WEBVTT - 12-22-25 Scott Sloan Show

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to be an American idiot.

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 2>In one of the final after President Joe Biden way

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 2>student loans about one hundred and fifty thousand people, you know,

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a little tip of the hat is

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>he headed out of office about a year ago on

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>that though, It's not like, you know, the Trump administration

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 2>has righted a lot of those wrongs, which is simply

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>have forgotten about this meant, the total US debt is

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>almost two trillion dollars in student loans, the average borrow

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>ohs over thirty nine thousand dollars per person, and so

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>many more have defaulted on those loans as well.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Delinquency rates are high, the repayment timelines are question well

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 3>at this point, where do things stay in relative this

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and how do we solve this? Allen Clinch is the

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>founder of Studentloan Justice dot org.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Ellen.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, Ay.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 5>Ben, Good morning, Scott.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>We saw default rates spike after COVID and then once

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>we return to payment or try to anyway, where are

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>we headed to now relative to the default cliff?

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right, Yeah, we are headed for a mass default.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 5>People are just done. People. You know, so many people

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 5>have been paying for years and years and years under

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 5>any one of the alphabet soup of already existing income

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 5>driven repayment plans. There's been four since nineteen ninety five,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 5>and the disqualification rate for these IDR programs is upwards

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 5>of ninety percent. And so.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>It is a huge crisis. Yeah, there's no I mean,

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 3>if you don't have the money, you don't have the money.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 3>I get that. And it's it's easy to wag your

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 3>finger at young people and say it's your fault. But

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and I get that too, But I'll be honest with you,

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the plans that I've seen from both Trump and Biden

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>don't really address the issue. I mean, for giving a

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>loan during COVID, I guess we can suspend that. That's

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 3>all fine, But there's no accountability here for universities. That's

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>why I don't like the entire ballout system. The way

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>it's been proposed and structured is so what happens is, fine,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna we're gonna wind up wiping all this debt out,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>all right, Well, what then happens, Well, universities will raise

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>their prices even more because students will have that extra

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>money to pay students who took on huge levels of

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>debt will be able to you know, turn that towards

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the government, meaning me and you to pay that pick

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 3>up the tab and politicians score points with young voters

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>who seldom turn out in order to get elected or reelected.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>So it serves all those interests, but it doesn't solve

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 3>the problem.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>The problem is you keep subsidizing college, you get more

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>and more and more expensive. That's really the problem here,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>and it's not addressed in any of these plans.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 5>I actually almost completely agree with you. I mean, the

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 5>lending system is a large catastrophic failure at this point,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 5>but the loans will not be paid. So ultimately the loans,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 5>at this late day, they will be canceled. But you

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 5>raise excellent points. You know, canceling student loans solves nothing

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 5>the price for all.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 6>The reasons that you mentioned, and you.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Know, the core of this problem, Scott, why is in

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 5>the fact that, unlike every loan in this country, student

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 5>loans have been uniquely stripped of the most fundamental consumer

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 5>protections you can imagine, mainly bankruptcy rights. So the family

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Father has called for bankruptcy rights, uniform bankruptcy rights in

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 5>the constitution ahead of the power to you know, raise

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 5>an army and declare war. And this has been stripped

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 5>uniquely from student loans. And this really is the lynchpin

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 5>that is enabled this runaway spending, run well, runaway charging

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 5>tuition prices and so court by the colleges, no accountability.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 5>And you know, counseling loans is all good and well,

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 5>but if you don't change the underlying system, then we're

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 5>going to be right back where we are now in

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 5>a few years.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>The system, the system from top to bottom has messed up.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you go back to the nineteen sixties, seventies,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it was eighteen percent of family income is

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>what tuition was, which is manageable sixty five. That's when

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>the government says, hey, you know what, we're going to

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>guarantee student loans now. And then Sally May gets involved.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And by seventy eight, as all these government programs, more

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>government gets involved, the more they screw things up. Tuition

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and fees crept up to what almost fifty percent of

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a family income today. It's a totally government controlled problem.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Because they stepped in guaranteed, subsidized for gave loans. They

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>have the power of the pen, and all it does

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 3>is encourage universities and colleges to hike their prices up

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 3>because they're getting free money. It's a simple solution if

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>you've got government out of this, because I'm guessing back

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>in the sixties and seventies, you take out a private

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 3>loan like you would for anything else, or you simply

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the cost to be affordable for a family to pay

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>out of pocket. That's not true.

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Anymore, No, that's exactly right. And you know, in some states,

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 5>particularly a lot of the Southern states, average student loan

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 5>that in those states exceeds the yearly earnings of the

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 5>average earners there in those states. But you know, Ohio

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 5>is actually terrible as well, seventy five billion dollars in

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 5>mostly federal student loan debt across the country. And it's

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 5>this sort of rampant inflation that just can't be allowed

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 5>to continue. Now, we as a group student on Justice

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 5>dot Org, we've been pushing probably eighty percent of our

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 5>our efforts have been towards getting the right of bankruptcy

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 5>returned to these loans, not so that everybody can run

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 5>out and file. That won't happen. Nobody wants to foilve

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 5>for bankruptcy but rather because bankruptcy serves to constrain the

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 5>lending side, it makes it ensures good faith in the

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 5>lending relationship. But more, maybe more importantly, it guarantees rational

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of market based prices. You know, it prevents the

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 5>price of the commodity being purchased from getting out of control.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 5>And so if there is even to be a federal

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 5>student owned program, I'm going forward, and I'm not sure

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 5>the government really is I should be in.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 6>The lending business at this point.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Not very good consider consider our federal debt right now.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but if they are, at a minimum, whatever loans

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 8>that they want to use to fund higher education in

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 8>this country, they've got to have all the consumer protections,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 8>most notably bankruptcy rights that every.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 5>Other loan for every other borrower has. We think that's

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 5>really the core of the problem. And you know, if

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 5>they had returned bankruptcy to student loans back when we

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 5>started our group eighteen long years ago, there would be.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 6>No student loan crisis today.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 5>The Department of Education in Congress would be very much

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 5>more judicious in how much they lend out and maybe

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 5>even for what sort of programs.

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that's interesting. You bring that by the ways,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Allen Collin, jac president of Student Loan Justice at organ

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>normally we probably we actually are agreeing on a lot

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of stuff here because I hear a student loan justice

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and think, well, you know, we're just gonna get free

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>money away, make college free. That's not really what you're saying.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>And I agree on some points there's no way these

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 3>young people are generally young people going to be able

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>to pay these loans back. We're seeing a seventy five

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>percent default rate that is just catastrophic. But I guess

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>when I think about bankruptcy, which you're right, it does

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>keep the lenders in check, going okay, is this a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>good risk? But here's what's going to happen, right, And

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>it's two sides of the same coin. There's gonna be

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>arguments and going, well, now you're stifling you know, higher

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>institutions of higher learning and what people are going to

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>study and career paths and things like that, which I

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.679
<v Speaker 3>say good because you know, if the argument is that

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>if we forgive all this money or make college free,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 3>it results in a better educated population, it's got to

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>be worth the cost. But it's not because what happens

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>is you get a whole bunch of students majoring and

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry bs that the market doesn't value and other

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>people simply just you know, showing up going out. I

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>guess I'll go to school because someone else is paying

0:07:58.240 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>for it, So if it's for free, it's for me.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 3>And then it doesn't even discount all the ones that

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>go to college who fail and still have to pay

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the loans and drop out for whatever reason. Graduates need

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 3>marketable skills going and we know this right now, and

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 3>so I think the bankruptcy thing, in a way would

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 3>eliminate all these fluffy programs and education in the Ivory Tower.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Allen would have finally have to come around and go, hey,

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>guess what, we're in a market too. Here, We're not

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>in a bubble. This is a market economy. Teach the

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 3>jobs and teach the skills that people need to make

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 3>money to service their loans, and the rest will take

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>care of itself.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right. You know, there's a very good reason

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 5>the founders called for bankruptcy ahead of the power to

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 5>raise an army and declare war in the Constitution. And

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 5>I think this student loan behemoth is precisely the sort

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 5>of thing that they wanted to avoid. Yeah, and you know,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 5>we're all.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 6>For having educated citizenry. And you know, maybe there's a value.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 5>To a philosophy degree or something that maybe may not

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 5>be necessarily marketable, but it's got to be done in

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 5>the context of fiscality.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>And well, as I've been saying, don't confuse a hobby

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 3>with a career. So if you want to study philosophy,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you can do that in your own time. You don't

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 3>need to go to school for it.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, it's hard to say what all what

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 5>all reform might happen when you know, at least the

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 5>accountability that comes with having to contend with bankruptcy laws

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 5>will compel, but certainly lower prices, smarter degrees. And I

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 5>might also add, you know, the colleges are now it's

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 5>taking an average of six.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 6>Point two years to get a four year degree, and so.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 5>The colleges have really got to be arranged in And

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're looking at people like Jim Jordan. Quite frankly,

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 5>he becomes very important in this whole discussion. He runs

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 5>the Judiciary Committee where our bankruptcy legislation is likely to

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 5>come from, if it comes from anywhere in the House,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 5>of represent is and so we're hoping very much that

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 5>Jim Jordan will look to people like, look to other

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 5>Republicans actually.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 6>Like why not just called for the return.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Of bankruptcy rights to student loans with a caveat that

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 5>the colleges should be held at least somewhat financially accountable

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 5>absolutely for bankruptcy discharges. And we think that's exactly the

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 5>way go. It's a lot like Dick Durbins bill from

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 5>last year as twenty five ninety eight. We think Jim

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Jordan could get that sucker passed to the House in

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 5>no time on a bipartisan basis, and that would that

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 5>would really be the first thing that needed to happen

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 5>if we want to see sanity, sanity.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 6>And you know, fiscal prudence returned to.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Is I guess because the federal since we federalized student

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>loans back in the seventies. Though, and okay, I can

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 3>file bankruptcy now, but based on the way our government

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>spends and how much debt we're in right now, Allen,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 3>do they even care? Would they just go, okay, well,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to really change, you know, this is

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>not going to make coll just tighten their belt I

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 3>mean the private market. Yeah, but we're talking about federally

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 3>subsidized student loans here. Do they even care?

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, they don't.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 8>They don't.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 5>The government does not act, you know, like a business

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 5>for example. That's true, but the Department of Education they

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 5>guard their nest egg, They guard their agency funding very carefully.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 5>They run the Department of Education as if it were

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 5>a business. So you know, one would hope that they

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 5>would care, but that sort of remains to be seen.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, here's here's what happens is you yeah, here's a

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>interrupt a second. Here's what happens as you know though, right,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 3>so we'll get this will go through rest like, Hey,

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense. They're tight to their belts. We're not

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 3>going to hand out money for programs that you're not

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna make a lot of money at, and it's gonna

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>bring the cut. And then you're gonna hear the cries

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>from people who are lobbying their lawmakers and saying it's unfair,

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>it's racist, it's sexist, it's this, it's that, And then lawmakers,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>of course will kowtow to that contingent and you know,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>break it and it'll probably worse than it was before

0:11:58.760 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 3>they did bankruptcy.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, that remains a be seen.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem with it.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 5>But generally you can pick a random college funding scheme

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 5>out of a hat at this.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 6>Point and I can almost guarantee.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 5>You that whatever they get will be far better than

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 5>what we have today. So you know, it's it's always

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 5>a balancing act with condres. Different spirit interests will have

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 5>their say, But at the end of the day, you know,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 5>we can't be financially ruining eighty five percent of the

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 5>people who take out student loans and leaving them with

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, predatory, untaable debt for the rest of their lives.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean that does not serve the country.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I look at it and go, well, okay,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 3>mom and dad. In the equation, they should kind of

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 3>know better about how much money they're borrowing because you're

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 3>old enough to know how that works. But if you're young,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 3>and you're you know, sixteen, seventeen years old, and you're

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>applying for colleges and it's all all well and good,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>you don't have an idea what that's like, what servicing

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 3>a loan is. And I think they keep kids financially

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>ignorant from the beginning for a reason, because at the

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, it's mana from heaven for the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 3>federal government. They're just going to keep getting their money.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>How when you can go after mom and dad social

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Security because the kid doesn't have a job that's going

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 3>to pay anything and can't serve us a loan. I

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>think that's just speaks volumes about where we are right now.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And the sickening part is, I honestly, I mean outside

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 3>of Jim Jordan, as you said, both sides to be

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 3>complicit in just basically doing the dirty work for colleges

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and universities. It's insane that someone has not called us

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 3>out sooner, rather than just going, yeah, we're gonna just

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 3>give you free money, and uh, well what about next

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>year's class? They're gonna want. And once it starts, of course,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>once you say we're gonna give forgive loan debt each

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, twenty four, twenty five, twenty six, twenty twenty seven,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>every class is gonna want basically a bailout. And if

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the idea is we forgive loans to stimulate the economy, well,

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about you. I got a mortgage that'd

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 3>be great. Imagine how much money I'd spend on liquor

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>and hot tubs and strippers and coke.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 6>Actually disagree with you on not so.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Much what you just said, but sort of the underlying

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 5>premise here and that and the important point here that

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 5>I haven't brought up yet is the federal government, believe

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 5>it or not, the Department of Education, they have been

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 5>making a king's ransome in profit on this federal student

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 5>loans program, certainly since Obama federalized in twenty ten. You know,

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 5>in nineteen sixty five the President LBJ declared that these

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 5>student loans would be free of interest. Well today over

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 5>one hundred billion dollars a year in interest, really, and

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 5>it accrues to the books of the Department of Education.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 5>And so the Department of Education is this is really

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 5>a cash cow for the people in Washington. People don't

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 5>quite understand how incredibly profitable this thing has been for

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 5>the taxpayer.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>And out of that, I mean, think of it. There's

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>no you know, you can't discharge it, you don't put

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 3>a collateral up. They can garnish your wages, they can

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 3>go after your mom and dad social Security, they can

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>do all these horrific things that that you know in

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the private sector, you can't do it all al and

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 3>all the best. Thanks again.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's been about.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I think almost exactly a year since Biden and is

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>one of the last gasps of his presidency wave the

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 3>magic wind would come to student loans. I haven't heard

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot in last year with Trump on that one guard.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is still there, still exists, can be fixed,

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>but they refuse to address the issue. And it's a problem.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a big press as what college looks like is

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>being changed by AI for example. We'll get a news

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 3>update in and more ahead. It's a Scott Sloman Show

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>on seven hundred WLW My Scott on seven hundred w

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 3>WELW short week, Ready for Christmas, winding it down, Ready

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to eat some good food and a lot of that.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>By good food, I mean food that's not good for you.

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>A lot of sugar this time here, a lot of candy,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.479
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pie, a lot of cake, all that stuff, cookies,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>you name it. I am down for it. Over a

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>word of the wise here. Nicole Avina joins the show again.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>She wrote writes a book called Sugarless about the I

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's the dangers of sugar, but we

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>didn't like some sugar from time to time. Nicole, welcome, good.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 9>Morning, good morning.

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Good when's the.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Last time you had sugar?

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, I have I have to say I

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 9>can have it in moderation. I have it, you know now,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 9>and then I have it under control. But I have

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 9>very little compared to most Americans.

