WEBVTT - How I Prepare for Difficult Conversations

0:00:09.550 --> 0:00:15.090
<v S1>Welcome back to Building Billions. Let's talk about default conversations.

0:00:15.100 --> 0:00:18.939
<v S1>I have found myself having a more difficult conversations than

0:00:18.940 --> 0:00:21.730
<v S1>I can count as of late, and it made me

0:00:21.730 --> 0:00:25.329
<v S1>realize I've never done a podcast on how I prep

0:00:25.329 --> 0:00:28.180
<v S1>for these conversations, and the framework that I use to

0:00:28.180 --> 0:00:31.090
<v S1>make these conversations go well. You know, I do have

0:00:31.090 --> 0:00:33.790
<v S1>to shout out my husband right now because he is

0:00:33.790 --> 0:00:36.610
<v S1>the master of getting what he wants. And sometimes that

0:00:36.610 --> 0:00:39.580
<v S1>is very frustrating because it even works on me. But

0:00:39.580 --> 0:00:45.700
<v S1>his ability to guide a conversation, to take somebody along,

0:00:45.700 --> 0:00:52.030
<v S1>a journey with him, exploring options, alternatives to finally land

0:00:52.030 --> 0:00:56.560
<v S1>on what he wants and to get agreements. It's just

0:00:56.950 --> 0:01:01.150
<v S1>it's almost magical. And I don't want you to think

0:01:01.150 --> 0:01:03.400
<v S1>that it's magical because it can be learned, and it's

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.289
<v S1>something that I have dramatically improved on over the last

0:01:08.290 --> 0:01:11.110
<v S1>ten years. He's still the master, I just have to

0:01:11.110 --> 0:01:14.620
<v S1>say that. But for somebody who used to just fumble

0:01:14.620 --> 0:01:17.770
<v S1>through conversations, not have certainty with their words, and it

0:01:17.770 --> 0:01:20.860
<v S1>wasn't that long ago like you can learn a lot

0:01:20.860 --> 0:01:25.400
<v S1>from what about share. So let's just dive on in.

0:01:26.590 --> 0:01:32.170
<v S1>First thing that I do before a difficult conversation, well,

0:01:32.170 --> 0:01:37.059
<v S1>let's qualify what is a typical conversation? Confronting somebody on them,

0:01:37.060 --> 0:01:43.360
<v S1>not doing something, following up with somebody when they missed

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:50.980
<v S1>the mark, when they did something entirely incorrectly. Uh. Talking

0:01:50.980 --> 0:01:54.040
<v S1>to people who just are great people but aren't getting

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.210
<v S1>the results. Talking to people that you want to succeed,

0:01:58.210 --> 0:02:00.730
<v S1>but they're not putting in the effort that they used

0:02:00.730 --> 0:02:03.400
<v S1>to in order to get to where they want to go.

0:02:03.430 --> 0:02:07.420
<v S1>There is no shortage of just different ways that you

0:02:07.420 --> 0:02:10.780
<v S1>have to confront things as you're growing a business. And

0:02:10.780 --> 0:02:15.399
<v S1>as I'm growing our business, as I'm focused on how

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.730
<v S1>do I keep communication in? I go back to the basics.

0:02:18.730 --> 0:02:21.250
<v S1>I go back to the things that I know work,

0:02:22.210 --> 0:02:24.810
<v S1>and these are them. So first thing that I do,

0:02:24.820 --> 0:02:28.840
<v S1>we use this assessment. It's called the R3 assessment. And

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:34.089
<v S1>before anybody gets hired with us during the interview process,

0:02:34.090 --> 0:02:35.950
<v S1>we actually have to take this assessment so that we

0:02:35.950 --> 0:02:38.980
<v S1>know what there are. Three is ahead of time. You

0:02:38.980 --> 0:02:43.060
<v S1>might be familiar with Myers-Briggs or risk assessment assessments of

0:02:43.060 --> 0:02:47.350
<v S1>those sorts. This is similar but different. It's something that

0:02:47.350 --> 0:02:52.480
<v S1>we spent at least half $1 million make eight uniquely

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.560
<v S1>ours modified editing a few years ago so that it

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:01.389
<v S1>really integrates well with the other business topics and business

0:03:01.389 --> 0:03:07.780
<v S1>philosophies that we have. So this R3 assessment is invaluable

0:03:07.780 --> 0:03:14.019
<v S1>because it shares the person's strengths, it shares a person's opportunities.

