WEBVTT - 01/07/26 - Hour 2

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Our two no bs on your radio and on YouTube

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and x waking up with you across the state of Wisconsin.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Eight seven seven seven nine four one nine seven to

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>three the phone number to join the conversation. Tons of

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Packers and Bears conversation throughout the week and.

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the day.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Tons of news in the NFL as Adam Schefter is

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>reporting that Mike McCarthy has any of you lined up

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>with the New York Football Giants. Big Mike, I would

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>assume get a number of different interviews. By what I'm

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to be here in New York City, actually

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey, happy to be here for this.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>That would be the most McCarthy hire of all time.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Like he would have to go.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all due respect, He's not going and coaching the

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland Brown.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 3>No, he coaches only the most touchstone franchises, the most

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 3>legendary franchises in the league.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, think about it with.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>The Arizona Cardinals count because they are one of the

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>oldest franchises in the sports.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>They are they moved around.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's not that they moved around, it's that they

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>haven't been that good for me, That's what it is

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>for me. It's like they don't have the legacy, but

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>they had the longevity. I mean, it would be them

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the Lions, right, the lines have been around that long too.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Just think about it, Packers, Cowboys, and in the New

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>York Giants. What other man you know, you could say

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>there might be better coaches in the NFL history where

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>their man has coached all those teams, that that all

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 3>those franchises would have entrusted that man to head up

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>their operations.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>That's an amazing that would be an amazing thing.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>If you the coach of all them, you just say like,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>well they don't win enough, and all of a sudden,

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, you did coach the Cowboys, which again,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime, they have met the right. In my lifetime,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals have been to as many Super Bowls as.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a fair point.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Historically, the Cowboys obviously are a very successful franchise, but

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>they've been a train wrecked last couple decades.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That's three of them, yeah, three decades. They have been

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the title game since ninety five. They had good

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>teams and runs, but they would lose in the playoffs. Again,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals have been to more Super Bowls in the

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>last three decades than the Cowboys. I saw the more

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>conference title games than the Cowboys doubled up. I guess

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>less people just care about Arizona as a market for

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pro football.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>It's you just don't like Arizona. I don't dislike them,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 3>that's my point. I don't think I think of that.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess they were in Saint Louis for a while.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>They were in Chicago. Oh yeah, yeah, So I don't.

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Know mister Bidwell, one of the founders hate them members

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL covenants. So I think it'd be an

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. We'll see if he ends up getting himself

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an interview there. But Kurt Banker posted this, and it's

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>getting some run earlier on this morning.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Dollar every time that you said that Kurt Banker posted something.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And probably have one dollar because I don't I don't

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like you, but someone I don't talk about him as

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>much as a lot of.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>People like that.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I meant to say, like, as many people have said,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 3>oh did you see what Kurt Banker posted? You know

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 3>what I mean?

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no doubt well and uh.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he posted something the picture of Joe Burrow's Instagram

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>post that he had put out that said twenty five

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>was adversity commented it with Kanye.

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>West's Good Life. Oh my gosh, it.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Post in there the part of the lyrics that say,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it feel like Atlanta, I feel like la it feel

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like Miami, feel like in summertimes?

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Shy? Yeah, you want to go with any more of it?

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I throw my hands up. I just like the song.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think the song means? Well? I

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 2>would think that he's trying to predict his next move,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>but I'm.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Not really Okay, So you are on that same spot.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't put that part in the Instagram post without that,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>without you wanting people to start thinking, hey.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, I'm gonna be available here.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 3>There is one thing we learned about Twitter though, early

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>on with the athletes is they would constantly post lyrics

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to songs that didn't really mean much, right. I think

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember this like ten years ago, where like a

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of athletes would just post lyrics to songs and

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people will try and read into them

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and think, oh, what does he mean by this?

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, no, I just like the song.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we can again, I get what

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, Yeah, but can we put old.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Logic to this.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not, because when again you're trying to say, is

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, when Twitter was first starting, we would

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have guys post lyrics to this. This is how guys

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>negotia now, this is you use your social media as

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a way of letting everybody know what what you got

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>rolling on.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it is, maybe it's not. I don't know.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I just I thought it was interesting.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Eight seven seven, seventy nine four one nine seven three

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Armen Sarians Right there, Billy Schmid, how much of the

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>game last night did you see? As the Badgers take

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>care of UCLA, now dominate early, hitting everything from the outside,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and then had to cling and hold on late against

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bruins and an eighty seventy two victory. Admittedly, so

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Armin I was calling high school basketball, so I was

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>unable to see most of the game.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>What did you see?

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, bits and pieces of it, especially the first half

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 3>when they look pretty dominant.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 3>Nick Boyd six for thirteen had a nice game. This

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to be a closer game, I thought, based

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>on certain prognostications, predictions that I like to read. But

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 3>the Badgers came out and played well in a time.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I think they needed to. They were, you know, kind

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>of had a you know, obviously loss to Purdue, lost big,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's been kind of a rocky couple of weeks

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for them. You know, they had to win against Central

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Michigan but lost to Villanopen Milwaukee. They had lost Q

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to Nebraska, and Wisconsin's been in this situation where they

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>haven't played a lot of close games either, Billy right,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if last night constitutes has one,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>but you're right, they did have to kind of hold on.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>But a nice kind of bounce back for them, I

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>thought at the Coal Center where they came out, played well,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>hit a bunch of shots and beat an opponent that

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, was ten and four at the time. Not terrible. Obviously,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 3>UCLA brings a lot of cashet. Whether or not they're

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 3>going to have a really good year remains to be

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>seen now the rest of the year in the Big ten.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But good work I think by the Badgers. And I

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>don't ever think.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>The game was truly truly in strong doubt, although I

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>think it they cut it down to what was at

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>seven at one point, maybe less, so good work by

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the Badgers last night to get back on the winning track.