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I would say, yeah, I'm more of a savory person.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I like the savory stuff I'll have, don't get me wrong,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 3>A good dessert or something like that, or a piece

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>of candy. But I'm not I'm not a sugar feen.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I have a friend of mine about the same age,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>and he has the diet of an eight year old.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>He'll drink like three of those blue slushies a day,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, he's a mess.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a lot of people that sort of

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 9>fall into one of either camp right where it's you

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 9>have that sweet tooth and you crave it all the time,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 9>or you're more of like a savory chips and cheese

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 9>type person.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 3>He has the you know, if you go to a

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>hotel and they have these real dispenser it's got three

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>things and you turn the crank and at ceral comes out,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 3>he's got one of those in front of his TV.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 8>Oh.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 9>I think that's definitely the sign of a sugar addict

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 9>in one of those devices.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>I was like, okay, skittles all over the place, Like

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like Willy Wonka in his basement. It's it's something else.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Some guys have bars. He has unlimited sugar, all right,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 3>And it's why is sugar so easy to I guess

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to abuse. I don't want to see abuse. It's not

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a fair term because everything in moderation, as you said,

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 3>is fine. I'm glad you're not like, oh you can't

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 3>had sugar at all ever. I mean, sugar is it's good,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>you just can't make it a steady part of your diet.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 9>But I think that's really the issue that a lot

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 9>of people are struggling with because although we want to

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 9>do it in moderation, most of us have a really

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 9>hard time doing that because it's so pervated. If you

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 9>think about it, you know, everywhere you go in the

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 9>grocery store, if you go to restaurants, most of the

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 9>dishes that we order when we eat out have sugar

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 9>added to them. And so even if you're trying to

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 9>cut back, and or even if you don't really have

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 9>a big eat tooth and you think you're not eating

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 9>a lot of sugar, odds are that you probably are

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 9>eating more than what is recommended.

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 7>By the guideline.

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>What are the guidelines? I have no idea.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, it's funny because for the longest time,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 9>we did not have government guidelines about sugar. We had

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 9>guidelines about everything else in terms of vitamins and you know,

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 9>how many calories you should eat to have a healthy diet,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 9>but we didn't have it for sugar. Now we do,

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 9>and it's recommended that you have no more than six

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 9>to eight teaspoons of sugar a day, which sounds great,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 9>but the problem is the average American has twenty two

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 9>teaspoons or sugar a day. So yeah, we're all eating

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 9>weight too much of it. And you know, it's not

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 9>just about obesity or being overweat. There's so much research

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 9>out that's come out. I talk about it in my

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 9>new book, Sugar Lists, about how sugar can impact your

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 9>physical health. It can also impact your mental health too,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 9>So it's a really good idea to cut back. Even

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 9>if you're not struggling with your body weat and.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important too. You go, well, wait a minute,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't eat a lot of sugary food. How can

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I have twenty two teaspoons or tablespoons of a sugar

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>a day. Well, it's hidden. And so the formula for

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>really really good food. If you want to make food

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 3>taste well, you've got to have savory, you got to

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 3>have sweet, you got to have you got to have

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 3>a fat, you got to have those things in it,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 3>and tart. Every good dish like wh it's a secret. Agree,

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>there's probably most people don't use enough acid in their cooking,

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 3>like lemon or something like that. But the big one

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 3>is sugar. And if you get that balance right between sweet,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 3>fat and salty, you're gonna This is why you can

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 3>sit down and get a whole sleeve of oreos and

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>not be satisfied for that reason. But sugar is a

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 3>big and it'shidden in you know, pasta sauces and everything

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 3>is sugar in it.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 9>It does and I think that's really, you know, the

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 9>tricky part. So it's really important to take a look

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 9>at the nutrition fact labels on the foods that you're purchasing,

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 9>and really, you know, look at the ingredients, you'd be surprised.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 9>So many things that you wouldn't expect to see sugar

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 9>in you'll find that, you know, sugar's listed as one

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 9>of those ingredients. And again, you know, even if you're

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 9>thinking that maybe you are consuming too much of it,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 9>it's not about you know, completely cutting it out of

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 9>your life. And I really make a point of this

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 9>in my new book, because that's just not sustainable, and

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 9>you know that's going to set people up for failure.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 9>It's really more about reducing it and doing more to

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 9>try to replace it with healthier alternatives so you could

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 9>still enjoy the foods and have them, but just without

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 9>all that added sugar.

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, big holidays roll along or occasions whatever, and you

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 3>have some sugar, or somebody brings some cookies and you know,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll have one. You have a couple, and you know,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>you feel great, and then all of a sudden, like

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 3>minutes left for me, minutes later, maybe like an hour later.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to kill myself. What is that?

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know what the problem with sugar is is

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 9>that it affects our brain in so many strange ways.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 9>It can affect the brain in a way that leads

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 9>us to be addicted. It can release dopamat and these

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 9>other neuro transmitters, and that's what leads people to crave

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 9>it and want more and more of it. But it

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 9>also does so many things to mess with our mind.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 9>It causes us to feel guilty after we eat it.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 9>It causes us to have these, you know, rapid spikes

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 9>in our blood sugar levels that then lead us to

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 9>then have these crash is in our blood sugar levels

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 9>that can impact our mood. So when people start to

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 9>reduce the sugar in their diet, they really start to

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 9>get in touch with those feelings and see that, Wow,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, this stuff is really making me feel strange

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 9>and act funny when I eat a lot of it.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 9>So if you stay away from it, then you really

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 9>can get a better control on what it's doing to

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 9>your brain and your body.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what does it do to your Is it more

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of a physical thing or a mental thing or is

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 3>it both?

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's both. I mean, you know, when you consume sugar,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 9>it's affecting your blood sugar levels, which then in turn

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 9>affects your neurotransmitter levels, and so it's affecting your brain.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 9>And I think you know, we have this physical change

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 9>that occurs in response to that, right we react to it.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 9>Our brain tells us, you know, how to react and

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 9>how to feel. But there is also this psychological piece

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 9>of it too, and I think that goes along with

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 9>the fact that you know, it is so pervasive in

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 9>our society and it's sort of this forbidden thing in

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 9>many ways.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, we know.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 9>Sugar's bad for us, you know, we shouldn't have too

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 9>much of it, and then when we do indulge, we

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 9>get that psychologic guilt. And I think this is what

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 9>happens with a lot of people who were dieting right

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 9>around this time of year. Everybody's you know, trying to

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 9>clean up their diet and maybe lose a couple pounds,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 9>like you said in the beginning, Yeah, and you know

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.239
<v Speaker 9>you get that guilt if you gave in and you know,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 9>ate that giant slap cake, then you feel bad about it.

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 9>You feel like you let yourself down. So that's important

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 9>to avoid and I talk about that in my new

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 9>book Sugarless, about how you know, you want to change

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 9>your relationship with food. You don't want to, you know,

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 9>have this unhealthy relationship with the things that we're eating.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 9>It's got to be a healthy dynamic, all.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, Nicole Vina is here. Sugar List is the book,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's the big problem for people, and that is

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 3>kicking the sugar hat. But if you want to lose weight,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 3>sugar is definitely going to add some hidden calories and

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>it does a lot. One of the issues that came

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 3>up and this is totally wow, it's kind of related.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 3>Now I won't know how to get in this is

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 3>we just legalized not long ago for recreational use. Ohio

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>did recreational marijuana, and the opponents of it to always

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 3>talk about how it's a gateway drug. You smoke some weed,

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna next thing you'd be shooting heroin. You get blasts,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>you get a cocaine nipple, bumps, everything right, And I

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>never I think that's a bunch of bunk. And I

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 3>basically my counter to this was, well, if that's the case,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>if that's the gateway, is the real gateway drug caffeine

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 3>or in this case, sugar is sugar gateway drugged other things?

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I think sugar is a gate I think it's

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 9>the original gateway drug.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>So right, Halloween comes along the holidays. Whatever you pack

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 3>your kid full of candy Easter and they lose their

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 3>mind and their mounds off the walls. They're like, wow,

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I feel great after each sugar. That's that's a drug.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And you know, we've actually conducted research studies in

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 9>my laboratory looking at that, looking at the relationship between

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.239
<v Speaker 9>sugar and then behavior later on and proclivity to use

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 9>drugs and alcohol. And for sure, if you have experience

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 9>with sugar, you're more likely to use drugs for alcohol.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, I think that's that's really the bigger problem.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 9>It's you know, it's not about recreational marijuana. I think

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 9>it's about getting to the root of the problem, which

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 9>is sugar. And it starts, you know, in kids when

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 9>they're three, four or five years old.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy you have a a few years later, you're

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 3>doing lines off the near end of a hooker. It's

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a town, it's a slippery slope, nicole, it

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 3>sure is.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 4>It really is, all.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, So sugar, there's just sugar addiction and drug dependency.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 3>And there certainly is a link there too, because you

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>get that. It's it's that feeling that you wind up getting,

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>go wow, the sugar high. This is this is really cool,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 3>and then later on you're looking for that maybe in

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 3>different ways. So it makes sense. But again, it's it's moderation,

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 3>it's tolerance, it's a bunch of other things too. And

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we also have a culture in our society too, this

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 3>diet culture. You know, there's a gym I drive by,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 3>uh near my house, it's the gym, and then right

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 3>next door is like a cookie place, So it's you

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 3>can't even get past the gym without being tempted by

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 3>by cookies. And I think we have a thing where, hey,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 3>if I work out, I can treat myself to a

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 3>cookie or sweets later in the day. And the problem

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is you just eat too many of them.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, what is that? That's happening where I live in

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 9>New Jersey too. I feel like that there must be

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 9>something going on with like the planning boards of you

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 9>have to put a cookie joint next to the gym,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 9>because I've seen neither myself. Yeah, I think you know,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 9>you're so right that it's sort of part of this

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 9>culture of like rewarding ourselves. If we do something good

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 9>like workout, right, then we're supposed to reward ourselves with

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 9>a cookie. And I think that happens on multiple levels

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 9>throughout the day for a lot of people when you

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 9>know they do a good job at work, or let's

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 9>go out and you know, celebrate by getting ice cream,

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 9>if you've got a good grade on your test. You know,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 9>it just happens throughout the day in multiple ways where

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 9>people reward themselves with food. And that's fine, But the

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 9>problem is, you know, if you're rewarding every little thing

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 9>that you do right with food, then that's where people

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 9>start to get into problems with you know, health issues, diabetes.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 7>Being over weed.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and I in our household, we had to

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>fight that. I mean, if me and my two brothers

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 3>would have stayed at home and lived at home, God

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 3>would probably be four thousand pounds by now. My mom

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and you know, hey, you're having a bad day, have

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>a meatball. You're having a good day. Here, have two meatballs.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Gonna be one of those one of those Italian mom situations.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 3>What about withdrawal, We mentioned the connection between sugar is

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 3>a gateway drug and a full dependency on sugar later

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>in life. And like anything that means there's withdrawal symptoms.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>We know what it is for other hard street drugs

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 3>which are much more serious and sugar certainly, but are

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>there withdraw symptoms and how do you combat that?

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, And so I think this is one of the

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 9>main reasons why people end up going back on sugar

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 9>is because of the withdrawal. We see this this time

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 9>of year where people say, Okay, I'm going to cut

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 9>back on sugar, and then all of a sudden, they

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 9>get irritable, and they get lethargic and cranky and crabby,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 9>and you know, maybe they're tired a lot and a

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 9>lot of times people will misattribute that and say, oh,

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 9>it must be that I have low blood sugar, so

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 9>I better eat more sugar so that I can make

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 9>sure I don't pass out. Well, the reality is it's withdrawal.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 9>That's what sugar withdrawal looks like. It's you know, these

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 9>feelings that are similar to what would happen if you

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 9>try to quit smoking cigarettes. That's really been the one

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 9>that seems to parallel at most. And again, you know,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 9>it's not going to kill you. You're not going to

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, die from the withdrawal, but it's uncomfortable, and

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, a lot of times it's enough for people

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 9>to then say you know what, forget it. I'm just

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 9>going to have some sugar so I feel better. But

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 9>then that starts to pull vicious cycle all over again.

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 9>Of you know, Okay, now I'm overeating sugar, and then

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 9>I try to quick and I wink to withdrawal, and

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 9>then I crave it, and so it's this non stop

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 9>cycle that emerges.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Where are you on artificial sweeteners, That's a good question.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 9>So I look at them as kind of like the

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 9>methadone to heroin, right. I mean, they're better than sugar,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 9>but you don't want to stay on it for the

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 9>rest of your life. And so what I usually recommend

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 9>is that if you are really struggling to get the

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 9>added sugar out of your diet, if you need to

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 9>rely on some of these artificial sweeteners or these alternative

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 9>sweeteners as a crutch to kind of bridge you away

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 9>from it, then that's fine. But the ultimate goal should

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 9>really be to reduce the dependence on the sweeteners in

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 9>our diet. You know, we don't need to add sugar

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 9>to everything we have. Coffee is a perfect example. And

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 9>I've been talking about this a lot because I think

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 9>about it more and more when I go to a

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 9>coffee shop anymore, it's more like going into a sugar shop.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean there's more sugar in the store that.

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 7>There is coffee.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 9>So again, we have to, I think, really just focus

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 9>on reducing the dependence on sweetness and think about, you know,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 9>why do we have to have sugar in all these

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 9>different things that maybe doesn't really belong there in the

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 9>first place.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I got a little cream in my coffee. That's

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 3>about it, just to you know, get that little balance

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 3>going on. But black is fine too.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, you go to a place and it's kind

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 3>of frightening actually that some of these drinks. I don't

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 3>want to vilify any coffee chain, Starbucks, but you go

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 3>in there and one of their drinks is the same

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 3>number of calories as a big Mac. That's a problem.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, and they're desserts. I mean, I don't even

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 9>know how they can be considered coffees anymore. I mean

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 9>they're like literally desserts. I think I could probably find

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 9>fewer calories at the ice cream store than I could

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 9>from you know, many of these coffee chains. So you

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 9>do need to be mindful of that. And the marketing

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 9>is a big part of it. I mean they're marketed

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 9>as being you know, coffee drinks and you're getting your

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 9>energy and getting it through that three pm slump, But

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 9>the reality is, you know you're going to hit a

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 9>huge crash when that sugar wears off, and it's going

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 9>to be compounded by you know the fact that your

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 9>craffein's wearing off as well.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, get caffeine and the sugar at the same time.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>You put two or three of those down to some

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 3>people do a day, and you're talking a full day

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 3>amount of calories just in your liquids on top of

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 3>everything else. And you wonder why, you know, we're a

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 3>little heavy. So uh, people concerned about maybe dropping a

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>few LB's and getting right as we as. We have

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 3>those cycles every year and this would be one of

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 3>those cycles. A good idea would be looking at how

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>much sugar you're getting in your diet. Sugarless is the

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 3>name of the book. It's Nicole A.

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 4>Vine.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I know you have some strategies in there too for

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to wing yourself off the sugar.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, absolutely, I have a whole seven step plan

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 9>that talks about how you can figure out where the

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 9>sugar is in your diet. Because a lot of people

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 9>just don't know right, kind of hidden in many places.

