WEBVTT - Sterling 10/2/26

0:00:00.250 --> 0:00:03.290
<v Speaker 1>Weekend is here. It's October. We heard Lance do Off

0:00:03.330 --> 0:00:09.620
<v Speaker 1>the Beaten Path topic. I mean, seriously, Joe Nuxall stuff

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.300
<v Speaker 1>was just brilliant. A lot of stuff to do this

0:00:12.340 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Friday night. Sterling stepping in. Russ Jackson keep me online

0:00:15.460 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in time or in time and in line. I don't know.

0:00:18.500 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Matt Reese has got news. Later on, Kevin Carr talking

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.110
<v Speaker 1>movie stuff. We'll also talk space stuff. They're back up

0:00:26.170 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on the International Space Station. Mo Egg are going to

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.540
<v Speaker 1>join us in about 30 minutes, talk Bengals and Bearcats

0:00:32.580 --> 0:00:35.979
<v Speaker 1>and who knows what else. And I, you know, the

0:00:36.020 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days, I, like a lot of people,

0:00:40.060 --> 0:00:43.590
<v Speaker 1>have been trying to make sense of something that doesn't

0:00:43.630 --> 0:00:47.309
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense in the news. Whether it's

0:00:47.430 --> 0:00:52.729
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati or Dayton or Louisville or Lexington or Indianapolis, 38

0:00:52.729 --> 0:00:56.770
<v Speaker 1>states wide, major cities across this nation, the iHeartRadio app

0:00:56.810 --> 0:01:04.910
<v Speaker 1>effectively globally. We kill a lot of people in this country.

0:01:04.990 --> 0:01:08.730
<v Speaker 1>The murder rate, however violent crime numbers statistically have been

0:01:08.810 --> 0:01:13.470
<v Speaker 1>trending downward historically, we are pretty good as a people

0:01:13.930 --> 0:01:19.260
<v Speaker 1>at killing people. murdering them, locking people up per capita.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:24.940
<v Speaker 1>The numbers industrialized nations compared to America. We like to

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>lock people up who are bad, who do bad things

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.860
<v Speaker 1>to prove they can't play in the big sandbox of life.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.459
<v Speaker 1>We like to be tough on crime and punishment. And

0:01:35.500 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a death penalty across this country. But apparently

0:01:38.980 --> 0:01:42.860
<v Speaker 1>we have a very big problem with part of the

0:01:42.900 --> 0:01:45.020
<v Speaker 1>death penalty. It's getting the death right.

0:01:45.790 --> 0:01:46.750
<v Speaker 2>The execution.

0:01:48.780 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I just listen, I want to know, when did we

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.300
<v Speaker 1>lose our ability to do this? If we have a

0:01:54.340 --> 0:01:57.810
<v Speaker 1>death penalty. Then how is it that we have no

0:01:57.860 --> 0:02:01.330
<v Speaker 1>ability to execute people in a humane way as much

0:02:01.370 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>as we can for a long time? When I was

0:02:05.420 --> 0:02:07.700
<v Speaker 1>a kid growing up, it made no sense. They used

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to call it Old Sparky. And if I'm not mistaken,

0:02:10.220 --> 0:02:15.109
<v Speaker 1>it was at Lucasville, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, right? Which

0:02:15.169 --> 0:02:17.910
<v Speaker 1>is where, if I'm not mistaken, also, what, 20 years ago?

0:02:17.970 --> 0:02:20.470
<v Speaker 1>Probably more than that now. There was a big riot

0:02:20.470 --> 0:02:23.510
<v Speaker 1>30 years ago already, Russ Jackson tells me. All right.

0:02:24.380 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He covered it in... Well, we're all just older now.

0:02:29.340 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>They used to... Put people in a chair and they

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>would hook them up to some electrodes and then they

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.940
<v Speaker 1>would have a number of people hit a button and

0:02:39.220 --> 0:02:42.990
<v Speaker 1>they would not know for sure who actually sent the

0:02:43.050 --> 0:02:46.230
<v Speaker 1>charge to the chair, which tried the person to death

0:02:46.410 --> 0:02:49.070
<v Speaker 1>in the chair that had been convicted and sentenced to

0:02:49.110 --> 0:02:51.710
<v Speaker 1>death in the state of Ohio. We're not doing that

0:02:51.770 --> 0:02:53.710
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio anymore. We got an injection thing, but you

0:02:53.730 --> 0:02:57.190
<v Speaker 1>can't get the injectable drugs so easily. So there's basically,

0:02:57.230 --> 0:02:59.550
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, like a moratorium in many places

0:02:59.610 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>around the country. Tennessee, I used to live there in

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a place called Merville near Alcoa outside Knoxville. And it

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is Knoxville, not Nashville, Knoxville, just so you know. And

0:03:11.380 --> 0:03:16.420
<v Speaker 1>in the volunteer state, they had the death penalty. In

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.140
<v Speaker 1>the volunteer state, they can't get the death right. Krista Pike,

0:03:20.260 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the only woman who was on Tennessee's death row, is,

0:03:24.500 --> 0:03:32.330
<v Speaker 1>as we speak right now, this fine Friday night, critically ill, unconscious, ventilated,

0:03:32.810 --> 0:03:38.450
<v Speaker 1>on a breathing machine. Two days plus after they, as

0:03:38.490 --> 0:03:42.900
<v Speaker 1>it's been called, botched, fumbled, failed, they could not get

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:49.050
<v Speaker 1>the killing right anymore. And I don't understand it. When

0:03:49.090 --> 0:03:53.260
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I remember the Lucasville thing. And

0:03:53.460 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they would talk about the process. Because in school, we

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. In like a civics class. Which seems

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of morbid. And I debated on bringing it up tonight.

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:04.380
<v Speaker 1>But the more and more I think about it, I

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.660
<v Speaker 1>am just bewildered by it. If we have a death penalty,

0:04:06.710 --> 0:04:08.230
<v Speaker 1>how the hell can you not kill the people that

0:04:08.290 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are on death row? When you do the job. We

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>call it cruel and unusual punishment. You swab off the

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>arm before you put the injectables in because you can

0:04:18.620 --> 0:04:21.250
<v Speaker 1>infect the arm of the person that you're about to execute.

0:04:21.310 --> 0:04:22.890
<v Speaker 3>That would be insane.

0:04:22.910 --> 0:04:27.469
<v Speaker 1>I just want to ask you this because I, you know,

0:04:29.089 --> 0:04:34.789
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to process it. We blow people out of

0:04:34.810 --> 0:04:37.980
<v Speaker 1>the water on boats. I don't know how many, probably

0:04:38.010 --> 0:04:43.419
<v Speaker 1>close to 100 people now suspected of. transporting drugs or

0:04:43.500 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other contraband off our shores and other parts of the world.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:49.890
<v Speaker 1>And we're pretty good at blowing them out of the water.

0:04:50.150 --> 0:04:54.650
<v Speaker 1>But we can't have people convicted of murder and crimes

0:04:54.670 --> 0:04:58.650
<v Speaker 1>that put them in a capital punishment situation and execute them.

0:04:59.540 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I don't I don't mean we can't

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.980
<v Speaker 1>as in we're not allowed. I mean, it's apparently they

0:05:04.020 --> 0:05:06.909
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. So this is the question of questions.

0:05:07.310 --> 0:05:10.110
<v Speaker 1>And I know this is not the most uplifting of

0:05:10.210 --> 0:05:15.940
<v Speaker 1>conversations and fun talk on a Friday night. But should

0:05:15.980 --> 0:05:19.539
<v Speaker 1>we not figure a way to kill people on death

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>row if we're going to have a death penalty? Otherwise,

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the waste of time, the money, the litigation, the process

0:05:27.020 --> 0:05:31.260
<v Speaker 1>to run the appeals over and over again, exhausting those.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's not cheap. And there's the Innocence Project here,

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.940
<v Speaker 1>University of Cincinnati. A lot of people historically have been

0:05:39.980 --> 0:05:44.669
<v Speaker 1>involved in freeing people or taking them from death situations

0:05:44.710 --> 0:05:48.250
<v Speaker 1>to maybe life in prison or getting them turned loose

0:05:48.350 --> 0:05:52.250
<v Speaker 1>after wrongful convictions. Many people were of the opinion historically

0:05:52.270 --> 0:05:54.270
<v Speaker 1>that have said, well, you know, if we execute just

0:05:54.490 --> 0:05:59.690
<v Speaker 1>one person who was incorrectly, improperly, wrongfully executed, convicted and

0:05:59.730 --> 0:06:02.300
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to death and the whole system is screwed. Here,

0:06:02.650 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>aside from that, we can't even get the people that

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>we know have been responsible for taking others' lives, sentenced

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:14.559
<v Speaker 1>to death according to the law, and then end their lives.

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So if we're in the business of executions, be it

0:06:19.220 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Ohio or Tennessee or pick a random state, Texas, Florida,

0:06:23.250 --> 0:06:26.790
<v Speaker 1>across this great nation, we've done pretty good at executing people,

0:06:26.810 --> 0:06:31.850
<v Speaker 1>these four states I just mentioned. How best– should the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.609
<v Speaker 1>person who's being executed get to choose? Should it be

0:06:36.630 --> 0:06:40.190
<v Speaker 1>a firing squad? Should we let them kill themselves? Should

0:06:40.210 --> 0:06:42.730
<v Speaker 1>there not be a death penalty at all since apparently

0:06:42.770 --> 0:06:44.830
<v Speaker 1>you can't get the juice to kill them and you

0:06:44.870 --> 0:06:49.210
<v Speaker 1>can't have medical professionals who take an oath that says

0:06:49.250 --> 0:06:52.750
<v Speaker 1>they are here to preserve and save life, not take life?

0:06:53.100 --> 0:06:56.220
<v Speaker 1>So they will be there, as I understand it, and

0:06:56.260 --> 0:07:01.950
<v Speaker 1>they will– examine the body or the individual who they

0:07:01.970 --> 0:07:05.250
<v Speaker 1>were trying to execute, and then they can say, okay, yes,

0:07:05.370 --> 0:07:08.650
<v Speaker 1>this person is dead or this person is not. They

0:07:08.690 --> 0:07:13.060
<v Speaker 1>tried to give her the juice not just once, but twice.

0:07:15.410 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And they say it's never happened that way. Now, there

0:07:19.180 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>have been laws on the books. If they tried to

0:07:21.500 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hang you and it failed, or if they tried to

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>execute you in other ways previously, what they would do is, oh,

0:07:26.820 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we did our best. Now, you know, your neck's stretched out.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.670
<v Speaker 1>It's a little crooked. You may have some brain damage,

0:07:34.230 --> 0:07:36.030
<v Speaker 1>but we tried to kill you. We couldn't. So now

0:07:36.090 --> 0:07:40.110
<v Speaker 1>you're free. Good luck to you. Enjoy life. I don't

0:07:40.150 --> 0:07:42.470
<v Speaker 1>see turning this woman out on the streets. Should they

0:07:42.510 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>try to execute her again? Or is that over the

0:07:46.740 --> 0:07:53.540
<v Speaker 1>top and inhumane and inexcusable? I just can't make sense

0:07:53.580 --> 0:07:57.970
<v Speaker 1>of it. I mean, in America, aren't we supposed to

0:07:58.010 --> 0:08:01.150
<v Speaker 1>take pride in our work? Whether you're making widgets or

0:08:01.190 --> 0:08:05.750
<v Speaker 1>hamburgers or tacos or talk shows or, I don't know,

0:08:05.790 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>plate glass or, I don't know, in the business of

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>executions by God, just do the work. Just do the work. 513-749-7800,

0:08:16.740 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the big one. You can talk back. The iHeartRadio app.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to sound so cavalier about this. I

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.060
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to sound– I don't mean to lessen it.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.570
<v Speaker 1>This is a woman, a human being, sentenced to death,

0:08:31.210 --> 0:08:33.470
<v Speaker 1>being treated right now for the serious effects of what

0:08:33.510 --> 0:08:40.870
<v Speaker 1>they call pentobarbital administered during this execution that didn't work. Hell,

0:08:40.890 --> 0:08:43.070
<v Speaker 1>they could have put a bubble in the hypodermic and

0:08:43.090 --> 0:08:45.740
<v Speaker 1>killed her that way. They could have smothered her with

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.460
<v Speaker 1>a pillow if they'd wanted. They could have just taken

0:08:48.500 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>her right back and shot her. They could have hung her.

0:08:50.780 --> 0:08:53.180
<v Speaker 1>They could have gassed her. They could have electrocuted her.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But instead, they tried to juice her, and it didn't work.

0:08:56.870 --> 0:09:01.810
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously. People regularly come out of rehab and

0:09:01.950 --> 0:09:05.170
<v Speaker 1>reuse drugs that are much stronger than their body is

0:09:05.230 --> 0:09:07.490
<v Speaker 1>able to handle and end up dead, and their family

0:09:07.850 --> 0:09:11.330
<v Speaker 1>is devastated, and these people are lost on a regular basis,

0:09:11.410 --> 0:09:13.810
<v Speaker 1>thankfully not in the numbers they were not that long

0:09:13.850 --> 0:09:17.870
<v Speaker 1>ago in the tri-state and across this country. But we

0:09:17.910 --> 0:09:24.630
<v Speaker 1>can't kill them, effectively put them to death in a reasonable, efficient,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:31.709
<v Speaker 1>effective manner. across this country anymore. I do not understand it.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you help me make sense of it? I mean,

0:09:41.420 --> 0:09:48.020
<v Speaker 1>it's really amazing to me how this has played out.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And I had a conversation with two different people over

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.430
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days that told me that they

0:09:57.650 --> 0:10:02.020
<v Speaker 1>believe that the debt penalty in its is wrong. One

0:10:02.059 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of them, the other said they thought it was right,

0:10:04.260 --> 0:10:06.940
<v Speaker 1>but now they think it's wrong because of this lethal

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.940
<v Speaker 1>injection thing going wrong. And by the way, this isn't

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the first time it's happened where they've had to juice

0:10:12.900 --> 0:10:16.740
<v Speaker 1>somebody twice. It's just the first time they've survived it.

0:10:18.210 --> 0:10:24.370
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. What's the point of it? And if

0:10:24.410 --> 0:10:28.130
<v Speaker 1>you can't get people and apparently they're jail or prison staff,

0:10:28.370 --> 0:10:31.670
<v Speaker 1>they're not doctors and nurses. And it's not even like it.

0:10:33.190 --> 0:10:35.210
<v Speaker 1>What happened to the executioner? You put a hat on.

0:10:35.220 --> 0:10:37.380
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a tough burden, right? I mean, that's

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.780
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult thing for someone to have to carry

0:10:40.940 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on their shoulders, on their back. Isn't it to be

0:10:45.700 --> 0:10:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the executioner? If we're going to do it, then do it.

0:10:50.780 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're not going to do it or you can't

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.010
<v Speaker 1>effectively put someone to death, which seems absurd to me,

0:10:56.030 --> 0:10:59.010
<v Speaker 1>because people have been killing each other since the beginning

0:10:59.030 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of time as we know it, as people have been around.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I just can't process it. It's hard to make sense

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.589
<v Speaker 1>of it. 513-749-7800, the big one, your chance to get interactive.

0:11:13.550 --> 0:11:15.929
<v Speaker 1>Should there not be a death penalty? Should they go

0:11:15.970 --> 0:11:20.010
<v Speaker 1>to a training class? I mean, look, if you're in

0:11:20.030 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the business and you got a job and you're working

0:11:22.980 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the change oil bay at a car dealership or

0:11:26.820 --> 0:11:29.700
<v Speaker 1>an oil quick change place, or you're making tacos or

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.210
<v Speaker 1>something else, and you're not able to get the work done,

0:11:33.530 --> 0:11:37.290
<v Speaker 1>then they will have a retraining situation. A trainer from

0:11:37.370 --> 0:11:40.660
<v Speaker 1>corporate will come in and often show people how to

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>do the work that's supposed to be done. Apparently, they're

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.420
<v Speaker 1>not doing that when it comes to the issue of executions.

0:11:51.100 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>If you can't do it right, don't do it at all.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And I understand the concept of, well, you know, She

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.870
<v Speaker 1>deserves to die. Maybe she deserves to suffer. She was

0:12:02.900 --> 0:12:06.410
<v Speaker 1>convicted of heinous, horrible crime, and that's the way it goes.

0:12:09.130 --> 0:12:14.530
<v Speaker 1>But you can't even handle the basics of the operation

0:12:14.550 --> 0:12:17.250
<v Speaker 1>of the execution, and now what do you do with her?

0:12:17.350 --> 0:12:19.370
<v Speaker 1>You just leave her there, and what does it cost

0:12:19.410 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep her alive? I mean, it's really, really difficult

0:12:22.940 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of this, and it's embarrassing. And it

0:12:28.580 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>really is. Let's get to Dalhai and Benny and Larry

0:12:31.100 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and room for you on a Friday. Sterling 513-749-7800, the

0:12:35.580 --> 0:12:37.540
<v Speaker 1>big one. Benny, what do you think about this thing

0:12:37.580 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee?

0:12:40.179 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 4>This is unbelievable.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.170
<v Speaker 5>Why can't, you know, people are doing drugs.

0:12:46.130 --> 0:12:49.470
<v Speaker 6>Just give her a shot of heroin, overdose her, and

0:12:49.530 --> 0:12:50.050
<v Speaker 6>let her go.

0:12:50.170 --> 0:12:50.970
<v Speaker 7>Put her in the ground.

0:12:52.170 --> 0:12:53.290
<v Speaker 5>That's how I feel about it.

0:12:54.110 --> 0:12:57.060
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that... Since it's in a situation, and

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the call, Benny, thank you. I mean, in

0:12:59.500 --> 0:13:01.570
<v Speaker 1>a situation like this, it's easy to just let her overdose.

0:13:02.140 --> 0:13:02.569
<v Speaker 3>All right, yeah.

0:13:02.750 --> 0:13:04.650
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm saying there's lots of ways people every

0:13:04.690 --> 0:13:08.770
<v Speaker 1>day die for all sorts of accidents. Miss, I had

0:13:08.809 --> 0:13:10.569
<v Speaker 1>a friend, a good friend of mine, just about a

0:13:10.590 --> 0:13:12.429
<v Speaker 1>year ago now, and just to think about it, it

0:13:12.470 --> 0:13:15.790
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense, fell out in her kitchen, and that

0:13:15.830 --> 0:13:19.180
<v Speaker 1>was the end of her. No real understanding, not making

0:13:19.220 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of it. Here's a situation where they were looking

0:13:22.100 --> 0:13:24.339
<v Speaker 1>to kill her, this woman, and could not handle it.

0:13:28.190 --> 0:13:34.750
<v Speaker 1>Is it appropriate to ask a doctor, a nurse, some

0:13:34.809 --> 0:13:39.510
<v Speaker 1>other type of medical professional who have taken a note

0:13:39.550 --> 0:13:42.550
<v Speaker 1>to save and preserve life to go into that execution

0:13:42.590 --> 0:13:44.270
<v Speaker 1>room and do the work? Because, you know, they can

0:13:44.309 --> 0:13:46.230
<v Speaker 1>at least put a needle in. Apparently, maybe they didn't

0:13:46.270 --> 0:13:48.510
<v Speaker 1>do the IV right is what reports are saying now.

0:13:48.550 --> 0:13:51.580
<v Speaker 1>They're not sure. They have to evaluate it. They got

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.689
<v Speaker 1>to see how the process goes. If I was this

0:13:55.770 --> 0:13:58.770
<v Speaker 1>woman's family, and if I was the victim's family members,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I might be like, oh, I don't care.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Maybe.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.180
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. It's a tough putt on that one. But

0:14:04.220 --> 0:14:06.470
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of it, I mean, if I'm

0:14:06.490 --> 0:14:11.660
<v Speaker 1>the person who is looking to be executed, right? If

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.940
<v Speaker 1>I'm Krista Pike's family, I'm disturbed because of the cruel

0:14:14.980 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and unusual punishment. And you kind of go, well, I mean,

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.100
<v Speaker 1>if she did bad things, she's convicted of bad things.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of suffering is right. But is the

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.940
<v Speaker 1>government in a situation where we want them? We don't

0:14:23.980 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>trust them to keep track of information of you or

0:14:27.420 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>me or our Willie. Or Eddie Fingers or Russ Jackson

0:14:32.460 --> 0:14:35.990
<v Speaker 1>or pick a person, your mom or mine, on the

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.950
<v Speaker 1>road driving down Montgomery Avenue into downtown Cincinnati or downtown

0:14:40.010 --> 0:14:44.410
<v Speaker 1>Dayton or downtown Covington with flock cameras tracking people around

0:14:44.430 --> 0:14:47.050
<v Speaker 1>to keep bad actors from doing bad things and help

0:14:47.090 --> 0:14:48.410
<v Speaker 1>police get the job done.

0:14:49.330 --> 0:14:49.550
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:14:49.970 --> 0:14:52.170
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to do that. That's an invasion of privacy.

0:14:52.210 --> 0:14:54.510
<v Speaker 1>But we're okay with killing people when apparently we can't

0:14:54.570 --> 0:14:55.730
<v Speaker 1>even handle the death part.

0:14:57.310 --> 0:14:57.609
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:14:58.790 --> 0:15:01.410
<v Speaker 1>Gonna freak out here. To Virginia Beach with Rick and

0:15:01.460 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>then Chris and Larry with Sterling 700 WLW.

0:15:04.300 --> 0:15:04.479
<v Speaker 7>Hey.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:07.660
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Sterling. How you doing?

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right, man. I'm just trying to make sense

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of what doesn't make a lot of sense.

0:15:12.900 --> 0:15:17.210
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, you know, there's tried and true. I mean,

0:15:17.250 --> 0:15:20.850
<v Speaker 8>just watch the Green Mile, you know, unless somebody messes

0:15:20.930 --> 0:15:21.230
<v Speaker 8>it up.

0:15:21.850 --> 0:15:23.150
<v Speaker 7>It works very good.

0:15:24.170 --> 0:15:26.570
<v Speaker 3>And then you have the.

0:15:28.670 --> 0:15:32.410
<v Speaker 8>The firing squad, which has worked 100% every time.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Listen, people get gunned down daily on the streets of

0:15:36.300 --> 0:15:39.940
<v Speaker 1>the tri-state, all over this country. Even though those violent

0:15:39.980 --> 0:15:43.380
<v Speaker 1>crime numbers have been down historically, we're still pretty good

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.660
<v Speaker 1>at gunning people down in this country.

0:15:45.730 --> 0:15:52.490
<v Speaker 8>Well, every morning here in Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Chesapeake, Hampton Roads,

0:15:53.450 --> 0:15:55.740
<v Speaker 8>it's a body count every morning on the news.

0:15:56.830 --> 0:16:00.610
<v Speaker 7>Just like over the Rhine, just like Chicago.

0:16:00.630 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 8>But anyways, but what I was going to say was, okay,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 8>so what you, what they should be using is fentanyl, uh,

0:16:12.210 --> 0:16:16.390
<v Speaker 8>to do these executions? Or what's that new drug that's

0:16:16.510 --> 0:16:18.930
<v Speaker 8>out there now that I just heard about this week?

0:16:19.010 --> 0:16:20.170
<v Speaker 8>I can't remember the name of it.

0:16:20.210 --> 0:16:22.090
<v Speaker 1>Not the car fentanyl is not new. You're talking about

0:16:22.110 --> 0:16:24.110
<v Speaker 1>the Crotam or whatever it's called that like is sort

0:16:24.170 --> 0:16:26.630
<v Speaker 1>of like the heroin for like the gas station business

0:16:26.890 --> 0:16:28.310
<v Speaker 1>kind of like thing that they're about.

0:16:28.670 --> 0:16:29.450
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that stuff.

0:16:29.490 --> 0:16:33.250
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's supposed to be like 10 times worse than fentanyl.

0:16:33.350 --> 0:16:35.370
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not good. Not good.

0:16:35.390 --> 0:16:35.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:35.830 --> 0:16:37.850
<v Speaker 7>So, I mean, why don't they use it?

0:16:37.860 --> 0:16:40.260
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I'm sure they've got enough in all these

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:45.580
<v Speaker 8>evidence rooms. To use it, which, you know, we wouldn't

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 8>have to pay for because we already got it in stock.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it doesn't take much.

0:16:49.980 --> 0:16:50.359
<v Speaker 9>You know what?

0:16:50.500 --> 0:16:52.260
<v Speaker 1>You may be right, Rick. I appreciate the call, man.

0:16:52.300 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:16:53.300 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, you know, we got contraband. We've got

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in evidence lockers all over the place. I mean, yeah,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.620
<v Speaker 1>we've got an ability. I just don't understand how it

0:17:02.700 --> 0:17:05.270
<v Speaker 1>is they couldn't get it done. I mean, seriously.

0:17:05.290 --> 0:17:07.220
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what they're doing.

0:17:07.290 --> 0:17:09.330
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Bubba, how are you? Bubba, you're with Sterling on

0:17:09.350 --> 0:17:09.710
<v Speaker 1>the big one.

0:17:10.450 --> 0:17:12.010
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they don't know what to do in the state

0:17:12.030 --> 0:17:14.669
<v Speaker 6>of Tennessee. They're not properly trained. They didn't have the

0:17:14.710 --> 0:17:19.860
<v Speaker 6>proper doctors or physicians there, and even a mortician or

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:25.219
<v Speaker 6>a forensic pathologist, whatever the needed medical personnel, they were

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.820
<v Speaker 6>absent from the execution.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.220
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to even process. Bob, I appreciate the comment.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.869
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Yeah, I mean, just a disaster all the

0:17:35.900 --> 0:17:38.369
<v Speaker 1>way around. To Westchester and Chris with Sterling on the

0:17:38.410 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>big one. It's been a minute. Chris, how are you?

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Good, buddy.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 7>How about yourself?

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. I mean, we can't even execute people good

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.700
<v Speaker 1>in America anymore. I mean, what the hell is wrong

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with this country?

0:17:48.940 --> 0:17:51.500
<v Speaker 7>This is the crazy thing about it, buddy. Okay, this

0:17:51.580 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 7>is the crazy thing.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 5>A 911 operator.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.609
<v Speaker 7>Wait, wait, wait. Chris, wait.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.429
<v Speaker 1>Chris, your phone was cutting out.

0:17:57.470 --> 0:17:57.790
<v Speaker 7>Start over.

0:17:57.810 --> 0:17:57.950
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.060
<v Speaker 7>You're the 911 operator. You get a phone call from

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 7>the prison. We need an ambulance. We have somebody dying.

0:18:11.420 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what happened?

0:18:12.700 --> 0:18:15.460
<v Speaker 7>Well, we tried to kill him twice, and it didn't work.

0:18:16.420 --> 0:18:19.129
<v Speaker 4>How do you... What do you think of that? Wait

0:18:19.170 --> 0:18:19.649
<v Speaker 4>a minute, wait a minute.

