Speaker 1: The Jesse Kelly Show. Let's have some fun on a Thursday.
Speaker 1: All we are so close to the end of the
Speaker 1: week you can smell it. And we're going to talk
Speaker 1: about a communist revolution. AOC's out there discussing something and
Speaker 1: it's so so helpful to discuss it. And in discussing it,
Speaker 1: we are going to discover why do democrats think and
Speaker 1: talk the way they think and talk with all the
Speaker 1: death threats and the white people are evil? As we
Speaker 1: walk through the mentality in the tactic behind it, we
Speaker 1: are going to learn a lot about the motivations, what
Speaker 1: drives these people, Why do they say and do the
Speaker 1: things they do. We're going to start out with that
Speaker 1: on the show. One hour from Now is part four
Speaker 1: of the Napoleon Invasion of Russia series. I am one
Speaker 1: hundred percent wrapping this thing up tonight, and it may
Speaker 1: be quick. I got all your emails about how you
Speaker 1: wanted to keep going and going. I can't do it forever,
Speaker 1: all right, So we'll wrap that up tonight. Part for
Speaker 1: the final part is that we're gonna talk about Look,
Speaker 1: you don't have to lie to me, just be honest.
Speaker 1: This is going to be about the Chief Justice GOP
Speaker 1: establishment types are mad about what happened in Indiana. I
Speaker 1: don't really care about these movements where people are being
Speaker 1: assaulted if they don't name who's doing the assaulting. All
Speaker 1: that democrats cheat in elections and so much more. Coming
Speaker 1: up tonight on the world famous Jesse Kelly's show, I
Speaker 1: want to begin here right here, actually with an email.
Speaker 1: It's an email. The subject to this one is malcontents
Speaker 1: and he says this, how is it that someone I'll
Speaker 1: use John Cougar Melloncamp as an example, was as successful
Speaker 1: as he was, had a beautiful wife and kids, could
Speaker 1: be a malecontent. He was one of my favorite musicians.
Speaker 1: Now he's filled with hate. He throws temper tantrums if
Speaker 1: someone in the crowd yells to play music instead of
Speaker 1: lecturing to the crowd. How does one become so filled
Speaker 1: with hate? And I'll combine that little email with this story.
Speaker 1: Mark Hamill. He's that guy who played Luke Skywalker in
Speaker 1: the Star Wars movies. The headline is Mark Hamill. Mark
Speaker 1: Hamill posts a photo depicting dead Trump just days after
Speaker 1: the assassination attempt. You can go look at it as
Speaker 1: some stupid AI cartoon where Trump's lying dead in a coffin.
Speaker 1: You know how it goes, Mark Hamill's cheering it on,
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. Okay, how do we get here?
Speaker 1: How's that possible? How are this many people so angry,
Speaker 1: violent and miserable? All right, well, there's there's a lot
Speaker 1: to this, but I want to play you something from AOC.
Speaker 1: I wind up playing it a couple of times, So
Speaker 1: don't worry if you don't. If you don't get it
Speaker 1: the first time, we're going to come back to it.
Speaker 1: AOC the communist is out there doing these interviews. When
Speaker 1: she said something today she's being mocked for, and yes
Speaker 1: it's mock worthy. Mock her all you want, but please
Speaker 1: listen to what she's saying and understand there is a
Speaker 1: tactic here that communists have been using forever, and how.
Speaker 2: Black Americans really created democracy in a structry that's exactly right,
Speaker 2: How they literally made something from nothing.
Speaker 1: What everyone's making fun of her today, what are you?
Speaker 1: What are you talking about? That's not even that's not
Speaker 1: even close to true. What black people created democracy in America?
Speaker 1: That's that's insane. There were all kinds of people who
Speaker 1: created What do you do with let me explain. Have
Speaker 1: you ever heard of the five black categories and the
Speaker 1: five red categories? You ever heard of that in your life? Okay,
Speaker 1: long time ago, China was a place that was divided up.
Speaker 1: There were various kings, and they were long dynasties. There
Speaker 1: were all these Chinese empires basically. Then those dynasties slowly
Speaker 1: but surely crumbled. Genghis Khan helped things along a little bit. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Those Chinese dynasties slowly crumbled. China became a land ruled
Speaker 1: by who had the most swords and shields at the time,
Speaker 1: war lords essentially, But this only lasts so long in
Speaker 1: a country. Eventually, China became a war, a civil war
Speaker 1: between the nationalists led by mostly Chang Kai Shek. You've
Speaker 1: probably heard of the name that's not important and Communist revolutionar.
