1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,160 Speaker 1: Hey, Michael. I think it was Milton Friedman who came 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:06,600 Speaker 1: up with the idea that if you spend your money 3 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:10,799 Speaker 1: on you, it's the best, but if someone spends your 4 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:14,720 Speaker 1: money on other things, that's the worst. And I believe 5 00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:17,160 Speaker 1: that's what's happening here. I don't know how he knows 6 00:00:17,200 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: what I want. He doesn't even know my name, much 7 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:23,160 Speaker 1: less many of the people in his district. So how 8 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: can you spend your money on you? 9 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:28,720 Speaker 2: Thanks? And you're a woman, you don't even know what 10 00:00:28,760 --> 00:00:29,680 Speaker 2: you want? 11 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:34,840 Speaker 3: Dragon at iHeartMedia dot com. 12 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 2: You try and ask a woman what she wants for dinner. 13 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:43,960 Speaker 3: I've kind of developed a new rule. And the new 14 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 3: rule in our household is what do you want to eat? 15 00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:50,279 Speaker 3: I don't know? Okay, Well, when you decide, let me know. 16 00:00:51,720 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 2: Because three hours later. 17 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 3: No, because she gets hungry. Tammer gets hungry. So at 18 00:00:58,240 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 3: some point she will tell me what she wants to go. 19 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,080 Speaker 3: All I have to do is just wait to get 20 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 3: the answer. I've become a little more like instead of 21 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 3: just you know, trying to push push push for a neck. No, 22 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:13,120 Speaker 3: you'll venturely tell me. 23 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:15,400 Speaker 2: In the Red Beard household, it's a guessing game. And 24 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 2: she doesn't even know the correct answer. So I'll list 25 00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 2: a dozen things in they're all wrong. 26 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 3: Well that's what I would always do now, you know, no, no, 27 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,800 Speaker 3: no no. So I go through the list, and of 28 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:28,040 Speaker 3: course the problem we kind of live in a we 29 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:32,679 Speaker 3: live in a food desert. We live in a restaurant desert. 30 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:36,600 Speaker 3: I mean it's pretty much chains or it's the same 31 00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:40,200 Speaker 3: place we go all the time, and so it's it's 32 00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:43,199 Speaker 3: it boils down to we don't even talk in terms 33 00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:46,680 Speaker 3: of do you want to go to name restaurants? We 34 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 3: don't do that. It's just do you one Mexican, Chinese, 35 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 3: Indian burgers, steak? What else am I missing? He means, 36 00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 3: you know, like five categories? So we just we decide category. 37 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 3: But she's right, Friedman, did you know you know best 38 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 3: how to spend your money? Now, maybe you don't spend 39 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,919 Speaker 3: it the best way you could, but people know they're 40 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:16,720 Speaker 3: going to when they spend their money, that is their 41 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 3: choice and they're getting what they want, which is a 42 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 3: great lead in to what I also believe that people 43 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 3: know when you're being bull you know what, bull craped. 44 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,840 Speaker 3: I really do believe people know that you can tell 45 00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:42,120 Speaker 3: by a person's body language you can tell by hesitation 46 00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:46,840 Speaker 3: in what they're saying, and you can tell by the words. 47 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 2: You can sometimes follow their eyes too. If their eyes 48 00:02:49,600 --> 00:02:51,840 Speaker 2: go up in that one direction, you know they're making 49 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,680 Speaker 2: stuff up right or. 50 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:01,400 Speaker 3: Like we like to joke anytime you watch interviews on TV. 51 00:03:03,440 --> 00:03:08,000 Speaker 3: That's a great question, Michael, which is let me think 52 00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 3: about that does make the difference whether the questions will 53 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 3: a good question or not. It's I need time to 54 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 3: formulate where do I start answering this question, and what 55 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 3: is this a trick question? Exactly? 