WEBVTT - Calculatin' Summabitch.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.140
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking to Steve Hilton later this hour.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>He's the guy running as Republican for governor in California

0:00:12.740 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to replace Gavin Newsom. Okay, I'm going to say this

0:00:15.500 --> 0:00:16.860
<v Speaker 2>out loud. You're all going to beat me up. I

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.329
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's got a chance of winning against Javier Becerra,

0:00:22.090 --> 0:00:25.090
<v Speaker 2>the former HHS secretary, because of the way everything's so

0:00:25.150 --> 0:00:30.070
<v Speaker 2>locked in this blue state with the Unions and all

0:00:30.110 --> 0:00:32.570
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff. But it's pretty interesting. One thing

0:00:32.590 --> 0:00:35.470
<v Speaker 2>we'll ask him about is Gavin Newsom came out yesterday

0:00:35.530 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and said, if Kamala Harris runs for president, I won't.

0:00:39.380 --> 0:00:41.459
<v Speaker 1>What is that strategy about? Maybe we'll get into that

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:42.300
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Hilton later.

0:00:43.110 --> 0:00:46.530
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a calculating some bitch, is that Gavin Newsom?

0:00:47.210 --> 0:00:48.900
<v Speaker 1>Calculating some bitch.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Hmm.

0:00:50.659 --> 0:00:53.540
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yep, yep, yep. The power, I can only

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.980
<v Speaker 3>imagine it. It's like, you know, some weird tribe that

0:00:56.020 --> 0:01:00.620
<v Speaker 3>has 40 words for snow or whatever. Trying to imagine

0:01:01.220 --> 0:01:04.220
<v Speaker 3>what the maneuvering looks like in the upper reaches of

0:01:04.300 --> 0:01:08.250
<v Speaker 3>Democrat politics, but... Yeah, if he is seen as resting,

0:01:08.310 --> 0:01:11.830
<v Speaker 3>trying to wrest the crown from her, that would be bad. Anyway,

0:01:11.850 --> 0:01:12.290
<v Speaker 3>more on that.

0:01:12.310 --> 0:01:14.710
<v Speaker 2>I certainly came the closest I've ever come to being

0:01:14.750 --> 0:01:16.910
<v Speaker 2>on a jury yesterday. In fact, I thought I was

0:01:17.030 --> 0:01:20.340
<v Speaker 2>on the jury. I basically was on the jury there,

0:01:20.420 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>very briefly. Before I got kicked off, I'll have to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.900
<v Speaker 2>talk about that a little bit later. But the jurors

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.390
<v Speaker 2>from the Clancy trial, if you remember that, the woman

0:01:30.410 --> 0:01:31.209
<v Speaker 2>who killed her kids.

0:01:32.870 --> 0:01:35.550
<v Speaker 2>The jurors are still talking, doing interviews. We're learning more

0:01:35.610 --> 0:01:37.990
<v Speaker 2>about the deliberations and what was going on, and there's

0:01:38.010 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>some shocking stuff in there.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.300
<v Speaker 3>Some fine, condescending white ladies, too, talking about how they

0:01:45.340 --> 0:01:48.870
<v Speaker 3>wanted to let Ms. Clancy off. It was 11 to 1.

0:01:48.870 --> 0:01:51.670
<v Speaker 3>To say she was too crazy to take responsibility for

0:01:52.170 --> 0:01:54.550
<v Speaker 3>slowly strangling her three children, one after the other.

0:01:54.710 --> 0:01:58.090
<v Speaker 1>Who was the one holdout, though? Who was the one holdout?

0:01:58.140 --> 0:01:59.230
<v Speaker 1>We'll learn more about that.

0:01:59.250 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Gayle King was talking about that on the early show

0:02:01.340 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 2>on CBS with one of the jurors.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>40.

0:02:06.790 --> 0:02:09.450
<v Speaker 5>I'm curious about the jurors themselves because we know it

0:02:09.490 --> 0:02:11.589
<v Speaker 5>was nine women, three men.

0:02:11.790 --> 0:02:14.329
<v Speaker 6>What was the age range? What was the racial makeup?

0:02:14.370 --> 0:02:17.770
<v Speaker 6>I haven't heard any of that. What was it?

0:02:17.770 --> 0:02:24.900
<v Speaker 7>70-ish to 22. And one person of color and then

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 7>everybody else was white.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 6>A lot of the jurors had children.

0:02:33.150 --> 0:02:38.730
<v Speaker 5>One person of color was a person of color. Is

0:02:38.770 --> 0:02:42.010
<v Speaker 5>a holdout juror a person, a black man?

0:02:42.570 --> 0:02:42.850
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:02:43.530 --> 0:02:47.630
<v Speaker 6>A black man is a holdout juror? Yes. Well, I

0:02:47.930 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 6>have to sit with that for just a second.

0:02:50.340 --> 0:02:50.630
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:02:50.660 --> 0:02:53.310
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll bet you do, because you're a racist. Why

0:02:53.340 --> 0:02:54.500
<v Speaker 3>do you have to sit with that? Because you view

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.980
<v Speaker 3>everyone's actions and attitudes through the lens of race.

0:02:58.260 --> 0:03:00.450
<v Speaker 2>Why does that have anything to do with anything? It

0:03:00.490 --> 0:03:02.910
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have anything to do with anything. Unless you're a racist.

0:03:03.470 --> 0:03:06.900
<v Speaker 2>Unless you're a racist and you assign attributes to people

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.940
<v Speaker 2>based on their skin color, which is the definition of

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>being a racist.

0:03:11.380 --> 0:03:15.620
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. In Gayle King's woke victim oppressor world, the

0:03:15.660 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>black man can't possibly.

0:03:17.740 --> 0:03:21.059
<v Speaker 2>Be the bad guy. So she has to sit with

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 2>that for a moment. I don't know that this is

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.700
<v Speaker 2>a bad guy anyway. This was the person who couldn't

0:03:26.980 --> 0:03:30.209
<v Speaker 2>deal with letting someone go who murdered their kids. I

0:03:30.230 --> 0:03:32.410
<v Speaker 2>can see where they're coming from. Although that was a

0:03:32.430 --> 0:03:35.150
<v Speaker 2>specific question a lot in the jury selection yesterday that

0:03:35.210 --> 0:03:39.070
<v Speaker 2>I was involved in. Can you, are you okay with,

0:03:39.470 --> 0:03:42.700
<v Speaker 2>you know, coming up with a vote of guilty in

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:47.900
<v Speaker 2>these situations? Although, man, somebody murdered their kids. That's a

0:03:47.940 --> 0:03:51.220
<v Speaker 2>whole different kettle of fish. Anyway, so who's this next

0:03:51.260 --> 0:03:51.820
<v Speaker 2>person we're going.

0:03:51.750 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>To hear from? I believe it is a TikToker of

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.420
<v Speaker 3>some sort, a woke youngster.

0:03:59.820 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 8>The holdout during the Lindsay Clancy trial was a black man.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.770
<v Speaker 8>And I'm not going to share any opinions because I'm

0:04:05.790 --> 0:04:06.910
<v Speaker 8>not a person of color.

0:04:06.930 --> 0:04:08.210
<v Speaker 6>I am a non-practicing white.

0:04:09.010 --> 0:04:09.750
<v Speaker 3>I'm surprised.

0:04:09.870 --> 0:04:12.270
<v Speaker 8>It changes the landscape of the conversation a little bit.

0:04:13.130 --> 0:04:14.790
<v Speaker 8>And I think a lot of us were assuming that

0:04:14.830 --> 0:04:15.790
<v Speaker 8>it was a white man.

0:04:15.810 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:18.580
<v Speaker 1>This is so nuts.

0:04:19.300 --> 0:04:19.620
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Gayle King.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:25.770
<v Speaker 2>Was kind of Whoa, I need to sit down for

0:04:25.790 --> 0:04:26.130
<v Speaker 2>a second.

0:04:26.210 --> 0:04:28.570
<v Speaker 1>I need to slouch. How do I process this?

0:04:28.810 --> 0:04:30.029
<v Speaker 3>What is there to process?

0:04:30.370 --> 0:04:34.460
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing here. There's no information of any interest whatsoever.

