Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Tuesday.
Speaker 1: It's an awesome Tuesday, no matter what you hear from
Speaker 1: anybody else. And our show is so gigantic tonight it
Speaker 1: could host the View by itself. We're gonna talk about
Speaker 1: these radical judges. Yes, this judge that shot down the
Speaker 1: Trump administration temporarily, we'll talk about that, the why behind
Speaker 1: all that. We're gonna talk about something great that's happening,
Speaker 1: something that Trump administration and Republicans can campaign on for
Speaker 1: the midterms versus what they're saying about other things. The
Speaker 1: Democrat plan for foreigners in the country. James Tallerco continues
Speaker 1: the torpedo his candidacy. Great news about housing and rent prices,
Speaker 1: all that email, more poison poured into the black community
Speaker 1: in this country, and so much more tonight coming up
Speaker 1: on the world famous Jesse Kelly Show. Now, before we
Speaker 1: get into all the meat and potatoes of the rest
Speaker 1: of the show, let me let me touch on something
Speaker 1: that it is. It is bad in it's bad news,
Speaker 1: but overall it's it's going to be okay in the end.
Speaker 1: There will be a lot of pain, a lot of time,
Speaker 1: but in the end it will be okay, I'm looking
Speaker 1: at a chart right here. This is a chart of
Speaker 1: the injunctions preliminary injunctions against sitting president's administrative policies. All right,
Speaker 1: what is this? What does any of that mean? In
Speaker 1: normal person's terms. A judge, a federal judge of some kind,
Speaker 1: steps in and says, stop, you're not allowed to do that.
Speaker 1: You know how many George Bush had to go through
Speaker 1: six Obama twelve the first Trump term, he had to
Speaker 1: go through seventy five. Joe Biden, Oh, look at that.
Speaker 1: The number went back down twenty one Trump two point zero.
Speaker 1: We are a year and a half less than into
Speaker 1: his presidency. He has one hundred and sixty nine injunctions
Speaker 1: against him already in his second term. And you woke
Speaker 1: up today, you're probably been mad about it all day,
Speaker 1: and you saw a headline like this radical judge shoots
Speaker 1: down Trump administration's database used to remove non citizens from
Speaker 1: the voter rules, and it makes you want to scream
Speaker 1: and yell and put your fist through the drywall. And
Speaker 1: we can't stand for this. Okay, you're right, you're right.
Speaker 1: It's really really I'm not going to pretend otherwise, it's
Speaker 1: really really bad. But we're going to talk about the
Speaker 1: how and why this is the case, and then I
Speaker 1: will explain to you why in the end I believe
Speaker 1: it's going to be okay. First of all, the judge.
Speaker 1: Who is this judge? Well, let's rewind, shall we. This
Speaker 1: is from some time ago, Senator Josh Hawley. Because he's
Speaker 1: in the Senate, he's on the Judiciary Committee, he had
Speaker 1: the chance to interrogate this woman as she was trying
Speaker 1: to get on to the federal court. Here's how that went, Senator.
Speaker 2: I did not resign from Jonesy because of any particular
Speaker 2: representation nice.
Speaker 3: So it wasn't it wasn't a moral It had.
Speaker 2: No moral quandaries, Absolutely not, Senator.
Speaker 3: I had no moral quandaries with any of the cases
Speaker 3: at Jones today.
Speaker 2: That's your testimony, Senator, I left the firm in January
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty one because I was offered an opportunity
Speaker 2: to return to public service. It's an opportunity the firm supported,
Speaker 2: and that I took.
Speaker 3: You had no.
Speaker 4: Quandary with them representing in the Trump litigation, your senator, that's.
Speaker 2: Your testimony, Senator, I did not leave my firm because
Speaker 2: of that representation. I left my problem, Senator. I left
Speaker 2: the firm months later because I received an opportunity to return,
Speaker 2: no problem, And.
Speaker 4: You have no problem representing the bondholders. So your your
Speaker 4: testimony is you're you're happy to represent anybody who comes
Speaker 4: your way. Donald Trump, you bet the bond holders, you
Speaker 4: bet hedge funds, you bet whoever.
