WEBVTT - It Just Doesn't Matter!

0:00:07.260 --> 0:00:11.110
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:11.130 --> 0:00:13.110
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:13.170 --> 0:00:15.370
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:15.550 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:17.100 --> 0:00:31.250
<v Speaker 4>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty. Chinese are extremely sensitive

0:00:31.810 --> 0:00:35.860
<v Speaker 4>about these nuances in diplomacy. They've been at it for

0:00:35.860 --> 0:00:39.420
<v Speaker 4>4,000 years. The Chinese, when they get upset, can do

0:00:39.500 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 4>things like take over an island here or there or

0:00:42.500 --> 0:00:46.100
<v Speaker 4>tear up an agreement or start threatening or do other

0:00:46.140 --> 0:00:48.459
<v Speaker 4>things that could cause a crisis.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's interesting. That's Charles Krauthammer, the late Charles Krauthammer,

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>who we were big fans of back in the day, 2016.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.780
<v Speaker 3>When I suppose who was Trump got elected in 16.

0:01:03.780 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 3>So was that the end of Obama? Anyway, Chinese care

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.830
<v Speaker 3>about these little tiny snubs and that sort of stuff.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.630
<v Speaker 3>So you have to be very, very careful with the

0:01:15.690 --> 0:01:19.690
<v Speaker 3>diplomacy and the showing up at the airport like Trump

0:01:19.709 --> 0:01:21.530
<v Speaker 3>did last night and the red carpet and having the

0:01:21.569 --> 0:01:23.990
<v Speaker 3>right fork in the right place and all that sort

0:01:24.010 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, I guess. Whatever. Get over yourselves, is what

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.100
<v Speaker 3>I would say. So President Xi is in Washington, D.C.,

0:01:32.690 --> 0:01:35.070
<v Speaker 3>and they're having their big dinner tonight. And let's get

0:01:35.110 --> 0:01:39.450
<v Speaker 3>a report from Lucas Tomlinson of Fox with what's going on.

0:01:39.950 --> 0:01:42.910
<v Speaker 5>The relationship between the United States and China will define

0:01:42.950 --> 0:01:43.850
<v Speaker 5>the 21st century.

0:01:43.950 --> 0:01:47.620
<v Speaker 6>Not everyone is thrilled about Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 6>to the White House after reports surfaced that China was

0:01:50.420 --> 0:01:54.100
<v Speaker 6>supplying satellite imagery to help Iran kill American troops in

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.970
<v Speaker 6>recent months. Among the critics, the Senate Armed Services Committee's

0:01:58.130 --> 0:01:59.020
<v Speaker 6>top Republican.

0:01:59.390 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 7>I would have suggested the president not invite Xi Jinping

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.500
<v Speaker 7>to Washington for such a lavish welcome.

0:02:07.780 --> 0:02:10.660
<v Speaker 6>Secretary Rubio reacting to that suggestion today.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.540
<v Speaker 5>This is the second largest economy in the world and

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 5>a pretty substantial military that's undergoing the most rapid military

0:02:16.900 --> 0:02:18.180
<v Speaker 5>buildup probably in history.

0:02:18.540 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So I thought that interesting back and forth over the

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.820
<v Speaker 3>last couple of days. was worth noting i mean the

0:02:24.980 --> 0:02:28.579
<v Speaker 3>chair of the armed services committee is no uh is

0:02:28.620 --> 0:02:31.299
<v Speaker 3>not a nobody and him thinking it's a bad idea

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 3>to have g come now i saw uh whoa who's

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.870
<v Speaker 3>that democratic senator who pretended he was a vietnam war

0:02:37.930 --> 0:02:40.430
<v Speaker 3>hero and turned out not to be blumenthal i can't

0:02:40.470 --> 0:02:43.029
<v Speaker 3>believe that he still gets to be a senator and

0:02:43.350 --> 0:02:46.470
<v Speaker 3>discuss military matters as a guy who claimed to be

0:02:46.990 --> 0:02:51.070
<v Speaker 3>a big time vietnam war vet with all these honors

0:02:51.090 --> 0:02:53.220
<v Speaker 3>and everything like that and he didn't go at all.

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It just shows you the way politics are. Anyway, I

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 3>couldn't tell if Blumenthal, if this was just partisan, anything

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump does is wrong, or if he actually thought we

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.570
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't invite President Xi. I don't know, and I don't

0:03:06.650 --> 0:03:08.690
<v Speaker 3>actually know what is the right answer on this. It

0:03:08.750 --> 0:03:13.150
<v Speaker 3>is pretty weird. President Xi is financing Iran. We are

0:03:13.250 --> 0:03:18.170
<v Speaker 3>at war with Iran. President Xi is daily attacking us.

0:03:18.190 --> 0:03:21.130
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this for years. The FBI opens up, what,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.350
<v Speaker 3>like 100 new investigations into Chinese hacks per day or

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.940
<v Speaker 3>something like that? And we get together and have dinner

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.500
<v Speaker 3>and smile at each other and act like we're friends.

0:03:30.780 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the point of all that is. Anyway,

0:03:33.580 --> 0:03:34.310
<v Speaker 3>the report rolls on.

0:03:34.890 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 6>Talks on trade and artificial intelligence are expected to dominate

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 6>the summit in Washington, the leader's first meeting since Xi

0:03:41.660 --> 0:03:45.380
<v Speaker 6>hosted Trump in Beijing in May. President Trump mentioned China

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.630
<v Speaker 6>only one time in his UN address, vowing the U.S.

0:03:48.870 --> 0:03:50.330
<v Speaker 6>must win the AI race.

0:03:50.350 --> 0:03:53.500
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to stifle growth of something that will

0:03:53.540 --> 0:03:55.580
<v Speaker 4>be bigger than the Industrial Revolution.

0:03:55.740 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 3>And we will be very careful.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 6>After Trump called on Putin to end his war on

0:04:00.140 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Ukraine at the UN, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thinks she

0:04:04.380 --> 0:04:05.780
<v Speaker 6>can help make that happen.

0:04:05.900 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 8>He is someone who can influence Russia, too, more than many,

0:04:10.500 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 8>many others can.

0:04:11.500 --> 0:04:15.740
<v Speaker 3>I'm not optimistic about that either. I'm really stuck on

0:04:15.780 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 3>this whole UN speeches, fancy meals is really close to worthless.

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.860
<v Speaker 3>The amount of coverage it gets as a ratio to

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>how important it is, is way out of. I mean,

0:04:30.060 --> 0:04:32.349
<v Speaker 3>every television bank I'm looking at right now has got

0:04:32.380 --> 0:04:35.589
<v Speaker 3>some picture of Trump and she and coming on the

0:04:35.630 --> 0:04:38.089
<v Speaker 3>plane and talking about the speeches from yesterday. And I

0:04:38.130 --> 0:04:42.330
<v Speaker 3>just I just don't think it means anything. Maybe I'm naive,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.300
<v Speaker 3>but show me the results of previous stuff a week

0:04:45.420 --> 0:04:49.380
<v Speaker 3>from now. Tell me what from these speeches at the U.N.

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.710
<v Speaker 3>or this meal we'll be talking about as a as

0:04:52.770 --> 0:04:56.850
<v Speaker 3>a still ongoing result of this. Anything at all? I'm

0:04:57.410 --> 0:05:01.530
<v Speaker 3>beyond skeptical. I want to hear how CBS approached this.

0:05:01.570 --> 0:05:03.610
<v Speaker 3>Give me 44. This is Nancy Cordes.

0:05:04.029 --> 0:05:04.469
<v Speaker 9>The U.S.

0:05:04.529 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 10>And China are at odds over AI, trade, and most importantly, Iran.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.980
<v Speaker 3>Trump, stop fawning over strongmen.

0:05:13.700 --> 0:05:15.620
<v Speaker 11>Stop calling Xi a great gentleman.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.010
<v Speaker 10>Lawmakers from both sides urged Trump to dial back the

0:05:20.050 --> 0:05:20.810
<v Speaker 10>warm welcome.

0:05:21.110 --> 0:05:25.710
<v Speaker 7>His guest is a brutal, unelected, and oppressive dictator.