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 9>And then also dealing with you know, the cravings. That's

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 9>really a big thing. And I think that's a hard

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 9>problem for a lot of people because you know, everywhere

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 9>we got ads for it all the time. You're you know,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 9>being offered it basically everywhere you go. And so how

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 9>do you cope with that? And you know, really just

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 9>reevaluating your relationship with food and really just basically retooling

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 9>yourself so that you can eat things alike, but just

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 9>not have them have so much control over you.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think it's the thing. We all have

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>our food triggers. I guess I'm a savory person, lesson

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>more than a sweet one. You know, put up pizza

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 3>in front of me, I'll kill it. But yeah, you know,

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 3>an entire cake or I may have a cupcake, but

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to eat twelve of them. But everyone has

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>their own triggers. But if here's a sugar Sugar list

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 3>is the name of the book, and it's Nicole Avina.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 3>She's a PhD but also a world renowned neuroscientist. So

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 3>great having on the show this morning. Thanks for the.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 6>Info, all right, Thank you.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you lean into it, and then after the holidays

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 3>hopefully you're back off unless you've got that elf diet

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 3>or everything you eat is sugar. I know people like that.

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 3>So there you go. All right, we're winding it down

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty five and we'll get news here in

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>just a few minutes. Traffick other all that just ahead.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Scott's Loan Show seven HLW.

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to be an americanity?

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Here we go.

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a Scott's Loan Show Monday more seven hundred ww.

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Here we go from the Big Bengals win yesterday, enjoying life.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>What is not to love about this time of the year.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I got something for you because it's all not you know,

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 3>happy holidays, even though that's most of the show today.

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you caught this, but seven on Friday,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Ohio Governor Mike DeWine shockingly line item vetoed a provision

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>of the state CB law which will now effectively ban

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the sale of something a lot of o'hon wands enjoy

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and that would be the hemp derived THC beverages that

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>you can get in bars and restaurants and other similar

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>products from General e taylers in the state, not necessarily

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 3>carry outs and Lifebo're talking about bars, and we're talking

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 3>about bars that have spent a fortune to try and

0:31:55.800 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 3>stay alive because the craft industry is fading, anda and

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 3>fused beverages of the future, and they've been embraced by

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 3>millions of Ohios. And with one stroke with pen, the

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 3>governor overrode that and the band means these beverages that

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 3>millions and enjoy can no longer be sold in locations

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 3>like convenience stores, bars, breweries or general stores. And these

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>restrictions will take effect in mid March. I cannot believe

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that it's come to this. Ohio State Senator Steve Hopman

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 3>from Just the Tipsity joining the show this morning on

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred w W Steve, I wish I wish you

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 3>a good morning. It doesn't feel like a good morning

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 3>based on what feels like a good part of your

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 3>life's work here. I mean, you've spent so much time

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 3>on Senate Bill fifty six, being the author of it,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and this is like the fifteenth time we've had this

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 3>conversation about stuff getting changed.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 10>Well, you're right now, We're done with it. There's a

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 10>couple of House members that have already introduced some other

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 10>things that they'd like to see change. But overall it

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 10>was a good bill. But unfortunately the governor saw differently

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 10>on this one subject.

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Did he explain his reasoning why and please just don't

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>tell me because it's about the children.

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 10>Yes, So whenever he line item vetos, he has a

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, the reason for doing it, And basically he

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 10>said that there would be confusion because you know in

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 10>the bill, you know, we got rid of gummies, different

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 10>things like that, especially for children. So we got rid

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 10>of that, but then we carved out the beverages until

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 10>November because we're following the federal law. And he said

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 10>there would be too much confusion with the beverages being

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 10>outlawed before the you know, after the other one. So

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 10>we're just going to outlaw everything all at once in

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 10>ninety days.

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, if it's the federal legislation is the root

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>cause of these problems, and giving this Congress just banned

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 3>certain THT products when you know they reopened the government,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>why did we need Why would the governor have to

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>act more aggressively than federal rock requires rather than just

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 3>simply mirroring federal standards.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean in the bill we did because we

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 10>in Ohio wanted to get rid of the gummies and

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 10>stuff that underage kids were getting. And we were doing

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 10>that in ninety days. I'm not sure that there would

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 10>be confusion among the consumers, at least for the you know,

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 10>over the next year. It would give people to finish

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 10>their you know, whatever allotment that they currently have. But

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 10>also in the bill, it would allow them to continue

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 10>to process. We were at five milligrams, so that was

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 10>you know, your six percent, like a six percent beer,

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 10>but would allow was going to allow Ryan Geist and

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 10>fifty West to process at ten or twenty so that

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 10>they could sell out a state, make money, keep people

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 10>employed that has gone away in ninety days.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Also, does the.

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Governor realize how many millions of Ohioans not only enjoy this,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 3>but how many thousands of people of employees? Does he

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 3>understand the business dynamic here?

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 10>I you know, that would have to be a question

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 10>for him. My understanding in the state of Ohio this

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 10>year it is a seventy five million dollar business, mostly

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 10>in the craft industries. You know, recently Cores and Anheuser

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 10>Busch is starting to get into the industry. But basically

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 10>it's a something that you find in the craft.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and as I talked to purveyors of craft beer,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 3>the taste for craft beer has ebbed. I mean, we

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 3>hit a peak. Everything has a business cyclist, you know,

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Steve Hoffman, and now we're starting to be like the

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>post you know, select beer kind of thing. A lot

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 3>of people still enjoy it. I don't think it's going

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 3>to go away, but it's pretty clear that people are

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 3>switching to other beverages. Seltzer's are big, and certainly THC

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 3>beverages are big too. So my concern is you don't

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 3>give people that option. Do they go back to drinking

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>craft beer? Probably not, They'll find something else. I would

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>imagine that these breweries aren't selling, doesn't that mean jobs

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 3>and some of these breweries closing up?

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 10>I would think so, you know, you know, the statistics

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 10>I see is that people under thirty drink more of

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 10>the THHC drinks than they do than they do beer.

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 10>And you know, seventy five million dollar industry in the

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 10>state of Ohio, that seems to be a good number

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 10>of jobs that ultimately would be lost. And do they

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 10>go to beer or something else or do they just

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 10>they want the THCHC effect and do they just start

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 10>smoking it?

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, and kind of cut the middle man out entirely.

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know what, I cringe every time. And you know,

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Mike the Wine is a Republican, and I hear about

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 3>how Republicans are pro business, pro small business, pro growth,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 3>proll is and they do things like this that completely

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 3>lead me scratching my head. Is Mike the Wine turning

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 3>his back on what used to be conservative values? There

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 3>has always been this way?

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, I again, you need to talk to

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 10>him about it, but I think he is more concerned

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 10>about safety of people and health of people, and I

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 10>believe that's in conflict of of what other people are

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 10>thinking that these things do for him.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Mike the Wine is a lawyer. He's not a physician. You,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Steve Hoffman, are a physician. What's your physician's take on

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>this stuff? Are people killing themselves when they sip THHD

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 3>and fuse beverages?

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think, like any other intoxicating substances, it's

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 10>within reason. So if you're within reason and you're not

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 10>going out and driving after taking large quantities of them, No,

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 10>I don't think we know the long term health effects

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 10>of these things. But you know, the early science says,

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, it's not that bad. You know, maybe beer

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 10>and whiskey in the long term might be even worse

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 10>for you, but you know, no real big negative effects

0:37:59.280 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 10>currently known.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that we currently know.

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 3>The future is always you know, always changes, science always improves,

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 3>and we listen to that science. But at the same time,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I have a definitive right by God to put whatever

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 3>it is on why my body. Plenty of people abuse substances, food,

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 3>whatever it might be. I mean, you name me something

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 3>in the world and I'll find somebody who abuses it.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 3>And you see that all the time in your practice, Steve,

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 3>and have to deal with those kinds of things for sure,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>And you see the effects of people not taking care

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 3>of their bodies and neglecting their health and focusing on

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 3>too many vices. And when we say that declined. But

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 3>again we all know that today. We know that cigarettes

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 3>are carcinogen, We know that smoking is not good for you.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 3>We know about popcorn lung now with vaping and things

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 3>like that. But again, you could do things in moderation,

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 3>and it's fine to me. It just seems to not

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>only be left to the adults to make a decision.

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Not kids, of course, but adults. And we know what

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 3>we put in our bodies. I mean, it's not I

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 3>don't think an exaggeration and think, okay, should there be

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a I don't know the side. Remember when more liberal

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 3>states we're talking about banning the size of sodas, we're

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about regulating the fast food industry and

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 3>only being allowed to get McDonald's once a month as

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how far does the government go. I hear

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 3>these things, and you know, damnit, I'm a grown person.

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 3>I can make an informed decision is what I want

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>to consume and put in my own body. It should

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 3>not be up to the governor with the stroke of

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a pen to undermine that. Because I think, in your

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 3>opinion on this, Steve, does this at some level go

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 3>against the will of the voters. Let's not forget almost

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 3>six and ten people supported recreational marijuana and Ohio we

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 3>generated over seven hundred million in the first year. At

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 3>what point does the legislative modification of a voter approved

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 3>citizen and it should have crossed the line from reasonable

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 3>regulation and define the clear will of what people want.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, I don't disagree with that a lot of that.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 10>But the beverages had nothing to do with the ballot

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 10>initiative because we're talking hemp and the ballot initiative was

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 10>strictly concerning marijuana. Yeah so, but you should, within reason,

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 10>have the uh the right to do, you know. In

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 10>the same for however you feel about tradum. You know,

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 10>his pharmacy board last week is going to outlaw that,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 10>and many people feel that is of benefit for their

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 10>own health.

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's say. I mean, I don't go the weave

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 3>on that, but I think it's an excellent point. Stamfuffman

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is is creative. A lot of people know what that is.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean I I personally don't use it. I don't

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 3>really know anyone that does. It's been around for what's

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the substance what's a concern with cretum?

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 10>Creative is something kind of like a t from East

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 10>Asia that that many that that people use and they

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 10>feel that it helps with anxiety and sleep and a

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 10>lot of things that that that the hamp people do.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 10>But in that end, there there's a substance. The intoxicating

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 10>substance is known as seven oh H and it is

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 10>at a very very low level, so it's really not

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 10>thought to be intoxicating. But just like camp they manufacturers

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 10>will concentrate seven O H and put a large amount

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 10>in there and then makes it dangerous, makes it makes

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 10>it intoxicating, and and so that's uh, you know, we're

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:19.879
<v Speaker 10>you know, the pharmacy board is gonna band all of it.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 3>So but at the same time, we live in a

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 3>country where you could get you know, an intoxicating marshroom

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 3>tea or so some of those lines where you know,

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a tribal ancestors been using that for for eons, right

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and seemingly I don't know if there's all effects to

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 3>that or not, but for some people they feel that

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 3>it's therapeutic.

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 10>I agree. I just you know, it's a scheduled uh

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 10>it's not scheduled one, but he wants to make the

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 10>scheduled one drugs so we can get rid of it.

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 10>But there's no real scientific research, you know, a high

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 10>state and you see and other highly academic places aren't

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 10>really doing the research or haven't done the research to

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 10>tell us this is good for you, and this is

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 10>what it's it's you know, this is why it's mad.

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 3>The cat's catch twenty two. It's a schedule one, so

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 3>they can't research it. And then they people who made

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>us schedule one say well there's not research. Yeah, because

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 3>you made a schedule one. We can't do research on

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 3>something that's that's that controlled. It's simple.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. You know, how how about the great news from

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump last week on marijuana?

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Really good? This is an odd game, isn't it. I

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 3>mean you mentioned, okay, yeah, the Sistanist initiative and sixty

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 3>percent of people wanting recreacial THC marijuana. You got, Well,

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't this this THHC, the CBD, THHG derivative liquids

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 3>and the alcohol well not alcohols but the beverages. It's

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.720
<v Speaker 3>not really what the vote. But I get that argument

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the same time, it's I think the spirit of it

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 3>is going, hey, you know what if I can smoke THC?

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>What is it that far reach to think that that

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 3>would include CBD derived beverages like this? And now that

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump is doing what he's doing, I think that's even

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 3>more against what what Mike Line thanks with this vetout.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 10>No, I don't, I don't disagree. You know, when when

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 10>Trump said that you know, I'm going to speed up

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 10>the process of making the marijuana THHC a Scheduled three

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 10>drug and Schedule one. It will be great for the

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 10>banking industry. We can't you know, can't bank. It's all

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 10>cash business in the dispensaries and in everything.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 10>And it'll provide the ability to do scientific research. And

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 10>I am I'm hoping that, uh, the academic institutes in

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 10>the state of Ohio will jump on it and be

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 10>able to go out and get federal funding to say

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 10>marijuana is good for you or it's bad for you,

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 10>and let's settle this for you know, what type and

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 10>how and what conditions.

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Steve another, by the way, that's the Ohio State Senator

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Steve Huffman on the show on seven hundred w OLW.

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you heard Mike the line shockingly line item

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>vetoed a provision in our state CBD law. You know,

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the the CBD slash THHD infused beverages that a lot

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 3>of people enjoy. That's spurned an entire industry that's rapidly

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 3>growing as big as a craft bret beer industry. And

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 3>it was I think in a few years of clips

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 3>that because so many people want this stuff. Mke the

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 3>wine ban that in Ohio. So all these companies that

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 3>leaned in and invested the small brewers, the rhyin geis

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the fifty west of the world and others are no

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 3>longer in ninety days going to be able to sell

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 3>and produce that stuff. And so six thousand plus people

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and so six thousand small businesses alone, by the way, businesses,

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 3>not people, but six thousand businesses are no longer going

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 3>to be able to compete in the sphere, despite the

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 3>massive demand by millions of adult Ohioans that want this stuff.

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>The other element here too, we had talked about, I

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 3>think last time around Steve about protections for housing, employment,

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 3>organ donation, stuff like that. Is that been removed by

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the governors. That's still in there.

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 10>It's still in there. Basically, those things are things that

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 10>mere previous laws. I don't believe there was anything really

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 10>new in there. I mean, if you're a smoker, you

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 10>can be banned from an organ transplant because of scientific

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 10>studies that show that you and so that's why it

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 10>was the you know, the organ band is still has

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 10>been included in there.

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Is there a connection medically, Steve, between the organ donation

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and marijuana. Why would you be excluded.

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 10>From that, if I remember right, the law doesn't say

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 10>that you are excluded. It says if there's a scientific basis,

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 10>you can be excluded if if they feel hey, look

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 10>if if if science shows that if you smoke marijuana

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 10>and you get a liver transplant plant, your likelihood of

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 10>rejection as higher. If the science is there, then we

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 10>should should stick by it. But we shouldn't just totally

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 10>get rid of that not based on science.

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, if it's science says that you have

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 3>a higher rate of not not being able to get

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 3>the organ, so it's kind of a waste of that

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 3>pressure tree. So I kind of get that element. One

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 3>of the thing I saw too was allowing police to

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 3>establish probable cause during traffic stops because someone is a

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 3>known user of marijuana. Is that still part of this.

