WEBVTT - What Language Do You Need?!

0:00:06.620 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Now broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at

0:00:10.619 --> 0:00:12.810
<v Speaker 1>the George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:12.910 --> 0:00:15.090
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:15.290 --> 0:00:16.590
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:16.790 --> 0:00:17.110
<v Speaker 2>And now.

0:00:31.460 --> 0:00:37.300
<v Speaker 3>Jeez, thank God it's almost over live from Studio C. Si, senor.

0:00:37.460 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>A dimly lit room deeper than the bowels of the

0:00:40.140 --> 0:00:44.420
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty Communications compound. It's actually a polling place.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.460
<v Speaker 3>The Armstrong and Getty Communications compound. So there'll be a

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.540
<v Speaker 3>lot of people coming in and out throughout the day voting.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>And we make them show their ID. Yeah, and then,

0:00:53.100 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, while I'm trying to do this show, I

0:00:54.780 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 3>got to, like, check their ballots and all that sort

0:00:57.060 --> 0:00:57.380
<v Speaker 3>of stuff.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.819
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of annoying. Anyway, today we are toiling under

0:00:59.860 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>the title of the show. There is somebody voting right now.

0:01:02.340 --> 0:01:08.700
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Yes. She doesn't speak English. I have no idea

0:01:08.740 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>if this is a citizen or not. What language do

0:01:10.610 --> 0:01:16.850
<v Speaker 3>you need the ballot? What language do you need? Maybe

0:01:16.890 --> 0:01:19.050
<v Speaker 3>we should prop that door open so it doesn't click

0:01:19.110 --> 0:01:20.830
<v Speaker 3>open and close like that. I don't know what that

0:01:20.870 --> 0:01:23.890
<v Speaker 3>language is. They have no ID. All right.

0:01:23.940 --> 0:01:24.110
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.209
<v Speaker 3>Funny. Anyway, we're toiling under the title of the show today.

0:01:28.709 --> 0:01:32.729
<v Speaker 3>One title. Only one title today. Unifying title. E Pluribus title.

0:01:34.010 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the most important election of this week.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:41.060
<v Speaker 2>Am I wrong?

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess I should come over by the microphone. Whatever.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.940
<v Speaker 3>Am I wrong? Or did midterms used to not get

0:01:48.970 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>this much attention? I feel like midterms used to come

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.580
<v Speaker 3>and go. You barely knew they were happening. That might

0:01:56.660 --> 0:02:00.500
<v Speaker 3>overstate it somewhat. But yes, the fever pitch of it

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.830
<v Speaker 3>in the age of hyperbole has definitely boiled to the top.

0:02:06.570 --> 0:02:08.809
<v Speaker 3>I have two theories on that. Yeah, go ahead.

0:02:09.870 --> 0:02:13.110
<v Speaker 4>One, of course, Trump drives everything. But the whole, it's

0:02:13.150 --> 0:02:16.950
<v Speaker 4>our national television show. We don't have any other shared experiences.

0:02:17.550 --> 0:02:23.149
<v Speaker 4>This is our national obsession. Politics is our national television show.

0:02:23.690 --> 0:02:25.510
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's part of it. The other part of it

0:02:25.620 --> 0:02:28.820
<v Speaker 3>is that it's our identity as well as human beings

0:02:29.740 --> 0:02:32.660
<v Speaker 3>in a way that was never true before. As we've

0:02:32.740 --> 0:02:35.859
<v Speaker 3>reviewed many times, it's worth repeating. If you asked somebody

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.510
<v Speaker 3>not very long ago, Not very long ago at all.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll say the 90s. Tell me about yourself. Give me

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.940
<v Speaker 3>a list of five things that tells me who you are.

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.780
<v Speaker 3>Politics might not make the list at all. And if

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>it did, it would be number five at best. Now

0:02:52.340 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>it's like number one or two for everybody.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:55.260
<v Speaker 2>Damn it.

0:02:55.900 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I've been watching the evening news every night my whole life.

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.450
<v Speaker 3>And I don't remember every single night the whole episode

0:03:05.510 --> 0:03:10.350
<v Speaker 3>being about midterm elections. Ever? I would have not watched

0:03:10.430 --> 0:03:13.049
<v Speaker 3>it because I wouldn't have cared. So I just I

0:03:13.090 --> 0:03:15.980
<v Speaker 3>don't I don't get it. But I guess you explained it.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.660
<v Speaker 3>I care. I care deeply. Well, also, and again, another factor.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.060
<v Speaker 3>My God, I have to keep repeating myself. Why am

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:30.470
<v Speaker 3>I teaching this remedial class? The gulf between the parties

0:03:30.610 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>policy wise is the widest it's been since 1861. Vote R,

0:03:38.140 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>vote D 30 years ago. Small tweaks around the edges.

0:03:42.020 --> 0:03:44.420
<v Speaker 3>A little more emphasis on this. A little less emphasis

0:03:44.500 --> 0:03:48.850
<v Speaker 3>on that. Fine. Now you've either got grown-ass men showing

0:03:48.890 --> 0:03:55.810
<v Speaker 3>their genitals to your 8-year-old girl and welfare, sex changes

0:03:55.870 --> 0:03:59.030
<v Speaker 3>for illegal immigrants, or you've got whatever the hell Trump

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:05.100
<v Speaker 3>is at this point. So that's the other aspect of it. Oh,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>you're worried about.

0:04:07.210 --> 0:04:11.170
<v Speaker 3>Grown-ass men showing their genitals to your children? I've got

0:04:11.190 --> 0:04:13.650
<v Speaker 3>a response to that. You have a cell phone in

0:04:13.670 --> 0:04:15.490
<v Speaker 3>your pocket, don't you? Is it a Samsung or is

0:04:15.530 --> 0:04:18.010
<v Speaker 3>it an iPhone? We ought to run that again. Look,

0:04:18.029 --> 0:04:23.230
<v Speaker 3>you're carrying a cell phone in your pocket. Abdul Al-Said's

0:04:23.290 --> 0:04:29.310
<v Speaker 3>bizarre answer to the gender-bending madness question on 60 Minutes,

0:04:29.390 --> 0:04:35.770
<v Speaker 3>specifically on boys running roughshod over little girls on sports fields.

0:04:36.130 --> 0:04:37.630
<v Speaker 3>You know, one thing that didn't get left out of

0:04:37.830 --> 0:04:41.890
<v Speaker 3>our October surprise, which actually ended up being November surprises

0:04:41.950 --> 0:04:45.750
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of cases. That was the surprise. They

0:04:45.770 --> 0:04:50.290
<v Speaker 3>got you. Oh, October's over. No surprises.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 4>And then day one of November, boom. Because we have

0:04:55.460 --> 0:04:58.700
<v Speaker 4>voting month now, which is a terrible idea. Like half

0:04:58.779 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 4>the votes in in all the states where they had

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 4>the November surprise.

0:05:02.140 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to have it. It's still going to take

0:05:04.500 --> 0:05:06.420
<v Speaker 3>weeks to figure out, you know, most of the Western

0:05:06.460 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>states for some reason. That's worth letting you know is

0:05:10.140 --> 0:05:14.970
<v Speaker 3>that the last two house races, 24 and 22, took

0:05:15.029 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 3>them eight days to call who won. had control of

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.830
<v Speaker 3>the House. So don't be expecting that.

0:05:23.210 --> 0:05:25.529
<v Speaker 4>If you grew up like I did, if you always

0:05:25.550 --> 0:05:28.750
<v Speaker 4>had the result that night before you went to bed,

0:05:28.770 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 4>that ain't going to happen. I love the states where

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 4>they don't open the mail-in ballots until the polls close.

