WEBVTT - Pregame Show - Mark Returns, RIP Donnie Iris 

0:00:00.790 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>As Twitter said today, Donnie Iris was the best of us.

0:00:06.260 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>He was a yinzer's yinzer. Some Pittsburghers leave, get famous,

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:16.860
<v Speaker 1>and never come back. But Donnie Iris never left. Donnie

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.710
<v Speaker 1>never big-timed anybody. Donnie never forgot where he came from.

0:00:22.860 --> 0:00:24.980
<v Speaker 1>I would say Donnie's in a better place, but to

0:00:25.020 --> 0:00:30.910
<v Speaker 1>Donnie Iris, the better place was Newcastle, Elwood City, or Coriopolis.

0:00:32.490 --> 0:00:37.150
<v Speaker 1>Donnie Iris passed away yesterday. He was 83. Donnie was

0:00:37.229 --> 0:00:40.470
<v Speaker 1>small in stature, but yet larger than life.

0:00:41.430 --> 0:00:42.170
<v Speaker 2>A giant.

0:00:43.510 --> 0:00:47.209
<v Speaker 1>His voice had that sonic quality, especially at the top end,

0:00:47.710 --> 0:00:52.900
<v Speaker 1>like a plaintive primal wail. And Donnie worked for it, too.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.860
<v Speaker 1>Even at Donnie's last show to Chris and the Wiley,

0:00:57.900 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Donnie sat in a chair, and he was clearly in

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad way.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.140
<v Speaker 2>But Donnie went for it, and he sparkled.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:11.470
<v Speaker 1>It was the last stand, and it was magnificent. Donnie

0:01:11.490 --> 0:01:14.430
<v Speaker 1>was 83. He didn't get cheated. He had a great run,

0:01:14.450 --> 0:01:20.130
<v Speaker 1>a great life, personally and professionally. Everybody loved Donnie Iris.

0:01:21.069 --> 0:01:25.069
<v Speaker 1>He was the model of perseverance. Donnie didn't hit big

0:01:25.110 --> 0:01:32.780
<v Speaker 1>till 1980, till he was 36. But Donnie had that short, skinny, timeless,

0:01:33.380 --> 0:01:36.300
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Holly type of look. And before you knew it,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:41.970
<v Speaker 1>Aaliyah was everywhere. And what a song it is, the layers,

0:01:42.650 --> 0:01:46.970
<v Speaker 1>the passion. Donnie was a fantastic singer, but he was

0:01:47.010 --> 0:01:51.130
<v Speaker 1>an even better songwriter. Him and Mark Avseck. And that's

0:01:51.190 --> 0:01:55.420
<v Speaker 1>the hard part. That is what's tough to do. To

0:01:55.460 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>write a hit song. To write an anthem to be

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.300
<v Speaker 1>played live that the crowd's going to sing along with.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>To get on the radio back when that really mattered.

0:02:06.540 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And Donnie and Mark did all the above. Donnie was

0:02:10.030 --> 0:02:15.829
<v Speaker 1>great live. Every time. Never disappointed. The Cruisers are a

0:02:15.870 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>great band. But as much as anything... Donny Iris was

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>one of us. Like I said, he never left. Donny

0:02:25.380 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Iris was never not ours. Not even for a second.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>A yinzer's yinzer.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.310
<v Speaker 2>The best of us. And I'm honored that Donny was

0:02:35.370 --> 0:02:35.870
<v Speaker 2>my friend.

0:02:37.860 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it'd turn up at one of my appearances, like

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at Sensi's in Mars, and that's only right, because I

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>went to dozens of his appearances, as in concerts.

0:02:49.100 --> 0:02:51.300
<v Speaker 2>Or I'd see him at Jurgle's at the cigar bar.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember one night, it was Michael Schenker on stage

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>from UFO, and Donny Iris in the cigar bar. What

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:06.739
<v Speaker 1>could be better? Donnie loved music, all music, new music.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:12.270
<v Speaker 1>Donnie loved the Steelers. Donnie loved Pittsburgh. And Donnie Iris

0:03:12.310 --> 0:03:16.250
<v Speaker 1>loved all of you. A day will never go by

0:03:17.310 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>when I don't miss him and wonder what his next

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>show is.

0:03:22.290 --> 0:03:24.709
<v Speaker 3>And now the super genius, Mark Madden.

0:03:24.770 --> 0:03:27.389
<v Speaker 2>The cream comes to the top. I feel like I'm

0:03:27.410 --> 0:03:28.290
<v Speaker 2>just bubbling over.

0:03:28.330 --> 0:03:29.730
<v Speaker 1>You wear pants while you're on the air?

0:03:29.750 --> 0:03:34.090
<v Speaker 3>Because I wouldn't. Who told you? The X at 105.9.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:49.860
<v Speaker 2>It's Double M.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Back in town for my one day per week of work.

0:03:53.310 --> 0:03:56.790
<v Speaker 1>Although I think I'm doing Friday's show from Hollywood in

0:03:56.810 --> 0:04:03.050
<v Speaker 1>between the Aerosmith shows. Randy Bauman's going to join the

0:04:03.110 --> 0:04:07.530
<v Speaker 1>show at 4.30 to talk more about Donny Iris. Obviously,

0:04:07.570 --> 0:04:13.540
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest story in Pittsburgh today. Randy has the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.099
<v Speaker 1>idea that they should erect a statue of Donnie in

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.260
<v Speaker 1>front of the Wiley, the new venue right by PPG

0:04:20.300 --> 0:04:23.420
<v Speaker 1>Paints Arena. I think that is an excellent idea, and

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.810
<v Speaker 1>the sooner the better. Okay, so let's talk about more

0:04:28.870 --> 0:04:35.470
<v Speaker 1>mundane stuff. I watched the Steeler game on VCR. And boy,

0:04:35.510 --> 0:04:38.750
<v Speaker 1>you talk about mundane. The Steelers are meh.

0:04:39.830 --> 0:04:40.070
<v Speaker 3>But.

0:04:40.820 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Disclaimer, the whole NFL is met, just about. But the

0:04:45.740 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are no better. Y'all excited about being 5-2, but

0:04:50.250 --> 0:04:54.710
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown and three field goals against a really blah

0:04:54.750 --> 0:04:55.670
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans team?

0:04:56.830 --> 0:05:00.410
<v Speaker 2>And you lean on the run game and the jumbo package?

0:05:01.150 --> 0:05:03.490
<v Speaker 1>It's like Mike McCarthy went to sleep and woke up

0:05:03.710 --> 0:05:06.029
<v Speaker 1>in 1966.

0:05:06.130 --> 0:05:08.670
<v Speaker 2>Warren was good. Dowdle was good.

0:05:09.950 --> 0:05:14.570
<v Speaker 1>They're different. They're a good fit together. I like that

0:05:14.630 --> 0:05:19.930
<v Speaker 1>division of duty. And maybe running the ball and using

0:05:19.970 --> 0:05:22.950
<v Speaker 1>that jumbo package is all the Steelers can really do well.

0:05:24.089 --> 0:05:26.890
<v Speaker 2>Here's something you're going to disagree with, but watch the tape.

0:05:27.029 --> 0:05:27.370
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:05:28.210 --> 0:05:33.169
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers' arm is mostly dead. Not the brain, but the

0:05:33.290 --> 0:05:38.610
<v Speaker 1>arm is. He can't zing it outside the numbers. More

0:05:38.650 --> 0:05:42.410
<v Speaker 1>than five, six yards away. He can't hit the deep

0:05:42.470 --> 0:05:47.190
<v Speaker 1>ball without floating it. The Steelers are 5-2 and not

0:05:47.290 --> 0:05:52.300
<v Speaker 1>at all inspiring. And now Cleveland comes to town this Sunday.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:56.580
<v Speaker 1>They're 5-2. And it's a big game out of nowhere

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at Akershire on Sunday. And Pittsburgh will probably win, but boy,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:11.390
<v Speaker 1>these Steelers look Tomlin-y. Rock fights, low scores, not many touchdowns,

0:06:11.970 --> 0:06:13.210
<v Speaker 1>boring AF.

