WEBVTT - The Refs Hate Us!

0:00:02.750 --> 0:00:06.910
<v Speaker 1>And now, broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio

0:00:07.050 --> 0:00:11.610
<v Speaker 1>at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:11.810 --> 0:00:13.090
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:13.350 --> 0:00:20.250
<v Speaker 1>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:25.210 --> 0:00:30.300
<v Speaker 2>Live from Studio C. C, I don't see you, senor.

0:00:31.420 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 3>A dimly lit room deep within the bowels of the

0:00:34.020 --> 0:00:38.180
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty communications compound. And today, toiling under the

0:00:38.220 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 3>title of the show.

0:00:40.180 --> 0:00:47.580
<v Speaker 2>Welcome the latest socialist, J.D. Vance. What? That's right. I'm

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>accusing him.

0:00:48.900 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 3>You're going to stir up some S with that one.

0:00:50.950 --> 0:00:56.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I love it. Or alternate title, Bad News, Don.

0:00:56.430 --> 0:01:00.290
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid you have a case of the Houthis. Ha ha.

0:01:01.020 --> 0:01:02.530
<v Speaker 3>Oh, wow. That's a lighthearted look.

0:01:05.010 --> 0:01:05.990
<v Speaker 2>Keeps me from crying.

0:01:07.890 --> 0:01:10.710
<v Speaker 3>I am just about to pull in. I had a

0:01:10.730 --> 0:01:12.729
<v Speaker 3>bit of a ZEP-bound emergency this morning.

0:01:13.490 --> 0:01:14.030
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my.

0:01:14.709 --> 0:01:17.789
<v Speaker 3>Talking to the doctor about that the other day. Those

0:01:17.810 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>of us on the GLP-1s, about 15% of us have

0:01:21.500 --> 0:01:26.260
<v Speaker 3>a certain reaction to those wonder drugs. I seem to

0:01:26.300 --> 0:01:26.820
<v Speaker 3>be one of them.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 2>I see. Rivaling the humble goose.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you? I don't imagine many people want a lot

0:01:36.900 --> 0:01:38.899
<v Speaker 3>of details on that, but it can happen.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, best to delay for a moment or two before

0:01:42.569 --> 0:01:44.110
<v Speaker 2>one's morning drive, yes.

0:01:46.470 --> 0:01:50.230
<v Speaker 3>Especially if you've had a good four or five-day buildup.

0:01:51.250 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, now see. No, Katie, am I wrong?

0:01:54.980 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>It was like you were so close to not going

0:01:58.060 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 4>too far with that.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean? God, I thought, wow, he's

0:02:01.860 --> 0:02:04.100
<v Speaker 2>turned over a new leaf. He's grown up.

0:02:04.940 --> 0:02:07.300
<v Speaker 3>So can we edit that out for the podcast?

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sure we can.

0:02:10.900 --> 0:02:16.169
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so explain the J.D. Vance title.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 2>We'll be featuring some actual audio from Mr. Vance later

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.150
<v Speaker 2>on the show, but he has really gone in for

0:02:23.330 --> 0:02:28.649
<v Speaker 2>central planning for the government needs to be making many,

0:02:28.710 --> 0:02:32.310
<v Speaker 2>many more decisions about how the economy works and apply

0:02:32.370 --> 0:02:36.900
<v Speaker 2>a heavier hand. We're all socialists now, it would seem.

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 2>The Republicans are in a bidding war with the Democrats

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>for who can hand out the most goodies. for the election,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the most benefits and that sort of thing. It's just, it's,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.940
<v Speaker 2>that's the new way we're becoming Britain bit by bit.

0:02:49.860 --> 0:02:53.380
<v Speaker 3>I remember many years ago, Newt was running for president.

0:02:53.580 --> 0:02:56.669
<v Speaker 3>I think he was running for president. It was a

0:02:56.690 --> 0:02:59.790
<v Speaker 3>long time ago, but when Newt Gingrich said, I don't

0:02:59.889 --> 0:03:03.890
<v Speaker 3>like Republican social engineer, a right-wing social engineering any better

0:03:03.930 --> 0:03:06.410
<v Speaker 3>than I like left-wing social engineering. And it always stuck

0:03:06.450 --> 0:03:09.850
<v Speaker 3>in my head, like the right-wing social engineering, but there

0:03:09.930 --> 0:03:11.769
<v Speaker 3>is more and more of that happening. Definitely.

0:03:12.380 --> 0:03:18.260
<v Speaker 2>Well said, Newt. Where have you gone, Newt Gringrich? Your

0:03:18.300 --> 0:03:21.380
<v Speaker 2>nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Woo, woo, woo.

0:03:22.150 --> 0:03:24.739
<v Speaker 3>But from what I understand, you did not invent....

0:03:27.210 --> 0:03:29.230
<v Speaker 2>Hey, it's Jack. I did not invent what?

0:03:29.990 --> 0:03:33.750
<v Speaker 3>From what I understand, you did not invent the idea

0:03:33.970 --> 0:03:35.820
<v Speaker 3>of Chay-D-Vance.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I'd love to have the credit for that, but no. No,

0:03:39.780 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I heard that somewhere else.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:42.940
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty clever.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.420
<v Speaker 3>I have a feeling that's going to make a number

0:03:45.460 --> 0:03:48.420
<v Speaker 3>of people very, very angry that are big J.D. Vance fans,

0:03:48.500 --> 0:03:50.340
<v Speaker 3>and he's the most likely person by far to be

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:51.869
<v Speaker 3>the Republican nominee for president.

0:03:52.260 --> 0:03:57.430
<v Speaker 2>Let me check my pockets. I'm fresh out of F. Sorry.

0:03:57.450 --> 0:04:02.390
<v Speaker 2>I caused him as I sees him. You don't like it?

0:04:02.930 --> 0:04:03.830
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what to tell you.

0:04:03.850 --> 0:04:05.850
<v Speaker 3>Did you look in your man bag? Maybe there's some

0:04:05.910 --> 0:04:06.210
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:04:07.970 --> 0:04:10.810
<v Speaker 2>I carried no man bag, sir. Let's start the.

0:04:10.730 --> 0:04:12.890
<v Speaker 3>Show officially before things get out of hand and then

0:04:12.930 --> 0:04:15.810
<v Speaker 3>bring it back around. I'm Jack Armstrong. He's Joe Getty.

0:04:15.930 --> 0:04:20.470
<v Speaker 3>On this, it is Wednesday already, September the 16th, the

0:04:20.510 --> 0:04:22.790
<v Speaker 3>year 2026. We are Armstrong and Getty, and we approve

0:04:22.810 --> 0:04:23.410
<v Speaker 3>of this program.

0:04:23.860 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's start officially then. According to FCC rules and regulations,

0:04:27.140 --> 0:04:29.540
<v Speaker 2>enough with the preliminaries. The show starts at mark.

0:04:29.900 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 5>Well, some TV news following a massive leadership change. The

0:04:32.620 --> 0:04:35.419
<v Speaker 5>new season of 60 Minutes just premiered to its smallest

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.730
<v Speaker 5>audience in more than 25 years. For some reason, the

0:04:39.830 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 5>image of a ticking pocket watch isn't resonating with younger viewers.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>What is that?

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.380
<v Speaker 5>To get more viewers, they're changing the show to 3,600 TikToks.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:56.510
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good. That's a funny joke.