0:18:20.050 --> 0:18:23.310
<v Speaker 7>So you need an ambulance because somebody's dying that you

0:18:23.369 --> 0:18:27.290
<v Speaker 7>tried to kill twice, and it didn't work? So you

0:18:27.590 --> 0:18:28.470
<v Speaker 7>need an ambulance?

0:18:29.010 --> 0:18:29.129
<v Speaker 3>What.

0:18:30.910 --> 0:18:32.230
<v Speaker 4>That must have.

0:18:31.890 --> 0:18:34.770
<v Speaker 7>Been the most confusing call they have ever got. And

0:18:34.790 --> 0:18:37.490
<v Speaker 7>the reason why they can't kill her after is apparently

0:18:37.530 --> 0:18:42.270
<v Speaker 7>in Tennessee, there's no protocol after a second dose. No

0:18:42.290 --> 0:18:44.669
<v Speaker 7>one's ever survived. And the other thing about the doctors

0:18:44.780 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 7>and the nurses is they can't in Tennessee. It's against

0:18:47.900 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 7>the law for them to use those people because it

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.820
<v Speaker 7>goes against the Hippocratic oath of taking a wife.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:18:54.780 --> 0:18:57.300
<v Speaker 7>So they're not allowed to use doctors and nurses, which

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.460
<v Speaker 7>is why you end up with what you end up with.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.180
<v Speaker 7>But like I said, I feel for the 911 operator.

0:19:04.260 --> 0:19:08.139
<v Speaker 1>And trying to make sense of that. Your phone's cutting out.

0:19:08.180 --> 0:19:10.340
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're saying. Yeah, I mean, it is confusing.

0:19:10.380 --> 0:19:14.260
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the 911 call. And I'm sure they did make

0:19:14.300 --> 0:19:17.820
<v Speaker 1>that call. That's crazy. We're not going to solve this, obviously.

0:19:18.140 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I just was trying to figure out how and why.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.450
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, no pride in your work anymore. I mean, seriously,

0:19:25.810 --> 0:19:28.310
<v Speaker 1>I take pride in this, believe it or not. I

0:19:28.350 --> 0:19:30.570
<v Speaker 1>work hard at it. You know what I mean? If

0:19:30.630 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't get this done, they'll find someone else. That's

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what they should do in Tennessee. But in the meantime,

0:19:35.900 --> 0:19:38.060
<v Speaker 1>I can break a lot of talk shows. I mean,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.140
<v Speaker 1>there's no question, whether it's segment by segment or otherwise,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.379
<v Speaker 1>I can drive right off the road. You don't do

0:19:43.420 --> 0:19:48.169
<v Speaker 1>that now as I'm speaking. But it's just hard to process. Nikki, Larry,

0:19:48.270 --> 0:19:52.139
<v Speaker 1>others coming up. Mo Egger, talk Bearcats and who they Bengals.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Cats versus cats and another cat in action after dark

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.430
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night, Friday, Sterling Nation Station that you're listening to

0:20:00.430 --> 0:20:04.650
<v Speaker 1>930 reports straight away with Matt Reese, 700 WLW. 15.30

0:20:04.940 --> 0:20:08.180
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon, you hear him talking Bearcats, talking Bengals.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.030
<v Speaker 1>He's everywhere. He's kind enough to give us some time.

0:20:11.210 --> 0:20:12.669
<v Speaker 1>Both of us started at the same time, and we're

0:20:12.710 --> 0:20:15.030
<v Speaker 1>both still here. Holy crap. Mo Egger, how are you?

0:20:16.430 --> 0:20:17.550
<v Speaker 3>I'm good, man. What's going on?

0:20:17.790 --> 0:20:18.090
<v Speaker 10>Nothing.

0:20:18.310 --> 0:20:21.250
<v Speaker 1>Just talking to you. Thinking about these Bengals, you know.

0:20:21.850 --> 0:20:22.369
<v Speaker 7>And, uh.

0:20:23.660 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Just trying to figure out, I watched the Browns the

0:20:26.660 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>other night there, and they seem to be clicking a

0:20:29.100 --> 0:20:32.500
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Jacksonville's coming into town. I'm like, well, who

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can I talk to about this? There's a guy who

0:20:34.580 --> 0:20:38.419
<v Speaker 1>lives it, breathes it. It's you. So that's all that's

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:38.739
<v Speaker 1>going on.

0:20:41.140 --> 0:20:41.459
<v Speaker 5>You all right?

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.859
<v Speaker 1>Uh-oh.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Hello?

0:20:45.580 --> 0:20:45.980
<v Speaker 3>You got me?

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I got you now. Yeah, for a minute I

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was like, wow.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:20:51.990 --> 0:20:56.820
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, it was always, yeah. Tell me about this,

0:20:56.890 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this matchup this weekend. I mean, I've been gun shy

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about these slow starts. They start sort of quick and

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.940
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go well. And I'm kind of sort of surprised.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.930
<v Speaker 1>And it was, you know, everybody, Oh, there's so much better.

0:21:09.970 --> 0:21:11.990
<v Speaker 1>There's so much better, but are they really so much better?

0:21:12.010 --> 0:21:15.910
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to find out on Sunday. You know,

0:21:15.930 --> 0:21:18.710
<v Speaker 3>you talk about this Jacksonville team. They've had one bad half.

0:21:19.090 --> 0:21:22.220
<v Speaker 3>If you eliminate the second half, of their second game

0:21:22.300 --> 0:21:24.710
<v Speaker 3>against the Denver Broncos in a game that they lost.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.580
<v Speaker 3>They've outscored their opponents 79 to 19 in those five,

0:21:28.820 --> 0:21:31.380
<v Speaker 3>in those five halves of football. They are really good.

0:21:31.900 --> 0:21:33.650
<v Speaker 3>And if you go back to last season, you know,

0:21:33.690 --> 0:21:36.169
<v Speaker 3>basically starting about the midway point of the season, they

0:21:36.210 --> 0:21:38.970
<v Speaker 3>were an absolute wagon on offense. They have one of

0:21:38.990 --> 0:21:42.409
<v Speaker 3>the best slot receivers in the NFL and Parker Washington.

0:21:42.490 --> 0:21:46.149
<v Speaker 3>And so at face value, just knowing that this is

0:21:46.170 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be a tough game, but then you add

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>to it, all the injuries, the Bengals have been sifting

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.179
<v Speaker 3>through in the secondary. You add the overall performance of

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the defense last week and, You add the special teams miscues.

0:21:56.660 --> 0:22:01.619
<v Speaker 3>I think there's legitimate reason for pensiveness and nervousness as

0:22:01.660 --> 0:22:03.230
<v Speaker 3>you look at the game on Sunday. I think the

0:22:03.270 --> 0:22:07.530
<v Speaker 3>difference between being 3-1, which they would be, the Bengals

0:22:07.550 --> 0:22:10.650
<v Speaker 3>would be if they won this game, and 2-2 is

0:22:10.730 --> 0:22:13.409
<v Speaker 3>pretty massive because they play a really bad team a

0:22:13.430 --> 0:22:17.150
<v Speaker 3>week from Sunday. Then there's their bye. They win on Sunday.

0:22:17.190 --> 0:22:18.980
<v Speaker 3>They have a chance to be 4-1 at the bye,

0:22:19.020 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 3>which I think everybody would sign up for. Yep. lose,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 3>and I think no matter what happens against Miami, you're

0:22:25.260 --> 0:22:27.300
<v Speaker 3>going to feel pretty underwhelmed about the way the season

0:22:27.340 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 3>has started.

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.660
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. Talking to, of course, Mo Egger,

0:22:30.780 --> 0:22:36.690
<v Speaker 1>ESPN 1530, about the Bengals. Sunday, 1 o'clock, Paycor, Jacksonville,

0:22:36.790 --> 0:22:42.490
<v Speaker 1>in town, Jags, Bengals getting it on. Is the line

0:22:42.510 --> 0:22:43.910
<v Speaker 1>on the offense.

0:22:46.470 --> 0:22:49.770
<v Speaker 1>Everything seemed like it had been fortified and up and

0:22:49.810 --> 0:22:52.209
<v Speaker 1>much better. We know the D seems to be, but

0:22:52.250 --> 0:22:54.810
<v Speaker 1>that offense seemed somewhat suspect to me, or was it

0:22:54.830 --> 0:22:56.130
<v Speaker 1>just I had had too much to drink?

0:22:56.150 --> 0:23:00.730
<v Speaker 3>I think the offensive line against Pittsburgh played pretty well

0:23:00.750 --> 0:23:05.230
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the game. Marius Mims at right tackle.

0:23:06.170 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I was asked on a podcast by Paul Danner Jr.

0:23:09.500 --> 0:23:12.699
<v Speaker 3>before the season for some bold predictions for the season.

0:23:13.420 --> 0:23:15.340
<v Speaker 3>And one of mine was going to be that Amarius

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:20.180
<v Speaker 3>Mims is an all-pro. And he's trending in that direction.

0:23:20.300 --> 0:23:22.859
<v Speaker 3>He has been terrific. I thought Orlando Brown played better

0:23:23.340 --> 0:23:27.340
<v Speaker 3>in the game against the Pittsburgh Steelers. Unfortunately, as has

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 3>sadly often been the case over the last couple of years,

0:23:31.460 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 3>when the game was hanging in the balance and the

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 3>offense needed to go down the field and win, Um,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.010
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Reisner gave up a pressure, gave up a sack.

0:23:40.530 --> 0:23:44.970
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow fumbles the football Bengals lose. I still believe

0:23:45.030 --> 0:23:47.369
<v Speaker 3>this is, and this isn't saying all that much. I

0:23:47.570 --> 0:23:49.740
<v Speaker 3>still believe this is the best offensive line. Joe has

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:54.340
<v Speaker 3>played behind. But that said, if you look at the

0:23:54.380 --> 0:23:57.140
<v Speaker 3>performance of the offensive line in the second game in particular,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.929
<v Speaker 3>Orlando Brown, when Joe took a lot of hits, he

0:23:59.970 --> 0:24:03.470
<v Speaker 3>got sacked five times. That overall performance left a lot

0:24:03.490 --> 0:24:07.810
<v Speaker 3>to be desired. I worry about this on Sunday because

0:24:07.830 --> 0:24:10.670
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Reisner has been on the injury report all week long.

0:24:11.290 --> 0:24:14.030
<v Speaker 3>Orlando Brown still, I don't think has put enough good

0:24:14.070 --> 0:24:16.780
<v Speaker 3>football on film this season to make you feel like,

0:24:16.820 --> 0:24:19.460
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's an above average left tackle in this league.

0:24:20.380 --> 0:24:23.060
<v Speaker 3>And so we'll see it to me. It remains the

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 3>biggest question Mark about this team. I think top to bottom,

0:24:26.780 --> 0:24:30.050
<v Speaker 3>if healthy defensively, they're going to be better. I think

0:24:30.090 --> 0:24:32.650
<v Speaker 3>we can argue over how, how much better they're going

0:24:32.690 --> 0:24:35.129
<v Speaker 3>to be. We all know about the skill guys, the

0:24:35.190 --> 0:24:37.290
<v Speaker 3>Bengals have. I think most of us agree. The quarterback

0:24:37.350 --> 0:24:39.609
<v Speaker 3>is really good defensively. Is the offensive line going to

0:24:39.650 --> 0:24:42.210
<v Speaker 3>be able to play at an above average level? I

0:24:42.260 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 3>thought against the Steelers for 58 minutes, it did until

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 3>it didn't. Yep.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.700
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't. That's the thing. It is a margin

0:24:50.740 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>that's thin, especially in the AFC North. How good is

0:24:56.260 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence right now? I mean, everybody talks about him

0:24:59.180 --> 0:25:02.149
<v Speaker 1>and Bengals have faced him before. We know that. But

0:25:02.590 --> 0:25:04.470
<v Speaker 1>it's almost to me, even at this point, he sort

0:25:04.510 --> 0:25:08.310
<v Speaker 1>of is sneaky good under the radar in some fashion.

0:25:08.869 --> 0:25:09.510
<v Speaker 1>Or am I crazy?

0:25:11.050 --> 0:25:13.540
<v Speaker 3>No, I think he's always been talented. I think that

0:25:13.580 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 3>goes without saying. I think what happened for the majority

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.060
<v Speaker 3>of his first, what was it, first four years on

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.580
<v Speaker 3>the league, they had no coaching stability, right? They tried

0:25:22.619 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 3>the Urban Meyer experiment. That didn't work. They paired him

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.150
<v Speaker 3>with Doug Peterson. That didn't work. I think what they've

0:25:28.170 --> 0:25:30.940
<v Speaker 3>done in Jacksonville is, is they have put him together

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.659
<v Speaker 3>with a guy in Liam Cohen who has kind of

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.260
<v Speaker 3>bounced around football. He was briefly the offensive coordinator at

0:25:37.300 --> 0:25:40.250
<v Speaker 3>the University of Kentucky. I think they have paired Trevor

0:25:40.270 --> 0:25:42.590
<v Speaker 3>Lawrence with a guy who knows what he's doing as

0:25:43.090 --> 0:25:46.129
<v Speaker 3>the team's primary play caller, as the team's head coach.

0:25:46.530 --> 0:25:48.790
<v Speaker 3>Also built a good team around him. Again, I go

0:25:48.810 --> 0:25:51.139
<v Speaker 3>back to last year when they won eight consecutive games.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.260
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure there was a better team in the league.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.420
<v Speaker 3>And I think they have so much talent that even

0:25:57.460 --> 0:26:00.270
<v Speaker 3>a guy in Travis Hunter, a dude who played both

0:26:00.310 --> 0:26:03.330
<v Speaker 3>ways in college, we barely even talk about him because

0:26:03.930 --> 0:26:06.690
<v Speaker 3>not that he's not very good. A, he got injured

0:26:06.730 --> 0:26:09.070
<v Speaker 3>last year. B, they just have a lot of other guys.

0:26:09.530 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>But the conversation starts with Trevor Lawrence. I watched him

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago engineer one of the better comebacks

0:26:16.060 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 3>you'll ever see in the NFL playoffs in the game

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.900
<v Speaker 3>against Atlanta. the LA chargers, he's terrific. Uh, and you

0:26:21.940 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 3>put him in the right system with guys he could

0:26:23.940 --> 0:26:27.410
<v Speaker 3>throw to Brian Thomas, Parker Washington. But I think more

0:26:27.450 --> 0:26:29.490
<v Speaker 3>than anything, a guy who knows what he's doing as

0:26:29.550 --> 0:26:32.910
<v Speaker 3>an offensive coach, an offensive minded head coach. I think

0:26:32.930 --> 0:26:36.420
<v Speaker 3>that's something that Trevor Lawrence didn't have over his first

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.100
<v Speaker 3>four seasons. He has it now. And I think the

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 3>results last year and so far, so far season has

0:26:42.460 --> 0:26:43.340
<v Speaker 3>spoken for themselves.

0:26:44.100 --> 0:26:48.690
<v Speaker 1>Um, What about this defense and what kind of nightmare

0:26:48.730 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they can pose for Trevor Lawrence? It was, we obviously

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.540
<v Speaker 1>have seen this defense for the Bengals improve and make

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.340
<v Speaker 1>some turnovers that have benefited who day overall.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:26:59.859 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think what I, what I think every

0:27:02.980 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 3>fan is wondering about is the status of the secondary,

0:27:05.700 --> 0:27:08.490
<v Speaker 3>given all the injury issues they have, you know, they've,

0:27:08.510 --> 0:27:10.850
<v Speaker 3>they're going to move Dax Hill to the inside to

0:27:10.930 --> 0:27:13.290
<v Speaker 3>play slot corner, which he had played prior to last

0:27:13.310 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 3>season and, Because of injury, right? Because they don't have

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:21.609
<v Speaker 3>their slot guy, Jalen Davis. Everybody at the safety position

0:27:22.170 --> 0:27:26.030
<v Speaker 3>has spent time on the injury report this week. For me, though,

0:27:26.090 --> 0:27:28.109
<v Speaker 3>and I think I'll go back to what Duke Tobin

0:27:28.150 --> 0:27:31.390
<v Speaker 3>said back in February, and I'll go back to what

0:27:31.410 --> 0:27:34.490
<v Speaker 3>we talked about all throughout training camp, pass rushes came

0:27:35.070 --> 0:27:37.420
<v Speaker 3>in the first two games. I think you saw a

0:27:38.660 --> 0:27:41.610
<v Speaker 3>pass rush that was very, very capable. You're not always

0:27:41.630 --> 0:27:43.890
<v Speaker 3>going to force a bunch of fumbles, but they forced

0:27:44.010 --> 0:27:47.090
<v Speaker 3>three Baker Mayfield fumbles in the first game. And then

0:27:47.109 --> 0:27:49.730
<v Speaker 3>I think just collectively did a really good job of

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 3>winning at the point of attack in the second game.

0:27:52.380 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I thought against Pittsburgh, what was maybe the most frustrating

0:27:55.180 --> 0:27:59.090
<v Speaker 3>part of that loss was They allowed Aaron Rogers who

0:27:59.470 --> 0:28:02.139
<v Speaker 3>got his ass kicked last night, quite frankly, by a, a,

0:28:02.410 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 3>a dominant Cleveland defensive front last night. They allowed Aaron Rogers,

0:28:07.140 --> 0:28:08.659
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals did to kind of stand there and do

0:28:08.700 --> 0:28:11.899
<v Speaker 3>whatever he wanted to do. And you take that and

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.380
<v Speaker 3>then you combine it with the missed tackles. And what was,

0:28:15.460 --> 0:28:18.340
<v Speaker 3>I think so frustrating from that perspective is over the

0:28:18.380 --> 0:28:21.540
<v Speaker 3>last two seasons, all we've talked about is, are the

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.050
<v Speaker 3>Bengals going to be better at making tackles? were so

0:28:25.090 --> 0:28:28.900
<v Speaker 3>bad last year. They were so bad in 2024. Well,

0:28:28.940 --> 0:28:32.140
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Warren himself for the Steelers caused 10 missed tackles.

0:28:32.420 --> 0:28:35.990
<v Speaker 3>Darnell Washington, a massive tight end, a bunch more missed tackles.

0:28:36.490 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Even in the first game against Tampa Bay, the Bengals

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 3>had a bunch of missed tackles. I think some of

0:28:40.260 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 3>them were a byproduct of Baker Mayfield being chased out

0:28:43.180 --> 0:28:46.460
<v Speaker 3>of the pocket. But that's what I wondered about this

0:28:46.700 --> 0:28:49.460
<v Speaker 3>defense coming into the season. And that's what we still

0:28:49.510 --> 0:28:51.470
<v Speaker 3>wonder about it now. Are they going to be able

0:28:51.490 --> 0:28:52.830
<v Speaker 3>to get the guy with the ball to the ground?

0:28:53.070 --> 0:28:56.070
<v Speaker 3>Against Pittsburgh, the answer was no. And again, the results

0:28:56.090 --> 0:28:58.290
<v Speaker 3>spoke for themselves. If the answer is no on Sunday,

0:28:58.830 --> 0:29:01.330
<v Speaker 3>very good chance Trevor Lawrence and that Jacksonville offense is

0:29:01.370 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 3>going to do whatever it wants.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.220
<v Speaker 1>Talking to Mo Egger, ESPN 1530, you hear him in

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the afternoons covering Bengals, Bearcats all over the broadcast. He's everywhere.

0:29:09.220 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Kind of give us some time on the weekend, Sterling.

0:29:12.420 --> 0:29:13.660
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dwell on it because it's not

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.850
<v Speaker 1>the matchup for the Bengals with the Jags this weekend,

0:29:15.870 --> 0:29:18.900
<v Speaker 1>but you mentioned Aaron Rodgers and certainly that. I tell you,

0:29:18.940 --> 0:29:21.540
<v Speaker 1>last night was great. When stuff doesn't work, he's fun

0:29:21.580 --> 0:29:23.530
<v Speaker 1>to watch because he just turns into such a– for

0:29:23.610 --> 0:29:24.990
<v Speaker 1>want of a better way to describe it, a bitch.

0:29:25.350 --> 0:29:29.550
<v Speaker 1>He just starts yelling at people and coming onto the sideline,

0:29:29.590 --> 0:29:32.450
<v Speaker 1>just yelling at everybody. And for some reason, when he's

0:29:32.510 --> 0:29:35.110
<v Speaker 1>struggling and that's happening, I enjoy that to no end.

0:29:35.590 --> 0:29:38.790
<v Speaker 1>And I normally don't revel in other people's misery, but

0:29:39.090 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>he's just I don't know, something to watch.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 3>He's an easy guy to root against. And when things

0:29:46.460 --> 0:29:49.070
<v Speaker 3>go wrong, as they did last night, it feels like

0:29:49.150 --> 0:29:51.150
<v Speaker 3>nothing is ever his fault. But I'll tell you what,

0:29:51.230 --> 0:29:53.970
<v Speaker 3>to me, and it might pain me to say this,

0:29:54.310 --> 0:29:56.170
<v Speaker 3>it might pain a lot of folks listening to this

0:29:56.370 --> 0:29:58.790
<v Speaker 3>to hear this, I thought the story of the game

0:29:58.830 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>last night was all the young talent, the Cleveland Browns have,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.590
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how good they're going to be. You know,

0:30:05.170 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to stop short of declaring that Deshaun Watson

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.820
<v Speaker 3>is back to being the guy he was in Houston. But,

0:30:12.460 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tony Pike and I have talked about this

0:30:14.140 --> 0:30:16.140
<v Speaker 3>a lot. They have a really good draft. They took

0:30:16.180 --> 0:30:18.190
<v Speaker 3>two really good young wide receivers. They have a lot

0:30:18.210 --> 0:30:20.170
<v Speaker 3>of really good young players. The player they got from

0:30:20.190 --> 0:30:24.910
<v Speaker 3>the Rams in exchange for Miles Garrett, Jared Verse, is really,

0:30:24.990 --> 0:30:29.050
<v Speaker 3>really good. It feels like they have... something kind of

0:30:29.070 --> 0:30:31.810
<v Speaker 3>special happening there where it's a lot of young players

0:30:32.330 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>who I don't think are, you know, they don't know

0:30:35.220 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 3>that they're not supposed to be very good. So I

0:30:37.580 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>thought that was the story of the game. You had

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.140
<v Speaker 3>the young upstart Browns that I thought made the Steelers

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.270
<v Speaker 3>as a team, and obviously in particular Aaron Rodgers, look very,

0:30:47.330 --> 0:30:50.230
<v Speaker 3>very old. And it's frustrating because the Browns did in

0:30:50.270 --> 0:30:51.790
<v Speaker 3>that game what I think a lot of us hoped

0:30:51.810 --> 0:30:53.090
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals would do but couldn't.

0:30:53.370 --> 0:30:55.810
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I absolutely agree. All right, Mo Egger, let's shift

0:30:55.850 --> 0:30:58.090
<v Speaker 1>gears just a little bit. You want to give a

0:30:58.130 --> 0:31:00.350
<v Speaker 1>prediction for Sunday? I don't know really how to do that,

0:31:00.370 --> 0:31:04.230
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, you can or you're not.

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:05.740
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I see what I mean. I will be

0:31:05.780 --> 0:31:07.540
<v Speaker 3>honest with you. I'm not in love with this game

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday, and I've been bullish on the Bengals. Yeah,

0:31:10.780 --> 0:31:13.580
<v Speaker 3>I've been bullish on the Bengals for months. You know,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 3>I still believe they're going to win the AFC North.

0:31:16.530 --> 0:31:20.070
<v Speaker 3>I still have him in that 11-12 win range, but

0:31:20.250 --> 0:31:23.910
<v Speaker 3>just the injuries on defense, the way this Jacksonville team

0:31:23.950 --> 0:31:26.490
<v Speaker 3>is playing, how they can poke holes in some of

0:31:26.530 --> 0:31:28.450
<v Speaker 3>the issues the Bengals have, I'll be honest with you,

0:31:28.820 --> 0:31:30.780
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot about this game I really don't like.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.340
<v Speaker 3>I'll leave my prediction at that.

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.070
<v Speaker 1>I think that works. I think a lot of us

0:31:35.090 --> 0:31:39.830
<v Speaker 1>feel the same way. Now, Big 12, big matchup, Arizona, Bearcats,

0:31:40.410 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's after dark, unbeaten, and they lead the way

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.580
<v Speaker 1>in the Big 12. First of all, how surprised are

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.060
<v Speaker 1>you to this point for what the schedule has been

0:31:48.740 --> 0:31:52.170
<v Speaker 1>before they face Arizona in this matchup come tomorrow night

0:31:52.210 --> 0:31:53.450
<v Speaker 1>at 11?

0:31:53.450 --> 0:31:55.930
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'll sound a little bit like a homer

0:31:55.990 --> 0:31:58.060
<v Speaker 3>and tell you that I'm not surprised at all, but

0:31:58.100 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not stunned. Thank you, Alberto. I'm not stunned. You know,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:07.150
<v Speaker 3>I think, I'm sorry, I'm getting out of an Uber. Now,

0:32:08.260 --> 0:32:09.580
<v Speaker 3>I'd be lying to you if I told you I

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.459
<v Speaker 3>thought they'd come back and beat Miami when they were

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 3>down by 21 points. I'd be lying to you if

0:32:13.540 --> 0:32:15.660
<v Speaker 3>I told you that when they were trailing Kansas State

0:32:15.700 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 3>by 10 early in the game last week that they

0:32:18.380 --> 0:32:20.780
<v Speaker 3>were in great shape. But I think what the Bearcats

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>can do is control the football game, control the football

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 3>game on the ground. They have a really good offensive line,

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and particularly the left side of their offensive line. They

0:32:27.860 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 3>have two backs who last week each went over 100

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>yards in Jabron Payne and Cole Tapp.

0:32:35.020 --> 0:32:35.700
<v Speaker 4>That's good.

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 3>I think where you have pause two things, one, they

0:32:39.460 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 3>have been atrocious at getting after the opposing quarterback. And

0:32:42.900 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 3>so are they going to be able to find ways

0:32:45.100 --> 0:32:48.130
<v Speaker 3>to apply more pass rush? And then number two, and

0:32:48.150 --> 0:32:51.050
<v Speaker 3>I think every Bearcat fan went into the season wondering, okay,

0:32:51.550 --> 0:32:54.230
<v Speaker 3>how good is their quarterback? JC French has done a

0:32:54.390 --> 0:32:57.830
<v Speaker 3>marvelous job. I think he's thrown nearly 200 consecutive passes

0:32:58.330 --> 0:33:02.020
<v Speaker 3>without an interception. I think part of that, though, is

0:33:02.060 --> 0:33:05.140
<v Speaker 3>he's a little gun-shy. Now, it's great to protect the football.

