WEBVTT - Professor Barbara Stone previews the June Primary

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And very happy Monday to you.

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 2>At twelve oh six in the West Eats the Giant

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>at Phillips Show, mister Randy Weggs in Culver City. John,

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Here we are the day before election day in the

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>state of California. The June primary is tomorrow, and as

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>of nine minutes ago in the state of California, with

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty three million ballots that were sent out, three point

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>six million got sent back a return rate of sixteen percent.

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>And we have a big show for you today. That's

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit complicated, so let's go ahead and go

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 2>through the schedule so you know what's coming up. At

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>twelve thirty five, Professor Barbara Stone is going to join

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 2>us from cal State Fullerton. At one o'clock, right at

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the top of the fixed California hour, Spencer Pratt, candidate

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>for mayor of Los Angeles. He's going to be here

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and weigh in on his race running against Karen Bass,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>who once another four years as mayor of the nation's

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>second law largest city. And then at two o'clock we're

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>going to open up the phone lines to candidates. I

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>know there's a lot of people running for various offices.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>The state legislature, Congress, City Council, Board of Equalization, school board,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever the case may be, who haven't had an opportunity

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to come on the show and pitch their campaigns. We

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>obviously can't make time for every candidate in every office.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>So what we're going to do the two o'clock hour

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>is we're going to open up the phones. So if

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you are a candidate for office and you want to

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>pitch your campaign, we'll give you a few minutes to

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>do that and make your case to voters the day

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>before the election. So if you're a candidate, or you

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>know someone or support someone who is running for office,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and you want them to be able to use this

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>platform to make their pitch to voters, let them know

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>that at two o'clock we will open up the phone

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 2>lines at eight hundred two two two five two two

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>two one eight hundred two two two five two two

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>two and allow them to make their pitch. This works

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>for southern California, northern California. I know there are many

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>of you who listen out of state. We're not taking

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 2>out of state candidates, but anyone whose name will appear

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>on a ballot in the state of California is allowed

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to call in and pitch their campaign.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, all of.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>That being said, Randy, we got some doozies of emails

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>John, there are a few people that are a little

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>upset with you. Let me read this email from Mark

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and San Diego. I have enjoyed the show, but unfortunately,

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>when the gambling talk show Captain went all in on

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 3>a red wing dominance strategy, it concerned me. If the

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Republicans are left out of the general election for governor

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>of California, I will end up blaming John Phillips. This

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>will make it impossible to listen in. Loved your show,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Mark and San Diego, all.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, and there were others that were similar in tone

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>correct Dave writes in it, Johnny, don't like show. At

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>gmail dot com, I believe you were wrong about voting

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 2>for Bianco. It looks like it'll be two Democrats were screwed. Okay,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>So I have already cast my ballot. I cast my

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 2>ballot for Chad Bianco for governor. If I had not voted,

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>and I were voting today, I would cast my ballot

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>for Chad Bianco for governor.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not changing.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>My picks on the website, and I'm not changing how

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I think on this, and I'll tell you why.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>There was a poll that was released.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Today showing what a head to head matchup of Steve

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Hilton versus Xavier Besserra and Steve Hilton versus Tom Steyer

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>would look like in November. The poll found that Tom

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Steyer would win with fifty five percent and Steve Hilton

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>would lose with thirty four percent. That would be a

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty one point Styr victory. If I head to head

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>matchup between Steve Hilton and Javier Besserra was on the ballot,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Biserah would have fifty eight percent and Hilton would have.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Thirty five percent.