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I think they kind of needed to recalibrate a little

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>bit for themselves.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave and Oregon Billy, remember that many of your listeners

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>are casual sports fans and may not have known that

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL playoffs were expanded front to fourteen teams in

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. It's a valid point that the Packers wouldn't

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>be in the playoffs if they were only ten teams.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You overreacted, Dave, I would totally disagree. Now, I do

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the fact that we have that, like a couple

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of games, we got fans that love and dig into

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the back half of the practice squad rosters. I would

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>counter that most people that are listening to us pretty

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>big sports fans. And again, I also think that thing

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like casual sports fans starts diminishing the intelligence of Packers fans.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Like Packers fans are some of the.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Most heady, knowledgeable, intuit sports fans that you're going to find.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why, Dave, as much as you might think like, oh, well,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he's just throwing that out there as a state of fact, No,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he's throwing it out there for a reason. You want

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to engender a reaction, you get set reaction and when

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it does not answer or validate what you believe, then

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the wrong reaction.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Now I believe it's the right reaction.

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And as much as there are people that listen to

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>us and like what times the game on, I fire

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>up and love everybody listens to us, I think that

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>diminishes the intelligence and the intuit factor of our listeners

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and sports fans in Wisconsin. Arman, I think it is

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>extremely an underestimation to think that we got a bunch

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of casuals listening to us right now because you don't

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like casuals.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>No, that's that's a good point.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would agree, But I guess I don't Dave

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>you're saying you don't think people remembered it was expanded

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>or remember when it was expanded, because I'd I'd be

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>surprised if people that followed the NFL didn't realize there

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>was a playoff expansion.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Also, it's to me, Arman, it's the people that are

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>using it as a as a crutch, a way to say, like, well,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly just not good enough. If you're using that

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and getting into arguments of saying why you need to

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have a coaching change, I would counter if you're arguing

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and just debating it with your boys and texting it

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the radio shows. You probably you probably are a

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>little more than a casual sports fan. You probably got

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the opinion with also his point. It's a valid point

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that they wouldn't have been in the whole point of

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what you said, Oh that is fact. We established that

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it was factual. I agree that your fact.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Your point was, what is the point of you saying that,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't I think Dave might be given a little

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>bit too much credit to our guys saying that just

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.119
<v Speaker 3>to make it like a point of fact. No one's

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>doing it to just Hey, I want to drop in

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>an interesting little factual tidbit.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>That I read the other day.

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Did you know the playoffs we're expanded in twenty twenty

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>and the packers want to actually, like Dave, I love

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you for that, but you have to realize that no

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 3>one's no one's dropping that in just to drop it

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 3>in as a fun factoid that you might read in

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>your bathroom, like in one of those like bathroom probably.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Isn't in one hundred non facts that you have like it.

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>It's meant to make it's meant to make a point

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and to your point, Billy, you're saying, make the point.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>They'll make the point. If you want to make it,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>make it. I will disagree with it, but then make

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the point. Like and again this sparks from our friend

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris and Lode's text Chris and Lodye just lit the fuse, sure,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because I've been reading it online so much, and that's

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>where I just like, I just don't fully comprehend it.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I get that it is factual. I totally get. Yes,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the seventh Seed wasn't was created. The Packers have been

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest beneficiaries of it. They also record

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>wise would have qualified for the playoffs and a couple

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of those years from just if you would have done

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Keller's favorite thing of seen it one through six right,

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So like, it's just it to me, is not as

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>much of a of a conversation if you don't back

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it up with something else. And Dave, we love you

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. I just don't want you to think that

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>we got a bunch of casual fans listening to us.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We invite all fans listening to us, But Packers fans

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are exceptionalists and they listen all the time, and they

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know everything. There's a reason why they were telling me

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Colin Oliver is gonna be baby Micah Baby Michaels was

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the love practice squad guys enough Mike Arma that they

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think that they could be Michah Parsons.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Well you do it, Michael Jerry Jones.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>There's always we're addicted to hope, as Norm McDonald one said.

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>And when there's a prospect, when there's a young player,

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>there's hope and there's excitement that he could become that great.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>That's why we take the box with the boat maybe

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>in it that bet. Now you talk about prospects.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and it's actually fun because you lead me

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right into a conversation that I was gonna have. We're

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear fro matt Lefluur coming up in about eight

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>minutes from right now. But Armin, did you know that

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>even though it is January six, I hope you enjoyed

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>your your holiday.

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Merry Christmas to the rest of the Christian Orthodox today.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You uh, we are like five weeks away from pitchers

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and catchers reporting, which is always a fun thing in

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the winter.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 3>And someone just randomly throws that in there that the

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>countdown on Twitter.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Official win totals and postseason odds go up at sportsbook

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>dot ag now our favorite sports book and the one

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that we frequent and the one that I will be

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at coming up this weekend. You should be at if

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to enjoy an incredible, incredible viewing experience of

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Packers and Bears on Saturday night the Potawatami Sports Book

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or Thursday night for Ole Miss Miami, or Friday night

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for Oregon Indiana, or Saturday for the NFL playoffs, or

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Sunday for the NFL playoffs. Yea, Sunday there's NFL playoffs

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and Bocks basketball. Nice love, It might be a good

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>day to be at the sports book. And if you

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>like college basketball and you're like, well wait, the playoffs

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are on, Oh, they'll have the college games on too,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so don't worry about that.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>They're always there are always love.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Ye.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But the point that I was rolling through here with

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the Milwaukee Brewers are finally getting a little

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more of the respect that we've been waiting for

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>them to be able to add arman, Uh, what would

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you guess the opening line for the Brewers win total

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Six would be? All right?