0:05:38.540 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>What is the theory on that? What is that? Why

0:05:42.300 --> 0:05:45.150
<v Speaker 3>do you do that? Oh, you know, Wanda, the votes

0:05:45.210 --> 0:05:49.340
<v Speaker 3>counted and leaks and affecting turnout or something, something. You know,

0:05:49.420 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Florida does it. The minute they get them, they count them,

0:05:52.020 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>they tabulate them. They just don't distribute that information. Works perfectly.

0:05:56.380 --> 0:06:00.430
<v Speaker 3>Works great. States that make you show I.D. works perfectly.

0:06:00.690 --> 0:06:04.270
<v Speaker 3>Works great. States that limit who get an absentee ballot

0:06:04.290 --> 0:06:06.390
<v Speaker 3>and you've got to reapply for it every two years

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. Works great. Works absolutely perfectly. The idea of

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 3>election six weeks where we blanket the landscape with mail-in

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.580
<v Speaker 3>votes and you vote when and where you please. No,

0:06:20.860 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>that's not healthy for reasons we're going to do a

0:06:24.580 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>little more later. And not just the logistical stuff. It

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.850
<v Speaker 3>takes so freaking long to figure out who won an

0:06:31.089 --> 0:06:34.089
<v Speaker 3>election and the potential for vote fraud, which is vast.

0:06:34.670 --> 0:06:35.490
<v Speaker 3>It's just, it's not.

0:06:37.230 --> 0:06:41.310
<v Speaker 3>You lose the coming together aspect of the election that

0:06:41.670 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I think is more spiritually important than people realize or contemplate.

0:06:47.580 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>The only interesting thing I've heard today, because I took

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of broadcast media and all of it

0:06:53.620 --> 0:06:58.330
<v Speaker 3>was completely useless election information.

0:06:58.450 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 4>And I mean completely useless information. You couldn't even stretch

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 4>to pretend that there was any value in any of

0:07:06.380 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the things they were saying on any of the shows.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.780
<v Speaker 3>No use. So why are you doing it? Don't you

0:07:13.820 --> 0:07:17.870
<v Speaker 3>know it's useless? It's completely useless. Anyway, the only interesting

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.110
<v Speaker 3>thing I came across was Trump did go on Hannity

0:07:20.150 --> 0:07:21.570
<v Speaker 3>yesterday and say at the end of the year, we're

0:07:21.590 --> 0:07:25.010
<v Speaker 3>not giving any more military aid to Israel. That comes

0:07:25.050 --> 0:07:29.030
<v Speaker 3>to an end. Our $ 4 billion annual aid to Israel

0:07:29.110 --> 0:07:31.950
<v Speaker 3>comes to an end. That's an idiotic decision. One in

0:07:31.990 --> 0:07:34.570
<v Speaker 3>a series. Way to go. Netanyahu was for it, if

0:07:34.590 --> 0:07:37.390
<v Speaker 3>you'll remember, a month or so ago. He thinks it's

0:07:37.450 --> 0:07:40.370
<v Speaker 3>both in both cases. It's they just think it'd be

0:07:40.450 --> 0:07:43.410
<v Speaker 3>it'd be better for Israel politically to not be getting

0:07:43.450 --> 0:07:46.610
<v Speaker 3>any aid so that people can't, you know, do their whole.

0:07:46.890 --> 0:07:50.390
<v Speaker 3>That's why eggs are expensive. All right. So I will

0:07:51.190 --> 0:07:55.710
<v Speaker 3>extend and revise my comments, Mr. Chairman. That is an

0:07:55.870 --> 0:08:01.530
<v Speaker 3>incredibly unfortunate decision. Well, it's a perhaps sound decision based

0:08:01.690 --> 0:08:06.570
<v Speaker 3>on an incredibly unfortunate and psychotic state of political affairs.

0:08:08.770 --> 0:08:11.950
<v Speaker 3>I think Netanyahu is for it because of what I

0:08:12.050 --> 0:08:15.970
<v Speaker 3>just said. Israel's in such bad shape in terms of

0:08:16.690 --> 0:08:18.970
<v Speaker 3>its approval in the United States at this point. They

0:08:18.990 --> 0:08:20.550
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be getting any money, so you can't

0:08:20.610 --> 0:08:23.650
<v Speaker 3>hang that around them. Yeah, yeah. You know, this is

0:08:23.710 --> 0:08:26.930
<v Speaker 3>a disappointing midterm election for Katie and me. We were

0:08:26.950 --> 0:08:30.150
<v Speaker 3>working on a project where we would send correspondence to

0:08:30.380 --> 0:08:33.260
<v Speaker 3>each of the swing states that everybody's paying attention to.

0:08:33.700 --> 0:08:36.579
<v Speaker 3>And we would go to them and they would each

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>tell us what everybody already knows. And we would go

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>around in the circle to each one of them all

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 3>day long, just over and over again. Katie had them

0:08:47.220 --> 0:08:50.220
<v Speaker 3>coached up on saying gas and diesel prices were going

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.949
<v Speaker 3>to be a big factor. It was artwork, to be honest. Oh,

0:08:53.950 --> 0:08:56.980
<v Speaker 3>it was all, but we couldn't get funding. Oh, geez.

0:08:58.250 --> 0:09:02.820
<v Speaker 3>Really disappointing. Oh, my God. Oh, my God. It is

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:10.140
<v Speaker 3>just unbelievable. I also think it's interesting that I've been

0:09:10.179 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 3>watching Mark Halperin's YouTube show. It's like a TV show,

0:09:13.460 --> 0:09:16.300
<v Speaker 3>but it's on YouTube every day. He says he doesn't

0:09:16.340 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 3>even look at the public polls that everybody talks about endlessly.

0:09:19.100 --> 0:09:20.180
<v Speaker 3>He says, I don't even look at them.

0:09:20.950 --> 0:09:23.790
<v Speaker 4>Because the private polls are so much better. And those

0:09:23.830 --> 0:09:25.510
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that tell you what's going to actually happen.

0:09:25.530 --> 0:09:28.860
<v Speaker 4>So it's funny that the whole world of politics looks

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.459
<v Speaker 4>at the polls, that experts who have better info, I don't.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.819
<v Speaker 3>Even look at them. There's no, what's the point. Right. Right.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.740
<v Speaker 3>My wife actually asked me about that, uh, yesterday or no,

0:09:39.860 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 3>it was today about, um, you know, the polls show

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>this race dead even, and she's not terribly political. Uh,

0:09:47.820 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 3>God bless her. Um, And I explained that, look, you've

0:09:51.260 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>got a fairly significant margin for error. You have to

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.450
<v Speaker 3>overweight every Republican respondee because they don't respond as often

0:09:57.470 --> 0:09:59.489
<v Speaker 3>as Democrats. You've got the problem of reaching people on

0:09:59.510 --> 0:10:02.189
<v Speaker 3>cell phones. Their accuracy is declining. And so you've got

0:10:02.210 --> 0:10:05.750
<v Speaker 3>a couple of blobs of it's within like six or

0:10:05.809 --> 0:10:10.100
<v Speaker 3>seven points of here. And then the blobs intersect. And

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.340
<v Speaker 3>maybe this blob is correct. Maybe it's at the far

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.380
<v Speaker 3>left of that blob and the far right of that one.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>And then you can say it's tied. But maybe it's

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.300
<v Speaker 3>at the far right of this one and the far

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>left of that one. And they're actually 11 points apart.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:29.330
<v Speaker 3>It's just blobs. So it's fine. It's just it's just yeah,

0:10:29.390 --> 0:10:34.429
<v Speaker 3>it's it's not pinpoints is my my point. Well, as

0:10:34.490 --> 0:10:40.170
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned yesterday. The internal polling from the campaigns, which

0:10:40.250 --> 0:10:43.790
<v Speaker 3>is significantly better because they have all the interest in

0:10:43.820 --> 0:10:47.100
<v Speaker 3>the world figuring out exactly who's voting on every block

0:10:47.140 --> 0:10:51.460
<v Speaker 3>and every town. is that everything has been breaking toward

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:56.470
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats last week or so. I just read where

0:10:56.660 --> 0:11:00.590
<v Speaker 3>late deciders are breaking heavily toward Republicans. So you can

0:11:00.690 --> 0:11:05.690
<v Speaker 3>take your liberal polls and shove them, Mr. Well, these

0:11:05.710 --> 0:11:08.870
<v Speaker 3>are from Republicans, these liberal polls here. You can take

0:11:08.929 --> 0:11:12.170
<v Speaker 3>your rhino polls and shove them, mister.

