WEBVTT - Sparkly & Tight

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:11.809
<v Speaker 1>Now broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at

0:00:11.850 --> 0:00:13.970
<v Speaker 1>the George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:14.050 --> 0:00:16.210
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:16.430 --> 0:00:33.790
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. And now. We have the same two

0:00:33.850 --> 0:00:36.730
<v Speaker 1>rules for the Armstrong and Getty show that Dolly Parton

0:00:36.770 --> 0:00:40.729
<v Speaker 1>had for clothing, she said. Sparkly and tight. That's what

0:00:40.770 --> 0:00:44.729
<v Speaker 1>we are. Sparkly and tight. Welcome to the live presentation

0:00:44.770 --> 0:00:47.430
<v Speaker 1>of the Armstrong and Getty program. Deeper than the bowels

0:00:48.370 --> 0:00:50.989
<v Speaker 1>of the Armstrong and Getty communications compound. And today we're

0:00:51.030 --> 0:00:53.570
<v Speaker 1>toiling under the title of the show. I struggled with

0:00:53.610 --> 0:01:04.490
<v Speaker 1>how to express this most succinctly and persuasively. Title number one. Mom,

0:01:04.569 --> 0:01:10.410
<v Speaker 1>the flag, apple pie, and Dolly. On a less life-affirming note,

0:01:10.990 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I hate politics. Oh, I hate politics so much. I'm

0:01:16.220 --> 0:01:18.980
<v Speaker 1>sure we'll get to that soon enough and for the

0:01:19.020 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>next however many years. As long as we live in

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.100
<v Speaker 1>this godforsaken system. So what's your explanation? I can't wait.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.630
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go through all of the different people

0:01:31.790 --> 0:01:37.340
<v Speaker 1>and entities that That came out with their, you know,

0:01:37.540 --> 0:01:39.970
<v Speaker 1>tip of the hat to Dolly Parton. I mean, they

0:01:40.110 --> 0:01:44.060
<v Speaker 1>vary more than any crowd I've ever seen in my life. Agreed.

0:01:44.090 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. Like, from the Parliament of Ireland to Eminem to,

0:01:50.020 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just incredible. What's your explanation for that?

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like I haven't heard that discussed much.

0:01:55.740 --> 0:01:58.690
<v Speaker 1>People keep talking about how many hits she had. Okay, fine.

0:01:59.790 --> 0:02:01.730
<v Speaker 1>And she was a good musician, no doubt about it.

0:02:01.750 --> 0:02:04.690
<v Speaker 1>But there's lots of good musicians that pass along, and

0:02:04.730 --> 0:02:08.390
<v Speaker 1>they don't get a hundredth of this sort of attention.

0:02:08.650 --> 0:02:13.190
<v Speaker 1>So what was her thing? Yeah, accepting, stipulating, as they

0:02:13.230 --> 0:02:16.410
<v Speaker 1>say in the courtroom, that she was a very well-known

0:02:16.530 --> 0:02:22.250
<v Speaker 1>and successful entertainer. I think it was that she radiated

0:02:22.500 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>goodness and kindness. I think so, too. And people respond

0:02:28.060 --> 0:02:31.660
<v Speaker 1>to that, even as they go about their cynical lives

0:02:31.740 --> 0:02:36.820
<v Speaker 1>in their snarky 21st century ways. There is something called riz, charisma,

0:02:36.940 --> 0:02:39.100
<v Speaker 1>and maybe she just had it on a level that

0:02:39.220 --> 0:02:42.010
<v Speaker 1>one and a Two billion and a half as opposed

0:02:42.030 --> 0:02:47.090
<v Speaker 1>to just like lots of charisma. She was utterly disarming. Yeah.

0:02:47.250 --> 0:02:50.350
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to imagine the kind of human being that

0:02:50.530 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't like her. Right. What you'd have to be. Right.

0:02:55.900 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>She was just so about kindness and generosity and an

0:03:01.940 --> 0:03:07.100
<v Speaker 1>enormous star while being completely unassuming. I mean, if that

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.340
<v Speaker 1>doesn't appeal to humans, you have a different point of

0:03:09.380 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>view than me. And we cannot be friends. I mean,

0:03:13.580 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>she gave away hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions

0:03:17.139 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>of dollars to charity over the many, many years. She'd

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be a billionaire if she hadn't given away so much

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.730
<v Speaker 1>money to charity. So that'll, you know, that'll buy a

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.570
<v Speaker 1>lot of goodwill. And I don't mean that in like

0:03:27.590 --> 0:03:30.950
<v Speaker 1>a cynical way that just makes, you know, makes people happy.

0:03:31.450 --> 0:03:31.530
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:03:31.550 --> 0:03:35.530
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough. Yeah. A great deal of it devoted childhood literacy,

0:03:35.630 --> 0:03:40.250
<v Speaker 1>which is. it's difficult to surpass as a wonderful idea,

0:03:40.310 --> 0:03:43.630
<v Speaker 1>given that if a child learns to read, A, and B,

0:03:43.670 --> 0:03:47.090
<v Speaker 1>becomes capable at it, that changes their life. Unfortunately, as

0:03:47.150 --> 0:03:50.650
<v Speaker 1>a nation, we've decided to give up on that. But, yeah, well,

0:03:50.750 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>she's old. So she grew up in a time and

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>place where that was really a big thing. I mean,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>her dad couldn't read or write. So one of 12

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in a one-bedroom shack? Holy crap. No electricity or running water. Yeah.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>To global superstardom and stayed normal. Yeah. That's not easy.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.690
<v Speaker 1>And got there pretty fast. So when she was graduating

0:04:21.700 --> 0:04:24.789
<v Speaker 1>high school, she says right before they left. And the

0:04:24.810 --> 0:04:27.270
<v Speaker 1>day she graduated high school, she moved to Nashville. But

0:04:29.270 --> 0:04:32.130
<v Speaker 1>before she graduated high school, like right before they did

0:04:32.170 --> 0:04:33.850
<v Speaker 1>the whole, you know, what do you want to be

0:04:33.870 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when you grow up? She said, I'm going to be

0:04:35.010 --> 0:04:38.250
<v Speaker 1>a star. Very matter of factly. And everybody laughed. She's

0:04:38.270 --> 0:04:40.890
<v Speaker 1>just one of those people that just knew, you know,

0:04:40.990 --> 0:04:43.190
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm going to do. I'm cut out for

0:04:43.230 --> 0:04:44.229
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, you see.

0:04:45.070 --> 0:04:45.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:45.750 --> 0:04:48.929
<v Speaker 1>As a hack musician, and I don't want to focus

0:04:48.990 --> 0:04:54.730
<v Speaker 1>on this, but her public image with the rhinestones and

0:04:54.750 --> 0:04:59.270
<v Speaker 1>the hooters and all that. And the hooters! Well, that's

0:04:59.290 --> 0:05:05.310
<v Speaker 1>the first not completely respectful comment on the Dolly Parton memorials.

0:05:06.130 --> 0:05:09.909
<v Speaker 1>Nor was she. I'm echoing her failures. She used the

0:05:09.950 --> 0:05:12.550
<v Speaker 1>term hooters, though. It's the term. It's not the body part.

