WEBVTT - I Know Grass & Trees... That's Pretty Much It.

0:00:09.850 --> 0:00:13.550
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio.

0:00:13.590 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>The George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:15.810 --> 0:00:17.980
<v Speaker 3>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:19.660 --> 0:00:31.390
<v Speaker 4>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:31.410 --> 0:00:33.350
<v Speaker 2>The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial was a

0:00:33.350 --> 0:00:33.930
<v Speaker 2>black man.

0:00:34.150 --> 0:00:36.770
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not going to share any opinions here.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.710
<v Speaker 2>Practicing white. I'm surprised. It changes the landscape of the

0:00:42.750 --> 0:00:43.870
<v Speaker 2>conversation a little bit.

0:00:44.170 --> 0:00:44.350
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:00:44.729 --> 0:00:46.370
<v Speaker 2>And I think a lot of us were assuming that

0:00:46.409 --> 0:00:49.530
<v Speaker 2>it was a white man. That's talking about the Clancy jury.

0:00:49.990 --> 0:00:53.550
<v Speaker 5>Why does it change the landscape of the discussion if

0:00:53.590 --> 0:00:55.190
<v Speaker 5>the holdout was a black guy?

0:00:55.210 --> 0:00:58.660
<v Speaker 1>Because she's a woke racist, obviously.

0:01:00.460 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 5>And the idea is that all smart people clearly thought

0:01:05.740 --> 0:01:06.660
<v Speaker 5>she should have been acquitted?

0:01:07.670 --> 0:01:10.810
<v Speaker 2>And to have a black person go against that would...

0:01:10.650 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that it? Yeah, not smart as much as... Moral, correct. Yeah, yeah.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.730
<v Speaker 5>And of course we can't gloss over the phrase non-practicing white.

0:01:24.069 --> 0:01:25.230
<v Speaker 2>What the hell is that?

0:01:25.430 --> 0:01:31.250
<v Speaker 1>I'm a practicing white man, by the way. Practice makes perfect. Anyway, yeah,

0:01:31.350 --> 0:01:33.530
<v Speaker 1>so obviously a crazy, woke person.

0:01:33.550 --> 0:01:36.430
<v Speaker 2>But interesting, because.

0:01:35.580 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>We're always talking about this, she's obviously very bright and well-spoken.

0:01:40.580 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But intelligence and wisdom and perspective and ideology are completely

0:01:47.260 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>different elements in the equation of what kind of person

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:49.950
<v Speaker 1>that is.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:55.540
<v Speaker 2>I'm a non-practicing white person. That is pathetic. And she

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>is a woke-a-doodle. I practice 20 minutes a day with

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a metronome. Wow. Wow.

0:02:00.900 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 5>That would explain, you know, your obvious skills. How good

0:02:03.140 --> 0:02:06.460
<v Speaker 5>my wife is. Oh, it's terrific, yes. So I've got a.

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Couple of things for you on that topic that I

0:02:08.100 --> 0:02:10.540
<v Speaker 1>found really interesting and hope you do, too. First of all,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the wonderful Helen Pluckrose describing what woke is. And this

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.660
<v Speaker 1>needs to be at the base of your understanding of

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.650
<v Speaker 1>what everybody's talking about with this crap.

0:02:21.610 --> 0:02:22.130
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty short.

0:02:22.210 --> 0:02:24.590
<v Speaker 1>The term woke is most commonly used to describe the

0:02:24.630 --> 0:02:28.460
<v Speaker 1>critical social justice movement. Its beliefs are rooted in critical

0:02:28.540 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>theories such as post-colonial theory, the whole settler colonial thing,

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.340
<v Speaker 1>queer theory, critical race theory, which themselves draw upon post-modern

0:02:37.380 --> 0:02:39.060
<v Speaker 1>concepts of knowledge, power, and language.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:40.619
<v Speaker 2>According to this framework.

0:02:40.940 --> 0:02:45.790
<v Speaker 1>Knowledge is socially constructed in the service of identity-based power.

0:02:46.270 --> 0:02:50.710
<v Speaker 1>It's not objectively discovered. It's constructed to serve the powerful.

0:02:51.250 --> 0:02:55.889
<v Speaker 1>Dominant groups, particularly white, western, heterosexual, cisgender, and able-bodied men,

0:02:56.190 --> 0:02:59.370
<v Speaker 1>determine which forms of knowledge are regarded as legitimate. These

0:02:59.510 --> 0:03:03.109
<v Speaker 1>dominant discourses shape how society understands the world and thereby

0:03:03.169 --> 0:03:07.500
<v Speaker 1>create and perpetuate a system of oppression such as racism, patriarchy,

0:03:07.590 --> 0:03:14.889
<v Speaker 1>and transphobia. Because people are socialized into these discourses or

0:03:14.950 --> 0:03:17.389
<v Speaker 1>ways of seeing the world, they're held to be largely

0:03:17.630 --> 0:03:20.889
<v Speaker 1>unaware that they're participating in the oppressive system.

0:03:21.310 --> 0:03:23.740
<v Speaker 2>Those who have adopted CSJ theories.

0:03:24.139 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Especially members of marginalized groups, are regarded as uniquely able

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.300
<v Speaker 1>to perceive and expose these invisible structures.

0:03:31.580 --> 0:03:36.690
<v Speaker 2>Hence, they are woke. They have awakened to the structural evil.

0:03:37.420 --> 0:03:42.020
<v Speaker 1>Disagreement, criticism, or questions about any of this are understood

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:46.330
<v Speaker 1>as evidence of ignorance or resistance to recognizing one's own

0:03:46.490 --> 0:03:50.150
<v Speaker 1>complicity and desire to preserve one's own privilege.

0:03:50.190 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>So that fits in with that anti-racist nonsense that Coase

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 5>came up with. If you say you're not racist, that's

0:03:58.420 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 5>proof that you're racist. Because you're just not awakened to

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.490
<v Speaker 5>all of these things that I can see because my

0:04:04.910 --> 0:04:07.030
<v Speaker 5>ability to perceive these things is at a much higher

0:04:07.090 --> 0:04:07.970
<v Speaker 5>level than that.

0:04:08.410 --> 0:04:11.830
<v Speaker 1>And happily, if you admit you are racist, that's also

0:04:11.870 --> 0:04:14.089
<v Speaker 1>proof that you're racist. And if you say I'm not

0:04:14.290 --> 0:04:17.770
<v Speaker 1>sure if I'm racist, that's extra strong proof that you're racist.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So you need to shut up and give up power.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.100
<v Speaker 5>If that sounds like Calvin Ball, if you were a

0:04:22.140 --> 0:04:24.979
<v Speaker 5>Calvin Hobbes fan back in the day, where he constantly

0:04:25.020 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 5>changes the rules so you always lose, yes, that is

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:28.340
<v Speaker 5>exactly what that is.

0:04:28.930 --> 0:04:31.190
<v Speaker 2>One more note from the wonderful Helen Pluckrose.

0:04:31.630 --> 0:04:35.750
<v Speaker 1>Allowing dissenting views to be believed or even spoken is

0:04:35.790 --> 0:04:39.500
<v Speaker 1>to enable the discourses to continue to construct the oppressive

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>systems and is akin to violence... And she points out

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that part is weakening now. People aren't being shoved out

0:04:46.460 --> 0:04:47.679
<v Speaker 1>of careers for saying.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Black Lives Matter, all lives matter, for instance.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.430
<v Speaker 1>So I just thought that was a really, really clear,

0:05:13.490 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>concise definition of the worldview that these people have learned. And,

0:05:16.990 --> 0:05:18.779
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can talk about the origins of it,

0:05:18.810 --> 0:05:20.870
<v Speaker 1>but we have before and we will again. I'm going

0:05:20.890 --> 0:05:22.530
<v Speaker 1>to throw this in for fun and then we'll get

0:05:22.550 --> 0:05:29.010
<v Speaker 1>to the DSA. That socialist Senate nominee, Angie Dixon, in Florida,

0:05:29.470 --> 0:05:32.820
<v Speaker 1>she's the black lady who always wears that pink fuchsia.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.620
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you call it? Shade of pink? I've

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>always been bad at, like, your second-tier colors. I can

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>tell you.