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 10>I can't remember, but again I think that was you know,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 10>restated from previously that you know, when we initially did

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 10>the medical marijuana law back in twenty sixteen, most of

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 10>the drug dogs in the state were became obsolete because

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 10>when they smelled marijuana, they would have hit and they

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 10>you couldn't tell if it was a legal substance or

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 10>an illegal substance or where they derived it from. So

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 10>that caused a lot of a lot of trouble. But

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 10>you know they if they still have probable cause not

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 10>because you're smoking, because they feel you're impaired, they would

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 10>be able to do a field sobriety test.

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of contradictions here. It just leads one scratching.

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 3>There is there any remedy here for manufacturers? And I'll

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 3>try to get somebody on maybe from Ryan Guister fifty

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 3>West to talk about this later on. Is this fight

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 3>completely over to this? In the overturned.

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, in the original bill, the House and the Senate

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 10>and had an agreement that we would, you know, the

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 10>Feds are going to get rid of it in a

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 10>year in November twenty six if they change things, that

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 10>we would look at that and see because we didn't

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 10>have time to put taxes on as regulations in the

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 10>whole scheme of things, so we kept the plan was

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 10>to keep it till November, so we can re look

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 10>at it from that. But from that aspect and see

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 10>if Governor DeWine has a different view of it, we

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 10>could look at a veto override it would take two

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 10>thirds of each each body so there are some things

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 10>we could reintroduce this, you know, when there's a new governor.

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Well that won't be long, that won't be much either year,

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>but still ramping down production, ramping it back up. I

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know what to tell the six thousand small businesses

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 3>out that have invested in this stuff when it was

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 3>illegal yesterday, now it's illegal today or ninety days. I

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 3>should say, Steve, my head is scratching. You're you're scratching

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 3>your head, I'm sure, but we'll leave it at that,

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and you have a merry Christmas. Thanks again for a

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 3>joining the show and keep us updated and what the

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 3>future holds for this.

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Merry Christmas to you and your family and all

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 10>your listeners.

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 3>You take care of Scott. Thanks against Steve. That's Ohio

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 3>State Senator Steve Hoffman from just the Tips city just

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 3>north of Dayton and Mike to wine again allegedly pro business.

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how this is pro business, pro pro

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 3>consumer because it goes against the face of the hottest

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 3>growing beverage. I guess niche in the state right now,

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 3>if not the country, for that manner, we don't want

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 3>any part of it. Why it's about the children oh

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 3>my god. Stop seven hundred w welw. Everyone needs help

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 3>every now and then, and it's easier to help us

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 3>get our heads right. This is Mental Health Monday with

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 3>mental health expert Julie Hettershire. All right, it's hard to

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 3>believe that twenty twenty five is coming to a close

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and the end of the year calendar. You know, we've

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 3>got a lot crammed in there, lots go on, lots

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 3>to do, a lot of things to wrap up at

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:19.399
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 3>One of the things we'll talk later is about credit

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 3>reports and pulling those look at those, you know, financial

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 3>advice Andy Schaeffer tomorrow. Beyond talking about that in one

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 3>area though people often don't think about it, and that

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 3>is what Julie's here to talk about this morning on

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.720
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred WW Julie hat to share our licensed mental

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 3>health expert. It's Mental Health Monday on the Scotsland Show. Welcome.

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 3>How are you hey?

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 10>I great?

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 11>Thanks?

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Helly?

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 7>You good?

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Ready for the holidays? Ready for the what do you

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 3>got gone for the holidays?

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.439
<v Speaker 12>We're having family over on Christmas and then a couple

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 12>of days later we're taking off for a week going

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:52.760
<v Speaker 12>someplace warm and beachy.

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 7>It's going to be lovely.

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh nice, good time to get away, all right. So

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this one weird trick for your mental health would be what.

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 12>Well, this is something that I've been doing for a

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 12>few years. I didn't invent it. Lots of people do it,

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.320
<v Speaker 12>and it's called sort of a year end life review.

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 12>And you know, businesses do year end reviews. You if

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 12>you're an employee of a business, you very often get

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 12>a performance review annually. But we don't often take a

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 12>look at our own lives in a holistic way and

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 12>ask ourselves some questions and reflect on what went well

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 12>and what didn't go as well over the course of

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 12>the year so that we can set ourselves up for

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 12>success going into the following year. And I think I've

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 12>been doing this about four or five years now, and

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 12>I love it. I love the whole process.

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 11>So I thought we could talk about.

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 12>It as a way to close out twenty five and

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 12>set ourselves up for success.

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 3>It's like a personal annual self review sort of thing.

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 3>You got to tact grow. Most of us, though, tend

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to yeah, people like, hey, you know something bad, I

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 3>don't want to talk about it, ignore it. But there

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 3>are those of us that tend to just focus on

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the future because you know, I can't change what happened.

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 3>I can learn from it and move forward. I don't

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 3>really want to look back. Is that flawed thinking?

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 12>Well, you can learn from it and move forward, but

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 12>only if you take the time to reflect on not

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 12>only what happened, but what it meant and why it happened,

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 12>and how maybe to prevent what you didn't like, and

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 12>to optimize for and maximize what you did like. So

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:21.239
<v Speaker 12>if business has just closed out their books at the

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 12>end of the year and started fresh the following year

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 12>without learning lessons positive or negative from what happened in

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 12>the prior year, they wouldn't have the level of success

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 12>that they do. If they do a comprehensive review, what

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:35.839
<v Speaker 12>were our hits, what were our this is what went well,

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 12>what didn't and why, and move forward from that. So

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 12>it's not really dwelling in the past. It's learning from

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:44.320
<v Speaker 12>your year to set yourself up for an even better

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 12>year to come.

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, So seven point maintenance check. You're like your car,

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 3>what do you got?

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 12>So the first one is and I don't didn't do

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 12>this when this article that I we are going to

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 12>list in the show notes is one that I really liked.

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 12>And the first question that the guy asked is what

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 12>did I change my mind about this year? What did

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:06.240
<v Speaker 12>I think I knew, or what did I think was true?

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 12>Or what did I think was right.

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 11>That I learned wasn't.

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 12>Because one of the things that we know about mental

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 12>well being, both cognitive and emotional into old age is

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 12>that cognitive flexibility is really important. Being able to think

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 12>something is true and then being able to find evidence

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 12>that indicates it's not, being able to consider that evidence

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 12>and maybe change your mind. This mental and cognitive flexibility

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 12>is really important for emotional well being but also cognitive

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 12>health as you enter later into life, and so being

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 12>able to take a look at what you believed and

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 12>what you might have changed your mind about and how

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 12>cognitively flexible you were over the course of the year,

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 12>and then also what those changes meant. So you may

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 12>have thought A was true, you realize at that point

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 12>A is not true for you. I mean, it may

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 12>be factually true, but it doesn't work for you anymore.

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 12>So you change your mind about it, And what does

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:05.919
<v Speaker 12>that do for you during the rest of the year,

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:07.439
<v Speaker 12>How does that impact your life?

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 11>Going forward.

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 12>So being able to take a look at that is

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:10.720
<v Speaker 12>really important.

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we're in the post truth world, though, and many

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 3>more people would rather be right than finding the truth.

0:53:18.280 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, in that case, then this question may not appeal

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:22.160
<v Speaker 12>to them, but I.

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 11>Look at it.

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 12>I look at it at it as sort of you know,

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 12>software updates for your brain. You know, you update your phones,

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 12>you update your computer. Things that used to work didn't

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 12>work anymore, lands that you tried. So, for example, I

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 12>tried to scheduling tactic with some of my clients over

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 12>the last couple of months of the year.

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 11>Wasn't a huge hit. Not going to do it anymore.

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 12>Thought it would be. Tried it, it wasn't. I'm not

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 12>going to do it anymore. It doesn't have to.

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 11>Be actual facts.

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 12>It can just be I tried this, it didn't work,

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 12>I changed my mind. I did something else. But how

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 12>cognitively flexible are you?

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Good?

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Next up?

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 11>What gave you energy?

0:53:58.719 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 12>What we energy you?

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 11>Whether it's physical energy from.

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 12>Working out, sleeping more, and eating better, whether it's energy

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 12>from being with different kinds of people, whether you started

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 12>a new hobby or a new project.

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:16.359
<v Speaker 11>That really really got you juiced. What gave you energy.

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 12>This year and take a look not only at the

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 12>thing itself, but sort of a larger theme and see

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 12>how you can incorporate more energy promoting things into your

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 12>life going forward.

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 11>So, if you did a.

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 12>Home reno project for the first time and you found

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 12>you really liked it, are there more things like that

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 12>that you can do to create positive, generative, life affirming

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 12>energy in your world? And what really got you turned

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 12>on and got you juiced this year is another really

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:46.360
<v Speaker 12>good question.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 3>To ask, gotcha all right that? No, that makes a

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of sense and find that and then maximize that

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 3>for the next year, obviously would be the suggestion there.

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 12>Yes, maximize that for the next year. If being with

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 12>certain types of people really work, do more of that?

0:54:59.480 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 10>Right?

0:54:59.680 --> 0:54:59.879
<v Speaker 8>Good?

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 12>And then and then the flip of that is what

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 12>drained your energy? What were the vampires? What sucked your

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:10.479
<v Speaker 12>energy this year? Was it people that you spent time

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 12>with certain people? Was it activities or projects that you

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:16.839
<v Speaker 12>were involved in. Was it staying up too late if

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 12>we're talking about physical well being, was it staying up

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 12>too late? What really sucked your energy this year? And

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 12>if you can take a look again at the overall

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 12>themes of that, then you can try to minimize those

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 12>and optimize for the things that at least or neutral,

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 12>if not create energy in your life.

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, it makes sense. You got a look at

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the it's yin and yang understandably, Julie Hatter's here the

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 3>term boat anchor. We know a boat anchor is, but

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 3>how does it apply to what we're talking about here.

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, for all of us, we have some things in

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 12>our life that kind of hold us back. They don't

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 12>necessarily prevent us from getting where we want to go,

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 12>but they make it harder. So, you know, we have

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.800
<v Speaker 12>maybe an unsupportive spouse if we're trying to get healthier,

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 12>or we have a boss who doesn't really seem to

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 12>put our ideas forward. We have to work really hard

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 12>to get anywhere with that person. Or we have some

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:13.760
<v Speaker 12>beliefs that seem to hold us back from doing our best,

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 12>like women can't be successful, or I shouldn't make too

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 12>much money or whatever.

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:21.840
<v Speaker 11>That can kind of hold us back.

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 12>And so just taking a look at what those things

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 12>might be that aren't necessarily preventing you from getting somewhere,

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 12>but are making it harder.

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 11>For you to get where you want to go. You

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 11>have to work twice as hard to get half as far.

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 11>Those are boat anchors, and just kind.

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.799
<v Speaker 12>Of understanding in your own life what those are and

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 12>then minimizing, eliminating if you can, or figuring out how

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 12>to work around them so that you can maximize your

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 12>success and your potential and your happiness in the new

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 12>year can be really impactful.

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 11>We tend to look at the.

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 12>Things that stop us, but we don't necessarily tend to

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 12>look at the things that flow us down or make

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:02.360
<v Speaker 12>things harder than they ought to be.

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because you're dragging that anchor, is what you're doing.

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 3>But for many people, isn't that going to be your

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:09.359
<v Speaker 3>career or your job? And what does that mean?

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, it might be for sure. And one of the

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 12>things that this life review can let you do is

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 12>if you are in a career a job that you

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 12>really don't like and that really is an energy suck

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 12>for you, then you can take a look at maximizing

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 12>the positives in other areas of your life to sort

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 12>of balance out the negative of the work. I realize

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 12>not everybody loves their work like I do, and so

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 12>being able to maximize the positives the projects, the hobbies,

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 12>the people. The activities, the habits that really build your

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 12>energy and build the positivity in your life can work

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 12>to offset some of the negativity around maybe your job,

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:52.680
<v Speaker 12>maybe a family situation that you can't get out of,

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 12>maybe a health situation that you can't get out of.

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 12>I mean, boat anchors can certainly be poor health. That

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 12>doesn't prevent you something, but it just makes it harder.

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:06.240
<v Speaker 12>You're in pain or movement is hard. So maximizing the

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 12>positive can help offset some of the negative or minimize

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 12>the impact of some of the negatives.

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 3>It's mental Health Money and the Scott's Loan Show on

0:58:13.960 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred WLW. She's July how to share local licensed

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 3>mental health therapist and the Personal Annual Review, which very

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 3>few people do, and it certainly is it has great appeal.

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I think you know you want to be a better

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 3>version of yourself in twenty twenty six and you were

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. And there are seven things you should do

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 3>if you do your own self analysis mental health analysis,

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 3>one being what did I change my mind on this year?

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:39.479
<v Speaker 3>The second one is what created energy? Then what took

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 3>my energy away? Number four is what are the boat

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 3>anchors in my life? And that brings us to number five.

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, what could I not do because I was afraid?

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 12>What did I want to do but I didn't do?

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 12>Because I was afraid?

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 11>For me? That would be skiing.

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 12>Skiing terrifies me. I'd really like to I'd really like

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 12>to learn, but I get so freaked out about that.

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:01.440
<v Speaker 12>There's no way I think I'll.

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Ever be able to scary about skiing.

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:09.520
<v Speaker 12>I can't stop, and stopping is a really important part.

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You can trust me, you can stop. It may not

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 3>be pretty, but you can stop yourself.

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 12>It may be a freaking yard sale when I stop,

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 12>and I may take others down with me.

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:24.400
<v Speaker 11>It could be really ugly.

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take you ski and that you know what

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna let's do that. We should make a play day.

0:59:28.920 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take you ski date.

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:59:31.080 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 3>You've never skied before.

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 11>I have, and I'm really bad.

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 7>At it, all right.

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I haven't scanned.

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 12>You many times and I'm really bad.

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, we may have to do that and

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:42.160
<v Speaker 3>break your fear of that. So I'll go out to

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect North, all right. So what did I not do?

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Because of fear? And a lot of people have move

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 3>There's some people that are extremely brave, they'll do anything.

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 3>But man, you don't fear. It gets in your head

0:59:52.120 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and that's a huge problem.

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah it is, and you know, you can take a

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 12>look at it. I didn't do this thing becau as I

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:02.720
<v Speaker 12>was afraid. What would have been the upsides if I

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 12>had done it? What would have been the downsides?

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 11>Now that it's.

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 12>Past and I'm looking at it in the rear view mirror,

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.480
<v Speaker 12>I can maybe take a more clear eyed look at

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 12>it and recognize where the fear came from. And fear

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:17.160
<v Speaker 12>comes from being new at something, from not knowing how

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 12>to do it, from being inexperienced. Very often, it doesn't

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 12>come from being incompetent. It usually comes from being inexperienced

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 12>and new, and the only way to get experience is

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 12>to do things.

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 11>So there's a really.

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 12>Great book out there called Feel the Fear and Do

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 12>It Anyway. I can't remember who wrote it, but it's

1:00:34.040 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 12>a classic. It's been around for a long time, and

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 12>it talks about how fear can actually motivate and energize

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 12>you to do things if.

