WEBVTT - Showdown! Common Man Hour 1

0:00:00.700 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Of a montage song tend to be a lot of

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.140
<v Speaker 1>people are excited about it including this one that says

0:00:05.580 --> 0:00:09.219
<v Speaker 1>showdown is such a good song uh we played two

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>versions of showdown depending upon the mood this is the

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.540
<v Speaker 1>one that i prefer the electric light orchestra there's another

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one that you.

0:00:15.020 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Play right that's doobie brothers will.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.660
<v Speaker 1>Be brothers and it's good the reason i like poppy

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>well and the reason i like this one there almost

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.330
<v Speaker 1>seems to be like i say a real there's like

0:00:25.430 --> 0:00:29.820
<v Speaker 1>tension to it right it's sort of it's not you know,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>over the top celebrate celebratory, like, you know, uh, nothing's going.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.630
<v Speaker 3>To stop us now or right now.

0:00:37.990 --> 0:00:39.769
<v Speaker 1>You know, then again, we're not at the right now point,

0:00:39.790 --> 0:00:41.750
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just bringing up the different songs we play

0:00:41.770 --> 0:00:42.170
<v Speaker 1>in the Daito.

0:00:42.590 --> 0:00:44.710
<v Speaker 3>I just, it just seems there's a little, uh, it's

0:00:44.750 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a showdown and it is going to be

0:00:48.340 --> 0:00:52.830
<v Speaker 3>a showdown. It should be, um, It should be a

0:00:52.870 --> 0:00:53.670
<v Speaker 3>good game. You know me.

0:00:53.690 --> 0:00:56.470
<v Speaker 1>I'm always careful about, you know, announcers will always do

0:00:56.530 --> 0:00:58.650
<v Speaker 1>that and hype in a game. We got a great

0:00:58.750 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one for you coming up from Motown. Well, we don't

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.850
<v Speaker 1>know that yet. It could be a complete lemon.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:03.980
<v Speaker 3>That's why they play the games.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.420
<v Speaker 1>And then again, it always depends upon what kind of

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>football you like.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:11.580
<v Speaker 3>You know, if.

0:01:13.540 --> 0:01:18.390
<v Speaker 1>The Viking Iowa game was close, nail biter. It seemed

0:01:18.410 --> 0:01:19.990
<v Speaker 1>like there was more bad offense.

0:01:19.730 --> 0:01:20.950
<v Speaker 3>Than there was great defense.

0:01:21.020 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But so, again, I didn't necessarily like that game. But

0:01:24.900 --> 0:01:33.380
<v Speaker 1>this has all the makings. There's a lot at stake, obviously. And, yeah,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.130
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of people that are verbally slapping,

0:01:38.170 --> 0:01:39.649
<v Speaker 1>tend to be on the back. I guess they wouldn't

0:01:39.670 --> 0:01:42.370
<v Speaker 1>even be verbally because it's on text.

0:01:42.450 --> 0:01:43.270
<v Speaker 2>They're messaging it?

0:01:43.290 --> 0:01:48.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're messaging you back slaps on the– Bradshaw and

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.100
<v Speaker 1>Brighton KFA and text line. This one says, such a

0:01:52.220 --> 0:01:56.590
<v Speaker 1>good montage as always. Maybe it's time to take the

0:01:56.670 --> 0:01:57.570
<v Speaker 1>interim title away.

0:01:57.590 --> 0:02:02.010
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know how you would react to that.

0:02:02.790 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Your kid's still bothered by the fact you're still interim?

0:02:04.820 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about that before.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Your decision on the.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.500
<v Speaker 4>on whether to remove the interim labor law, you're like

0:02:10.660 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 4>the Aaron Rogers of decision-making. You're just going to play

0:02:12.540 --> 0:02:13.419
<v Speaker 4>this thing out as long.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:14.299
<v Speaker 3>As you're absolutely right.

0:02:14.540 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe you're the Quinn Hughes.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.900
<v Speaker 1>I'm obviously still, still my thought. I was going to say,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.329
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm Quinn. He was just waiting, just biding my time. Um, well,

0:02:23.370 --> 0:02:24.970
<v Speaker 1>and there is plenty to get to. I mean, we've

0:02:24.990 --> 0:02:28.470
<v Speaker 1>got Vikings lines showdown Motown green Bay wins last night.

0:02:28.510 --> 0:02:29.169
<v Speaker 3>They keep pace.

0:02:29.510 --> 0:02:31.490
<v Speaker 1>Do you know the NFC North is 15 and three

0:02:31.530 --> 0:02:33.889
<v Speaker 1>against all of the teams outside the NFC North this year.

0:02:33.910 --> 0:02:35.169
<v Speaker 3>That's what that division is.

0:02:36.010 --> 0:02:38.860
<v Speaker 1>Um, Gophers have a big game against Indiana.

0:02:38.900 --> 0:02:40.340
<v Speaker 3>Can they move the needle finally?

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, beating Iowa was nice, 15th ranked Iowa, but

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.030
<v Speaker 1>can you beat 4th ranked defending national champion Indiana in Bloomington?

0:02:47.389 --> 0:02:49.510
<v Speaker 1>Why are they playing the game over in Bloomington? Their

0:02:49.530 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>stadium is over at Huntington Bank.

0:02:52.620 --> 0:02:54.179
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't make sense. I mean, I know they have a

0:02:54.220 --> 0:02:55.700
<v Speaker 2>lot of land over there by the Mall of America.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>But are they playing at Bloomington-Jefferson? Why would they have

0:02:59.100 --> 0:03:01.540
<v Speaker 1>the game over there? Is that sort of like that

0:03:01.660 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Field of Dreams kind of a thing where they'd like

0:03:03.500 --> 0:03:05.270
<v Speaker 1>to move stuff around and make a difference? It just

0:03:05.290 --> 0:03:06.510
<v Speaker 1>seems weird to me that they'd play there.

0:03:06.830 --> 0:03:09.570
<v Speaker 3>We have that game to talk about. Also, the Wild,

0:03:10.169 --> 0:03:14.010
<v Speaker 3>lose to the Isles. WNBA, is it going to a

0:03:14.030 --> 0:03:14.810
<v Speaker 3>seventh game or is it over?

0:03:14.850 --> 0:03:15.290
<v Speaker 2>It is, yes.

0:03:15.310 --> 0:03:17.620
<v Speaker 3>It's going to a seventh game. That and so much more.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Where do we start? How about we spin the wheel

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:20.700
<v Speaker 3>of topic and make that determination?

0:03:31.970 --> 0:03:37.750
<v Speaker 2>What did you shoot today?

0:03:37.750 --> 0:03:38.450
<v Speaker 3>79.

0:03:38.450 --> 0:03:39.490
<v Speaker 2>Where'd we play?

0:03:39.610 --> 0:03:41.730
<v Speaker 1>I broke 80 for the first time in a month.

0:03:42.230 --> 0:03:42.830
<v Speaker 3>Logger's Trail.

0:03:43.510 --> 0:03:44.170
<v Speaker 2>Where'd you hit it on?

0:03:44.270 --> 0:03:46.330
<v Speaker 3>I just roped one right up the middle. How far

0:03:46.350 --> 0:03:46.730
<v Speaker 3>from the green?

0:03:46.770 --> 0:03:49.610
<v Speaker 1>On one foot. 30 to the pin.

0:03:50.050 --> 0:03:50.570
<v Speaker 2>Second shot?

0:03:50.690 --> 0:03:53.180
<v Speaker 1>I missed it left. I pulled on the iron again.

0:03:53.220 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a tendency to lean into it while I

0:03:54.900 --> 0:03:56.300
<v Speaker 1>hit a nifty little short pitch.

0:03:56.380 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Just gorgeous.

0:03:57.300 --> 0:03:57.780
<v Speaker 2>Then what?

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.220
<v Speaker 3>I hit it to two feet, made the putt. Incredible.

0:04:00.260 --> 0:04:04.190
<v Speaker 1>Then I made a quadruple nine on number two. And

0:04:05.230 --> 0:04:07.250
<v Speaker 1>it dawned on me at that very moment, you know

0:04:07.270 --> 0:04:11.370
<v Speaker 1>what my problem is? I stopped enjoying the process.

0:04:13.610 --> 0:04:15.010
<v Speaker 3>Instead of enjoying the game of.

0:04:15.030 --> 0:04:21.150
<v Speaker 1>Golf and breathe deep, the gathering gloom, Generally, it's gathering

0:04:21.250 --> 0:04:24.089
<v Speaker 1>doom when I play golf. But I was just more

0:04:24.170 --> 0:04:27.550
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the end result, the end result, the end result.

0:04:27.670 --> 0:04:29.110
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to make a par, make a par, par, par.

0:04:29.570 --> 0:04:30.750
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go par, par, par. I'm going to

0:04:30.770 --> 0:04:31.469
<v Speaker 3>throw a bogey.

0:04:32.029 --> 0:04:35.710
<v Speaker 1>And then my swing gets tight and it gets leaky.

0:04:35.750 --> 0:04:36.330
<v Speaker 3>And then it just.

0:04:36.770 --> 0:04:38.330
<v Speaker 1>And today I just decided I'm going to... And when

0:04:38.380 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I got to the.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.380
<v Speaker 1>I bogeyed four and five and then I roped a

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.330
<v Speaker 1>five iron into about two feet on number six.

0:04:49.089 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Birdie bogeyed seven but then i part i went i

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:54.380
<v Speaker 3>part eight part.