0:05:39.460 --> 0:05:43.940
<v Speaker 5>What's green, but whether it's Kelly green or... What an

0:05:43.980 --> 0:05:45.850
<v Speaker 5>interesting thing to know about yourself.

0:05:47.670 --> 0:05:48.690
<v Speaker 2>I just, I'm not interested.

0:05:48.930 --> 0:05:49.510
<v Speaker 4>I can never remember.

0:05:49.550 --> 0:05:53.980
<v Speaker 5>I've always been bad at second-tier colors. You have a

0:05:54.020 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 5>very intricate knowledge of your strengths and weaknesses. Well, yeah,

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.310
<v Speaker 5>I actually do because I like to be right. But

0:06:01.570 --> 0:06:05.450
<v Speaker 5>the other thing I'm terrible at is identifying plants. I've

0:06:05.589 --> 0:06:09.810
<v Speaker 5>tried to remember what plants are which, and I just can't.

0:06:09.830 --> 0:06:11.430
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea. I always have to ask my wife,

0:06:11.790 --> 0:06:14.180
<v Speaker 2>what is that bush again? I have no idea where

0:06:14.190 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I rank on the plant identifying scale. It's like I

0:06:16.740 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>got brain damage. I should put some thought into these things. Eh,

0:06:20.010 --> 0:06:23.290
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't do me any good. Anyway, so this socialist.

0:06:23.250 --> 0:06:28.770
<v Speaker 1>Democrat, Angie Dixon, she's an avowed democratic socialist, doesn't.

0:06:28.510 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Believe in private property.

0:06:30.500 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>She owns two homes and raked in at least $ 270, 000

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.620
<v Speaker 1>last year. She is absolutely, like all of these people are,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.190
<v Speaker 1>a champagne socialist. Crazy, a child of affluence who somehow

0:06:46.529 --> 0:06:48.010
<v Speaker 1>feels guilty about it, I guess.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.420
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, that brings us to the main topic.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.170
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times had a piece recently. The headline was,

0:06:54.500 --> 0:06:58.610
<v Speaker 1>Seeking Jolt, GOP Turns to a New Red Scare.

0:07:00.130 --> 0:07:01.089
<v Speaker 2>And as who wrote this?

0:07:01.130 --> 0:07:05.250
<v Speaker 1>Ira Stoll wrote in the Free Beacon. Even by the

0:07:05.310 --> 0:07:08.950
<v Speaker 1>standards of modern partisan cheerleading, every once in a while, okay,

0:07:09.050 --> 0:07:11.270
<v Speaker 1>almost every day, an article comes along that is so

0:07:11.390 --> 0:07:14.370
<v Speaker 1>shameless in its Democratic Party advocacy that it's enough to

0:07:14.410 --> 0:07:16.610
<v Speaker 1>make a reader laugh out loud or at least engage

0:07:16.650 --> 0:07:20.390
<v Speaker 1>in a visible eye roll. And it goes through how

0:07:20.510 --> 0:07:27.470
<v Speaker 1>it's a red scare. The accusation that Democrats are communists is, quote, far-fetched, quote, baseless, because, quote,

0:07:27.750 --> 0:07:32.250
<v Speaker 1>no credible midterm candidate identifies as a communist. Also, the charge, quote,

0:07:32.270 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>has little overlap with Democrats' actual platforms. But then finally,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.670
<v Speaker 1>in the 14th paragraph, they get to, they, uh.

0:07:41.270 --> 0:07:42.500
<v Speaker 2>Bernie Sanders and all.

0:07:42.420 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>These democratic socialists praising the Cuban Revolution, or what's it,

0:07:49.100 --> 0:07:54.180
<v Speaker 1>Dario Eliza Villas Chavalier, God, too many names, once maintained

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a social media account that suggested public libraries should carry

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>more Marxist literature. And then Ira Stoll gets into the

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.950
<v Speaker 1>fact that Marxists always claim they're not Marxists in the U.S.

0:08:04.190 --> 0:08:07.570
<v Speaker 1>They always claim they're not communists. So, way to go,

0:08:07.610 --> 0:08:10.070
<v Speaker 1>New York Times. But that brings us to the ultimate,

0:08:10.190 --> 0:08:13.970
<v Speaker 1>ultimate thing I wanted to talk about. Absolutely great coverage

0:08:14.010 --> 0:08:19.489
<v Speaker 1>in the free press about the civil war inside the DSA. Because,

0:08:19.690 --> 0:08:22.390
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost to their credit, the DSA tolerates a

0:08:22.430 --> 0:08:25.380
<v Speaker 1>lot of dissenting voices and a lot of dissenting points

0:08:25.420 --> 0:08:29.420
<v Speaker 1>of view. They're all freaking whack jobs. But they got

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:35.220
<v Speaker 1>into the various coalitions within the DSA. They're caucuses, they

0:08:35.260 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>call them. And they have a list of them along

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>with how significant they are.

0:08:41.340 --> 0:08:44.900
<v Speaker 2>Oops, this is the wrong one. Dang it, where is it? Sorry,

0:08:44.940 --> 0:08:46.939
<v Speaker 2>say something perceptive.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:54.660
<v Speaker 5>I want to talk about what Trump said about AI yesterday. Tweeted,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 5>or truth socialed all day long. Really strong takes on

0:08:58.420 --> 0:09:00.830
<v Speaker 5>the whole AI thing, which I think now means it

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:01.870
<v Speaker 5>is red-pilled.

0:09:03.510 --> 0:09:06.250
<v Speaker 1>Whatever that means, so stay tuned. Yeah, you know, I

0:09:06.290 --> 0:09:08.780
<v Speaker 1>get lost on the whole pill thing. It's like identifying

0:09:08.820 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>plants to me.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:10.179
<v Speaker 2>I can never remember.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.739
<v Speaker 5>So if you come across an obscure sort of red,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 5>sort of pink plant, you're at a loss for description.

0:09:18.980 --> 0:09:21.380
<v Speaker 2>Oh, even if I've been told the name 20 times before?

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 5>You wouldn't know the plant or the color. So it's

0:09:24.059 --> 0:09:27.310
<v Speaker 5>kind of an off-pink and a plant you don't know.

0:09:27.990 --> 0:09:29.330
<v Speaker 5>You just stared at it and.

0:09:29.190 --> 0:09:32.830
<v Speaker 2>Go, gah. You don't have the color and you don't

0:09:32.850 --> 0:09:36.100
<v Speaker 2>have the plant. Well, no, I'm saying like we've got,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:09:36.700 --> 0:09:40.380
<v Speaker 1>Like five different plants in our landscaping in our yard.

0:09:40.980 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And I've been told the names of the various plants

0:09:43.179 --> 0:09:44.340
<v Speaker 1>over and over again.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:46.099
<v Speaker 2>I know. And I look at it.

0:09:46.100 --> 0:09:50.390
<v Speaker 5>I know grass and trees. That's pretty much it. Yes,

0:09:50.510 --> 0:09:54.470
<v Speaker 5>I am your equal. I'm absolutely your equal. You know,

0:09:54.490 --> 0:09:56.730
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at the clock. We actually don't have time

0:09:56.790 --> 0:09:59.910
<v Speaker 5>to rush through this. I think it's worth a look.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>At the various factions within the DSA that are absolutely kooky.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.490
<v Speaker 1>And absolutely disprove the New York.

0:10:09.370 --> 0:10:12.330
<v Speaker 2>Times premise, too, for what it's worth. So, that after

0:10:12.350 --> 0:10:12.610
<v Speaker 2>the break.