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>So I haven't looked and based on what you said there,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to think because.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It's like a year ago it was eighty and eighty

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 2>two and a half.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's been like and this was coming off

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a year where they won the division. So it's been

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 3>like three or four years where we've said, like, they

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>haven't gotten the respect and and and I kind of

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 3>expected the.

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Same thing again.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So if this year things are changing and they were

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>woefully undervalued last year at eighty two and a half, obviously,

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say that the books are going to set

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it a little higher this year, the respect, but not

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 3>too high.

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say, Billy, eighty seven and a half? Is

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 2>that right? Is that right? In check? Is eighty seven?

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's go your your boys handicapping now come look at

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>you dial by my own lines now would be the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>highest win total in the division. That's a good question.

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it will be. I don't think it

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 3>will be. And there was some thought last year that

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>ninety one would be enough. Right now, the NFC, NFC

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>and L Central was one of the better divisions I

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 3>thought in MLB last year, and it was much better

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 3>than people thought. And there were a couple of teams

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 3>obviously winning ninety plus. So I don't think eighty eight

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven will be enough to win the division.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And the prognosticators are judging it the exact same way.

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Cubs eighty eight and a half and the Reds

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>come in with a win total of eighty three and

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I could see the Reds getting up there. I could

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>see the Reds getting a little more love this year.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I maybe thought it might be a little

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>higher for the Reds because of the year they had

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>last year. One team in this division, Billy, will win

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 3>ninety games, for sure. I don't have any qualm saying that.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of surprised. I mean, I'm not surprised because

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>these lines are set on money and things like that,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 3>but I do think eighty seven won't be enough.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I do think one team will win ninety. It is

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Win total, sitting at eighty seven and a half, would

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>be tied for the fourth highest in the National League.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you're gonna be stunned by this development. The

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers are the highest. That's crazy.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>A half. That's crazy. How come they there's a straight

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>up bet will they win one hundred games, and you

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>know what, that's not a crazy number to bet on.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 3>A team winning one hundred games usually would be very

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 3>daring you to bet the under. Yeah, basically daring you

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 3>to bet the under. And people are like, yeah, I

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 3>watch baseball, I'll bet the over, which you which?

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Which? You know that?

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's logic both ways. Oh, you know, they

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 3>didn't win a hundred last year because they took their

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>foot off the gas and they went to the playoffs

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 3>and they were banged up, and they're gonna rest guys

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and we'll show hey play both way. Like all those things,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I understand why somebody like me might talk themselves into

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 3>betting the under.

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>But then I'll be sweating that. Look you I ended

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>up already.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, it's just a sucker. I mean, I'm a sucker.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm a square. But that's the reason.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's the reason.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, that is some pretty wild working. So I'm

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 3>not surprised the Dodgers are one of those teams.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers, Phillies, Phi subs clubs tied with the Brewers at

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven would be the Atlanta Braves in the NL.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>In the National League.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Just behind would be the Mets and Padres, followed by

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the Reds, Giants, and Diamondbacks.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>It feels like they don't have a lot of confidence

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.479
<v Speaker 3>in general in the NL. Or is that just my imagination?

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Billy? I think you're spot on. But that is a

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>couple of days ago with the win totals.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Then just this morning, the postseason odds come out and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>even more implied probability that the Brewers are making the

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>playoffs as they sit at a minus two thirty to

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs. Now, I'm not super good on the

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>math and all of the percentages as how do you

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>get to this, but that's an implied probability of making

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs of seventy percent.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>That's higher than I thought. That's definitely higher than I thought.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Plus one ninety.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>If you think the Brewers end up missing the postseason

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, the only other teams ahead of them in

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the National League the same Shooters, the Dodgers, the Phillies,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs at minus two sixteen implied postseason spot of

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy two. So just to tick higher than the Brewers

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but still sitting there neck and neck with those two teams, well,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe that makes sense.

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember last year was exactly even money to make

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs with the Brewers. So if that makes sense

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 3>at eighty two and a half, I suppose, because right

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>believe if you do remember there are expanded playoffs in

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the layoffs.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>If you don't remember that, it's just a point of fact.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>In case you're casual and you didn't remember that, they

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 3>did expand the playoffs multiple times.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And at the Potawatomi Sportsbook final thing with the odds

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Brewers, Brewers and Cubs still sit plus two

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Even Stephen at the top of those lists.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So they are expecting books are expecting it to be

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>as tight as it was last year, maybe tighter than

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it was last year because I think ultimately the end

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>number was a little bit more lopsided than the entire

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>season would have led to. But it also is a

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>good one when you start wondering, I mean, where do

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you where do they think some of the money is.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they always bank on a lot of Cubs

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>money coming in, sure, but I think with the sustained

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>success that the Brewers have put together, there's gonna be

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>enough people across the country to go, Yeah, I think

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna buy the MB I think I'm just