0:04:56.710 --> 0:04:58.810
<v Speaker 3>And I'm glad he went with that because there is

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>no doubt that the younger crowd is not into anything

0:05:01.940 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>that's on the network or an hour long or all

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.260
<v Speaker 3>the different sorts of things. But so that many people

0:05:07.910 --> 0:05:11.390
<v Speaker 3>that were loyal 60 Minutes fans like I have been

0:05:11.750 --> 0:05:15.860
<v Speaker 3>since I was like 11 years old. Got the news

0:05:15.940 --> 0:05:19.930
<v Speaker 3>that Barry Weiss, the so-called conservative, even though she's a

0:05:20.170 --> 0:05:25.810
<v Speaker 3>gay pro-choice woman, and fired Scott Pelley and is so pro-Trump,

0:05:25.850 --> 0:05:28.890
<v Speaker 3>I'm not watching anymore. So they had their lowest audience ever.

0:05:28.970 --> 0:05:34.610
<v Speaker 3>That is unbelievable. After all those years of just ridiculous

0:05:35.330 --> 0:05:39.770
<v Speaker 3>liberal bias stories that were just out of bounds in

0:05:39.810 --> 0:05:41.330
<v Speaker 3>terms of trying to be journalistic.

0:05:42.010 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 3>That's where we are.

0:05:43.830 --> 0:05:47.669
<v Speaker 2>That is the playing field on which we play on

0:05:47.710 --> 0:05:50.010
<v Speaker 2>when we play. I couldn't figure out how that's the playing.

0:05:50.250 --> 0:05:52.430
<v Speaker 2>That's our playing field. That's what I'm trying to say.

0:05:52.850 --> 0:05:56.180
<v Speaker 2>We just the refs hate us. If the refs are

0:05:56.210 --> 0:05:58.500
<v Speaker 2>the media, which is why new media is so much

0:05:58.540 --> 0:05:59.100
<v Speaker 2>more important.

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>So many people have correctly perceived that. Well, I wonder

0:06:02.220 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 3>if they'll drift back over time. The viewers doesn't matter.

0:06:05.140 --> 0:06:09.460
<v Speaker 3>But the New York Times had a big, prominently popular.

0:06:09.750 --> 0:06:12.250
<v Speaker 3>Placed peace saying, no, it was 60 minutes.

0:06:12.310 --> 0:06:14.890
<v Speaker 2>It was good. It was fine. It was good. Yeah,

0:06:14.990 --> 0:06:18.930
<v Speaker 2>it was. And even handed their second story was pretty political,

0:06:18.970 --> 0:06:19.490
<v Speaker 2>but it was great.

0:06:20.450 --> 0:06:25.060
<v Speaker 3>So AI continues to be in the news and maybe

0:06:25.140 --> 0:06:26.740
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of our lives. I can't tell if

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.219
<v Speaker 3>this is just a blip or we're going to be

0:06:30.260 --> 0:06:35.630
<v Speaker 3>talking about this. At practically this level for a long time,

0:06:35.710 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>like when covid hit. I don't know. But, man, there's

0:06:38.580 --> 0:06:43.460
<v Speaker 3>sure a lot of heavyweight chatter among highly placed AI

0:06:43.500 --> 0:06:47.870
<v Speaker 3>people and highly placed government officials and financial people yesterday,

0:06:47.930 --> 0:06:50.529
<v Speaker 3>just like there has been since last. Was it Thursday

0:06:50.570 --> 0:06:52.710
<v Speaker 3>or Friday when the big story dropped with the guy

0:06:52.730 --> 0:06:54.210
<v Speaker 3>saying we're all going to be dead in 10 years?

0:06:55.540 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. You know, speaking of the New York Times,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times-Siena poll just came out, and it

0:07:03.620 --> 0:07:07.330
<v Speaker 2>has all sorts of results that the paper is featuring

0:07:07.529 --> 0:07:11.150
<v Speaker 2>having to do with people's attitude toward AI and data

0:07:11.170 --> 0:07:14.190
<v Speaker 2>centers and superintelligence and that sort of stuff. But the

0:07:14.270 --> 0:07:18.390
<v Speaker 2>poll was taken 10 days ago. And they even say

0:07:18.410 --> 0:07:21.620
<v Speaker 2>in the paper, you know, it's possible some people's opinions

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.850
<v Speaker 2>have evolved somewhat. And I was thinking to myself, In

0:07:25.870 --> 0:07:29.630
<v Speaker 2>the last 10 days, there has been an enormous change

0:07:29.670 --> 0:07:32.690
<v Speaker 2>in people's perception of these things. And then I thought

0:07:32.730 --> 0:07:37.890
<v Speaker 2>to myself, I says to myself, I says, how do

0:07:37.910 --> 0:07:41.750
<v Speaker 2>we live in a world in which people can hear

0:07:41.830 --> 0:07:47.420
<v Speaker 2>about something, something complicated? I mean, like the ultimate example

0:07:47.450 --> 0:07:52.870
<v Speaker 2>of they're both true. Two seemingly opposing ideas. But hear that,

0:07:52.970 --> 0:07:56.610
<v Speaker 2>try to process it, understand what's actually happening, and develop

0:07:56.670 --> 0:08:00.500
<v Speaker 2>a strong take that they won't budge from, probably ever

0:08:00.540 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of their lives, in the space of

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a week. What is that?

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Tribalism?

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess. Oh, I had one more thought on that topic.

0:08:10.380 --> 0:08:13.620
<v Speaker 2>I want to express to the good people listening how

0:08:13.660 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>much I appreciate that you are here. Not just because

0:08:17.820 --> 0:08:21.180
<v Speaker 2>you're our listeners and customers. I don't need the money.

0:08:21.260 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm very wealthy. I bought 10,000 shares of Apple stock

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:26.590
<v Speaker 2>in 1994.

0:08:26.590 --> 0:08:27.220
<v Speaker 3>1979.

0:08:27.220 --> 0:08:32.810
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't remember when they started for my great life. Anyway, no,

0:08:32.910 --> 0:08:36.030
<v Speaker 2>it's not just about commerce. It gives me hope that

0:08:36.050 --> 0:08:39.570
<v Speaker 2>there are at least some people who think, hmm, there

0:08:39.670 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 2>are smart people who seem to think the other thing.

0:08:42.100 --> 0:08:45.179
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what their ideas are. I hope there's a

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:46.620
<v Speaker 2>market for that. I really do.

0:08:48.670 --> 0:08:50.890
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, we'll get into that coming up. I heard

0:08:50.929 --> 0:08:56.790
<v Speaker 3>the best realistic description of how AI would kill us yesterday,

0:08:57.150 --> 0:08:59.260
<v Speaker 3>since that's been one of the questions for the past week.

0:08:59.660 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 3>How exactly would it kill us? You keep talking about

0:09:01.780 --> 0:09:03.410
<v Speaker 3>it'll kill us. Will it kill us? It might kill us.

0:09:03.660 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 2>In what way will it kill us? And it turns

0:09:05.740 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 2>out the answer is with a club. So that's not good.

0:09:09.820 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Barbaric!

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.579
<v Speaker 2>It's gruesome. I'm sorry.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:19.309
<v Speaker 6>That's such a bad joke. That's not what I was picturing.

0:09:19.330 --> 0:09:23.780
<v Speaker 6>Big club to death by AI. That's considerably more primal

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:24.740
<v Speaker 6>than I expected.

0:09:24.820 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 2>That's not high tech at all.

0:09:28.460 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we will get to Katie's headlines coming up and

0:09:32.420 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 3>more news of the day.

0:09:33.220 --> 0:09:34.020
<v Speaker 2>Hope you can stay here.

0:09:35.620 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and.

0:09:45.550 --> 0:09:45.729
<v Speaker 7>Getty.