0:10:13.030 --> 0:10:16.250
<v Speaker 5>I think it's interesting for the NFL that the two

0:10:16.350 --> 0:10:18.739
<v Speaker 5>most hyped teams in all of the NFL.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>The Rams and the defending.

0:10:24.380 --> 0:10:27.740
<v Speaker 5>Best record in the AFC Broncos, two most hyped teams

0:10:27.780 --> 0:10:32.890
<v Speaker 5>going into the season, both got destroyed on national television

0:10:32.929 --> 0:10:36.890
<v Speaker 5>in their first games by division rivals, including Denver just

0:10:36.929 --> 0:10:39.530
<v Speaker 5>getting pantsed by the Chiefs last night. Anyway, the wait

0:10:39.570 --> 0:10:42.140
<v Speaker 5>is over. Football is here, and so is DraftKings. DraftKings

0:10:42.220 --> 0:10:46.739
<v Speaker 5>is now live in all 50 states, one app, every

0:10:46.780 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 5>sport nationwide.

0:10:48.730 --> 0:10:51.390
<v Speaker 1>New DraftKings customers, sign up with the code Armstrong, spend

0:10:51.390 --> 0:10:54.370
<v Speaker 1>$ 5 to get $ 200 in rewards within 21 days, including

0:10:54.410 --> 0:10:58.229
<v Speaker 1>all markets. That's the code Armstrong in partnership with DraftKings.

0:10:58.290 --> 0:10:59.570
<v Speaker 1>The crown is yours.

0:10:59.809 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 6>Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. 1-800-MY-RESET. Connecticut, call 888-789-7777. Visit ccpg.org.

0:11:08.100 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>on behalf of boot hill casino in kansas bet tax

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.780
<v Speaker 6>pass-through may apply in illinois 21 plus voiding canada bet

0:11:13.820 --> 0:11:16.420
<v Speaker 6>with draft kings sportsbook to get bonus bets that expire

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.220
<v Speaker 6>in seven days or trade with draft kings predictions to

0:11:19.260 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 6>get predictions dollars that expire in one year event contract

0:11:22.140 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 6>trading involves risk of loss predictions offer void in new

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.340
<v Speaker 6>york non-withdrawable rewards issued as 50 click to claims every

0:11:28.380 --> 0:11:32.610
<v Speaker 6>seven days for 21 days terms at dkng.co slash offer

0:11:32.730 --> 0:11:36.189
<v Speaker 6>limited Time offer nationwide based on sportsbook predictions and free-to-play

0:11:36.210 --> 0:11:38.650
<v Speaker 6>sports contest availability varies by state.

0:11:39.650 --> 0:11:53.579
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.460
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:11:58.390 --> 0:12:01.130
<v Speaker 7>A Nova Scotia man set a Guinness World Record by

0:12:01.230 --> 0:12:05.910
<v Speaker 7>solving 211 Rubik's Cubes while bouncing on a pogo stick.

0:12:06.630 --> 0:12:10.380
<v Speaker 7>He plans to beat his record next year with 212

0:12:10.380 --> 0:12:14.060
<v Speaker 7>Rubik's Cubes unless Nova Scotia gets internet porn.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 5>I was hoping for a better punchline. That is a

0:12:19.780 --> 0:12:21.580
<v Speaker 5>heck of a record to beat. Once again, you've got

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.130
<v Speaker 5>to shut down the whole Guinness Book thing. Nobody cares

0:12:25.150 --> 0:12:25.370
<v Speaker 5>about that.

0:12:26.070 --> 0:12:28.460
<v Speaker 2>Miss Jump the Shark, as they say, and that's one

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:29.460
<v Speaker 2>of the records, yes.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.660
<v Speaker 1>So, I promised you this, and I lost it, but

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.809
<v Speaker 1>I found it at the various caucuses within the DSA.

0:12:36.090 --> 0:12:38.990
<v Speaker 1>I mistakenly attributed the excellent reporting to the Free Press,

0:12:39.010 --> 0:12:42.110
<v Speaker 1>when indeed it was Joshua Chaffin at the Wall Street Journal.

0:12:44.220 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>For perspective, the DSA, the Democratic Socialists of America, have

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.580
<v Speaker 1>27 members on their national political committee.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 2>And so just remember the number 27.

0:12:52.580 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you how many of each of

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.429
<v Speaker 1>these caucuses sit on that seat of honor. So you

0:12:58.450 --> 0:12:59.990
<v Speaker 1>got what they call the half a loaf crowd, the

0:13:00.390 --> 0:13:03.970
<v Speaker 1>socialist majority caucus. They've got four of the 27 seats.

0:13:04.370 --> 0:13:09.630
<v Speaker 1>They're the most pragmatic middle-of-the-road caucus. It's Zoran Mamdani's team

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.660
<v Speaker 1>are on this caucus. They support AOC for president, that

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.460
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Then you got the groundwork caucus, very similar.

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>It's more focused on climate issue, Green New Deal. They're

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.449
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with all of that stuff. They have five of

0:13:24.490 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the 27 seats. Then you've got North Star, which is the,

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:30.980
<v Speaker 1>and they have zero seats, but they're significant.

0:13:31.340 --> 0:13:33.230
<v Speaker 2>They're the anti-fascist old guard.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.610
<v Speaker 1>Their overriding priority is defeating President Trump and Trumpism and

0:13:36.670 --> 0:13:40.890
<v Speaker 1>ending Republican control of Congress. They support mainstream Democratic Party

0:13:40.929 --> 0:13:41.910
<v Speaker 1>candidates if need be.

0:13:42.090 --> 0:13:44.350
<v Speaker 2>Okay, fine. Then you've got your revolutionaries.

0:13:44.770 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>The Bread and Roses Coalition, named after the 1912 textile

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>industry strike in Lawrence, Massachusetts. I already know I don't

0:13:53.460 --> 0:13:54.500
<v Speaker 1>want to hang out with these people.

0:13:56.110 --> 0:13:56.690
<v Speaker 2>No kidding.

0:13:57.170 --> 0:13:59.010
<v Speaker 1>You name your team after that. They have five of

0:13:59.030 --> 0:14:03.410
<v Speaker 1>the 27 seats. This Marxist caucus was, oh, wait a minute.

0:14:03.510 --> 0:14:03.910
<v Speaker 2>Damn it.

0:14:03.950 --> 0:14:06.910
<v Speaker 1>Now, the New York Times just lectured us. These people

0:14:06.950 --> 0:14:07.870
<v Speaker 1>are not communists.

0:14:07.890 --> 0:14:08.630
<v Speaker 2>They're socialists.

0:14:10.100 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>This Marxist caucus was instrumental in the DSA's backing of

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.859
<v Speaker 1>Bernie in 2020. They're devoted to rank and file labor organizing.

0:14:17.900 --> 0:14:22.140
<v Speaker 1>They're all about unions promoting unions because union workers will

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.510
<v Speaker 1>always vote socialists. Then you've got the Communist Caucus, who

0:14:26.550 --> 0:14:31.430
<v Speaker 1>are also not communists. The Commie Caucus, here's the world's

0:14:31.490 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>smallest surprise, grew out of the East Bay DSA chapter

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.820
<v Speaker 1>from the San Francisco Bay Area, with particular emphasis on

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>housing and tenant organizing. They've got more of a down-and-dirty vibe.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 2>They're organizing grassroots-y.

0:14:48.060 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Tenant strikes. They're all about that sort of thing. Then

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.340
<v Speaker 1>you've got the Marxist Unity Group. They have three of

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.780
<v Speaker 1>the 27 seats on the Council of Elders. The Mugs,

0:14:57.900 --> 0:15:00.810
<v Speaker 1>as they're known, are, oh God, speaking of people I

0:15:00.810 --> 0:15:02.910
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hang out with, are known for being

0:15:03.170 --> 0:15:07.710
<v Speaker 1>really into academic theory and Marxist orthodoxy. They have required

0:15:07.790 --> 0:15:12.550
<v Speaker 1>reading and a special fondness for theorist Karl Kotsky. Mug

0:15:12.610 --> 0:15:16.830
<v Speaker 1>wants to begin the DSA's break with the Democratic Party yesterday.