0:04:54.180 --> 0:04:57.740
<v Speaker 1>Nine i bogeyed 10 and from that point on i

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.690
<v Speaker 1>part everything else coming in including i hit of the

0:05:00.750 --> 0:05:03.370
<v Speaker 1>last eight holes i only hit two greens but it

0:05:03.410 --> 0:05:05.050
<v Speaker 1>was back to the common man we all know and

0:05:05.089 --> 0:05:06.669
<v Speaker 1>love i was six for six on my up and

0:05:06.710 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>downs including a brilliant sans save on 17. Enjoy the season,

0:05:14.860 --> 0:05:17.460
<v Speaker 1>as Mike Tice once said. And Tenneby, I recommend this.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.849
<v Speaker 1>And you probably already do. You never golf anymore.

0:05:19.870 --> 0:05:21.969
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem. When was the last time you stuck

0:05:22.010 --> 0:05:24.810
<v Speaker 3>a tee in the ground? Three months ago? Four months ago?

0:05:25.089 --> 0:05:27.690
<v Speaker 2>When I played with you at Midland Hills. Was that June?

0:05:29.110 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 3>It was the 3rd of June, another sleepy, dusty Delta day.

0:05:33.980 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I was out on the.

0:05:34.940 --> 0:05:35.900
<v Speaker 2>That was the last time.

0:05:36.500 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Chopping cotton. My brother was bailing. Hey, wow.

0:05:39.580 --> 0:05:40.300
<v Speaker 2>Told you, doctor.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.260
<v Speaker 3>I got a hold of Dr.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Doug. He's invited me to play golf with you. You

0:05:43.490 --> 0:05:45.170
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to play golf without me, weren't you? And

0:05:45.210 --> 0:05:47.170
<v Speaker 1>now you have me, you, Dr. Doug.

0:05:47.190 --> 0:05:49.490
<v Speaker 4>I'll take any Tipitaka invite I can get.

0:05:49.529 --> 0:05:50.089
<v Speaker 3>Tipitaka.

0:05:50.110 --> 0:05:53.170
<v Speaker 1>Because I emailed him or texted him.

0:05:53.490 --> 0:05:56.779
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting my... I get so many vaccines now.

0:05:56.980 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>See, I'm just the opposite of RFK.

0:06:00.180 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 3>No, what's his name?

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.100
<v Speaker 1>The Kennedy character. I like vaccines. I'll take any I

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>can get. I've got tetanus, flu... covid measles and i

0:06:09.490 --> 0:06:10.990
<v Speaker 1>get them all at the same time i do a

0:06:11.060 --> 0:06:13.970
<v Speaker 1>rabies i got rabies vaccine yeah i do them all

0:06:14.010 --> 0:06:14.929
<v Speaker 1>i just.

0:06:14.529 --> 0:06:16.930
<v Speaker 3>I i load up i just load up but the.

0:06:16.910 --> 0:06:19.470
<v Speaker 1>Reason i asked dr doug's i always go i forgot

0:06:19.490 --> 0:06:21.110
<v Speaker 1>what he told me he said if you're going to

0:06:21.230 --> 0:06:24.590
<v Speaker 1>get a you know a shot which arm should you

0:06:24.650 --> 0:06:26.210
<v Speaker 1>get it in if you're going to play golf the

0:06:26.250 --> 0:06:28.670
<v Speaker 1>next day you know what he said get it in

0:06:28.710 --> 0:06:30.530
<v Speaker 1>your right because your left arm is more important to

0:06:30.570 --> 0:06:34.300
<v Speaker 1>your swing sure And he's right. So then, right arm's

0:06:34.339 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a little stiff in the morning, right? But that left

0:06:36.460 --> 0:06:39.020
<v Speaker 1>arm is more important to it. So then he said, hey,

0:06:39.980 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a member of Tempatonka. Maybe you, he goes, get

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.350
<v Speaker 1>with Tana and pick a date and let's play next summer.

0:06:47.410 --> 0:06:48.110
<v Speaker 3>Tempatonka.

0:06:52.230 --> 0:06:54.790
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather, if your choice was to play golf

0:06:54.810 --> 0:06:58.190
<v Speaker 1>at Tempatonka or go to the Vikings game at Ford Field,

0:06:58.210 --> 0:06:58.810
<v Speaker 1>what would you rather do?

0:06:58.830 --> 0:06:59.589
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't even think about it.

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:00.409
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, me as well.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.540
<v Speaker 4>We were supposed to play at Tapataka, and it was

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.060
<v Speaker 4>the week the Vikings, it was their first game against

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.140
<v Speaker 4>the Packers. So Jim Nance was out there at Tapataka

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>because he's a member, and we were supposed to be

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>out there, but Dr. Doug ran into some work issues,

0:07:15.870 --> 0:07:17.690
<v Speaker 4>so we didn't go. But yeah, two of us could

0:07:17.710 --> 0:07:18.710
<v Speaker 4>have been hanging out with Jim Nance.

0:07:18.990 --> 0:07:19.530
<v Speaker 3>And you know what?

0:07:19.870 --> 0:07:22.650
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I've told that if Jim Nance, when he

0:07:22.710 --> 0:07:25.940
<v Speaker 1>is on property... He's the starter, and he hands everybody

0:07:25.980 --> 0:07:27.260
<v Speaker 1>a necktie in the first half.

0:07:27.540 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what he does.

0:07:29.300 --> 0:07:30.220
<v Speaker 2>He's Jimmy Nance.

0:07:30.780 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Peek at the purple other side of the break. There's

0:07:32.490 --> 0:07:34.610
<v Speaker 1>plenty to dive into that and so much more. Oh,

0:07:34.730 --> 0:07:36.950
<v Speaker 1>and Program Password's really fun.

0:07:36.990 --> 0:07:39.810
<v Speaker 3>We have two. I don't think Lee Ballsvick's ever played before,

0:07:39.850 --> 0:07:40.170
<v Speaker 3>has she?

0:07:40.210 --> 0:07:40.850
<v Speaker 2>She's played once.

0:07:40.870 --> 0:07:41.390
<v Speaker 3>One other time?

0:07:41.710 --> 0:07:41.810
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:07:41.830 --> 0:07:44.450
<v Speaker 1>So Lee, and she's being joined by Belle Jensen. Belle's

0:07:44.500 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>never played, has she?

0:07:45.420 --> 0:07:46.740
<v Speaker 2>She's not. She's making her debut.

0:07:46.780 --> 0:07:48.380
<v Speaker 3>So Belle Jensen making her debut.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.220
<v Speaker 1>The two of them do a podcast together, but we're

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.820
<v Speaker 1>splitting them up. Lee and I go way back. We

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.810
<v Speaker 1>were in the same class at Brown Institute. We started

0:07:57.870 --> 0:07:59.270
<v Speaker 1>our broadcast careers in the same.

0:07:59.290 --> 0:08:00.290
<v Speaker 2>I thought you went to Brown University.

0:08:01.490 --> 0:08:04.050
<v Speaker 3>We both went to Brown University. We're both Ivy Leaguers.

0:08:04.650 --> 0:08:06.290
<v Speaker 3>And so, yeah.

0:08:06.450 --> 0:08:08.190
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to team up in a little program pass.

0:08:08.230 --> 0:08:09.910
<v Speaker 1>We're at, of course, Little B, top of the hour

0:08:09.930 --> 0:08:10.369
<v Speaker 1>at 1 o'clock.

0:08:10.390 --> 0:08:12.630
<v Speaker 3>So plenty to get to. Tenby's got a keyword for us.

0:08:12.630 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 3>What you got?

0:08:13.060 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 4>The fan and two men in a junk truck want

0:08:15.180 --> 0:08:16.580
<v Speaker 4>to give you a shot to win bonus bucks with

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 4>our national cash contest.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Enter the keyword CHECK.

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 4>At kfan.com now for a shot at winning the keyword

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:32.610
<v Speaker 4>is check enter now kfan.com the common man.

0:08:31.550 --> 0:08:35.110
<v Speaker 1>One guy who part of the appeal is we literally

0:08:35.170 --> 0:08:36.810
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to come out of his mouth

0:08:36.890 --> 0:08:39.990
<v Speaker 1>some of it might be cringeworthy but some of it

0:08:40.010 --> 0:08:41.470
<v Speaker 1>might be entertaining.

0:08:41.090 --> 0:08:42.970
<v Speaker 2>Weekdays at noon on the.

0:08:42.910 --> 0:08:46.550
<v Speaker 3>Fan From the 1-800-ASK-GARY-TRAFFIC-CENTER.

0:08:46.730 --> 0:08:49.089
<v Speaker 2>This report is sponsored by Choice Bank.

0:08:49.270 --> 0:08:52.530
<v Speaker 6>Congestion northbound Highway 52 crossing the Lafayette Bridge and on

0:08:52.590 --> 0:08:56.010
<v Speaker 6>South 35E approaching West 7th and the road work there.

0:08:56.530 --> 0:09:00.850
<v Speaker 6>Looks good on the crosstown. No significant issues on 494.

0:09:00.850 --> 0:09:03.770
<v Speaker 6>35W north, a little crowded trying to exit onto East 94,

0:09:03.770 --> 0:09:07.059
<v Speaker 6>but overall, 35W looks good. I'm Deb Snyder and that's

0:09:07.100 --> 0:09:07.940
<v Speaker 6>your latest Total Track.

0:09:15.270 --> 0:09:19.170
<v Speaker 4>Your all-access pass to KFN starts at kfn.com slash watch.

0:09:19.809 --> 0:09:24.530
<v Speaker 4>Watch the Power Trip Morning Show, program password, exclusive interviews,

0:09:24.570 --> 0:09:27.450
<v Speaker 4>and more. Get closer to the shows and personalities you love,

0:09:27.610 --> 0:09:29.270
<v Speaker 4>powered by Quantum Fiber from AT &amp; T.