0:05:26.860 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 3>OK, so that from Schumer. Now, that was just partisan politics.

0:05:31.779 --> 0:05:35.900
<v Speaker 3>Barack Obama welcomed President Xi also. And at that time,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.339
<v Speaker 3>we we already knew President Xi was an evil communist

0:05:39.380 --> 0:05:42.940
<v Speaker 3>dictator who had slaves and was hacking into everything he

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:44.740
<v Speaker 3>could hack in and stealing our technology and all the

0:05:44.779 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>bad things he was doing back then. And he welcomed him.

0:05:47.100 --> 0:05:49.020
<v Speaker 3>So let's God, I wish we didn't have to play

0:05:49.050 --> 0:05:54.070
<v Speaker 3>these partisan games all the time. Something a little more concrete.

0:05:54.230 --> 0:05:58.190
<v Speaker 3>Scott Besant, he is the Secretary of the Treasury, was

0:05:58.230 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>interviewed yesterday talking about how many meetings they might have.

0:06:03.860 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 12>This is our second in-person meeting. There's a chance they

0:06:06.540 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 12>may have a historic four meetings this year, four meetings

0:06:10.180 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 12>between the most powerful country in the world and the

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:19.099
<v Speaker 12>second largest economy in the world. Visit in Beijing, this visit,

0:06:19.740 --> 0:06:24.980
<v Speaker 12>visit to Shenzhen. for a conference in November, and then

0:06:25.020 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 12>President Xi coming for the G20 in Doral.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way, that G20 meeting in Florida, Trump invited

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Vladimir Putin to that. Now that one I definitely don't

0:06:39.820 --> 0:06:42.339
<v Speaker 3>think is cool, that you have Putin come to the

0:06:42.380 --> 0:06:46.570
<v Speaker 3>United States and eat dinner. with you and treated like

0:06:46.670 --> 0:06:49.650
<v Speaker 3>an equal on the world stage, like a, like any

0:06:49.710 --> 0:06:52.830
<v Speaker 3>sort of normal actor on the world stage. That is

0:06:52.950 --> 0:06:55.300
<v Speaker 3>just completely out of bounds. I don't know if Trump

0:06:55.420 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>just invited him knowing he won't come or the security

0:06:58.300 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 3>would not allow it to come or for all the

0:07:01.339 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 3>different reasons that it shouldn't happen. It won't happen. And

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 3>so he just invited him for, I don't know the

0:07:06.700 --> 0:07:10.500
<v Speaker 3>way Trump works people, but the idea of Vladimir Putin

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.910
<v Speaker 3>having dinner at the golf club in Florida, while he's

0:07:15.070 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>bombing children's hospitals in Ukraine. That's just appalling. Anyway, this

0:07:24.180 --> 0:07:27.190
<v Speaker 3>is the News Nation take on the whole AI angle

0:07:27.380 --> 0:07:29.710
<v Speaker 3>on the summit between Trump and Xi today.

0:07:30.230 --> 0:07:32.530
<v Speaker 9>Say the AI race is one of their top priorities

0:07:32.570 --> 0:07:34.330
<v Speaker 9>for this U.S.-China relationship.

0:07:35.150 --> 0:07:37.570
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this should be a focus.

0:07:37.150 --> 0:07:39.890
<v Speaker 9>Headed into today, just taking that into consideration?

0:07:40.270 --> 0:07:42.180
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not it should be a focus, it simply

0:07:42.310 --> 0:07:42.980
<v Speaker 2>is a focus.

0:07:43.860 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 12>Americans may not associate it directly with the China relationship,

0:07:47.660 --> 0:07:49.740
<v Speaker 12>but of course, it affects all of our lives.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I have a colleague who likes to say, it's like electricity.

0:07:52.740 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>You don't think about it, but it's part of absolutely everything.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>So of course, it's going into this summit. It's going

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>into our daily lives.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.780
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not optimistic that China has any interest in

0:08:03.820 --> 0:08:05.820
<v Speaker 3>playing ball on this whole AI thing. I was going

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.290
<v Speaker 3>to throw out a question to those of you.

0:08:07.310 --> 0:08:07.390
<v Speaker 4>I.

0:08:09.110 --> 0:08:13.470
<v Speaker 3>Got two questions. So, Executive Producer Hanson came up with

0:08:13.490 --> 0:08:18.790
<v Speaker 3>a good idea today. We need an AI Tim Beloyer.

0:08:18.890 --> 0:08:22.770
<v Speaker 3>If you've been fans of this show for years... we

0:08:22.830 --> 0:08:24.850
<v Speaker 3>used to talk about legal stuff and this guy named

0:08:24.910 --> 0:08:26.770
<v Speaker 3>Tim who happened to be a lawyer would call into

0:08:26.790 --> 0:08:29.060
<v Speaker 3>the show and say, Hey, good point about this, or

0:08:29.100 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you're wrong about this, or here's something you might want

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>to know about this thing you were talking about. And

0:08:34.020 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>over time, Tim became a regular guest and they know

0:08:36.620 --> 0:08:40.460
<v Speaker 3>he's fabulously successful and writes books that get national attention

0:08:40.500 --> 0:08:42.059
<v Speaker 3>and all that sort of stuff. But we'd love to

0:08:42.100 --> 0:08:44.479
<v Speaker 3>have an AI, Tim, the lawyer we know because we're

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.449
<v Speaker 3>on in Silicon Valley, we've been on in San Francisco

0:08:47.490 --> 0:08:49.969
<v Speaker 3>for 23 years now.

0:08:50.050 --> 0:08:50.250
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:08:51.330 --> 0:08:55.180
<v Speaker 3>Um, And all over the Bay Area, all over California,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:09:01.510
<v Speaker 3>around the country. If you are some sort of expert

0:09:01.550 --> 0:09:05.610
<v Speaker 3>around AI and you would like to either email us

0:09:05.690 --> 0:09:07.429
<v Speaker 3>or call in on a regular basis, or we could

0:09:07.450 --> 0:09:09.230
<v Speaker 3>just have you as a guest whenever we need to,

0:09:09.250 --> 0:09:11.750
<v Speaker 3>that would be fantastic. And here's one of the questions

0:09:11.830 --> 0:09:17.099
<v Speaker 3>I would ask. People keep portraying this race that we've

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.940
<v Speaker 3>got going on between us and China. Well, we can't

0:09:19.980 --> 0:09:23.010
<v Speaker 3>slow down on AI or China will win the race.

0:09:23.090 --> 0:09:26.950
<v Speaker 3>They'll get ahead of us. I've heard multiple reports that

0:09:26.990 --> 0:09:32.010
<v Speaker 3>China's basically six months behind us. Does that framework work?

0:09:32.370 --> 0:09:35.980
<v Speaker 3>Does that make any sense? Is there a getting to

0:09:36.020 --> 0:09:40.359
<v Speaker 3>the end, like getting there, that will give us an

0:09:40.420 --> 0:09:46.429
<v Speaker 3>advantage of any consequence over... China, if they get there,

0:09:46.510 --> 0:09:49.420
<v Speaker 3>whatever there means, if they get there six months later,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking of the whole nuclear race. Now, it was

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.430
<v Speaker 3>important for us getting nuclear weapons before Hitler did. Very,

0:09:56.470 --> 0:09:58.890
<v Speaker 3>very important for obvious reasons to end World War Two

0:09:58.929 --> 0:10:02.239
<v Speaker 3>or before Japan was. really working on a nuclear weapon

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.940
<v Speaker 3>or anywhere close. But Germany was and the Soviet Union

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>got one quickly. But, well, I guess that's part of

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.300
<v Speaker 3>my point. So we get there to to AGI, artificial

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.710
<v Speaker 3>general intelligence, where computers are programming themselves and everything like that.

0:10:17.340 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 3>If China gets there six months later, have we done anything,

0:10:21.420 --> 0:10:25.820
<v Speaker 3>won anything? Is that part of the whole conversation as

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.270
<v Speaker 3>important as it's portrayed all the time? We need to

0:10:28.330 --> 0:10:32.470
<v Speaker 3>stay ahead of China. Or what happens would be the

0:10:32.490 --> 0:10:35.030
<v Speaker 3>question I'd ask to whatever AI expert we have out there.