0:15:17.860 --> 0:15:18.870
<v Speaker 2>Their members skew.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 5>So you were a political science major. Does this matter

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 5>to politics, all these different groups? And I don't mean

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 5>just the socialists thing because it exists on the right too.

0:15:36.820 --> 0:15:41.870
<v Speaker 5>All these different tiny factions of libertarian and conservatism and

0:15:41.890 --> 0:15:44.070
<v Speaker 5>stuff like that, does that matter?

0:15:44.850 --> 0:15:47.430
<v Speaker 2>End up mattering? Because most of us don't pay any

0:15:47.490 --> 0:15:48.210
<v Speaker 2>attention to that.

0:15:49.470 --> 0:15:52.650
<v Speaker 5>Most of us are not locked into whether we're an

0:15:52.810 --> 0:15:55.860
<v Speaker 5>East Coast Straussian or a West Coast Straussian, which I

0:15:55.900 --> 0:15:57.900
<v Speaker 5>heard discussed on a podcast the other day for the

0:15:57.940 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 5>first time ever. Most of us don't fit in those terms.

0:16:03.020 --> 0:16:06.140
<v Speaker 5>But the people that do, do they influence America and

0:16:06.180 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 5>it seeps out to us in ways we don't know?

0:16:09.020 --> 0:16:11.580
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thoroughly unsatisfying answer.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes. They're fun to mock, though. That's the important thing.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.940
<v Speaker 2>East and West Coast Straussians? Yeah, it's pretty interesting, actually.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Which am I. Do you have any idea? It's complicated.

0:16:27.340 --> 0:16:28.580
<v Speaker 2>I should actually talk about that. Because I don't want

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.380
<v Speaker 2>to offend any of my fellow Straussians.

0:16:30.500 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Right. You like Leo Strauss, but you've got completely separate views.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:37.450
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was Levi Strauss.

0:16:37.540 --> 0:16:37.780
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:16:38.380 --> 0:16:41.650
<v Speaker 2>So the new radicals. We haven't gotten to the radicals yet. Okay.

0:16:42.110 --> 0:16:45.850
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we've had multiple Marxist groups. They're not the new radicals.

0:16:46.070 --> 0:16:49.670
<v Speaker 1>These people have four seats. Springs of Revolution. They're the

0:16:49.710 --> 0:16:55.190
<v Speaker 1>DSA's anti-Israel rage machine. Leaders were active in the student

0:16:55.210 --> 0:16:58.430
<v Speaker 1>encampments that sprang up after the October 7th rapes, murders,

0:16:58.490 --> 0:17:03.070
<v Speaker 1>and baby burnings on Israel. They pushed earlier campaigns against Zionism,

0:17:03.130 --> 0:17:05.650
<v Speaker 1>and their high mark was winning passage at last year's

0:17:05.690 --> 0:17:09.060
<v Speaker 1>convention of a controversial measure that makes it an expellable

0:17:09.210 --> 0:17:13.180
<v Speaker 1>offense for any DSA member to support Zionism or even

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>criticize the boycott, divest, sanction Israel movement.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.699
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got Red Star. They have three seats in.

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:27.500
<v Speaker 1>Also from the San Francisco DSA, Red Star has various

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.230
<v Speaker 1>relaunches over the years, periods of critical self-reflection. They talk

0:17:31.270 --> 0:17:36.830
<v Speaker 1>a lot about organizational structure and theory. They worship the

0:17:36.910 --> 0:17:41.419
<v Speaker 1>anti-American regimes in Havana and Caracas. They support Hamas. The

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:47.780
<v Speaker 1>Liberation Caucus, up-and-coming Maoists. faction, openly hostile to AOC, whom

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.970
<v Speaker 1>it derides as an opportunist and figurehead of DSA's right wing.

0:17:51.330 --> 0:17:58.609
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the Caracol Caucus, eco-Marxist champions of degrowth. They

0:17:58.650 --> 0:18:00.669
<v Speaker 1>believe the Green New Deal championed by AOC doesn't go

0:18:00.710 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>far enough, and the very notion of green or sustainable

0:18:02.580 --> 0:18:03.300
<v Speaker 1>growth is mistaken.

0:18:03.340 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>We need to degrow. Most of these organizations have a

0:18:06.780 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 2>seat at the DSA.

0:18:07.940 --> 0:18:11.970
<v Speaker 1>These people are communist lunatics, and to the The extent

0:18:11.990 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that the quote-unquote mainstream Democrats don't condemn them loudly, that's

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.220
<v Speaker 1>a real black mark against them.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 5>So AI continues to be the hottest story in news,

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.780
<v Speaker 5>which I'm happy about. It led almost every newscast I've

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.070
<v Speaker 5>seen in the last I don't know how many days.

0:18:32.570 --> 0:18:34.669
<v Speaker 5>We've got the latest on what happened yesterday. Yesterday was

0:18:34.710 --> 0:18:35.870
<v Speaker 5>a big day around AI.

0:18:35.890 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned. The Armstrong and Getty Show. Now, with that,

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.180
<v Speaker 2>we have to be a little bit careful. We have

0:18:55.220 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 2>to very be, you know, we.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 8>Have to do things and we have to do them prudently.

0:18:59.940 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 8>But that doesn't mean we're going to stop an industry because,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, as we work on the next 10 years

0:19:04.700 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 8>about how to destroy it. And I have an expression.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.460
<v Speaker 2>It's whoever wins, AI wins.

0:19:09.500 --> 0:19:10.260
<v Speaker 8>That's how big it is.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>It's bigger than the Internet.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 8>And whoever wins, AI wins, and we can't.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Let this kind of stuff happen.

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.260
<v Speaker 8>And that includes, very much includes data centers. There are

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.540
<v Speaker 8>communities that were dying that have data centers right now,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 8>and now they're wealthy communities.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.380
<v Speaker 4>Really wealthy communities.

0:19:28.140 --> 0:19:28.380
<v Speaker 3>Where?

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Are there communities that were dying that are now wealthy

0:19:31.619 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 5>communities that have.

0:19:32.420 --> 0:19:36.330
<v Speaker 2>A data center? Absolutely. Really? Where are they? Enormous contributions.

0:19:37.410 --> 0:19:37.929
<v Speaker 6>Oh, yeah.

0:19:38.010 --> 0:19:40.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are all sorts of stories. Virginia is super hot.

0:19:40.609 --> 0:19:45.090
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana famously was able to give $ 50, 000 bonuses to teachers

0:19:45.550 --> 0:19:47.010
<v Speaker 1>because they had so much tax revenue.

0:19:47.109 --> 0:19:49.350
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, it's a boon to local finances. It doesn't

0:19:49.369 --> 0:19:50.770
<v Speaker 2>mean it's necessary. a good idea.

0:19:50.790 --> 0:19:54.290
<v Speaker 5>I feel like that's a separate topic to the whole

0:19:54.330 --> 0:19:56.050
<v Speaker 5>AI is going to kill us. It's not separate in

0:19:56.090 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 5>that we've got to have the data centers, but is

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 5>AI going to kill us and does it need to.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.129
<v Speaker 2>Be regulated and all that sort of stuff? Let's start here.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.610
<v Speaker 5>So that was Trump calling into a– an AI conference

0:20:07.630 --> 0:20:09.210
<v Speaker 5>that was going on with a lot of the heavyweights,

0:20:09.270 --> 0:20:14.330
<v Speaker 5>including that Hawaiian guy from NVIDIA, which is that currently

0:20:14.350 --> 0:20:15.690
<v Speaker 5>the most viable company in the world?