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Go 13-14 past.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:09:59.570
<v Speaker 3>I'm calm and he's calm.

0:09:57.870 --> 0:09:59.010
<v Speaker 2>Go 13, 14 past.

0:09:59.130 --> 0:10:00.690
<v Speaker 3>I'm common. He's 10 and B.

0:10:00.770 --> 0:10:03.070
<v Speaker 1>Peek at the purple brought to you by our friends

0:10:03.170 --> 0:10:05.510
<v Speaker 1>at Affordable Electric. For all of your electrical needs, whatever

0:10:05.530 --> 0:10:09.510
<v Speaker 1>it might be, you've heard me extol the virtues of

0:10:10.910 --> 0:10:14.250
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Electric for a long time now. So they're your

0:10:14.309 --> 0:10:16.130
<v Speaker 1>old home specialists too. Some of those of you that

0:10:16.250 --> 0:10:19.290
<v Speaker 1>older home, sometimes it can be a bit more complicated.

0:10:19.809 --> 0:10:21.790
<v Speaker 1>The electrical systems are a little different, but they know

0:10:21.830 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it inside and out. So But whether you have an

0:10:25.020 --> 0:10:26.810
<v Speaker 1>old home or a new home or somewhere in between

0:10:26.850 --> 0:10:28.810
<v Speaker 1>and you have an electrical issue, trust the folks at

0:10:28.850 --> 0:10:31.209
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Electric. Over 30 years, they've been operating in the

0:10:31.230 --> 0:10:37.470
<v Speaker 1>Twin Cities. Affordable-Electric.com or 612-331-VOLT.

0:10:37.490 --> 0:10:38.310
<v Speaker 3>612-331-VOLT.

0:10:38.350 --> 0:10:43.740
<v Speaker 1>And remember, you can book online anytime at Affordable-Electric.com.

0:10:43.780 --> 0:10:47.780
<v Speaker 3>And remember, Affordable Electric is... Oh, yeah.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:48.060
<v Speaker 4>They are.

0:10:53.750 --> 0:10:56.740
<v Speaker 3>Shockingly affordable. Mark Craig, we reference him often.

0:10:56.750 --> 0:10:59.420
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Mark Craig right at the top

0:10:59.460 --> 0:11:02.060
<v Speaker 1>here for helping me with my show prep today. He

0:11:02.100 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote a piece, Tenon B. He's esteemed a football writer

0:11:07.300 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Fish Rap Factory on the west side. This

0:11:12.660 --> 0:11:15.790
<v Speaker 1>is his 39th year as a sports writer, 30 plus,

0:11:16.309 --> 0:11:19.910
<v Speaker 1>of covering the NFL. Former longtime Pro Football Hall of

0:11:19.950 --> 0:11:23.590
<v Speaker 1>Fame selector. He's on the 50-person Associated Press panel that

0:11:23.630 --> 0:11:26.890
<v Speaker 1>selects the NFL's All-Pro teams, MVP, and other honors recipients.

0:11:27.830 --> 0:11:28.450
<v Speaker 3>He's worked for the.

0:11:28.450 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Canton, Ohio repository, not suppository, but repository, from 87 to 99.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:40.260
<v Speaker 3>He's been with the Strib. Fish Rap Factory ever since.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.579
<v Speaker 3>His headline says, Dear.

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Vikings Nation, how about you enjoy 6-0 and stop whining

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.020
<v Speaker 1>about the offense? And I just love that because you

0:11:48.070 --> 0:11:50.390
<v Speaker 1>and I have sort of had that same mantra here

0:11:50.410 --> 0:11:53.770
<v Speaker 1>that I would like everybody, including the head coach, probably

0:11:53.790 --> 0:11:56.270
<v Speaker 1>the head coach more than anybody else, would like to

0:11:56.330 --> 0:11:59.550
<v Speaker 1>see the offense a bit more explosive.

0:12:00.510 --> 0:12:03.470
<v Speaker 3>See those he's JJ kind of plays, right?

0:12:03.550 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>But Whatever the reason might be, whether it is the

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.380
<v Speaker 1>interior of the offensive line isn't as good as it

0:12:11.420 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>probably should be, and I do think that's one of

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.620
<v Speaker 1>the issues. Quarterback, kind of new to the system still,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.500
<v Speaker 1>and we all know how, you know, one of the

0:12:18.570 --> 0:12:21.109
<v Speaker 1>claims to fame for Kevin O'Connell.

0:12:20.730 --> 0:12:24.150
<v Speaker 3>Is he's complicated, but very special offense.

0:12:24.590 --> 0:12:27.910
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, sometimes it's opponent and injuries because

0:12:27.950 --> 0:12:32.550
<v Speaker 1>we've had some injuries this year. But as he talks about,

0:12:32.570 --> 0:12:37.869
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have the top-ranked offense or defense 29th

0:12:37.929 --> 0:12:41.150
<v Speaker 1>ranked offense. What I like, what he says though, tend

0:12:41.170 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to be, he, he says the, the perpetually perturbed purple

0:12:45.650 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>pitchfork posse.

0:12:46.700 --> 0:12:49.020
<v Speaker 3>Sort of like doing a Glenn's greenback guardians.

0:12:49.900 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Pull that pocket protectors kind of following in that same vein.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:13:02.410
<v Speaker 1>He also says, I like this where he says, football

0:13:02.429 --> 0:13:03.109
<v Speaker 1>is like a puzzle.

0:13:04.130 --> 0:13:05.250
<v Speaker 3>How long have I been saying that?

0:13:05.290 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>You've said that before.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.540
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that for 15 years now, maybe more.

0:13:09.340 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Football's like a puzzle. Sometimes it's okay for the offense

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:16.140
<v Speaker 1>to just not muck things up. Murray's completing 66.4% of

0:13:16.179 --> 0:13:20.650
<v Speaker 1>his passes, ninth best, and his two interceptions are fifth best.

0:13:20.690 --> 0:13:23.250
<v Speaker 1>He also hasn't turned them all over in 236 snaps.

0:13:31.900 --> 0:13:34.590
<v Speaker 1>There are signs the Vikings offense will get better. There's

0:13:34.610 --> 0:13:36.590
<v Speaker 1>also too much talent for it not to, unless not

0:13:36.650 --> 0:13:38.490
<v Speaker 1>overlook the fact that the play that won the Colts

0:13:38.530 --> 0:13:41.170
<v Speaker 1>game was Murray's 35-yard scramble in.

0:13:41.130 --> 0:13:41.870
<v Speaker 3>The fourth quarter.

0:13:42.250 --> 0:13:46.890
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm not convinced that the offense can get better.

0:13:46.910 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They do have the talent you think they would. But again,

0:13:49.860 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries can rear their ugly head at any time.

0:13:54.260 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 3>And maybe Kyler Murray will. Again, for me, the jury

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.420
<v Speaker 3>is still out on Murray. I think he's competent, right?

0:14:01.380 --> 0:14:03.610
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know how good he really truly is

0:14:03.690 --> 0:14:07.030
<v Speaker 1>because he's never– for being a rookie of the year

0:14:07.050 --> 0:14:10.030
<v Speaker 1>in his first season, for winning a Heisman Trophy and

0:14:10.050 --> 0:14:11.109
<v Speaker 1>being the number one pick overall.

0:14:11.630 --> 0:14:15.090
<v Speaker 3>I would say his accomplishments.

0:14:14.460 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>On the NFL field have not matched his accolades, his Heisman.

0:14:21.630 --> 0:14:25.530
<v Speaker 3>And then his Rookie of the Year award, right?

0:14:25.650 --> 0:14:28.820
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of it probably has to do with

0:14:28.860 --> 0:14:30.380
<v Speaker 1>he was playing for a terrible team in a terrible

0:14:30.420 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>city with terrible fans in a terrible stadium playing for

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals. but every game is a puzzle. And

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:37.820
<v Speaker 1>right now the Vikings have solved all of their puzzles

0:14:37.860 --> 0:14:40.260
<v Speaker 1>to this point. They, um, they don't, they, they don't

0:14:40.300 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball in, in KLC has been talking about

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it every single news conference.

0:14:44.730 --> 0:14:47.610
<v Speaker 3>And, you know, you know, the day, you know, they are.

0:14:47.350 --> 0:14:49.869
<v Speaker 1>Right after the game, the day, the day after the

0:14:49.910 --> 0:14:53.890
<v Speaker 1>game news conference, the Wednesday one, he talks about how,

0:14:54.370 --> 0:14:56.750
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do is not turn the ball over.

0:14:56.790 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>There was another number again, and it may have even

0:14:58.910 --> 0:15:00.740
<v Speaker 1>been included in this piece here.

0:15:01.580 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Um, Where the Vikings record when they don't turn the

0:15:09.900 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>ball over. Or when they win the turnover battle.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.140
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's like.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it was in this story or somewhere.

0:15:17.340 --> 0:15:17.690
<v Speaker 3>They're like 41-5.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's actually better than that.

0:15:20.950 --> 0:15:23.830
<v Speaker 1>It might be better than that. It might very well

0:15:23.850 --> 0:15:24.610
<v Speaker 1>be better than that.

0:15:24.630 --> 0:15:24.790
<v Speaker 6>So.

0:15:30.740 --> 0:15:33.110
<v Speaker 1>Turnovers in big games, that's a cliche, but there's a

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.370
<v Speaker 1>reason cliches are cliches, because generally they're true.

