WEBVTT - HR 2 - Brian Metzer

0:00:09.030 --> 0:00:13.389
<v Speaker 1>When asked about Major League Baseball's looming labor stoppage and

0:00:13.410 --> 0:00:17.790
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming World Series between Tampa Bay and Milwaukee, President

0:00:17.810 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump said, nobody cares. In fact, I believe we

0:00:22.020 --> 0:00:23.860
<v Speaker 1>have the audio. It's a little hard to hear. It's

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.380
<v Speaker 1>sort of being yelled off mic, but you can make

0:00:26.420 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it out.

0:00:31.250 --> 0:00:31.890
<v Speaker 2>I think it will.

0:00:32.670 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 3>That is going to happen.

0:00:36.340 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>OK, let's let's do it. Nobody cares. There it is.

0:00:43.260 --> 0:00:43.750
<v Speaker 4>You heard it.

0:00:44.460 --> 0:00:48.010
<v Speaker 1>President Trump says nobody cares about baseball. The president of

0:00:48.030 --> 0:00:51.550
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America says no one cares about

0:00:51.590 --> 0:00:52.730
<v Speaker 1>America's pastime.

0:00:53.750 --> 0:00:54.270
<v Speaker 4>Is he right?

0:00:54.270 --> 0:00:56.270
<v Speaker 2>412.

0:00:56.270 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>833, to have that backwards, I do. 833-412-9939. Is the

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.869
<v Speaker 1>president right? Does no one care about the World Series?

0:01:07.350 --> 0:01:12.170
<v Speaker 1>Does no one care about the looming lockout?

0:01:12.190 --> 0:01:14.610
<v Speaker 4>833-412-WXDX.

0:01:16.150 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Beyond Greater Tampa Bay and Milwaukee, the state of Wisconsin,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.179
<v Speaker 1>Trump might be right about the World Series. It's not

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>like the Brewers and the Rays have any significant fan

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bases whatsoever. outside of their own markets. America loves to

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.220
<v Speaker 1>complain that it's tired of watching the Dodgers and the

0:01:33.260 --> 0:01:34.820
<v Speaker 1>Yankees in the World Series every year.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>The ratings say otherwise.

0:01:37.550 --> 0:01:39.870
<v Speaker 1>My bet is the TV ratings for this fall classic

0:01:39.910 --> 0:01:43.310
<v Speaker 1>will sing a very different song and will probably lend

0:01:43.370 --> 0:01:45.990
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credence to what Trump just said right there.

0:01:47.430 --> 0:01:51.490
<v Speaker 1>Regarding the pending lockout, though, I'll disagree with Trump on

0:01:51.530 --> 0:01:55.910
<v Speaker 1>that front. Every baseball fan in America is going to

0:01:55.970 --> 0:02:00.110
<v Speaker 1>care about what happens with the lockout. It may keep

0:02:00.170 --> 0:02:03.370
<v Speaker 1>the sport away for a few months, for an entire season,

0:02:03.390 --> 0:02:07.130
<v Speaker 1>like we saw with the NHL back in 0405. And

0:02:07.330 --> 0:02:13.190
<v Speaker 1>hockey fans worldwide cared about that because everyone knew that

0:02:13.230 --> 0:02:17.250
<v Speaker 1>the result was probably going to mean a salary.

0:02:16.810 --> 0:02:19.430
<v Speaker 4>Cap floor or the dissolution of the league.

0:02:20.090 --> 0:02:22.510
<v Speaker 1>People cared about it because they knew it meant a

0:02:22.590 --> 0:02:27.010
<v Speaker 1>league with competitive balance and an injection of enthusiasm for

0:02:27.030 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fan bases in cities that had none.

0:02:30.100 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 4>With a cap.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.060
<v Speaker 1>Or you're going to get a league that might not

0:02:33.100 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>come back as we knew it if it came back

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:40.650
<v Speaker 1>at all. If Trump's no one cares quip was directly

0:02:40.690 --> 0:02:44.430
<v Speaker 1>meant about the lockout because fewer people care about baseball

0:02:44.470 --> 0:02:47.030
<v Speaker 1>than they used to in some markets around the country.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.870
<v Speaker 1>That's accurate. I think that's the case in this one.

0:02:52.150 --> 0:02:54.990
<v Speaker 1>But that's because after so many years of being a

0:02:55.070 --> 0:02:58.369
<v Speaker 1>farm team for the rest of Major League Baseball, many

0:02:58.410 --> 0:03:03.329
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Pirates fans won't be weeping about missing midweek games

0:03:03.389 --> 0:03:06.030
<v Speaker 1>in mid-August when the team is at best struggling to

0:03:06.090 --> 0:03:11.370
<v Speaker 1>maintain relevance in the wildcard race and simply flirting with 500.

0:03:11.370 --> 0:03:15.290
<v Speaker 1>For those reasons, I could certainly understand why John Q.

0:03:15.370 --> 0:03:18.970
<v Speaker 1>Bucko fan would be rooting for an extended lockout that

0:03:19.010 --> 0:03:21.100
<v Speaker 1>results in a salary cap instead of some sort of

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>quick fix so we can have opening day in March

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>again with a CBA that doesn't have much teeth to it. Personally,

0:03:27.820 --> 0:03:29.260
<v Speaker 1>I'd stand right next to that guy.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm with him.

0:03:31.740 --> 0:03:35.710
<v Speaker 1>I would rather see lost months of a season and

0:03:35.750 --> 0:03:38.430
<v Speaker 1>a CBA with a cap and a floor than I

0:03:38.490 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>would a new CBA with no real backbone. Give me

0:03:44.300 --> 0:03:47.180
<v Speaker 1>the lost months. Give me the lost time, but give

0:03:47.220 --> 0:03:53.970
<v Speaker 1>me a real CBA. Again, 833-412-9939. But it's nearly impossible

0:03:54.270 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to separate the topics from each other entirely, isn't it?

0:03:57.470 --> 0:04:01.630
<v Speaker 1>You can't logically have a conversation about the perceived need

0:04:01.670 --> 0:04:05.130
<v Speaker 1>for a cap without mentioning that two low payroll teams

0:04:05.490 --> 0:04:07.270
<v Speaker 1>with a combined 201 regular season wins are.

0:04:09.030 --> 0:04:11.170
<v Speaker 4>Are now colliding to play each other in the World Series.

0:04:12.650 --> 0:04:15.470
<v Speaker 1>That's in spite of the fact that Milwaukee is Major

0:04:15.510 --> 0:04:19.969
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball's smallest market and Tampa had the fifth smallest

0:04:20.130 --> 0:04:24.070
<v Speaker 1>opening day payroll at $ 88 million, which was $ 11 million

0:04:25.029 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>lower than Pittsburgh's even. Yet there they are winning 16

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.460
<v Speaker 1>more games than the Pirates and winning the American League

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Championship Series. The Brewers also won Pittsburgh's division with 103 victories,

0:04:36.740 --> 0:04:40.180
<v Speaker 1>which was the most in baseball. So, no, a cap

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.940
<v Speaker 1>isn't essential to winning in Major League Baseball. However, it

0:04:46.020 --> 0:04:49.940
<v Speaker 1>is usually essential to maintaining a team that does win

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.099
<v Speaker 1>for an extended stretch. Just look at the Penguins and

0:04:53.140 --> 0:04:55.799
<v Speaker 1>how they came out of that lockout in the NHL

0:04:56.220 --> 0:05:00.100
<v Speaker 1>and won for a long time. Look at the Pirates, conversely,

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who built a National League playoff team from 2013 to 15,

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:09.380
<v Speaker 1>then started selling key pieces to other teams. Kudos to

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and Milwaukee for threading that needle. They've both

0:05:12.180 --> 0:05:15.060
<v Speaker 1>been good for the better part of two decades, despite

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>different general managers and managers and different generations of players.

0:05:20.300 --> 0:05:24.190
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates, though, as a converse to that, went from

0:05:24.190 --> 0:05:25.390
<v Speaker 1>1979 to 1990 without a playoff appearance, from 93 to

0:05:25.380 --> 0:05:26.530
<v Speaker 1>2012 without having a winning.

0:05:26.250 --> 0:05:29.089
<v Speaker 4>Season at all, 93 to 2012, every single one of.

0:05:28.290 --> 0:05:41.190
<v Speaker 1>Them sub-500s, And then he had from 2016 to present

0:05:41.230 --> 0:05:46.530
<v Speaker 1>day with eight losing seasons and no playoff appearances. The

0:05:46.570 --> 0:05:50.950
<v Speaker 1>Rays and the Brewers have avoided such extended funks lately

0:05:51.010 --> 0:05:53.860
<v Speaker 1>because they're just more nimble organizations.

0:05:54.940 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 4>They're better front offices.

0:05:57.330 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>In 2017, Milwaukee was an 86-win team, and they missed

0:06:01.700 --> 0:06:04.620
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs after finishing second place in the division.

0:06:04.980 --> 0:06:07.380
<v Speaker 4>Since then, though, they made the playoffs.