0:04:35.339 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, at least the tic-tac-a-girl wouldn't offer an opinion because

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.659
<v Speaker 3>she's not a person of color and she's a non-practicing white.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I've never heard.

0:04:42.420 --> 0:04:45.580
<v Speaker 2>That phrase before. What's a non-practicing white?

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.790
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you could guess. Come on. She's a white person

0:04:48.820 --> 0:04:52.290
<v Speaker 3>who disavows whiteness to show how pure and enlightened she is.

0:04:52.350 --> 0:04:54.450
<v Speaker 3>Please don't hate me for being white. I'm with you.

0:04:54.529 --> 0:04:58.650
<v Speaker 3>I hate white people, too. I hate America. I'm an anti-racist.

0:04:58.850 --> 0:04:59.470
<v Speaker 3>Don't hurt me.

0:05:00.650 --> 0:05:03.130
<v Speaker 1>How do you all not get that assigning.

0:05:04.339 --> 0:05:08.020
<v Speaker 1>Personality traits to skin color.

0:05:08.060 --> 0:05:13.860
<v Speaker 2>Is the textbook one-line definition of racism.

0:05:14.620 --> 0:05:15.810
<v Speaker 1>How do you not get that?

0:05:18.110 --> 0:05:18.390
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:05:18.430 --> 0:05:21.130
<v Speaker 1>You're upsetting their entire worldview, you realize.

0:05:21.190 --> 0:05:21.810
<v Speaker 3>Be gentle.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.109
<v Speaker 2>All right, different topic. This made a lot of noise

0:05:25.170 --> 0:05:28.690
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend. I'm sorry, let me just elaborate on

0:05:28.850 --> 0:05:30.990
<v Speaker 2>that just for a second. This is absolutely wonderful.

0:05:31.029 --> 0:05:34.210
<v Speaker 3>It's like a blind taste test where you confront these

0:05:34.290 --> 0:05:39.049
<v Speaker 3>people with several different roles being played, but don't pre-inform

0:05:39.089 --> 0:05:42.270
<v Speaker 3>them that one of the parties is actually a Palestinian

0:05:42.310 --> 0:05:44.989
<v Speaker 3>or a member of Hamas, or one of the parties

0:05:45.070 --> 0:05:47.390
<v Speaker 3>is a black man, or this other party is... this

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.180
<v Speaker 3>blind taste test is a white person, and just let

0:05:50.220 --> 0:05:52.260
<v Speaker 3>them go on the merits. And then when they go

0:05:52.339 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>on the merits and are confronted with, you know, what

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.540
<v Speaker 3>goes against their worldview, they're so freaked out, like, you know, King,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>she can't even process it. They can't handle a blind

0:06:01.060 --> 0:06:03.220
<v Speaker 3>taste test because they're racists.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't even imagine why she was just so

0:06:06.660 --> 0:06:10.340
<v Speaker 2>disturbed by that. But so, as we talked about a lot,

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>and we all know, going on outside the courtroom was

0:06:13.620 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>this weird.

0:06:15.370 --> 0:06:16.050
<v Speaker 1>Coming.

0:06:15.790 --> 0:06:21.990
<v Speaker 2>Together of support for the murdering mom by a certain

0:06:22.029 --> 0:06:26.500
<v Speaker 2>percentage of people across the country, you know, and then

0:06:26.510 --> 0:06:30.739
<v Speaker 2>the holding up babies on social media saying, me too,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.299
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of stuff, which is just pretty crazy.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.790
<v Speaker 3>What was the caption, Katie? It was... Same, Lindsay. Same, Lindsay.

0:06:39.810 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 9>Okay.

0:06:40.930 --> 0:06:44.910
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a very direct statement that I, too,

0:06:45.089 --> 0:06:47.230
<v Speaker 3>could kill my baby and would be justified.

0:06:47.250 --> 0:06:50.510
<v Speaker 2>I live on the verge of murdering my children, too,

0:06:50.830 --> 0:06:53.750
<v Speaker 2>because they woke me up in the middle of the night.

0:06:53.990 --> 0:06:55.870
<v Speaker 2>What is the line that gets crossed for you for

0:06:55.930 --> 0:06:57.210
<v Speaker 2>strangling your kids to death?

0:06:57.990 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Being desperate for the approval of people online.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.580
<v Speaker 2>But we knew that conversation was going on outside the courtroom.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.420
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of hoping it wasn't going on in

0:07:06.460 --> 0:07:08.740
<v Speaker 2>the courtroom, that they were just looking at having just

0:07:08.779 --> 0:07:12.310
<v Speaker 2>sat through... all this jury instruction and stuff yesterday, just

0:07:12.350 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>looking at the facts and applying them to the law

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that you have in front of you. But apparently that

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the only thing going on, according to this juror.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:25.580
<v Speaker 7>We knew that this was a turning point and this

0:07:25.660 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 7>would be something that could change something to make it

0:07:29.170 --> 0:07:33.130
<v Speaker 7>better for other women in the future, for other families.

0:07:33.850 --> 0:07:38.030
<v Speaker 7>You know, justice for those children is this never happening again.

0:07:39.070 --> 0:07:41.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't feel like when you're a juror you

0:07:41.490 --> 0:07:45.090
<v Speaker 2>should be looking at a big picture sending a message

0:07:45.230 --> 0:07:45.929
<v Speaker 2>for the future.

0:07:47.450 --> 0:07:50.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wow, that is something. Isn't it?

0:07:50.820 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So doesn't that suggest that they were having that conversation

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in the room?

0:07:55.460 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 9>Sure.

0:07:57.180 --> 0:07:59.850
<v Speaker 2>Or I suppose it's possible that they were breaking the

0:07:59.910 --> 0:08:02.030
<v Speaker 2>rules of jurors and discussing the case separately.

0:08:03.390 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, during breaks or whatever.

0:08:05.100 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>And some of them were like, I know, I sure

0:08:06.900 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>hope we get to send the message that it's hard

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.460
<v Speaker 2>being a mom. If they were having that out loud

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>with the other jurors and there wasn't somebody saying, whoa, whoa, whoa,

0:08:16.380 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>we're not.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>In the sending a message business here.

0:08:18.820 --> 0:08:21.060
<v Speaker 2>We're in the looking at the facts applying it to

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the law business. How this plays out is outside our hands.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.780
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe there wasn't anybody in there that would

0:08:26.820 --> 0:08:27.180
<v Speaker 2>say that.

0:08:27.780 --> 0:08:32.780
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that one holdout rogue evil juror who turned out

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.250
<v Speaker 3>to be a black man, so never mind. Yeah, boy,

0:08:36.330 --> 0:08:39.510
<v Speaker 3>is that something. We knew this would be a turning point.

0:08:40.330 --> 0:08:42.790
<v Speaker 3>The gal went to multiple doctors, got all sorts of drugs,

0:08:42.830 --> 0:08:45.209
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of care. Everybody was aware of it.

0:08:45.330 --> 0:08:47.390
<v Speaker 1>What sort of blow is this going to strike?

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't even get rationally– I would like to rationally

0:08:52.140 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>understand her point and then either accept it or reject it.

0:08:56.390 --> 0:09:01.670
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know what she means. Well, you can't.

0:09:01.330 --> 0:09:05.890
<v Speaker 2>Accept it just straight as a juror, though, can you?

0:09:06.370 --> 0:09:08.500
<v Speaker 2>If you have it on your mind at all that

0:09:08.540 --> 0:09:09.940
<v Speaker 2>I'm striking a blow for.

0:09:09.860 --> 0:09:13.260
<v Speaker 1>Something with this– That doesn't make sense to me.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:14.300
<v Speaker 3>Correct, yeah.

0:09:14.460 --> 0:09:17.380
<v Speaker 1>That's clouding your judgment. Clearly clouding your judgment.

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.590
<v Speaker 2>Because you have an opinion of which direction this topic

0:09:20.610 --> 0:09:24.950
<v Speaker 2>should go that's being factored into applying the law and

0:09:24.970 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the facts.

0:09:25.830 --> 0:09:29.090
<v Speaker 3>Right, outside of the evidence, etc. Yeah, I would agree.

0:09:29.130 --> 0:09:31.449
<v Speaker 3>That's horrifying. Yeah.

