WEBVTT - Discouraging & Humiliating

0:00:09.110 --> 0:00:12.950
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:12.990 --> 0:00:17.229
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:17.390 --> 0:00:18.770
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:18.950 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 3>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 4>So it's a big difference between Texas, which that was

0:00:34.380 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 4>a potential extinction event there because they got swept out

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 4>of everything from governor to the Supreme Court and even

0:00:41.540 --> 0:00:44.710
<v Speaker 4>the House of Representatives. That is going to do damage,

0:00:44.770 --> 0:00:45.850
<v Speaker 4>not just in Texas.

0:00:46.210 --> 0:00:46.650
<v Speaker 2>It's going to.

0:00:46.650 --> 0:00:49.949
<v Speaker 4>Hurt the Republican Party going forward. And if we can't

0:00:49.990 --> 0:00:54.070
<v Speaker 4>win in places like Texas or Kansas or Iowa, you know,

0:00:54.170 --> 0:00:55.940
<v Speaker 4>we are not viable nationally.

0:00:56.670 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Ron DeSantis will be the next president of the United

0:01:00.460 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>States is something somebody might say if they believe that.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 2>If they had never seen him in public.

0:01:07.620 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to address that very question and talk about

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Ron's speech the other day and his appearance on Laura

0:01:13.390 --> 0:01:16.190
<v Speaker 3>Ingraham's show and a bunch more. But first, this.

0:01:16.590 --> 0:01:18.190
<v Speaker 2>So there's a couple of things going on that you

0:01:18.209 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>should know about. First of all, it's a day of

0:01:21.740 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>rioting in Paris. Watching some of the videos, you have

0:01:24.420 --> 0:01:26.780
<v Speaker 2>to search for them because for whatever reason, the media

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.500
<v Speaker 2>is not interested in the France riots.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.819
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it turns out it's angry leftists and not plucky

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.100
<v Speaker 3>young students who just want higher teacher pay.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>They're expecting between a half million and a three quarter

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.380
<v Speaker 2>million people in the streets today in France. 70,000 police

0:01:43.459 --> 0:01:44.980
<v Speaker 2>are on hand to deal with that. So it could

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.980
<v Speaker 2>be quite the day in France. Going over to England,

0:01:48.020 --> 0:01:51.550
<v Speaker 2>cross the channel. Russell Brand has been found guilty of

0:01:51.810 --> 0:01:54.930
<v Speaker 2>one count of rape and several counts of sexual assault.

0:01:55.570 --> 0:01:58.250
<v Speaker 2>I did a dive into what that means under their

0:01:58.330 --> 0:02:02.410
<v Speaker 2>laws over there. He is likely he's 51 years old.

0:02:02.450 --> 0:02:05.310
<v Speaker 2>He is likely to spend most of his 50s in jail.

0:02:06.450 --> 0:02:09.299
<v Speaker 2>Russell Brand is a very rich celebrity who they often

0:02:09.340 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>call a comedian. Yet I've never heard him say anything

0:02:11.740 --> 0:02:15.019
<v Speaker 2>funny one time ever. But he's become a really big

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>deal for I know for a lot of you. He's

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.030
<v Speaker 2>he's big on. Well, Tucker Carlson and a bunch of

0:02:20.050 --> 0:02:25.490
<v Speaker 2>different new right stuff. He's he's a huge figure. So

0:02:25.510 --> 0:02:30.150
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you all feel about that. And

0:02:30.169 --> 0:02:31.790
<v Speaker 2>then a couple of races that we don't know the

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>answer to yet in Los Angeles. Ramen noodles, the ramen,

0:02:37.580 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the socialist is leading over Karen Bass. barely like a

0:02:42.940 --> 0:02:45.139
<v Speaker 2>point and a half, but 30% of the vote yet

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.180
<v Speaker 2>to count because California is just so ridiculous in the

0:02:48.220 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 2>way we count ballots. How can Los Angeles, one of

0:02:50.820 --> 0:02:54.670
<v Speaker 2>the most modern cities on planet Earth, have 30% of

0:02:54.690 --> 0:02:56.930
<v Speaker 2>the vote yet to count? How is that even possible?

0:02:57.350 --> 0:02:58.590
<v Speaker 3>Here's my headline for the L.A.

0:02:59.030 --> 0:02:59.250
<v Speaker 5>Race.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>In the race between insane and incompetent, insane has pulled

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:05.260
<v Speaker 3>ahead for the moment.

0:03:05.490 --> 0:03:08.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no kidding. Then up there in Alaska, where one

0:03:08.169 --> 0:03:10.250
<v Speaker 2>of your Dan Sullivans used to be or is a

0:03:10.290 --> 0:03:13.570
<v Speaker 2>senator currently and running against that other woman, Peltola. Peltola's

0:03:13.630 --> 0:03:19.730
<v Speaker 2>in the lead. 600 vote difference between the two. That

0:03:19.830 --> 0:03:22.390
<v Speaker 2>is razor thin. And they think because of the way

0:03:22.470 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Alaska is.

0:03:22.930 --> 0:03:23.890
<v Speaker 3>Now, Alaska is different.

0:03:23.930 --> 0:03:26.410
<v Speaker 2>It's so spread out and so rural. L.A., I don't

0:03:26.430 --> 0:03:28.609
<v Speaker 2>know your excuse, but Alaska, they think it might be

0:03:28.650 --> 0:03:30.230
<v Speaker 2>a month before they have the results.

0:03:31.580 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Plus, you've got their Byzantine ranked choice stuff to

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.580
<v Speaker 3>go through. I don't know how long that takes. But

0:03:36.980 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the thing, well, many things struck me about being in

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.050
<v Speaker 3>Alaska this summer. One of them was that there are

0:03:44.090 --> 0:03:47.510
<v Speaker 3>towns you've all heard of. Everybody's heard of in Alaska

0:03:48.270 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and not just like Anchorage, but Haines, Alaska, Sitka, you know,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>various towns. They're tiny. They're absolutely tiny. They're just the

0:03:56.460 --> 0:03:59.140
<v Speaker 3>only towns of any significant size. And so people know

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.740
<v Speaker 3>their names. Just like, you know, Lincoln, Nebraska, you know,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.740
<v Speaker 3>everybody knows a town from each state, at least one

0:04:05.780 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 3>to three towns, but they're tiny. So, yes, 600 votes.

0:04:08.860 --> 0:04:10.100
<v Speaker 3>That's that's amazing.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:16.460
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know how you could possibly think. A U.S.

0:04:16.660 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Senate seat on the line and the amount of money

0:04:19.580 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and power that's involved in a U.S. Senate seat. How

0:04:21.820 --> 0:04:25.339
<v Speaker 2>do you keep skullduggery from happening when it's that close

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.250
<v Speaker 2>on either side? 600 votes. I mean, you don't have

0:04:29.270 --> 0:04:29.450
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:04:29.450 --> 0:04:32.310
<v Speaker 3>It's very difficult. Yeah, I'll bet. Not many skulls have

0:04:32.350 --> 0:04:35.130
<v Speaker 3>to be dug. So back to the question of Ron

0:04:35.170 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 3>DeSantis being the next president. Jack jumped the gun there

0:04:39.100 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 3>a bit with his cynical dismissal. Accurate.

0:04:43.260 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Ron.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Accurate that it's cynical. Ron DeSantis is one of the

0:04:49.060 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>few people who's going to get a solid, credible second

0:04:53.700 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>chance to run for president. I consciously decided not to

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.550
<v Speaker 3>use the phrase another bite at the apple because it's

0:05:01.690 --> 0:05:04.930
<v Speaker 3>such a cliche in commentary these days. Just say what

0:05:04.970 --> 0:05:05.270
<v Speaker 3>you mean.

0:05:05.290 --> 0:05:07.970
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to him yesterday. I thought he would

0:05:08.010 --> 0:05:10.990
<v Speaker 2>be president if it were the 1800s, if everybody is

0:05:11.029 --> 0:05:13.310
<v Speaker 2>taking this all in in print. Or if it were

0:05:13.310 --> 0:05:15.610
<v Speaker 2>2028 and I'm about to make the case, I'll thank

0:05:15.630 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>you to stop with your cynicism, your skepticism. Get back

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:20.099
<v Speaker 2>in my barrel.