0:11:12.380 --> 0:11:15.939
<v Speaker 4>All I will say is Mark Halpern was the only

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>person anywhere in America that was actually not just spouting

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.660
<v Speaker 4>his opinion, was actually going with information, who was saying

0:11:22.700 --> 0:11:26.140
<v Speaker 4>before the Trump election, Trump's going to win all the

0:11:26.179 --> 0:11:29.820
<v Speaker 4>swing states. And I don't understand why everybody's not talking

0:11:29.860 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 4>about this. He said that for weeks leading up to

0:11:32.090 --> 0:11:36.380
<v Speaker 4>the election. Because that's what all the internal polling showed.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 4>They have way better polling than whatever you're looking at

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.380
<v Speaker 4>in the New York Times or, you know, Quinnipiac or whatever.

0:11:43.220 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 4>The people that make their livings, keep their jobs by

0:11:46.700 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 4>figuring out what's going to happen, have better polling.

0:11:49.340 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>And their polling this time around says everything's breaking toward

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.580
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats at the last minute. I'm not comfortable with

0:11:55.660 --> 0:11:59.490
<v Speaker 3>the term internal polling. Can we find a different term?

0:12:01.890 --> 0:12:05.890
<v Speaker 3>I feel threatened by it. Triggered. Triggered, exactly. I feel triggered, yeah.

0:12:06.130 --> 0:12:09.050
<v Speaker 3>Or not safe. You don't feel safe with that. Right, yeah,

0:12:09.090 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 3>you've made me feel unsafe. There you go. What's worth

0:12:11.650 --> 0:12:13.900
<v Speaker 3>noting is this is radio, and we're not doing lots

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of video yet on YouTube and other places and the socials.

0:12:19.260 --> 0:12:23.380
<v Speaker 3>I am wearing my F-Y'all-ican party T-shirt in honor of

0:12:23.460 --> 0:12:24.059
<v Speaker 3>Election Day.

0:12:24.730 --> 0:12:26.890
<v Speaker 4>And I, of course, am wearing an Uncle Sam uniform,

0:12:26.910 --> 0:12:29.260
<v Speaker 4>as I always do on Election Day. Let's start the

0:12:29.300 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 4>show officially. I'm Jack Armstrong.

0:12:31.059 --> 0:12:32.949
<v Speaker 3>He's Joe Getty. On this, it is getting to be

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.090
<v Speaker 3>already Tuesday, November the 3rd, the year 2026. We're Armstrong

0:12:37.150 --> 0:12:39.690
<v Speaker 3>and Getty, and we approve of this program. Let's begin then, officially,

0:12:39.710 --> 0:12:41.890
<v Speaker 3>according to FCC rules and regs. Here we go. It's

0:12:41.929 --> 0:12:43.770
<v Speaker 3>an Election Day special at Mark.

0:12:43.890 --> 0:12:45.110
<v Speaker 5>You're going to zoom in. You're going to zoom in

0:12:45.170 --> 0:12:47.870
<v Speaker 5>and get up here to 9321 Triangle Circle. That's what

0:12:47.910 --> 0:12:50.390
<v Speaker 5>they call it, right around Nick and Jack Farms. Everyone

0:12:50.429 --> 0:12:52.250
<v Speaker 5>knows that Nick and Jack Farms has always been Kerry

0:12:52.290 --> 0:12:53.750
<v Speaker 5>Trump ever since 1884 when he only won 42%.

0:12:53.710 --> 0:12:54.050
<v Speaker 3>Of the vote.

0:12:55.620 --> 0:12:56.939
<v Speaker 5>We're going to go south. We're going to head our

0:12:56.980 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 5>way south. We're going to zoom in a little bit.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.260
<v Speaker 5>Right there, there's a green patch. We call this Elms

0:13:00.300 --> 0:13:02.699
<v Speaker 5>Country Club. Back in the day, Elms Country Club is where,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.260
<v Speaker 5>of course, Hamilton lost the duel with Washington. Everyone knows

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 5>this is a huge Republican mainstay. We're going to back

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.100
<v Speaker 5>up a little bit. I never stop talking. I always

0:13:10.140 --> 0:13:11.099
<v Speaker 5>just keep moving the map.

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.660
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a lot of that this afternoon. Oh,

0:13:14.730 --> 0:13:17.150
<v Speaker 3>and that's the short version of that bit. Oh, my God,

0:13:17.190 --> 0:13:19.010
<v Speaker 3>I got tears in my eyes. That is so good.

0:13:19.030 --> 0:13:20.450
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a lot of that this afternoon.

0:13:20.470 --> 0:13:21.910
<v Speaker 4>And if you feel like you get something out of

0:13:21.950 --> 0:13:24.250
<v Speaker 4>people doing that, rather than just waiting to see who won,

0:13:24.270 --> 0:13:24.830
<v Speaker 4>then go ahead and.

0:13:24.790 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 3>Knock yourself out. Seriously, we will tell you when, you know,

0:13:28.380 --> 0:13:31.060
<v Speaker 3>various states close and when you're likely to know anything,

0:13:31.100 --> 0:13:33.020
<v Speaker 3>because there's like a third of the populace of the

0:13:33.059 --> 0:13:36.250
<v Speaker 3>country that they won't even be done like midday tomorrow.

0:13:36.309 --> 0:13:37.350
<v Speaker 3>They go for days.

0:13:37.429 --> 0:13:37.729
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:13:38.170 --> 0:13:38.630
<v Speaker 2>Really?

0:13:39.309 --> 0:13:42.250
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Really? Katie's Headlines next. Stay here.

0:13:43.750 --> 0:13:49.650
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and.

0:13:49.340 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:54.030 --> 0:13:57.890
<v Speaker 3>A couple of old school conservative stalwarts like Peggy Noonan

0:13:57.990 --> 0:14:02.350
<v Speaker 3>and George Will in major publications are sort of embracing

0:14:02.470 --> 0:14:05.310
<v Speaker 3>slash rooting for a bad night for the Republicans tonight

0:14:05.790 --> 0:14:08.510
<v Speaker 3>with the idea that there's an entire remake of the

0:14:08.550 --> 0:14:14.309
<v Speaker 3>whole conservative movement afoot. Let's start over from scratch. I

0:14:14.309 --> 0:14:17.430
<v Speaker 3>don't know if that's going to happen. Well, let's talk

0:14:17.490 --> 0:14:19.990
<v Speaker 3>about that and I will ruin it. So stay tuned

0:14:20.030 --> 0:14:22.460
<v Speaker 3>for that. Let's figure out who's reporting what. It's the

0:14:22.500 --> 0:14:25.980
<v Speaker 3>lead story with Katie Green. Katie, hit it. Big shocker.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.380
<v Speaker 3>Lead story. All the alphabet networks. The midterms.