Speaker 3: That's that's your testimony. Just want to make sure I
Speaker 3: got it right, Senator.
Speaker 2: Throughout my career, I have adhered to the code of
Speaker 2: ethics that all lawyers are bound by.
Speaker 4: Sure, but the code of ethics allow you to make
Speaker 4: money from anybody. I'm listening. You can choose your clients.
Speaker 4: I'm not accusing you of any ethical violations at all.
Speaker 3: I'm not.
Speaker 4: I'm just trying to figure out why you thought it
Speaker 4: was important to have these hedge funds as your clients,
Speaker 4: and if you had any moral quandaries. And your testimony
Speaker 4: is you didn't have any moral quandaries, which is fine,
Speaker 4: But I just wonder if that's the best judgment.
Speaker 1: Would you like to know the name of this judge
Speaker 1: who decided to stop the Trump administration temporarily? I need
Speaker 1: to know temporarily stop the Trump administration from trying to
Speaker 1: get a hand on our voter rules. What is the
Speaker 1: name of this judge? You know, the Trump administration was
Speaker 1: out there because they believe there are a bunch of
Speaker 1: dead people and most importantly foreigners, on our voter rules.
Speaker 1: They believe correctly that Democrats across the United States of
Speaker 1: America are only elected because of votes cast by people
Speaker 1: who aren't really people and aren't really American citizens. The
Speaker 1: Trump administration, to their credit, they are bending over backwards
Speaker 1: trying to get these people off the voter rules. But
Speaker 1: this judge doesn't like that. Now, hold on a second.
Speaker 1: I want to make sure I go to the paper,
Speaker 1: so I want to get her name right. Her name
Speaker 1: is Sparkle suk Nonin. I just want to be clear
Speaker 1: that I'm not making that up. Her name is Sparkle
Speaker 1: suk Nonin. Hold on, let me check really quickly. Where
Speaker 1: was she born? Oh, Trinidad and Tobago. Hey, Chris, is
Speaker 1: that right next to Iowa? It is right now, Trinidad
Speaker 1: in Tobago. So what's going on? You know what's going on?
Speaker 1: We've talked about it many times before. Why were there
Speaker 1: twelve injunctions against Obama then seventy five against Trump then
Speaker 1: only twenty one against Biden at now one hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty nine against Trump. Let's rewind, shall we. It was
Speaker 1: actually the Obama the Obama administration that did this. As
Speaker 1: we've discussed many times before, the problem with Barack Obama
Speaker 1: is not just his deep abiding hatred for the United
Speaker 1: States of America. The problem was Obama was good at it,
Speaker 1: and Barack Obama came in and did things differently than
Speaker 1: even Democrats like Bill Clinton before him had done. Obama
Speaker 1: realized the federal judiciary and really all of the federal bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: but we'll focus on the judiciary is actually the most
Speaker 1: important thing you have to conquer if you're a communist
Speaker 1: revolutionary in really any country. I was about to say
Speaker 1: in the United States of America, but country after country
Speaker 1: after country across the world is experiencing this. In UK,
Speaker 1: it's the judges El Salvador when they were going through
Speaker 1: living hell done there, it was the judges. It's judges.
Speaker 1: It's a judges. You must conquer the bench if you
Speaker 1: are a communist revolutionary, otherwise judges will administer justice fairly
Speaker 1: in your communist revolution will fail. Barack Obama recognized it
Speaker 1: or someone around him recognized it, and they went and
Speaker 1: started grabbing, not just some guy who's a little left,
Speaker 1: not just someone who he voted Democrat a couple times.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama brought in something brand new, a focused effort
Speaker 1: to grab the most despicable, deranged America hating commi savages,
Speaker 1: not just foreign ones, domestic ones, and get them into
Speaker 1: the federal system as fast as you possibly can, because
Speaker 1: once you get them in that system, they will spend
Speaker 1: every single waking moment as the sword of the communist revolution.