0:05:21.339 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Crawl into your jar, idiot. Ron DeSantis. made the

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 3>mistake that we swore we were not going to make

0:05:29.900 --> 0:05:34.609
<v Speaker 3>in our radio career. Try it as somebody else's version

0:05:34.650 --> 0:05:35.529
<v Speaker 3>of what we ought to be.

0:05:36.210 --> 0:05:37.789
<v Speaker 2>Here's my Ron DeSantis impersonation.

0:05:37.890 --> 0:05:43.110
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God. See what I'm working with? He's making

0:05:43.250 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>awkward movements. He's standing awkwardly. His arms are doing odd things.

0:05:47.460 --> 0:05:51.290
<v Speaker 3>Posture is somewhat offbeat. This does not work well. He's

0:05:51.390 --> 0:05:53.490
<v Speaker 3>tucked his neck down. He doesn't know what to do

0:05:53.529 --> 0:05:56.010
<v Speaker 3>with his hands. He's one of those people that's so uncomfortable.

0:05:56.500 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 3>He just is like, where should I put my hands here?

0:05:59.660 --> 0:06:02.300
<v Speaker 3>Does this look relaxed? You know, Katie, in retrospect, maybe

0:06:02.339 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>we should have done our show in the way others advised. Right, yeah. Anyway. Okay,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:13.390
<v Speaker 3>so here's my point. Ron DeSantis ran as the professional

0:06:13.710 --> 0:06:19.260
<v Speaker 3>political consultant's version of Ron DeSantis last time. And combined

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.450
<v Speaker 3>with the Trump comeback, he was doomed. This time, Ron

0:06:24.650 --> 0:06:27.390
<v Speaker 3>Diaz is going to run as Ron Diaz. He's going

0:06:27.410 --> 0:06:30.650
<v Speaker 3>to say, look, I'm awkward. I'm not very charismatic, but

0:06:30.690 --> 0:06:33.590
<v Speaker 3>I get stuff done. Here's my record in Florida. Do

0:06:33.610 --> 0:06:36.409
<v Speaker 3>we want another game show host? Do we want another

0:06:36.490 --> 0:06:39.750
<v Speaker 3>slick politician? I get stuff done. Here's the stuff I

0:06:39.790 --> 0:06:41.750
<v Speaker 3>want to get. And we'll play some of what he

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.530
<v Speaker 3>said recently. I'm not saying he has any more than a,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.870
<v Speaker 3>you know. double-digit-ish chance, just as nobody does this far out.

0:06:50.470 --> 0:06:53.230
<v Speaker 3>But I think it could be a different process.

0:06:53.250 --> 0:06:55.370
<v Speaker 2>The fact that he has to think about when to

0:06:55.450 --> 0:06:57.300
<v Speaker 2>smile and all that sort of stuff, or at least

0:06:57.380 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the last time around he did, I hate the fact

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>that that matters. That's not the way you should choose

0:07:01.980 --> 0:07:03.219
<v Speaker 2>your chief executive.

0:07:03.580 --> 0:07:08.339
<v Speaker 3>Right, and I think he's figured that out. So quickly,

0:07:08.740 --> 0:07:10.900
<v Speaker 3>let's do 50, what he said the other night in

0:07:10.930 --> 0:07:12.090
<v Speaker 3>a speech, got a lot of attention.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, first, we were not immune to this wave. I mean,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.950
<v Speaker 4>we felt it. We saw it in our data. I

0:07:18.990 --> 0:07:22.950
<v Speaker 4>told candidates in the beginning of the fall, take what

0:07:22.990 --> 0:07:27.030
<v Speaker 4>President Trump got here two years ago, 13-point margin statewide.

0:07:27.410 --> 0:07:28.790
<v Speaker 3>Take 10 points off that.

0:07:29.190 --> 0:07:32.510
<v Speaker 4>That's the new line of scrimmage with where voters were there.

0:07:32.570 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 4>And so if he won your district by 15, you're

0:07:35.150 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 4>down to a five-point race.

0:07:36.580 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>And so we always plan for that. And I think

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:39.540
<v Speaker 3>if you look.

0:07:40.420 --> 0:07:44.860
<v Speaker 4>Texas had basically a 20-point swing. Trump won by 13.

0:07:44.860 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>They lose the governor's race by 7%. They lost the

0:07:47.740 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Senate race by more than that. We had about that

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 4>10 to 12-point swing. We didn't do the 20. And

0:07:53.860 --> 0:07:56.290
<v Speaker 4>I think it's because We've built up a lot of

0:07:56.370 --> 0:07:59.450
<v Speaker 4>trust with our voters over the years that when we're

0:07:59.490 --> 0:08:01.450
<v Speaker 4>asking them to come out, they do. So we were

0:08:01.570 --> 0:08:04.420
<v Speaker 4>able to mitigate the downside. We were not immune to it,

0:08:04.650 --> 0:08:08.100
<v Speaker 4>but we won every statewide race, U.S. Senate, governor, all

0:08:08.150 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>our cabinet races. We had a 27 out of 40

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 4>in the Florida Senate.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We did lose one.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a Floridian, but.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.540
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Florida won every statewide race for Republicans

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.860
<v Speaker 2>and Texas lost every single statewide race for Democrats. What

0:08:24.900 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a stark difference between two large red states. I know Floridians,

0:08:29.780 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>some of them famous, some of them not. And they

0:08:32.220 --> 0:08:36.620
<v Speaker 2>all say it's a really well-governed state. We try stuff

0:08:36.660 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 2>and if it doesn't work out right, we just change it.

0:08:38.740 --> 0:08:42.260
<v Speaker 2>He's probably the best state executive in the country.

0:08:43.110 --> 0:08:46.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah. I want to feature one more thing that

0:08:46.100 --> 0:08:48.530
<v Speaker 3>he said on Laura Ingram's show. This is clip 53, Michael.

0:08:49.730 --> 0:08:52.980
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to do huge conservative things that are

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>going to reorient the country for a generation, fine. But

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.380
<v Speaker 4>I saw no indication that the current group of Republican

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:05.070
<v Speaker 4>senators were interested in doing that type of bold conservative change.

0:09:05.090 --> 0:09:09.689
<v Speaker 4>I mean, why haven't we done immigration? Shut off H-1B visas.

0:09:09.950 --> 0:09:13.580
<v Speaker 4>Why haven't we codified Trump's immigration executive orders?

0:09:13.750 --> 0:09:14.300
<v Speaker 3>There's so.

0:09:14.500 --> 0:09:15.260
<v Speaker 2>Why haven't we.

0:09:15.860 --> 0:09:20.300
<v Speaker 4>Strip jurisdiction from the federal courts over deportation cases. There's

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.940
<v Speaker 4>so many things that could have been done. They didn't

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.459
<v Speaker 4>even attempt it, Laura. They would say, oh, if only

0:09:25.500 --> 0:09:27.460
<v Speaker 4>we needed 50 votes, we would have done it. You

0:09:27.500 --> 0:09:30.620
<v Speaker 4>don't have 50 votes for doing conservative things. You've never

0:09:30.780 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 4>shown that you'll do conservative things even with 50 votes.

0:09:34.460 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 4>So I hear you. I'd love to see all this

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.580
<v Speaker 4>great stuff being done. I just never saw an indication

0:09:39.620 --> 0:09:40.179
<v Speaker 4>that they did it.

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:41.219
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's good.

0:09:42.460 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, his point midterm was a real rebuke of the

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 3>president and Congress and voters stayed home from frustration because

0:09:47.980 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>they didn't see what they were promised being executed. And

0:09:52.330 --> 0:09:55.470
<v Speaker 3>you cannot have enough contempt for Congress at this point.

