0:26:54.109
<v Speaker 1>cars into our country?

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.510
<v Speaker 6>That's a big question. I know American carmakers are worried

0:26:58.530 --> 0:27:03.750
<v Speaker 6>about that. From a competitive standpoint, from a national security standpoint,

0:27:04.430 --> 0:27:08.990
<v Speaker 6>those cars are wired to the Chinese system. And again,

0:27:09.170 --> 0:27:12.490
<v Speaker 6>the China system is not, they don't have private companies there.

0:27:12.930 --> 0:27:16.609
<v Speaker 6>They have something called the military fusion system. So every

0:27:16.710 --> 0:27:21.270
<v Speaker 6>company in China is required under Chinese Communist Party rules

0:27:21.650 --> 0:27:25.550
<v Speaker 6>that they have to cooperate with both the military and

0:27:25.590 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 6>the intelligence services. So unleashing Chinese electric cars in the

0:27:31.460 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 6>United States, to me, would be a great national security threat.

0:27:35.540 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow. And then there's the issue of AI, which every

0:27:40.660 --> 0:27:43.500
<v Speaker 1>news outlet is claiming is front and center with the

0:27:43.540 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>conversations with the Trump White House and President Xi's team.

0:27:48.340 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Anything to gain there?

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 6>I don't think much will come from the summit on

0:27:54.600 --> 0:28:00.310
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence. Basically, the Chinese want the U.S. to loosen

0:28:00.510 --> 0:28:04.730
<v Speaker 6>export controls on advanced chips from those NVIDIA chips, which

0:28:04.850 --> 0:28:09.899
<v Speaker 6>are really the computer power behind AI. We're in an

0:28:09.980 --> 0:28:14.460
<v Speaker 6>AI race with China. I don't agree with the corporate people,

0:28:14.500 --> 0:28:16.710
<v Speaker 6>the tech people that want us to slow down. I

0:28:16.750 --> 0:28:21.190
<v Speaker 6>think that would only advantage China. And we definitely should

0:28:21.330 --> 0:28:24.770
<v Speaker 6>not do anything that would allow China to gain an

0:28:24.910 --> 0:28:27.389
<v Speaker 6>edge in the AI race. I think that would be

0:28:27.450 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 6>a huge mistake for the United States, because what's at

0:28:30.940 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 6>stake is the free and open democratic system. The Chinese

0:28:34.700 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 6>government Their AI is constrained under Marxist-Leninist rules. They cannot

0:28:40.950 --> 0:28:44.459
<v Speaker 6>tell the truth. One of the key features of communism,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.900
<v Speaker 6>I've learned this over 40 years, is lies and deception.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.100
<v Speaker 6>And they will incorporate those lies and deception into their AI.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.930
<v Speaker 6>And if their AI models become the world standard, we're

0:28:56.950 --> 0:28:59.370
<v Speaker 6>going to lose a great amount of freedom.

0:29:00.900 --> 0:29:03.580
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's been some belief, I've read a lot about

0:29:04.660 --> 0:29:07.410
<v Speaker 1>the whole AI thing, the battle between us and China,

0:29:07.470 --> 0:29:11.990
<v Speaker 1>that President Xi's more afraid of artificial general intelligence than

0:29:12.050 --> 0:29:14.890
<v Speaker 1>we are because of the fact that maybe he can't

0:29:14.970 --> 0:29:18.020
<v Speaker 1>control it once it becomes too smart and keep it from,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, telling the truth, for instance.

0:29:22.380 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I wrote a story about this in the Washington

0:29:24.580 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Times recently. The head of the Chinese intelligence system, the

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.940
<v Speaker 6>Ministry of State Security, wrote an article recently which said

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:38.330
<v Speaker 6>that AI could pose an existential threat to the Chinese

0:29:38.370 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 6>Communist Party rule. I say, hey, this is a roadmap

0:29:43.020 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 6>for how to defeat this despised political party, which has

0:29:48.660 --> 0:29:51.900
<v Speaker 6>been responsible for the deaths of more than 60 million

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:52.740
<v Speaker 6>Chinese people.