56 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:22,079 Speaker 2: If they say that's a great question and then repeat 57 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 2: the question, they have no idea, no idea. 58 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,040 Speaker 3: That's right, they had no idea. I sincerely believe that 59 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,040 Speaker 3: all of the woke crap that we've been dealing with 60 00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:37,640 Speaker 3: has never really been effective, particularly in these quarters. And 61 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:40,440 Speaker 3: I say particularly in these quarters because Dragon and I 62 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 3: actually hear the woke crap and we turn that into 63 00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:47,920 Speaker 3: subjects that we make fun of, We mockt how stupid 64 00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:52,360 Speaker 3: the wokeness is. I think the conservatives themselves have long 65 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 3: suspected that all this push for woke woke language the 66 00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 3: true margarita or cocktails of a victimhood, group, identity, identity politics. 67 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 3: I think it alienates most Americans. We mack it here, 68 00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 3: and I think mockery and making fun of something is 69 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:19,039 Speaker 3: the best way to really counter some things because you 70 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:24,440 Speaker 3: can use logic and reasoning and rational arguments all day long, 71 00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 3: and people will understand those rational arguments. They'll understand your logic, 72 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:35,640 Speaker 3: but it doesn't really internalize until you can mock it 73 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 3: and make fun of it. When you mock it and 74 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:42,039 Speaker 3: make fun of it, you internalize them more. That's why 75 00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 3: I think some of the greatest teachers are the teachers 76 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:48,120 Speaker 3: who present something. You know that they take a history class, 77 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 3: for example, and if they're animated, and they use all 78 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 3: sorts of multiple ways of conveying the information audio, visual recordings, 79 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:05,720 Speaker 3: photographs everything, it brings it alive. Or you bring artifacts 80 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:08,280 Speaker 3: or things into the classroom and actually say, hey, look 81 00:05:08,320 --> 00:05:12,040 Speaker 3: at this. You know, as much as I, as much 82 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 3: as Glenn Beck and I despise each other, Glenn Beck 83 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:17,600 Speaker 3: does a really good job. You know. He collects all 84 00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 3: these historical artifacts that Sunday I suppose when he dies 85 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:27,800 Speaker 3: will be in a in a really amazing musicum you'll 86 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:29,360 Speaker 3: be able to see things as you would. I mean, 87 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:32,720 Speaker 3: he collects like odd things that you'll Hitler owned at 88 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:35,039 Speaker 3: one point where you'll be able to go see those 89 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,720 Speaker 3: kinds of things. It'll really bring history alive, and he's 90 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 3: very good at doing that. I give him credit for that. 91 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,440 Speaker 3: They go back to Wolkeness from them because I think 92 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 3: it really alienates this It doesn't. It's not convincing, but 93 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:51,479 Speaker 3: it's not persuasive. It doesn't help in a debate. It's 94 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:57,479 Speaker 3: actually off putting. It's just too grading. And we know 95 00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:01,520 Speaker 3: it's devising. And no matter what your politics, I don't 96 00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:03,479 Speaker 3: care what side of it or where you are on 97 00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:05,599 Speaker 3: the spectrum of politics. You know, I heard the word 98 00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,599 Speaker 3: spectrum used yesterday on something and I thought, this is 99 00:06:08,600 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 3: a word that's becoming overused. And I just now used 100 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 3: it and thought about that. When I say spectrum of 101 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,839 Speaker 3: the political spectrum, I really do believe that politics is 102 00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:21,799 Speaker 3: on a spectrum. You've got the left wing nut jobs, 103 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:23,960 Speaker 3: you got the right wing nut jobs, you got everybody 104 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 3: in the middle. And I don't mean like at ninety degrees. 105 00:06:27,800 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 3: I mean all across that half circle of a baseline. 106 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 3: People are all and your politics can be at a 107 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:41,279 Speaker 3: forty five degree angle on that spectrum on one issue 108 00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 3: and you can be way over here on a twenty 109 00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:46,600 Speaker 3: five degree angle. On another issue, I think we just 110 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 3: try to button hold people too much in politics. So 111 00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:56,919 Speaker 3: this whole idea about wokeness and my theory that it's 112 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:02,719 Speaker 3: really never been effective, I now have some empirical evidence. 113 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,960 Speaker 3: There's a new study by the Network Contagion Research Institute 114 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:12,040 Speaker 3: that has finally put out some evidence that woke language 115 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 3: actually provokes real anger, defensiveness, and bile in the respondents. 