1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:04,000 Speaker 1: Hey, Michael, sorry about yesterday. I was stuck in meetings 2 00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: all day and didn't get to listen. Also, I can 3 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:11,200 Speaker 1: loan you five bucks towards this letter. Hope that helps. Also, 4 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 1: is this package that the Republicans are trying to use 5 00:00:14,360 --> 00:00:17,520 Speaker 1: to open the government the same one that was approved 6 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 1: under Biden thirteen times? Is that true? Or is that 7 00:00:20,920 --> 00:00:24,400 Speaker 1: just smoke? I'm being filled by my Republican leaders. 8 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 2: Help me out here driving Yeah, what. 9 00:00:32,880 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 3: I maybe this because I've been gone, I lost all 10 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 3: reference what she was talking about. 11 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:39,160 Speaker 4: Well, first off, she was going to offer you five 12 00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:40,800 Speaker 4: bucks for that spam letter to. 13 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,160 Speaker 5: Seek oh okay, to help you, oh for that letter 14 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:46,640 Speaker 5: r your your email? 15 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 4: Okay, right, yeah, And then she was curious about the 16 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:55,240 Speaker 4: budget bill. Supposedly that's something that the Democrats had already 17 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 4: passed prior many times before, and now they're not wanting 18 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 4: to do it this time. 19 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 3: Yes, they've passed this exact same continue Continuing resolution numerous times, 20 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:11,080 Speaker 3: and now they don't want to because because they're because 21 00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:17,920 Speaker 3: they're idiots. Well they're all idiots. If you don't recognize 22 00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 3: that by now, you're not paying attention. I want to 23 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:25,679 Speaker 3: finish one more thing about about climate change, because you know, 24 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:27,720 Speaker 3: this is a this is a real bugaboo of mine. 25 00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:32,880 Speaker 3: The for years that inter Governmental Panel and Climate Change 26 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:38,120 Speaker 3: has asserted that human driven climate change Anthrobrginny climate change 27 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:41,720 Speaker 3: has led to accelerate a sea level rise. But when 28 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 3: you look at the real world data, it tells you 29 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 3: a different story. I'm Shoseiah, You're shocked, right, It's one 30 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:51,800 Speaker 3: that challenges the foundation of those claims. But first, what 31 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:55,520 Speaker 3: do they tell us about sea level rise? Let's go 32 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 3: to Eugene Robinson, he's over on MSNBC. I don't have 33 00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 3: the exact on this. It doesn't make any difference whether 34 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 3: it's ten years ago or ten minutes ago. It's it's 35 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 3: the same story. 36 00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:09,480 Speaker 6: Maybe we put infrastructure back on the top of the 37 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:11,679 Speaker 6: list and worry about a lot of these regions. 38 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 7: Well there's an idea. I mean, where we're going to 39 00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 7: start taking this seriously. We have a huge percentage of 40 00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 7: the US population that lives on or near a coast, 41 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:30,000 Speaker 7: especially the Atlantic and Gulf coasts, and those coasts suffer hurricanes, 42 00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:36,200 Speaker 7: big storms, and it's it's just inevitable. Climate change makes 43 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,600 Speaker 7: it worse because sea levels have risen back. 44 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 3: Even if you don't climate change makes it worse because 45 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 3: sea levels have risen. Is that? What did he mean 46 00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 3: that climate change has made the damage worse because sea 47 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 3: levels have risen. 48 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:49,200 Speaker 2: I don't know. 49 00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 3: But the point is sea levels rise, right, Well, yeah, 50 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 3: actually they do. 51 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 5: So there's really no story there, but he seems to 52 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 5: think that there is. 53 00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:01,239 Speaker 3: But what if I told you there there's no scientific 54 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,800 Speaker 3: evidence to suggest that the rate of seed level rise 55 00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:10,160 Speaker 3: has increased since the mid nineteenth century. Now again, I 56 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 3: don't deny climate change itself. I think the climate is 57 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 3: always changing and it's simply beyond our control. All we 58 00:03:17,680 --> 00:03:20,840 Speaker 3: can do is mitigate against whatever Mother Nature is throwing 59 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 3: at us. You know, I found it funy moth shizam. 60 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 3: CNN is doing it right now. I still am putting 61 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 3: off my discussion about this hurricane season because I kept thinking, well, 62 00:03:33,440 --> 00:03:35,360 Speaker 3: there'll be a big ass hurricane. Well I guess what 63 00:03:35,400 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 3: there is. There's a big ass hurricane. It's not going 64 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 3: to change my story because the big ass hurricane, which 65 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 3: CNN seems to be covering Wall the Wall, is headed 66 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 3: out to the Atlantic. Yeah, Jamaica, Bermuda. They might be 67 00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 3: in the path, but it's not going to hit the coast. 