0:09:55.750 --> 0:09:59.730
<v Speaker 3>Both parties. I mean, they don't do much and what

0:09:59.750 --> 0:10:03.410
<v Speaker 3>they do is the wrong thing no wonder people people

0:10:03.429 --> 0:10:06.860
<v Speaker 3>are frustrated and america vaults back and forth from one

0:10:06.929 --> 0:10:09.390
<v Speaker 3>crappy party to the other one back and forth and

0:10:09.410 --> 0:10:12.459
<v Speaker 3>back and forth every couple of years what will break

0:10:12.540 --> 0:10:17.700
<v Speaker 3>the log jam nobody knows anyway Ron, I think Ron

0:10:17.740 --> 0:10:21.349
<v Speaker 3>has a real chance. He has got to hang a

0:10:21.450 --> 0:10:25.449
<v Speaker 3>lantern on his awkwardness. Although, you know, against like a

0:10:25.470 --> 0:10:30.190
<v Speaker 3>Marco Rubio, who's another solid conservative and is significantly more articulate,

0:10:33.059 --> 0:10:35.220
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a tough sled. But who knows?

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:10:36.580 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be fun to watch.

0:10:37.580 --> 0:10:43.770
<v Speaker 2>I think we care more now about presentation and glibness

0:10:43.890 --> 0:10:48.050
<v Speaker 2>and the showbiz angle of it than we ever have.

0:10:48.290 --> 0:10:50.790
<v Speaker 2>So it's not his time, man. If it was 1888

0:10:50.790 --> 0:10:51.949
<v Speaker 2>or something, that'd be perfect.

0:10:52.490 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, uh, the backlash against the Trumpian, I'm

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.020
<v Speaker 3>an entertainer thing again, if he hangs his lantern.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>On, no, we're going to choose a different entertainer.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.450
<v Speaker 3>Okay. You know, you're probably right. Uh, I am, I'm

0:11:08.550 --> 0:11:12.230
<v Speaker 3>wishing my wishes are the father of my thoughts. So

0:11:13.090 --> 0:11:18.370
<v Speaker 3>scammers and data salesmen and online jerks, they know who's

0:11:18.390 --> 0:11:20.429
<v Speaker 3>the father of my thoughts because they have all sorts

0:11:20.470 --> 0:11:25.069
<v Speaker 3>of information on me. Family members, names of my kids, addresses,

0:11:25.370 --> 0:11:29.130
<v Speaker 3>cell phone numbers. It's all exposed for anyone who looked

0:11:29.190 --> 0:11:33.429
<v Speaker 3>on these data broker sites. Incogni gets that stuff off

0:11:33.590 --> 0:11:34.170
<v Speaker 3>of the sites.

0:11:34.550 --> 0:11:35.970
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't believe us, type your own name

0:11:35.990 --> 0:11:38.270
<v Speaker 2>into a people search site sometime and see all that

0:11:38.309 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>information show up, including family members.

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>It's disturbing.

0:11:41.910 --> 0:11:44.350
<v Speaker 2>And that is why we use Incogni. Incogni sends requests

0:11:44.370 --> 0:11:47.230
<v Speaker 2>to remove your personal information, including your address, from hundreds

0:11:47.270 --> 0:11:49.270
<v Speaker 2>of data brokers. I check every week to see how

0:11:49.290 --> 0:11:51.380
<v Speaker 2>many data brokers they went after this week. I love it.

0:11:51.700 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 2>And it keeps sending them because these sites love to

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>sneak your info right back up there again.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.610
<v Speaker 3>Incogni has sent hundreds of removal requests for both of us.

0:11:59.620 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I haven't checked in the last couple of days. I'll

0:12:01.179 --> 0:12:03.860
<v Speaker 3>have to. But there's a 30-day money-back guarantee. And right now,

0:12:03.900 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>if you use our code Armstrong, you get 60% off.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.830
<v Speaker 3>They can't scam you if they can't find you. Go

0:12:08.870 --> 0:12:13.630
<v Speaker 3>to incogni.com slash Armstrong. Get that 60% off. I-N-C-O-G-N-I dot

0:12:13.690 --> 0:12:16.470
<v Speaker 3>com slash Armstrong and Cogni dot com slash Armstrong.

0:12:16.510 --> 0:12:18.910
<v Speaker 2>As I've been saying for years, economic reporting is the

0:12:19.070 --> 0:12:22.189
<v Speaker 2>dumbest reporting that exists of all the genres of reporting.

0:12:22.330 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>They don't even try, and oftentimes it's being reported by

0:12:25.910 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 2>people that don't know. But so yesterday there were all

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>these pronouncements made about the stock market going up and

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:36.219
<v Speaker 2>what it means from the election. Today, a 1,200-point drop,

0:12:36.260 --> 0:12:38.660
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest drops in months, and now all

0:12:38.700 --> 0:12:42.510
<v Speaker 2>kinds of pronouncements about... why they were wrong yesterday about

0:12:42.770 --> 0:12:44.670
<v Speaker 2>everything is going to be wonderful ever, ever. Now the

0:12:44.690 --> 0:12:47.390
<v Speaker 2>Democrats have been elected and that means the steady government,

0:12:47.450 --> 0:12:50.449
<v Speaker 2>people are feeling comfortable. What happened now? We don't feel

0:12:50.490 --> 0:12:51.370
<v Speaker 2>comfortable a day later.

0:12:52.030 --> 0:12:54.050
<v Speaker 3>Keeping in mind, you're the same guy who said that

0:12:54.090 --> 0:12:54.810
<v Speaker 3>stuff yesterday.

0:12:55.190 --> 0:12:55.410
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:12:55.429 --> 0:12:56.170
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:12:59.510 --> 0:13:02.990
<v Speaker 2>Uh, too much AI in too many areas of our lives.

0:13:03.030 --> 0:13:04.470
<v Speaker 2>We want to talk about that among other things.

0:13:04.550 --> 0:13:04.870
<v Speaker 3>Stay here.

0:13:06.370 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:13:18.550 --> 0:13:21.390
<v Speaker 6>From Belgium to Ireland to the Netherlands, several grocery stores

0:13:21.410 --> 0:13:24.290
<v Speaker 6>say they were also impacted by cyber attacks. One store

0:13:24.309 --> 0:13:27.710
<v Speaker 6>in Sweden saying, Overnight, our refrigerators and freezers were hacked

0:13:27.750 --> 0:13:30.370
<v Speaker 6>and the temperature set to 50 degrees. The store meaning

0:13:30.370 --> 0:13:34.590
<v Speaker 6>50 degrees Celsius, which is about 122 degrees Fahrenheit. The

0:13:34.690 --> 0:13:38.220
<v Speaker 6>attacks forcing some stores to close. Many left with empty shelves.

0:13:38.620 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 6>One Swedish grocery store employee saying they had to throw

0:13:41.059 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 6>away all of their frozen goods. I said, hey, I mean,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.219
<v Speaker 6>the only thing you notice is that it was actually

0:13:46.260 --> 0:13:48.780
<v Speaker 6>warm inside the freezer and that sort of thing. Various

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.189
<v Speaker 6>supermarket chain representatives across the continent say the attacks resulted

0:13:52.250 --> 0:13:54.110
<v Speaker 6>in millions of dollars of spoiled food.

0:13:54.170 --> 0:13:55.870
<v Speaker 2>So I saw this clip on the list and I

0:13:55.970 --> 0:13:59.290
<v Speaker 2>actually said to the producer, Hanson, is this new or

0:13:59.350 --> 0:14:00.850
<v Speaker 2>is this the same one from the other day? No,

0:14:00.890 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>it's an ongoing story. The Internet hacking of freezers across Europe.

0:14:05.940 --> 0:14:06.980
<v Speaker 2>What the heck is going on?

0:14:08.059 --> 0:14:11.309
<v Speaker 3>A couple of things. Number one, hackers. Finding a motive

0:14:11.410 --> 0:14:14.650
<v Speaker 3>is tough. There is some speculation that Putin is sending

0:14:14.690 --> 0:14:17.010
<v Speaker 3>the message, okay, you're going to support Ukraine, are you?

0:14:17.330 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I am going to mess with you every day. I

0:14:19.460 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>am going to make your lives hard.

0:14:21.740 --> 0:14:22.140
<v Speaker 7>Maybe.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm always a little confused by sending a message that

0:14:26.220 --> 0:14:28.300
<v Speaker 2>people aren't sure if it's from you or not.

0:14:30.770 --> 0:14:34.390
<v Speaker 3>He always... He always preserves plausible deniability.