0:05:12.630 --> 0:05:15.830
<v Speaker 1>Half the world has the body part. All right, breasts,

0:05:15.890 --> 0:05:18.070
<v Speaker 1>for God's sake. Memory glands. What do you want out

0:05:18.089 --> 0:05:24.060
<v Speaker 1>of me? I like the term figure. Oh, bosom. Her

0:05:24.070 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>prodigious bosoms.

0:05:26.130 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:05:26.750 --> 0:05:32.380
<v Speaker 1>No, I always found it mildly annoying. Because I thought

0:05:32.460 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>she was so wonderful. And, you know, as a songwriter,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.990
<v Speaker 1>as a musician, as a thinker and a businesswoman and

0:05:40.029 --> 0:05:43.130
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it, I was like, you could be

0:05:43.150 --> 0:05:47.550
<v Speaker 1>wearing anything, looking like anything. But, you know, she had

0:05:47.589 --> 0:05:51.430
<v Speaker 1>her thing. She had her, you know, her groove and

0:05:51.470 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>she stuck with it. So I got to respect her.

0:05:53.130 --> 0:05:55.290
<v Speaker 1>I have to read from one of the New York

0:05:55.310 --> 0:05:58.390
<v Speaker 1>Times articles that I got into because they kept hyperlinking

0:05:58.490 --> 0:06:01.070
<v Speaker 1>to various things. And one of them was about her look.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.850
<v Speaker 1>And how they tried to change her look, and it

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:11.190
<v Speaker 1>became a real problem. She had to break with the

0:06:11.230 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>management company that was launching her. She said, I'm not,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I just can't. I can't. Because she kind of broke

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:22.150
<v Speaker 1>right when the woman thing was changing to, like, tight

0:06:22.330 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>slacks and a different kind of shirt and flat hair

0:06:25.260 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and just a different look. And she did that for

0:06:27.100 --> 0:06:28.940
<v Speaker 1>like a day and said, I, this is not me.

0:06:28.980 --> 0:06:30.340
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this. And went back to the giant

0:06:30.380 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hair and they said, well, we can't market you that way.

0:06:31.980 --> 0:06:33.540
<v Speaker 1>And okay, I guess we're not, I guess we have

0:06:33.580 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to agree to disagree. So she really was looking for

0:06:35.940 --> 0:06:40.029
<v Speaker 1>a more Helen ready-ish approach to exactly. You're old enough

0:06:40.070 --> 0:06:42.090
<v Speaker 1>to remember that. That's exactly what they're trying to do.

0:06:42.710 --> 0:06:45.529
<v Speaker 1>Google it. As usual, the people that run these kind

0:06:45.570 --> 0:06:49.570
<v Speaker 1>of show business industries having no imagination whatsoever. We'll just

0:06:49.589 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do exactly what everybody else is doing it. I hate them, too,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.030
<v Speaker 1>along with politics, but go on. And assume nobody with

0:06:56.089 --> 0:06:58.050
<v Speaker 1>the talent can possibly figure this out on their own.

0:06:58.810 --> 0:07:00.990
<v Speaker 1>They need the suits to tell them how to be

0:07:01.010 --> 0:07:03.690
<v Speaker 1>good at what they do. Yes. Even though they've never

0:07:03.730 --> 0:07:07.830
<v Speaker 1>done it. No. They've watched other people do it, so

0:07:07.850 --> 0:07:12.510
<v Speaker 1>they think they know, but they don't. How much money

0:07:12.540 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>do you suppose she made off of I Will Always

0:07:14.820 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Love You? Just that one song. If that's all she'd

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.070
<v Speaker 1>ever done was written that song and Whitney records it,

0:07:19.100 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much money she would have made. That

0:07:20.860 --> 0:07:24.990
<v Speaker 1>was back when people were still buying physical media, so zillions.

0:07:26.130 --> 0:07:28.510
<v Speaker 1>She would have been insanely wealthy with just that one song.

0:07:28.970 --> 0:07:31.770
<v Speaker 1>It was number one for 11 weeks, 13 weeks, something

0:07:31.790 --> 0:07:33.070
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was a number one hit for her

0:07:33.370 --> 0:07:34.990
<v Speaker 1>and then for Whitney Houston, so it made a lot

0:07:35.030 --> 0:07:37.050
<v Speaker 1>of money. Number one hit for her twice on the

0:07:37.070 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>country charts. Right. Yes. And it was on the same

0:07:40.700 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>album as Jolene. That was a good album. She said,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.340
<v Speaker 1>I must have something going that night. Holy crap. She

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.780
<v Speaker 1>wrote those two songs in the same night. That's funny

0:07:48.820 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>how that works with the artists, isn't it? That's incredible. Yeah,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I know it is. Yeah, but we got some more

0:07:58.300 --> 0:08:00.300
<v Speaker 1>flashbacks and retrospects and all that sort of stuff. I just,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, I used to say this should be, this

0:08:04.660 --> 0:08:07.220
<v Speaker 1>should have like a PhD level study, but that's back

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>when I used to have respect for PhD level studies

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.430
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. Third thing I hate, yes. There should

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.580
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of study on her ability to, to

0:08:19.420 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>appeal to everyone. That's an incredibly rare thing. Right, right.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think people know this about us, but I

0:08:28.100 --> 0:08:32.620
<v Speaker 1>want to make clear, as a cynic, a celebrity passes.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.780
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I generally don't have all that much interest

0:08:37.050 --> 0:08:41.230
<v Speaker 1>in showing out about that. I just, I don't. I

0:08:41.290 --> 0:08:44.270
<v Speaker 1>admired their work. They lived a good life, I feel,

0:08:44.330 --> 0:08:47.810
<v Speaker 1>for their family. It's that. But as we started to

0:08:47.850 --> 0:08:52.250
<v Speaker 1>discuss at the beginning what it is about dolly and

0:08:52.350 --> 0:08:56.950
<v Speaker 1>her life and her manner that was so universally beloved

0:08:57.410 --> 0:09:02.170
<v Speaker 1>i think is i think it's important and i think

0:09:02.210 --> 0:09:05.530
<v Speaker 1>it's worth contemplating for a minute particularly in a world

0:09:05.550 --> 0:09:10.890
<v Speaker 1>where we're surrounded by you know hateful divisive politics bizarro

0:09:10.990 --> 0:09:16.130
<v Speaker 1>movements everybody's angry everybody's distracted constantly by the internet It's

0:09:16.190 --> 0:09:18.730
<v Speaker 1>one of the few common, well, my title was, my

0:09:18.750 --> 0:09:21.530
<v Speaker 1>proposed title, Mom, the Flag, Apple Pie, and Dolly. This

0:09:21.610 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few commonalities we have left. Yeah.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.180
<v Speaker 1>And it's worth, anytime we run into one of those,

0:09:28.260 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's worth everybody saying, I like that, and you like that,

0:09:31.700 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and I do too. Let's think about that. That's exactly

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.270
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to get into that. That is a

0:09:37.410 --> 0:09:41.950
<v Speaker 1>very unique thing. Katie is nodding her head along. I'm

0:09:41.990 --> 0:09:43.910
<v Speaker 1>glad to hear we have your agreement, Katie. She was

0:09:43.950 --> 0:09:47.219
<v Speaker 1>a woman. If we're having the argument about what a

0:09:47.260 --> 0:09:50.250
<v Speaker 1>woman is, Dolly Parton. Oh, I see. Yeah. You know what?