Speaker 1: And Barack Obama was obviously correct. Donald Trump one point
Speaker 1: zero walks into the White House in seventy five times,
Speaker 1: one of those commed judges stepped up and said, no,
Speaker 1: I can't do that. Of course, Joe Biden got elected,
Speaker 1: and they said, oh, that's okay, do whatever you want.
Speaker 1: Now they've doubled their efforts for Donald Trump two point zero. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: all this it sounds bad. Well let's continue on that
Speaker 1: theme for a moment before we get to some good things.
Speaker 1: Is bad. It is bad, And I think one of
Speaker 1: the most consistent emails I get to the show is
Speaker 1: an email along the lines of Jesse, what can we
Speaker 1: do about the judges. Jesse, we can't. Why can't we
Speaker 1: get rid of these judges? Jesse? What can be done
Speaker 1: about the judges? And I know why you send that email.
Speaker 1: I have the exact same feelings that go through me
Speaker 1: every single day you send the email because they seem untouchable,
Speaker 1: don't they. You know, I know it's really hard to
Speaker 1: bounce a US senator, but we can do it. We
Speaker 1: just did it in Texas. It's hard, but we can
Speaker 1: do it. It's hard to bounce somebody who's in the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives. You gotta raise money. You got a campaign.
Speaker 1: It's hard, it's difficult, it's not fast usually, but we
Speaker 1: can do it. Your mayor is a dirt ball. Might
Speaker 1: be difficult getting him out, but you can do it.
Speaker 1: Enough time, enough effort. But a judge. Did you cast
Speaker 1: a vote for Sparkle Sparkle? Hold on a think I'm
Speaker 1: gonna make sure I get the sheet again. Sparkle Sparkle
Speaker 1: suk N Did you cast a vote for Sparkle? You know,
Speaker 1: I read some of the descent today and there was
Speaker 1: a lot of clicking and popping in there. Did you
Speaker 1: cast a vote for Sparkle? You didn't? It feels helpless,
Speaker 1: doesn't it? All right? It's bad, it's true, but there
Speaker 1: is a light at the end of this tunnel somewhere,
Speaker 1: and we'll talk about that in the moment. Then we'll
Speaker 1: move on.
Speaker 5: Jesse Kelly Show on a wonderful Tuesday. You can email
Speaker 5: the show Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com your love,
Speaker 5: your hate, your death threats, and I am going to
Speaker 5: get to those tonight. And another reminder, little programming note
Speaker 5: that Monday, Monday.
Speaker 1: History is returning. I promised you a while ago I
Speaker 1: was going to deliver a revolutionary war story to celebrate
Speaker 1: our two hundred and fiftieth and you're gonna like this one.
Speaker 1: So Monday, if you're into that hour two right after
Speaker 1: Medal of Honor Monday, we shall begin with that. Now,
Speaker 1: back to the judges. All right, there's a problem. It's
Speaker 1: obviously a problem. Communists have filled up so much of
Speaker 1: the court system with these comedy judges and the injunctions,
Speaker 1: and they're doing bad things. It's a problem. All right,
Speaker 1: that's bad. But you know, when things are really really
Speaker 1: bad in life, whether it be on a personal level
Speaker 1: or for a nation, you know, you got a bunch
Speaker 1: of comedy judges, or you're out of work, something like that.
Speaker 1: It's easy to feel like the current state of things
Speaker 1: is permanent, isn't it. I've told you before, I've been
Speaker 1: out of work, running out of money, life, two kids,
Speaker 1: car payment, running out of money. And you're sitting there,
Speaker 1: you're replying here, you're replying there, you're turning in resumes,
Speaker 1: and it's really really easy when you're home that night
Speaker 1: to sit down and say to yourself, I'm never going
Speaker 1: to find a job. I'm going to be well, just
Speaker 1: put it in the words I was using for myself.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be a jobless loser my entire life.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be a husband who can't provide for
Speaker 1: his wife and children. That's me. It's easy to convince
Speaker 1: yourself that, isn't it. But that's not true. You'll find
Speaker 1: a job if that's you right now. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it'd be today or tomorrow. You'll find a job. I
Speaker 1: found one eventually climbed out of it. When you are
Speaker 1: looking at the United States of America and you consider
Speaker 1: that we have a bunch of communists in the judiciary,
Speaker 1: and they are wounding our republic as fast and hard
Speaker 1: as they possibly can. It can be easy since we
Speaker 1: can't elect them or unelect them. It can be easy
Speaker 1: to say we are screwed, this is permanent. But you
Speaker 1: know that's not true, and then we tell you why
Speaker 1: that's not true. Human beings, all of us, we are
Speaker 1: created with a desire for justice inside of us. It
Speaker 1: is how the human mind works, It's how human beings work.