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>That would be a twenty three point Javier Besserra victory.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Meaning if it is a Republican versus a Democratic matchup,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it is almost certain the result will be a double

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>digit Democratic victory, probably by north of twenty percent. That

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 2>means the Republican candidate would lose and the Democrats would

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 2>control the governor's mansion for another four years and you

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>go John Well. Chad Bianco, according to the betting markets

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 2>right before the show started today, only has a five

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 2>percent chance of making the runoff. Five percent that means

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>ninety five times out of one hundred he won't make

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the runoff. Yes, I know, but at least you have

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a chance. At least you have an opportunity to win

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the seat. What is the goal? This is the question

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 2>that I asked to people. What is the goal? Is

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the goal to lose with dignity or is the goal

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>to give yourself an opportunity to win the seat. If

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the goal is to lose with dignity, that do whatever

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.679
<v Speaker 2>it is that you want to do. If the goal

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 2>is to win the seat, you have one path. That's it,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and that is a democratic lockout in November. Now it

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>became a lot more difficult to achieve after Trump endorsed Hilton.

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Whoever is giving him advice in California is giving him

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>her riff advice. I realize that he's paying attention to

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a run right now, so he's relying on his people

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>in California. We shot ourselves in the foot on this

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>one by convincing him to get involved and to pick

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 2>a candidate. Because the moment he picked a candidate, Steve

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Hilton's number is shot through the roof and Steve Hilton

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 2>will likely make the runoff. Now There are some polls

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>that say he may not, but most of them, including

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the betting markets, say.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That he will. Odds are Steve.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Hilton is going to make the runoff, in part in

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 2>large part due to the Trump endorsement. But if you

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>don't win the seat, what's the point. And I know

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>there are people who are out there and they say, well,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it's going to do damage to downballot candidates. If the

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Republicans take a swing and miss and they don't get

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a Democratic lockout, and they get locked out often November ballot,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be bad for down ballot candidates.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, guess what.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Look at the statewide constitutional offices. You know, the last

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>time a Republican won one of those was two thousand

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and six when it was Arnold Swarzenegger at the top

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of the ticket.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And Steve Poisoner for insurance commissioner.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>It is highly unlikely that any of those candidates are

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>going to win. Look at what's going on with the

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>congressional districts prior to Prop fifty. Maybe you would have

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a point. Maybe you could say, look, here's the deal.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>If there's no Republican on the top of the ticket,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats could win control of Congress. So therefore those

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 2>races are important, and it is important to have a

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Republican on the top of the ticket, even if you're

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>sacrificing that office to save control of Congress. Okay, but

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>now we have a jerrymanderd map, where there or what

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>three races that are being contested. Everything else is a

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>foregone conclusion. One of them's in San Diego, one of

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>them's in the Central Valley, and one of them's in Sacramento.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>If Republicans get locked off the top of the ticket,

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>that's not going to determine who controls Congress. Okay, how

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>about the state legislature. Democrats currently have a super majority

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in the state Senate. They have a supermajority in the

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 2>State Assembly. What you're arguing over is whether or not

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 2>their super majority has X number of seats or why

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>number of seats. But you're not going to break the supermajority,

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and you're not going to get Republicans control of the

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 2>State Assembly or the state Senate. That is not on

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the table. They're not playing in enough seats, Which leads

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>me to the question, what do you have to lose?

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Why not go for broke and do everything you can

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to win. I do not understand this loser's mentality of

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 2>trying to lose a certain way.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's so important to lose a certain.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Way because it'll look bad if we don't.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>That is an awful attitude to have.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 2>You look at teams, athletic teams that go into matches,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>that go into games with the working assumption that they're

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>not going to win. Guess what happens they lose. If

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you want to give yourself an opportunity to win this seat,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>there is one play for Republicans and that is a

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>democratic lookout.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That is literally it.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>If the object is to lose a certain way, then fine,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>But I don't understand while you go into a game

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>with that mentality, what do you get if it's a

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Republican versus a Democratic matchup in November and you lose

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>by twenty three points? What is it that you got

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>out of that? What value do you have? Is it

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>going to determine who controls the state legislature? No?

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to determine who controls the Congress?