0:06:14.490 --> 0:06:15.050
<v Speaker 2>Tomlin-y.

0:06:15.910 --> 0:06:16.250
<v Speaker 3>Yuck.

0:06:17.370 --> 0:06:20.589
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be excited, go ahead.

0:06:20.610 --> 0:06:24.430
<v Speaker 1>Hey, at least Marie Antoinette didn't get her head chopped

0:06:24.550 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>off in Paris. Now, you look ahead to this game,

0:06:29.940 --> 0:06:32.740
<v Speaker 1>Steelers defense and offense both rank above Cleveland's.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Steelers defense is sixth in the league in yardage.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:43.630
<v Speaker 1>15 scoring defense. But I'm still not sold on that defense.

0:06:45.070 --> 0:06:47.070
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring on Tommy Football. Tom, are you sold on

0:06:47.110 --> 0:06:49.610
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers? I'm starting to get sold on the Steelers.

0:06:49.630 --> 0:06:51.789
<v Speaker 1>And let me make my argument to you here. I

0:06:51.810 --> 0:06:53.450
<v Speaker 1>get where you're coming from as far as the Tomlin-y

0:06:53.470 --> 0:06:54.830
<v Speaker 1>thing for them not scoring points.

0:06:55.130 --> 0:06:56.610
<v Speaker 4>No excuse for that. You got to put the ball

0:06:56.650 --> 0:06:58.540
<v Speaker 4>in the end zone against the Saints more than they did.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.050
<v Speaker 4>But I feel like Tomlin loses that game or the

0:07:01.070 --> 0:07:03.770
<v Speaker 4>Tampa Bay Buccaneers game and doesn't have the Steelers set

0:07:03.830 --> 0:07:05.849
<v Speaker 4>up to go 4-0 in this stretch of four games

0:07:05.890 --> 0:07:08.089
<v Speaker 4>to be 6-2 at the bye week if they can

0:07:08.130 --> 0:07:08.650
<v Speaker 4>get past the Browns.

0:07:08.670 --> 0:07:10.830
<v Speaker 1>I agree with all that. I'm sold on McCarthy more

0:07:10.850 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>than I am his roster. And here's the other thing, too.

0:07:13.500 --> 0:07:15.660
<v Speaker 4>I know that they went jumbo package against the Saints,

0:07:16.020 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 4>and that is not what Mike McCarthy has done in

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.100
<v Speaker 4>his past. But the opponent dictated them to do that.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 4>They stunk against the run. You had to run it

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 4>down their throat.

0:07:23.700 --> 0:07:23.940
<v Speaker 3>And what.

0:07:24.660 --> 0:07:28.060
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy has to work with dictates that. His receiving room stinks.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 4>But I've been seeing week to week a new approach

0:07:31.580 --> 0:07:34.980
<v Speaker 4>to the opponent specifically designed for that opponent as opposed

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>to in the years past with Mike Tomlin.

0:07:36.340 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It was, we're the Steelers.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 4>We show up and we play our brand of football

0:07:39.700 --> 0:07:41.300
<v Speaker 4>and that's always going to be good enough. There's an

0:07:41.340 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 4>adaptability now to the team.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.059
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin did that because to do otherwise, to practice adaptability

0:07:47.460 --> 0:07:50.460
<v Speaker 1>requires actually coaching. And work during the week, yeah.

0:07:50.900 --> 0:07:51.890
<v Speaker 2>Exactamundo.

0:07:52.230 --> 0:07:54.190
<v Speaker 1>Now, are you sold on the Steelers defense? I'm not.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sold on the Steelers defense because we're not

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.390
<v Speaker 4>seeing the edge rushers have the impact that they're supposed

0:08:00.410 --> 0:08:03.290
<v Speaker 4>to have yet. I'm real skeptical still on the Steelers

0:08:03.330 --> 0:08:06.610
<v Speaker 4>secondary shock through for 278 yards like that just cannot

0:08:06.650 --> 0:08:09.190
<v Speaker 4>be ignored. When you look at that Saints game, I

0:08:09.270 --> 0:08:11.810
<v Speaker 4>am sold on one aspect of them though. And that's

0:08:11.830 --> 0:08:14.170
<v Speaker 4>their defensive line. Their front is as good as it

0:08:14.210 --> 0:08:16.190
<v Speaker 4>was advertised at the beginning of the season. And they

0:08:16.210 --> 0:08:18.790
<v Speaker 4>have to rely on depth, and they've gotten by beautifully. Yeah,

0:08:18.810 --> 0:08:20.790
<v Speaker 4>they've gotten by without harm, and that says a lot

0:08:21.190 --> 0:08:23.130
<v Speaker 4>about them guys in the trenches. Are you sold on

0:08:23.150 --> 0:08:26.070
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers' offense? Only one touchdown in Paris, they could

0:08:26.090 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>have played that game in a railroad car. Similarly to

0:08:28.380 --> 0:08:30.580
<v Speaker 4>the defense, I'm sold on aspects. I think they can

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 4>run the football. I think that they're good at that.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.580
<v Speaker 4>Warren is a legitimate, not a superstar, but a star

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 4>in the making. He's having a breakout year as far

0:08:38.900 --> 0:08:42.380
<v Speaker 4>as that's concerned. But I still need to see them

0:08:42.570 --> 0:08:47.290
<v Speaker 4>against a real, legit, strong defense. and how they handle

0:08:47.350 --> 0:08:49.850
<v Speaker 4>pressure from a real strong defense. I know the Saints

0:08:49.929 --> 0:08:51.810
<v Speaker 4>pressured Rodgers. He was able to get away from it.

0:08:52.230 --> 0:08:54.309
<v Speaker 4>The Bucs did too. He was able to make enough

0:08:54.429 --> 0:08:56.650
<v Speaker 4>out of it to win those games. But what about

0:08:56.690 --> 0:08:59.230
<v Speaker 4>when a real team like Denver, or I know Houston's

0:08:59.250 --> 0:09:00.770
<v Speaker 4>been sucking lately, but they can still get a lot

0:09:00.790 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of pressure on the quarterback. What happens then? I'm not

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:04.140
<v Speaker 4>sold on that aspect.

0:09:04.380 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Are you happy with the running back split?

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.300
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people want Warren to get more carries,

0:09:08.340 --> 0:09:10.900
<v Speaker 1>but I think Donald's more than earning his key. I'm

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely happy.

0:09:12.100 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 4>Happy with what they've done it was 15 touches total

0:09:14.900 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 4>for dowdle uh 21 touches total for jaylen warren i

0:09:18.059 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 4>think that's perfect as long as warren's over that 20

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.479
<v Speaker 4>touch threshold i think you're using him appropriately and the

0:09:24.500 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 4>other thing you just said there that's the most important

0:09:26.059 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 4>as far as the split is concerned it's not like

0:09:27.620 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 4>you put dowdle out there for 15 touches and he

0:09:29.420 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 4>averaged like a yard per carry he was having impact

0:09:32.020 --> 0:09:33.940
<v Speaker 4>in the game as well he was their leading receiver

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 4>pass catching wise you.

0:09:34.900 --> 0:09:38.020
<v Speaker 1>Know why people want warren to get more carries fantasy

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.990
<v Speaker 1>football But he had a good fantasy game anyway. He

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:42.300
<v Speaker 1>had 100 yards. That's good.

0:09:42.350 --> 0:09:43.380
<v Speaker 2>But more is more.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.630
<v Speaker 1>More is more, yeah. It's amazing how fantasy culture permanates

0:09:48.190 --> 0:09:51.870
<v Speaker 1>how you look at your favorite team or you make

0:09:51.910 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Warren your favorite player because you drafted him.