0:09:31.570 --> 0:09:33.650
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know that. Were they having out

0:09:33.690 --> 0:09:36.850
<v Speaker 2>loud conversations, the 12 of them, about what this will

0:09:36.870 --> 0:09:38.949
<v Speaker 2>do for history and women and whatever?

0:09:38.970 --> 0:09:41.150
<v Speaker 1>That's nuts.

0:09:42.020 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I find it a little difficult to believe they didn't,

0:09:45.980 --> 0:09:47.780
<v Speaker 3>given the things I've heard them say afterward.

0:09:47.820 --> 0:09:50.449
<v Speaker 2>And there wasn't one person in the room that said

0:09:50.470 --> 0:09:51.050
<v Speaker 2>what I just.

0:09:50.950 --> 0:09:51.870
<v Speaker 1>Said a few minutes ago?

0:09:51.890 --> 0:09:54.050
<v Speaker 3>Whoa, this isn't our role?

0:09:54.070 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>To change the tide of history and the view of

0:09:58.020 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 2>what it's like to be a mom.

0:10:00.220 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, to quote, I believe, maybe that same gal we

0:10:03.140 --> 0:10:06.850
<v Speaker 3>just heard from, he just couldn't get past the fact

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.689
<v Speaker 3>that she savagely murdered her three children. So he held out.

0:10:11.030 --> 0:10:14.110
<v Speaker 3>He was immune to their quote-unquote reasoning.

0:10:17.470 --> 0:10:19.449
<v Speaker 1>And then we got another.

0:10:19.570 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, this is an author. Taking this point of view

0:10:24.270 --> 0:10:24.860
<v Speaker 3>on the whole thing.

0:10:27.780 --> 0:10:30.420
<v Speaker 10>So, Lindsay Clancy, I want to say this to you.

0:10:30.460 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 10>I don't care if you ever literally hear this out

0:10:32.660 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 10>loud or not. I am sending all the love and

0:10:36.460 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 10>support in the world.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:40.540
<v Speaker 6>Hero.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 10>You are divine feminine rising. Your soul came here for

0:10:44.620 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 10>a massive f * * * ing mission. You are

0:10:46.860 --> 0:10:51.179
<v Speaker 10>goddess incarnated woman. You have sacrificed so much and I

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.300
<v Speaker 10>am so sorry for everything that you have experienced but

0:10:54.380 --> 0:10:56.750
<v Speaker 10>I am telling you that you are loved you are

0:10:56.780 --> 0:10:58.089
<v Speaker 10>supported more than you could.

0:10:58.070 --> 0:10:59.349
<v Speaker 6>Ever f * * * ing realize.

0:11:00.230 --> 0:11:02.390
<v Speaker 10>And there are so many people in this world who

0:11:02.429 --> 0:11:04.610
<v Speaker 10>have the ability to help you and will support you

0:11:04.670 --> 0:11:06.030
<v Speaker 10>for the rest of your f * * * ing

0:11:06.070 --> 0:11:07.860
<v Speaker 10>life because you deserve it.

0:11:07.870 --> 0:11:14.990
<v Speaker 3>Well that's abhorrent. Rachel Fiore's teachings on oneness consciousness and

0:11:15.030 --> 0:11:18.020
<v Speaker 3>begin your journey toward inner peace and expanded awareness.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.060
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if four people have read and it's

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 2>a self-published book or if she's a real author. I

0:11:23.100 --> 0:11:23.620
<v Speaker 2>have no idea.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.740
<v Speaker 3>She's a spiritual leader and founder CEO of Masters of

0:11:26.860 --> 0:11:29.239
<v Speaker 3>Self University. Well, I could call myself that, too.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.300
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much she has, but that is

0:11:32.340 --> 0:11:36.010
<v Speaker 2>an abhorrent point of view. I mean, just absolutely abhorrent.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't have had to live many years ago where

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you would have been so shunned by society for saying

0:11:42.820 --> 0:11:43.500
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:44.579
<v Speaker 1>You'd have been done.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 9>Wow.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 3>We live in the era of victimhood and feelings and

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:53.100
<v Speaker 3>no standards.

0:11:54.340 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are really no standards if you were a

0:11:57.020 --> 0:11:58.699
<v Speaker 2>hero for strangling your children.

0:11:59.660 --> 0:12:06.819
<v Speaker 3>You're an effing hero for strangling your children. Just like

0:12:06.860 --> 0:12:09.540
<v Speaker 3>George Floyd was a hero, I guess. And you sacrificed

0:12:09.580 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>so much.

0:12:10.020 --> 0:12:14.460
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry about the three dead kids you strangled to death.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.420
<v Speaker 3>Or their father.

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.250
<v Speaker 2>Including the two that had to watch a sibling or

0:12:19.330 --> 0:12:21.130
<v Speaker 2>two be strangled to death.

0:12:21.770 --> 0:12:22.510
<v Speaker 3>Picture that.

0:12:23.330 --> 0:12:23.929
<v Speaker 1>And then dad.

0:12:24.150 --> 0:12:24.350
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:25.570 --> 0:12:26.810
<v Speaker 1>And grandparents, and I'm sure there are.

0:12:26.770 --> 0:12:31.140
<v Speaker 2>Other people involved that are pretty marked emotionally for the

0:12:31.179 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>rest of their lives by this.

0:12:34.740 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>These are odd times. I don't know if you've noticed. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:12:38.780 --> 0:12:43.140
<v Speaker 3>All right, a much cheerier and more positive forward-looking note

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.780
<v Speaker 3>from our friends at Blue Collar Dollar. I want to

0:12:45.830 --> 0:12:49.069
<v Speaker 3>talk to the business owners, the entrepreneurs, farmers, hardworking folks

0:12:49.110 --> 0:12:52.030
<v Speaker 3>who've built up something in this country but feel like

0:12:52.050 --> 0:12:54.170
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street suit and tie crowd is a bit

0:12:54.250 --> 0:12:58.570
<v Speaker 3>fancy for them. Blue Collar Dollar provides high-level retirement strategies

0:12:58.630 --> 0:13:00.950
<v Speaker 3>for men and women who actually do the heavy lifting

0:13:01.190 --> 0:13:02.030
<v Speaker 3>without the pretensions.

0:13:02.170 --> 0:13:03.850
<v Speaker 2>You make the call, you talk to somebody, you're not

0:13:03.870 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 2>going to hear any jargon. Jargon?

0:13:05.580 --> 0:13:06.140
<v Speaker 3>What's jargon?

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.339
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to hear any jargon or corporate fluff.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Just straight talk, real respect for your hard-earned money. If

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.900
<v Speaker 2>you are over 55 and you've put aside at least

0:13:13.900 --> 0:13:17.709
<v Speaker 2>$ 250, 000 for retirement, Blue Collar Dollar has a special offer

0:13:17.750 --> 0:13:17.950
<v Speaker 2>for you.

0:13:18.550 --> 0:13:21.469
<v Speaker 3>Just pick up your phone right now, dial pound 250

0:13:21.470 --> 0:13:27.619
<v Speaker 3>and say the keywords Blue Collar Dollar. That's pound 250,

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.420
<v Speaker 3>the keyword's blue-collar dollar.

0:13:29.780 --> 0:13:30.260
<v Speaker 6>Paid endorsement.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.220
<v Speaker 8>Armstrong and Getty are not talent clients and receive compensation

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.300
<v Speaker 8>for promoting talent, creating a conflict of interest. Investment advisory

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 8>services offered through Talent LLC and SEC-registered investment advisor.

0:13:36.740 --> 0:13:39.370
<v Speaker 6>For more additional disclosures, visit bluecollar.com, paid for by Epic Financial.

0:13:39.870 --> 0:13:46.210
<v Speaker 8>Armstrong and Getty.