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>What does it matter? The answer is it doesn't. So

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>my attitude is do what you can do with the

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>hand to cards that you've been dealt to get the

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>best possible outcome, because that's the only thing you can do.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 2>You can wish that things weren't a certain way. You

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 2>could wish that things were something that they earned, but

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 2>you're just lying to yourself. You have to deal with reality.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>You have to deal with the electorate as it stands

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 2>right now in California, and what is possible because let

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>me tell you, Eric Swalwell is.

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Out of the race right now.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>He dropped out some time ago, and at one point

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>in time he was the Democratic leader in the primary.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's just play along for a second and assume that

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the stories involving alleged sexual rape and sexual harassment didn't

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>break until after the primary, and let's say it was

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric Swalwell versus one of the Republicans. I am here

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to tell you the Democratic voters in California would vote

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>for Eric Swalwell, an accused rapist, over a Republican. I

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think that would change their vote. I really don't.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>The people I know who are Democratic voters in this

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 2>state would prefer an accused rapist Democrat over any Republican.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the people you know are different that's the attitude

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrats I talked to. Take Javier Bessera, whose

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 2>chief of staff just cut a deal with the Feds,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and Dana Williamson just cut a deal with the Feds

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 2>or is alleged to have done so, or is trying

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to do so, And then you have a third person too,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and you go, okay, well, Besarah could get indeted for

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 2>money laundering, but Sarah could get in dieted for tax evasion.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Tom Steyer has an ad out right now suggesting that

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that could happen, and Besarah has asked him to pull

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the ad, which he's not going to do obviously. I

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>think it's entirely possible that could happen, because either Besarah

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>was in on it or he's the dumbest man on

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>planet Earth. Either way, it's not good for him. But

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't see Democratic voters changing their mind over alleged

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>money laundering. I don't think they care because, let me

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>tell you, if they would be willing to vote for

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Eric Swalwell, an accused rapist, they're not going to have

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a problem with money laundering. They're just going to say

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 2>it's Trump out to get him and he's being targeted

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 2>because he's a Democrat and he could be the next

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>governor in California, and it is a political prosecution. And

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>even if he did it, who cares. He's not a Republican.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the attitude that they're going to have. And maybe

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 2>he won't win by twenty three points, but he's going

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to win by double digits. It's not going to be

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a close election. And then he's going to be a

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 2>horrible governor because the guy doesn't have the intellect or

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 2>abilities to do the job. And we're reminded of this

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 2>time and time again. But the point is, you're not

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>going to beat him if it's him versus a Republican.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>The way to beat him is in the primary. The

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 2>way to beat him is to deny him real estate

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 2>on the November ballot. That's it. Is it a log

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>shot and a hail Mary, Yes it is. But it's

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the best play you have. And when you don't have

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>great options, you have to take the least bad one.

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Is there risk, Yes, there's risk in everything in life.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the way it works. If you're scared, call the police.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>But with the options that you have, it is the

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>only option that gives you an opportunity to win the seat.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it. This is it.

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>So you can do whatever you want with your vote.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't tell you how to vote. I tell you

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>how I'm voting, and I explain why I'm voting that way.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But as we approach the election one day before the election,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 2>although it's not really election day anymore, it's election season

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>because we vote for a month, at least consider that argument,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>because let me tell you, if we end up with

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Javier Besserra or Tom Steyer as governor, it is not

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>going to get better from where things were with Gavin Newsom.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Tom Steyer is to the left of Gavin Newsom,

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and Javier Bessera has a room temperature IQ. So he's

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be the Joe Biden of California. It's going

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>to be some group of people you don't know running

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the state. Why not give yourself a chance? Remember with

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trumpp said when he went and he went to

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I forget which black group it was, into BLACP or someone.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>He went to a group that doesn't typically support Republicans,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and he pitched himself. He went there and he asked

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>them for their vote. And after he asked them for

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>their vote. He said, what do you have to lose?