0:09:45.770 --> 0:09:47.270
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:09:52.230 --> 0:09:54.510
<v Speaker 3>Is Saudi Arabia about to go to war with the Houthis?

0:09:54.730 --> 0:09:57.089
<v Speaker 3>And the Houthis apparently are armed like a, well, like

0:09:57.150 --> 0:09:58.990
<v Speaker 3>a real military, like it could be a real war.

0:09:59.190 --> 0:10:03.140
<v Speaker 3>So that's exciting. to have out there as a possibility. Also,

0:10:03.179 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>we got a story about an AI actress. I can't

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.900
<v Speaker 3>wrap my head around what that means. So I look

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:12.099
<v Speaker 3>forward to that discussion later. What the F type of

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.340
<v Speaker 3>AIS it is. No kidding.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.450
<v Speaker 1>What the F type of AI shit it is. Yeah.

0:10:17.210 --> 0:10:19.950
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. All right. We'll try to figure it out. But first,

0:10:19.970 --> 0:10:21.830
<v Speaker 2>let's figure out who's reporting what. It's the lead story

0:10:21.850 --> 0:10:23.929
<v Speaker 2>with Katie Green. Take it away.

0:10:24.270 --> 0:10:26.610
<v Speaker 4>All righty. The Alphabet Network's ABC.

0:10:27.010 --> 0:10:27.370
<v Speaker 1>U.S.

0:10:27.510 --> 0:10:32.179
<v Speaker 4>Says Americans should, quote, reconsider travel to Saudi Arabia.

0:10:32.860 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I will. Yeah.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 2>NBC.

0:10:35.420 --> 0:10:38.740
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Arabia accuses the Houthis of attacking Mecca, warns that

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Holy City is, quote, a red line.

0:10:43.510 --> 0:10:45.090
<v Speaker 1>And CNN.

0:10:45.570 --> 0:10:48.250
<v Speaker 3>So attacking their oil installations isn't a red line?

0:10:49.290 --> 0:10:53.109
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, but attacking Mecca, that sounds to me like

0:10:53.510 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to whip up their people. Saudi Arabia is.

0:10:56.630 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>They know they're about to go to war with the Houthis,

0:10:59.140 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's some really useful wartime propaganda. Because, you know,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia is an uneasy balance of modernity and, like,

0:11:07.260 --> 0:11:12.100
<v Speaker 2>the year 832. with fundamentalist Muslims ooching about in the desert,

0:11:12.140 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>and they've got to rally their support.

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>And also this one from CNN. Iran's newfound precision in

0:11:19.860 --> 0:11:23.699
<v Speaker 4>hitting United States assets may have had Russian help.

0:11:25.059 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>And Chinese help. NPR. Iran's back to building ballistic missiles, too.

0:11:33.140 --> 0:11:33.340
<v Speaker 3>Goody.

0:11:35.170 --> 0:11:39.140
<v Speaker 4>From NPR, the Fed is expected to raise interest rates

0:11:39.220 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in three years.

0:11:43.580 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump is probably going to level a blast at that

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>new guy Kevin Warsh like he did at the Supreme

0:11:48.140 --> 0:11:49.390
<v Speaker 2>Court justices yesterday.

0:11:49.410 --> 0:11:50.710
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm almost guaranteed.

0:11:50.730 --> 0:11:53.030
<v Speaker 2>He's not the guy I interviewed. He's a shell of himself.

0:11:53.370 --> 0:11:54.670
<v Speaker 3>Interest rates going up.

0:11:55.530 --> 0:11:58.290
<v Speaker 1>Moving up. CNBC.

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 4>CNBC. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sides with NVIDIA's CEO on

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 4>AI safety and the slowdown debate.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.260
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got an interesting clip or quote from a

0:12:12.300 --> 0:12:15.700
<v Speaker 3>guy that runs NVIDIA about the whole AI thing. See

0:12:15.740 --> 0:12:18.660
<v Speaker 3>if you agree or disagree with what his take is.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.740
<v Speaker 3>That's the most valuable company in the world.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.630
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it? It's damn valuable anyway. They should be proud

0:12:24.670 --> 0:12:25.130
<v Speaker 2>of themselves.

0:12:25.450 --> 0:12:30.260
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. This was awful yesterday from the Washington Post. Three

0:12:30.380 --> 0:12:34.790
<v Speaker 4>dead after L.A. news helicopter goes down while covering crash.

0:12:35.690 --> 0:12:39.170
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's a bad story. Yikes.

0:12:39.470 --> 0:12:40.569
<v Speaker 3>And all the networks.

0:12:41.190 --> 0:12:43.390
<v Speaker 4>I was watching a few of them at the same

0:12:43.429 --> 0:12:45.150
<v Speaker 4>time while this was happening, trying to figure out if

0:12:45.210 --> 0:12:46.130
<v Speaker 4>it was one of their news.

0:12:46.220 --> 0:12:49.500
<v Speaker 2>Right. Oh, yeah.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>And friends of theirs and everything.

0:12:50.780 --> 0:12:50.939
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:50.980 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 3>I saw some of those clips.

0:12:52.300 --> 0:12:52.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 4>New York Post.

0:12:54.970 --> 0:12:56.170
<v Speaker 3>Forget your data privacy.

0:12:56.580 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>AI chatbots already know more about you than your own mother.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.100
<v Speaker 3>Oh, because of the information we give them while we're

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:05.740
<v Speaker 3>talking to them? Okay.

0:13:06.300 --> 0:13:07.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's clearly true.

0:13:07.850 --> 0:13:10.170
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's one thing. The new Apple Siri, if you've

0:13:10.190 --> 0:13:13.010
<v Speaker 3>downloaded the new operating system that just came out, the

0:13:13.050 --> 0:13:16.250
<v Speaker 3>new AI, Siri AI, it's supposed to be a leap forward,

0:13:16.270 --> 0:13:18.860
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be on par with like chat GPT and

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.310
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. I haven't tried it out yet. But

0:13:21.350 --> 0:13:23.290
<v Speaker 3>it's going to keep track of everything you're saying and

0:13:23.350 --> 0:13:28.150
<v Speaker 3>doing in one place, which could be very, very helpful. Hey, Siri,

0:13:28.190 --> 0:13:30.590
<v Speaker 3>you know that meeting I have on Thursday because Siri

0:13:30.690 --> 0:13:32.770
<v Speaker 3>is looking at your email and your phone and everything

0:13:32.809 --> 0:13:34.710
<v Speaker 3>like that and, you know, bringing it all together. But

0:13:34.770 --> 0:13:36.980
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, it's going to have an awful

0:13:37.010 --> 0:13:37.670
<v Speaker 3>lot of info.

0:13:38.220 --> 0:13:41.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they're competing with things that some of which

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:46.050
<v Speaker 2>we've just mentioned that do that without Apple's. incredibly strict

0:13:46.150 --> 0:13:49.130
<v Speaker 2>privacy standards. One of the things holding Apple back in

0:13:49.270 --> 0:13:52.429
<v Speaker 2>AI is that it protects people's privacy so much and

0:13:52.490 --> 0:13:54.610
<v Speaker 2>isn't fast and loose with sending data back and forth.

0:13:54.830 --> 0:13:57.570
<v Speaker 3>But Siri being in your phone can grab all that

0:13:57.630 --> 0:13:58.350
<v Speaker 3>stuff in your phone.

0:13:58.890 --> 0:13:59.170
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:14:00.370 --> 0:14:01.550
<v Speaker 3>There's a funny joke about that.