Speaker 1: Of course you do know Maose Dung. If you've ever
Speaker 1: listened to this show, you were well aware of Maose Dung,
Speaker 1: one of the leaders. He wasn't the leader in the beginning,
Speaker 1: I should know, but well, just for simplicity's sake, Maose
Speaker 1: Dung the leader of the Communist revolution. All right, So
Speaker 1: if you are Mao, you don't have as many guns,
Speaker 1: you don't have as much wealth. The nationalist types at
Speaker 1: this time were more in control of the cities, the
Speaker 1: city areas. Rural China then and now is it's a
Speaker 1: very poor place, very very poor. The internet will show
Speaker 1: you videos of China and all you see are these
Speaker 1: mega cities and lights and fireworks and wow. You look
Speaker 1: at it and for five seconds and you say something
Speaker 1: stupid like there's so much more modern than we are. Yeah,
Speaker 1: go out to the countryside. You'll be horrified. Rural China
Speaker 1: was very poor back then too, and Mao he needed
Speaker 1: an army, he needed recruits, and so mal came up
Speaker 1: with this concept. You see, there were five red categories.
Speaker 1: Now what does that mean? Five red categories? Well, I'll
Speaker 1: read it this way. They were considered to be the
Speaker 1: social classes favored by the Chinese Communist Party, poor and
Speaker 1: lower middle peasants, workers, revolutionary soldiers, revolutionaries, cadres. A cadre
Speaker 1: is a party member that's in good standing. You know
Speaker 1: how I always tell you about you need an updated
Speaker 1: system membership card, always having to prove your loyalty. That's
Speaker 1: a cadre thing. Every time Jimmy Kimmel gets up and
Speaker 1: gives an unfunny joke insulting Trump. That's him trying to
Speaker 1: maintain his cadre status anyway. And finally, revolutionary martyrs people
Speaker 1: of course, who have died or lost family members on
Speaker 1: behalf of the communist cause. Now, who were those people
Speaker 1: as it pertains to the United States of America today,
Speaker 1: those are the people. They can get away with anything anything.
Speaker 1: They are going to get off scott free on crimes
Speaker 1: or get off with almost no punishment on crimes. Every
Speaker 1: time you see some street animal who's committed a thousand
Speaker 1: rapes and then he gets some DEI Communist judge and
Speaker 1: she tells him he's just had a rough upbringing and
Speaker 1: he's misunderstood. He needs ninety days of treatment, and she
Speaker 1: lets him go. The purpose of that is he's in
Speaker 1: one of the red categories. He's one of the favored groups.
Speaker 1: DEI itself the reason they love it so much. These
Speaker 1: are all the favored groups. It's been put into place
Speaker 1: in government across Corporate America. Corporate America will brag to
Speaker 1: your face that they are going to punish black categories
Speaker 1: and favor red categories. That's why you'll walk down the
Speaker 1: Jetway on Delta, and you'll see a poster on the
Speaker 1: side that says Delta has committed to hiring twenty percent
Speaker 1: women by next year. What are you talking about? You
Speaker 1: mean you're gonna You're gonna eliminate men from the jobs. Men,
Speaker 1: Men aren't qualified. What do you do well? Women are
Speaker 1: in the red categories, the favored men are in the
Speaker 1: black categories. Not favor anyway, that was the five red categories.
Speaker 1: There were five black categories as well. Now in China,
Speaker 1: these were landlords, rich farmers, counter revolutionaries, bad influencers. Isn't
Speaker 1: that hilarious because that can mean anybody and rightists that
Speaker 1: would be people like you and me. Now that doesn't
Speaker 1: directly mirror what democrats, what communists do today, but it
Speaker 1: pretty much does. You see, there are categories where you
Speaker 1: you are the bad guy no matter what, because you're
Speaker 1: in one of the bad categories. For instance, in this country,
Speaker 1: if you are a white male, a white male, you
Speaker 1: have something and I'm gonna steal Alvin Lewis's term. Alvin
Speaker 1: Louie's a really sharp guy. You know how we always
Speaker 1: use the term white guilt. He says, that's incorrect, and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna steal this from him from now on, he said,
Speaker 1: the term we should be using is white shame. Guilt
Speaker 1: means you did something wrong. Shame is an eternal category
Speaker 1: that you can never escape from, you can never atone for.