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know what, he did better with the black

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 2>vote than Mitt Romney did, and he did better with

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the black vote than John McCain did because he went

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>in there and asked them for their vote, and people

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>liked to be asked for their vote. It's a sign

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>of respect. And he posed a question that was a

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>legitimate question. After voting for the Democratic Party in lockstep

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for decades and generations, what do you have? What do

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 2>you have to lose to try something different? What do

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you have to lose to role the dice on someone

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>who belongs to a party that you typically don't vote for.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>And the answer was they had nothing to lose, and

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>many of them took the leap and voted for him.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>They rolled the dice and they said, all right, Biden

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and the Democrats or Hillary and the Democrats at the time,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 2>they've done nothing for me, so why not give someone

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>else a chance? And they roll the dice. And that's

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>what I did in this election. Eight hundred two two

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>two five two two two is jelephone number one eight

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred two two two five two two two If you'd

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>like to email the show. You can do so at

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Johnny don't Like show at gmail dot com. That's Johnny

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't Like show at gmail dot com. If you'd like

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to listen to the podcast edition of this program, Let's

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 2>say that you want to hear Spencer Pratt's first appearance

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>on the show that we just replayed on Memorial Day, Randy,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>that's easy to do. All you got to do is

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>search for the John Phillips Show wherever you get your podcasts,

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and that could be on the Apple podcast app. About

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>a third of our listeners use that one iHeartRadio, about

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a third of our listeners use that. There is Spotify,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 2>you can search for the John Phillip Show, hit subscribe,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 2>download all the episodes. More and more people every single

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 2>day are getting their podcasts on the YouTube, so you

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 2>can do a gascono on YouTube. You can also get

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the free KABC app, the free KSFO app, or the

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 2>KMJ now app because we're on that station every single

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Saturday at noon. So many different ways to listen live

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to what we're doing here every single day from noon

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to three wherever you are thanks to streaming, and you

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>can download the podcast, listen to them on your time

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and listen to them in the background of whatever else

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>you're doing, while you're working on busy work, while you're cooking,

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 2>while you're exercising, or while you're watching two professional hockey

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 2>players go at it on HBO?

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Why do you have to watch porn in the living?

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you'd like to take a peek at my

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 2>ballot choices, you could do so at KABC dot com

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and KSFO dot com. And tomorrow night, Randy, we're doing

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>double duty tomorrow night. So tomorrow we're here from noon

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>to three. As always, I'm here from five to six

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>on seven ninety KABC for my Newsblitz show, and then

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>from seven to nine we're going live and statewide. We'll

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 2>be here from seven to nine pm on KABC in

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Southern California, KSFO in the Bay, and KMJ and Fresno.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Be joined by our buddies Frank Motech of KABC and

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Phil Dressi of KMJ.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>We will give you all.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>The results for all the races that we can give

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you results when the polls close at eight o'clock.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>All right, we have Spencer Pratt coming up after the

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>news at one, and we're also going to be taking

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 2>calls from candidates to two o'clock hour. If you're a

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>candidate for office, if you support someone who is on

0:19:58.080 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 2>the ballot, you want to let them know that they

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>can call all in and promote their campaign. We're going

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>to do that at the two o'clock hour at eight

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred two two two five two two two. All right,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>it is our pleasure to welcome our next guest to

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the program. She is the professor of Political science and

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>meritis at California State University at Fullerton.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Professor Barbara Stone.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome, hi, John. So what's your read at this point

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>on the governor's race?