0:06:07.220 --> 0:06:11.859
<v Speaker 1>Every season since 2022 when they also had 86 wins.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>That's a real good run.

0:06:14.020 --> 0:06:16.740
<v Speaker 1>Seven of the last nine years, Tampa Bay has either

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.940
<v Speaker 1>made the playoffs or won 90 games. Both clubs have

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.980
<v Speaker 1>managed to sustain. They're the exceptions to the rule. Like

0:06:25.010 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I said, their front offices are very light on their feet.

0:06:28.140 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They got organizational infrastructure that is able to breed repeated success.

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.980
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates don't, and that's their fault. That's not Major

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.099
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball's fault. That's not the lack of a cap.

0:06:39.540 --> 0:06:44.460
<v Speaker 1>But getting a cap is certainly better than not. I

0:06:44.500 --> 0:06:48.029
<v Speaker 1>look at hockey as an example. And I imagine that

0:06:48.070 --> 0:06:51.270
<v Speaker 1>with a cap, the Brewers and Tampa would keep winning

0:06:51.350 --> 0:06:53.970
<v Speaker 1>in a cap system too. They just wouldn't have to

0:06:54.050 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>spend as much effort trying to force the stars to

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:03.220
<v Speaker 1>align every offseason. Also, a cap would protect worthy franchises

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:09.219
<v Speaker 1>like Tampa and like Milwaukee from this widening economic gulf

0:07:09.780 --> 0:07:12.830
<v Speaker 1>with major market teams due to local revenue streams and

0:07:12.850 --> 0:07:16.530
<v Speaker 1>their ability to pay deferred contracts. So, I disagree with

0:07:16.550 --> 0:07:20.310
<v Speaker 1>the president there. I don't care all that much about

0:07:20.350 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the current iteration of Major League Baseball going away for

0:07:22.900 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a while, but I do care very much about what

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it will look like when it comes back.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.060
<v Speaker 4>That, Mr. President, I do care about.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>833-412-9939. I'll ask you, is the president right? Is Trump right?

0:07:39.570 --> 0:07:42.420
<v Speaker 1>No one cares about baseball. No one cares about the

0:07:42.450 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>World Series. No one cares about the lockout. Is he

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>right or do you actually care? I won't care if

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they miss some games. I won't care if they miss months.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I do care about what comes out at the other end.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 4>I care a.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.660
<v Speaker 1>Lot because if they get a cap floor system, it

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.790
<v Speaker 1>changes everything. If they don't and they come back with

0:08:03.830 --> 0:08:11.510
<v Speaker 1>some sort of spineless continuation of whatever already exists, then

0:08:11.540 --> 0:08:13.500
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to care about the sport.

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:14.820
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to care about it.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be as passive as I've been in

0:08:17.780 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>recent seasons. You can also tweet me at Tim Benz, PGH.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we go to break, I wanted to play that

0:08:24.790 --> 0:08:27.790
<v Speaker 1>soundbite as well from Big Cat. He was on the

0:08:27.810 --> 0:08:30.550
<v Speaker 1>DV morning show. I mentioned it earlier, but we've got

0:08:30.590 --> 0:08:32.610
<v Speaker 1>the audio now. We pulled it off the podcast page

0:08:32.650 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>at DVE's website at dve.com. This is Big Cat talking

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.180
<v Speaker 1>about the number of games in Europe, including the Steeler

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.820
<v Speaker 1>game coming up on Sunday against the Saints in France.

0:08:44.900 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I hate it. Why are we doing it? Why are

0:08:47.059 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>we doing this, Big Cat? It's so stupid.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 5>It's also so stupid just simply because... The NFL is

0:08:55.630 --> 0:08:57.660
<v Speaker 5>the greatest sport to watch on your couch.

0:08:57.820 --> 0:08:58.470
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I get it.

0:08:58.500 --> 0:09:00.620
<v Speaker 5>Going to a live sporting event is really cool, but

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.500
<v Speaker 5>I think we can all agree we've all been to

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.579
<v Speaker 5>NFL games, a bunch of them. It's not a good

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.780
<v Speaker 5>product when you're in person. The tailgate's fun. Going to

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.900
<v Speaker 5>the event of it is fun, but actual watching the

0:09:11.940 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 5>game with the stoppage, not being able to see anything,

0:09:14.820 --> 0:09:19.140
<v Speaker 5>it's not fun. This is the sport that's built for TV.

0:09:19.540 --> 0:09:21.860
<v Speaker 5>Why are we then playing all these games in Europe?

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.820
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't grow the game. If anything, you can make

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.479
<v Speaker 5>the argument it does the opposite. If you want to

0:09:27.540 --> 0:09:30.420
<v Speaker 5>grow the game in Europe, give everyone the red zone.

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.490
<v Speaker 5>Give every single person in France the red zone channel.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.190
<v Speaker 5>That will grow the game. And maybe they'll stop rioting, too.

0:09:38.230 --> 0:09:39.930
<v Speaker 5>They'll be too busy with Scott Hansen.

0:09:41.490 --> 0:09:42.429
<v Speaker 4>Which is a great line.

0:09:42.790 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>But he makes a really strong point that Everything that

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.860
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is based upon is based upon television. So

0:09:51.900 --> 0:09:55.020
<v Speaker 1>try to put the hook into the European fans with television.

0:09:56.070 --> 0:09:57.989
<v Speaker 1>The going to the game part is not the best

0:09:58.050 --> 0:10:01.460
<v Speaker 1>part for the NFL. but the nfl looks at growing

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the game as let's put a big party on and

0:10:04.250 --> 0:10:06.620
<v Speaker 1>get a bunch of foreign fans to show up and

0:10:06.700 --> 0:10:10.500
<v Speaker 1>pump revenue into us that way by the event but

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>honestly you want to hook them with the good stuff

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff isn't the event in person the good

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.660
<v Speaker 1>stuff is the event on television So he makes a

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.500
<v Speaker 1>real strong point. You want to grow the game in Europe,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>grow it with your outreach of the television side. The

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of games in person is just residual. That's residue.

0:10:35.030 --> 0:10:35.209
<v Speaker 1>Get 833-412-9939.

0:10:35.210 --> 0:10:35.730
<v Speaker 4>We can talk about that.

0:10:38.660 --> 0:10:41.010
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about that Wall Street Journal article that

0:10:41.030 --> 0:10:42.770
<v Speaker 1>we were speaking about before about.

0:10:42.710 --> 0:10:45.350
<v Speaker 4>Slowing the game down too much even on TV and

0:10:45.390 --> 0:10:45.670
<v Speaker 4>how the.

0:10:45.630 --> 0:10:49.170
<v Speaker 1>TV market, excuse me, the TV product might be hurt

0:10:49.290 --> 0:10:52.390
<v Speaker 1>as well because NFL games are just lasting too long

0:10:52.410 --> 0:10:54.340
<v Speaker 1>and the pace of play is way too slow. That's

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tough to sell to European fans. And I do want

0:10:57.220 --> 0:10:58.900
<v Speaker 1>to hear from baseball fans of the Trump thing.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Is he right?

0:11:00.740 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you not care at all about baseball coming back

0:11:03.740 --> 0:11:06.780
<v Speaker 1>from the lockout, the lockout itself, or the World Series?

0:11:07.350 --> 0:11:13.020
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of highfalutin holier than now preach from

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.660
<v Speaker 1>the old school that, that I've said, we want Tampa

0:11:16.700 --> 0:11:19.370
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Milwaukee in the world series for, you know,

0:11:19.590 --> 0:11:21.569
<v Speaker 1>decades now, this is what we want.

0:11:21.610 --> 0:11:25.030
<v Speaker 4>We want the small market teams to succeed. Okay. Here

0:11:25.070 --> 0:11:28.410
<v Speaker 4>they are. You're going to watch. I'm real dubious of that.

0:11:29.050 --> 0:11:31.540
<v Speaker 1>It sounds good to say it because it feels good

0:11:31.580 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to root for the little guy. When I got two

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.230
<v Speaker 1>little guys in it, you're going to bother watching. You

0:11:37.250 --> 0:11:39.130
<v Speaker 1>like the quality of play from the Brewers and Rays.

0:11:39.309 --> 0:11:41.170
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the star power, so you turn it

0:11:41.190 --> 0:11:43.850
<v Speaker 1>on the television? This is kind of time to put

0:11:43.870 --> 0:11:47.089
<v Speaker 1>your money where your mouth is, so to speak. Tweet

0:11:47.130 --> 0:11:49.390
<v Speaker 1>me at TimBenzPGH on that front as well. When we

0:11:49.429 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>come back, Steelers and Saints in France on Sunday. There

0:11:53.620 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of lessons to be learned from that

0:11:55.580 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay game. We'll have them for you next on

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:03.910
<v Speaker 1>105.9 The X. Brian Metzer, the Penguins Radio Network, coming

0:12:03.950 --> 0:12:06.220
<v Speaker 1>up shortly to talk about the Pens game tonight, which

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you can hear here on 105.9 The X. Faceoff against

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers coming your way at 7. Pre-game at 6.