0:09:50.350 --> 0:09:52.190
<v Speaker 1>I love that because, you know, a guy will say, no,

0:09:52.230 --> 0:09:56.970
<v Speaker 1>that's a man. Or in Yiddish slash German, mensch means

0:09:56.970 --> 0:09:59.860
<v Speaker 1>that's a complete man. That is that is somebody worth

0:09:59.900 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>admiring yeah yeah she she went with that cartoonish hair

0:10:05.740 --> 0:10:09.750
<v Speaker 1>and uh breast augmentation but she started from a base

0:10:09.850 --> 0:10:15.100
<v Speaker 1>of Very attractive. But through all of that, she remained classy. Yeah.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:15.650
<v Speaker 1>She was.

0:10:15.740 --> 0:10:16.030
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:16.270 --> 0:10:22.180
<v Speaker 1>How she did that. Right. Without ever being smutty, slutty, trashy. Right.

0:10:22.300 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you pull off that line? I don't know.

0:10:24.820 --> 0:10:28.260
<v Speaker 1>We've left out her fantastic sense of humor. Right. And

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>her refusal to take herself overly seriously. Which helps a lot. Wisdom,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:38.660
<v Speaker 1>in short. She had a ridiculous smile. So that helps, too.

0:10:39.340 --> 0:10:41.270
<v Speaker 1>That helps, too. looked sincere to me.

0:10:41.770 --> 0:10:41.949
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:42.130 --> 0:10:42.309
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:42.330 --> 0:10:42.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:42.730 --> 0:10:46.209
<v Speaker 1>I think she's just like really digging, you know, whatever

0:10:46.270 --> 0:10:48.699
<v Speaker 1>she was doing or whoever she was talking to, which

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.660
<v Speaker 1>I never worked a day in her life. Right. I

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can't pull off for an hour enjoying who I'm talking

0:10:54.940 --> 0:10:58.100
<v Speaker 1>to her. If you don't look homicidal for five minutes,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.870
<v Speaker 1>it's a victory. Yeah. Um, Yeah, well, if you look

0:11:01.890 --> 0:11:03.700
<v Speaker 1>at where she came from and what she went through,

0:11:03.740 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that will give you wisdom. That will give you perspective.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.500
<v Speaker 1>Do we know anything about her other 11 brothers and sisters?

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:15.420
<v Speaker 1>Are they all really cynical, angry, troll-like people? Exactly. She

0:11:15.470 --> 0:11:18.530
<v Speaker 1>got all the joy. All the joy went to Dolly.

0:11:18.610 --> 0:11:22.689
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well, let's start the show officially. Got a

0:11:22.710 --> 0:11:24.730
<v Speaker 1>good clip for you. I'm Jack Armstrong. He's Joe Getty.

0:11:24.770 --> 0:11:27.510
<v Speaker 1>On this, it is Wednesday, August 26th, the year 2026.

0:11:27.510 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We're Armstrong and Getty, and we approve of this program.

0:11:30.429 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin the show officially then, according to FCC rules,

0:11:32.910 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>regs at mark. Okay, the category in our top ten

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Dolly Parton pet peeves. Dolly, are you all set? Here

0:11:38.420 --> 0:11:39.660
<v Speaker 1>we go. Number three.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.750
<v Speaker 4>Okay, smart-ass emcees who introduced me by saying, and now

0:11:43.780 --> 0:11:44.610
<v Speaker 4>here they are.

0:11:44.650 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Dolly Parton. Number two.

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 4>When the Super Bowl is over, winner never says, hey,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to Dollywood.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:56.420
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:11:57.100 --> 0:12:01.850
<v Speaker 1>And now, the number one Dolly Parton pet peeve. Nobody

0:12:01.910 --> 0:12:09.770
<v Speaker 1>notices I've got a great ass, too. Wow. That is

0:12:09.870 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not a person who takes herself overly seriously. How do

0:12:13.140 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you get a shout out from John Fogarty and Eminem?

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.500
<v Speaker 1>Heavy D and Steven Pinker. I mean, the list I've

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:27.290
<v Speaker 1>got here is absolutely amazing. Heavy D and Steven Pinker.

0:12:27.550 --> 0:12:29.309
<v Speaker 1>That may be the first time those two have ever

0:12:29.350 --> 0:12:33.270
<v Speaker 1>been mentioned in the same sentence. Wu-Tang Clan and Larry Gatlin.

0:12:33.610 --> 0:12:35.290
<v Speaker 1>For those of you who know who that is. I mean,

0:12:35.309 --> 0:12:43.020
<v Speaker 1>it's just, it's insane. Wow. Robert Reich and every living president.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.780
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's something going on there. The only

0:12:49.860 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>time you will hear this sort of outpouring again from

0:12:52.980 --> 0:12:55.500
<v Speaker 1>the world of music, well, from the entire world, will

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.030
<v Speaker 1>be when Paul McCartney passes. But he was a foreigner.

0:13:00.510 --> 0:13:02.929
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, he had similar attributes

0:13:03.210 --> 0:13:07.690
<v Speaker 1>of just disarming, you know, not taking himself seriously, etc.

0:13:09.380 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And monumental talent. What Dolly Dye of? I didn't get

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.660
<v Speaker 1>into that. I didn't read or watch any of this

0:13:14.700 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff where they got into the last days. Officially a

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.189
<v Speaker 1>brief bout of cancer. Okay. We got headlines on the

0:13:21.230 --> 0:13:23.350
<v Speaker 1>way and lots to talk about today. Lindsey Graham's sister.

0:13:23.390 --> 0:13:25.580
<v Speaker 1>I hope she's smarter than I think she is, and

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope she is willing to learn. You hate her?

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.179
<v Speaker 1>You hate her. You're a hater. I don't hate her.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.620
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think she probably should have been a U.S. Senator,

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:36.860
<v Speaker 1>but she's going to be, so let's get over it.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Headlines on the way. Stay here.

0:13:37.980 --> 0:13:40.740
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:54.250 --> 0:13:58.590
<v Speaker 1>Shaboozy, Brooke Shields, and Motley Crue all weighing in with

0:13:58.630 --> 0:14:04.469
<v Speaker 1>their tributes to Dolly Parton. I mean, what? Never thought

0:14:04.490 --> 0:14:07.790
<v Speaker 1>I'd hear that combo. I know. I got many of those.

0:14:07.870 --> 0:14:12.580
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. Well, I'm going to that festival, by the way. Yeah,

0:14:12.620 --> 0:14:14.540
<v Speaker 1>I know. And then outside the world of music, like

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.780
<v Speaker 1>you said, Steven Pinker, the great defender of enlightenment and humanism, blah, blah, blah.

0:14:19.850 --> 0:14:21.690
<v Speaker 1>More to come on a million different topics, but let's

0:14:21.710 --> 0:14:23.910
<v Speaker 1>figure out who's reporting what. It's the lead story with

0:14:24.010 --> 0:14:25.130
<v Speaker 1>Katie Green. Katie.

0:14:25.510 --> 0:14:28.810
<v Speaker 3>So not to waste time, all the alphabet networks, Dolly Parton.

0:14:30.050 --> 0:14:30.670
<v Speaker 1>Non-stop.