0:13:47.910 --> 0:13:48.750
<v Speaker 9>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:48.770 --> 0:13:51.290
<v Speaker 4>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.260
<v Speaker 11>The NFL's big return from being known as the no-fun

0:13:56.300 --> 0:14:03.270
<v Speaker 11>league for banning some of the best celebrations. itself yep

0:14:03.309 --> 0:14:06.390
<v Speaker 11>the league's official kickoff campaign this season has one of

0:14:06.429 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 11>the nfl's most viral on field celebrators cameron bynum coaching

0:14:11.540 --> 0:14:13.700
<v Speaker 11>others on the art of the shimmy the shake the

0:14:13.740 --> 0:14:15.119
<v Speaker 11>worm and more.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.740
<v Speaker 2>So after all these years we've been saying for years

0:14:17.860 --> 0:14:21.700
<v Speaker 2>let them do their dances the no fun league the

0:14:21.780 --> 0:14:26.180
<v Speaker 2>nfl what so now they're gonna they're now they're going

0:14:26.220 --> 0:14:29.130
<v Speaker 2>to encourage player celebrations on the field As we've been

0:14:29.170 --> 0:14:32.650
<v Speaker 2>saying forever, it's a TV show. I tuned in to

0:14:32.670 --> 0:14:36.030
<v Speaker 2>be entertained. I find those dances pretty entertaining.

0:14:36.890 --> 0:14:41.100
<v Speaker 3>It shouldn't be, like, terrible and abusive, but I'm shocked

0:14:41.140 --> 0:14:42.900
<v Speaker 3>to hear that because I was watching the highlights. I

0:14:42.900 --> 0:14:45.340
<v Speaker 3>think it was last night. And some dude, I think,

0:14:45.420 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 3>was it the Chargers? I can't remember. He scored a

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.580
<v Speaker 3>touchdown and he jumped up against, you know, the padding

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 3>around the bottom of the goal post. I saw that.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:53.990
<v Speaker 3>And he wrapped his arms and legs around it, then

0:14:54.020 --> 0:14:57.410
<v Speaker 3>let go and jumped. He did not hump it. He

0:14:57.450 --> 0:15:01.130
<v Speaker 3>did not simulate anything, and the ref immediately threw the

0:15:01.170 --> 0:15:05.010
<v Speaker 3>flag on him. Is that a specific rule violation? You

0:15:05.050 --> 0:15:06.550
<v Speaker 3>can't defile the padding?

0:15:06.570 --> 0:15:08.270
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, why did they flag him?

0:15:08.710 --> 0:15:09.330
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't know.

0:15:09.350 --> 0:15:11.350
<v Speaker 2>Well, then they're going to have to have very specific

0:15:11.430 --> 0:15:14.050
<v Speaker 2>rules around where you cross the line.

0:15:15.110 --> 0:15:16.810
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get what was wrong. Yeah.

0:15:17.270 --> 0:15:19.250
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we got a million texts on something that

0:15:19.310 --> 0:15:23.210
<v Speaker 2>is completely not important. It was Terrell Owens, not Vernon Davis,

0:15:23.490 --> 0:15:24.820
<v Speaker 2>who danced on the logo. I.

0:15:26.980 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Sorry for getting my 20-year-old outlandish 49ers receivers mixed up.

0:15:32.420 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 3>And you did.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.300
<v Speaker 2>If that's the biggest mistake I make today, I'll be

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 2>in pretty good shape. But I was misled by AI,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.460
<v Speaker 2>which is its own interesting thing, which I think it

0:15:41.540 --> 0:15:44.020
<v Speaker 2>was doing a confirmation thing.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.540
<v Speaker 1>Because I said, it doesn't make any difference.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get off on that. But that

0:15:48.180 --> 0:15:51.370
<v Speaker 2>is a little disturbing that once again, on something I

0:15:51.410 --> 0:15:54.530
<v Speaker 2>wasn't sure about, the AI got it wrong.

0:15:54.550 --> 0:15:55.650
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:15:57.250 --> 0:15:57.830
<v Speaker 3>Not important.

0:15:58.390 --> 0:16:01.150
<v Speaker 2>What is, is there's a new AI for anybody who's

0:16:01.190 --> 0:16:01.950
<v Speaker 2>got an iPhone.

0:16:01.970 --> 0:16:03.770
<v Speaker 1>If you downloaded the latest.

0:16:04.970 --> 0:16:08.530
<v Speaker 2>Operating system, this was what was announced last week when

0:16:08.550 --> 0:16:10.570
<v Speaker 2>they announced the new foldable phone and everything like that.

0:16:11.510 --> 0:16:14.490
<v Speaker 2>Every once in a while, huge remakes. Everything looks different

0:16:14.550 --> 0:16:16.730
<v Speaker 2>this morning. Trying to figure out how to do this

0:16:16.790 --> 0:16:19.710
<v Speaker 2>and that because I was used to that and this.

0:16:19.890 --> 0:16:22.130
<v Speaker 1>And everything is different. The Siri is supposed to be

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:22.620
<v Speaker 1>much better.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.990
<v Speaker 2>I haven't. tried it yet but it's supposed to be

0:16:25.070 --> 0:16:28.890
<v Speaker 2>full-on like chatbot ai quality where i can just say

0:16:28.930 --> 0:16:32.170
<v Speaker 2>to my phone hey find me the email where uh

0:16:32.190 --> 0:16:33.750
<v Speaker 2>you know the boss said i need to blah blah

0:16:33.770 --> 0:16:36.220
<v Speaker 2>blah and it'll find it for you or all kinds

0:16:36.260 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of fairly complicated things or you know go into my

0:16:39.380 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>texts what was the address of you know that sort

0:16:41.700 --> 0:16:44.260
<v Speaker 2>of thing if it works the way they portrayed it

0:16:44.300 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in the review i was reading last night it sounds

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.090
<v Speaker 2>fantastic That'd be a hell of an upgrade, because Siri

0:16:49.130 --> 0:16:50.550
<v Speaker 2>is dumb as a dog.

0:16:50.770 --> 0:16:53.220
<v Speaker 1>Which everybody agreed on. Not a smart dog. Which everybody

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.660
<v Speaker 1>agreed on. It's like asking a fourth grader to help

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.220
<v Speaker 1>you with something. I don't know.

0:16:59.420 --> 0:17:01.739
<v Speaker 2>But Siri's supposed to be full AI quality now, and

0:17:01.780 --> 0:17:05.700
<v Speaker 2>that'd be pretty cool. I did use the newest version

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.790
<v Speaker 2>of editing photos.

0:17:08.609 --> 0:17:10.169
<v Speaker 3>It's so amazing.

0:17:10.850 --> 0:17:13.790
<v Speaker 2>The scrubbing thing, where you scrub stuff out that you

0:17:13.830 --> 0:17:15.889
<v Speaker 2>don't want in the picture. I don't know how it

0:17:15.930 --> 0:17:18.859
<v Speaker 2>even does that. But I took a picture of a

0:17:18.900 --> 0:17:21.700
<v Speaker 2>cool motorcycle at a gas station, and there was a

0:17:21.780 --> 0:17:23.659
<v Speaker 2>car behind it, made it hard to see, and so

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.990
<v Speaker 2>I touched the car. It lit up, got rid of

0:17:26.010 --> 0:17:29.670
<v Speaker 2>the car, and filled in the background in a way

0:17:29.710 --> 0:17:32.790
<v Speaker 2>that looked perfectly real with, like, street.

0:17:32.510 --> 0:17:33.530
<v Speaker 1>And bushes and stuff.

0:17:34.270 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Like, how did it do that? But it's witchcraft. It's unnatural.

0:17:39.260 --> 0:17:45.180
<v Speaker 3>It goes against God, in my opinion. day we were

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.770
<v Speaker 3>talking about something she said i watched the video and

0:17:47.790 --> 0:17:50.490
<v Speaker 3>then we all realized together well it doesn't mean anything

0:17:51.210 --> 0:17:54.030
<v Speaker 3>right whether i saw the picture of him right that

0:17:54.050 --> 0:17:55.729
<v Speaker 3>means nothing.

0:17:57.170 --> 0:17:59.379
<v Speaker 2>We're talking to steve hilton who's running for governor in

0:17:59.390 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>california man is.

0:18:00.780 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 3>He bringing the thunder against the half-wit javier becerra can't

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>wait for the chat stay with us.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 4>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:24.430 --> 0:18:26.010
<v Speaker 3>You got Ro Khanna. Yeah.

0:18:26.190 --> 0:18:26.750
<v Speaker 2>Kamala.

0:18:27.170 --> 0:18:27.430
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:27.590 --> 0:18:28.850
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if she runs, but we'll see. I

0:18:29.310 --> 0:18:32.550
<v Speaker 3>know she's called around. Yeah. But I wouldn't run if

0:18:32.570 --> 0:18:36.409
<v Speaker 3>she ran. If she runs, you will not? Of course not.