0:10:35.070 --> 0:10:41.610
<v Speaker 3>You can text us 415-295-KFTC or email or, you know,

0:10:41.650 --> 0:10:43.150
<v Speaker 3>we'll set up a phone call. Love to talk to

0:10:43.170 --> 0:10:47.620
<v Speaker 3>you about that. need to talk to you about this

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.420
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago i had reason to do

0:10:51.460 --> 0:10:54.020
<v Speaker 3>a little research on somebody and i had their phone

0:10:54.059 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 3>number and i thought i wonder what i can find

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>out about somebody based on their phone number i had

0:10:59.179 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>no idea this i was shocked i mean i'm naive

0:11:02.140 --> 0:11:04.100
<v Speaker 3>i didn't know there are all these websites where you

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 3>can pay like five dollars a month and you put

0:11:06.900 --> 0:11:09.450
<v Speaker 3>in somebody's phone number and you get all this information

0:11:09.490 --> 0:11:13.220
<v Speaker 3>and there are tons of websites like that um We

0:11:13.260 --> 0:11:16.230
<v Speaker 3>got this story. Authorities say a Kentucky officer ran the

0:11:16.270 --> 0:11:20.429
<v Speaker 3>same two license plates 2000 times. They belong to the

0:11:20.510 --> 0:11:23.770
<v Speaker 3>mother of his child. She had an order of protection

0:11:23.790 --> 0:11:25.949
<v Speaker 3>against him. He didn't hack anything. He just typed in

0:11:25.970 --> 0:11:30.050
<v Speaker 3>the plate. One of 120,000 cameras. The Washington Post found

0:11:30.090 --> 0:11:33.250
<v Speaker 3>at least 50 more. Most were watching women. So here

0:11:33.290 --> 0:11:36.829
<v Speaker 3>is what is happening. You've got logs of your license

0:11:36.929 --> 0:11:39.610
<v Speaker 3>plate and your locations and everything out there. You've got

0:11:39.670 --> 0:11:42.350
<v Speaker 3>all the information that you can get from a phone

0:11:42.390 --> 0:11:45.950
<v Speaker 3>number that I mentioned. It's all out there. They're data brokers.

0:11:46.010 --> 0:11:49.740
<v Speaker 3>They sell this stuff, home addresses, phone numbers, relatives, everywhere

0:11:49.790 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you've lived. Your habits, you don't want that stuff out

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 3>there for all kinds of safety reasons, all kinds of

0:11:56.140 --> 0:11:59.300
<v Speaker 3>marketing reasons. That's why we use Incogni, I use Incogni.

0:11:59.340 --> 0:12:02.100
<v Speaker 3>It sends removal requests to more than 420 data broker

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.780
<v Speaker 3>and people search sites, then follows up so that you

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.750
<v Speaker 3>don't get relisted. Go to Incogni.com slash Armstrong to get 60% off.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>That's Incogni.com slash Armstrong. They can't harm you if they

0:12:12.900 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>can't find you. I'm a big fan of that. As

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.339
<v Speaker 3>we move into this weird world where all your information

0:12:17.380 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>is floating around there on the web, and pretty soon AI,

0:12:19.780 --> 0:12:21.179
<v Speaker 3>you'll be able to tell, I bet I could do

0:12:21.220 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 3>this right now. Hey, AI, here's a phone number. Tell

0:12:24.620 --> 0:12:26.730
<v Speaker 3>me everything you can about this person and then do that.

0:12:26.830 --> 0:12:30.369
<v Speaker 3>Does AI go out there and scrub all those websites

0:12:30.429 --> 0:12:35.210
<v Speaker 3>and try to get all the information? Horrifying. So Heather Myers,

0:12:35.330 --> 0:12:37.750
<v Speaker 3>who's filling in for Katie Green doing news today, told

0:12:37.809 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>us a story that she's been following a little bit

0:12:39.929 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 3>earlier about, for the first time ever, a high school

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>degree isn't really worth that much less than a college degree.

0:12:45.500 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>We're going to get the details on that coming up.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:48.860
<v Speaker 3>That's a big story. Stay tuned.

0:12:50.220 --> 0:12:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:12:58.740 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 3>We did get a text about that Lizzie Borden series

0:13:07.100 --> 0:13:10.660
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix. They said it's really good, but very graphic,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.179
<v Speaker 3>so beware. Okay, so if you aren't the sort of

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>person that wants to see a hatcheting, maybe don't watch that.

0:13:17.940 --> 0:13:20.220
<v Speaker 3>Heather Myers is nice enough to fill in for Katie

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Green for a couple of days while Katie is doing

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 3>her anniversary trip. Heather is a longtime TV host and

0:13:27.460 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a correspondent for Newsmax right now. And what was the

0:13:30.020 --> 0:13:31.949
<v Speaker 3>story you covered the other day that caught my attention?

0:13:32.610 --> 0:13:35.630
<v Speaker 9>This caught my attention too, Jack, because I have a

0:13:35.670 --> 0:13:36.670
<v Speaker 9>high school-aged son.

0:13:36.710 --> 0:13:37.790
<v Speaker 11>I believe you do too.

0:13:38.390 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 9>So for decades, young Americans have been told that that

0:13:41.580 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 9>four-year college degree is the immediate ticket to a good job.

0:13:46.020 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 9>But there's brand new data coming out about our labor

0:13:48.460 --> 0:13:51.860
<v Speaker 9>market that shows that those with a recent college degree,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.370
<v Speaker 9>so a recent college grad, I'm talking between the ages

0:13:54.410 --> 0:13:58.130
<v Speaker 9>of 22 and 26, are having one of the toughest

0:13:58.210 --> 0:14:02.770
<v Speaker 9>times ever finding a job. At the same time, those

0:14:02.950 --> 0:14:06.630
<v Speaker 9>without a bachelor's degree and maybe with just a high

0:14:06.670 --> 0:14:09.670
<v Speaker 9>school diploma or partial college education are having one of

0:14:09.710 --> 0:14:12.910
<v Speaker 9>the best job markets that they've experienced in the past

0:14:12.910 --> 0:14:13.530
<v Speaker 9>20 years.

0:14:14.530 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I knew this was coming. Whenever I would talk about

0:14:17.910 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the fact like I'm not pushing my kids to go

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.620
<v Speaker 3>to college, I have one that probably won't, one that

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>probably will, but I'm definitely not pushing it. And whenever

0:14:24.980 --> 0:14:26.620
<v Speaker 3>I have mentioned that, people have said to me, well,

0:14:26.660 --> 0:14:29.510
<v Speaker 3>you know, statistically, over time, people who graduate college make

0:14:29.550 --> 0:14:32.090
<v Speaker 3>this much more money. That has been true always. I

0:14:32.130 --> 0:14:34.180
<v Speaker 3>don't believe it's going to be true anymore. And I

0:14:34.220 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 3>knew at some time, at some point, the data would

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>catch up to that. And I'm sure that's, you know,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 3>roughly starting now and going forward. There's all kinds of

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>reasons for that. I've got a thing from a college

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>professor I'm going to read a little bit later in

0:14:46.340 --> 0:14:49.620
<v Speaker 3>the show. Him talking about current students who know nothing,

0:14:50.060 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 3>learn nothing, come out of college no more qualified than

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 3>when they went in, only poorer. And then you've got

0:14:56.220 --> 0:14:58.580
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing. If I bring on a college graduate,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:04.060
<v Speaker 3>what crazy crap do they believe about the employer-employee relationship? And,

0:15:04.420 --> 0:15:07.250
<v Speaker 3>you know, suing me for this and that and all. Yeah,

0:15:07.300 --> 0:15:07.950
<v Speaker 3>who wants that?

0:15:09.270 --> 0:15:09.410
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:15:09.470 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 9>And so this is interesting because the study touched on

0:15:11.820 --> 0:15:15.100
<v Speaker 9>exactly what you just mentioned. A few of the other

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.420
<v Speaker 9>reasons of why we're seeing this trend is that AI

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.550
<v Speaker 9>has largely taken over entry level white collar jobs. So

0:15:22.610 --> 0:15:25.090
<v Speaker 9>those recent college grads are coming out and usually you'd

0:15:25.110 --> 0:15:27.150
<v Speaker 9>start kind of at the bottom of the ladder job.