Speaker 1: If you are, for instance, a white Christian male in
Speaker 1: the United States of America, well you belong to one
Speaker 1: of the black categories. You see, you're one of the
Speaker 1: enemy groups to the revolution in you. You're the enemy
Speaker 1: of everything. There is no such thing as me, if
Speaker 1: I'm in a red category, being able to treat you unfairly,
Speaker 1: if you're in a black category, if I'm in a
Speaker 1: red category, if I'm one of the good guys, if
Speaker 1: I'm one of the revolutionaries, I can kill you, torture you,
Speaker 1: take away your job, steal your kids, burn down your home.
Speaker 1: You are deserving of every terrible thing. You're in the
Speaker 1: black category. Pal, and I have a license to do
Speaker 1: these things, not just the license of my conscience, a
Speaker 1: legal license to do these things because I'm in I'm
Speaker 1: in the good categories. Headline Virginia prosecutor declines to bring
Speaker 1: charges against a woman accused of threatening Stephen Miller. Stephen
Speaker 1: Miller's in the black category. The death threat guy in
Speaker 1: the red. It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a
Speaker 1: wonderful Thursday, and I forgot to tell you. Remind you
Speaker 1: that tomorrow tomorrow is asked doctor Jesse Friday, pour your
Speaker 1: questions onto me. All three hours belong to you tomorrow,
Speaker 1: as they always do. Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com.
Speaker 1: Get your questions emailed in now. They are already coming
Speaker 1: in hot and heavy, because you know, the routine doesn't
Speaker 1: even have to be political. Ask me editing. We'll chop
Speaker 1: away at those for three hours tomorrow. Back to what
Speaker 1: we were discussing AOC.
Speaker 2: What now, black Americans really created democracy in as freshery.
Speaker 2: That's exactly right, how they literally made something from nothing.
Speaker 1: I mentioned MAO had the five bad categories and five
Speaker 1: good categories. And if you belong to the good categories,
Speaker 1: you could do no wrong. You'd be offered legal protection,
Speaker 1: better job status, everything you can imagine. And if you
Speaker 1: belong to the bad categories, the black categories he called them, well,
Speaker 1: there was nothing you could do. There was nothing you
Speaker 1: could do to escape the oppression, to violence, the terror
Speaker 1: that was coming your way. It was just things you
Speaker 1: couldn't even control. And here's another part of this. I
Speaker 1: want to drive home, just so you're not under the
Speaker 1: impression that their tactics have changed. MAW very very effectively
Speaker 1: use the different races and ethnicities inside the borders of
Speaker 1: China to accomplish this goal. It is common for Americans
Speaker 1: because we don't often know a bunch of things about
Speaker 1: other countries. It's not because we're dumb, we just don't
Speaker 1: learn that stuff. It's common for Americans to think that
Speaker 1: everyone in China is just Chinese, right, It's all one big,
Speaker 1: one big group Chinese people. China is an unbelievably old place.
Speaker 1: I already mentioned all the different dynasties and rulers and
Speaker 1: regions and things like that, unbelievably diverse geography there, the
Speaker 1: mountain people that China has and has had, all kinds
Speaker 1: of different tribes and ethnicities and things that you would
Speaker 1: consider different races. I realize as Westerners they all look
Speaker 1: the same to us, but all kinds of different ones.
Speaker 1: And how effective is it if you're a Mau and
Speaker 1: you walk into a village and maybe these people, maybe
Speaker 1: they don't feel like they've been given a fair shake.
Speaker 1: Or even better, here's even better, if your mouth. What
Speaker 1: if this ancient tribe you just walked into. What if
Speaker 1: what if they have an axe to grind with that
Speaker 1: tribe over there? What if it's even legitimate, there's real
Speaker 1: historical atrocities, legitimate things there. Well, what that tribe becomes
Speaker 1: They become the ultimate recruiting center for you because you
Speaker 1: weaponize the mal contentment, you weaponize the grievance, you weaponize
Speaker 1: the desire for revenge, and you tell that tribe you're
Speaker 1: one of the good guys. You can do no wrong.