0:14:34.410 --> 0:14:36.570
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's why part of his thing. So I terrorists,

0:14:36.610 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, often take responsibility for it, like within an

0:14:40.390 --> 0:14:42.620
<v Speaker 2>hour or the next day. We want you to know

0:14:42.700 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we did this. OK, we're trying to get a result

0:14:45.900 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>from what we're doing.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.540
<v Speaker 3>This brings us back to a conversation we've had many times.

0:14:49.950 --> 0:14:56.790
<v Speaker 3>Why does Putin bother preserving not even credible deniability, plausible deniability?

0:14:57.070 --> 0:15:00.350
<v Speaker 3>I don't know exactly. But like the many drone attacks

0:15:00.390 --> 0:15:03.090
<v Speaker 3>and explosions at airports and the rest of it, he's

0:15:03.150 --> 0:15:06.229
<v Speaker 3>sending a message. He figures you know who did it,

0:15:07.150 --> 0:15:10.180
<v Speaker 3>which is in contrast to his domestic thing, which is

0:15:10.220 --> 0:15:13.820
<v Speaker 3>to make it so freaking obvious who did it. I'm

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>not even going to cover my tracks, he says. That's

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>how scary I am.

0:15:16.900 --> 0:15:17.100
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:15:17.860 --> 0:15:20.540
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that I thought was interesting was that

0:15:21.540 --> 0:15:24.660
<v Speaker 3>hackers are like if it's connected to the Internet, it

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:29.580
<v Speaker 3>is hackable from refrigerators to your ring doorbell or whatever.

0:15:29.700 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, if it's not got decent security, the hackers,

0:15:32.820 --> 0:15:34.489
<v Speaker 3>I guess, are going all over the place.

0:15:34.780 --> 0:15:37.790
<v Speaker 2>This is another vote for living in a jar. See

0:15:37.910 --> 0:15:38.350
<v Speaker 2>our two.

0:15:39.710 --> 0:15:45.510
<v Speaker 3>The default administrator password for this, the the. temperature controller

0:15:45.570 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that's involved in a lot of these places, these freezers,

0:15:50.030 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the default administrator password is 12345. And a lot of

0:15:54.220 --> 0:15:57.780
<v Speaker 3>supermarket chains or its people don't change the password. I wouldn't.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.980
<v Speaker 2>I would just leave it to whatever it was. I'm

0:16:00.020 --> 0:16:02.260
<v Speaker 2>not going to put a new password on my freezer.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:03.740
<v Speaker 2>Why do we even have a password, I would think.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.540
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I know, I know. But if it is

0:16:07.590 --> 0:16:09.450
<v Speaker 3>connected to the Internet, it's got to have a password,

0:16:09.470 --> 0:16:12.610
<v Speaker 3>and it better not be 12345. The other interesting aspect

0:16:12.650 --> 0:16:15.250
<v Speaker 3>of the long report I read on it, was that

0:16:16.230 --> 0:16:20.530
<v Speaker 3>somebody or other, where is this? Researchers at the cybersecurity

0:16:20.590 --> 0:16:25.730
<v Speaker 3>firm Clarity successfully used Anthropix Cloud after the French cyber

0:16:25.750 --> 0:16:28.130
<v Speaker 3>attacks last month to build a test program to attack

0:16:28.170 --> 0:16:33.090
<v Speaker 3>refrigerator systems. It took them 30 minutes and $ 6. With AI,

0:16:33.110 --> 0:16:35.510
<v Speaker 3>you just prompt it and get a coffee, said the

0:16:35.630 --> 0:16:41.390
<v Speaker 3>chief technology officer. Interesting. Hot and cold running cyber attacks

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.580
<v Speaker 3>is my prediction for I don't know until we figure

0:16:44.620 --> 0:16:45.420
<v Speaker 3>out what to do about it.

0:16:45.420 --> 0:16:50.590
<v Speaker 2>It could be just a weirdo, right? It's like, why

0:16:50.630 --> 0:16:54.970
<v Speaker 2>do you vandalize the park equipment?

0:16:55.410 --> 0:16:56.690
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a vandal.

0:16:56.810 --> 0:16:57.490
<v Speaker 2>It's a vandal, yeah.

0:16:58.290 --> 0:16:58.430
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:59.090 --> 0:17:01.770
<v Speaker 2>It could be that. That'd actually be better news than

0:17:01.790 --> 0:17:03.540
<v Speaker 2>if it's Putin sending a message. I can reach out

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>and touch you in so many different ways.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:06.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:17:07.540 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 2>There's so many with everything hooked to the Internet. If

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.270
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese decide to attack Taiwan and they want to

0:17:12.310 --> 0:17:15.270
<v Speaker 2>disrupt the United States or Russia or whoever does that,

0:17:15.450 --> 0:17:18.090
<v Speaker 2>there's so many different ways to do it. Power plants,

0:17:18.190 --> 0:17:21.310
<v Speaker 2>cell phones, freezers at grocery stores is one I had

0:17:21.450 --> 0:17:22.830
<v Speaker 2>didn't have on my radar.

0:17:23.750 --> 0:17:23.970
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:17:24.230 --> 0:17:24.450
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:17:24.790 --> 0:17:24.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:25.050 --> 0:17:28.350
<v Speaker 3>Use your imagination. It's all on the table. And Xi

0:17:28.369 --> 0:17:31.470
<v Speaker 3>Jinping has a building full of the smartest people in China,

0:17:31.490 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the smartest computer people in China working on that very

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.300
<v Speaker 3>thing right now, as we speak. And they're building ships

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.060
<v Speaker 3>for the Navy as fast as they can.

0:17:41.300 --> 0:17:47.219
<v Speaker 2>So the biggest online dating company in the world is

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>saying no AI bots on our site because they're worried

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.700
<v Speaker 2>about people just using AI bots. And then what's the point?

0:17:55.740 --> 0:17:57.590
<v Speaker 2>Which is kind of an interesting topic and fits in

0:17:57.609 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>with other things. It's a New York Times guest essay today.

0:18:00.890 --> 0:18:02.050
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll get to that a little bit later.

0:18:02.730 --> 0:18:06.419
<v Speaker 3>And as we scan the horizon for interesting and wise

0:18:07.060 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>autopsies of the recent election, we've come across a couple

0:18:10.100 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of people who are very, very stupid who are commenting

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.459
<v Speaker 3>on it as well. So we'll share those with you

0:18:15.510 --> 0:18:16.090
<v Speaker 3>next half hour.

0:18:16.350 --> 0:18:18.710
<v Speaker 2>New York Times has got a great inside the war

0:18:18.770 --> 0:18:22.030
<v Speaker 2>room in recent days of the Trump people. There's some

0:18:22.070 --> 0:18:26.490
<v Speaker 2>interesting nuggets in that. Of just how bad the gallows

0:18:26.530 --> 0:18:27.990
<v Speaker 2>humor was leading up to the election.

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.220
<v Speaker 3>They saw it coming. Struck you as authentic, huh?

0:18:30.500 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 9>Oh, yeah.

0:18:32.030 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty. The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.659
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, I mean, if I were in the ballot,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 3>we would have won.

0:18:57.820 --> 0:19:00.500
<v Speaker 7>You saw the people that were packed, thousands and thousands

0:19:00.540 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 7>of people at every rally.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.980
<v Speaker 3>And if I was on the ballot, we would have won.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.930
<v Speaker 7>But you couldn't transfer that love.

0:19:06.950 --> 0:19:08.570
<v Speaker 3>There was such love at those rallies.

0:19:08.590 --> 0:19:09.409
<v Speaker 7>It was incredible.

0:19:10.330 --> 0:19:12.770
<v Speaker 3>We weren't able to transfer the love to candidates.

0:19:13.530 --> 0:19:17.730
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Vance says the reason Republicans lost last night

0:19:17.790 --> 0:19:20.050
<v Speaker 1>was the war in Iran.

0:19:20.109 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's largely true because it drove the

0:19:24.140 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 7>gasoline up a little bit short term. And probably that's...

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 7>probably it's true but at the same time if i

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:31.780
<v Speaker 7>had it to do again i'd have to do it

0:19:31.820 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 7>again because long term uh it's the only answer you

0:19:34.700 --> 0:19:38.300
<v Speaker 7>can't let iran have a nuclear weapon i do yeah

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 7>i can't let iran have a nuclear weapon or everything

0:19:41.180 --> 0:19:46.189
<v Speaker 7>that you see here someday might not exist so.