0:15:27.330 --> 0:15:29.770
<v Speaker 9>Those are now being done by AI for a lot

0:15:29.810 --> 0:15:30.470
<v Speaker 9>of these companies.

0:15:30.510 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Those weren't jobs you needed a college degree for anyway.

0:15:33.220 --> 0:15:33.420
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>They're hiring college graduates to do college graduates are doing

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 3>them because it was all I could find. But that's

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.660
<v Speaker 3>not no, that's not what got them the job.

0:15:41.380 --> 0:15:41.660
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.270
<v Speaker 9>Another reason, simple supply and demand. So older workers and

0:15:45.350 --> 0:15:48.030
<v Speaker 9>skilled trades are starting to retire. So that's creating demand

0:15:48.050 --> 0:15:51.630
<v Speaker 9>for people who can do jobs that require hands on skills.

0:15:51.690 --> 0:15:55.290
<v Speaker 9>I'm talking about your air conditioning repair person, your plumber,

0:15:55.310 --> 0:15:59.100
<v Speaker 9>your electrician. Those trade jobs are still, you know, they

0:15:59.140 --> 0:16:00.820
<v Speaker 9>need to fill a lot of spots in those jobs.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 9>There was something else here.

0:16:03.340 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh, okay.

0:16:03.780 --> 0:16:05.970
<v Speaker 9>So, you know when you're talking about something in front

0:16:05.990 --> 0:16:08.250
<v Speaker 9>of your phone and then sooner than later you get

0:16:08.270 --> 0:16:10.190
<v Speaker 9>a video about this exact topic?

0:16:10.330 --> 0:16:10.510
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:10.530 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>We were discussing this just the other day, yeah.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I'm talking about this subject matter with my

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:17.860
<v Speaker 9>husband and all of a sudden I get this video

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.690
<v Speaker 9>for a company called Degree Free. And basically what this

0:16:21.810 --> 0:16:24.470
<v Speaker 9>woman and I believe her husband have done is they

0:16:24.510 --> 0:16:28.610
<v Speaker 9>have figured out how to reverse engineer your way into

0:16:28.650 --> 0:16:31.450
<v Speaker 9>the career that you want to go into without getting

0:16:31.490 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 9>a college degree. So I interviewed her for the same story.

0:16:35.740 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 9>And she basically said that the most important thing that

0:16:39.950 --> 0:16:43.610
<v Speaker 9>employers are looking for is no longer a bachelor's degree.

0:16:43.710 --> 0:16:45.110
<v Speaker 11>It's work experience.

0:16:45.630 --> 0:16:48.170
<v Speaker 9>So if you don't have any work experience and it

0:16:48.190 --> 0:16:50.990
<v Speaker 9>could be something as like being a high school waiter

0:16:51.010 --> 0:16:53.310
<v Speaker 9>or waitress at a restaurant or a lifeguard, any of

0:16:53.350 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 9>those kinds of jobs, employers want that more than anything

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:58.140
<v Speaker 9>else right now.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't surprise me a bit. Uh, It's very easy

0:17:04.300 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of young people now to, and part

0:17:07.660 --> 0:17:09.620
<v Speaker 3>of it is we've crafted a society where it's very

0:17:09.660 --> 0:17:11.450
<v Speaker 3>hard to get a job as a teenager now. There's

0:17:11.470 --> 0:17:13.490
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of things that I did that you're not

0:17:13.510 --> 0:17:16.660
<v Speaker 3>allowed to do anymore. Anyway, so you could graduate from

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.990
<v Speaker 3>college with a worthless degree. You're out there. You're 22,

0:17:19.990 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 3>23 years old. You've never worked a day in your life.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.310
<v Speaker 3>You've never had a boss. You've never had it been

0:17:26.350 --> 0:17:28.690
<v Speaker 3>given a task that you had to perform or anything ever.

0:17:29.230 --> 0:17:29.630
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:17:30.010 --> 0:17:32.230
<v Speaker 3>There's a big difference between that person and you hire

0:17:32.250 --> 0:17:33.890
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's had a couple of jobs. And who cares

0:17:33.930 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 3>about the degree? Because we all know in most cases.

0:17:36.820 --> 0:17:39.030
<v Speaker 11>They're worthless. Yeah.

0:17:39.050 --> 0:17:39.940
<v Speaker 3>So that was her point.

0:17:40.030 --> 0:17:42.930
<v Speaker 9>She said that for a lot of these employers, these

0:17:43.030 --> 0:17:46.050
<v Speaker 9>recent college grads are coming in with zero work experience

0:17:46.350 --> 0:17:48.750
<v Speaker 9>and then asking for a salary similar to what the

0:17:48.810 --> 0:17:51.070
<v Speaker 9>owner of the company is bringing home every week.

0:17:51.250 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 3>And it's not the kids' fault. I don't want to

0:17:52.910 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>make it sound like that. It's horrible that we sold

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 3>this line of crap to college kids and parents about

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.500
<v Speaker 3>this for years. All these different kind of gender study

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.660
<v Speaker 3>degrees and everything like that that aren't going to do

0:18:05.060 --> 0:18:07.460
<v Speaker 3>anything for you. Oh, that's horrible.

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.139
<v Speaker 9>Expensive piece of paper. And they have all this debt.

0:18:10.580 --> 0:18:12.020
<v Speaker 9>And then they have to go back and get the

0:18:12.060 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 9>waiter waitressing job or that entry level job that they

0:18:14.580 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 9>could have gotten at 18.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.910
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for that story, Heather. Really appreciate that. We'll talk

0:18:19.930 --> 0:18:23.590
<v Speaker 3>to you a little bit later. That is not surprising.

0:18:23.670 --> 0:18:26.150
<v Speaker 3>The data has caught up to what we all thought

0:18:26.170 --> 0:18:28.670
<v Speaker 3>was going to happen anyway. Stay tuned for more.

0:18:28.990 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:41.420 --> 0:18:46.970
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to continue this conversation we were just having

0:18:46.990 --> 0:18:49.590
<v Speaker 3>with Gary Dietrich, who joins the Armstrong and Getty Show

0:18:49.650 --> 0:18:53.419
<v Speaker 3>right now. CBS Television and iHeartRadio political analyst Gary Dietrich.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>How are you today, Gary?

0:18:54.890 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 11>Hey, I'm doing great, Jack. And by the way, I

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 11>just heard a rumor recently that you've been taking some

0:18:59.960 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 11>flack for cream in your coffee, buddy, but I want

0:19:03.660 --> 0:19:08.109
<v Speaker 11>you to know dairy farmers nationwide, 110% behind the little

0:19:08.150 --> 0:19:11.870
<v Speaker 11>teaspoon or two that you use every day. So don't

0:19:11.930 --> 0:19:13.170
<v Speaker 11>push back on that, Jack.

0:19:13.230 --> 0:19:13.540
<v Speaker 7>Come on.