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.740
<v Speaker 1>And we've got the Hockey Night Show at 5.30. A

0:12:16.940 --> 0:12:21.290
<v Speaker 1>couple of tweets coming in about our baseball conversation, if

0:12:21.309 --> 0:12:24.910
<v Speaker 1>you missed it. President Trump says no one cares about baseball.

0:12:25.010 --> 0:12:27.390
<v Speaker 1>No one cares about the lockout. No one cares about...

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about the World Series.

0:12:28.860 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Is he right?

0:12:29.580 --> 0:12:31.500
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be right about the World Series.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.660
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's right about the lockout. I care

0:12:33.700 --> 0:12:35.620
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what's going to happen with this lockout.

0:12:36.020 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how many games they're going to miss.

0:12:37.900 --> 0:12:39.250
<v Speaker 1>I care what it looks like when we come out

0:12:39.260 --> 0:12:39.990
<v Speaker 1>the back end, though.

0:12:40.179 --> 0:12:45.709
<v Speaker 4>I really do. What do you think? 412-833-9939. This is Jim.

0:12:46.250 --> 0:12:48.929
<v Speaker 1>He says, I don't know one person who cares about

0:12:48.970 --> 0:12:52.370
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball, let alone if they lock out. Baseball

0:12:52.429 --> 0:12:57.970
<v Speaker 1>is dead, especially the younger generation. Between video games... gambling

0:12:59.210 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and the wider spread the easier proliferation of getting your

0:13:04.030 --> 0:13:07.059
<v Speaker 1>hands on watching your team any night anywhere out of

0:13:07.100 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>market games I think that has helped the younger generation

0:13:10.980 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>stay around it's not like it used to be that's

0:13:13.460 --> 0:13:17.700
<v Speaker 1>for sure younger kids tend to like NBA college football

0:13:17.780 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>pro football more than they do Major League Baseball for

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.969
<v Speaker 1>sure but especially with like the star power that exists

0:13:26.130 --> 0:13:27.890
<v Speaker 1>in between the players, the.

0:13:27.809 --> 0:13:29.550
<v Speaker 4>Dodgers, the players, the Yankees.

0:13:30.150 --> 0:13:32.620
<v Speaker 1>Kids are attracted to stars these days, and Major League

0:13:32.630 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Baseball is doing a better job of marketing stars individually.

0:13:37.260 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You can see that even on a lesser level here

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.980
<v Speaker 1>with Skeens. You know, Skeens had been playing in a

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.100
<v Speaker 1>bigger market. He'd be an even bigger star than what

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.020
<v Speaker 1>he is now, but he plays here. That said, they

0:13:48.059 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>still get his face out there a bunch nationally, don't they?

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that keeps young people involved. But

0:13:54.660 --> 0:13:58.100
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, yeah, that's an issue. And I think part

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of the issue is it can't just be kids in

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>New York and L.A. and Boston who feel like in Chicago,

0:14:03.580 --> 0:14:05.460
<v Speaker 1>who feel like their teams have a chance to win

0:14:05.500 --> 0:14:05.859
<v Speaker 1>every year.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 4>That's why it's important. You know, it's true. He sends

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:10.660
<v Speaker 4>a tweet.

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.500
<v Speaker 1>Get ready for Trump to try to force a deal

0:14:13.870 --> 0:14:15.590
<v Speaker 1>just when the owners have the players on the ropes

0:14:15.610 --> 0:14:18.260
<v Speaker 1>during the lockout. Oh, I can see that happening. I

0:14:18.300 --> 0:14:20.979
<v Speaker 1>can see that happening, although he'd probably be on the

0:14:21.020 --> 0:14:23.940
<v Speaker 1>side of the owners, I would think. But yeah, whatever

0:14:24.020 --> 0:14:25.900
<v Speaker 1>side he's on, he'll probably get in and muck it

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>up at the end.

0:14:27.460 --> 0:14:30.380
<v Speaker 4>But I thought of that. You're not the first person

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 4>to think that. I thought that.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.550
<v Speaker 1>It's like if you saw his face when the guy

0:14:34.590 --> 0:14:37.130
<v Speaker 1>was yelling the question from the background, he wasn't ready

0:14:37.170 --> 0:14:37.830
<v Speaker 1>for the question.

0:14:37.990 --> 0:14:40.530
<v Speaker 4>He hadn't thought about it. But you could see the

0:14:40.570 --> 0:14:41.330
<v Speaker 4>gears turning.

0:14:42.140 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>This is something I'm going to have to have an

0:14:43.780 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>opinion on at some point and let everybody know what

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>my opinion is. And whatever his opinion is, I'm sure

0:14:49.580 --> 0:14:55.620
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come at exactly the wrong time. Fansville412 says,

0:14:55.990 --> 0:15:00.250
<v Speaker 1>you know Trump is an idiot, right? Well, yeah, but

0:15:00.270 --> 0:15:02.510
<v Speaker 1>is he wrong about the World Series? I don't think

0:15:02.530 --> 0:15:04.950
<v Speaker 1>he's wrong about the World Series. I don't think a

0:15:04.970 --> 0:15:07.150
<v Speaker 1>lot of people really care about the World Series result.

0:15:07.790 --> 0:15:10.290
<v Speaker 1>They might like the style of baseball. They might like

0:15:10.390 --> 0:15:12.860
<v Speaker 1>the concept of two small market teams being in it,

0:15:13.410 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're going to be invested in it,

0:15:15.130 --> 0:15:16.410
<v Speaker 1>and I sure don't think a lot of people are

0:15:16.430 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>going to watch.

0:15:18.270 --> 0:15:20.260
<v Speaker 4>And this is a tweet on a slightly different topic.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>This is what we were speaking about before, that tweet

0:15:22.940 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that Trey Essex had about the quality of football and

0:15:25.580 --> 0:15:27.500
<v Speaker 1>how the quality of play in the National Football League

0:15:27.540 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is down, and he said the quality of coaching is down.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:32.860
<v Speaker 4>I think it's overcoached.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the quality of coaching is down because they're

0:15:35.020 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>doing too friggin' much of it. And they're setting themselves

0:15:38.580 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up for failure, these coaches, in a lot of situations.

0:15:41.860 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Jack sends a tweet. He says, a big reason why

0:15:45.020 --> 0:15:47.540
<v Speaker 1>it is less enjoyable is because of the interruption in

0:15:47.580 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the flow of the games due to the increasing number

0:15:49.940 --> 0:15:52.610
<v Speaker 1>of penalties. Look for those to go down because the

0:15:52.710 --> 0:15:55.420
<v Speaker 1>NFL is first and foremost a TV show and the

0:15:55.470 --> 0:15:57.570
<v Speaker 1>games are running long, too long.

0:15:58.070 --> 0:15:58.630
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll see.

0:15:59.070 --> 0:16:02.869
<v Speaker 1>If the length of the game interrupts the flow of

0:16:02.910 --> 0:16:05.850
<v Speaker 1>the ratings, then yeah, you're on to something. If the

0:16:05.890 --> 0:16:08.110
<v Speaker 1>ratings stay the same, then the NFL doesn't care if

0:16:08.410 --> 0:16:10.830
<v Speaker 1>you're watching for a longer period of time. Hey, then

0:16:10.850 --> 0:16:12.890
<v Speaker 1>you're helped because you're watching for a longer period of

0:16:12.930 --> 0:16:15.210
<v Speaker 1>time and you're waiting to see if your bet cashes

0:16:15.290 --> 0:16:18.390
<v Speaker 1>in to see if your team covers the spread in

0:16:18.810 --> 0:16:21.730
<v Speaker 1>three hours and 32 minutes as opposed to three hours

0:16:21.770 --> 0:16:24.550
<v Speaker 1>and 11 minutes. They don't have a problem with that whatsoever.

0:16:25.570 --> 0:16:28.110
<v Speaker 1>Then Jack sends, ironically, the same link to the Wall

0:16:28.130 --> 0:16:31.890
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal article that we were talking about before. So

0:16:31.970 --> 0:16:36.220
<v Speaker 1>you could tweet as well, at Tim Benz, PGH. Jerry

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.020
<v Speaker 1>Dulac was on with us earlier in the show. Jerry's

0:16:39.090 --> 0:16:43.010
<v Speaker 1>in France covering for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and for the

0:16:43.050 --> 0:16:46.870
<v Speaker 1>Steelers radio network, the Steelers game in France against the Saints.

0:16:46.910 --> 0:16:49.070
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot of lessons to be

0:16:49.110 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>learned from that game against Tampa that the Steelers better

0:16:52.140 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>apply to that game against the Saints. And the first

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.700
<v Speaker 1>one that comes to mind is pretty clear is that

0:16:58.740 --> 0:17:02.620
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Bernard has to be the number two receiver, regardless

0:17:02.660 --> 0:17:05.750
<v Speaker 1>of who comes back healthy. I felt that way even

0:17:05.790 --> 0:17:09.389
<v Speaker 1>before he had the 87 yards and 11 catches against Tampa.