0:29:53.340 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 8>So, yeah, I.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Think it's a two-edged sword. And I think that the

0:29:58.100 --> 0:30:02.530
<v Speaker 6>United States hopefully will use AI to bring about a

0:30:02.770 --> 0:30:07.130
<v Speaker 6>political reform within China. And that can only happen if

0:30:07.230 --> 0:30:11.490
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese Communist Party is defeated, like its predecessor, the

0:30:11.530 --> 0:30:12.810
<v Speaker 6>Soviet Communist Party.

0:30:13.490 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Since you don't see a lot of movement with this

0:30:16.340 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get-together between Trump and Xi and a lot of positive,

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is the best positive we can get with China positive?

0:30:22.570 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Their demographics, their economy, just the situation their country is

0:30:27.860 --> 0:30:28.430
<v Speaker 1>in right now.

0:30:30.430 --> 0:30:33.870
<v Speaker 6>They have a lot of problems. Xi Jinping is facing problems.

0:30:33.970 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 6>I'd say the two most significant problems within China are

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.140
<v Speaker 6>the fact that they have a military that's been devastated

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.100
<v Speaker 6>by corruption or political purges.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 8>We don't really know.

0:30:46.140 --> 0:30:50.620
<v Speaker 6>There's so much secrecy there. But basically, the entire Central

0:30:50.700 --> 0:30:54.300
<v Speaker 6>Military Commission, except for one other officer in And Xi

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.180
<v Speaker 6>Jinping has been completely removed. And now the ostensible reason

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.020
<v Speaker 6>is it's for some type of corruption. But more likely,

0:31:02.500 --> 0:31:07.540
<v Speaker 6>there's a very strong political factions within the Chinese Communist Party.

0:31:07.980 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 6>And somehow Xi Jinping feels threatened that the military is

0:31:12.340 --> 0:31:13.740
<v Speaker 6>somehow posing a threat.

0:31:14.740 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>To his rule.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 6>And the second thing is the Chinese economy. They've got

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:24.130
<v Speaker 6>huge internal economic problems, primarily as a result of President

0:31:24.150 --> 0:31:28.690
<v Speaker 6>Trump's tariffs. They're basically fighting to keep their economy afloat.

0:31:29.450 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 6>Back maybe 10, 15 years ago, they loosened up. They

0:31:34.340 --> 0:31:39.580
<v Speaker 6>basically had a quasi capitalist system, which was marginally controlled

0:31:39.620 --> 0:31:43.380
<v Speaker 6>by the Communist Party. Now, under Xi Jinping, he has

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.180
<v Speaker 6>definitely reined in all the private sector and tried to

0:31:47.220 --> 0:31:52.070
<v Speaker 6>bring it back under tight Chinese communist rule control. And

0:31:52.370 --> 0:31:55.490
<v Speaker 6>the result is their economy is going down the tubes.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.700
<v Speaker 1>That is super interesting stuff. I'm glad I brought that up.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Bill Gertz, columnist and reporter of

0:32:03.820 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Times. We'll keep an eye on the summit,

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but I, like you, don't expect a lot. Thanks for

0:32:08.780 --> 0:32:09.380
<v Speaker 1>your time today.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:11.460
<v Speaker 6>Thank you very much.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:17.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. China's not going to change what they want to do.

0:32:17.060 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>They want to take over the world. That's their goal.

0:32:19.220 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>They're going to do everything they can to accomplish that.

0:32:22.740 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why more people don't realize there's no

0:32:25.100 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>such thing as a Chinese company that isn't part of

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist Party. You're not allowed to have a

0:32:32.020 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>business or a company that's not part of, as he said,

0:32:35.500 --> 0:32:39.210
<v Speaker 1>their military fusion or whatever it's called, whether it's TikTok

0:32:39.250 --> 0:32:41.070
<v Speaker 1>or a shoe company or whatever the heck it is.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Just talking about how I'm leading with a pool that

0:32:46.700 --> 0:32:48.300
<v Speaker 1>I'm in with the football games, even though I don't

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.380
<v Speaker 1>know anything about it. The football season is heating up

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and every week feels bigger with DraftKings. DraftKings is now

0:32:53.940 --> 0:32:56.980
<v Speaker 1>live in all 50 states. One app, all the football nationwide.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.340
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings customers, if you're new, sign up with the code Armstrong.