0:18:36.450 --> 0:18:39.190
<v Speaker 3>Why would I? I wouldn't do that to her. I

0:18:39.190 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't do it to me.

0:18:39.859 --> 0:18:40.180
<v Speaker 2>Why would I?

0:18:40.170 --> 0:18:42.220
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't do that to you. I wouldn't waste everyone's time.

0:18:42.820 --> 0:18:43.380
<v Speaker 3>Who needs that?

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 8>What do you mean?

0:18:44.740 --> 0:18:46.590
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't even make sense to me.

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.770
<v Speaker 3>I just, I wouldn't. No, I wouldn't. First of all, electorally,

0:18:50.810 --> 0:18:53.450
<v Speaker 3>it's a gift from God for everybody else. They enjoy

0:18:53.470 --> 0:18:56.070
<v Speaker 3>the hell out of it. Mutual assured destruction. It services

0:18:56.130 --> 0:18:57.330
<v Speaker 3>no greater good.

0:18:58.690 --> 0:19:02.020
<v Speaker 2>That's Gavin Newsom with Jake Tapper who said what I

0:19:02.060 --> 0:19:04.460
<v Speaker 2>was thinking. Why the hell not? That doesn't make any

0:19:04.500 --> 0:19:08.060
<v Speaker 2>sense to me. When did that become a thing? I

0:19:08.100 --> 0:19:11.230
<v Speaker 2>was surprised when Marco Rubio came out and said, if J.D.

0:19:11.270 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Vance runs, I won't run. Well, when does that become

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:19.179
<v Speaker 2>a thing? Throughout my life of following politics, people that

0:19:19.220 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>were close friends would run against each other and tear

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>each other.

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Apart to get the nomination.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>When did we get to this point where, no, no, no,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:28.300
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't run against them.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.770
<v Speaker 1>We'd have to say bad things about each other.

0:19:30.950 --> 0:19:34.210
<v Speaker 3>What? Yeah, I think we're looking at a little seven-dimensional

0:19:34.290 --> 0:19:37.490
<v Speaker 3>chess here. The conniving class is conniving as they always do.

0:19:38.290 --> 0:19:41.430
<v Speaker 3>There are a number of explanations that leap to mind.

0:19:42.330 --> 0:19:45.869
<v Speaker 3>Number one, I'm not hiring Gavin Newsom as a political commentator.

0:19:45.890 --> 0:19:48.730
<v Speaker 3>That explanation didn't make any sense. He didn't say anything.

0:19:48.750 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to run if she runs.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I won't run. You won't? No, of course not. Why

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.340
<v Speaker 3>would I? What? That doesn't make any sense. I wouldn't

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.379
<v Speaker 3>waste their time. I wouldn't serve the greater good.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:03.419
<v Speaker 3>He is, he perceives in the dog, rip dog's throat

0:20:03.580 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 3>out dog world of politics. That she is above him

0:20:09.820 --> 0:20:14.500
<v Speaker 3>in some ways, which is testament to how stupid politics are.

0:20:15.500 --> 0:20:22.530
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that half-wit, that utterly incapable politician who was

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.949
<v Speaker 3>humiliated on a world stage. Kamala Harris is somehow above him.

0:20:26.210 --> 0:20:33.090
<v Speaker 3>But he perceives that. So for a couple reasons. So

0:20:33.190 --> 0:20:36.149
<v Speaker 3>when she bows out, he has not angered her. He

0:20:36.190 --> 0:20:40.149
<v Speaker 3>will get her support and her money. Secondly, he understands

0:20:40.470 --> 0:20:45.389
<v Speaker 3>she's still raising money based on this ridiculous idea that

0:20:45.430 --> 0:20:48.990
<v Speaker 3>she'll run again. And he's not going to F with

0:20:49.060 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 3>her hustle, as Louis Armstrong famously said once, one of

0:20:51.619 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 3>my favorite quotes, because he doesn't need to now.

0:20:54.890 --> 0:20:57.129
<v Speaker 2>Well, do you think they're coordinating anyway? Like, he has

0:20:57.190 --> 0:20:59.790
<v Speaker 2>talked to Kamala's people. He knows she's not running, so

0:20:59.830 --> 0:21:03.410
<v Speaker 2>he's perfectly comfortable saying that. I mean, if she announces

0:21:03.450 --> 0:21:07.270
<v Speaker 2>she's running, is he really going to not take his

0:21:07.330 --> 0:21:10.690
<v Speaker 2>shot to, quote, Alexander Hamilton, shoot his shot?

0:21:11.470 --> 0:21:16.130
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think, well, you offered several different possibilities there.

0:21:16.869 --> 0:21:21.150
<v Speaker 3>It could be they're coordinating or the grapevine is reliable

0:21:21.190 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>enough that He's made the judgment she's not running. And

0:21:24.500 --> 0:21:26.980
<v Speaker 3>I don't think she is. I mean, she's just offering

0:21:27.020 --> 0:21:29.790
<v Speaker 3>herself up for horrible humiliation again.

0:21:30.810 --> 0:21:32.230
<v Speaker 1>As a guy who's done that a few times in

0:21:32.250 --> 0:21:33.810
<v Speaker 1>his life, I don't suggest doing it again.

0:21:34.420 --> 0:21:39.370
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but again, I don't fully understand the palace intrigue

0:21:39.660 --> 0:21:43.850
<v Speaker 3>that I was trying to explain before, but he perceives

0:21:44.170 --> 0:21:49.990
<v Speaker 3>that playing the loyal, oh, that hero to America, Kamala Harris, no.

0:21:50.250 --> 0:21:54.389
<v Speaker 2>Oh, of course not. If George Washington runs, all of

0:21:54.470 --> 0:21:57.429
<v Speaker 2>us will stand aside. He will run unopposed because we

0:21:57.470 --> 0:21:58.770
<v Speaker 2>all are in agreement he should be.

0:21:59.910 --> 0:22:03.550
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he looks less grasping, he looks like a team player,

0:22:03.570 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't anger the current queen of democratic politics. I

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:12.260
<v Speaker 3>don't know. He's probably AOC anyway, but yeah, it's a

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.980
<v Speaker 3>calculating thing. He doesn't mean a word he says.

0:22:15.380 --> 0:22:16.450
<v Speaker 1>So here's a dumb guy take.

0:22:17.330 --> 0:22:18.170
<v Speaker 3>What's with.

0:22:18.850 --> 0:22:22.869
<v Speaker 1>His mannerisms, his hand gestures, he's.

0:22:22.750 --> 0:22:27.889
<v Speaker 2>Got the most awkward, unnatural, the way he sits, the

0:22:27.950 --> 0:22:31.510
<v Speaker 2>way he moves his body, the way he gestures is

0:22:31.950 --> 0:22:36.620
<v Speaker 2>really weird. It doesn't mean anything, but I've seen enough

0:22:36.650 --> 0:22:37.980
<v Speaker 2>of those videos where.

0:22:37.820 --> 0:22:40.409
<v Speaker 3>It's, It's just, I don't know what that is.

0:22:40.490 --> 0:22:44.030
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of, it's quite effeminate. I, you know, I

0:22:44.090 --> 0:22:46.650
<v Speaker 2>almost hate to say that because I don't, that doesn't matter,

0:22:47.290 --> 0:22:48.070
<v Speaker 2>but it is.

0:22:48.130 --> 0:22:49.979
<v Speaker 1>He's just got a very kind of.

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Weird, flappy, I don't know what it is. Didn't, at

0:22:58.700 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 3>some point in our career, we accused him of wearing panties.

0:23:01.900 --> 0:23:03.770
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember. I'm sure you did.

0:23:03.790 --> 0:23:03.889
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:23:05.070 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps. Yeah, I have no idea. He's an odd duck.

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I'm not welcome amongst Marin County elite, so

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.899
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how they act like that, apparently.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Huh.

0:23:18.460 --> 0:23:23.070
<v Speaker 3>I don't. That's a new thing. What's that? Acting like

0:23:23.090 --> 0:23:23.410
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't?

0:23:23.490 --> 0:23:24.490
<v Speaker 1>No, the not.

0:23:24.450 --> 0:23:29.590
<v Speaker 2>Running against people because you think, because you're friends or.