0:14:01.590 --> 0:14:04.830
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Katie. I'll find the joke. Hey Siri, snitches

0:14:04.870 --> 0:14:08.950
<v Speaker 2>get stitches, huh? From the Wall Street? Yeah, mine too.

0:14:09.330 --> 0:14:09.809
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Used to describe what will happen if someone informs on

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.179
<v Speaker 6>them or another party.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah i know what it means all right back to

0:14:22.210 --> 0:14:23.210
<v Speaker 2>you katie.

0:14:23.390 --> 0:14:27.830
<v Speaker 4>From the wall street journal this english village is threatening

0:14:27.890 --> 0:14:31.510
<v Speaker 4>to quit the uk over planned asylum camp.

0:14:32.790 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh is that a thing Can you quit? They're seceding.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're up in arms over a proposal to house

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.540
<v Speaker 4>over 1,200, quote, asylum seekers at a former military base.

0:14:45.740 --> 0:14:49.450
<v Speaker 4>And this is a town that has a population of 350.

0:14:49.450 --> 0:14:52.490
<v Speaker 2>Good for y'all. Fight it as hard as you possibly can.

0:14:52.870 --> 0:14:55.030
<v Speaker 2>Fight it like your lives depend on it and your

0:14:55.130 --> 0:14:56.510
<v Speaker 2>daughter's lives depend on it.

0:14:58.290 --> 0:14:58.910
<v Speaker 3>Study finds.

0:14:59.940 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Where Americans want pets out. Doctors' offices, grocery stores, and

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:07.820
<v Speaker 4>anywhere food is served.

0:15:08.140 --> 0:15:12.450
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't particularly want them all the other places either,

0:15:12.510 --> 0:15:14.930
<v Speaker 3>but I suppose that ship has sailed as we've gone

0:15:14.970 --> 0:15:17.230
<v Speaker 3>from a society that has kids to a society that

0:15:17.270 --> 0:15:19.350
<v Speaker 3>has pets. I was telling my kids when we were

0:15:19.390 --> 0:15:21.700
<v Speaker 3>at the hotel, I went to see my mom and dad.

0:15:22.580 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Dogs everywhere. I said, when I was a kid, if

0:15:25.860 --> 0:15:28.820
<v Speaker 3>you walked into a hotel and somebody had a dog

0:15:29.220 --> 0:15:31.900
<v Speaker 3>in the elevator, you'd have thought, oh, my God, there's.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 2>A dog in the elevator.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Now it's always, like, more likely than not there's a

0:15:37.380 --> 0:15:38.180
<v Speaker 3>dog in the elevator.

0:15:38.870 --> 0:15:41.110
<v Speaker 2>My bride and I are planning a vacation, and I

0:15:41.150 --> 0:15:44.229
<v Speaker 2>saw one hotel we were looking at and said, you know, whatever,

0:15:44.390 --> 0:15:50.190
<v Speaker 2>Jones Hotel is family-friendly, and Jones Hotel is pet-friendly. I'm like, oh, great.

0:15:50.450 --> 0:15:54.430
<v Speaker 2>The last hotel I was in, Yapping dog. Right down

0:15:54.470 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the hallway. Yapped for an hour straight. Then we left.

0:15:57.420 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>It might have gone for 12 hours straight.

0:15:58.840 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:15:59.180 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 2>We left. Unbelievable.

0:16:00.540 --> 0:16:02.500
<v Speaker 3>A lot of y'all look miserable to me. You're like

0:16:02.580 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to corral your dog and you're trying to get

0:16:04.660 --> 0:16:06.220
<v Speaker 3>it to find some place to let it pee.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:07.300
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't look that.

0:16:07.180 --> 0:16:07.660
<v Speaker 3>Fun to me.

0:16:08.470 --> 0:16:10.229
<v Speaker 2>I love dogs, but I just don't get it.

0:16:11.690 --> 0:16:13.730
<v Speaker 3>And finally, the Babylon Bee.

0:16:14.930 --> 0:16:18.670
<v Speaker 4>Sidney Sweeney tries to gain support of liberal women by

0:16:18.790 --> 0:16:19.950
<v Speaker 4>murdering multiple children.

0:16:20.490 --> 0:16:21.390
<v Speaker 7>Oh. Oh.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 8>Wow.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.700
<v Speaker 3>That was a Clancy comment, not a Sidney Sweeney comment, really.

0:16:28.780 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I get it. That's good.

0:16:30.020 --> 0:16:32.260
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything I could log into so I don't

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>hear Sidney Sweeney's name ever again? Is there an opt

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.780
<v Speaker 3>out place somewhere where she never crosses my path in

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:40.470
<v Speaker 3>any way?

0:16:41.300 --> 0:16:44.670
<v Speaker 2>As a heterosexual man, I will concede that Ms. Sweeney

0:16:44.850 --> 0:16:48.850
<v Speaker 2>is of spectacular sexiness, but she has now achieved the

0:16:48.890 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>level of unless she cures cancer. Or we used to

0:16:53.420 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 2>say assassinates the president, but now people try to do

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>that over and over again. So unless she cures cancer

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>or sets foot on the moon, I don't want to

0:17:01.740 --> 0:17:06.220
<v Speaker 2>hear her name again. There's actually a piece in the

0:17:06.250 --> 0:17:09.530
<v Speaker 2>free press about Sidney Sweeney derangement syndrome.

0:17:09.810 --> 0:17:10.369
<v Speaker 3>Oh, really?

0:17:10.390 --> 0:17:12.929
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That's pretty clever.

0:17:13.330 --> 0:17:16.010
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, we definitely have more news to get to.

0:17:16.590 --> 0:17:19.030
<v Speaker 3>A lot going on. The whole Middle East thing. I

0:17:19.490 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>know this sounds crazy to say.

0:17:21.810 --> 0:17:22.230
<v Speaker 2>Oh, boy.

0:17:22.470 --> 0:17:25.750
<v Speaker 3>Could just explode. I mean, if it's Saudi Arabia and

0:17:25.770 --> 0:17:28.750
<v Speaker 3>the Houthis really go to war, how's Iran and Israel

0:17:28.770 --> 0:17:31.130
<v Speaker 3>and the United States get sucked into that? I don't know.

0:17:32.340 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:45.830 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia is vowing to take firm measures against Iranian-backed

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.109
<v Speaker 8>Houthi fighters who continue to strike static oil infrastructure and

0:17:54.170 --> 0:17:58.619
<v Speaker 8>threaten multiple cities, including Mecca. A drone attack last week

0:17:58.670 --> 0:18:02.900
<v Speaker 8>hit the 700-mile east-west pipeline, forcing a shutdown that could

0:18:02.940 --> 0:18:06.420
<v Speaker 8>last for weeks and impact the ability to transport four

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 8>million barrels of oil a day to market.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.379
<v Speaker 2>They've learned from Iranian training and Iranian.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 9>Support over the years how to be essentially these effective

0:18:15.460 --> 0:18:17.060
<v Speaker 9>Islamist pirates in the region.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>So iran and saudi arabia have been avowed enemies forever

0:18:22.820 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 3>right you got the whole sunni shia thing going one

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.730
<v Speaker 3>of them's one of them to iran's shia and saudi

0:18:29.750 --> 0:18:33.470
<v Speaker 3>arabia's sunni is that right yes uh correct.

0:18:33.190 --> 0:18:35.250
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention just the good old uh who's going

0:18:35.270 --> 0:18:37.590
<v Speaker 2>to be the power who's going to be the top dog.