0:33:05.310 --> 0:33:08.310
<v Speaker 3>You want that. That goes without saying. But there's a

0:33:08.350 --> 0:33:09.830
<v Speaker 3>part of me that would like to see him be

0:33:09.850 --> 0:33:12.950
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more bold downfield and maybe take a

0:33:12.990 --> 0:33:15.060
<v Speaker 3>shot or two, because I think the Bearcats actually have

0:33:15.100 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>some decent skill guys. And so this game tomorrow, you know,

0:33:18.620 --> 0:33:20.660
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to last season, the Bearcats lost

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:25.020
<v Speaker 3>their last five games, right? The most frustrating of those

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.350
<v Speaker 3>losses was the game at home to Arizona and Noah Fafita,

0:33:28.510 --> 0:33:32.450
<v Speaker 3>a really good throwing quarterback. I think the game tomorrow

0:33:33.070 --> 0:33:35.110
<v Speaker 3>is going to be really high scoring, and I think

0:33:35.150 --> 0:33:38.330
<v Speaker 3>the game tomorrow is almost going to require J.C. French,

0:33:38.350 --> 0:33:41.010
<v Speaker 3>the UC quarterback, to do a little bit more with

0:33:41.050 --> 0:33:43.630
<v Speaker 3>his arm. He only threw it 13 times last week

0:33:43.670 --> 0:33:46.910
<v Speaker 3>against Kansas State. The Bearcats controlled the game on the ground.

0:33:47.370 --> 0:33:50.990
<v Speaker 3>When a team sells itself out to take away Cincinnati's

0:33:51.050 --> 0:33:54.170
<v Speaker 3>rushing attack, which I think Arizona will do, Can you

0:33:54.190 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 3>see his quarterback rise to the occasion? And I think

0:33:56.260 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a fair amount of skepticism as to whether or

0:33:58.160 --> 0:33:59.820
<v Speaker 3>not he's going to be able to do that.

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.060
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess we'll see how it goes. You know

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.010
<v Speaker 1>what else is interesting to me about this and how

0:34:05.110 --> 0:34:08.510
<v Speaker 1>good they have been so far in seeming to develop?

0:34:09.030 --> 0:34:11.310
<v Speaker 1>And it's a wild thing to watch your view of

0:34:11.390 --> 0:34:13.370
<v Speaker 1>it doing what you do compared to me just sort

0:34:13.410 --> 0:34:16.900
<v Speaker 1>of as a fan generally is how these rosters are

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>being pieced together. looking at everybody when it comes to

0:34:20.900 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the money and trying to basically recruit a class every

0:34:24.430 --> 0:34:26.870
<v Speaker 1>single season. It's a, it's a wild thing to see

0:34:26.910 --> 0:34:27.510
<v Speaker 1>come together.

0:34:29.130 --> 0:34:31.810
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean, you know, this is, this version of

0:34:31.870 --> 0:34:37.629
<v Speaker 3>college football is unrecognizable to anybody who might, you know,

0:34:38.230 --> 0:34:41.290
<v Speaker 3>might've gone into a coma seven or eight years ago.

0:34:41.310 --> 0:34:45.630
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it, you know, and it's, it's true.

0:34:45.650 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 3>There's, Your average Big 12 team, obviously that's a league

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati is in, has more than 35 new players. Now, obviously,

0:34:56.260 --> 0:34:59.219
<v Speaker 3>some of them are freshmen, but an overwhelming majority of

0:34:59.260 --> 0:35:01.669
<v Speaker 3>them are not. It's why the team they're playing tomorrow, Arizona,

0:35:01.690 --> 0:35:03.930
<v Speaker 3>is an outlier. Noah Fafita, their quarterback, has been a

0:35:03.950 --> 0:35:07.290
<v Speaker 3>part of that program for five years now. That's something

0:35:07.450 --> 0:35:09.469
<v Speaker 3>you simply don't have. And so I think there's good

0:35:09.510 --> 0:35:12.069
<v Speaker 3>and bad to that. The good is, well, if you

0:35:12.090 --> 0:35:14.150
<v Speaker 3>have a bad season, you can hit the reset button

0:35:14.210 --> 0:35:16.730
<v Speaker 3>and go buy a whole new roster and have a

0:35:16.770 --> 0:35:19.149
<v Speaker 3>whole new team and be significantly better in a very

0:35:19.210 --> 0:35:22.250
<v Speaker 3>short amount of time. I think from a fan perspective, though,

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:27.020
<v Speaker 3>The one thing, and I'm a UC guy, the one

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.620
<v Speaker 3>thing I've loved about being a fan of the Bearcats

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 3>football and basketball has been watching guys over the course

0:35:32.739 --> 0:35:38.340
<v Speaker 3>of three years, four years, or five years grow, develop,

0:35:38.739 --> 0:35:40.340
<v Speaker 3>and you feel like you have a connection to them.

0:35:40.460 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Des Ritter was UC's quarterback for four years, and I

0:35:42.860 --> 0:35:45.020
<v Speaker 3>remember him as a freshman. He couldn't throw the ball.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.660
<v Speaker 3>And then by the time he was a senior, he

0:35:47.739 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 3>ended up being the third quarterback taken in the 2022 draft.

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.460
<v Speaker 3>And you felt a connection to him. Kenyon Martin is

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.900
<v Speaker 3>a basketball fan. Kenyon Martin, as a freshman, could not

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 3>play by his senior year. He was the best player

0:36:02.460 --> 0:36:04.540
<v Speaker 3>in the country, number one overall pick in the NBA draft.

0:36:04.580 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 3>And over those four years, you watched him grow and develop.

0:36:07.180 --> 0:36:09.970
<v Speaker 3>I missed that. And I think when you have... When

0:36:09.989 --> 0:36:12.350
<v Speaker 3>you don't have that as much, fans don't feel as

0:36:12.390 --> 0:36:15.250
<v Speaker 3>connected to the players on their favorite team. And then

0:36:15.290 --> 0:36:17.430
<v Speaker 3>by extension, they don't feel as connected to the team

0:36:17.469 --> 0:36:18.049
<v Speaker 3>they cheer for.

0:36:18.130 --> 0:36:18.430
<v Speaker 5>You know what?

0:36:18.450 --> 0:36:21.250
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see five, ten years down the

0:36:21.290 --> 0:36:25.029
<v Speaker 1>line when kids have been through school out and in

0:36:25.070 --> 0:36:27.029
<v Speaker 1>the world for a little while, if they have that

0:36:27.469 --> 0:36:30.420
<v Speaker 1>same feeling. I imagine if it's a program that wins,

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.549
<v Speaker 1>they'll embrace it more and have that connection. even though

0:36:33.590 --> 0:36:36.100
<v Speaker 1>they may have lost that individual player feeling that so

0:36:36.140 --> 0:36:39.339
<v Speaker 1>many of us in pro sports have lost a couple

0:36:39.380 --> 0:36:41.660
<v Speaker 1>decades ago, I guess. Maybe. I don't know.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.859
<v Speaker 3>I can only speak as a fan, and I'll make

0:36:44.900 --> 0:36:47.450
<v Speaker 3>it about UC. When they made the college football playoff

0:36:47.510 --> 0:36:52.050
<v Speaker 3>in 2021, went undefeated, beat Notre Dame, 13-0, played Alabama.

0:36:52.630 --> 0:36:54.710
<v Speaker 3>To me, what was great about that as a fan was,

0:36:55.460 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 3>I watched those guys in 2018 and 2019. I watched

0:36:59.550 --> 0:37:04.170
<v Speaker 3>Sauce Gardner and Kobe Bryant and Brian Cook and Des Ritter.

0:37:04.469 --> 0:37:07.070
<v Speaker 3>And I watched so many of those guys kind of like,

0:37:07.469 --> 0:37:11.290
<v Speaker 3>you know, collectively grow together. And so I remember in

0:37:11.290 --> 0:37:14.900
<v Speaker 3>2018 thinking like, boy, if these guys stay together in

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:16.459
<v Speaker 3>two or three years, they could be really, really good.

0:37:17.340 --> 0:37:19.339
<v Speaker 3>And then in 2021, going into the season, thinking like

0:37:19.380 --> 0:37:21.620
<v Speaker 3>this is the culmination of years of watching these guys

0:37:21.660 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 3>grow together, sometimes fail together. I, I think as a fan,

0:37:26.700 --> 0:37:31.860
<v Speaker 3>that's special. I think as a student athlete, they're getting paid,

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.620
<v Speaker 3>which is great. I want them to get paid. I

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.299
<v Speaker 3>certainly believe that you should have some ability to move

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.299
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a bad situation in college. That said,

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.940
<v Speaker 3>when you talk to... I work with Tony Pike. When

0:37:44.980 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I talk with him about his teammates that he played...

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Tony was in school for six years. When he played

0:37:49.940 --> 0:37:53.030
<v Speaker 3>that he played for two, three, four, five years with,

0:37:53.570 --> 0:37:56.870
<v Speaker 3>it's different... than I think when you spend a year

0:37:56.910 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>with somebody, you know, and like winning, I'm sure creates

0:38:01.060 --> 0:38:03.530
<v Speaker 3>bonds that, you know, losing teams don't enjoy.

0:38:03.550 --> 0:38:03.910
<v Speaker 11>I just.

0:38:05.180 --> 0:38:07.500
<v Speaker 3>I have to think that there are parts of the

0:38:07.580 --> 0:38:11.180
<v Speaker 3>college athlete experience that, while it's awesome that they're getting paid,

0:38:11.739 --> 0:38:13.770
<v Speaker 3>aren't as cool as it used to be.

0:38:13.930 --> 0:38:14.270
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:38:14.290 --> 0:38:17.490
<v Speaker 3>Because you just, dudes are hopscotching all over the place.

0:38:18.210 --> 0:38:21.170
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other side, though. You can't spend the good feeling,

0:38:21.230 --> 0:38:23.330
<v Speaker 1>but you can spend that money if you don't live

0:38:23.350 --> 0:38:25.790
<v Speaker 1>the dream to even collect the league minimum in the

0:38:25.870 --> 0:38:26.930
<v Speaker 1>NFL or elsewhere.

0:38:26.950 --> 0:38:27.589
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:27.819
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:38:28.430 --> 0:38:30.620
<v Speaker 1>So you may not have that all, but later on

0:38:30.660 --> 0:38:32.140
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to get out in the real world

0:38:32.180 --> 0:38:34.219
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a little bit of bank, hopefully, it

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly makes life a little easier when you're trying to

0:38:36.620 --> 0:38:38.100
<v Speaker 1>navigate it.

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Trust me. You're talking to somebody who– I think it's

0:38:40.460 --> 0:38:42.340
<v Speaker 3>awesome the guys get paid. I don't want there to

0:38:42.380 --> 0:38:45.300
<v Speaker 3>be restrictions on what they make. I am the ultimate capitalist.

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe in salary caps. I don't believe in

0:38:48.219 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 3>restricting what people pull in. And so, yeah, look, I'm

0:38:53.300 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 3>around a lot of student-athletes. Their lifestyle is a heck

0:38:56.060 --> 0:38:59.750
<v Speaker 3>of a lot different than student-athletes of even just seven

0:38:59.770 --> 0:39:01.230
<v Speaker 3>or eight years ago, much less 20, 25, 30 years ago.

0:39:01.250 --> 0:39:01.330
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:39:04.290 --> 0:39:07.010
<v Speaker 3>You know, is there something about the experience of being

0:39:07.050 --> 0:39:09.529
<v Speaker 3>in one place for a long amount of time that

0:39:09.570 --> 0:39:10.350
<v Speaker 3>I think is special?

0:39:10.969 --> 0:39:11.509
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:39:11.570 --> 0:39:13.830
<v Speaker 3>And I think a lot of kids are missing out

0:39:13.910 --> 0:39:16.250
<v Speaker 3>on that. And it might not matter to them because

0:39:16.290 --> 0:39:19.629
<v Speaker 3>they are starting whatever's coming after college with a nice

0:39:19.690 --> 0:39:21.790
<v Speaker 3>nest egg if they've handled their money well. And I

0:39:21.850 --> 0:39:24.350
<v Speaker 3>think that's good. But I just wish there was a

0:39:24.410 --> 0:39:27.569
<v Speaker 3>way to sort of combine both. And I unfortunately don't

0:39:27.610 --> 0:39:29.589
<v Speaker 3>think that toothpaste is being put back in the tube.

0:39:29.830 --> 0:39:29.930
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:31.700
<v Speaker 1>Think we are of like minds in that. It's always

0:39:31.739 --> 0:39:33.779
<v Speaker 1>good to catch up. Thank you for making time on

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:38.620
<v Speaker 1>a Friday night. Mo Egger, ESPN 1530. Tomorrow night, talking

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Bearcats in Arizona, Big 12, late-night matchup. And then, of course, Sunday,

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:47.370
<v Speaker 1>1 o'clock, Paycorp, Jaguars in town. You got Chase, you

0:39:47.390 --> 0:39:50.569
<v Speaker 1>got Burrow in company, Bengals getting it on. where the

0:39:50.630 --> 0:39:54.090
<v Speaker 1>best Bengals coverage is 700 WLW. Thank you, Mo Egger.

0:39:55.260 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 4>All right, man, thanks.

0:39:55.930 --> 0:39:58.380
<v Speaker 1>Take care of yourself. I appreciate you being here and

0:39:58.460 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>navigating the world of driver car situation and doing the

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:07.739
<v Speaker 1>show segment. Tremendous. Superstar activities. Quick break. We'll come back.

0:40:07.739 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>10 o'clock report straight away. Lots more to do. Space stuff,

0:40:11.110 --> 0:40:14.489
<v Speaker 1>movie conversation, and more on the home of the best

0:40:14.570 --> 0:40:19.770
<v Speaker 1>Bengals coverage. News Radio 700 WLW Cincinnati. Match-ups of match-ups.

0:40:21.010 --> 0:40:22.989
<v Speaker 1>Bengals look to bounce back, get a win with the

0:40:23.050 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Jags in town Sunday, 1 o'clock, Paycor, where? Home of Bengals,

0:40:27.420 --> 0:40:31.500
<v Speaker 1>best Bengal coverage, where is it? Newsradio 700, WLW, yes, correct.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:37.170
<v Speaker 1>All right, so here we are. Russ Jackson, keep me

0:40:37.210 --> 0:40:40.090
<v Speaker 1>online and in time. There are cameras all over this building,

0:40:40.310 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>by the way. There are cameras in this studio. There

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.219
<v Speaker 1>are cameras in most places. There are cameras when you

0:40:47.260 --> 0:40:49.540
<v Speaker 1>go to gas up your car. There are cameras in school.

0:40:49.580 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>There are cameras in the post office. There are cameras

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.620
<v Speaker 1>on cameras. There's a camera on your wrist, most likely.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.610
<v Speaker 1>There's probably a camera on your phone. If not, I

0:40:57.620 --> 0:40:59.950
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Are you like a unicorn or something like that?

0:40:59.969 --> 0:41:01.590
<v Speaker 1>You might have the one phone that doesn't have a

0:41:01.610 --> 0:41:04.170
<v Speaker 1>camera on at this point. Even my mom does and

0:41:04.210 --> 0:41:08.450
<v Speaker 1>listens to the iHeartRadio app. which is unbelievable because she

0:41:08.530 --> 0:41:12.009
<v Speaker 1>is not the most technologically savvy person out there. That

0:41:12.090 --> 0:41:15.350
<v Speaker 1>being said, as we sit here now after months and

0:41:15.390 --> 0:41:19.100
<v Speaker 1>months of conversation about the flock camera situation around this

0:41:19.180 --> 0:41:22.860
<v Speaker 1>country and what it means to privacy issues and safety

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and security. I can recall sitting behind this very microphone

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.860
<v Speaker 1>just on the other side of Montgomery Road from Kenwood

0:41:30.900 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Town Center within hours after a smash and grab took

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>place at a jewelry store where thousands of dollars of

0:41:38.300 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>jewels had been taken. Where those perpetrators, the accused, the alleged,

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.550
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a lawsuit. were able to be tracked down,

0:41:47.170 --> 0:41:51.709
<v Speaker 1>their movements followed, isolating them and letting law enforcement know

0:41:51.790 --> 0:41:54.430
<v Speaker 1>where they were effectively so they were able to track

0:41:54.530 --> 0:41:59.930
<v Speaker 1>them down and lock them up. The flock cameras work.

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>The flock cameras do have other problems with misuse and

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:11.029
<v Speaker 1>abuse of the technology. Individuals in law enforcement across the

0:42:11.070 --> 0:42:14.910
<v Speaker 1>country who have either been up to no good, having

0:42:14.950 --> 0:42:19.090
<v Speaker 1>some type of stalker behavior, looking to harass other people

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:22.380
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise, the misuse of this information and the cash

0:42:22.420 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>data has been proven time and time again. And it's

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>not a bunch of abuse compared to the actual outcome

0:42:30.380 --> 0:42:36.580
<v Speaker 1>and positive nature of the technology. But whether it's Hamilton

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>County is in just the news today, or Dayton, Ohio

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>from weeks back, or pick a municipality on the other

0:42:45.380 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>side of the Ohio from where I sit now in

0:42:47.700 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Northern Kentucky and across this country, city by city, they

0:42:52.820 --> 0:42:58.140
<v Speaker 1>fall like dominoes where they are saying, nah, nah, nah, baby, nah.

0:42:58.660 --> 0:43:01.970
<v Speaker 1>We don't want these cameras around because of people's fear.

0:43:02.390 --> 0:43:06.660
<v Speaker 1>My question to you is this. If they work, If

0:43:06.700 --> 0:43:11.830
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to safeguard the abuse of the technology

0:43:12.410 --> 0:43:15.410
<v Speaker 1>so that someone doesn't decide that their ex or someone

0:43:15.430 --> 0:43:18.169
<v Speaker 1>they're interested in or someone they've got a problem with

0:43:18.710 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is not able to be tracked down, followed in a

0:43:22.450 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>history of their path and pattern of travels to where

0:43:25.780 --> 0:43:28.939
<v Speaker 1>someone can either look to do them harm or just

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>basically get up in their business when it is none

0:43:31.500 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of their business, then I think we could be in

0:43:34.420 --> 0:43:37.790
<v Speaker 1>a good place if that could be controlled. But apparently,

0:43:38.469 --> 0:43:43.620
<v Speaker 1>there is a lack of trust between the public and

0:43:43.700 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>safety administration and law enforcement and maybe the state, maybe

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the county, and maybe the federal government as we sit

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:54.540
<v Speaker 1>here in 2026 on the cusp of another election as

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>well as the cusp of another new year. So I

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.330
<v Speaker 1>just want to ask you this. Where is the line

0:44:02.370 --> 0:44:07.060
<v Speaker 1>of acceptability when it comes to the utilization of of

0:44:07.100 --> 0:44:11.380
<v Speaker 1>your travels, the data from your car, because most likely

0:44:11.460 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>if it's a late model car within the last, what, 10, 12, 13,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:19.109
<v Speaker 1>14 years, there's a whole lot of data being kept

0:44:19.630 --> 0:44:22.910
<v Speaker 1>on your driving habits and speed and all kinds of

0:44:22.969 --> 0:44:25.330
<v Speaker 1>other stuff, effectively a black box in the vehicle that

0:44:25.370 --> 0:44:28.350
<v Speaker 1>people willy-nilly trade with insurance companies for a deal on

0:44:28.370 --> 0:44:32.550
<v Speaker 1>their rates. And you likely have cameras at your house

0:44:32.850 --> 0:44:35.670
<v Speaker 1>or your business where you work, maybe what you own.

0:44:36.570 --> 0:44:39.150
<v Speaker 1>So that you can keep track of your stuff, people's

0:44:39.210 --> 0:44:42.590
<v Speaker 1>comings and goings in and around your property, be it

0:44:42.610 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>your business and operating hours to keep shrinkage to a minimum,

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.620
<v Speaker 1>be it theft from inside the company or everyday people

0:44:49.739 --> 0:44:51.819
<v Speaker 1>out and about in the world who might like to

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.100
<v Speaker 1>cause some type of problems. of one type or another.

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:59.930
<v Speaker 1>You see cameras everywhere. You see the mobile cameras that

0:45:00.010 --> 0:45:04.989
<v Speaker 1>police or companies are providing to private ownership of businesses

0:45:05.250 --> 0:45:08.150
<v Speaker 1>to put in their parking lots and other places so

0:45:08.190 --> 0:45:13.650
<v Speaker 1>that law enforcement can have information shared instantaneously about people

0:45:14.050 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>losing their mind and doing dumbass things like donuts in

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:21.540
<v Speaker 1>the middle of intersections or in parking lots or street

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of meetups where they can cause problem at gas

0:45:24.980 --> 0:45:28.839
<v Speaker 1>stations or restaurants or in a neighborhood or otherwise. Those

0:45:28.900 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>are all, I think, anything I've just mentioned, all positive

0:45:33.410 --> 0:45:39.330
<v Speaker 1>benefits from the surveillance state. I did say surveillance state, though,

0:45:39.350 --> 0:45:43.509
<v Speaker 1>didn't I? And that's the worry that people have, that

0:45:43.550 --> 0:45:47.089
<v Speaker 1>Big Brother is watching. But on your social media, be

0:45:47.130 --> 0:45:50.190
<v Speaker 1>it Facebook or otherwise, my guess is there's baby pictures,

0:45:50.270 --> 0:45:53.970
<v Speaker 1>personal travel pictures, oftentimes when and while on vacation, which

0:45:53.989 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you should not share, which lets people know how they

0:45:56.780 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>can find your stuff when you're not where you normally

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:01.700
<v Speaker 1>are to get into your stuff. But you have cameras

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe at the house so you can watch them when

0:46:04.060 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you're on vacation. What's the difference between the flock camera

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.250
<v Speaker 1>and those? And the talk had been that some of

0:46:10.270 --> 0:46:13.430
<v Speaker 1>your doorbell cameras or my doorbell camera, depending on whose

0:46:13.870 --> 0:46:16.730
<v Speaker 1>ownership of the device and system that you're paying for,

0:46:17.430 --> 0:46:21.430
<v Speaker 1>could in fact be utilized by law enforcement. And that

0:46:21.450 --> 0:46:24.140
<v Speaker 1>has been proven effective too. If you just go to

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:30.540
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and search like doorbell cameras, CCTV, or otherwise, the

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:36.390
<v Speaker 1>sheer enormity of data and documentation of odd things happening

0:46:36.450 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on porches with, you know, porch pirates or accidents happening

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>or weird weather anomalies or, I mean, pick a circumstance.

0:46:49.780 --> 0:46:52.020
<v Speaker 1>I guess what it boils down to is the trust,

0:46:52.900 --> 0:46:56.299
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the city of Cincinnati or Louisville or Lexington

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>or Covington or Newport or Dayton, Kentucky or Dayton, Ohio

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or Middletown or wherever else in between. Do you trust

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The initiative and the actions of people in positions of

0:47:10.020 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>power and authority that put on badges that we entrust

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.830
<v Speaker 1>with our safety and security to enforce the laws on

0:47:17.850 --> 0:47:20.090
<v Speaker 1>the books to keep those who cannot play in the

0:47:20.130 --> 0:47:26.210
<v Speaker 1>big sandbox of life from becoming a hazard and victimizing

0:47:26.250 --> 0:47:28.670
<v Speaker 1>all of us, right? So if we can trust them

0:47:28.730 --> 0:47:32.730
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and we trust them and hope that

0:47:32.750 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they are– brave enough to put themselves in a situation

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:40.219
<v Speaker 1>where every time they put that uniform on, every time

0:47:40.260 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they do detailed job in that uniform, whether it's outside

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:46.270
<v Speaker 1>UC where a couple of summers ago, somebody got run

0:47:46.310 --> 0:47:48.589
<v Speaker 1>down by a guy who was upset out of his

0:47:48.670 --> 0:47:54.270
<v Speaker 1>mind or just acting in an aberration of bad behavior

0:47:54.290 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and reaction to what happened to his son. to what

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:00.129
<v Speaker 1>happened in Kentucky with a state trooper, with a bad actor,

0:48:00.150 --> 0:48:02.730
<v Speaker 1>with a gun who decided to gun him down, there

0:48:02.790 --> 0:48:05.990
<v Speaker 1>is danger inherent with that job. Whether it's a simple,

0:48:06.469 --> 0:48:08.310
<v Speaker 1>as much as one can call it that, a traffic

0:48:08.350 --> 0:48:12.690
<v Speaker 1>stop or domestic violence call where all the parties involved,

0:48:12.750 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the victim or the aggressor, often will turn

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.660
<v Speaker 1>on law enforcement when called to provide assistance and help

0:48:19.700 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of that trauma. It ain't an easy job.

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:26.379
<v Speaker 1>It's often a thankless job. And it's certainly a dangerous job.

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.140
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting that we have this and we trust

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:35.670
<v Speaker 1>them with all of these things. But apparently don't trust

0:48:35.730 --> 0:48:39.029
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the flock camera that's out there now,

0:48:39.450 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 1>either bagged or tore down or vandalized or just sitting

0:48:42.860 --> 0:48:45.380
<v Speaker 1>there and you don't know whether it's the city or

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:49.219
<v Speaker 1>a county or other municipality or a school district. Because

0:48:49.260 --> 0:48:52.220
<v Speaker 1>school districts have spent tens of thousands, if not hundreds

0:48:52.260 --> 0:48:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars for these flock cameras to be

0:48:55.940 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>up in or around high schools, middle schools, elementary schools,

0:48:59.420 --> 0:49:02.260
<v Speaker 1>keeping track of who's picking up kids, coming and going,

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.050
<v Speaker 1>and for the safety and the well-being of those children

0:49:06.090 --> 0:49:10.670
<v Speaker 1>inside those facilities so that we can go on with

0:49:10.730 --> 0:49:13.069
<v Speaker 1>our daily lives and hope that they're okay and can

0:49:13.110 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>come home safe. So whether it's your face when you're

0:49:18.660 --> 0:49:22.090
<v Speaker 1>at the airport, whether it's the camera at the convenience store,

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.259
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you at the red light, whether it's you

0:49:26.340 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>driving down the street to the library to pick the

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>kids up to go get a bite to eat, whatever

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:34.959
<v Speaker 1>else it happens to be, how concerned are you about

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:39.420
<v Speaker 1>the flock camera thing or the surveillance society in which

0:49:39.460 --> 0:49:41.989
<v Speaker 1>we're living? at this particular point. I don't know if

0:49:42.010 --> 0:49:45.210
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's a big brother state, but it's close

0:49:45.250 --> 0:49:48.470
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of people's minds. But when they work

0:49:49.410 --> 0:49:54.770
<v Speaker 1>and when they're operated appropriately, respecting the line of usage,

0:49:57.030 --> 0:50:02.149
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredibly successful and proper tool. But because some

0:50:02.230 --> 0:50:06.460
<v Speaker 1>people can't handle it, all of us pay the price.

0:50:07.250 --> 0:50:10.270
<v Speaker 1>It will be a little bit more wild out on

0:50:10.310 --> 0:50:13.650
<v Speaker 1>the streets, and we will see a slowing down of

0:50:13.710 --> 0:50:17.029
<v Speaker 1>some of the quick ability to track individuals down who

0:50:17.050 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have been up to no good as a result of this.