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 11>You harness it correctly.

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 12>But I think taking a look at our year and saying,

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 12>what did I not do because I was afraid can

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:48.960
<v Speaker 12>set us up to be braver going into the new

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 12>year and to really more clearly analyze the risks and benefits.

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and that's true. The fear thing is true,

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>especially the more of a competitor or someone who's a perfectionist,

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 3>because that fear gets in your head and it'll prevent

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>you from doing things in life that you enjoy. And

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that's a whole different matter.

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it really can.

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah. Greatest hits and worst missus number six.

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:17.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So I think it's important to take a look.

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 12>At what went well, really well, and what didn't go

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 12>so well and optimized for what did go well. We

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 12>learn as much from analyzing what works as we do

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 12>from analyzing what doesn't work, because sometimes we think it

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 12>worked and we don't need to pay attention to it,

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:35.720
<v Speaker 12>but oftentimes the reasons why it worked, the ingredients for

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 12>the hit are replicable if we understand what they are,

1:01:39.480 --> 1:01:42.080
<v Speaker 12>so we tend to take apart the missus the things

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 12>that didn't work and really analyze those deeply. It's also

1:01:45.760 --> 1:01:48.400
<v Speaker 12>important to analyze what did go well and understand why,

1:01:48.440 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 12>so you can do more of what works, which is

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:55.440
<v Speaker 12>a great, great tactic, and it's important to do a balance,

1:01:55.520 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 12>not just look at the things that didn't go well,

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 12>because the pessimist tends to do that. Optimists to look

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 12>at what worked, but take a balanced view what worked

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:05.919
<v Speaker 12>and what didn't, and understand a little bit about why

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 12>that is, so that going forward you can optimize for

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 12>the positives and minimize the negatives.

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, So Albert Einstein famous you said, when you

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>stop learning, you start dying, and that would be number seven.

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:17.520
<v Speaker 3>What did you learn this year?

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? What did you learn? What new thing did you learn?

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 12>It might be something you changed your mind about, as

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 12>in question one, it might be a whole new thing

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:28.920
<v Speaker 12>you learned. Did you learn to play piano? Did you

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:31.080
<v Speaker 12>learn that you like spicy food when you didn't think

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 12>you did. Did you learn how to ski? Maybe that's

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 12>me next year with you. But what did you learn

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:38.760
<v Speaker 12>this year? What new thing did you try? What were

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 12>you willing to be a beginner at? What did you

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:44.360
<v Speaker 12>allow life to surprise you with? What did you learn

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 12>this year? Because we really are creatures that are meant

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 12>to grow and learn until the day we die, and

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 12>oftentimes we get stuck in our bubbles of competence.

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:55.439
<v Speaker 11>We know how to do this.

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 12>We know we like this, we know we like to

1:02:57.600 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 12>go there, and we keep doing the same thing over

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 12>and over. So did you expand your horizons in any way?

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 12>Did you broaden your world and make it bigger and richer?

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:06.439
<v Speaker 11>In any way?

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 12>Did you learn something new? And what was that and

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 12>what impacts that have on you? And how can you

1:03:12.160 --> 1:03:14.400
<v Speaker 12>maybe do more of that going into the future.

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, makes sense. Julie Hatter Share a licensed mental health therapist.

1:03:18.520 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Your own personal annual review in your head? What did

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 3>you change your mind on this year? What created energy?

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 3>What drained your energy? What are the boat anchors in

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:28.520
<v Speaker 3>your life? The things slowing you down? What did you

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>do because of fear or did not do because of fear?

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Greatest hits worth, missus, and what you learned this year.

1:03:34.000 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll kind of center around the same theme. But and

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>if you do this, you have a greater direction of

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>what twenty twenty six is going to look for you.

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate you so much and thanks for joining the

1:03:44.320 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 3>show every Monday all this year, and I look forward

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:49.560
<v Speaker 3>to meeting up with you and maybe skiing in twenty

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixth.

1:03:50.120 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 11>Joly, it sounds great. We'll talk soon.

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Take care Merry Christmas. Be well, my friend, let's do

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>a news update and boor to follow here it's a

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Scott's Loan show on the home of the best Bengals coverage,

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Big Dub Yesterday, Big Dub's Baby seven hundred WW Cincinnati.

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to.

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Be an Americans?

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Got flowing seven hundred W A guest the leads the

1:04:11.520 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>nation in spam and scam messaging. This guy, Ohio, congratulations

1:04:18.760 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 3>and study just came out and said, we get more

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 3>junk mail, more phishing emails, more fake texts or tolls

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 3>we never went through and have to pay. It's incredible.

1:04:29.160 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why that is. We're gonna find out.

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:32.840
<v Speaker 3>His name is Brian Cross. Brian lives in the realm

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of SMS messaging and he is one of the guys

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>who follows this stuff on a very very close basis.

1:04:39.920 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>And I guess, Brian, I've always said this, first of all, welcome. Secondly,

1:04:43.440 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>if we didn't respond to the spam and the scams,

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>they wouldn't send us as much stuff. It's our fault

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>because clearly there are people who love junk mail.

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, That's exactly it. There's there's always the complaint

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>of junk mail in the mailbox, and you know, the

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 4>response always the junk maan would go away if it

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>didn't work. These marketers have budgets and they've got ROI

1:05:06.600 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>numbers to hit, and if a tactic isn't working, they're

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the first to stop it. So these things keep coming

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>because they make money.

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>It's an interesting study though, too, because I'm trying to

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>think ten thousand ads a day. Do you think that

1:05:21.720 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>is six to ten thousand ads a day is with

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the typical person faces And you're like, I don't really

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>see that many. Well, I guess if you included billboards

1:05:29.480 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and radio and television typical broadcast, but then factor in

1:05:33.000 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, email, product placement, text messaging, things like that,

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe you're getting close to that mark. But that seems

1:05:39.840 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>softly high.

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Ten thousand seems very high. I've you know, I've heard

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>that number in terms of pieces of information things that

1:05:47.960 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 4>we see, but an actual advert something like that, that

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 4>does seem a bit high.

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's no doubt about it. You know, most people

1:05:57.120 --> 1:05:58.840
<v Speaker 3>don't like this. I guess it would be that one

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>third of consumers in the service, if sixty six percent

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 3>surveyed said they want fewer marketing messages. That means a

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>third are fine with them out there getting or don't

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:11.280
<v Speaker 3>think they're getting enough, which is driving this whole problem.

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'd be curious to break that one down. I've

1:06:14.840 --> 1:06:17.440
<v Speaker 4>none of those people are saying I need more.

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 3>But well, somebody is responding or clicking on this. I

1:06:21.880 --> 1:06:24.240
<v Speaker 3>mean that's the thing with social anyway. If you click,

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:27.960
<v Speaker 3>even accidentally on something, that algorithm is going to force

1:06:28.000 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>more of that type of product to your device. And

1:06:30.520 --> 1:06:32.280
<v Speaker 3>not only that, it's also going to show them, hey,

1:06:32.320 --> 1:06:34.600
<v Speaker 3>we've got to click through here, So that encourages more

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of the bad behavior it does.

1:06:36.840 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 4>It does, and marketers have this thing. There's many different

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 4>ways called three sixty cults around, sound caught, whatever, but

1:06:44.760 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 4>they're basically starting from a point where they say, hey,

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 4>if you know, there's there's information that says the average

1:06:51.640 --> 1:06:56.280
<v Speaker 4>consumer makes the buying decision after being touched at least

1:06:56.400 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 4>seven to twelve times, and there I think with gen

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:01.720
<v Speaker 4>why now I think that jumps up to like twenty,

1:07:01.880 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 4>So it means I got to talk to you, you

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>have to see something from me at least seven or

1:07:06.960 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>eight times before you even start thinking of buying my products.

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 4>So the three sixty the surround sound. You know, you think, okay,

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>I need to surround the consumer. I need to touch

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 4>you with its you know, TV radio, out of home Internet,

1:07:21.160 --> 1:07:24.000
<v Speaker 4>where do you go like text message there. That's that's

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 4>why we're seeing all of this because you know it's

1:07:27.440 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 4>sort of I guess exasperates it, right, It's it's okay,

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 4>if Jen why is twenty hits? You know this is

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:36.440
<v Speaker 4>gen Z going to be thirty five hits. So if

1:07:36.880 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the science so that have to touch you that many times,

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 4>that's probably going to increase the amount of advertising you

1:07:42.720 --> 1:07:45.080
<v Speaker 4>see from every brand that is out there.

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because in order to I guess overwhelm your senses

1:07:50.080 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to put that to the top of your feed, so

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to speak, you've got to hit people more with your

1:07:53.880 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>message in order to get through it.

1:07:56.600 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 4>You do. Now, that's that's one theory, right. So you

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 4>know there's there's there's lots to talk to you know,

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:07.080
<v Speaker 4>disruption and differentiation and things like that. You know, I mean,

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:09.920
<v Speaker 4>every everybody, every marketing school as a slide where you

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>see like, you know, all these advertising you know, usually

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 4>like in Times Square or something like that, but I

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 4>mean you see billboard over billboard over billboard over billboard

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:21.360
<v Speaker 4>and things like that, and you're taught, Okay, you have

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 4>to differentiate from this. Well, everyone's differentiating with quantity. But

1:08:27.000 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that kind of has been going away.

1:08:30.680 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 4>You think I would say quality, right, so you can

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>combat quantity. You do quality well, generally quality is a

1:08:38.360 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 4>subjective term, but basically you know some sort of creativity,

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:44.879
<v Speaker 4>some sort of risker reward. One of the other problems

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>that we have in marketing is not just the number,

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>the sheer number of it, but everyone's doing the same thing.

1:08:53.200 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 4>They all blend together. The reason why it takes eighteen hits,

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:58.679
<v Speaker 4>twenty hits whatever to find somebody is because they all

1:08:58.680 --> 1:09:01.720
<v Speaker 4>look the same. Everybody is afraid of losing their job.

1:09:01.840 --> 1:09:04.600
<v Speaker 4>CMO have this what I think it's sounded like an

1:09:04.640 --> 1:09:08.479
<v Speaker 4>eighteen month average tenure at their company. So everybody's following

1:09:08.520 --> 1:09:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the data trends. Everybody's following, you know, the best practices.

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Everybody's playing it safe. Well, the thing is is if

1:09:15.240 --> 1:09:17.400
<v Speaker 4>you go down to the base core of marketing, it

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is to differentiate. So if you look like your competitor

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:22.639
<v Speaker 4>and everyone's doing the same thing and doing what data

1:09:22.680 --> 1:09:25.640
<v Speaker 4>tells you to do, or gosh. Now, whatever the aipot

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:29.200
<v Speaker 4>tells you to do, you look the same. You're not differentiating.

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Quite frankly, you're not doing your job. And I think

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 4>that that's why the majority of all this marketing that

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:38.880
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing is useless, because it's terrible. It's not the

1:09:38.920 --> 1:09:39.360
<v Speaker 4>right stuff.

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's retally interesting. I mean, you know, having some

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 3>experience in this to Brian and not certainly your level,

1:09:44.479 --> 1:09:47.880
<v Speaker 3>but you know you watch I don't know, streaming or

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>a regular broadcast television, let's say, because you know I

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:53.479
<v Speaker 3>get the the visual. Two is you know every car

1:09:53.560 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 3>ad looks the same. And I always joke about it,

1:09:55.720 --> 1:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>is I just listen. I just need this suv or

1:09:58.000 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>this truck to get me through the potholes in Cincinnati.

1:10:01.400 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm not driving up a mountain. I'm not towing the

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Queen Mary, I'm not trying to pull I don't know,

1:10:06.880 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 3>some sort of it looks like a giant steel cover

1:10:09.520 --> 1:10:12.719
<v Speaker 3>over the top of a nuclear missile silo or something,

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>all right, And no one is driving their truck like that.

1:10:15.360 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>And you know there's a new one the rendering the

1:10:18.160 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 3>super Bowl, the Jeep one where there's a charging station

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 3>on top of a Mountain. Yeah, no one's doing that.

1:10:24.120 --> 1:10:27.559
<v Speaker 3>So but that's to your point, right, is that somebody

1:10:27.560 --> 1:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>will come up with that idea and everyone will rush

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to copy. We've seen I think the diversity thing in

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:35.720
<v Speaker 3>TV and also broadcast too, right, is if you look

1:10:35.720 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>at your typical ad now, they're really I think I

1:10:40.800 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of these says are more diverse than

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>what the that's reflective of the general population. I know

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:47.880
<v Speaker 3>someone may take that in a Dilbert kind of wrong way,

1:10:47.920 --> 1:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>but that's what I'm saying is you just have this

1:10:50.120 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>rush to imitate that going Okay, well we need a

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 3>lot more diversity, or we need a lot more of

1:10:53.960 --> 1:10:56.680
<v Speaker 3>these the same thing over and over and over, and

1:10:56.680 --> 1:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>you just beat the you just beat it to death.

1:11:00.280 --> 1:11:03.719
<v Speaker 4>We're taught about authenticity, and we're taught about you know, hey,

1:11:03.840 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 4>if if you really want to consumers to pay attention

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 4>to advertising, it needs to provide value. And and a

1:11:10.000 --> 1:11:11.559
<v Speaker 4>lot of people scratch their head and they're like, how

1:11:11.560 --> 1:11:14.960
<v Speaker 4>does it. How does the advertise that provide value? And sure,

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 4>you can do things like hey, here's a you know,

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.400
<v Speaker 4>here's a recipe for my you know, liquor brand or

1:11:20.400 --> 1:11:23.679
<v Speaker 4>whatever that provides value, but you know what what struck

1:11:23.760 --> 1:11:25.760
<v Speaker 4>me is is when you were talking about driving the

1:11:25.800 --> 1:11:29.599
<v Speaker 4>potholes of Cincinnati, and I was thinking about you know,

1:11:29.960 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 4>if you think about a pizza commercial, right, every pizza

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:36.240
<v Speaker 4>commercial is a slice of pizza being pulled away from

1:11:36.280 --> 1:11:42.160
<v Speaker 4>the main pie with this long the cheese pull. So

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 4>that that's what all these marketers are rushing to. But

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:46.679
<v Speaker 4>there was a key study and a few years ago

1:11:47.360 --> 1:11:51.439
<v Speaker 4>where Dominoes basically went and and and and put these

1:11:51.479 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 4>trucks out on the street. You know, obviously branded them

1:11:54.320 --> 1:11:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Domino and it was Balos and they were going through

1:11:57.080 --> 1:12:00.360
<v Speaker 4>and they were filling in the potholes of people's and

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 4>people were like, what the heck is going on here?

1:12:02.680 --> 1:12:04.639
<v Speaker 4>Then they had a cute little tie in about making

1:12:04.640 --> 1:12:07.000
<v Speaker 4>it safer for the pizza if you live at you

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:10.479
<v Speaker 4>faster or whatnot. But they were filling potholes that the

1:12:10.640 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 4>city wasn't. So you talk about providing value and breaking

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 4>through clutter and having a bunch of people go, man,

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:18.559
<v Speaker 4>you know when you see Dominoes fixing that potle you

1:12:18.640 --> 1:12:21.320
<v Speaker 4>hit every night coming over from work, you you go,

1:12:21.400 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 4>oh that's different, and you remember it, well, it's.