0:14:31.010 --> 0:14:31.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:32.110 --> 0:14:35.869
<v Speaker 1>Apparently a brief battle with cancer. Man, it seemed to

0:14:35.910 --> 0:14:39.630
<v Speaker 1>happen fast, which is. Well, you know what? She canceled

0:14:39.650 --> 0:14:44.970
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of shows like six months ago. Right, well, yeah,

0:14:45.050 --> 0:14:48.890
<v Speaker 1>but they put together that whole residency thing in Vegas,

0:14:48.930 --> 0:14:51.770
<v Speaker 1>which she would have been huge. Right. And, you know,

0:14:51.830 --> 0:14:55.150
<v Speaker 1>they booked that. She booked that thinking she was healthy, obviously.

0:14:55.230 --> 0:14:56.130
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that long ago.

0:14:57.670 --> 0:15:01.670
<v Speaker 3>From the Wall Street Journal. Years late, billions over budget.

0:15:01.990 --> 0:15:06.060
<v Speaker 3>California's high-speed rail hasn't laid a track.

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's reporting on that? Wall Street Journal. Yeah, we'll get

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:14.690
<v Speaker 1>into that. Yet another... I mean, it's like retrying John

0:15:14.730 --> 0:15:18.770
<v Speaker 1>Wilkes Booth for killing Lincoln. There's no need. The state

0:15:18.830 --> 0:15:22.410
<v Speaker 1>is guilty of enormous theft, and yet the punishment is

0:15:22.490 --> 0:15:25.590
<v Speaker 1>not forthcoming. USA Today.

0:15:26.290 --> 0:15:30.410
<v Speaker 3>Shopping malls are charging for prime parking, and it's not

0:15:30.500 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>going well. Wow.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>All right. First of all, shopping malls are still open

0:15:38.340 --> 0:15:41.620
<v Speaker 1>in various places, apparently. Are they talking about big box

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>hell shopping malls or traditional malls?

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.570
<v Speaker 3>Like traditional malls. But I know that a lot of

0:15:47.590 --> 0:15:49.690
<v Speaker 3>people use them as a safe place to walk.

0:15:50.850 --> 0:15:51.030
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:51.090 --> 0:15:53.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, true. That's what my parents used to do. That's

0:15:54.290 --> 0:15:57.050
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're charging us now. Park farther away,

0:15:57.100 --> 0:16:00.820
<v Speaker 1>you numbskulls. Heartless Joe. What?

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>New York Post, Chucky Masked Sicko, who terrorizes Philadelphia citizens,

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 3>is captured in Vegas.

0:16:08.860 --> 0:16:12.430
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they caught him in Vegas. Wow. After a two-week manhunt.

0:16:12.450 --> 0:16:13.830
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw in those videos. They

0:16:13.850 --> 0:16:18.490
<v Speaker 1>were chilling. Just a sick effort. Thought he was being

0:16:18.510 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>funny or something. Well, as someone who loves horror, did

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not love this. No, no, no. Nobody loves that stuff

0:16:24.980 --> 0:16:25.540
<v Speaker 1>in real life.

0:16:25.660 --> 0:16:25.820
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.100
<v Speaker 1>Right. Study finds had a sleepless night.

0:16:29.660 --> 0:16:33.900
<v Speaker 3>Study suggests that exercising protects your memory as much as

0:16:33.980 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>a nap.

0:16:36.100 --> 0:16:36.260
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:16:37.020 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Cool. Babylon B.

0:16:40.140 --> 0:16:46.310
<v Speaker 3>Apocalypse draws near as last remaining universally loved human passes away.

0:16:46.530 --> 0:16:49.890
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder about that. Was she the last universally

0:16:49.950 --> 0:16:53.950
<v Speaker 1>loved human? We'll see. We ain't going to have many more.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.540
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about various titles we could give the

0:16:57.580 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>show today, and one I was toying with the idea

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.900
<v Speaker 1>of here comes the Civil War. The last thing that

0:17:02.940 --> 0:17:07.100
<v Speaker 1>held us together has passed. Yeah. Thank God she never

0:17:07.180 --> 0:17:10.740
<v Speaker 1>weighed in on Trump or anything. No, she's too smart

0:17:10.780 --> 0:17:13.659
<v Speaker 1>for that. Yes, she was. I sure would love to

0:17:13.700 --> 0:17:17.770
<v Speaker 1>have seen her behind closed doors making business decisions. There

0:17:17.830 --> 0:17:19.010
<v Speaker 1>had to be that side of her.

0:17:19.950 --> 0:17:20.210
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

0:17:20.230 --> 0:17:25.340
<v Speaker 1>You don't become a billionaire by accident. Nope. Nope. We

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of the news of the day that

0:17:26.580 --> 0:17:28.620
<v Speaker 1>we need to get into and some other interesting stuff

0:17:28.660 --> 0:17:30.860
<v Speaker 1>about Dolly Parton that is worth talking about, too. If

0:17:31.060 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you miss a segment, get the podcast. Armstrong and Getty

0:17:33.340 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on demand.

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>What would you tell your younger self?

0:17:47.830 --> 0:17:49.189
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a tricky question.

0:17:49.350 --> 0:17:51.490
<v Speaker 4>It was my dream to do it. But I would

0:17:51.510 --> 0:17:54.030
<v Speaker 4>just probably, looking back, I would just say, girl, you

0:17:54.070 --> 0:17:56.780
<v Speaker 4>better buckle up because you're in for the ride of

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 4>your life. You're going to have to take a lot

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.580
<v Speaker 4>of stuff. You're going to have to give a lot

0:18:00.619 --> 0:18:03.490
<v Speaker 4>of stuff. And you're going to have to stand by

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 4>your guns, believe in yourself, stay true to yourself.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.219
<v Speaker 1>I heard some interview, this just popped into my head,

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.939
<v Speaker 1>where she's talking about, I created a persona which is

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.379
<v Speaker 1>mostly not me. And I thought, well, that's really interesting.

0:18:14.820 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Because one of your appeals is coming off so insanely genuine.

0:18:19.500 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're saying your persona is mostly not who you are.

0:18:22.340 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'd love to know more about that. Yeah. Anyway,

0:18:30.260 --> 0:18:31.700
<v Speaker 1>we can talk more about that later. We got a

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.580
<v Speaker 1>couple of texts, a conversation about the passing of Dolly

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Parton and the amazing variety of different people that spoke

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.220
<v Speaker 1>out about that yesterday in positive ways. And somebody texted,

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>don't forget big boobs. Everyone likes those. So thanks for that.

0:18:47.380 --> 0:18:49.550
<v Speaker 1>Good point. Yes. But we got this. You have any

0:18:49.590 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>idea what this means? This is about. The Hooters comment

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.430
<v Speaker 1>was not even close to the holy crap moment. You're

0:18:55.470 --> 0:18:58.010
<v Speaker 1>a seriously disgusting person, Jack. I hope you get to

0:18:58.050 --> 0:19:02.649
<v Speaker 1>taste holy C word. And for that matter, you have

0:19:02.710 --> 0:19:05.469
<v Speaker 1>no idea what the word holy means or what holy is.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope you get a mouthful of holy C dot

0:19:08.940 --> 0:19:13.859
<v Speaker 1>dot dot. You jerk. I think they're accusing you of

0:19:14.460 --> 0:19:18.830
<v Speaker 1>being blasphemous by saying holy crap. What? As far as

0:19:18.869 --> 0:19:23.820
<v Speaker 1>I can tell. I don't know. The rantings of the

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.740
<v Speaker 1>kooky are often difficult to interpret. If I'm going to

0:19:27.780 --> 0:19:32.010
<v Speaker 1>spend eternity in hell with a mouthful of holy sea,

0:19:32.090 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I should know why. Probably burning hot, holy crap, yes.