Speaker 1: It's part of the reason human beings choose to live
Speaker 1: with each other in a society, and in fact they
Speaker 1: demand that society create laws and then hold people accountable.
Speaker 1: Isn't that kind of odd when you think about it,
Speaker 1: especially because you're somebody who loves freedom as I do.
Speaker 1: Isn't it odd that human beings, so many of them,
Speaker 1: really all of them, have chosen to live with other people,
Speaker 1: form a government, and then have that government create some
Speaker 1: sort of a justice system. Why would I want people
Speaker 1: to create rules rules for me because I have a
Speaker 1: sense of justice and I need someone to administer it.
Speaker 1: I cannot find a single time in the history of
Speaker 1: the world where judges have been allowed to completely abuse justice. Forever,
Speaker 1: it has never happened. Eventually, the people will rise up,
Speaker 1: society will rise up, and those justice justices will either
Speaker 1: be neutered or removed. Now I say removed. Ideally, you
Speaker 1: and I continue to purge foreigners, clean up the voter rules.
Speaker 1: In the end, this will result in more Republicans getting elected,
Speaker 1: and since you and I are going to participate in primaries,
Speaker 1: we're going to get the right kind of Republicans elected.
Speaker 1: And so ideally in the future it will be fairly
Speaker 1: routine to have in the House of Representatives and the
Speaker 1: Senate where they convene and vote to impeach and remove
Speaker 1: these judges from the bench. Now, I know you're saying, well,
Speaker 1: we're a long way away from that. I didn't promise
Speaker 1: you the solution was coming tomorrow. Ideally, that's what I
Speaker 1: would like to see. Now. On the darker front, if
Speaker 1: the GOP never can find that kind of courage, people
Speaker 1: are going to start killing them. And that's about the
Speaker 1: worst thing in the world. I don't want to see that.
Speaker 1: I don't want to live in that kind of country.
Speaker 1: But that's common too. Remember when I said people will
Speaker 1: demand justice, I didn't mean it always looked good. In
Speaker 1: countries where judges become extremely corrupt for long enough, judges
Speaker 1: start dying. It's awful awful place.
Speaker 3: To be.
Speaker 1: No matter what. In the end, it will not last
Speaker 1: forever because the people will demand justice. So that local
Speaker 1: dirt ball judge of you, who just turn the serial
Speaker 1: rapists loose, that judge won't be there forever. In the
Speaker 1: federal system, judges like this when injunction after injunction, installed
Speaker 1: by Obama, installed by Joe Biden, we think to ourselves,
Speaker 1: it's completely hopeless. It's not completely hopeless. That judge won't
Speaker 1: be there forever. Yes, we have a bunch of dirty
Speaker 1: foreigners as judges in the United States of America now
Speaker 1: because communists bring them in and put them on the
Speaker 1: bench and they know they'll be communists foot soldiers. But
Speaker 1: that won't last forever either. It's easy to see they're
Speaker 1: eventually becoming some sort of an amendment that says a judge,
Speaker 1: just like a president, has to be born in the
Speaker 1: United States of America. That's a clear path forward. I
Speaker 1: know if gets frustrating right now and they do damage
Speaker 1: right now, but it won't last forever. I promise you.
Speaker 1: Justice comes in the end one way or the other,
Speaker 1: all right, now, Why they love foreigners so much?
Speaker 5: Next the Jessing Kelly Show, odd a wonderful, fantastic Tuesday.