0:20:15.750 --> 0:20:17.270
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. I think it is, yeah.

0:20:17.290 --> 0:20:22.770
<v Speaker 5>Of course, Anthropic and OpenAI are going to have their

0:20:22.950 --> 0:20:25.650
<v Speaker 5>IPOs sometime in the fall.

0:20:26.130 --> 0:20:29.930
<v Speaker 2>Or are they? Which are expected to be just ginormous.

0:20:30.450 --> 0:20:31.230
<v Speaker 2>Or will they?

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 5>And some people think that they're laying the groundwork for

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 5>that now. with all this talk of regulation to where

0:20:39.180 --> 0:20:40.699
<v Speaker 5>they'll be locked in as the leaders.

0:20:41.300 --> 0:20:42.500
<v Speaker 2>I wish I knew the answer to this.

0:20:42.780 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 5>I hope smart people are making the right decisions for

0:20:44.900 --> 0:20:48.020
<v Speaker 5>the right reasons around this. But anyway, David Sachs, who

0:20:48.060 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 5>has emerged in the last couple of days, he's a

0:20:49.859 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 5>real enormous influence, super rich guy, tech guy, and one

0:20:55.180 --> 0:20:57.620
<v Speaker 5>of the big advisors to Trump on this whole issue,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:03.770
<v Speaker 5>who was outspoken over the weekend replying to Dario Amadei's

0:21:05.270 --> 0:21:07.889
<v Speaker 5>piece about, hey, AI's going to kill us, we've got

0:21:07.910 --> 0:21:10.750
<v Speaker 5>to have some guardrails, and David Sack says, yeah, you

0:21:10.770 --> 0:21:14.990
<v Speaker 5>just want guardrails so you can't have any competition. Here

0:21:15.070 --> 0:21:18.410
<v Speaker 5>he is being questioned on CBS News yesterday, David Sack.

0:21:18.810 --> 0:21:24.100
<v Speaker 8>So Dario Amadei, you think, is incorrect in predicting the

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:25.100
<v Speaker 8>worst outcomes here.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think if Dario believes that we're going to

0:21:28.180 --> 0:21:30.980
<v Speaker 9>have the worst outcomes, my question for him is, why

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 9>are you doing this? It doesn't make sense to me

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.260
<v Speaker 9>that you're running a frontier AI company if you think

0:21:38.300 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 9>frontier AI is going to end humanity. So again, I

0:21:42.060 --> 0:21:44.939
<v Speaker 9>would push that back on him and say, how are

0:21:44.980 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 9>you going to make this safe? And if you don't

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.060
<v Speaker 9>think you can, you should probably either shut down the

0:21:50.140 --> 0:21:53.850
<v Speaker 9>company or step aside and let someone else lead it.

0:21:54.180 --> 0:21:59.030
<v Speaker 2>So does that make sense to you or no? Maybe not.

0:21:59.630 --> 0:22:00.470
<v Speaker 2>I was just thinking.

0:22:01.150 --> 0:22:05.330
<v Speaker 1>It's possible Sachs, who is close to the president and

0:22:05.510 --> 0:22:10.300
<v Speaker 1>has access, I would assume, directly or indirectly to classified information,

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>believes that, yes, there's a chance this goes terribly, terribly wrong.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But if we let China get there first, it's guaranteed

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:20.220
<v Speaker 1>to go terribly, terribly wrong.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, then let's play that next clip because that fits

0:22:22.290 --> 0:22:24.330
<v Speaker 5>in with what Joe just said, David Sachs, again, in

0:22:24.369 --> 0:22:28.670
<v Speaker 5>that same interview. What happens if the United States loses

0:22:28.690 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 5>the AI race?

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.660
<v Speaker 9>If the United States loses the AI race and China

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.180
<v Speaker 9>is the main competitor, then I think we should expect

0:22:35.300 --> 0:22:35.940
<v Speaker 9>that the U.S.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:37.540
<v Speaker 2>Will not be the number one country.

0:22:37.340 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 3>In the world.

0:22:38.420 --> 0:22:42.489
<v Speaker 1>So to quote the great Woody Allen, more than any

0:22:42.550 --> 0:22:46.090
<v Speaker 1>other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path

0:22:46.150 --> 0:22:50.020
<v Speaker 1>leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:23:00.780
<v Speaker 1>Let us pray we have I wonder if, in all seriousness,

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.220
<v Speaker 1>that's the point of view within those who know where

0:23:05.260 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>they meet and talk. This is an incredibly dangerous thing,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and we need to get it first. And even that

0:23:11.340 --> 0:23:12.659
<v Speaker 1>doesn't guarantee.

0:23:12.180 --> 0:23:12.940
<v Speaker 2>It will be awful.

0:23:13.180 --> 0:23:15.590
<v Speaker 5>Like I said yesterday, I do think Dario comes off

0:23:15.660 --> 0:23:20.090
<v Speaker 5>as unbelievably naive. And he's a computer genius. He's not

0:23:20.130 --> 0:23:22.250
<v Speaker 5>a geopolitics expert.

0:23:23.940 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Or an anthropologist.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.409
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if he's ever paid any attention to

0:23:26.420 --> 0:23:28.530
<v Speaker 5>that stuff in his life. He's probably dedicated his whole

0:23:28.570 --> 0:23:31.210
<v Speaker 5>life to zeros and ones on computer stuff. Because I

0:23:31.250 --> 0:23:33.609
<v Speaker 5>thought he sounded ridiculous in a couple of the interviews

0:23:33.830 --> 0:23:34.590
<v Speaker 5>that I heard him play.

0:23:34.970 --> 0:23:37.010
<v Speaker 2>Countries need to come together and we need to work

0:23:37.050 --> 0:23:37.850
<v Speaker 2>with China.

0:23:38.609 --> 0:23:41.290
<v Speaker 5>He said, that's above my pay grade. I know that's

0:23:41.310 --> 0:23:43.369
<v Speaker 5>going to be hard to do. Yeah, that's a bit

0:23:43.410 --> 0:23:46.970
<v Speaker 5>of an understatement. That'll be hard to get China to

0:23:47.030 --> 0:23:50.820
<v Speaker 5>work with us. You know, with no ulterior motives or

0:23:50.859 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 5>anything like that.

0:23:51.580 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>See, that's the problem, Dario. It's above everybody's pay grade.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 5>But, Dario, the view from Sachs and J.D. Vance is

0:24:02.900 --> 0:24:06.860
<v Speaker 5>that goodness, whatever. Hey, smart guys, you're telling us you're

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 5>developing a product that could kill everybody.

0:24:09.660 --> 0:24:12.580
<v Speaker 2>Then stop, if you're so worried about it.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 5>If you are developing a car that, I mean, we've

0:24:17.380 --> 0:24:18.419
<v Speaker 5>developed a car that is.

0:24:20.930 --> 0:24:22.030
<v Speaker 2>A two-liter engine.

0:24:22.550 --> 0:24:24.570
<v Speaker 5>Now, we haven't come up with brakes that can stop

0:24:24.609 --> 0:24:26.470
<v Speaker 5>a car with that kind of engine yet, but we

0:24:26.510 --> 0:24:28.470
<v Speaker 5>are going to put them out on the market. Right.

0:24:29.970 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>No, that doesn't make any sense. You're going to kill

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:33.419
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the car and you're going to.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 5>Get sued to death over having put out a car

0:24:36.900 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 5>that nobody can stop.

0:24:38.380 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>And your company will go away.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.609
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not sure that holds up.

0:24:44.109 --> 0:24:48.250
<v Speaker 5>If Dario is thinking, we're the best at this, But

0:24:48.290 --> 0:24:50.570
<v Speaker 5>there are other people, I heard last night, now I

0:24:50.609 --> 0:24:52.550
<v Speaker 5>know everybody's guessing on this stuff, but I heard on

0:24:52.650 --> 0:24:55.290
<v Speaker 5>one of your Smarty Pants shows last night that they

0:24:55.310 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 5>think China's six months behind us. Only six months? They're

0:24:59.940 --> 0:25:02.260
<v Speaker 5>only six months behind us on the AI?