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.260
<v Speaker 6>We'll just do CNNs in all caps. America heads to

0:14:33.300 --> 0:14:36.500
<v Speaker 6>the polls. Yeah, that's the way it ought to be.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:40.420
<v Speaker 3>CBS News.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 6>Trump says peace deal still possible with United States as

0:14:45.380 --> 0:14:49.420
<v Speaker 6>United States launches limited strikes on eve of elections.

0:14:51.210 --> 0:14:53.030
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've been hitting them now and then and not

0:14:53.330 --> 0:14:56.410
<v Speaker 3>announcing it, which is interesting. Yeah, just kind of lawn

0:14:56.750 --> 0:15:00.630
<v Speaker 3>mowing forays, as they say, just keeping their ability to

0:15:00.670 --> 0:15:04.890
<v Speaker 3>threaten shipping in our bases at bay. Somebody asked Trump

0:15:04.910 --> 0:15:06.330
<v Speaker 3>the other day, is there going to be an attack

0:15:06.390 --> 0:15:09.270
<v Speaker 3>after the midterm? He said no. I mean, he just

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.820
<v Speaker 3>stated it, and it's not getting much attention. Of course,

0:15:11.860 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>he says all sorts of stuff. From the Washington Post.

0:15:15.810 --> 0:15:22.050
<v Speaker 6>Nearly $ 1. 9 billion traded on midterms in booming prediction markets.

0:15:22.650 --> 0:15:23.050
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

0:15:23.090 --> 0:15:25.210
<v Speaker 3>The prediction markets are huge on this. We can tell

0:15:25.230 --> 0:15:25.810
<v Speaker 3>you where they are.

0:15:28.010 --> 0:15:31.970
<v Speaker 6>From the New York Times. Are freezers being hacked? Europe

0:15:32.090 --> 0:15:34.590
<v Speaker 6>and the United States military investigate.

0:15:35.070 --> 0:15:36.190
<v Speaker 3>What are you going to get out of hacking from

0:15:36.210 --> 0:15:38.270
<v Speaker 3>my freezer? You going to thaw out my meat ahead

0:15:38.290 --> 0:15:41.630
<v Speaker 3>of time? No, they're attacking grocery stores, freezers, and fridges

0:15:41.690 --> 0:15:43.430
<v Speaker 3>all over Europe, and they're having to throw away all

0:15:43.450 --> 0:15:43.910
<v Speaker 3>the food.

0:15:43.950 --> 0:15:44.390
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:15:44.450 --> 0:15:44.630
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 6>From the Wall Street Journal, people are using AI for

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 6>divorce advice, and it's driving their lawyers crazy.

0:15:53.660 --> 0:16:00.250
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'll be darned. I've done that myself. Mm-hmm.

0:16:00.270 --> 0:16:03.730
<v Speaker 4>Your chatbot doesn't have an interest in dragging it out

0:16:03.810 --> 0:16:05.090
<v Speaker 4>to get more billable hours.

0:16:06.930 --> 0:16:10.730
<v Speaker 3>That's funny. That wasn't the lawyers. Take it all. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

0:16:12.690 --> 0:16:13.370
<v Speaker 3>New York Post.

0:16:13.990 --> 0:16:18.210
<v Speaker 6>AI-powered glasses could eliminate talking at work, but experts fear

0:16:18.310 --> 0:16:21.670
<v Speaker 6>privacy concerns, quote, you never have to type.

0:16:21.630 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Or speak again. Oh, that'd be great for human beings.

0:16:25.620 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 3>What the F are we doing here? I want to

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.100
<v Speaker 3>talk about that one. How do you write that headline

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.340
<v Speaker 3>with a straight face? Never have to talk again. Great,

0:16:34.380 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>your brain will atrophy. What the hell? The monkey that

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>got too smart for its own good. Who are you

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.380
<v Speaker 3>calling a monkey? Study finds.

0:16:49.300 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Study links regular cold showers to 26% fewer sick days.

0:16:57.660 --> 0:17:01.430
<v Speaker 3>Toughen you up. It's like the cold plunge thing. I

0:17:01.450 --> 0:17:04.949
<v Speaker 3>could do a chilly shower. The cold plunge ain't happening.

0:17:04.990 --> 0:17:06.930
<v Speaker 3>I'd have a heart attack and die. We should talk

0:17:06.950 --> 0:17:07.970
<v Speaker 3>about that, too. I have a theory.

0:17:07.990 --> 0:17:08.890
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:17:09.830 --> 0:17:11.670
<v Speaker 3>And finally, the Babylon Bee.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 6>Decades of recycling progress undone by single midterm election. And

0:17:19.900 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 6>it's got a picture with all of the campaign signs

0:17:23.859 --> 0:17:25.300
<v Speaker 6>all over along.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it was visual. We got this text. Quit talking

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 3>about it. Drives me nuts. Do sports talk.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.610
<v Speaker 4>Talk about cats, anything, but don't dwell on the stuff

0:17:32.619 --> 0:17:34.290
<v Speaker 4>that you've already determined.

0:17:37.030 --> 0:17:38.670
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.869
<v Speaker 7>Martha Stewart is apologizing after posting and later deleting a

0:17:43.970 --> 0:17:47.170
<v Speaker 7>photo of herself in a Halloween costume holding a sign

0:17:47.210 --> 0:17:51.109
<v Speaker 7>that read, I am hungry, help me. Amid backlash, the

0:17:51.150 --> 0:17:53.390
<v Speaker 7>lifestyle guru addressed the costume.

0:17:52.970 --> 0:17:54.429
<v Speaker 3>But didn't fully apologize.

0:17:54.810 --> 0:17:58.070
<v Speaker 7>But as the controversy grew, Stewart issued another more direct

0:17:58.130 --> 0:18:00.900
<v Speaker 7>apology saying in part, it's hard to admit when you've

0:18:00.940 --> 0:18:03.580
<v Speaker 7>really screwed up. She added, wearing a costume like I

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.619
<v Speaker 7>did was insensitive and not funny.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:11.230
<v Speaker 3>I am very sorry. Now there's a news story. I'm

0:18:11.250 --> 0:18:14.010
<v Speaker 3>going to demand an apology for the apology. What are

0:18:14.030 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you apologizing for? Martha Stewart dresses up as a hobo

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:19.740
<v Speaker 3>for Halloween.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.740
<v Speaker 4>And then people complain because that's what people do. And

0:18:24.770 --> 0:18:28.410
<v Speaker 4>then she apologizes grovingly, grovingly.

0:18:29.590 --> 0:18:34.060
<v Speaker 3>Uh, we'll give you a few minutes to work on that. Uh, yeah, yeah.

0:18:34.180 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 3>If you're offended, you have power. If you're aggrieved, you

0:18:38.020 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>have the floor. No, shut up.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 4>Why do people apologize for this stuff? Do you realize

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.460
<v Speaker 4>how long you have to wait for it to blow over?

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:49.090
<v Speaker 4>Like another five minutes. Shut up, jackass. That's my apology.

0:18:49.490 --> 0:18:51.830
<v Speaker 3>Good God, things come and go so fast in the

0:18:51.869 --> 0:18:55.980
<v Speaker 3>modern world. Why does anybody react to any of this stuff? Again,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.100
<v Speaker 3>you got to apologize for the apology now, unless you

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.780
<v Speaker 3>got a couple of hot stock tips for me. Thug life.