Speaker 1: And okay, so let's touch on this since we just
Speaker 1: brought up the judge Sparkle suknanin doing the best she
Speaker 1: can to keep well dead people and foreigners on the
Speaker 1: voter rules. She's doing the best she can to do that.
Speaker 1: You know exactly why they vote Democrat. That's why, that's
Speaker 1: why the communists brought in twenty million foreigners under Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: They vote Democrat. They not only vote Democrat. If you
Speaker 1: get them installed in positions like judges, they will fight
Speaker 1: tooth and naota continue to bring in more. It's a
Speaker 1: terrible system. Remember remember how insanely evil the Biden administration was.
Speaker 1: This is Alejandro Mayorcis. He was the d HS head,
Speaker 1: the big cheese at the Department of Homeland Security. You
Speaker 1: know what he's announcing here, USA USAID funding. It's going
Speaker 1: to programs. You know this money, your money, it helped
Speaker 1: foreigners come into the country.
Speaker 6: USAID already has launched a series of new initiatives to
Speaker 6: promote good governance and expand opportunities that will enable the
Speaker 6: people of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to build better
Speaker 6: futures in their home countries. This includes the region wide
Speaker 6: five million dollar Regional Challenge to advance gender equality in
Speaker 6: Honduras nearly twenty four million dollars to expand employment opportunities
Speaker 6: and promote.
Speaker 1: Remember, as he gives the explanation, this money ended up
Speaker 1: going to NGOs NGOs that then brought foreigners to your country.
Speaker 1: This is how deeply evil democrats have become. Their elected
Speaker 1: leaders get elected and steal your and race across the
Speaker 1: globe to drag foreigners into your country, to rape and
Speaker 1: pillage and raise the cost of everything, simply because it
Speaker 1: means more power for them.
Speaker 6: Civic an elective election Participation and integrity in El Salvador
Speaker 6: nearly twelve million dollars to help small businesses recover from
Speaker 6: the impact of COVID, as well as new multi year
Speaker 6: solicitations for up to one hundred and fifteen million dollars.
Speaker 1: Consider for a moment. Consider this. In fact, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: rewind it and start this again. I want you to
Speaker 1: consider this. Is it just this, This thought just hit
Speaker 1: me as I'm listening to this. Consider how crazy it is.
Speaker 1: I didn't even think about this first that the head
Speaker 1: of the Department of Homeland Security he is not sending
Speaker 1: a private email announcing that he's sending millions and millions
Speaker 1: and millions of dollars to foreign countries, all while Americans
Speaker 1: are feeling this use. This is not a private email.
Speaker 1: It's not He didn't whisper it in a colleague's ear
Speaker 1: out in the back alley somewhere. He called a press
Speaker 1: conference with a stage, a microphone, and television cameras, and
Speaker 1: he's standing up bragging about sending millions of your dollars
Speaker 1: to foreign countries, dollars that went to bring foreigners into
Speaker 1: the country.
Speaker 6: USAID already has launched a series of new initiatives to
Speaker 6: promote good governance and expand opportunities that will enable the
Speaker 6: people of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to build better
Speaker 6: futures in their home countries. This includes the region wide
Speaker 6: five million dollar Regional Challenge to advance gender equality in Honduras,
Speaker 6: nearly twenty four million dollars to expand employment opportunities and
Speaker 6: promote civic and elective election participation and integrity in El Salvador,
Speaker 6: nearly twelve million dollars to help small businesses recover from
Speaker 6: the impact of COVID, as well as new multi year
Speaker 6: solicitations for up to one hundred and fifteen million dollars
Speaker 6: to address crime and violence, including gender based violence, and
Speaker 6: provide opportunities to youth and others in Guatemala, more than
Speaker 6: nineteen million dollars to strengthen anti corruption efforts. These are
Speaker 6: but a few of the ex How.