0:18:37.390 --> 0:18:40.230
<v Speaker 3>Right which might have more to do with it certainly

0:18:40.270 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 3>among the leadership um This is closer to them going

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:49.430
<v Speaker 3>to war, definitely, since the Houthis are full-on Iranian, created

0:18:49.490 --> 0:18:52.070
<v Speaker 3>and backed. Although, I was reading a long article the

0:18:52.090 --> 0:18:54.330
<v Speaker 3>other day about how they're way more independent than a

0:18:54.350 --> 0:18:57.129
<v Speaker 3>lot of these other groups at this point, and very,

0:18:57.290 --> 0:18:58.090
<v Speaker 3>very well-armed.

0:18:58.950 --> 0:19:02.510
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, yeah. The fight in Yemen, which has been the

0:19:02.530 --> 0:19:07.450
<v Speaker 2>greatest humanitarian catastrophe in whatever number of decades. It's funny

0:19:07.490 --> 0:19:10.060
<v Speaker 2>that college kids aren't marching about that. It's weird.

0:19:10.260 --> 0:19:10.420
<v Speaker 8>Anyway.

0:19:11.780 --> 0:19:15.629
<v Speaker 2>It's long been a proxy fight between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

0:19:15.730 --> 0:19:17.850
<v Speaker 2>Now it could just be a it's on.

0:19:18.310 --> 0:19:19.130
<v Speaker 3>No more proxies.

0:19:19.190 --> 0:19:22.650
<v Speaker 2>I want to punch you in the face situation. That

0:19:22.690 --> 0:19:24.830
<v Speaker 2>report from Fox goes on.

0:19:25.890 --> 0:19:30.500
<v Speaker 8>Houthi fighters are overrunning Yemen government forces, leaving chaos and

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 8>death in their wake, vowing to take control of one

0:19:33.700 --> 0:19:37.060
<v Speaker 8>of the most strategic waterways in the world, the Bab

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.050
<v Speaker 8>al-Mandeb Strait, an 18-mile strip of water at the mouth

0:19:41.090 --> 0:19:41.899
<v Speaker 8>of the Red Sea.

0:19:42.570 --> 0:19:44.409
<v Speaker 2>More than $ 1 trillion.

0:19:44.369 --> 0:19:47.930
<v Speaker 8>Worth of cargo passes through the strait each year, including 12%

0:19:47.930 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 8>of the world's oil.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 5>We are capable of closing Bab el-Mandab strait and the

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Red Sea maritime navigation due to advances in our missile

0:19:58.300 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 5>and aerial capabilities.

0:19:59.660 --> 0:20:02.670
<v Speaker 2>Well, that seems like a big deal. It's a huge

0:20:02.710 --> 0:20:04.930
<v Speaker 2>deal in a lot of different ways. The war part,

0:20:04.990 --> 0:20:08.310
<v Speaker 2>which you've outlined, and also energy-wise, that was one of

0:20:08.330 --> 0:20:11.470
<v Speaker 2>the main bypasses the Saudis were using to get the

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.980
<v Speaker 2>royal out because the Strait of Hormuz is a tad

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 2>clogged up, you may have heard. So, yeah, this is

0:20:17.980 --> 0:20:18.659
<v Speaker 2>a development.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.139
<v Speaker 3>So then we go to Trey Yankstofox, who's got our

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.780
<v Speaker 3>involvement in some of the violence that's going on over there.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.340
<v Speaker 9>Tension remains high around the Strait of Hormuz as reports

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.890
<v Speaker 9>indicate multiple explosions were heard there overnight. The Iranians claim

0:20:35.910 --> 0:20:39.590
<v Speaker 9>they shot down an MQ-1 Predator drone belonging to the

0:20:39.630 --> 0:20:40.409
<v Speaker 9>United States.

0:20:40.770 --> 0:20:41.710
<v Speaker 2>And we do know that U.S.

0:20:41.770 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 9>Forces targeted a number of small Iranian boats that were

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 9>reportedly trying to steal a U.S.

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Sea drone earlier this week.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 3>We fired off a ton of our best. We're running

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.500
<v Speaker 3>low on munitions yesterday.

0:20:56.070 --> 0:20:57.609
<v Speaker 2>I was just going to jump in and say before

0:20:57.650 --> 0:21:01.170
<v Speaker 2>we continue with Trey. Yeah, we fired 70 or more

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of our high end defense interceptors when Iran launched that

0:21:06.540 --> 0:21:09.859
<v Speaker 2>brief ish missile attack on Jordan. Not to mention. So

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.619
<v Speaker 2>it was 60 to 70 Patriot interceptors and also a

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>dozen or so THAAD interceptors. And that expenditure is what

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.980
<v Speaker 2>we've used in a full week at other times in

0:21:21.020 --> 0:21:28.820
<v Speaker 2>the war. Iran is changing its tactics, including firing these rockets, munitions, missiles,

0:21:28.859 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure the proper term, that as they get

0:21:31.260 --> 0:21:35.980
<v Speaker 2>close to the target, they split into multiple munitions. They

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>multiply like the Hydra, right? And then so you have

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to use lots and lots of Patriots and Thads to

0:21:41.530 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 2>shoot them down, and we are burning through our supply.

0:21:44.770 --> 0:21:50.330
<v Speaker 3>Which is a strategy from the bad guys to have

0:21:50.350 --> 0:21:51.570
<v Speaker 3>us run out of those, I think.

0:21:52.220 --> 0:21:52.540
<v Speaker 7>Oh, yeah.

0:21:52.820 --> 0:21:57.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah. I think you're absolutely right. And here's the

0:21:57.430 --> 0:22:02.590
<v Speaker 2>30,000-foot view of that situation. The really good missile defense

0:22:02.630 --> 0:22:05.830
<v Speaker 2>stuff we've developed, and it's amazing. It's a tribute to

0:22:05.869 --> 0:22:10.740
<v Speaker 2>American scientific imagination, hard work, and genius in manufacturing. Anyway,

0:22:10.780 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>that is... Oh, my God. Good point. But that's enabled...

0:22:16.650 --> 0:22:18.730
<v Speaker 2>the sort of warfare we've seen, you know, we're going

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to punch you good and hard in the face and

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 2>see if you come around and you'll retaliate, but we'll

0:22:23.100 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 2>shoot down your rocket. So then we'll, we'll have more

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.700
<v Speaker 2>negotiations than, I don't know, maybe kick you a couple

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.540
<v Speaker 2>of times and you'll shoot back and we'll shoot those down. And, and,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we'll, we'll go back to the table, blah, blah, blah.

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to, you know, in the past, your soldiers

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.459
<v Speaker 2>were vulnerable to attacks. And especially now the, the, the

0:22:41.900 --> 0:22:46.540
<v Speaker 2>weapons are so sophisticated that, So could we be returning

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.020
<v Speaker 2>to we're going to win it and we're going to

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 2>win it fast because our guys are getting killed and

0:22:50.220 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing we can do to protect them style of warfare?

0:22:53.030 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm thinking about.

0:22:55.590 --> 0:23:02.909
<v Speaker 3>And now bringing the two reports together, the whole Yemen, Houthis,

0:23:03.150 --> 0:23:06.270
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia, Iran, United States thing is this.