0:50:19.380 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>So you give up what? A little bit of privacy,

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:29.260
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what? Independence, to keep the government

0:50:29.300 --> 0:50:31.020
<v Speaker 1>out of our lives, and with that, a little bit

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:34.259
<v Speaker 1>more danger. I guess that's really what it's about. That's

0:50:34.300 --> 0:50:37.339
<v Speaker 1>the decision that's been made. It'll be interesting to see

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.299
<v Speaker 1>if over time this doesn't come back into a situation

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where people start asking for the cameras back because there's

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been an uptick in certain types of crime or them

0:50:50.500 --> 0:50:55.810
<v Speaker 1>not being caught, apprehended as quickly or as easily because

0:50:55.830 --> 0:50:58.130
<v Speaker 1>they're not being able to say, okay, well, this happened

0:50:58.150 --> 0:51:00.910
<v Speaker 1>on Montgomery Road. They ended up here. They were on

0:51:00.969 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Red Bank. All of a sudden, they're downtown. they're here,

0:51:04.219 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you can send police to go get them. 513-749-7800,

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:11.660
<v Speaker 1>the big one, your chance to get interactive now. I

0:51:11.660 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you think. If you're on the

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, you can talk back, click the microphone, leave

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:18.740
<v Speaker 1>a message there. And I'm also on X, and no,

0:51:18.780 --> 0:51:21.610
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean the 90s party drug. Well, maybe in

0:51:21.630 --> 0:51:25.009
<v Speaker 1>the 90s. At Sterling Radio on what was Twitter, your

0:51:25.030 --> 0:51:26.930
<v Speaker 1>chance to speak your mind there as well. Is Nikki

0:51:26.969 --> 0:51:30.290
<v Speaker 1>still there? She's been holding forever. And we were talking

0:51:30.350 --> 0:51:34.819
<v Speaker 1>about the earlier, the death row situation in Tennessee where

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.420
<v Speaker 1>they had an inability to actually carry out an execution,

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:41.860
<v Speaker 1>which may as well. I mean, if you're there is

0:51:41.900 --> 0:51:44.340
<v Speaker 1>a way to solve the problem. Let the criminals kill

0:51:44.380 --> 0:51:45.259
<v Speaker 1>those on death row.

0:51:47.580 --> 0:51:47.819
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.029
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's thinning of their own hurt. And then

0:51:50.070 --> 0:51:50.830
<v Speaker 1>maybe that would work.

0:51:51.030 --> 0:51:51.410
<v Speaker 9>I don't know.

0:51:51.489 --> 0:51:53.489
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of questions about a lot going on.

0:51:53.950 --> 0:51:56.990
<v Speaker 1>And tomorrow we go with Nicky. I appreciate your patience

0:51:57.050 --> 0:51:59.570
<v Speaker 1>and holding on a Sterling show here on a Friday

0:51:59.610 --> 0:52:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on the big one. How are you, Nicky? I'm good.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 6>How are you?

0:52:03.420 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right. What do you have? What's on your mind?

0:52:06.620 --> 0:52:11.250
<v Speaker 12>I just feel that she should walk, honestly.

0:52:11.810 --> 0:52:14.690
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think she can anymore. If you're talking

0:52:14.750 --> 0:52:16.870
<v Speaker 1>about Krista Pike, you mean the woman who they tried

0:52:16.890 --> 0:52:17.770
<v Speaker 1>to execute and didn't?

0:52:19.090 --> 0:52:19.910
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Right.

0:52:20.030 --> 0:52:21.529
<v Speaker 1>So you think they should let her go because they

0:52:21.570 --> 0:52:22.350
<v Speaker 1>couldn't kill her, you mean?

0:52:23.630 --> 0:52:28.669
<v Speaker 12>Yes, because I feel like she's suffered enough. I'm not

0:52:28.730 --> 0:52:32.780
<v Speaker 12>trying to sound mean. I do believe that You know,

0:52:32.860 --> 0:52:37.240
<v Speaker 12>like everyone should go to jail if they.

0:52:37.060 --> 0:52:40.740
<v Speaker 1>Do wrong and, you know, all of that.

0:52:40.900 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 12>But it's just like they try to kill her and

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:45.259
<v Speaker 12>she is not.

0:52:45.620 --> 0:52:46.939
<v Speaker 9>Killed, you know?

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:47.460
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:52:47.620 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 6>So.

0:52:48.020 --> 0:52:49.779
<v Speaker 1>So wait a minute. So if it had only if

0:52:49.820 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>they tried once and they couldn't knock her out and

0:52:53.810 --> 0:52:58.250
<v Speaker 1>take her out. In this execution attempt. So do you say, okay, well,

0:52:58.290 --> 0:53:00.210
<v Speaker 1>after the first failure, you let them out? Or do

0:53:00.230 --> 0:53:02.149
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, let's try it again? Or when they're

0:53:02.430 --> 0:53:04.940
<v Speaker 1>not quite right in the head and have suffered severe damage,

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>then you go, okay, good luck to you. Or when

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do you say, okay?

0:53:09.940 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 9>I don't know.

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 12>I'm just, I just feel like that. I thought they

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:16.020
<v Speaker 12>said they tried twice.

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:16.820
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they did.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:17.300
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:17.900 --> 0:53:18.180
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:23.110
<v Speaker 12>So they tried twice. And she still didn't die.

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:53:23.820 --> 0:53:26.859
<v Speaker 12>And she can't walk, I guess. I don't know any

0:53:26.940 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 12>background about all this.

0:53:28.540 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.359
<v Speaker 1>You just, just the general idea. So, I mean, here's

0:53:32.380 --> 0:53:35.180
<v Speaker 1>the thing is she killed somebody, she was sentenced to death, right?

0:53:35.820 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And then they went to execute her and it didn't work.

0:53:38.140 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>They tried once, they juiced her again, and apparently they

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:44.310
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the needle in her arm properly as it's

0:53:44.350 --> 0:53:46.890
<v Speaker 1>been described. And this is, we don't know the facts

0:53:46.950 --> 0:53:49.489
<v Speaker 1>fully yet, but that's what they reported. And instead of

0:53:49.530 --> 0:53:51.070
<v Speaker 1>getting the ID, what they're.

0:53:50.890 --> 0:53:55.290
<v Speaker 12>Going to report anyways, because they don't they don't ever

0:53:55.350 --> 0:53:57.530
<v Speaker 12>want to admit any wrongs that we do.

0:53:57.710 --> 0:53:58.850
<v Speaker 1>Well, they not wait.

0:53:58.870 --> 0:53:59.230
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, though.

0:53:59.250 --> 0:54:01.359
<v Speaker 1>But they did. They did admit one. They tried once.

0:54:01.420 --> 0:54:03.259
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work. They tried again. It didn't work. So

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>they've admitted it. They can't hide it. I mean, you know,

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 1>she's she's like in an ICU or some type of

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:13.300
<v Speaker 1>medical facility now in the hospital and wait. So what happened?

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:15.980
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with her? Now, do you give

0:54:16.020 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>her back to her family or what? I mean, I'm

0:54:18.500 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not trying to I'm not trying to argue with you.

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.299
<v Speaker 1>I'm just asking. So what if it had been your

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>family member that had been killed, God forbid, by someone

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:32.569
<v Speaker 1>and tortured, abused, killed and abused? But would you understand?

0:54:32.780 --> 0:54:34.969
<v Speaker 1>So would you say then that that person after they

0:54:34.989 --> 0:54:38.450
<v Speaker 1>tried to execute them, if they were culpable, responsible, convicted,

0:54:38.550 --> 0:54:40.950
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to execution for the death of a loved one

0:54:41.010 --> 0:54:43.330
<v Speaker 1>or friend or somebody else that, OK, well.

0:54:44.100 --> 0:54:48.470
<v Speaker 12>Did you hear about our other two partners? I looked

0:54:48.550 --> 0:54:52.969
<v Speaker 12>on the news right before I called and I only

0:54:53.010 --> 0:54:58.180
<v Speaker 12>looked quickly and it said the other one got probation

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:00.339
<v Speaker 12>and then the other one got 30 years.

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Listen, whether she got life or the other got an

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:10.489
<v Speaker 1>execution or the other one got five years is irrelevant.

0:55:10.690 --> 0:55:16.810
<v Speaker 1>Her case, her conviction, her execution, they failed to execute effectively.

0:55:17.150 --> 0:55:17.910
<v Speaker 1>I grasp that.

0:55:18.010 --> 0:55:18.989
<v Speaker 8>It is cruel.

0:55:19.130 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It is insane. I don't know how the hell you

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can't finish the job. It's a simple thing.

0:55:24.420 --> 0:55:24.900
<v Speaker 3>Clearly.

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:28.239
<v Speaker 12>Right. Like the other guy said, they could have gave her...

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:31.900
<v Speaker 12>heroin or something, and I'm not trying to be mean.

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 12>My sister died of an overdose.

0:55:35.260 --> 0:55:39.529
<v Speaker 1>I'm terribly sorry. That's a horrific thing. My God, that's awful.

0:55:40.650 --> 0:55:44.950
<v Speaker 9>So I'm just saying, I understand all this. I want.

0:55:47.750 --> 0:55:48.430
<v Speaker 6>True life.

0:55:48.570 --> 0:55:49.330
<v Speaker 4>I want.

0:55:50.610 --> 0:55:56.439
<v Speaker 12>Pro-life. I'm a Republican, but after we tried to kill her...

0:55:57.590 --> 0:56:00.820
<v Speaker 12>And she didn't go. What are we supposed to do now?

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that's what everybody's trying to figure out.

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.420
<v Speaker 1>Do you just give her life if she's brain dead

0:56:05.540 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and slobbering on herself and, you know, and now like

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:11.379
<v Speaker 1>unable to even do the most basics of things now?

0:56:11.420 --> 0:56:13.380
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that cruel and unusual? I mean, it's tough, Nikki.

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the call and you're holding on for so long.

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:19.610
<v Speaker 1>It is an impossible situation. It is so hard to

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:21.969
<v Speaker 1>process and grasp the circumstance.

0:56:22.770 --> 0:56:23.009
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:56:23.030 --> 0:56:26.980
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's crazy. At this point, apparently still in

0:56:27.020 --> 0:56:32.100
<v Speaker 1>critical condition. Her lawyers, which Nikki was alluding to the

0:56:32.180 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of letting her go, they're hoping that they commute

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:38.330
<v Speaker 1>and they're asking for a commution of the sentence. A commutation,

0:56:38.370 --> 0:56:40.210
<v Speaker 1>I believe, is the correct term. I'm no lawyer. I

0:56:40.210 --> 0:56:42.770
<v Speaker 1>don't want to play one on the radio. Too much

0:56:42.810 --> 0:56:44.090
<v Speaker 1>school left to go back to do it and I'm

0:56:44.130 --> 0:56:48.210
<v Speaker 1>too old. So the commutation of the sentence is what

0:56:48.230 --> 0:56:52.169
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping for. They halted the executions for the rest

0:56:52.210 --> 0:56:55.590
<v Speaker 1>of this year. And they've called in an outside source,

0:56:55.630 --> 0:56:57.770
<v Speaker 1>I guess, who's an expert on killing people. I don't

0:56:57.790 --> 0:57:00.290
<v Speaker 1>know how that works, but they've got a third party

0:57:00.330 --> 0:57:03.350
<v Speaker 1>to review the systems and the processes in apparently this

0:57:03.410 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>particular case. And this was after a 1995 torture and

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.300
<v Speaker 1>killing of a woman by the name of Colleen Slemmer.

0:57:11.739 --> 0:57:15.340
<v Speaker 1>She was 30 years ago and she was sentenced to

0:57:15.420 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>death 30 years ago. It took 30 years to get

0:57:18.020 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to this point. Then they couldn't even kill her right.

0:57:20.740 --> 0:57:23.340
<v Speaker 1>And of course, across the country, across the world, people

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about this or mental health issue and so on.

0:57:26.820 --> 0:57:29.060
<v Speaker 1>But what do you do? How do you do it?

0:57:30.220 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously, in 30 seconds, do I have time

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:37.570
<v Speaker 1>to let's do this. Let's take a break. We have

0:57:37.590 --> 0:57:41.410
<v Speaker 1>your 1030 report. We got Randy and Sam and others

0:57:41.750 --> 0:57:43.850
<v Speaker 1>on the line. We'll take a break. We'll get an

0:57:43.890 --> 0:57:46.910
<v Speaker 1>update on news. We'll come back. We'll rip through the calls.

0:57:46.950 --> 0:57:49.410
<v Speaker 1>We have lots of other stuff to get to. Kevin

0:57:49.450 --> 0:57:53.030
<v Speaker 1>Carr later talking the new Digger movie. We will also

0:57:53.090 --> 0:57:57.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to Mike D. Wall from Space.com about the International

0:57:57.260 --> 0:58:00.660
<v Speaker 1>Space Station and SpaceX just docking and dropping off some

0:58:00.700 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>new astronauts up there to do some work way, way

0:58:04.740 --> 0:58:07.670
<v Speaker 1>off our place. Not really in deep space, but they're

0:58:07.750 --> 0:58:10.020
<v Speaker 1>way out there as far as I'm concerned. Lots of

0:58:10.060 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff to do. We're glad you're here. It's a Friday

0:58:13.140 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>night sterling, and we're hanging out on the home of

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:18.540
<v Speaker 1>the best Bengals coverage with the Jags in town come

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.700
<v Speaker 1>Sunday and the Bearcats on the road at Arizona tomorrow

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:25.550
<v Speaker 1>night right here. Bearcats play here. Bengals play here. Reds

0:58:25.570 --> 0:58:29.870
<v Speaker 1>when they get back at it. It's NewsRadio 700 WLW Cincinnati.

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:31.980
<v Speaker 14>I know.

0:58:32.100 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I am used to talking about Regs. We will again.

0:58:35.060 --> 0:58:37.860
<v Speaker 1>I heard Lance earlier do it, and then he was

0:58:38.340 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>stroking out. And then he's like, I don't even know

0:58:39.860 --> 0:58:41.550
<v Speaker 1>why I brought it up. I was driving in going,

0:58:41.590 --> 0:58:44.270
<v Speaker 1>why are you hurting yourself? You're hurting me too. But

0:58:44.290 --> 0:58:47.530
<v Speaker 1>then he played that awesome Nuxie thing from back in

0:58:47.550 --> 0:58:49.290
<v Speaker 1>the day too, which was awesome. And if you didn't

0:58:49.310 --> 0:58:52.290
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to hear it, don't do it now. Later,

0:58:52.310 --> 0:58:54.630
<v Speaker 1>check out the podcast. And then you'll be able to

0:58:54.670 --> 0:58:56.850
<v Speaker 1>hear it, too. It's a beautiful thing. Russ Jackson, keep

0:58:56.870 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>me online and in time. Lee Mallon's got news. And

0:59:01.180 --> 0:59:05.570
<v Speaker 1>we got, let's see, Mike D. Wall from Space.com coming

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:08.590
<v Speaker 1>up after the 11 o'clock report. Going to talk about

0:59:08.610 --> 0:59:11.490
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station. they uh just uh i was

0:59:11.510 --> 0:59:13.709
<v Speaker 1>going to say jetted but they i mean they kind

0:59:13.770 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of did but the just the spacex rocket got up

0:59:17.220 --> 0:59:19.300
<v Speaker 1>there and then hooked up to the space station and

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole new cruise up there so we'll talk to

0:59:21.060 --> 0:59:23.770
<v Speaker 1>mike about all that and Kevin Carr also with his

0:59:23.810 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>new Digger movie, and maybe a little horror speak. It's October.

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 9>Horror.

0:59:28.060 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>H-O-R-R-O-R. I'm trying to enunciate more clearly. I said horror,

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:39.140
<v Speaker 1>like Rocky Horror, not another word that sounded a little

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:42.630
<v Speaker 1>too much like. You know what's horrific, though, is the

0:59:42.690 --> 0:59:48.590
<v Speaker 1>story of– Rush Jackson's the best, yes. Krista Pike's conviction

0:59:49.450 --> 0:59:53.050
<v Speaker 1>in this trial, in the sentencing for the murder, the abuse,

0:59:53.470 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the arguable torture, the butchering of this woman. It took

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:04.820
<v Speaker 1>30 years from prosecution to execution, 31 years since the

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:07.580
<v Speaker 1>whole thing began. She was 20 years old when it happened.

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:10.940
<v Speaker 1>And I understand. I had a couple of people message

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:15.380
<v Speaker 1>saying that people are acting like somehow Krista Gail Pike,

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:18.410
<v Speaker 1>50-year-old woman in Tennessee right now getting medical care in

1:00:18.490 --> 1:00:21.310
<v Speaker 1>some fashion because they tried to execute her not just once,

1:00:22.950 --> 1:00:27.010
<v Speaker 1>but twice and couldn't get it done. And people saying, well,

1:00:27.030 --> 1:00:29.890
<v Speaker 1>maybe she should be let go or whatever else. I

1:00:29.890 --> 1:00:32.830
<v Speaker 1>don't know what condition she'd be in to be let go.

1:00:33.150 --> 1:00:35.210
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know why it took 30 years if

1:00:35.250 --> 1:00:38.230
<v Speaker 1>you have a death penalty and someone's admitted it. And

1:00:38.750 --> 1:00:41.290
<v Speaker 1>they've been convicted. And it's not a question of like

1:00:41.910 --> 1:00:46.470
<v Speaker 1>wrongful conviction or some type of other malpractice of the

1:00:46.510 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>judicial system, you know, or somebody fingered the wrong person.

1:00:50.550 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's someone who admitted it. And Tennessee couldn't get it

1:00:57.580 --> 1:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>done twice. I just don't know if we're going to

1:01:02.540 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have a death penalty and figure out how to kill people.

1:01:06.890 --> 1:01:10.710
<v Speaker 1>It's that simple. And I had, hold on a minute,

1:01:11.130 --> 1:01:13.150
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get to Nick and Bill and Randy is

1:01:13.170 --> 1:01:14.650
<v Speaker 1>going to lead it off and there's room for you.

1:01:14.710 --> 1:01:16.610
<v Speaker 1>Pick up the phone, give it the finger, 513-749-7800, the

1:01:16.630 --> 1:01:20.190
<v Speaker 1>big one. We'll rip through the calls here in just

1:01:20.230 --> 1:01:23.030
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But I just want to say this. I mean,

1:01:23.270 --> 1:01:25.870
<v Speaker 1>if we have a death penalty, if we decide that

1:01:25.990 --> 1:01:29.030
<v Speaker 1>it's not about, forget about the money aspect, because it's

1:01:29.090 --> 1:01:32.590
<v Speaker 1>more expensive to go through the execution process just with

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the appeals and the opportunity in that process to make

1:01:35.700 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that somebody has an opportunity to defend themselves, and

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:45.710
<v Speaker 1>effectively their life, right, costs way more than just keeping

1:01:45.730 --> 1:01:48.910
<v Speaker 1>them locked up for the rest of their lives. So

1:01:49.270 --> 1:01:53.750
<v Speaker 1>forget about the financial aspect. I ask this, too. Is

1:01:53.790 --> 1:01:59.939
<v Speaker 1>it a deterrent? Maybe the failure to complete the execution

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>could very well be a little bit more of a deterrent,

1:02:04.700 --> 1:02:08.690
<v Speaker 1>but I doubt it. you know, to keep people from

1:02:08.730 --> 1:02:11.490
<v Speaker 1>doing crime, because we hear that a lot. I used

1:02:11.530 --> 1:02:13.970
<v Speaker 1>to think that way. I don't know that criminals now go,

1:02:13.990 --> 1:02:15.740
<v Speaker 1>you know, I might get executed. They might put me

1:02:15.800 --> 1:02:19.100
<v Speaker 1>on death row. Maybe I ought to get a regular job.

1:02:19.480 --> 1:02:21.660
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I ought to stop this horrible life of crime

1:02:21.700 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of mine. Maybe I ought to reevaluate and start living

1:02:24.540 --> 1:02:27.050
<v Speaker 1>the right life rather than the wrong life, because they

1:02:27.090 --> 1:02:29.310
<v Speaker 1>might try to stick me and fail to execute me.

1:02:29.950 --> 1:02:32.830
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's possible, right? Or is it just a

1:02:32.870 --> 1:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>punishment issue? What is the point of it if we

1:02:36.760 --> 1:02:40.070
<v Speaker 1>can't do it? To Redding and Randy, Nick and others

1:02:40.230 --> 1:02:42.550
<v Speaker 1>up after you on a Friday, Sterling. Randy, what do

1:02:42.570 --> 1:02:44.190
<v Speaker 1>you think? Appreciate you listening to The Big One and

1:02:44.230 --> 1:02:44.810
<v Speaker 1>joining the show.

1:02:46.370 --> 1:02:48.050
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thanks for having me, Sterling.

1:02:48.170 --> 1:02:48.570
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sir.

1:02:48.990 --> 1:02:57.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, on this botched execution, I don't know if everybody

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>has had access to the information of what this lady did.

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:05.620
<v Speaker 4>I happened to listen to Dan.

1:03:05.340 --> 1:03:10.140
<v Speaker 2>Carroll last night, and he described what this woman had done.

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And if more people had known that, they'd be.

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:14.950
<v Speaker 5>Like, oh, my goodness.

1:03:15.620 --> 1:03:21.510
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, if it was a botched execution, which is

1:03:21.570 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a laugh, I mean, but.

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:29.270
<v Speaker 2>And she's on life support in a hospital, then I

1:03:29.290 --> 1:03:30.689
<v Speaker 2>guess she's in a coma, right?

1:03:31.290 --> 1:03:33.330
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if she's in a state that they

1:03:33.370 --> 1:03:38.410
<v Speaker 1>put her in or if the actual attempted executions, plural,

1:03:39.050 --> 1:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>somehow put her in a state of unconsciousness long term.

1:03:42.380 --> 1:03:45.340
<v Speaker 1>I don't know all the details in that regard because

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen conflicting reports out of Tennessee on this from

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:51.850
<v Speaker 1>national media and local media. But what I can tell you,

1:03:52.050 --> 1:03:53.810
<v Speaker 1>and for those who don't know, and here's the thing,

1:03:54.690 --> 1:03:58.610
<v Speaker 1>whether it was something that was less heinous but still

1:03:58.950 --> 1:04:02.890
<v Speaker 1>worthy of the death penalty in Tennessee or any other state,

1:04:03.170 --> 1:04:05.690
<v Speaker 1>what I wonder is this, because you said something, Randy,

1:04:06.250 --> 1:04:09.220
<v Speaker 1>that is very interesting. When you looked up and saw

1:04:09.260 --> 1:04:11.420
<v Speaker 1>the details of what she was convicted of with these

1:04:11.460 --> 1:04:16.290
<v Speaker 1>two other people, which was apparently her boyfriend, And somebody else,

1:04:17.050 --> 1:04:20.330
<v Speaker 1>they lured this person, this girl, into a wooded area

1:04:20.770 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in Knoxville. I just lived right near there, actually, in

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the 80s for a little bit. They tortured her. They

1:04:27.820 --> 1:04:31.380
<v Speaker 1>used a box cutter, a meat cleaver. It's been reported

1:04:31.420 --> 1:04:33.590
<v Speaker 1>that a chunk of asphalt to crack her in her

1:04:33.690 --> 1:04:38.410
<v Speaker 1>skull when apparently she was not dead yet. And Pike

1:04:38.450 --> 1:04:41.860
<v Speaker 1>confessed to all of it. Uh, and one person sort

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:43.700
<v Speaker 1>of was the rat of the group. The other person

1:04:43.740 --> 1:04:45.910
<v Speaker 1>got some time, but not, you know, with a chance

1:04:45.950 --> 1:04:48.890
<v Speaker 1>of parole for life. Uh, and Pike got the, the

1:04:48.910 --> 1:04:54.470
<v Speaker 1>debt penalty. So, I mean, what do you do? What

1:04:54.490 --> 1:04:55.610
<v Speaker 1>do you do right now with her?

1:04:58.280 --> 1:04:59.900
<v Speaker 5>Um, I don't know.

1:04:59.940 --> 1:05:02.939
<v Speaker 2>Didn't we all grow up with, um, if at first

1:05:02.980 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you don't succeed.

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Try, try again.

1:05:04.940 --> 1:05:08.500
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, yeah, yeah. Randy, I appreciate the comments.

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I just it's very difficult to sort of,

1:05:15.020 --> 1:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, process this. And I feel dirty and sort

1:05:17.920 --> 1:05:24.700
<v Speaker 1>of sick, honestly. Talking about the suffering of not just

1:05:24.740 --> 1:05:28.820
<v Speaker 1>the woman who was murdered, which is bad enough, but

1:05:28.860 --> 1:05:31.790
<v Speaker 1>then the execution, which I don't know, is that murder

1:05:31.850 --> 1:05:33.930
<v Speaker 1>or not murder? I've had people messaging me telling me

1:05:33.950 --> 1:05:36.490
<v Speaker 1>they think it's effectively the same as murder or in

1:05:36.530 --> 1:05:41.110
<v Speaker 1>this case, torture, they say. Or what? I mean, where

1:05:41.190 --> 1:05:44.530
<v Speaker 1>is the line of what's okay? Whether it was as

1:05:44.590 --> 1:05:48.100
<v Speaker 1>gruesome as I described or something else, if convicted and

1:05:48.140 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to death, what does it matter? If it was

1:05:50.460 --> 1:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite as gruesome, would you be more willing to go, oh,

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>let her out? Or what? To Terrace Park and Nick,

1:05:56.720 --> 1:05:59.780
<v Speaker 1>then Sam, and room for you.

1:05:59.800 --> 1:06:00.200
<v Speaker 5>513-749-7800.

1:06:00.220 --> 1:06:02.470
<v Speaker 1>The big one was Sterling. Nick, what's up? How are you?

1:06:03.870 --> 1:06:04.430
<v Speaker 5>I'm good, man.

1:06:04.470 --> 1:06:04.790
<v Speaker 3>How are you?

1:06:07.640 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>What's that, buddy? I'm sorry, you cut out.

1:06:10.320 --> 1:06:10.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry.

1:06:10.740 --> 1:06:12.180
<v Speaker 11>I was just saying, I'm good.

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 13>How are you?

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.110
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm all right. I'm still here. So, you know,

1:06:15.450 --> 1:06:17.530
<v Speaker 1>I'm not on live support. I'm talking to you. I'm

1:06:17.570 --> 1:06:21.370
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with Russ Jackson, you know, and everything is great, man.

1:06:22.090 --> 1:06:24.150
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for asking. Tell me about this case and

1:06:24.190 --> 1:06:25.930
<v Speaker 1>what you think about this circumstance.

1:06:27.130 --> 1:06:32.190
<v Speaker 11>You know, I feel like the circumstance is unfortunate, but

1:06:32.210 --> 1:06:35.930
<v Speaker 11>I feel like it's kind of on Tennessee from what

1:06:35.970 --> 1:06:39.350
<v Speaker 11>I've read and what I've heard. Tennessee is using only

1:06:39.570 --> 1:06:44.760
<v Speaker 11>one drug, pentobarbital. And, you know, some of the other

1:06:44.780 --> 1:06:50.660
<v Speaker 11>states that still do executions, they're using like a cocktail

1:06:50.680 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 11>of like four drugs.