0:19:06.330 --> 0:19:09.090
<v Speaker 4>We did have the headline from Katie about people who

0:19:09.150 --> 0:19:12.310
<v Speaker 4>take cold showers get sick less. And that sort of

0:19:12.369 --> 0:19:15.869
<v Speaker 4>stuff I've always been interested in. What is the name

0:19:15.950 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 4>for that when it's. I know it's causality versus whatever

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:22.970
<v Speaker 4>the other one is.

0:19:23.290 --> 0:19:24.310
<v Speaker 3>Correlation.

0:19:24.730 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 4>But trying to figure out what other things go with

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:28.740
<v Speaker 4>that sort of person. So the sort of person that

0:19:28.780 --> 0:19:31.379
<v Speaker 4>takes cold showers to try to be more energetic or

0:19:31.420 --> 0:19:33.619
<v Speaker 4>more of a go-getter is more of a go-getter. And

0:19:33.660 --> 0:19:35.580
<v Speaker 4>they probably go to the gym more often and they

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.260
<v Speaker 4>probably eat healthier and they probably do all kinds of

0:19:38.340 --> 0:19:41.030
<v Speaker 4>other things that makes them less likely to be sick, right?

0:19:41.050 --> 0:19:43.810
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's just almost guaranteed. The few people I

0:19:43.850 --> 0:19:46.390
<v Speaker 4>know that do cold plunges are also fitness nuts.

0:19:47.910 --> 0:19:49.669
<v Speaker 3>Not a surprise. You're not going to have.

0:19:49.550 --> 0:19:52.699
<v Speaker 4>Many cold plunge people who take cold showers to give

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 4>themselves more energy or whatever, who also sit around on

0:19:55.420 --> 0:19:57.060
<v Speaker 4>the couch all day long and eat chips.

0:19:57.740 --> 0:19:58.820
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to happen.

0:19:58.900 --> 0:20:01.300
<v Speaker 4>So I always like that out.

0:20:01.619 --> 0:20:04.610
<v Speaker 3>I've always liked that about statistics, that sort of thing. Yeah,

0:20:04.650 --> 0:20:07.650
<v Speaker 3>unless you tease out all of that stuff and equalize

0:20:07.750 --> 0:20:10.730
<v Speaker 3>for A, B, C, D through Z, you know, probably

0:20:11.270 --> 0:20:14.149
<v Speaker 3>it's a meaningless study. Yeah, it's like the– I was

0:20:14.190 --> 0:20:16.450
<v Speaker 3>talking to my son about this the other day when

0:20:16.730 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 3>we got onto the topic of– he was talking about

0:20:18.940 --> 0:20:24.770
<v Speaker 3>how many kids at school vape nicotine and how– At

0:20:24.830 --> 0:20:26.910
<v Speaker 3>least at least it used to be the studies where

0:20:26.930 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>you're twice as likely to be divorced, get divorced. You're

0:20:29.500 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>twice as likely to get divorced if you smoked. Well,

0:20:31.980 --> 0:20:35.380
<v Speaker 3>the smoking doesn't cause the divorce. Obviously, it's the sort

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of person that smokes and all the other lifestyle choices

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 3>that come with it tend to leave toward toward marriages

0:20:41.420 --> 0:20:45.110
<v Speaker 3>that don't last. That's those sorts of stats I find fascinating.

0:20:45.630 --> 0:20:48.370
<v Speaker 3>And they're underappreciated because people go with the original stat

0:20:48.390 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 3>all the time and draw kinds of broad conclusions. Well, right,

0:20:52.380 --> 0:20:55.330
<v Speaker 3>and I would prefer to be aware that there are–

0:20:55.350 --> 0:21:00.830
<v Speaker 3>what term would you use? Personality clusters or lifestyle clusters

0:21:00.890 --> 0:21:04.970
<v Speaker 3>that are shown by a variety of behaviors, and that

0:21:05.010 --> 0:21:09.130
<v Speaker 3>way I could quickly label people and know who I'm

0:21:09.170 --> 0:21:09.530
<v Speaker 3>dealing with.

0:21:09.550 --> 0:21:11.010
<v Speaker 4>Because that's what you want to do. I want to

0:21:11.030 --> 0:21:13.300
<v Speaker 4>be able to quickly know. That's what you need. You

0:21:13.340 --> 0:21:15.460
<v Speaker 4>need the metaglasses that can put them in some sort

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of group. Right, so I can immediately look down on them.

0:21:20.100 --> 0:21:22.179
<v Speaker 4>And in a few cases, it would be look up

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.149
<v Speaker 4>to them and fawn all over them to try to

0:21:24.210 --> 0:21:25.010
<v Speaker 4>gain their favor.

0:21:25.330 --> 0:21:30.770
<v Speaker 3>But it'll be one or the other. Oh, speaking of which,

0:21:30.810 --> 0:21:32.690
<v Speaker 3>I got a handful of stories that are completely not

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>political that I find interesting. And I hope you do, too.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:41.260
<v Speaker 3>The best college bargain right now is a super pricey

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:48.889
<v Speaker 3>elite liberal arts school. Nobody pays the rack rate at

0:21:48.930 --> 0:21:52.369
<v Speaker 3>these schools. Nobody. And I'm looking down a list of

0:21:53.090 --> 0:21:56.770
<v Speaker 3>some of your this seems to be fairly clustered in

0:21:56.990 --> 0:22:00.109
<v Speaker 3>Iowa in the middle. I'm sorry, in in the East Coast,

0:22:00.230 --> 0:22:05.710
<v Speaker 3>in the Midwest. But you got Williams College, Grinnell College.

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>That's in Iowa. Swarthmore is in Pennsylvania. I'd like to

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.570
<v Speaker 3>go to a place called Swarthmore. I'd have to work

0:22:12.670 --> 0:22:15.190
<v Speaker 3>on pronouncing it. And they go through a bunch of

0:22:15.230 --> 0:22:19.010
<v Speaker 3>these places. Nobody pays the rack rate at all. In fact,

0:22:19.050 --> 0:22:23.609
<v Speaker 3>the sticker price for Swarthmore, Jack's soon-to-be alma mater. I

0:22:23.670 --> 0:22:25.750
<v Speaker 3>feel like you wear a cape if you go to Swarthmore.

0:22:26.770 --> 0:22:31.870
<v Speaker 3>The cape is optional, but preferred. The sticker price, which

0:22:31.910 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 3>includes costs like transportation. It's like door-to-door service for a

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:41.530
<v Speaker 3>cruise or something. It's $ 98, 000 and change. But this year's

0:22:41.900 --> 0:22:46.250
<v Speaker 3>average aid package is $ 78, 000 and change, covering roughly 80%

0:22:46.250 --> 0:22:49.149
<v Speaker 3>of attendance costs. And nearly 350 of the only 1,700

0:22:49.150 --> 0:22:58.450
<v Speaker 3>students there pay nothing. And starting in the next academic year,

0:22:58.490 --> 0:23:01.210
<v Speaker 3>the school won't charge tuition to families with typical assets

0:23:01.310 --> 0:23:05.380
<v Speaker 3>earning under $ 200, 000. So who do they let in then?

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.899
<v Speaker 3>And they're cheaper in general. I'm sorry, one of the

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>points of this article is that all of these elites,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.090
<v Speaker 3>little liberal arts, you can't possibly afford the rack rate schools,

0:23:15.490 --> 0:23:17.949
<v Speaker 3>are less than the state schools. So then why do

0:23:17.990 --> 0:23:21.189
<v Speaker 3>they have that? price at the top to start with?