68 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 3: You know, we might get some bands of rain or something, 69 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:56,560 Speaker 3: but it's not catastrophic. 70 00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:00,000 Speaker 5: The data simply. 71 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 3: Show that the pace of rising seas has not expected 72 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 3: what would be expected in the absence of human induced 73 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 3: climate change. Now it's a crucial distinction, and it's well 74 00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:18,120 Speaker 3: known among top scientists, some of who have chosen critics 75 00:04:18,160 --> 00:04:25,040 Speaker 3: say to intentionally mislead the public for years. A comprehensive 76 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 3: study released last month broke new ground because it analyzed 77 00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:36,880 Speaker 3: global tide gauge records. Tide gauges provide the only the 78 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 3: only extended real world measurements that date back to the 79 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:45,920 Speaker 3: mid eighteen hundreds, and they're the only ones that can 80 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:52,359 Speaker 3: accurately indicate whether c level rise has accelerated, decelerated, or 81 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:58,919 Speaker 3: remain somewhat steady. So following the publication of this new study, 82 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 3: the authors of the art started engaging in a prolonged 83 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,799 Speaker 3: dialogue more than fifty emails going back and forth among 84 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 3: the authors of the study. One of the authors is 85 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:15,080 Speaker 3: Robert Kupp. He's a leading sea level rise expert. That's 86 00:05:15,120 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 3: pretty narrow, isn't it. At Rutgers. He also had representatise 87 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 3: from the IPCC, NASA, and Noah. This correspondence, which they 88 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 3: did not expect to get out, but which did get out, 89 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:33,200 Speaker 3: revealed a surprising truth. Guess what that truth is. Key 90 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:37,920 Speaker 3: scientists have long been aware that they cannot have not 91 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:44,599 Speaker 3: conclusively concluded, conclusively proven and acceleration in sea level rise. 92 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:47,680 Speaker 3: Yet they keep maintaining that they can show that. 93 00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 4: So this. 94 00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:57,120 Speaker 3: This trove of emails offered for the public to see 95 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 3: and inside, look at how experts have misled journalists, they've 96 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 3: misled policy makers, and they've misled you and me. Now, 97 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:10,839 Speaker 3: while some climate scientists previously previously have acknowledged the lack 98 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:15,800 Speaker 3: of supporting real world data, the reason these emails are 99 00:06:15,839 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 3: important is because the revelations come as headlines about climate 100 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:24,919 Speaker 3: fuel disasters are overshadowing the debate on sea levels. But 101 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:29,520 Speaker 3: since the nineteen nineties predictions about catastrophic sea level rise, 102 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:33,920 Speaker 3: that's been an integral part about climate change, and it's 103 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 3: also been shaping the media and narratives. What the cabal 104 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:42,719 Speaker 3: tells us and that therefore informs the policy foretests for 105 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 3: adaptation costs. But here's the clincher. The evidence not only 106 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:53,240 Speaker 3: refutes the claims of acceleration, but it exposes the methods 107 00:06:53,279 --> 00:07:01,720 Speaker 3: that these scientists employed to actually willfully misrepresent the data. 108 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 3: According to the email exchange with Copp that's the professor 109 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 3: from Rutgers, there were three main tactics. First, the researchers 110 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 3: used complex modeling. Now we know that depending on its 111 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 3: underlying assumptions, you can show whatever you want to show. 112 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 3: You can show acceleration, deceleration, or you can show no 113 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:24,120 Speaker 3: change at all. So despite the fact that you have 114 00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:27,400 Speaker 3: more than one hundred and fifty years of actual tide 115 00:07:27,520 --> 00:07:31,880 Speaker 3: gauge data, negating the need for such models, nonetheless they say, well, 116 00:07:31,920 --> 00:07:36,200 Speaker 3: let's model it instead. Now, which would you trust more 117 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 3: a model that crap in, crap out, or let's go 118 00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 3: look with our own eyes. Let's see what the written 119 00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 3: historical record of the tide gauge's show, and that'll indicate 120 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 3: to us from you know, the mid eighteen hundreds through 121 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:56,600 Speaker 3: twenty twenty five, has there really been any change? That's 122 00:07:56,600 --> 00:08:00,680 Speaker 3: the first problem. That's the first I would say, aha 123 00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 3: that these professors have yet to address. Now, of course 124 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:11,400 Speaker 3: neither is NASA, Noah or the IPCC. Second, alternative indirect 125 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:18,360 Speaker 3: measurements get presented as substitutes for tide gage data. Why 126 00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 3: would you do that. You've got