0:19:34.350 --> 0:19:35.250
<v Speaker 1>I should know why.

0:19:35.730 --> 0:19:35.990
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:36.070 --> 0:19:37.889
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, that would be nice. Maybe it's on the

0:19:37.930 --> 0:19:42.540
<v Speaker 1>forum somewhere. Also, let the revolution begin, or not the revolution,

0:19:42.540 --> 0:19:44.730
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, as my, our old friend, Mike, the

0:19:44.770 --> 0:19:48.290
<v Speaker 1>attorney points out, um, when Trump posted that the flags

0:19:48.310 --> 0:19:51.899
<v Speaker 1>would be flown at half mast in honor of Ms. Parton, uh,

0:19:51.950 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and her life, uh, the online world exploded with anger.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:19:56.540 --> 0:19:59.460
<v Speaker 1>Of course, because, because it was Trump, I guess, but

0:19:59.619 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it online, anything is just, it's a, it's a cesspool

0:20:04.540 --> 0:20:09.020
<v Speaker 1>of radioactive effluvium way to spend your life. I thought

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.619
<v Speaker 1>it was cool. Flaming sewage. How about the fact that

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.460
<v Speaker 1>the Empire State Building turned itself whatever color in honor

0:20:14.500 --> 0:20:17.100
<v Speaker 1>of Dolly Parton last night? I like that. Rhinestone-y. Yeah,

0:20:17.180 --> 0:20:21.530
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing. So on a slightly more serious note, golly gee,

0:20:21.590 --> 0:20:27.710
<v Speaker 1>this is something. Bill Gates has issued the occasional messages

0:20:27.970 --> 0:20:31.949
<v Speaker 1>on how he sees AI and its development and what

0:20:31.990 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it might bring in the future. And his latest is

0:20:35.180 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a 12-page humdinger, by golly. Gates issued a stark warning

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>about AI's risks to employment in the human condition, saying

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.830
<v Speaker 1>that companies were barreling ahead with the technology and with

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.130
<v Speaker 1>no larger plan for the massive upheaval it would cause. Quote,

0:20:51.210 --> 0:20:53.810
<v Speaker 1>even under the best circumstances, the transition to this new

0:20:53.990 --> 0:20:56.210
<v Speaker 1>AI era will be one of the most turbulent times

0:20:56.270 --> 0:20:59.970
<v Speaker 1>in human history, he wrote in a 12-page essay. Right now,

0:20:59.990 --> 0:21:01.970
<v Speaker 1>we are not preparing for it. I don't see evidence

0:21:02.010 --> 0:21:05.490
<v Speaker 1>that leaders, experts, and communities are confronting the challenges adequately.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>One of the most turbulent times in human history is

0:21:08.940 --> 0:21:13.970
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a thing to throw around. He decided

0:21:14.010 --> 0:21:16.830
<v Speaker 1>to weigh in now, apparently, because he believes that there

0:21:16.910 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is not much time to prepare for the transition. That's

0:21:20.300 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what I was wondering when he says that. What's he

0:21:23.420 --> 0:21:29.270
<v Speaker 1>feel like the horizon is? I don't think he was very,

0:21:29.330 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>very specific. If he has been, I haven't come across it.

0:21:32.010 --> 0:21:35.850
<v Speaker 1>But he's going to D.C. like now. He says he

0:21:35.890 --> 0:21:38.109
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk to lawmakers. Quote, you have a chance

0:21:38.130 --> 0:21:41.970
<v Speaker 1>to act now. Before unemployment rises sharply, communities are hurting

0:21:42.090 --> 0:21:47.870
<v Speaker 1>and public trust has eroded. Eroded further? Yikes. That's interesting

0:21:47.910 --> 0:21:51.070
<v Speaker 1>what he said there about the companies having no plan.

0:21:53.330 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not really their job or arena. I mean, how

0:22:01.859 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>could they? So I'm trying to think of an example,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but like when the car industry came along, you know,

0:22:08.020 --> 0:22:11.910
<v Speaker 1>when cars became really popular, there was a very big

0:22:11.990 --> 0:22:14.530
<v Speaker 1>concern that all of a sudden we had mobile bedrooms

0:22:14.950 --> 0:22:16.350
<v Speaker 1>and people were going to be able to make out

0:22:16.390 --> 0:22:18.710
<v Speaker 1>and have sex in cars. For the first time ever,

0:22:18.750 --> 0:22:20.369
<v Speaker 1>you got a mobile bedroom. You used to have to

0:22:20.650 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>either get a hotel or be at home. Uh, and

0:22:22.740 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that was just like swept the nation. I've read a

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of articles about that from way back. I think

0:22:26.420 --> 0:22:28.380
<v Speaker 1>it was forties and fifties. It's really kind of hilarious

0:22:28.420 --> 0:22:32.139
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, but it wasn't the car industry's duty to

0:22:32.180 --> 0:22:35.090
<v Speaker 1>come up with a plan for that. That was a

0:22:35.150 --> 0:22:38.689
<v Speaker 1>by-product of this new invention. Isn't it the same with AI?

0:22:38.710 --> 0:22:38.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:39.670 --> 0:22:42.190
<v Speaker 1>I'm vending this AI. It's a, it's a computer thing.

0:22:42.230 --> 0:22:43.909
<v Speaker 1>It can learn itself, whatever like that. What's that going

0:22:43.930 --> 0:22:47.939
<v Speaker 1>to do to people working? I don't know. You figured out. Well, right.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.540
<v Speaker 1>And boy, this is a, this leads to a, incredibly

0:22:51.580 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>important tangent that I'll try to keep kind of brief,

0:22:53.500 --> 0:22:58.590
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, let the companies pursue their self-interest because it's

0:22:58.650 --> 0:23:04.290
<v Speaker 1>when government gets involved and mixes some politicians view opinion

0:23:04.369 --> 0:23:06.810
<v Speaker 1>on what the public interest is with the private interest

0:23:07.070 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that all of a sudden the free market gets completely skewed.

0:23:10.420 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Government itself becomes screwed up and, and you just, you're

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.980
<v Speaker 1>better off letting the free market function and, And then

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.580
<v Speaker 1>government stepping in where government should. Yeah, I like Bill

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.379
<v Speaker 1>Gates weighing in on this because I think we've all

0:23:23.420 --> 0:23:27.710
<v Speaker 1>gotten bamboozled a little bit on this, including myself. Like

0:23:27.810 --> 0:23:31.570
<v Speaker 1>the AI, the people making these things, like Altman and

0:23:31.770 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Elon and Emodi, it's their job to figure out how

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:40.180
<v Speaker 1>humanity is going to adjust to it. No, it's not. Right.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.910
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason they're spinning it positively is so

0:23:43.930 --> 0:23:47.490
<v Speaker 1>people will continue to invest and support it. But they

0:23:47.530 --> 0:23:49.970
<v Speaker 1>don't need to come up with a plan. A few

0:23:50.030 --> 0:23:53.710
<v Speaker 1>more specifics, because it's good to start the day with

0:23:53.990 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>existential angst. Much of his essay focused on jobs, noting

0:23:57.580 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that entry and mid-level jobs are most at risk of

0:24:00.220 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>being eliminated. He argued that AI will soon also affect

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.700
<v Speaker 1>blue collar work and the breadth and speed make it

0:24:06.740 --> 0:24:08.490
<v Speaker 1>different from other workplace transitions.