0:17:09.430 --> 0:17:12.790
<v Speaker 1>Now it's an arguable. DK Metcalf is the first wide

0:17:12.810 --> 0:17:18.740
<v Speaker 1>receiver option. Bernard is No. 2. Then Pittman, then Wilson, Skorodnik,

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.179
<v Speaker 1>whoever else, when they get healthy. Even if you want

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.459
<v Speaker 1>to bring Pat Friermuth in the conversation at tight end.

0:17:24.500 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 4>We should.

0:17:25.820 --> 0:17:29.340
<v Speaker 1>Bernard, though, needs to be Robin to Metcalf's Batman, and

0:17:29.380 --> 0:17:31.030
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if Metcalf's a Batman.

0:17:31.050 --> 0:17:31.770
<v Speaker 4>He might be a $ 33 million Robin.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.699
<v Speaker 1>But Bernard makes Metcalf better in a way no one

0:17:37.770 --> 0:17:40.350
<v Speaker 1>else has since he became a Steeler.

0:17:41.830 --> 0:17:43.770
<v Speaker 4>Now, he wasn't getting real deep shots.

0:17:43.790 --> 0:17:47.570
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually, 1.5 air yards was the average depth

0:17:47.609 --> 0:17:51.430
<v Speaker 1>of target for his 12 targets, Bernard, that he got.

0:17:51.970 --> 0:17:54.780
<v Speaker 1>And none of them was deeper than 9 yards on Sunday.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.699
<v Speaker 1>But he drew enough attention from Tampa Bay's defense that

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.580
<v Speaker 1>they finally loosened up some of the coverage on Metcalf

0:18:03.190 --> 0:18:05.810
<v Speaker 1>And then Metcalf went from two catches for 12 yards

0:18:06.210 --> 0:18:09.290
<v Speaker 1>to 81 yards in the second half of nine catches.

0:18:10.109 --> 0:18:12.390
<v Speaker 4>So Bernard had something to do with that.

0:18:14.619 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Number two, Rico Dowdle, he still needs carries. In his

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first two games with the Steelers, Dowdle, I thought, was

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a victim of circumstance. And those circumstances were crummy run

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.150
<v Speaker 1>blocking and his toe injury, or his foot or whatever

0:18:29.170 --> 0:18:29.430
<v Speaker 1>he had.

0:18:30.990 --> 0:18:31.910
<v Speaker 4>Dowdle's a good back.

0:18:33.619 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And the Steelers are fortunate to have him as another

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.950
<v Speaker 1>option alongside Jalen Warren. Warren is incredibly easy to root for.

0:18:43.050 --> 0:18:44.990
<v Speaker 1>He's hardworking. He's versatile.

0:18:45.030 --> 0:18:48.129
<v Speaker 4>He's tough. He minds his own business. He's quiet. He

0:18:48.190 --> 0:18:52.629
<v Speaker 4>only cares about winning. He's undervalued. He overachieves. He's catnip

0:18:52.670 --> 0:18:53.340
<v Speaker 4>for Yinzers.

0:18:53.940 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a Stiller prototype Yinzer catnip member for the

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.530
<v Speaker 1>fan base to root for. But Dowdo is good. And

0:19:03.830 --> 0:19:06.990
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's a nice off-season addition. He's got

0:19:07.430 --> 0:19:10.690
<v Speaker 1>a couple 1,000-yard seasons under his belt. He's got kinetic

0:19:10.770 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>explosiveness and straight-ahead runs. Plus, he was more noticeable in

0:19:15.100 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>regulation Sunday. He averaged over 5.5 yards a carry on

0:19:18.660 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>seven attempts, 40 yards. Warren ended up with 78 yards

0:19:21.660 --> 0:19:25.100
<v Speaker 1>from scrimmage, but 34 of that was in overtime. I'm

0:19:25.140 --> 0:19:27.220
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Warren's just like everybody else. He should

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.420
<v Speaker 1>probably get two-thirds of the touches.

0:19:30.100 --> 0:19:31.060
<v Speaker 4>Any more than that, though.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>For a back who's 5'8, 215, that's a lot of

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.050
<v Speaker 1>exposure to fatigue and fumbling and injury.

0:19:38.619 --> 0:19:39.869
<v Speaker 4>So don't forget about Dowdle.

0:19:39.890 --> 0:19:44.310
<v Speaker 1>Despite Warren's significant early season hot streak, now that Dowdle

0:19:44.350 --> 0:19:46.929
<v Speaker 1>is healthy again, they can't just put him in dry

0:19:47.010 --> 0:19:49.810
<v Speaker 1>storage in case Warren gets hurt, which for a while.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 4>appeared to be the thinking. I'll give you one more.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>This is another lesson that needed to be learned from

0:19:55.580 --> 0:19:59.820
<v Speaker 1>that game against Tampa. How they used Ramsey, that's exactly

0:19:59.859 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>how they should be using Ramsey. The more conventional they

0:20:03.660 --> 0:20:06.090
<v Speaker 1>are with Ramsey, asking him to only cover guys in

0:20:06.109 --> 0:20:08.629
<v Speaker 1>the secondary, the less bang for the buck they're going

0:20:08.650 --> 0:20:08.930
<v Speaker 1>to get.

0:20:09.450 --> 0:20:12.050
<v Speaker 4>That's not his strongest suit. It hasn't been for a while.

0:20:12.550 --> 0:20:12.949
<v Speaker 4>I get it.

0:20:13.369 --> 0:20:15.510
<v Speaker 1>Cornerback depth has been thin recently.

0:20:15.550 --> 0:20:19.350
<v Speaker 4>Now Echols is out. But Jamel Dean is back. Coming

0:20:19.369 --> 0:20:20.850
<v Speaker 4>off a strong game. Dillon Everett.

0:20:21.550 --> 0:20:25.530
<v Speaker 1>His learning curve doesn't appear to be too steep. Asante

0:20:25.570 --> 0:20:28.350
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is capable. And I know Joey Porter Jr.

0:20:28.410 --> 0:20:31.429
<v Speaker 4>Is gone. But free up Ramsey anyway. Let him blitz.

0:20:32.650 --> 0:20:33.450
<v Speaker 4>Let him freelance.

0:20:34.330 --> 0:20:36.310
<v Speaker 1>Let him create havoc at the line of scrimmage in

0:20:36.330 --> 0:20:39.859
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. He had 10 tackles on Sunday, 9 solo,

0:20:39.859 --> 0:20:43.300
<v Speaker 1>2 sacks. In the long run, that'll help him when

0:20:43.340 --> 0:20:45.940
<v Speaker 1>he stays deep in coverage too because it's just a

0:20:45.980 --> 0:20:48.619
<v Speaker 1>very different look that the opposing offense is going to

0:20:48.660 --> 0:20:49.380
<v Speaker 1>have to account for.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 4>But let Ramsey be Ramsey.

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Let him be the moving chess piece he was always

0:20:54.770 --> 0:20:57.390
<v Speaker 1>meant to be when you got him here last year.

0:20:58.750 --> 0:21:00.710
<v Speaker 1>So those are three lessons that I think the Steelers

0:21:00.790 --> 0:21:03.149
<v Speaker 1>had to learn from that game against Tampa that they

0:21:03.190 --> 0:21:05.870
<v Speaker 1>got to apply against the Saints, Browns, and everybody else

0:21:06.290 --> 0:21:08.870
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. Back to Hockey Talk when we come back.

0:21:08.910 --> 0:21:11.690
<v Speaker 1>Brian Metzer, Pittsburgh Penguins Radio Network. If you're just tuning

0:21:11.730 --> 0:21:14.390
<v Speaker 1>in to the Mark Madden Show, we played Kyle Dubas'

0:21:14.869 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sound bites earlier from his press conference today, and we

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.740
<v Speaker 1>will again during the Hockey Night Show coming up at

0:21:20.740 --> 0:21:25.179
<v Speaker 1>5.30 in advance of the Penguins game against the Florida Panthers. Tonight,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.460
<v Speaker 1>Tim Benz filling in for Mark. Today, the diagnosis for

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:34.470
<v Speaker 1>Ben Kindle, a vasovagal episode. which is something that causes

0:21:34.510 --> 0:21:38.129
<v Speaker 1>your heart rate and blood pressure to drop suddenly. If

0:21:38.790 --> 0:21:42.090
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Cleveland Clinic, it describes a vasovagal

0:21:42.210 --> 0:21:45.780
<v Speaker 1>episode as, quote, the most common type of fainting. So

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.899
<v Speaker 1>they're going to evaluate Kendall moving forward. For the time being,

0:21:48.940 --> 0:21:50.820
<v Speaker 1>he's on injury reserve.

0:21:51.060 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 4>So everyone. Hoping for the best from Kindle. They'll continue

0:21:54.460 --> 0:21:55.180
<v Speaker 4>to do testing.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Dubas has said he'll keep the media and the fan

0:21:58.060 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>base updated as Kindle progresses back to health.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 4>So that's the update on him. So you won't see

0:22:05.050 --> 0:22:06.290
<v Speaker 4>Kindle tonight, obviously.