0:33:01.420 --> 0:33:04.620
<v Speaker 1>Spend five bucks to get $ 150 in rewards within 14 days,

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>including all markets. That code is Armstrong. In partnership with DraftKings,

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the crown is yours. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

0:33:11.980 --> 0:33:12.900
<v Speaker 8>1-800-MY-RESET.

0:33:12.940 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut. Call 888-789-7777.

0:33:14.330 --> 0:33:19.710
<v Speaker 8>Visit ccpg.org. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino in Kansas,

0:33:19.810 --> 0:33:22.930
<v Speaker 8>bet tax pass-through may apply in Illinois. 21 plus. Void

0:33:22.950 --> 0:33:25.770
<v Speaker 8>in Canada. Bet with DraftKings Sportsbook to get bonus bets

0:33:25.810 --> 0:33:28.970
<v Speaker 8>that expire in seven days or trade with DraftKings Predictions

0:33:29.030 --> 0:33:31.580
<v Speaker 8>to get predictions dollars that expire in one year. Event

0:33:31.620 --> 0:33:34.420
<v Speaker 8>contract trading involves risk of loss. Predictions offer void in

0:33:34.460 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 8>New York. Non-withdrawable rewards issued as $ 50 click-to-claims every 7

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 8>days for 21 days. Terms at dkng.co slash offer. Limited

0:33:42.900 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 8>time offer. Nationwide based on sportsbook predictions and free-to-play sports

0:33:46.420 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 8>contest availability. Varies by state.

0:33:50.290 --> 0:34:00.090
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:34:00.850 --> 0:34:02.590
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:34:11.670 --> 0:34:15.690
<v Speaker 3>A bakery in Soho has gained attention online for offering

0:34:15.730 --> 0:34:19.130
<v Speaker 3>a loaf of sourdough bread that costs $ 60, which sounds

0:34:19.150 --> 0:34:23.290
<v Speaker 3>like a lot, but instead of butter, it comes with $ 52.

0:34:22.690 --> 0:34:33.380
<v Speaker 1>So Kirsten Sinema's ex-boyfriend went nuts and threw all her

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.190
<v Speaker 1>paintings in the pool. If you don't remember who she is.

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:43.130
<v Speaker 1>She was the bisexual senator from Arizona, U.S. senator. She

0:34:43.170 --> 0:34:48.790
<v Speaker 1>was the first bisexual person or openly bisexual person admitted

0:34:48.989 --> 0:34:55.310
<v Speaker 1>to the elected to the U.S. Senate. Were the like

0:34:55.410 --> 0:34:58.530
<v Speaker 1>thigh high boots with her short skirts and stuff like that. Anyway,

0:34:58.969 --> 0:35:01.770
<v Speaker 1>she and I liked her politics. I don't care what

0:35:01.790 --> 0:35:03.530
<v Speaker 1>she does in her personal life. None of my business.

0:35:03.890 --> 0:35:05.890
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dating her. Wasn't not married to her or whatever.

0:35:06.219 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what she does in personal life. I

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>liked her politics. Remember with Joe Manchin, she held firm

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on not blowing up the filibuster and a couple other

0:35:14.219 --> 0:35:16.739
<v Speaker 1>crazy things the Democrats wanted to do that they would

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.670
<v Speaker 1>have done. And she was a Democrat senator from Arizona,

0:35:19.790 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>eventually switched to independents. So I liked her politics, but man,

0:35:23.260 --> 0:35:26.020
<v Speaker 1>her personal life was a mess. So she's currently being

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sued under North Carolina's homewrecker laws. How do we feel

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>about homewrecker laws if you lean libertarian slash conservative? I

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.620
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth on a lot of these different topics.

