1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,920
Speaker 1: This is a podcast from wor Now more of the

2
00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:09,360
Speaker 1: WOOR Saturday Morning Show and Larry Minty Welcome back. So

3
00:00:09,560 --> 00:00:13,920
Speaker 1: who is going to be the next James Bond? Let's

4
00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,760
Speaker 1: talk about that and tomorrow Night's Golden Globes with New

5
00:00:17,880 --> 00:00:22,320
Speaker 1: York Post entertainment critic Johnny Olegzinski. I might be one

6
00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:25,439
Speaker 1: of the few people probably not really looking forward to

7
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:29,240
Speaker 1: the Golden Globes because I liked Nicki Glazer that much.

8
00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:32,440
Speaker 1: I thought she was incredible in the Tom Brady Roast.

9
00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,599
Speaker 1: I thought she was incredible last year. I don't care

10
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:38,559
Speaker 1: about the awards at all or the ceremony. I just

11
00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:39,239
Speaker 1: want to see her.

12
00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:41,760
Speaker 2: You really just threw me a curveball with that looking

13
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,559
Speaker 2: forward to the Golden Globes. S I almost did a

14
00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:46,720
Speaker 2: spit take. Didn't prepare that in my notes. I'm a

15
00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:50,360
Speaker 2: little bit flummoxed here. Yes, the Nicky Glazer part is

16
00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:52,959
Speaker 2: going to be very good because last year, last year,

17
00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:55,200
Speaker 2: she was sensational, and remember she was coming off of

18
00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:57,800
Speaker 2: that awful, awful Joe Coy, who was sort of the

19
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:01,080
Speaker 2: worst host they'd ever had in the room. People were groaning,

20
00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:03,400
Speaker 2: and he went on this sort of apology tour for it,

21
00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:06,800
Speaker 2: and then she came and saved the day because she prepared.

22
00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:11,840
Speaker 2: She's naturally funny and mean and mean spirited in just

23
00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:14,120
Speaker 2: the right way. She kind of owned the room. So

24
00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 2: I'm excited for her. She has an uphill climb, you know.

25
00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:20,080
Speaker 2: I don't know how she's gonna make jokes about the

26
00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:26,080
Speaker 2: film Surat and Brazil's the secret agent. But she's smart

27
00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,559
Speaker 2: enough that I hope she finds a way and lifts

28
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:32,280
Speaker 2: what otherwise will be kind of a snoozy ceremony.

29
00:01:32,319 --> 00:01:35,559
Speaker 1: I suspect, yeah, she will go after people in the room.

30
00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:37,760
Speaker 1: I think she's going to ignore some of the movies,

31
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:39,520
Speaker 1: but she's going to go after the people in the

32
00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:40,800
Speaker 1: room like she did last year.

33
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:44,479
Speaker 2: The Golden Globes is tough because there's a legacy of well,

34
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:46,840
Speaker 2: the Oscars has a legacy of great hosts too, but

35
00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:49,080
Speaker 2: that's when you're starting to go back to you know,

36
00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:52,880
Speaker 2: Billy Crystal and Steve or decades ago. There were great hosts,

37
00:01:53,360 --> 00:01:56,000
Speaker 2: and I liked Conan, but the Golden Globes had Remember

38
00:01:56,080 --> 00:02:00,440
Speaker 2: Ricky Gervais was so eviscerating, and he was this kind

39
00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,000
Speaker 2: of Hollywood outsider that would mock and destroy everybody so

40
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:06,000
Speaker 2: everyone's sort of in the shadow of Ricky Gervais, and

41
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:08,760
Speaker 2: you have Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, who are both

42
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:13,160
Speaker 2: great and made hilarious jokes by James Cameron and Ben Affleck,

43
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,040
Speaker 2: And now I bet we're going to see her, you know,

44
00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:16,160
Speaker 2: go really full out.

45
00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:18,880
Speaker 1: Oh, I hope, so, I hope so. I think the

46
00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,120
Speaker 1: only reason people will watch the Golden Globes is for her.

47
00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:24,240
Speaker 1: I don't think a lot of people are going. I

48
00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,760
Speaker 1: can't wait for the Golden Globes. It's never been a

49
00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:30,880
Speaker 1: precursor to anything that's going to happen afterwards. The award

50
00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:33,880
Speaker 1: itself has never mattered in the past that have been

51
00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:38,200
Speaker 1: downright silly. People watched, as you said, for Ricky Gervas,

52
00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:41,399
Speaker 1: people watch for Tina Fey and Amy Pohlar. I think

53
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:42,520
Speaker 1: she has that same poll.

54
00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:46,160
Speaker 2: That and the fact that because they provide champagne at

55
00:02:46,200 --> 00:02:48,840
Speaker 2: the table for the stars, which the Oscars do not,

56
00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:51,119
Speaker 2: you know, you never see you know, the cash bar

57
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,240
Speaker 2: at the Oscars, that the stars got a little bit

58
00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:58,160
Speaker 2: you know, slurry speech, and they're a bit more outrageous.