0:22:06.710 --> 0:22:10.210
<v Speaker 1>Brian Rust hurt as well in their most recent game

0:22:10.270 --> 0:22:11.050
<v Speaker 1>against Utah.

0:22:11.490 --> 0:22:12.810
<v Speaker 4>A lot going on with the.

0:22:12.810 --> 0:22:16.070
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Penguins and joining us right now to talk about it.

0:22:16.470 --> 0:22:18.710
<v Speaker 1>It is Brian Metzer from the Pittsburgh Penguins Radio Network.

0:22:18.750 --> 0:22:21.290
<v Speaker 1>You will hear him as part of the broadcast tonight.

0:22:21.869 --> 0:22:26.929
<v Speaker 1>Pens and Panthers at PPG Paints Arena. Faceoff, 7 o'clock,

0:22:27.210 --> 0:22:30.910
<v Speaker 1>pregame at 6. Mets will be doing the intermissions postgame.

0:22:30.970 --> 0:22:34.690
<v Speaker 1>Pens live weekly. And Florida coming here, Mets, after an

0:22:34.730 --> 0:22:37.990
<v Speaker 1>emotional game last night for them in Ottawa.

0:22:38.070 --> 0:22:39.950
<v Speaker 4>The return of Brady Kachuk.

0:22:40.670 --> 0:22:43.470
<v Speaker 1>For folks who didn't see it, Kachuk, there was a

0:22:43.530 --> 0:22:46.190
<v Speaker 1>video that was played for him at his former place

0:22:46.230 --> 0:22:47.770
<v Speaker 1>of employment for the Ottawa Senators.

0:22:48.250 --> 0:22:50.430
<v Speaker 4>They put it on the Jumbotron, a welcome back video.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.379
<v Speaker 1>Everybody booed it during the timeout and Kachuk came out

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.500
<v Speaker 1>and skated a victory lap after they booed it. Tipped

0:22:57.540 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>his cap, waved to the fans, that sort of thing.

0:23:00.540 --> 0:23:03.700
<v Speaker 1>Did the little skate around as everybody was booing him lustily.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.190
<v Speaker 4>And then he scored a goal.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>To give florida a one nothing lead but it didn't

0:23:08.500 --> 0:23:11.139
<v Speaker 1>last very long as the panthers end up losing five

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to one boy brady kachuk metz has turned into hockey's

0:23:15.260 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimate heel has he not.

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>It's it's remarkable to see how the entire nation has

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>like revolted against this kid and you know i get

0:23:25.380 --> 0:23:27.369
<v Speaker 3>it he he forced his way out he didn't want

0:23:27.380 --> 0:23:29.530
<v Speaker 3>to be in ottawa anymore and those fans are gonna

0:23:30.150 --> 0:23:33.900
<v Speaker 3>grind the ax probably in perpetuity just to show their

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.900
<v Speaker 3>ill will and resentment towards him. But I did get

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.100
<v Speaker 3>some chuckles after I saw the reaction to him.

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.580
<v Speaker 2>And it's, of course, he went out and scored a goal.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Kachuks at this point, both of them,

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.780
<v Speaker 3>now he's jumped to the front of the line, but

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.980
<v Speaker 3>they have both become the two biggest heels in the

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 3>league or so it seems.

0:23:51.660 --> 0:23:53.510
<v Speaker 2>I know that there's a number of other U.S.

0:23:53.550 --> 0:23:57.060
<v Speaker 3>Born players that are on the wrong side of the

0:23:57.210 --> 0:23:59.860
<v Speaker 3>like meter at this point, trying to force their way

0:23:59.940 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 3>out of teams. But those two kind of were the

0:24:03.020 --> 0:24:05.659
<v Speaker 3>head of the conga line, or so it seems. And

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 3>here he goes, not only being this heel character and

0:24:09.859 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the villain in their story, but he's scoring goals like

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 3>crazy now. He had a hat trick the other night,

0:24:15.020 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 3>back-to-back hat tricks, as a matter of fact. So it's

0:24:17.740 --> 0:24:20.140
<v Speaker 3>just funny to see how he has just become this

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.659
<v Speaker 3>character of hate for all of Canada and specifically for

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:24.460
<v Speaker 3>the people in Ottawa.

0:24:25.050 --> 0:24:27.859
<v Speaker 4>What are they now, 5-3-3 or something like that, 5-3-2?

0:24:28.730 --> 0:24:32.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, the thing is, Tim, yeah, they're 5-3-2.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 4>5-3-2, 12 points, yeah.

0:24:33.900 --> 0:24:35.180
<v Speaker 2>And they're fourth in their division.

0:24:35.220 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 3>But what's interesting to me is that they're– I think

0:24:38.900 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>they got off to a little bit slower start because

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Barkov was lost again. You have some other injuries that

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 3>have popped up with them. And it's Marchand's out now.

0:24:47.780 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 3>As soon as he came back, he essentially went out immediately.

0:24:50.859 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 3>So I thought that that would disrupt him a little bit.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 3>But now it just seems like they're kind of finding

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.870
<v Speaker 3>their footing and playing better with the lineup that they have. Yeah,

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.629
<v Speaker 3>they ended up losing the game last night, but they

0:25:00.650 --> 0:25:02.689
<v Speaker 3>had won three in a row. And over that span,

0:25:03.090 --> 0:25:06.129
<v Speaker 3>scored seven, three, and then eight goals in those games.

0:25:06.210 --> 0:25:09.580
<v Speaker 3>So it seemed like their offense had come alive. And, um,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.979
<v Speaker 3>that they just, they're kind of finding their identity minus

0:25:13.030 --> 0:25:16.210
<v Speaker 3>some of these players that aren't there specifically Barkov. I mean,

0:25:16.250 --> 0:25:18.330
<v Speaker 3>losing him last year was a big blow and then

0:25:18.369 --> 0:25:21.350
<v Speaker 3>now losing him again, that's a very important player for them.

0:25:21.450 --> 0:25:24.409
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that's a big reason why they're

0:25:24.430 --> 0:25:26.510
<v Speaker 3>kind of up and down from where we think they

0:25:26.550 --> 0:25:28.869
<v Speaker 3>should be. And now they're goaltenders on the shelf as

0:25:28.930 --> 0:25:31.710
<v Speaker 3>well for a few weeks. So they, they are in

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a tough spot with injuries. And I guess you're going

0:25:33.619 --> 0:25:36.100
<v Speaker 3>to have that when you have a veteran laden team,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.470
<v Speaker 3>but it just They seem to have the bad luck

0:25:39.690 --> 0:25:41.970
<v Speaker 3>on their side with all of these guys going down

0:25:42.020 --> 0:25:42.340
<v Speaker 3>at once.

0:25:42.910 --> 0:25:47.940
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, the Hurricanes leading the Metropolitan Division, 17 points, 8-2-1.

0:25:47.980 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>They've lost Stahl, but I expected them to have a

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>slower start than they have. And here they are with,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, 17 points already to lead all of

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the NHL. And lo and behold, right behind them, the

0:26:01.900 --> 0:26:07.900
<v Speaker 1>New York Rangers, Sully's Rangers, 7-3-1, 15 points. Um, I'm

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.770
<v Speaker 1>surprised at that seven, two and one in their last 10.

0:26:10.770 --> 0:26:12.850
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of the Rangers and the

0:26:12.910 --> 0:26:14.770
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes atop the Metro right now?

0:26:14.790 --> 0:26:17.490
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the hurricane just looked like a great team.

0:26:17.609 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they got a plus 15 goal differential. They've

0:26:20.460 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>scored 42 goals on the year, which if I'm not mistaken,

0:26:23.660 --> 0:26:28.730
<v Speaker 3>leads the Eastern conference. So they're scoring at a breakneck pace.

0:26:28.790 --> 0:26:30.450
<v Speaker 3>I think only the Golden Knights have a couple more

0:26:30.470 --> 0:26:34.210
<v Speaker 3>goals than they do overall. So they're very good in

0:26:34.250 --> 0:26:37.100
<v Speaker 3>that way. They still defend very well. I think a

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of people thought they would kind of come down

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.899
<v Speaker 3>to earth after that hot playoff run to win the

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Stanley Cup, having Stahl go out.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:45.460
<v Speaker 2>But it hasn't really hurt them, Tim.