0:23:21.710 --> 0:23:23.830
<v Speaker 3>That's such a great question. I don't know. So that

0:23:23.850 --> 0:23:24.389
<v Speaker 3>you can brag about it?

0:23:24.540 --> 0:23:26.409
<v Speaker 4>So that people can go around saying, yeah, I went

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.139
<v Speaker 4>to a school that cost $ 100, 000 a year to go to?

0:23:28.820 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, the closest they got to explaining that was that

0:23:32.260 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 3>for a very long time, a high price tag and

0:23:35.460 --> 0:23:39.379
<v Speaker 3>a very low rate of admission was... Do you go

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to classes in a castle at Swarthmore?

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:42.260
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 3>In your cave? Oh, yeah. Hell, you go to your

0:23:44.770 --> 0:23:47.850
<v Speaker 3>dorm as a castle. Classes are in a bigger castle.

0:23:48.410 --> 0:23:51.940
<v Speaker 3>In your You hang your cape up by the door

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 3>as you snuggle up into your dorm room there. It's

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.859
<v Speaker 3>all stone. You got a roaring fire there.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course.

0:23:57.140 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like something out of Harry Potter.

0:23:58.420 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:23:59.110
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:59.609 --> 0:23:59.830
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:24:00.250 --> 0:24:03.570
<v Speaker 3>Very Hogwarts-ish. Yeah. But that's the closest they came to

0:24:03.609 --> 0:24:07.689
<v Speaker 3>explaining that was, yeah, a high tab and high or

0:24:07.750 --> 0:24:11.770
<v Speaker 3>low admission rate. That's how you prove you are exclusive.

0:24:12.150 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 3>But now, given the utter plunge in people's regard for

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 3>college educations in general, Everybody gets enormous aid packages. They've

0:24:22.890 --> 0:24:28.340
<v Speaker 3>got more examples, but they're fairly typical or similar. So

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 3>you got Bowdoin College in Maine, which I've heard of

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a million times just because of the Eastern media elite.

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.869
<v Speaker 3>I'm wearing my sweater tied around my neck if I

0:24:35.890 --> 0:24:36.210
<v Speaker 3>go there.

0:24:36.810 --> 0:24:37.090
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:37.210 --> 0:24:37.570
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:24:37.670 --> 0:24:37.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:37.910 --> 0:24:44.410
<v Speaker 3>No capes, though, because they'll immediately know you're a Swarthmore man. Anyway.

0:24:45.290 --> 0:24:49.530
<v Speaker 3>So the college, this 18-year-old really bright kid, college offered

0:24:49.570 --> 0:24:54.389
<v Speaker 3>an aid package covering almost 80% of its $ 98, 000 first-year cost,

0:24:54.430 --> 0:24:58.750
<v Speaker 3>leaving him to pay $ 21, 000. At the University of Maryland,

0:24:58.810 --> 0:25:01.980
<v Speaker 3>his local public university, he would have paid the full

0:25:02.060 --> 0:25:04.460
<v Speaker 3>in-state cost of $ 32, 000, so another $ 11, 000. Man, the collapse

0:25:04.500 --> 0:25:04.699
<v Speaker 3>of the.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Respect is not even the right word. The worship of

0:25:14.660 --> 0:25:17.100
<v Speaker 3>certain kind of colleges is one of my favorite things

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that's happened in modern life. Right. And finally, Davidson College,

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>where my last serious girlfriend before I met my wife

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.380
<v Speaker 3>went when she dumped me, families earning less than $ 175, 000

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.659
<v Speaker 3>will pay no tuition. Those making under $ 85, 000 get everything covered,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:39.369
<v Speaker 3>and then they calculate need. So anyway, I thought that

0:25:39.390 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 3>was interesting and strange. We're just at the front end

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>of seeing how this whole college thing shakes out since

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.140
<v Speaker 3>the world has decided it isn't really worth it going

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.619
<v Speaker 3>to college. Well, right. You have lots and lots and

0:25:51.660 --> 0:25:54.940
<v Speaker 3>lots of people for lots and lots of reasons to

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.500
<v Speaker 3>very solid reasons. So you get the flattening of information,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:05.690
<v Speaker 3>the perversion of college curriculum and and the ideological Marxist

0:26:05.869 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 3>indoctrination that's happening there. But the whole flattening of information

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.460
<v Speaker 3>where I can go online right now and with a

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.770
<v Speaker 3>little help from a chat bot assemble for myself in

0:26:16.010 --> 0:26:21.850
<v Speaker 3>probably roughly five minutes plus ordering the books, a graduate

0:26:21.869 --> 0:26:27.130
<v Speaker 3>level course in any topic on earth. And probably some, Jack,

0:26:27.190 --> 0:26:28.950
<v Speaker 3>and you do this a fair amount more than I

0:26:28.990 --> 0:26:33.630
<v Speaker 3>have in recent days, and get enough like super high

0:26:33.690 --> 0:26:37.810
<v Speaker 3>level help in interpreting it. for instance, reading Ulysses and

0:26:37.830 --> 0:26:40.330
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out what the hell's going on, that

0:26:40.369 --> 0:26:43.209
<v Speaker 3>you could absolutely educate yourself. But how many years are

0:26:43.250 --> 0:26:47.350
<v Speaker 3>we from our minds being so lazy and flabby because

0:26:47.410 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 3>of AI that we lack the critical thinking to A,

0:26:50.630 --> 0:26:54.260
<v Speaker 3>learn anything, or B, control the AI systems? So yeah,

0:26:54.300 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 3>where this is in 10 years, nobody has any idea.

0:26:56.700 --> 0:27:02.100
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of AI, I found this fascinating. The smartest people

0:27:02.220 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 3>in AI believe this is the world's Most important chart,

0:27:08.900 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 3>and nobody is talking about it. Wow, that's the best

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.050
<v Speaker 3>tease ever. I was going to go get some coffee

0:27:15.070 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 3>during your segment and hope you didn't notice I left

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.609
<v Speaker 3>the room, but world's best chart. You'd be a fool

0:27:20.650 --> 0:27:22.410
<v Speaker 3>if you did. Most important.

0:27:23.530 --> 0:27:25.369
<v Speaker 4>Did you know your home address is on the internet

0:27:25.390 --> 0:27:26.950
<v Speaker 4>right now? Anyone can find it.

0:27:27.170 --> 0:27:27.570
<v Speaker 3>Anyone.

0:27:28.030 --> 0:27:31.629
<v Speaker 4>Stranger, scammer, someone who just hates you, someone sitting in

0:27:31.670 --> 0:27:35.590
<v Speaker 4>a car outside your house. Ever type your own name

0:27:35.609 --> 0:27:36.810
<v Speaker 4>into a people search site?

0:27:36.850 --> 0:27:37.689
<v Speaker 3>It's horrifying.

0:27:37.790 --> 0:27:40.270
<v Speaker 4>Seconds later, you'll see your home address, your cell numbers

0:27:40.290 --> 0:27:44.350
<v Speaker 4>you've ever had, all your family members' names, your friends' names.

0:27:44.770 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Then if you dig in, there's all kinds of more information.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 4>That's why we use Incogni. I use Incogni myself. It

0:27:50.300 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 4>sends requests to remove personal information, including home address, from

0:27:53.619 --> 0:27:56.700
<v Speaker 4>hundreds of data brokers and people search sites automatically. Keep

0:27:56.740 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 4>sending them because the sites love to sneak your info

0:27:58.800 --> 0:27:59.500
<v Speaker 4>right back in there.