116 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 3: Woke language is often used as a way to browbeat 117 00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:28,560 Speaker 3: just ordinary people into submission. Well, this study shows that 118 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:32,040 Speaker 3: we got plausible grounds to conclude that it's actually achieving 119 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 3: the precise opposite someone in I don't care whether it's 120 00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:42,119 Speaker 3: in this building or it's out in my social life 121 00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 3: or wherever. People can say certain things that I know 122 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,680 Speaker 3: are just buzzwords. And when they use the buzzwords, particularly 123 00:07:49,760 --> 00:07:54,760 Speaker 3: a woke buzzword or it's a politically correct buzzword, I 124 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 3: immediately stop thinking about what they're trying to convey to me, 125 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 3: and I start thinking about what's their cultural position, what's 126 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:09,000 Speaker 3: their political position, What are they really trying to convey here, 127 00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 3: what do they really believe? It completely distracts me from 128 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 3: whatever they're actually showing. Well, this research shows that, you know, 129 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:23,840 Speaker 3: I like to say things are just stupid. Well, this research, 130 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:30,440 Speaker 3: more than anything else, probably shows that woke is just stupid. 131 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,440 Speaker 3: The survey tested the actual effect of woke language on 132 00:08:35,480 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 3: Americans by drawing from public messaging put out by the 133 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 3: Anti Defamation League. That organization one of America's most influential 134 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:52,840 Speaker 3: liberal in geos non government organizations, and it has been 135 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:57,079 Speaker 3: at the forefront of shaping how anti Semitism is taught 136 00:08:57,120 --> 00:09:00,720 Speaker 3: in schools all across the country. They develop all sorts 137 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:05,200 Speaker 3: of educational resources, handbooks, curriculum programs, you name it, but 138 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:07,680 Speaker 3: in an effort. And there's no doubt in my mind 139 00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:11,680 Speaker 3: that this effort has been well intentioned to fight the 140 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:16,320 Speaker 3: scourge of increasing Jew hatred. What did the Anti Defamation 141 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 3: lead do? They embraced the language of woke in their campaigns, 142 00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 3: and generally speaking, they have increasingly adopted language that presents 143 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:32,040 Speaker 3: Jews as victims, victims of physical violence, of prejudice, of 144 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:36,200 Speaker 3: silence from neutral bystanders. Jews get framed simply as one 145 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 3: of the many oppressed groups at one of the many 146 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:43,120 Speaker 3: oppressed group identities in this country, and so the logic goes, 147 00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:47,240 Speaker 3: we can fight anti Semitism by getting people to see 148 00:09:47,480 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 3: Jews in a woke term. And I love the fact 149 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:58,600 Speaker 3: that they use Jews as an example, because the problem 150 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:01,720 Speaker 3: is is that they're type of rhetoric utterly fails to 151 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:05,320 Speaker 3: stimulate feelings of any sort of solidarity, any sort of 152 00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:09,240 Speaker 3: care or concern. In fact, it doesn't even create any 153 00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:15,120 Speaker 3: sense of positivity or even respect. Actually, the study demonstrates 154 00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 3: that exposure to this psychologically framing of everything in a 155 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 3: woke term actually increases participants reported anger, their defensiveness, even 156 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:30,200 Speaker 3: hostility towards Jews. So here's the ADL, the aneid of 157 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 3: Defamation League, trying to fight anti Semitism and in doing 158 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:41,400 Speaker 3: so decides to go woke. Well, they went broke because 159 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:47,600 Speaker 3: it increases something called the hostile attribution basis. That's a 160 00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:50,280 Speaker 3: bunch of jargon, but it's a way of assessing whether 161 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 3: you interpret people's behavior in good faith or not so well, 162 00:10:57,040 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 3: not kind of truly paradoxically anti semitism. Using the woke 163 00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 3: language of ADL's language can measurably increase feelings of anti Semitism. 