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:26.960
<v Speaker 3>A new one. So speaking of Dominoes is the one

1:12:26.960 --> 1:12:29.759
<v Speaker 3>that advertises that they're going to not an all electric,

1:12:29.800 --> 1:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>but they're converting a lot of their cars to electric now,

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not quite sure that trends. I get what

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:35.439
<v Speaker 3>they're doing, and that's trying to appeal to a younger,

1:12:36.320 --> 1:12:39.640
<v Speaker 3>environmentally conscious consumer, but I don't know if that's the

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:40.120
<v Speaker 3>right play.

1:12:40.160 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 4>You know.

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:41.960
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is like, Okay, well, I just want

1:12:42.000 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>my pizza to get their hot and fresh. You know,

1:12:44.680 --> 1:12:47.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming that some drivers are electric and some aren't.

1:12:47.520 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>But well, why is this why is this part of

1:12:49.360 --> 1:12:50.479
<v Speaker 3>a national marketing campign?

1:12:51.240 --> 1:12:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah exactly. So, yeah, no, the you're trying to hear

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:56.960
<v Speaker 4>all the things, so that one obviously would be, hey,

1:12:57.040 --> 1:13:01.519
<v Speaker 4>let's show that we're you know, conscious mean corporation destroying

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:01.840
<v Speaker 4>the plan.

1:13:02.320 --> 1:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:13:02.520 --> 1:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>So Brian crossing the show. He's a marketing expert with

1:13:05.240 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Elasticity his name of his agency, and we're talking about

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:10.519
<v Speaker 3>a new study coming out two thirds of consumers want

1:13:10.560 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 3>fewer marketing messages. Well know, duh, we're just we're inundated

1:13:13.880 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>all the time, and it's working because there's a percentage

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that that will click and go through and actually use

1:13:20.800 --> 1:13:23.040
<v Speaker 3>the product or service, and that'll drive more of this

1:13:23.080 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 3>stuff too. And you know the one I thought would

1:13:25.280 --> 1:13:27.599
<v Speaker 3>die by now, and I just thought this morning, the

1:13:27.720 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>free newspaper. I live in suburbia, proud suburbanite, where once

1:13:31.320 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 3>a week someone will drive through and throw a I

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:36.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know, some newspaper thin It's just like a big

1:13:36.840 --> 1:13:39.519
<v Speaker 3>ad section in my driveway and a bag plastic bag,

1:13:39.520 --> 1:13:41.639
<v Speaker 3>which I then promptly pick up and throw on my recycling.

1:13:41.640 --> 1:13:44.439
<v Speaker 3>And I do this exercise every week. I'm surprised that's

1:13:44.479 --> 1:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>still around.

1:13:46.240 --> 1:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>You know. It's it's the exact same thing as the

1:13:48.840 --> 1:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>direct mail. There is a lot, you know. One of

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:53.200
<v Speaker 4>the things that we do when we bring you know,

1:13:53.920 --> 1:13:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, new teammates on, you know, the younger employees

1:13:58.040 --> 1:13:59.720
<v Speaker 4>right out of college and whatnot, we take them and

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:04.600
<v Speaker 4>sit them in focus groups. And what's interesting is is

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 4>they go through school and and even you know, early

1:14:08.200 --> 1:14:11.120
<v Speaker 4>two three, four years in the industry, they come out

1:14:11.479 --> 1:14:13.840
<v Speaker 4>in this bubble thinking everybody does what they do, that's

1:14:13.920 --> 1:14:16.439
<v Speaker 4>that the entire country is like them. And they stick

1:14:16.479 --> 1:14:20.840
<v Speaker 4>them in in a focus group and they just scratch

1:14:20.920 --> 1:14:23.120
<v Speaker 4>their head. They're like what, and we're like, yeah, these

1:14:23.120 --> 1:14:25.600
<v Speaker 4>are the people you're marketing to this is this is

1:14:25.640 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>what you need to think of. Like not everybody went

1:14:27.920 --> 1:14:32.439
<v Speaker 4>to designed school and thinks exactly like, so no for

1:14:32.439 --> 1:14:34.639
<v Speaker 4>for everyone. And I do the exact same thing, right,

1:14:34.680 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 4>I take it, I lean over, I pick it up,

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>I put it right into that trash can. But again,

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 4>it's the same thing these newspapers. You know, it takes

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:46.720
<v Speaker 4>money for them to you know, write it, print it,

1:14:47.160 --> 1:14:49.600
<v Speaker 4>produce it, stick it in the wrappers, stick it on

1:14:49.720 --> 1:14:51.880
<v Speaker 4>a van, have that van drive around at four a m.

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Throw it around. That all takes money. And I mean

1:14:54.120 --> 1:14:56.800
<v Speaker 4>they're not doing that just to burn money. They're doing

1:14:56.800 --> 1:15:01.400
<v Speaker 4>it because the advertising and the things that paper made

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 4>for all of that to happen. So there are enough

1:15:04.080 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 4>people that don't throw it away, that do pick it up,

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:09.240
<v Speaker 4>that love it, and they're like, I want the local news.

1:15:09.240 --> 1:15:10.760
<v Speaker 4>This is way better than what I get on the

1:15:10.840 --> 1:15:12.599
<v Speaker 4>national CNN, Like I need to know.

1:15:12.760 --> 1:15:16.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a bad of ads, a bag of ads.

1:15:16.360 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not even like a paper, Yeah, it's just ads.

1:15:18.360 --> 1:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, well, now I'm going to kick it out

1:15:20.800 --> 1:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>of the plastic wrap, and somebody's looking, and of course

1:15:22.960 --> 1:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the ones in your mailbox, and I've got a I

1:15:25.840 --> 1:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>think it's a gutter or windows or something. Every week

1:15:29.200 --> 1:15:31.080
<v Speaker 3>they send me something, I'm like, wow, that is an

1:15:31.080 --> 1:15:33.479
<v Speaker 3>incredible a lout of money in markup that you have

1:15:33.520 --> 1:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>to add to the cost of your product in order

1:15:35.200 --> 1:15:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to send me these unwanted messages. And it's a lot

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:40.679
<v Speaker 3>easier to just bombard people with the email. And that's

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>the new frontier, right Brian. And maybe not that new,

1:15:43.400 --> 1:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>but texting now I get probably three or four day now,

1:15:46.640 --> 1:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm guessing that number is going to grow in

1:15:48.360 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>the near future.

1:15:50.479 --> 1:15:54.120
<v Speaker 4>It will until the numbers change. So again everything is

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>when I talk about data driven, some of the data

1:15:56.920 --> 1:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>is good. So you know, we now know that hey

1:15:59.439 --> 1:16:03.759
<v Speaker 4>if I it out through email, if if five percent

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:07.439
<v Speaker 4>opened my email, then man, I did good. Ninety percent

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:11.920
<v Speaker 4>of people with with phones they can't have an unread

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:14.519
<v Speaker 4>text message like like like if they get a text message,

1:16:14.520 --> 1:16:18.160
<v Speaker 4>they have to read it. It's just it's behavior, whereas

1:16:18.160 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 4>people are used to having these big, full fat you know,

1:16:21.120 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 4>email and sys of unread things. So if you if

1:16:25.120 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 4>someone comes and says, hey, if I send a text message,

1:16:27.960 --> 1:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I have a ninety percent chance of them opening it. Well,

1:16:30.720 --> 1:16:33.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to use the text message channel until that

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:36.559
<v Speaker 4>that that stat changes and that stack comes back to hey,

1:16:36.680 --> 1:16:40.479
<v Speaker 4>most text messages are you know, getting bound, getting blocked,

1:16:40.560 --> 1:16:44.280
<v Speaker 4>aren't being read. Then they'll start changing their tactics. So yeah,

1:16:44.320 --> 1:16:46.960
<v Speaker 4>that number will go up as long as the stats

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:48.120
<v Speaker 4>are people read them.

1:16:48.240 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, your little balloon pops up says you know, one, two, three,

1:16:50.600 --> 1:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>or four messages and you click on it like other ads,

1:16:52.880 --> 1:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>but you click on it to get rid of that.

1:16:55.280 --> 1:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Then the alert that tells you how many there are.

1:16:57.520 --> 1:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the phone companies are going to start figuring

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that out pretty soon is a way to work around that.

1:17:01.880 --> 1:17:04.320
<v Speaker 3>And then in addition, and we have the eight hundred

1:17:04.320 --> 1:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>pound gorilla, which is always and has been now the

1:17:07.439 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 3>automated robo calls.

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, uh, there there's a there's an article. I

1:17:12.680 --> 1:17:15.080
<v Speaker 4>wish I would have researched this, and I know where

1:17:15.120 --> 1:17:16.519
<v Speaker 4>to go this way, but I was one of my

1:17:16.560 --> 1:17:19.599
<v Speaker 4>favorite articles I've read, and I'd say the last moth

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:23.080
<v Speaker 4>was a guy there was They were interviewing a man

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 4>who you know, because robo calls are illegal now and

1:17:26.320 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 4>with fines of up to I think some of my

1:17:28.160 --> 1:17:31.720
<v Speaker 4>fifty thousand per you know instance or something. He's he's

1:17:31.720 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 4>made a side business of using that that that law

1:17:35.560 --> 1:17:37.920
<v Speaker 4>because these robo calls is aren't following the law. So

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>you know he's talking about you know, it's a job

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:43.439
<v Speaker 4>like it takes persistence and running papers and knowing the process,

1:17:43.479 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 4>all these things. But apparently this guy makes like something

1:17:46.120 --> 1:17:50.120
<v Speaker 4>like twenty twenty five thousand dollars a month in following

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 4>up in charging the robo calls that are breaking the laws.

1:17:55.240 --> 1:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we all want to figure out a way to

1:17:56.640 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>streamline that. I get that people continue. I think lonely people.

1:18:00.040 --> 1:18:03.280
<v Speaker 3>We just want to talk to somebody when the telemarketers call,

1:18:03.320 --> 1:18:06.680
<v Speaker 3>which is a sad indictment of our society, but it

1:18:06.760 --> 1:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of ruins for the rest of us. So that's

1:18:08.160 --> 1:18:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a getting texted and inundated with all these things. And

1:18:12.040 --> 1:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>then finally too, I look at this and go at

1:18:15.040 --> 1:18:17.679
<v Speaker 3>some point, you know, all these cold and personal marketing

1:18:17.720 --> 1:18:19.920
<v Speaker 3>messages you get get deleted. They're gonna have to fine

1:18:19.920 --> 1:18:21.719
<v Speaker 3>tune that, aren't they. I mean, you mentioned the onset

1:18:21.800 --> 1:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>of this thing, Brian, that it's it's the different stuff

1:18:25.640 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 3>that cuts through the clutter. Be a difference maker, make

1:18:27.600 --> 1:18:29.439
<v Speaker 3>a change and don't do the same old, same hold

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:31.080
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of these are the same old, samehold

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:33.759
<v Speaker 3>that are getting I don't know, I guess marginal results.

1:18:33.760 --> 1:18:37.559
<v Speaker 4>So it'll continue, it will and and that's the fine

1:18:37.560 --> 1:18:41.040
<v Speaker 4>line though, right you said the cold and in personal

1:18:41.080 --> 1:18:44.519
<v Speaker 4>conversation are the marketing message. Well, if you slip over

1:18:44.560 --> 1:18:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the other side, you know, you know, marketing has the

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:50.679
<v Speaker 4>data and the ability to you know, say, hey, Scott,

1:18:50.760 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 4>saw you just bought a glass of red wine at

1:18:54.160 --> 1:18:57.640
<v Speaker 4>dinner last night. Hey, we were selling bread wine. And

1:18:58.240 --> 1:19:00.280
<v Speaker 4>on that line, you have that that creepy like whoa

1:19:00.400 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 4>wait a second, how do you know my name and

1:19:02.520 --> 1:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>what I bought what not. You're always trying to kind

1:19:05.280 --> 1:19:08.160
<v Speaker 4>of thread that needle of how do I make it

1:19:08.200 --> 1:19:12.599
<v Speaker 4>important to you and personalize to you? So that's not cold,

1:19:12.600 --> 1:19:14.800
<v Speaker 4>but not like hey, creepy, you were tracking you a

1:19:14.840 --> 1:19:17.599
<v Speaker 4>big brother kind of thing. So it's definitely a fine

1:19:17.600 --> 1:19:18.400
<v Speaker 4>line to walk there.

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:20.679
<v Speaker 3>He is Brian Cross on the Scott Sloan Show this morning.

1:19:21.080 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Text marketing expert or communication expert. I guess the stuff

1:19:24.280 --> 1:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>that annoys you, Brian, with the news that Ohio leads

1:19:27.880 --> 1:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the country when it comes to spam scam communications. I

1:19:31.840 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 3>don't know why we're getting hit, maybe because so many

1:19:34.360 --> 1:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Ohioans apparently like getting that kind of stuff and react

1:19:37.000 --> 1:19:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to it all the best. Thanks again for joining the show.

1:19:39.439 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I appreciate you having me. Thank you Mary.

1:19:41.479 --> 1:19:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Christmas buddy, have a great holiday. Got to get to

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:46.599
<v Speaker 3>a news update, traffic, weather, all that and what lies

1:19:46.640 --> 1:19:49.760
<v Speaker 3>ahead is Christmas here twenty twenty five. Hopefully I have

1:19:49.760 --> 1:19:51.639
<v Speaker 3>some good time to sit down and relax and enjoy

1:19:51.640 --> 1:19:55.360
<v Speaker 3>your holiday. Scott's Loan Show seven hundred w WELW Money Money,

1:19:55.479 --> 1:19:58.519
<v Speaker 3>Scott's Sloan Show on seven hundred WLW. Not too many

1:19:58.520 --> 1:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>more of these left and the show. But Bengals football.

1:20:02.000 --> 1:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Following last week's shutout embarrassment by Baltimore, the Bengals end

1:20:05.800 --> 1:20:08.400
<v Speaker 3>a two games stead. They're up to what five and

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:11.479
<v Speaker 3>ten now, of course out of the playoffs. The team

1:20:11.560 --> 1:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>is healthy, they look dominant. They look pretty good for

1:20:15.000 --> 1:20:17.759
<v Speaker 3>most of this game. James Rapeat is here with Bengals

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Talk dot Com and the Sports Illustrative of course and

1:20:20.439 --> 1:20:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Lockdown Bengals Podcast. James, welcome, How are you. I'm doing well.

1:20:25.479 --> 1:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing well. They look pretty good yesterday. As I

1:20:28.640 --> 1:20:30.760
<v Speaker 3>said healthy. You know when they're healthy when you get

1:20:30.760 --> 1:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>tea and you get Jami Joe together, magic things happen.