real world data, but 127 00:08:23,080 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 3: alternative and indirect measurements get substituted for the actual data, 128 00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:33,280 Speaker 3: selectively highlighting those that suggest acceleration, and they admit that 129 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 3: in the emails. Third, scientists sometimes focused on short term 130 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:43,720 Speaker 3: data sets, notably satellite records that span just a thirty 131 00:08:43,800 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 3: year period. To us, think, think about it this way. 132 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 3: You're looking at a data set from let's just say 133 00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 3: eighteen hundreds. Let's just say from eighteen hundred to twenty 134 00:08:53,200 --> 00:09:01,839 Speaker 3: twenty five, and you've got a measurement. Let's say that 135 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:06,440 Speaker 3: that eighteen hundred to twenty twenty five is one yard 136 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:10,280 Speaker 3: three feet, and you've got a measurement that's six inches 137 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:13,120 Speaker 3: half a foot. So depending on where you put that 138 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 3: half foot or if you extend the half foots let's 139 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:23,440 Speaker 3: say from eighteen ninety three to nineteen thirty three. Oh, 140 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 3: that shows what we need, so you pick that. 141 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 5: That's what they were doing. 142 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:35,400 Speaker 3: They were selectively focusing on short term data sets where 143 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 3: they could get the conclusion that they wanted. And then 144 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:41,800 Speaker 3: they wonder why we you know, we're told to trust 145 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:48,880 Speaker 3: the science. I've become very skeptical of science. I want 146 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:51,280 Speaker 3: to know your methodology. I want to I want to 147 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:54,440 Speaker 3: see it peer reviewed. I want to see your correspondence. 148 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:56,600 Speaker 3: I want to see the whole kitten kaboodle. I want 149 00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 3: to see everything that you've done, because like here, the 150 00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:03,600 Speaker 3: publisher report, oh, we've got serious sea level rise problems, 151 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 3: and then we find their emails and we find out, oh, 152 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:11,840 Speaker 3: they've cherry picked everything. I think this is a This 153 00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:16,679 Speaker 3: is indicative of a broader pattern where in rhetorical strategies, 154 00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 3: institutional pressures, the flow of the money for the grants 155 00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:27,600 Speaker 3: and the studies leads to misleading scientific claims. Now, CoP's 156 00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 3: the professor at Rutger, his expertise in the field, it's undisputed. 157 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:37,560 Speaker 3: But as the email exchange demonstrates, expertise alone does not 158 00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 3: create scientific evidence where no scientific evidence exists. This guy's 159 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 3: credibility ought to be shot, but it won't be because 160 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,240 Speaker 3: nobody will talk about the disclosure of the emails. So 161 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:54,760 Speaker 3: in the course of three days, over two dozen emails 162 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 3: were exchanged between Cop and these other people, and those conversations, 163 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:04,640 Speaker 3: eight public unedited, actually reveal the nuances of the debate. 164 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:08,560 Speaker 3: Early in the discussion, Cop cited a at least decade 165 00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 3: old study I'm not quite sure. It was at least 166 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:15,280 Speaker 3: ten years old, which shows that model results can vary 167 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:21,160 Speaker 3: widely based on input, method and assumptions. The peer reviewed 168 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 3: scientific literature acknowledges those variances, contrasting sharply with the IPCC's 169 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:36,120 Speaker 3: quote very high confidence, and there is acceleration in sea 170 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:36,839 Speaker 3: level rise. 171 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:40,760 Speaker 5: They're just lying to you. 172 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:45,320 Speaker 3: Imagine that a church, the church of the climate activists, 173 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:51,600 Speaker 3: actually lying to you. How can that church continue to exist? Oh, 174 00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 3: because it's really about control. It's not about what's really 175 00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:58,680 Speaker 3: going on with the climate. It's not truly understanding that. 176 00:11:58,880 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 6: Oh. 177 00:11:59,120 --> 00:11:59,920 Speaker 5: Yeah, you know what. 178 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 3: Sometimes the climate warms, sometimes it changes, sometimes the sea 179 00:12:03,240 --> 00:12:06,240 Speaker 3: level rises, sometimes it decreases. And so what we ought 180 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 3: to do is learn to mitigate against those changes over 181 00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 3: which we have no control. 