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 4>What's my read? Actually a couple three things of By

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 4>the way, I hope if only to try to understand

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 4>that your listeners listen to your first half hour because

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 4>you explained your position as clearly as anybody could, including

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 4>the downsides. And since your program's not supposed to be

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 4>for dummies, all those people are voting for Javier Binsera

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 4>that they don't have to agree with you, but they

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 4>should hear what you said, and i'd lead in. It's

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 4>funny because you made the case for Republicans should have

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 4>focused from the beginning on getting two Republicans in the runoff.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 4>That was your only chance. Historically, that certainly true. The

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 4>funny thing is I talked to lots of people on

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>both sides of the aisle, and as soon as Donald

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump made his endorsement, Republicans stopped talking about that. That

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>just simply didn't enter in to their thinking. Who paid

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 4>attention were the Democrats. If you will recall the original

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 4>thing going that up to twenty five percent chance two

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Republicans could get in the runoff came from Democrat consultants,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 4>and every Democrat I have talked to appears to believe

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 4>that that was and still is. They don't know we

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 4>tanked it, that that was a real possibility. So like

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 4>I had lunch a couple of days ago with a

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 4>couple of ladies died in the world, Democrats, they're exactly

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 4>the people you're describing. They don't care if he murdered somebody.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 4>He's a Democrat, other guy's a Republican. They're voting Democrat.

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 4>At least one of them really really truly wanted to

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 4>be a Katie Porter voter, but she really really really

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>didn't want two Republicans in the runoff. So a person

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 4>who votes almost immediately when she gets her ballot had

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:40.239
<v Speaker 4>not yet voted as of actually this last Saturday, and

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 4>it was because she was waiting to make sure how

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 4>it played out, because she was going to vote for

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 4>whichever Democrats showed ahead. And she is not stupid far

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>as I can tell. She doesn't. I mean, Bessarah would

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 4>not be her choice, but he's going to keep the

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Republicans from sweeping, so that's how she was going to vote.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 4>We may have dropped the thought, but they didn't, So

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that means you're going to get but Sarah

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 4>in the runoff, probably, although not for sure for sure,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 4>but I think probably. And most of the polling shows

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Hilton in Styre quite close. In fact, it's all within

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the margin of error pretty much, except the last Emerson

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 4>poll on the top person. And listening to the other

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>numbers you were reading off like about how much Hilton

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 4>would lose to Besarah by Interestingly enough, I'm quite confident

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 4>that he would lose, but I don't think by that margin.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 4>What was his name, Cox, that had the bear and

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 4>that was his campaign Oh dear lord, he did better

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>than thirty three percent, So I actually suspect without knowing

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 4>that the polling you're looking at at least on the

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 4>margins under represents Republicans. And therefore, if you made me bet,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 4>and I don't bet on anything except horses and sure things,

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 4>if you made me bet, I would bet that the

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>runoff will be be Sarah and Hilton.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think happens in November? If it's that?

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 4>If that's the case, John John, I told you your

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 4>program is not for dummies, and I don't want to

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 4>be on the program for dummies. So if you have

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 4>somebody who honestly thinks Steve Hilton can win, that fine.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 4>We all believe what we believe, but there are no

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 4>numbers anytime that would support that.

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, Chen who ran for Controller did about as good

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of a job as you could do as a Republican

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>statewide candidate. That was in what twenty twenty two when

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>he ran for controller he ended up with forty four percent.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 2>That's with all of the newspaper endorsements, that is, with

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>certain high profile Democratic donors getting behind him, and Democratic

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 2>influencers and all of the Republican influencers and elected officials,

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 2>and forty four percent appears to be the high water

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>mark right now.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and I think is far and away the high watermark.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 4>And the funniest thing. Your next guest is going to

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 4>be Spencer Pratt, who is going to bring in some

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 4>votes because some people know him from his reality TV show.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 4>I guess if you don't watch Fox News, you have

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 4>no idea who Steve Hilton is, so he doesn't see

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I would go well on he people didn't know him,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah. But he had everything you could ask

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 4>for a Republican to have going for him, plus an

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 4>ethnic vote behind him. And I don't see Hilton coming

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 4>anywhere near that, not because there's anything wrong with him,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 4>just because he doesn't have anything to put He's not arnold.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Heuts up.

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's shift gears here and talk about the

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 2>LA mayor's race, because last week I opened up the

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 2>phone lines and asked the question, of all of the

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>candidates on the ballot, which one excites you the most?