0:09:54.470 --> 0:09:56.010
<v Speaker 2>But nobody drafted Rico Donald.

0:09:56.260 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 4>In that specific position i think is where that factors

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.540
<v Speaker 4>in maybe the most because you see splits at that

0:10:01.590 --> 0:10:04.089
<v Speaker 4>position throughout the nfl and a team like the steelers

0:10:04.150 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 4>i mean it's in their best interest to keep that

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.380
<v Speaker 4>20 touches Warren, 15 touches Rico Dowdle line of thinking

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.420
<v Speaker 4>going for the season. It'll help Warren out in the

0:10:13.460 --> 0:10:13.900
<v Speaker 4>long run.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it reminds me of Tom when the Steelers

0:10:15.740 --> 0:10:19.060
<v Speaker 1>were 11 and 0 in 2020. And I said, I

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.870
<v Speaker 1>just don't think they're very good. And it turned out

0:10:20.910 --> 0:10:23.730
<v Speaker 1>they indeed weren't very good. This isn't that foolish. I mean,

0:10:23.750 --> 0:10:25.809
<v Speaker 1>they have five and two is not seven and 0,

0:10:25.809 --> 0:10:26.950
<v Speaker 1>let alone 11 and 0.

0:10:26.950 --> 0:10:28.390
<v Speaker 2>But, but I don't know.

0:10:28.490 --> 0:10:31.790
<v Speaker 1>I just can't buy in. I, I, I feel like again,

0:10:31.809 --> 0:10:33.630
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean this in a good way.

0:10:33.850 --> 0:10:34.730
<v Speaker 2>It's very Tomlin-y.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.980
<v Speaker 4>But the caveat is the league's stinking, and there's no

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.020
<v Speaker 4>one in the AFC North that looks like they're really

0:10:42.059 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 4>ready to reach up and take control of the division.

0:10:44.620 --> 0:10:46.140
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's going to be the winner of this game

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday between the Steelers and the Browns.

0:10:48.140 --> 0:10:53.730
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you beat Cleveland, then you play Cincinnati. After

0:10:53.770 --> 0:10:56.230
<v Speaker 1>a bye. Right, but I think Cincinnati's going to beat them.

0:10:56.620 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 4>They have to fly back from Madrid, though, the week before.

0:10:59.090 --> 0:11:01.030
<v Speaker 4>That's a little bit of a tricky travel spot for them.

0:11:01.050 --> 0:11:02.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Cincinnati's going to beat them.

0:11:03.350 --> 0:11:05.390
<v Speaker 1>And then the week after, though, you're at Philadelphia, but

0:11:05.429 --> 0:11:07.650
<v Speaker 1>there's no Jalen Hurts, and they're clearly in a downward

0:11:07.690 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>spiral being 2-5. But you never win there. Yeah, but

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.220
<v Speaker 1>they win two of the next three, no matter who

0:11:12.260 --> 0:11:14.020
<v Speaker 1>the two are against. You've got to beat Cleveland. If

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you win one of the next two after that, you're

0:11:15.900 --> 0:11:17.020
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. Yeah, I agree.

0:11:17.179 --> 0:11:19.810
<v Speaker 4>And it's totally fine as far as the division is concerned, too,

0:11:19.850 --> 0:11:21.430
<v Speaker 4>because you would have taken a split with the Bengals

0:11:21.450 --> 0:11:23.270
<v Speaker 4>at the beginning of the year, right? And said that

0:11:23.290 --> 0:11:25.210
<v Speaker 4>that would have been probably good enough to compete for

0:11:25.230 --> 0:11:28.070
<v Speaker 4>the AFC North division. You already accomplished the win aspect

0:11:28.110 --> 0:11:31.010
<v Speaker 4>of that split. So if you go win Browns, lose Bengals,

0:11:31.030 --> 0:11:32.550
<v Speaker 4>win Eagles, you're set.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:34.580
<v Speaker 2>You do agree that the Steelers are boring.

0:11:35.540 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. I don't know if I

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:37.620
<v Speaker 1>agree with that.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 2>You're a Mark. You're a Yenzer.

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:41.420
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Mark.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.990
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're actually executing this stretch like they're supposed to.

0:11:45.070 --> 0:11:47.210
<v Speaker 4>And to me, that's not boring. They didn't stub their toe.

0:11:47.220 --> 0:11:49.020
<v Speaker 1>If they're executing like they're supposed to, how come they

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>only got one touchdown? But they're winning the games.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.219
<v Speaker 4>They had not won these games in years past. They'd

0:11:53.340 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 4>always stubbed their toe. The Tampa game would have been

0:11:55.220 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 4>a loss, no doubt. You've got to play better than

0:11:56.580 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>this to win real games.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.620
<v Speaker 1>And Rodgers said that after the game against the Saints.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:00.540
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I give credit for that.

0:12:01.059 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>He didn't, you know, rest on his laurels and say,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.990
<v Speaker 1>this was fantastic. We've won three in a row. Everything

0:12:05.050 --> 0:12:07.590
<v Speaker 1>is clicking perfectly. Do you agree that we're kidding ourselves

0:12:07.630 --> 0:12:10.070
<v Speaker 1>about his arm? I think there are aspects of his

0:12:10.110 --> 0:12:11.489
<v Speaker 1>arm that have faded. I do.

0:12:11.750 --> 0:12:13.770
<v Speaker 4>I still think when he has to, though, he can get— like,

0:12:13.490 --> 0:12:14.929
<v Speaker 4>the deep ball to DK was pretty good.

0:12:15.470 --> 0:12:17.689
<v Speaker 2>It's not when he has to. It's once in a while.

0:12:17.710 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there's anything clutch in Brad, and sometimes

0:12:21.059 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it happens, sometimes it doesn't. And I'm more worried about

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.420
<v Speaker 1>throwing outside the hash marks than I am deep.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 2>You don't throw deep that much.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.340
<v Speaker 4>I think he's able to hide the inefficiencies though, with

0:12:29.380 --> 0:12:31.740
<v Speaker 4>his brains. Like he knows where to throw the ball.

0:12:31.780 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not ripping the guy at all.

0:12:32.900 --> 0:12:35.420
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been fine. He's 90 years older. However,

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.650
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's going to turn to dust. One of

0:12:37.690 --> 0:12:39.770
<v Speaker 1>these days, he's going to throw a ball, Tom, and

0:12:39.790 --> 0:12:40.630
<v Speaker 1>his arm's going to fall off.

0:12:42.429 --> 0:12:43.610
<v Speaker 4>You know what he has been doing a lot of

0:12:43.830 --> 0:12:46.870
<v Speaker 4>is taking sacks himself. Like he's the second most sack

0:12:46.890 --> 0:12:48.670
<v Speaker 4>quarterback in the NFL this year. And I don't know

0:12:48.690 --> 0:12:50.770
<v Speaker 4>if that's on the offensive line. I think the line's

0:12:50.790 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 4>been doing a better job week to week to week.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.700
<v Speaker 4>He hangs onto the ball a lot longer this year. And,

0:12:56.070 --> 0:12:58.930
<v Speaker 4>He's taken some boneheaded sacks, too. Like the fire drill

0:12:58.970 --> 0:13:00.630
<v Speaker 4>sack he took before the end of the first half.

0:13:01.010 --> 0:13:02.010
<v Speaker 4>Why are you taking that sack?

0:13:02.030 --> 0:13:03.890
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of that. They're reminding me of all the

0:13:03.950 --> 0:13:07.910
<v Speaker 1>protesters running around trying to avoid the water cannons. In France.

0:13:08.110 --> 0:13:12.390
<v Speaker 2>Nothing happened, though, Tom. The NFL conquers all.