0:24:08.690 --> 0:24:08.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:09.130 --> 0:24:12.050
<v Speaker 1>And he cites the move from agriculture to office work.

0:24:12.290 --> 0:24:17.230
<v Speaker 1>And that took generations. But that sectors like law, customer service, software,

0:24:17.250 --> 0:24:19.820
<v Speaker 1>and manufacturing will feel AI's impact over the course of

0:24:19.859 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a single decade. And when AI can produce error-free work,

0:24:24.780 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if ever, it will be able to function on its

0:24:27.619 --> 0:24:29.619
<v Speaker 1>own without a human checking in on it. And companies

0:24:29.660 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>will have very economic, I'm sorry, every economic incentive to

0:24:33.380 --> 0:24:37.649
<v Speaker 1>let it. Need a strong, much stronger safety net. And

0:24:37.690 --> 0:24:40.390
<v Speaker 1>he points out when factories closed, many locals saw more

0:24:40.530 --> 0:24:44.070
<v Speaker 1>opioid deaths. Imagine similar pressures on both white collar and

0:24:44.150 --> 0:24:48.670
<v Speaker 1>blue collar workers nationwide. And then one more note. Both

0:24:48.710 --> 0:24:50.570
<v Speaker 1>of my kids are going to be living in my

0:24:50.609 --> 0:24:53.429
<v Speaker 1>house for the rest of my life. That's correct. Get

0:24:53.450 --> 0:24:58.100
<v Speaker 1>a bigger house. If you can afford it. Gates stressed

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the risk of cyber attacks on the grid, hospitals, and banks.

0:25:03.500 --> 0:25:07.100
<v Speaker 1>Fraud and surveillance will be widespread. AI will also enable

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.230
<v Speaker 1>governments to use deadly force without a human's input. Yeah,

0:25:10.290 --> 0:25:15.570
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. We have a tendency to talk about AI

0:25:15.750 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Chinese robots in warfare. Then we talk about

0:25:19.410 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>AI and what it's going to do to the workplace.

0:25:22.270 --> 0:25:25.030
<v Speaker 1>Then we talk about AI and criminals' abilities to hack

0:25:25.070 --> 0:25:28.470
<v Speaker 1>into everything and act like those all three aren't going

0:25:28.510 --> 0:25:31.730
<v Speaker 1>to be happening at the same time. It's not like

0:25:31.780 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>those aren't separate entities at separate eras. They're all going

0:25:35.859 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to be happening at the same time. It's not a checklist.

0:25:38.660 --> 0:25:44.620
<v Speaker 1>It's a flood. Yeah. One more thought on relationships. Gates,

0:25:44.700 --> 0:25:46.810
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's right, stressed that AI can be

0:25:46.850 --> 0:25:49.689
<v Speaker 1>an echo chamber. which could have profound effects on children.

0:25:49.950 --> 0:25:56.500
<v Speaker 1>Chatbots are addictive and can be a source of friction-free companionship,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>unlike humans, and can worsen critical thinking. This would be

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.500
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible time for humans to lose their critical

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.420
<v Speaker 1>thinking skills. In an era of deep fakes and misinformation

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that can be tailored to you individually, the ability to

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tell what is true from what is not becomes an

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.830
<v Speaker 1>essential life skill. Well, that's easy for you to say.

0:26:14.869 --> 0:26:18.980
<v Speaker 1>He's a super genius. He's called for taxes on AI tokens.

0:26:19.070 --> 0:26:21.670
<v Speaker 1>Are you familiar with the term token? It's a unit

0:26:21.730 --> 0:26:25.950
<v Speaker 1>of computing power. So I've got my little AI company,

0:26:26.170 --> 0:26:29.149
<v Speaker 1>and I pay one of the many companies that is

0:26:29.190 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>building the data centers for a certain number of tokens

0:26:31.619 --> 0:26:34.500
<v Speaker 1>so I can do my AI stuff. Okay, Bill Epstein Gates.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>And this money the government gets from these tokens, what

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>are they going to do with this? What's the genius

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>plan for that? Well, these tokens, these taxes could delay

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.580
<v Speaker 1>companies rush away from human labor. And those taxes could

0:26:48.619 --> 0:26:51.619
<v Speaker 1>also fund a social safety net for restraining people whose

0:26:51.660 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>jobs won't exist. Retraining, not restraining. So part of it

0:26:54.660 --> 0:26:57.859
<v Speaker 1>is a punishment to slow them down. Nobody's slowing down China.

0:26:58.700 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And then the other end is a safety net, which,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.980
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't have a lot of optimism on

0:27:03.180 --> 0:27:06.570
<v Speaker 1>crafting safety nets. So that part I didn't like of

0:27:06.609 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bill Gates spiel. yes, I'm not sure what the

0:27:10.540 --> 0:27:13.859
<v Speaker 1>alternative is and neither does anybody else. Well, when the

0:27:13.890 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>robot apocalypse comes, you and your dog will still have

0:27:16.940 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>each other, right? I got another comment on that, but first, yes,

0:27:19.660 --> 0:27:22.740
<v Speaker 1>Rough Greens. A wagging tail and a lolling tongue and

0:27:22.780 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a tennis ball thrown will still bring joy to our hearts,

0:27:25.180 --> 0:27:26.820
<v Speaker 1>won't it? But you want your dog to live as

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>healthy and as long as possible, and that's where Rough

0:27:29.060 --> 0:27:32.409
<v Speaker 1>Greens comes in. It's America's number one dog supplement. You

0:27:32.450 --> 0:27:34.610
<v Speaker 1>know who liked dogs? Dolly Parton. I'm going to tie

0:27:34.650 --> 0:27:37.130
<v Speaker 1>her into everything. And that's why she would probably appreciate

0:27:37.170 --> 0:27:40.150
<v Speaker 1>you using Rough Greens. Can her estate sue me like

0:27:40.190 --> 0:27:43.730
<v Speaker 1>she's endorsing this product? Yes, indeed, yes. Rough Greens is

0:27:43.750 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>something you sprinkle on your dog's current food. Live probiotics,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.340
<v Speaker 1>digestive enzymes, omega oils, over 20 vitamins and minerals, all natural,

0:27:50.380 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>made right here in the United States. And you can

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>try it for nothing, which is really, really cool. Try

0:27:54.340 --> 0:27:57.050
<v Speaker 1>it for free. Just pay the shipping. Go to roughgreens.com

0:27:57.090 --> 0:27:59.310
<v Speaker 1>right now. Grab your free Jumpstart trial bag. You only

0:27:59.330 --> 0:28:05.540
<v Speaker 1>cover shipping at ruffgreens.com. You've got to use the code ARMSTRONG. Again, roughgreens.com.