0:15:36.670 --> 0:15:39.690
<v Speaker 3>Big plays and turnovers. Oh, no, you're right.

0:15:39.710 --> 0:15:40.890
<v Speaker 2>41-5, I thought it was better than that.

0:15:40.930 --> 0:15:42.670
<v Speaker 3>Is that what it is, 41-5? Where did you find that?

0:15:42.790 --> 0:15:43.500
<v Speaker 3>Was that in that story?

0:15:43.510 --> 0:15:45.460
<v Speaker 2>Just AI overview, I just Googled it.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, 41-5.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's where it says, this year the Vikings have turned

0:15:52.740 --> 0:15:56.210
<v Speaker 1>the ball over four times, fourth best while ranking first.

0:15:56.890 --> 0:15:59.970
<v Speaker 1>in turnover differential, plus seven. Murray has turned the ball

0:16:00.010 --> 0:16:03.410
<v Speaker 1>over twice in five games. The 2025 Vikings gave up

0:16:03.410 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>94 points off turnovers. This year's team has given up 19.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Only one tutty and two field goals have been scored

0:16:10.340 --> 0:16:17.300
<v Speaker 1>off turnovers against Flores' top-ranked scoring defense. He says that's

0:16:17.340 --> 0:16:19.860
<v Speaker 1>not a shiny stat like 300 yards passing, but not

0:16:19.940 --> 0:16:23.330
<v Speaker 1>turning the ball over sure helps the defense hold opponents

0:16:23.370 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to a crazy low 12-point Three points per play.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:36.910
<v Speaker 3>And here's what I like.

0:16:38.350 --> 0:16:41.530
<v Speaker 1>To me, and I know a high-powered offense can be

0:16:41.590 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just as frustrating to the opposition as a top-ranked defense

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can be.

0:16:46.580 --> 0:16:47.910
<v Speaker 3>But I do think....

0:16:50.860 --> 0:16:54.820
<v Speaker 1>When your offense can't move the ball against the other team,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can't pick up first downs, you're losing yardage, they're blitzing you.

0:16:58.940 --> 0:17:02.700
<v Speaker 1>I think that's more disorienting than just like their offense

0:17:02.740 --> 0:17:04.350
<v Speaker 1>is moving the ball up and down the field because

0:17:04.380 --> 0:17:06.510
<v Speaker 1>you're still thinking, well, you know, we can force turnovers

0:17:06.550 --> 0:17:08.330
<v Speaker 1>here and our offense can probably keep up a little

0:17:08.369 --> 0:17:11.209
<v Speaker 1>bit and score. But when your offense is having trouble

0:17:11.270 --> 0:17:13.130
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball and getting.

0:17:12.950 --> 0:17:13.750
<v Speaker 3>Into scoring position.

0:17:14.010 --> 0:17:14.730
<v Speaker 2>Moving the chains.

0:17:14.750 --> 0:17:15.330
<v Speaker 3>Moving the chains.

0:17:15.410 --> 0:17:18.310
<v Speaker 1>It can really cause a lot of frustration because at

0:17:18.350 --> 0:17:21.150
<v Speaker 1>that point too, all of a sudden it's like, Okay,

0:17:21.510 --> 0:17:23.210
<v Speaker 1>three and out, you punt the ball. The other team,

0:17:23.260 --> 0:17:27.140
<v Speaker 1>like the Vikings, just moving the ball, matriculating down the field, right?

0:17:27.660 --> 0:17:29.940
<v Speaker 1>Doing those longer drives if they can. You know, a

0:17:29.940 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of their drives, they last, they always end in

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>field goals. And I think that's part of the frustrating

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>part for Vikings fans. But it's the old, if you

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>keep their defense on the field a long time, they

0:17:39.780 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>get tuckered after a while, right? So I'm with, now,

0:17:43.780 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not, I'm with Craig on his premise,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:47.940
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:17:49.100 --> 0:17:50.740
<v Speaker 3>But, you know, I think we all would like to see.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.100
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because I guess.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The dream is if you could get an offense that

0:17:56.420 --> 0:17:59.909
<v Speaker 1>was even middle of the pack or top third to

0:17:59.950 --> 0:18:03.469
<v Speaker 1>go with this defense, maybe an odds-on favorite to get

0:18:03.510 --> 0:18:04.070
<v Speaker 1>to the big game.

0:18:04.090 --> 0:18:04.710
<v Speaker 3>They really would.

0:18:04.770 --> 0:18:08.130
<v Speaker 1>Because this defense right now is not showing any signs

0:18:08.150 --> 0:18:10.990
<v Speaker 1>of cracking. Now we're about to find out. How good

0:18:11.050 --> 0:18:13.149
<v Speaker 1>is the Lions offense? We know they have weapons. We

0:18:13.190 --> 0:18:15.090
<v Speaker 1>know they're a good offense. We talked about it all week.

0:18:15.630 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Jameer Gibbs is one of the most talented backs in

0:18:17.660 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the league. He is explosive. He's tough, too. He's not

0:18:22.619 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just one of those running backs with those mincing little steps, right?

0:18:26.619 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that.

0:18:29.660 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>He can throw a shoulder into. So he's probably part

0:18:31.660 --> 0:18:33.500
<v Speaker 3>of the reason why he's got a shoulder issue. Amon

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.570
<v Speaker 3>Ross St. Brown's a crafty wide receiver. LeFleur talked about his.

0:18:36.530 --> 0:18:43.530
<v Speaker 1>Mentality being better than his biggest attribute. Laporta's really good.

0:18:43.550 --> 0:18:45.310
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line is starting to gel. This will be

0:18:45.330 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a real test for the Vikings' offense. And as we know,

0:18:47.130 --> 0:18:49.060
<v Speaker 1>we've got San Francisco coming up. We've got Green Bay,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.300
<v Speaker 1>who won last night. Offense looked pretty good. And, of course,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.619
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. But let's see what happens on here.

0:18:53.660 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But it should be fun on Sunday. And I think

0:18:56.740 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings will comport themselves well. I'm expecting a good game,

0:19:01.140 --> 0:19:03.340
<v Speaker 1>hoping for a good game. And I think it will

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>be one of those games that goes down to the

0:19:04.740 --> 0:19:07.100
<v Speaker 1>wire before the clock expires.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.790
<v Speaker 2>That's what I desire.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>From this football game. Peek at the Purple brought to

0:19:11.940 --> 0:19:16.090
<v Speaker 1>you by Affordable Electric. For all of your electrical needs, affordable-electric.com.

0:19:16.130 --> 0:19:18.610
<v Speaker 1>Want to talk about the, is it Dylan Larkin?

0:19:19.050 --> 0:19:19.290
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:19:19.330 --> 0:19:22.290
<v Speaker 1>Want to talk about the Dylan Larkin situation with Tenneby?

0:19:22.830 --> 0:19:26.030
<v Speaker 1>He's been suspended by the club. Unless that's changed. Did

0:19:26.070 --> 0:19:27.580
<v Speaker 1>he get traded today? Did I miss anything?

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>No, he was suspended.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so nothing's changed since then. But we'll talk about

0:19:30.780 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that in a while. They lose to the Isles. That

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:33.860
<v Speaker 1>and more to get to. We'll talk a little goal

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.330
<v Speaker 1>for football with Indiana. Also, Lil B, top of the

0:19:36.350 --> 0:19:39.590
<v Speaker 1>hour for the feminine touch of the program. And then

0:19:39.869 --> 0:19:42.669
<v Speaker 1>Lee Balsvick and Bell Jensen for program password.

0:19:42.710 --> 0:19:44.990
<v Speaker 3>All of that and more here on the program.

0:19:57.580 --> 0:20:01.500
<v Speaker 5>Another epic episode of Program Password begins today at 1.30.

0:20:01.500 --> 0:20:04.530
<v Speaker 2>And you can watch it on KFAN's social channels. The Fan,

0:20:04.869 --> 0:20:06.730
<v Speaker 2>along with Two Men and a Junk Truck.

0:20:07.070 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 6>One....

0:20:11.210 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Fan on the Farm is back through October 30th.

0:20:14.500 --> 0:20:15.220
<v Speaker 2>That's today.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Allen. In order to know your tractor talk

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 4>packs at the iHeartRadio app each day from 9 to noon,

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.659
<v Speaker 4>if yours is selected on the air, you can win

0:20:21.700 --> 0:20:24.899
<v Speaker 4>a prize pack including a travel blanket, cooler, Bluetooth speaker,

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.060
<v Speaker 4>and more, all thanks.

0:20:25.859 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 2>To Minnesota corn.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.980
<v Speaker 4>Minnesota's agricultural communities are powered by family corn farmers.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.540
<v Speaker 3>You know what somebody texted to me right out of

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.260
<v Speaker 3>the gate today, Tenneby? Hold on, let me find this,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 3>because I think this is, and this is crucial. Here

0:20:40.660 --> 0:20:45.530
<v Speaker 3>it is. This is courtesy of the Bradshaw and Bryant

0:20:45.550 --> 0:20:46.230
<v Speaker 3>K-Van text line.

0:20:46.250 --> 0:20:50.110
<v Speaker 1>It says, comment, PA is wavering. He didn't go with

0:20:50.130 --> 0:20:52.170
<v Speaker 1>7-0 radio.

0:20:52.869 --> 0:20:53.209
<v Speaker 2>Ooh.

0:20:55.050 --> 0:20:56.170
<v Speaker 3>Does he know something?