1:06:52.120 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>They can't get them because some of the companies weren't

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>willing to sell them because they did not want them

1:06:56.960 --> 1:07:00.090
<v Speaker 1>used for executions rather than other purposes.

1:07:01.130 --> 1:07:01.390
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

1:07:01.610 --> 1:07:01.870
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

1:07:02.370 --> 1:07:06.650
<v Speaker 11>But, uh, I believe like I think effective July for

1:07:06.730 --> 1:07:12.540
<v Speaker 11>either June or July 1st, Idaho is now using firing

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:15.460
<v Speaker 11>squad as a primary method of execution.

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:15.939
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:07:16.420 --> 1:07:16.620
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

1:07:17.220 --> 1:07:19.260
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it used to be the difference they would

1:07:19.300 --> 1:07:22.290
<v Speaker 1>have across the country. They would hang people. They would

1:07:22.310 --> 1:07:26.270
<v Speaker 1>electrocute them. There would be a gassing. There would be

1:07:26.770 --> 1:07:29.390
<v Speaker 1>a firing squad, as you mentioned. What else is there?

1:07:31.390 --> 1:07:33.820
<v Speaker 1>I guess now this, the lethal injection, which ain't so lethal.

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:35.340
<v Speaker 14>Right.

1:07:35.560 --> 1:07:38.340
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, we got many options. Would you, I mean, see,

1:07:38.620 --> 1:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what type of person would you have to be to

1:07:40.940 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>step up to be the person to do the deed?

1:07:43.980 --> 1:07:46.290
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be a very difficult thing to

1:07:46.510 --> 1:07:49.430
<v Speaker 1>ask of someone to live with themselves. That's why they

1:07:49.470 --> 1:07:52.370
<v Speaker 1>have that multiple thing where they'd be like you, me,

1:07:52.390 --> 1:07:54.970
<v Speaker 1>and another guy hitting a button and not knowing which

1:07:55.110 --> 1:07:58.070
<v Speaker 1>one actually was responsible for it. And that's what they

1:07:58.090 --> 1:08:00.850
<v Speaker 1>have done historically in a lot of places. what do

1:08:00.890 --> 1:08:03.380
<v Speaker 1>you think should happen with the death penalty? Anything open

1:08:03.390 --> 1:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it up wider, like you mentioned with the firing squad

1:08:05.580 --> 1:08:05.900
<v Speaker 1>or what?

1:08:07.100 --> 1:08:09.220
<v Speaker 7>Honestly, I think open it up wider.

1:08:09.400 --> 1:08:12.840
<v Speaker 11>Like, you know, these criminals are not, they're not getting

1:08:12.860 --> 1:08:16.349
<v Speaker 11>a slap on the wrist and you know, you, you

1:08:16.370 --> 1:08:20.470
<v Speaker 11>have to earn the death penalty. Um, so it's like,

1:08:21.229 --> 1:08:23.870
<v Speaker 11>I say, open it up wider, find a different method. That's,

1:08:24.260 --> 1:08:29.229
<v Speaker 11>you know, at least nine out of 10 times successful.

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a good number, really, nine out of 10.

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:36.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, even if it was eight, I don't know.

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>If we were king, if we were boss, if we

1:08:40.820 --> 1:08:42.580
<v Speaker 1>were making the rules, we were lawmakers and we were

1:08:42.600 --> 1:08:45.090
<v Speaker 1>looking at this process, and let's twist it this way,

1:08:45.100 --> 1:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll take some more calls, and I'll ask

1:08:46.470 --> 1:08:49.610
<v Speaker 1>you this, Nick, and get others' opinion too. So do

1:08:49.650 --> 1:08:52.870
<v Speaker 1>we give the person to be executed the choice and

1:08:52.990 --> 1:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>method of their ending? Or do we leave that up

1:08:57.439 --> 1:09:01.460
<v Speaker 1>to those who were victimized by the convicted?

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:03.940
<v Speaker 11>You know, why not?

1:09:04.120 --> 1:09:05.100
<v Speaker 7>Give them the choice.

1:09:05.120 --> 1:09:10.929
<v Speaker 11>You know, if there's five fairly successful methods, you know,

1:09:11.410 --> 1:09:12.110
<v Speaker 11>give them the choice.

1:09:12.450 --> 1:09:14.750
<v Speaker 1>And if they fail, do you, as I think it

1:09:14.790 --> 1:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was Nikki who called earlier, if I'm not mistaken, And

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:19.860
<v Speaker 1>she said that, you know, it's sort of like that

1:09:20.300 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Commodores thing, like the once, twice, three times a lady thing.

1:09:23.720 --> 1:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the first time, we'll try again because it

1:09:25.780 --> 1:09:27.820
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite work. And then the third time, well, do

1:09:27.840 --> 1:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you let her free or what?

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 7>No, absolutely not.

1:09:31.760 --> 1:09:36.210
<v Speaker 11>These people on death row earned their spot. And, you know,

1:09:36.330 --> 1:09:38.090
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that's an option. And I will say

1:09:38.130 --> 1:09:40.470
<v Speaker 11>you handled yourself pretty well with that caller because I

1:09:40.470 --> 1:09:42.310
<v Speaker 11>was I was getting worked up in the car.

1:09:42.410 --> 1:09:43.570
<v Speaker 3>I was like, what do you mean?

1:09:44.380 --> 1:09:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, that used to be the method that they would

1:09:46.979 --> 1:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>operate in some cases in that they would have like

1:09:50.060 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the first or second attempt. And after that, they'd let

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you go, which is true. But then, I mean, you know,

1:09:54.920 --> 1:09:57.510
<v Speaker 1>it's it's what happened to your next son. I mean,

1:09:57.530 --> 1:09:59.170
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of like, you know, hang them high kind

1:09:59.210 --> 1:10:02.310
<v Speaker 1>of scenario. And Eastwood wasn't even guilty. That was a

1:10:02.350 --> 1:10:05.150
<v Speaker 1>wrongful hanging. I'm sorry, that was an obscure reference to

1:10:05.189 --> 1:10:07.849
<v Speaker 1>a classic film. Sorry about that, Nick. Appreciate the call, man.

1:10:07.870 --> 1:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Let's get Bruce on and then Sam. What

1:10:11.479 --> 1:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>about this case in Tennessee and this Pike woman who

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>now is in waiting for whatever comes next?

1:10:18.439 --> 1:10:19.660
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're talking to me, Bruce?

1:10:20.260 --> 1:10:22.620
<v Speaker 1>You're Bruce, I'm Sterling, and you're on the big one. Yeah,

1:10:22.640 --> 1:10:25.300
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to you. You're talking to me. I am

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:26.460
<v Speaker 1>honored to talk to you.

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:30.290
<v Speaker 4>All right, then, same here. I've got two solutions to

1:10:30.310 --> 1:10:33.170
<v Speaker 4>the death penalty. The first one's easy. Have all these

1:10:33.210 --> 1:10:36.290
<v Speaker 4>states come to Hamlin County and buy some fentanyl and

1:10:36.330 --> 1:10:38.330
<v Speaker 4>eliminate everybody on death row in one day.

1:10:39.689 --> 1:10:40.139
<v Speaker 1>That could be.

1:10:40.150 --> 1:10:43.599
<v Speaker 4>That's always deadly. That's always deadly. It doesn't cost much.

1:10:43.620 --> 1:10:45.840
<v Speaker 4>For 50 bucks, you could kill 5,000 people.

1:10:47.000 --> 1:10:49.820
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done that research, but yeah, that might be

1:10:49.860 --> 1:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a way to do it. And that drug is readily available.

1:10:52.620 --> 1:10:55.059
<v Speaker 1>And those who have it are willing to sell it.

1:10:56.320 --> 1:10:59.590
<v Speaker 4>You betcha. And my other solution is to, if this

1:10:59.620 --> 1:11:03.110
<v Speaker 4>lady's on death row, to tissue match her. And when

1:11:03.130 --> 1:11:06.150
<v Speaker 4>they've got all her organs matched, you see signs everywhere,

1:11:06.189 --> 1:11:08.269
<v Speaker 4>you know, Joni needs a kidney and all this stuff.

1:11:08.390 --> 1:11:09.090
<v Speaker 1>Can't do that now.

1:11:09.110 --> 1:11:11.530
<v Speaker 3>Once you get her organs matched, knock her out.

1:11:11.800 --> 1:11:15.020
<v Speaker 1>Once they give her the drugs, though, those, as I

1:11:15.080 --> 1:11:17.780
<v Speaker 1>understand it, once you put that through, I think a

1:11:17.840 --> 1:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the stuff that would be able to be reused,

1:11:20.740 --> 1:11:23.300
<v Speaker 1>like I have two friends, well, actually two of three

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:26.009
<v Speaker 1>friends who, one has only one kidney now. One has

1:11:26.060 --> 1:11:28.170
<v Speaker 1>three because they got an extra. because one of them

1:11:28.250 --> 1:11:30.910
<v Speaker 1>failed and somebody else now just has two because they

1:11:30.950 --> 1:11:35.410
<v Speaker 1>had a transplant. I hope it's not catchy. But that

1:11:35.450 --> 1:11:39.570
<v Speaker 1>being said, apparently with the lethal injection, just like with

1:11:39.610 --> 1:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the execution, the pieces and parts aren't available for reuse.

1:11:44.979 --> 1:11:45.820
<v Speaker 4>It's not possible.

1:11:46.320 --> 1:11:47.180
<v Speaker 3>I'll accept that one.

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:49.720
<v Speaker 4>We'll give them Fenton Hall and call it a day.

1:11:50.380 --> 1:11:52.860
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you may be right. So you're okay

1:11:52.900 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with the death penalty. What's interesting is I've had like

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:59.540
<v Speaker 1>communique by electronic. that has been more against the death

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:02.500
<v Speaker 1>penalty and more people going, it's okay, just get it

1:12:02.580 --> 1:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right by phone.

1:12:04.479 --> 1:12:07.860
<v Speaker 4>Somebody strangled my granddaughter to death. They wouldn't have to

1:12:07.900 --> 1:12:09.900
<v Speaker 4>worry about the death penalty. They'd never make it to

1:12:09.939 --> 1:12:11.060
<v Speaker 4>the courthouse.

1:12:11.120 --> 1:12:14.100
<v Speaker 1>And that's a tough position right there to be in, right?

1:12:14.340 --> 1:12:17.580
<v Speaker 1>Because you want retribution, but then you are taken from

1:12:17.620 --> 1:12:20.090
<v Speaker 1>your family because you will put yourself in the same

1:12:20.150 --> 1:12:24.330
<v Speaker 1>position by taking another's life, even though that retribution feels

1:12:24.370 --> 1:12:27.020
<v Speaker 1>like you're doing the right thing. That ends up causing

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:27.820
<v Speaker 1>more pain, too.

1:12:29.060 --> 1:12:31.670
<v Speaker 4>I'm 77. I can't wait 30 years for somebody to

1:12:31.710 --> 1:12:32.450
<v Speaker 4>be executed.

1:12:32.610 --> 1:12:35.010
<v Speaker 1>I just had a conversation with somebody about that the

1:12:35.050 --> 1:12:36.610
<v Speaker 1>other day, and they were like, I'm old enough. I'll

1:12:36.650 --> 1:12:39.590
<v Speaker 1>take the hit. And that's basically what you just said.

1:12:40.210 --> 1:12:40.630
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

1:12:41.590 --> 1:12:42.969
<v Speaker 4>I'm definitely on the back nine.

1:12:42.990 --> 1:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope you play it well. Keep in the fairway, brother. Bruce,

1:12:48.820 --> 1:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it was good to talk to you. I appreciate you

1:12:50.780 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>listening and being a part of the show. I hope

1:12:52.060 --> 1:12:52.620
<v Speaker 1>you'll call again.

1:12:54.390 --> 1:12:55.620
<v Speaker 4>Same to you. I like listening to you.

1:12:55.630 --> 1:12:56.309
<v Speaker 3>You're a good man.

1:12:56.370 --> 1:12:58.150
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Bruce. Take care of yourself, man. Thanks for

1:12:58.170 --> 1:13:00.210
<v Speaker 1>the kind words, too. To Florence and Sam, it's your

1:13:00.270 --> 1:13:01.950
<v Speaker 1>turn with Sterling on the big one. What do you have?

1:13:01.970 --> 1:13:03.980
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Sterling.

1:13:04.060 --> 1:13:08.280
<v Speaker 9>I don't see why we can't use the drug fentanyl,

1:13:09.040 --> 1:13:13.780
<v Speaker 9>which is so deadly, and we can get free from

1:13:13.840 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 9>coming across the border. There's no cost to it. I

1:13:18.760 --> 1:13:22.179
<v Speaker 9>just don't understand why we have such a problem getting

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:28.469
<v Speaker 9>the correct drugs to put them... They're on death row.

1:13:28.610 --> 1:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, no, I got you.

1:13:29.210 --> 1:13:31.070
<v Speaker 4>They've committed a heinous crime.

1:13:31.250 --> 1:13:33.410
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

1:13:33.950 --> 1:13:35.889
<v Speaker 4>They shouldn't have a choice.

1:13:38.170 --> 1:13:42.269
<v Speaker 9>If you've committed a crime that the courts have decided

1:13:42.850 --> 1:13:46.550
<v Speaker 9>to take your life, it should happen within five years.

1:13:47.750 --> 1:13:56.710
<v Speaker 9>I think Texas has, like, a high-speed... A high-speed lane

1:13:56.750 --> 1:13:59.759
<v Speaker 9>for death row people, I mean, within five years, you're gone.

1:13:59.780 --> 1:14:02.140
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think they had to. Florida used to be

1:14:02.180 --> 1:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty quick with it, too, once they got that up

1:14:04.460 --> 1:14:08.090
<v Speaker 1>and running again. I think once you've exercised– if you've

1:14:08.130 --> 1:14:11.950
<v Speaker 1>exercised your opportunity to have appeal and if you have

1:14:11.970 --> 1:14:14.950
<v Speaker 1>been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt– I've had the

1:14:14.979 --> 1:14:17.650
<v Speaker 1>Innocent Project people on before. And when I lived in–

1:14:17.820 --> 1:14:20.099
<v Speaker 1>I left here and went to work in Louisiana for

1:14:20.120 --> 1:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, and there's a place called Angola. I don't

1:14:22.680 --> 1:14:24.500
<v Speaker 1>know if it's still open, but it was in the

1:14:24.560 --> 1:14:26.350
<v Speaker 1>news a lot at the time. And at that point,

1:14:26.430 --> 1:14:28.610
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans was like the murder capital of the country

1:14:28.670 --> 1:14:31.970
<v Speaker 1>per capita. So I kept getting calls from everybody up

1:14:32.010 --> 1:14:33.210
<v Speaker 1>here going, are you all right? You need to come

1:14:33.250 --> 1:14:35.910
<v Speaker 1>back home to Ohio. You're going to Cincinnati. Come to Dayton.

1:14:35.930 --> 1:14:38.570
<v Speaker 1>You're going to die. I survived. I had never had

1:14:38.610 --> 1:14:41.150
<v Speaker 1>a problem down there. However, there was a guy in

1:14:41.550 --> 1:14:43.970
<v Speaker 1>Angola who had been sentenced and had been there for

1:14:44.010 --> 1:14:46.479
<v Speaker 1>like decades, and they found he was innocent. And it

1:14:46.490 --> 1:14:48.700
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal. At one point, it was going

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:51.580
<v Speaker 1>to be some type of execution. in this somehow that

1:14:51.620 --> 1:14:54.059
<v Speaker 1>got sidelined and then when they found that he had

1:14:54.120 --> 1:14:56.730
<v Speaker 1>wrong been wrongfully convicted the only way they'd let him

1:14:56.950 --> 1:14:59.610
<v Speaker 1>out this poor guy is to say that he couldn't

1:14:59.670 --> 1:15:04.370
<v Speaker 1>sue them which was bewildering to me and so he

1:15:04.410 --> 1:15:06.710
<v Speaker 1>had to sign that agreement to be able to to

1:15:06.770 --> 1:15:09.940
<v Speaker 1>be free so if you're in that situation it could

1:15:09.979 --> 1:15:11.979
<v Speaker 1>happen and what the way it's been argued to me

1:15:12.060 --> 1:15:15.740
<v Speaker 1>which is really where I become stomped and not sure

1:15:15.780 --> 1:15:18.980
<v Speaker 1>how to think about it is when the idea is

1:15:19.040 --> 1:15:22.340
<v Speaker 1>that what happens If you're poor and you got a

1:15:22.420 --> 1:15:27.629
<v Speaker 1>bad public defender and just because of circumstantial evidence or otherwise,

1:15:27.670 --> 1:15:32.070
<v Speaker 1>you're wrongfully convicted and you end up getting the hangman's

1:15:32.130 --> 1:15:36.010
<v Speaker 1>noose or that executioner's bullet or that lethal injection that

1:15:36.050 --> 1:15:40.570
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go wrong. And then you're the innocent that is killed.

1:15:42.150 --> 1:15:44.849
<v Speaker 1>I mean, imagine that weight on someone if you find

1:15:44.890 --> 1:15:48.030
<v Speaker 1>that out and think about putting someone who's not actually

1:15:48.110 --> 1:15:49.530
<v Speaker 1>responsible for said crime.

1:15:50.200 --> 1:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>But is that the, I'm at a loss for the words,

1:15:58.180 --> 1:15:59.500
<v Speaker 9>but is that the norm?

1:15:59.960 --> 1:16:02.500
<v Speaker 1>Well, it isn't. Hopefully.

1:16:02.560 --> 1:16:03.839
<v Speaker 4>That's the one in a hundred.

1:16:04.040 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, but is it worth that one for the 99

1:16:07.160 --> 1:16:10.610
<v Speaker 1>that deserved it? Because my guess is if you're the

1:16:10.670 --> 1:16:14.210
<v Speaker 1>poor bastard who's in that situation.

1:16:14.550 --> 1:16:16.990
<v Speaker 4>If you're the one in 100, yeah, it would make

1:16:17.010 --> 1:16:17.769
<v Speaker 4>a huge difference.

1:16:18.050 --> 1:16:19.870
<v Speaker 1>And then you have to ask yourself, is the state

1:16:19.930 --> 1:16:23.130
<v Speaker 1>of Tennessee or Ohio or the United States government in

1:16:23.170 --> 1:16:25.809
<v Speaker 1>a situation where we can look up and stand proud

1:16:26.430 --> 1:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about being, you know, the country of countries, if you will,

1:16:31.070 --> 1:16:33.620
<v Speaker 1>to say that we're OK with eliminating the life of

1:16:33.780 --> 1:16:36.670
<v Speaker 1>a few innocents to get the bad? when we could

1:16:36.689 --> 1:16:38.890
<v Speaker 1>just house them for the rest of their lives? Because

1:16:38.910 --> 1:16:40.990
<v Speaker 1>that's effectively, I don't think I was as articulate as

1:16:41.030 --> 1:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it was presented to me in the past in conversations,

1:16:44.150 --> 1:16:46.990
<v Speaker 1>but that then makes me think, and it hits me

1:16:47.020 --> 1:16:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in a different place as I start to rationalize and

1:16:49.460 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>make sense of this circumstance.

1:16:52.180 --> 1:16:57.020
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, but how long does the normal person on death

1:16:57.100 --> 1:17:03.450
<v Speaker 9>row spend on death row while they exhaust their appeals.

1:17:03.470 --> 1:17:05.730
<v Speaker 4>Isn't it like 20 to 25 years?

1:17:05.890 --> 1:17:08.150
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's more expensive to go through that

1:17:08.210 --> 1:17:11.010
<v Speaker 1>process to even get to the execution than just to say, hey,

1:17:11.050 --> 1:17:12.750
<v Speaker 1>you're never going to see the light of day again.

1:17:12.810 --> 1:17:13.769
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy your cell.

1:17:15.110 --> 1:17:17.719
<v Speaker 4>Just bury them under the jail.

1:17:17.960 --> 1:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Just stack them.

1:17:20.040 --> 1:17:22.580
<v Speaker 4>Up with so many charges and so much.

1:17:23.510 --> 1:17:27.010
<v Speaker 9>That they'll never see the light of day problems.

1:17:27.070 --> 1:17:29.769
<v Speaker 1>See, and you just went from one side to the other,

1:17:29.850 --> 1:17:32.389
<v Speaker 1>which is where I am navigating, because part of me goes,

1:17:32.689 --> 1:17:35.650
<v Speaker 1>you know what? I'm not like a killer, right? But

1:17:35.670 --> 1:17:38.730
<v Speaker 1>I know how to defend myself, and I've taken some

1:17:38.770 --> 1:17:42.030
<v Speaker 1>training on firearms, and I can tell you that I

1:17:42.070 --> 1:17:44.110
<v Speaker 1>want to hit body mass, and I can hit somebody

1:17:44.150 --> 1:17:46.930
<v Speaker 1>from a distance, or at least on paper, three in

1:17:46.950 --> 1:17:50.020
<v Speaker 1>the body. So if I can do it, they should

1:17:50.040 --> 1:17:52.180
<v Speaker 1>be able to find somebody who's a pro to do

1:17:52.240 --> 1:17:54.599
<v Speaker 1>it to those who have been sentenced to death.

1:17:56.040 --> 1:18:03.200
<v Speaker 9>Why can't they set up nine firearms with laser sights,

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:09.479
<v Speaker 9>dial right in on the horns, nine people push the button,

1:18:10.970 --> 1:18:12.150
<v Speaker 9>No one knows who did it.

1:18:12.270 --> 1:18:12.450
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:18:12.510 --> 1:18:14.970
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they've done historically with three. And then

1:18:15.010 --> 1:18:17.570
<v Speaker 1>you don't know. It was great call. I appreciate talking

1:18:17.590 --> 1:18:18.309
<v Speaker 1>to you.

1:18:18.830 --> 1:18:21.350
<v Speaker 4>Why can't you do it with nine and just be

1:18:21.390 --> 1:18:21.930
<v Speaker 4>done with it?

1:18:21.950 --> 1:18:23.750
<v Speaker 1>Well, that may be. We'll see how it goes. We're

1:18:23.770 --> 1:18:26.150
<v Speaker 1>short on time. I appreciate the call. Ken, you've been

1:18:26.170 --> 1:18:28.349
<v Speaker 1>holding on for like a while. You got about 45

1:18:28.350 --> 1:18:29.170
<v Speaker 1>seconds to a minute.

1:18:29.390 --> 1:18:29.630
<v Speaker 10>Go.

1:18:29.729 --> 1:18:31.070
<v Speaker 1>I hate to do that to you, but I'd rather

1:18:31.110 --> 1:18:33.270
<v Speaker 1>get you on than rather than have you sit through longer.

1:18:35.250 --> 1:18:35.550
<v Speaker 3>Hey, brother.

1:18:35.590 --> 1:18:36.310
<v Speaker 4>How are you doing?

1:18:36.410 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right, man. Just, you know, hanging out, talking

1:18:38.610 --> 1:18:39.230
<v Speaker 1>to you. Life's good.

1:18:39.229 --> 1:18:40.850
<v Speaker 15>Hey, that is good.

1:18:40.850 --> 1:18:43.820
<v Speaker 13>Hey, I'm not on death row, though.

1:18:43.820 --> 1:18:46.100
<v Speaker 1>So that's even better. Even better.

1:18:46.240 --> 1:18:46.519
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:18:48.260 --> 1:18:51.460
<v Speaker 14>So what about, you know, I don't, I don't, I've,

1:18:51.600 --> 1:18:57.000
<v Speaker 14>I've heard that this, this person who, uh, had a botched, uh,

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:00.220
<v Speaker 14>death sentence.

1:18:59.820 --> 1:19:00.660
<v Speaker 4>Or whatever it was.

1:19:01.380 --> 1:19:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Um, and she's not the first for the year.

1:19:03.780 --> 1:19:04.059
<v Speaker 7>Right.

1:19:04.280 --> 1:19:07.530
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there, there's been other botched death.

1:19:08.610 --> 1:19:11.809
<v Speaker 1>Uh, I will take a look and make sure that

1:19:11.830 --> 1:19:16.010
<v Speaker 1>I speak correctly about botched 2026 executions. I'll have to

1:19:16.050 --> 1:19:16.610
<v Speaker 1>take a look.

1:19:17.550 --> 1:19:21.030
<v Speaker 13>Apparently there, and I don't know, I don't have the

1:19:21.410 --> 1:19:24.269
<v Speaker 13>details on this, there's a doctor who was assigned to this,

1:19:24.890 --> 1:19:28.309
<v Speaker 13>and he was assigned to another one previously, and the

1:19:28.350 --> 1:19:33.980
<v Speaker 13>same type of thing happened. So apparently it's harder to

1:19:34.020 --> 1:19:36.320
<v Speaker 13>kill somebody than you think.

1:19:36.640 --> 1:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unless you're the person who's been sentenced to death

1:19:39.880 --> 1:19:42.889
<v Speaker 1>and apparently it was pretty damn easy unfortunately too easy

1:19:42.910 --> 1:19:45.830
<v Speaker 1>ken i appreciate the call second in tennessee this year

1:19:46.590 --> 1:19:52.229
<v Speaker 1>thank you russ so uh yeah twice so they failed

1:19:52.260 --> 1:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with her twice and failed with another and then they

1:19:55.560 --> 1:19:57.900
<v Speaker 1>got it right i guess right so that's how that

1:19:57.920 --> 1:20:01.300
<v Speaker 1>goes that uh that's not a good average really when

1:20:01.320 --> 1:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you think about it maybe they need to have training,

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:06.820
<v Speaker 1>continuing education or something along those lines. You know, the

1:20:06.840 --> 1:20:08.990
<v Speaker 1>thing is, though, it's not as easy as we make

1:20:09.030 --> 1:20:10.950
<v Speaker 1>it sound. And it's easy for me to sit here

1:20:10.970 --> 1:20:13.370
<v Speaker 1>behind a microphone or somebody else to kill, kill, kill.

1:20:13.830 --> 1:20:16.090
<v Speaker 1>But imagine, you know, everyone else involved in this. It's

1:20:16.110 --> 1:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just a horrible tragedy. And where's the justice for the

1:20:19.840 --> 1:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>dead girl?

1:20:21.360 --> 1:20:21.580
<v Speaker 3>Really?

1:20:21.860 --> 1:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Seriously. The news straight away. Lee Mowen has your 11

1:20:24.600 --> 1:20:27.309
<v Speaker 1>o'clock report. Mike Wall joins me from Space.com. On the

1:20:27.350 --> 1:20:31.490
<v Speaker 1>other side, we'll talk International Space Station, Spacemen, NASA, and more,

1:20:31.550 --> 1:20:35.670
<v Speaker 1>plus Kevin Carr. Hang out. Best Bengals coverage. Bearcats play here.

1:20:35.830 --> 1:20:42.130
<v Speaker 1>Bengals do, too. 700 WLW Cincinnati. Mike D. Wall, Space.com.