164 00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:13,960 Speaker 3: So when you're talking about social issues like you know, 165 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 3: inequality or racism, but you're using woke language. This study 166 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:25,320 Speaker 3: shows that it actually appears to upset people because it 167 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:29,600 Speaker 3: does exactly what woke language was designed to do. It divides, 168 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:33,679 Speaker 3: it accuses, and it relies on the message of competition 169 00:11:34,520 --> 00:11:40,000 Speaker 3: instead of unity. Now I've long suspected this, but I've 170 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:43,680 Speaker 3: never had the evidence. This is not the first study 171 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 3: indicating that woke messaging creates more hostility, not less. The 172 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 3: same organization ran a similar research project after learning that 173 00:11:56,000 --> 00:12:02,040 Speaker 3: and astonishing fifty two percent of professionals have to attend 174 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:06,480 Speaker 3: some sort of DEI meetings and training events at work. 175 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:11,800 Speaker 3: What's the purpose, Well, the stated intention, I should say, 176 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:20,080 Speaker 3: is increasing awareness of an opposition to systemic oppression. Now 177 00:12:20,320 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 3: I will tell I will fully confess not even Catholic, 178 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:26,079 Speaker 3: but put me in a confessional and I will tell 179 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:29,160 Speaker 3: you that when someone starts telling me about how some 180 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:34,880 Speaker 3: group is systemically oppressed. Now I'm not talking about you know, 181 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:39,199 Speaker 3: Christians in Syria, for example, They're not just being systemically oppressed, 182 00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:47,120 Speaker 3: They're being systematically annihilated. It's a holocaust of Christians in Syria. 183 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:53,760 Speaker 3: I know, I'm talking about well, you know, effeminate gay 184 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 3: men or you know, really, but you know, lesbian women 185 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 3: or his fannings or blacks or whatever identity column you 186 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,200 Speaker 3: want to put somebody in. When you tell me that 187 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 3: their system, that their systemic oppression of those people, my 188 00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:13,320 Speaker 3: brain immediately just shuts down because I just think it's 189 00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:18,480 Speaker 3: total bull crap. But nobody's ever so to speak, run 190 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:23,319 Speaker 3: the numbers before to see if the DEI training really works, 191 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:26,240 Speaker 3: because if they had done that, they have seen that 192 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,079 Speaker 3: more often than not, the curse is worse than the 193 00:13:28,760 --> 00:13:32,280 Speaker 3: cure is worse than the disease. And even that's only 194 00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 3: if you actually believe that diversity, equity inclusion was about 195 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 3: curing anything, as opposed to say, you know, actually just 196 00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 3: subsidizing a class of human resources professionals and then conjuring 197 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:48,200 Speaker 3: an entire microeconomy out of that. You know what that 198 00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:52,559 Speaker 3: microeconomy is worth right now, according to Mackenzie, one of 199 00:13:52,600 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 3: the giant consulting firms, eight billion dollars. Now again, I 200 00:13:58,120 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 3: like to think about eight billion dollar that's taken out 201 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:07,280 Speaker 3: of something productive and put into think about, well, it's 202 00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:12,679 Speaker 3: kind of I can't actually equate the ethics programs because 203 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:16,080 Speaker 3: dragon there's really nothing in our ethics program that are 204 00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 3: testing that we do that's really DEI. There's nothing there 205 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,840 Speaker 3: about DEI that I recall, or if there is, I've 206 00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 3: just fully spaced it out, So we don't really do that. 207 00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 3: Am I missing something here? Do we do any DEI 208 00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:32,080 Speaker 3: training at iHeart? I can't think of anything. 209 00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:33,480 Speaker 2: I think it might be a little bit in the 210 00:14:33,520 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 2: ethics training. 211 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:36,120 Speaker 3: Do you think there's something in this? 212 00:14:36,400 --> 00:14:38,920 Speaker 2: Maybe a sentence or two or a slide or something. 213 00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:41,800 Speaker 3: Okay, so maybe it's just a slide out of you know, 214 00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:44,800 Speaker 3: one hundred slides. There's one. But I just don't think 215 00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:47,120 Speaker 3: we do it here because I think I think it 216 00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:50,480 Speaker 3: really would have stuck in my head. But think of 217 00:14:50,520 --> 00:14:54,880 Speaker 3: the time that people spend. You have to hire a professional, 218 00:14:55,840 --> 00:14:58,120 Speaker 3: you've got somebody full time in that company or in 219 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 3: that organization. Then they hire a consultant because they don't 220 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:04,400 Speaker 3: do the work themselves. Well what does the hire consultant 221 00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:07,720 Speaker 3: come in and do it? So Mackenzy estimates that we 222 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:10,720 Speaker 3: spend eight billion dollars, which I know, in the grand 223 00:15:10,760 --> 00:15:12,640 Speaker 3: scheme of you know, a trillion dollars GDP, it's not 224 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:15,000 Speaker 3: a lot of money, but still that's eight billion dollars 225 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 3: that in those companies could be put to an actual 226 00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:24,480 Speaker 3: constructive use, like in our case, finishing the bathrooms. Did 227 00:15:24,520 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 3: you stay? Have you stuck your head in there today? Dragon? 