0:19:45.950 --> 0:19:49.630
<v Speaker 2>Do you think trump understood what vance did right there

0:19:49.710 --> 0:19:55.090
<v Speaker 2>so the reporting by Fox yesterday was that, uh, all your, uh,

0:19:56.090 --> 0:19:58.370
<v Speaker 2>important people there in the white house gathered together. What's

0:19:58.410 --> 0:20:00.630
<v Speaker 2>our messaging going to be coming out of last night's

0:20:00.710 --> 0:20:04.210
<v Speaker 2>ass kicking and Vance immediately runs to the Twitter machine

0:20:04.410 --> 0:20:06.850
<v Speaker 2>and tweets out a, his reason for it, which wasn't

0:20:06.890 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>what they were going to say, obviously. Um, got ahead

0:20:10.540 --> 0:20:13.490
<v Speaker 2>of their messaging. You think Trump understands what's going on there?

0:20:14.890 --> 0:20:16.510
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he does.

0:20:16.810 --> 0:20:17.270
<v Speaker 2>Probably.

0:20:17.850 --> 0:20:20.550
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I suspect so. I just like this line that

0:20:20.590 --> 0:20:22.150
<v Speaker 3>he couldn't transfer the love.

0:20:22.170 --> 0:20:23.750
<v Speaker 2>That's all I'm trying to do, baby. I'm trying to

0:20:23.790 --> 0:20:24.490
<v Speaker 2>transfer my love.

0:20:25.230 --> 0:20:32.630
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can't transfer love. Yeah, you'll just have to wait. Beautiful.

0:20:33.369 --> 0:20:37.500
<v Speaker 2>So New York Times with an interesting piece today. They're liberals.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:37.770
<v Speaker 1>They are.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I give more credit to any story that includes Jonathan Swan.

0:20:43.420 --> 0:20:46.020
<v Speaker 2>And this one does. I've seen the enemy and it

0:20:46.100 --> 0:20:49.060
<v Speaker 2>is us inside Team Trump's historic collapse. I'll just give

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:50.310
<v Speaker 2>you a little bit of this because we don't need

0:20:50.330 --> 0:20:52.710
<v Speaker 2>to spend a lot of time on this. The Washington

0:20:52.750 --> 0:20:54.470
<v Speaker 2>Post has got a good article about what the Democrats

0:20:54.510 --> 0:20:56.910
<v Speaker 2>are going to do or what they're the decision they're facing.

0:20:56.970 --> 0:20:57.889
<v Speaker 2>So I'll get to that here, too.

0:20:57.910 --> 0:20:58.010
<v Speaker 8>But.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.590
<v Speaker 2>This is back to the New York Times. Six days

0:21:00.650 --> 0:21:03.470
<v Speaker 2>before the election, more than two dozen of President Trump's

0:21:03.530 --> 0:21:07.250
<v Speaker 2>top strategists logged on to a private video call. The

0:21:07.310 --> 0:21:10.770
<v Speaker 2>mood was grim. The discussion began with talk of cyanide.

0:21:11.530 --> 0:21:13.070
<v Speaker 2>Do you want the white pill first or the black

0:21:13.109 --> 0:21:18.449
<v Speaker 2>pill first? Ask some guy you don't know. But it

0:21:18.490 --> 0:21:20.869
<v Speaker 2>was there looking at the internal polling, which we learned

0:21:21.430 --> 0:21:25.090
<v Speaker 2>the day before the election was horrible and predicted what

0:21:25.150 --> 0:21:27.830
<v Speaker 2>was going to happen and did happen. Another one of

0:21:27.890 --> 0:21:31.550
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party's top data consultants laid out two scenarios.

0:21:31.590 --> 0:21:35.630
<v Speaker 2>In the first, the $ 400 million MAGA Inc. super PAC

0:21:35.950 --> 0:21:38.070
<v Speaker 2>was reaching the voters that it had wanted and expected

0:21:38.109 --> 0:21:42.350
<v Speaker 2>to vote. That's the optimistic scenario. The other was a wipeout. Me,

0:21:42.430 --> 0:21:44.970
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting my affairs in order, say James Blair, who

0:21:45.020 --> 0:21:47.619
<v Speaker 2>left the White House to oversee the president's midterm strategy,

0:21:47.980 --> 0:21:50.220
<v Speaker 2>which he said to laughter, according to four people on

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.260
<v Speaker 2>the call. I suggest everyone else do the same.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:53.420
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:21:53.900 --> 0:21:55.780
<v Speaker 2>That's a heck of a thing to say. You're the

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.820
<v Speaker 2>guy in charge of the midterm strategy, and your announcement

0:21:59.859 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>to the crowd is, I'm getting my affairs in order,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.330
<v Speaker 2>I suggest everyone else do the same. For roughly 30 minutes,

0:22:05.380 --> 0:22:09.149
<v Speaker 2>the call ran on gallows humor, funeral arrangements, prison food,

0:22:09.410 --> 0:22:13.470
<v Speaker 2>presidential pardons, even a brief riff on fleeing the country. Wow.

0:22:13.609 --> 0:22:16.590
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we could all get asylum in Israel, one person said.

0:22:17.570 --> 0:22:17.869
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:22:19.330 --> 0:22:21.929
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's some pretty funny stuff. Well, what else are

0:22:21.950 --> 0:22:24.260
<v Speaker 2>you going to say? You're looking over the numbers and realize, oh,

0:22:24.300 --> 0:22:25.940
<v Speaker 2>we're just going to get devastated.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:22:26.859 --> 0:22:28.459
<v Speaker 2>It's just a question of how bad it is.

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.940
<v Speaker 3>There you go.

0:22:32.300 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was interesting from the Washington Post and

0:22:34.660 --> 0:22:36.570
<v Speaker 2>looking at some tweets I saw today kind of fits

0:22:36.630 --> 0:22:40.790
<v Speaker 2>in with it. Once the euphoria fades from Tuesday night,

0:22:40.830 --> 0:22:43.790
<v Speaker 2>when Democrats decisively won back the House and Senate, their

0:22:43.830 --> 0:22:46.369
<v Speaker 2>new majorities face a sobering task, figuring out how to

0:22:46.450 --> 0:22:49.260
<v Speaker 2>wield their power in the final two years of Trump's tenure.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 2>With committee gavels in hand, Democrats will be empowered to

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.860
<v Speaker 2>investigate Trump. And many have already made clear they plan

0:22:55.900 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to probe all manner of alleged corruption by the president,

0:22:58.660 --> 0:23:02.390
<v Speaker 2>his administration, his family and his corporate allies. But Democrats

0:23:02.530 --> 0:23:05.570
<v Speaker 2>also argue they cannot and will not only be an

0:23:05.670 --> 0:23:09.649
<v Speaker 2>anti-Trump party when they take control. They've repeatedly stated they

0:23:09.690 --> 0:23:13.490
<v Speaker 2>must materially improve the lives of voters or risk quickly

0:23:13.530 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>losing Congress again. I think that's clearly true. Whether or

0:23:18.300 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>not they can stop the momentum that their base desires

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of doing the investigation stuff remains to be seen, and

0:23:25.820 --> 0:23:27.419
<v Speaker 2>we'll find out here in a couple of months. I

0:23:27.460 --> 0:23:36.869
<v Speaker 2>remember Nancy Pelosi back in, this probably would have been 2010. No, no, no.

0:23:37.010 --> 0:23:37.630
<v Speaker 2>Going back further.

0:23:38.109 --> 0:23:38.369
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:23:39.190 --> 0:23:43.710
<v Speaker 2>This harp still exists. But this would have been 2006.