Speaker 1: Does he get away with that? Credit to mays more
Speaker 1: for digging up that old clip. By the way, how
Speaker 1: does he get away with that? Well, here's a sobering
Speaker 1: thought headline from Breitbart. Most Democrats say illegal aliens should
Speaker 1: remain in the US and eventually apply for citizenship. What
Speaker 1: does most mean? Seventy three? When I said Democrats have
Speaker 1: become so deeply evil, they're trying as hard as they
Speaker 1: can to fill your country up with foreigners. I wasn't
Speaker 1: just talking about elected officials. That's how the average Democrat
Speaker 1: thinks now, and they're always bending over backwards trying to
Speaker 1: sell it to you. Why it's so important that we
Speaker 1: continue to allow millions and millions and millions of foreigners
Speaker 1: to pour into your country. I kid you not. This
Speaker 1: is a headline for the Wall Street Journal. You ready
Speaker 1: for this? Buckle up for this. You're ready here it
Speaker 1: is America's immigrant soccer team. Wait what did you do that?
Speaker 1: America's immigrant soccer team? And it goes on. Of course,
Speaker 1: you know exactly how this is going. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of World Cup fever going on right now, not in
Speaker 1: this car, not in this family. Of course, no, freedom
Speaker 1: is not free. But there's a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of soccer buzz going on. The World Cup's going on.
Speaker 1: The United States of America is winning games, and I
Speaker 1: am happy about that. I might even watch on Thursday.
Speaker 1: If I'm being totally honest with you, Why would the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal print that? Because there is this never
Speaker 1: ending effort by so many parts of our system to
Speaker 1: convince you that foreigners built the country, foreigners make the country.
Speaker 1: Without foreigners, we wouldn't at this, We wouldn't at that,
Speaker 1: We couldn't even play soccer. Where would you get spice
Speaker 1: for your food? Open up the border again? Do you
Speaker 1: want to go back to losing in the soccer game?
Speaker 1: And you know what, maybe the most damaging part about
Speaker 1: this is, do you know how I found this article
Speaker 1: in the Wall Street Journal? Because I didn't read the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal today? Would you like to know how
Speaker 1: and where I found that article. Oh good, I'm glad
Speaker 1: you asked. I'm going to read for you a quote.
Speaker 1: You ready for it? Here you go. The success of
Speaker 1: US men's national soccer team in this year's World Cup
Speaker 1: is the product in part of America's historically welcoming immigration system.
Speaker 1: Ah hold on, let me look who said that. Republican
Speaker 1: Senator John Cornyan. Republican Senator John Cornyan from the blood
Speaker 1: red state of Texas is out there now telling you, Hey,
Speaker 1: you want to go back to losing soccer games? Hey, sorry,
Speaker 1: your wife got butchered in the public park last night
Speaker 1: by that dude from Haiti. But you don't want to
Speaker 1: go back to losing at soccer, do you? Republican Senator
Speaker 1: John Cornyn? Now why is the We'll get to that
Speaker 1: in a moment. When I speak about John Cornyn, it
Speaker 1: makes me think about chalk. That's what it does. You
Speaker 1: know why, Because when I hear John Cornyn speak, I've
Speaker 1: I've felt this way forever. You know what. I hear
Speaker 1: low testosterone. When I hear somebody who campaigns so hard
Speaker 1: for open borders, who works with Democrats on gun laws,
Speaker 1: I hear a man who drinks large quantities of synthetic estrogen,
Speaker 1: and his t levels have reached dangerously low levels. And
Speaker 1: I think to myself, I wonder could we change him
Speaker 1: with a male vitality stack from Chalk What would what
Speaker 1: would John Cornyn with twenty percent more testosterone? What would
Speaker 1: John Cornyn become? Hey, he's not gonna be you or me,
Speaker 1: but he might become something decent. Do you want to
Speaker 1: feel better all the time? Do you want to avoid
Speaker 1: becoming John Cornyn? Go get a male vitality stack from
Speaker 1: Chock c hoq chalk dot com, slash Jesse, get a
Speaker 1: subscription mail vitality stack Chuck dot com, slash Jesse. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna play you something. This is Elon Musk. It'll lead
Speaker 1: me into a John Cornan talk, because why would you
Speaker 1: think like that?