0:13:12.429 --> 0:13:17.630
<v Speaker 1>They did, yes. Their security force. You know who else

0:13:17.710 --> 0:13:19.390
<v Speaker 1>had a big weekend was T.J. Watt's wife.

0:13:20.830 --> 0:13:22.550
<v Speaker 2>Complaining about almost safety.

0:13:22.670 --> 0:13:23.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:13:23.070 --> 0:13:25.569
<v Speaker 2>Complaining about like, you know, like stats. I mean, like

0:13:26.050 --> 0:13:27.690
<v Speaker 2>they won the game. Why are you complaining?

0:13:27.710 --> 0:13:30.730
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. And then she was also complaining about

0:13:30.750 --> 0:13:32.740
<v Speaker 4>the team going over, right? Like I saw that she

0:13:32.770 --> 0:13:34.700
<v Speaker 4>had some posts on Instagram. Like this is ridiculous that

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.340
<v Speaker 4>we have to fly over and play this game in Paris,

0:13:36.380 --> 0:13:38.740
<v Speaker 4>France and all this turmoil and unrest.

0:13:39.020 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, the protesters probably like saw that and saw her

0:13:41.540 --> 0:13:42.740
<v Speaker 1>and say, we're not going to mess with her.

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:43.380
<v Speaker 2>You know what?

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.660
<v Speaker 1>That's like, remember old country for no men. Yes.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.070
<v Speaker 2>Remember the mother-in-law?

0:13:47.429 --> 0:13:48.069
<v Speaker 1>Don't you worry.

0:13:48.150 --> 0:13:49.390
<v Speaker 2>Nobody's going to bother her.

0:13:49.390 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>105.9 The X.

0:13:52.260 --> 0:13:56.220
<v Speaker 3>It's the Woody Show. Weekday mornings at 6 on 105.9

0:13:56.220 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 3>The X.

0:13:57.140 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>This hour of the Mark Madden Show is brought to

0:13:59.220 --> 0:14:03.380
<v Speaker 1>you by Bud Light. Proudly served at Mountain. Super genius.

0:14:03.540 --> 0:14:04.420
<v Speaker 1>I love the show.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.580
<v Speaker 2>What he likes ain't legal nowhere but Medellin.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>The X at 105.9.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what to make of this game Sunday

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.479
<v Speaker 1>between the Steelers and Cleveland at Accresure. I know they're

0:14:17.500 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>both five and two. I know they're tied for first

0:14:20.340 --> 0:14:24.860
<v Speaker 1>place atop the AFC North. But I think they're just

0:14:24.900 --> 0:14:29.300
<v Speaker 1>playing for the title of slumlord of slop town. As

0:14:29.330 --> 0:14:32.870
<v Speaker 1>somebody said on Twitter a couple weeks back, Tom, do

0:14:32.890 --> 0:14:36.700
<v Speaker 1>you buy into Cleveland? Not yet entirely, but.

0:14:37.620 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty clear that Deshaun Watson isn't going to flash

0:14:39.950 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 4>all the way back into his pan of his form

0:14:41.780 --> 0:14:45.090
<v Speaker 4>in recent couple of years. Like he's a solid quarterback

0:14:45.130 --> 0:14:46.410
<v Speaker 4>right now. And we said at the beginning of the year,

0:14:46.430 --> 0:14:47.510
<v Speaker 4>the Browns have a good roster.

0:14:47.650 --> 0:14:49.810
<v Speaker 1>He was just going to suck, but that's not been

0:14:49.830 --> 0:14:51.830
<v Speaker 1>the case. I didn't think he was going to suck.

0:14:52.130 --> 0:14:55.870
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, I entertained the possibility he might suck,

0:14:56.450 --> 0:14:58.530
<v Speaker 1>but I thought he was by far their best choice

0:14:58.570 --> 0:15:01.890
<v Speaker 1>to start over Sanders. People didn't like that. All those

0:15:02.750 --> 0:15:07.030
<v Speaker 1>bleeding morality and, and hand jobs and, and masseurs and,

0:15:07.930 --> 0:15:11.470
<v Speaker 1>whatever he was into, you know, which was reprehensible, but

0:15:11.990 --> 0:15:13.930
<v Speaker 1>you know, he, he did his time.

0:15:13.950 --> 0:15:15.390
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:15:15.430 --> 0:15:17.820
<v Speaker 1>Went through the process and you got to let the

0:15:17.860 --> 0:15:20.380
<v Speaker 1>guy play again and he's playing pretty good. No, he is.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.540
<v Speaker 4>And that's why you start to buy into them somewhat

0:15:23.660 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 4>because the roster around him is a legitimately good roster

0:15:26.540 --> 0:15:29.180
<v Speaker 4>building towards something, a young roster, two really good young

0:15:29.220 --> 0:15:31.990
<v Speaker 4>receivers that are rookies. Schlesinger on the defensive side of

0:15:32.010 --> 0:15:34.390
<v Speaker 4>the ball is a great off ball linebacker developing into

0:15:34.430 --> 0:15:36.310
<v Speaker 4>his own. It was just going to be the quarterback

0:15:36.330 --> 0:15:38.190
<v Speaker 4>that we thought would hold them back. But instead, he's

0:15:38.210 --> 0:15:41.310
<v Speaker 4>leading fourth quarter comebacks and making them pull out road

0:15:41.330 --> 0:15:42.690
<v Speaker 4>wins against the Titans when it looks like they would

0:15:42.710 --> 0:15:43.390
<v Speaker 4>blow that game.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.770
<v Speaker 1>Before the season started, would you have started him? How'd

0:15:45.790 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you weigh in?

0:15:46.550 --> 0:15:49.060
<v Speaker 4>I probably would have started Deshaun Watson, but I expected

0:15:49.100 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>him to stink. And then they would have made the

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:52.540
<v Speaker 4>transition to Shador Sanders at some point.

0:15:52.580 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>See, I don't want that guy on my team, let

0:15:54.980 --> 0:15:59.290
<v Speaker 1>alone playing quarterback. But A, I'm paying him anyway. And B,

0:15:59.740 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the other option is Shador Sanders.

0:16:01.700 --> 0:16:03.740
<v Speaker 4>Well, and I know this is the benefit of hindsight,

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 4>but C, it was clearly the right choice. He's clearly

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.100
<v Speaker 4>a far better quarterback than Shador Sanders is.

0:16:08.940 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no question about that. Tom, did you see what

0:16:14.460 --> 0:16:20.090
<v Speaker 1>Pat McAfee said? Yes. He got kind of heckled on

0:16:20.110 --> 0:16:23.530
<v Speaker 1>the Utah Instagram page, right? The official Utah Instagram page.

0:16:24.380 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And he said he never wanted to go back to Utah.

0:16:27.100 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And he talked about being uncomfortable in a place where

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he drew a parallel between him getting a hard time

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.860
<v Speaker 1>in Utah and Charlie Kirk being assassinated. And it goes

0:16:37.900 --> 0:16:40.660
<v Speaker 1>to show how much power Pat has because, to me,

0:16:40.710 --> 0:16:44.150
<v Speaker 1>that's a suspendable offense, being that tasteless. To draw that comparison.

0:16:44.170 --> 0:16:45.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to draw that comparison.

0:16:45.450 --> 0:16:48.989
<v Speaker 1>And yet he got Utah... And who else apologized? I

0:16:49.030 --> 0:16:52.470
<v Speaker 1>think ESPN even. I saw Utah officially apologize.

0:16:52.570 --> 0:16:53.030
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:16:53.070 --> 0:16:54.910
<v Speaker 2>There was another apology, too. I forget who.

0:16:55.330 --> 0:16:57.430
<v Speaker 4>People just apologizing to him, just walking down the hallways

0:16:57.490 --> 0:16:59.170
<v Speaker 4>at ESPN and saying they're sorry just to be safe.