Speaker 1: I have your back, they can do no right. It's
Speaker 1: time to go set things right. Democrats in the United
Speaker 1: States of America have employed this tactic to.
Speaker 2: The mask there's a certain level of wealth and accumulation
Speaker 2: that is unearned.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: You can't earn a billion dollars.
Speaker 1: You just can't earn that. That's exactly correct. You can.
Speaker 2: You can get market power, you can break rules, you
Speaker 2: can do all sorts of things, you can abuse labor laws,
Speaker 2: you can pay people less than what they're worth. But
Speaker 2: you can't earn that right, and so you have to
Speaker 2: create a myth that since you didn't earn that, you
Speaker 2: have to create a myth of earning it.
Speaker 1: Rich guy over there, he's in one of those black categories.
Speaker 1: In fact, the fact that he is rich. Mao did
Speaker 1: the same thing with the landowners. The fact that he
Speaker 1: is rich, that is all the proof you need that
Speaker 1: he's in the black category. So if you want to
Speaker 1: go burn his house down, shoot him in the face,
Speaker 1: rape his wife, go ahead, steal all his stuff, go ahead.
Speaker 1: You deserve that, don't you understand? You deserve it. He
Speaker 1: doesn't deserve it. You have been attacked by him. You
Speaker 1: are the rightful heir to this country. He has stolen
Speaker 1: it from you. Mao preached that over and over again
Speaker 1: to all these different minority groups around China. This country
Speaker 1: belongs to you. You are the true heir to China.
Speaker 1: The land, everything, it should be yours. These other people
Speaker 1: they stole it. They stole it. You built it. The
Speaker 1: country actually belongs to you. Should we go hurt them?
Speaker 1: We are the good guys, after all, they are the thieves,
Speaker 1: the bad guys. Should we go hurt them? This mentality
Speaker 1: is spread throughout the Democrat Party. It has become so
Speaker 1: ingrained in the average everyday Democrat. This is just how
Speaker 1: they look at and think about everything, and none of
Speaker 1: them know what none of them know. They are participating
Speaker 1: in the five Black categories, the five red categories. They're
Speaker 1: participating in a communist tactic as old as time. I
Speaker 1: will finish this up in a moment. We'll get to
Speaker 1: a couple other things. Jesse Kelly show on a wonderful Thursday,
Speaker 1: as we near the end of the week. So we'll
Speaker 1: continue on just for a couple more minutes here on
Speaker 1: this thing, this thing that the communists have always done,
Speaker 1: and they've done it here in the United States of America,
Speaker 1: and it is what has led to so many Democrats
Speaker 1: being okay with violence, committing acts of violence, assassinations. The
Speaker 1: concept is quite simple. If you are in one of
Speaker 1: the favored classes, favored categories, you will be protected and
Speaker 1: provided for, and you can do no wrong. And in fact,
Speaker 1: you have an obligation to do wrong to the people
Speaker 1: in the unfavored categories. You should hurt them, you should
Speaker 1: steal from them, you should try to kill them. Communists
Speaker 1: have always operated in this way, and it's just their language.
Speaker 1: Now you hear this from Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 3: Extreme heat has to be viewed as one of the
Speaker 3: most dangerous results of the changing climate. And so what
Speaker 3: are we going to do about it. I mean, it
Speaker 3: is happening, and we know it's happening. While we race
Speaker 3: to find you know, big changes and transitions that have
Speaker 3: to go on, we have to worry about what's happening
Speaker 3: on the ground with so many millions of people, in
Speaker 3: particular women.
Speaker 1: What setting aside all the other commy goblygook in there
Speaker 1: this extreme heat and the climate's changing and everything else.
Speaker 1: And guess who's most uniquely at danger women because everyone
Speaker 1: knows men don't feel heat the same way. Well, all
Speaker 1: the truth is, this is how democrats have learned to talk.
Speaker 1: Women are part of the favored class. So of course,
Speaker 1: whatever the subject is you're bringing up, you have to
Speaker 1: bring it up in the context of this is why
Speaker 1: it's uniquely dangerous to you, and why you should go
Speaker 1: hurt people in the bad categories to try to make
Speaker 1: everything right. And it is it's become so ingrained in
Speaker 1: their way of thinking that I saw this article today.