228 00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:30,080 Speaker 3: On the on the fourth floor, the men's restroom is 229 00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 3: virtually complete. I'm shocked. The sinks have water, the toilets 230 00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:41,080 Speaker 3: have water. The urinals do not. So we're getting close 231 00:15:41,800 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 3: pretty soon. No more tracks down the steps that eight 232 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 3: billion dollars could be used to do things like, oh, 233 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 3: I don't know, how about a salary increase? Hmm, oh, 234 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:55,400 Speaker 3: wages are flat. Well, you could take eight billion dollars 235 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:57,840 Speaker 3: spread that around. May not be much, but that's something 236 00:15:57,880 --> 00:15:59,960 Speaker 3: you could use. Or you could buy some new piece 237 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:03,880 Speaker 3: of equipment, you could expand your operation, any number of things. 238 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 3: But back to the program, Back to the study. They 239 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:11,960 Speaker 3: found that when Americans were exposed to this kind of 240 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:18,560 Speaker 3: messaging that gets lifted directly from these DEI programs, it 241 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:25,440 Speaker 3: actually increased a person's perception of racism in the workplace. Now, 242 00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:29,240 Speaker 3: when I saw that, my first thought was, because that's 243 00:16:29,280 --> 00:16:32,560 Speaker 3: precisely what they wanted to do. They want you to 244 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:38,480 Speaker 3: see racism everywhere, They want you to see oppression everywhere. 245 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:46,280 Speaker 3: Why because that empowers them so if it increases the 246 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 3: perception of racism in the workplace, even without any evidence 247 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:53,120 Speaker 3: that there actually is any, that's going to result in 248 00:16:53,200 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 3: heightened racial prejudice, inner group hostility, suspicion division. Those programs 249 00:17:00,280 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 3: lead to increased support for actual punishment against those who 250 00:17:03,680 --> 00:17:07,439 Speaker 3: might create a microaggression something. Actually, some people lost their 251 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:11,200 Speaker 3: jobs over. I gotta tell you, Dragon, that was pretty funny, 252 00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 3: And it was funny because it was true. She's a 253 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 3: woman and she doesn't. 254 00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:22,400 Speaker 1: Even know what she wants gold Dragon, gold. 255 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:26,360 Speaker 3: Dragon at iHeartMedia dot Com. 256 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 2: I will freely admit that I'm on my second marriage 257 00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 2: right now, but that the first one really wasn't my 258 00:17:33,760 --> 00:17:36,560 Speaker 2: fault when you consider what she was coined downstairs on 259 00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:38,680 Speaker 2: the third floor as the lesbian prostitute. 260 00:17:38,720 --> 00:17:39,480 Speaker 3: Thank Robert. 261 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:41,480 Speaker 2: So I think I think I'm okay. 262 00:17:44,560 --> 00:17:48,720 Speaker 3: And I also, knowing missus Redbeard as I do, if 263 00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 3: she really does know what she wants to eat, she 264 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:52,159 Speaker 3: doesn't really give her rats. Ask what you want to 265 00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:54,200 Speaker 3: eat or not, that's where you're going to go true, 266 00:17:54,560 --> 00:17:57,119 Speaker 3: and the same is true in my household. I just 267 00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:00,280 Speaker 3: need to I just need to know, And I think, 268 00:18:00,359 --> 00:18:02,960 Speaker 3: don't you think sometimes it's more of they just don't 269 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:06,200 Speaker 3: want to make the decision, right. Yeah. But then when 270 00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:08,800 Speaker 3: you make the decision, it's, well, that's not what I 271 00:18:08,840 --> 00:18:09,320 Speaker 3: really want. 272 00:18:09,560 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 2: It's the wrong decision. 273 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:14,160 Speaker 3: It's the wrong decision because they don't know what they want, 274 00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:17,239 Speaker 3: and so you have to go through all of the 275 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 3: hoops because what you're really doing is you're just forcing 276 00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 3: them to think about what they really want. 277 00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 2: I've seen some of the woman hacks on social media 278 00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 2: where you just say, hey, babe, guess where I'm taking 279 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:35,080 Speaker 2: you to dinner and then they'll name a restaurant, they'll 280 00:18:35,119 --> 00:18:37,719 Speaker 2: name a place, so they'll name you know, steak, and 281 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:40,200 Speaker 2: you're you're right, that's where we're going. 