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that old ball glove logo and feel good

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about it because year in and year out, they seem

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep winning this thing, even though people don't necessarily

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>believe they will.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I like the over on the wins almost

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>better than the playoffs in in a weird way, because

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 3>you don't know sometimes it's gonna happen in the rest

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of league. But the Brewers have been winning eighty seven

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 3>eighty eight games pretty plus pretty consistently for a while now,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>so that that number would be pretty interesting. I can

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>already see Brewers fans Billy thinking themselves, Oh no, see,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't want I want to fly under the radar.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Already nervous Bruce fans are already nervous at they're not

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote flying under the radar. Oh no, now there's

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>hype around us. Oh no, we're gonna it's the e

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 3>or in us, right, it's the it's the totally you.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>People are starting to take notice. I don't like this.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't want any more of this. Yeah, stop thinking

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>we're good.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Eighty two was solo l I remember when eighty two

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 3>and a half came out. I'm like, what are they

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 3>what are they thinking? I'm not trying to be super biased,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>but my team can at least win eighty three games, Like,

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>come on.

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm over to the last two years, so take that

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the under. Well, I'm taken the under the last two years?

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that emotional hedge at least and in all reality

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the first year I thought I was.

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was easy money. The eighty two and

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 2>a half and.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, Bret Council is the best manager in baseball.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>He's probably worth at least ten wins. They get rid

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of Corbin Burns, it's gonna be tougher. And then all

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden they win ninety games and I look

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like an idiot. Next year, I'm like, okay, regression year

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. Probably that's how it ends up being bet

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the under again. L So now the Martingale effect would

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be you go the under again, Yeah, triple the investment.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Last thing I'm gonna do is that.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna lose again because this time I am

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll with the over and then catch a fat

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>out when all of a sudden they win eighty six

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>games and sneak into the playoff.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know the emotional headge factor.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Then that's I can't wait for Game one sixty two

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>when Caleb durban is pitching in the fifth inning because

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers already have a playoff spot booked up at

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven wins and it's like the bottom of the

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sixth inning and they're down eight to four.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sitting there with the over. You gotta be

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>bleeping kids.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I just I just remember thinking in twenty three we

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 3>won ninety two games with like a banged up team.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>It felt like at least, yeah, we had pitching. But

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I just see this thing being able to

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 3>be just as good or better. But I didn't want to, Like,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to my own bias creep in. That's

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>all the thing I'm worried about, all your bias creeping.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, only let your bias show, and only show

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 3>your biass.

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Once we get to our conversation about Barrison Packers, yay,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>always does you do that? We'll do that more on

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>to the other side. Eight seven seven seven nine four

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>one nine seven three. Maggie and George just said casual fans,

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh heck no, I have yell on for ten to

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve hours a day. Learn so much from you guys.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't only talk about sports, you talk about all sports,

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what makes it fun.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Maggie.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It's listeners like you are, Friend, David Oregon, Chris and Loani, everybody,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Corey who said, man, Billy's fired up this morning.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 5>I like it.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Jake and wakashot back on my six am schedule, and

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I could not be happier with a great show as always, boys,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we are fired up to be with all of you.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We're back right after this. Here from the head coach,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafuur coming up. It's Nobs on the game, No

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Bs on the game is back. Could have here from

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafluor coming up in a second, but got to

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>get to a couple of texts and messages here on

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube stream. Our friend Mike Witz said, all right,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>biopick and nobs. Who plays Billy? Who plays Arman? Who

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>plays Scott Dolphin? Well, I think the easiest one is

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>George Clooney plays Scott Dolphin, right, Like, that's probably the

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>easiest answer you could get. Arman probably plays Armin in

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the bio pick. Really, I'm playing myself. I don't know

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that anybody is gonna be able to hit the voice

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>inflection first off, the voice itself. Well, I mean there's

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that can do an arm and

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sorry and impression of like.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Was you gotta have my back? It's not they got

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>my back. I don't even know where this is coming for.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 3>This is me.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 2>May no one else playing me.

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Biopick isn't always straight about an impression, but I get

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>your point.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought you might have to be you and the

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 1>bio pick. I mean, I think it's south Reelick. Give

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>him his first acting role.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 3>Guy that looks like me, guy that kind of is

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 3>quot that's cool, multiple people told me unsolicited.

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know we talk about it, Billy. I'm sorry.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I was sitting there by myself at an American family

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 3>field and people were just coming.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Up to me, saying, hey, you look like Sales. Sal's

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>your brother. Kids at the Admirals Games thought I was sell.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>They really thought Sal was sticking his brother in the

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 2>seats that you were sitting in.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 3>That's what I said, That's the first thing I said.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I said, I'd had better seats. I wish I'd had

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 3>better seats. We're in terrists level. Can you imagine other

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 3>up and terrors level. I'm just saying I'd be pissed

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>if he sat me here in four thirty five. Those

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 3>are good seats up there, though, if you get the

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>right worse relax. I actually like those seats. But the

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>thing actually like if you're up top being just into

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the outfield, Oh yeah, oh, because you get a great

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 3>view of the field, and it's relaxing up there, especially

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 3>that breeze is hitting.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Right in the in the up into the smoker section.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well sure, Oh you don't sit in the

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 3>family section, the Coca Cola family section up there, Billy, Yeah, no,

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be a good one for you.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I I have a lot of good ideas, but I'm

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I'm just thinking of them. Still.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean the tough things are like some of

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the guys that I think probably would have been the

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>ones to do it, have sen sadly passed away.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, like meat.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Loaf probably would have been the first one. Yeah, they

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>passed away twenty two, So that's not gonna happen. David

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Boxiari probably got a lot bigger things going on, a

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>lot better looking than I. But it is about the

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>hair right, mostly probably, I guess, And I mean anybody

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>can just not shave and be able to look this

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of ratty on any given day. So I think

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>up for interpretation, who would do me pause in the biopic?