182 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:14,679 Speaker 5: It. 183 00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:17,240 Speaker 3: And I know there's there's a cost benefit analysis to 184 00:12:17,240 --> 00:12:20,079 Speaker 3: be made, but I always think about it, and I remember 185 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:22,520 Speaker 3: specifically seeing this. There was a horrible tornado when I 186 00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:27,880 Speaker 3: was the undersecretary that hit in I forget whether it 187 00:12:27,920 --> 00:12:30,079 Speaker 3: was more or Midwest City, but it was somewhere in 188 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:35,400 Speaker 3: the Oblahoma City area, and neighborhoods were just destroyed. But 189 00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 3: some people survived that because they had built when they 190 00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:42,480 Speaker 3: had tornado shelter. Some had tornado shelters below ground, and 191 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:45,080 Speaker 3: some had safe rooms built in their house where they 192 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 3: didn't have a basement, and the house would be just 193 00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:50,120 Speaker 3: be demolished, but there would be this you know, ten 194 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:52,439 Speaker 3: by ten safe room or you know sixth bus sak 195 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 3: whatever they needed for their family that was still standing. 196 00:12:56,520 --> 00:12:59,959 Speaker 3: We stood a direct hint by a tornado. People say, 197 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:04,120 Speaker 3: lives that's mitigation, that's mitigating against the disaster. Now, if 198 00:13:04,160 --> 00:13:07,280 Speaker 3: you live in Tornado Alley, the expense of that might 199 00:13:07,320 --> 00:13:09,760 Speaker 3: be worth it. You might even get a little reduction 200 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:12,280 Speaker 3: on your insurance policy because they know they're going to 201 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 3: have to pay out on a life policy because you 202 00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 3: got wiped away as a human in that tornado. So 203 00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 3: it might help in terms of insurance. But again you've 204 00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 3: got to make a cost benefit of analysis. Is it 205 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:28,240 Speaker 3: worth it or not worth it? Some people have pressed this. 206 00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:35,840 Speaker 3: Professor from Rutgers Copp argues that other studies quote stand 207 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:40,280 Speaker 3: in contrast with the findings of the tide gauge analysis. Well, 208 00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 3: the critics are stressing that such phrasing falls short of 209 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:52,959 Speaker 3: directly disproving the tide gauge results and instead quote reflects 210 00:13:53,000 --> 00:14:00,200 Speaker 3: a tendency to privilege model based or indirect results. Two 211 00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 3: data sets. A data set that comes from modeling, a 212 00:14:04,840 --> 00:14:09,960 Speaker 3: data set that comes from real, live, human observation, written 213 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:14,960 Speaker 3: recordings of what we observed, what the gauges show. You know, 214 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:18,440 Speaker 3: a typical like a thermometer. It's got markings on it 215 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,200 Speaker 3: and you can see where it is, and you go 216 00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:22,360 Speaker 3: check it, you know, once a day or twice a day, 217 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 3: whatever they do to check get the gauges, and then 218 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:27,280 Speaker 3: you make a notation in a notebook or in a 219 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:31,280 Speaker 3: d in a database somewhere. So which would you trust? Well, 220 00:14:31,320 --> 00:14:33,480 Speaker 3: I want, I want the real world observation. I don't 221 00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:38,360 Speaker 3: want the modeling because again, crap in, crap out. So 222 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:42,360 Speaker 3: then this controversy starts to escalate, and it escalates five 223 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:45,520 Speaker 3: days after the email exchange when the professor and fifteen 224 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 3: colleagues called for the retract. So you got to give 225 00:14:49,560 --> 00:14:53,400 Speaker 3: the Rutger's professor at least some credit, some credit here, 226 00:14:53,840 --> 00:14:58,680 Speaker 3: because he and fifteen colleagues called for the retraction. But 227 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 3: guess what they called for the retract Not the modeling study, 228 00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:12,280 Speaker 3: but the tide gauge focused study. They allege methodological flaws 229 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 3: in the human observations. They trust the models more than 230 00:15:18,120 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 3: they trust what somebody looked at with their own eyes 231 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:24,280 Speaker 3: and made a record of. Now, if you go back 232 00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 3: to the eighteen hundreds, do you think they were anticipating 233 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,560 Speaker 3: that a century later that climate change might be a 234 00:15:32,560 --> 00:15:36,720 Speaker 3: big deal. So let's let's fabricate the numbers. No, I 235 00:15:36,760 --> 00:15:41,280 Speaker 3: don't think so. I don't think so at all. So, ultimately, 236 00:15:41,520 --> 00:15:45,880 Speaker 3: where are we? Ultimately, the tide gauge record remains clear, 237 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 3: there's no acceleration in the sea level rise. Now, other 238 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:54,120 Speaker 3: studies using alternative methods shorter timeframes, even those funded by 239 00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:58,160 Speaker 3: major agencies, do not change the conclusion drawn from the 240 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:04,760 Speaker 3: generations of direct human observation data. Manipulation is not limited 241 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:08,400 Speaker 3: sea level studies. Media outlets have been accused of cherry 242 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:12,200 Speaker 3: picking time periods for hurricane or heat wave records, or 243 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:16,600 Speaker 3: you know, gauge placement, the urban heat index effect. They 244 00:16:16,800 --> 00:16:20,840 Speaker 3: they're distorting all of this stuff. So, despite the claims 245 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:24,360 Speaker 3: that rising seas are going to decimate a tolls in 246 00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:30,880 Speaker 3: coastal cities, I wouldn't make a footnote here. Why do 247 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 3: the people have put money at risk to build condos? 