0:20:57.550 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 1>He didn't go with 7-0 radio. Do you think his

0:21:05.740 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>teeth are chattering? That is an impressive record. The NFC

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.620
<v Speaker 1>North has a combined record of 15-3 when they're not

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:22.710
<v Speaker 1>playing teams within their own division. That's just kicking booty

0:21:22.750 --> 0:21:24.510
<v Speaker 1>and taking names is what it is, man.

0:21:25.070 --> 0:21:25.910
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty incredible.

0:21:26.030 --> 0:21:28.389
<v Speaker 1>And it's a really good division, which is kind of

0:21:29.090 --> 0:21:33.430
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think about because it used to be, gosh,

0:21:34.030 --> 0:21:36.850
<v Speaker 1>there was a time when Minnesota just, you know, back in.

0:21:38.710 --> 0:21:40.590
<v Speaker 3>My growing up days where the Vikings were just, they

0:21:40.609 --> 0:21:45.100
<v Speaker 3>were dominant. During the 70s, after Green Bay, Green Bay was.

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.980
<v Speaker 1>Always, they were the franchise for years. Won those two

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>big games to close out the 60s. For the 70s,

0:21:52.500 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they were pretty brutal. I even think for a lot

0:21:54.619 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of the 80s, too, they just weren't any good.

0:21:56.700 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Until Favre came along. They had a little bit of

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.180
<v Speaker 4>magic with Mikowski there.

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.580
<v Speaker 3>That's correct. And the Kitties were just always awful. And

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 3>the Bears weren't really very good either, right?

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>They had the 85 season, but was there anything else?

0:22:10.100 --> 0:22:14.100
<v Speaker 1>It was, there's were three pretty, pretty poor franchises.

0:22:13.550 --> 0:22:14.740
<v Speaker 3>As far as wins, losses.

0:22:14.790 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And now it's like, we just had the combined total and,

0:22:17.850 --> 0:22:21.189
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got Viking six and all bears five

0:22:21.230 --> 0:22:23.690
<v Speaker 1>and two lions, four and two in the pack.

0:22:23.730 --> 0:22:27.129
<v Speaker 3>Now are they five and three? Are we eight games

0:22:27.210 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 3>in already? They're five and three, aren't they?

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they are.

0:22:31.500 --> 0:22:33.500
<v Speaker 3>Eight games into the season already. We're almost to the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>halfway point of the National. The National Football League.

0:22:37.340 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Your Wild get outskated last night, Tenneby. I don't know

0:22:40.660 --> 0:22:44.060
<v Speaker 1>if they were really outskated. That's just... It's just an

0:22:44.140 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>old phrase from the days when you would put together newscasts.

0:22:47.700 --> 0:22:51.020
<v Speaker 1>Because they play hockey, you just go, And in the NHL,

0:22:51.100 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Wild outskated by... You know, that just means they were outplayed.

0:22:54.700 --> 0:22:56.379
<v Speaker 1>It's just another way of saying outplayed.

0:22:57.300 --> 0:22:57.869
<v Speaker 2>You are a....

0:22:59.490 --> 0:23:04.250
<v Speaker 1>An astute hockey observer. And oftentimes you'll tell me team

0:23:04.430 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a lost, even though they outplayed team B, what happened

0:23:08.900 --> 0:23:11.020
<v Speaker 1>last night? We lost three one.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:11.350
<v Speaker 4>Was it?

0:23:11.540 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 2>No, we lost in overtime.

0:23:12.700 --> 0:23:13.620
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we did.

0:23:13.900 --> 0:23:14.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 4>So we did, we did get a goal late from

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Matt Boldy with like three, four minutes left to force overtime.

0:23:18.740 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 2>So we, we salvaged a point. And was it a

0:23:20.700 --> 0:23:21.460
<v Speaker 2>spectacular goal?

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that what I read?

0:23:22.020 --> 0:23:23.340
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was nice.

0:23:23.380 --> 0:23:25.580
<v Speaker 4>He forced a turnover. The blue line made one movie.

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.220
<v Speaker 4>He's got a couple of quick first steps. He was

0:23:29.260 --> 0:23:30.419
<v Speaker 4>kind of alone with the goal. He had a little

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 4>bit of pressure coming from the right side, so it

0:23:31.619 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 4>sounded like he could make a deker thing, but he

0:23:34.500 --> 0:23:36.220
<v Speaker 4>patented five-hole goal for Matt Boldy.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.770
<v Speaker 2>Who do you think.

0:23:38.070 --> 0:23:42.609
<v Speaker 3>Was a better player? Goldie, Bill Goldsworthy, or Boldy? Is

0:23:42.670 --> 0:23:43.850
<v Speaker 3>it Boldy or Goldie?

0:23:43.910 --> 0:23:45.050
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I didn't see Goldie play.

0:23:45.090 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was a hell of a player, though, man.

0:23:46.550 --> 0:23:47.610
<v Speaker 2>But Matt Boldy's pretty good.

0:23:47.730 --> 0:23:47.890
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:23:48.780 --> 0:23:49.190
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, Anthony.

0:23:50.530 --> 0:23:52.990
<v Speaker 4>Um, but overall, I mean the game, I would say

0:23:53.010 --> 0:23:56.109
<v Speaker 4>it was pretty even both ways, which I think is

0:23:56.410 --> 0:23:58.530
<v Speaker 4>still disappointing if you're a wild fan, because I think

0:23:58.550 --> 0:24:00.490
<v Speaker 4>you should be out playing the New York Islanders, you know,

0:24:01.230 --> 0:24:04.030
<v Speaker 4>first shift of the game, uh, that top line for

0:24:04.050 --> 0:24:06.909
<v Speaker 4>the wild and, uh, they score a goal. You're up one,

0:24:06.950 --> 0:24:09.790
<v Speaker 4>nothing early. And that line seemed to be going early

0:24:09.830 --> 0:24:11.510
<v Speaker 4>in the game. You thought, man, they might just kind

0:24:11.550 --> 0:24:12.930
<v Speaker 4>of put it on the Islanders here. And then as

0:24:12.950 --> 0:24:15.930
<v Speaker 4>kind of the second half of the first period came

0:24:15.970 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 4>around and throughout the game, the wild just, uh, I

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 4>don't know. Maybe that culture went over Utah and the victory,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.980
<v Speaker 4>the emotional victory over Vancouver. Maybe they just came out

0:24:31.030 --> 0:24:34.350
<v Speaker 4>a little flat. I don't know. The Islanders got a young,

0:24:34.430 --> 0:24:38.750
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned yesterday, they have a young defenseman who's 19

0:24:38.750 --> 0:24:42.530
<v Speaker 4>years old who is basically the next Quinn Hughes.

0:24:42.910 --> 0:24:44.990
<v Speaker 2>He's not that far off now at the age of 19.

0:24:44.990 --> 0:24:46.700
<v Speaker 4>He's already a stud and he's just going to be

0:24:49.970 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Norris trophy candidate year in, year out. And he had

0:24:53.540 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 4>a couple of nice plays in regulation and scored the

0:24:55.660 --> 0:24:58.220
<v Speaker 4>game winner in overtime after Kaprizov had the first chance

0:24:58.940 --> 0:25:00.340
<v Speaker 4>where the Wild had a two-on-one rush.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>He misses the net.

0:25:01.220 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 4>So then the Islanders had an odd man rush the

0:25:03.460 --> 0:25:04.850
<v Speaker 4>other way and Schaefer buried it.

0:25:05.220 --> 0:25:07.900
<v Speaker 1>Two storylines that we're following here with the Wild would

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.780
<v Speaker 1>be the ongoing saga with Quinn Hughes.

0:25:10.820 --> 0:25:13.310
<v Speaker 3>Will he stay or will he go? We still don't know.

0:25:13.369 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>He says his He's a country boy, but no, he's

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>living in L.A. I'm trying to do the Glenn Campbell song.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.340
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Campbell did a song called, he had his feet

0:25:24.380 --> 0:25:26.980
<v Speaker 1>in L.A., but his heart was in Tennessee, right?

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:27.780
<v Speaker 3>He was in L.A.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Trying to seek fame and fortune, but really he was

0:25:30.180 --> 0:25:32.780
<v Speaker 1>a good old boy from Tennessee. And Larkin says he's

0:25:32.820 --> 0:25:35.580
<v Speaker 1>got his feet here, he likes them, and maybe he does.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.419
<v Speaker 1>I think really what might be the crux of this

0:25:37.460 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>still is he'd like to make sure we have a

0:25:39.460 --> 0:25:41.379
<v Speaker 1>team that has a chance to win a cup and

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.250
<v Speaker 1>maybe play with his brother someday. The other storyline we're

0:25:44.310 --> 0:25:50.730
<v Speaker 1>following is Dylan Larkin. Dylan Larkin was suspended yesterday, by

0:25:50.750 --> 0:25:52.750
<v Speaker 1>the way. He requested a trade months ago, right?

0:25:53.170 --> 0:25:53.410
<v Speaker 4>May.

0:25:53.770 --> 0:25:55.970
<v Speaker 3>Back in May. So he requested a trade.

0:25:57.410 --> 0:25:59.270
<v Speaker 1>That was put on hold for a while while the

0:25:59.290 --> 0:26:01.410
<v Speaker 1>Red Wings apparently were searching for a new general manager.

0:26:01.430 --> 0:26:03.409
<v Speaker 1>They had an interim general manager, and they said, we

0:26:03.430 --> 0:26:05.010
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do anything until we get the real

0:26:05.050 --> 0:26:05.510
<v Speaker 1>general manager.

0:26:05.550 --> 0:26:06.370
<v Speaker 3>Let him make the decisions.