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 3>But like Jason might be a good one because sometimes

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>because I have seen him gotten you got a little fat.

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw him, I saw him porking up a little bit.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Unless that was just Ai saying like, hey, I know

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>your wife was watching Jason Momoa in Aquaman.

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't feel so bad because this is him after Aqua.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing is like usually in biopicks, it's tried

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to be someone that's looked similar, like the whole Jesse Eisenberg,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 3>you know Mark Zuckerberg thing.

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 2>They kind of looked the similar and.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Then it was like then it's like the whole Brad

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Pitt Billy Bean thing where it none looks like them

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 3>at all, But you just want a good look at

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood actor or your movie to sell tickets.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Well that's true, yeah, like to me, so you could

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 2>get a whole Momoa thing going on. I mean, Timothy

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Shallamey would do a great job playing me in the biopeck.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 3>What that would be that would be an amazing one.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 3>And he's with one of the Jenners, right, am I wrong?

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>All right? Hey what about you? No more pop culture

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 2>than that? What about Jay Hernandez? Remember him from Uh?

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>He was in Crazy Beating if Pleasing a bunch of

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 3>other things now like usually like police dramas and stuff.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 2>For me, I thought you said for you? Oh okay,

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I think you said a Hernandez, I look like Jay Hernandez, Billy.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Someone told me that once.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Anytime anyone tells me one thing, I'm sticking with it,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>by the way, right, and I'm avoiding and the good Look,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Jay Hernandez looks a lot more like you than South Freelick.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, all right, I'm taking that. Yeah, I would.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I would go with you looking more like Jay Hernandez

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>than South free like and probably more in the line.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah forty seven years old? Hey, who's playing hunter? We

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>keep going with it, We keep going with this. Well

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is he in the no BS biopick?

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Though?

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I Well, he'd appear in it because like the whole

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>no BS biopick would also involve like some situations around

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 3>the station. It wouldn't be Oh that's fair, ye, more

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>people involved like who would play certain guys that we've

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 3>interacted with.

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, somebody's playing Drew, somebody's playing Hunter. Somebody's gonna

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>get the coolest job being able to play Drew. And

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they need someone tall for Dave. Obviously, Yeah, he's not

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna like this.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 2>He's tall.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not that tall. We can find a six eighth guy. Now,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if he was a seven footer like Butcher would be

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a different story. That then that'd be something else. Who

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>would play?

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 3>But I think, well, you know, we actually get a

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>polar Bear to play, Actually get a real polar Bear,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, or an ex NBA star, you know that.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>What if Billa or one of those guys, you know

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 2>what I mean? Like that would be good. Jared Bergran

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>in the play to play Butch. Yeah, someone asked him

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 2>at a die bar, you played Brian Butch.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 3>He said, I have Brian Butch. Only good one yeah,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Bergrand Yeah, one of you know, just J P. Javinski

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 3>one or the other. Like I'll tell you who it

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>won't be. It won't be my man, Alexis Billy Awskis.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 2>He was awesome. It was phenomenal last night.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, granted, I know, offensively, not super impressive, but

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for a young freshman being able to play as many

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of minutes as he is getting himself into the

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lineup getting out of the lineup. Jack Janicky, Hey, how

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>about that? Love that a couple of triples last night?

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I was in a J and K Security Solutions postgame

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>show over the weekend with our friend, UH friend's David Nick.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>He were calling and saying, man, where's Jack Janicky? At

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting more from Jack Janicky. Jack Janicky might

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have been listening knocked out a couple of triples last

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>morning for me as the Badger's go and beat the

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>UCLA Bruins.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if I'm just if it's just

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 2>me arman.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Whenever U c l A loses a game, I do

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately look up Mick cronin postgame to.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 2>See if he's angry. I had to see God didn't

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>sound like he was.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Now he will be later on because I did, Uh,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I did get a little bit of information in my research.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>He will very much not like this one.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Mick and the UCLA Bruins will go.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Last night's game in Madison, will then fly back to

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast to take on Maryland. That's after they

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>played at Iowa before they played Wisconsin. Right, So they

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>played at Iowa this weekend, at Wisconsin, back out to UCLA,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>off to play Maryland on Saturday.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Back to Penn State on a Wednesday.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a take on the Nitney Lyons, and then Saturday

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>taking on Ohio State five or six.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>He was really mad in Columbus.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I remember he was so mad about that, and he

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 3>was talking about the volleyball team and this in the

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 3>field hockey team.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>What about the lacrosse kit or whatever it was. But

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I will have to look it up after the Ohio

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>State game, because that one will be fun to be.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Because it's really easy to get yourself into the line

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of thinking as a code.

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Like last night Ucla.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, they're one for seventeen from three, so their ways

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 3>shooting way under any sort.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Of baseline average. You could say that's a big reason

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 2>they lost.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, you go one for seventeen from three, you shoot

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 3>six percent or whatever that is, you're in bad shape.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And they shot forty six from the field.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 3>So they did a lot of things okay last night,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 3>but you cannot shoot that poorly from three and win

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>in college basketball, and you can easily talk yourself into

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the travel for that. Oh you guys at tired legs.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Tis what guys supposed to do. The Commissioner's got you.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 3>They should go much longer.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 2>Were we supposed to be on planes. He should get

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 2>the Gottlieb the petition for him.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Doug Gottlieb dropping two minute bars after the Green Bay

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee game about traveling the Horizon League.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 2>This is much worse.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, and gottlie probably would have said, at least you

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>guys got good refs because of the Tuesday.

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>He said, yeah, you guys get good refs in the weekdays.

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>In the Big Ten, we get the bad ones. There's

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a pegging order. He's like, I understand it. There's a

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 2>pecking order.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 3>That was really funny too. So, but I think last

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 3>night was the type of game that Greg gard envisioned.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 3>This seemed to be.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you walk into this year, he has

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 2>that hybrid mix.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Obviously the transfers, he's had a good, good thing going

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 3>with that with the established players, you know, and except

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 3>for uh Black, all going I think was you know,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 3>one for one for like nine from three. Except for that,

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 3>this is probably exactly the way he wanted this thing

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to go. In terms of the blueprint of this Badger team,

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>you had contributions from everywhere. You had guys, you know,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>hitting the boards nicely as a group last night. You

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 3>know you mentioned uh Billiauskis already, you mentioned Jiniki in there,

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and a nice you know, a nice rotation of guys

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 3>going in there, contributing inside outside and sharing the scoring load.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Boyd with twenty of the transfer, and then Blackwell obviously

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 3>as well, and yeah, no one went to play. Well,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 3>this is the playbook. This was the blueprint I think

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 3>for this team, for Greg Guard and they got to

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 3>be happy with this win, getting back on track at

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 3>home against UCLA, a team that was had been playing

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 3>pretty well.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the first time that the Badgers beat the

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Bruins in Madison since nineteen sixty two. Now, granted, I

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many times they're playing on Madison since

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty two, but being able to get any kind

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of victories over a UCLA brand is a good one

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have. So you like being you

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like welcoming UCLA to Madison and sending them out with

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>an L. I also, again, this is going to be

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>probably the not for the children. Part of the conversation.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I like seeing a little scrap, a little fight, little

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>togetherness with the squad. Right flaggrant one file leads to

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a dust stop. Sure, get all

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the boys and again it's it doesn't mean that they're

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>going to come out here and win five straight games.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But you start seeing who's with you in the foxhole

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>when stuff starts hitting the fan and you saw that

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over the last couple days.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>How about this one from our.

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Friend Eddie and styles and then this is pretty exceptional

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for who could play armand sorry, and he said Chrissy

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from the Sopranos. Now, Christopher Molasanti of the Sopranos fictional

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>character would be armand Sary like that would the side

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>by side would beautiful. Now the problem is, well, the

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is, you know, Christopher Molasanti that that character was

0:29:54.760 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>birthed in the late nineteen nineties. So Michael Imporio, I

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>believe it is how I pronounce my man Michael's name.

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, he's currently in his sixties, So it might

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>look a little different for Arman with Michael playing Armin

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the biopick. Now, if we somehow be able to

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>time trap for the biopick. Maybe a little makeup job

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>or an oh my god. And Christopher mola Santi from

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>when he is hanging out in that apartment when he's

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going through his uh trying to be a movie writer.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh that is perfect, arman.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And just a white little tank top, undershirt, unzipped parachute jacket.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I gotta be right. I got to look. I got

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the chest hair.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can go on shaven, yes. And Christopher

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Molosanti had the chest out. He was letting that taco

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>meat hang out.

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I can do that. So I like this. We'll keep

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep noodling this. I think that's a really really

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>good one for us to be able to roll. This

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>is pretty good. I'll keep noodling this all right. I

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>like this.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>My friend Mike said, I'm no casual, been a Wisconsin

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sports fan for all my forty eight years. Maybe someday

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we will get nobs to radio row at the Super Bowl.

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Go pack, Go well. Mike Well brought us to a

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl radio row. We were there last year. Probably

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the coolest things that we listen It probably

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>was the coolest.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Thing I've ever done in radio and I don't want

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>to say crowning achievement of my career, but like I

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 3>was going through my phone, Billy getting a little wistful. Yeah,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>and I was seeing the picture of was talking Josh

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Jacobs last year. That was pretty cool. I mean, I'm

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>never gonna forget being down there with everybody being down

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 3>there with you and doing a show there in that

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 3>awesome set we were in and you know, it made

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 3>you feel like you were somebody. You know, sets that

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 3>you could possibly have was ours at Radio Row last

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 3>year and thanks to the packers being able to just

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 3>set most of it up. But it was I remember

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 3>when we saw Nick Wright, Like I just remember seeing

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the people walked by, the how excited we were getting.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>It was just fun, you know, to be there. So

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a great memory.

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So I was starting to roll through the pictures that

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you should probably post the boys hanging out at that's

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the one you're gonna show it on the field at

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. You're gonna show you boys that one day.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Well what I did, guys, you know, I was going

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>through the uh, what you probably are supposed to do

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, and like tell everybody

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>all the cool stuff you did during the year.

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't do that. I don't do that.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I started like poking through, and I'm like, I should

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do one of these twenty twenty five PAGs.

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't take a bunch of pictures.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>With the kids, you know, a couple of cool ones

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in here. And I'm like, you know what, No, no,

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I probably should have. And now it's January seventh,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and now I think it's too late to even wish

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>people a happy New Year. So I think it might

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be too tough. I think it might be over at

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this point. Eight seven seven seven three. You know, I

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>always think we should have got a group picture.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna look like one of these pictures like the

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 3>original se if I can get this right here the

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 3>camera store.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Here, look at that.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 3>That's the ninety two pack Like that's one of the

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 3>greatest pictures ever, the ninety two Packers coaching staff.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like all the young bucks right there, like just awesome.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 3>That's not a good one, you guys know the picture

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 3>ninety two Packers staff on the Mike Holmgren staircase. All

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 3>were in the polo shirts with all the great future coaches,

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 3>sort of like that ninety three and ninety five Brown

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 3>staff that had that had saving on it, Billy and

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 3>all the other great coaches and stuff like that. I

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know, that's what that's the way it fell for me,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.959
<v Speaker 3>ninety five the ninety five Indians. Look at that lineup,

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean? So we're getting we're getting

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 3>emotional and whistful here.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Or look at this guy right here.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you want to talk about a cool guy hanging

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>out having a drink, Yeah, oh yeah, hanging out with

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl thirty one banner.

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>We had a picture this guy. This guy got a

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 2>picture with me on did you know? Did you we

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 2>were on one at that point because there's a lot

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 2>of free stuff rolling through. There were a lot of

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 2>free drinks. We were going through that like that little

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 2>like Title Town hot what do they call?

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 5>It?

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't Title Town. It was like super Bowl House. And

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we know where we are right now,

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>we're getting lost. Then we saw Nagler. It was all good.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is that this is at the super Bowl

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote media party. And I did realize that I

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have the same picture of Armin five times in that

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>exact same post, but all of them are live shots,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't just hold and you're able to

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>see it, you just get a little bit of a

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>nod from Army each time as he's holding the two

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>drinks double fisting like any good lad should be doing

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at a party with free drinks.

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 2>They were free. I'm not a big, you know, a drinker,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>but they're free. It's me, give me three.

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know you're doing it right because you got

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>yourself the coffee and the cover. You said, I'm gonna

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>get the I'm gonna get the caffeine and the alcohol

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>into this thing, and he's just got the subtle nod

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of I get I'm right where.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I gave myself That wasn't It wasn't this specifically, but

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I gave myself the advice that I would give to

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 3>all my residents when I was an RA and be like,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 3>this was a little off the record advice. Oh, I

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 3>tell boys, I don't know what's gonna happen, but I said,

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 3>mix it in water, mixing the water, That's what I

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 3>would tell them. You know, they were nervous, like they'd

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 3>see me. They were obviously drunk. I'm like, listen, you're

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>out of the building.

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. I just said, mixing the water.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to have to wake you up at

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 3>three in the morning because you just puked all over yourself.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Mix in a great fatherly advice from one arm and

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>sorry and eight seven seven seven nine four one night

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>seven three, mattle the floor next other game.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Hanging out with you on nobs on the game.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I have armand sorry and and I uh wistfully

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>scrolling through our pictures from New Orleans at Super Bowl

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio Row, sweet sweet shots of us hanging out and

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>being able to talk to Josh Jacobs, amongst other Green

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers get a Super Bowl media night watch Armin

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and Hunter meet the guy from the Bachelor and he

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was cool. Yeah both, I mean just six to midnight.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It was incredible, incredible theater being able to watch that.

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>That's enjoyment.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 3>That's the guy that played Bruzwooz by the way, in

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the Biot Pick Joey. I just say it looks looked

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 3>the same.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you're giving Brucewooz that kind of credit. I yeah,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess I am. But that's pretty nigh. Yeah, that's

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty nice of you. Now, one guy you know, Matt

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Laflour it's gonna be hard to find somebody to play

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>him in a bio pick, because you have to be

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a dashingly, devilishly handsome young man. Now Matt Lafleur yesterday

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at the podium speaking to reporters after his team catches

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>their one two three fourth straight loss in a game

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that was well easily predicted as a loss.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 2>When no starters were really playing.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Of consequence for the Green Bay Packers, and now Matt

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Lafleur asking and being asked and answering, how on earth

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are you guys prepping and going into a week of practice.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys doing today to get yourself ready

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>for Saturday? I guess the Chicago Bears in the lyled

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>card round.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 5>It'll be primarily a walk through, jogged through tempo. Just

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 5>with the number of guys that we had playing in

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 5>and having a short week, definitely wanted to do a

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 5>little bit more, but following the advice of our medical

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 5>staff and regards, and then we'll have two really good

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 5>days coming up here tomorrow And what was that Thursday,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Carats tomorrow?

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, do you feel like you're well?

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Your key guys are helping ready to go After getting

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 5>a letter to be this week or last week. Yeah,

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 5>I think, you know, we're in pretty good health right now.

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 5>So I think the most important thing is just for

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 5>all those guys just that did play and get their

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 5>bodies back, and then we have to have a great

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 5>week of preparation.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you anticipate in the leak would be able to

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 4>be in the backup quarterback this week?

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 5>I would anticipate that he is not clear, he's not

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 5>cleared the protocol, but the practice is part of the

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 5>return to play.

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 3>How'd you got a chance to look back at how

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 3>do you think Diggs did stay for Sunday?

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Pashting it?