0:16:59.190 --> 0:17:01.690
<v Speaker 1>Well, there was somebody tweeted. I think this is such

0:17:01.790 --> 0:17:05.250
<v Speaker 1>a great comparison. So I'm lifting it for my very own.

0:17:05.310 --> 0:17:07.889
<v Speaker 1>I will, after acknowledging it now, pass it along as

0:17:07.930 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my original idea. pat has turned into biff tannin from

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the future too oh.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 4>That's so great you know why that's so great because

0:17:15.580 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 4>as much of a bully biff tannin is he's just

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.659
<v Speaker 4>as much of a dummy too like he's a dumb

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.100
<v Speaker 4>bully like he does the that's as dumb as a

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.629
<v Speaker 4>screen door on a battleship line to marty mcfly and

0:17:24.650 --> 0:17:27.169
<v Speaker 4>he's like it's on a submarine you dummy like he

0:17:27.230 --> 0:17:29.030
<v Speaker 4>bullies people but he doesn't have the brain power to

0:17:29.090 --> 0:17:31.369
<v Speaker 4>do it properly and i'm not saying that pat's a

0:17:31.390 --> 0:17:33.390
<v Speaker 4>big dummy except i kind of am.

0:17:33.310 --> 0:17:39.729
<v Speaker 1>Yes Well, no, Pat isn't dumb. He's just really insecure.

0:17:40.109 --> 0:17:41.250
<v Speaker 2>That's for damn sure.

0:17:41.410 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's a guy who has the best media deal, the

0:17:44.300 --> 0:17:46.939
<v Speaker 1>biggest media profile in the country.

0:17:47.730 --> 0:17:49.629
<v Speaker 2>And that might include besides sports.

0:17:49.670 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It might include everything, but he can't take even an

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.140
<v Speaker 1>iota of criticism, not one.

0:17:54.380 --> 0:17:57.220
<v Speaker 4>And you saw the video, right? That the Utah kids posted.

0:17:57.700 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 4>It was innocuous thing ever. And most of the kids

0:18:01.220 --> 0:18:03.370
<v Speaker 4>were just making fun of him for that gimmick that

0:18:03.380 --> 0:18:05.850
<v Speaker 4>he does every week of taking off his shirt, which

0:18:05.950 --> 0:18:08.030
<v Speaker 4>is just so old and played out now.

0:18:08.050 --> 0:18:08.730
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's cringy.

0:18:08.970 --> 0:18:11.590
<v Speaker 4>And he definitely got butthurt over that. He saw them

0:18:11.650 --> 0:18:14.770
<v Speaker 4>making fun of his gimmick. And then the insecurity just

0:18:15.050 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>overran his thought process.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.929
<v Speaker 1>And, uh, Like I said, he can't stand any criticism.

0:18:23.190 --> 0:18:25.230
<v Speaker 1>He wants everything run exactly his way.

0:18:25.250 --> 0:18:28.300
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:18:28.340 --> 0:18:32.020
<v Speaker 1>The Biff Cannon comparison is just so right on the money.

0:18:32.060 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Charlie Kirk comparison, that parallel was absolutely tasteless.

0:18:35.580 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's insane.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>If I said that, I'd be in hot water. I

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:39.570
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't get fired.

0:18:39.609 --> 0:18:40.649
<v Speaker 1>You should be in hot water. But I'd be in

0:18:40.810 --> 0:18:44.690
<v Speaker 1>hot water. It's an insane parallel to draw. Literally, that's

0:18:44.810 --> 0:18:48.490
<v Speaker 1>mentally not okay to go there in your head to say, Hey,

0:18:48.530 --> 0:18:50.149
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of kids saying I shouldn't take my

0:18:50.210 --> 0:18:52.180
<v Speaker 1>shirt off. I think they want to assassinate me.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:18:53.940 --> 0:18:55.490
<v Speaker 2>Oh, and I know what I was going to say.

0:18:57.230 --> 0:18:57.730
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:18:58.660 --> 0:19:01.859
<v Speaker 1>Last week, wherever game day was, it was $ 3 million to.

0:19:01.740 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>The kicking contest.

0:19:03.060 --> 0:19:04.820
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's right. It was in BYU, right? It was

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>only because some other donors came through, some backers. And

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this week, it was only $ 1 million. And I guess

0:19:09.580 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the kid kicking kind of chided Pat about it. But

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.780
<v Speaker 1>that was harmless, too. Yes, that's kind of the ribbing

0:19:14.820 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be on a show like that, right? Like,

0:19:16.660 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>give and take.

0:19:17.100 --> 0:19:19.340
<v Speaker 4>How about Pat has a nice one-liner, a zinger ready

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:20.580
<v Speaker 4>to go right back at the kid?

0:19:20.619 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, Pat doesn't.

0:19:21.460 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Pat is overly— you might not believe this one.

0:19:24.540 --> 0:19:28.300
<v Speaker 2>I've concluded about Pat. He's overly rehearsed. You get the idea.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:29.340
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't rehearse at all.

0:19:29.940 --> 0:19:30.060
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But you can catch him off guard if you say

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 2>something unexpected.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Like that. I think it was a girl. I think

0:19:35.700 --> 0:19:36.500
<v Speaker 1>it was a woman who did it.

0:19:37.010 --> 0:19:39.150
<v Speaker 4>She said that to him. He was kind of caught unawares.

0:19:39.170 --> 0:19:40.949
<v Speaker 4>Because that wasn't part of the script. That wasn't how

0:19:40.970 --> 0:19:42.590
<v Speaker 4>things were supposed to go for Pat McAfee. It was

0:19:42.630 --> 0:19:44.350
<v Speaker 4>just supposed to be, hey, I got a chance to

0:19:44.369 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 4>kick for a million dollars. And she was supposed to go,

0:19:46.050 --> 0:19:48.369
<v Speaker 4>thank you, Pat McAfee. You're the greatest human being to

0:19:48.390 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 4>walk the earth for even giving me this opportunity.

0:19:50.460 --> 0:19:54.380
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Chuck Norris did you see the halftime score

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.380
<v Speaker 1>of the WNBA final no 25-22 it was the lowest

0:19:58.859 --> 0:20:03.010
<v Speaker 1>scoring first half in WNBA finals history And afterwards, all

0:20:03.170 --> 0:20:05.730
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta coach did and Angel Reese did was complain

0:20:05.770 --> 0:20:07.910
<v Speaker 1>about her getting five. I saw that they were complaining. Meanwhile,

0:20:07.930 --> 0:20:10.230
<v Speaker 1>she's the biggest hack in history. Yes. I saw that

0:20:10.250 --> 0:20:12.370
<v Speaker 1>there was some complaining happening after the game. And they're

0:20:12.390 --> 0:20:15.389
<v Speaker 1>playing game six at Atlanta. They want to get the

0:20:15.430 --> 0:20:17.510
<v Speaker 1>bigger arena. They're playing in the afternoon.

0:20:18.750 --> 0:20:19.390
<v Speaker 3>Weekday afternoon.

0:20:19.410 --> 0:20:20.730
<v Speaker 1>Because they want to play where the Hawks are playing?

0:20:20.850 --> 0:20:21.109
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:21.430 --> 0:20:23.830
<v Speaker 4>Instead of in their usual gym? But it's weekday afternoon.

0:20:23.890 --> 0:20:27.429
<v Speaker 4>This league is so inept. It just gets in its

0:20:27.490 --> 0:20:30.790
<v Speaker 4>way at every turn. Why would you put your WNBA

0:20:30.869 --> 0:20:33.670
<v Speaker 4>final game... And I think it's a clinching game, too.

0:20:33.950 --> 0:20:34.469
<v Speaker 2>It can be, yeah.

0:20:34.550 --> 0:20:35.490
<v Speaker 3>In the afternoon.