248 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 3: Office buildings, anything else along Miami Dade County, along the 249 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 3: eastern seaboard, or for that matter, in Galveston or Houston 250 00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 3: or anywhere along the Pacific coast. Why do they continue 251 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:50,360 Speaker 3: to do that? Why do they continue to put money 252 00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 3: at risk if they think the sea level rise is 253 00:16:53,200 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 3: going to increase more rapidly than their ROI before they 254 00:16:57,640 --> 00:17:00,200 Speaker 3: get their money back on the investment they make. It 255 00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:04,080 Speaker 3: makes no economic sense whatsoever. It shows stupidity on the 256 00:17:04,119 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 3: part of the investors, on the part of the people 257 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:13,760 Speaker 3: who have made billions by carefully investing their money. The 258 00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:19,320 Speaker 3: recent research shows that most atoll islands have grown or 259 00:17:19,359 --> 00:17:23,720 Speaker 3: remained stable since twenty eighteen. And despite Congressman what's his 260 00:17:23,840 --> 00:17:28,040 Speaker 3: name from the Yahoo from Georgia who thought that Glam 261 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,200 Speaker 3: was going to tip over, Glam still hasn't tipped over. 262 00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:32,719 Speaker 5: And Guam. 263 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 3: I don't know that Glam specifically, but these atoll islands, 264 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:41,440 Speaker 3: like Guam have actually grown or remained stable. But despite 265 00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 3: all that evidence, experts predict that continued reliance on rhetorical 266 00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:51,680 Speaker 3: distractions and appeals to authority will maintain public belief and acceleration. 267 00:17:52,320 --> 00:17:53,840 Speaker 5: In other words, we've got. 268 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:56,879 Speaker 3: Your fooled will keep using this data, and despite the 269 00:17:56,920 --> 00:17:59,639 Speaker 3: emails getting disclosed, will just say, well, you know what, 270 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 3: if better to trust the models and not trust human observation, really, 271 00:18:05,760 --> 00:18:06,840 Speaker 3: line sacks and poop. 272 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 5: What we need to. 273 00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:15,879 Speaker 1: Do is just give these climatologists a swift kick and 274 00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:18,800 Speaker 1: the earballs. 275 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 3: Can I just say that, even though I had a 276 00:18:30,119 --> 00:18:35,080 Speaker 3: fairly rough weekend, just tense and you know, lots of 277 00:18:35,119 --> 00:18:39,320 Speaker 3: things to get done and busy and stuff with my mom, 278 00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:41,359 Speaker 3: I really. 279 00:18:41,119 --> 00:18:42,880 Speaker 5: Despise this audience. You know. 280 00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:45,159 Speaker 3: I thought i'd come back and you know, they'd be 281 00:18:45,200 --> 00:18:47,879 Speaker 3: welcoming and you know how you doing. I'd have you 282 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:50,480 Speaker 3: back all of that. But no, they're just a big 283 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:54,160 Speaker 3: glob of smart asses out there that, unfortunately I think 284 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:55,399 Speaker 3: are just a reflection. 285 00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:55,560 Speaker 5: Of you and me. 286 00:18:56,040 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 2: Earballs are going to become a thing. 287 00:18:57,760 --> 00:19:02,600 Speaker 3: Yeah they are. And night when you're you know, playing around, 288 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:04,560 Speaker 3: you'll now you'll think. 289 00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:07,120 Speaker 4: I'm gonna be yelling upstairs or downstairs to missus Redbeard 290 00:19:07,119 --> 00:19:08,719 Speaker 4: and is a use your ear balls? 291 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 3: I hate all of you. I just hate all of you. 292 00:19:19,600 --> 00:19:21,640 Speaker 3: Old Fetterman's up on the news. We know what he's doing. 293 00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:26,440 Speaker 3: Oh demn start breaking ranks over shutdown, showdown. We got oh, 294 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:30,920 Speaker 3: we got a little alliteration going the shutdown showdown. 295 00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:32,160 Speaker 2: The Schumer shutdown showdown. 296 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 3: There you go, see bingo, you should go right for 297 00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 3: Fox News. Let's see CNN. Family sues gaming platform roadblocks 298 00:19:41,560 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 3: over teen sons death. What's roadblocks? Am I culturally illiterate 299 00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:46,720 Speaker 3: on this one? 300 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:47,320 Speaker 5: Honest? 301 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:50,200 Speaker 2: I really don't know for sure, But you don't either. 302 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,320 Speaker 4: Think it's something similar to Minecraft where you can build 303 00:19:53,359 --> 00:19:54,680 Speaker 4: your own world. 304 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:59,200 Speaker 3: Oh okay, all right, I think okay, I'm so, I'm 305 00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:01,160 Speaker 3: sorry for the death of a sun for whatever reason. 306 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:03,720 Speaker 3: I'm sorry about that, but I'm ecstatic to know that 307 00:20:05,080 --> 00:20:08,360 Speaker 3: you don't know any more than I do. That makes 308 00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 3: me feel good. 309 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:10,600 Speaker 4: It's not one that I got into, and it's not 310 00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:11,680 Speaker 4: when my kids got into. 311 00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:13,600 Speaker 5: So I just just something fairly new then. 312 00:20:13,920 --> 00:20:15,679 Speaker 4: Now, I don't think I think it's been around as 313 00:20:15,720 --> 00:20:18,480 Speaker 4: long as like Minecraft, but it's just just breezed by 314 00:20:18,560 --> 00:20:19,120 Speaker 4: my family. 315 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:24,439 Speaker 3: Okay, well, well, considering your family, that's not surprising. So 316 00:20:25,040 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 3: you know a lot of things passed yourby. Then you get, 317 00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:34,960 Speaker 3: then you get then you get stuck here with me 318 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 3: and your earballs. 