0:26:06.430 --> 0:26:07.530
<v Speaker 2>And they still don't have a real general manager. And

0:26:07.550 --> 0:26:08.510
<v Speaker 2>they still don't have a real general manager.

0:26:08.890 --> 0:26:13.830
<v Speaker 1>So now, I guess, Larkin and his people... basically put

0:26:14.130 --> 0:26:15.850
<v Speaker 1>their skate down and said, they.

0:26:15.770 --> 0:26:16.210
<v Speaker 3>Drew a line.

0:26:16.230 --> 0:26:16.990
<v Speaker 2>They said, enough's enough.

0:26:17.109 --> 0:26:19.050
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they drew a blue line around the state. They said,

0:26:19.109 --> 0:26:19.590
<v Speaker 3>enough's enough.

0:26:19.970 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not playing anymore. And they said, okay, well, we're

0:26:21.580 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>going to suspend you without pay. Tiny Joe Nelson, who

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>used to work here, wrote this three hours ago. Did

0:26:26.460 --> 0:26:28.980
<v Speaker 1>you see this from Bring Me the Sports? He writes,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Red Wings are crazy if they decline. Wilds reported Dylan

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:38.110
<v Speaker 1>Larkin offers. Tiny Joe writes as follows. Holding out for

0:26:38.170 --> 0:26:40.790
<v Speaker 1>NHL-ready talent is insane when a team like the Watt

0:26:40.830 --> 0:26:45.210
<v Speaker 1>is making an incredibly valuable offer for 30-year-old Dylan Larkin

0:26:45.230 --> 0:26:48.909
<v Speaker 1>who wants nothing to do with Detroit hockey anymore. What

0:26:48.970 --> 0:26:57.380
<v Speaker 1>is Minnesota offering? Apparently, multiple first-round picks and more. Here's

0:26:57.390 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what it says. This is Michael Russo, apparently. It's a

0:27:03.540 --> 0:27:06.670
<v Speaker 1>futures-based offer. based on what I think is a good

0:27:07.030 --> 0:27:10.490
<v Speaker 1>young player, a contracted player, a veteran that makes decent money,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.260
<v Speaker 1>and multiple first-round picks, is what Russo said Thursday during an.

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Appearance on Daily Faceoff.

0:27:18.700 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>He elaborated in his storyline at The Athletic saying Minnesota's

0:27:22.540 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>offer could conceivably include a young center such as Uroff

0:27:26.980 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or Strammel, A forward such as Ryan Hartman or Bobby

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Brink and multiple first-round picks. Is that what he wrote?

0:27:35.310 --> 0:27:37.610
<v Speaker 1>I'm going by what I just saw right now from

0:27:37.670 --> 0:27:39.870
<v Speaker 1>Bring Me the News. Is that what Russo was saying?

0:27:40.230 --> 0:27:43.710
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like you're trading for Dylan Hughes.

0:27:43.730 --> 0:27:44.810
<v Speaker 3>Quinn Hughes. Quinn Hughes.

0:27:45.190 --> 0:27:47.070
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a Quinn Hughes kind of a trade,

0:27:47.109 --> 0:27:47.850
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it, to you?

0:27:50.210 --> 0:27:50.970
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a lot.

0:27:51.770 --> 0:27:55.050
<v Speaker 4>I think, well, first we need to start with the

0:27:55.070 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Detroit Red Wings just might be a dysfunctional organization. They

0:27:59.940 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 4>shipped out Steve Iserman as their GM and then went

0:28:04.260 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 4>two months when they already knew the Dylan Larkin. With

0:28:07.220 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the Dylan Larkin situation going on, they have another issue

0:28:10.820 --> 0:28:13.980
<v Speaker 4>going on, and they never hired a GM. They went

0:28:14.020 --> 0:28:18.669
<v Speaker 4>two months before they even named an interim GM, and

0:28:18.690 --> 0:28:22.350
<v Speaker 4>they still don't have a full-time GM. What I don't

0:28:22.369 --> 0:28:23.609
<v Speaker 4>understand with Detroit is.

0:28:25.340 --> 0:28:28.860
<v Speaker 4>The reason they haven't accepted a wild offer is they

0:28:28.900 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 4>want players that can help them right now. And the wild,

0:28:33.060 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 4>basically their offers, all the wild have is, well, we

0:28:35.500 --> 0:28:39.090
<v Speaker 4>have few, the wild don't want to help you right

0:28:39.130 --> 0:28:40.150
<v Speaker 4>now because we are the wild.

0:28:40.170 --> 0:28:41.950
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to win right now. Like the reason they're

0:28:41.970 --> 0:28:42.930
<v Speaker 2>going after Dylan Larkin is, Hey.

0:28:42.970 --> 0:28:44.050
<v Speaker 4>We have a couple of your window to win a

0:28:44.070 --> 0:28:47.670
<v Speaker 4>Stanley cup. So we're not going to trade players off

0:28:47.730 --> 0:28:49.690
<v Speaker 4>our roster to bring in Larkin, which just ends up

0:28:49.710 --> 0:28:52.140
<v Speaker 4>being like an equal trade, right? We're, we're trying to

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.460
<v Speaker 4>give you futures. That's going to impact our future. it'll

0:28:55.500 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>impact our ability to win in the future. But Detroit,

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 4>for some reason, despite the fact that, um, they've barely

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 4>made the playoffs in recent years and they missed it

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.219
<v Speaker 4>again last year. And why Detroit thinks that they are

0:29:09.270 --> 0:29:12.610
<v Speaker 4>in a position to get win now players as if

0:29:12.630 --> 0:29:14.410
<v Speaker 4>they could make a run to the Stanley cup. It's just,

0:29:14.550 --> 0:29:17.330
<v Speaker 4>it's absolutely delusional. And the reason they are delusional, they

0:29:17.350 --> 0:29:18.970
<v Speaker 4>haven't even named a GM yet. So this is really

0:29:19.010 --> 0:29:22.090
<v Speaker 4>probably the owner's vision. And the owner is delusional in

0:29:22.110 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 4>this case. Um, I know no one wants to do

0:29:25.900 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 4>a rebuild after you haven't made the playoffs for X

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 4>amount of years, but you're not close. You're not on

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.850
<v Speaker 4>the cusp of being a playoff contender, Stanley Cup contender.

0:29:35.070 --> 0:29:36.270
<v Speaker 3>Delusion might be the right word.

0:29:36.570 --> 0:29:42.100
<v Speaker 4>Yes. So it's just this lack of leadership and direction.

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.420
<v Speaker 4>I think they are not knowing exactly where they want

0:29:45.460 --> 0:29:49.980
<v Speaker 4>to go. So in the wild, I mean, from all reports,

0:29:50.020 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 4>they've given them a pretty darn good offer.

0:29:52.180 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Dylan Larkin's a good player. He ain't Quinn

0:29:54.780 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Hughes good.

0:29:55.260 --> 0:29:55.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:56.390 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, like you should not be getting a Quinn Hughes-level package.

0:29:59.540 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 3>So let me ask you a question.

0:30:00.140 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>You should not be getting a Connor Hellebuck package.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're the Detroit GM, and I'm Bill Guerin,

0:30:05.820 --> 0:30:07.970
<v Speaker 1>and I call you and I say, this is it,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>take it or leave it for Larkin. We'll give you Stramel, Hartman,

0:30:13.820 --> 0:30:16.700
<v Speaker 1>and two first-round picks. Would you do that if you

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>were Detroit, or would you say that's not enough? Would

0:30:20.060 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it have to be more than two first-round picks?

0:30:21.420 --> 0:30:22.780
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the argument Detroit's going to have is, well,

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:24.460
<v Speaker 4>those two first-round picks are going to be late in

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.100
<v Speaker 4>the first round, right? You're not going to be getting

0:30:28.140 --> 0:30:30.220
<v Speaker 4>a top 10 pick out of that. You can still

0:30:30.380 --> 0:30:34.010
<v Speaker 4>find hits. It would depend on what you think of Stramel.

0:30:34.110 --> 0:30:37.630
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen enough of Stramel. He was a first-round

0:30:37.650 --> 0:30:41.530
<v Speaker 4>pick for a while. He was disappointing at first. The

0:30:41.570 --> 0:30:42.250
<v Speaker 4>first year or two.

0:30:42.290 --> 0:30:44.469
<v Speaker 1>So is Yurov a more valuable player right now as

0:30:44.510 --> 0:30:44.870
<v Speaker 1>we speak?

0:30:44.910 --> 0:30:47.890
<v Speaker 2>Yurov is more valuable than Stramel.

0:30:47.910 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Yurov produced in Russia at a very young age in

0:30:54.660 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 4>a pretty darn good league over there. and Urov has

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 4>already been in the NHL, and you've already seen a

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:01.850
<v Speaker 4>jump of, you know, from year one to year two,

0:31:01.890 --> 0:31:06.050
<v Speaker 4>you've seen progression out of him. Stramel's still a huge

0:31:06.110 --> 0:31:08.290
<v Speaker 4>question mark, but in terms of what the Wild have

0:31:08.310 --> 0:31:10.230
<v Speaker 4>to offer, he's one of their, you know, consider one

0:31:10.250 --> 0:31:12.550
<v Speaker 4>of their top prospects and had a good year or

0:31:12.610 --> 0:31:14.550
<v Speaker 4>two at Michigan State.

0:31:16.350 --> 0:31:18.690
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would have a hard time.