Speaker 1: The headline is it's from NBC News Kamala Harris, you
Speaker 1: know Dome. She wants to DNC to release its autopsy
Speaker 1: report of the twenty twenty four campaign. It's this little
Speaker 1: background on this this happens all the time. After a
Speaker 1: political party loses a presidential race, that political party will
Speaker 1: pay some idiot political consultant millions and millions of dollars
Speaker 1: to sit down and work up a report, poll numbers,
Speaker 1: everything else and figure out, Hey, why did we lose.
Speaker 1: That's why it's called an autopsy. The body's laying there,
Speaker 1: let's cut it open, do some tests. Why is this
Speaker 1: guy dead? Why did we lose an election? And they
Speaker 1: dig into it, and Dome is asking the DNC to
Speaker 1: release it and so on. But if you skip down
Speaker 1: far enough in the article, it's a few pages in
Speaker 1: you get to this little gem. I want to remind
Speaker 1: you that it's not just that they think in these terms.
Speaker 1: He's in this category and she's in that category, and
Speaker 1: he's in that one, and she's in that one. It's
Speaker 1: not just that they think like this. It is so
Speaker 1: ingrained in their thinking. They are convinced that you think
Speaker 1: like this. Here's a headline, some even or not headline
Speaker 1: from the article. Some even whisper to one another that
Speaker 1: the party will be doomed in twenty twenty eight if
Speaker 1: it nominates another woman or another person of color after
Speaker 1: Harris and Hillary Clinton lost in the twenty twenty four
Speaker 1: and twenty sixteen elections to Trump. Think for a moment
Speaker 1: about how insane that is. Hillary Clinton is a historically
Speaker 1: bad political candidate. She doesn't have the charisma of her husband. Sure,
Speaker 1: she can win a Senate race in New York, which
Speaker 1: where she can basically buy a Senate seat in New York.
Speaker 1: But when it comes to running for president, you have
Speaker 1: to have national appeal. You know, Hillary Clinton was uniquely
Speaker 1: terrible in this regard. Dome probably topped Hillary Clinton as
Speaker 1: far as being a worse candidate for president for all
Speaker 1: the things we talk about all the time. Awkward, doesn't
Speaker 1: know anything about anything, No charisma, just seems out of place.
Speaker 1: You could sit down and talk for ten minutes about
Speaker 1: why Kamala Harris lost and why didn't work out for
Speaker 1: you can do the same thing for Hillary Clinton. The
Speaker 1: Communists looked and said to themselves, it's definitely because they're women.
Speaker 1: That was actually the problem. The problem is all these
Speaker 1: other guys thinking about the categories. You never thought about that.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm assuming you didn't. You certainly didn't care
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris had a darker complexion. What is she Jamaican,
Speaker 1: Chris Jamaican, an Indian. I don't whatever doesn't matter. That
Speaker 1: was nothing that mattered at all, That never even crossed
Speaker 1: my mind. Why would I give a crap. You didn't
Speaker 1: like that she was an idiot and a communist who
Speaker 1: was going to ruin everything, so that's why you bounced her.
Speaker 1: But to the communist who only thinks in the terms
Speaker 1: of these categories, it's everything. This is part of the
Speaker 1: reason I played this yesterday. I'll play it again. Who
Speaker 1: though it's that I wouldn't I'm a liar from your Rubio.
Speaker 1: And again, I like Rubio a lot. I'm really not
Speaker 1: trying a dog on him. But we have to set
Speaker 1: this society. Help for America is what it's always been.
Speaker 1: I think it's the hope I hope we all share.
Speaker 1: We wanted to continue to be the place where anyone
Speaker 1: from anywhere can achieve anything. That is exactly how you
Speaker 1: end up with an ethnic war inside the United States
Speaker 1: of America of warring tribes who are trying to campaign
Speaker 1: on racial grievances, where you get one people hating another people,
Speaker 1: that exact kind of thing. Anyone can come here and
Speaker 1: get rich. No, let's let's set that aside. Let's not
Speaker 1: do that anymore. Let's do some emails. Hey, Jesse, the
Speaker 1: subject to this one is Napoleon. I love your history stories.
Speaker 1: The word is not further the word. The word is farther.
Speaker 1: You cannot go fur Therefore you cannot go further, go
Speaker 1: far farther. You know that I went to community college? Right?