0:23:43.710 --> 0:23:46.940
<v Speaker 2>When Nancy Pelosi was running on, we'll have the gavel

0:23:46.980 --> 0:23:49.940
<v Speaker 2>and the Supreme subpoena power for all the investigations they're

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.100
<v Speaker 2>going to do on George Bush about the Iran, the

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Iraq war and all this different stuff. And then they

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 2>got in power and they didn't do any of that

0:23:55.609 --> 0:23:57.210
<v Speaker 2>because she knows that's not the way to win the

0:23:57.250 --> 0:23:59.689
<v Speaker 2>next election. That's not what you want to do. All

0:23:59.730 --> 0:24:02.810
<v Speaker 2>these backward looking investigations. People don't really like that. But

0:24:02.830 --> 0:24:06.590
<v Speaker 2>those are different times. The landscape has changed a lot

0:24:06.670 --> 0:24:10.629
<v Speaker 2>since then. And now your base demands this sort of thing,

0:24:10.710 --> 0:24:13.510
<v Speaker 2>and it'll be interesting to see. The guy who's going

0:24:13.580 --> 0:24:17.379
<v Speaker 2>to run the main committee on this sort of stuff,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Democrat in California, Garcia, has already announced, well, his two-word

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>tweet on election night was lawyer up, but he's been

0:24:25.859 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>out doing, he says the investigations start in the first

0:24:30.100 --> 0:24:33.740
<v Speaker 2>hours of him taking charge of the gavel. It begins

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.990
<v Speaker 2>for the Trump family and everything that's been going on, so...

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.420
<v Speaker 2>How are you going to stop him from doing that?

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Is is somebody is a is Jeffries the leader of

0:24:45.340 --> 0:24:47.340
<v Speaker 2>the party in the Senate, the speaker of the House?

0:24:47.380 --> 0:24:48.939
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to come to him saying, no, no, no, no, no, no.

0:24:49.540 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Shut up.

0:24:50.940 --> 0:24:53.260
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. The other part of their difficulty, though,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.300
<v Speaker 3>is that there's very, very little they can do on, quote, unquote, affordability.

0:24:58.140 --> 0:24:59.820
<v Speaker 3>Congress doesn't run the economy.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.570
<v Speaker 2>Can they do they have the power to cut off

0:25:04.590 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs somehow? I was reading about that yesterday. The

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.460
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate reality of the tariffs caused a lot of the misery.

0:25:15.330 --> 0:25:20.210
<v Speaker 2>And as you were explaining yesterday, for your border states

0:25:20.230 --> 0:25:22.310
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of stuff, Texas being a border state,

0:25:23.609 --> 0:25:25.510
<v Speaker 2>tariffs cause a lot of the misery. And if Democrats

0:25:25.550 --> 0:25:28.730
<v Speaker 2>cut off the tariffs, they'll get credit for an economic boom,

0:25:28.810 --> 0:25:31.270
<v Speaker 2>even though all they did was turn off a bad policy.

0:25:31.869 --> 0:25:32.109
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:25:33.130 --> 0:25:35.250
<v Speaker 3>Although sometimes that's what a good policy is. Sure, sure.

0:25:35.270 --> 0:25:35.389
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:36.450 --> 0:25:38.220
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the answer to your question, though, to

0:25:38.260 --> 0:25:44.300
<v Speaker 3>what extent legislation could could could end the tariffs, because

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump has used several different pretexts for why he can

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.210
<v Speaker 3>apply various tariffs, some of which are tied up in

0:25:50.250 --> 0:25:50.770
<v Speaker 3>the courts.

0:25:50.910 --> 0:25:51.449
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh, yeah.

0:25:51.550 --> 0:25:54.109
<v Speaker 3>Well, several of them. Yeah. In a major way. Supreme

0:25:54.150 --> 0:25:57.050
<v Speaker 3>Court style. So I don't know. It's an interesting question.

0:25:57.609 --> 0:25:58.010
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:58.490 --> 0:26:01.390
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I were a Democrat. Of course,

0:26:01.630 --> 0:26:03.619
<v Speaker 2>it's possible for me to think like a Democrat. I'm

0:26:03.940 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretending to think like a Democrat while I'm still

0:26:05.980 --> 0:26:09.270
<v Speaker 2>thinking like, you know, a middle-of-the-road or center-right guy. I

0:26:10.210 --> 0:26:16.149
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't want them to go big on investigations. No, not

0:26:16.190 --> 0:26:18.369
<v Speaker 2>to win the next election. I think the public's going

0:26:18.390 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>to hate that, but base would love it.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah. I mean, you've got to do something to

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>appear to be earning your keep, you know, to keep

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.490
<v Speaker 3>those contributions flowing in. And so they may run a

0:26:30.530 --> 0:26:32.970
<v Speaker 3>couple of investigations up the flagpole and see what kind

0:26:33.010 --> 0:26:36.030
<v Speaker 3>of dollar figures materialize. Because don't forget, that's what animates

0:26:36.070 --> 0:26:40.990
<v Speaker 3>politics these days. Small dollar and online donations. So they'll

0:26:41.010 --> 0:26:45.230
<v Speaker 3>see what happens. I tell you this. I'm just thinking

0:26:45.270 --> 0:26:48.369
<v Speaker 3>about how J.D. Vance is pro-tariff and the rest of it.

0:26:48.830 --> 0:26:51.090
<v Speaker 3>If I had J.D. Vance stock, I would be selling it.

0:26:51.230 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Sell it today. Might be premature, but I don't think

0:26:55.020 --> 0:26:57.380
<v Speaker 3>it is. I'm not sure who I'd buy in place.

0:26:57.420 --> 0:27:02.290
<v Speaker 3>Little DeSantis, little Rubio, little Bet the Field. I don't

0:27:02.310 --> 0:27:04.550
<v Speaker 3>like his chances at all, but there's lots going to

0:27:04.570 --> 0:27:05.489
<v Speaker 3>happen between now and then.

0:27:07.690 --> 0:27:09.550
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure he's got a great backup plan. I mean,

0:27:09.570 --> 0:27:12.070
<v Speaker 2>he came out of the financial world in the Bay Area.

0:27:12.109 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he's got some corporation he could go work

0:27:14.660 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>for and make a ton of money, and he'll write

0:27:16.060 --> 0:27:17.669
<v Speaker 2>a book and all that sort of stuff, so. It's

0:27:17.710 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 2>not like his fallback is bad. Although when you, you know,

0:27:20.660 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 2>when you've been thinking you're going to be president for

0:27:22.220 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>quite some time, that's hard to let go of. Tell

0:27:24.700 --> 0:27:27.620
<v Speaker 2>you about my favorite picture in the entire world from

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>yesterday in just a second. After we tell you about,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:30.660
<v Speaker 2>what are we telling you about?

0:27:31.830 --> 0:27:35.669
<v Speaker 3>Warrior Foundation Freedom Station. Today is the big annual Warrior

0:27:35.690 --> 0:27:38.229
<v Speaker 3>Foundation Freedom Station give-a-thon. If you're not familiar with this

0:27:38.290 --> 0:27:41.710
<v Speaker 3>incredible foundation, they've stood beside our ill and injured warriors

0:27:41.750 --> 0:27:45.469
<v Speaker 3>for over 20 years, providing transitional housing, support services, outdoor therapy,

0:27:45.590 --> 0:27:47.189
<v Speaker 3>and the chance to rebuild their lives.

0:27:47.450 --> 0:27:50.010
<v Speaker 2>And today during this give-a-thon, there's one mission to fly

0:27:50.070 --> 0:27:52.310
<v Speaker 2>warriors home for the holidays, and for those who can't fly,

0:27:52.350 --> 0:27:53.890
<v Speaker 2>their families will be flown to them.

0:27:54.670 --> 0:27:56.900
<v Speaker 3>Because no one deserves to be alone for the holidays,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.120
<v Speaker 3>especially those who've sacrificed so much for our freedom.

0:28:00.500 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, consider giving back today by giving a phone call

0:28:05.300 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 2>to 619-WARRIOR. That's super easy.

0:28:07.500 --> 0:28:12.220
<v Speaker 3>619-WARRIOR. Your donation is tax-deductible, of course, and it's a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>heartfelt thank you that ensures our Warriors wake up in

0:28:15.260 --> 0:28:17.940
<v Speaker 3>their own beds on Christmas morning or surrounded by their family.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Donate now. Once again, call 619-WARRIOR. That's 619-WARRIOR. Or visit warriorfoundation.org.

0:28:24.900 --> 0:28:30.660
<v Speaker 3>That's warriorfoundation.org. Get that name right. Warriorfoundation.org.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Did you see the best picture in the world yesterday?

0:28:33.460 --> 0:28:34.300
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure.