282 00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 3: Para would never fall for that. She would never if 283 00:18:46,359 --> 00:18:48,760 Speaker 3: I if I went home and said guess where I'm 284 00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:53,159 Speaker 3: taking you for dinner tonight? She go where? She wouldn't. 285 00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:53,919 Speaker 3: She wouldn't tell me. 286 00:18:54,240 --> 00:18:56,280 Speaker 2: It would be where to force them to guess. 287 00:18:58,880 --> 00:19:01,720 Speaker 3: No, because what he would be doing is thinking where 288 00:19:01,800 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 3: does he really want to go? 289 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:05,760 Speaker 2: M m oh, yeah, but that's the eighty years of 290 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:07,879 Speaker 2: marriage that you two have, yes, right. 291 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:09,720 Speaker 3: So she would be thinking where does he really want 292 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:12,480 Speaker 3: to go? Because now now we're both playing exactly the 293 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 3: same game, and we're never going to go anywhere. It's it's, 294 00:19:15,119 --> 00:19:20,119 Speaker 3: you know, we need Trump to come in and do 295 00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:22,840 Speaker 3: a negotiation. We need Trump to come in and you know, 296 00:19:22,920 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 3: decide for us every you know, whenever we're going out 297 00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:26,919 Speaker 3: to dinner, where are we going to go? Where are 298 00:19:26,960 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 3: we going to go? Do you think he malaniey have 299 00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:30,119 Speaker 3: that problem. 300 00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:34,399 Speaker 2: It's always McDonald's. It's always McDonald's. 301 00:19:33,920 --> 00:19:40,480 Speaker 3: Always McDonald's. Guess I mean McDonald's. McDonald's. I went into 302 00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:44,840 Speaker 3: while I was in New York zero one. Oh yeah, yeah, 303 00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 3: I just wanted it was late in the afternoon. I 304 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:50,399 Speaker 3: wanted to diet coke. Sodh it was. It was actually 305 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,160 Speaker 3: the day we were leaving, so I said, it wasn't 306 00:19:53,160 --> 00:19:54,800 Speaker 3: too far from the hotel and we were walking that 307 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:56,840 Speaker 3: direction now, so let's just run in here. Let me 308 00:19:57,119 --> 00:19:58,920 Speaker 3: Do you want to diet coke? She said, oh yeah, yeah, 309 00:19:58,960 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 3: let's go get a diet coke. So he ran in, 310 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:03,720 Speaker 3: got a couple of diet cokes, walk out. We're drinking 311 00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:06,280 Speaker 3: and walking back to the hotel. And then when I 312 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:09,080 Speaker 3: get to the hotel, there's a screw up with her key. 313 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:11,760 Speaker 3: We had a late checked out, but her key quit 314 00:20:11,800 --> 00:20:15,440 Speaker 3: working mind didn't. So I set it down and went 315 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:18,440 Speaker 3: to her room, came back, grabbed my bag, and walked 316 00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 3: out enough to die. Coax anymore? Life, dragon, You don't 317 00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:25,320 Speaker 3: know how difficult my life is. 318 00:20:26,119 --> 00:20:27,480 Speaker 2: Why is life so hard? 319 00:20:27,760 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 3: I know? So I sat in the cab all the 320 00:20:31,080 --> 00:20:35,040 Speaker 3: way out Legardi without a diet, cried, I you know, 321 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:38,840 Speaker 3: that's why I almost didn't come in. I started called 322 00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:41,280 Speaker 3: Tepper and just say I left my diet coke in 323 00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:43,520 Speaker 3: the room. I can't I can't get to work, can't 324 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:47,719 Speaker 3: make it, can't make it. What do you know? How 325 00:20:47,800 --> 00:20:50,400 Speaker 3: much you stop and think for a moment about what 326 00:20:50,520 --> 00:20:54,480 Speaker 3: you know about what the Department of War media access 327 00:20:54,640 --> 00:21:00,920 Speaker 3: guidelines actually say. There's no there's no right or answer here. 328 00:21:01,400 --> 00:21:04,360 Speaker 3: And I'm not trying to embarrass anybody. I just want 329 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 3: you to know what you know about it it because 330 00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:12,399 Speaker 3: if you listen to the cabal, they will tell you 331 00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 3: it's it's a violation of freedom of the press. It's 332 00:21:14,840 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 3: a violation of the First Amendment that you're gonna have 333 00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 3: to be escorted anywhere inside the Pentagon, even if you 334 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:25,600 Speaker 3: have a validated and legitimate press pass. That it's all 335 00:21:25,640 --> 00:21:31,000 Speaker 3: pretty bad. And I have to admit that they I 336 00:21:31,040 --> 00:21:35,159 Speaker 3: haven't actually read the document, so I fell prey to 337 00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 3: the same thing that, Okay, they're changing everything and they're 338 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:42,960 Speaker 3: going to start controlling things. A friend of mine who 339 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:47,920 Speaker 3: is a editor and co founder of The Federalist, Sean Davis. 