0:19:15.170 --> 0:19:15.390
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:15.670 --> 0:19:17.390
<v Speaker 3>I feel less of a man because I put cream

0:19:17.410 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in my coffee. So we were just having this conversation

0:19:20.859 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 3>about and then we'll get into politics. But we're just

0:19:22.540 --> 0:19:24.859
<v Speaker 3>having this conversation about for the first time ever, the

0:19:24.900 --> 0:19:29.220
<v Speaker 3>job market is better for young people with a high

0:19:29.260 --> 0:19:32.190
<v Speaker 3>school degree than with a college degree for a variety

0:19:32.210 --> 0:19:35.710
<v Speaker 3>of reasons, including the whole everybody's caught on to the

0:19:35.770 --> 0:19:38.470
<v Speaker 3>fact that a lot of these college degrees, you didn't

0:19:38.530 --> 0:19:42.890
<v Speaker 3>learn a single thing. And maybe what you learned was

0:19:42.990 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>to be in a pain in the ass employee who's

0:19:44.740 --> 0:19:47.550
<v Speaker 3>going to sue me over something crazy. But anyway, over

0:19:47.590 --> 0:19:49.510
<v Speaker 3>the years, I've given you we've made a lot of

0:19:49.550 --> 0:19:51.550
<v Speaker 3>fun of you going. to Harvard, which I'm actually very

0:19:51.609 --> 0:19:53.850
<v Speaker 3>impressed with because you went to Harvard back in the

0:19:53.869 --> 0:19:57.209
<v Speaker 3>day when when that meant something. But do you have

0:19:57.260 --> 0:20:01.540
<v Speaker 3>any opinions on this? What college is worth now versus

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the old days? Like, for instance, your alma mater, Harvard,

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.899
<v Speaker 3>up until recently when they tried to change this. The

0:20:08.940 --> 0:20:11.060
<v Speaker 3>whole how many A's they gave out thing that got

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:16.740
<v Speaker 3>so much attention. If you include A minus, 84% of

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.179
<v Speaker 3>the grades given out at Harvard were A's. A's are

0:20:20.300 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 3>A minuses.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:22.220
<v Speaker 2>84%.

0:20:22.220 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's insane.

0:20:24.820 --> 0:20:27.100
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, given the fact that I got all

0:20:27.140 --> 0:20:28.980
<v Speaker 11>D's when I got out of there, you know, this

0:20:29.010 --> 0:20:32.229
<v Speaker 11>does probably speak well. Just joking. Here's the thing, Jack.

0:20:32.410 --> 0:20:35.610
<v Speaker 11>It's funny you're having this conversation today. Literally, Jack, two

0:20:35.650 --> 0:20:39.190
<v Speaker 11>days ago, they had an online conversation with Harvard's president,

0:20:39.490 --> 0:20:42.710
<v Speaker 11>who I sat through the entire hour of this Zoom call, whatever,

0:20:42.970 --> 0:20:44.230
<v Speaker 11>just to see what he had to say about it.

0:20:44.230 --> 0:20:46.469
<v Speaker 11>Of course, he dealt with federal lawsuits and all. But

0:20:46.630 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 11>great inflation, believe it or not, was the first topic discussed.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.260
<v Speaker 11>he addressed. Now, I want to say one caveat. I

0:20:52.300 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 11>went to one of the Harvard professional schools, the Kennedy School.

0:20:54.660 --> 0:20:56.740
<v Speaker 11>I got my master's degree there. So I can't speak

0:20:56.780 --> 0:21:00.310
<v Speaker 11>to Harvard College, as they call the undergrad. But more broadly,

0:21:01.590 --> 0:21:05.290
<v Speaker 11>what's really interesting is that places super expensive like Harvard

0:21:05.570 --> 0:21:09.110
<v Speaker 11>People are talking about regularly now, Jack, going to three-year

0:21:09.190 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 11>college degrees rather than four, partially just because of what

0:21:12.940 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 11>you said, the return on investment, the cost of going

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 11>to any college these days versus the return. And it's

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.419
<v Speaker 11>somewhat sad to say for people who are behind the

0:21:23.500 --> 0:21:25.700
<v Speaker 11>humanities and Phi Beta Kappa and all these sort of

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:30.930
<v Speaker 11>Renaissance man approach. But to your point, Jack, vocationally focused

0:21:31.070 --> 0:21:34.189
<v Speaker 11>education seems to be the wave of the future as

0:21:34.270 --> 0:21:36.710
<v Speaker 11>opposed to more general ed, you know, the kinds of

0:21:36.750 --> 0:21:39.810
<v Speaker 11>things people thought was important in the past in terms

0:21:39.869 --> 0:21:42.189
<v Speaker 11>of having this so-called well-rounded education.

0:21:42.650 --> 0:21:47.369
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you're a parent like me. The goal

0:21:47.430 --> 0:21:49.389
<v Speaker 3>for your kids is for them to be able to

0:21:49.450 --> 0:21:53.449
<v Speaker 3>support themselves. I'd love them to be well-rounded, but the

0:21:53.530 --> 0:21:55.149
<v Speaker 3>real goal is for them to be able to get

0:21:55.210 --> 0:21:56.470
<v Speaker 3>out in the world and support themselves.

0:21:57.540 --> 0:22:00.379
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, there is all that. The vocational ed

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 11>part of it is really interesting because even in California,

0:22:04.340 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 11>there's now been all of a sudden for the first time,

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.459
<v Speaker 11>the ability for our junior colleges, over 100 of them

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.050
<v Speaker 11>in California, and for folks who aren't familiar, that's the

0:22:12.090 --> 0:22:16.290
<v Speaker 11>two-year college system, to actually grant bachelor's degrees themselves for

0:22:16.310 --> 0:22:19.729
<v Speaker 11>the first time. Not just UC and CSUs. The important

0:22:19.750 --> 0:22:23.930
<v Speaker 11>thing there, Jack, is these bachelor degrees are very vocationally focused,

0:22:24.010 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 11>many of them very technical or in medical fields, et cetera,

0:22:27.060 --> 0:22:29.500
<v Speaker 11>where the perception is jobs are plentiful.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, with an actual skill, so many of these degrees,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.659
<v Speaker 3>what the hell would you do with that? It's so nuts. Anyway,

0:22:37.460 --> 0:22:39.409
<v Speaker 3>we're here to talk politics with you, which kind of

0:22:39.430 --> 0:22:43.270
<v Speaker 3>fits in with this because a lot of your college

0:22:43.430 --> 0:22:47.550
<v Speaker 3>crowd is is behind this big socialist movement we got

0:22:47.710 --> 0:22:50.470
<v Speaker 3>going on right now, what they call the downwardly mobile.

0:22:50.510 --> 0:22:51.889
<v Speaker 3>These are people that spend a lot of money to

0:22:51.930 --> 0:22:53.449
<v Speaker 3>get a degree or going out into the world and

0:22:53.470 --> 0:22:56.510
<v Speaker 3>can't make a living. And their their thought isn't, well,

0:22:56.670 --> 0:22:59.810
<v Speaker 3>that degree is pointless. There's no job market for people.

0:23:00.130 --> 0:23:03.350
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be capitalism. It's got to be the system.

0:23:03.430 --> 0:23:04.850
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be the patriarchy. It's got to be

0:23:04.869 --> 0:23:06.650
<v Speaker 3>white people. It's got to be something. And so they're

0:23:06.710 --> 0:23:09.530
<v Speaker 3>leaning toward the socialists. And this poll that came out.

0:23:10.210 --> 0:23:13.830
<v Speaker 3>That rocked the L.A. mayor race in which the DSA

0:23:13.890 --> 0:23:16.300
<v Speaker 3>politician is now in the lead. Tell us that story.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this Jack is this has gotten buried because of

0:23:20.619 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 11>G's visit to the White House and all kinds of things.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:23.980
<v Speaker 4>The U.N.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 11>All things happen this week. But this new poll that

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.619
<v Speaker 11>shows Karen Bass's opponent, Karen Bass, for those who don't know,

0:23:30.660 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 11>the incumbent mayor, much embattled, especially after the L.A. fires

0:23:34.619 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 11>and homelessness, etc., But her Democratic Socialist opponent, I mean,

0:23:39.740 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 11>avowed Democratic Socialist, is in the lead by over 10 points.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.830
<v Speaker 11>And we're only, Jack, six weeks away from Election Day.

0:23:47.190 --> 0:23:50.230
<v Speaker 11>This is rocking the political world because just envision.

0:23:49.810 --> 0:23:50.210
<v Speaker 8>This, Jack.

0:23:50.609 --> 0:23:54.669
<v Speaker 11>You could have in six weeks the two largest cities

0:23:54.750 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 11>in the United States, New York and Los Angeles, the bi-coastal,

0:23:58.580 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 11>some would say, epicenters of politics, run by people closely aligned,

0:24:04.060 --> 0:24:07.500
<v Speaker 11>endorsed by the Democratic Socialist America. You don't think that's

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 11>going to rock the Democratic Party in the midterms and

0:24:10.380 --> 0:24:13.590
<v Speaker 11>going into 28? I'll tell you, the pressure is on

0:24:13.630 --> 0:24:16.030
<v Speaker 11>from that wing of the Democratic Party. And it's not

0:24:16.070 --> 0:24:18.550
<v Speaker 11>really a wing, per se, because they sort of very

0:24:18.650 --> 0:24:21.429
<v Speaker 11>loosely associate themselves currently and, of course, have a lot

0:24:21.450 --> 0:24:25.580
<v Speaker 11>of anathema for the formal Democratic Party. But it's sending shockwaves, Jack,

0:24:25.619 --> 0:24:26.460
<v Speaker 11>I'll guarantee you that.