0:31:18.810 --> 0:31:20.810
<v Speaker 4>I would bet the Wild don't want to give up

0:31:20.890 --> 0:31:23.780
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Herman. I think they'd probably try to Okay. I mean,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 4>it's going to have to be a Hartman or a

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Brink just because we're going to have to send

0:31:27.380 --> 0:31:28.460
<v Speaker 4>out salary elsewhere.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>And obviously it's not going to be one of your

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.700
<v Speaker 4>top five, six, seven players. You can't send out Brodine

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:39.770
<v Speaker 4>at this point. He's too valuable. So you're trying to

0:31:39.810 --> 0:31:42.410
<v Speaker 4>find a guy who makes a decent amount of money,

0:31:43.590 --> 0:31:46.110
<v Speaker 4>but I would bet to wager the wild would rather

0:31:46.130 --> 0:31:47.910
<v Speaker 4>have Ryan Hartman on their team for the playoffs than

0:31:47.950 --> 0:31:52.030
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Brink. So I'm sure they've been trying to send

0:31:52.070 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Brink away.

0:31:53.230 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And if I asked you this question, how much greater

0:32:00.300 --> 0:32:03.530
<v Speaker 1>percentage-wise do you think the Wilds' chances are of getting

0:32:03.570 --> 0:32:10.110
<v Speaker 1>to the NHL Finals with Larkin or without him? But

0:32:10.710 --> 0:32:14.850
<v Speaker 1>the second part to that question is, Can they still,

0:32:15.390 --> 0:32:17.510
<v Speaker 1>with adding him, can they still do it if they

0:32:17.570 --> 0:32:21.270
<v Speaker 1>had to give away like Urov, Hartman, and Brink? Let's

0:32:21.290 --> 0:32:23.729
<v Speaker 1>say they didn't give up those three. Would that be

0:32:23.830 --> 0:32:24.170
<v Speaker 1>worth it?

0:32:24.190 --> 0:32:24.730
<v Speaker 3>Would you say?

0:32:24.750 --> 0:32:26.740
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're not going to give up all three.

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.860
<v Speaker 3>They won't, okay. They would only give up two, probably.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, Urov might have to be a part of the

0:32:33.100 --> 0:32:33.780
<v Speaker 4>Larkin deal.

0:32:33.860 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 2>But here's the deal, too.

0:32:36.940 --> 0:32:39.060
<v Speaker 4>If you are the Wild and you are giving up

0:32:39.340 --> 0:32:43.570
<v Speaker 4>these assets for Dylan Larkin, You better well darn know

0:32:43.610 --> 0:32:46.790
<v Speaker 4>that Quinn Hughes is signing once Dylan Larkin.

0:32:46.910 --> 0:32:47.850
<v Speaker 2>Oh, right, right.

0:32:47.870 --> 0:32:50.380
<v Speaker 4>That's got to be the wink-wink with Quinn Hughes. Hey,

0:32:50.430 --> 0:32:53.020
<v Speaker 4>if we get Dylan Larkin, you're signing, correct? Because if

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:54.780
<v Speaker 4>you give up all that for Dylan Larkin and then

0:32:54.820 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Quinn Hughes leaves, it'd still be great. We haven't had,

0:33:00.180 --> 0:33:03.930
<v Speaker 4>probably ever, a combo of centers like Dylan Larkin and

0:33:04.030 --> 0:33:06.170
<v Speaker 4>Jule Erickson-Neck together, right, in terms of two on the

0:33:06.210 --> 0:33:08.790
<v Speaker 4>same team. So that immediately would give you at least

0:33:08.890 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 4>two legit top six centers for probably the first time

0:33:11.860 --> 0:33:15.900
<v Speaker 4>in the Wild's history. I think probably the Wild, they're

0:33:15.940 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 4>trying to do this because they've been trying to go

0:33:19.260 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 4>to more of a futures related, and that's why all

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 4>the first round picks are.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Being thrown out there.

0:33:23.380 --> 0:33:25.820
<v Speaker 4>Because I think they want to keep Urov on top

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 4>of this.

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you another question.

0:33:29.900 --> 0:33:31.850
<v Speaker 4>But you know, you asked me in terms of Stanley

0:33:31.870 --> 0:33:36.010
<v Speaker 4>Cup odds. Last year in the playoffs, Julek Sinek got hurt.

0:33:36.650 --> 0:33:39.870
<v Speaker 4>And they had to face the Colorado Avalanche without Jewel Erickson-Neck.

0:33:39.890 --> 0:33:42.650
<v Speaker 4>And that was a huge blow for him.

0:33:42.770 --> 0:33:43.650
<v Speaker 2>One, because he's that good.

0:33:43.690 --> 0:33:47.469
<v Speaker 4>And two, there was no one behind him that could

0:33:47.510 --> 0:33:51.729
<v Speaker 4>pick up any slack at the level. Dylan Larkin would

0:33:51.770 --> 0:33:54.570
<v Speaker 4>allow you to survive a Jewel Erickson-Neck. And actually, Jewel

0:33:54.590 --> 0:33:56.390
<v Speaker 4>Erickson-Neck is hurt as we speak. It sounds like he's

0:33:56.410 --> 0:33:57.830
<v Speaker 4>going to the doctor today. He got hurt in last

0:33:57.890 --> 0:34:00.370
<v Speaker 4>night's game. So we're going to find out if there's

0:34:00.390 --> 0:34:02.050
<v Speaker 4>any injury to him and how long that could be.

0:34:02.630 --> 0:34:05.670
<v Speaker 4>But this team has not been able to survive... Erickson-Neck

0:34:05.690 --> 0:34:07.810
<v Speaker 4>being out for long stretches because they don't have a

0:34:07.910 --> 0:34:12.860
<v Speaker 4>capable second center. Or Larkin would then become your first center, probably.

0:34:13.530 --> 0:34:15.940
<v Speaker 1>Because I haven't been paying as close attention to the

0:34:15.980 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Red Wings, Dylan Larkin, the NHL, and the Wilds as

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.580
<v Speaker 1>I once did, let me ask you another question. I

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>know Larkin has expanded his list of teams that he

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>would play for to 10th. has has does anybody know

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.700
<v Speaker 1>or have any indication has anybody reported if he had

0:34:33.739 --> 0:34:36.620
<v Speaker 1>his choice where he'd want to go do you think

0:34:36.660 --> 0:34:38.220
<v Speaker 1>minnesota was where he would.

0:34:38.260 --> 0:34:39.340
<v Speaker 4>I think this is where he wants to be i

0:34:39.620 --> 0:34:43.420
<v Speaker 4>mean when initially his trade list was three teams and

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.100
<v Speaker 4>this is back in the summer when we heard that

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.180
<v Speaker 4>it was it was minnesota florida las vegas those are

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 4>the three teams um He expanded his list to 10

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.580
<v Speaker 4>because Detroit asked him. He's like, hey, we can't negotiate

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.940
<v Speaker 4>with just three teams. Those three teams don't necessarily want

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:06.620
<v Speaker 4>you back. Las Vegas is pretty loaded at center, so

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.540
<v Speaker 4>they don't feel the need to have to give up

0:35:08.580 --> 0:35:11.100
<v Speaker 4>a big package for Dylan Larkin because they are fine

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 4>at the center position. Florida, when Barkov is healthy, is

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.020
<v Speaker 4>also relatively set at center and don't have.

0:35:17.940 --> 0:35:21.250
<v Speaker 2>The cap space either. Minnesota....

0:35:22.130 --> 0:35:24.350
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's been reported he wants to come here.

0:35:24.430 --> 0:35:26.730
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Bill Guerin was his Team USA GM. Yeah, okay.

0:35:26.950 --> 0:35:29.390
<v Speaker 2>It's a place you can win. It's in the United States.

0:35:30.030 --> 0:35:33.540
<v Speaker 4>He's got Team USA buddies on the team, and Quinn Hughes,

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:40.940
<v Speaker 4>Matt Boldy, Brock Faber. And, you know, for a guy,

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's a perfect fit. It's a team that

0:35:43.219 --> 0:35:46.580
<v Speaker 4>needs another center to have kind of be that missing

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 4>piece for them to win a Stanley Cup. So, yeah,

0:35:50.219 --> 0:35:51.660
<v Speaker 4>I think he's wanted to come here all along.

0:35:54.550 --> 0:35:56.690
<v Speaker 1>Tiny Joe writes, Larkin is great, but he's wanted out

0:35:56.730 --> 0:35:59.419
<v Speaker 1>of Detroit since his early June trade request.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.219
<v Speaker 3>Fans are booing him every time he steps on the ice,

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.020
<v Speaker 3>and now he's benched himself while demanding a trade.

0:36:03.460 --> 0:36:05.219
<v Speaker 1>The guy appears to be willing to accept a team

0:36:05.260 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>suspension and sacrifice $ 41, 000 per day to.

0:36:08.340 --> 0:36:09.570
<v Speaker 3>Get out of town. Is that what he makes a

0:36:09.610 --> 0:36:11.529
<v Speaker 3>game on average is $ 41, 000? Must be.

0:36:12.050 --> 0:36:15.850
<v Speaker 1>Wow. That is somebody who is obviously bitter. And then

0:36:15.910 --> 0:36:21.930
<v Speaker 1>somebody text on the Bradshaw and Bryant page. K-Van text

0:36:21.969 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>line that says, I really don't want Larkin. Seems like

0:36:24.820 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a locker room cancer. I don't know if he's a

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:29.580
<v Speaker 1>locker room cancer. I just think he doesn't want to

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.140
<v Speaker 1>play there. He wants to try to, because he's 30.

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 4>We've never heard of him being a problem in the

0:36:34.460 --> 0:36:35.020
<v Speaker 4>locker room.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:36.540
<v Speaker 2>He wants out.

