Speaker 1: Actions of the Bill Cunningham Show may be pre recorded.
Speaker 2: Willie Rock You by Choice Hotels, a Conor rodg and
Speaker 2: Roadway in Hotels are serving up double points for over qualifying.
Speaker 1: Stay book at.
Speaker 2: Choice Hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been
Speaker 2: recognized as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but
Speaker 2: two prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast excellence, the one
Speaker 2: and only Bill Cunningham.
Speaker 1: I'm Billy Cunningham, the great American. Welcome this Sunday night,
Speaker 1: and first of all, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Speaker 1: I am told the White House at a big Christmas
Speaker 1: function which they played Silent Night, and Merry Christmas was signed,
Speaker 1: was hung everywhere in the White House, and people freely
Speaker 1: could save Merry Christmas. So that's a positive. And that's
Speaker 1: only after less than one year of Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 1: A couple of housekeeping matters. First of all, the US
Speaker 1: has boarded a third Venezuelan and oil tanker pursuing to
Speaker 1: a federal judge's warrant to seize it. It was identified
Speaker 1: two years ago someone in the Biden administration using the
Speaker 1: auto pen listed a whole bunch of tankers that were
Speaker 1: in violation of a US law and also the World
Speaker 1: Court the un because they were unflagged, unconnected to a country.
Speaker 1: They were sailing around giving oil from Venezuela to Cuba
Speaker 1: and to Iran that needs help, serious help, and to Iraq,
Speaker 1: and now that's been stopped. So the next few weeks
Speaker 1: are going to be interesting because those regimes could collapse
Speaker 1: at one point or another, if they haven't collapsed already.
Speaker 1: And it's sad for the good people of Cuba to
Speaker 1: have to go through this. It's up to them to
Speaker 1: correct it, not up to us. So we'll continue to
Speaker 1: follow that as events unfold. Also with picking up the
Speaker 1: pieces of the homeless guy named John who broke the
Speaker 1: case at Brown University. Now the officials there are breaking
Speaker 1: their arms and dislocating their shoulders, patting themselves on the
Speaker 1: back for solving this thing, which is again and he
Speaker 1: was here legally because he was part of some diversity
Speaker 1: program from Portugal and he was admitted, i think in
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen or twenty eighteen, given a permanent residence green
Speaker 1: card because he won the lottery in Portugal. He'd been
Speaker 1: here before on a student visa, did allows a job
Speaker 1: and between the years twenty oh three and twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: many were unsure about this murderer, this triple homicide artist
Speaker 1: who should not have been in the country at all.
Speaker 1: And Christy nom has now stopped the so called diversity
Speaker 1: program because as you know, America does not have enough diversity.
Speaker 1: We need more diversity of Portuguese and so she has
Speaker 1: stopped the program, to the consternation at many liberals. But
Speaker 1: when I look at this case that was finally resolved
Speaker 1: Thursday and Friday, John the homeless guy broke the case.
Speaker 1: I know this is something that Dei hires at Brown University,
Speaker 1: you don't want to hear. You might recall the second
Speaker 1: photo put out with some individual looking with bushy eyebrows,
Speaker 1: kind of walking around as a person of interest, not
Speaker 1: as a perpetrator, but as somebody who may have met
Speaker 1: the murderer. It turned out that he did meet the murderer,
Speaker 1: and the homeless guy lived in the basement of the
Speaker 1: physics building. He lived in a basement as a homeless person.
Speaker 1: And know when a Brown University knew he was in
Speaker 1: the basement living there, and he just happened to run
Speaker 1: into the guy and started falling with him. The murderer
Speaker 1: because to the homeless guy, John said, he didn't fit in.
Speaker 1: The homeless guy who's likely to get the fifty thousand
Speaker 1: dollars reward, by the way, the homeless guy who's like
Speaker 1: thirty eight years old as a graduate of Brown University,
Speaker 1: how about that deal? So we began following the murderer.
Speaker 1: He didn't thought he fitted in. He uh recorded the
Speaker 1: idea that he was driving a white Nissan with a
Speaker 1: Florida plate for the homeless guy named John. It was
Speaker 1: like boy Florida plate in the Rhode Island and I
Speaker 1: don't think so. So he just made a note of
Speaker 1: that in his mind, put it on Reddit, and then
Speaker 1: when the missive went out from the FBI, if you're
Speaker 1: this person, come forward. Within an hour, he walked up
Speaker 1: to two Providence police officers in uniform on the Brown
Speaker 1: University campus and said, uh, I think I'm that guy
Speaker 1: you're looking for me? He said, yeah, you know anything
Speaker 1: about this case? Yeah, it was a guy I followed.
Speaker 1: He might be the guy who killed those those uh
Speaker 1: that two students in Brown and wounded the other nine.
Speaker 1: So they took him in, confirmed the story, and then
Speaker 1: from the rented card place they got his identity out
Speaker 1: of the murderer. From that, they led them to the
Speaker 1: storage unit and he killed himself two before his body
Speaker 1: was located unbeknownst to the police. Complete mental and prosecutorial misconduct,
Speaker 1: police information by the Providence cop, the Providence mayor, the
Speaker 1: Providence president has no idea what they're doing. The homeless
Speaker 1: guy cracked the case, and he's entitled the fifty thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Hope he spends the money wisely. But if somebody has
Speaker 1: a place to go to school, why in the world
Speaker 1: would you send your kid, your daughter, or your son
Speaker 1: to a place like Columbia or Harvard, or Yale or
Speaker 1: a Dartmouth or Brown University when their bunch are run
Speaker 1: by a bunch of liberals encouraging students to engage in
Speaker 1: hate speech against Jews and others. And his homeless guys
Speaker 1: living in buildings. This guy has a mental difficulties, that is,
Speaker 1: the homeless guy also has a substance abuse problem. So
Speaker 1: I hope this fifty thousand dollars gets some straight a
Speaker 1: little bit of a housekeeping matter. And secondly, or fourthly,
Speaker 1: and Nicki Minaje, Nicki Minaje, the female rap star has
Speaker 1: now taken to Erica Erica Kirk and she appeared at
Speaker 1: the Turning Point USA rally in Phoenix, Arizona, in front
Speaker 1: of eight thousand I saw this morning. I think Fox
Speaker 1: newsheaded this morning. The morning session started at nine am
Speaker 1: local time in Phoenix and by four am there were
Speaker 1: thousands lined up around the block. And I have hope.
Speaker 1: The hope is only this that if you give our
Speaker 1: college graduates in a doctrination program for four years, in
Speaker 1: most colleges, they come out as marching Marxists. They do
Speaker 1: not come out as free thinkers, believing in family, faith,
Speaker 1: and the flag. The three main principles of Charlie were
Speaker 1: number one God, number two family, number three America. And
Speaker 1: you don't get that in high school very often. You
Speaker 1: don't get that very often in college at all. So
Speaker 1: to have this particular movement that Charlie started about twelve
Speaker 1: years ago to metastasize in many colleges, telling these kids
Speaker 1: about God and about family and about the flag in
Speaker 1: America was right at the heart of the education system
Speaker 1: we have in this country. There's not enough of that.
Speaker 1: All of us have a concern. In twenty twenty eight
Speaker 1: or even twenty twenty six, and about eleven months from now,
Speaker 1: if this country turns to Akeem Jeffreys and Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: to solve problems, my gosh, are we in trouble. More
Speaker 1: trouble than you can imagine. Because they don't have the solution.
Speaker 1: All they can do is smear and divide. The Democratic
Speaker 1: Party presides over racism, they always have historically to the
Speaker 1: party of racism, and racism pays big dividends for the
Speaker 1: Democrats by keeping their supporters all riled up. It means
Speaker 1: that they can count upon about ninety five percent or
Speaker 1: so of Democratic Black female vote and about eighty percent
Speaker 1: of the black male vote. And that's how they stay
Speaker 1: in power, whether you're Brandon Johnson or whether you're Kim
Speaker 1: Bass or whether Mam Donnie has captured most of that
Speaker 1: vote because kids come out of college not educated but indoctrinated.
Speaker 1: And to heavy party that survives because of racism is
Speaker 1: sick and sad. In the twenty first century. The Democratic
Speaker 1: Party only presides over racist they claim, in order to
Speaker 1: keep them in the fold, to keep them voting for Democrats.
Speaker 1: The party of Racism today the same as it was
Speaker 1: for the past two hundred years, as the Democrat party,
Speaker 1: and so to have Nicki Minaj appear at the turning
Speaker 1: point USA America at fest and Phoenix for the last
Speaker 1: three or four days was wonderful. And later on we
Speaker 1: may play some of that, some cuts from Nicki Minaj.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure Conservative talk radio has played Nicki minage
Speaker 1: very often. I'm not sure about that. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: I might be wrong. I might be wrong, but I
Speaker 1: doubt it. But Nicki Minaj is making sense. Now, lastly,
Speaker 1: before I take your calls, before I pu little Nicki minajh.
Speaker 1: This story broke about three days ago, and I know
Speaker 1: it's an important story because the mainstream media has ignored
Speaker 1: it completely. You might recall in twenty twenty, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: made a telephone call to a guy named Raffensberger, who's
Speaker 1: the Secretary of state in Georgia, the Peachtree State, and
Speaker 1: said find me eleven thousand and seven or sixty five votes.
Speaker 1: And he didn't say corruptly or illegally. He said they
Speaker 1: got to be out there somewhere. Something's wrong. The Trump
Speaker 1: just said, I know I won Georgia. Also in that election,
Speaker 1: John asof barely beat David Perdue, who had been in
Speaker 1: office for quite a while, and many people said something's
Speaker 1: not right. You might recall that the media told us
Speaker 1: it was the most secure election in American history, that
Speaker 1: was unbelievably secure in twenty twenty. But now the other
Speaker 1: shoe is dropped. Here we go. A Georgia State Election
Speaker 1: Board investigation substantiates that Fulton County, though home of Fanny
Speaker 1: Willis and lover boy Nathan Wade, that Fulton County violated
Speaker 1: election rules in twenty twenty by failing to have poll
Speaker 1: workers sign required tabulation tapes for early voting in thirty
Speaker 1: six of thirty seven advanced voting precincts affecting ready for
Speaker 1: this number, three hundred and fifteen thousand votes in Fulton County.
Speaker 1: Let me guess ninety percent were Democratic votes. These unsigned
Speaker 1: tapes broke the chain of custody in certification requirements under
Speaker 1: Georgia law, which mandates signed tapes as the sole legal
Speaker 1: proof of authentic vote totals. During a Board and meeting
Speaker 1: of December, the ninth and Brumbaugh, attorney for the Fulton
Speaker 1: County Board of Elections, contends that quote, we do not
Speaker 1: dispute this, Okay, don't dispute it, She said, it was
Speaker 1: a violation of law. She also went on to say,
Speaker 1: don't worry about it. After twenty twenty, we have new
Speaker 1: leadership and a new building and a new board and
Speaker 1: a new standard operating procedure, and since then the training
Speaker 1: has been enhanced. Quote, we don't dispute the allegation from
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election. So a little bit further, David Cross,
Speaker 1: a local election integrity activist, made that allegation. He fought
Speaker 1: a former complaint alleging in March of twenty twenty two
Speaker 1: that Fulton County illegally counted three hundred and fifteen thousand
Speaker 1: early votes. And now the Georgia State Board of Supervision
Speaker 1: and the Board of Elections says they do not dispute
Speaker 1: the finding. What does that mean for the twenty twenty election? Continue?
Speaker 1: Quote these signed tapes are the sole legal certification that
Speaker 1: the reported totals are authentic. Fulton County produced zero signed
Speaker 1: tabulating tapes in the early voting. These are not clerical errors.
Speaker 1: They are catastrophic breaks in chant accosted in certification. Since
Speaker 1: no tape was legally certified, Fulton County had no lawful
Speaker 1: authority to certify its advanced voting results to the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State Refensberger, who accepted in twenty twenty and folded
Speaker 1: those uncertified numbers in the George's official total without questioning them.
Speaker 1: When the law demands three signatures on a tabulation tape
Speaker 1: and the county fails to follow the rules, those three
Speaker 1: hundred and fifteen thousand votes in Fulton County are by
Speaker 1: definition uncertified and illegally cast. What here it is? What's
Speaker 1: that mean? That means John Ossoff should not be in
Speaker 1: the United States Senate his running mate, that the reverend
Speaker 1: won by more than that, but as Off did not.
Speaker 1: So here we are what In December of twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: we find out about almost five years later that all
Speaker 1: the comments about the most secure election in American history
Speaker 1: was twenty twenty was a lie and these came out
Speaker 1: of one county in one state. In twenty twenty, the
Speaker 1: Democrats believed sink the Bismark, sink the Trumpster by any
Speaker 1: means necessary, including lying, cheating, and stealing. Do you honestly
Speaker 1: believe that in twenty twenty that Joe Biden received eighty
Speaker 1: one million votes, which is fifteen million more votes for
Speaker 1: him that were cast for Barack Usain Obama in twenty
Speaker 1: eight or twenty twelve, and millions more than were cast
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, and millions more than
Speaker 1: cast for Trump in twenty twenty and more votes that
Speaker 1: were cast for Donald Trump in twenty twenty four or
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, how much cheating actually took place when one
Speaker 1: county and more or less the swing state of Georgia
Speaker 1: should not accounted three hundred and fifteen thousand votes out
Speaker 1: of Fulton County, ninety five percent of which were Democratic votes.
Speaker 1: Can we go back in time and review the comments
Speaker 1: of Raffinsburger and the Democratic Party about that being the
Speaker 1: most secure election and American history was twenty twenty? That
Speaker 1: was a buld face, unmitigated lie. Let's continue. Whenever stop,
Speaker 1: we simply continue. The fight goes on. We're going to
Speaker 1: play for you later. Some cuts. Some Nicki minaj Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Nicki Minaje on the Bill Cunningham Show talking
Speaker 1: about the sacred aspect of Turning Point USA and her
Speaker 1: loving feelings for Donald Trump. This is unbelievable. Let's continue
Speaker 1: with more and line up the calls now, Danny Boy,
Speaker 1: Danny Boy. The number to call. We have five lines
Speaker 1: open now eight six six six four seven seven three
Speaker 1: three seven eight six six six four seven seven three
Speaker 1: three seven. Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you every
Speaker 1: Sunday night. We're gonna play later some of the cuts
Speaker 1: of Nicki Minaj, the Rapper, African American female that had
Speaker 1: had great success and turning point USA Saturday. The rapper
Speaker 1: previously partnered with you and Ambassador Mike Waltz. Despite light
Speaker 1: Christian persecution and Nigeria, I would note a positive aspect.