0:23:06.890 --> 0:23:09.300
<v Speaker 9>With a focus on Iran, one of the country's largest proxies,

0:23:09.340 --> 0:23:11.980
<v Speaker 9>the Houthis in Yemen, are ramping up their attacks on

0:23:12.020 --> 0:23:15.780
<v Speaker 9>Yemeni government forces and neighboring Saudi Arabia. The Saudis intercepted

0:23:15.820 --> 0:23:18.379
<v Speaker 9>a Houthi drone overnight near the holy city of Mecca

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.380
<v Speaker 9>as these attacks expand in range. Now, the key thing

0:23:21.420 --> 0:23:23.700
<v Speaker 9>to remember here is that the escalation is linked to

0:23:23.740 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 9>the situation with Iran, and the Houthis are receiving direct

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.980
<v Speaker 9>orders and support from the regime in Tehran.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.540
<v Speaker 7>Why are the Houthis doing it? Because Iran is paying

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.860
<v Speaker 7>them cash? and offering them material and operational support. But

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.219
<v Speaker 7>this Iranian escalation is evidence of the pain that they

0:23:40.270 --> 0:23:41.290
<v Speaker 7>are going through economically.

0:23:42.450 --> 0:23:42.770
<v Speaker 3>I hope.

0:23:45.190 --> 0:23:47.929
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, is it enough? Is it enough for the reasons

0:23:47.950 --> 0:23:49.209
<v Speaker 2>we've discussed many times?

0:23:49.410 --> 0:23:52.530
<v Speaker 3>Well, is it an indication of how desperate they are,

0:23:52.609 --> 0:23:55.830
<v Speaker 3>or is it just them fighting a war and doing well?

0:23:57.410 --> 0:23:59.950
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's an interesting take. I guess I've accepted that

0:24:00.030 --> 0:24:03.739
<v Speaker 2>conventional wisdom, but I know the people are hurting, but

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.369
<v Speaker 2>the people could be starving like the godforsaken people you

0:24:08.410 --> 0:24:13.490
<v Speaker 2>see in those anti-hunger ads. And the IRGC will be fat, happy,

0:24:13.590 --> 0:24:14.570
<v Speaker 2>and well-supplied.

0:24:15.630 --> 0:24:18.380
<v Speaker 3>Man, shooting a drone over Mecca. Over Mecca is kind

0:24:18.420 --> 0:24:22.590
<v Speaker 3>of a vague term. over over in the area yeah

0:24:23.330 --> 0:24:25.650
<v Speaker 3>okay may not have been headed there in any way

0:24:25.670 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 3>it just was.

0:24:26.210 --> 0:24:29.220
<v Speaker 2>Like what like south mecca mecca heights so you could

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>be right that they're trying to build up public will

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.620
<v Speaker 2>of they shot a drone at mecca surely they realized

0:24:35.660 --> 0:24:40.270
<v Speaker 2>that's a if i was mbs i would absolutely say

0:24:40.310 --> 0:24:43.410
<v Speaker 2>that whether it was true or not but.

0:24:43.369 --> 0:24:45.530
<v Speaker 3>Surely iran and the houthis know that wouldn't be a

0:24:45.550 --> 0:24:49.820
<v Speaker 3>good strategy I can't imagine them doing it. Maybe there's

0:24:49.859 --> 0:24:51.889
<v Speaker 3>a reason they would, but I can't come up with it.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.950
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be an insane thing to do.

0:24:55.410 --> 0:24:58.670
<v Speaker 3>But that's what happened. MBS, I mean, it was like.

0:24:58.530 --> 0:25:02.190
<v Speaker 2>14 miles outside of Mecca heading toward an oil terminal.

0:25:02.490 --> 0:25:06.300
<v Speaker 2>They shot it down. MBS thinks to himself, hmm, and

0:25:06.340 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>announces they shot down a drone looking right at Mecca.

0:25:09.340 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I get Mecca and Medina messed up. I'm not Muslim.

0:25:12.220 --> 0:25:13.490
<v Speaker 1>Is that where....

0:25:16.710 --> 0:25:19.330
<v Speaker 3>Where he got the word, Muhammad got the word from

0:25:19.369 --> 0:25:21.770
<v Speaker 3>God and wrote down all the stuff or memorized it

0:25:21.830 --> 0:25:24.030
<v Speaker 3>for the Koran. Did that happen at Mecca or was

0:25:24.070 --> 0:25:25.830
<v Speaker 3>he born there? Well, there's Mecca and Medina.

0:25:25.869 --> 0:25:29.810
<v Speaker 2>There's two. Funky, cold Medina or the other one. Sorry,

0:25:29.830 --> 0:25:35.330
<v Speaker 2>that is a really outdated reference. That's got to be sacrilegious. Uh,

0:25:35.470 --> 0:25:35.930
<v Speaker 2>Tone Loke?

0:25:37.190 --> 0:25:40.230
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, using Tone Loke to talk about, yeah.

0:25:41.070 --> 0:25:42.330
<v Speaker 2>I apologize. No, I don't.

0:25:42.369 --> 0:25:44.070
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, it would be a really big deal to

0:25:44.109 --> 0:25:45.929
<v Speaker 3>their religion, I would think, for all.

0:25:46.970 --> 0:25:47.470
<v Speaker 2>Muslims.

0:25:48.490 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that split works between the Sunnis

0:25:51.410 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and the Shiites.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:54.500
<v Speaker 2>I don't know either.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:55.820
<v Speaker 2>Might have to look.

0:25:55.859 --> 0:25:57.100
<v Speaker 3>I'll do a quick research on that.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:57.900
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 3>But the Obama and Rebecca thing, jeez, they would go

0:26:00.700 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>badass crazy, wouldn't they?

0:26:02.020 --> 0:26:05.459
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia? Again, yeah, that'd be an insane thing to do.

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.459
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine why they would do it intentionally. More

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.460
<v Speaker 2>analysis in a moment afterward from our friends at SimpliSafe

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.810
<v Speaker 2>Home Security. They're celebrating their 20th anniversary, growing and growing

0:26:14.850 --> 0:26:18.380
<v Speaker 2>and growing. We both love SimpliSafe You know, not only

0:26:18.420 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>does it protect your place and the people you love,

0:26:21.060 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>but it can lower your insurance costs, partly because with

0:26:24.060 --> 0:26:29.300
<v Speaker 2>the AI powered smart outdoor cameras, they detect suspicious activity

0:26:29.340 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>at the perimeter and alert live U.S. based agents to

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.050
<v Speaker 2>step in. So they stop the breaking before it happens,

0:26:35.109 --> 0:26:35.929
<v Speaker 2>unlike other systems.

0:26:36.390 --> 0:26:39.730
<v Speaker 3>Yep. I went on the Simply Safe website. I customized

0:26:39.750 --> 0:26:41.730
<v Speaker 3>it for my home like you can do. It comes

0:26:41.830 --> 0:26:44.950
<v Speaker 3>very quickly. It's easy to set up. And you stick

0:26:45.010 --> 0:26:46.950
<v Speaker 3>with it because you like it, not because you're locked

0:26:46.990 --> 0:26:49.669
<v Speaker 3>into a contract. That is SimpliSafe. And right now you

0:26:49.710 --> 0:26:52.350
<v Speaker 3>can get 50% off new SimpliSafe system. Just go to

0:26:52.390 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 3>SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:59.780
<v Speaker 2>60% off SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. And when you order, write

0:26:59.820 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>in our show name in the How'd You Hear About

0:27:01.340 --> 0:27:04.260
<v Speaker 2>Us survey. Please, if you can take a minute, SimpliSafe.com

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.929
<v Speaker 2>slash Armstrong. Don't forget there's no safe like SimpliSafe. And

0:27:08.970 --> 0:27:11.430
<v Speaker 2>then maybe we'll touch on Ukraine-Russia a little bit later,

0:27:11.450 --> 0:27:15.669
<v Speaker 2>but why? With those two wars going the way they're going,

0:27:16.310 --> 0:27:19.150
<v Speaker 2>there's no end in sight, really, at either one of them.

0:27:19.910 --> 0:27:21.230
<v Speaker 7>No. No.