0:24:26.700 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, we could have a senator or two that are

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.389
<v Speaker 3>socialists or aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America, which is.

0:24:34.130 --> 0:24:35.709
<v Speaker 3>You know, and we've talked about a lot. I mean,

0:24:35.750 --> 0:24:37.820
<v Speaker 3>if you look at their website, it's some crazy stuff.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.980
<v Speaker 3>It's get rid of the Constitution. It's you know, it's

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of interesting, really interesting stuff. Aren't these candidates?

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying this for a while. I don't feel

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.060
<v Speaker 3>like it gets said. I don't hear it enough in

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.630
<v Speaker 3>mainstream news. Aren't these the most radical candidates we've ever

0:24:53.690 --> 0:24:56.970
<v Speaker 3>had in the major parties for office in our lifetimes?

0:24:57.650 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, the thing about it is, Jack, I'm quite the

0:25:01.020 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 11>student of this kind of stuff. Some could say that,

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.740
<v Speaker 11>for example... when Governor Wallace in the South ran for

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 11>the presidency. People who've been around a while or studied

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 11>political history know this. Some could say he was radical

0:25:14.220 --> 0:25:17.350
<v Speaker 11>in the other direction. Some could say there's been Republicans, i.e.

0:25:17.390 --> 0:25:20.270
<v Speaker 11>Barry Goldwater in the Republican Party, others who've been very

0:25:20.350 --> 0:25:24.510
<v Speaker 11>radical in a conservative direction. But in sort of recent politics,

0:25:24.530 --> 0:25:27.429
<v Speaker 11>certainly in the century, this is sending shockwaves. I mean,

0:25:27.450 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 11>the only thing people have been able to sort of

0:25:29.580 --> 0:25:32.460
<v Speaker 11>try to draw some parallels to is Newt Gingrich and

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.540
<v Speaker 11>the things that happened when the conservatives in the House

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 11>really began to flex their muscle. And of course, that

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.570
<v Speaker 11>was accelerated through the so-called MAGA movement. But in the

0:25:41.609 --> 0:25:44.590
<v Speaker 11>Democratic Party, we haven't seen anything like this in terms

0:25:44.609 --> 0:25:47.909
<v Speaker 11>of upheaval, Jack, since the 1960s. I mean, there's no

0:25:47.950 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 11>doubt about that. That's when sort of so-called liberal progressive politics,

0:25:52.130 --> 0:25:56.540
<v Speaker 11>the 68th Democratic Convention, was really a clash. between the moderate,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.699
<v Speaker 11>the sort of established wing of the Democratic Party and

0:25:59.740 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 11>the new young liberals. And that's what we're seeing now.

0:26:02.420 --> 0:26:05.820
<v Speaker 11>You know, the energy, as they say, inside the Democratic

0:26:05.859 --> 0:26:10.050
<v Speaker 11>Party is with the DSA, some say movement. Let's just

0:26:10.090 --> 0:26:12.730
<v Speaker 11>call it that for today. And that's going to be

0:26:13.090 --> 0:26:14.990
<v Speaker 11>very interesting to see how it plays out, both in

0:26:15.010 --> 0:26:17.030
<v Speaker 11>this election and in 28. I mean, you've got both

0:26:17.070 --> 0:26:19.690
<v Speaker 11>Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris who have been polling at

0:26:19.730 --> 0:26:23.699
<v Speaker 11>the top for the Democrats in terms of the presidential

0:26:23.740 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 11>race in just two years, have both gone and campaigned

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:32.730
<v Speaker 11>for the aforementioned Democratic Socialist-aligned, to some degree, candidate in Michigan,

0:26:32.770 --> 0:26:35.610
<v Speaker 11>as you know. And so there's a sense in which,

0:26:36.230 --> 0:26:38.490
<v Speaker 11>what do you do with this? I mean, it's creating

0:26:38.550 --> 0:26:41.310
<v Speaker 11>a schism inside the party. Some are saying if Hakeem

0:26:41.369 --> 0:26:44.379
<v Speaker 11>Jeffries becomes the speaker, he's going to have a really

0:26:44.420 --> 0:26:47.060
<v Speaker 11>difficult time, for example, keeping his own caucus together.

0:26:47.869 --> 0:26:51.409
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'd say so. So, as you know, the presidential

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>election starts the day after the midterms on November 4th.

0:26:55.619 --> 0:26:58.939
<v Speaker 3>It'll be all 2028 talk, and some people are going

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to jump into the race in November and December, according

0:27:01.530 --> 0:27:04.270
<v Speaker 3>to most people who are following this closely. We had

0:27:04.330 --> 0:27:07.030
<v Speaker 3>Lonnie Chen on yesterday. He said, don't be surprised if

0:27:07.109 --> 0:27:09.350
<v Speaker 3>AOC is the nominee for the Democratic Party. How do

0:27:09.369 --> 0:27:10.030
<v Speaker 3>you react to that?

0:27:10.670 --> 0:27:14.740
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know... Early, Jack, I remember you and I

0:27:14.780 --> 0:27:18.699
<v Speaker 11>having conversations way, way back when people thought it was

0:27:18.740 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 11>going to be Rudy Giuliani as the, remember, nominee for

0:27:23.460 --> 0:27:26.090
<v Speaker 11>the Republican Party back then. So it's way too early

0:27:26.109 --> 0:27:28.869
<v Speaker 11>to talk about with any certainty about this. But I

0:27:28.910 --> 0:27:31.350
<v Speaker 11>would say this. You could take a deck of cards

0:27:31.369 --> 0:27:34.790
<v Speaker 11>right now, right? There's probably 15 or 20 Democratic names.

0:27:35.150 --> 0:27:38.070
<v Speaker 11>Throw them up in the air. Pick one out that lands.

0:27:38.170 --> 0:27:40.330
<v Speaker 11>They might be the nominee. And I don't say that

0:27:40.430 --> 0:27:44.910
<v Speaker 11>facetiously because things are so topsy-turvy. so turbulent right now.

0:27:45.170 --> 0:27:46.750
<v Speaker 11>Is it going to be, for example, is it going

0:27:46.770 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 11>to be a more conservative or let's just not say conservative,

0:27:49.740 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 11>more moderate established candidate, say Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania, or Beshear,

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 11>governor of Kentucky? Is that going to be a Democratic

0:27:58.900 --> 0:28:02.310
<v Speaker 11>nominee or is it going to be somebody like an

0:28:02.390 --> 0:28:05.270
<v Speaker 11>AOC who, as you know, has been leading the charge

0:28:05.850 --> 0:28:08.710
<v Speaker 11>for the DSA in many ways, certainly behind them, as

0:28:08.730 --> 0:28:12.129
<v Speaker 11>has Bernie Sanders. She's the heir apparent to the Bernie

0:28:12.190 --> 0:28:16.310
<v Speaker 11>Sanders wing effort within that party. And let's not forget,

0:28:16.410 --> 0:28:21.190
<v Speaker 11>Bernie Sanders came very close to toppling Hillary Clinton for

0:28:21.210 --> 0:28:22.270
<v Speaker 11>that party's nomination.

0:28:22.310 --> 0:28:24.869
<v Speaker 3>If his own party hadn't jumped in and fixed it

0:28:24.910 --> 0:28:26.629
<v Speaker 3>to make sure he wasn't, he was going to be

0:28:26.650 --> 0:28:30.379
<v Speaker 3>the nominee. So that's my point. Unless the Democrats are

0:28:30.390 --> 0:28:33.140
<v Speaker 3>going to do that again, figure out a way. To

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 3>stop one of these people, you're going to have one

0:28:36.700 --> 0:28:39.410
<v Speaker 3>of these whack jobs be the nominee, which might be good.