1:20:34.320 --> 1:20:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And if you looked at that, certainly you could always

1:20:36.160 --> 1:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>do the what if game? Uh, you know, if they

1:20:38.320 --> 1:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>stayed healthy this season? What now? Okay, Well that that

1:20:40.880 --> 1:20:44.280
<v Speaker 3>didn't happen obviously, although I look at this and go,

1:20:44.320 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I've seen this movie before in previous lives, James and

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>you have as well. In that the Bengals going they

1:20:49.160 --> 1:20:51.599
<v Speaker 3>beat Baltimore and then they went out, let's say, their

1:20:51.680 --> 1:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>last two games, and now we're in a you know,

1:20:53.200 --> 1:20:54.680
<v Speaker 3>we're on a three game heater right now.

1:20:54.720 --> 1:20:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Great.

1:20:55.439 --> 1:20:58.920
<v Speaker 3>What scares me about that is front office looks at

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:02.719
<v Speaker 3>it and goes, We're fine, everything's good. We've done that before.

1:21:02.760 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>We've done that in previous seasons. Why would this time

1:21:05.080 --> 1:21:05.519
<v Speaker 3>be different.

1:21:07.080 --> 1:21:09.719
<v Speaker 7>I don't know that it is. And you're right, that's

1:21:11.000 --> 1:21:14.360
<v Speaker 7>the scary part because what they may say is, oh,

1:21:14.400 --> 1:21:18.479
<v Speaker 7>we're born too with healthy Joe, and we've found a

1:21:18.520 --> 1:21:21.880
<v Speaker 7>way to build the momentum, and that momentum can carry

1:21:21.880 --> 1:21:24.599
<v Speaker 7>into the offseason, which is completely fallow now. I think

1:21:24.640 --> 1:21:28.800
<v Speaker 7>specific players can build momentum for themselves. Teams don't carry

1:21:28.840 --> 1:21:31.960
<v Speaker 7>momentum to it from one year to another. It's not

1:21:31.960 --> 1:21:36.479
<v Speaker 7>how it works. And so yeah, I think that is

1:21:36.520 --> 1:21:40.559
<v Speaker 7>the major concern in the thought yesterday as we're starting

1:21:40.560 --> 1:21:43.479
<v Speaker 7>to wrap the Dolphins and then you see the schedule

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:46.519
<v Speaker 7>and it's the Cardinals and the Browns who are both

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:49.160
<v Speaker 7>really bad and theoretically you should beat.

1:21:51.720 --> 1:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, theoretically you should be able to be able to

1:21:54.240 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 3>beat them. But again, let's just say they do. What

1:21:57.960 --> 1:21:59.640
<v Speaker 3>changes then in the mind.

1:21:59.400 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 7>Of the Blackburn I don't know if there's let's start big,

1:22:05.320 --> 1:22:07.519
<v Speaker 7>big picture. I don't think Duke Tobin and Zach Taylor,

1:22:07.560 --> 1:22:11.439
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that that is happening. And you go

1:22:11.560 --> 1:22:15.760
<v Speaker 7>beyond that. Al Golden, the defensive coordinator. Yeah, his first

1:22:15.840 --> 1:22:17.800
<v Speaker 7>year and they've had an up and down year, but

1:22:17.840 --> 1:22:21.280
<v Speaker 7>that Zach Taylor Scott and I know he believes in

1:22:21.360 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 7>now and so for keeping Zach, I always thought you're

1:22:24.360 --> 1:22:27.120
<v Speaker 7>keeping up, and so I don't think that they're going

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:30.120
<v Speaker 7>to let out go. And so then what change do

1:22:30.160 --> 1:22:34.120
<v Speaker 7>you want, like what major changes? You know, maybe you're saying,

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:36.599
<v Speaker 7>all right, you want them to add more scouts, which

1:22:37.000 --> 1:22:39.360
<v Speaker 7>sounds great to me, or you want them to do

1:22:39.479 --> 1:22:43.519
<v Speaker 7>organizational structural changes like that, and maybe some of that

1:22:43.560 --> 1:22:46.439
<v Speaker 7>could happen. But from a coaching staff standpoint or a

1:22:46.520 --> 1:22:49.599
<v Speaker 7>Duke Tobin standpoint, which those are the two areas that

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:53.400
<v Speaker 7>fans are frustrated with and calling for change. I just

1:22:53.400 --> 1:22:55.559
<v Speaker 7>don't think you're going to see it, because you're right.

1:22:55.600 --> 1:22:58.360
<v Speaker 7>I think they have a good shot to win these

1:22:58.360 --> 1:23:00.519
<v Speaker 7>next two games, and even if they split that, I

1:23:00.560 --> 1:23:02.519
<v Speaker 7>don't think Zach Taylor was necessarily in danger.

1:23:04.040 --> 1:23:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't see that either, simply because they don't like

1:23:05.880 --> 1:23:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to pay someone for not playing for them or not

1:23:07.760 --> 1:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>working for them mean part of the organization. They're extremely

1:23:10.080 --> 1:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>loyal to a fault, and I contend you knowose people.

1:23:13.120 --> 1:23:17.519
<v Speaker 3>There's billboards up fire, Duke fire Zach. Okay, great, you

1:23:17.520 --> 1:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>could bring in I don't know. You could bring Bill

1:23:19.840 --> 1:23:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Belichick in, You could bring Bill Cower in, You could

1:23:22.240 --> 1:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>bring in George Hallis. You can bring in Hall of

1:23:25.080 --> 1:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Fame coaches if you want to. But the problem, to

1:23:28.320 --> 1:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>me and I think most fans, it's above them. It

1:23:31.800 --> 1:23:34.599
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter the coaching, it's the front office. And yeah,

1:23:34.640 --> 1:23:36.800
<v Speaker 3>you've added more pieces to your scouting staff. Still, the

1:23:36.800 --> 1:23:41.519
<v Speaker 3>smalle Cy NFL, they tend to be a pound foolish

1:23:41.560 --> 1:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>penny wise. But unless that attitude changes, it really doesn't

1:23:45.360 --> 1:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>matter who the coach and GM are. I mean, could

1:23:47.320 --> 1:23:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Duke Tobin do his job if he had more tools?

1:23:49.120 --> 1:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>He says no. But like Zach being the spokesperson for

1:23:52.200 --> 1:23:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the entire organization, if it continues to be that way,

1:23:56.240 --> 1:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really matter who you bring in. Am I right?

1:24:00.640 --> 1:24:03.320
<v Speaker 7>I think to a degree, yeah, I think to a degree.

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:08.080
<v Speaker 7>It's at the same time I do things that certain

1:24:08.120 --> 1:24:11.439
<v Speaker 7>things could change and matter, And the identity of the

1:24:11.520 --> 1:24:15.960
<v Speaker 7>team and the players is as much as you put

1:24:15.960 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 7>it on ownership, it certainly would be the head coach

1:24:18.080 --> 1:24:21.200
<v Speaker 7>and you take the identity, and I think Zach would say, hey,

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:25.280
<v Speaker 7>we know what we need to do to get back

1:24:25.479 --> 1:24:27.679
<v Speaker 7>to where we need to go. And I don't think

1:24:27.720 --> 1:24:30.840
<v Speaker 7>they feel like that they're internally that they're super far

1:24:30.880 --> 1:24:34.320
<v Speaker 7>off from doing that. Obviously part of that is Joe's health.

1:24:34.920 --> 1:24:37.160
<v Speaker 7>But what I would say is you need to be

1:24:37.240 --> 1:24:39.120
<v Speaker 7>able to find a way where Joe Burrow misses nine

1:24:39.160 --> 1:24:42.120
<v Speaker 7>teams that the season doesn't just go completely down the drains. Yeah,

1:24:42.160 --> 1:24:44.840
<v Speaker 7>And they would push back and say, well, that's our

1:24:44.880 --> 1:24:46.920
<v Speaker 7>franchise quarterback, and it's really hard to win without your

1:24:46.920 --> 1:24:49.519
<v Speaker 7>franchise quarter Fine, I am not saying it's not hard

1:24:49.880 --> 1:24:52.400
<v Speaker 7>hard to win a super Bowl too, but that's the standard.

1:24:52.439 --> 1:24:57.200
<v Speaker 7>And so yeah, I think the entire organization should be

1:24:57.240 --> 1:25:01.679
<v Speaker 7>looking at itself right now because Joe Burrow had missed

1:25:01.680 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 7>the playoffs for three straight years and that should be

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:08.280
<v Speaker 7>damn near impossible, and yet they pulled that off. And yeah,

1:25:08.600 --> 1:25:10.640
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty three was the one that I'll give them

1:25:10.640 --> 1:25:12.800
<v Speaker 7>them all against for, but this year I don't, and

1:25:12.840 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 7>certainly last year whinjo without the.

1:25:14.760 --> 1:25:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it's a down or trae director, you know, the

1:25:16.600 --> 1:25:19.439
<v Speaker 3>AFC Championship appearance of Super Bowl appearance wre awhile pass

1:25:19.479 --> 1:25:22.919
<v Speaker 3>that after three seasons something monument has to change. Nonetheless,

1:25:22.960 --> 1:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>let's not overshadow we win yesterday against a division rival

1:25:26.200 --> 1:25:29.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Baltimore Ravens or Baltimore is Baltimore the week

1:25:29.439 --> 1:25:32.600
<v Speaker 3>before they got got destroyed by them and ending the

1:25:32.600 --> 1:25:35.799
<v Speaker 3>two game skit obviously five and ten. Now for the Bengals,

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins are a terrible team. Two it gets benched in

1:25:38.520 --> 1:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>favor of a rookie. Bengals had a at third quarter

1:25:41.320 --> 1:25:44.160
<v Speaker 3>was unbelievable. Three takeaways a fourth down stop in the

1:25:44.200 --> 1:25:47.439
<v Speaker 3>third quarter set up the offense for the forty five

1:25:47.479 --> 1:25:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to twenty one win Ki, And you know, I watch

1:25:49.960 --> 1:25:52.479
<v Speaker 3>that game and I went, well, that was kind of

1:25:52.520 --> 1:25:54.920
<v Speaker 3>an unremarkable first half. I mean, Bengals on the first

1:25:54.960 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>drive in Miami with a fumble caused by Battle and

1:25:57.360 --> 1:25:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Miles Murphy scoops the ball up. Barrett Carter in her

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>have some of the Dolphins next drive. Dolphins had a

1:26:02.200 --> 1:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of big plays in the first and somewhat in

1:26:04.080 --> 1:26:05.479
<v Speaker 3>the second half against the Bengals.

1:26:07.160 --> 1:26:09.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and they did, and it did feel like at

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:11.200
<v Speaker 7>one point it was going to be a shootout. And

1:26:12.360 --> 1:26:14.439
<v Speaker 7>the Bengals go down, they score and take a lead,

1:26:15.040 --> 1:26:19.120
<v Speaker 7>and then Devin Chan has his huge run where Geno

1:26:19.280 --> 1:26:22.240
<v Speaker 7>Stone and you mentioned we only have a few games

1:26:22.320 --> 1:26:24.880
<v Speaker 7>left of this, we better have only a few games.

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:30.040
<v Speaker 7>I think the I mean he's right in front of

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:32.280
<v Speaker 7>Devin Chan and he doesn't even get a finger on no,

1:26:32.320 --> 1:26:35.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't think, goes off and scores a really long

1:26:36.040 --> 1:26:38.240
<v Speaker 7>touchdown and you're like, all right, well, this is going

1:26:38.280 --> 1:26:40.720
<v Speaker 7>to be a shootout. And obviously the Dolphins took the

1:26:40.800 --> 1:26:45.360
<v Speaker 7>lead later in the half, but this this defense, they

1:26:45.360 --> 1:26:49.280
<v Speaker 7>were opportunistic and they force the fumble and then they

1:26:49.280 --> 1:26:51.800
<v Speaker 7>bat the ball up and it gets intercepted. And that's

1:26:51.880 --> 1:26:55.680
<v Speaker 7>usually what happens when you're facing a rookie quarterback, a

1:26:55.800 --> 1:26:58.400
<v Speaker 7>late round rookie quarterback making its first start, is you

1:26:58.439 --> 1:27:01.280
<v Speaker 7>can force a couple of turn on. So that's a

1:27:01.360 --> 1:27:03.639
<v Speaker 7>game they should have won. When you have Joe Burrow

1:27:03.680 --> 1:27:05.240
<v Speaker 7>and you have Jamar and t and you have your

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:08.960
<v Speaker 7>fallout and the weapons and a defense that has shown

1:27:09.560 --> 1:27:11.320
<v Speaker 7>as bad as they've been this year, they've shown that

1:27:11.360 --> 1:27:16.439
<v Speaker 7>they can force turnovers in tee times and they did that.

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:18.479
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it was a crazy third quarter where the

1:27:18.520 --> 1:27:20.280
<v Speaker 7>game just completely gets away from Miami. Yeah.

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen a melt down well, I mean Bengals

1:27:22.520 --> 1:27:24.559
<v Speaker 3>opponent melt down lock that. Bengals have had plenty of

1:27:24.560 --> 1:27:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that these days. And for sure, oh my god, it's

1:27:29.040 --> 1:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>good to say another the other team, the opponent actually

1:27:31.240 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 3>had that. App James Rapeen from Bengals Talk dot Com

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and Lockdown Bengals podcast, chopping up the win yesterday, get

1:27:37.840 --> 1:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>right game for the Bengals. Certainly it looked on weak spots.

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned Genostone. He and all intensive purpose should not

1:27:44.240 --> 1:27:45.800
<v Speaker 3>be in the league now. He shouldn't be on the

1:27:45.800 --> 1:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>team next season. If you're to restructure that defense next year.

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Who stays? Who do you like? DJ Turner? Obviously, Miles

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Murphy has surprisingly turned his game around. Shamar Stewart. I

1:27:58.160 --> 1:28:00.360
<v Speaker 3>think the sample size is a rookie is just too small.

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>With the injuries and the holdout and all the other stuff.

1:28:02.280 --> 1:28:03.559
<v Speaker 3>You got to give them a little bit of time.

1:28:04.040 --> 1:28:06.559
<v Speaker 3>But other than that, can you think of people who

1:28:06.560 --> 1:28:09.800
<v Speaker 3>would be necessary and vital to building around on the

1:28:09.800 --> 1:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>defense for twenty twenty six?

1:28:12.880 --> 1:28:17.839
<v Speaker 7>Oh it's tough, Like right.

1:28:17.640 --> 1:28:18.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll just go to it.

1:28:19.200 --> 1:28:21.360
<v Speaker 7>It's such a short list because I think that they're

1:28:21.400 --> 1:28:23.400
<v Speaker 7>going to build around their young linebackers. But I'm not

1:28:23.400 --> 1:28:25.640
<v Speaker 7>sure those guys are going to start next year. I

1:28:25.680 --> 1:28:27.280
<v Speaker 7>just think they have three years left on their deal.

1:28:27.680 --> 1:28:30.439
<v Speaker 7>Miles Murphy, I think has become a building block piece,

1:28:30.880 --> 1:28:33.160
<v Speaker 7>But that doesn't mean you don't need another edge rusher

1:28:33.240 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 7>like you still do, right, And that's what's really tough

1:28:36.000 --> 1:28:38.880
<v Speaker 7>here is outside of Corner, And I feel pretty good

1:28:38.880 --> 1:28:41.280
<v Speaker 7>about Corner. I think Dax Zille and DJ Turner, he

1:28:41.360 --> 1:28:44.639
<v Speaker 7>saw Jalen Davis, Benball, but Dak Vielle and DJ Corner

1:28:45.080 --> 1:28:47.959
<v Speaker 7>DJ Turner, I think those are two real building blocks.