0:27:21.380 --> 0:27:26.179
<v Speaker 2>Russia has, like Iran, ramped up its production of the

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:31.380
<v Speaker 2>next generation of devastating weapons, and Ukraine is catastrophically low

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>in interceptors at this point. So you remember that moment

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 2>when Ukraine's drone technology was just amazing and They're really

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 2>making progress and holding Russians off. That phase may be over.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>And Trump is demanding the Ukrainians not attack Russia's oil capacity,

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:53.620
<v Speaker 2>which is like the only weapon they have.

0:27:56.930 --> 0:28:00.429
<v Speaker 3>So we got a lot to get to today. We

0:28:00.450 --> 0:28:03.129
<v Speaker 3>will get into AI at some point because there's some

0:28:03.170 --> 0:28:05.210
<v Speaker 3>good new stuff. But just before we take a break,

0:28:07.790 --> 0:28:10.169
<v Speaker 3>Mark Halpern on his afternoon news show that I watch,

0:28:10.369 --> 0:28:15.609
<v Speaker 3>he put out his eight for twenty eight list for

0:28:15.650 --> 0:28:19.510
<v Speaker 3>this week. That's the he ranks the people that he

0:28:19.609 --> 0:28:22.030
<v Speaker 3>thinks are going to run for president as a Democrat

0:28:22.410 --> 0:28:25.190
<v Speaker 3>and where they currently are in terms of likelihood of

0:28:25.210 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 3>them running and getting the nomination. And they've moved a

0:28:28.500 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>lot over recent months. He he interviews donors and, you know.

0:28:36.990 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 3>off-the-record conversations with people in campaigns and all that sort

0:28:40.060 --> 0:28:43.580
<v Speaker 3>of stuff. And he doesn't usually divulge what he knows

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.180
<v Speaker 3>because it's off-the-record. But I was pretty surprised to see

0:28:47.260 --> 0:28:50.090
<v Speaker 3>that he's got at number one now because he had

0:28:50.130 --> 0:28:52.630
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris at number one several months back, thinking she

0:28:52.670 --> 0:28:54.590
<v Speaker 3>was going to run, thinking she would get the nomination,

0:28:54.630 --> 0:28:57.970
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know what changed. But she's down to six.

0:28:58.230 --> 0:29:01.460
<v Speaker 3>He currently has number one to be the nominee, Gavin Newsom.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I know there's a big poll out of people,

0:29:06.740 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>just normal schlubs like ourselves, for the 2028 Democratic nomination,

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>which is the most useless pile of garbage you can imagine.

0:29:14.380 --> 0:29:18.180
<v Speaker 2>It means nothing, tells you nothing, informs you of nothing,

0:29:18.420 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>just a waste of time. Halpern talking to the real

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.530
<v Speaker 2>movers and shakers behind the scenes, that is interesting.

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:26.670
<v Speaker 3>Well, right, who they're going to support.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:29:28.380 --> 0:29:30.950
<v Speaker 3>Because that's when you don't run. That's when you stop running,

0:29:30.950 --> 0:29:34.110
<v Speaker 3>when you lose your financial support and then then you

0:29:34.150 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 3>can't run yeah yeah unless you're a billionaire so we

0:29:38.380 --> 0:29:41.140
<v Speaker 3>were talking about how the uh the tit-for-tat phase of

0:29:41.180 --> 0:29:43.739
<v Speaker 3>the iran war may be ending which reminds me we

0:29:43.780 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 3>need to talk about sydney sweeney derangement syndrome wow so

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 3>stay with us for that wow well you're you really

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.660
<v Speaker 3>you were excited about that weren't you what i can

0:29:53.860 --> 0:29:57.750
<v Speaker 3>particularly you were excited about that tease transition i don't

0:29:58.270 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>i don't follow you at all And as long as

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.100
<v Speaker 3>you say for tat, you can get away with it.

0:30:04.420 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why.

0:30:05.540 --> 0:30:06.300
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Weird, these rules. You know, I was thinking that as

0:30:08.940 --> 0:30:12.170
<v Speaker 2>I grew my shih tzu the other day. It's true.

0:30:14.510 --> 0:30:19.630
<v Speaker 3>Be like if there was an expression of for fac

0:30:19.870 --> 0:30:23.170
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. As long as you said for fac,

0:30:23.350 --> 0:30:26.590
<v Speaker 3>you could use it as a different expression. SNL brought

0:30:26.630 --> 0:30:28.570
<v Speaker 3>us so brilliantly a number of years back. It's so

0:30:28.610 --> 0:30:33.390
<v Speaker 3>fucking comfortable. the name of this store was sofa King.

0:30:34.250 --> 0:30:38.070
<v Speaker 2>And, uh, I got to turn off your mics. It's

0:30:38.150 --> 0:30:40.910
<v Speaker 2>probably a good idea. Michael speaking, which is shocking, uh,

0:30:42.210 --> 0:30:45.130
<v Speaker 2>upsetting of the format. Next segment. I have a, I've

0:30:45.170 --> 0:30:47.410
<v Speaker 2>made a command decision. Okay, cool.

0:30:47.990 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 3>And, um, somebody had to apologize for laughing at a

0:30:52.890 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 3>tick tock joke that somebody was Arch Manning of the, uh,

0:30:58.460 --> 0:31:01.470
<v Speaker 3>Texas Longhorns quarterback. I don't think he should have apologized.

0:31:01.530 --> 0:31:04.370
<v Speaker 3>What was he forced to apologize for by the woke mob?

0:31:04.390 --> 0:31:06.510
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that and all kinds of stuff coming up.

0:31:06.550 --> 0:31:06.830
<v Speaker 3>Stay here.

0:31:08.330 --> 0:31:17.690
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:31:22.140 --> 0:31:27.050
<v Speaker 3>According to ChatGPT, Mecca is enormously important to both Sunnis

0:31:27.310 --> 0:31:30.510
<v Speaker 3>and Shias. It is the holiest city for both groups.

0:31:31.470 --> 0:31:36.660
<v Speaker 3>So it's hard to imagine the Houthis bombing it? No, no.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't seem like it's on the table.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, again, just to whip up populace. It's good water's

0:31:41.660 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>time propaganda, though. So the command decision I've made is

0:31:45.900 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>to skip mailbag today to give more time for the

0:31:49.260 --> 0:31:52.650
<v Speaker 2>freedom-loving quote of the day because it is so unbelievably brilliant.

0:31:54.270 --> 0:32:00.490
<v Speaker 2>It comes from my favorite Frenchman, Breville Lepagom. I thought

0:32:00.510 --> 0:32:01.630
<v Speaker 2>you were going to say Jacques Cousteau.

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:02.470
<v Speaker 7>Nope.

0:32:02.710 --> 0:32:06.220
<v Speaker 2>Actually, my favorite Frenchman for a long time was Lebeau

0:32:06.300 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 2>from Hogan's Heroes. But now it is Breville Lepagom.

0:32:12.460 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Not Lafayette, LeBou from Hogan Zeroes.

0:32:15.740 --> 0:32:19.540
<v Speaker 2>Lafayette would have been a good one. Anyway, so here's

0:32:19.580 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 2>what my favorite Frenchman writes. And part of the reason

0:32:22.580 --> 0:32:25.180
<v Speaker 2>I'm fired up about this is I see J.D. Vance,

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 2>sometimes referred to these days as Chey-D. Vance, performing the

0:32:29.700 --> 0:32:33.580
<v Speaker 2>horseshoe theory maneuver. And it's on the young right in particular,

0:32:33.620 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>people are talking about central planning and how we really

0:32:35.860 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>need to do that. The government needs to take more power.