Speaker 7: While most of the fraudulent government payments to especially to
Speaker 7: the NGOs, go to the Democrats, most of it, like
Speaker 7: I don't know, for augment's sake, let's say eighty percent,
Speaker 7: not maybe ninety percent, ten to twenty percent of it
Speaker 7: does go to Republicans. And so when we turn off
Speaker 7: funding to a fraudulent NGO, we'd get complaints from whatever
Speaker 7: the ten percent of Republicans who receiving the money, and
Speaker 7: they would, you know, they would very loudly complain because
Speaker 7: they're they're The honest answer is the Republicans.
Speaker 1: Are partly they're receiving some of the fraud too. They're
Speaker 1: getting a big Let's talk about that. Next, it is
Speaker 1: the Jesse Kelly Show, reminding you you can email the
Speaker 1: show your love, your hates, your death threads Jesse at
Speaker 1: Jesse kellyshow dot com. So I read for you John
Speaker 1: Cornyn's comments, Hey, you know what we need immigration, That's
Speaker 1: how we stay good at soccer, and then I played
Speaker 1: for you these comments from Elon Musk. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: the system and why it seems like so often there
Speaker 1: are Republicans who do us wrong.
Speaker 7: While most of the fortunate government payments to especially to
Speaker 7: the NGOs, go to the Democrats, most of it, like
Speaker 7: I don't know, for Augument's sake, let's say eighty percent,
Speaker 7: not maybe ninety percent, ten to twenty percent of it
Speaker 7: does go to Republicans. And so when we turn off
Speaker 7: funding to a Portulan NGO, we'd get complaints from whatever
Speaker 7: the Tempa Center Republicans who are saving the money, and
Speaker 7: they would, you.
Speaker 1: Know, they would very loudly complain because the.
Speaker 7: Honest answer is the Republicans are partly They were receiving
Speaker 7: some of the fraud too. They're getting a big right.
Speaker 1: I'm going to play something. It sounds unrelated, but I'll
Speaker 1: close that loop here and a few of you hang
Speaker 1: with me. This was Senator Chuck Schumer talking about the
Speaker 1: Save America Act. Now, remember the Save America Act. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: it's not going to pass. We'll get into that in
Speaker 1: a while. Yet not going to pass yet, it's no
Speaker 1: chance of it. But this is Chuck Schumer. We went
Speaker 1: on TV and said.
Speaker 8: This, this horrible thing to say that one of the
Speaker 8: worst most anti anti election democracy things that's ever been proposed.
Speaker 8: They say it's, oh, it's all about ID voter idea.
Speaker 8: It's not. They will remove twenty five million people off
Speaker 8: the rolls. Why because they'll require under this act, which
Speaker 8: is not going to pass, and we're not going to
Speaker 8: let it pass. We've defeated in court. I was a
Speaker 8: lead plaintiff in the decision to do that. We've refused
Speaker 8: to give them the votes that they would want for this.
Speaker 1: God, we don't have the votes. We got all that
Speaker 1: we understand perfectly well. Why Democrats don't want it passed.
Speaker 1: That's obvious to anybody with two brain cells. Democrats, the
Speaker 1: foreigners bring in more foreigners, you get it. They vote
Speaker 1: in elections. It's the only way Democrats are in power.
Speaker 1: We got all that, but I actually asked the question
Speaker 1: to a United States Senator after that clip. I said, okay,
Speaker 1: because he was lamenting to me that we don't have
Speaker 1: enough Republicans, that we are losing enough Republican votes that
Speaker 1: we can't get the thing passed or not. And I said, so, Senator,
Speaker 1: can can you explain this to me? These Republicans who
Speaker 1: won't pass to Save America Act and keep foreigners out
Speaker 1: of our elections? Do they not know what is happening
Speaker 1: with the foreigners in the communist revolution in this country?
Speaker 1: Or do they not care? I'll skip past the details
Speaker 1: of what he said, but it really comes down to
Speaker 1: something I've discussed with you many many times before. There
Speaker 1: are Republicans, and I was about to say a lot,
Speaker 1: but that is not true. We are getting fewer and
Speaker 1: fewer of them, because this is not all bad news.