0:26:45.500 --> 0:26:48.030
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just mentioned it. They're red hot. They're

0:26:48.050 --> 0:26:50.870
<v Speaker 3>leading the division. And they look like an all-around great

0:26:50.910 --> 0:26:54.300
<v Speaker 3>hockey team. Eric Tolsky's done a wonderful job of building

0:26:54.340 --> 0:26:57.980
<v Speaker 3>that roster. Lots of depth, lots of scoring available, and

0:26:58.300 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 3>just lots of players that maybe were bad fits on

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.030
<v Speaker 3>their own teams or just didn't really get it going

0:27:04.290 --> 0:27:07.970
<v Speaker 3>have found a home there and just become special players

0:27:08.010 --> 0:27:10.690
<v Speaker 3>for the Hurricanes. On the Rangers side, I thought for

0:27:10.750 --> 0:27:13.030
<v Speaker 3>sure they would crash down to earth, Tim, with the

0:27:13.090 --> 0:27:15.550
<v Speaker 3>loss of Shusterkin. I mean, that was a big blow

0:27:15.590 --> 0:27:19.050
<v Speaker 3>to them. But now you have Dylan Guerin that is

0:27:19.470 --> 0:27:21.250
<v Speaker 3>kind of just carrying the ball for them.

0:27:21.750 --> 0:27:22.010
<v Speaker 2>He's 4-2-1.

0:27:24.010 --> 0:27:28.690
<v Speaker 3>A 1.85 goals against average, 929 save percentage, just taking

0:27:28.730 --> 0:27:31.650
<v Speaker 3>care of business between the pipes. I think that they

0:27:31.710 --> 0:27:33.740
<v Speaker 3>still would probably be in the market for a goaltender

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.780
<v Speaker 3>at some point. But if he's going to play like that,

0:27:35.820 --> 0:27:38.300
<v Speaker 3>it was a 2020 draft pick. I was looking into

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.740
<v Speaker 3>him a little bit the other night because I didn't

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 3>know a ton about him. But he's been kind of

0:27:42.980 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 3>a godsend for them to have him step in and

0:27:45.140 --> 0:27:47.389
<v Speaker 3>be able to play the way that he has to

0:27:47.430 --> 0:27:51.100
<v Speaker 3>this point. And Sully has them playing at a high level.

0:27:51.180 --> 0:27:56.030
<v Speaker 3>He's getting good performances from Lafreniere, who is seemingly finally

0:27:56.070 --> 0:27:58.290
<v Speaker 3>looking like the first overall draft pick he was a

0:27:58.330 --> 0:28:00.669
<v Speaker 3>few years ago whenever he came into the league. He

0:28:00.690 --> 0:28:03.550
<v Speaker 3>has 13 points and seven goals in 11 games.

0:28:04.030 --> 0:28:06.350
<v Speaker 2>Adam Fox has bounced back a little bit this year.

0:28:06.430 --> 0:28:08.929
<v Speaker 3>He's the second leading scorer on the team. And it's

0:28:08.950 --> 0:28:13.290
<v Speaker 3>helping them that guys like Zabinijad and Miller are starting

0:28:13.310 --> 0:28:15.740
<v Speaker 3>to kind of round back into the forms that we've

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.940
<v Speaker 3>seen in their career. And they have a talented young

0:28:17.980 --> 0:28:22.609
<v Speaker 3>player too, Tim, Gabe Perreault, who was struggling to break

0:28:22.650 --> 0:28:25.330
<v Speaker 3>into their lineup early last year. Their fans really wanted

0:28:25.350 --> 0:28:28.270
<v Speaker 3>him to play. Sully set him down to the minors,

0:28:28.350 --> 0:28:32.250
<v Speaker 3>and he made a late run on the roster and

0:28:32.270 --> 0:28:34.590
<v Speaker 3>put up some late points last year. Well, he's got

0:28:34.650 --> 0:28:36.910
<v Speaker 3>seven points in the 11 games with four goals this

0:28:36.930 --> 0:28:37.490
<v Speaker 3>year playing.

0:28:38.170 --> 0:28:39.930
<v Speaker 2>You know, a regular shift for them every night.

0:28:39.990 --> 0:28:42.350
<v Speaker 3>So they have players that haven't even gotten themselves on

0:28:42.430 --> 0:28:44.790
<v Speaker 3>track yet, and they're still that good. So they look

0:28:44.830 --> 0:28:46.850
<v Speaker 3>like a pretty good team and a threat coming out

0:28:46.870 --> 0:28:47.790
<v Speaker 3>of the Metro for sure.

0:28:48.590 --> 0:28:50.890
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that they're winning at home for a change,

0:28:51.060 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>unbeaten at home after they were so bad last year,

0:28:54.020 --> 0:28:56.580
<v Speaker 1>a really important storyline for them. But as far as

0:28:56.620 --> 0:29:00.060
<v Speaker 1>the Penguins go, an important three-game homestand after getting swept

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the road, getting no points, losing in regulation all

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.660
<v Speaker 1>four of their games against Western Conference teams.

0:29:06.140 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 4>They need to reverse course in a hurry here, Mets.

0:29:08.380 --> 0:29:08.860
<v Speaker 4>Can they?

0:29:12.700 --> 0:29:14.150
<v Speaker 2>I'm still trying to figure out who they are.

0:29:14.170 --> 0:29:18.250
<v Speaker 3>You know, Tim, they turn the puck over to breakneck pace.

0:29:18.710 --> 0:29:21.930
<v Speaker 3>They've struggled in that way for sure. They can certainly

0:29:22.010 --> 0:29:23.930
<v Speaker 3>still score a little bit. I know that they were

0:29:23.950 --> 0:29:26.740
<v Speaker 3>anemic on the road going into the Utah game when

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 3>they scored four. They were averaging just over two goals

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 3>per game. in the first three games against Chicago, Colorado

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.670
<v Speaker 3>and Vegas. But those teams really blew them out. And

0:29:36.790 --> 0:29:39.410
<v Speaker 3>Chicago was the one that really had me shaking my

0:29:39.450 --> 0:29:41.380
<v Speaker 3>head because that was their best chance at two points

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.580
<v Speaker 3>on the trip because the other three teams have been

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.350
<v Speaker 3>so good to start the year and showed it against them.

0:29:46.750 --> 0:29:49.370
<v Speaker 3>So I, It'll be very interesting to see how they

0:29:49.430 --> 0:29:53.110
<v Speaker 3>perform coming back home with the three-game homestand that you mentioned.

0:29:53.390 --> 0:29:54.930
<v Speaker 2>But it's a tough one. We just talked about how

0:29:54.970 --> 0:29:55.890
<v Speaker 2>good Florida's been.

0:29:55.910 --> 0:29:58.810
<v Speaker 3>Nashville is never a slouch when it comes to playing

0:29:58.830 --> 0:29:59.310
<v Speaker 3>the Penguins.

0:29:59.550 --> 0:30:00.990
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got Utah again.

0:30:01.390 --> 0:30:04.610
<v Speaker 3>Then you have to go to Montreal before hosting Vegas

0:30:04.650 --> 0:30:08.170
<v Speaker 3>and Boston. So going into November, I mean, if you

0:30:08.190 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 3>were just on paper going to plot this out based

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.940
<v Speaker 3>on what we've seen from them, yes, they've been surprising

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 3>enough over the years that they could go and just

0:30:15.260 --> 0:30:17.620
<v Speaker 3>rip off a number of wins in a row. you

0:30:17.660 --> 0:30:19.930
<v Speaker 3>might see them picking up, what, maybe another one or

0:30:20.010 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 3>two wins before the month of November starts here, based

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.930
<v Speaker 3>on how the schedule's laid out. I don't like the

0:30:26.010 --> 0:30:29.729
<v Speaker 3>constantly revolving lines. That's been a problem for me. Dan

0:30:29.790 --> 0:30:31.990
<v Speaker 3>Mews is kind of tinkered with the lineup night in

0:30:32.030 --> 0:30:35.390
<v Speaker 3>and night out, either due to injuries, performance, or whatnot,

0:30:35.430 --> 0:30:37.090
<v Speaker 3>just kind of changing things up that way.

0:30:37.530 --> 0:30:39.450
<v Speaker 2>The goaltending has been ho-hum.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.180
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that they've been able to get a

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.180
<v Speaker 3>key save in some of these games. The last really

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:49.180
<v Speaker 3>outstanding performance that they got was probably Marishev against Columbus.

0:30:49.610 --> 0:30:52.450
<v Speaker 3>And that was still a shootout loss back on October 9th.

0:30:52.530 --> 0:30:55.209
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot not to like there. And the

0:30:55.250 --> 0:30:57.969
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing statistically that has jumped out at me with

0:30:57.990 --> 0:31:00.690
<v Speaker 3>this Penguins team, Tim, is their inability to win big

0:31:00.750 --> 0:31:04.170
<v Speaker 3>face-offs too. That's been a really big problem going through

0:31:04.210 --> 0:31:07.010
<v Speaker 3>this season. Sidney Crosby has taken the bulk of them.

0:31:07.510 --> 0:31:09.810
<v Speaker 3>And on the year, he has won 52.8% of his draws.

0:31:09.890 --> 0:31:11.750
<v Speaker 2>But as a team, they're winning 44.6% of their draws today.