319 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 5: We know that you use the sheets to cover your earballs. 320 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:40,920 Speaker 5: That's that's the sad part. 321 00:20:40,920 --> 00:20:43,320 Speaker 2: They get cold, and they get cold. They just kind of. 322 00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:49,520 Speaker 3: So continuing on the same theme, not earballs, but the 323 00:20:49,520 --> 00:20:53,280 Speaker 3: same thing about we're being lied to think about this. 324 00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:56,360 Speaker 3: Now the sun's rising, it's now, you know, it's now 325 00:20:56,480 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 3: moved over to the broken blind so it's not quite 326 00:20:59,160 --> 00:20:59,960 Speaker 3: in my eyes again. 327 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:04,199 Speaker 5: The sun today will warm the. 328 00:21:04,600 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 3: Earth ups It's the sign that you know, God has 329 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 3: decided that he's not gonna send Christ back. We survived, 330 00:21:13,880 --> 00:21:16,840 Speaker 3: at least as of right now, we've survived another day. 331 00:21:17,720 --> 00:21:21,280 Speaker 3: And it'll help the plants grow. It'll you know, photosynthesis, 332 00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:22,640 Speaker 3: everything that goes on with the sun. 333 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:24,760 Speaker 5: Isn't that great. 334 00:21:26,080 --> 00:21:30,000 Speaker 3: Let me tell you about Stardust Solutions And no, it's 335 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:34,200 Speaker 3: not the old casino in Vegas. It's a geoengineering startup. 336 00:21:34,760 --> 00:21:40,600 Speaker 3: They've raised sixty million dollars fools, I don't know who 337 00:21:40,680 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 3: did it, sixty million dollars to develop technology that aims 338 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:51,440 Speaker 3: to dim the sun by spraying aero aerosol particles into 339 00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:56,080 Speaker 3: the atmosphere. It's this particular funding rent. This is their 340 00:21:56,119 --> 00:21:59,720 Speaker 3: first round of funding, is the largest ever for a 341 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:03,840 Speaker 3: cup in that sector. It includes investments from Silicon Valley 342 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:10,280 Speaker 3: figures and an Italian industrial dynasty. The CEO of the company, 343 00:22:10,760 --> 00:22:14,800 Speaker 3: Yanni Yevvob, a former is Raeli government physicist, explains that 344 00:22:14,840 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 3: their approach involves quote, solar radiation management. Now, the Sun 345 00:22:21,119 --> 00:22:27,280 Speaker 3: is this gigantic burning ball of gas that you know, 346 00:22:27,720 --> 00:22:32,680 Speaker 3: we send, We send little probes that will be destroyed 347 00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:36,680 Speaker 3: even before they hit the Sun from the intense heat. 348 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 3: And we're going to somehow engage in solar radiation management 349 00:22:45,560 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 3: in order to redirect the Sun's rays. Now, I'm not 350 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:56,240 Speaker 3: sure really what that. Just call me stupid, Just call me. 351 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:59,360 Speaker 3: I'm thinking with my earballs right now. Just think about this. 352 00:22:59,720 --> 00:23:03,280 Speaker 3: He acknowledge this would be that it would not entirely 353 00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:04,560 Speaker 3: eliminate climate risks. 354 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:05,600 Speaker 5: You think, So. 355 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:10,640 Speaker 3: How about we rephrase it? Instead of saying it will 356 00:23:10,640 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 3: not entirely eliminate climate risks, how about we say that 357 00:23:15,119 --> 00:23:15,760 Speaker 3: it's going. 358 00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 5: To create climate risks. 359 00:23:19,400 --> 00:23:21,840 Speaker 3: In a recent interview, he said, there will still be 360 00:23:21,920 --> 00:23:26,920 Speaker 3: extreme weather events, you think, because maybe the Sun's disappeared, 361 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:30,280 Speaker 3: or we're now manipulating where the sun rays, you know, 362 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:35,159 Speaker 3: where that those rays actually hit the Earth. Now, this 363 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:38,080 Speaker 3: is not like previous geo engineering efforts. You know that 364 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:42,359 Speaker 3: universities and nonprofits do. This is a private company. The 365 00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:45,240 Speaker 3: company claims that it's working on a proprietary particle. 366 00:23:47,119 --> 00:23:48,040 Speaker 5: We're going to send. 367 00:23:47,880 --> 00:23:52,119 Speaker 3: Particles into the air that's scalable, cost effective, And of 368 00:23:52,160 --> 00:23:56,960 Speaker 3: course they tell us it's safe. Yes, And I'm a 369 00:23:57,000 --> 00:24:02,919 Speaker 3: brilliant radio talk show host too, Yeah, safe, brilliant. He 370 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:05,399 Speaker 3: says that they aim to develop a particle as safe 371 00:24:05,440 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 3: as say flower, and they're seeking a patent for it. 372 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:16,560 Speaker 3: Is flower always safe? What if I pour flower into 373 00:24:16,640 --> 00:24:21,880 Speaker 3: your gas tank? What if I smash your head into 374 00:24:21,920 --> 00:24:25,920 Speaker 3: a bag of flower and hold it there, Yeah, you 375 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 3: can be dangerous. 376 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,320 Speaker 4: I'm just concerned that they're getting these ideas from the 377 00:24:29,359 --> 00:24:32,800 Speaker 4: Simpsons episode that aired in nineteen ninety five where mister 378 00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 4: Burns decides to block out the sun. 379 00:24:35,840 --> 00:24:37,640 Speaker 3: You know, I don't think i've ever seen Yeah, I've 380 00:24:37,680 --> 00:24:39,520 Speaker 3: heard you mentioned that one before, and I've never taken 381 00:24:39,520 --> 00:24:40,959 Speaker 3: the time to go look it up and watch it. 382 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, there's a whole thing because mister Burns, you know, 383 00:24:43,640 --> 00:24:47,439 Speaker 4: nuclear power plant owner new Killer new Celer just to 384 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:49,920 Speaker 4: try and piss that the other guy, right, So he 385 00:24:49,960 --> 00:24:52,800 Speaker 4: wanted to stop the solar power generation, so he put 386 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:56,320 Speaker 4: up a big giant shield to block out the sun, 387 00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:00,200 Speaker 4: so everybody would rely on new culer energy. 