0:20:35.510 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of clinching, you think Milwaukee's got it wrapped up? Yeah,

0:20:39.460 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it's over.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Tonight's done. Did you see that stadium in Tampa Bay

0:20:42.380 --> 0:20:45.300
<v Speaker 4>for Game 3? It was a Milwaukee takeover. There were

0:20:45.380 --> 0:20:46.660
<v Speaker 4>so many Brewer fans down there.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.429
<v Speaker 1>Well, A, Tampa Bay never has drawn. Never. B, I

0:20:50.470 --> 0:20:53.689
<v Speaker 1>keep saying about empty seats, because we've talked in the

0:20:53.710 --> 0:20:56.270
<v Speaker 1>past week when I've deigned to show up, which isn't often,

0:20:56.290 --> 0:20:59.300
<v Speaker 1>and I wish I didn't at all. But we've talked

0:20:59.340 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about empty seats in a lot of different things, like

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.140
<v Speaker 1>the Vegas Golden Knights sellout streak ending.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.109
<v Speaker 2>The tickets are just too expensive. It's nothing beyond that.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.770
<v Speaker 4>And does anything change in that regard? Do the ticket

0:21:08.810 --> 0:21:10.970
<v Speaker 4>prices ever start to come back down? I don't think

0:21:11.010 --> 0:21:13.230
<v Speaker 4>they do. I don't think you ever put that toothpaste.

0:21:12.930 --> 0:21:13.389
<v Speaker 1>Back in the tube.

0:21:13.450 --> 0:21:15.010
<v Speaker 2>And the games are all free on TV.

0:21:15.030 --> 0:21:17.310
<v Speaker 4>The only thing would be if wages, as far as

0:21:17.330 --> 0:21:19.790
<v Speaker 4>the economy was concerned, started to go up to match

0:21:19.850 --> 0:21:23.070
<v Speaker 4>the ticket prices. That's our only bet. But they're never

0:21:23.109 --> 0:21:25.250
<v Speaker 4>going to bring the prices down. That's just not how

0:21:25.270 --> 0:21:26.190
<v Speaker 4>these owners operate.

0:21:26.390 --> 0:21:28.270
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about this with Pierre later, but

0:21:28.310 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, McDavid's on pace to score 235 points, which

0:21:31.100 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>would be a single season record, but he's going to

0:21:33.340 --> 0:21:34.540
<v Speaker 1>fall off. He has to, right?

0:21:35.740 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like he's going to have a dry

0:21:38.780 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>spell at some point. Let me ask you what I'm

0:21:40.260 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>going to ask Pierre though. Let's say he breaks the

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>single season points record, which is 215. And I do

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.660
<v Speaker 1>not think he will, but let's just say, but still

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't win a cup ever. I don't think he's top five.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.460
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can put him in there.

0:21:54.650 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he can either, but it's tough not to.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.979
<v Speaker 4>I know, but it just comes with the territory for

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.619
<v Speaker 4>all the all-time greats. Every single person that you put

0:22:01.660 --> 0:22:04.140
<v Speaker 4>forward as an all-time great in hockey has a cup,

0:22:04.369 --> 0:22:05.010
<v Speaker 4>at least one.

0:22:05.790 --> 0:22:07.850
<v Speaker 1>Every one. There's no Marino in that sport.

0:22:08.970 --> 0:22:13.470
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget, it's contingent on him never getting hurt.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This season, yeah. If he misses like two or three games,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.740
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to– even if he keeps his pace up. Now,

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>do you put an asterisk on it?

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.570
<v Speaker 4>If he gets it by like a point in the

0:22:23.700 --> 0:22:25.570
<v Speaker 4>84th game, do you put a little asterisk on it?

0:22:25.710 --> 0:22:26.230
<v Speaker 2>Single season.

0:22:26.250 --> 0:22:28.330
<v Speaker 1>You're playing by the rules that are presented to you.

0:22:28.510 --> 0:22:30.629
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. I don't pull Roger Marris.

0:22:30.670 --> 0:22:33.050
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That was disgraceful. That they did to him.

0:22:33.170 --> 0:22:38.209
<v Speaker 1>And the commissioner of baseball was Babe Ruth's former publicist.

0:22:38.570 --> 0:22:40.100
<v Speaker 1>What the frig else is he going to do except

0:22:40.130 --> 0:22:42.300
<v Speaker 1>back his guy? And didn't it take him like– Fewer

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.740
<v Speaker 1>games anyway to hit the 6,100? No. No, it did

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>take him into the extra point of the season. After 154,

0:22:47.700 --> 0:22:49.700
<v Speaker 1>he had 59. Okay. But, I mean, come on.

0:22:50.700 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 4>That's Roger Maris' fault because they added games? Because the

0:22:53.660 --> 0:22:55.899
<v Speaker 4>owners and the commissioner wanted to add more money to

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 4>the season?

0:22:57.300 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Should have done steroids. 105.9.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.750
<v Speaker 1>From the NJM Insurance Weather Center. This report is sponsored

0:23:03.770 --> 0:23:07.190
<v Speaker 1>by Groundworks, your local experts for foundation and concrete repair.

0:23:07.450 --> 0:23:08.550
<v Speaker 2>Few more clouds.

0:23:08.270 --> 0:23:10.030
<v Speaker 1>Today, but still a nice day. It makes the sun

0:23:10.050 --> 0:23:10.350
<v Speaker 1>and clouds.

0:23:10.650 --> 0:23:11.129
<v Speaker 3>Oh, hi.

0:23:11.470 --> 0:23:13.950
<v Speaker 2>Always great to hear from the lady callers.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>TX at 105.9.

0:23:41.310 --> 0:23:42.730
<v Speaker 2>Tom, what do we got for the trifecta?

0:23:43.030 --> 0:23:45.629
<v Speaker 4>For today's trifecta, as optimism is starting to take hold

0:23:45.670 --> 0:23:47.449
<v Speaker 4>on the Pittsburgh Steelers, and I'm part of that, I'm

0:23:47.470 --> 0:23:50.740
<v Speaker 4>getting pretty optimistic. I got three legit worry spots still

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to the Steelers.

0:23:52.700 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Players or position groups.

0:23:54.540 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Number three, we're starting to throw the pass defense in there.

0:23:57.980 --> 0:24:00.929
<v Speaker 4>I know that Samuel and Dean had good pass defense performances.

0:24:01.010 --> 0:24:03.410
<v Speaker 4>Samuel against the Colts, Dean against the Bucs. That means

0:24:03.430 --> 0:24:04.570
<v Speaker 4>they're getting tested a lot.

0:24:04.940 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And then shucked through for 278 against them this past game.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:09.020
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing.

0:24:09.060 --> 0:24:11.300
<v Speaker 1>Shucked through for that much and only scored one touchdown.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:15.340
<v Speaker 1>It is amazing. Because of the turnover. The Peyton Wilson intercept.

0:24:15.420 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>They were going to go into the end zone on

0:24:16.660 --> 0:24:18.730
<v Speaker 1>that drive. It was a perfect drive up into that point.

0:24:19.350 --> 0:24:22.330
<v Speaker 4>But you're facing much better quarterbacks on the horizon, starting

0:24:22.350 --> 0:24:24.290
<v Speaker 4>with Joe Burrow on the other side of the bye week.

0:24:24.350 --> 0:24:27.290
<v Speaker 4>So I'm real worried about the secondary still. Number two,

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.659
<v Speaker 4>worried about Rodgers' durability. We talked about this earlier in

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the show. He's got 22 sacks on the season. Only

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.460
<v Speaker 4>Deshaun Watson's been sacked more. And whether it is the

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.300
<v Speaker 4>offensive line that's the reason or it's him that's the reason,

0:24:39.460 --> 0:24:42.060
<v Speaker 4>it's too many sacks for a 42-year-old man. So if

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.510
<v Speaker 4>he keeps getting sacked at that level, he'll get hurt

0:24:44.530 --> 0:24:46.970
<v Speaker 4>and miss games. But my number one worry is still

0:24:46.990 --> 0:24:49.570
<v Speaker 4>the edge rushers. I know Watt had his sack against

0:24:49.609 --> 0:24:51.810
<v Speaker 4>the Saints, but that was one sack in a long

0:24:51.850 --> 0:24:55.590
<v Speaker 4>time coming for him. And mainly Alex Highsmith. He has

0:24:55.630 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 4>just been invisible for almost a month of football now.