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:03.290
<v Speaker 3>Bastards. So think about who could be looking for you

0:28:03.369 --> 0:28:04.909
<v Speaker 3>right up to this minute. They can't harm you if

0:28:04.930 --> 0:28:08.530
<v Speaker 3>they can't find you. Go to incognito.com slash Armstrong for 60% off.

0:28:08.910 --> 0:28:14.970
<v Speaker 3>That's I-N-C-O-G-N-I dot com slash Armstrong. It's like incognito. Incognito.com

0:28:15.130 --> 0:28:18.060
<v Speaker 3>slash Armstrong. Again, you get 60% off with our code.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Incognito.com slash Armstrong is crazy affordable. Do this. It's a

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>good idea. All right, so here's the chart. And as

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.340
<v Speaker 3>it is a chart, I will have to rely on

0:28:27.420 --> 0:28:34.290
<v Speaker 3>my Legendary powers of description, which I haven't even considered

0:28:34.390 --> 0:28:38.030
<v Speaker 3>how to do. All right. So it is a chart

0:28:38.490 --> 0:28:41.790
<v Speaker 3>of AI companies. This is specifically the one I'm looking

0:28:41.870 --> 0:28:49.190
<v Speaker 3>at is Anthropic by month. What percentage of your projects,

0:28:49.230 --> 0:28:58.140
<v Speaker 3>your time spent, use no AI, minimal AI, AI assist?

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:05.150
<v Speaker 3>AI collaborates or AI leads the parade. AI is doing

0:29:05.210 --> 0:29:08.370
<v Speaker 3>this work. And occasionally I'll weigh in and say, how's

0:29:08.450 --> 0:29:12.970
<v Speaker 3>it going? Okay. Can I get you anything? In August

0:29:13.130 --> 0:29:14.390
<v Speaker 3>of 25, the minimal AI.

0:29:16.210 --> 0:29:16.580
<v Speaker 1>Was 40%.

0:29:16.580 --> 0:29:27.940
<v Speaker 3>And the AI assists was 50% or so. There was

0:29:28.140 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 3>a little tiny bit of AI collaborates and a little

0:29:31.420 --> 0:29:35.190
<v Speaker 3>bit of no AI. Zero AI is leading. And this

0:29:35.230 --> 0:29:38.930
<v Speaker 3>was in 1985? No, that was last year, last August, right?

0:29:39.620 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>And so they go month by month by month. The

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.900
<v Speaker 3>AI collaborates is growing in leaps and bounds, but there's

0:29:46.030 --> 0:29:52.490
<v Speaker 3>no AI leads until March of this year, when all

0:29:52.510 --> 0:29:56.570
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden AI leads is 1%. Golly gee, you

0:29:56.630 --> 0:30:00.010
<v Speaker 3>remember March? Oh, the motor car was just entering the

0:30:00.050 --> 0:30:03.229
<v Speaker 3>streets of America. FDR was the president. No, it was

0:30:03.290 --> 0:30:04.470
<v Speaker 3>March of this effing year.

0:30:04.470 --> 0:30:04.670
<v Speaker 2>1%.

0:30:04.670 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Next month, 3%. Next month, 12%. Next month, 14%. Next month, 22%.

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.940
<v Speaker 3>By August, 26%. AI is running the show. August of

0:30:09.980 --> 0:30:23.910
<v Speaker 3>this year. And when I listen to these AI experts

0:30:23.990 --> 0:30:27.450
<v Speaker 3>on these various podcasts talk about things, they always mention these, like,

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 3>landmark dates. And they're all within the last three years.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:36.060
<v Speaker 3>You know, it was in March of 25 when everything changed.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.420
<v Speaker 3>Everything changed just a few months ago, like a year ago. But, yeah.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 3>They're going to have to start going with weeks. You

0:30:44.500 --> 0:30:45.940
<v Speaker 3>remember the third week of September?

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wow.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.580
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like the Wright brothers barely got a plane

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 4>off of the sand for a few seconds in 2025,

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.820
<v Speaker 4>and we landed on the moon earlier.

0:30:57.540 --> 0:31:00.460
<v Speaker 3>This year, and now we're on the way to Mars. Right,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.980
<v Speaker 3>halfway there, yeah. It's a phenomenon known as recursive self-improvement,

0:31:04.020 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 3>or RSI, which roughly translates to AI building smarter AI.

0:31:08.700 --> 0:31:12.050
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic refers to it as closing the loop, a cycle

0:31:12.070 --> 0:31:14.670
<v Speaker 3>in which each improvement makes the machines better and faster

0:31:14.790 --> 0:31:18.989
<v Speaker 3>at improving themselves. And AI companies are now seeing the

0:31:19.050 --> 0:31:21.709
<v Speaker 3>early signs of recursive self-improvement, which is speeding up the

0:31:21.750 --> 0:31:26.990
<v Speaker 3>research and freaking everyone else out. As this technology accelerates

0:31:27.030 --> 0:31:29.670
<v Speaker 3>its own evolution, the risk is that we struggle to

0:31:29.710 --> 0:31:31.550
<v Speaker 3>keep pace and keep it under control.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 4>So we've got Lonnie Chan, one of our favorite political

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 4>analysts on later today, not to talk about today's midterms,

0:31:37.060 --> 0:31:37.980
<v Speaker 4>because what would he say?

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.620
<v Speaker 3>I want to hear about the polls in Texas. James Tallarico,

0:31:41.940 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is he going to win? The presidential election kicks off tonight, really.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:46.540
<v Speaker 3>And we're going to talk to him a little bit

0:31:46.580 --> 0:31:48.620
<v Speaker 3>about that. But I have heard a number of people

0:31:48.660 --> 0:31:51.570
<v Speaker 3>say AI is going to be an enormous topic for

0:31:51.590 --> 0:31:55.450
<v Speaker 3>the presidential election. I don't quite understand in what way

0:31:55.510 --> 0:31:57.630
<v Speaker 3>it will be, but that doesn't surprise me because it's

0:31:57.780 --> 0:32:01.540
<v Speaker 3>two years from today, this week. Two years away. That's

0:32:01.580 --> 0:32:02.260
<v Speaker 3>a long time.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Given the timelines you've just given us over how much

0:32:05.340 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 4>AI has changed, who knows what the conversation is going

0:32:08.420 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 4>to be leading to presidential election day two years from now.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.459
<v Speaker 3>Well, Michael, if I moderate the debate, I think you

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 3>know what my first question of the candidates is going

0:32:16.700 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:18.820
<v Speaker 2>What the f * * * type of AI s * * *

0:32:18.900 --> 0:32:19.420
<v Speaker 2>is this?

0:32:19.820 --> 0:32:22.500
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Mailbag coming up in a moment. Stay with us.

0:32:22.500 --> 0:32:23.900
<v Speaker 3>You're a debate moderator.

0:32:25.780 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.100
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Poor Darlene Graham.

0:32:42.940 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 4>I was just reading the Wall Street Journal story about her.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:48.350
<v Speaker 4>She had no interest in this. No, she didn't want this.