Speaker 1: The Nigerian government has caused the release of a one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty Catholic school children who were kidnapped by
Speaker 1: Boca Haram, offshoot of ISIS, and I pray they return
Speaker 1: in good health. But what's happening in Nigeria, in fact
Speaker 1: over most of Africa when it comes to the obliteration
Speaker 1: of Christianity is truly unbelievable. I know it might be true,
Speaker 1: but I doubt it. I can't think anywhere in the
Speaker 1: world today in the last one hundred years were Catholics
Speaker 1: and Christians targeted Muslims and Islamic believers for immediate death.
Speaker 1: Because if you in Egypt, for example, announce I'm leaving.
Speaker 1: I'm leaving the Muslim religion. Ninety five percent of Egyptians
Speaker 1: believe that you should be beheaded immediately. So when Nicki
Speaker 1: Minaj talks about Nigeria, what's happened in Christianity in which
Speaker 1: the obliteration of that faith is occurring, part of the
Speaker 1: Islamic jihad against Christians and Jews believe it the global
Speaker 1: Intafada as well underway not just in Australia, but over
Speaker 1: Africa and Asia and in parts of America in which
Speaker 1: fifty or so adherent to Muslims has been elected to
Speaker 1: one or two political offices, including I might add as
Speaker 1: the Mayor of New York City is going to take
Speaker 1: power in about ten days. Mom, Donnie and God helped
Speaker 1: New York City after that. So Nicki Minaj was introduced
Speaker 1: as the surprise surprise Guests by Erica Kirk and they
Speaker 1: discussed the recent realignment of the Trump administration on Christian
Speaker 1: persecution in Nigeria, which by the way, has been going
Speaker 1: on for about the last seven or eight years and
Speaker 1: until Donald Trump took the presidency. Did you hear much
Speaker 1: from Joe Biden about Catholics and Christians being tortured, obliterated,
Speaker 1: thrown into sexual slavery in Nigeria. Only Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: doing that. And in the past she has certainly supported
Speaker 1: Democratic candidates, but she is the utmost respect now for
Speaker 1: the Republican administration of Donald Trump, because she says, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and the Republicans are giving hope during these dark times,
Speaker 1: and God knows they're dark. So let's continue with more
Speaker 1: on the other side. We'll take her telephone calls eight
Speaker 1: six six six four seven seven three three seven, and
Speaker 1: she talks about Trump and Vance as one of us.
Speaker 1: Is Donald Trump one of you? Do you do you
Speaker 1: feel as if we don't deserve to have him as
Speaker 1: the president? Did he have to do this at the
Speaker 1: age of almost eighty, when he's a multi billionaire, almost
Speaker 1: gets shot twice, spills blood for you, and I then
Speaker 1: goes through the crap he goes through almost every day
Speaker 1: at the hands of the mainstream media, and somehow he's
Speaker 1: not lost touch with the world. He is not and
Speaker 1: he's still connected to us. So let's continue with more.
Speaker 1: I'll set up tonight's guest later on. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: later on Maya Cook, who was a Fox digital analyst.
Speaker 1: She was on handed he quite a bit the last
Speaker 1: few weeks to talk about what's happening with the Epstein
Speaker 1: tapes and the files and what's happening in Minnesota. Then
Speaker 1: later on also is the Great Kendall Teats. Kendall Teats
Speaker 1: is a defending education dot Org about the indoctrination of
Speaker 1: children in high schools and colleges. And also later on
Speaker 1: to Steve gorm about the environment and how the movement
Speaker 1: has collapsed. So if a line becomes available, eight sixty
Speaker 1: six six four seven, seven three three seven, And Merry Christmas,
Speaker 1: and I'll be with you next Sunday night, but also
Speaker 1: Happy New Year, Bill Cunningham, the Great American with you
Speaker 1: and all great Americans every Sunday I hit the music.
Speaker 1: Danny Gleason, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you.
Speaker 1: And I'm watching ABC News the other night they have
Speaker 1: a special and something this must be a sign of
Speaker 1: the apocalypse. They had a special about the birth of
Speaker 1: Jesus through the Womb of Mary. And I'm thinking about
Speaker 1: the think back in time, and I've been to Nazareth,
Speaker 1: and I've been to Bethlehem, and I've been to Jerusalem,
Speaker 1: and I thought, and they had a couple of the
Speaker 1: hu that were present two thousand years ago. Let's say
Speaker 1: you're fourteen years old and your betrothed to a guy
Speaker 1: named Joseph from another family. I mean, all of Nazareth
Speaker 1: was maybe one to one hundred and fifty total people.
Speaker 1: It was dirty, they were mud huts. Think back to
Speaker 1: two thousand years ago, what life would be like for
Speaker 1: a girl about thirteen or fourteen years old and your
Speaker 1: betrothed to some other family at that point, even to
Speaker 1: a large extent today, the family set up the marriage.
Speaker 1: And you're an observant Jew, and one afternoon an archangel
Speaker 1: appears to you name Gabriel, and he announces to you,
Speaker 1: as a thirteen or fourteen year old girl, that you're
Speaker 1: going to be pregnant and that you're going to bear
Speaker 1: the Messiah who will be live for eternity, and that
Speaker 1: your mission will be to produce that child. And then
Speaker 1: she announces to Gabriel that's impossible, I'm a virgin. And
Speaker 1: Gabriel said, the Holy Spirit will cause the pregnancy to occur,
Speaker 1: and you will bear the baby and you will call
Speaker 1: him Jesus. Now, at that point she had a problem.
Speaker 1: Would you agree, because in that culture. If you get
Speaker 1: pregnant as a teenage girl and you're not married, most
Speaker 1: of the marriages took place at the age of fourteen
Speaker 1: or fifteen, you were stoned to death. It wasn't like, oh,
Speaker 1: you had an affair, No, no, no, you were stone
Speaker 1: to death. So Mary had a problem. She's thinking, how
Speaker 1: do I tell Joseph and my mom and dad and
Speaker 1: his mom and dad that I'm pregnant and I'm thirteen
Speaker 1: or fourteen years old. Not just I'm pregnant, but the
Speaker 1: an archangel appeared to me and said that I'm going
Speaker 1: to deliver the Messiah, and I'm not married and I'm
Speaker 1: thirteen or fourteen years old. You got a problem. So
Speaker 1: the ARCHANGELI appear then to Joseph and I gave him
Speaker 1: what his mission was. Somehow, Joseph then accepted it. Joseph
Speaker 1: told his mother and father and Mary he told her
Speaker 1: mother and father that I'm delivering the Messiah. At that point,
Speaker 1: there was a story to tell, so she had to
Speaker 1: convince her family. The number one, I'm a virgin. Number two,
Speaker 1: I'm pregnant. Number three, an archangel appeared to me, and
Speaker 1: number four growing inside me is the Messiah. And for
Speaker 1: the next two thousand years, he'd be worshiped by billions,
Speaker 1: and all of human history will count time from the
Speaker 1: moment of my son's birth. And I'm living in the dirty,
Speaker 1: little town of dirt, little town of Nazareth and Judea,
Speaker 1: Who's going to believe this story? The answer is they believed,
Speaker 1: and they kept the secret. They had a quiet ceremony,
Speaker 1: they quickly got married, and then the rest, shall we say,
Speaker 1: his history ended up going to Bethlehem, no more or
Speaker 1: less register as required to do. By the way, there's
Speaker 1: no Motel sixes. There was none of that going on
Speaker 1: at the time. There were other families that would take
Speaker 1: in the travelers, and so Joe his families had connections
Speaker 1: in Bethlehem for the baby Jesus. Did not know that
Speaker 1: Baby Jesus would be born there to tell friends and family.
Speaker 1: Number one, I'm a virgin. Number two, I'm pregnant. Number three,
Speaker 1: an angel and the Holy Spirit made me pregnant. And
Speaker 1: number four, I'm pregnant with the Son of God. How
Speaker 1: would you handle that?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 1: They handled it quite well. And the rest, shall we say,
Speaker 1: is history. Well, let's continue. I want to ask you
Speaker 1: this question tonight. If you had to make one prediction
Speaker 1: good or bad that's going to happen in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1: What would it be. I'll give you my prediction. The
Speaker 1: economy's going to rip and roar, that Venezuela Madora will
Speaker 1: eventually leave, that Putin will seek peace in Ukraine fearing
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. That Iran will be devastated by a terrible drought,
Speaker 1: and that Jijauping will not invade Taiwan because of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: The economy or rip, roar, and the Republicans will keep
Speaker 1: the House in the Senate in twenty twenty six. That's
Speaker 1: my prediction. What is your prediction? Number to call eight
Speaker 1: sixty six six four seven seven three three seven, and
Speaker 1: I'll give each caller about thirty seconds to a minute.
Speaker 1: If you get on the line, We'll take your call
Speaker 1: tonight to give me your prediction for the year twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six, as Danny Gleeson will line up the calls.
Speaker 1: First calls will be from Connecticut, Florida and Colorado. Now,
Speaker 1: uh Saturday, Nicki Minaj the Rapper take about two minutes
Speaker 1: appeared with Turning Point USA and Erica Kirk. It was like,
Speaker 1: are you kidding me? Is this the moment at which
Speaker 1: we're going to realize that younger Americans will listen to
Speaker 1: a Stephen A Smith or a Nicki Minaje and not
Speaker 1: to what they hear in the CBS Evening News Danny
Speaker 1: Boy hit it.
Speaker 4: You know, interestingly enough, people have been even Christians have
Speaker 4: been being persecuted right here in our country in different ways.
Speaker 4: So when we talk about Nigeria and other countries, know
Speaker 4: that prior administrations saw nothing wrong with that, and that's
Speaker 4: what was wrong with them. I truly feel that there
Speaker 4: are people out there who felt good about chastising Christians
Speaker 4: right here in our country, and it's kind of really,
Speaker 4: really sick. We can't let people like that be in power,
Speaker 4: you guys.
Speaker 1: That's the truth.
Speaker 4: I can sugar coat it and laugh and kiki, but
Speaker 4: the truth is I am here today to tell you, you guys,
Speaker 4: that we absolutely cannot let people who have a problem
Speaker 4: with us worshiping God. We cannot have them in power.
Speaker 4: We cannot have them in power. All you have to
Speaker 4: do is look at what is happening in other places
Speaker 4: in the world, look at what is being done to
Speaker 4: Christians all around the world, and ask yourself why people
Speaker 4: in this country that were in positions of power, felt
Speaker 4: so comfortable too try to take our voices from us.
Speaker 4: They were that afraid, They are that intimidated, They are
Speaker 4: that insecure, They are that small inside that hearing us
Speaker 4: and seeing us worship God irritated them. Our spirit irritates
Speaker 4: them because when we speak, they get shown up. When
Speaker 4: the truth walks in the room. The lies hide. They
Speaker 4: don't come out willingly. You got a pry it out
Speaker 4: of them. They hide because they don't want you or
Speaker 4: anyone to know who they really are behind closed doors,
Speaker 4: because even they know how evil it is to try
Speaker 4: to deprive people of worshiping God.
Speaker 1: You think about the Catholic President, Joe Biden, the Catholic
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, could not have cared
Speaker 1: less about what's happening to Catholics and Christians and Nigeria.
Speaker 1: Throughout the entire world, including Somalia. There's no Christian country
Speaker 1: that's executing Muslims, but Muslim countries execute Christians all the time.
Speaker 1: Let's go to your calls line becomes available eight sixty
Speaker 1: six six four seven seven three three seven. Let's go
Speaker 1: to Steven Colorado and then Wayne and then or Dwayne
Speaker 1: and then Edward and Steve and Colorado Springs. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the Bill Cunningham Show. And Steve, what do you got.
Speaker 5: Hey?
Speaker 6: I agree with you.
Speaker 1: The economy is going to get better.
Speaker 7: I agree the Republicans will do fine in the midterms
Speaker 7: as long as we keep a lid on the cheating
Speaker 7: and keep the Department of Justice, and everybody has to
Speaker 7: hold their feet to the fire so they can't squirm
Speaker 7: around and throw out the Republican observers and cheat on
Speaker 7: all the mail in ballots like they do here in Colorado.
Speaker 5: And it takes.
Speaker 7: A trained carpenter to build one. And the only thing
Speaker 7: the Democrats are going to have is some kind of
Speaker 7: watch out for it. They'd love to sabotage Trump's economy
Speaker 7: and did they did it the first time with COVID,
Speaker 7: And they're going to come up with something some kind
Speaker 7: of crisis, is some kind of big lie, and it
Speaker 7: might be pretty ridiculous because they're so desperate now, they're
Speaker 7: like desperate rats. But that's the only thing they can
Speaker 7: do is try to ruin Trump's beautiful economy He's working
Speaker 7: so hard to build.
Speaker 1: Stay do you think the Democrats wish America?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 1: Do you think or you think the Democrats maybe in
Speaker 1: January thirty, it is about five weeks from now. They're
Speaker 1: going to shut down the economy again and then blame Trump.
Speaker 1: He went through about a forty three day but what
Speaker 1: six seven weeks and that took about a trillion trillion
Speaker 1: dollars off the American economy. And they want to do
Speaker 1: that again because they want to destroy Yeah, judo move
Speaker 1: they do.
Speaker 7: They're going to try to do a Judo move and
Speaker 7: make it look like Trump's it's Trump's fault that the
Speaker 7: healthcare system is collapsing, when all it is is Obamacare collapsing,
Speaker 7: and it was all their stupid ideas. It was all
Speaker 7: ill founded anyway, Obamacare.
Speaker 1: It was Obamacare was designed to fail. And when it
Speaker 1: was failing, thank god from the Democratic perspective, that COVID
Speaker 1: came along and that gave the opportunity to prop up
Speaker 1: the system. And it's failed right now. And basically, deductibilities
Speaker 1: are five to ten thousand dollars each. Insurance premiums have
Speaker 1: gone up seventeen hundred percent. Remember Obama, I wish we
Speaker 1: have that sum. We'll play at some point. If you
Speaker 1: like your plan, keep your plan, like your doctor keep
Speaker 1: your doctor premiums. Yearly, we'll go down on average by
Speaker 1: twenty five hundred dollars a year per family. Is going
Speaker 1: to reduce the deficit. Those lies were heaped upon lies,
Speaker 1: and we believe the lies because Obama was saying it.