0:03:14.020 --> 0:03:17.410
<v S1>And it also has this list of like do this

0:03:17.410 --> 0:03:21.700
<v S1>and don't do this when communicating with this person. So

0:03:21.700 --> 0:03:23.829
<v S1>when I'm going to have a difficult conversation with somebody,

0:03:23.830 --> 0:03:27.790
<v S1>I'm going to look at their assessment and I can

0:03:27.790 --> 0:03:30.250
<v S1>start to understand, okay, how are they going to want

0:03:30.250 --> 0:03:34.570
<v S1>me to approach this conversation? I am what's called a

0:03:34.570 --> 0:03:38.800
<v S1>high influencer. This is this was titled influencer before influencers

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.530
<v S1>became a thing. I'm not saying I am an influencer.

0:03:41.530 --> 0:03:44.110
<v S1>I am literally saying through the assessment results I am

0:03:44.110 --> 0:03:47.680
<v S1>an influencer, which means I love talking to people, being

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.100
<v S1>around people. I love social interactions. The more people, the better.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.860
<v S1>I'm also a high driver, which means I want to

0:03:53.860 --> 0:03:56.500
<v S1>get all of the tasks done as quickly as possible,

0:03:56.950 --> 0:04:00.880
<v S1>and I essentially vacillate between those two. Well, if I

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.830
<v S1>have somebody that I'm talking to who is a high

0:04:02.830 --> 0:04:11.890
<v S1>analyzer and wants details, data, facts, spreadsheets, charts, sometimes if

0:04:11.890 --> 0:04:14.980
<v S1>I'm not careful, I can entirely shut that person down

0:04:14.980 --> 0:04:20.050
<v S1>because I am up in visionary la la land and

0:04:20.050 --> 0:04:23.679
<v S1>they're like, but wait, did you say it was about 25%

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.049
<v S1>or was it 23%? And they're hung up on some

0:04:26.050 --> 0:04:28.599
<v S1>stat that didn't think it was important or material to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:34.719
<v S1>the conversation, or I'm just rambling too much, like I

0:04:34.900 --> 0:04:39.339
<v S1>host a podcast and I speak to people and I

0:04:39.339 --> 0:04:41.830
<v S1>practically talk for a living. I do shit for a

0:04:41.830 --> 0:04:44.050
<v S1>living too, but I talk for a living, so I

0:04:44.050 --> 0:04:47.380
<v S1>have an ability to use words. I'll always say it

0:04:47.380 --> 0:04:51.610
<v S1>that way. And if I'm talking to an analyzer, this

0:04:51.610 --> 0:04:54.460
<v S1>might trigger them to just not get the best results.

0:04:54.460 --> 0:04:57.339
<v S1>Or if I'm going to give them feedback about the

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.960
<v S1>spreadsheet or the the proposed structure that they sent over

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:06.479
<v S1>to me. If I'm not. Precise in the criticism that

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.409
<v S1>a gimme an upset spreadsheet. But forget about it. Like

0:05:10.500 --> 0:05:12.540
<v S1>I'm going to send them so far into their basement,

0:05:12.540 --> 0:05:14.940
<v S1>but they're not going to be able to hear my criticism.

0:05:14.940 --> 0:05:17.549
<v S1>So when I look at this assessment and you can

0:05:17.550 --> 0:05:19.739
<v S1>use different assessments in your business, if you're interested in

0:05:19.740 --> 0:05:23.400
<v S1>using the R3, we do sell them and we can

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.589
<v S1>get you access to them. If you want to shoot

0:05:25.589 --> 0:05:29.310
<v S1>us an email at info at Carto. I'm happy to

0:05:29.310 --> 0:05:31.320
<v S1>get you set up. You and your team set up

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:41.039
<v S1>with assessments. But with the assessment is twofold. First, this

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:46.360
<v S1>assessment has already identified to the person where there's opportunity.

0:05:46.410 --> 0:05:49.950
<v S1>So if you can understand what those opportunities are you

0:05:49.950 --> 0:05:52.140
<v S1>have the leverage in this conversation. You know how they're

0:05:52.140 --> 0:05:53.880
<v S1>going to respond. And if you know how somebody's going

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.419
<v S1>to respond, you can get a better outcome just by

0:05:57.420 --> 0:06:01.740
<v S1>preparing yourself. The second thing that is so valuable is

0:06:01.740 --> 0:06:04.080
<v S1>if you're in a leadership position or you're the business

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:09.719
<v S1>owner and you're navigating a difficult situation with a team member,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.850
<v S1>you could actually use the R3 assessment to get agreement

0:06:14.850 --> 0:06:18.570
<v S1>on what the area of opportunity is. So let's say

0:06:18.570 --> 0:06:22.260
<v S1>what the person that I'm holding accountable, that they are

0:06:22.260 --> 0:06:25.589
<v S1>withdrawing from bigger projects that I have to assign to

0:06:25.589 --> 0:06:28.500
<v S1>because they aren't bought in due to me not going

0:06:28.500 --> 0:06:32.520
<v S1>with their initial idea. If that was a conversation for

0:06:32.550 --> 0:06:35.010
<v S1>that meeting, I would actually print out there are three

0:06:35.010 --> 0:06:38.909
<v S1>assessment results, and I would ask them to circle or

0:06:38.910 --> 0:06:42.270
<v S1>highlight the areas that they agree with and cross off

0:06:42.270 --> 0:06:44.550
<v S1>the areas that they don't agree with in this assessment.

0:06:44.850 --> 0:06:47.580
<v S1>So once I see what they agree with and it

0:06:47.580 --> 0:06:51.720
<v S1>says that a challenge area of area that's problematic for

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.830
<v S1>them is that they withdraw when something isn't their idea.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.080
<v S1>I can then use that as coaching, and I find

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.489
<v S1>that sometimes it's easier to hear something in a from

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.719
<v S1>almost somebody else than it is to just like take

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.930
<v S1>the criticism. And what I mean by somebody else would

0:07:09.930 --> 0:07:12.090
<v S1>be like this assessment like they are already agree that

0:07:12.090 --> 0:07:14.850
<v S1>this assessment is true. So they can recognize this might

0:07:14.850 --> 0:07:18.989
<v S1>be a blind spot versus Natalie. Just saying in communication

0:07:18.990 --> 0:07:22.710
<v S1>it's a blind spot of yours. So that agreement that

0:07:22.710 --> 0:07:26.790
<v S1>you're getting with that person, I'm telling you it's unbelievably

0:07:26.790 --> 0:07:32.310
<v S1>valuable in coaching people. One but then ultimately to getting

0:07:32.310 --> 0:07:36.180
<v S1>the result that you're looking for. The next thing after

0:07:36.180 --> 0:07:40.350
<v S1>getting access to their assessment, understanding what they value, what

0:07:40.350 --> 0:07:43.500
<v S1>their challenges are, what their strengths are. I'm going to

0:07:43.500 --> 0:07:47.040
<v S1>look at what their goals are, because if I can

0:07:47.370 --> 0:07:51.410
<v S1>tie together how I know they're going to respond, aka

0:07:51.420 --> 0:07:55.560
<v S1>R3 to where they want to go, I have the

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.730
<v S1>ultimate leverage in this conversation. If somebody is withdrawing, let's

0:07:59.730 --> 0:08:01.860
<v S1>just use this example. This is a real life example.

0:08:01.860 --> 0:08:04.710
<v S1>If somebody is withdrawing from a project that I determined

0:08:04.710 --> 0:08:07.140
<v S1>is a priority for this organization, but I can tell

0:08:07.140 --> 0:08:12.420
<v S1>that they're passing it. They aren't really helping the team out.

0:08:12.420 --> 0:08:16.230
<v S1>They're missing deadlines. That would be problematic to begin with.

0:08:16.230 --> 0:08:20.190
<v S1>But with most things like this, just as like a

0:08:20.190 --> 0:08:25.700
<v S1>little small caveat with most projects. The project isn't actually

0:08:25.700 --> 0:08:30.140
<v S1>that person's job. I think that person probably has some

0:08:30.140 --> 0:08:34.880
<v S1>other function in your business a bookkeeper, a analyst, a controller,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:42.809
<v S1>a CMO, a director of accounting, whatever their role is.

0:08:42.830 --> 0:08:46.550
<v S1>So if they're missing things on a project, something that's new,

0:08:46.550 --> 0:08:50.060
<v S1>something that you're asking them to work on, the the

0:08:50.059 --> 0:08:52.640
<v S1>easy rationale from their standpoint is, oh, I'm just so

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.449
<v S1>busy doing my day to day job, the actual responsibilities

0:08:56.850 --> 0:08:59.930
<v S1>of this role. And you could take that at face value,

0:08:59.929 --> 0:09:04.040
<v S1>but I never do, and I don't, because those projects

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.410
<v S1>are the things that move our business forward. It's not

0:09:06.410 --> 0:09:09.410
<v S1>what everybody is doing. If everybody just did what they

0:09:09.410 --> 0:09:12.400
<v S1>were hired to do and only fulfilled on those activities,

0:09:12.410 --> 0:09:15.860
<v S1>our business could not grow. Neither can your business. Your

0:09:15.860 --> 0:09:20.420
<v S1>business cannot grow. If new projects and new initiatives aren't

0:09:20.420 --> 0:09:24.380
<v S1>being brought into the fold today to build the future

0:09:24.380 --> 0:09:28.010
<v S1>revenue streams, the future opportunities up tomorrow. And so when

0:09:28.010 --> 0:09:31.300
<v S1>somebody checks out of these projects and they use the

0:09:31.340 --> 0:09:35.270
<v S1>I'm so busy on these other things rationale when really,

0:09:35.270 --> 0:09:37.700
<v S1>you know that it's because they didn't want this project

0:09:37.700 --> 0:09:40.070
<v S1>to begin with or they didn't like the idea, or

0:09:40.070 --> 0:09:42.620
<v S1>they had this other idea that you shot down, I'm

0:09:42.620 --> 0:09:45.230
<v S1>going to take not just there are three, but also

0:09:45.230 --> 0:09:47.750
<v S1>their goals. When they say that they want to be

0:09:47.750 --> 0:09:53.210
<v S1>the vice president of finance or accounting or analysts, or

0:09:53.210 --> 0:09:54.890
<v S1>they say that they want to make more money, or

0:09:54.890 --> 0:09:56.750
<v S1>they want to develop these skills to be able to

0:09:56.750 --> 0:10:00.110
<v S1>be a better leader. I can use that to say.

0:10:01.610 --> 0:10:04.520
<v S1>Do you think it's a good leadership quality that you're

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.360
<v S1>not engaged in this project? You're demonstrating to everybody, even

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.530
<v S1>though you're already a leader and you're responsible, that you

0:10:12.530 --> 0:10:17.570
<v S1>aren't really taking responsibility. But how does that align to

0:10:17.570 --> 0:10:21.560
<v S1>you actually saying that you want to make more money

0:10:21.770 --> 0:10:26.510
<v S1>and have greater responsibility in this organization, and all of

0:10:26.510 --> 0:10:30.530
<v S1>a sudden you're like, oh, that's the core of the conversation.

0:10:30.710 --> 0:10:33.979
<v S1>That's how you get the behavior to change. For them

0:10:33.980 --> 0:10:36.230
<v S1>to understand that the way that they're acting, the way

0:10:36.230 --> 0:10:39.890
<v S1>that they're engaging right now, the issue that's present is

0:10:39.890 --> 0:10:42.589
<v S1>stopping them from getting to where they want to go.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.740
<v S1>It's it's not helping them. It's not taking them to

0:10:45.740 --> 0:10:47.750
<v S1>the next level. It's not them showing up as their best.

0:10:47.750 --> 0:10:51.290
<v S1>They're choosing to cop an attitude. They're choosing to be problematic.

0:10:51.290 --> 0:10:54.410
<v S1>You're trying to get them not to have an attitude

0:10:54.410 --> 0:10:57.320
<v S1>and not to be problematic without saying stop having an

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.020
<v S1>attitude and stop being problematic is how well is that

0:11:00.020 --> 0:11:02.690
<v S1>going to work? Walk into a meeting along with somebody.

0:11:02.690 --> 0:11:04.910
<v S1>Be like, you're being problematic. I could tell you have

0:11:04.910 --> 0:11:06.439
<v S1>a bad attitude about this. You need to have a

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.680
<v S1>better attitude. Kind of reminds me of like being a

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.640
<v S1>kid wanting to have a cookie and your parents say

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.920
<v S1>no and you ask why? And they say, because I

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.410
<v S1>said so. That's how it feels to your team members

0:11:18.410 --> 0:11:21.170
<v S1>when you just say you're being problematic or you are

0:11:21.170 --> 0:11:25.310
<v S1>just playing this issue, it doesn't really help that because

0:11:25.309 --> 0:11:28.069
<v S1>then they're just pissed that you're telling them that they're problematic.

0:11:28.070 --> 0:11:30.140
<v S1>It's going to compound the issue, or you're trying to

0:11:30.140 --> 0:11:32.690
<v S1>get is a different result. So you're going to communicate

0:11:32.690 --> 0:11:35.360
<v S1>with them in a way. In this particular case, I'm

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.280
<v S1>going to show them there are three show them that

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.100
<v S1>it says, hey, you withdraw when is by your idea

0:11:40.100 --> 0:11:43.099
<v S1>and then type, oh, why is that a problem? Well,

0:11:43.100 --> 0:11:45.530
<v S1>you said that you want to be over this entire team.

0:11:45.530 --> 0:11:47.360
<v S1>How can I trust that you are going to be

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.630
<v S1>able to be over this entire team if you're negative

0:11:50.630 --> 0:11:52.820
<v S1>and withdrawn and products that you don't want to do.

0:11:52.820 --> 0:11:55.339
<v S1>Let me ask you another question. Would you allow your

0:11:55.340 --> 0:11:59.990
<v S1>team members in the future to. Withdraw and be negative

0:11:59.990 --> 0:12:03.890
<v S1>on projects, but you are asking them to help move

0:12:03.890 --> 0:12:08.230
<v S1>forward with and they probably go, no, said I. That's

0:12:08.390 --> 0:12:13.190
<v S1>what I want to do. So super, super helpful tools

0:12:13.190 --> 0:12:18.830
<v S1>goals always. And then this R3 assessment for game changer.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:25.280
<v S1>I go into so much detail about this in. But twice. First,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.790
<v S1>my book called teamwork. If you go to carnivorous.com for teamwork,

0:12:28.970 --> 0:12:32.000
<v S1>get a free copy that I will send to you.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.880
<v S1>You will pay for shipping, but get yourself a free copy.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:40.490
<v S1>Invaluable as it relates to confronting difficult conversations and really

0:12:40.580 --> 0:12:44.240
<v S1>guiding and building a high performance team. And then the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.150
<v S1>other place is a People Essentials workshop. The book is

0:12:47.150 --> 0:12:50.390
<v S1>one thing, but going through this, doing role plays and

0:12:50.390 --> 0:12:53.449
<v S1>having these one on one interactions with me and our

0:12:53.450 --> 0:12:57.860
<v S1>team in person. If your business is doing over $1

0:12:57.860 --> 0:13:01.670
<v S1>million in annual revenue, get the book. But also come

0:13:01.670 --> 0:13:04.880
<v S1>be this person, because this is just the tip of

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.580
<v S1>the iceberg as it relates to the people developing the

0:13:07.580 --> 0:13:12.469
<v S1>content that I have. So part three on this. One

0:13:12.470 --> 0:13:16.670
<v S1>of my favorite ways to communicate is through the vision,

0:13:16.670 --> 0:13:23.600
<v S1>commitment and execution framework called A, B, C, E vision

0:13:23.630 --> 0:13:27.709
<v S1>commitment execution. So how this works is I'm going to

0:13:27.710 --> 0:13:30.260
<v S1>enter a meeting. I've already prepped myself ahead of time

0:13:30.260 --> 0:13:34.550
<v S1>with what their goals are and their preferred communication style

0:13:34.550 --> 0:13:39.200
<v S1>through process through the R three. Then I have to

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.430
<v S1>actually flush out what the ask is of this medium.

0:13:42.470 --> 0:13:44.900
<v S1>Like what am I actually trying to get out of

0:13:44.900 --> 0:13:49.160
<v S1>this conversation? So most people just go right into it

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:54.680
<v S1>and they start sharing why they're upset, how difficult things

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:59.180
<v S1>have been, all the problems. That's just you start the

0:13:59.179 --> 0:14:01.850
<v S1>meeting up wrong. That's going to put somebody at the defensive,

0:14:02.330 --> 0:14:05.990
<v S1>that's going to put them feeling like they're being challenged.

0:14:05.990 --> 0:14:07.699
<v S1>And then you guys are going back and forth in

0:14:07.700 --> 0:14:10.969
<v S1>a debate. I just want to tell you this. You

0:14:10.970 --> 0:14:14.420
<v S1>do not want to debate your team members. There is

0:14:14.420 --> 0:14:16.890
<v S1>no ideal scene where you are one on one with

0:14:16.890 --> 0:14:18.440
<v S1>the team member, and you guys are going back and

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.860
<v S1>forth about something that you're bringing up. That's a personal

0:14:21.860 --> 0:14:25.820
<v S1>issue or shortcoming. And you guys are like going toe

0:14:25.820 --> 0:14:29.420
<v S1>to toe on this development area. Now, I'm good with

0:14:29.420 --> 0:14:32.960
<v S1>going toe to toe and debating about ideas and products

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.660
<v S1>and finding to win for our customers, like, give me

0:14:35.660 --> 0:14:37.850
<v S1>those debates all day long. But when it comes to

0:14:37.850 --> 0:14:42.080
<v S1>somebody in their behavior and their competency in their role,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.960
<v S1>I'm not trying to debate or put somebody on the defensive.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.700
<v S1>I'm trying to get them to understand that I see

0:14:46.700 --> 0:14:48.800
<v S1>this blind spot and I need them to see it, too.

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.359
<v S1>And we need to figure out how to work on

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.410
<v S1>this or else it's not going to work. So the

0:14:54.410 --> 0:14:59.120
<v S1>framework BCE vision, commitment, execution. I'm going to start with, okay,

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.700
<v S1>why are we even having this conversation? The why is

0:15:01.700 --> 0:15:05.870
<v S1>always tied to their goals. The why is always tied

0:15:05.870 --> 0:15:08.720
<v S1>to their goals. The vision of the conversation is to

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.440
<v S1>get them and the organization closer to your goals. Now

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.990
<v S1>you can get really specific around this depending on what

0:15:14.990 --> 0:15:18.260
<v S1>their goals are, as you should like. It should just be.

0:15:18.260 --> 0:15:20.570
<v S1>I want to help you achieve your goals and I

0:15:20.570 --> 0:15:23.030
<v S1>want the organization to achieve its goals. That's not like

0:15:23.030 --> 0:15:26.930
<v S1>a check. Good job on vision. It would be more specific. Hey,

0:15:26.930 --> 0:15:29.810
<v S1>I understand that becoming a vice president of our accounting

0:15:29.810 --> 0:15:32.270
<v S1>department is really important to you. That's still important to

0:15:32.270 --> 0:15:35.780
<v S1>you and that you get there by it. Yes, it

0:15:35.780 --> 0:15:38.300
<v S1>is important to me. Or they could say no and

0:15:38.300 --> 0:15:42.530
<v S1>then you have that conversation. But I'm establishing the vision. Okay?

0:15:42.530 --> 0:15:46.550
<v S1>If being the vice president of accounting is important to you,

0:15:47.180 --> 0:15:50.120
<v S1>I want to make sure that I'm helping you see.

0:15:51.130 --> 0:15:56.290
<v S1>Areas of opportunity that will have to be addressed before

0:15:56.290 --> 0:15:59.470
<v S1>I can consider putting you in that position, because that

0:15:59.470 --> 0:16:02.050
<v S1>position is very important to the organization, and I know

0:16:02.050 --> 0:16:04.000
<v S1>it's very important to you, and I'd be remiss if

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.670
<v S1>I didn't share with you these things that I've seen

0:16:06.670 --> 0:16:10.570
<v S1>that hurt your ability to actually get to where you

0:16:10.570 --> 0:16:13.180
<v S1>want to go. Do you think you have that person's

0:16:13.180 --> 0:16:17.800
<v S1>attention at that moment? You sure do. So that's the vision.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v S1>You're trying to help them get to where they want

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:25.570
<v S1>to go. Now, in that the next step would be

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:31.510
<v S1>your commitment. So how are you committed to helping that

0:16:31.510 --> 0:16:35.680
<v S1>person improve and how are they committed to actually improving

0:16:36.580 --> 0:16:39.760
<v S1>the vision you've shared? Okay. Why are we having this conversation?

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.790
<v S1>Why is this important? The commitment you're saying, hey, I'm

0:16:42.790 --> 0:16:44.890
<v S1>willing to invest in you. I'm willing to give you

0:16:44.890 --> 0:16:48.400
<v S1>these opportunities. I'm willing to spend time role playing with you,

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.200
<v S1>whatever it is that you're willing to do, and then

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.990
<v S1>you're also asking them to detail out what they are

0:16:52.990 --> 0:16:55.840
<v S1>willing to commit to in order to get better. Oh,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:57.520
<v S1>I'm going to take a journal of every single time

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.500
<v S1>I feel like I'm withdrawing, and I'm going to write

0:16:59.500 --> 0:17:03.130
<v S1>down to myself, I am ten, and then I'm going

0:17:03.130 --> 0:17:04.609
<v S1>to snap out of it and I'm going to like,

0:17:04.660 --> 0:17:07.990
<v S1>rejoin with enthusiasm. Okay, great. That's one of their commitments.

0:17:08.619 --> 0:17:12.250
<v S1>And then from their execution, what are the blocking and

0:17:12.250 --> 0:17:14.290
<v S1>tackling that needs to take place in order for this

0:17:14.290 --> 0:17:17.920
<v S1>issue to be improved? Now, this is just a framework

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.190
<v S1>that I'm using to prepare myself for this conversation. So

0:17:21.190 --> 0:17:24.850
<v S1>I don't come in hot and heavy and maybe even

0:17:24.850 --> 0:17:30.310
<v S1>flustered or all over the place like it's very clearly stated.

0:17:30.609 --> 0:17:33.220
<v S1>Oh yeah, this is why I'm getting by and I'm

0:17:33.220 --> 0:17:37.209
<v S1>connecting with the importance of this at the get. That's

0:17:37.210 --> 0:17:40.480
<v S1>the vision. And then we're moving into, okay, where are

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.370
<v S1>you committed to in order to make this happen? Are

0:17:42.369 --> 0:17:44.830
<v S1>you committed to make these changes? Some people might look

0:17:44.830 --> 0:17:47.350
<v S1>at you and say, you know, I can't do what

0:17:47.350 --> 0:17:49.450
<v S1>you're asking me to do. This just happened to me

0:17:50.260 --> 0:17:52.900
<v S1>about two months ago. I realized that I was allowing

0:17:52.900 --> 0:17:56.770
<v S1>somebody who was working close to me to have half

0:17:56.770 --> 0:18:00.070
<v S1>the output as other team members, and I started to

0:18:00.070 --> 0:18:03.400
<v S1>do this individual's job because I wasn't trusting of them

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.330
<v S1>and I wasn't confident in their ability to execute. So

0:18:07.330 --> 0:18:09.970
<v S1>I sat down and I said, listen, come Monday, I

0:18:09.970 --> 0:18:13.419
<v S1>know it's Friday right now. Come Monday, my intention is

0:18:13.420 --> 0:18:19.990
<v S1>to expect out of you what the job description states.

0:18:19.990 --> 0:18:22.660
<v S1>We hired you to do this role. You're doing this

0:18:22.660 --> 0:18:27.850
<v S1>role at half output. That is not acceptable. And I

0:18:27.850 --> 0:18:30.520
<v S1>cannot tolerate this any longer in this role because it's

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.240
<v S1>affecting my ability to do my job. And I'm paying

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.419
<v S1>you to do the full job. So my expectations are

0:18:37.420 --> 0:18:39.700
<v S1>not only not being met, but you're not going over

0:18:39.700 --> 0:18:42.490
<v S1>and above my expectations. This is a problem for me.

0:18:42.700 --> 0:18:44.889
<v S1>So I want you to take the weekend, and I

0:18:44.890 --> 0:18:47.530
<v S1>want you to think about if you are willing to

0:18:47.530 --> 0:18:52.030
<v S1>put in the effort and energy to become better at

0:18:52.030 --> 0:18:55.929
<v S1>these five very specific things. Or if you'd like to

0:18:55.930 --> 0:18:58.870
<v S1>figure out how a transition plan can work, and we

0:18:58.869 --> 0:19:01.150
<v S1>will support you in a transition, and we'll figure out

0:19:01.630 --> 0:19:04.780
<v S1>how to make this go as smoothly as possible. And

0:19:05.619 --> 0:19:09.040
<v S1>what comes around for team member says, I don't think

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.680
<v S1>that I can give this job anymore than I currently am.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:17.110
<v S1>I have other priorities right now and this isn't working

0:19:17.109 --> 0:19:22.330
<v S1>for me. Okay, great. Find the next person. We replace

0:19:22.330 --> 0:19:25.390
<v S1>this person. And two and a half weeks. I still

0:19:25.390 --> 0:19:28.420
<v S1>have great affinity for this person. Like it's not that

0:19:28.420 --> 0:19:31.660
<v S1>this person's a bad person, they just weren't fulfilling the expectation.

0:19:31.660 --> 0:19:34.810
<v S1>I've since backfilled the role and the new person is

0:19:34.810 --> 0:19:38.410
<v S1>kicking ass in the role, so everybody wins. A new

0:19:38.410 --> 0:19:42.790
<v S1>person gets to come into the organization and be valued,

0:19:42.790 --> 0:19:47.080
<v S1>and I get the value out of what I paid

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.010
<v S1>to have this role support me, and the previous team

0:19:51.010 --> 0:19:53.320
<v S1>member gets to go do something that's more in alignment

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.870
<v S1>with what their priorities are. That is a win win.

0:19:55.869 --> 0:20:01.840
<v S1>That is not a problem. So framing that conversation using vision, commitment,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.560
<v S1>execution means that I didn't just go in there and

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.530
<v S1>was like all over the place and super sloppy and

0:20:08.530 --> 0:20:12.100
<v S1>rambling on and on and not being specific. I was

0:20:12.100 --> 0:20:14.920
<v S1>very specific. Are you willing to do what is going

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.770
<v S1>to require. I'm willing to tell you what is required.

0:20:17.770 --> 0:20:19.810
<v S1>Are you willing to do those things? Yes or no?

0:20:19.900 --> 0:20:21.369
<v S1>You could think about it. Let me know. I'm not

0:20:21.369 --> 0:20:26.740
<v S1>that super clear. The more clear you are in difficult conversations,

0:20:27.100 --> 0:20:29.770
<v S1>the more success you are going to have when having

0:20:29.770 --> 0:20:34.149
<v S1>the conversation. With that, I hope you enjoyed this episode

0:20:34.150 --> 0:20:38.080
<v S1>of Building Billions. If you haven't yet, give Building Billions

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.350
<v S1>a share. I love seeing your stories on Instagram, on

0:20:41.350 --> 0:20:45.729
<v S1>Tik Tok, on LinkedIn, all the places would love to

0:20:45.730 --> 0:20:49.270
<v S1>have you share this content. That is how this podcast grows,

0:20:49.270 --> 0:20:52.419
<v S1>I appreciate you. For doing that and look forward to

0:20:52.420 --> 0:20:53.620
<v S1>connecting next time.