0:28:39.750 --> 0:28:42.090
<v Speaker 3>Let him go through this little thing that you're not

0:28:42.110 --> 0:28:43.970
<v Speaker 3>going to get elected president as a DSA member.

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, and the question is going to become, I mean,

0:28:46.980 --> 0:28:49.250
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of assumptions being made on both sides here.

0:28:49.490 --> 0:28:51.750
<v Speaker 11>But let's just say, because he's polling so far ahead

0:28:51.910 --> 0:28:54.590
<v Speaker 11>within his own party, that J.D. Vance is the nominee.

0:28:54.870 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 11>You know, the history is not great for vice presidents

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.420
<v Speaker 11>succeeding their boss and moving into the White House. Frankly,

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.750
<v Speaker 11>it's a pretty dicey proposition, just historically speaking. And if

0:29:07.790 --> 0:29:10.790
<v Speaker 11>you're in many people's minds, let's see where we are,

0:29:10.830 --> 0:29:12.890
<v Speaker 11>you know, 18 months from now. But if you have

0:29:12.930 --> 0:29:15.930
<v Speaker 11>the country, really, I mean, Trump's numbers at a historic

0:29:15.990 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 11>low for his own approval ratings right now. Everybody knows that,

0:29:20.220 --> 0:29:22.660
<v Speaker 11>both in terms of the economy, Iran, you just go

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.420
<v Speaker 11>down the list. Even AI, people say he's on the

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 11>quote-unquote wrong side of that issue in terms of the populace.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.180
<v Speaker 11>You know, it could be tough. I think we have

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.870
<v Speaker 11>to be careful about making an assumption that, you know,

0:29:35.810 --> 0:29:39.410
<v Speaker 11>XYZ candidate couldn't succeed. Jack, I will say this. The

0:29:39.470 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 11>current political... environment, you have to say, is more, some

0:29:42.820 --> 0:29:46.260
<v Speaker 11>would say more volatile, certainly more flexible than it's been

0:29:46.900 --> 0:29:50.100
<v Speaker 11>in a long, long time, and with both parties' nominations

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.020
<v Speaker 11>without an incumbent. It's been a while since we've not

0:29:54.060 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 11>had an incumbent running for the presidency, either Republican or Democrat.

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.730
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you know, again, take the deck of cards,

0:30:00.790 --> 0:30:02.110
<v Speaker 11>throw them in the air, let's see where we are

0:30:02.150 --> 0:30:03.090
<v Speaker 11>in 12 to 18 months.

0:30:04.030 --> 0:30:06.330
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to ask you some yes-no questions that

0:30:06.350 --> 0:30:08.490
<v Speaker 3>I've put to several people over the last couple of days,

0:30:08.550 --> 0:30:12.390
<v Speaker 3>if you could just go yes-no. Is Kamala Harris going

0:30:12.410 --> 0:30:12.610
<v Speaker 3>to run?

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.060
<v Speaker 11>Let me first say, yes, I do take cream in

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:16.100
<v Speaker 11>my coffee. That's a yes.

0:30:16.380 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you do? Okay, well.

0:30:17.660 --> 0:30:19.580
<v Speaker 11>Okay, well, so put me in that category. All the

0:30:19.620 --> 0:30:21.300
<v Speaker 11>rest of you people send the hate mail to A &amp; G,

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.990
<v Speaker 11>not my place. Okay, so is Kamala Harris going to run? Jack,

0:30:25.490 --> 0:30:27.510
<v Speaker 11>I think this has to be a huge maybe. Let

0:30:27.550 --> 0:30:30.390
<v Speaker 11>me tell you why. Because she's out there campaigning. But

0:30:30.430 --> 0:30:32.700
<v Speaker 11>I'll tell you, a recent poll just came out this

0:30:32.780 --> 0:30:38.180
<v Speaker 11>week of California Democrats. not enthusiastic about her running. I mean,

0:30:38.330 --> 0:30:40.870
<v Speaker 11>over half of them said she should not run. And

0:30:41.050 --> 0:30:44.630
<v Speaker 11>six out of 10, I mean, excuse me, six times

0:30:44.730 --> 0:30:47.970
<v Speaker 11>more said they think that Gavin Newsom has a better

0:30:48.050 --> 0:30:50.210
<v Speaker 11>chance of winning the White House than she does. So

0:30:50.410 --> 0:30:52.830
<v Speaker 11>if you ask insiders in the party, they don't think

0:30:52.890 --> 0:30:55.690
<v Speaker 11>she should run. Will she? You have to go inside

0:30:55.710 --> 0:30:56.950
<v Speaker 11>of her own brain to figure that out.

0:30:57.130 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So you don't have a yes or no on that?

0:30:58.890 --> 0:31:01.990
<v Speaker 11>Well, I, because you can't, I can't say yes or no.

0:31:02.270 --> 0:31:03.910
<v Speaker 11>I think it's going to be, I think it's, we

0:31:03.930 --> 0:31:04.430
<v Speaker 11>don't know yet.

0:31:04.510 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Is Gavin Newsom going to run?

0:31:06.260 --> 0:31:10.370
<v Speaker 11>Oh, he already has been running. That's 110%, despite of what...

0:31:10.470 --> 0:31:13.010
<v Speaker 11>That's a clear yes? Yeah, 100% on that one.

0:31:13.310 --> 0:31:14.570
<v Speaker 3>Is J.D. Vance going to run?

0:31:15.090 --> 0:31:16.130
<v Speaker 11>Oh, yeah, that's 193%.

0:31:16.130 --> 0:31:20.740
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and then so does Marco Rubio hold to his pledge,

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 3>if J.D. runs, I won't run?

0:31:22.500 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think he doesn't. Now, could he still... He

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 11>says he's not interested in the VP slot, but could

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.780
<v Speaker 11>he be talked into that? I mean, look, those have

0:31:29.820 --> 0:31:33.540
<v Speaker 11>been the two biggest... shall we say, front men for

0:31:33.580 --> 0:31:36.940
<v Speaker 11>this administration, there's no doubt there's a lot of affection.

0:31:36.980 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 11>If you look at the polls inside the party, Vance

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.620
<v Speaker 11>doubles up Rubio, but Rubio is even pulling at around 20%.

0:31:44.620 --> 0:31:47.460
<v Speaker 11>and at 40-something percent for Vance amongst people in his

0:31:47.500 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 11>own party. So clearly very popular. His stock's really been rising.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 11>I would not be surprised if he ends up in

0:31:53.620 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 11>the VP slot.

0:31:54.300 --> 0:31:56.580
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my dream matchup's not going to happen. I think

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.980
<v Speaker 3>we'd have two grown-ups having real substantive conversations like the

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.620
<v Speaker 3>old days if it was Rubio versus Rahm Emanuel. That's

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.310
<v Speaker 3>what I would like to see. I think we'd go

0:32:05.350 --> 0:32:07.270
<v Speaker 3>back to normal conversations about that.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:09.980
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, people say that the same might be true

0:32:10.020 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 11>if you had a Bashir or a Shapiro or others

0:32:12.780 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 11>with Rubio. Rubio's sharp. I mean, he knows foreign policy like, frankly,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 11>almost nobody else inside the Beltway. That's obvious. And given

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 11>all the foreign entanglements right now and all the issues geopolitically,

0:32:25.620 --> 0:32:29.660
<v Speaker 11>witness what's happening in the U.N. this week, Rubio would

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 11>certainly add a lot of gravitas to a ticket for

0:32:33.140 --> 0:32:33.700
<v Speaker 11>the Republicans.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.380
<v Speaker 3>Gary Dietrich, thanks for your time today. Appreciate it.

0:32:37.030 --> 0:32:38.470
<v Speaker 11>Okay, buddy. Talk to you soon.

0:32:38.510 --> 0:32:41.810
<v Speaker 3>Gary wears loafers, though. So the fact that he puts

0:32:41.830 --> 0:32:43.630
<v Speaker 3>cream in his coffee, I don't think that helps my cause.