Speaker 1: Fewer and fewer of them, but there are Republicans from
Speaker 1: red states who are not actually on the right. Some
Speaker 1: of them are actually Democrats, some of them don't really
Speaker 1: care either way. If they were in a blue area,
Speaker 1: they'd run as Democrats and take every left wing position.
Speaker 1: But since they're in a red area, they're going to
Speaker 1: take every Republican position they possibly can. What do these
Speaker 1: people care about? Then? What motivates them? What drives John Cornyn,
Speaker 1: you're a senator from Texas, What drives Mitch McConnell, What
Speaker 1: drives these types? What makes them go here? It is power?
Speaker 1: Power is what makes them go. So back to what
Speaker 1: Elon Musk said, Remember he said it was mostly Democrats,
Speaker 1: but there's a few Republicans. Because remember Elon muskets in there,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump two point zero and Elon Musk starts cutting
Speaker 1: off corrupt government funding from us AID. It wasn't only
Speaker 1: Democrats calling to complain.
Speaker 7: While most of the fraudulent government payments to especially to
Speaker 7: the NGOs, go to the Democrats, most of it, like
Speaker 7: I don't know, for Augument's sake, let's say eighty percent,
Speaker 7: not maybe ninety percent, ten to twenty percent of it
Speaker 7: does go to Republicans. And so when we turn off
Speaker 7: funding to a fuordulent NGO, we'd get complaints from whatever
Speaker 7: the TEENPA center Republicans who receiving the money, and they would,
Speaker 7: you know, they would very loudly complain.
Speaker 1: Because the.
Speaker 7: Honest answer is the Republicans are partly They're receiving some
Speaker 7: of the fraud too. They're getting a big.
Speaker 1: If I'm a corrupt senator from a red state and
Speaker 1: I don't care about saving America, I don't care about
Speaker 1: stopping communism, I don't These things don't motivate me. If
Speaker 1: it is only power that motivates me, Well, I'm a
Speaker 1: senator or a member of the House, I have access
Speaker 1: if I choose to use it to all kinds of
Speaker 1: government money, which I can then find a way, in
Speaker 1: roundabout ways, I can find a way to funnel that
Speaker 1: government money back to me, either back to my campaign
Speaker 1: or back to a cousin. You remember the whole Joe
Speaker 1: Biden planned my cousin's brother's uncle started in LLC and wow,
Speaker 1: they got a great contract from China. We have have
Speaker 1: enough Republicans who are only there because they want power.
Speaker 1: That is why we can't get something obvious like the
Speaker 1: Save America Act passed yet, because there are still too
Speaker 1: many of those guys there and you know, Trump came
Speaker 1: out today and said this, and look, he needs to
Speaker 1: use his bully pulpit.
Speaker 3: I get it.
Speaker 1: I know why he said this. I'm not mad to vote.
Speaker 6: Being a leader's a bet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a leader. John's a leader, That's.
Speaker 5: What being his leader.
Speaker 3: Vet.
Speaker 1: Look, we have to be able to get proof of
Speaker 1: citizenship when you vote, otherwise we don't have elections. We
Speaker 1: have to be able to get voter ID. So John
Speaker 1: is a leader and hopefully he can get the votes.
Speaker 1: Trump's doing nothing wrong there, so he's doing exactly what
Speaker 1: he should be doing, John Thune, you go get the votes.
Speaker 1: And in fact, Donald Trump is going to the United
Speaker 1: States Senate tomorrow and they are having a closed door meeting.
Speaker 1: Did you know this? And Donald Trump is going to
Speaker 1: behind closed doors browbeat the United States Senate and try
Speaker 1: to get them to pass the Save America Act. But sorry,
Speaker 1: he will fail, and he will fail and it's not
Speaker 1: his fault. He'll fail because we have Republicans. John Cornyn
Speaker 1: types don't care about you, don't care about the country.
Speaker 1: They don't care about stopping democrats. They care about power
Speaker 1: and endless foreigners in corruption, keep them in power. All right,
Speaker 1: it's enough bad news. Let's get to some Supreme Court talk.
Speaker 1: That'll be fun.