Speaker 1: But Democrats voted one hu percent for it, Republicans voted
Speaker 1: one hundred percent against it. And who's the blame right now?
Speaker 1: It's Donald Trump and the Republicans and Obamacare is their
Speaker 1: plan that's failed, and Trump and the Democrats are Republicans
Speaker 1: are trying to save it. So go back. We have thousands,
Speaker 1: got to get some more calls. And is it Dwayne
Speaker 1: in Connecticut? Is that correct?
Speaker 8: That is correct?
Speaker 1: Give me a comment or two.
Speaker 8: Hey Bill, how are you today?
Speaker 1: Merry Christmas and happy New Year?
Speaker 8: Great? Hey, listen, I want to go back to what
Speaker 8: you said about the twenty twenty election. I taught listen,
Speaker 8: I talked to God again. It goes with the God thing.
Speaker 8: And he says, because I'm throwing stuff at the TV,
Speaker 8: I'm crying. My wife hates me for all of this.
Speaker 8: And you know what I heard.
Speaker 9: He told me.
Speaker 8: He says, watch four years of hell, and we did.
Speaker 8: We went to it. All, we went for four years
Speaker 8: of hell and looked and then the economy and everything's
Speaker 8: got fixed up again when it could have been.
Speaker 6: Eight years of glory.
Speaker 8: And the thing is all.
Speaker 9: These migrants coming into the country, okay, and everybody thinks
Speaker 9: it's for voting, when really it's census to fill up
Speaker 9: all these called blue states with immigrants so they could
Speaker 9: get money from the federal Gummer, Am I right?
Speaker 1: Well, I look at Minnesota. You know Medicare, Medicaid is
Speaker 1: about fifty percent Feds about fifty percent in the state.
Speaker 1: The fraud in Minnesota was about eighteen billion dollars cost
Speaker 1: Minnesota's about nine billion cost us. But more importantly, they
Speaker 1: monetize criminality by an immigrant group, and to criticize it
Speaker 1: as racism. It's not racist if someone's acting criminally, call
Speaker 1: them out irrespective of race. If you use race not
Speaker 1: to call them out, hell, that's racism by itself. Hold
Speaker 1: everybody the same election standard. And how do these Democrats
Speaker 1: get into office, like Nancy Pelosi or like elon Omar
Speaker 1: oh No and or Congressman Waters And all of a
Speaker 1: sudden they go in a little bit of money to
Speaker 1: come out worth tens of millions of dollars. How's that
Speaker 1: possible unless they're cheating. And I think Harry Truman said
Speaker 1: if a politicians and office enhancing their their own value,
Speaker 1: they're cheating. And right now we have large numbers of
Speaker 1: Democrats that are monetizing their office and blaming others for
Speaker 1: their crimes, and we should not have to put up
Speaker 1: with it.
Speaker 6: So I'll come this administration before hasn't been arrested for treason,
Speaker 6: and I.
Speaker 1: Head on as on my daytime show. I had on
Speaker 1: a congressman a few days ago that said he wants
Speaker 1: to see somebody go to jail. At some point, someone's
Speaker 1: got to go to jail or a Democrats for the
Speaker 1: felonies they committed. And I hope it's out of South Florida.
Speaker 1: There's an investigation underway there, and I hope something happens
Speaker 1: with Komy and with Obama and with Biden, and with Clapper,
Speaker 1: and with and Brennan who set up the false intelligence
Speaker 1: report which was the basis of the impeachment. I'm told
Speaker 1: that's going to happen in the first quarter of next year.
Speaker 1: It would be a great thing if Barack Hussein, Obama,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden are indicted I'm not sure they can
Speaker 1: be convicted because they're president, so to speak. We will
Speaker 1: see what the US Supreme Court says. But he said
Speaker 1: to me, somebody's got to go to jail. Who are Democrats?
Speaker 1: And all I can say is God, bless you. Thanks
Speaker 1: for your call from Connecticut. Let's take a short break,
Speaker 1: come back on the other side. Bill Cunningham, with you
Speaker 1: every Sunday night. Sorry, Danny boy, Danny Boy. A couple
Speaker 1: of other last items early Sunday, which is this morning.
Speaker 1: Deputy Attorney General at Todd Blanche, I like that guy said.
Speaker 1: The removal of Donald Trump's photos had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with the President's involvement with young girls or women at
Speaker 1: the behest of Jeffrey Epstein, was instead driven by concerns
Speaker 1: for the women depicted whether they wanted their pictures out.
Speaker 1: About two hours ago, according to this media account that
Speaker 1: the photos have now been released of Donald Trump, US
Speaker 1: Department of Justice said quote, it has restored photos featuring
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump and the latest release of Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: related documents after a review determined the image had not
Speaker 1: depict any Epstein victims. Of course, because we know, According
Speaker 1: to the Department of Justice, Todd Blanche. More than two
Speaker 1: hundred attorneys in the Department of Justice dropped everything they
Speaker 1: were doing and were parceled out thousands of pages I said,
Speaker 1: thousands of pages of depositions, documents, grand jury witness statements, etc.
Speaker 1: To review. They dropped two hundred lawyers in Washington drop
Speaker 1: what they were doing and said, get to work. There
Speaker 1: was about a million pages. We have two hundred and
Speaker 1: some lawyers. That's like reading a book every few hours
Speaker 1: and determine if there's anything in there that should not
Speaker 1: be released pursuing to other federal laws. And they released
Speaker 1: a whole bunch and they had redactions, and now they're
Speaker 1: getting rid of the reductions. So where would the Democrats
Speaker 1: go from here? I have no idea, But I began
Speaker 1: about an hour ago talking about what happened to the
Speaker 1: state of Georgia when three hundred and fifteen thousand votes
Speaker 1: out of Fulton County should not have been counted in
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election because they weren't tabulated correctly. The
Speaker 1: tapes did not have signatures, and it was a lie. Obviously,
Speaker 1: John Osoff would not be in the Senate right now
Speaker 1: if these facts were known in twenty twenty and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump easily would have won the state of Georgia. I'd
Speaker 1: have to wonder, and by the way, the elections officials
Speaker 1: in Georgia agree with that. I'd have to wonder how
Speaker 1: many other states had similar problems that have not been
Speaker 1: identified yet. Mail and ballots are sent all over the
Speaker 1: country to individuals, and who's voting. Nobody knows. That's why
Speaker 1: mail and ballots are ripe with fraud. So let's continue
Speaker 1: with more. Coming up first will be Maya Cook. She's
Speaker 1: with the Department, hasband with the DOJ and terrorism cases.
Speaker 1: She's a Fox News contributor and she was on with
Speaker 1: Fox News earlier this week. I want to talk to
Speaker 1: her about what happened in the Brown University. By the way,
Speaker 1: it is not racist if you call Brown University brown university,
Speaker 1: because one of the specialists in Brown said, if you
Speaker 1: say the Brown killer, that's unfair to Brown people. That's
Speaker 1: the kind of crap that goes on at Brown University,
Speaker 1: which hopefully will collapse into a ball of pity. So
Speaker 1: let's continue with more and later on also we'll be
Speaker 1: Kendall teets a defending Education dot org, etc. By the way,
Speaker 1: once again, as we continue, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Speaker 1: Bill cunning in the Great American with you every Sunday.
Speaker 10: Night, Willie.
Speaker 2: The ball through you by Choice Hotels, a Kno Lodge
Speaker 2: and Roadway In Hotels are serving up double points for
Speaker 2: every qualifying stay book at Choice Hotels dot com. Now
Speaker 2: here's the man who's been recognized as radio's best, the
Speaker 2: recipient of not one but two prestigious Marconi Awards for
Speaker 2: his broadcast exodence, the one and only Bill Cunningham.
Speaker 1: And May Cook. Welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show.
Speaker 1: And first of all, let's deal just a little bit
Speaker 1: about the Epstein files, which sickens me because I've had
Speaker 1: it up to here. Other than the Kennedy assassination, this
Speaker 1: has been the most investigated criminal case in the history
Speaker 1: of America, going back from twenty to twenty five years.
Speaker 1: Most of the victims, and I'm sure there are victims,
Speaker 1: have been paid millions and millions of dollars. Because of
Speaker 1: banks and insurance companies and brokerage firms, et cetera. More
Speaker 1: lawsuits have been filed on their behalf. The more has released,
Speaker 1: the more has known, the more the media covers that
Speaker 1: can you tell me, you're kind of like a female
Speaker 1: type person. I have a wife, I have a sister,
Speaker 1: I have a granddaughter. Sexual assault, sexual rape. I've handled
Speaker 1: maybe twenty to twenty five rape cases, and my professional
Speaker 1: life is a criminal offense attorney, and there should be coverage.
Speaker 1: Have you noticed the lack of proportionality of the coverage
Speaker 1: of this compared to what's happening with immigrant crime happening
Speaker 1: all over the country. Have you noticed that?
Speaker 11: Have you noticed the difference bill one hundred percent? The
Speaker 11: media is so obsessed with the Epstein fil relief that
Speaker 11: they forgot their first job was transparency to the American people.
Speaker 11: And what Americans should be realizing today is that we
Speaker 11: had the worst border crisis in the history of America
Speaker 11: under Joe Biden's open border rapes, incest, people being just
Speaker 11: mulled on the street, attacked, ice officers being attacked today,
Speaker 11: and that's what we should be focused on.
Speaker 1: The rule of law.
Speaker 11: And the rule of law actually worked in Epstein as well,
Speaker 11: but the media refused us to cover it. You know,
Speaker 11: the Trump administration gave unprecedented support for transparency. Even after
Speaker 11: Joe Biden declined to make these files public. The media
Speaker 11: never covers that when we talk about Epstein, the first
Speaker 11: Trump administration was actually prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein for HAINUS crimes.
Speaker 11: Obama declined, Biden didn't do anything. And now you have
Speaker 11: the DOJ redacting and releasing files because there has been
Speaker 11: rape of miners. If these miners want to come out
Speaker 11: and talk about this bill, by all means, but the
Speaker 11: DOJ must be careful because there's legal precedence on what
Speaker 11: you can and can't release today. And we're looking at
Speaker 11: thousands of pages of material, and every single time the
Speaker 11: Democrats get their hands on this, they select give the
Speaker 11: media and the public information so that there is a
Speaker 11: massive miscarriage of justice. Nobody's talking about the fact that
Speaker 11: Bill Clinton is all over the Fteam files. I mean,
Speaker 11: Hillary's hiding right now.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine if they had Donald Trump in crime?
Speaker 1: Can you imagine if they had Donald Trump in a
Speaker 1: hot tub with a bunch of seemingly half naked or
Speaker 1: naked women and he's all the media would melt down.
Speaker 1: And I watched Todd Blanche the Deputy ag, on a
Speaker 1: lot of talk shows this morning. He gave me some numbers.
Speaker 1: He said, there's about a million pages of documents. I said,
Speaker 1: a million pages between Florida, Washington, and New York, which
Speaker 1: includes grand jury testimony, depositions from all the various lawyers
Speaker 1: suing individuals for money for their clients and if they
Speaker 1: were sexually abused and someone's responsible, they should be paid,
Speaker 1: the grand jury stuff, all the Southern District of New
Speaker 1: York information. And he said, we took over two hundred
Speaker 1: assistant ages, and we told these two hundred people to
Speaker 1: drop what you're doing in the AG's office, stop what
Speaker 1: you're doing, and start reading and analyzing a million pages
Speaker 1: and get it done within the next thirty days. That
Speaker 1: would be about thirty five thousand pages per day, seven
Speaker 1: days a week. And he's saying, look, I can't release
Speaker 1: information about victims' names without their permission, especially if they're juveniles.
Speaker 1: I can't do that. There's privileged information between lawyers and
Speaker 1: clients I can't release. And before we go through the process,
Speaker 1: each time something is flagged, we have a committee of
Speaker 1: senior attorneys in the AG's office that have dropped what
Speaker 1: they're doing to review whether or not to release it
Speaker 1: or not. And so Todd Bland said today removing the
Speaker 1: photos from Epstein files had nothing to do with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But we can't simply put on the public record one thousand,
Speaker 1: a million pages of this stuff because it would violate
Speaker 1: other federal laws. But the media and the Democrats well
Speaker 1: and accept that. Sadly, Rocanna and my friend Tom Massey
Speaker 1: from Northern Kentucky, they now want to hold Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: in contempt of Congress. What's up with that?
Speaker 11: Well, where were they with Joe Biden? I mean, Joe
Speaker 11: Biden sat on these files. If there was really files
Speaker 11: or photographs of President Trump, they would have been released. Remember,
Speaker 11: the Democrats were in charge for four years. The fact
Speaker 11: that we're finally releasing files that being stopful and redacting
Speaker 11: just tells you everything about our justice system. They're not
Speaker 11: weaponizing the justice system. They're actually protecting survivors. They're protecting victims,
Speaker 11: and they're protecting young girls that were molested and raped
Speaker 11: by this evil man. And of course there's thousands of
Speaker 11: pages of documents though this scandal, the scheme went on
Speaker 11: for decades and we're finally getting transparency. And what bothers
Speaker 11: me today is people like Rokanna, where were they under
Speaker 11: Joe Biden? These are the same politics today's a merry
Speaker 11: go around. It's the same people that stand there and
Speaker 11: jump up and down for accountability when you have President Trump,
Speaker 11: But they weren't saying anything under Joe Biden. I think
Speaker 11: the hypocrisy is sickening. And if they really care about victims,
Speaker 11: then let's talk about Lake and Riley. Let's talk about
Speaker 11: all the young women that have been raped at the
Speaker 11: hands of illegal immigrants. But these same Democrats turn their
Speaker 11: backs on us and continue to vilify ice. Who are
Speaker 11: the bravest soldiers, in my opinions, the bravest law enforcement
Speaker 11: officers in the country. Where are they defending that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I watch what happened in Portland. They finally arrested
Speaker 1: some transgender and ANTIFA outfit punched a sergeant. He got arrested.
Speaker 1: Of course he's out on Bonni immediately. But what's happening now,
Speaker 1: I think is that this is takeing. The coverage has
Speaker 1: taken the place of objectively covering the successes of the
Speaker 1: Trump administration. It's been politicized by the media and a
Speaker 1: few Republicans, so they don't talk about the success of
Speaker 1: the economy. What's happening of Venezuela, what's happened on the
Speaker 1: southern border, it takes the place of it. And as
Speaker 1: far as Senator Kine, the VP nominee with Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: thank god he didn't win. He's now calling for Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton should address the photos of himself being in these
Speaker 1: photos and compromising positions. Also, there's a big paint, a
Speaker 1: painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress in private
Speaker 1: quarters of Jeffrey Epstein. And right now you can't find
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton with a search warrant. And to me, it's sickening.
Speaker 1: We know as lawyers, as a civil aspect and a
Speaker 1: criminal aspect. In twenty seventeen, eighteen, and nineteen, under who
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, the Southern District of New York launched a
Speaker 1: full scale, multi month, a year and a half investigation
Speaker 1: of Julane Maxwell and also Jeffrey Epstein. And they believed
Speaker 1: there were lots of men who could be indicted. And
Speaker 1: I've watched more than one US attorney say that we
Speaker 1: indicted the only two people people that had criminal liabilities,
Speaker 1: and those were Jeffrey Epstein and Julane Maxwell. We did
Speaker 1: not indict anyone else. No one else had a criminal
Speaker 1: a connection to the case. And I replayed it. I
Speaker 1: watched it again about two or three hours ago. And
Speaker 1: so is it possible that this whole thing, because after all,
Speaker 1: Maxwell was sent to prison for twenty years for trafficking
Speaker 1: young girls to men. I like to know who are
Speaker 1: the men I keep I watch all these interviews on
Speaker 1: MS now and CNN and some on Fox about the survivors.
Speaker 1: I want to know other than the one time Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew was identified by Roberts Jeffrey, she identified Prince Andrew,
Speaker 1: and other than that. And you watched the media, hope
Speaker 1: as much as I do, as any of these victims
Speaker 1: on TV said this man raped me. This is the guy.
Speaker 1: Even if you're a twenty year old woman, if you're
Speaker 1: being trafficked, that's a crime. So are you aware of
Speaker 1: any of these women in public way who've said this
Speaker 1: is the guy that did it to me?
Speaker 11: And if not, why, Look, I've heard some allegations from
Speaker 11: some of the women who have named individuals, and I
Speaker 11: think that this is where the Department of Justice has
Speaker 11: to work with these victims. If I was over there
Speaker 11: right now, I would say start naming them, start talking
Speaker 11: to the victims, and go to them one by one
Speaker 11: and ask them, do you want to prosecute. We will
Speaker 11: be with you every step of the way. I think
Speaker 11: that's the way to create transparency. The DOJ has all
Speaker 11: the power today. They can raise their hands and say
Speaker 11: I am with you. Victims, contact us, set up a
Speaker 11: new email address, and let's go. Because these men are sick.
Speaker 11: They need to be held accountable. And remember, titles don't
Speaker 11: transcend the law. So Bill Clinton, if I believe he
Speaker 11: is one of these men, he should be prosecuted. I
Speaker 11: don't care if he was the ex president, I don't
Speaker 11: care if he's the janitor. He needs to be prosecuted
Speaker 11: because these young women should have never gone through that victimization.
Speaker 1: Well, let's do it. And I'm waiting for something to
Speaker 1: shoe to drop, and uh, let's move on to Part two.
Speaker 1: Media complicit blamed as FED say, Minnesota fraud crisis could
Speaker 1: reach I said nine billion dollars, nine billion dollars. And
Speaker 1: I'm thinking at this point, how does Keith Allison, who's
Speaker 1: running for reelection next year, the AG Tim Waltz running
Speaker 1: for re election next year, and the mayor of Minneapolis,
Speaker 1: Fred just got elected a month or so ago. And this,
Speaker 1: this article in Fox News makes the point that there's
Speaker 1: supposedly one great newspaper in the Minneapolis area that covers
Speaker 1: the entire state, and that one newspaper has been silent
Speaker 1: loathed these many months because they're not doing their job
Speaker 1: because the editor used to work for Tim Waltz and
Speaker 1: so kind of layout. How in Minneapolis practically did they
Speaker 1: loot the treasury for nine billion dollars? How did it work?
Speaker 11: Look, I think this was a scandal that was very easy.
Speaker 11: The Somalian population and have several others came in and
Speaker 11: they started targeting handout programs, and so you look at it. Actually,
Speaker 11: I'm looking at numbers. It's approximately eighteen billion dollars in
Speaker 11: federal funds were expended on fourteen Minnesota run program since
Speaker 11: twenty eighteen, and they were fraudulently obtained. These funds were
Speaker 11: meant for services like child nutrition, housing stabilization, autism care,
Speaker 11: disability support. But evidence shows that many payments were tied
Speaker 11: to fabricated claims or shell entities. And this was reported
Speaker 11: over and over again by auditors and whistleblowers, and Tim
Speaker 11: Walts knew, and he looked the other way because guess what,
Speaker 11: people yelled the our word racist. The minute you yell
Speaker 11: racists in America today, people without a backbone, Democrats frumble,
Speaker 11: so they decided to look the other way. And a
Speaker 11: major piece of this controversy stem from this now default
Speaker 11: nonprofit Feeding Our Future. It's the largest COVID nineteen pandemic
Speaker 11: era frot scheme in US history, and it was specifically
Speaker 11: to help feed children. And they set up these fake
Speaker 11: accounts and the number of children they were supposedly feeding
Speaker 11: went up exponentially, And this is exactly why auditors said
Speaker 11: this is not possible. But Tim Waltz turned his back.
Speaker 11: And let me tell you, the media is not covering this,
Speaker 11: and the newspapers are not covering it because they're in
Speaker 11: bed with Democrats today. And this is exactly why people
Speaker 11: listen to your radio program or people online that have
Speaker 11: podcasts today, because we don't trust the media. We're continue
Speaker 11: to lie, They continue to lie and gaslight us. I
Speaker 11: think after they told us, Joe Biden was sharp as
Speaker 11: attacked and then got on national television and President Bump
Speaker 11: didn't know what the hell he was saying. We knew,
Speaker 11: we knew that we were being lied to. We don't
Speaker 11: trust anybody anymore. Remember get the jab it's going to
Speaker 11: protect you. I mean, we are in such a state
Speaker 11: of panic today when we're told trust us, we don't.
Speaker 11: We don't trust the government. They're not here to help us.
Speaker 11: They need to get out.
Speaker 1: Of our way.
Speaker 11: And Tim Walts needs to be fired.
Speaker 1: Well, the Minnesota Star Tribune masquerades as a newspaper, it's
Speaker 1: really a fish wrapper. It's really the high news twist
Speaker 1: effects don't cover it. And in this case about the
Speaker 1: eighteen billion dollar fraud, about half of it's federal, about
Speaker 1: half of its state, which where we get the nine
Speaker 1: billion number. It appears that's been going on for many years,
Speaker 1: maybe ten years. And you have congress people like elan
Speaker 1: Omar that goes from sixty thousand dollars a net worth
Speaker 1: according to our federal forms, to about thirty million dollars.
Speaker 1: She obviously is getting help. And you have numerous other
Speaker 1: circumstances in which those public officials that should be the
Speaker 1: whistleblowers turned into recipients of the crime. And in this case,
Speaker 1: there was four hundred Minnesota state employees who blew the
Speaker 1: whistle on Tim Waltz in these programs, and many of
Speaker 1: them were fired because they didn't stay within the line
Speaker 1: of command. The shanty Command and they were fired. So
Speaker 1: if you work for the state of Minnesota, it's a
Speaker 1: one company town and you can't jump out a line.
Speaker 1: And to me, it's going to be shocking if they
Speaker 1: get re elected next year, which is entirely possible. Now, lastly,
Speaker 1: it's come out that from the State of Georgia that
Speaker 1: Fulton County had about three hundred thousand or so ballots
Speaker 1: that should not have been counted, and that somehow it appears,
Speaker 1: according to Rafsenberger, that in the last election, that three
Speaker 1: hundred thousand ballots suddenly found themselves shall we say that
Speaker 1: should not have been counted? I can look back to
Speaker 1: what happened with Donald Trump when he said to Rafsenberger
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty we need to find eleven thousand, seven
Speaker 1: and sixty five votes. And if you you know, he
Speaker 1: didn't say illicitly or wrongfully, he said they got to
Speaker 1: be there somewhere and we can't find them. So isn't
Speaker 1: it isn't it rich that in twenty twenty four out
Speaker 1: of Fulton County that there was three hundred thousand so
Speaker 1: votes that should not have been counted. That was that
Speaker 1: changed elections up and down the ladder. What do you
Speaker 1: think about that one?
Speaker 11: Well, I'm not surprised today. I mean, ask yourself, what
Speaker 11: where do you go and vote as an American citizen.
Speaker 11: I don't care what state you're in, where you have
Speaker 11: to prove citizenship, they ask you for your last four
Speaker 11: digits of your Social Security and the majority of the
Speaker 11: states to even register to vote. So when President Trump
Speaker 11: challenged the election results in twenty twenty to ask how
Speaker 11: is this possible? Find me the vote people? What after
Speaker 11: him for insurrection? I think the worst thing in history
Speaker 11: is not to be able to challenge our voting laws
Speaker 11: or to ask if the results are accurate. We need
Speaker 11: paper ballots today. We need to stop this nonsense about
Speaker 11: voting for two weeks and ballot harvesting and whatever is
Speaker 11: happening in America. States can't handle their elections. As much
Speaker 11: as I want states to be the commander in chief,
Speaker 11: when it comes to how we do this, it has
Speaker 11: been so It's been so wrongly done every single state,
Speaker 11: including Ohio. I mean, we have fraud here. The fact
Speaker 11: that election officials do not mandate show me citizenship, show
Speaker 11: me your passport, show me proof tells you everything you
Speaker 11: need to know. The system has been rigged against US citizens.
Speaker 11: We no longer matter in this election process, and until
Speaker 11: we don't fix it, we're going to continue to challenge
Speaker 11: elections and continue to wonder did we win or did
Speaker 11: we lose?
Speaker 1: Now, I'm always amazed that one of the worst campaigns
Speaker 1: ever run by any candidate in the past one hundred
Speaker 1: years was in twenty twenty when Joe Biden, from his basement,
Speaker 1: ran a campaign and somehow implausibly, he received eighty one
Speaker 1: million votes. Joe Biden twenty twenty against eighty one million votes,
Speaker 1: which is fifteen million more votes than Barack Hussein Obama
Speaker 1: received and twenty eight And so you cannot tell or
Speaker 1: end twenty twelve, you can't tell me that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: ran a great campaign, unbelievable campaign in twenty twenty, got
Speaker 1: fifteen million more votes than Obama. And I have to
Speaker 1: think that Fulton County is the tip of the iceberg
Speaker 1: when it comes to fraud. It's probably happening almost everywhere. Well,
Speaker 1: once again, we got to run. I could talk to
Speaker 1: you all evening. Can't do it, and we'll do it again.
Speaker 1: But may you and yours may I cook have a
Speaker 1: wonderful twenty six. Let's keep an eye on the fraud,
Speaker 1: keep an eye on the looting and the treasury. And
Speaker 1: thank God. I often say, Meg, we're blessed to have
Speaker 1: Trump in the White House. Many times I don't think
Speaker 1: we deserve to have him there. We're not good enough.
Speaker 1: But may I Cook have a merry Christmas and happy
Speaker 1: New Year. And thanks for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. Meg,
Speaker 1: thank you very.
Speaker 11: Much, Thank you you too.
Speaker 1: God bless America. How in the world, How in the
Speaker 1: world can Fulton County miscount by hundreds of thousand ballots
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four? How's that possible? Bill Cunningham, the
Speaker 1: Great American with you every Sunday night, Billy cunning under
Speaker 1: grant in America. And I see great things in the
Speaker 1: future for Maya Cook. But she makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: She was born in India, made in America, came here legally.
Speaker 1: And some of the most strident individuals who say we
Speaker 1: should follow the law and not be so generous with
Speaker 1: welfare are those who come into the country. May I
Speaker 1: use the term legally, and those like Maya Cook that
Speaker 1: wants the rule of law to be followed. When it's
Speaker 1: not followed whether it's Minnesota, Ohio, or California that's going
Speaker 1: to have six and eight dollars a gallon gas and
Speaker 1: now can't keep the lights turned on in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: The media should cover these stories just a little bit,
Speaker 1: would you agree? Coming up next to Kendall Teets of
Speaker 1: Defending Education, she's done some work on what's happening in
Speaker 1: the public school system, and I read her column. It
Speaker 1: was wonderful stuff. This is what happens at Brown University
Speaker 1: when millions and millions and millions are spent on academic professors,
Speaker 1: and little or no money you spent on recording devices
Speaker 1: or cameras to keep the student safe. Why would any knowing,
Speaker 1: thoughtful mom or dad ever send their kid, especially a female,
Speaker 1: to an Ivy League school that has such low, impossible
Speaker 1: standards and teaches Marxism and demands anti Semitism of its
Speaker 1: own students. You send away a bright kid, come back
Speaker 1: if someone with three colored hair and a nosering don't
Speaker 1: do it. You can think about it, but don't do it.
Speaker 1: Bill cunning In the Great American with you every Sunday.
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham, the Great American. When I look at the
Speaker 1: history of American race, relations. Most of the difficulties have
Speaker 1: come to the left. Going back one to two hundred years,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party used black folks as slaves, and then
Speaker 1: after the Civil War, after the Republican Party freed the slaves,
Speaker 1: guess what happened next is that the Democratic Party in
Speaker 1: the South said, you know what, let's have the Kuku clan.
Speaker 1: And after that failed miserably because Republicans opposed to Going
Speaker 1: up to the nineteen thirties to forties, the black folks
Speaker 1: were denied entrance into the regular military by the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Then in nineteen sixty four and sixty five, the Civil
Speaker 1: Rights Acts all passed because of the Republican Party said
Speaker 1: enough is enough. And so you thought that racially discriminatory
Speaker 1: segregated classes, for example in school after Brown versus Board
Speaker 1: of Education would be concluded, But that's not the case.
Speaker 1: In fact, there's a new segregation happening in public schools,
Speaker 1: and it's happening mainly in blue cities, blue states, like
Speaker 1: in New York City and Los Angeles, Chicago, but also
Speaker 1: happening in Minneapolis. And joining you nine now is Kendall Teats.
Speaker 1: She's an investigative reporter for defending education and she's focusing
Speaker 1: now in Minnesota, many other states, lots of work to
Speaker 1: do in Kendall teats, I think for the first time,
Speaker 1: welcome to the Bill Cunningham Show. So describe the formula
Speaker 1: Minneapolis schools. Public schools are now using to use race
Speaker 1: based decisions when it came the students who should not
Speaker 1: be race based. Tell what's going Tell the American people
Speaker 1: what's happening in Minnesota.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 3: So, Minnesota's been in the news recently, as you know,
Speaker 3: but something that hasn't been covered is really just Minnesota's
Speaker 3: leftward shift in education. So it's become one of the
Speaker 3: most aggressive states in reshaping education. So we can discuss
Speaker 3: Minneapolis public schools, they have had racially segregated classes, and
Speaker 3: I can get into some of the specifics on that,
Speaker 3: but we really document in the state wide leftward shift,
Speaker 3: and it really is a civil rights crisis. So you've
Speaker 3: got grant opportunities coming down from the state at the
Speaker 3: government level that are race based. You also have ethnic studies,
Speaker 3: which is going to be required by every high school
Speaker 3: offered that they require it by twenty twenty six. So
Speaker 3: there are lots of examples across the state where race
Speaker 3: has been a factor, and we've really been documenting that.
Speaker 3: But to go back to your question about what's going
Speaker 3: on specifically in Minneapolis public schools, they have racially segregated classes,
Speaker 3: which would be a violation of you know, Title six
Speaker 3: and the cool Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In
Speaker 3: response spending education in October, file the civil Rights complaint
Speaker 3: with the US Department of Education over these racially segregated classes.
Speaker 3: And like you said, I mean, we settled this in
Speaker 3: nineteen fifty four in Brown versus Board of Education, the
Speaker 3: Supreme Court made it clear that segregating students by race
Speaker 3: in public schools is unconstitutional. It's truly as simple as that. So,
Speaker 3: you know, this is this class, these classes that are
Speaker 3: being offered, they really do appear to be only open
Speaker 3: to black students, which is obviously unconstitutional. In the same
Speaker 3: school district, they have a required Ethnic studies course that
Speaker 3: centers around structural analysis of racism and colonialism. Kind of
Speaker 3: just goes back to this race based teachinging, you know,
Speaker 3: direct students to challenge the white figure narrative. So these
Speaker 3: your ideas that are being taught to the most impressionable
Speaker 3: minds at the K through twelve level, and like you said,
Speaker 3: at a public school district.
Speaker 6: This is not this is not a private school Kendall Tits.
Speaker 1: So are they so outwardly racist for the Democrats to say,
Speaker 1: black kids you go in this class, white kids are
Speaker 1: brown kids, you go in that class? Or do they
Speaker 1: couch it in such a way as to hide the
Speaker 1: races and the Democratic Party practices because it benefits them.
Speaker 1: How specific are they If you're in the third grade
Speaker 1: and you still can't read, I don't care if you're white, black,
Speaker 1: or polka? Doont government ought to be saying you can't
Speaker 1: go to the fourth grade unless you can read social promotion?
Speaker 1: How specifically are these blue city, blue state schools and
Speaker 1: explicitly excluding children, not adults, much less children based up
Speaker 1: on skin color. Give me a concrete example.
Speaker 3: Yeah, like I said, you have multiple classes in high
Speaker 3: schools across Minneapolis public schools that do feature regular, regular
Speaker 3: or sorry, racially segregated classes that appear to be limited
Speaker 3: by race. You can see the specifics of those classes
Speaker 3: on our website defending ed dot org. As far as
Speaker 3: this ethnic studies course, I mean, they cite critical race
Speaker 3: theory that is completely based on race. It promotes the
Speaker 3: ideas of coral Marx and pedals. The notion and this
Speaker 3: is documented as well on our website that capitalism and
Speaker 3: Western culture are to blame for slavery, genocide, colonialism, and
Speaker 3: white supremacy.
Speaker 1: And you know this isn't it's amazing that America and Europe,
Speaker 1: specifically England stopped a slavery. They didn't keep it going,
Speaker 1: they stopped it. There were thousands and thousands of British
Speaker 1: sailors who were killed on ships stopping the slave trade.
Speaker 1: America stopped racism and pursuing into slavery. Other countries all
Speaker 1: over the world continued it. And you have in your
Speaker 1: column teachers ask students quote challenge the white savior narrative
Speaker 1: and they have to complete a youth led participatory action
Speaker 1: research project that pushes them into activism. So you can't
Speaker 1: teach reading, writing, and arithmetic. Well, so let's move on
Speaker 1: to targeting white children that are in the third and
Speaker 1: fourth and fifth grade about their privilege and about the
Speaker 1: savior narrative. How corrosive is that to the white kids
Speaker 1: they have to hear this crap.
Speaker 3: Well, it's corrosive to the white kids. And not to
Speaker 3: mention it's also corrosive.
Speaker 11: To the black kids.
Speaker 3: If you are sitting in class and you're getting told
Speaker 3: that because you happen to be white and immutable characteristic,
Speaker 3: you are an oppressor, and if you happen to be black,
Speaker 3: you're oppressed.
Speaker 11: So you're basically.
Speaker 3: Told from the outset that you know, the authors stocked
Speaker 3: against you because of your skin color. It's not I
Speaker 3: don't think, like you said, what America was founded on,
Speaker 3: and that should not be something that you know, we're
Speaker 3: teaching our kids, and you know, I just one more
Speaker 3: example I think is really important to point out is
Speaker 3: Minnesota at the state level, has teacher licensing framework. They
Speaker 3: call them the Standards of Effective Practice that have a
Speaker 3: requirement that teachers talk about racial consciousness and reflection, and
Speaker 3: it includes training on how you know light supremacy undermines
Speaker 3: pedagogical equity. And that sounds like a bunch of random
Speaker 3: words slap together, but there is meaning underlying all of that,
Speaker 3: and they want to make sure that race is the
Speaker 3: underpinning for anything that teachers are teaching in the public
Speaker 3: school system.
Speaker 1: So you fail when you teach the basics of academic
Speaker 1: excellence and then you go into indoctrination of children that
Speaker 1: are quite impressionable. You also have Minnesota's fighting the Trump
Speaker 1: administration's quote gender ideology and sports ban. You're like a
Speaker 1: and type person. And Title nine was in there to
Speaker 1: give girls high school, grade school, and college and later
Speaker 1: on equal opportunity to money when it comes to scholarships,
Speaker 1: et cetera. So explain what this is about gender ideology
Speaker 1: in Minnesota, which is all over the Blue cities and
Speaker 1: Blue states, and sports fan that allows men to pretend
Speaker 1: as if they're women, boys as if they're girls, to
Speaker 1: play women's sports. What is gender ideology? What are we
Speaker 1: talking about?
Speaker 3: Well, when we say gender ideology, we mean instances where
Speaker 3: you know, progressives believe that males who identify as females
Speaker 3: to be able to play in female sports, use female
Speaker 3: locker rooms, use female restrooms. And at the state level,
Speaker 3: you know, the Trump administration has put down executive orders
Speaker 3: that fight against policies like that or sports bands and
Speaker 3: the examples of you know, biological men wanting to play
Speaker 3: in women's sports, and we believe that those are unlawful
Speaker 3: rewrites nine, which, like you said, we're put out to
Speaker 3: help women and girls. That is what Title nine is about.
Speaker 3: So you really just flipped the purpose of titlemine on
Speaker 3: its head when you're allowing biological men who might identify
Speaker 3: as girls sure playing in their sports. And you know,
Speaker 3: at the same time we have we documented a group
Speaker 3: of school board candidates under the banner of the name
Speaker 3: Gender Justice. They published a joint initiative supporting the full
Speaker 3: inclusion of transgender and nine non binary students in school athletics,
Speaker 3: which they claim that Title nine protects. So at its
Speaker 3: core here is really just the push and the pull
Speaker 3: of what Title nine means. I think it's pretty obvious
Speaker 3: what Title nine says. It's protecting women and girls, but
Speaker 3: progressive in this instance, school board candidates are really just
Speaker 3: flipping it on its head and saying that, you know,
Speaker 3: this is this includes the full inclusion of transgender and
Speaker 3: non binary students, which is just you know, specifically in
Speaker 3: school athletics. I think that that is an extremely unpopular issue.
Speaker 3: That is eight and ten Americans don't think that a
Speaker 3: biological man should be participating.
Speaker 11: In women's sports.
Speaker 1: How about this one? In your column defending education dot Org.
Speaker 1: Normally your racial discrimination is not so public, but in Minnesota,
Speaker 1: which I'm sure is the same thing in many urban districts.
Speaker 1: In Chicago public schools, in Los Angeles public schools, they
Speaker 1: have a form you fill out as to how you
Speaker 1: want to be identified, and you have to be he she,
Speaker 1: they them, And that's got eighty or ninety categories. And
Speaker 1: we're asking an eight year old girl to identify and
Speaker 1: has to read exactly the one hundred and five categories
Speaker 1: of gender to determine which I fit in. But you
Speaker 1: point out that the Minnesota Department of Education has a
Speaker 1: grant worth nine point four million. It's opened to universities
Speaker 1: and explicitly focused on quote increasing licensed school psychologists, nurses,
Speaker 1: and school counselors and skill social workers of color and indigenous.
Speaker 1: So they simply put out effectively, it says it that
Speaker 1: in order to get this money, you have to you
Speaker 1: have to be black, I guess Hispanic and or maybe
Speaker 1: an Indian. Can I say Indian? I'm not sure? But
Speaker 1: what In other words, if you're a white female, a
Speaker 1: white or a white male, you can't get the money. Normally,
Speaker 1: the racism of the Democrat Party is not so explicit,
Speaker 1: but here it is. And if you point out this
Speaker 1: effectively excludes all who are not black indigenous, or people
Speaker 1: of color, and on its surface, it violates Title six
Speaker 1: of the Civil Rights Actor, which prohibbits discrimination on the
Speaker 1: basis of race, color, and national origin. And Tim Watson, Minnesota,
Speaker 1: I guess, Keith Allison, the ag they're saying, we're going
Speaker 1: to violate the law and keep practicing racism. Do I
Speaker 1: have that right? You got me all urine in and
Speaker 1: off right now?
Speaker 3: Oh? Yes, No, that's exactly right. And you know there's
Speaker 3: multiple instances of grants and programs top down from the
Speaker 3: Minnesota Department of Education in the government that set out
Speaker 3: these rules about how teachers need to be licensed, how
Speaker 3: they need to recruit teachers, and this money really goes
Speaker 3: towards certain people, and this is effectively excluding those who
Speaker 3: are not BIPOC as they say, black Indigenous people of color.
Speaker 3: And as you correctly point out, this appears.
Speaker 12: To be a violation of Title thinks.
Speaker 1: Of the Civil Right Gus, I'm looking is that? Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm a lawyer of been inn ag in Ohio,
Speaker 1: and I'm thinking it looks to me like it does.
Speaker 1: You also point out there's an administrative rule in Minnesota,
Speaker 1: standards of effective practice teachers must meet to be licensed.
Speaker 1: So if you're a teacher and you want to be licensed,
Speaker 1: the standard on Racial Consciousness and Reflection requires teachers to
Speaker 1: understand how focentrism, you're a centrism, Ism, deficit based deficits,
Speaker 1: white supremacy undermine equity. So to get licensed to be
Speaker 1: a teacher, you got to check the box saying yes,
Speaker 1: I'm a racist, Yes I have benefit. My skin color
Speaker 1: is wrong. I understand what I've got and because the
Speaker 1: way I was born, I'm not as good as someone
Speaker 1: a person of color. Do I have that right that.
Speaker 3: That is correct? You know?
Speaker 11: These are these are these are teacher licensure requirements.
Speaker 3: And you know, as I mentioned before, it sounds like
Speaker 3: a bunch of random words strung together, but there is
Speaker 3: meaning behind that. It's basically blaming white supremacy for undermining
Speaker 3: quote pedagogical equity. That just means white supremacy is to
Speaker 3: blame for bad outcomes when it comes to maybe black students,
Speaker 3: and you know, all roads in their mind apparently lead
Speaker 3: back to white supremacy. That's what to blame is to
Speaker 3: blame if you know certain students are not doing as
Speaker 3: well as others, and I think that, you know, I mean,
Speaker 3: we could keep going with these examples. You have a
Speaker 3: statewide grow your Own program and that's you know about
Speaker 3: recruiting district employees to become licensed teachers. But it requires
Speaker 3: any district applying to have at least thirty percent students
Speaker 3: of color, and if they don't reach that thirty percent threshold,
Speaker 3: they're just not eligible for the grant.
Speaker 1: So these are all public money.
Speaker 12: Imposed, Yeah, exactly, it's they impose these race based stipulations
Speaker 12: that you know, determine how grant money from the government
Speaker 12: is allocated and who can participate.
Speaker 1: Well, this is blatant racism. Of course, the party practicing
Speaker 1: and benefits and in a sense, because the Democratic parties
Speaker 1: made the decision that we're going to appeal and apply
Speaker 1: racist principles that they've done since they're founding in the
Speaker 1: nineteenth century, in order to gin up a particular racial
Speaker 1: group to vote for us. To look at all the
Speaker 1: benefits we give you, and so many white liberals, especially
Speaker 1: white liberal females, simply bow their head at the altar
Speaker 1: of dei, which is dee, and they bow their heads saying, yes,
Speaker 1: we have to in order to be licensed as a teacher,
Speaker 1: I must practice racism against white students. And others, And
Speaker 1: I can only imagine what's happening in the major cities
Speaker 1: in this country. When the Democratic Party stops benefiting from racism,
Speaker 1: that's when things are going to change. I doubt it will.
Speaker 1: And race based licensing, grant programs and teachers that are
Speaker 1: lying to their students in a world, Then what happens
Speaker 1: when these kids get out and the white kids grow
Speaker 1: up thinking I'm a marching Marxist. I don't like this
Speaker 1: country anymore. I can't imagine some little boy or girl
Speaker 1: in the Minnesota school and the same thing applies in
Speaker 1: almost every blue city, blue state that I come out
Speaker 1: thinking I've done a lot wrong in my life because
Speaker 1: of the color of my skin. And the only way
Speaker 1: for me tosolve myself a blame is to be a
Speaker 1: liberal Democrat, to march around officials, make a fool of myself,
Speaker 1: and as a consequence, I'll pay the penance. Well, good luck, Kendall, teacher,
Speaker 1: you're at this, You're at a reporter for defending education
Speaker 1: dot Org. We could spend all day a lot of
Speaker 1: this stuff, but I hope when the court system gets this,
Speaker 1: we have about thirty seconds remaining. What did the courts
Speaker 1: say about this other than the Chief Justice who says
Speaker 1: the way to stop racism is to quit practicing it.
Speaker 1: But what does the court system say about this stuff?
Speaker 3: You know, it's a good question, and you're a lawyer.
Speaker 3: I'm not, so I can't. I can't speak to the
Speaker 3: specifics in what it all means. But I think it's
Speaker 3: clear that you know, these the Title nine, Title six
Speaker 3: have been part of the United States Constitution for a
Speaker 3: while now, and that or not. And it's just we
Speaker 3: should just be abiding by that. These are not even
Speaker 3: new laws, and we need to by the laws and
Speaker 3: the regulations that we already have.
Speaker 1: Kendall Teach, you're a great American Defense Education dot Org.
Speaker 1: Thanks for coming on The Bill Cunningham Show, and Merry
Speaker 1: Christmas and Happy New Year.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Kendall, thank you, Thank you.
Speaker 1: God bless America. Let's continue with more of the truth
Speaker 1: will set you free. The Party of racism continues to
Speaker 1: practice it and blame others for their sins and crimes.
Speaker 1: Bill cunning In The Great American Live with you every
Speaker 1: Sunday night. Bbye, Billy cunning In The Great American. Kendall
Speaker 1: Teits young woman understands the education system in this country
Speaker 1: which produces marching Marxist and non independent thinkers. So every
Speaker 1: chance I get in the year twenty twenty six, I'm
Speaker 1: going to spend as much time as I can with
Speaker 1: the experts from defending education to see what can be done,
Speaker 1: what should be done, must be done because these are
Speaker 1: perilous times. I have a sense, as maybe you do,
Speaker 1: that something bad is going to happen in the year
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six, and I just pray that we have
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in office and functioning, because I would not
Speaker 1: have him do my Sunday school classes, but I want
Speaker 1: him to be the president because we live in difficult,
Speaker 1: perilous times. I guess I'm concerned that down the road
Speaker 1: that Putin may set off a nuclear device somewhere, or
Speaker 1: you may invade Taiwan, or some other catastrophe may happen.
Speaker 1: And I don't want someone like Kamala Harris or Tim
Speaker 1: Waltz or Joe Biden or some other liberal Democrats in
Speaker 1: charge from Brooklyn, New York City or Los Angeles. I
Speaker 1: want a bad dude, and that bad dude is Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and that's who I want to be in office. So
Speaker 1: we need him. If something bad happens. I want Trump
Speaker 1: in office. I did not want Kamala Harris and Tim
Speaker 1: Watz that one was incompetent and the other one's a crook.
Speaker 1: I'll let you decide which is which. Comment later is
Speaker 1: going to have Steve gorm about the collapse of the
Speaker 1: so called green movement in this country, even Bill Gates
Speaker 1: and now seeing the light. Billy Cunningham, the Great American,
Speaker 1: with you and all great Americans. Merry Christmas and Avenue
Speaker 1: year with you every Sunday.
Speaker 10: Night, Willie brought you by Choice Hotels, Econo Lodge and
Speaker 10: Roadway In Hotels are serving up double points for every
Speaker 10: qualifying stay book at Choice.
Speaker 2: Hotels dot com. Now here's the man who's been recognized
Speaker 2: as radio's best, the recipient of not one, but two
Speaker 2: prestigious Marconi Awards for his broadcast excellence, the one and
Speaker 2: only Bill Cunningham.
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham, the Grand American. Of course, one thing we
Speaker 1: share is the weather, in the climate, meteorology, et cetera.
Speaker 1: One of the good things is that the federal government
Speaker 1: it's not hired back about four thousand meteorologists, as if
Speaker 1: we need more weather reports. Every time you watch television
Speaker 1: any extent, it's nothing but an extended weather report. I
Speaker 1: know what the weather is going to be. But one
Speaker 1: thing I hate to always say that things are terrible,
Speaker 1: things are awful, Things can't get any worse. Every now
Speaker 1: and then I see the green sprouts of an April
Speaker 1: day with the truth bursting forward about the green energy movement.
Speaker 1: What it's cost us is literally trillions of dollars resulting
Speaker 1: in nothing. I think Shakespeare said sound and fury signifying nothing,
Speaker 1: and all the times of al Gore, etc. Is now crashing.
Speaker 1: And of course Steve Gorm is one of the apostles
Speaker 1: of a not agreeing demand made climate change to a
Speaker 1: significant extent, and his new book out It's been out
Speaker 1: for a while, is knocking him to green breakdown the
Speaker 1: coming renewable energy failure, which is happening, but the Democrats
Speaker 1: are not giving up. Steve Gorm once again, welcome to
Speaker 1: the Bill Cunningham Show, and first of all, Steve Mary
Speaker 1: Chris missing a Happy New Year.
Speaker 5: Hey Bill, Merry Christmas, having New Year. I've never been
Speaker 5: called an apostle before, so thanks.
Speaker 1: Well join you. Well, I mean it's like, well, you know,
Speaker 1: I've been doing this for years and I'm thinking maybe
Speaker 1: what we're saying is breaking through, and that is that
Speaker 1: the climate is always changing. It will always change. So
Speaker 1: the argument is climate is changing. You want the answers, yes,
Speaker 1: but man made climate change it is a completely different matter.
Speaker 1: But talk about several issues. Bill Gates, for example, has
Speaker 1: now seen the lights, seeing the promised Land, and he's
Speaker 1: kind of rejected the idea of climate catastrophes, and that's
Speaker 1: made the liberals quite unhappy. They're going after Bill Gates
Speaker 1: hard about net zero, etc. Explain the conversion to the
Speaker 1: American people about Bill Gates.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this was really quite a turnaround. Mister Gates, as
Speaker 5: you know, as one of the wealthiest men in the world.
Speaker 5: I think he's worth more than one hundred billion dollars
Speaker 5: and he's had foundations that have been contributing billions of
Speaker 5: dollars for years and years to try and fight global
Speaker 5: warming and reduce emissions. He wrote a book in twenty
Speaker 5: twenty one that was titled How to Avoid a Climate Disaster.
Speaker 5: But just two weeks before the Climate conference in Billiem, Brazil,
Speaker 5: he came out and sent a memo to the UN
Speaker 5: Climate Conference and also put on his website and he
Speaker 5: took a different point of view on many things. Some
Speaker 5: of the things he said, quote, climate change is a
Speaker 5: serious problem, but it will not be the end of civilization. Secondly,
Speaker 5: he said to quote, unfortunately the doomsday outlook is causing
Speaker 5: much of the climate community to focus too much on
Speaker 5: terms mission near term emissions goals. And then he also
Speaker 5: concluded with quote, our chief goal should be to prevent suffering,
Speaker 5: particularly for those in the tough conditions who live in
Speaker 5: the world's poorest countries. Wow, this is this is just
Speaker 5: a big, big change for mister Gates. This is very
Speaker 5: sensible and and I think he was The press attacked
Speaker 5: him and many of the climatists, and the press said,
Speaker 5: you know, what's he saying, And then the climate realists
Speaker 5: the skeptics said, you know, welcome to the sensible side
Speaker 5: of the street. So really a big, big, big change.
Speaker 1: I mean Donald Trump is the instigator of much of this,
Speaker 1: because he also believes it's a hoax. He said it's
Speaker 1: a hoax. I'd love the speech at the UN about
Speaker 1: four or five months ago in which he stood up
Speaker 1: at the United Nations, looked them all in the eye
Speaker 1: and said this is a hoax. And I can imagine
Speaker 1: the puckering because you have to hold certain opinions to
Speaker 1: get paid. And when you pay for poverty, you get
Speaker 1: more poverty. And when you pay to hold an opinion
Speaker 1: and get studies and jobs, et cetera from it, you
Speaker 1: better stay on the company line. And therefore the liberals
Speaker 1: et cetera. No, you have to hold one definitive opinion
Speaker 1: in order to get paid, and the liberals after money
Speaker 1: like anyone else. And one thing you point out is
Speaker 1: that during winter it gets a little cold at times.
Speaker 1: And Cincinnati's had some record snowfall in December, and here
Speaker 1: we are winter. We're at the doorstep of winter. And
Speaker 1: this every time it's hot or cold, windy, or still
Speaker 1: dry or wet, it's always climate change. It's pounded into
Speaker 1: your head. Is America experiencing a severe cold winter right now?
Speaker 1: Which is so unusual? And these temperatures are due, of
Speaker 1: course the human calls climate change? Is that bs, Well,
Speaker 1: we have a it is a little bit.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we have a good, old fashioned, really cold winter.
Speaker 5: I'm in Chicago. We had record snowfalls for November. We
Speaker 5: had ten inches in Chicago the last day or two.
Speaker 5: A week ago we had zero in Saturday and Sunday
Speaker 5: in early December, and I've got some friends around here.
Speaker 5: They're saying, I'm sure hoping all gets over with quickly,
Speaker 5: But Noah. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration came out
Speaker 5: and promoted an article, and in the article it said,
Speaker 5: quote accelerated Arctic warming, known as Arctic amplification, has been
Speaker 5: evident since the nineteen nineties. Is one of the more
Speaker 5: robust signs of global warming currently. Certain hypothesis established Arctic
Speaker 5: amplification as a contributor to more severe winter weather have
Speaker 5: ignited intense debates among climate scientists. But you know, the
Speaker 5: credibility is not very good with the climatists. If you will,
Speaker 5: I love to quote doctor David Weiner of the Climate
Speaker 5: Research Unit of East Anglia in East Anglia.
Speaker 6: Is where they were.
Speaker 5: They've been holding and keeping the global temperature records for
Speaker 5: many years in England. He came out in two thousand
Speaker 5: and said, quote, children just aren't going to know what
Speaker 5: snow is.
Speaker 1: Yes, they do.
Speaker 5: Your listeners can go to a website at Rutgers University
Speaker 5: called the Global Snow Lab, and they have church there
Speaker 5: and they show that the snow extent in winter months
Speaker 5: in the northern hemisphere, the amount of snow that's on
Speaker 5: the ground. The use satellites to look at this. The
Speaker 5: snow extent has actually been increasing since the nineteen sixties.
Speaker 5: So the idea that we're that snow is disappearing really
Speaker 5: as false. But that's that's what many of the people say.
Speaker 1: And the idea that that.
Speaker 5: Warm weather in the Arctic is causing polar vortexes, that's
Speaker 5: that's just you know, we used to call these coal snaps.
Speaker 5: Now they're polar vortexes made up.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, you and I both know that one
Speaker 1: is real cold and icy snowy that's caused caused by
Speaker 1: global warming. You and I know that the warm temperatures
Speaker 1: cause ice and snow. Now, one thing I saw this
Speaker 1: in the news a couple of nights ago, that Chevron
Speaker 1: is pulling out of the state of California, the largest,
Speaker 1: one of the one or two largest oil companies in
Speaker 1: the world. They can't handle their regulations put out by
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, and they say they're done. They're pulling out
Speaker 1: out a billion dollars of investments, leaving tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of jobs. And it's predicted to the cost of a
Speaker 1: gallon of unleaded gas in California by summertime will be
Speaker 1: six dollars a gallon. And so when I read that,
Speaker 1: I just filled up my Chevy Blazer and it was
Speaker 1: two dollars and nineteen cents in Ohio and it goes
Speaker 1: up between two nineteen and two seventy. But in Chevron's case,
Speaker 1: Californians are going to spend six dollars for a gallon
Speaker 1: of gas because of the policies, not because of the climate.
Speaker 1: Well Californians ever figure it out.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Bernie Sanders just went down to the Cup conference
Speaker 5: and crowe about how California was becoming more renewable. But
Speaker 5: you know, they talk about this affordability crisis. California is
Speaker 5: a perfect example of an energy affordability crisis. Gasoline prices
Speaker 5: are much higher than the rest of the nation. Prior
Speaker 5: to this recent decrease, they were about four to fifty
Speaker 5: dollars a gallon. And as you say, there there used
Speaker 5: to be forty refineries in California. Now they're down to
Speaker 5: ten and two of them are looking to close, and
Speaker 5: they're predicting the prices are going to be up at
Speaker 5: six dollars per gallon.
Speaker 6: They have the.
Speaker 5: Second highest electricity prices in the nation, behind Hawaii, and
Speaker 5: they're catching Hawaii very quickly, and it's just a very,
Speaker 5: very expensive state to live. So it's a perfect example
Speaker 5: of how not to do green energy, how not to
Speaker 5: make energy unaffordable. But they're still marching down this road.
Speaker 5: Mister Newsom is pitching this crazy green stuff.
Speaker 1: And politically he appears to be popular in California. Politically
Speaker 1: he's leading the Democratic nomination for president in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine having Gavin Newsom in charge of America's
Speaker 1: energy policy.
Speaker 5: Well there's another there's going to be a big issue
Speaker 5: next year, and that is you know, we're in the
Speaker 5: middle of an artificial intelligence revolution. We've talked about that
Speaker 5: in the past. They're building data centers all over the country. Well,
Speaker 5: we now have two hundred and thirty environmental groups that
Speaker 5: signed a letter to Congress calling for a halt to
Speaker 5: data center construction in the United States. And we just
Speaker 5: had Bernie Sanders come out this week center Bernie Sanders
Speaker 5: who urged a ban on data center construction. What's going
Speaker 5: on is astonishing. The big guys Microsoft, Meta, Google, Amazon
Speaker 5: are spending two hundred and eighty billion dollars this year
Speaker 5: to build data centers, and that's more than the the
Speaker 5: gross domestic product of more than one hundred nations around
Speaker 5: the world. But now it looks like the Democratic Party
Speaker 5: is starting to line up on the side of banded
Speaker 5: data centers. So this could be just a huge chooge
Speaker 5: right next year.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine if the policies in California are going
Speaker 1: to be across America, say between twenty twenty eight to
Speaker 1: twenty thirty six, and then all of a sudden, we're
Speaker 1: back to the solar batteries, We're back to the windmills,
Speaker 1: and we're going to make it hard for oil and
Speaker 1: natural gas companies to reduce products, and that would plunge
Speaker 1: America into a new dark age, maybe literally. So talk
Speaker 1: tell the American people about these nuclear power plants that
Speaker 1: are being put together that are different than Three Mile Island.
Speaker 1: It's different than Chernobyl and today here we are and
Speaker 1: that could be the answer. And the cleanest energy imaginable
Speaker 1: is a nuclear power plant. Explain how things have changed
Speaker 1: the last fifty years when it comes to those technologies.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, we still need to get the cost down,
Speaker 5: but that's another thing. Going on. The artificial intelligence revolution
Speaker 5: is driving a resurgence.
Speaker 1: In nuclear power.
Speaker 5: We have nuclear plants that are being restarted now in Iowa,
Speaker 5: in Michigan, and Pennsylvania, and there's some that were construction
Speaker 5: with stop that are starting again in South Carolina. President
Speaker 5: Trump also issued an executive order in May, actually four
Speaker 5: of them on nuclear, and one of them said he
Speaker 5: wants to quadruple nuclear capacity by twenty to fifty. We
Speaker 5: currently get eighteen percent of our electricity for nuclear in
Speaker 5: the US and he wants to boost that way up.
Speaker 5: And then, as you say, they are new technologies called
Speaker 5: small modular reactors. They're trying to be able to build
Speaker 5: reactors and factories, put them on trucks and train ship
Speaker 5: them to the site and install them. And the goal
Speaker 5: here is get the price way way down. So we'll
Speaker 5: see if this happens. This is they still need cost breakthroughs.
Speaker 5: Nuclear still as very expensive three or four times as
Speaker 5: expensive as gas takes can take a decade to put
Speaker 5: in a plant, which is very slow. But we may
Speaker 5: have a nuclear resurgence. We now have like twenty five
Speaker 5: companies in the US working on small modular reactors. So
Speaker 5: just another big change over the policies in the past.
Speaker 1: So we have the technology available within the next five
Speaker 1: or six or seven years to manufacture these small reactors,
Speaker 1: put them on a truck to take them to a
Speaker 1: city and install them. And why does the green energy
Speaker 1: movement hate nuclear power when it's the best kind of power.
Speaker 1: Why what's the reason?
Speaker 5: Well, I think the history has been you know, many
Speaker 5: many years. That was one of the drivers of the
Speaker 5: environmental movement in the sixties, seventies.
Speaker 1: And eighties was to oppose nuclear.
Speaker 5: Before they got into the you know, we've got to
Speaker 5: stop global warming as the big thing.
Speaker 6: We also have had some disasters.
Speaker 5: We had three mile island issue, We had the Chernobyl
Speaker 5: in Europe, and we had the one in Japan who's
Speaker 5: escaping me right now, And so safety has been a
Speaker 5: big issue and the cost of these things, they're overregulated.
Speaker 5: I spoke at a plastic pipe group a while back
Speaker 5: and the guy said, if I ship pipe to a
Speaker 5: regular factory, because I have to have two pages of paperwork.
Speaker 5: If I shipped into a nuclear plant, I have to
Speaker 5: have an injur of paperwork. So we have big regulation
Speaker 5: issues and those are things that have retarded nuclear around
Speaker 5: the world. But We now have many countries building small
Speaker 5: modular reactors also and trying. Still experimental of this stuff is,
Speaker 5: but I have hopes that it's going to break through
Speaker 5: and we won't have to subsidize nuclear plants anymore. They'll
Speaker 5: be able to compete.
Speaker 12: On their own.
Speaker 1: So you're optimistic, Steve Gorm. You're optimistic politically. If we
Speaker 1: keep the same political leadership and don't go back to
Speaker 1: the John Kerries, the al Gores, the Gavin Newsom's of
Speaker 1: this world, we're going to come out of this. Okay,
Speaker 1: I need some optimist, I think.
Speaker 5: So. Yeah, Well, we have a rising number of political
Speaker 5: parties that are pushing back against climatism and that zero.
Speaker 5: In the US we have Trump and the Republicans. They
Speaker 5: haven't said they're a post in that zero, but the
Speaker 5: policies are pushing that way. And now we have four
Speaker 5: major parties outside the US to reform UK, led by
Speaker 5: Nigel Paraj In England they've coined the phrase stupid zero.
Speaker 5: We have the and they're poll They're leading in polls
Speaker 5: in the UK, a second in the polls in Germany
Speaker 5: is the alternative for Deutschland, and they said they want
Speaker 5: to get rid of all the wind turbine towers in Germany.
Speaker 5: That's one of their their party planks. And then just
Speaker 5: in the last two months we had two parties in Australia,
Speaker 5: the Nationals and the Liberal Party have come out against
Speaker 5: net zero. They say it's just too expensive. So around
Speaker 5: the world we have all these groups that are saying,
Speaker 5: you know, this green energy thing isn't going to work,
Speaker 5: let's get back to sensible energy policy.
Speaker 1: One good we have about a minute remaining evs. The
Speaker 1: EV sales in America are collapsing, mainly because the government
Speaker 1: is not bribing people with seven and a half thousand
Speaker 1: dollars to buy one. And secondly, when you've had an
Speaker 1: EV for a while, the last thing you want to
Speaker 1: do is get another EV. So I still see lots
Speaker 1: of tesla's flowing around. But those who've had evs they
Speaker 1: did it. I guess to show how great I am.
Speaker 1: I'm just exhibiting my social consciousness. But what's the stat
Speaker 1: on if you've had an EV the odds of buying
Speaker 1: another EV, which are expensive.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, they're cool cars, cool second cars, But
Speaker 5: as you say, they removed the text credits for them,
Speaker 5: and sales have plunged. It's possible that Tesla is going
Speaker 5: to show a loss actually in this next quarter. We're
Speaker 5: waiting to see. But they're about the last winter, they
Speaker 5: were about seven percent of US new car sales. Now
Speaker 5: they're they're probably dropping. They dropped in the summer and
Speaker 5: with the subsidies gone, so they're kind of a niche thing.
Speaker 5: And you know, Ford just canceled their f one to
Speaker 5: fifty Lightning and took a nineteen billion dollar charge against
Speaker 5: that for canceling that, so they've got some issues. I
Speaker 5: think they're going to get better and better. But the
Speaker 5: idea that we should force everybody to drive evs to
Speaker 5: to stop to make the storms less severe, that's your
Speaker 5: silly stuff.
Speaker 1: So you're saying that for the most one of the
Speaker 1: more popular pickups in America, how much did Ford lose
Speaker 1: on that.
Speaker 5: Well, this is the Lightning, the electric version of it.
Speaker 5: But they just took a big charge nineteen billion dollars. Uh,
Speaker 5: that's an awful big thing. They're still going to have
Speaker 5: hybrids and and they'll do some things, but you know,
Speaker 5: we do the manufacturers stepping back now from from the
Speaker 5: e V craze.
Speaker 1: And car dealers have told me that when you when
Speaker 1: they bring in an ev in trade. Some won't even
Speaker 1: take them in on trade because they can't get rid
Speaker 1: of them. And those who need to be towed off
Speaker 1: a highway somewhere tow trucks won't. It won't tow an
Speaker 1: ev it's too dangerous.
Speaker 5: Reseale. The resale has been very, very low priced.
Speaker 1: Who would buy a three year old Tesla? You have
Speaker 1: to be you have to be stupid? Well once again, ye,
Speaker 1: once again. Uh, it's great that I think what you're
Speaker 1: doing is having a measurable effect. And what is your
Speaker 1: website if people want to get more about outside the
Speaker 1: Green Box and the Green break the Green Breakdown and
Speaker 1: also the mad mad world of climatology. H can you
Speaker 1: tell the American people how to get your books?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'll send them a signed copy if they order
Speaker 5: one from my website. Steve Gorham g O R E
Speaker 5: h A M dot com. And by the way, these
Speaker 5: are colored paperbacks and they're a lot of fun they
Speaker 5: have in addition to the science that can, they have
Speaker 5: about one hundred and fifty colors sidebars. Here's one from
Speaker 5: Green Breakdown. These are real headlines. A surgeon uses human
Speaker 5: fat to run his cars. There was a surgeon in
Speaker 5: Beverly Hills that was taking the fat from his his
Speaker 5: surgeries and turning it into fuel. He actually got prosecuted.
Speaker 5: Now this is not something you're supposed to do. But no,
Speaker 5: this mad, mad, mad world of climatism, that's where we are.
Speaker 5: And the great reads for people.
Speaker 1: I Steve Gorm, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and let's
Speaker 1: keep the lines of communication open. We're having some measurable impact.
Speaker 1: And thanks for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. And Steve,
Speaker 1: you're a great American. Thank you, Thank you.
Speaker 10: Bill.
Speaker 1: Let's continue with more. Bill Cunningham, the Great American Live
Speaker 1: with you every Sunday Night by Billy Cunningham, The Great American.
Speaker 1: Steve Gorm headed on maybe six seven times this year.
Speaker 1: Every time he comes on, things get a little bit better.
Speaker 1: Right now, the ev market is collapsing. Ford and others
Speaker 1: have lost tens of billions of dollars. They didn't have
Speaker 1: to do it. They were following the government dictates, acting
Speaker 1: as if we're going to run around with windmills and
Speaker 1: solar batteries to power cars and all that kind of crap.
Speaker 1: And it never happened. Now that is collapsing, so I
Speaker 1: said to Steve gorm you heard me say it. I
Speaker 1: think maybe he and I are having some measurable effect
Speaker 1: on public policy. Let's continue with more. Coming up next
Speaker 1: to is John Lott, who was in the Trump administration
Speaker 1: to begin with in the first term. He comes with
Speaker 1: the facts and the figures. With all these shooting shootings
Speaker 1: taking place of Brown and elsewhere, can gun control solve
Speaker 1: that problem? I don't think so. Bill Cunningham, the Great
Speaker 1: American with you, every so, Bill Cunningham, the Great American.
Speaker 1: Of course, John Lott is an expert Crime Research dot
Speaker 1: Org when it comes to all things about guns. And
Speaker 1: one of the tragedies of what happened to Brown University
Speaker 1: is the media uses that as an occasion to attack
Speaker 1: Second Amendment rights, and they do it quite well because
Speaker 1: emotion should not take the place of reason. And so
Speaker 1: when you have numerous college kids that have been terrorized
Speaker 1: on college campuses by someone illegally carrying firearms, their first
Speaker 1: reaction is to go after the inanimate metal object instead
Speaker 1: of the person doing the shooting. And the word gun
Speaker 1: violence is ubiquitous. I would hasten to point out there's
Speaker 1: about fifty thousand Americans die every year in car accidents,
Speaker 1: we would never say, you know, we have car violence.
Speaker 1: We deal with the person driving the car, whether they're drunk,
Speaker 1: had a license, whether they have insurance. And then the
Speaker 1: car is an instrumentality to cause harm, much as a
Speaker 1: gun is an instrumentality to cause harm. But there's no
Speaker 1: such a thing as car violence. We focus on the
Speaker 1: driver when it comes to a weapon, a gun under
Speaker 1: the Second Moendment, my right to carry, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the gun becomes the object and not the person doing it.
Speaker 1: Joining you and I now is that same John Latton?
Speaker 1: First of all, John, can you tell the American people
Speaker 1: they are restrictive gun laws available in Australia and how
Speaker 1: they failed miserably Abundai Beach.
Speaker 13: Before I get into that, I just want to make
Speaker 13: a comment. I think it's worse than what you're saying,
Speaker 13: and that is the problem is is that you have
Speaker 13: these laws that create the problems. You create these gun
Speaker 13: free zones like at Brown University. And the thing is
Speaker 13: the people who obey it are basically the law abiding
Speaker 13: good individuals and the criminals the people who want to
Speaker 13: go and till other people take advantage of that. In fact,
Speaker 13: they're attracted to those areas, And the problem that we
Speaker 13: have is you pass these rules or laws that go
Speaker 13: and create the problem, create the magnets for these attacks,
Speaker 13: and rather than going back and undoing the regulations.
Speaker 6: That are there, they double down and have even.
Speaker 13: More restrictions they are being put on there. But anybody
Speaker 13: who read I mean, obviously we don't know even who
Speaker 13: committed this horrible crime at Brown yet, but time after
Speaker 13: time we get the diaries and manifestoes.
Speaker 1: For these mass murders, and.
Speaker 6: Time after time they read the same way.
Speaker 13: These guys are planning these attacks well in advance. They're
Speaker 13: often suicidal. They want to go and get media attention,
Speaker 13: and they know the more people they kill, the more
Speaker 13: media attention that they're going to be able to get.
Speaker 6: And they know if they go to a.
Speaker 13: Place where they're victims are defenseless, they're going to be
Speaker 13: able to go and kill more people and get more
Speaker 13: media attention. Look, we don't need to get rid of
Speaker 13: the First Amendment to stop these guys from getting I
Speaker 13: don't even know how you would do it from getting
Speaker 13: the media attention that they crave. But the point is
Speaker 13: is that you have to take away their goal, and
Speaker 13: their goal is to get media attention.
Speaker 6: The way you do that is.
Speaker 13: To convince them that they're not going to be able
Speaker 13: to go and kill that many people. And the way
Speaker 13: you do that is by making, you know, having a
Speaker 13: sign that says warning you know, so.
Speaker 6: Lect teachers are staff at.