0:32:45.670 --> 0:32:48.740
<v Speaker 3>I like SimpliSafe so much that I've been using it

0:32:48.780 --> 0:32:51.260
<v Speaker 3>for years and years. Am I locked into a contract? No,

0:32:51.700 --> 0:32:53.780
<v Speaker 3>neither will you be if you call up SimpliSafe or

0:32:53.820 --> 0:32:57.110
<v Speaker 3>go on their website and customize the system for your

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.790
<v Speaker 3>home for home security. And you can set it up yourself.

0:32:59.850 --> 0:33:02.390
<v Speaker 3>That's part of the Simpli and SimpliSafe. Set it up yourself,

0:33:02.510 --> 0:33:06.790
<v Speaker 3>ordering it, using it. A lot of security systems back

0:33:06.810 --> 0:33:08.630
<v Speaker 3>in the day were so complicated that people didn't use

0:33:08.670 --> 0:33:10.290
<v Speaker 3>them because setting them up every night was like, I'm

0:33:10.310 --> 0:33:14.810
<v Speaker 3>too tired. SimpliSafe is not like that. They've got AI-powered

0:33:14.860 --> 0:33:18.020
<v Speaker 3>cameras that detect suspicious activity at the perimeter and alert

0:33:18.060 --> 0:33:21.340
<v Speaker 3>live US-based agents before someone breaks in. Learn more about

0:33:21.380 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 3>that at the website. Right now, you can get 50%

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.830
<v Speaker 3>off a new SimpliSafe system. Just go to simplisafe.com slash Armstrong.

0:33:27.150 --> 0:33:30.350
<v Speaker 3>That's simplisafe.com slash Armstrong for 50% off. And when you order,

0:33:30.390 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 3>please write in armstrong and getty show and the whole

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.740
<v Speaker 3>how did you hear about us we'd appreciate that they

0:33:35.790 --> 0:33:37.350
<v Speaker 3>do a little survey at the end don't forget there's

0:33:37.380 --> 0:33:39.350
<v Speaker 3>no safe like simply say there are a lot of

0:33:39.370 --> 0:33:41.770
<v Speaker 3>people joe's like this and gary's like this some people

0:33:41.830 --> 0:33:43.790
<v Speaker 3>like this i'm not like this when i ask a

0:33:43.870 --> 0:33:48.210
<v Speaker 3>yes or no hypothetical will not answer um because i

0:33:48.570 --> 0:33:50.570
<v Speaker 3>don't i don't know i just i've never had any

0:33:50.610 --> 0:33:52.730
<v Speaker 3>problem uh right here right now what do i think

0:33:52.870 --> 0:33:55.850
<v Speaker 3>of these two things i think kamala doesn't run i

0:33:55.870 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>think gavin does run i think jd does run So

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Marco won't run. I think that's almost certainly going to

0:34:01.340 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 3>be the case. And some of them are going to

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.460
<v Speaker 3>jump in here in just a couple of weeks. That's

0:34:04.500 --> 0:34:06.020
<v Speaker 3>enough politics. Something different next.

0:34:07.580 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:34:21.420 --> 0:34:23.260
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 8>I miss being young. Your 20s are great. You're down

0:34:29.380 --> 0:34:32.580
<v Speaker 8>for whatever. Your friends call you. They're like, do you

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.739
<v Speaker 8>want to go? You're like, I'll go. You don't even

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 8>know where you're going. You're like, I'll move, dude. I'll

0:34:38.420 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 8>set my apartment on fire. What do you want to do?

0:34:45.500 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 8>Your 30s come and you're like, where are we going?

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.100
<v Speaker 8>How late are they open?

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.030
<v Speaker 3>Is it loud?

0:34:55.910 --> 0:34:57.170
<v Speaker 8>I am going to drive separate.

0:34:57.190 --> 0:34:58.110
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:35:08.700 --> 0:35:15.180
<v Speaker 8>Your 40s, you're... I'm not going. I'm mad that you

0:35:15.219 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 8>thought I would go.

0:35:19.660 --> 0:35:22.779
<v Speaker 3>Nate Bargatze, who's one of the funniest people ever? That's right,

0:35:22.820 --> 0:35:25.660
<v Speaker 3>your 40s, I'm not going. I can't believe you even

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.780
<v Speaker 3>asked me. It's a little maddening that you even thought

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.500
<v Speaker 3>I would consider. Like, every once in a while that happens.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.989
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a... a band playing somewhere that's a

0:35:36.969 --> 0:35:40.180
<v Speaker 3>45 minute drive on a Tuesday night. Are you kidding?

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Are you kidding? No, there's not a chance. Of course,

0:35:44.140 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 3>part of that is a lot of people my age,

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:47.859
<v Speaker 3>their kids are grown up and gone. And so they're

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of going back to doing that sort of lifestyle.

0:35:51.060 --> 0:35:52.700
<v Speaker 3>I've still got kids at home. So no, I'm not

0:35:52.739 --> 0:35:56.230
<v Speaker 3>doing anything most nights and certainly not anything ever on

0:35:56.270 --> 0:36:01.130
<v Speaker 3>a weeknight. Trump just put out a truth social post.

0:36:02.350 --> 0:36:07.330
<v Speaker 3>That's worth remarking upon. I met President Xi at the

0:36:07.390 --> 0:36:14.090
<v Speaker 3>plane in parentheses airport with an exclamation mark. I don't

0:36:14.130 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 3>know why airports in parentheses or why it's got an

0:36:16.930 --> 0:36:19.989
<v Speaker 3>exclamation mark. Anyway, I met President Xi at the plane

0:36:20.300 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 3>airport yesterday. He looks strong, vibrant, and fit better than ever.

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Madam Xi, of course, beautiful, all caps, President DJT. There

0:36:29.660 --> 0:36:32.380
<v Speaker 3>you go. Buttering up the commies. Well, maybe it'll get

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:37.230
<v Speaker 3>us something. I doubt it. Couldn't hurt, I suppose. Hanson

0:36:37.290 --> 0:36:39.890
<v Speaker 3>first turned us on to this documentary that's coming out

0:36:39.930 --> 0:36:44.169
<v Speaker 3>and showed us the trailer. This is the one about

0:36:44.210 --> 0:36:49.790
<v Speaker 3>Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos. It's called You Can See Everything.

0:36:49.870 --> 0:36:54.549
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen any of these trailers? They're weird. So

0:36:54.870 --> 0:36:56.870
<v Speaker 3>the trailer was weird, and I thought, okay, this has

0:36:57.790 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 3>maybe got a bit of a reality show thing going

0:37:00.860 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 3>here where it's all about the editing and the angles

0:37:03.260 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 3>to make it look crazier than it is, but According

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 3>to some of the reviews I've read, it is really

0:37:10.900 --> 0:37:14.859
<v Speaker 3>gripping on how weird Elizabeth Holmes is, who apparently thinks

0:37:14.900 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 3>she can hypnotize people with her eyeballs. If you've seen

0:37:18.100 --> 0:37:20.580
<v Speaker 3>the trailers, she thinks that if she stares into your

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.219
<v Speaker 3>eyes with her big, pretty eyes really wide open. that

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 3>she can hypnotize you into believing things, which may be

0:37:27.340 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 3>how she pulled that off. I don't know. Getting billions

0:37:30.500 --> 0:37:33.379
<v Speaker 3>of dollars invested. But I am looking forward to seeing that.

0:37:33.780 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 3>It comes out on October 16th. You can see everything.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:44.630
<v Speaker 3>And the reviews are really good. People say it's dang interesting.

0:37:44.830 --> 0:37:47.170
<v Speaker 3>And I look forward to telling you more about that later.

0:37:47.190 --> 0:37:49.430
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have a guest third hour. His name

0:37:49.489 --> 0:37:52.259
<v Speaker 3>is Joe Getty. And I don't know what we're going

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 3>to talk about, but, you know, you you paid for

0:37:54.460 --> 0:37:57.070
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty and you're being ripped off right now.

0:37:57.090 --> 0:37:58.750
<v Speaker 3>So you'll get the whole thing coming up. If you

0:37:58.770 --> 0:38:01.170
<v Speaker 3>miss the segment, it's podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.020
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.