0:36:36.700 --> 0:36:36.939
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.100
<v Speaker 2>He wants out so badly. I'm sure his teammates are

0:36:40.140 --> 0:36:40.819
<v Speaker 2>bitter about that.

0:36:40.860 --> 0:36:41.100
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:36:43.060 --> 0:36:44.420
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know if that makes you a cancer.

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.819
<v Speaker 4>Like Quinn Hughes wanted out of Vancouver. I don't know

0:36:46.860 --> 0:36:47.779
<v Speaker 4>if that makes him a cancer.

0:36:48.050 --> 0:36:48.260
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:36:50.710 --> 0:36:52.950
<v Speaker 3>This one says Spurgeon would be a great way to

0:36:53.010 --> 0:36:56.950
<v Speaker 3>shed salary. Is that accurate?

0:36:57.030 --> 0:37:00.029
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're just making about the same.

0:37:00.050 --> 0:37:00.810
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:37:01.790 --> 0:37:02.549
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:37:04.969 --> 0:37:07.310
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to win a Stanley Cup, you're trying

0:37:07.350 --> 0:37:09.630
<v Speaker 4>to shed the salary of guys that aren't as important.

0:37:10.010 --> 0:37:12.590
<v Speaker 4>And Jared Spurgeon ain't what he used to be, but

0:37:12.610 --> 0:37:16.220
<v Speaker 4>he's still a top four defenseman. And you'd still have

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:17.739
<v Speaker 4>to go out probably before the trade deadline to try

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:18.459
<v Speaker 4>to fill that void.

0:37:24.010 --> 0:37:28.910
<v Speaker 3>Film at 11. I just saw this on the schedule.

0:37:30.910 --> 0:37:36.390
<v Speaker 3>Clippers 1-3 at Timberwolves 3-2. It's an NBA Cup.

0:37:36.530 --> 0:37:40.529
<v Speaker 1>Are they still doing that nonsensical NBA Cup thing?

0:37:41.430 --> 0:37:42.569
<v Speaker 3>Are they really doing it?

0:37:43.130 --> 0:37:47.230
<v Speaker 1>Do the players have so little interest in playing these

0:37:47.290 --> 0:37:50.110
<v Speaker 1>first few games in October and November that they actually

0:37:50.150 --> 0:37:51.290
<v Speaker 1>continue to incentivize?

0:37:51.330 --> 0:37:52.379
<v Speaker 3>There's no other reason they did it, folks.

0:37:54.690 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 1>The reason they tried to tell you that there were

0:37:58.469 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>other reasons they did this because an in-season tournament makes

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:07.339
<v Speaker 1>it more interesting, gives them something. It was because the

0:38:07.420 --> 0:38:14.220
<v Speaker 1>caliber of play in the NBA is so bad in October, November,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and even December that they have to try to incentivize

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.700
<v Speaker 1>it for these guys to play harder. And I don't

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.430
<v Speaker 1>even know if they are because of this. Do they

0:38:21.450 --> 0:38:22.210
<v Speaker 1>play harder for some.

0:38:22.230 --> 0:38:22.910
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

0:38:23.660 --> 0:38:24.140
<v Speaker 3>Let me see.

0:38:24.180 --> 0:38:25.739
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it has an impact on whether they do load

0:38:25.780 --> 0:38:26.420
<v Speaker 4>management or not.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:28.610
<v Speaker 4>Let's see.

0:38:28.630 --> 0:38:31.830
<v Speaker 3>What would you rather have? The Naismith Trophy or the

0:38:32.010 --> 0:38:32.790
<v Speaker 3>NBA Cup?

0:38:34.710 --> 0:38:34.950
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:38:35.410 --> 0:38:37.430
<v Speaker 4>Didn't the Lakers win the first NBA Cup and then

0:38:37.489 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 4>raise the banner in their building?

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>This one says not per game, per day. Well, yeah,

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 3>I get that.

0:38:54.219 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you extrapolate it out, it's basically for

0:38:58.700 --> 0:39:02.969
<v Speaker 1>the amount of games he's playing. If the game was

0:39:03.010 --> 0:39:06.210
<v Speaker 1>only a 62-game schedule, it wouldn't be $ 41, 000 a day.

0:39:06.250 --> 0:39:16.510
<v Speaker 3>It just wouldn't. But yeah, I guess technically it's $ 41, 000

0:39:14.100 --> 0:39:14.540
<v Speaker 3>per day.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Someone's disappointed there's no montage for the NBA Cup. Why

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't you put one of those together, TKP?

0:39:22.580 --> 0:39:24.020
<v Speaker 2>I apologize.

0:39:24.060 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know until 30 seconds ago that yeah i

0:39:26.340 --> 0:39:27.150
<v Speaker 4>guess i didn't.

0:39:26.860 --> 0:39:29.020
<v Speaker 3>I still can't believe they actually do that.

0:39:32.700 --> 0:39:35.980
<v Speaker 1>Somebody says they they did i miss the nobody i

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't get many halloween bits this year for some reason

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:39.500
<v Speaker 1>maybe people are tired of the bits but this one

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>may be one of my favorite I'm going to dress

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>up as a far right extremist and go as 10

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of these T-shirts.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:51.590
<v Speaker 3>Now that's funny. That's funny.

0:39:52.130 --> 0:39:54.750
<v Speaker 1>That's the only one I have. Yeah, we didn't, generally

0:39:54.790 --> 0:39:56.469
<v Speaker 1>that used to be just a big hit. I think

0:39:56.510 --> 0:39:57.750
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the best bits of all time.

0:39:57.770 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Next time I hit it well right, you can say

0:39:59.380 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 4>that's a crackpot conservative shot.

0:40:00.739 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a crackpot. And when I hook my left,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you can say, boy, that was a liberal. And I

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.980
<v Speaker 1>didn't take any well stones today either. I was so

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>happy I was to shoot a 70. And, Tenneby, if

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you would have saw some of the pitch shots I hit,

0:40:14.860 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which I've not hit a good pitch shot in a month.

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I stand over it.

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>My knees are knocking, and I don't know if I

0:40:21.380 --> 0:40:22.900
<v Speaker 1>should pinch it a little bit, should I put a

0:40:22.940 --> 0:40:26.430
<v Speaker 1>putting stroke on it. Just all the things that I've

0:40:26.489 --> 0:40:29.029
<v Speaker 1>learned over the years about the short game just completely

0:40:29.110 --> 0:40:32.540
<v Speaker 1>left me until today. I've got a couple of big

0:40:32.580 --> 0:40:34.900
<v Speaker 1>rounds this weekend, too, so I'm looking forward to it.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.020
<v Speaker 1>Let's go ahead and take a break when we do.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Lil B, feminine touch of the program. She joins us,

0:40:40.300 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>program password Lee Baldwin. Yeah, baby. Of Cool 108 fame

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.100
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina fame. She's also a member of the Minnesota

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasters Hall of Fame.

0:40:48.340 --> 0:40:50.450
<v Speaker 3>Is Belle Jensen in yet? She will be if she's not.

0:40:50.460 --> 0:40:50.779
<v Speaker 4>She'll be in.

0:40:51.140 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 3>If she's not in, she will be.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.110
<v Speaker 1>I think I might be the only Twin Cities personality

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.310
<v Speaker 1>that will not ever get into the PA's got.

0:40:57.210 --> 0:40:59.570
<v Speaker 3>To be next, right? I don't know how he's not in.

0:41:00.489 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Then Cove, then meat sauce. Maybe you.

0:41:02.500 --> 0:41:02.900
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:02.940 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Hockey.

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Don't tell me about hockey. They'll go as a trio?

0:41:07.260 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 3>They should. You know what they'll do? You'll see that

0:41:10.860 --> 0:41:11.910
<v Speaker 3>with rock and roll guys.

0:41:11.950 --> 0:41:14.069
<v Speaker 1>They'll go as part of a band, but then they'll

0:41:14.110 --> 0:41:16.130
<v Speaker 1>also go for their solo effort as well, right?

0:41:16.270 --> 0:41:18.170
<v Speaker 4>They'll probably be the only ones that go in that night.

0:41:18.190 --> 0:41:20.489
<v Speaker 4>They wouldn't even put anyone else out there with them.

0:41:20.790 --> 0:41:22.930
<v Speaker 1>And, like I say, they'll all go in as a team,

0:41:22.969 --> 0:41:25.049
<v Speaker 1>the Power 2 Morning Show, and then eventually they'll all

0:41:25.090 --> 0:41:27.739
<v Speaker 1>go in individually as well. So there'll be two time

0:41:27.780 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>inductees into the Minnesota Broadcasters Hall of Fame. We'll pause,

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:34.500
<v Speaker 1>come back, and Lil B joins us next here on

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>The Fan.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.250
<v Speaker 2>Lil B joins Common next on The Fan. The Fan.

0:41:42.330 --> 0:41:44.630
<v Speaker 3>From the 1-800-ASK-GARY-TRAFFIC-CENTER.

0:41:44.830 --> 0:41:48.130
<v Speaker 2>This report is sponsored by Verizon Business.

0:41:48.370 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 5>35W northbound, heavy traffic, Lake Street 294 from downtown Minneapolis

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.060
<v Speaker 5>to the Forest Lake split.

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Taking 22 minutes.

0:41:56.100 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 5>35E southbound, stop and go between Randolph and Shepherd Road

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:03.070
<v Speaker 5>through Roadwork Zone from downtown St. Paul to the Burnsville split,

0:42:03.070 --> 0:42:03.670
<v Speaker 5>20 minutes.

0:42:04.130 --> 0:42:04.950
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Beck and that