Speaker 13: The school, are carrying concealed and will use their guns
Speaker 13: to go and protect others that are there.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, In Australia, I can recall. I can't imagine
Speaker 1: a more clear example of the cry globalize the Intifada
Speaker 1: than Australia. In the Middle May, I say, of nowhere,
Speaker 1: It's thousands of miles away from Gaza or Israel. There's
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of Palestinian activists running around the Opera
Speaker 1: House in Sydney with their Palestinian garbe saying kill the Jews,
Speaker 1: kill the Jews. And if I'm Jewish and I see
Speaker 1: the synagogues are being fire bombed by businesses, are being
Speaker 1: broken into and vandalized by cars, are being blown up
Speaker 1: by Islamic terrorists. The first thing I want to do
Speaker 1: is protect myself, but you can't do that in Australia.
Speaker 1: Describe the situation in Australia about possession of guns by
Speaker 1: regular people.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 13: Well, basically what happened was after a mass shooting that
Speaker 13: they had Tasmania in ninety six, nineteen ninety six, they
Speaker 13: went and imposed all sorts of new gun control regulations
Speaker 13: and confiscated almost a third of the guns that were
Speaker 13: privately owned at that time. They had registration licensing, so
Speaker 13: they knew who had the guns. They paid a a
Speaker 13: nominal fee for taking the guns from people.
Speaker 6: And you know, there's been a lot.
Speaker 13: Of claims even in the last few days about the
Speaker 13: supposed benefits from that confiscation that they had. A lot
Speaker 13: of people will go and say, well, it lowered the
Speaker 13: firearm homicide rate or it lowered the firearm suicide rate.
Speaker 13: It's really statistical malpractice that they have there when they
Speaker 13: make that claim. For fifteen years prior to the confiscation,
Speaker 13: both the firearm homicide right and the firearms suicide rate.
Speaker 6: Was falling, but they actually stopped.
Speaker 13: Falling after or much slower rate of decline after the
Speaker 13: confiscation occurred. In fact, total suicides went up. I'm not
Speaker 13: going to go and argue that the confiscation caused suicides
Speaker 13: to rise, but it's very difficult to go and argue
Speaker 13: that there was a benefit from that.
Speaker 6: Look, if you had a perfectly.
Speaker 13: Straight line that was falling over the entire period that
Speaker 13: you have there, you could pick any point along that line,
Speaker 13: and the after average is going to be below the
Speaker 13: before average. But you look at it and you say, look,
Speaker 13: it's falling at exactly the same rate beforehand as it
Speaker 13: is afterwards. It's really hard to see any benefit that's
Speaker 13: occurring from that. But in fact, what you would do
Speaker 13: is you'd say, is it falling at a faster rate
Speaker 13: or a slower rate?
Speaker 6: Is there some discontinuity that was occurring there?
Speaker 13: And what you find is that for firearm homicide rates,
Speaker 13: it stopped falling. So it was falling and then all
Speaker 13: of a sudden it stopped afterwards. Look, if they're right,
Speaker 13: if the gun can troll, advocates who point to this
Speaker 13: all the time, and everybody from Obama to Hillary Clinton
Speaker 13: to Biden to Democrats over the last few days have
Speaker 13: been pointing to this. You know, what you should have
Speaker 13: seen was an immediate large drop in firearmahamicides or suicides,
Speaker 13: and then over time, as gun ownership recovered to some extent,
Speaker 13: you would have seen an increase. And that's not the
Speaker 13: pattern that you see at all.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the Wall Street Journal. You have a
Speaker 1: column up a few days ago about the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal's fearmongering doesn't survive contact with evidence. And when I
Speaker 1: read this article of the Wall Street Journal, which generally
Speaker 1: about half the time they make some sense. They rend
Speaker 1: this big story in the front page by reporter Marc Merrimont,
Speaker 1: who continued his attack on people carrying firearms. He presented
Speaker 1: four stories that those untrained civilians that have a weapon,
Speaker 1: generally it'll be a handgun, have caused mayhem and that
Speaker 1: somehow it's good then in America to make sure there's
Speaker 1: high hurdles to be able to carry a firearm to
Speaker 1: protect yourself. Explain why this story in the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal is not accurate.
Speaker 13: Right, you know, this is the fourth in a series
Speaker 13: of articles by this gentleman, and you know wants to argue,
Speaker 13: is it's dangerous to have concealed carry either right to
Speaker 13: carry or constitutional carry type loss And so over the
Speaker 13: four years from twenty twenty two to now, he has
Speaker 13: four examples. Actually two of them are really only relevant
Speaker 13: for the story that he has about people legally caring.
Speaker 6: But there's like no perspective here.
Speaker 13: You don't mention that there's like one point six million
Speaker 13: defensive gun uses.
Speaker 1: Each year that occur.
Speaker 13: You don't mention that they're twenty one million concealed carry
Speaker 13: permit holders in the United States or twenty nine constitutional
Speaker 13: carry states where it's not even necessary for people to
Speaker 13: have a permit. So the rate of problems is tiny.
Speaker 13: And the other thing is, you know, obviously two is
Speaker 13: too too many that have occurred even over four years,
Speaker 13: but where.
Speaker 6: Bystanders accidentally shot? But the question is what's the alternative?
Speaker 13: And so what we did was we went back over
Speaker 13: the decade from twenty sixteen through now to go and
Speaker 13: see how many accidal gun shots by civilians who are
Speaker 13: legally carrying a concealed handgun, how that compared to the police.
Speaker 13: And what you find is that if you remove a
Speaker 13: security guard from them, which is kind of a different story,
Speaker 13: and just look at regular civilians, there are three such
Speaker 13: shootings that had occurred over the ten years. By contrast,
Speaker 13: there were twenty accidental shootings by police of bystanders when
Speaker 13: they're trying to stop a crime. Twenty eight people were
Speaker 13: either killed or are wounded in those accidental shootings of bystanders.
Speaker 13: So and that's like seven times higher than the rate
Speaker 13: that civilians accidentally shot a bystander when they're trying to
Speaker 13: stop the crime.
Speaker 1: You know, John, we've done this for many years, and
Speaker 1: I think we're having measurable impact on someone. When I
Speaker 1: read a line from the Wall Street Journal story quote
Speaker 1: when untrained or panic shooters missed their target, it's children, neighbors,
Speaker 1: and bystanders who pay the price. And so you went
Speaker 1: through a process because you worked with research with the
Speaker 1: Trump administration and you plugged into chat, GPT, Gronka and
Speaker 1: other systems AI, which is a wonderful benefit and maybe
Speaker 1: a cost to us in the long run, who knows.
Speaker 1: But when you have twenty one million individuals carrying weapons,
Speaker 1: did you find any case in the last several years
Speaker 1: where a person costitutional carry missed their target and killed
Speaker 1: a child?
Speaker 6: Well, we couldn't.
Speaker 13: We couldn't find even one case where somebody under constitutional
Speaker 13: carry accidentally shot any busybother over the last ten years.
Speaker 13: But yet, you know, obviously you know the article the
Speaker 13: most wanted to make a big deal about constitutional carry.
Speaker 13: You know, you think he'd at least provide one example
Speaker 13: himself of that being a problem, but not even the
Speaker 13: story provides an example of that.
Speaker 1: And when you when you did your review and the
Speaker 1: police incidents, and I don't know, there's seven hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty thousand police officers Marshall's FBI CEOs and the country
Speaker 1: and some of one hundred and fifty thousand who every
Speaker 1: day confront millions of criminal situations. You found twenty cases
Speaker 1: in which officers accidentally shot a total of twenty eight
Speaker 1: by standers. Unfortunately, six were killed, twenty two were runed in.
Speaker 1: And so that is so it's below one thousandth of
Speaker 1: one percent, it's almost non existent. And so all the.
Speaker 6: Clear ten years, ten years, over ten years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but the media you got, you know, these untrained
Speaker 1: individuals like you and I are accidentally shooting children as
Speaker 1: like what, well, it's untethered to reality, correct.
Speaker 13: Yeah, I mean there's not one example that we found
Speaker 13: over the ten years where a child was bystandard was
Speaker 13: shot when somebody was using a gun defensively. So you know,
Speaker 13: it's you know, it's unfortunate. But as I said, this
Speaker 13: is the fourth in a series that the Wall Street
Speaker 13: journalists had, all very long stories that they have. I'm
Speaker 13: sure they think they're doing some big exposa on it.
Speaker 6: I've written.
Speaker 13: I finally wrote the op ed because I'd written letters
Speaker 13: to the editor for the Wall Street Journal but got
Speaker 13: and also sent information to the reporter, but you know,
Speaker 13: it was ignored, and the you know, the reporter did
Speaker 13: never got back to me either on this stuff. And
Speaker 13: he doesn't have any quotes in any of his articles
Speaker 13: from anybody who takes kind of a pro self defense position.
Speaker 1: Makes it on this stuff. Just how about your research
Speaker 1: overall police in America accidentally wounded five point six times
Speaker 1: as many bystanders as civilians, killed three times as many
Speaker 1: and wounded seven times. It's just a typical constitutional carry person.
Speaker 1: And so you also point out that otherwise research showing
Speaker 1: the FBI's active shooter definition, we looked at cases over
Speaker 1: ten years or individuals actively attempted to kill people in
Speaker 1: public area, excluding shootings tied to other crimes. That showed
Speaker 1: that armed civilians consistently acted safely and effectively. But that's
Speaker 1: not a story, is it?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 6: Unfortunately not, Colonel News.
Speaker 1: Is it going to be covering that? Well, all I
Speaker 1: can say is with the antisemitism, and plus we're constantly
Speaker 1: told by Democrats when it comes to major cities, how
Speaker 1: safe things are, that violence is going down, that it's
Speaker 1: all okay. In reality, I live in little Cincinnati, Ohio,
Speaker 1: and every year we have at least twenty thousand shots fired,
Speaker 1: and the city of Cincinnati, by I would assume thousands
Speaker 1: of individuals. Each one's a felony, and none are ever
Speaker 1: making the police blotterer because the person who fired the
Speaker 1: gun wasn't apprehended. Imagine how many shots are fired, like
Speaker 1: in Los Angeles or Chicago. If Cincinnati's got twenty thousand
Speaker 1: bullets rolling around town, I would imagine big cities have
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands and none ever hit the police statistics, correct.
Speaker 13: Right, you know, Look, here's the problem, and that is
Speaker 13: what we just had. The police chief in DC resigned
Speaker 13: because it finally came came out that the reason why
Speaker 13: she resigned was because all of her commanders testified before
Speaker 13: the House Operations Committee that she was ordering them to
Speaker 13: misclassify crimes to go and reduce the number of serious
Speaker 13: crimes that were being reported.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 13: So it's just not Chicago and New York City and
Speaker 13: some other places which have been caught manipulating the crime
Speaker 13: data that's there you know, it raises real questions about,
Speaker 13: you know, how accurately what we can do to depend
Speaker 13: on the crime data that's coming out. Well, it's one
Speaker 13: reason of many that the that the FBI data reported
Speaker 13: crime is so different from the National Crime Victimization Bureau
Speaker 13: of Justice satistic data, which shows that over the last
Speaker 13: four years we had the largest percentage increase and violent
Speaker 13: crime ever recorded over any four year was a fifty
Speaker 13: nine percent increase. My own belief is it's falling this
Speaker 13: year finally, and we're going to hit record low murder rates.
Speaker 13: And I believe when it comes out a year from now,
Speaker 13: in September next year, it's going to also show because
Speaker 13: of Trump's efforts with regard to illgal aliens and other things,
Speaker 13: we're going to see a big drop in violent crime.
Speaker 1: And Democrats will take credit for that. But Pamela Smith
Speaker 1: of Washington, DC, chief of Classic DEI Hire, when her
Speaker 1: commanders were under oath and testified they weren't going to
Speaker 1: lie for her, that they cook the books to make
Speaker 1: Mario bows Of the mayor of Washington, DC, look better,
Speaker 1: And I suspect the same things happening in Cincinnati as
Speaker 1: it's happening all over the country by democratic mayors who
Speaker 1: want to show that National guardsmen in our town make
Speaker 1: no sense because crime is down. In reality, crime is
Speaker 1: up and they're cooking the books. Well, John Lott, we
Speaker 1: got to go Crimeresearch dot org. Crimeresearch dot Org and
Speaker 1: John Lott, may you and yours have a merry Christmas
Speaker 1: and a happy New Year. And thank you very much.
Speaker 6: Merry Christmas.
Speaker 1: Bill, thanks very much. And John keep being that we
Speaker 1: need we need you to stay on this. We need
Speaker 1: you because our rights are at risk and when college
Speaker 1: kids that have been traumatized are used by the media
Speaker 1: to promote a false narrative, and I like to have
Speaker 1: facts and figures to back it up. And Crimeresearch dot
Speaker 1: org you give me those statistics. And John, thanks for
Speaker 1: what you do. Thank you well, thank you.
Speaker 13: People can go to our website and sign up for
Speaker 13: our emails that we send out once every two weeks
Speaker 13: with our research and the data that we have doesn't
Speaker 13: do us any good to do the work if people
Speaker 13: aren't educated and can't use the data that we.
Speaker 1: Put out Crimeresearch dot org. John Lott, You're a great
Speaker 1: American and once again, thank you very much. Thank you,
Speaker 1: God bless you. I le's continue with more. Bill cunning
Speaker 1: In the Great American live with you every Sunday night,
Speaker 1: Billy cunning In the Great American. I intend to be
Speaker 1: with you a week from tonight, but I won't be
Speaker 1: with you before Christmas. Christmas is about the birth of
Speaker 1: the Messiah, the Christ, the Baby Jesus, from which time
Speaker 1: is counting, from the time he was born to a
Speaker 1: peasant girl named Mary in a dirty little town in
Speaker 1: Judea named named a Nazareth, that in which he lived,
Speaker 1: went to Bethlehem and was born. So before you go
Speaker 1: to bed to night, thank God all Mighty you live
Speaker 1: in America. Thank God Almighty that you recognized as a
Speaker 1: God above. And thank God your life is lived for
Speaker 1: a particular purpose at a particular time. But if you
Speaker 1: have time, be kind, do not be cruel, be fair,
Speaker 1: do not be nasty, and spend time over the next
Speaker 1: several days with your family, with your friends, celebrate the
Speaker 1: birth of the Baby Jesus, but also recommit yourself to
Speaker 1: the home of the Free and the land of the brave,
Speaker 1: that is surely the United States of America. As Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk would have said, number one is God. Number two
Speaker 1: is family. Number three is the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Bill Cunningham, with you every Sunday night.