340 00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:50,280 Speaker 3: He worked for one of the senators that was involved 341 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:53,520 Speaker 3: when I was in Katrina. Sean. Sean's a brilliant guy, 342 00:21:54,440 --> 00:21:56,200 Speaker 3: and I think The Federalist is a is a great 343 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:58,159 Speaker 3: website if you If you don't read The Federalist, you 344 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 3: probably should. He put out a statement on x that 345 00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:11,280 Speaker 3: I really think is just sharing worth sharing with you. 346 00:22:13,560 --> 00:22:17,400 Speaker 3: He titled it statement on Department of War Media Access 347 00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:21,879 Speaker 3: Guidelines from the Federalist CEO Sean Davis and editor in 348 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:26,640 Speaker 3: chief Molly Hemingway. You've certainly seen Molly on She's a 349 00:22:26,680 --> 00:22:30,240 Speaker 3: Fox News contributor, so I'm sure you've seen Molly. Here's 350 00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:36,159 Speaker 3: what their statement is. When other credentialed autlests and journalists 351 00:22:36,600 --> 00:22:41,240 Speaker 3: spread lies about the Russia collusion hoax or the Covington 352 00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:43,320 Speaker 3: kids hoax, we haven't thought about that in a while, 353 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:48,439 Speaker 3: or the Kavanaugh rape hoax, or the Ukraine impeachment hoax, 354 00:22:49,320 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 3: or the COVID nineteen natural origin hoax or the peaceful 355 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:58,679 Speaker 3: Black Lives Matter riots hoax, or the Suckers and Losers hoax, 356 00:22:59,480 --> 00:23:03,320 Speaker 3: or the Hunter Biden laptop hoax or the Biden's Brain 357 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:09,240 Speaker 3: has Totally find you guys hoax. The Federalists fearlessly reported 358 00:23:09,280 --> 00:23:13,800 Speaker 3: the truth, and they did. The Federalist is a great 359 00:23:13,920 --> 00:23:17,399 Speaker 3: place to go if you want to see the truth 360 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:20,199 Speaker 3: about some of this crap that the cabal feeds you. 361 00:23:21,800 --> 00:23:27,160 Speaker 3: Their statement continues. Corrupt corporate journalists published lies and regurgitated 362 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:32,239 Speaker 3: regime propaganda and were given awards. We publish facts and 363 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 3: the truth, and the federal government responded by waging a 364 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:41,240 Speaker 3: global war of illegal censorship against the Federalists, which they did. 365 00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:45,840 Speaker 3: They profited from lies while we were punished for reporting 366 00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:51,800 Speaker 3: the truth. Where these self styled First Amendment defenders? Or 367 00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:55,520 Speaker 3: where were these self styled First Amendment defenders when we 368 00:23:55,520 --> 00:23:58,879 Speaker 3: were illegally censored and targeted for debunking deep state lies 369 00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:03,160 Speaker 3: in hoaxes. Many of them not only refuse to defend us, 370 00:24:03,800 --> 00:24:09,200 Speaker 3: but cheer the illegal censorship efforts against US. NBC News, 371 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 3: for example, colluded with big Tech to demonetize and de 372 00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:17,240 Speaker 3: platform US for criticizing the government and the corrupt corporate 373 00:24:17,280 --> 00:24:22,199 Speaker 3: news media. So you'll have to forgive our skepticism of 374 00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:25,919 Speaker 3: corporate media's ostensible new love of press freedoms and the 375 00:24:25,960 --> 00:24:30,080 Speaker 3: First Amendment. That's a brilliant paragraph, right, That's just a 376 00:24:30,200 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 3: one sentence paragraph that is just brilliantly written. So you'll 377 00:24:34,880 --> 00:24:39,120 Speaker 3: just have to forgive our skepticism of corporate media's ostensible 378 00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:44,720 Speaker 3: new love of press freedoms and the First Amendment. Just 379 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:48,760 Speaker 3: I want to insert it parenthetical here when you think 380 00:24:48,800 --> 00:24:53,080 Speaker 3: about the Cabal, I've started, you know, I don't know 381 00:24:53,119 --> 00:24:57,000 Speaker 3: who's picked it up, but I've heard other people start 382 00:24:56,040 --> 00:25:01,399 Speaker 3: to refer to that unholy alliance of big tech and 383 00:25:01,440 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 3: the media and the government as the Cabal, and it 384 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:07,159 Speaker 3: really does have meaning for me. It's not something I 385 00:25:07,280 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 3: use as a joke. I mean it very sincerely. Because 386 00:25:13,520 --> 00:25:16,680 Speaker 3: the corporate media, the dominant media, the mainstream media, whatever 387 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:21,120 Speaker 3: you want to call them, really have just become stenographers 388 00:25:21,119 --> 00:25:24,840 Speaker 3: for the Democrat Party. That's all they really do. Now, 389 00:25:24,920 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 3: occasionally they'll put out a piece that is an objectively 390 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:31,760 Speaker 3: written report about something that's non political, and it's actually 391 00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 3: worthwhile reading. But you've got to you've got to swim 392 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:36,520 Speaker 3: through all of the gunk and the muck and the 393 00:25:36,600 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 3: mud to get through that one story, which is why 394 00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:42,960 Speaker 3: I might still read all of those newspapers, but I 395 00:25:43,040 --> 00:25:46,560 Speaker 3: do primarily for the purpose of this program. Anyway. They 396 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:51,159 Speaker 3: continue in their statement, they say, we actually read through 397 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,880 Speaker 3: the new Department of War media access guidelines, and we've 398 00:25:54,920 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 3: found zero new restrictions on the ability of journalists to report, 399 00:25:59,040 --> 00:26:02,760 Speaker 3: honor to criticize as the government. Many corporate journalists, eager 400 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:06,960 Speaker 3: to grandstand, will claim otherwise without evidence. But we will 401 00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:12,240 Speaker 3: show you what the actual document says. Quote nothing in 402 00:26:12,280 --> 00:26:17,000 Speaker 3: this document requires you to waive any constitutional rights. This 403 00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:21,640 Speaker 3: in brief constitutes a description of Department of War policies. 