WEBVTT - 3-31-26 Scott Sloan Show

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to be an American?

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you know how hard is to say this is

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the most bizarre stories we've ever seen in Cincinnati.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 3>You know how hard that is in the city of ours.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to its Scott Sloan back on seven hundred W GOL,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the man beaten down twenty had beaten twenty eight times

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 2>last summer, who is also facing criminal charges, is supposed

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to have his day in court today. That would be

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Alex Tchravinsky, his trial charged with disorderly conduct after what

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>happened in July. Back on fourth and ALM. It's been

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>delayed and delayed and delayed again and after a last

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>minute continuance, but today allegedly is the day. Today is

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>the day he will be in court and on that

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>as attorney Steve Gooden on the show on seven hundred

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>WLW Steve, welcome, how are you look?

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, fantastic?

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna happen today.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like something is They're gonna go well,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>we need more time, right because last time in this

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>really odd case, the prosecution's key witness face to appear.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>He said he or she said, there's fear for safety

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>there after misinformation, Len and believe he'd be identified as

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>an FBI informant, and they got a continuance on that,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and I judge said, okay, this is the last one.

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>But how does misinformation the prosecution failed to manage become

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.279
<v Speaker 2>grounds to delay a defendant who is ready for trial.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, look, this is probably the most litigated

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 4>misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge in American history, so nothing would

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 4>surprise me. But I do know you know this judge

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 4>a bit, and I think he's going to put his

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 4>foot down today and make.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The trial go forward.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Also, I would note it is a very rare instance

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 4>in which is going to be a jury trial for

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 4>misdemeanor disorderly conduct. It's kind of a rare instance where

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>that's even allowed. So I presumably the jury commissioner has

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 4>brought in perspective jurors, and I think that is typically

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>a factor for a judge when he grants a continuance,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 4>if the jurors are really ready to go, doesn't want

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 4>to inconvenience them. So I would bet that today is

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>finally the day for the most litigated, disportless kind.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Of strategy perhaps in the history of the Republic.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>We've had a lot of We've had a lot of

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>bizarre cases come through Cincinnata. There's always some if something

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>bizarre is going on, there's always a tie to Cincinnati,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>and often we have crazy stuff happening here. But this

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 2>is uh, this has got to be at the top

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of that list. All right, So final continuance. But do

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we even know are they going to produce this this

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>mystery witness and what happens the case if they don't.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, if they don't, I mean, they presumably have other witnesses.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So I mean it's just really kind of a sad.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Commentary on the state of the city that, of course,

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.839
<v Speaker 4>if you have a street brawl in Cincinnati, either may

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 4>be may or may not be an FBI. And for

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 4>him at just standing around in the crowd, uh, you know,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 4>whether he was an afoormant or not. I think I

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 4>think they concluded he was not, but but some thought

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 4>he was. So I mean, you know, even that that

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 4>adds another level of uh bizarreness and uh, you know,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 4>flexity to the whole thing. But presumably they have other witnesses.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what they've got to show here is kind

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 4>of weird. So disorderly conduct in this case is defined

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 4>and I quote by engaging in fighting or threatening harm,

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>by making unreasonable noises or using offensively coarse language or gestures.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>And in order to get the more serious form of

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 4>it that actually carries jail time, I mean, typically it's

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 4>just a payout ticket. You have to show that there

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>was persistent conduct.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, that way. So that's what they've got a show.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>So they're going to need to put on quite a

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 4>few witnesses, and I'm assuming they're going to try to

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>authenticate and play this video. I guess there's video from

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 4>multiple different angles, security cameras, celf phoned stuff, social media,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 4>things of that nature. So you know, certainly they're going

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to be able to at least put on a basic

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 4>case with the video alone. Now that said, his lawyers

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 4>said he's going to argue self defense, you know, because

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>he says he has been he was struck at least

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight times and allegedly had some cognitive issues right afterwards.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 4>And I guess he did give some statements to the police,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 4>but he's going to argue I think that those statements

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>were affected by being hit in the head repeatedly. And

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 4>also I'm assuming his lawyer is going to go here.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 4>If I were his lawyer, I'd be going very heavily

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>into the decision to charge mister Travinsky because he is

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 4>listed as a victim and witness in multiple felony cases

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 4>from the other individuals who struck he and this lady

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 4>known as Holly, who was knocked unconscious and beaten very badly.

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 4>So he is both a victim and now a very

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>and a witness and now a defendant. And he was

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 4>only charged many, many many months later after there have

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 4>been press conferences and so forth, and prothlague game in

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Lynch and some leaders in the black community. You thought

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 4>that he needed to be charged based upon seeing the videos.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>So there is some stink on the case from that

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 4>point of view as to whether or not he was capegoated.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think you've got a lot for this jury

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to consider. I feel sorry for this jury because they

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 4>probably got him paneled their dead at the courthouse, thinking

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>my god, we may have a homicide trial or some

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 4>serious case involving a you know, a large lawsuit. This

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>is going to be fascinating, and instead they're going to

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>be dissecting a street brawl from different different angles for

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>three or four days.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So God bless them.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 2>There the two detectives who spent literally one hundreds of

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>hours on game, they wouldn't sign the charges against Alex Ttravinsky.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>They were threatened, I guess with the motion, and the captain, who,

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 2>by the way, is now the interim police chief, Adam Henney,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>signed it to protect his office. What's that tell you

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>about the strength of the case when the investigators won't

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>put their names on.