1:20:43.660 --> 1:20:46.550
<v Speaker 1>He knows a thing or two about space and technology.

1:20:46.560 --> 1:20:49.570
<v Speaker 1>He's an Ohio guy out west. And I appreciate him

1:20:49.590 --> 1:20:51.929
<v Speaker 1>making time to join us again. It's been a while.

1:20:51.950 --> 1:20:56.630
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this because the ISS, the International

1:20:56.689 --> 1:20:59.830
<v Speaker 1>Space Station, has a new crew of astronauts that were

1:20:59.850 --> 1:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>brought there aboard a SpaceX rocket. And I saw one

1:21:04.040 --> 1:21:07.430
<v Speaker 1>of the most amazing statistics ever. And I need you

1:21:07.450 --> 1:21:12.710
<v Speaker 1>to confirm or deny this. Did this rocket and these

1:21:12.950 --> 1:21:16.729
<v Speaker 1>astronauts leave Earth? I would say lifting off or taking

1:21:16.850 --> 1:21:19.220
<v Speaker 1>off the way I would depart CBG to, say, head

1:21:19.229 --> 1:21:22.340
<v Speaker 1>to Vegas or somewhere else like San Francisco, the Bay

1:21:22.360 --> 1:21:25.990
<v Speaker 1>Area where you are, whatever. but it'd take about five hours,

1:21:26.050 --> 1:21:27.769
<v Speaker 1>five and a half to fly from here to like

1:21:27.790 --> 1:21:29.890
<v Speaker 1>where you are. Uh, it would take a couple of

1:21:29.930 --> 1:21:32.090
<v Speaker 1>days to drive from here to Vegas and another day,

1:21:32.170 --> 1:21:35.710
<v Speaker 1>probably from Vegas to where you are yet eight hours

1:21:35.830 --> 1:21:38.990
<v Speaker 1>to get from liftoff to the space station. Is that accurate?

1:21:40.590 --> 1:21:41.190
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

1:21:41.250 --> 1:21:43.490
<v Speaker 10>It took them like a little less than that, actually

1:21:43.530 --> 1:21:46.740
<v Speaker 10>seven hours, 55 minutes, which is the fastest that an

1:21:46.780 --> 1:21:49.720
<v Speaker 10>American spacecraft has ever made it to the ISS, but

1:21:49.740 --> 1:21:53.200
<v Speaker 10>it's not the actual fastest, like the actual fastest, like

1:21:53.220 --> 1:21:56.849
<v Speaker 10>the like world record is, um, There was a Russian

1:21:56.930 --> 1:21:59.150
<v Speaker 10>Soyuz spacecraft that got there in like three hours and

1:21:59.189 --> 1:21:59.710
<v Speaker 10>three minutes.

1:22:00.010 --> 1:22:00.410
<v Speaker 5>How?

1:22:00.689 --> 1:22:01.129
<v Speaker 9>How?

1:22:01.150 --> 1:22:03.630
<v Speaker 5>That's even crazier. Yeah, it's just quick.

1:22:03.650 --> 1:22:08.429
<v Speaker 10>I mean, they just timed it. Like in that case,

1:22:08.450 --> 1:22:10.210
<v Speaker 10>you know, I mean, when you launch to orbit to

1:22:10.250 --> 1:22:12.970
<v Speaker 10>meet up with the space station, you're basically chasing it

1:22:13.030 --> 1:22:14.330
<v Speaker 10>down and it's all this.

1:22:14.880 --> 1:22:16.560
<v Speaker 5>All these very smart people.

1:22:16.439 --> 1:22:19.640
<v Speaker 10>With math figuring out on which orbit to catch the

1:22:19.680 --> 1:22:24.900
<v Speaker 10>space station. And yeah, this Russian mission back in 2020

1:22:24.900 --> 1:22:26.170
<v Speaker 10>caught it after only two.

1:22:26.070 --> 1:22:26.889
<v Speaker 5>Orbits of Earth.

1:22:26.990 --> 1:22:31.450
<v Speaker 10>Up there at that altitude, 250 miles, you complete one

1:22:31.470 --> 1:22:33.750
<v Speaker 10>orbit of Earth every 90 minutes or so.

1:22:33.930 --> 1:22:35.490
<v Speaker 5>So catching it in three hours means nothing.

1:22:36.180 --> 1:22:38.120
<v Speaker 10>Like you basically chased it down after two orbits of

1:22:38.140 --> 1:22:40.479
<v Speaker 10>the earth, which is all of it's pretty incredible. These

1:22:40.510 --> 1:22:43.090
<v Speaker 10>people are just so smart and they've just figured it

1:22:43.130 --> 1:22:43.530
<v Speaker 10>all out.

1:22:43.610 --> 1:22:46.010
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, I don't know how they do it personally,

1:22:46.030 --> 1:22:47.309
<v Speaker 5>but it's, it's very impressive.

1:22:47.470 --> 1:22:50.189
<v Speaker 1>Just thinking about it makes my head hurt. I mean,

1:22:50.229 --> 1:22:53.179
<v Speaker 1>just trying to process it. I think I've waited damn

1:22:53.200 --> 1:22:55.780
<v Speaker 1>near that long for food at a restaurant before and

1:22:55.820 --> 1:23:01.050
<v Speaker 1>then left. And I mean, seriously, um, Yeah, yeah. What

1:23:01.110 --> 1:23:05.140
<v Speaker 1>is the deal with this particular crew? Because the last time,

1:23:05.180 --> 1:23:07.410
<v Speaker 1>of course, as we know, there was a lot of

1:23:07.450 --> 1:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>news associated with the crew that was stuck there. Then

1:23:10.260 --> 1:23:11.860
<v Speaker 1>they got them out of there. There was a medical

1:23:11.900 --> 1:23:15.140
<v Speaker 1>thing at some point, right? Or something like that. And

1:23:15.160 --> 1:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>now this 13, number 13, they say unlucky since Apollo,

1:23:19.080 --> 1:23:21.939
<v Speaker 1>but here it is back again. What does this group

1:23:22.100 --> 1:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have on their agenda?

1:23:24.640 --> 1:23:29.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, this is just like a standard mission, basically.

1:23:29.080 --> 1:23:30.759
<v Speaker 5>There will hopefully not be any drama.

1:23:30.860 --> 1:23:32.920
<v Speaker 10>And there has been a little bit of drama with

1:23:33.200 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 10>some of the recent ones. Like you were mentioning, this

1:23:38.390 --> 1:23:42.210
<v Speaker 10>is called Crew 13 because it's like the 13th contracted

1:23:42.950 --> 1:23:44.970
<v Speaker 10>flight that SpaceX has done to the space station for

1:23:45.010 --> 1:23:48.820
<v Speaker 10>NASA with astronauts on board. Two flights ago, Crew 11,

1:23:48.820 --> 1:23:51.340
<v Speaker 10>they had to come home about a month early because

1:23:51.380 --> 1:23:54.660
<v Speaker 10>a NASA astronaut on that mission had a medical issue.

1:23:54.680 --> 1:23:56.179
<v Speaker 5>And it was.

1:23:56.100 --> 1:23:58.640
<v Speaker 10>Not life-threatening or anything, but they wanted to get them

1:23:58.680 --> 1:24:01.060
<v Speaker 10>back down to Earth and check it out with all

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:02.280
<v Speaker 10>the equipment that we have down here.

1:24:02.360 --> 1:24:04.440
<v Speaker 5>So that left a month early.

1:24:04.479 --> 1:24:06.939
<v Speaker 10>And so Crew 12, which was the next one, launched

1:24:07.010 --> 1:24:09.870
<v Speaker 10>in February, and they were up there. They've been up

1:24:09.890 --> 1:24:12.690
<v Speaker 10>there since February, so that's a little longer than usual.

1:24:13.370 --> 1:24:16.750
<v Speaker 10>It's usually like a six-month stint. So There's been a

1:24:16.770 --> 1:24:18.610
<v Speaker 10>little drama with some of the recent ones, but yeah,

1:24:18.630 --> 1:24:20.450
<v Speaker 10>hopefully this will be a standard, you know, stay up

1:24:20.490 --> 1:24:23.210
<v Speaker 10>there for six months, do maintenance work on.

1:24:23.189 --> 1:24:25.820
<v Speaker 5>The space station, do some spacewalks.

1:24:25.080 --> 1:24:27.200
<v Speaker 10>To fix stuff or kind of put on some new

1:24:27.240 --> 1:24:29.500
<v Speaker 10>solar arrays, that sort of thing, and do a bunch

1:24:29.520 --> 1:24:34.620
<v Speaker 10>of scientific experiments, you know, figure out what microgravity does

1:24:34.720 --> 1:24:38.470
<v Speaker 10>to various parts of the body, stem cells, how plants grow,

1:24:38.490 --> 1:24:39.830
<v Speaker 10>all that sort of stuff.

1:24:39.830 --> 1:24:40.610
<v Speaker 5>That they regularly do.

1:24:41.729 --> 1:24:43.790
<v Speaker 1>Talking to Mike D. Wall, by the way, a spaceflight

1:24:43.810 --> 1:24:49.230
<v Speaker 1>tech editor, Space.com, about the 13th crew of astronauts in

1:24:49.270 --> 1:24:52.450
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station just taking over there. I'm still

1:24:52.490 --> 1:24:54.630
<v Speaker 1>trying to process three to four hours that the Russians did.

1:24:55.010 --> 1:24:59.900
<v Speaker 1>Eight seems inconceivably just impossible to me. This makes me

1:25:00.000 --> 1:25:05.700
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit more– falling in line to believing

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this could be a regular thing, maybe not for my

1:25:08.660 --> 1:25:11.839
<v Speaker 1>or your generation, but maybe the next generation to almost

1:25:11.900 --> 1:25:15.180
<v Speaker 1>be going up and out there like we do to

1:25:15.220 --> 1:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fly across the country to see a game, friends or family.

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:22.810
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, that's sort of what people who care about

1:25:22.830 --> 1:25:24.830
<v Speaker 10>spaceflight and want us to have a bigger presence up

1:25:24.870 --> 1:25:26.950
<v Speaker 10>there and all that are hoping for, that it becomes

1:25:27.010 --> 1:25:32.360
<v Speaker 10>more routine. And that's what SpaceX is hoping to do

1:25:32.420 --> 1:25:35.080
<v Speaker 10>with Starship, which we've talked about before. And that's another

1:25:35.120 --> 1:25:38.240
<v Speaker 10>thing that actually happened recently. They flew the 14th test

1:25:38.280 --> 1:25:41.260
<v Speaker 10>flight of Starship, that 400-foot-tall rocket.

1:25:41.140 --> 1:25:44.000
<v Speaker 5>That they wanted to use to get people to the

1:25:44.040 --> 1:25:46.740
<v Speaker 5>moon and to Mars. And it was a big deal.

1:25:46.960 --> 1:25:48.639
<v Speaker 10>That flight was on Monday, and that was the first

1:25:48.700 --> 1:25:50.979
<v Speaker 10>time that it went to orbit. And it actually deployed

1:25:51.000 --> 1:25:53.560
<v Speaker 10>satellites into orbit that are still up there doing stuff.

1:25:53.820 --> 1:25:57.980
<v Speaker 10>It deployed 26 Starlink satellites. If Starship works out the

1:25:58.000 --> 1:26:01.059
<v Speaker 10>way Elon Musk wants it to, and we're not.

1:26:00.979 --> 1:26:02.979
<v Speaker 5>Sure what's going to happen, it's still in the test.

1:26:02.800 --> 1:26:05.620
<v Speaker 10>Flight phase, but he's saying that they want to launch

1:26:05.660 --> 1:26:09.030
<v Speaker 10>it like 10,000 times a year or something kind of

1:26:09.050 --> 1:26:12.890
<v Speaker 10>crazy like that and just launch tons of flights and

1:26:14.150 --> 1:26:17.429
<v Speaker 10>just basically have this huge presence in low Earth orbit

1:26:17.490 --> 1:26:20.970
<v Speaker 10>and get people living in space stations up there, multiple

1:26:20.990 --> 1:26:23.839
<v Speaker 10>space stations and moon bases and Mars bases and all

1:26:23.880 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 10>that stuff. That's like That's the long-term future and use

1:26:27.080 --> 1:26:30.260
<v Speaker 10>this thing to like fly around from one spot to

1:26:30.300 --> 1:26:31.060
<v Speaker 10>another on earth.

1:26:31.140 --> 1:26:33.309
<v Speaker 5>It can get anywhere around earth in like an hour.

1:26:33.060 --> 1:26:35.230
<v Speaker 10>Or 90 minutes or something like that. So that's, that's

1:26:35.250 --> 1:26:36.450
<v Speaker 10>like part of the dream too.

1:26:36.570 --> 1:26:36.769
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:26:36.830 --> 1:26:37.850
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Tremendous.

1:26:38.170 --> 1:26:41.150
<v Speaker 1>So how far away, when you say near future, long-term,

1:26:41.470 --> 1:26:43.470
<v Speaker 1>are you talking stuff that we could do or are

1:26:43.510 --> 1:26:46.370
<v Speaker 1>you talking about like stuff, your kids and any future

1:26:46.490 --> 1:26:47.330
<v Speaker 1>ups that I might have?

1:26:48.500 --> 1:26:52.140
<v Speaker 10>Well, if Starship works, then we could just be a

1:26:52.200 --> 1:26:55.020
<v Speaker 10>few years from some of this stuff. Actually, NASA contracted

1:26:55.060 --> 1:26:58.490
<v Speaker 10>SpaceX to use Starship to put its Artemis astronauts on

1:26:58.510 --> 1:27:01.390
<v Speaker 10>the moon, and they want to do that in like 2028.

1:27:01.390 --> 1:27:02.950
<v Speaker 5>So that's only a couple of years away, right?

1:27:02.970 --> 1:27:05.310
<v Speaker 10>I mean, all this stuff is up in the air

1:27:05.370 --> 1:27:08.350
<v Speaker 10>because we don't know how effective it's going to be,

1:27:08.370 --> 1:27:10.759
<v Speaker 10>how efficient it's going to be. But it is sort

1:27:10.800 --> 1:27:13.860
<v Speaker 10>of like if Starship works the way they want it to,

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:16.680
<v Speaker 10>this is not like 20 years off or 30 years off.

1:27:16.720 --> 1:27:19.810
<v Speaker 10>It could just be like, five years off so yeah

1:27:19.970 --> 1:27:21.030
<v Speaker 10>we we just have to wait and.

1:27:20.970 --> 1:27:23.450
<v Speaker 1>See now mike wall i have to ask this because

1:27:23.470 --> 1:27:25.839
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed all kinds of things and i don't recall

1:27:25.910 --> 1:27:28.780
<v Speaker 1>us really discussing much in the way of ai but

1:27:28.800 --> 1:27:31.780
<v Speaker 1>when you think of uh that or super intelligence whatever

1:27:31.880 --> 1:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>moniker everybody wants to use these days i couldn't care

1:27:33.979 --> 1:27:38.820
<v Speaker 1>less but uh the idea that it is so fast

1:27:38.900 --> 1:27:42.140
<v Speaker 1>it is so smart it can learn and take things

1:27:42.260 --> 1:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in and extend thought way beyond our consideration or fathomability

1:27:46.390 --> 1:27:49.110
<v Speaker 1>at this point How much do you think that is

1:27:49.189 --> 1:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>taking into play, what will be Generation Next with travel

1:27:52.660 --> 1:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and us leaving Terra Firma to get out there?

1:27:56.580 --> 1:27:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it'll trickle down. It's just like everything.

1:27:59.580 --> 1:28:01.660
<v Speaker 10>It seems to be, or its proponents say, it's a

1:28:01.700 --> 1:28:06.790
<v Speaker 10>world-changing technology, and it'll have all these impacts on pharmaceuticals

1:28:06.850 --> 1:28:10.630
<v Speaker 10>and medicine, being able to predict things. or like what

1:28:10.689 --> 1:28:13.630
<v Speaker 10>protein formations, what protein folding will lead to new drugs

1:28:13.650 --> 1:28:16.150
<v Speaker 10>and all this stuff. And it's actually interesting, you know,

1:28:16.670 --> 1:28:20.470
<v Speaker 10>it could be transformative in space too. Like you may

1:28:20.510 --> 1:28:23.120
<v Speaker 10>have heard about some of these, some of the AI

1:28:23.160 --> 1:28:26.599
<v Speaker 10>data center constellations that SpaceX and Google and other.

1:28:26.479 --> 1:28:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Companies want to put in Earth orbit and beyond.

1:28:29.780 --> 1:28:31.600
<v Speaker 10>And that's another thing, you know, like, because there's all

1:28:31.620 --> 1:28:34.340
<v Speaker 10>this controversy about like having data centers on Earth, you know,

1:28:34.360 --> 1:28:36.479
<v Speaker 10>people don't like them having them close by and they

1:28:37.170 --> 1:28:39.290
<v Speaker 10>use a lot of energy and use so much water.

1:28:39.330 --> 1:28:42.900
<v Speaker 10>And so, there's this big push to put, like, tens

1:28:42.939 --> 1:28:46.280
<v Speaker 10>of thousands of them, or even more, you know. Like, yeah, actually,

1:28:46.300 --> 1:28:48.139
<v Speaker 10>SpaceX wants to put a million of them.

1:28:48.400 --> 1:28:48.979
<v Speaker 5>In Earth orbit.

1:28:49.640 --> 1:28:52.099
<v Speaker 1>Is that possible with space? I don't mean to interrupt.

1:28:52.160 --> 1:28:54.340
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just trying to, because we talked about

1:28:54.380 --> 1:28:58.719
<v Speaker 1>light pollution before, and just the idea associated with satellites.

1:28:59.420 --> 1:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So if there's going to be all this array of

1:29:02.460 --> 1:29:06.070
<v Speaker 1>a variety of different technologies and installations, I don't know

1:29:06.090 --> 1:29:07.730
<v Speaker 1>if that's the right term, but I'm using it now.

1:29:07.790 --> 1:29:11.530
<v Speaker 1>You can correct me. You're the brain. In this situation,

1:29:11.550 --> 1:29:14.809
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how cluttered will it be? And will that

1:29:14.870 --> 1:29:17.830
<v Speaker 1>affect our quality of life here on Earth?

1:29:18.990 --> 1:29:20.870
<v Speaker 5>There are a lot of people who think it will.

1:29:20.950 --> 1:29:23.870
<v Speaker 10>And, yeah, there are astronomers who are really, really worried

1:29:23.890 --> 1:29:25.670
<v Speaker 10>about that, you know, because if you have that many

1:29:25.710 --> 1:29:28.540
<v Speaker 10>satellites up there, What's it going to look like for

1:29:28.580 --> 1:29:32.750
<v Speaker 10>a really sensitive telescope trying to see, I mean, billions

1:29:32.810 --> 1:29:35.170
<v Speaker 10>and billions of light years away, you know, these little,

1:29:35.710 --> 1:29:38.300
<v Speaker 10>these specks of satellites are going to just cause streaks

1:29:38.340 --> 1:29:40.900
<v Speaker 10>all over those images and just people who care about

1:29:40.939 --> 1:29:44.080
<v Speaker 10>having dark night skies, you know, like... There's some, yeah,

1:29:44.100 --> 1:29:45.940
<v Speaker 10>people have done some modeling work. What if there are

1:29:45.960 --> 1:29:48.099
<v Speaker 10>a million satellites in low earth orbit and around dusk

1:29:48.140 --> 1:29:50.650
<v Speaker 10>and dawn, it would look like a ring, like it

1:29:50.660 --> 1:29:52.530
<v Speaker 10>would create like a Saturn like ring. Some of these

1:29:52.550 --> 1:29:56.470
<v Speaker 10>simulations suggest it would totally transform a night sky. And

1:29:56.490 --> 1:29:58.710
<v Speaker 10>then there's the question of, well, what if some of

1:29:58.750 --> 1:30:01.570
<v Speaker 10>these things, what are they going to do when they deorbit?

1:30:01.590 --> 1:30:03.509
<v Speaker 10>You know, that's so much metal up in the atmosphere.

1:30:03.530 --> 1:30:05.229
<v Speaker 5>It will be raining everywhere.

1:30:05.530 --> 1:30:07.930
<v Speaker 1>It will no longer be me asking you about if

1:30:08.010 --> 1:30:10.510
<v Speaker 1>I find a meteorite, how much it's worth, it's going

1:30:10.530 --> 1:30:14.230
<v Speaker 1>to be my insurance company going. We don't, ever falling

1:30:14.310 --> 1:30:17.820
<v Speaker 1>space crap. That's what will be on your homeowner's policy.

1:30:18.990 --> 1:30:21.650
<v Speaker 10>There's some of that, but also they will say they're

1:30:21.670 --> 1:30:23.490
<v Speaker 10>designed to burn up in the atmosphere. But even if

1:30:24.030 --> 1:30:26.120
<v Speaker 10>they burn up 100% in the atmosphere, that's a lot

1:30:26.140 --> 1:30:29.040
<v Speaker 10>of metals that are going into our atmosphere. We're doing

1:30:29.360 --> 1:30:32.700
<v Speaker 10>a grand kind of geoengineering project on our planet. What

1:30:32.740 --> 1:30:34.639
<v Speaker 10>will it mean to have all this metal.

1:30:34.460 --> 1:30:36.340
<v Speaker 5>Pollution in our upper atmosphere? What will it do to

1:30:36.360 --> 1:30:37.040
<v Speaker 5>the ozone layer?

1:30:37.520 --> 1:30:39.979
<v Speaker 10>There's already some studies that kind of suggest it's not

1:30:40.020 --> 1:30:42.160
<v Speaker 10>good for the ozone layer to have all these aluminum

1:30:42.229 --> 1:30:44.410
<v Speaker 10>oxides up there. They'll kind of eat away at the

1:30:44.450 --> 1:30:47.580
<v Speaker 10>ozone layer. We sort of did that experiment already in

1:30:48.280 --> 1:30:50.360
<v Speaker 10>the 70s and the 80s, and we know it's not

1:30:50.400 --> 1:30:51.280
<v Speaker 10>good to have a big hole.

1:30:51.160 --> 1:30:51.880
<v Speaker 5>In your ozone layer.

1:30:51.900 --> 1:30:54.200
<v Speaker 10>It leads to more cancer and cataracts and all the

1:30:54.220 --> 1:30:56.680
<v Speaker 10>stuff we saw from people in the Southern Hemisphere where

1:30:56.700 --> 1:31:00.110
<v Speaker 10>the ozone hole was. So there's people who are really

1:31:00.150 --> 1:31:02.130
<v Speaker 10>worried about this, and there's people worried about if there's

1:31:02.150 --> 1:31:05.030
<v Speaker 10>that much clutter up there, you could have collisions, and

1:31:05.070 --> 1:31:07.070
<v Speaker 10>all it would take is a couple collisions to create

1:31:07.170 --> 1:31:09.450
<v Speaker 10>big debris clouds that might lead to a cascade of

1:31:09.490 --> 1:31:10.150
<v Speaker 10>more collisions.

1:31:11.070 --> 1:31:11.670
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it is.

1:31:13.090 --> 1:31:14.710
<v Speaker 10>It's sort of a wild west. There are all these

1:31:14.770 --> 1:31:17.850
<v Speaker 10>projects that have just been greenlit or expected to be greenlit,

1:31:17.870 --> 1:31:20.790
<v Speaker 10>and some people are not too happy about that. But

1:31:21.170 --> 1:31:22.650
<v Speaker 10>we'll just have to see if they all come to

1:31:22.689 --> 1:31:25.660
<v Speaker 10>pass and what's going to happen, because right now there

1:31:25.840 --> 1:31:26.580
<v Speaker 10>are no breaks on.

1:31:26.560 --> 1:31:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Any of this stuff yet.

1:31:28.400 --> 1:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Should there be?

1:31:30.990 --> 1:31:32.150
<v Speaker 5>I personally think so.

1:31:32.290 --> 1:31:34.830
<v Speaker 10>I personally, I mean, I don't know what my opinion

1:31:34.890 --> 1:31:36.370
<v Speaker 10>counts or how much it matters.

1:31:36.450 --> 1:31:40.410
<v Speaker 1>You're the space flight tech editor from space.com. Your opinion

1:31:40.450 --> 1:31:45.019
<v Speaker 1>means something. You know some stuff. Yeah, you've got different perspectives.

1:31:45.040 --> 1:31:46.260
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I'm asking you.

1:31:47.500 --> 1:31:50.720
<v Speaker 5>But where there's money to be made, that usually wins out, right?

1:31:50.760 --> 1:31:53.310
<v Speaker 10>So people, there are a lot of scientists who are saying, wait,

1:31:53.330 --> 1:31:54.690
<v Speaker 10>let's study this a little bit more.

1:31:54.770 --> 1:31:55.750
<v Speaker 5>Let's be a little careful.

1:31:55.770 --> 1:31:59.070
<v Speaker 10>Let's try to draw up a compact with other countries

1:31:59.110 --> 1:32:01.350
<v Speaker 10>to try to figure out what's safe, what's sustainable.

1:32:01.370 --> 1:32:03.689
<v Speaker 5>Because that's the scary part.

1:32:04.170 --> 1:32:08.019
<v Speaker 10>There are a lot of really, really capable satellite operators. Obviously,

1:32:08.060 --> 1:32:11.200
<v Speaker 10>SpaceX is really good at managing a big constellation.

1:32:11.220 --> 1:32:12.720
<v Speaker 5>They have Starlink up there now. There's like 11,000 of

1:32:12.760 --> 1:32:15.519
<v Speaker 5>them operating. they're very good at managing them.

1:32:15.540 --> 1:32:18.040
<v Speaker 10>There's been no problems so far with that from, there've

1:32:18.060 --> 1:32:21.060
<v Speaker 10>been no collisions or anything like that. But like, what

1:32:21.120 --> 1:32:23.400
<v Speaker 10>if there's like, just like, yeah, some of these startups

1:32:23.850 --> 1:32:25.410
<v Speaker 10>who don't know what they're doing and they put up

1:32:25.450 --> 1:32:27.630
<v Speaker 10>a thousand satellites and are quite as good at controlling

1:32:27.670 --> 1:32:29.849
<v Speaker 10>them and they don't have the technology and all this stuff,

1:32:29.870 --> 1:32:33.390
<v Speaker 10>you know, like there's just no kind of breaks and

1:32:33.410 --> 1:32:35.590
<v Speaker 10>there's no enforcement on any of that stuff. All it

1:32:35.630 --> 1:32:39.140
<v Speaker 10>takes is like one bad operator, one mistake, and you

1:32:39.180 --> 1:32:42.420
<v Speaker 10>could have clutter all over low earth orbit. So there's

1:32:42.439 --> 1:32:44.470
<v Speaker 10>just people who are worried about, I'm certainly not the

1:32:44.510 --> 1:32:46.729
<v Speaker 10>only one, just people worried about if we just go

1:32:47.250 --> 1:32:48.530
<v Speaker 10>like kind of breakneck pace.

1:32:49.100 --> 1:32:50.690
<v Speaker 5>Make as much money as we can, put as much

1:32:50.729 --> 1:32:51.280
<v Speaker 5>stuff up as.