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.869
<v Speaker 1>That discount code is Armstrong at checkout. Roughgreens.com code Armstrong.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.750
<v Speaker 1>Roughgreens doesn't replace your dog's food. It makes it better.

0:28:13.770 --> 0:28:17.909
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why this hadn't occurred to me before.

0:28:18.590 --> 0:28:23.700
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm the only one, but it's almost... Funny that

0:28:24.100 --> 0:28:27.780
<v Speaker 1>the industry, the heavyweights discussing how we're going to handle

0:28:27.820 --> 0:28:29.850
<v Speaker 1>the problem of AIs or the people that are making it,

0:28:30.310 --> 0:28:34.290
<v Speaker 1>they didn't need to do that at all. Bill Gates,

0:28:34.310 --> 0:28:36.830
<v Speaker 1>when you invented the Internet, I don't remember people putting

0:28:36.869 --> 0:28:39.530
<v Speaker 1>out big pieces, you putting out a big piece about

0:28:39.570 --> 0:28:42.350
<v Speaker 1>how the Internet was going to destroy people's lives. Maybe

0:28:42.370 --> 0:28:44.470
<v Speaker 1>you didn't understand that. But it made all kinds of

0:28:44.510 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff bad and good. But you didn't. Wasn't your job

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the bad stuff? Why is it AI's

0:28:50.140 --> 0:28:52.570
<v Speaker 1>job to figure out the bad stuff? That's an interesting

0:28:53.390 --> 0:28:56.710
<v Speaker 1>philosophical and governmental question because if you are putting out

0:28:56.970 --> 0:29:02.050
<v Speaker 1>a product that is just patently dangerous, then yes, you

0:29:02.110 --> 0:29:04.590
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out how to make your product less dangerous.

0:29:04.870 --> 0:29:09.030
<v Speaker 1>But if it's dangerous because of how productive it is,

0:29:09.250 --> 0:29:14.130
<v Speaker 1>we're into a weird gray area. And again, dislocation, and

0:29:14.170 --> 0:29:15.530
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you I know, and I want to

0:29:15.590 --> 0:29:18.210
<v Speaker 1>tip my cap to your opinion, think, dudes, this is

0:29:18.260 --> 0:29:20.950
<v Speaker 1>like the steam engine and the cotton gin thing. And

0:29:20.990 --> 0:29:24.900
<v Speaker 1>everything else, it will create jobs. It will not remove them.

0:29:25.020 --> 0:29:27.420
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right. I don't think you are. I

0:29:27.500 --> 0:29:31.620
<v Speaker 1>am voicing that, so they are part of the discussion.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.530
<v Speaker 1>I pray they're right. And I always thought I have

0:29:34.550 --> 0:29:37.070
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good imagination, but maybe I just lack imagination

0:29:38.270 --> 0:29:40.820
<v Speaker 1>as to how that will look. But fortunately, here is

0:29:40.890 --> 0:29:44.900
<v Speaker 1>the rub. Even if you believe that, that in spite

0:29:44.940 --> 0:29:49.590
<v Speaker 1>of the massive amount of change. We can adjust and

0:29:49.930 --> 0:29:52.230
<v Speaker 1>reallocate resources and labor and the rest of it. It's

0:29:52.290 --> 0:29:56.980
<v Speaker 1>the pace of change that will be so mind blowing.

0:29:57.380 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's the sort of thing governments have never had

0:30:00.300 --> 0:30:04.260
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. I mean, hell, slow paced demographic change.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.170
<v Speaker 1>They suck at. I mean, great piece, Holman Jenkins, Wall

0:30:08.190 --> 0:30:13.209
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal today, he was talking, his message was essentially, hey, socialists,

0:30:13.610 --> 0:30:17.430
<v Speaker 1>we've already run out of other people's money to spend.

0:30:17.780 --> 0:30:20.739
<v Speaker 1>Look at the United States. Look at our budget. The

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.860
<v Speaker 1>budget is the safety net. Everything else is a minor

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the budget. With rising interest rates, we've already

0:30:27.180 --> 0:30:29.700
<v Speaker 1>run out of money for our social safety net. Tax

0:30:29.740 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the billionaires, the oligarchs, yeah, we know. But anyway, if

0:30:33.820 --> 0:30:38.100
<v Speaker 1>they're that bad at adjusting to the very slow graying

0:30:38.180 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of america picture of all that s happens in a

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.940
<v Speaker 1>month and a half so is all this talk from

0:30:45.100 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>elon about we won't need money in the future and

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.310
<v Speaker 1>it'll we'll have 10 times the economy or 30 times

0:30:49.330 --> 0:30:51.030
<v Speaker 1>the economy or whatever and the same thing from the

0:30:51.090 --> 0:30:53.630
<v Speaker 1>other big leaders is that all just to try to

0:30:53.670 --> 0:30:56.190
<v Speaker 1>have a some positive news out there about ai because

0:30:56.310 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>without that it would be all negative Oh, well, to

0:31:02.060 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>your question specifically, Elon is absolutely brilliant, but he has

0:31:05.260 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>huge blind spots, too. And this might be one of them,

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the socioeconomic reality he's talking about. One of his biggest

0:31:13.220 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>blind spots is everybody ain't like you, dude. We're not

0:31:18.300 --> 0:31:21.980
<v Speaker 1>all super geniuses who only care about, you know, working

0:31:22.020 --> 0:31:25.210
<v Speaker 1>and getting to Mars. Right. I work really hard on

0:31:25.250 --> 0:31:28.130
<v Speaker 1>that because as an iconoclast, also known in some quarters

0:31:28.190 --> 0:31:32.450
<v Speaker 1>as a weirdo, I've tried to understand that, okay, my

0:31:32.510 --> 0:31:34.710
<v Speaker 1>perception is different than a lot of people's.

0:31:35.590 --> 0:31:36.090
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:31:36.690 --> 0:31:38.670
<v Speaker 1>I have a completely new perspective of this whole thing

0:31:38.710 --> 0:31:41.030
<v Speaker 1>now because of that Bill Gates piece, and I can't

0:31:41.050 --> 0:31:44.850
<v Speaker 1>believe that I didn't notice this. It's not the industry's

0:31:44.970 --> 0:31:48.690
<v Speaker 1>job to figure out the downside. When has it ever been? No,

0:31:49.490 --> 0:31:50.930
<v Speaker 1>we need to depend on government.

0:31:50.950 --> 0:31:51.050
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:31:51.870 --> 0:31:55.310
<v Speaker 1>Well, we need to depend on us. We're the government.

0:31:55.350 --> 0:31:59.250
<v Speaker 1>But the idea of taxing them to the point that

0:31:59.270 --> 0:32:02.230
<v Speaker 1>there's too slow that we can figure it out. That's

0:32:02.270 --> 0:32:08.220
<v Speaker 1>a terrible idea. That's a terrible idea, Bill. Sorry. You

0:32:08.260 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think I spent too much time on the island? Oh,

0:32:12.700 --> 0:32:17.020
<v Speaker 1>that was out. I recuse. We got mailbag next. Stay here.