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>And the answer almost to a person with Spencer Pratt,

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 2>including people who live in the city of La people

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 2>who live in Orange County, people who live in cities

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in La County that aren't La City, the Bay area,

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>out of state. He has captured the attention of a

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of people paying attention to this election, at.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Least part of it. John, I mean, it's well, I

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>think La is ungovernable, so I won't really try to

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 4>be an expert on them. But we live in a

0:26:53.680 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 4>certain way, and we get our information from social media,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 4>we get our information from many non traditional sources, and

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 4>let me tell you that boy knows how to work them.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely can't believe it. But he is clearly a

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 4>national star. He is the only Republican remotely of that

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 4>sort I can remember where the national media is covering him,

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 4>because he just has a feel for what you do

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 4>to get attention. And you go, well, no, honey, he's

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 4>getting attention, and in something like he's running for that's

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 4>worth a pile of money. Actually, it's a wonderful show

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to watch. By the way, just to comment, and if

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 4>you have any explanation for it, I'd like to hear it.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 4>I've decided that maybe either the polling is terrible, which

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 4>is perfectly possible, or her La is even further weirdo

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 4>less than I think, because virtually every poll I've seen

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 4>John shows Raman statistically tied with Pratt for the pleasant

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 4>second spot. And I'm just going, seriously, you've got Karen

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Bass and what she pulls off. And then you've got

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 4>a socialist who says she's a socialist may or may

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 4>not be in the runoff. I I don't recommend your

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 4>listeners live in City of LA if they can avoid

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 4>it well.

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 2>And then you have another socialist candidate, that reverend lady,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>who's pulling pretty decently. And if you add what she

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>has up with what Nythia Rahman has, the socialist vote

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>is doing better than Karen Bass.

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh well, by the way, what poll did I just see?

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 4>And John, it's so hard to pull this thing. First

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 4>of all, you have to determine who's actually going to

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 4>vot and that's a problem. And then you have to

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 4>determine whose ballots not getting burned up at drop boxes

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 4>in so in South Los Angeles, you saw that one

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 4>of those happened, so that I'm good to think the

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 4>polling's off. But let's assume the polling is halfway accurate.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Karen Bath may not make the runoff. How would that

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 4>be crazy saying? Anyhow? And if she cannot make run offs,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 4>at least theoretically, Spencer Pratt can be mayor at least theoretically,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's fun but what he is a fracted

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 4>nationwide in terms of attention blows me away.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>What happens if he doesn't make the runoff where he,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to my eye and it sounds like to your eye,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 2>has done everything right. The guy has a story, The

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>guy has a reason for running. The guy was great

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>in the debate, is good in the interviews, is doing

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>everything that you want a candidate to do on social media?

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 2>If that turns out not to be enough as LA

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>just a lost cause politically, yes.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Now I say that, I say that was it four

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 4>years ago? Rick Caruso came close. Now, Rick Caruso had

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 4>registered as a Democrat, and they had to bring out

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>the sitting president and vice president and all those people

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 4>in order to beat him. So I probably shouldn't say

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>what I just did, but put it together with how

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 4>well socialists at least in the polling or running, and

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 4>that place has deteriorated in ways that are unbelievable. Who

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 4>was it somebody was recently talking about not that many

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 4>years ago, LA was seeing the renaissance. Businesses were growing downtown,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 4>people were moving downtown. It was the coming place. And

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>look what liberal democrats have managed to do to the city.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 4>You'd think somebody would wake up, But of course what

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 4>happens is people take our advice and just move out.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So that doesn't make it any better. It's a real pity.

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think so many Democratic voters have such

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a high tolerance for very bad government? Because when you

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 2>talk to them one on one, at least the ones

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that live in the big cities, they're aware that these

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 2>cities are run very poorly. They're aware that they shouldn't

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 2>have to wring the button for the in assistance of

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 2>an associate to buy their shampoo. They're aware that they're

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>homeless encampments right outside their kids' schools, yet they continue

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to vote for it. Every time they're given an opportunity.