388 00:25:00,920 --> 00:25:02,960 Speaker 5: Wonderful. How did that work out in that episode? 389 00:25:03,040 --> 00:25:04,800 Speaker 2: Oh, Maggie shot mister Burns. 390 00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:07,879 Speaker 3: Oh okay, okay, all right, Maybe we should send an 391 00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:09,880 Speaker 3: email to this guy and just warn him that, you know, 392 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:14,240 Speaker 3: hey listen, or maybe this is a maybe he got 393 00:25:14,240 --> 00:25:15,840 Speaker 3: the idea from the Simpsons, I don't. 394 00:25:15,640 --> 00:25:19,000 Speaker 4: Know, thirty years old episode. Come on, hey, listen. What 395 00:25:19,119 --> 00:25:25,400 Speaker 4: goes around comes around? It plans to begin controlled outdoor 396 00:25:25,480 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 4: experiments is a way that they describe it. Come this spring, 397 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:33,720 Speaker 4: releasing particles from a modified plane at an altitude of 398 00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:40,320 Speaker 4: eleven miles now shockingly and I find this hard to believe. 399 00:25:40,800 --> 00:25:46,600 Speaker 4: But this concept has drawn some criticism, concerns over governance 400 00:25:47,640 --> 00:25:53,359 Speaker 4: and unknown risks, you mean, like the idea that now I. 401 00:25:53,359 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 3: Don't know whether I don't remember. I don't think this 402 00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:01,000 Speaker 3: guy actually is a US citizen. I think he's still Israeli. 403 00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:02,240 Speaker 3: But maybe it's the dual citizen. 404 00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:02,679 Speaker 2: I don't know. 405 00:26:04,160 --> 00:26:07,960 Speaker 3: But think about the international implications. So we're gonna throw 406 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:09,960 Speaker 3: or he's gonna go throw some stuff up in the 407 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:13,920 Speaker 3: air block the sun, and China's not gonna be worried 408 00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:16,359 Speaker 3: about that. South America's not gonna be worried about that. 409 00:26:16,440 --> 00:26:18,360 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think. I think when they say. 410 00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:24,119 Speaker 3: Creates concerns over governance, I would say masters are the 411 00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:26,480 Speaker 3: obvious and unknown risks. 412 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:30,359 Speaker 4: We're already concerned about putting aerosols into the air during 413 00:26:30,400 --> 00:26:30,960 Speaker 4: the eighties. 414 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:32,680 Speaker 5: I'm just thinking that the kid. 415 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:36,160 Speaker 3: I think the way to to really get this project 416 00:26:36,200 --> 00:26:37,920 Speaker 3: off the ground is to get a hold of the 417 00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:42,199 Speaker 3: Kim Trail people, those that you know, all the all 418 00:26:42,200 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 3: the Kim Trails, you know, like when they're landing at there, 419 00:26:44,800 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 3: they're they're they're flying over They're not they're not landing 420 00:26:47,359 --> 00:26:49,480 Speaker 3: at d i A. They're just going from you know, 421 00:26:49,880 --> 00:26:52,280 Speaker 3: they're they're going from Phoenix to Chicago, and they fly 422 00:26:52,359 --> 00:26:52,920 Speaker 3: over us, and. 423 00:26:52,920 --> 00:26:56,080 Speaker 4: Those guys are busy getting their tinfoil hats resized exactly. 424 00:26:56,960 --> 00:27:00,800 Speaker 3: Uh let's see, uh a, you know versus your Chicago 425 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,800 Speaker 3: professor David Keith has expressed doubts about the feasibility of 426 00:27:03,840 --> 00:27:08,480 Speaker 3: creating a particle superior to sulfates, which is what's currently 427 00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:12,200 Speaker 3: the common option used in geoengineering research. 428 00:27:13,200 --> 00:27:13,920 Speaker 5: Oh so now. 429 00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:16,119 Speaker 3: We're just upset because maybe this guy's coming over with 430 00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:20,480 Speaker 3: a new particle that's better than the old particle, and 431 00:27:20,520 --> 00:27:24,080 Speaker 3: then they question the startup's long term viability and the 432 00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:29,919 Speaker 3: role of private entities addressing global climate challenges. I found 433 00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:36,200 Speaker 3: that statement particularly hilarious because now I understand that climate 434 00:27:36,359 --> 00:27:39,520 Speaker 3: is obviously is not bound by any sort of geographical 435 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:44,000 Speaker 3: boundaries that we just artificially create. I get that, and 436 00:27:43,440 --> 00:27:48,119 Speaker 3: it's not even bound by actual geographical differences like you know, 437 00:27:48,240 --> 00:27:50,160 Speaker 3: oceans and land masses. 438 00:27:50,720 --> 00:27:51,440 Speaker 5: I get all of that. 439 00:27:51,680 --> 00:27:57,200 Speaker 3: But they're really upset because they're addressing something that really 440 00:27:57,240 --> 00:28:03,240 Speaker 3: ought to be left to Oh entities that address it 441 00:28:03,920 --> 00:28:07,640 Speaker 3: climate change, that address it, they get funded by governments. 442 00:28:07,760 --> 00:28:09,919 Speaker 3: We don't want no private sector people doing this. 443 00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:11,960 Speaker 5: No quote. 444 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:15,160 Speaker 3: They have convinced Silicon Valley venture capitalists to give them 445 00:28:15,160 --> 00:28:17,160 Speaker 3: a lot of money, and I would say that they 446 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:23,600 Speaker 3: shouldn't have according to climate economists Garna Wagner. Now, yet 447 00:28:23,680 --> 00:28:26,879 Speaker 3: VAB emphasize the developm would only occur under the clear 448 00:28:27,040 --> 00:28:34,639 Speaker 3: governance led by governments. I think he's full of particles. Yeah, 449 00:28:34,760 --> 00:28:36,240 Speaker 3: I think he's just full of particles. 450 00:28:37,400 --> 00:28:38,080 Speaker 5: I might. 451 00:28:40,200 --> 00:28:44,000 Speaker 6: Those trails coming out of jet airplanes high in the 452 00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 6: sky are called con trails short for condensation trails, because 453 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:55,840 Speaker 6: that's all they are. This condensation from the exhaust. 