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 5>My days are all confused too. Yeah, I couldn't tell

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 5>you today. It's Wednesday in our world. So I thought,

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 5>you know, I thought there was a lot of good

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 5>things that he did. So it's just about getting him

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 5>up to speed so that you know, half or doesn't

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 5>feel like there's things that we cannot call What was that?

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that possible?

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 5>I think so absolutely. He's been putting an extra time

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 5>and meeting with DA and the rest of our dB coaches,

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 5>and he's been doing a really nice job. And he's

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's not his learning curve is going to

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 5>be a little bit different than a lot of other players,

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 5>and the fact that he's played a ton of football.

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 5>What were the good things that stood out with him,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 5>especially in the situation he's in Week eight team.

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Coming in within our team.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 5>I just think that, you know, he played physical. He

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 5>had one play where he had a nice punch at

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 5>the ball, So that was really what shoot out to me.

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 5>How much have you talked to the team and showed

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 5>them the tape from three weeks ago?

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>Was it just the day after he put it to bed?

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Do you bring up a lot of those same things

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 2>this week?

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 5>No? Absolutely, We always kind of just talked about some

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 5>of where our focus needs to be and things that

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 5>we have to do better, and just what the opposite

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 5>oppositions to present.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 2>With how that ended.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Do you sense the same amounts of the resolve and

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 4>discolution for how that went as you show that now, I.

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 5>Think that's in the past. I think there's nothing we

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 5>can do about that. We just got to look to

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 5>the future.

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>How valuable do you think experience is in a week

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like this, You're going against an opponent that doesn't have

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 1>any postseedon experience.

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 5>This is your third straight You can hit a Yeah,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 5>I think there's some value in that, but ultimately it's

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 5>about just being able to go out there and kind

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 5>of channel your emotion and go out and execute. So

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 5>the team that typically can do that the best is

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 5>probably going to be the team that wins the game.

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it just a football game at the end of

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>the day.

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 5>I mean you have to treat any differently. Obviously the

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 5>states are higher and all, but absolutely, I mean it's

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 5>the same thing our guys have been doing all season long.

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a tough opponent on the road, a division rival.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 5>There's obviously going to be a lot of excitement, not

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 5>only I mean everywhere about this game. So you know,

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 5>we just got to go play our type of game.

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 4>You played them a number of times, but can you

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 4>appreciate how historic this matchup is in the postseason against

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the Bears, how.

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Rare it is for you guys to play them.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a pretty good, pretty cool deal. I think

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 5>anytime you're talking about division rivals and you're in the

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 5>playoffs with a lot at stake, I think it just

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 5>heightens it a little bit. Is there an added challenge

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 5>this week trying to switch things up because you've seen

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the same UPONEA three times in the last month. I

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 5>would say it's the same for both. We're both in

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 5>the same boat. Kay Man, you always talk about taking

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 5>advantage of your opportunities.

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Did you think Sorel Cox and Colin Oliver did that?

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Did they Can you use them a little bit more

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 2>in this game?

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Potentially. I think they definitely showed well. I was

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 5>really impressed with their style of play, their effort, and

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 5>their ability to go out there and make some play.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 5>So I thought all three of those guys did a

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 5>really nice job.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Josh had four carries against Baltimore, didn't play last week.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 5>What kind of shape does that?

0:40:58.440 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 4>In the end?

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Is this not es fresh? She'spend some time. I think

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 5>that's a better question for Josh. I'm sure you guys

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 5>will get an opportunity to ask him later, but he

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 5>seems like he's in great spirits.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 3>What would it do if you guys could get Zach

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Town back for the first time in a month?

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that'd be a huge get. I mean,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 5>he's he's our most consistent offensive lineman. He's one of

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 5>the best I think in the league and at his position,

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 5>and so yeah, that would definitely be a boost. Do

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 5>you expect him to play I would expect him.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, you've had a number of games down the stretch,

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 4>six games. I think you could had well over three

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 4>hundred yards. But has there been anything you feel like

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 4>has been just missing from the off runs that you

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 4>would like to see you take him to another level?

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 4>An O the red zone, it's one issue where you has.

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 5>You just took the words right out of my mouth Boom.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 5>You got to finish. You got to score touchdowns in

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 5>the red zone, and that's the bottom line.

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't You can move the in between the twenties

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 5>all day long, but you have to finish drives and

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 5>you can't have you know, just every play is so

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 5>pivotal down there. You can't have any mistakes. There's no

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 5>wasted plays. It just sets you behind the sticks, and

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's not where you want to be against

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 5>this defense.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And it is one of the biggest things that the

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Packers need to rectify if they're going to win not

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>only this playoff game, but multiple playoff games. The red

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>zone efficiency just has to be better. And I like

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>then mattl Floor said, you took a words right out

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of my mouth. Spone yeah, score touchdowns. It's crazy how

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>much easier this game is when you put six up

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>intet of three.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>It is amazing.

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>Zach time the most consistent lineman they have. Would you agree,

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Billy that's one hundred percent?

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And I would also agree that he's one of the

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>best offensive linemen in the league, So being able to

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>get him back crazy. How it also coincides with him

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>going down as the forgotten guy in Denver along with

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the four game losing streaks, so would be big to

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be getting Zach tom Beck at right tackle coming up

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday against the Chicago Bears. More on this matchup,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>more on your nicolay lo dot com talking text line messages,

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>YouTube comments galore, and who's playing Arman and Billy in

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the bio pick This one's running rampant.

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 2>We got more of your answers coming up next on

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the game