0:24:59.190 --> 0:25:01.690
<v Speaker 1>I think he knows he's sucking Hein. You know what's

0:25:01.790 --> 0:25:03.450
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. Yeah, yeah.

0:25:04.750 --> 0:25:06.450
<v Speaker 4>That's the guy they're going to move on from in

0:25:06.470 --> 0:25:09.570
<v Speaker 4>the offseason. And Sawyer will step into that role as

0:25:09.609 --> 0:25:12.390
<v Speaker 4>far as the third person in the pecking order is concerned.

0:25:12.410 --> 0:25:14.689
<v Speaker 1>They're scared a lot. They're scared he'll yell and get

0:25:14.730 --> 0:25:17.050
<v Speaker 1>mad if they face him down. To take him off

0:25:17.090 --> 0:25:19.430
<v Speaker 1>the field. Think about all the change that was supposed

0:25:19.450 --> 0:25:21.889
<v Speaker 1>to happen with how the edge rushers were deployed. And

0:25:21.950 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>he is rushing the passer from the same spot in

0:25:24.390 --> 0:25:27.540
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same way every single snap. It started out

0:25:27.580 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a little different. Now it's not different at all. And

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the trickle down for Herbig. He only has

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.460
<v Speaker 1>one side now that he can line up on or

0:25:33.580 --> 0:25:35.219
<v Speaker 1>one person that he can line up for to be

0:25:35.260 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a traditional pass rusher. Otherwise, he's got to play the

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.310
<v Speaker 1>Nick Hurd position. They're scared of him because he's loud.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:39.740
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:25:39.869 --> 0:25:40.369
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you.

0:25:40.530 --> 0:25:43.350
<v Speaker 1>We saw that on camera on the Thursday night game.

0:25:43.390 --> 0:25:45.970
<v Speaker 1>He yelled into the headset to Patrick Graham up in

0:25:45.990 --> 0:25:48.210
<v Speaker 1>the booth and made Patrick Graham come down to the sideline.

0:25:48.250 --> 0:25:50.750
<v Speaker 1>He disgusts me. Who'd he ever beat? He has no

0:25:50.830 --> 0:25:53.419
<v Speaker 1>playoff wins. I don't know how. If there's anybody who

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.139
<v Speaker 1>should have humility, it's TJ Watt.

0:25:55.260 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, again, he had the sack in the game,

0:25:57.300 --> 0:26:01.409
<v Speaker 4>but the sack production from those three is inefficient to

0:26:01.430 --> 0:26:03.450
<v Speaker 4>where it's supposed to be for the money that they're making.

0:26:03.630 --> 0:26:06.170
<v Speaker 4>And it has been way too quiet for almost a

0:26:06.230 --> 0:26:08.690
<v Speaker 4>month now of football. Her big two sack game against

0:26:08.730 --> 0:26:11.540
<v Speaker 4>the Buccaneers. I get that, but like, it's just not

0:26:11.580 --> 0:26:14.060
<v Speaker 4>consistent between those three guys right now. You're not getting

0:26:14.100 --> 0:26:15.659
<v Speaker 4>it week in and week out from at least one

0:26:15.700 --> 0:26:19.220
<v Speaker 4>of them. By the way, I got to come back

0:26:19.260 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 4>to Biff Tannen. I mean, Pat McAfee for a second.

0:26:22.990 --> 0:26:24.550
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see his show today, but I'm sure I

0:26:24.550 --> 0:26:27.410
<v Speaker 4>would have heard about this if he had. I doubt

0:26:27.450 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 4>that he eulogized Donnie. I didn't see anything about him

0:26:30.500 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 4>eulogizing Donnie.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.810
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's because Pat's a fake ass Pittsburgh. He's only

0:26:33.830 --> 0:26:35.970
<v Speaker 1>a Pittsburgh when it's convenient, when it's convenient for him. He's,

0:26:36.010 --> 0:26:38.090
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's like Mark Cuban. Yes. When he can

0:26:38.130 --> 0:26:42.609
<v Speaker 1>baby face himself, uh, via using Pittsburgh, he'll do it. Otherwise,

0:26:43.170 --> 0:26:44.930
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's put that in his rear view mirror.

0:26:44.950 --> 0:26:47.060
<v Speaker 1>He's an indie guy. He's from Indianapolis. He likes to,

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:47.970
<v Speaker 1>he likes to jump back and forth.

0:26:47.990 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 2>That's okay.

0:26:48.980 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>No, Pat's for himself. First and second at hometowns don't

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.340
<v Speaker 1>really exist in his mind. Pat McAfee is the hometown.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.250
<v Speaker 1>Pat, Pat McAfee, as I've heard it said, Oh, um, Okay,

0:27:00.270 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>halftime Super Bowl. Jay-Z was in charge of picking the act.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.820
<v Speaker 1>He picked himself. How old is Jay-Z?

0:27:06.900 --> 0:27:08.100
<v Speaker 2>Jay-Z's 50-something.

0:27:08.140 --> 0:27:10.820
<v Speaker 1>He's in his 50s. He might even be in his 60s,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I think. He's been around forever. I guess Roc Nation's

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.220
<v Speaker 1>been choosing the halftime show for a few years now.

0:27:16.780 --> 0:27:17.780
<v Speaker 1>He's 56 years old.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 4>And then it finally was his turn to call upon

0:27:20.290 --> 0:27:22.970
<v Speaker 4>himself and anoint himself as the Super Bowl halftime show.

0:27:23.609 --> 0:27:24.100
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:27:24.390 --> 0:27:26.330
<v Speaker 4>I don't hate it at all. I like Jay-Z. I

0:27:26.350 --> 0:27:27.810
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to be a fun halftime show.

0:27:27.970 --> 0:27:29.030
<v Speaker 2>Why can't they ever do Roc?

0:27:29.810 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Because it's just not the mainstream music these days is

0:27:32.859 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>rock and roll. Is it?

0:27:35.500 --> 0:27:36.340
<v Speaker 2>I should slap you.

0:27:36.740 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You think that it's still mainstream?

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Greta Van Fleet's the only rock band that's

0:27:40.060 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 4>still kicking ass right now.

0:27:41.300 --> 0:27:45.820
<v Speaker 1>I think most football fans would rather see rock. A

0:27:45.859 --> 0:27:48.459
<v Speaker 1>heritage band? Yes, if that's what it takes. That's what

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it will take. Oh, Jay-Z's not a heritage performer?

0:27:50.700 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 4>For sure he is, but that genre of music, I think,

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.220
<v Speaker 4>is a little more popular with the youngins these days.

0:27:55.380 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>It's more popular among the players.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:58.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, with no question about that.

0:27:58.619 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Who wasn't performed?

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.030
<v Speaker 1>Although rock and roll's pretty popular in those locker rooms, too.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.500
<v Speaker 1>Who wasn't performed at halftime? Who's Cincinnati who's doing a

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl one year? Oh, my God. I know you're

0:28:06.900 --> 0:28:08.419
<v Speaker 1>talking about the kicker went out and watched the game.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:09.740
<v Speaker 2>The kicker went out and watched the halftime act.

0:28:09.810 --> 0:28:12.290
<v Speaker 1>It was Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg and Eminem. Yeah,

0:28:12.350 --> 0:28:14.409
<v Speaker 1>and the kicker stayed on the field at halftime and

0:28:14.450 --> 0:28:15.130
<v Speaker 1>watched the act.