0:32:48.830 --> 0:32:51.730
<v Speaker 3>No, Trump browbeat her into it and she's mortified. She

0:32:51.750 --> 0:32:55.150
<v Speaker 3>doesn't know what to do with herself. Here's your freedom-loving

0:32:55.190 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 3>quote of the day, continuing, perhaps ending, our series about

0:32:58.020 --> 0:33:01.180
<v Speaker 3>elections from Hunter S. Thompson from his classic Fear and

0:33:01.220 --> 0:33:03.900
<v Speaker 3>Loathing on the campaign trail 72, which I've read a

0:33:03.940 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 3>couple of times and is absolutely wonderful. The whole framework,

0:33:07.420 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and this was written, keeping in mind, it was written,

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.350
<v Speaker 3>I believe, in 1973. The whole framework of the presidency

0:33:13.370 --> 0:33:15.090
<v Speaker 3>is getting out of hand. It's come to the point

0:33:15.110 --> 0:33:17.250
<v Speaker 3>where you almost can't run unless you can cause people

0:33:17.290 --> 0:33:19.850
<v Speaker 3>to salivate and whip on each other with big sticks.

0:33:20.170 --> 0:33:21.780
<v Speaker 3>You almost have to be a rock star to get

0:33:21.820 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 3>to the kind of fever you need to survive in

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:31.170
<v Speaker 3>American politics. Oh, Hunter S. That was the beginning. That

0:33:31.210 --> 0:33:37.550
<v Speaker 3>was the beginning. Mailbag. Drop us a note, mailbag at armstrongandgetty.com. Quickly,

0:33:37.610 --> 0:33:40.910
<v Speaker 3>Brad mentioned that Mike Slater gave us a nice shout-out

0:33:40.950 --> 0:33:44.790
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of his podcast recently. Mike is one

0:33:44.810 --> 0:33:47.850
<v Speaker 3>of the best and smartest people in broadcaster podcasting. He's

0:33:47.870 --> 0:33:49.670
<v Speaker 3>a lovely fellow, and we thank him for that. The

0:33:49.730 --> 0:33:53.370
<v Speaker 3>only decent person in the industry. Yeah, by one of

0:33:53.450 --> 0:33:57.450
<v Speaker 3>the most decent, I meant the only one. Yes. Eric

0:33:57.510 --> 0:34:00.890
<v Speaker 3>in Texas spells Eric with a K. Blame him or

0:34:00.910 --> 0:34:04.270
<v Speaker 3>his parents. We'll take your calls. Good morning, gentlemen, he writes.

0:34:04.290 --> 0:34:07.130
<v Speaker 3>Would you please talk about nothing else except for exit

0:34:07.170 --> 0:34:10.590
<v Speaker 3>polls today? I am dying to know how the 28th

0:34:10.650 --> 0:34:12.690
<v Speaker 3>district in Texas is going to turn out. I know

0:34:12.730 --> 0:34:15.230
<v Speaker 3>I won't be able to sleep until I know. Seriously, guys,

0:34:15.250 --> 0:34:17.180
<v Speaker 3>thank you for talking about more than just politics and

0:34:17.219 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 3>not being hacks. You're always a good listener. Thanks, Eric.

0:34:21.140 --> 0:34:26.460
<v Speaker 3>Let's see. How about this from Kate? Oh, filling out

0:34:26.500 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 3>my ballot tonight. Kate's a Cal Unicornian. I could hear

0:34:29.410 --> 0:34:31.170
<v Speaker 3>your voices in my head from way back in the

0:34:31.170 --> 0:34:36.460
<v Speaker 3>2008 election. which you so lovingly characterized as the high-speed

0:34:36.540 --> 0:34:40.850
<v Speaker 3>chicken abortions ballot. Wow. As there were all sorts of

0:34:40.890 --> 0:34:45.980
<v Speaker 3>ballot measures, including... That's right. Twelve hundred square foot apartments

0:34:46.020 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 3>for each chicken. Right.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:48.090
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:34:48.510 --> 0:34:53.850
<v Speaker 3>The high speed, never existing rail debacle and something about abortion.

0:34:54.330 --> 0:34:56.509
<v Speaker 3>She says, I was intelligent enough to agree with you

0:34:56.570 --> 0:34:59.130
<v Speaker 3>on voting no on nearly everything that year, but young

0:34:59.150 --> 0:35:01.629
<v Speaker 3>and dumb enough to think. But a bullet train would

0:35:01.670 --> 0:35:06.290
<v Speaker 3>be so cool, despite Joe screaming that there would never, ever,

0:35:06.489 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 3>ever be a bullet train. Joe, you're right, and I've

0:35:09.500 --> 0:35:13.700
<v Speaker 3>never forgiven myself. Good. That's healthy. I know you'd rather

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.259
<v Speaker 3>be right than happy, so I wanted to brighten your day. Oh,

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 3>my God. My goodness, I'm almost faggot-fy. Friend of Armstrong

0:35:21.460 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and Getty over 25 years. I get new gray hairs

0:35:24.340 --> 0:35:26.569
<v Speaker 3>every year. I continue to wait for my potholders in

0:35:26.590 --> 0:35:28.050
<v Speaker 3>the mail. Never retire.

0:35:28.590 --> 0:35:29.029
<v Speaker 1>Oh, boy.

0:35:29.050 --> 0:35:35.750
<v Speaker 3>Oh, boy. Thanks for that. Anita, next time never seems

0:35:35.790 --> 0:35:39.710
<v Speaker 3>to come. This country's problem is that the next time

0:35:39.750 --> 0:35:41.650
<v Speaker 3>never seems to come. Every time we say we will

0:35:41.670 --> 0:35:44.570
<v Speaker 3>get better candidates, next time we get worse ones. Candidate

0:35:44.630 --> 0:35:47.710
<v Speaker 3>quality and candidate character still matter. If we keep doing

0:35:47.750 --> 0:35:49.940
<v Speaker 3>this 100 years from now, will we be arguing about

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 3>whether we have to vote for the rapist because at

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 3>least he's not the murderer? Why is it that every

0:35:55.300 --> 0:35:57.930
<v Speaker 3>cycle we rationalize a worse candidate because the other side

0:35:57.950 --> 0:36:01.330
<v Speaker 3>is supposedly worse still? In every cycle, our standards decline further.

0:36:01.430 --> 0:36:03.610
<v Speaker 3>At some point, someone has to say enough. Well, in

0:36:03.670 --> 0:36:05.910
<v Speaker 3>every cycle, we act like this is the election that

0:36:05.950 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>will determine things. One way or the other. Oh, yeah. Yeah.

0:36:10.540 --> 0:36:13.420
<v Speaker 3>It'll really set the course for the next millennium or something.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.420
<v Speaker 3>How much time do we have, Michael? About 30 seconds.

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:17.620
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man.

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 3>We had a number of emails calling BS on your assertion, Jack,

0:36:20.940 --> 0:36:23.940
<v Speaker 3>that you've never had the flu. We don't really have

0:36:24.020 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>time to call to pay that off. It's a hot topic.

0:36:27.850 --> 0:36:32.069
<v Speaker 3>It's yes. Well, yes. Your various claims of things you've. Well,

0:36:32.170 --> 0:36:38.370
<v Speaker 3>it's just it got some reaction. Oh, boy. We got

0:36:38.390 --> 0:36:39.990
<v Speaker 3>a lot more. Yes, you say.

0:36:42.870 --> 0:36:46.210
<v Speaker 4>Russia did something horrible overnight. Attacking a school and an

0:36:46.270 --> 0:36:47.770
<v Speaker 4>aid center in Ukraine.

0:36:47.930 --> 0:36:48.410
<v Speaker 1>Oh, boy.

0:36:49.489 --> 0:36:52.210
<v Speaker 3>Pretty awful. Among other things we'll talk about. You can

0:36:52.230 --> 0:36:55.350
<v Speaker 3>get every segment of the show by subscribing. Armstrong and

0:36:55.370 --> 0:36:56.610
<v Speaker 3>Getty on demand. It's a podcast.

0:36:57.930 --> 0:36:59.050
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.