0:31:16.190 --> 0:31:19.500
<v Speaker 3>Their power play face-off percentage, which it got a little

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.220
<v Speaker 3>bit better with just this last game, the last couple

0:31:22.260 --> 0:31:24.500
<v Speaker 3>games when they scored a couple power play goals. is

0:31:24.540 --> 0:31:28.980
<v Speaker 3>still only at 49.1. The defensive zone draws are down

0:31:29.380 --> 0:31:32.410
<v Speaker 3>to 40.2. So they're not taking possession of the puck

0:31:32.450 --> 0:31:36.250
<v Speaker 3>when it's dropped, and they've had trouble gathering it and

0:31:36.290 --> 0:31:39.050
<v Speaker 3>getting their feet under them in those situations. So they've

0:31:39.090 --> 0:31:40.510
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of work to do as a group

0:31:40.530 --> 0:31:42.950
<v Speaker 3>to get themselves on track with a tough schedule lying ahead.

0:31:43.190 --> 0:31:46.930
<v Speaker 1>Brian Metzer, Pittsburgh Penguins Radio Network. On the broadcast tonight,

0:31:47.550 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Florida Panthers in town. You can listen to the

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.500
<v Speaker 1>game on 105.9 The X. Thursday night hockey at PPG

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Paints Arena. Be listening for puck drop at 7 on

0:31:57.180 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the X. Mets, you brought up Crosby in the face-off circle,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.090
<v Speaker 1>slightly above average for him there.

0:32:03.350 --> 0:32:04.410
<v Speaker 4>What about the rest of his game?

0:32:06.790 --> 0:32:09.750
<v Speaker 2>It's rounding into form, I would say, a little bit.

0:32:10.010 --> 0:32:12.070
<v Speaker 3>It started slow this year, and I don't know if

0:32:12.150 --> 0:32:16.140
<v Speaker 3>it had to do with the uh shortened training camp

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:17.790
<v Speaker 3>i mean there was a lot of people talking about

0:32:17.810 --> 0:32:20.610
<v Speaker 3>that that could have been the situation but for me

0:32:20.850 --> 0:32:23.530
<v Speaker 3>you know he's looked a little bit more sydney crosby

0:32:23.630 --> 0:32:26.690
<v Speaker 3>like in the past week or so uh he has

0:32:26.730 --> 0:32:28.950
<v Speaker 3>had you know his line changing a little bit nick

0:32:28.990 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 3>robertson came off brian rush jumped back up there he

0:32:31.900 --> 0:32:33.380
<v Speaker 3>had to leave the game the other night so it'll

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 3>be interesting to see if that stays if he plays

0:32:35.660 --> 0:32:38.620
<v Speaker 3>or not uh chinikov was there which i thought for

0:32:38.660 --> 0:32:41.340
<v Speaker 3>at least two periods the That just kind of stunted

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.220
<v Speaker 3>Sid because they already proved last year that that wasn't

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.310
<v Speaker 3>a great look. I was surprised to see Dan Mews

0:32:46.350 --> 0:32:50.490
<v Speaker 3>do it. Chinnikov didn't really fit in there. He finally

0:32:50.510 --> 0:32:52.190
<v Speaker 3>scored a goal the other night, though, we should mention.

0:32:52.550 --> 0:32:56.460
<v Speaker 3>But overall, I think Sid putting together four points in

0:32:56.500 --> 0:32:58.580
<v Speaker 3>his last four games, even.

0:32:58.460 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Though he didn't score. in the Utah game.

0:33:00.900 --> 0:33:03.060
<v Speaker 3>He probably came close to scoring a goal in the

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.860
<v Speaker 3>waning moments, if not for the aforementioned Ben Kindle, Tim,

0:33:07.180 --> 0:33:09.850
<v Speaker 3>knocking a puck that if he lets it get to Sid,

0:33:09.940 --> 0:33:11.910
<v Speaker 3>it probably finds its way to the back of the net.

0:33:12.210 --> 0:33:14.330
<v Speaker 2>And I think his post-game commentary spoke to that.

0:33:14.690 --> 0:33:16.930
<v Speaker 3>But I think he's been a little better lately, still

0:33:17.010 --> 0:33:19.750
<v Speaker 3>not quite himself, still not shooting the puck enough. He's

0:33:20.150 --> 0:33:23.540
<v Speaker 3>had the last handful of games, it's one shot, two

0:33:23.580 --> 0:33:25.620
<v Speaker 3>games with two shots, and then he's had just one

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.980
<v Speaker 3>shot in each of his last two games. He's got

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 3>to put more pucks to the net hopefully get a

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.700
<v Speaker 3>little continuity with his line mates it will help him

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.180
<v Speaker 3>if ricard raquel sticks with him and gets himself going

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 3>because he finally got on the board the other night

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 3>getting him on a goal scoring track here will be

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.500
<v Speaker 3>a good thing because he missed so many so many

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>beautiful opportunities to this point in the season where he

0:33:46.300 --> 0:33:48.260
<v Speaker 3>was fed like a bear at the zoo and wasn't

0:33:48.300 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 3>able to put it into the.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Net what do you make it of the blue line.

0:33:52.620 --> 0:33:54.979
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's a whole other that's a whole other.

0:33:54.820 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Whole other kettle of fish as mike lang might say.

0:33:58.050 --> 0:34:01.030
<v Speaker 3>Yes, definitely a whole other kettle of fish. I think

0:34:02.090 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Declan Carlisle, that experiment is maybe coming to an end.

0:34:07.580 --> 0:34:08.899
<v Speaker 2>He was a little bit better the other night.

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:13.900
<v Speaker 3>They changed the pairings last game, but him with Carlson

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 3>was not a good look. He had Carlisle with Korczak

0:34:17.540 --> 0:34:21.009
<v Speaker 3>the other day. That was kind of iffy. Soloviev back

0:34:21.050 --> 0:34:23.230
<v Speaker 3>in the lineup. He's good and bad. He turns the

0:34:23.270 --> 0:34:25.549
<v Speaker 3>puck over a little too much when he does get

0:34:25.570 --> 0:34:28.650
<v Speaker 3>the chance to play. I think Spencer Stastny was one

0:34:28.670 --> 0:34:31.110
<v Speaker 3>of the better defensemen they've had now since he arrived

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:31.740
<v Speaker 3>in Pittsburgh.

0:34:32.090 --> 0:34:34.299
<v Speaker 2>And he's still not quite the world burner you need

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:34.739
<v Speaker 2>him to be.

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:38.460
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of, if he doesn't make mistakes, you're happy.

0:34:38.500 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think he hasn't made mistakes. But as a group, Tim, they.

0:34:41.980 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Just turned the puck over so much.

0:34:44.100 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Problems getting it out of their own zone, problems breaking

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 3>it out. And the Carlisle specifically has turned over two

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>or three pucks right around his own net, and most

0:34:53.540 --> 0:34:56.109
<v Speaker 3>of them ended up in the cage. So that's just

0:34:56.140 --> 0:34:57.370
<v Speaker 3>something you cannot do.

0:34:57.489 --> 0:34:59.469
<v Speaker 2>So they have a lot of work to clean up

0:34:59.550 --> 0:35:00.229
<v Speaker 2>that blue line.

0:35:00.690 --> 0:35:02.970
<v Speaker 3>And the big news is you may not have Sam Gerrard,

0:35:03.290 --> 0:35:05.739
<v Speaker 3>who also was injured now. He looked to be in

0:35:05.780 --> 0:35:07.500
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pain when he left the ice the

0:35:07.540 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 3>other night and whenever he went into the boards hard.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.460
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure what this blue line is even

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.140
<v Speaker 3>going to look like here in the next couple of weeks,

0:35:17.219 --> 0:35:19.380
<v Speaker 3>if there's going to be any moves afoot. If you're

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.819
<v Speaker 3>going to bring up any of the young guys, you

0:35:20.860 --> 0:35:23.900
<v Speaker 3>have Pickering and Brunick and Wilks that look like they

0:35:23.940 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 3>are ready to take the jump to the National Hockey League,

0:35:26.100 --> 0:35:28.509
<v Speaker 3>at least to see how they would fare. But you

0:35:28.550 --> 0:35:30.609
<v Speaker 3>don't really have roster spots based on all the names

0:35:30.650 --> 0:35:33.150
<v Speaker 3>we just ran through to get him up here. And

0:35:33.370 --> 0:35:36.089
<v Speaker 3>you also have Van Riemsdyk, who's getting himself healthy. He

0:35:36.140 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 3>was a nightmare at the end of his last couple games.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>He was a big culprit in terms of turning the

0:35:41.420 --> 0:35:44.180
<v Speaker 3>puck over as well. So just as a group, they

0:35:44.219 --> 0:35:45.990
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of work to do. And I think

0:35:46.030 --> 0:35:48.250
<v Speaker 3>that they are as big a reason why the team

0:35:48.290 --> 0:35:51.370
<v Speaker 3>has struggled lately as anybody else, that group of defensemen.

0:35:51.900 --> 0:35:54.780
<v Speaker 4>Finally, Matt, real quick here, final 30 seconds.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Murashov, what are you seeing from him that has led

0:35:57.460 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to some of his struggles since that Columbus game?

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.650
<v Speaker 3>It's shocking because he answered that great performance against Columbus

0:36:03.690 --> 0:36:04.890
<v Speaker 3>that we talked about with.