454 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 5: Bye, see, you're not a kim trailer. 455 00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:05,239 Speaker 2: I'm not sure if he's trying to be funny or not. 456 00:29:05,640 --> 00:29:09,680 Speaker 3: I know, I'm thinking he's really trying to be Seriously, 457 00:29:09,880 --> 00:29:13,080 Speaker 3: I'm talking about kim trails, because what's really going on 458 00:29:13,400 --> 00:29:17,000 Speaker 3: is United twelve forty seven flying overhead right now, and 459 00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:20,120 Speaker 3: you see that contrail behind it. That's not really a contrail. 460 00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:24,280 Speaker 3: That's a kim trail, and they only spray it over 461 00:29:24,360 --> 00:29:28,880 Speaker 3: Colorado because there's too many conservative people left in Colorado 462 00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:32,239 Speaker 3: and the chemicals eat our brains up. 463 00:29:32,600 --> 00:29:34,800 Speaker 2: I need to sharpen the point to my tinfoil hap 464 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:35,440 Speaker 2: you do. 465 00:29:35,560 --> 00:29:40,000 Speaker 3: I mean, and clearly he does too. I mean contrails. 466 00:29:40,640 --> 00:29:44,040 Speaker 3: I mean, who thinks that those are contrails? Come on, 467 00:29:44,200 --> 00:29:50,280 Speaker 3: they're kim trails. Kim trails, by the way, kim trails. 468 00:29:50,320 --> 00:29:55,360 Speaker 3: It's c h E M T r AI L s 469 00:29:56,080 --> 00:30:00,200 Speaker 3: one word, no hype and nothing's kim trails. So there 470 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:06,440 Speaker 3: are we even now? Uh cream out cream aldul jabbar cream. 471 00:30:06,560 --> 00:30:11,640 Speaker 3: Jean Pierre is that with her book called Independent, Well, 472 00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:14,479 Speaker 3: there's a joke right there. Independent A look inside a 473 00:30:14,480 --> 00:30:17,040 Speaker 3: broken white house outside the party lines. 474 00:30:17,760 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 2: Wow? 475 00:30:18,600 --> 00:30:20,600 Speaker 5: Is it Jake Tapper Jr. 476 00:30:20,680 --> 00:30:21,880 Speaker 2: Let's let's observe. 477 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,560 Speaker 3: How the White House is broken, but not say anything, 478 00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:27,240 Speaker 3: and then when we leave, or instead of leaving because 479 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:29,560 Speaker 3: it is broken, let's just stick around so we can 480 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:34,640 Speaker 3: write a book. Well, I guess what the Washington Post. Yeah, 481 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:38,440 Speaker 3: the Washington Post. Now, not like some little town in 482 00:30:38,920 --> 00:30:43,760 Speaker 3: Idaho named Washington. I'm talking about Washington, DC. Yeah, that Washington, 483 00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:50,200 Speaker 3: the Amazon Post, the Jeff Bezos Post uh skating review. 484 00:30:51,520 --> 00:30:56,480 Speaker 3: Becker Rothfield suggests the Jean Pierre quote may represent the 485 00:30:56,480 --> 00:31:00,280 Speaker 3: future of the Democrat Party, despite her notional disavowal of it, 486 00:31:00,840 --> 00:31:02,760 Speaker 3: but that's not necessarily a good thing for the party, 487 00:31:02,840 --> 00:31:07,920 Speaker 3: as despite quote loudly declaring herself an independent and a 488 00:31:08,080 --> 00:31:12,040 Speaker 3: futile effort to cleanse herself of the taint of her 489 00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:15,960 Speaker 3: own party, the former Press secretary says, the Post is 490 00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:20,840 Speaker 3: still quote espousing the same old worldview in the same old, 491 00:31:20,920 --> 00:31:28,000 Speaker 3: tired tone. Wow, let me double check this, Yeah, Washington Post. 492 00:31:29,280 --> 00:31:30,800 Speaker 3: Now in the book, she you know, this is a 493 00:31:30,840 --> 00:31:32,800 Speaker 3: book that I might actually find funny, because you know, 494 00:31:33,680 --> 00:31:36,040 Speaker 3: I still read the comics in the newspaper, well, the 495 00:31:36,080 --> 00:31:38,920 Speaker 3: online newspaper. I still read the comics. This might be 496 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:41,600 Speaker 3: like reading the comics. It might be like having my 497 00:31:41,680 --> 00:31:46,120 Speaker 3: old Dilbert day by day calendar or the Farcye calendar. 498 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:51,320 Speaker 3: John Pierre criticized the Democrats for their betrayal of President 499 00:31:51,400 --> 00:31:56,040 Speaker 3: Biden and questions their decisions, their decision not to automatically 500 00:31:56,080 --> 00:32:01,200 Speaker 3: support Kamala Harris as his successor, But the Post notes 501 00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:04,480 Speaker 3: that Jean Pierre never answers the quote the rather central 502 00:32:04,600 --> 00:32:10,360 Speaker 3: question of whether she was actually electable, and even confesses 503 00:32:10,400 --> 00:32:15,440 Speaker 3: that she quote never really believed Harris could win. They 504 00:32:15,480 --> 00:32:19,920 Speaker 3: then blast the former Press secretary as an artifact of 505 00:32:19,960 --> 00:32:24,760 Speaker 3: an age that looks recent on paper that feels prehistoric 506 00:32:24,840 --> 00:32:26,040 Speaker 3: in practice. 507 00:32:25,920 --> 00:32:28,080 Speaker 5: The age of pantsuits, the word. 508 00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:33,480 Speaker 3: Empowerment, the music Hamilton, the cheap therapeutic entreaties to work 509 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:37,920 Speaker 3: on yourself and to lean into various corporate abysses. With 510 00:32:38,040 --> 00:32:41,640 Speaker 3: her book written in an outmoded register that has been 511 00:32:41,720 --> 00:32:47,120 Speaker 3: failing since twenty sixteen, they write, it is incredible, an 512 00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:52,000 Speaker 3: emblematic of the democrats total esthetic and intellectual driftlessness that 513 00:32:52,120 --> 00:32:55,560 Speaker 3: someone who writes in such feel good thought repelling cliches 514 00:32:56,000 --> 00:33:00,920 Speaker 3: was hired to communicate with the nation from its highest podium, 515 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:06,800 Speaker 3: noting how revelingly blinkered. She comes across like her colleagues 516 00:33:06,840 --> 00:33:09,280 Speaker 3: in the Hall of Congress. The Post says, she appears 517 00:33:09,320 --> 00:33:12,280 Speaker 3: to have little authentic understanding of why her erstwhile parties 518 00:33:12,560 --> 00:33:19,960 Speaker 3: approval rating has cratered. Wow, when I tell you the 519 00:33:19,960 --> 00:33:25,640 Speaker 3: Democrat Party is imploding. Another piece of evidence. Will mark 520 00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:28,200 Speaker 3: this as Exhibit number forty seven B