1:28:48.360 --> 1:28:50.360
<v Speaker 7>Jordan Battle I think he can start for you in

1:28:50.400 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 7>his final year of his rookie rookie deal. Gino Stone

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:55.519
<v Speaker 7>has played his way out of Cincinnati. I would not

1:28:56.120 --> 1:28:58.920
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't have him play on Sunday this week, to

1:28:58.960 --> 1:29:03.360
<v Speaker 7>be honest with you, I would try to get a

1:29:03.400 --> 1:29:05.760
<v Speaker 7>look at some of these young defensive linemen. Obviously, he

1:29:05.840 --> 1:29:07.760
<v Speaker 7>tells Famar Stewart out there, you need to get him

1:29:07.800 --> 1:29:10.320
<v Speaker 7>as many looks as you can, m Kimley Jackson, as

1:29:10.320 --> 1:29:12.479
<v Speaker 7>many looks as you can, just to see if there's

1:29:12.479 --> 1:29:16.400
<v Speaker 7>anything there. But you're talking about all three levels. You're

1:29:16.400 --> 1:29:19.040
<v Speaker 7>going to need to invest in your defensive line room

1:29:19.320 --> 1:29:24.439
<v Speaker 7>and tactical linebacker and safety. And you still can use

1:29:24.439 --> 1:29:27.640
<v Speaker 7>another corner, There's no doubt about it. So there's a

1:29:27.640 --> 1:29:30.120
<v Speaker 7>lot of work to be done in my mind, specifically

1:29:30.160 --> 1:29:33.160
<v Speaker 7>in free agency where you go get proven talent that

1:29:33.560 --> 1:29:35.040
<v Speaker 7>can fill some of those needs.

1:29:35.240 --> 1:29:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they did have a quarter for sure. I

1:29:37.600 --> 1:29:40.600
<v Speaker 3>mean at halftime, I'm watching them interview Zach Taylor for

1:29:40.640 --> 1:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the three questions he gets, and one of is he

1:29:44.000 --> 1:29:46.040
<v Speaker 3>responded saying, you know, if we could win the turnover

1:29:46.080 --> 1:29:49.719
<v Speaker 3>battle and sure enough to go out and get four

1:29:50.040 --> 1:29:52.519
<v Speaker 3>just in the third quarter, alone. That was absolutely remarkable.

1:29:52.560 --> 1:29:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Talk about calling your shot on the other side of

1:29:55.160 --> 1:29:58.919
<v Speaker 3>the ball. Though offensively, Joe Burrow had the worst performance

1:29:58.960 --> 1:30:01.799
<v Speaker 3>of his career last week against Baltimore. This week twenty

1:30:01.800 --> 1:30:04.400
<v Speaker 3>five or thirty two, three hundred nine yards, four tds.

1:30:04.960 --> 1:30:07.800
<v Speaker 3>He has surpassed twenty thousand career passing yards and one

1:30:07.840 --> 1:30:11.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty touchdown passes. And they pulled him after

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:13.559
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati was up by thirty one. That's a great comeback

1:30:13.560 --> 1:30:15.160
<v Speaker 3>game for QB one.

1:30:16.280 --> 1:30:21.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it is, it is, and he's that's what you expect.

1:30:21.800 --> 1:30:24.720
<v Speaker 7>Like I went and I was thinking about it going

1:30:25.080 --> 1:30:27.160
<v Speaker 7>into the game, and certainly when I was driving to

1:30:27.200 --> 1:30:29.000
<v Speaker 7>the game, and I'm like, man, I think Joe's just

1:30:29.040 --> 1:30:31.800
<v Speaker 7>gonna play really well to it. Yeah, Like it's it's

1:30:31.800 --> 1:30:35.680
<v Speaker 7>study out, it's Miami, and it kind of resets you.

1:30:35.920 --> 1:30:37.800
<v Speaker 7>And he's playing against the team that he should be

1:30:37.840 --> 1:30:41.599
<v Speaker 7>able to dispect and bounce back against, and he did that. Now,

1:30:41.680 --> 1:30:44.120
<v Speaker 7>he was aided by some short fields, but you look

1:30:44.200 --> 1:30:47.360
<v Speaker 7>at it as one forty six and a half quarterback

1:30:47.400 --> 1:30:50.280
<v Speaker 7>graating passer rating is the second best of his career,

1:30:50.840 --> 1:30:53.719
<v Speaker 7>and the four touchdowns, it just seemed like he got

1:30:54.520 --> 1:30:57.400
<v Speaker 7>whatever he needed to, and early on it was t Higgins,

1:30:57.720 --> 1:31:00.280
<v Speaker 7>and then it evolved into Jamar Chase, and then it

1:31:00.360 --> 1:31:03.320
<v Speaker 7>was Chase Brown and andre Yosabash made a big play,

1:31:03.560 --> 1:31:05.439
<v Speaker 7>and Drew Sample made some big plays, and then it

1:31:05.439 --> 1:31:07.599
<v Speaker 7>was Nike get sticky with the touchdown and he just

1:31:07.680 --> 1:31:09.960
<v Speaker 7>was able to spread the ball out. And so I

1:31:10.880 --> 1:31:13.800
<v Speaker 7>the one takeaway I had from yesterday from a Joe

1:31:13.800 --> 1:31:18.720
<v Speaker 7>Burrow perspective is it was just, at least for me,

1:31:18.760 --> 1:31:20.879
<v Speaker 7>if I was in the organization, it would just remind

1:31:20.960 --> 1:31:23.880
<v Speaker 7>you how close you can be when you have a

1:31:23.960 --> 1:31:28.200
<v Speaker 7>franchise quarterback and all star quarterback like that, and how

1:31:28.280 --> 1:31:31.080
<v Speaker 7>desperate and bad you look when you don't. Yeah, And

1:31:31.120 --> 1:31:34.000
<v Speaker 7>so to me it should remind them that they need

1:31:34.000 --> 1:31:37.320
<v Speaker 7>to be very aggressive this offseason. But you know, I'm

1:31:37.320 --> 1:31:41.600
<v Speaker 7>not damn and they're not me, right exactly exactly.

1:31:42.400 --> 1:31:45.839
<v Speaker 3>Chase Brown twelve carries, sixty six yards then and a touchdown.

1:31:45.880 --> 1:31:48.400
<v Speaker 3>By the way, as a receiver, just four catches forty

1:31:48.400 --> 1:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>three and two touchdowns. That was a huge performance by

1:31:52.320 --> 1:31:54.479
<v Speaker 3>the feature back. What three of those scores came in

1:31:54.600 --> 1:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>just over I think seven minutes of game time. Those

1:31:57.200 --> 1:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>of us rushing and receiving scores and you see that,

1:32:00.240 --> 1:32:02.400
<v Speaker 3>you go, wow, why can't we have that nice thing

1:32:02.439 --> 1:32:04.639
<v Speaker 3>all the time? And then you know, next two games

1:32:04.680 --> 1:32:06.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe he rushes for inal fifty yards. I just I

1:32:06.920 --> 1:32:07.679
<v Speaker 3>can't figure it out.

1:32:09.439 --> 1:32:15.519
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's it is tough. I'll say this. I think

1:32:16.240 --> 1:32:19.640
<v Speaker 7>the past two weeks, the Buffalo game, I felt like

1:32:19.720 --> 1:32:24.000
<v Speaker 7>it was all snow and that was the issue. Last week,

1:32:26.240 --> 1:32:28.200
<v Speaker 7>the offense was just so bad it was hard for

1:32:28.240 --> 1:32:30.840
<v Speaker 7>me to put it on Chase. But he definitely has

1:32:30.920 --> 1:32:32.840
<v Speaker 7>shown the series well over the twel hundred yards from

1:32:32.840 --> 1:32:35.799
<v Speaker 7>scrimmage that last year and at the end of last season,

1:32:35.840 --> 1:32:39.519
<v Speaker 7>wasn't a fluke. I mean the juke he put on

1:32:39.600 --> 1:32:43.200
<v Speaker 7>that Dolphins defender in the third quarter when it's seventeen

1:32:43.280 --> 1:32:46.880
<v Speaker 7>fourteen after catching the ball out of the backfield and

1:32:47.160 --> 1:32:49.439
<v Speaker 7>I use number twenty. I forget exactly what which Dolphin's

1:32:49.439 --> 1:32:52.919
<v Speaker 7>depender was, but to score the touchdown like that's special,

1:32:52.960 --> 1:32:56.679
<v Speaker 7>Like that's that's a really high level play. And we've

1:32:56.720 --> 1:32:58.519
<v Speaker 7>seen that where he just continues to rack u one

1:32:58.560 --> 1:33:02.120
<v Speaker 7>hundred plus yards from scrim to China from I do

1:33:02.200 --> 1:33:05.559
<v Speaker 7>think he's a building block and it's gonna be interesting

1:33:05.560 --> 1:33:08.720
<v Speaker 7>because he's going into a sports season and end of

1:33:08.760 --> 1:33:11.720
<v Speaker 7>his rookie contract next year? Is that a guy they

1:33:11.720 --> 1:33:14.320
<v Speaker 7>tried to get ahead of with a team friendly deal.

1:33:14.400 --> 1:33:16.599
<v Speaker 7>Do they draft a running back instead? I know everyone's

1:33:16.640 --> 1:33:18.800
<v Speaker 7>focused on the defense. They're gonna have to spend some

1:33:18.880 --> 1:33:22.880
<v Speaker 7>draft butts on offense to either start building the replacements

1:33:22.920 --> 1:33:26.200
<v Speaker 7>Andre Joselvashkaian last year, next season, you know, like they

1:33:26.840 --> 1:33:29.840
<v Speaker 7>start to do that now, and and so I do

1:33:29.920 --> 1:33:32.120
<v Speaker 7>wonder what they'll do with a guy like Chase Brown

1:33:32.200 --> 1:33:33.320
<v Speaker 7>has clearly been productive.

1:33:34.120 --> 1:33:37.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, James Rapine, We've got two games up, both home games,

1:33:37.520 --> 1:33:39.519
<v Speaker 3>so the road trips are over way to end in Miami.

1:33:39.520 --> 1:33:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Well of the sunshine. It's nice and maybe that was

1:33:41.800 --> 1:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the happy juice that Joe Borroniti. You see some fight

1:33:44.040 --> 1:33:46.640
<v Speaker 3>him and d to quit tripping and just focus on

1:33:46.680 --> 1:33:50.360
<v Speaker 3>the game. Home games against Arizona, they're fighting for a spot. Cleveland,

1:33:50.439 --> 1:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of course, is out of it, and there are many

1:33:53.080 --> 1:33:55.320
<v Speaker 3>in Cincinnati, and I think some people, even in the

1:33:55.320 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 3>media and influencers, that think the Bengals should tank it

1:33:58.720 --> 1:34:00.479
<v Speaker 3>in order to get a better draft. I don't think

1:34:00.520 --> 1:34:02.880
<v Speaker 3>football's ever worked that way, nor should it work that way.

1:34:02.920 --> 1:34:04.479
<v Speaker 3>And not only that, even if you did and the

1:34:04.560 --> 1:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>lost three instead of one three. What does that move

1:34:06.960 --> 1:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>you up a couple spots.

1:34:09.840 --> 1:34:13.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, if they lost yesterday, the eighth instead of ninth. Late. Now,

1:34:14.120 --> 1:34:16.479
<v Speaker 7>if they win the next two, there's a decent chance

1:34:16.520 --> 1:34:20.360
<v Speaker 7>that they they dropped to the twelfth, the fourteenth pick

1:34:21.000 --> 1:34:25.920
<v Speaker 7>like in that range. I think is realistic to expect.

1:34:24.920 --> 1:34:30.080
<v Speaker 7>I did it. I do. I think it's It's really

1:34:30.120 --> 1:34:32.200
<v Speaker 7>tough because you want to see Joe Burrow play football,

1:34:32.560 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 7>and if he plays like he did yesterday, then that

1:34:35.800 --> 1:34:39.840
<v Speaker 7>you live with it. But at the same time, they

1:34:39.840 --> 1:34:44.120
<v Speaker 7>do need talent, man, and the earlier you pick, it's

1:34:44.200 --> 1:34:46.479
<v Speaker 7>not just the first round. The earlier you pick in

1:34:46.479 --> 1:34:48.360
<v Speaker 7>the first round, the earlier you pick in the second

1:34:48.720 --> 1:34:54.519
<v Speaker 7>fourth different And so that is I'm not telling fans

1:34:54.520 --> 1:34:56.120
<v Speaker 7>that they need to worry about that or should worry

1:34:56.120 --> 1:34:58.679
<v Speaker 7>about that, because that's not their job. That is my job.

1:34:58.960 --> 1:35:01.120
<v Speaker 7>So I do think about it. The good news is

1:35:01.200 --> 1:35:04.519
<v Speaker 7>is their draft position was completely unchanged. They went into

1:35:04.600 --> 1:35:08.240
<v Speaker 7>yesterday picking ninth, they're still picking ninth. I think if

1:35:08.240 --> 1:35:10.360
<v Speaker 7>they win the final two, they'll be in the uh

1:35:10.600 --> 1:35:12.719
<v Speaker 7>the low double digit, somewhere in the ten to fourteen.

1:35:12.800 --> 1:35:15.800
<v Speaker 3>RAS gotcham uh James rapine. Let's catch up off this

1:35:15.840 --> 1:35:18.639
<v Speaker 3>week obviously, but double catch up and do a post

1:35:18.680 --> 1:35:20.160
<v Speaker 3>mortem on the season. What do you say after that

1:35:20.200 --> 1:35:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland home game? Yeah, but it's it's over. It's over.

1:35:22.920 --> 1:35:26.639
<v Speaker 3>There is no postseason. Hey, Merry Christmas, buddy, enjoy your time.

1:35:26.479 --> 1:35:29.280
<v Speaker 7>Off, Mary Christmas. Time off.

1:35:30.200 --> 1:35:32.680
<v Speaker 3>You got time off? Come on, you show up, you

1:35:32.720 --> 1:35:34.679
<v Speaker 3>watch a football game, you write a couple of words,

1:35:35.320 --> 1:35:37.800
<v Speaker 3>that's like four hours. That's like seven hours of work coming.

1:35:39.640 --> 1:35:40.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm off.

1:35:40.800 --> 1:35:44.240
<v Speaker 3>There's no time YouTube, buddy, Thanks again, I appreciate you.

1:35:44.360 --> 1:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Merry Christmas. James repeat, talk about just just diminishing what

1:35:48.680 --> 1:35:50.439
<v Speaker 3>he does for a living. Got to get to news

1:35:50.439 --> 1:35:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and Willie on the way. Scott Sloan Hope the Best

1:35:52.920 --> 1:35:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Bengals covered seven hundred w ol thebody since now