0:36:05.910 --> 0:36:08.230
<v Speaker 2>A couple duds, and he still makes the big saves.

0:36:08.270 --> 0:36:11.380
<v Speaker 3>He's still good positionally, but he's getting beat by some

0:36:11.430 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 3>clean shots, and I don't know why that is.

0:36:13.380 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 2>If it's just a.

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Positional thing, if he's got something in his vision or what,

0:36:17.980 --> 0:36:19.500
<v Speaker 3>I still think he's going to be very good. He

0:36:19.820 --> 0:36:21.859
<v Speaker 3>has had his moments in these games, but his last

0:36:21.900 --> 0:36:24.380
<v Speaker 3>two starts have left a lot to be desired, and

0:36:24.420 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not as if Shilos has really just taken the

0:36:26.980 --> 0:36:29.500
<v Speaker 3>ball and run with it either, but I was disappointed

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 3>to see how Murshov answered the performance in Columbus. I

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>thought that was going to be a welcome to the

0:36:34.940 --> 0:36:37.859
<v Speaker 3>league moment. And unfortunately, he took a couple steps back.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 3>But all of what we just talked about with the

0:36:40.060 --> 0:36:42.390
<v Speaker 3>poor play in front of him has also added to that.

0:36:42.750 --> 0:36:45.290
<v Speaker 3>Teammates not doing him any favors in terms of the

0:36:45.310 --> 0:36:48.390
<v Speaker 3>coverage defensively or turning the puck over in front of him.

0:36:49.150 --> 0:36:49.870
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate it, Mets.

0:36:51.010 --> 0:36:51.770
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, my friend.

0:36:51.790 --> 0:36:53.709
<v Speaker 3>I look forward to seeing you down at the rink,

0:36:53.830 --> 0:36:56.990
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure it will be a pretty raucous affair

0:36:57.110 --> 0:36:58.140
<v Speaker 3>against the Florida Panthers.

0:36:58.420 --> 0:37:01.819
<v Speaker 1>Brian Metzer, Pittsburgh Penguins Radio Network. Hockey Night Show coming

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:06.180
<v Speaker 1>up at 5.30. Steelers Saints News as well. Also, Kyle Dubas,

0:37:06.489 --> 0:37:09.469
<v Speaker 1>not on Evgeny Malkin. Coming up at the 5 o'clock hour,

0:37:09.469 --> 0:37:15.300
<v Speaker 1>105.9 The X. Brought to us by People's Natural Gas,

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.740
<v Speaker 1>reminding you to call 811 before you dig. Even landscaping

0:37:19.780 --> 0:37:27.169
<v Speaker 1>work requires you to call 811. More info at peoples-gas.com. Yeah,

0:37:27.190 --> 0:37:30.350
<v Speaker 1>just expanding a little bit on that conversation with Brian Metzer.

0:37:31.450 --> 0:37:33.430
<v Speaker 4>Looking at the Metropolitan, how about that?

0:37:33.590 --> 0:37:37.660
<v Speaker 1>Sully, 6-0 at home, second place in the Metro with

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:38.220
<v Speaker 1>the Rangers.

0:37:38.750 --> 0:37:39.989
<v Speaker 4>And that was the big thing last year.

0:37:40.010 --> 0:37:42.089
<v Speaker 1>They could never win at home, and they even got

0:37:42.130 --> 0:37:44.270
<v Speaker 1>that part somewhat figured out now. So that's going to

0:37:44.310 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to track from a Penguins perspective. If you

0:37:48.700 --> 0:37:50.900
<v Speaker 1>missed it earlier, let me give you the injury report

0:37:50.980 --> 0:37:55.580
<v Speaker 1>again for the Steelers. Ramsey upgraded to limited with his wrist.

0:37:55.980 --> 0:37:58.460
<v Speaker 1>Dowdle still at limited with his knee, which is a

0:37:58.580 --> 0:38:02.220
<v Speaker 1>different injury from the toe earlier. Skoranek out with his calf.

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.430
<v Speaker 1>Echols out with his hamstring. We kind of figured those two.

0:38:07.230 --> 0:38:09.930
<v Speaker 1>Elliott was a full participant for a second straight day,

0:38:09.950 --> 0:38:14.370
<v Speaker 1>so that's important. And that, to me, is encouraging. Highsmith,

0:38:14.410 --> 0:38:17.190
<v Speaker 1>he's got the groin problem limited, though. He didn't take

0:38:17.230 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>any step back today. Cam, rest, not injury-related, they say.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Didn't practice again today. And Watt, limited, so he didn't

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.300
<v Speaker 1>practice yesterday. He did practice today, but they've got a

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>calf injury now noted with his rest designation from Wednesday.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:35.620
<v Speaker 4>So that's something to keep an eye on.

0:38:36.219 --> 0:38:39.500
<v Speaker 1>Interesting stat from Matt Williamson as it relates to the

0:38:39.540 --> 0:38:44.500
<v Speaker 1>game on Sunday in Paris with the Steelers and Saints.

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:47.970
<v Speaker 1>I saw this in his Matt's stats that he always does.

0:38:47.989 --> 0:38:50.370
<v Speaker 1>We talk about it every week on Countdown to Kickoff.

0:38:50.410 --> 0:38:53.630
<v Speaker 1>Join us next week at the Saloon in Mount Lebanon,

0:38:53.650 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>6-8 on Wednesday. We're giving away tickets to the Steelers-Browns game,

0:38:57.860 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>which could be first place versus first place. First place

0:39:00.540 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on the line going into the bye for the Steelers, potentially,

0:39:02.820 --> 0:39:05.110
<v Speaker 1>if they take care of business against the Saints. And

0:39:05.130 --> 0:39:07.430
<v Speaker 1>the Browns do the same against the Titans, who just

0:39:07.450 --> 0:39:08.709
<v Speaker 1>got their first win last week.

0:39:09.590 --> 0:39:10.229
<v Speaker 4>But how about this?

0:39:10.690 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>For as much as we heard about Rodgers wanting to

0:39:14.180 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>be under center and as much as they have tried

0:39:16.340 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize the ground game over the last month, the

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:25.790
<v Speaker 1>Steelers currently rank 28th in the National Football League when

0:39:25.810 --> 0:39:28.390
<v Speaker 1>it comes to play-action usage. 28th.

0:39:29.230 --> 0:39:30.489
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't make any sense to me.

0:39:30.630 --> 0:39:30.950
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:39:31.810 --> 0:39:34.700
<v Speaker 4>Why, with the ground game going and with.

0:39:34.590 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>The inability to see receivers separate on a regular basis,

0:39:38.980 --> 0:39:41.259
<v Speaker 1>as we have seen so far in this season, why

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.460
<v Speaker 1>not use play-action to your advantage when you've got a

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.779
<v Speaker 1>veteran QB that's capable of doing it? Now, I get

0:39:46.820 --> 0:39:49.339
<v Speaker 1>it when you pass 17 times in a row, no

0:39:49.420 --> 0:39:51.620
<v Speaker 1>one thinks a run is coming, but that's why you

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.950
<v Speaker 1>got to stay more balanced. And the funny thing about

0:39:53.969 --> 0:39:58.130
<v Speaker 1>it is they're playing against New Orleans, who also, I believe,

0:39:58.630 --> 0:40:04.569
<v Speaker 1>only four teams, four teams have seen play action more

0:40:04.730 --> 0:40:07.790
<v Speaker 1>often than the Saints defense has. So that must tell

0:40:07.830 --> 0:40:10.390
<v Speaker 1>you that other offenses think that play action is the

0:40:10.430 --> 0:40:13.339
<v Speaker 1>way to go against New Orleans. The Steelers don't do

0:40:13.380 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it enough. New Orleans sees it a bunch. The Steelers

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>should be using it more often. I think it's very,

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:23.110
<v Speaker 1>very clear. That's a deep dive. He's sort of football

0:40:23.140 --> 0:40:25.890
<v Speaker 1>nerd stat, but it's one to keep in mind, especially

0:40:26.150 --> 0:40:28.490
<v Speaker 1>when you've got two different backs now with Dowdle back

0:40:29.070 --> 0:40:31.690
<v Speaker 1>and Warren being pretty hot as he was for the

0:40:31.730 --> 0:40:33.970
<v Speaker 1>first three games and then found a gear again in overtime.

0:40:34.489 --> 0:40:38.370
<v Speaker 1>They should use play action a lot on Sunday in Paris.

0:40:38.390 --> 0:40:38.450
<v Speaker 3>833-412-9939.

0:40:44.590 --> 0:40:49.190
<v Speaker 1>In 30 seconds, what we had today for the Penguins

0:40:49.630 --> 0:40:53.089
<v Speaker 1>was a press conference about one specific topic, and one

0:40:53.130 --> 0:40:56.549
<v Speaker 1>specific topic did not get brought up, which hopefully makes

0:40:56.610 --> 0:40:58.209
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Dubas feel a little bit better.

0:40:58.590 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk about that next on 105.9 The X.