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.140
<v Speaker 2>They're stealing the tech as fast as they can, as usual.

0:25:05.180 --> 0:25:07.340
<v Speaker 5>Now that's another thing Dario said that I thought was

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 5>just hilarious. We need to make sure that China doesn't

0:25:10.540 --> 0:25:14.030
<v Speaker 5>steal our technology. Okay, they're flying a plane that looks

0:25:14.220 --> 0:25:15.350
<v Speaker 5>exactly like an F-35.

0:25:16.530 --> 0:25:17.070
<v Speaker 2>You know why?

0:25:17.230 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Because they stole every bit of the technology of an F-35.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 5>We've never been able to stop them from stealing anything.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.270
<v Speaker 5>So why do you think that's going to happen here?

0:25:28.950 --> 0:25:31.670
<v Speaker 2>We don't, sir. I love your car metaphor, but I think.

0:25:32.810 --> 0:25:36.130
<v Speaker 1>The honest answer to that is, well, we've developed the engine,

0:25:36.330 --> 0:25:40.270
<v Speaker 1>and it's 4,000 horsepower today, but it might be 40,000

0:25:40.270 --> 0:25:44.429
<v Speaker 1>horsepower tomorrow. And we don't even know how to design brakes,

0:25:44.490 --> 0:25:47.540
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know how many horsepower it's going to be.

0:25:47.619 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The engine decides itself. Right.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 5>And then there's this political piece today, and this is

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 5>what I've been dreading, but it looks to me like

0:25:59.820 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 5>it's happened. President Trump is setting up a new loyalty

0:26:03.940 --> 0:26:07.550
<v Speaker 5>test for the GOP on artificial intelligence, and House Republicans

0:26:07.609 --> 0:26:10.169
<v Speaker 5>have to decide whether it's an exam they want to pass.

0:26:10.650 --> 0:26:15.210
<v Speaker 5>Coming out strong yesterday, Trump calling the whole AI technology

0:26:15.290 --> 0:26:18.169
<v Speaker 5>is going to kill us all or ruin the world

0:26:18.230 --> 0:26:22.859
<v Speaker 5>or whatever a hoax. And in his long, many, many

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.699
<v Speaker 5>posts yesterday, I mean, he posted all day.

0:26:25.580 --> 0:26:27.990
<v Speaker 2>Long, I'll read from it.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.380
<v Speaker 5>AI taking over the world, destroying humanity and all other

0:26:31.420 --> 0:26:36.790
<v Speaker 5>things bad is a hoax, all caps. No different from Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine.

0:26:37.109 --> 0:26:40.090
<v Speaker 5>Impeachment hoax number one, impeachment hoax number two, and all

0:26:40.109 --> 0:26:42.530
<v Speaker 5>of the other hoaxes and scams that America was forced

0:26:42.570 --> 0:26:43.130
<v Speaker 5>to endure.

0:26:43.510 --> 0:26:44.790
<v Speaker 2>And in one of the other ones, he talks about

0:26:44.830 --> 0:26:46.330
<v Speaker 2>climate change, hoax, all these different things.

0:26:47.700 --> 0:26:47.780
<v Speaker 1>Um.

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 5>So he's setting up a litmus test. If you want

0:26:52.140 --> 0:26:56.990
<v Speaker 5>to be a Republican that he doesn't criticize strongly, you

0:26:57.310 --> 0:26:59.030
<v Speaker 5>have to be on board that the whole AI thing

0:26:59.070 --> 0:26:59.430
<v Speaker 5>is a hoax.

0:27:00.650 --> 0:27:01.390
<v Speaker 2>It ain't a hoax.

0:27:02.609 --> 0:27:04.189
<v Speaker 5>Is it going to kill us all in 10 years?

0:27:04.210 --> 0:27:08.149
<v Speaker 5>That's probably an exaggeration. But it's going to upend the

0:27:08.210 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 5>world like nothing ever has. I sincerely believe that. That's

0:27:12.650 --> 0:27:17.460
<v Speaker 5>not a hoax. But... Maybe what you're saying is, again,

0:27:17.820 --> 0:27:20.139
<v Speaker 5>why don't they just say everything out loud? Why does

0:27:20.180 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 5>everything have to be couched in other language? If what

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.530
<v Speaker 5>he's saying, I wish he would just say this.

0:27:27.650 --> 0:27:28.350
<v Speaker 2>AI is huge.

0:27:28.650 --> 0:27:30.190
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be the biggest thing ever. He did

0:27:30.210 --> 0:27:31.730
<v Speaker 5>say it's going to be bigger than the internet. He

0:27:31.790 --> 0:27:32.750
<v Speaker 5>is saying it's.

0:27:32.690 --> 0:27:33.150
<v Speaker 2>Going to be huge.

0:27:33.230 --> 0:27:35.350
<v Speaker 5>It could disrupt work in ways we can't imagine. It

0:27:35.369 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 5>could go off the rails and cause all kinds of devastation.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.899
<v Speaker 5>We still have to go full speed ahead so that

0:27:42.940 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 5>we're the ones that have it and not China, period.

0:27:45.740 --> 0:27:48.530
<v Speaker 5>That's a message you could give to people, isn't it?

0:27:49.690 --> 0:27:54.050
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the electorate is mature enough to

0:27:54.230 --> 0:27:56.930
<v Speaker 1>hear that. People want to be told what they want.

0:27:56.950 --> 0:28:00.100
<v Speaker 5>So we're going to go if it's a hoax like Russia, Russia, Russia?

0:28:01.060 --> 0:28:02.340
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be our message?

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:03.340
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 5>That's silly.

0:28:05.869 --> 0:28:08.330
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, it is. Politics is silly. It's stupid.

0:28:08.390 --> 0:28:10.300
<v Speaker 1>It's disgusting and grubby.

0:28:11.420 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Let me read.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.419
<v Speaker 5>I got so many good things here, but let me

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 5>read a tiny bit, and then I'll get to a

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.580
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street Journal brilliance, and that echoes exactly what you

0:28:19.619 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 5>said yesterday, so I'm sure you'll enjoy that.

0:28:21.660 --> 0:28:22.020
<v Speaker 3>Oh, good.

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:28:23.220 --> 0:28:26.609
<v Speaker 5>This is what Mark Halpern wrote in his newsletter today.

0:28:27.869 --> 0:28:30.770
<v Speaker 5>This is one of the most complicated stories I've ever covered.

0:28:31.930 --> 0:28:32.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say so.

0:28:33.150 --> 0:28:33.610
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.859
<v Speaker 5>When the president calls the views of the big firms

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 5>a hoax, when the vice president uses the phrase a

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.700
<v Speaker 5>Trojan horse, and when David Sachs says Anthropic is running

0:28:42.740 --> 0:28:48.190
<v Speaker 5>a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear mongering, we

0:28:48.230 --> 0:28:50.490
<v Speaker 5>have to take that point of view very, very seriously.

0:28:50.950 --> 0:28:52.410
<v Speaker 2>These aren't throwaway lines.

0:28:52.470 --> 0:28:57.130
<v Speaker 5>They're characterizations that suggest a deeply jaundiced view of the motives, character,

0:28:57.170 --> 0:29:00.580
<v Speaker 5>and intentions of two of the most important CEOs in

0:29:00.620 --> 0:29:01.020
<v Speaker 5>the world.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>That's true. That's true.