0:28:38.370 --> 0:28:44.100
<v Speaker 2>Bob Dylan shaking hands with the Pope. The Pope is

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.220
<v Speaker 2>wearing his Pope costume, because I think you have to.

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Bob Dylan's wearing a black hoodie and a polka dot

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:52.740
<v Speaker 2>tie for some reason.

0:28:53.900 --> 0:28:55.330
<v Speaker 3>A hoodie and tie?

0:28:55.660 --> 0:28:58.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's like a velvet hoodie. I don't know

0:28:58.610 --> 0:29:00.810
<v Speaker 2>if he is hiding from, he didn't want to be recognized.

0:29:00.870 --> 0:29:02.110
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I feel like you got to pull

0:29:02.150 --> 0:29:04.090
<v Speaker 2>your hood off when you meet with the Pope.

0:29:04.610 --> 0:29:05.250
<v Speaker 3>Oh, hood up.

0:29:05.750 --> 0:29:09.410
<v Speaker 2>Hood up, yes. Hood up over his head. Looking like

0:29:09.450 --> 0:29:14.150
<v Speaker 2>a monk of some sort. I've always been really interested

0:29:14.190 --> 0:29:18.230
<v Speaker 2>in Bob Dylan's, whether or not he's actually religious or not.

0:29:18.310 --> 0:29:20.650
<v Speaker 2>He's gone back and forth. You know, he's Jewish. Then

0:29:20.690 --> 0:29:23.980
<v Speaker 2>he's super hardcore Christian, put out some Christian albums. Then

0:29:24.180 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of suggested maybe he wasn't a Christian anymore, although

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>nobody's exactly sure about that. And here he's meeting with

0:29:28.660 --> 0:29:31.310
<v Speaker 2>the Pope. I mean, you don't meet with the Pope

0:29:31.310 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>by accident. It's not like he ran into him on

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.180
<v Speaker 2>the street. He went to the Vatican. So he's still

0:29:36.180 --> 0:29:38.220
<v Speaker 2>a Christian, I guess. I don't know. i was at

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.060
<v Speaker 2>another chance to meet the pope i was at another

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.260
<v Speaker 2>latin mass yesterday which is one of the weirder things

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.300
<v Speaker 2>i do i go to a latin mass not understanding

0:29:45.340 --> 0:29:48.220
<v Speaker 2>a single thing they're saying but uh really enjoy it

0:29:48.620 --> 0:29:50.460
<v Speaker 2>and the person that originally invited me was there and

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 2>came up to me afterward and said hey glad you

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.730
<v Speaker 2>glad you made it so the picture of the pope

0:29:55.970 --> 0:29:59.090
<v Speaker 2>and bob dylan one response is dylan is so lucky

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 2>The other response is, the Pope is so lucky. And

0:30:02.660 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 2>there you go.

0:30:04.060 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>How do you like being Pope so far? Is it

0:30:07.540 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 3>what you expected?

0:30:08.780 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Is this the religion where you get circumcised or don't

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>get circumcised?

0:30:13.310 --> 0:30:15.710
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's up to you, my son. Or is it?

0:30:15.790 --> 0:30:21.430
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. From Catholic foreskins, I don't have any idea.

0:30:22.090 --> 0:30:22.370
<v Speaker 5>You!

0:30:22.430 --> 0:30:24.610
<v Speaker 3>You brought it up, you hypocrite!

0:30:24.670 --> 0:30:25.890
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I didn't drop the F word.

0:30:26.430 --> 0:30:30.130
<v Speaker 3>Wow, wow. Okay, let's hear from it, idiots. About the election,

0:30:30.770 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 3>clip number 80, Michael, this is some famous TikToker, Alexis Hinton,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.780
<v Speaker 3>commenting on the recent midterms.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 8>I woke up this morning and went on the Internet

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.420
<v Speaker 8>to look up who our next president was because the

0:30:43.460 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 8>election yesterday, the election last night, I woke up this

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.830
<v Speaker 8>morning looking up trying to see who replaced Donald Trump.

0:30:49.070 --> 0:30:51.910
<v Speaker 8>And I'm not seeing anything about a new president.

0:30:52.430 --> 0:30:53.250
<v Speaker 1>So I was so confused.

0:30:53.310 --> 0:30:55.490
<v Speaker 8>I texted my sister. I'm like, who is it?

0:30:55.570 --> 0:30:56.490
<v Speaker 9>Who is the new president?

0:30:56.510 --> 0:30:58.990
<v Speaker 8>Because I didn't go vote. I didn't I wasn't like

0:30:59.050 --> 0:31:01.470
<v Speaker 8>really aware of who was running for president. So I

0:31:01.490 --> 0:31:04.910
<v Speaker 8>started texting Chad GBT and I just I'm so embarrassed. Like,

0:31:05.540 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 8>I know I'm.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:07.070
<v Speaker 2>Not the only one.

0:31:07.100 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 8>I know I can't be the only one who thought

0:31:09.220 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 8>that we were.

0:31:09.700 --> 0:31:11.060
<v Speaker 1>Having a new president.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.420
<v Speaker 3>So do we admire? My IQ just dropped five points.

0:31:13.540 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Do we admire people that don't pay any attention to

0:31:15.580 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 2>politics or despise them or or what? I feel like

0:31:22.700 --> 0:31:26.260
<v Speaker 2>if you don't pay any attention and don't spout off,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that's fine.

0:31:27.340 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>And don't vote. And don't vote.

0:31:29.020 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely don't vote. That's fine. You know, we're self-governing and

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you're deciding to let other people make decisions for you.

0:31:39.770 --> 0:31:42.110
<v Speaker 2>But I can understand you've decided that's what's going to

0:31:42.130 --> 0:31:44.750
<v Speaker 2>make me happiest. Maybe you choose that at different points

0:31:44.770 --> 0:31:48.950
<v Speaker 2>in your life or whatever. But the spouts off and

0:31:49.010 --> 0:31:51.790
<v Speaker 2>has no idea... Doesn't pay any attention. That crowd.

0:31:54.050 --> 0:31:57.070
<v Speaker 3>Visited a friend in the hospital recently. And, you know,

0:31:57.190 --> 0:32:01.170
<v Speaker 3>I did not walk into any hospital rooms and say,

0:32:01.270 --> 0:32:04.130
<v Speaker 3>I think we probably ought to operate or whatever. You

0:32:04.170 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>know why? Because I have no effing idea what I'm

0:32:06.150 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about. So I did not join in the process.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.300
<v Speaker 3>I think we need more of that spirit in the country, honestly.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of idiots, this is a funny coincidence. I

0:32:16.180 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 3>was just reading a great piece of writing from Christian Schneider.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:25.060
<v Speaker 3>in the National Review, and his premise is that we

0:32:25.100 --> 0:32:27.860
<v Speaker 3>have a lack of shame in our politics. We need

0:32:27.900 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 3>more shame and less shameful activity. And he points out,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 3>and I thought this was pretty insightful, that during the

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:39.550
<v Speaker 3>wokepocalypse and the DEI period and everything, there was illegitimate

0:32:39.670 --> 0:32:43.630
<v Speaker 3>shaming going on all over the place. And to say, yeah,

0:32:43.810 --> 0:32:48.250
<v Speaker 3>FU became the right thing to do. to become just

0:32:48.470 --> 0:32:51.870
<v Speaker 3>hardened and not accept any shaming because it was all

0:32:51.950 --> 0:32:56.430
<v Speaker 3>so fake and unjustified. But now actual things you ought

0:32:56.450 --> 0:32:59.250
<v Speaker 3>to be ashamed of, people are saying, I'm not ashamed.

0:32:59.310 --> 0:33:03.710
<v Speaker 3>And that's put us where we are. Anyway, being shamed

0:33:03.730 --> 0:33:06.209
<v Speaker 3>turned into a badge of honor. This is how American

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.580
<v Speaker 3>politics ended up being infected with scofflaws like George Santos,

0:33:11.020 --> 0:33:13.020
<v Speaker 3>who was less than three months into a seven-year prison

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.780
<v Speaker 3>term when Trump commuted it, calling him somewhat of a rogue.