59
00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:00,160
Speaker 2: That's what makes it fun and not so much. I

60
00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:02,280
Speaker 2: don't care who wins the Golden I have to write

61
00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:04,359
Speaker 2: about it. So actually, when you read my combat, who won?

62
00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:06,960
Speaker 2: I do care? I care very very much. I care

63
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:07,560
Speaker 2: very much.

64
00:03:08,080 --> 00:03:10,920
Speaker 1: There's some there was a rumor out there that Timothy

65
00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:14,680
Speaker 1: shell and May had been online as a performer. Not

66
00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:19,160
Speaker 1: everybody's guessing that it's him. Yes, yeah, yeah, we talked

67
00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:20,639
Speaker 1: about it on the air a couple of weeks ago

68
00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:26,760
Speaker 1: that he's actually this rapper from a masked rapper from Britain.

69
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,799
Speaker 2: Meaning that it's really him. This is all just performance art.

70
00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:32,280
Speaker 2: Wait exactly.

71
00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:35,880
Speaker 1: He doesn't identify himself as as such, but everybody's saying

72
00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:37,280
Speaker 1: it's him. They can tell it's him.

73
00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,600
Speaker 2: Okay, so it's it's like it's Banksy or something. Yes, wow,

74
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,720
Speaker 2: well he is. He is that weird where I'm not

75
00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:45,800
Speaker 2: going to discount that theory entirely.

76
00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:49,560
Speaker 1: I can't wait to read about it in the Post

77
00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:53,160
Speaker 1: once once you uncover this and you expose him as

78
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:55,440
Speaker 1: being what's his name? Do you know what's the rapper?

79
00:03:57,200 --> 00:03:59,520
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the next James Bond? Is the casting

80
00:03:59,560 --> 00:03:59,920
Speaker 1: done for that?

81
00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:04,040
Speaker 2: Well? According to The Daily Mail, which is not as

82
00:04:04,120 --> 00:04:07,120
Speaker 2: reputable as sources the New York Post, they there was

83
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:10,720
Speaker 2: a story in the Mail that an actor named Callum Turner,

84
00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,960
Speaker 2: who you know everyone, I can feel all of America's

85
00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:16,880
Speaker 2: blank stares right now, and I said Callum Turner that

86
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,720
Speaker 2: he's been out telling his mates at the pub that

87
00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:21,839
Speaker 2: he has the job. A lot of you have probably

88
00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:24,039
Speaker 2: seen him if you watch There was a show called

89
00:04:24,080 --> 00:04:26,839
Speaker 2: Masters of Air that he was on. He was just

90
00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:29,760
Speaker 2: in a movie I hated called Eternity. He was not

91
00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:31,800
Speaker 2: because of him. He was fine. But that is the

92
00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:35,400
Speaker 2: size of actor that they would usually go for. They're

93
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:39,280
Speaker 2: not all these names like like a Paul Meskull or

94
00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:42,320
Speaker 2: Harris Dickinson who you know, my draw blinks through there.

95
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:45,680
Speaker 2: They're too big to become James Bond. They like someone

96
00:04:45,680 --> 00:04:48,520
Speaker 2: who's sort of early career but not entitled. They don't

97
00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:50,520
Speaker 2: only they want to go back to George lazenby just

98
00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,120
Speaker 2: picking a guy off the street who looks like Sean Connery.

99
00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:55,200
Speaker 1: I remember Masters of Air. I thought that was great.

100
00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:57,440
Speaker 1: That was the Tom Hanks bern that's right, yeah, yeah, yeah,

101
00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,200
Speaker 1: that was really good. And the guy that played Elvis

102
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,680
Speaker 1: what's his name? He was Austin Butler Star. Yeah, Austin

103
00:05:01,720 --> 00:05:05,400
Speaker 1: Butler was in it too. Is Sydney Sweeney going to

104
00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:06,080
Speaker 1: be the it girl.

105
00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:10,000
Speaker 2: Oh she could well, as we know, Jeff Bezos is

106
00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:12,920
Speaker 2: obsessed with her. I'm sure they'll be in Saint Bart's

107
00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:16,360
Speaker 2: hanging out soon enough. And you know, when you're footing

108
00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:18,160
Speaker 2: the bill for the movie, you do get to make

109
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,080
Speaker 2: lots lots of choices. She'd be fun. She'd go back

110
00:05:21,080 --> 00:05:23,280
Speaker 2: to the kind of the old Bond girls of the seventies.

111
00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:25,720
Speaker 1: Yeah, and a lot of people have been talking about that.

112
00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:28,040
Speaker 1: I mean, it's been in Variety that there there's a

113
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:29,960
Speaker 1: push for her to be the new Bond girl, which

114
00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:32,400
Speaker 1: makes me believe it's already happened.

115
00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:34,640
Speaker 2: It could be, and she's the right age, right type.

116
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:38,600
Speaker 1: Johnny Olezinski, New York Post entertainment critic. This has been

117
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:40,760
Speaker 1: a podcast from wo R