0:32:39.370 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And so this is what Le Pogam writes. There's truth

0:32:43.340 --> 0:32:46.380
<v Speaker 2>in almost everything. The problem is the test. In physics,

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>it's simple. If your plane flies, you're right. If your

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.810
<v Speaker 2>computer calculates, you're right. If your vacuum cleaner sucks, you're right.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.750
<v Speaker 2>I found myself wondering, does that translate in the same

0:32:56.130 --> 0:32:59.510
<v Speaker 2>ironic way in French as it does in English? Anyway,

0:32:59.710 --> 0:33:03.730
<v Speaker 2>reality doesn't negotiate. It doesn't form committees. Music and live performance,

0:33:03.770 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 2>that's more subtle. There's taste in colors. You can prefer

0:33:06.740 --> 0:33:09.780
<v Speaker 2>an adagio to a sax solo, but no serious person

0:33:09.820 --> 0:33:13.860
<v Speaker 2>can say that Mozart or Beethoven is bad. An out-of-tune piano,

0:33:13.900 --> 0:33:16.620
<v Speaker 2>someone singing off-key, it shows. It's not an opinion, it's

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>an ear. Economics, we treat it as if it were

0:33:20.420 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 2>a matter of taste. It isn't. Marxism is a symphony

0:33:24.340 --> 0:33:27.180
<v Speaker 2>for a hundred instruments where no one has ever rehearsed,

0:33:27.420 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>where all the instruments are out of tune, and where

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.530
<v Speaker 2>the conductor wrote the score in his head based on

0:33:31.570 --> 0:33:34.570
<v Speaker 2>a theory. Then they close the doors of the hall

0:33:34.630 --> 0:33:41.990
<v Speaker 2>and they demand the ovation. What happens on a large scale? Famine, gulags, death, misery, madness.

0:33:42.420 --> 0:33:46.100
<v Speaker 2>Not because the musicians were monsters, because the piece is unplayable.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Without prices, you no longer have an ear. Without property,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you no longer have tuned instruments. Without profit and loss,

0:33:53.820 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 2>no one hears the off note anymore. That's an especially

0:33:57.270 --> 0:34:00.370
<v Speaker 2>astute observation. And if you point it out, they explain

0:34:00.410 --> 0:34:04.380
<v Speaker 2>that you're the problem. Mize wrote about it in 1920.

0:34:04.380 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Without market prices, economic calculation is impossible. The conductor doesn't

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>have the knowledge. Hayek added the rest. The knowledge is local, dispersed,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.310
<v Speaker 2>sometimes silent. It doesn't fit into a ministry. It doesn't

0:34:17.390 --> 0:34:21.590
<v Speaker 2>fit into a slogan. The moral globalism that followed, wokeism,

0:34:21.690 --> 0:34:26.149
<v Speaker 2>institutional feminism, identity theater, is another score written against the ear.

0:34:26.510 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 2>They replaced the test with the narrative. They tune the

0:34:29.860 --> 0:34:33.210
<v Speaker 2>instruments to the right word, not to reality. And you

0:34:33.250 --> 0:34:36.710
<v Speaker 2>end up with completely detached characters capable of speaking for

0:34:36.750 --> 0:34:39.570
<v Speaker 2>an hour without ever touching the ground. It's not a

0:34:39.630 --> 0:34:42.740
<v Speaker 2>casting accident. It's what a hall produces that has stopped

0:34:42.860 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 2>listening to whether it's right. The Austrian school is Mozart

0:34:46.780 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>applied to economics, not because it would be elegant because

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.310
<v Speaker 2>it refuses to play off key. Prices are the tuning,

0:34:53.710 --> 0:34:57.130
<v Speaker 2>a number that condenses what millions of people know without

0:34:57.330 --> 0:35:00.790
<v Speaker 2>anyone having to know everything. Property is the instrument that

0:35:00.850 --> 0:35:03.980
<v Speaker 2>holds the tuning over time. The entrepreneur is the musician

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.259
<v Speaker 2>who risks his skin on a phrase no one has

0:35:06.300 --> 0:35:10.219
<v Speaker 2>played before. Profit isn't vulgarity. It's the silence after the

0:35:10.300 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>right note, the proof that you've created value for someone else.

0:35:13.980 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Mozart doesn't need you to believe in him. Your ear

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.550
<v Speaker 2>is enough. A healthy economy doesn't either. Full shelves, planes

0:35:20.590 --> 0:35:24.490
<v Speaker 2>that fly, people escaping poverty. It rings true. Bad ideas

0:35:24.630 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 2>kill first those who believe in them. Reconversion is possible.

0:35:28.460 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 2>You just need to retune the strings. Then we build.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was brilliant.

0:35:34.100 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's pretty good.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. God, I could go on for an hour about that.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>how much I hate central planning and why it's such

0:35:41.140 --> 0:35:43.739
<v Speaker 2>a terrible idea. And I think it's one of those

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.010
<v Speaker 2>truths that needs to be retaught over and over again.

0:35:46.260 --> 0:35:49.750
<v Speaker 3>I came across this thread about Chairman Mao running China

0:35:49.969 --> 0:35:53.610
<v Speaker 3>and some of his worst ideas that killed 40 million people.

0:35:53.770 --> 0:35:56.129
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that goes unnoticed by history.

0:35:56.110 --> 0:35:56.589
<v Speaker 2>For most people.

0:35:56.610 --> 0:36:01.990
<v Speaker 3>It's not convenient. One of his most hilariously bad ideas

0:36:02.090 --> 0:36:04.150
<v Speaker 3>that killed millions of people, I'll have to get to

0:36:04.190 --> 0:36:06.130
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later. I don't know if I'd ever

0:36:06.170 --> 0:36:09.170
<v Speaker 3>heard it before. The central planning thing, though. Still trying

0:36:09.190 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 3>to come up with my favorite Frenchman. It's either Wembiana,

0:36:12.540 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the center for the Spurs, or Robespierre. I'm going to

0:36:15.620 --> 0:36:17.500
<v Speaker 3>go with one of those two. I'll have to think

0:36:17.540 --> 0:36:18.020
<v Speaker 3>it over, though.

0:36:18.420 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I'd go with the Spurs center. Sacre bleu. Terrible choices.

0:36:22.989 --> 0:36:27.709
<v Speaker 2>C'est terrible or something. I don't know. I got six

0:36:27.730 --> 0:36:30.250
<v Speaker 2>weeks of French in high school. I thought, the wires,

0:36:30.270 --> 0:36:32.950
<v Speaker 2>there's so many silent letters. You know me in silent letters.

0:36:33.170 --> 0:36:38.170
<v Speaker 2>You know, oh, I hate them. Too many. So I

0:36:38.210 --> 0:36:39.650
<v Speaker 2>went with Sherman, yeah.

0:36:39.930 --> 0:36:40.690
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:36:41.110 --> 0:36:42.109
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic.

0:36:42.969 --> 0:36:44.620
<v Speaker 3>We've got a lot more to come. If you miss

0:36:44.660 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a segment, get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:36:47.380 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 3>You should subscribe. That example from Chairman Mao in central

0:36:49.820 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 3>planning would have sounded crazy 10 years ago. Now that

0:36:54.180 --> 0:36:56.670
<v Speaker 3>I've lived through the whole apocalypse, I can believe that

0:36:56.710 --> 0:36:59.450
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing happening. So lots on the way. Again,

0:36:59.489 --> 0:36:59.810
<v Speaker 3>stay here.

0:37:02.570 --> 0:37:03.649
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.