404 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:26,480 Speaker 3: Quote continues. Members of the news media are not required 405 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 3: to submit their writings to the Department of War for approval. 406 00:26:31,520 --> 00:26:36,880 Speaker 3: Continuing the quote, This in brief and its appendices address 407 00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:40,640 Speaker 3: Department of War policy and the potential basis for such 408 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:45,439 Speaker 3: a determination, and do not prohibit you, as a credential holder, 409 00:26:45,840 --> 00:26:52,840 Speaker 3: from engaging in constitutionally protected journalistic activities such as investigating, reporting, 410 00:26:52,960 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 3: or publishing stories, continuing to quote my signature meaning Secretary 411 00:27:01,040 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 3: of War Pete Hegesath. My signature represents my acknowledgment, and no, 412 00:27:06,560 --> 00:27:12,240 Speaker 3: I'm sorry, this is the reporters acknowledgment. My signature represents 413 00:27:12,359 --> 00:27:16,120 Speaker 3: my acknowledgment and understanding of such Department of War policies 414 00:27:16,320 --> 00:27:20,399 Speaker 3: and procedures. Even if I do not necessarily agree with 415 00:27:20,520 --> 00:27:25,480 Speaker 3: such policies and procedures, Signing this acknowledgment does not waigh 416 00:27:25,680 --> 00:27:30,400 Speaker 3: any rights I may have under the law. Oh, those 417 00:27:30,440 --> 00:27:34,919 Speaker 3: are the facts, and as is usually the case, the 418 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:39,280 Speaker 3: Federalists was the first outlet to actually report them. They 419 00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:43,000 Speaker 3: continue with the statement, we look forward to eagerly covering 420 00:27:43,000 --> 00:27:47,080 Speaker 3: the Pentagon, both on site and from a distance, with 421 00:27:47,200 --> 00:27:50,200 Speaker 3: the same fearlessness and courage and devotion to the truth 422 00:27:50,560 --> 00:27:53,720 Speaker 3: that we have exhibited since we were created. And if 423 00:27:53,720 --> 00:27:58,719 Speaker 3: the new guidelines result in fewer professional con artists and 424 00:27:58,840 --> 00:28:02,480 Speaker 3: media hoaxers roaming the halls looking for new lies to pedal, 425 00:28:03,200 --> 00:28:08,919 Speaker 3: so be it. Bingo, there you have it. So what 426 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:17,560 Speaker 3: are they upset about? Oh, sometimes restrictions to restrictive access 427 00:28:18,119 --> 00:28:20,560 Speaker 3: to certain places where they probably should not have been 428 00:28:20,560 --> 00:28:23,400 Speaker 3: in the first place, which is their right to do 429 00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:28,720 Speaker 3: so they don't. For example, you have to be credentialed 430 00:28:29,119 --> 00:28:32,359 Speaker 3: to get into the Brady briefing room at the White House. 431 00:28:33,400 --> 00:28:37,879 Speaker 3: There's nothing unconstitutional about that. They have to limit the access. 432 00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:44,640 Speaker 3: So it's just, oh, I represent the Denver Post. I 433 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 3: want to get access to the Pentagon. Okay, Well, then 434 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:52,680 Speaker 3: you have to apply, You have to prove your credentials, 435 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:54,760 Speaker 3: you have to prove that you're a reporter for the 436 00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:57,400 Speaker 3: Denver Post. You have to go through all these steps, 437 00:28:57,760 --> 00:29:00,400 Speaker 3: and we will give you credentials just to give you 438 00:29:00,520 --> 00:29:04,400 Speaker 3: unfettered access. It just gives you credentials that you can 439 00:29:04,440 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 3: get inside the building. Once again, the cabal trying to 440 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:14,080 Speaker 3: make you think that Trump is what, oh, attacking the 441 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 3: First Amendment, not at all. The United Nations is proposing 442 00:29:18,440 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 3: a new digital ID. Well could possibly go wrong with 443 00:29:22,400 --> 00:29:27,640 Speaker 3: a digital ID. I saw people traveling this weekend that 444 00:29:27,800 --> 00:29:31,040 Speaker 3: were showing digital IDs, which I didn't think was acceptable. 445 00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:33,200 Speaker 3: Or maybe it was actually to get into some places 446 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:35,560 Speaker 3: where people need to see a driver's license, and it 447 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:37,360 Speaker 3: was and it was on their on their phone and 448 00:29:37,360 --> 00:29:39,560 Speaker 3: they were showing on the phone, and I thought, I'm 449 00:29:39,920 --> 00:29:42,040 Speaker 3: never going to hand my phone over to a cop 450 00:29:42,320 --> 00:29:44,480 Speaker 3: to look at my driver's license. Just not going to 451 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:47,040 Speaker 3: do it. Well, now the United Nations is actually out 452 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:50,920 Speaker 3: there proposing it. We use a digital ID. I'll let 453 00:29:50,960 --> 00:29:57,040 Speaker 3: you hear that when we get back. Hey, I'm digitally 454 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:02,400 Speaker 3: pretty good at everything, but when it comes to stuff 455 00:30:02,480 --> 00:30:06,360 Speaker 3: like this, I'm still a pure and love guy. No, 456 00:30:06,840 --> 00:30:09,920 Speaker 3: I don't want a digital currency. I don't want well, 457 00:30:10,040 --> 00:30:13,560 Speaker 3: I don't care if you all on crypto digital IDs. Nope, 458 00:30:13,800 --> 00:30:14,400 Speaker 3: not gonna happen.