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 2>They complain about it, but they don't change their behavior

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 2>at the ballot box.

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 4>I can think of two or three different explanations, and

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe they're all subservient to something else. John, You act

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 4>as if people understand that if you elect these kinds

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 4>of people, they will do what they say they're going

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 4>to do, and that will result in these policies which

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 4>will affect you badly. By the time you go through one, two, three, four,

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 4>people have lost the thread. They don't They look at

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 4>a field running and they go, oh, I like her.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 4>I have a friend who actually, if it's female she's

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 4>voting for. That's as far as she's going to go.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 4>You have I like this person, or oh, look she's

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 4>good on this that I like most of it, very performative.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 4>They don't put that together with this person will appoint

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 4>these people, These people will do this, This will result

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 4>in something very bad for you. I honest, honestly believe

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a very low level of conceptualization among the public.

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 4>And if you pin the public down on it, they

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 4>would go, no, no, no, you're implying I'm stupid. I'm

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 4>not stupid. I just don't care. And that's what you're

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 4>up against. Now I can make that excuse for the public.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's an excuse. What do we have with

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley? Those idiots who over the years, they certainly

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 4>should know more than just Sally a citizen, And they've

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 4>been giving money to left wing Democrats for years and

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 4>years and years, so they've been supporting this. I get

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 4>on them way before I get on the voters, because

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 4>their money could change things, not just overnight, but it could.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's funny I have good Republican friends who are

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 4>looking at the billionaire's tax, aren't going to be on

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 4>the ballot, and who think it's horrible, but thinks all

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>those guys deserve it because they've been supporting these day

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Democrats who are the ones who, of course have given

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 4>us the problems.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 2>What do we do to bring Silicon Valley along and

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 2>educate them on the politics of California and what they

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>need to do to make the state a normal place again.

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 4>How's this, John? We could start by instituting a billionaire's

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 4>tax that will hit them. Oh, I guess that's what

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats are doing.

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 2>That really is playing with fire for them, because if

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 2>they wake them up and get them engaged and get

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>them I guess acting rationally politically with their money and

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>their support and their technology, that could really pose a

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 2>problem for the Democrats in California.

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's true, and there are there are

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 4>some things actually what has to happen. You have to

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 4>have the We have decent people who are still willing

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 4>to live in the state, who are still willing to

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 4>be Republicans, who are willing to put in the time

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 4>they have to do, and even more than we do

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 4>basic grassroots organizing if that sounds right, not because in

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 4>and of itself that will accomplish anything. It won't. But

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 4>you have the troops ready. If in fact, the idiots

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 4>with I mean the very rich people with all the money,

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 4>decide that maybe they've been wrong, and maybe after they

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 4>pour the money in in November, which by the way,

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 4>is when they're going to that, maybe they should be

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 4>thinking about at least trying to make the state competitive.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 4>And they need they can move out of it. A

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of them have, but if they'd meant it, they

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 4>could make a difference. And that's the only place I

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 4>can find it, because you've got to have huge bucks

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 4>over a period of time.

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Professor Barbara Stone, Professor of Political Science Emeritus at California

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 2>State University at Fullerton. And you're gonna be with us

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 2>on election night tomorrow from seven to nine.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, And by the way, you know, I know you

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 4>have to get off, but you know how dangerous that

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 4>is because today I say this is gonna happen, and

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>then tomorrow night you go, well, all.

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, well we'll check in tomorrow night. Professor Barberstone, thank you.

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 2>It's the John Phillips Show. We have one more hour

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to go. Spencer Pratt joins us next at two o'clock.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>If you're a candidate for office and want to pitch

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>your campaign, we'll give you the time to do so

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.919
<v Speaker 2>at eight hundred two two two five two two two.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the day before election Day right here on The

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 2>John Phillips Show.