0:29:03.900 --> 0:29:07.110
<v Speaker 5>You got a whole bunch of heavyweights, the heaviest of heavyweights,

0:29:07.180 --> 0:29:13.050
<v Speaker 5>frigging president, vice president, saying the two most powerful CEOs

0:29:13.090 --> 0:29:15.270
<v Speaker 5>in the world and backed by the richest guy in

0:29:15.290 --> 0:29:18.470
<v Speaker 5>the world are, holy crap, and this is all some

0:29:18.510 --> 0:29:22.610
<v Speaker 5>sort of trick. That's a pretty big dividing line over

0:29:22.630 --> 0:29:23.930
<v Speaker 5>a very important topic.

0:29:23.950 --> 0:29:24.070
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:29:26.550 --> 0:29:26.730
<v Speaker 5>Hmm.

0:29:27.580 --> 0:29:29.900
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right, every aspect of this is fairly complicated,

0:29:29.940 --> 0:29:35.470
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's so frustrating that it's become already,

0:29:35.490 --> 0:29:39.630
<v Speaker 1>it would appear coded. If you're pro-AI going full steam ahead,

0:29:40.420 --> 0:29:43.570
<v Speaker 1>that's being a Republican. And if you're a doomer or

0:29:43.590 --> 0:29:46.110
<v Speaker 1>a hit-the-brakes person, you've got to do that to be

0:29:46.130 --> 0:29:46.730
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat.

0:29:46.870 --> 0:29:49.110
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm a doomer, but I don't know that I'm

0:29:49.130 --> 0:29:51.530
<v Speaker 5>a hit-the-brakes person. Is that a category you can be?

0:29:53.270 --> 0:29:56.090
<v Speaker 1>I heard the most reassuring argument against panicking and running

0:29:56.110 --> 0:29:58.910
<v Speaker 1>around terrified coming up in a moment after a word

0:29:58.930 --> 0:30:02.020
<v Speaker 1>from our friends at Incogni. Right now, somewhere a stranger

0:30:02.060 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is buying a list, not of stocks, but of people

0:30:04.420 --> 0:30:08.210
<v Speaker 1>like you. Data brokers sell these marketing lists? And some

0:30:08.270 --> 0:30:11.950
<v Speaker 1>of them have interesting names, suffering seniors, recently widowed, rural

0:30:11.990 --> 0:30:14.790
<v Speaker 1>and barely making it, low-income swing voters, so on and

0:30:14.850 --> 0:30:15.250
<v Speaker 1>so forth.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.210
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't cost them much either.

0:30:17.230 --> 0:30:19.660
<v Speaker 1>It has your name, your phone, your home address, your age,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.420
<v Speaker 1>your income, your health, how you vote, that sort of thing.

0:30:21.980 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Your life packaged and sold, but you can stop them.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.170
<v Speaker 2>And, yeah. This is what you do. You get Incogni

0:30:30.190 --> 0:30:31.270
<v Speaker 2>working for you. That's what I got.

0:30:31.310 --> 0:30:33.310
<v Speaker 5>Incogni is working for me right now. I don't have

0:30:33.330 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 5>to lift a finger. It automatically sends removal requests to

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 5>more than 420 data broker and people search sites out

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 5>there that have your info that people can easily search on.

0:30:43.460 --> 0:30:46.670
<v Speaker 5>Then keeps following up so you don't get quietly relisted.

0:30:47.380 --> 0:30:50.709
<v Speaker 1>Just go to incogni.com slash armstrong. You get 60% off.

0:30:50.770 --> 0:30:53.450
<v Speaker 1>It's very affordable. Your private life should never be somebody

0:30:53.490 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>else's prospect list. Incogni.com slash armstrong. They can't harm you

0:30:58.300 --> 0:31:01.650
<v Speaker 1>if they can't find you. The long and short of

0:31:01.690 --> 0:31:04.590
<v Speaker 1>the argument against panicking, and I've got it around here somewhere,

0:31:04.630 --> 0:31:09.190
<v Speaker 1>but it's all of the doomsday scenarios, number one, there

0:31:09.290 --> 0:31:11.510
<v Speaker 1>are serious real-world.

0:31:10.950 --> 0:31:12.820
<v Speaker 2>Impediments to any of them happening.

0:31:13.300 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>It's incredibly difficult to manufacture a virus, even if you

0:31:18.140 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have the recipe. It takes an incredible scientific infrastructure, knowledge, know-how,

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:29.090
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. And like China already could essentially

0:31:29.110 --> 0:31:32.460
<v Speaker 1>manufacture go pretty far. I mean, the COVID that they

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.540
<v Speaker 1>brewed up in Wuhan, for instance, with the help of

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.510
<v Speaker 1>our own Dr. Anthony Fauci, pretty nasty. That's just not

0:31:38.530 --> 0:31:40.010
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in the real world. And they go

0:31:40.050 --> 0:31:41.989
<v Speaker 1>through a bunch of, you know, robot armies coming for

0:31:42.010 --> 0:31:42.430
<v Speaker 1>your liver.

0:31:42.950 --> 0:31:44.270
<v Speaker 2>They wouldn't want mine.

0:31:44.910 --> 0:31:48.570
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly unlikely because the manufacturing capability doesn't work. And

0:31:48.610 --> 0:31:51.350
<v Speaker 1>the most reassuring thing to me was the people who

0:31:51.430 --> 0:31:54.150
<v Speaker 1>want very much for this stuff not to happen are

0:31:54.190 --> 0:31:56.860
<v Speaker 1>the first people to get their hands on the technology

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>as it develops. So the good guys are actually able

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.140
<v Speaker 1>to stay ahead of the bad guys. I'm not sure

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.010
<v Speaker 1>I buy it, but it let me go to sleep

0:32:05.050 --> 0:32:05.370
<v Speaker 1>last night.

0:32:05.380 --> 0:32:07.710
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so you convinced me on the virus thing and

0:32:07.750 --> 0:32:12.450
<v Speaker 5>the robot armies coming to rip out my heart. But

0:32:12.530 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Dario's threat, based on the hugging face that... So 1,200

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.290
<v Speaker 5>agents attacked a website. There might be a million agents

0:32:21.390 --> 0:32:24.430
<v Speaker 5>attack the entire internet and bring it down within the

0:32:24.470 --> 0:32:25.170
<v Speaker 5>next six months.

0:32:25.620 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Or just the banking sector or just utilities.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.900
<v Speaker 5>That one seems completely realistic and doable to me.

0:32:32.500 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:32:32.900 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Based on everything I've read.

0:32:34.060 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Like, that's a real world, could actually happen before Christmas

0:32:39.100 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of situation. Mm-hmm.

0:32:41.820 --> 0:32:42.220
<v Speaker 3>Woo!

0:32:42.820 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, and the White Hats don't know what their Frankenstein

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.370
<v Speaker 1>monster is capable of. I want very much, I hear

0:32:49.410 --> 0:32:51.950
<v Speaker 1>you yelling at your listening device, those of you who

0:32:51.990 --> 0:32:54.380
<v Speaker 1>are like, yeah, the doomsday stuff is not going to happen.

0:32:54.420 --> 0:32:56.820
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a very helpful, very good technology.

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>They'll figure it out.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.220
<v Speaker 2>I'm not in that camp. I wish I could believe it.

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:05.290
<v Speaker 5>I'll read this last paragraph from Gerard Baker of the

0:33:05.330 --> 0:33:08.530
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street Journal, who, I'm dumbing it way down because

0:33:08.550 --> 0:33:10.690
<v Speaker 5>we're out of time. The last paragraph, this is basically

0:33:10.710 --> 0:33:13.380
<v Speaker 5>what Joe was saying yesterday. The stakes are so high

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 5>that to let this decision be made by our usual

0:33:16.300 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 5>entrenched political and ideological lines, to regulate or not to regulate,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.940
<v Speaker 5>would be an error. Perhaps these calls for intervention and

0:33:23.030 --> 0:33:26.490
<v Speaker 5>restraint are self-dealing by powerful vested interests.