Speaker 1: Are you aware that I do not even have an
Speaker 1: associate's degree? What, Chris, how many years at community college?
Speaker 1: We're going to call it three three? Look? Years? Is
Speaker 1: such a it's such a subjective term. All right, we're
Speaker 1: going to call it three years plus No, not another
Speaker 1: year at Montana University plus another. We should probably call
Speaker 1: it a half year at Montana State University. Remember the
Speaker 1: very first semester at Montana State University, I got a
Speaker 1: zero point zero grade point average. I don't I don't
Speaker 1: know that you can consider yourself to have attended if
Speaker 1: you don't get any grades. You realize that's the university
Speaker 1: telling you you pretty much weren't here. That's that's what
Speaker 1: they're saying. So we'll call it a half year there,
Speaker 1: a half year either way. I'm just a white trash guy.
Speaker 1: I'm going to mispronounce words. By this point in time,
Speaker 1: I think that's baked into the cake. Hey, doctor vest
Speaker 1: please do a full hour on the Napoleon Retreat tonight.
Speaker 1: Your history segments are awesome. That your true calling. Buddy,
Speaker 1: You're a pretty decent political guy, but the history segments
Speaker 1: are phenomenal. Keep the good work, okay, I am. I
Speaker 1: am thrilled that you have enjoyed the Napoleon Retreat from
Speaker 1: Russia history we've been doing, and as always, I'm always
Speaker 1: going to be working on another one. I'm not working
Speaker 1: on another one yet because I haven't decided exactly which
Speaker 1: route I'm going to go. I might start piecing together
Speaker 1: some sort of revolutionary war story, because I know our
Speaker 1: two hundred and fiftieth birthday is. It's a couple months away,
Speaker 1: but I think I might have time on that. I
Speaker 1: might try to work in another history story before that one.
Speaker 1: This is a long way of me saying I haven't
Speaker 1: made the decision yet, Okay, all right, I don't like
Speaker 1: being lied to and I don't believe in generalized victim campaigns.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about both these things. And just a moment
Speaker 1: is the Jesse Kelly Show on a fantastic Thursday. Member
Speaker 1: tomorrow is ask doctor Jesse Friday, and you need to
Speaker 1: get your questions emailed in right now to Jesse at
Speaker 1: Jesse kellyshow dot com. Before we get to I don't
Speaker 1: like being lied to and generalize victim campaigns. I have
Speaker 1: to address something horrible that Jewish producer Chris just said
Speaker 1: when we came back with that song ac DC long
Speaker 1: Way to the Top. Chris said, is this the only
Speaker 1: acceptable use of bagpipes? Do you seriously not like bagpipes?
Speaker 1: You don't find bagpipes to be soothing? You know what? What? Yes?
Speaker 1: I said bagpipes are soothing. You don't find that to
Speaker 1: be enjoyable. If you find yourself in the vicinity of
Speaker 1: a Saint Patti's Day parade and they're playing bagpipes, you
Speaker 1: don't like that? Are you serious? It makes you want
Speaker 1: to drink? You know there's something too there obviously is
Speaker 1: something to DNA and heritage. You know that I don't
Speaker 1: really know anything about my family's super ancient history background. Sorry,
Speaker 1: we're just not those kind of people. And I am
Speaker 1: curious in case you're wondering. But I also don't want
Speaker 1: the government receiving samples of my DNA, So I've never
Speaker 1: wanted to send in anything to those You know, DNA.
Speaker 1: We'll tell you about your great great grandpa things. I'm curious.
Speaker 1: I wish I could find out, but I can't find
Speaker 1: out without the government stealing my information. So I'm not
Speaker 1: going to do it now. That said, I understand that
Speaker 1: there's obviously some German in there. From my mom's side,
Speaker 1: I know that. And on my dad's side. My last
Speaker 1: name's Kelly. That's about as Irish as you can possibly get.
Speaker 1: So there's quite a bit of Irish in me somewhere.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's why. Maybe it's just ingrained in me, Chris,
Speaker 1: where I have a better ear for wonderful music and
Speaker 1: you you don't what, Chris? You like Polka? That is
Speaker 1: the lamest thing in the world. How are you? How
Speaker 1: are you always lame? Honestly?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 1: I want to move on. Chief Justice John Roberts says
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court doesn't have purely political actors. Let me
Speaker 1: explain something to you about trust, something we've talked about many,
Speaker 1: many times before. Trust is a thing that if you
Speaker 1: lose it, it doesn't come back overnight. It doesn't come back
Speaker 1: with an apology. It's not how it works at all.