0:28:15.430 --> 0:28:15.899
<v Speaker 2>I'd have cut him.

0:28:15.950 --> 0:28:16.689
<v Speaker 1>I'd have cut him.

0:28:17.350 --> 0:28:18.189
<v Speaker 2>I'd have cut him right then and there.

0:28:18.230 --> 0:28:19.950
<v Speaker 1>We'll have the punter, or we'll handle it by going

0:28:19.970 --> 0:28:21.150
<v Speaker 1>for two for the rest of the game.

0:28:21.210 --> 0:28:22.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that's.

0:28:21.930 --> 0:28:24.250
<v Speaker 1>Inexcusable, and I think he's still their kicker.

0:28:24.270 --> 0:28:25.169
<v Speaker 3>Oh, he is.

0:28:25.230 --> 0:28:25.910
<v Speaker 2>Evan McPherson.

0:28:25.950 --> 0:28:28.700
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely still their kicker. It's the Super Bowl, bro.

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Who would you make your halftime act? You could pick

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>any of your halftime acts. make my half tie back.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.020
<v Speaker 1>You know who I would think about doing?

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think they're maybe not popular enough to

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 4>do this, but the white stripes with Jack white kind

0:28:40.060 --> 0:28:41.420
<v Speaker 4>of being like the headlining guy.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.860
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think Jack would work with Meg again.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably not.

0:28:44.580 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:44.940 --> 0:28:46.140
<v Speaker 2>But you could just have Jack white.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.750
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. But I love the white stripes, the original band.

0:28:49.070 --> 0:28:50.910
<v Speaker 2>I do too. I don't think they would think Jack

0:28:50.950 --> 0:28:51.630
<v Speaker 2>white's big enough.

0:28:51.870 --> 0:28:52.430
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right.

0:28:52.450 --> 0:28:54.150
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they would think Greta Van Fleet's big.

0:28:54.170 --> 0:28:55.810
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they think that either. Do you think

0:28:55.850 --> 0:28:58.130
<v Speaker 4>Jack white's big enough to do it? I don't know

0:28:58.150 --> 0:29:00.910
<v Speaker 4>if Greta's there yet, but Jack white, probably.

0:29:02.460 --> 0:29:04.290
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, some of the hip hop acts they've

0:29:04.310 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>had the past time and years, I've never heard of.

0:29:06.810 --> 0:29:09.590
<v Speaker 1>Like Kendrick Lamar, The Weeknd. You've heard of those guys.

0:29:09.950 --> 0:29:10.550
<v Speaker 2>Vaguely.

0:29:10.570 --> 0:29:13.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Like I had to have Bad Bunny explained to me.

0:29:13.410 --> 0:29:15.190
<v Speaker 1>I liked Bad Bunny, though. I thought that was a

0:29:15.230 --> 0:29:16.130
<v Speaker 1>fun halftime show.

0:29:16.230 --> 0:29:18.370
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was much better in Happy Gilmore 2.

0:29:18.370 --> 0:29:19.030
<v Speaker 1>It's the caddy.

0:29:19.310 --> 0:29:21.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that I really did like.

0:29:22.730 --> 0:29:24.390
<v Speaker 1>Tom, I'm going to talk about this at length in

0:29:24.410 --> 0:29:29.730
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but the Cordell Stewart documentary comes out tonight

0:29:29.750 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at 9 o'clock. HBO, right? Yeah. And apparently he's quoted

0:29:34.340 --> 0:29:37.330
<v Speaker 1>as saying that he thinks that once the record gets

0:29:37.350 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>set straight, which I'm sure he did intend as a pun,

0:29:39.540 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that he could get in the Hall of Fame. He

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.330
<v Speaker 1>ain't getting in the Hall of Fame. Come on now.

0:29:46.230 --> 0:29:48.580
<v Speaker 4>Do you think maybe Steelers Hall of Honor? Maybe there's

0:29:48.620 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 4>a chance that that happens? No, he'll get into Steelers

0:29:50.900 --> 0:29:52.660
<v Speaker 4>Hall of Honor for sure. I think he will. And

0:29:52.820 --> 0:29:55.060
<v Speaker 4>even if the record didn't get set straight, as he's saying,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.620
<v Speaker 4>I think that he would have gotten in eventually to

0:29:56.660 --> 0:29:58.940
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers Hall of Honor. But Hall of Fame, you

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:00.900
<v Speaker 4>got to have more self-awareness than that, Cordell.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think, you know, and he is openly

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.250
<v Speaker 1>quoted as saying he pushed for this documentary to get done.

0:30:07.990 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Why would he want to reopen up that chapter? Which

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.300
<v Speaker 1>was obviously very painful for him. It has a little

0:30:12.340 --> 0:30:14.620
<v Speaker 1>bit of the Streisand effect to it, right? Where like

0:30:14.700 --> 0:30:16.450
<v Speaker 1>people kind of forgot about it or it was so

0:30:16.490 --> 0:30:18.420
<v Speaker 1>long ago that they just never even knew about it.

0:30:18.530 --> 0:30:20.180
<v Speaker 1>And you're reminding them of it.

0:30:20.290 --> 0:30:22.130
<v Speaker 4>And then maybe people will go dig into it a

0:30:22.150 --> 0:30:24.420
<v Speaker 4>little bit more because of this documentary and find out

0:30:24.460 --> 0:30:27.050
<v Speaker 4>about it more when you would have just You could

0:30:27.070 --> 0:30:28.510
<v Speaker 4>have just let it lie in bed and no one

0:30:28.530 --> 0:30:31.030
<v Speaker 4>would have realized it happened or remembered that it happened.

0:30:31.050 --> 0:30:32.950
<v Speaker 1>You know what's going on now on the various social

0:30:32.990 --> 0:30:36.300
<v Speaker 1>media sites is, well, everybody knows Madden spread that rumor

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>where I did pointedly the opposite. Why do you think

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's happening?

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:41.980
<v Speaker 2>Because people just decide they don't like me.

0:30:42.340 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 4>They just assume that you had to have, right, because

0:30:44.300 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 4>of this persona that they make up of you in

0:30:45.700 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 4>their head.

0:30:45.940 --> 0:30:47.660
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I did the opposite. People would try to

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.430
<v Speaker 2>talk about it on the air all the time.

0:30:49.450 --> 0:30:52.130
<v Speaker 1>Dump them. Callers would dump them. We'd just get them off.

0:30:52.210 --> 0:30:55.590
<v Speaker 1>And like Smizek was hovering over my shoulder like a

0:30:55.710 --> 0:30:58.830
<v Speaker 1>balding vulture looking to get me any way he could.

0:30:58.850 --> 0:31:00.100
<v Speaker 1>You don't think he would have made the most of

0:31:00.130 --> 0:31:00.860
<v Speaker 1>that if it were true?

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.260
<v Speaker 4>Would have jumped all over that. And even today he's

0:31:03.300 --> 0:31:05.220
<v Speaker 4>still active on social media. He would have been tweeting

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.940
<v Speaker 4>about it during this documentary coming out if he could.

0:31:08.370 --> 0:31:10.470
<v Speaker 1>Take some shots at you. But he knows it's not true.

0:31:10.610 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I know what I heard, and I heard him say it.

0:31:12.890 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>But they're making it up. Of course they are.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 4>It's literally all just from the persona, the idea that

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 4>they've made up of you in their head. And they're like, well,

0:31:19.900 --> 0:31:21.420
<v Speaker 4>Madden's a jerk, so he must have been a jerk

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:22.350
<v Speaker 4>when it came to Cordell.

0:31:23.390 --> 0:31:24.650
<v Speaker 2>It's the Dennis Day factor.

0:31:24.650 --> 0:31:24.690
<v Speaker 3>105.9.