0:23:31.330 --> 0:23:34.449
<v Speaker 2>You think they deserve the nomination? Well, you're assuming he

0:23:34.490 --> 0:23:36.550
<v Speaker 2>means it. Like I said, he doesn't.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:37.060
<v Speaker 3>Mean a word he says.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.620
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do you think Marco Rubio means it when he says,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.940
<v Speaker 1>if J.D. runs, I won't run?

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.180
<v Speaker 3>I actually do think that. But why?

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:44.820
<v Speaker 1>Again, that's a new thing.

0:23:46.780 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a totally different question because he's a totally different

0:23:49.020 --> 0:23:52.980
<v Speaker 3>human being. I think, A, he perceives that as the

0:23:53.020 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 3>sitting veep, he's just the presumptive go-to guy. Plus, at

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>this point, he gains nothing by even hinting that he

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.980
<v Speaker 3>might run. What I was going to say is, I

0:24:06.020 --> 0:24:10.780
<v Speaker 3>have no plans to run. And then later, you jump

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in with both feet. What you always intended to do,

0:24:13.980 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>that's as old as the hills. So they're just dressing

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:18.340
<v Speaker 3>it up differently, I think.

0:24:18.780 --> 0:24:21.180
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:24:22.010 --> 0:24:28.070
<v Speaker 2>I think Newsom is formidable, unfortunately. I think Kamala Harris

0:24:28.190 --> 0:24:33.530
<v Speaker 2>is embarrassing. So if she runs, that'll be Newsom.

0:24:34.350 --> 0:24:35.389
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I still say.

0:24:35.450 --> 0:24:36.949
<v Speaker 1>And keep him on the sideline?

0:24:36.990 --> 0:24:39.790
<v Speaker 3>Gavin does not have anywhere near the chops it takes

0:24:40.270 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>on a national level. Okay, if.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>She does run. Do you think he honors his commitment

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and sits this one out? I think that'd be a

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.190
<v Speaker 2>huge mistake. Barack Obama's the only one who played this

0:24:51.290 --> 0:24:53.750
<v Speaker 2>right in the last how many years? You've got to

0:24:53.830 --> 0:24:56.090
<v Speaker 2>go when you're hot. That hole, I'll wait for the

0:24:56.150 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 2>next time. Things move so fast in four years or

0:25:00.150 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 2>eight years. You're just Chris Christie waiting. You don't want

0:25:03.580 --> 0:25:06.179
<v Speaker 2>to wait. When you're hot and you've got the attention

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.050
<v Speaker 2>of people, you've got to go. So you think he'll

0:25:09.150 --> 0:25:10.650
<v Speaker 2>actually sit out of Kamloops?

0:25:10.690 --> 0:25:13.270
<v Speaker 1>The idiot runs.

0:25:13.590 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 3>No, no. Like I said, and this is, he shares

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>this in common with Rubio. There is no good that

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.060
<v Speaker 3>comes of saying, I'm going to take you on right now.

0:25:25.130 --> 0:25:29.810
<v Speaker 3>It's actually straight out of Sung Tu and the Chinese,

0:25:30.250 --> 0:25:33.210
<v Speaker 3>what is it, the 112 Principles or 26, I can't remember,

0:25:33.250 --> 0:25:36.090
<v Speaker 3>it's in a book right over there. But one of

0:25:36.109 --> 0:25:39.950
<v Speaker 3>the main strategies is do not show yourself as an

0:25:40.070 --> 0:25:46.940
<v Speaker 3>enemy until the last second. Be benign, be cooperative, be friendly,

0:25:47.140 --> 0:25:50.980
<v Speaker 3>act like an ally or at least a valuable trading

0:25:51.060 --> 0:25:53.340
<v Speaker 3>partner until the second you need to turn.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.340
<v Speaker 2>So that's what they're doing. Let me hit you with

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.890
<v Speaker 2>a quick thing, some quick polling that just came out.

0:26:00.990 --> 0:26:02.030
<v Speaker 3>Right after we tell you about.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.740
<v Speaker 3>Tell you about this. NordVPN. Your online life is busy.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Cyber threats never take a day off. We've noticed.

0:26:10.340 --> 0:26:13.750
<v Speaker 1>That's why you need NordVPN. So it's more than a VPN.

0:26:13.770 --> 0:26:16.649
<v Speaker 2>It's an all-in-one digital security app with tools designed to

0:26:16.690 --> 0:26:21.470
<v Speaker 2>help keep you safer online. NordVPN's built-in next-gen antivirus works

0:26:21.580 --> 0:26:23.970
<v Speaker 2>quietly in the background, helping protect you 24-7.

0:26:25.470 --> 0:26:28.270
<v Speaker 3>It scans website urls warns you about scams helps you

0:26:28.290 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>stop fake pages linked to malware phishing and fraud it

0:26:31.020 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 3>also scans files as you download them blocks intrusive ads

0:26:34.820 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 3>and stops trackers from following your browsing habits even has a.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Dark web monitor i like that knowing if my stuff's

0:26:40.859 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>floating around on the dark web so.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.510
<v Speaker 3>Whether you're checking banking sites using apps or simply browsing

0:26:45.530 --> 0:26:48.730
<v Speaker 3>nord vpn is security made simple helping provide an extra

0:26:48.750 --> 0:26:50.869
<v Speaker 3>layer of digital protection yeah it.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.060
<v Speaker 2>Turn it on with just a few clicks across all

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.900
<v Speaker 2>your devices and let NordVPN help protect your digital life.

0:26:57.420 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Go big on your online protection.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Visit NordVPN.com and get NordVPN with a next-gen antivirus. NordVPN.com. NordVPN.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:08.170
<v Speaker 3>Connect and protect.

0:27:08.510 --> 0:27:11.409
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about my experience trying to get

0:27:11.470 --> 0:27:14.409
<v Speaker 2>on a jury yesterday and getting booted off and everything

0:27:14.970 --> 0:27:15.570
<v Speaker 2>at some point.

0:27:15.590 --> 0:27:17.630
<v Speaker 1>What did you have coming up that you're all excited about?

0:27:20.190 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm scolding America that these nice people are not communists.

0:27:25.060 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 3>They dabble in socialism a bit, but they're certainly not communists.

0:27:28.859 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a red scare. And then we will take you

0:27:31.220 --> 0:27:36.100
<v Speaker 3>inside the DSA and there are many caucuses within, you know,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 3>like the Democratic Party has the Blue Dog Caucus or whatever.

0:27:39.780 --> 0:27:41.550
<v Speaker 3>They have that within the DSA. Crazy.

0:27:42.850 --> 0:27:45.290
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday may be the day that.

0:27:45.150 --> 0:27:48.860
<v Speaker 2>We officially drew lines in the whole AI thing. Republicans

0:27:48.910 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>are going to be– AI is overblown. It's nothing to

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>worry about. It's a hoax for people who claim it is.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And Democrats are going to be the people who say

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.139
<v Speaker 2>be afraid, be very afraid about AI.

0:27:59.660 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And those are the tribes.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.020
<v Speaker 2>I hope that's not what happened because I don't want

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 2>this to be one of those topics. But it may

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.020
<v Speaker 2>very well be as of yesterday because of what Trump said,

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:09.340
<v Speaker 2>what Obama said, etc.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.140
<v Speaker 1>etc. We'll get to that in hour three probably. Lots

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on the way.

0:28:12.619 --> 0:28:13.020
<v Speaker 3>Stay here.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:24.290
<v Speaker 9>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:28:24.330 --> 0:28:26.030
<v Speaker 4>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:28:29.450 --> 0:28:31.949
<v Speaker 2>So, I'm going to do a little glimpse behind the

0:28:31.990 --> 0:28:33.850
<v Speaker 2>scenes here that I think is kind of interesting. Hanson

0:28:33.869 --> 0:28:35.570
<v Speaker 2>just told me this story. So, we were supposed to

0:28:35.609 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>have Steve Hilton on. If you're a Fox fan, you've

0:28:38.780 --> 0:28:40.660
<v Speaker 2>seen him on Fox many, many times. He had his

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>own show. He's running for governor in California. Biggest state

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:46.580
<v Speaker 2>in the union.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Big deal.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.030
<v Speaker 1>He's the Republican nominee. That's a really big deal. I

0:28:50.230 --> 0:28:51.410
<v Speaker 1>don't think he has a chance to win.