0:35:39.660 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that, well, I can tell you specifically

0:35:45.020 --> 0:35:48.780
<v Speaker 1>what is going on here. So if you remember, Kyrsten

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.580
<v Speaker 1>Sinema had a scandal toward the end of her being

0:35:51.620 --> 0:35:55.900
<v Speaker 1>a U.S. senator where it was found out that she

0:35:55.940 --> 0:35:59.219
<v Speaker 1>was having an affair with her bodyguard. And she and

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:03.489
<v Speaker 1>her bodyguard were having sex at hotels, on business trips,

0:36:03.650 --> 0:36:06.390
<v Speaker 1>government trips all across the country. All of this came

0:36:06.469 --> 0:36:10.250
<v Speaker 1>out in testimony because they have homewrecker laws in North

0:36:10.290 --> 0:36:14.390
<v Speaker 1>Carolina where her bodyguard was married and the bodyguard's wife,

0:36:14.530 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he was married. is the bodyguard's wife is suing Kyrsten

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Sinema under this homewrecker law. And the idea is that

0:36:21.540 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>we had a family, which is also a business, but

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we had a happy family, me, him and kids and

0:36:27.140 --> 0:36:30.380
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. And you came along and got in

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.310
<v Speaker 1>the middle of that and wrecked our, the way I

0:36:33.370 --> 0:36:34.609
<v Speaker 1>look at it. And this is one of the reasons

0:36:34.650 --> 0:36:37.169
<v Speaker 1>I think the laws make sense to me. You came

0:36:37.230 --> 0:36:41.290
<v Speaker 1>along and wrecked our business by getting involved with my husband.

0:36:41.330 --> 0:36:43.830
<v Speaker 1>You knew I was in a business and you wrecked

0:36:43.910 --> 0:36:47.750
<v Speaker 1>my business. there's only five states that have these laws.

0:36:48.530 --> 0:36:49.770
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I think about it. I'd like

0:36:49.810 --> 0:36:53.029
<v Speaker 1>to hear a debate about this. But it's North Carolina, Mississippi.

0:36:53.330 --> 0:36:57.190
<v Speaker 1>So you're thinking, okay, the South. But it's South Dakota, Hawaii,

0:36:57.290 --> 0:37:01.250
<v Speaker 1>and Utah. It's quite the mishmash of states there that

0:37:01.270 --> 0:37:04.299
<v Speaker 1>had these homewrecker laws. Anyway, because of the lawsuit under

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.460
<v Speaker 1>the homewrecker law, we found out all about this stuff

0:37:07.020 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of her having sexing up this bodyguard, and they were

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in an affair. Well, he went nutso the other day,

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:17.689
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason. We don't exactly know why. And went

0:37:17.750 --> 0:37:21.790
<v Speaker 1>to her house, broke in, and started damaging stuff. He

0:37:21.910 --> 0:37:26.390
<v Speaker 1>caused more than $ 200, 000 in damage, tossed dozens of valuable

0:37:26.410 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>paintings into her pool. threatening that he would throw a

0:37:30.260 --> 0:37:33.259
<v Speaker 1>piece of artwork in the pool every 10 minutes if

0:37:33.340 --> 0:37:36.140
<v Speaker 1>she didn't concede to his demands and make a post

0:37:36.260 --> 0:37:39.250
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter. We don't know what the post to Twitter

0:37:39.290 --> 0:37:42.410
<v Speaker 1>was going to be. Post that on Twitter. I'm throwing

0:37:42.450 --> 0:37:44.620
<v Speaker 1>another painting in the pool. The police finally showed up.

0:37:44.630 --> 0:37:48.150
<v Speaker 1>There's like 12 pieces of artwork at the bottom of

0:37:48.170 --> 0:37:50.330
<v Speaker 1>the pool. The guy went nuts. He's in a mental

0:37:50.370 --> 0:37:53.690
<v Speaker 1>facility right now. There's your Kirsten Cinema update, if you

0:37:53.710 --> 0:37:54.489
<v Speaker 1>were looking for one.

0:37:55.810 --> 0:37:56.870
<v Speaker 8>Armstrong and Getty.