0:32:18.470 --> 0:32:27.510
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:32:30.630 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Both Dan Sullivans won up in Alaska? Is that going

0:32:33.540 --> 0:32:37.470
<v Speaker 1>to be the race? No, but they've advanced to the

0:32:37.540 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>final X number in the ranked vote choice system. So

0:32:41.780 --> 0:32:44.460
<v Speaker 1>still both Dan Sullivans are competing against each other? Both

0:32:44.500 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in the game, yes. The real Dan Sullivan and the

0:32:48.020 --> 0:32:53.100
<v Speaker 1>fake Republican Dan Sullivan. Yeah, beautiful. Here's your freedom-loving quote

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:54.660
<v Speaker 1>of the day. I chose this because I've got a

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.739
<v Speaker 1>lot of information on this topic. I hope we'll get

0:32:56.790 --> 0:32:59.530
<v Speaker 1>to it. But it was said not by Christopher Hitchens,

0:33:00.310 --> 0:33:04.150
<v Speaker 1>who is often credited with this, but writer Andrew Cummins. Quote,

0:33:05.390 --> 0:33:09.030
<v Speaker 1>Islamophobia is a word created by fascists and used by

0:33:09.170 --> 0:33:14.950
<v Speaker 1>cowards to manipulate morons. Hmm. Pretty good time. Islamophobia is

0:33:15.010 --> 0:33:17.990
<v Speaker 1>a word created by fascists and used by cowards to

0:33:18.050 --> 0:33:21.390
<v Speaker 1>manipulate morons. God, I wish Christopher Hitchens was alive today

0:33:21.410 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to take on this DSA crowd. Particularly the Islamofascist part.

0:33:27.260 --> 0:33:27.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He'd be so good. Yeah, a valuable voice.

0:33:30.020 --> 0:33:30.460
<v Speaker 2>Lost!

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't have smoked. Mailbag. Drop us a note. Mailbag at armstrongandgetty.com.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:43.020
<v Speaker 1>On the topic of Dolly... MR writes, one of the

0:33:43.060 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>correspondents on TV said Dolly was the only entertainer in

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.570
<v Speaker 1>his lifetime that always led with love. A lovely tribute

0:33:50.610 --> 0:33:54.410
<v Speaker 1>and so true. Very simply true. Thank you for writing.

0:33:54.430 --> 0:33:59.270
<v Speaker 1>On a totally different topic, JT in Livermore. Jack's chatbot

0:33:59.330 --> 0:34:05.210
<v Speaker 1>told him that Jack had earned the chatbot's honesty? Right. Um, WTF?

0:34:05.250 --> 0:34:07.570
<v Speaker 1>Did the chatbot just admit that it isn't honest with

0:34:07.590 --> 0:34:09.470
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us? And or is it saying that

0:34:09.489 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to earn the honesty we assumed was supposed

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to be there? Troubling. Greg from Sunnyvale with quite the

0:34:19.580 --> 0:34:25.060
<v Speaker 1>note on, uh, abdul al-saeed's appearance on the jesse waters

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>show he also put out a tribute to dolly parton

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last night al-saeed did that oh my god is he

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>dangerous uh and and he points out a number of

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.339
<v Speaker 1>different ways that jesse was just a terrible interrogator and

0:34:39.570 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>or expresser of you know the view that a lot

0:34:42.820 --> 0:34:45.050
<v Speaker 1>of what al-saeed believes is abhorrent he really did a

0:34:45.130 --> 0:34:50.630
<v Speaker 1>poor job um But then he says, lastly, I was

0:34:50.890 --> 0:34:54.830
<v Speaker 1>further disappointed with Jesse when I saw him on the Foxes,

0:34:54.870 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the five. After the panel discussion about Al-Said, Jesse said

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.859
<v Speaker 1>he liked Abdul. which had agreements by all the others

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.700
<v Speaker 1>on the panel. This is concerning because he is so dangerous.

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.529
<v Speaker 1>He's using his charm to minimize his true goal or

0:35:06.550 --> 0:35:08.730
<v Speaker 1>to mask it. Once he and others get control, they

0:35:08.750 --> 0:35:11.210
<v Speaker 1>will no longer be charming to those who disagree with them.

0:35:11.469 --> 0:35:13.670
<v Speaker 1>They will no longer show friendship to you and others

0:35:15.090 --> 0:35:16.850
<v Speaker 1>in their way. And I think it's a mistake to

0:35:16.890 --> 0:35:19.350
<v Speaker 1>verbalize to anyone like you like him. He's lying and

0:35:19.430 --> 0:35:22.890
<v Speaker 1>using his charm for deception. I would agree completely. Yeah.

0:35:24.700 --> 0:35:28.700
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. Yeah, trust me. The DSA put out a

0:35:28.780 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>statement about Dolly Parton, one of the great, we love her, blah, blah, blah.

0:35:32.340 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The DSA did. And George Bush. I mean, like I said,

0:35:35.900 --> 0:35:40.090
<v Speaker 1>the range of people is quite amazing. Yeah, I believe

0:35:40.170 --> 0:35:42.830
<v Speaker 1>one of them was sincere and one was not. Joe

0:35:42.890 --> 0:35:46.350
<v Speaker 1>in Manteca writes on the topic of McCarthyism, interestingly. It's

0:35:46.390 --> 0:35:48.770
<v Speaker 1>interesting how during the Cold War, Senator McCarthy was so

0:35:48.810 --> 0:35:52.580
<v Speaker 1>concerned about communists infiltrating our government country at the same

0:35:52.620 --> 0:35:55.410
<v Speaker 1>time People seem much more aware of the threat of communism.

0:35:55.670 --> 0:35:57.250
<v Speaker 1>Today it seems like we don't care as much. What

0:35:57.270 --> 0:35:59.890
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Well, A, we clearly don't care as

0:35:59.950 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>much because we have forgotten the horrific lessons of communism.

0:36:02.890 --> 0:36:05.549
<v Speaker 1>But I think more importantly, and I didn't realize this

0:36:05.570 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>until later in life, the left in education, which is

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of education, really hammered McCarthyism and made that

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the face of anti-communism, trying to teach children that anti-communism

0:36:20.500 --> 0:36:24.330
<v Speaker 1>was irrational, it was bigoted. It unfairly hurt a bunch

0:36:24.370 --> 0:36:26.350
<v Speaker 1>of people, and there was certainly some truth to that.

0:36:26.770 --> 0:36:27.009
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:27.050 --> 0:36:29.230
<v Speaker 1>When you think about that era and the communist scare,

0:36:29.310 --> 0:36:33.370
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the overreach as opposed to the fact

0:36:33.410 --> 0:36:36.190
<v Speaker 1>that there were actually lots of communists that had gotten

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>into our government and our press. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, they

0:36:39.660 --> 0:36:44.220
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely teeming in the State Department, especially in our media.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So that was an intentional strategy to make Joe McCarthy

0:36:48.100 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>look like anti-communism. No, he was a self-aggrandizing nut job,

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but the communism part was absolutely real. So the 60

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.969
<v Speaker 1>Minutes reran their segment on the California bullet train. Wall

0:36:59.989 --> 0:37:01.870
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal has an article about it today. It's one

0:37:01.890 --> 0:37:05.989
<v Speaker 1>of the great government awfulnesses of our lifetimes.

0:37:06.570 --> 0:37:07.650
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.