Speaker 1: If trust is lost, any kind of trust, business, personal,
Speaker 1: government trust, If trust is lost, there's only one way
Speaker 1: to earn it back. There is I look, and honestly
Speaker 1: I wish there were other ways, easier ways. There is not.
Speaker 1: You have to be open about everything, not just apologetic.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Here's what I did, Here's what
Speaker 1: I lied about, Here's what this, here's what that. I
Speaker 1: am sorry. I am an open book. Ask me anything,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. You want to know this, I'll show you.
Speaker 1: I am an open book. I am sorry. Now. Even that,
Speaker 1: even that, it's not instant. Even with that, if trust
Speaker 1: can be earned back, it takes time. Depending on the
Speaker 1: level of betrayal or whatever we're talking about, it takes
Speaker 1: a certain amount of time to earn it back, no
Speaker 1: question about that. So to all these evil systems and
Speaker 1: all these institutions that have violated our trust over and
Speaker 1: over again, it blows my mind that they all consistently
Speaker 1: try to just lie and deny when trust has been
Speaker 1: violated over and over and over again. That is the
Speaker 1: exact opposite of how you earn back trust. That's how
Speaker 1: you make distrust worse. We see Kaitanji Brown Jackson in
Speaker 1: the things she says. We see these communist judges in
Speaker 1: the things they say, It's obvious to everybody these people
Speaker 1: are communist actors. We do not trust them at all,
Speaker 1: standing up in front of us and saying, hey, we
Speaker 1: don't have purely political people here. Come on, John, That
Speaker 1: makes it so much worse. It makes it so much worse.
Speaker 1: And I know John Roberts, I know he thinks he's
Speaker 1: protecting the institution. Institutions always do when they do this thing.
Speaker 1: Whenever they do this, they always think, oh gosh, we
Speaker 1: can't we can't admit we're wrong. Then the institution looks bad.
Speaker 1: We have to cover it up. We remember, remember when
Speaker 1: they leaked the Dobbs decision when Rovers's way got overturned,
Speaker 1: and we'd never had a major leak like that before
Speaker 1: ever in the history of the Supreme Court. And clearly
Speaker 1: one of the commed judges or one of the comedy
Speaker 1: judges clerks leaked it out there to try to get
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices killed and all the other horrible things
Speaker 1: that happen. And remember there was supposed to be because
Speaker 1: it was such an egregious violation of Supreme Court rules.
Speaker 1: It was supposed to be a major investigation where the
Speaker 1: Federal Bureau of Investigation combs through every single person's life
Speaker 1: until they find the person responsible and then they throw
Speaker 1: the book at them. So nothing like that ever happens again,
Speaker 1: And instead John Roberts, worried about the institution, said, you know, nah, no, FBI, no, Well,
Speaker 1: you know what we'll you know what we'll do. We'll
Speaker 1: handle this internally. Don't you love when they say that
Speaker 1: this is an internal matter, will handle it internally. Now, surprise, surprise,
Speaker 1: it got handled, and we never found the guy or girl,
Speaker 1: whoever it is. Now that distrust permanent. That person who
Speaker 1: leaked the last one probably still sitting there, probably ready
Speaker 1: to leak another one. These people who run corrupt institutions
Speaker 1: that have violated our trust, over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: they all do the same thing, and it's always the
Speaker 1: exact opposite of what they should do. They just keep
Speaker 1: lying more and covering up, and lying more and covering up,
Speaker 1: making the distrust deeper and deeper and deeper. If you
Speaker 1: want to earn trust back, honesty, over and over and
Speaker 1: over again, open the book's openness, over and over and
Speaker 1: over again. That is how trust. It is the only
Speaker 1: way how trust is slowly but surely earned back. That
Speaker 1: is a fact. Now we set aside politics, and I'm
Speaker 1: really genuinely honest, I have no idea how long it's
Speaker 1: going to take me. I do not think it will
Speaker 1: take me the whole hour we are going to finish
Speaker 1: up Napoleon's invasion slash retreat from Russia. Part four starts
Speaker 1: next