1:32:51.229 --> 1:32:53.950
<v Speaker 10>We can, because it'll just be great for everybody. You know,

1:32:53.970 --> 1:32:56.930
<v Speaker 10>that's a little, all it takes is one mistake. And,

1:32:56.950 --> 1:32:59.310
<v Speaker 10>I mean, history tells us if you have enough time

1:32:59.350 --> 1:33:02.889
<v Speaker 10>and enough opportunity, there will be at least one mistake.

1:33:03.030 --> 1:33:05.630
<v Speaker 1>And that just adds and bodes even more well for

1:33:05.670 --> 1:33:08.030
<v Speaker 1>what I've discussed with you time and time again, probably

1:33:08.060 --> 1:33:10.099
<v Speaker 1>to the point of annoyance for you, and I apologize

1:33:10.140 --> 1:33:13.540
<v Speaker 1>in advance. But we could be the trash collectors and

1:33:13.580 --> 1:33:17.540
<v Speaker 1>the recyclers of space like Star Wars. And that is

1:33:17.560 --> 1:33:19.660
<v Speaker 1>where the future is. That is where the money is.

1:33:19.700 --> 1:33:21.900
<v Speaker 1>We could have Mount Rumpke in space or bring it.

1:33:21.910 --> 1:33:24.270
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you that I don't know how much that

1:33:24.310 --> 1:33:26.290
<v Speaker 1>would cost, but somebody is going to have to be

1:33:26.350 --> 1:33:28.810
<v Speaker 1>doing that at some point, maybe 10 years, 20 years.

1:33:29.110 --> 1:33:31.550
<v Speaker 1>How soon do you think that would be something necessary?

1:33:31.870 --> 1:33:35.210
<v Speaker 1>Because what you described as stuff in orbit, low orbit

1:33:35.229 --> 1:33:39.570
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise, moves fairly quickly. And can be very dangerous

1:33:39.650 --> 1:33:43.420
<v Speaker 1>and hazardous to anything up there, satellites or even human-like

1:33:43.580 --> 1:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>craft at some point that could be the end of us.

1:33:48.160 --> 1:33:51.420
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, stuff that's at the altitude of the International Space

1:33:51.439 --> 1:33:54.410
<v Speaker 10>Station moves at like 17,500 miles per hour.

1:33:54.570 --> 1:33:56.790
<v Speaker 5>So even like a small.

1:33:56.510 --> 1:33:59.030
<v Speaker 10>Object like this, like the size of a screw or

1:33:59.070 --> 1:34:03.350
<v Speaker 10>like a paint chip can disable a satellite if it

1:34:03.390 --> 1:34:04.030
<v Speaker 10>hits it, right?

1:34:04.090 --> 1:34:04.270
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:34:05.170 --> 1:34:08.070
<v Speaker 10>There are people, there are companies, there are governments working

1:34:08.110 --> 1:34:11.230
<v Speaker 10>on ways to deorbit space junk. And they want to

1:34:11.270 --> 1:34:13.710
<v Speaker 10>target the kind of biggest, most dangerous things, which are

1:34:13.729 --> 1:34:19.090
<v Speaker 10>basically these big rocket bodies from big Chinese rockets that

1:34:19.170 --> 1:34:21.850
<v Speaker 10>are just flying around the Earth, or these big old

1:34:21.930 --> 1:34:23.110
<v Speaker 10>Russian rockets from back in.

1:34:23.070 --> 1:34:24.630
<v Speaker 5>The day that are just up.

1:34:24.550 --> 1:34:26.590
<v Speaker 10>There, dead, big hunks of metal, like the size of

1:34:26.630 --> 1:34:29.520
<v Speaker 10>a school bus that is zooming around Earth. So there

1:34:29.740 --> 1:34:31.479
<v Speaker 10>are companies that are working on how to get.

1:34:31.400 --> 1:34:32.939
<v Speaker 5>Those big, dangerous things down.

1:34:32.960 --> 1:34:36.790
<v Speaker 10>And then maybe, like, the kind of long-term solution is

1:34:36.870 --> 1:34:39.790
<v Speaker 10>to design satellites better and to dispose of them before

1:34:39.830 --> 1:34:42.150
<v Speaker 10>they become space-struck, you know, bring them down in the atmosphere.

1:34:42.170 --> 1:34:44.550
<v Speaker 1>Can we do it like asteroids? Can we do it

1:34:44.570 --> 1:34:47.910
<v Speaker 1>like asteroids and just shoot them? Remember that game, Asteroids?

1:34:48.210 --> 1:34:50.650
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was such a very simple game, but

1:34:50.670 --> 1:34:52.590
<v Speaker 1>you could just sit there and just blow stuff up.

1:34:52.630 --> 1:34:53.430
<v Speaker 1>I think that'd be great.

1:34:54.729 --> 1:34:56.190
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, there are people.

1:34:57.320 --> 1:35:00.490
<v Speaker 10>who are working on kind of like using lasers to,

1:35:00.650 --> 1:35:03.090
<v Speaker 10>to ablate the surfaces and like bring them down.

1:35:03.130 --> 1:35:03.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:35:03.510 --> 1:35:05.309
<v Speaker 10>There are, there are all sorts of ideas that you

1:35:05.350 --> 1:35:08.790
<v Speaker 10>can think of. There's, there's nets, there's like grabbers and hooks.

1:35:08.890 --> 1:35:10.890
<v Speaker 10>There's all, there's all sorts of ideas about how to

1:35:11.330 --> 1:35:12.950
<v Speaker 10>grab these things and bring it down.

1:35:13.070 --> 1:35:15.980
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I'm not sure how far off that is.

1:35:16.040 --> 1:35:16.260
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:35:16.600 --> 1:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to drive you nuts with that, but

1:35:18.040 --> 1:35:21.479
<v Speaker 1>it's every conversation eventually that we have or anytime I

1:35:21.580 --> 1:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>read anything about it or I watch some type of

1:35:23.979 --> 1:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like thing, you know, documentary, I'm like, Who's getting the trash?

1:35:27.820 --> 1:35:30.300
<v Speaker 1>It's just all I'm worried about is sanitation. I'm like,

1:35:30.360 --> 1:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody's getting paid.

1:35:31.740 --> 1:35:32.259
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy.

1:35:32.460 --> 1:35:34.820
<v Speaker 1>Look, time is short. Mike Wall, I appreciate you making time.

1:35:34.860 --> 1:35:37.230
<v Speaker 1>I hope all is well with the family wall, kids

1:35:37.280 --> 1:35:39.700
<v Speaker 1>back to school and all. I have to ask one

1:35:39.740 --> 1:35:42.790
<v Speaker 1>more thing, only because it was announced publicly, which I

1:35:42.850 --> 1:35:45.530
<v Speaker 1>think is the first time anyone in a position of

1:35:45.590 --> 1:35:49.910
<v Speaker 1>authority or otherwise said what we have talked about time

1:35:49.930 --> 1:35:52.950
<v Speaker 1>and time again also, which is the military presence and

1:35:52.990 --> 1:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>possible issue of or usage of weapons in space. Were

1:35:58.040 --> 1:36:00.830
<v Speaker 1>you surprised by that? And in short order within a

1:36:00.850 --> 1:36:03.889
<v Speaker 1>minute or so, what are your thoughts about that announcement

1:36:03.930 --> 1:36:05.309
<v Speaker 1>that was made in the last couple of two weeks,

1:36:05.370 --> 1:36:05.790
<v Speaker 1>three weeks?

1:36:06.810 --> 1:36:09.290
<v Speaker 10>I was, I was not surprised that we have, that

1:36:09.310 --> 1:36:11.350
<v Speaker 10>we have weapons in space. I think everybody's kind of

1:36:11.410 --> 1:36:13.780
<v Speaker 10>assumed that who's been following it. I was surprised they

1:36:13.820 --> 1:36:16.100
<v Speaker 10>announced it. And I think they announced it as like

1:36:16.140 --> 1:36:19.460
<v Speaker 10>a message to Russia and China as basically because they,

1:36:19.479 --> 1:36:21.439
<v Speaker 10>they have these same types of weapons up their ways

1:36:21.479 --> 1:36:24.450
<v Speaker 10>to like, jam other satellites or just just kind of

1:36:24.490 --> 1:36:27.000
<v Speaker 10>mess with them not necessarily blow them up because that's

1:36:27.040 --> 1:36:30.320
<v Speaker 10>too obvious right um but to just just yeah to

1:36:30.380 --> 1:36:33.220
<v Speaker 10>just blind them or to jam them and those are

1:36:33.260 --> 1:36:35.120
<v Speaker 10>up there we like no russia and china are doing

1:36:35.140 --> 1:36:37.230
<v Speaker 10>kind of anti-satellite stuff like that so i think this

1:36:37.240 --> 1:36:39.490
<v Speaker 10>was the u.s government saying we have this stuff too

1:36:40.070 --> 1:36:42.290
<v Speaker 10>and if you want to mess with our satellites we

1:36:42.310 --> 1:36:43.750
<v Speaker 10>will mess with yours i think it was sort of

1:36:43.770 --> 1:36:46.010
<v Speaker 10>like a brinksmanship thing or it was definitely.

1:36:45.710 --> 1:36:48.450
<v Speaker 1>Sending a message Anything that I've not asked that you

1:36:48.470 --> 1:36:51.790
<v Speaker 1>think is relevant before we say again, thank you and

1:36:51.850 --> 1:36:54.900
<v Speaker 1>let you free to enjoy the big sandbox of life

1:36:54.939 --> 1:36:55.639
<v Speaker 1>through this weekend?

1:36:56.979 --> 1:37:00.280
<v Speaker 10>No, I think that's like the space station stuff and

1:37:00.540 --> 1:37:03.720
<v Speaker 10>Starship and like all the orbiting data centers that might

1:37:03.740 --> 1:37:05.400
<v Speaker 10>be coming our way if they can figure out how

1:37:05.439 --> 1:37:07.670
<v Speaker 10>to cool them in space where there is no atmosphere

1:37:07.710 --> 1:37:10.910
<v Speaker 10>to wick away heat, all that stuff. It's all, yeah,

1:37:11.250 --> 1:37:13.970
<v Speaker 10>I think those are the kind of big hits that

1:37:14.010 --> 1:37:14.830
<v Speaker 10>I wanted to touch on.

1:37:15.110 --> 1:37:16.350
<v Speaker 5>And so I think you hit them all.

1:37:16.490 --> 1:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you very much for your time and your insights,

1:37:19.140 --> 1:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and I hope you enjoy the rest of your weekend,

1:37:20.700 --> 1:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll catch up again soon. He's always great reading,

1:37:22.900 --> 1:37:25.850
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great resource. It's Mike DeWall, Space Flight

1:37:25.910 --> 1:37:29.309
<v Speaker 1>Tech channel editor, space.com, the website. Thank you, my man.

1:37:29.370 --> 1:37:30.790
<v Speaker 1>I hope you take care of yourself, and we'll catch

1:37:30.830 --> 1:37:31.150
<v Speaker 1>up again soon.

1:37:32.560 --> 1:37:34.009
<v Speaker 5>That sounds good. Good to talk to you.

1:37:34.100 --> 1:37:34.430
<v Speaker 3>You too.

1:37:34.470 --> 1:37:37.509
<v Speaker 1>Take care of yourself. Straight away, your 1130 report. Kevin

1:37:37.550 --> 1:37:40.889
<v Speaker 1>Carr on the other side. New movies, scary stuff, and more.

1:37:40.970 --> 1:37:45.970
<v Speaker 1>Nation Station. Sterling, that's me. 700-WLW. Mailbox. He has comics.

1:37:46.010 --> 1:37:49.330
<v Speaker 1>He has stories. He's a silver gecko on Substack. Takes

1:37:49.350 --> 1:37:51.950
<v Speaker 1>the hit for us in the movie theater oftentimes so

1:37:52.010 --> 1:37:55.990
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to feel the pain unnecessarily. Dude, how

1:37:56.090 --> 1:37:58.450
<v Speaker 1>are you? How's everything? The weather has changed. The season

1:37:58.510 --> 1:38:01.610
<v Speaker 1>is here of horrors, and there's a new Tom Cruise movie.

1:38:04.210 --> 1:38:07.530
<v Speaker 3>Is that rolled into the horror element of everything? Oh, no,

1:38:07.550 --> 1:38:08.450
<v Speaker 3>he's got another movie.

1:38:08.490 --> 1:38:08.870
<v Speaker 12>Here we go.

1:38:09.130 --> 1:38:09.530
<v Speaker 1>It could be.

1:38:09.610 --> 1:38:10.110
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

1:38:10.130 --> 1:38:12.939
<v Speaker 1>This is really weird. I saw a trailer for it.

1:38:13.130 --> 1:38:17.030
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite understand, Kevin, what is going on. At first,

1:38:17.070 --> 1:38:18.900
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is that Digger Phelps? Who is he?

1:38:18.979 --> 1:38:21.500
<v Speaker 1>Who's he supposed to be? He wants to save the world.

1:38:21.540 --> 1:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. And then somebody else was telling me

1:38:25.460 --> 1:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that they thought he broke the world that he's trying

1:38:27.420 --> 1:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to save. So help us understand.

1:38:30.140 --> 1:38:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah this one oh first of all you gotta he

1:38:33.280 --> 1:38:35.240
<v Speaker 3>does tom cruise will every now and then do a

1:38:35.300 --> 1:38:39.679
<v Speaker 3>character that's very off type and oftentimes looks very different

1:38:39.700 --> 1:38:42.280
<v Speaker 3>i kind of collateral is a good example of one

1:38:42.320 --> 1:38:44.580
<v Speaker 3>where he looked a little bit different or interview the

1:38:44.600 --> 1:38:47.410
<v Speaker 3>vampire but uh you know, stuff like when he was

1:38:47.470 --> 1:38:51.479
<v Speaker 3>in Tropic Thunder and he played Les Grossman, the studio boss.

1:38:51.580 --> 1:38:52.780
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that.

1:38:52.860 --> 1:38:53.259
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:38:53.660 --> 1:38:53.900
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

1:38:54.420 --> 1:38:56.420
<v Speaker 3>It's much more like that, where he really kind of

1:38:56.600 --> 1:38:59.960
<v Speaker 3>jumps into a character. And in this movie, he plays

1:39:00.400 --> 1:39:06.420
<v Speaker 3>Digger Rockwell, who's a oil magnate. And it takes place

1:39:06.460 --> 1:39:09.389
<v Speaker 3>in the future, you know, after some more, you know,

1:39:09.400 --> 1:39:11.250
<v Speaker 3>more and more drilling has taken place and more and

1:39:11.270 --> 1:39:14.969
<v Speaker 3>more carbon has gone in the air. And he's basically

1:39:14.990 --> 1:39:17.980
<v Speaker 3>super wealthy and he uses his wealth and influence to

1:39:18.100 --> 1:39:22.510
<v Speaker 3>kind of skirt around protections and stuff. And as a result,

1:39:23.410 --> 1:39:27.309
<v Speaker 3>there's a catastrophic environmental disaster that happens as a result of.

1:39:27.790 --> 1:39:29.650
<v Speaker 4>His oil drilling.

1:39:30.010 --> 1:39:35.180
<v Speaker 3>And it's his whole world crumbling around him, not just physically,

1:39:35.260 --> 1:39:38.599
<v Speaker 3>but emotionally and just his own home life and everything.

1:39:39.880 --> 1:39:43.259
<v Speaker 3>His business is in jeopardy, and he's trying to wrestle

1:39:43.300 --> 1:39:45.549
<v Speaker 3>control of the whole thing. but it's also got the

1:39:45.590 --> 1:39:51.269
<v Speaker 3>story within a story that, well, it's directed by Alejandro

1:39:51.310 --> 1:39:54.550
<v Speaker 3>and Ritu who did a bird man and he did

1:39:54.570 --> 1:39:55.469
<v Speaker 3>the revenant, but.

1:39:55.350 --> 1:39:57.090
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot more, it's got a.

1:39:57.070 --> 1:39:59.349
<v Speaker 3>Lot more connected tissue with bird man in the sense

1:39:59.410 --> 1:40:02.410
<v Speaker 3>that there is the story within a story. And it's

1:40:02.490 --> 1:40:06.370
<v Speaker 3>focused on one very imperfect character, whether or not he's

1:40:06.410 --> 1:40:10.230
<v Speaker 3>the hero or anti-hero is up to the viewer, but it's,

1:40:10.979 --> 1:40:13.240
<v Speaker 3>It has a lot of layers and at times makes

1:40:13.300 --> 1:40:16.850
<v Speaker 3>the movie really crowded. And that's sort of what I

1:40:16.890 --> 1:40:20.229
<v Speaker 3>ding against it. But it's also this insane satire of

1:40:20.310 --> 1:40:24.290
<v Speaker 3>business and politics and the oil business and climate change

1:40:24.350 --> 1:40:29.110
<v Speaker 3>and all these different things swirling about and how humans,

1:40:29.490 --> 1:40:34.850
<v Speaker 3>especially generationally, handle this. And when the scenes hit, they

1:40:34.900 --> 1:40:37.799
<v Speaker 3>hit really well. I mean, there's some very funny moments.

1:40:38.500 --> 1:40:43.150
<v Speaker 3>with Cruz playing Digger and like John Goodman plays the

1:40:43.210 --> 1:40:46.689
<v Speaker 3>president and there's just absurd things happening and that works

1:40:46.729 --> 1:40:50.680
<v Speaker 3>really well sometimes it doesn't it does run a little

1:40:50.720 --> 1:40:54.140
<v Speaker 3>bit long and it's too busy of a movie but

1:40:54.200 --> 1:40:55.970
<v Speaker 3>like I said when the scenes work they really do

1:40:56.010 --> 1:40:58.150
<v Speaker 3>and it makes it Pretty enjoyable to watch at times.

1:40:58.350 --> 1:41:00.430
<v Speaker 1>You know what's strange is that John Goodman used to

1:41:00.470 --> 1:41:04.570
<v Speaker 1>be a real huge human being, and he's not anymore.

1:41:04.810 --> 1:41:07.490
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise in this Digger movie is made up to

1:41:07.530 --> 1:41:09.860
<v Speaker 1>look like he's a much larger human being, which is

1:41:10.140 --> 1:41:13.740
<v Speaker 1>sort of irregular and strange in this. Talking to Kevin Carr,

1:41:13.760 --> 1:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Silver Gecko and Substack, back this new

1:41:15.560 --> 1:41:20.950
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise movie with John Goodman called Digger. There was

1:41:21.010 --> 1:41:23.990
<v Speaker 1>something creepy, and it was the same thing in the

1:41:24.060 --> 1:41:26.460
<v Speaker 1>movie you mentioned that Cruise did before, where he was

1:41:26.479 --> 1:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of made up as somebody else in Tropic Thunder.

1:41:28.780 --> 1:41:29.340
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah, Tropic Thunder.

1:41:29.600 --> 1:41:31.700
<v Speaker 1>You can sort of see it in the eyes, but

1:41:31.740 --> 1:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not quite placing it. I see the same thing

1:41:34.689 --> 1:41:37.090
<v Speaker 1>in Johnny Depp in the trailers for the Scrooge movie

1:41:37.110 --> 1:41:39.670
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, where you sort of can place it. Yeah,

1:41:39.710 --> 1:41:42.510
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of see it, but not. How is that,

1:41:42.590 --> 1:41:44.630
<v Speaker 1>and how fun do you think it must be to

1:41:44.790 --> 1:41:47.210
<v Speaker 1>put on that suit in that makeup and then just

1:41:47.330 --> 1:41:49.210
<v Speaker 1>lose yourself in some type of character?

1:41:50.290 --> 1:41:53.230
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think for Cruise, it gives him something different

1:41:53.290 --> 1:41:53.650
<v Speaker 3>to do.

1:41:53.770 --> 1:41:55.179
<v Speaker 4>He always plays that stock character.

1:41:55.800 --> 1:41:56.540
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise.

1:41:56.560 --> 1:42:00.479
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I see Tom Cruise. He's Maverick from Top Gun.

1:42:00.540 --> 1:42:03.540
<v Speaker 3>He's the guy from whatever his name is on Days

1:42:03.580 --> 1:42:07.059
<v Speaker 3>of Thunder. I mean, he's Cocktail. He's Risky Business. That's

1:42:07.380 --> 1:42:10.620
<v Speaker 3>just the standard Tom Cruise character. And I think it

1:42:10.770 --> 1:42:12.360
<v Speaker 3>gives him a chance to stretch. It gives him a

1:42:12.390 --> 1:42:15.390
<v Speaker 3>chance to be something different. But he's also a control freak.

1:42:15.430 --> 1:42:18.830
<v Speaker 3>So it's all kind of within his own parameters. And

1:42:19.070 --> 1:42:21.969
<v Speaker 3>that's what allows him to really bust loose. And that's

1:42:22.450 --> 1:42:26.360
<v Speaker 3>why he was so funny in Tropic Thunder. Because it

1:42:26.400 --> 1:42:32.139
<v Speaker 3>allowed him to break his own character without– by becoming

1:42:32.180 --> 1:42:36.050
<v Speaker 3>another character without betraying his sort of his stock Tom Cruise.

1:42:36.090 --> 1:42:38.110
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that works. But a lot of

1:42:38.189 --> 1:42:41.470
<v Speaker 3>actors like– now, Johnny Depp, you mentioned Johnny Depp with Ebenezer.

1:42:42.950 --> 1:42:45.490
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Johnny Depp has done a lot of these performances.

1:42:45.610 --> 1:42:46.790
<v Speaker 1>A whole bunch, yeah.

1:42:47.890 --> 1:42:51.590
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of the more regular Johnny Depp performance.

1:42:52.030 --> 1:42:54.590
<v Speaker 3>You rarely get authentic Johnny Depp in your movies. You've

1:42:54.610 --> 1:42:57.410
<v Speaker 3>got him always playing a character, whether it's Jack Sparrow

1:42:57.490 --> 1:43:03.140
<v Speaker 3>or that awful French-Canadian detective in those Kenneth Smith movies.

1:43:04.360 --> 1:43:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was pretty strong.

1:43:06.620 --> 1:43:10.179
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. But, I mean, that's, I think, what's interesting watching.

1:43:10.240 --> 1:43:13.540
<v Speaker 3>It's just also just the over-the-top craziness of what's going

1:43:13.600 --> 1:43:15.320
<v Speaker 3>on in the surreal nature of the movie.

1:43:15.439 --> 1:43:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah. We're seeing it in the theater or streaming

1:43:18.660 --> 1:43:20.479
<v Speaker 1>because you said it was long. You said when it hits,

1:43:20.560 --> 1:43:22.660
<v Speaker 1>it hits. However, is it like such a wait in

1:43:22.700 --> 1:43:25.390
<v Speaker 1>between it hitting scene wise where you're like, why am

1:43:25.450 --> 1:43:27.150
<v Speaker 1>I in the theater? Why can't I just be at home?

1:43:28.210 --> 1:43:32.009
<v Speaker 3>Well, it depends on what you go to the theater for.

1:43:32.170 --> 1:43:37.250
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's certainly visually. I mean, it's it

1:43:37.330 --> 1:43:40.660
<v Speaker 3>does benefit from a large screen presentation. We'll say that

1:43:41.300 --> 1:43:43.300
<v Speaker 3>maybe not at the level that say like the Odyssey.

1:43:43.380 --> 1:43:44.660
<v Speaker 3>The Odyssey, I think, is going to be a very

1:43:44.700 --> 1:43:47.610
<v Speaker 3>different movie at home. than it was on the big screen,

1:43:47.640 --> 1:43:51.960
<v Speaker 3>especially the IMAX screen. This Digger looks really good on

1:43:51.979 --> 1:43:53.799
<v Speaker 3>the big screen, but I think you can also appreciate

1:43:53.840 --> 1:43:55.780
<v Speaker 3>it at home. I don't know if it's the movie

1:43:55.800 --> 1:43:57.600
<v Speaker 3>you want to watch on your phone, but, you know,

1:43:57.620 --> 1:43:59.860
<v Speaker 3>that's not my generally.

1:43:59.880 --> 1:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>People watch on their wrist. It's very challenging these days.

1:44:03.180 --> 1:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me reintroduce you real quick. Kevin Carr, by the way,

1:44:05.080 --> 1:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Silver Gecko, Substack, talking about the new movie Digger. Are

1:44:08.060 --> 1:44:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you done with that? Because I want to switch to

1:44:09.280 --> 1:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>something else because we're talking about people changing type. In

1:44:12.400 --> 1:44:15.530
<v Speaker 1>some fashion in acting, I have seen a litany of

1:44:15.550 --> 1:44:18.510
<v Speaker 1>because we are now into October, a lot of ads

1:44:18.530 --> 1:44:21.490
<v Speaker 1>for horror movies, and they've been coming more fast and

1:44:21.550 --> 1:44:24.830
<v Speaker 1>more furiously over this last year, it seems that I

1:44:24.870 --> 1:44:28.150
<v Speaker 1>can recall and some really good ones. But two actors

1:44:28.260 --> 1:44:31.380
<v Speaker 1>that I have seen in the last week looking to

1:44:31.420 --> 1:44:35.479
<v Speaker 1>do something different. and out of place, Jennifer Connelly and

1:44:35.540 --> 1:44:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Chastain with these horror films that are coming out,

1:44:38.760 --> 1:44:40.500
<v Speaker 1>if not this weekend, in the next couple of weeks.

1:44:40.880 --> 1:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>How awesome is that to see these women step up

1:44:43.200 --> 1:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and play something so away from what we normally see?

1:44:47.500 --> 1:44:51.780
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's talk Jessica Chastain first. She's done horror before.

1:44:51.900 --> 1:44:54.599
<v Speaker 3>She's done quite a few horror movies. There was one

1:44:54.620 --> 1:44:59.010
<v Speaker 3>she did, it was called Mama, where she had an

1:44:59.070 --> 1:45:02.210
<v Speaker 3>adopted daughter and then there was this like or she

1:45:02.250 --> 1:45:04.420
<v Speaker 3>had a niece or something. And this, this ghost type

1:45:04.460 --> 1:45:07.760
<v Speaker 3>thing was, was like basically with its mother. It's always

1:45:07.800 --> 1:45:09.500
<v Speaker 3>a mother movie, I guess with her, because the other

1:45:09.540 --> 1:45:15.270
<v Speaker 3>mommy looks fantastic. And it, it's, You know, Jessica Chastain,

1:45:15.290 --> 1:45:18.030
<v Speaker 3>she actually plays quite diverse roles anyway.

1:45:18.100 --> 1:45:20.820
<v Speaker 1>Oh, she absolutely does. I just, she looks so creepy

1:45:20.939 --> 1:45:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in like that. She's in like in a, like, I

1:45:22.760 --> 1:45:24.260
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's like a Chuck E. Cheese kind

1:45:24.280 --> 1:45:26.979
<v Speaker 1>of place or whatever in the balls. And she's got

1:45:27.020 --> 1:45:30.820
<v Speaker 1>that weird Joker-esque sort of perma smile kind of thing.