0:28:52.010 --> 0:28:52.260
<v Speaker 3>Um....

0:28:53.650 --> 0:28:57.130
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he would hate me saying that, but Lon

0:28:57.150 --> 0:29:00.410
<v Speaker 2>He Chen, our friend Lon He, who got more votes

0:29:00.450 --> 0:29:03.470
<v Speaker 2>than any Republican in the entire United States that election,

0:29:03.750 --> 0:29:06.470
<v Speaker 2>with the backing of the LA Times and the San

0:29:06.530 --> 0:29:07.630
<v Speaker 2>Francisco Chronicle.

0:29:08.530 --> 0:29:11.670
<v Speaker 3>Every major paper in the state, yes. Couldn't win.

0:29:12.290 --> 0:29:15.450
<v Speaker 2>And made the point that this state is so freaking

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.820
<v Speaker 2>mobbed up with the unions and all the different political.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.020
<v Speaker 3>Actors, it's just... Yeah, every time you bring that up,

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.260
<v Speaker 3>I always reply with this. Even if he just makes

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.740
<v Speaker 3>his point good and loud and wakes up a certain

0:29:27.790 --> 0:29:30.510
<v Speaker 3>percentage of the population, moves the ball down the field,

0:29:30.590 --> 0:29:33.590
<v Speaker 3>next election maybe the Republican has a chance.

0:29:33.690 --> 0:29:36.050
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying don't run or try, but I just

0:29:36.070 --> 0:29:36.550
<v Speaker 2>don't think he would.

0:29:36.890 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But I've always wondered what it's like. in a losing campaign.

0:29:41.700 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be, I can't imagine the stress and the...

0:29:47.180 --> 0:29:49.430
<v Speaker 2>And the finger pointing that just I feel like is

0:29:49.490 --> 0:29:52.930
<v Speaker 2>inevitable if you're in one of those situations. Anyway, we're

0:29:52.970 --> 0:29:54.390
<v Speaker 2>trying to get him on the phone and we're having

0:29:54.430 --> 0:29:55.530
<v Speaker 2>some sort of problem.

0:29:55.330 --> 0:29:58.370
<v Speaker 3>With the line. How did that go down? Executive producer Hanson.

0:29:58.450 --> 0:30:01.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there was a bit of maybe miscommunication

0:30:01.930 --> 0:30:03.690
<v Speaker 2>with the staff, first of all.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.860
<v Speaker 1>But then secondly... Phone systems just.

0:30:06.780 --> 0:30:09.580
<v Speaker 2>Suck these days. You know, we can't even use them anymore.

0:30:09.620 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And he had a bad connection.

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>So it was, it's a landline, but this is terrible.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.850
<v Speaker 2>And he was pissed. But he wanted to come on

0:30:21.890 --> 0:30:23.250
<v Speaker 2>and talk to you guys. He had a big plan

0:30:23.270 --> 0:30:25.470
<v Speaker 2>and a big event he's got going today. But yeah,

0:30:25.650 --> 0:30:28.750
<v Speaker 2>Hanson said he was quite livid and with lots of

0:30:29.410 --> 0:30:34.150
<v Speaker 2>flowery language on whatever had happened. And I just I

0:30:34.190 --> 0:30:38.260
<v Speaker 2>just think that I can't believe what imagine what it

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 2>feels like when you're trying to push the boulder up

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the hill in a campaign when you're up against all

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:45.220
<v Speaker 2>these different forces.

0:30:45.860 --> 0:30:49.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's hard enough. Oh, my gosh. Stupid stuff.

0:30:49.850 --> 0:30:50.250
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:30:50.270 --> 0:30:50.870
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:30:51.370 --> 0:30:53.050
<v Speaker 2>I wish Hanson could use the language he used on

0:30:53.090 --> 0:30:57.670
<v Speaker 2>me when he said I was the one online working.

0:30:58.290 --> 0:31:00.410
<v Speaker 2>But you just, you'd have that feeling of, well, it's

0:31:00.430 --> 0:31:02.590
<v Speaker 2>like watching a team lose a football game. It'd be

0:31:02.630 --> 0:31:06.130
<v Speaker 2>exactly like the Denver Broncos sideline last night. It'd just

0:31:06.170 --> 0:31:08.270
<v Speaker 2>be like, damn, nothing is working.

0:31:08.330 --> 0:31:13.650
<v Speaker 1>How did you, we're already, ah! It would be so frustrating.

0:31:14.690 --> 0:31:15.710
<v Speaker 1>Or the Rams the other night.

0:31:15.890 --> 0:31:16.550
<v Speaker 3>You got to regroup.

0:31:17.390 --> 0:31:20.310
<v Speaker 2>So what am I allowed to say or not allowed

0:31:20.370 --> 0:31:22.820
<v Speaker 2>to say about my jury situation?

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I can say anything now, right?

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:25.780
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:31:27.950 --> 0:31:31.420
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so legally I can say anything. Since I got

0:31:31.460 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>booted off, I didn't make the jury the trial that

0:31:33.420 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>starts today. Legally I can say anything.

0:31:35.460 --> 0:31:36.180
<v Speaker 3>How about ethically?

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.860
<v Speaker 2>Ethically, I wouldn't say much about the case. I don't

0:31:42.900 --> 0:31:45.550
<v Speaker 2>need to say anything about the case. Really, I don't think.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's it. That's other than that. I mean, so

0:31:49.300 --> 0:31:50.580
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't slander anybody.

0:31:50.980 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So there is a fair amount of luck if you've

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.090
<v Speaker 2>never done this before or made it this far. There's

0:31:56.110 --> 0:31:57.510
<v Speaker 2>a fair amount of luck to ending up on a

0:31:57.550 --> 0:32:00.510
<v Speaker 2>jury just because I have gone a bunch of times

0:32:00.550 --> 0:32:02.270
<v Speaker 2>where you got a big room of people and they say,

0:32:02.310 --> 0:32:04.090
<v Speaker 2>everybody who's an A, you can go home.

0:32:04.490 --> 0:32:05.330
<v Speaker 3>Everybody is a B.

0:32:05.850 --> 0:32:07.390
<v Speaker 1>OK, so the B's made it to the next step.

0:32:08.230 --> 0:32:11.450
<v Speaker 2>You know for just random reasons they're randomly picking all

0:32:11.470 --> 0:32:13.940
<v Speaker 2>these different people then i finally made it into the

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.740
<v Speaker 2>room and then then it's the random who gets to

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.180
<v Speaker 2>sit in the 12 seats that are the most likely

0:32:20.220 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>people to end up on the jury unless they're disqualified

0:32:23.060 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>for some reason or whatever and i made it to

0:32:25.460 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that step so i was going to be juror number

0:32:28.140 --> 0:32:30.690
<v Speaker 2>nine and i was very excited about this i thought.

0:32:30.610 --> 0:32:32.090
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be on a dang jury and i

0:32:32.150 --> 0:32:33.890
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be and uh.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.140
<v Speaker 2>Went through all kinds of different questioning and filled out

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.100
<v Speaker 2>this form and did all these different things. And I

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.450
<v Speaker 2>had no problem with any of the things anybody brought up.

0:32:43.570 --> 0:32:45.950
<v Speaker 2>Unlike one other trial I was on one time where

0:32:46.010 --> 0:32:48.190
<v Speaker 2>I just thought the point of view of one of

0:32:48.230 --> 0:32:50.930
<v Speaker 2>the lawyers was ridiculous. And I got booted off for

0:32:50.990 --> 0:32:53.490
<v Speaker 2>obvious reasons.

0:32:53.510 --> 0:32:55.620
<v Speaker 1>I was in line with everybody else on this one.

0:32:57.670 --> 0:33:01.370
<v Speaker 2>And there are other people that had problems with some

0:33:01.410 --> 0:33:04.210
<v Speaker 2>of the instructions, like really a lot of questions. I'm

0:33:04.230 --> 0:33:07.070
<v Speaker 2>not sure if I can, like this one I'd never heard.

0:33:07.250 --> 0:33:10.140
<v Speaker 2>I'd never heard this before. This is a law in California,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>and maybe it only applies to misdemeanors. I don't know.

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.620
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get far enough to get to full jury instructions.