0:33:26.830 --> 0:33:31.350
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't make them wrong. That's what you were saying. Right.

0:33:32.470 --> 0:33:35.790
<v Speaker 5>They may be trying to get regulatory capture, and it's

0:33:35.850 --> 0:33:36.990
<v Speaker 5>every bit as dangerous as this.

0:33:38.290 --> 0:33:40.810
<v Speaker 1>And we've got to beat China. There's a whole heap

0:33:40.830 --> 0:33:43.670
<v Speaker 1>of both are trues going on here. That's why we can't,

0:33:43.770 --> 0:33:47.060
<v Speaker 1>as Gerard put it, reduce it to our usual jackass

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.860
<v Speaker 1>partisan yelling match.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.459
<v Speaker 2>Here's the twist. But we are.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.140
<v Speaker 5>We are going to reduce it to our usual jackass

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:54.940
<v Speaker 5>yelling matches.

0:33:55.340 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 2>OK, more on the way. Stay here. goes coming after

0:34:18.860 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes and.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 8>He finds Kelsey Travis Kelsey inside.

0:34:24.550 --> 0:34:25.580
<v Speaker 5>The 20 down.

0:34:26.910 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 2>To the 5.

0:34:32.370 --> 0:34:34.370
<v Speaker 5>That was quite a statement game from the Kansas City

0:34:34.390 --> 0:34:37.130
<v Speaker 5>Chiefs last night I thought that opening drive where Mahomes

0:34:37.489 --> 0:34:39.390
<v Speaker 5>took the ball and ran it in for a touchdown

0:34:40.430 --> 0:34:42.190
<v Speaker 5>and all the questions are is he going to like

0:34:42.650 --> 0:34:45.089
<v Speaker 5>pamper that body this year because he went right into

0:34:45.110 --> 0:34:49.110
<v Speaker 5>people And then he was interviewed after the game and said,

0:34:49.150 --> 0:34:49.890
<v Speaker 5>I'm a football player.

0:34:49.910 --> 0:34:51.230
<v Speaker 2>I saw the goal line. That's what we do.

0:34:51.250 --> 0:34:55.010
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey, is he the handsome boy that Taylor Swift married?

0:34:55.390 --> 0:34:57.969
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, interesting thing that I saw a little bit about

0:34:58.010 --> 0:35:02.820
<v Speaker 5>that on how he said getting married has really focused

0:35:02.860 --> 0:35:04.899
<v Speaker 5>him and settled him down, which is what marriage does.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:06.100
<v Speaker 5>That's a fantastic thing.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.779
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's a... It tends to. Yeah, that's a

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.260
<v Speaker 2>good one. So back to the AI thing, at least briefly.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Number one, right at the outset of the clip we

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.620
<v Speaker 1>played when we were coming back last segment, Trump said

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>something to the effect of, we've got to do this,

0:35:20.390 --> 0:35:23.890
<v Speaker 1>he said wisely or judiciously or carefully or.

0:35:23.870 --> 0:35:24.549
<v Speaker 2>Something like that.

0:35:25.890 --> 0:35:28.890
<v Speaker 1>And I was glad to hear him say that. But

0:35:29.630 --> 0:35:33.450
<v Speaker 1>in thinking about it, I'm convinced that the conversations that

0:35:33.550 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>really matter are not being had in public.

0:35:36.910 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I think there's at least, maybe it's like an upside

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:40.660
<v Speaker 2>down iceberg.

0:35:40.900 --> 0:35:44.860
<v Speaker 1>There's like a critical 20% or so we're not hearing

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.620
<v Speaker 1>because it's classified.

0:35:47.469 --> 0:35:49.090
<v Speaker 2>Or nobody wants to say it out loud.

0:35:50.969 --> 0:35:54.910
<v Speaker 1>God, I hope you're right. Well, it might be because

0:35:54.950 --> 0:35:57.090
<v Speaker 1>it's so damn disturbing. They don't want to say it

0:35:57.110 --> 0:36:00.700
<v Speaker 1>out loud. I'm not saying that's reassuring necessarily. I just...

0:36:01.700 --> 0:36:05.489
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm not privy to the conversations that really,

0:36:05.550 --> 0:36:05.950
<v Speaker 1>really matter.

0:36:06.110 --> 0:36:07.890
<v Speaker 5>I think saying we need to be really careful about

0:36:07.910 --> 0:36:09.509
<v Speaker 5>this and be smart about it means we're not going

0:36:09.530 --> 0:36:12.750
<v Speaker 5>to do anything. So here's Mark Halpern on his interviews

0:36:12.790 --> 0:36:15.890
<v Speaker 5>with various people wrote, the sheer ignorance of Congress on

0:36:15.930 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 5>this issue, with few exceptions, is breathtaking and scary and

0:36:19.020 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 5>it will never change. I know everybody I've seen interviewed,

0:36:21.780 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 5>I thought Mike Johnson, he sounds to me like, I

0:36:24.100 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 5>could be wrong, Speaker of the House sounded to me

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 5>like he's read a paragraph about AI ever in his life.

0:36:31.510 --> 0:36:32.819
<v Speaker 2>I hope he knows more about it than that.

0:36:33.140 --> 0:36:36.060
<v Speaker 5>The consensus view in Silicon Valley, talking to the smart

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.300
<v Speaker 5>people there, is that the federal government and the governors

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 5>have absolutely no idea how to deal with these challenges.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:41.900
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.779
<v Speaker 5>Which might be true even if you know everything about AI.

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 5>Still might be no good answer for what you're going

0:36:50.739 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 5>to do.

0:36:52.469 --> 0:36:54.529
<v Speaker 1>I certainly get that idea when the heavyweights of the

0:36:54.570 --> 0:36:58.029
<v Speaker 1>industry talk about what went wrong and why did all

0:36:58.070 --> 0:37:01.219
<v Speaker 1>those agents attack the hugging face and why did they

0:37:01.590 --> 0:37:03.860
<v Speaker 1>get excited that they now had a message board and

0:37:03.910 --> 0:37:08.620
<v Speaker 1>how did they convince some of their number to commit suicide, essentially.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.540
<v Speaker 2>We don't know.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Quit anthropomorphizing AI. How about it quits acting like people?

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:20.620
<v Speaker 5>And then I'll stop.

0:37:21.870 --> 0:37:24.569
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a brain. It's a different sort of brain.

0:37:24.630 --> 0:37:26.150
<v Speaker 2>It's an artificial brain, but it's a brain.

0:37:27.700 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 5>I should talk about my doctor appointment I had about

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.700
<v Speaker 5>the drug Zepbound, the weight loss GOP one.

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.739
<v Speaker 2>Hilarious. Oh, really? I think so.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.340
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's been hilarious from the beginning. They're pretending

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 5>like you're going through some sort of careful medical procedure

0:37:43.860 --> 0:37:46.870
<v Speaker 5>before they put you on something that they charge you

0:37:46.910 --> 0:37:48.049
<v Speaker 5>a lot of money for.

0:37:49.030 --> 0:37:52.470
<v Speaker 1>The lighter side of getting lighter. Also, there's a street

0:37:52.510 --> 0:37:55.700
<v Speaker 1>drug that they say is 10 times more, 100 times

0:37:55.739 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>more potent than fentanyl.

0:37:57.060 --> 0:37:57.380
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:37:58.840 --> 0:37:59.060
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:59.219 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:37:59.620 --> 0:37:59.779
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:38:00.260 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Mm-hmm.

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.110
<v Speaker 2>What are you taking that to do? Die, apparently. And

0:38:04.170 --> 0:38:05.610
<v Speaker 2>people are. Oh, goody.

0:38:05.770 --> 0:38:07.590
<v Speaker 5>If you missed the segment, get the podcast Armstrong and

0:38:07.630 --> 0:38:08.510
<v Speaker 5>Getty on demand.

0:38:09.570 --> 0:38:10.660
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty.