WEBVTT - 3-4-26 Sloan with Steve Goodin

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Want to be an American flony back on seven hundred WLW.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like a sleep when it's pouring rain outside,

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so it just makes you sleep more. The only problem

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with that is you got to get you gotta get

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>up right, and it was a slow move today for me.

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I might be with you as well. We have horrible news,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>of course with the fire. We'll get more than a

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>bit later on in Warren County, but also the follow

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up from the mass shooting at Riverfront Live over the weekend.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Nine people shot, hundreds traumatized, and the man now accused

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of pulling the trigger could walk free on a fifty

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars bond. He's climbing self defense and the mayor

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is furious. The question, though, is why didn't prosecutors asked

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep him locked up in the first place? On

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that is attorney defense attorney, constitutional expert and all around

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>decent guy, Steve Gooden, Steve, how you doing, buddy, good

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>good boy?

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Suh.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So we got the case of Frenny Cobb. He's twenty

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>four years old, arrested on a single felonious assault charge

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in connection with the shooting. Nine people twenty injured in

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the stampede. The judge set bonded fifty thousand dollars. Cobb

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is a convicted fellon, illegally barred from having a firearm.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>He was just in jail, got out of prison and

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>picked up a gun and went and shot an individual

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd at this event on Saturday. He's had

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two prior weapon under disability convictions before the shooting, including

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>one just a year ago, and only served twelve months

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>before his release. Steve, at what point does the systems

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>repeated leniency in this whole restorative justice thing and bail

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>reform towards an armed repeat offender across judicial discretion into

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>just absolute negligence, Because it feels like this is negligent

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, this was a complete failure of the system

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>on multiple levels, and there's a lot to unpack here,

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 2>but one thing I do want to make clear, thank god,

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that looks as of the US Attorney's Office has stepped

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>in with federal charges. They slapped what's called a federal

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>holder on these two gentlemen, both of whom I guess

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>there was a straight up gun battle the you, and

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>it looks as though that they're not going anywhere thanks

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 2>to the intervention of the FBI and the US Attorney's office,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>so that at least, you know, they have rectified the situation,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>at least for the moment. They are facing federal weapons

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>churages now that they could carry up to fifteen years each.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's good news. The bad news is, you're right,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>there's no way either of these guys should have been

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>getting out on any kind of a low bond. And

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the saying is, you know, success as many fathers,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but failures and orphan here the failure has many many fathers.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 2>It looks as though the prosecutors and the police officers

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 2>wok forward with a single count of colonious assault. It

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>looks clear to me that at this point they know

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>there was a gun battle, but there seems to be

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a no nine people shot, twenty others injured, but there

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a lack of clarity at this point

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>in the investigation is to who shot whom. So it

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 2>looks as though they threw this kind of placeholder charge out.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>That was mistake number one. You know, it didn't carry

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the gravity or really communicate the gravity of what happened.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And then number two, we do have judges and I've

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>dealt with this judge before, Bernard Monday. He's actually overall

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a really good judge. But there are a lot of

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 2>judges in this courthouse right now that have this ideological bent.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 2>They don't believe in cash bond. They think it's unfair

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 2>that people like you and I who have means, if

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>we're accused of a crime, that we can go get

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>a put our house up, or have access sell stock

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and post a bond. They think it's fundamentally unfair that

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>people who don't have means are being held in jail.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It's an ideological thing that has nothing to do whatsoever

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>with the facts of a case. And it got so

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>bad in Hamilton County if you recall about three or

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>four years ago, Judge Megan Shanahan, he's now in the

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>High Supreme Court, actually put forward a statewide issue requiring

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>judges to consider public safety is an issue in the

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>posting or setting of cash bonds in addition to their

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>ability to pay, which is like sort of the progressive

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>democratic focus. It's always the ability to pay, not public safety.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>So there's a requirement these judges have. It's in the

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Ohio Constitution now imposed by the voters that they should

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>look at public safety above all else, and that clearly

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>just didn't happen here. So a fifty thousand dollars bond

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 2>conceivably posted, you know, a ten percent, which is the

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>standard I thing here. So someone could post five thousand

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars cash of walk out on some sort of an

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>ankle bracelet. You know, that's a really bad, bad thing.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>And you know, back when I was a prosecutor, we

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>viewed this very very differently twenty years ago. Not only

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>were you trying to protect the public, but you also

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to protect the defendant because you know, in the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>in the immediate aftermath of some big public shooting like this,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, there tends to be victims, families looking for

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 2>them too. It's in society's interest, they're interest everyone for

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>them to sit. Look, if there's something flawed about this

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 2>case and it turns out that got the wrong guys,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, this will be presented to the grand jury

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>within ten days. Anyway, they'll be out of the worst

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>thing that happens here is that someone who is credibly

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 2>accused of a mass shooting sits in jail for ten

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>days while the authority sorted out. That's something that is

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 2>not offensive to our system or to society or anything

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 2>of the sort. And it's just common sense. And this

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of stuff again that makes people look

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>at this and shake their head. And it's fascinating to

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>me that even the mayor, wait, and the mayor is out.

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 2>The mayor was somebody who was really really bragged about

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 2>remaking the carhouse and pushing these things and attacked cash

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 2>bonds and look.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember that that isn't that irony? I don't want

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to say delicious, because you know this is such a

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>serious crime, Steve Gooden, But here's a guy who campaigned

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on restorative justice bond reform. We got to be better,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>a gentler. We can't punch down. We've got to treat

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>people better. Okay, great, And now he's in the podium saying,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>how the hell could this person get out into the

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars buck It's because you and I said

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>progressive push for this, That's.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>All I mean, that's absolutely read. I read this quote. Iomas,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think I still have a cell phone

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>here somewhere else. Who was going to text it it

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the party now, like we will have been

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>saying this for years and look, this is just in

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those things that's been out there

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>for about ten to fifteen years on the progress among

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>progressive politicians that drives people. Not just one of these things.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>It's an article of faith on that side. And you know,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>like the way I try to explain it to my

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 2>my democratic friends is like this, and like, you know

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>how in seeing some people feel when you talk to

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a hardcore conservative and say, guys, look, we believe in

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>gun rights, but we don't you think we should have

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 2>some gun control. Maybe you shouldn't be able to carry

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>an A forty seven out in public or AK forty

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>seven in public, and they say, no, no, no, no,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>it's got to be it's all or nothing. That's how

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>democrats sound when you in common sense people talk about

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>balbell or form. Well, it's just fundamentally unfair that rich

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>people can postpond and well, no, actually, when you look

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>at the facts of the matter, when someone commits a

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>violent offense, there ought to be an ability to hold

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>on to them. And frankly, in the federal system there

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is no cash bond. You have what's called a detention hearing,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 2>where a magistrate, a federal magistrate looks at the facts

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>of the case, and if you're caught with a bunch

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of drugs or guns, you're going nowhere. You have no

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to postpond. It's been like that in this country

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>for two hundred and thirty four years in the federal system,

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and the country hasn't fallen apart, and it's not some

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>grave injustice. So the idea that we're even we're just

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>playing with ourselves in state courts over this stuff. Ideologically,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>at all they're doing is they're cycling more people out

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to hurt others get killed, and it's just bad. Well

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>it's good here, but it's really bad here. Yeah. Yeah.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And there are some judges out there. I mentioned names

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of Silverstein ordation and ordered banning objections during bond rulings,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>which is just absolutely I don't even know if that's

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>legally permissible. The mont Is Merriweather thing. We bonded out

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on a weapons disability charge and participated in the downtown brawl.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs of Police Association wants to have roundtables the

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>judges refuse to participate in that they feel them bold

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and to continue this pattern that puts the public in serious,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>serious jeopardy. And that's back, of course by people like

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>mayor Pirival, who now wants to undo this and go, well,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe this was a bad decision, with Au admitting it

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>was a bad decision. The judge judge in this case

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, Judge Mundy, he said a bond Steve good

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>than fifty thousand dollars in a single full only as

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>assault charge to the shooting on Saturday at Riverfront Live.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>He said, look, my hands are tied by the charging decision,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>says that's the max. That's all I can do. Did

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he have any more discretion, broader discretion or you just

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>chose not to exercise it?

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I it's arguable I would say that.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I but I think he did. I mean, look, I

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>mean is tech he is correct. They've put forward a

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>single case of a flows assault, not the nine charges

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>or however many this guy hit. They didn't also charge

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>him with any of the gun offenses for whatever reason,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>which would have justified a higher bond. So they did

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>put the judge here in a kind of a bad place.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Why they made those decisions at this early stage, I

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Maybe they're waiting on additional ballistic evidence. I

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know, but it sounds pretty clear to me they

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>were able to put a gun on this guy's hand

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and that there should have been more charges put there.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's correct. But I want to zone back in

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on this public safety piece and if the judge could have,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>in my view, argued and found that because of the

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>nature of the overall incident, that there was a true

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>public safety issue and that that justified a higher bond.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And what's going on in that arragement room all the time.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>We're having judges who are deviating from this public safety requirement,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and because of the bond issue is usually washed through

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the system so quickly because we have what we call

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a rapid and dim grandury system. When all the felonies

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and serious churches are dealt with in about ten days

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and you have a new judge and it takes over,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>there really is no effective way for the state to

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 2>appeal these bad decisions. And frankly, now we have a

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>situation where you have the prosecutor's office and all the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>judges who are sort of on the same page it

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 2>seems ideologically anyway, But if the prosecutor wanted to appeal effectively,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>they're not really going to have time. These judges are

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to know that. So they're really not posting

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>these high bonds for their ideological reasons, it seems to me.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean again, I don't know, but I mean we're seeing,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're campaigning on these sorts of things that

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>made public statements to this effect. So you're right. I mean,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Bernard Muddy was put in a very bad position, I

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 2>think by the charging decision, but he could have deviated,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>as I understand that under Ohio law and put a

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>really high bond on this because there are clearly more

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>charges coming, no question. And again the Feds didn't mess

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>around with it. And I think that is the other

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>really interesting thing here because traditionally, but the US Attorney's

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Office would work with the state attorney's office citing which

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>case is to take. And here it looks as though

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 2>from everything I have heard, that the US Attorney's Office

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and the FBI at HTF just came in unilaterally and said, no,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 2>we're taking we're taking this away because this isn't right.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he is an attorney. Former prosecutor Defenser Steve Good

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the show on seven hundred WLWD News yesterday that

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the individual, one of the individuals responsible for the mass

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>shooting at Riverfront Live on Saturday or left nine people

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>shot and hundreds traumatized, could walk fan a fifty thousand

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars bond that was posted yesterday by Judge Munday in

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 1>his court and said, listen, that's all I can do.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Even have apt had Peerval and other Democrats backpedaling on

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the issue of restorative justice, because this is what it

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like. You know, it's one thing to cite someone

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or penalize someone and set a high bond because they've

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>got a bag of weed. But when you hire a

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>violent predatory criminal with a track record, that person needs

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to be locked up and knocked up sooner rather than later.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>In that regard, there's kind of an I don't know

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>if it's a loophole or not. Steven, maybe this supplies

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with our standard ground law. I'm not sure, but take

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>me through the fact that the shooter on Fountain Square.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We sim shoot the two individuals at Citybird Chicken on

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Fountain Square. That person was led out because the claim

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that was self defense at the two inside the store,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and the video inside City Bird backed up that. The

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the seventeen and eighteen year old if I'm

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessair, nineteen year old pulled guns out and we're

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>going to shoot him through the glass while they're sitting

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>having chicken at a restaurant, and Fountain Square with a

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people around, said it was self defense. This

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>guy was prohibited from having a weapon because he is

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>already convicted in this case. You've got individuals here who

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>both had a jacket on them that prevented them from

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>having a weapon, and yet they get around to turn

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>around and claim self defense. Do we kind of like

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have a pattern of a loophole here?

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>What a little bit now, I think, frankly, I heard

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 2>this too. I saw this on the news, and I

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>actually watched a club of the video. This guy's lawyer,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the moprint Live Shooter. He is going to claim self defense,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>but of course, as you point out, he is legally

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>barred from having a firearm. And it is exactly like

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>what happened to Fountain Square. Now, it looks as though

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on Fountain Square they are still pursuing at least felony

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 2>charges against the individual for having the firearm to begin with,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>even though it looks as though he did establish a

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>right to self defense and some of that you know

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you're right stand your ground in Ohio actually make self

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>defense claims easier to assert, I guess because you don't

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>have a duty to retreat anymore. That's really all the change,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's very fact specific to every case. But here

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Riverfront Live situation, I mean, the idea that

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 2>this guy that there were multiple individuals going into this

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>what I'm told was a private party with five or

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>six hundred people getting in there with firearms, both of

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>whom were legally barred from owning the firearms and having

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>them on their body. I mean, that's unfortunately that doesn't

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 2>under a highalog go to self defense piece. But they

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>will both base some charges. And it looks as though

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the federal prosecuted US attorney is focusing on the weapons aspect,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>at least initially in the charges that he is bringing

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>in federal courts. So it looks as though at least

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the system was correcting itself from this instance on this.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>But that is like that is the heart of the

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 2>problem that we're seeing in Cincinnati, which is convicted felons

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 2>carrying guns with impunity and it not being taken very

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 2>seriously in the state courts.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We spent like six million dollars on what they call

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>targeted community alternatives to prison. It's a program, another program,

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>no more programs, I swear to God. But and it's

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>designed to divert following the offenders away from incarceration. Someone

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Cobbs record cocaine trafficking, two weapons under disability convictions.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand how your candidate for diversion in that

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guy who decides why he would be eligible for diversion,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>how's that work?

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Well? I mean, typically it's a judicial decision where the

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor's office does sign off and they what they look

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>at or non violent offenses, and for better or worse,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>by and large, under Ohio law, merely possessing the gun

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 2>but not using the gun is considered, you know, non violent.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're looking at they're looking as someone who

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>actually has pulled the gun on someone or who has

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 2>attacked someone. And and the kind of drift of where

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the system is right now, not just in Cincinnati but

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>statewide is to look at drug offenses in sort of

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a more forgiving way. And I mean there's there's certainly

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 2>an argument to that effect, but what the way I

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I always looked at it and the way we looked

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 2>at it back in the day when when I worked

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in the in the prosecutor's office under very different administrations,

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>is we looked at drug users and addicts in a

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>very different light than we looked at drug dealers, because

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>we saw drug dealers as folks who tended to be armed,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 2>who were capable of violence, whether they had committed violence

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in the offense or not, and that they were profiting

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>off the misery and addiction of others. So we always

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 2>looked at those folks very differently, and I think that

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>has eroded over time, and now just drug offenses generally

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 2>are looked at by a lot of the judges and

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the prosecutors, not just here but statewide.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 2>There's just being well, it's just part of the overall

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>drug problem, quote unquote, And I think we would all

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 2>be better served as society to look at if you

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>had the way we looked at it at a grand jury,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 2>is drugs and you're using and drugs in your system,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe that's somebody that does need to be

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>diverted into a treatment scenario and not have their lives ruined.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Drugs plus a gun and the drugs are packaged in

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a certain way, that's the guy that that's the guy

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that deserves to go to prison because he's profiting from it.

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of common sense sort of analysis is

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of followed by the wayside over the years.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>From what I yeah, no question, Sarah Herringer, Patrick's widow

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is pushing a law that would require real time ankle

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>monitor data and making cutting one off an automatic felony.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And it hasn't passed. But if that had been on

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the book with his murder, Mordecai Black want to say,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Herringer, does the same logic apply to supervision of

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>repeat gun defenders post release like this?

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>You know it should. And I'll tell you, I think,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what if if we get a probation officer

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>here on the phone with us and he was given

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>some truth surm, I think they would tell you that

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the technology and the funds just aren't there at the

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 2>county level to really monitor these ropes. And I got

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to know Sarah, unfortunately pretty well through all this, and

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you that you know that there were

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>many many failures there. There were personal failures, but there

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 2>was a system's failure. There's a technology failure. We have

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the ability to to do real time monitoring both on

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 2>probation and then hurt the situation. Unfortunately with Mordecai black

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 2>on parole, A's just we don't as a society spend

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the money there, we don't staff these things the right way,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and we just have not made it a priority. And

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>that's a shame because if we are going to let

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>people out and have these inkle monitors, they ought to

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 2>be able to work. And really it's the same technology

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 2>they've had since the mid nineties. And you're right, you

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 2>can take a kitchen knife and cut one of them off.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 2>You were so sure. So it's no way to do that.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the idea that we don't have the technicians say,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've got an Apple watch right now, and

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>it'll sell you know, it'll wear it at night. You know,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it'll tell you your quality sleep, will tell you how

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>much you're sleeping. You'll tell you if you're snoring, if

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you tell if you're an a FIB, give you an

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>EKG and do all these amazing things. You need to

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>tell me that the technology doesn't exist to go, hey, listen,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if you cut this thing off, instant alarm bells go

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>off or in the case of a gun film like this,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they need one that uses that technology that would

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>sense if that individual shoots a firearm and an automatic

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>goes off and said, this person who is prohibited from

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>having a firearm just shot one off, you go and

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>arrest the guy. How hard is that? I don't think

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's that hard. But we've got to have the political

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>will power, of course, to do these things. He is

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Steve Gooden, attorney at law, former prosecutor around defense. Steve

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all the best, Thanks again for coming on the show anytime.

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Scott take care always got great legal analysis for us.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Here it's it's mindless and you know how to show

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you the problem that I have with politics as a

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>no nonsense, straightforward, common sense kind of guy, a political

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that this is a great example of

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>progressives and Democrats talking out of both sides of their

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>mouth that you know, you have have to have pure

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of all in other progressives who ran on the whole

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of restorative justice and bond reform, well, this is

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:45.479
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like. These are the effects of that

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that these guys get out and just commit crime after

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>crime because some people you can't reform. Actually a lot

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of people you can't reform. Why give them a second, third,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or fourth chance. It's just throwing lives. The blood is

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on their hands, on their hands. I'll switch up in

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a second here, and there's another speaking of politics in

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the squaretgard The same thing is kind of happening. You know,

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in an election, there was a lot made about you know,

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>transgender people in bathrooms, in that stuff. There's not enough

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of them to cause the problems that were indicated during

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the election. But I got an example of, you know,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>turning the tables around here of that happening actually in

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Warren County in a very very serious, disgusting case that

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had this been someone that fit that category, you would

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hear more about it. But instead it's just a sad case.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>It faded away. You know what I'm talking about. If

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't, I'll explain next seven hundred ww