1:45:30.840 --> 1:45:34.019
<v Speaker 1>And it's really, it gave me the chills the first

1:45:34.060 --> 1:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>time I saw it. I'm like, holy crap.

1:45:36.960 --> 1:45:39.980
<v Speaker 3>Well, and she's just facial feature wise. She's got very

1:45:40.020 --> 1:45:43.020
<v Speaker 3>large eyes. Yeah. And she's got a very big grin.

1:45:43.470 --> 1:45:45.889
<v Speaker 3>And so you put her in a movie like this,

1:45:46.590 --> 1:45:53.740
<v Speaker 3>and it leans into the creepy look of it. And that's–

1:45:54.450 --> 1:45:58.570
<v Speaker 3>I love it when an actor or actress, just an actor,

1:45:58.670 --> 1:46:02.270
<v Speaker 3>does that. And it's okay doing horror movies. It's okay

1:46:02.290 --> 1:46:05.690
<v Speaker 3>doing genre picks. I was just watching– because it's Halloween time,

1:46:05.710 --> 1:46:08.720
<v Speaker 3>so I'm watching– we lost Sam Neill this year.

1:46:08.760 --> 1:46:09.460
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's right, yeah.

1:46:09.479 --> 1:46:12.180
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people recognize him. from Jurassic Park, but

1:46:12.500 --> 1:46:15.439
<v Speaker 3>he was in a handful of John Carpenter movies.

1:46:16.040 --> 1:46:17.660
<v Speaker 4>And, you know, I just watched In the Mouth of.

1:46:17.640 --> 1:46:21.310
<v Speaker 3>Madness where he plays an insurance investigator and it's a

1:46:21.350 --> 1:46:25.049
<v Speaker 3>cheesy horror movie based on sort of like a modern

1:46:25.110 --> 1:46:26.770
<v Speaker 3>version of a Lovecraft writer.

1:46:27.870 --> 1:46:31.000
<v Speaker 4>And he is happy to do it because he's done.

1:46:30.900 --> 1:46:33.940
<v Speaker 3>Multiple horror movies in the past. He was in like Well,

1:46:33.970 --> 1:46:35.990
<v Speaker 3>he was in Damien. He played Damien.

1:46:36.189 --> 1:46:39.610
<v Speaker 1>That's where I was introduced as a tiny Sterling Kevin Carr.

1:46:39.630 --> 1:46:42.049
<v Speaker 1>And he creeped me out then, and he has creeped

1:46:42.070 --> 1:46:44.490
<v Speaker 1>me out ever since. And I saw him in Jurassic Park.

1:46:44.550 --> 1:46:48.370
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, hell no. Because I still flashback

1:46:48.390 --> 1:46:51.030
<v Speaker 1>to being a six-year-old kid, and he's like a puppet

1:46:51.070 --> 1:46:52.610
<v Speaker 1>of Satan. I'm like, oh, no.

1:46:53.390 --> 1:46:55.420
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, because, you know, that was him kind of.

1:46:56.229 --> 1:47:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to do the Steven Spielberg, Indiana Jones kind of.

1:47:00.120 --> 1:47:01.740
<v Speaker 4>Role, you know, for Jurassic.

1:47:01.760 --> 1:47:04.590
<v Speaker 3>Park, but... But yeah, his very first big role was

1:47:05.090 --> 1:47:07.010
<v Speaker 3>The Final Conflict, the third Omen movie.

1:47:07.030 --> 1:47:09.610
<v Speaker 4>He was in one of my favorite spaceship.

1:47:09.229 --> 1:47:10.710
<v Speaker 3>Horror movies, Event Horizon.

1:47:10.729 --> 1:47:12.030
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

1:47:13.130 --> 1:47:17.510
<v Speaker 3>Dives full force into that movie. By the way, if

1:47:17.530 --> 1:47:21.150
<v Speaker 3>you want to talk about my favorite subgenres, it is

1:47:21.350 --> 1:47:25.559
<v Speaker 3>horror on a spaceship. Something horrible happening on a spaceship.

1:47:25.680 --> 1:47:29.530
<v Speaker 3>And Event Horizon's one. Alien is another real famous one.

1:47:29.540 --> 1:47:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Of course, yeah. There's one about 10, 15 years ago

1:47:34.000 --> 1:47:36.880
<v Speaker 3>called Life. It stars Jake Gyllenhaal and I think Rebecca

1:47:36.900 --> 1:47:41.570
<v Speaker 3>Ferguson and Ryan Reynolds, isn't it? That's a really good

1:47:41.710 --> 1:47:43.950
<v Speaker 3>one because it's just where do you go.

1:47:46.010 --> 1:47:47.719
<v Speaker 4>If there's a bad thing on a spaceship?

1:47:48.240 --> 1:47:50.780
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is perfect timing, of course. The new crew

1:47:50.840 --> 1:47:53.060
<v Speaker 1>up in the International Space Station. That's always the thing.

1:47:53.080 --> 1:47:55.900
<v Speaker 1>And then you think some weird, creepy growth that pops

1:47:55.979 --> 1:47:58.140
<v Speaker 1>in there. Then they're all infected and they come back

1:47:58.180 --> 1:47:58.620
<v Speaker 1>to Earth.

1:47:59.060 --> 1:47:59.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry.

1:47:59.680 --> 1:48:00.979
<v Speaker 1>This is the stuff of nightmares.

1:48:01.560 --> 1:48:02.320
<v Speaker 5>I apologize.

1:48:02.820 --> 1:48:08.060
<v Speaker 1>Anything else before we go? Space genre. I mean, all

1:48:08.100 --> 1:48:10.559
<v Speaker 1>these different, there are so many different types of horror movies.

1:48:10.650 --> 1:48:13.810
<v Speaker 1>There's the realistic, there's the over the top, there's the crazy, insane,

1:48:13.850 --> 1:48:17.450
<v Speaker 1>like inconceivable, not possible, but just stupid. And there's a

1:48:17.490 --> 1:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>whole month of it. Get five of your like, must

1:48:20.460 --> 1:48:23.979
<v Speaker 1>see in this month. Got to check them out. Horror

1:48:24.040 --> 1:48:25.060
<v Speaker 1>movies before we let you go.

1:48:25.979 --> 1:48:27.639
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm going to go to the old standards.

1:48:27.700 --> 1:48:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I always love the thing. The 1982 John

1:48:30.720 --> 1:48:33.540
<v Speaker 3>Carpenter movie. As much as I love the Halloween movies,

1:48:33.860 --> 1:48:36.809
<v Speaker 3>Halloween three season of The Witch is so bonkers. But

1:48:36.820 --> 1:48:38.670
<v Speaker 3>that's also very fun and very Halloweeny.

1:48:39.770 --> 1:48:40.610
<v Speaker 4>I would say.

1:48:42.400 --> 1:48:44.519
<v Speaker 3>Invasion of the Body Snatchers, always one of my favorite

1:48:44.620 --> 1:48:48.820
<v Speaker 3>ones for more modern ones. You know, the original Saw

1:48:48.979 --> 1:48:51.920
<v Speaker 3>is still quite unnerving. It is. You can do a

1:48:51.960 --> 1:48:54.800
<v Speaker 3>twofer with that, the original Hostel, which is that's the

1:48:54.820 --> 1:49:00.360
<v Speaker 3>dark torture porn area of the world. But, you know,

1:49:00.460 --> 1:49:04.750
<v Speaker 3>Eli Roth directed a kid's movie, which was The House

1:49:04.790 --> 1:49:07.070
<v Speaker 3>with the Clock in Its Walls. That's a really great

1:49:07.130 --> 1:49:11.300
<v Speaker 3>Halloween movie. And even though it's Eli Roth, it's it's

1:49:11.400 --> 1:49:14.420
<v Speaker 3>not a punishing horror. It's it's sort of like it's

1:49:14.479 --> 1:49:19.090
<v Speaker 3>gateway horror for something like, you know, Hocus Pocus level of.

1:49:19.210 --> 1:49:19.850
<v Speaker 1>Good for the kids.

1:49:19.890 --> 1:49:21.050
<v Speaker 5>So, yeah.

1:49:21.729 --> 1:49:21.950
<v Speaker 3>Nice.

1:49:22.070 --> 1:49:26.150
<v Speaker 1>And one more. Just one wild card. Because that was four. Well,

1:49:26.170 --> 1:49:28.050
<v Speaker 1>you did get five because you threw hostile and saw

1:49:28.090 --> 1:49:29.900
<v Speaker 1>in one that counts as one. And I'm making the rules.

1:49:31.040 --> 1:49:34.050
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, okay.

1:49:34.090 --> 1:49:34.590
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:49:34.870 --> 1:49:38.310
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's go crazy. Let's go completely bonkers. Hellraiser by

1:49:38.729 --> 1:49:40.510
<v Speaker 3>Clyde Barker. That's a really chilling movie.

1:49:40.590 --> 1:49:41.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it really is.

1:49:41.490 --> 1:49:42.390
<v Speaker 4>You've not seen it.

1:49:42.410 --> 1:49:42.849
<v Speaker 1>It is great.

1:49:42.870 --> 1:49:43.290
<v Speaker 3>Really chilling.

1:49:43.310 --> 1:49:43.809
<v Speaker 7>Not for the kids.

1:49:44.290 --> 1:49:44.750
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

1:49:45.030 --> 1:49:47.260
<v Speaker 1>Anything else before we let you go besides the fact

1:49:47.300 --> 1:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that you are Silver Gecko on Substack? You'll show up

1:49:49.540 --> 1:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in mailboxes. You have comics. You have stories. You do

1:49:52.240 --> 1:49:54.340
<v Speaker 1>all these other things, and occasionally you take the hit

1:49:54.360 --> 1:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for us at the theater so we know what's worth

1:49:56.540 --> 1:49:57.240
<v Speaker 1>our time or not.

1:49:58.370 --> 1:49:59.990
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, that seems to do it all.

1:50:00.090 --> 1:50:01.970
<v Speaker 4>So we'll end there.

1:50:02.030 --> 1:50:02.530
<v Speaker 3>That'll be good.

1:50:02.610 --> 1:50:04.410
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, then we're done. All right. Enjoy the

1:50:04.450 --> 1:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of your weekend. He's Kevin Carr. I'm Sterling. Silver

1:50:06.939 --> 1:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Gecko Substack. Go find him. Check him out. He'll pop

1:50:09.240 --> 1:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>into your mailbox. We'll do more of this on the

1:50:10.880 --> 1:50:15.340
<v Speaker 1>other side. 700-WLW. Not quite done yet. Lee Malowin's got

1:50:15.360 --> 1:50:18.490
<v Speaker 1>your midnight report in about seven minutes from.

1:50:19.830 --> 1:50:20.030
<v Speaker 7>Mark.

1:50:21.010 --> 1:50:23.370
<v Speaker 1>And then you get Red Eye Radio. I'll be back

1:50:23.410 --> 1:50:26.830
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow after Ken Brew, starting at 3. I'm not sure.

1:50:26.850 --> 1:50:29.110
<v Speaker 1>Donna D may be with me. She may not be

1:50:29.189 --> 1:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>with me. The guy who's created and stars in this

1:50:33.420 --> 1:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>show that's streaming on Amazon Prime called Graves End, which

1:50:39.160 --> 1:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty cool show. And it's a neat to

1:50:41.220 --> 1:50:42.920
<v Speaker 1>see that he was on, I think, before the first

1:50:42.960 --> 1:50:45.810
<v Speaker 1>season or shortly after the first season debuted. The third

1:50:45.860 --> 1:50:48.330
<v Speaker 1>season's now available. We'll talk to him tomorrow afternoon. I

1:50:48.330 --> 1:50:50.189
<v Speaker 1>think it's about 3.30 or so, if I'm not mistaken.

1:50:50.880 --> 1:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other stuff to get to tomorrow as well. Uh,

1:50:54.560 --> 1:50:58.720
<v Speaker 1>great calls tonight, incredible conversation, a boatload of other things,

1:50:58.760 --> 1:51:00.790
<v Speaker 1>but I was thinking about this Kevin Carr thing. And then, uh,

1:51:01.330 --> 1:51:04.809
<v Speaker 1>Melissa and Oakley who listens regularly, she and her husband,

1:51:04.870 --> 1:51:07.670
<v Speaker 1>she says, my husband never mentions his name. So I

1:51:07.689 --> 1:51:10.110
<v Speaker 1>don't know, uh, who that is, but either way, appreciate

1:51:10.130 --> 1:51:13.150
<v Speaker 1>you listening. Uh, and she added to the list of

1:51:13.220 --> 1:51:15.580
<v Speaker 1>horror movies. Cause Kevin Carr and I were talking about

1:51:15.620 --> 1:51:17.790
<v Speaker 1>some of that silver gecko on sub stack talking about, uh,

1:51:18.630 --> 1:51:21.390
<v Speaker 1>new movies and everything in this new digger, which you

1:51:21.430 --> 1:51:23.990
<v Speaker 1>may have just heard that conversation. She mentioned the conjuring.

1:51:24.030 --> 1:51:25.770
<v Speaker 1>How can you not mention the conjuring is one of

1:51:25.790 --> 1:51:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the best. I don't disagree with you. I like it. It's,

1:51:30.820 --> 1:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty good series that goes along with that.

1:51:34.160 --> 1:51:36.700
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the doll movies, and I don't mean Chucky,

1:51:36.740 --> 1:51:39.019
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the doll films from forever ago.

1:51:39.420 --> 1:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't, and there's a newer one, Annabelle, right?

1:51:42.040 --> 1:51:45.990
<v Speaker 1>That was like a doll and like a haunted and

1:51:46.050 --> 1:51:48.220
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that sort of goes with that. She

1:51:48.260 --> 1:51:50.010
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that. She also mentioned, how do you not mention

1:51:50.439 --> 1:51:54.470
<v Speaker 1>Texas Chainsaw Massacre? I agree. The original and then also

1:51:54.510 --> 1:51:58.590
<v Speaker 1>the one that they did in McConaughey. And I get

1:51:58.810 --> 1:52:01.610
<v Speaker 1>the blonde women mixed up in that. And I cannot

1:52:01.650 --> 1:52:04.370
<v Speaker 1>think of her name now. She got real big for

1:52:04.410 --> 1:52:09.570
<v Speaker 1>movies and then lost. Anyway, great in the remake on that, too.

1:52:10.570 --> 1:52:13.090
<v Speaker 1>In The Shining, I'll mention The Shining and Rosemary's Baby,

1:52:13.130 --> 1:52:16.530
<v Speaker 1>two movies that still to this day. will mess with me.

1:52:16.570 --> 1:52:18.550
<v Speaker 1>The Shining, of course, a book about the size of

1:52:18.570 --> 1:52:21.710
<v Speaker 1>the Iliad, not quite that big. The original movie, and then,

1:52:21.729 --> 1:52:24.830
<v Speaker 1>of course, they remade it in some weird incarnation a

1:52:24.850 --> 1:52:27.910
<v Speaker 1>time or two as well. And Rosemary's Baby, the original

1:52:27.990 --> 1:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>creep me the hell out, is a kid that I

1:52:30.410 --> 1:52:33.110
<v Speaker 1>got to see when I probably shouldn't have when it

1:52:33.140 --> 1:52:37.059
<v Speaker 1>was on TV, even somewhat edited, still sticks with me.

1:52:38.280 --> 1:52:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And they remade that into an episodic thing just a

1:52:42.280 --> 1:52:44.860
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, too. And that was really good as well.

1:52:45.189 --> 1:52:48.060
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for mentioning that, Melissa. So yeah, there's a

1:52:48.100 --> 1:52:50.340
<v Speaker 1>lot of different horror films that are out there. The

1:52:50.400 --> 1:52:54.800
<v Speaker 1>genres are the thing because there's the outlandish, inconceivable, over-the-top.

1:52:55.120 --> 1:52:57.780
<v Speaker 1>The thing that maybe as a child sticks with us,

1:52:57.860 --> 1:53:01.059
<v Speaker 1>or at least me, which is the idea that you

1:53:01.120 --> 1:53:03.220
<v Speaker 1>can't get rid of the killer, that they just keep

1:53:03.280 --> 1:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>coming back. It's sort of like that Halloween thing or

1:53:06.220 --> 1:53:09.150
<v Speaker 1>the Friday the 13th with Jason Voorhees or whatever else.

1:53:09.810 --> 1:53:12.090
<v Speaker 1>You kill him and they keep going back to the

1:53:12.110 --> 1:53:16.410
<v Speaker 1>same place, which I never understood. And And a new

1:53:16.490 --> 1:53:18.830
<v Speaker 1>Friday the 13th for us says, too. So we'll see

1:53:18.870 --> 1:53:21.970
<v Speaker 1>how that comes out. A prequel to the Friday. So

1:53:21.990 --> 1:53:25.850
<v Speaker 1>it'll be like Thursday the 12th. Crystal Lake makes sense.

1:53:25.900 --> 1:53:26.110
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:53:26.140 --> 1:53:28.340
<v Speaker 1>Which is where that all started. So interesting to see

1:53:28.380 --> 1:53:31.240
<v Speaker 1>how they sort of tie that all up and sort

1:53:31.280 --> 1:53:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of show you where it started. And I bet if

1:53:32.860 --> 1:53:36.580
<v Speaker 1>it does well, because they're not that expensive to make generally,

1:53:36.660 --> 1:53:39.140
<v Speaker 1>which is what Kevin has talked about time and time again.

1:53:39.689 --> 1:53:42.470
<v Speaker 1>then there'll probably be some more of those too. We

1:53:42.490 --> 1:53:44.570
<v Speaker 1>may get into this a little bit tomorrow and it's October.

1:53:44.590 --> 1:53:47.090
<v Speaker 1>So we've got time to talk scary movies, stuff that

1:53:47.130 --> 1:53:49.870
<v Speaker 1>creeps us out and stuff that makes us uncomfortable. And

1:53:50.370 --> 1:53:52.110
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us, aside from the news that can

1:53:52.130 --> 1:53:54.590
<v Speaker 1>be scary, we like to cough up hard-earned cash to

1:53:54.610 --> 1:53:58.830
<v Speaker 1>go places and let people scare us. I will never forget. Well,

1:53:58.930 --> 1:54:01.929
<v Speaker 1>I was probably 14 or 15 and I got kicked

1:54:02.030 --> 1:54:05.790
<v Speaker 1>out of a haunted house. I wasn't driving. I wasn't

1:54:05.830 --> 1:54:07.729
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with my friends. And I'm trying to remember

1:54:07.840 --> 1:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of my friends with us. And this was

1:54:11.160 --> 1:54:13.060
<v Speaker 1>in the Dayton area. We went to one of these

1:54:13.100 --> 1:54:17.630
<v Speaker 1>haunted houses. And I don't, I mean, look, a controlled

1:54:17.770 --> 1:54:22.230
<v Speaker 1>fear and chaos is great. But somebody touched me in

1:54:22.250 --> 1:54:25.900
<v Speaker 1>the haunted house, right? And I don't mean like I

1:54:25.939 --> 1:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was groped and molested, touched like that. I mean like

1:54:28.640 --> 1:54:31.099
<v Speaker 1>someone of the characters or the actors in The Haunted

1:54:31.160 --> 1:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>House reached out and grabbed me. My visceral response was

1:54:37.060 --> 1:54:42.020
<v Speaker 1>to punch. And I did. And they did not like that.

1:54:43.540 --> 1:54:46.660
<v Speaker 1>And then I was asked to leave. I don't know

1:54:46.720 --> 1:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how often that happens if you work in a haunted house.

1:54:49.780 --> 1:54:52.740
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there has to be some rules. But I

1:54:52.780 --> 1:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just remember... They grabbed me. I freaked out. The first

1:54:56.260 --> 1:55:00.560
<v Speaker 1>response was throw a punch. So I would imagine that

1:55:00.600 --> 1:55:05.550
<v Speaker 1>may happen more regularly than you would imagine. It just

1:55:05.590 --> 1:55:08.810
<v Speaker 1>has to happen occasionally, or at least it did to me.

1:55:09.230 --> 1:55:12.370
<v Speaker 1>And I got yelled at for that. I was like, well,

1:55:12.390 --> 1:55:13.470
<v Speaker 1>what do you want me to do? You touched me.

1:55:14.030 --> 1:55:15.690
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're like, well, it's a haunted house. You

1:55:15.710 --> 1:55:19.870
<v Speaker 1>paid to be scared. Yeah, but there are boundaries. And

1:55:20.290 --> 1:55:23.030
<v Speaker 1>you got into my personal bubble, my personal space, and

1:55:23.070 --> 1:55:27.420
<v Speaker 1>I frowned against that. And I still do. And subsequently,

1:55:27.440 --> 1:55:29.460
<v Speaker 1>I got to do a lot of promotions and work

1:55:29.540 --> 1:55:31.020
<v Speaker 1>in and around them. I have a cousin who used

1:55:31.060 --> 1:55:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to run one up in the Dayton-Springfield area for charity.

1:55:34.760 --> 1:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And I know did a lot of great work and

1:55:36.480 --> 1:55:38.470
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of great fun with that. I ought

1:55:38.490 --> 1:55:39.690
<v Speaker 1>to have him on and see if he's doing that,

1:55:39.970 --> 1:55:42.810
<v Speaker 1>how they dealt with that. Because my mom was not

1:55:42.890 --> 1:55:46.490
<v Speaker 1>happy with me. Why did you hit somebody? They touched me.

1:55:47.470 --> 1:55:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Told me not to let anybody just touch me. So

1:55:49.760 --> 1:55:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I did what I had to do. Here's something else,

1:55:51.480 --> 1:55:53.900
<v Speaker 1>and this is definitely something I'll get into tomorrow. A

1:55:53.980 --> 1:55:58.800
<v Speaker 1>former NASCAR driver in the truck series, a woman, you

1:55:58.820 --> 1:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>might know her name, Jennifer Jo Cobb. I think she's

1:56:01.560 --> 1:56:05.950
<v Speaker 1>no longer driving. She was accused of and apparently convicted

1:56:06.190 --> 1:56:12.410
<v Speaker 1>or found to be responsible for alienation of affection. A

1:56:12.490 --> 1:56:16.590
<v Speaker 1>jury found that she caused the marriage between Tracy Hughes,

1:56:17.020 --> 1:56:19.900
<v Speaker 1>And Clayton Hughes, with whom she had had an affair,

1:56:19.940 --> 1:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a side thing, she had caused alienation and trouble in

1:56:23.860 --> 1:56:27.060
<v Speaker 1>the marriage. And as a result of that, she is

1:56:27.100 --> 1:56:29.530
<v Speaker 1>going to have to pay. I got to think there's

1:56:29.550 --> 1:56:31.210
<v Speaker 1>going to be an appeal, but she was ordered to

1:56:31.250 --> 1:56:37.570
<v Speaker 1>pay eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars because she somehow

1:56:37.710 --> 1:56:42.610
<v Speaker 1>caused Tracy Hughes. And Clayton Hughes to have an alienation

1:56:42.670 --> 1:56:45.610
<v Speaker 1>of affection situation because somebody stepped out to get with

1:56:45.650 --> 1:56:49.540
<v Speaker 1>her and get a little bit on the side. Eight, eight, what?

1:56:50.400 --> 1:56:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight fifty. How much was that worth? dinner, a movie,

1:56:54.180 --> 1:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of drinks, a weekend, 8.50? What is that worth? Unbelievable.

1:57:00.160 --> 1:57:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The news straight away. Lee Malwin has an update on

1:57:03.380 --> 1:57:05.570
<v Speaker 1>what's going on around planet Earth and what matters to

1:57:05.650 --> 1:57:08.730
<v Speaker 1>us here in the tri-state and beyond. Red Eye Radio

1:57:08.770 --> 1:57:11.090
<v Speaker 1>to follow. Thank you, Russ Jackson, for doing what you do.

1:57:11.410 --> 1:57:13.510
<v Speaker 1>Great guests from Kevin Carr and Mike D.

1:57:13.570 --> 1:57:14.030
<v Speaker 9>Wall.

1:57:14.410 --> 1:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Who else? I know I'm forgetting other people.

1:57:18.360 --> 1:57:18.580
<v Speaker 3>Others.

1:57:20.430 --> 1:57:24.130
<v Speaker 1>And we'll do it again tomorrow afternoon following Ken Brew.

1:57:24.190 --> 1:57:26.310
<v Speaker 1>Moe Wagger. Moe, how do I forget Moe? Moe, my baby.

1:57:26.970 --> 1:57:30.010
<v Speaker 1>Moe on Talking Bengals and Bearcats, too. So, yeah, good show,

1:57:30.070 --> 1:57:32.870
<v Speaker 1>good calls, everything. Time for news. I'm done. I'm tired.

1:57:32.890 --> 1:57:34.610
<v Speaker 1>I've had a migraine all day. Bear with me. I'm

1:57:34.630 --> 1:57:36.450
<v Speaker 1>going to take some drugs after I get home and

1:57:36.830 --> 1:57:38.370
<v Speaker 1>be back here to do it again on the home

1:57:38.410 --> 1:57:42.590
<v Speaker 1>of the Reds and the Bearcats and the Bengals. News

1:57:42.650 --> 1:57:43.370
<v Speaker 1>Radio 700 WLW Cincinnati.

1:57:46.310 --> 1:57:48.260
<v Speaker 3>News, traffic, and weather.

1:57:48.810 --> 1:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>News Radio 700 WLW.

1:57:52.540 --> 1:57:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Cincinnati.

1:57:54.560 --> 1:57:58.600
<v Speaker 15>A new safety platform debuts for Blink 2K26. With your

1:57:58.640 --> 1:58:02.750
<v Speaker 15>midnight report, I'm Lee Mowan. Breaking now. Thursday is the

1:58:02.790 --> 1:58:05.190
<v Speaker 15>start date of Blink. It's also the first day for

1:58:05.210 --> 1:58:08.150
<v Speaker 15>the Cincy Alert platform. It's powered by the smart 911

1:58:08.150 --> 1:58:12.780
<v Speaker 15>app and promises security. to deliver updates about emergencies, weather conditions,

1:58:12.900 --> 1:58:17.460
<v Speaker 15>municipal information, and road closures. Visitors and residents alike can

1:58:17.600 --> 1:58:24.410
<v Speaker 15>opt in by texting BLINK2026 to 77295. Meantime, we've also

1:58:24.450 --> 1:58:26.880
<v Speaker 15>learned about the planned enforcement across Cincinnati.

1:58:26.900 --> 1:58:29.200
<v Speaker 11>I feel very good about where we are as a

1:58:29.240 --> 1:58:30.320
<v Speaker 11>city and as a region.

1:58:30.340 --> 1:58:32.860
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is an event that is in two states,

1:58:33.480 --> 1:58:35.990
<v Speaker 3>three different municipalities, two different counties.

1:58:36.730 --> 1:58:38.770
<v Speaker 10>It's a big event and it has a big public

1:58:38.790 --> 1:58:39.490
<v Speaker 10>safety response.