0:33:16.650 --> 0:33:20.060
<v Speaker 3>Trump praised his loyalty, saying that Santos had the courage, conviction,

0:33:20.100 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 3>and intelligence to always vote Republican. So much for the

0:33:23.980 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>belief that remorse for wrongdoing should be encouraged. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:33:27.940 --> 0:33:29.620
<v Speaker 3>clip 81, I give you George Santos.

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.710
<v Speaker 2>It is a blue tsunami. Your reaction? We f * * *

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:34.790
<v Speaker 2>ed up.

0:33:35.950 --> 0:33:36.630
<v Speaker 3>We really did.

0:33:36.670 --> 0:33:39.170
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I gotta tell you. We f * * *

0:33:38.750 --> 0:33:44.750
<v Speaker 2>ed up. It's like Republicans literally squandered their majority. Congratulations.

0:33:45.250 --> 0:33:45.350
<v Speaker 1>Um.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.090
<v Speaker 2>It's a disaster. It's a f * * * ing disaster.

0:33:49.140 --> 0:33:51.010
<v Speaker 2>It's a blue tsunami full of f * * *

0:33:50.750 --> 0:33:54.630
<v Speaker 2>ing disaster. Imagine if it rained knives for a month

0:33:54.690 --> 0:33:55.930
<v Speaker 2>and then that turned into a wave.

0:33:55.970 --> 0:33:56.930
<v Speaker 3>That's what happened tonight.

0:33:57.250 --> 0:33:59.970
<v Speaker 2>Ashley Henson can't win Iowa. It's just a s * * * show.

0:34:00.550 --> 0:34:02.410
<v Speaker 3>As I used to say to the University of Michigan

0:34:02.450 --> 0:34:05.230
<v Speaker 3>football team when I was the quarterback there, you've got

0:34:05.250 --> 0:34:06.930
<v Speaker 3>to pull together or we're going to lose.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.140
<v Speaker 2>Is that hopefully the last time I ever hear from him?

0:34:09.660 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 3>My God, if there's a God, yes, please.

0:34:12.540 --> 0:34:15.259
<v Speaker 2>We're going to hear from some DSA idiots with what

0:34:15.300 --> 0:34:19.140
<v Speaker 2>they think is going to happen now that their side

0:34:19.180 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>has taken power. Among other things on the way, not political.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:22.100
<v Speaker 3>Stay tuned.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:29.380
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and.

0:34:29.060 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 9>Getty.

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:34:36.110 --> 0:34:40.509
<v Speaker 9>I would definitely support collective ownership of industries in the

0:34:40.530 --> 0:34:42.819
<v Speaker 9>United States. Ultimately, for me, the long-term goal of the

0:34:42.860 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 9>political project is a socialist transformation of society and a

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 9>move beyond the economy being centered around profit and instead

0:34:51.580 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 9>being centered around human need.

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 4>There should be no kings anywhere, which means the bosses

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:57.020
<v Speaker 4>should be.

0:34:56.900 --> 0:34:58.420
<v Speaker 1>Accountable to us, the workers.

0:34:58.900 --> 0:35:00.700
<v Speaker 2>The landlords should be accountable.

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>To us, the workers.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.750
<v Speaker 5>We believe infrastructure expands to health care, to education. and

0:35:05.910 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 5>having those services be controlled in at least some partial

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 5>state capacity.

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:35:13.060 --> 0:35:15.860
<v Speaker 2>The bosses should answer to the workers and the landlord

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 2>should answer to the workers. You actually are a communist.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.380
<v Speaker 2>You want me to put the trivial back in trivia

0:35:23.420 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>for you? We're about to have the first U S

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:32.850
<v Speaker 2>Senator whose name contains exactly one of each vowel in

0:35:32.890 --> 0:35:38.950
<v Speaker 2>a hundred years. A hundred years ago, we had Edwin S. Broussard,

0:35:39.070 --> 0:35:42.410
<v Speaker 2>who had A-E-I-O-U in his name. And it's been a

0:35:42.450 --> 0:35:45.370
<v Speaker 2>hundred years since then, but now we have Julia Letlow,

0:35:45.710 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 2>who also has A-E-I-O-U in her name. Who possibly figured

0:35:51.219 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 2>that out?

0:35:54.380 --> 0:35:54.860
<v Speaker 3>Did A.I.

0:35:54.900 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Do that?

0:35:55.880 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 3>And then printed it, typed it to appear on the Internet?

0:36:00.610 --> 0:36:02.270
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is trivial.

0:36:03.780 --> 0:36:06.670
<v Speaker 3>God, I'd say. I'm looking at this picture of Bob

0:36:06.690 --> 0:36:08.049
<v Speaker 3>Dylan and the Pope.

0:36:08.070 --> 0:36:08.410
<v Speaker 9>Uh-huh.

0:36:12.370 --> 0:36:14.029
<v Speaker 3>Is this like a good and evil thing?

0:36:15.510 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Bob Dylan's not evil. Or are you thinking the Pope's evil?

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. That's why I'm so intrigued.

0:36:22.300 --> 0:36:24.020
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Bob, couldn't be a bigger fan. You got to

0:36:24.060 --> 0:36:26.900
<v Speaker 2>put your hood down when you finally get there to

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.529
<v Speaker 2>the Pope and shake hands with him. Come on, that's just,

0:36:29.710 --> 0:36:30.290
<v Speaker 2>that's rude.

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.530
<v Speaker 3>It's chilly. I could get a cold.

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:41.450
<v Speaker 2>I'm old. Available draft. I was talking about taking in

0:36:41.469 --> 0:36:43.350
<v Speaker 2>the coverage from the election and how it didn't even

0:36:43.390 --> 0:36:45.910
<v Speaker 2>cross my mind to watch any of the network news

0:36:46.010 --> 0:36:50.100
<v Speaker 2>that exist, let alone cable news. There was a couple

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.779
<v Speaker 2>of different websites. Free Press had a great panel. I mean,

0:36:54.300 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 2>just top notch. And I was over at the Dispatch

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.260
<v Speaker 2>in different places. But the ratings just came out. NBC

0:37:01.300 --> 0:37:05.610
<v Speaker 2>had 7 million people watch. ABC, 5 million. CNN, 4 million.

0:37:05.850 --> 0:37:10.870
<v Speaker 2>MSN now, 4, Fox, 4, CBS, 3. Enjoy it while

0:37:10.930 --> 0:37:15.270
<v Speaker 2>it lasts. I guarantee you. My kids, their generation, they

0:37:15.290 --> 0:37:18.390
<v Speaker 2>ain't a chance. They're going to think, huh, I want

0:37:18.430 --> 0:37:20.890
<v Speaker 2>to know something. I think I'll turn on NBC News.

0:37:21.230 --> 0:37:24.810
<v Speaker 2>Those days are really good. Your viewers are dying every day.

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.650
<v Speaker 2>People love Steve Kornacki. Isn't he with NBC now, or

0:37:28.690 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 2>is he?

0:37:28.950 --> 0:37:31.430
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Yeah, he is. Let's come down here

0:37:31.469 --> 0:37:34.030
<v Speaker 3>to the 3rd District of Ohio. It's a Republican stronghold

0:37:34.050 --> 0:37:36.310
<v Speaker 3>since 1943. Now let's move over to the east.

0:37:36.510 --> 0:37:36.690
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:37:37.530 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I do want to get to that op-ed in the

0:37:40.060 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>New York Times about too much AI on certain sites

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.700
<v Speaker 2>that I actually think is pretty interesting, especially when you've

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.550
<v Speaker 2>got this anti-AI wave that seems to be sweeping the country,

0:37:50.590 --> 0:37:54.830
<v Speaker 2>certainly with data centers and just AI in general. AI slop,

0:37:54.870 --> 0:37:56.450
<v Speaker 2>my kids. I bet I hear that once a day

0:37:56.489 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 2>from my kids. That's AI slop. They're just a bitter

0:38:00.660 --> 0:38:01.910
<v Speaker 2>taste about AI in general.

0:38:01.950 --> 0:38:02.270
<v Speaker 6>Good.

0:38:02.570 --> 0:38:05.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. If you missed a segment of the podcast, Armstrong

0:38:05.290 --> 0:38:06.339
<v Speaker 2>and Getty on demand.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:09.460
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.