0:33:14.980 --> 0:33:19.380
<v Speaker 2>But it was, are you okay with convicting someone, finding

0:33:19.420 --> 0:33:21.980
<v Speaker 2>someone guilty on the testimony of one witness?

0:33:22.010 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:33:22.780 --> 0:33:25.220
<v Speaker 2>All we have is one person's version of the story.

0:33:25.740 --> 0:33:29.380
<v Speaker 2>By law in California, you can find somebody guilty on

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the testimony of one person.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:33.940
<v Speaker 1>And the question was, are you okay with that?

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And there were a couple of people like, I don't

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>know if I can find somebody guilty based on one

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.420
<v Speaker 2>person's word. And so they questioned it, but they didn't

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:46.350
<v Speaker 2>get kicked off. I said I had no problem with that. Also,

0:33:46.380 --> 0:33:48.090
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that was a thing. I'd never really

0:33:48.110 --> 0:33:50.270
<v Speaker 2>thought about it before, but I suppose it has to be.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.540
<v Speaker 3>I don't– I'm surprised there are any laws to that

0:33:55.740 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 3>on that question at all. It's up to the jury

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.540
<v Speaker 3>to decide whether the state has made their case.

0:34:01.100 --> 0:34:01.340
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:10.090
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, so they went through the– so the judge allowed–

0:34:10.110 --> 0:34:14.050
<v Speaker 2>a few people got replaced who had had similar crimes

0:34:14.110 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 2>in their lives and for obvious reasons. shouldn't be on

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.140
<v Speaker 2>the jury and all that sort of stuff. Then they

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:24.060
<v Speaker 2>did a sidebar with the two attorneys, come back, and

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:30.790
<v Speaker 2>the prosecuting attorney who works for the county, when he

0:34:30.810 --> 0:34:33.050
<v Speaker 2>was given his couple of choices to boot people.

0:34:32.850 --> 0:34:37.029
<v Speaker 1>Off, juror nine, I mean immediately. And here's what I

0:34:37.050 --> 0:34:37.630
<v Speaker 1>think happened.

0:34:40.300 --> 0:34:44.390
<v Speaker 2>I got the look from him that, When I first

0:34:44.450 --> 0:34:47.330
<v Speaker 2>saw him, that I get at grocery stores, that I

0:34:47.370 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>get at schools, that I get at various places, as

0:34:50.060 --> 0:34:54.250
<v Speaker 2>a minor celebrity. It's just you come to know the

0:34:54.290 --> 0:34:57.169
<v Speaker 2>look if you're, and I mean minor, but if you're

0:34:57.190 --> 0:35:00.210
<v Speaker 2>a minor celebrity, there's a certain look people give when

0:35:00.250 --> 0:35:01.910
<v Speaker 2>they look your way, and then they kind of get

0:35:01.989 --> 0:35:03.770
<v Speaker 2>wide-eyed like, oh, I know who you are.

0:35:03.790 --> 0:35:05.380
<v Speaker 3>Right, you see the recognition.

0:35:05.410 --> 0:35:08.299
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you get used to it because I'm about

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.819
<v Speaker 2>to have a conversation about the radio show, which is fine.

0:35:11.380 --> 0:35:14.540
<v Speaker 3>Usually followed with the middle finger, generally speaking. Or a

0:35:14.580 --> 0:35:16.940
<v Speaker 3>punch right in the stomach. Right in the stomach.

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Oof.

0:35:17.860 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 3>No, actually, it's usually followed by lovely, lovely people.

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think I got that look from the guy,

0:35:22.780 --> 0:35:27.569
<v Speaker 2>and I think he thought, all things being equal, I'd

0:35:27.630 --> 0:35:30.660
<v Speaker 2>rather not have this case discussed at length next week

0:35:30.700 --> 0:35:33.410
<v Speaker 2>when it's over. I don't see any upside to that.

0:35:33.430 --> 0:35:36.310
<v Speaker 2>Because I would have. I would have discussed it at length.

0:35:36.870 --> 0:35:40.649
<v Speaker 2>The jury deliberation, the crime, all.

0:35:40.570 --> 0:35:41.169
<v Speaker 1>The different stuff.

0:35:41.510 --> 0:35:44.980
<v Speaker 2>Even if I was perfectly happy with the verdict, I

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:45.940
<v Speaker 2>would have talked about it at length.

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.940
<v Speaker 3>And my guess would be he thought, I just don't

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.419
<v Speaker 3>want that. Yeah, I speculated via text. We were talking

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>about this. When was it? Last night?

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:54.890
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.460
<v Speaker 3>He was afraid perhaps you'd said or tweeted something ridiculous,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.060
<v Speaker 3>like they wouldn't arrest him if they weren't guilty, which

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.089
<v Speaker 3>is what you tweeted the other day, right? Yeah. But,

0:36:07.290 --> 0:36:09.690
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's hard to say. It's hard to say.

0:36:09.710 --> 0:36:12.790
<v Speaker 3>I like your theory. He just thought, all things being equal,

0:36:13.110 --> 0:36:15.070
<v Speaker 3>I don't need the possible headache.

0:36:15.290 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Because there was another person, I don't know if this

0:36:17.739 --> 0:36:19.739
<v Speaker 2>would be cool or not since the trial is in session,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>but there was another high-level media person.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 3>They didn't get booted.

0:36:24.260 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>But they're not, they're retired. They're not going to go

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 2>on the radio and talk at length about every bit

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 2>of the, you know, and maybe make comments about the

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 2>lawyers and all kinds.

0:36:33.820 --> 0:36:38.779
<v Speaker 1>That's the way I am, you know. Yeah, yeah. So

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.810
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why I got booted. which is disappointing.

0:36:42.390 --> 0:36:45.049
<v Speaker 3>And I was hurt. I mean, I thought, I'm in.

0:36:45.070 --> 0:36:47.770
<v Speaker 2>I was already planning, I was already working out the

0:36:47.810 --> 0:36:49.549
<v Speaker 2>childcare situation, like how am I going to get my

0:36:49.590 --> 0:36:51.500
<v Speaker 2>kids picked up into Boy Scouts and the sports and

0:36:51.620 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 2>different sort of stuff. With the trial, it was going

0:36:53.580 --> 0:36:55.299
<v Speaker 2>to be quite an interruption for my life. I was

0:36:55.340 --> 0:36:56.900
<v Speaker 2>picking out what I was going to wear because it's

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:58.860
<v Speaker 2>really hot in there, so I'm going to decide to

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.299
<v Speaker 2>wear this. I was maybe going to talk to the

0:37:01.420 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>one juror who smelled like In-N-Out.

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:04.540
<v Speaker 1>Hey, what did you do? Go to In-N-Out and take

0:37:04.580 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the cheeseburgers and rub them.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 3>On your body? Yeah, that's a good thing to say

0:37:08.500 --> 0:37:09.460
<v Speaker 3>in the jury box, yes.

0:37:09.940 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Because somebody, after the long hour and a half lunch break,

0:37:13.410 --> 0:37:16.970
<v Speaker 2>smelled like somebody stuck an In-N-Out cheeseburger on my face.

0:37:17.350 --> 0:37:19.029
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you eat in a place like that, you're

0:37:19.050 --> 0:37:20.290
<v Speaker 1>going to stink like a burger.

0:37:20.310 --> 0:37:21.450
<v Speaker 3>See, but this is part of the bargain.

0:37:21.530 --> 0:37:24.090
<v Speaker 2>This is the very sort of comment, what I just made,

0:37:24.450 --> 0:37:26.990
<v Speaker 2>that he thought, I don't need this, and he booted

0:37:27.010 --> 0:37:27.410
<v Speaker 2>me off.

0:37:27.730 --> 0:37:30.910
<v Speaker 1>But I walked to my car... My heart hurt like

0:37:30.969 --> 0:37:32.090
<v Speaker 1>I got dumped.

0:37:31.730 --> 0:37:32.540
<v Speaker 4>By a girlfriend.

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.460
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, what? I'm not good enough for this?

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.070
<v Speaker 3>Rejected by the justice system that's desperate for jurors.

0:37:40.130 --> 0:37:41.450
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:37:41.489 --> 0:37:43.890
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that hurt. Well, not on a jury.

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:46.859
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong and Getty.