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, it's I mean, I think it's pretty

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 4>obvious it's not the best case in the world. I

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 4>mean that being said, you know, it is a jury trial,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 4>so you know, anything can happen in a jury trial.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 4>As we always say, it's not like, you know, jurors

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 4>can have a different view of what the community standard

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 4>should be for a case like this, So you just

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>you never know. And there is a question as to

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 4>how much the judge is going to let the attorneys

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 4>get into that kind of background about how it was charged,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 4>and how much the jurors are.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Going to know.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Folks like you and I are pretty plugged into this.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 4>The average citizen in Hamilton County may not recall that

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 4>level of detail.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And if the.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Judge rules that are truly not relevant to whether or

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 4>not the crime was committed. He may keep some of

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 4>that information from the jurors, so we don't know what

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 4>they will actually know. But if they hear that, it's

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 4>going to really hurt the case. And surely they're going

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 4>to be allowed to know that he was assaulted, that

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 4>he got the worst of this and it's bad.

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Now, if I'm Alex Jrminsky's lawyer, the biggest thing I

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 4>would worry about is this. It's what I would call

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 4>the Victoria Parks factor. I mean, she did say she

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 4>was a former city council member who famously said that

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 4>these quote deserve to get be down. There are people

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 4>who may look at this and think, you know, nobody

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 4>here covered themselves and glory.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>They were all out.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 4>Drinking at two three in the morning in the middle

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 4>of this thing, and there are there was a school

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 4>thought that hey, you know he was down there mixed

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>up in this in one way or another, and you know,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 4>and a pox on all their houses and everyone's guilty

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 4>of something. I mean, there are people who would look

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 4>at it that way. So you know, again we're well

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 4>afield of the law. It's really hard to apply the

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>law and these kind of misdemeanor decisions because are kinds

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of cases because you know, engaging and fighting.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's you know, it's the language is both.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 4>It seems very specific, but actually when you think about it,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 4>it's very vague.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the kind of.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Thing that goes on in these worlds all the time.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 4>The jury is going to have a changeful well.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I think also it shows you that the echo chamber

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is louder than the law in that this is exactly

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>like the Nicholas Sandman thing from twenty nineteen where this

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>young man from a cubcath is in DC on a

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>high school trip, confronts Nathan Phillips, the Native American man

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>who was protesting, and the initial reports were the he

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>had and this would be Nick Sandman, the student had

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>attacked and verbally attacked or looked down upon this Native

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>American man, and it turns out the opposite was true.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>That he didn't walk up to him.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>The Native American elder man walked up to him and

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>he just had like a staring contest, I guess, and

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>was smiling at him. But all those people who attacked

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Nick Sandman then didn't retract what they said and said, hey,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, at first Blush it looked like he was

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the aggressor, and it turns out the other man was

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the aggressor. No one ever apologizes for these things. Same

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>thing here is that it looked like, initially from the

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>citizen video from the street videos, that it was Alex

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Stravinsky as the guy who committed the assault, when it

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>turns out he was assaulted twenty eight times prior, including Holly.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>And the end result is, well, you know, we had

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>all these people step up and say, hey, listen, you

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>charge everybody else weren't charging the white guy. And of

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 2>course when the truth came out from the state a

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>different story, no one apologized, and we've delayed this trial

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>now forever. And I think that's part of it as well,

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>because history makes your memory a little bit foggy, right,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So all those things aside this charge here that ale

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Stravinsky was the aggressor, it turns out he was attacked.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 2>That's even backed up by the state. The state's on

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>timeline shows that how does that charge survive the self

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>defense argument?

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know it likely won't.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I you know, my prediction is that the

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 4>most I think most people are going to go look

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>at this and think, look this, I didn't deserve to

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 4>be this assaulted the way he was, didn't deserve to

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 4>have his life turned upside down with these criminal charges.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I do predict that they'll find them not guilty. I mean,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the the only issue that I think they're

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 4>going they're gonna pound on here is as the videos

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I have seen. Again, I caution people all the time

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 4>that these videos we see on Facebook and Twitter, you know,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 4>are often you know, selectively posted, edited and and and

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 4>often don't have the full context of what happened. But

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 4>there is this issue of what they're calling quote end

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>quote the slap.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It does look as though that after he.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Was assaulted and walked away from the situation, that he

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 4>did re engage with one individual and slap that individual. Now,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 4>whether that admits to some sort of quote persistent fighting,

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. Prosecutors that I know very well, as

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>well as some of the police officers who looked at it,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 4>said look, you know, it's it's not a serious it's nothing,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the context of what happened. So I

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>know a lot of very smart and experienced people looked

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>at that particular part of the video and found it

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 4>to be not something that would rise to the level

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 4>of criminal conduct, particularly in the case of a guy

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 4>who was the victim of a serious assault, and a

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 4>felony level assault at that by a large crowd. So

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>but that, I think you're going to hear a lot

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 4>of talk about this slap and where he looked as

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 4>though there was a brief moment where he was at

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 4>least in the clear and away from these individuals and

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>then sort of re engaged. I think that's ultimately what

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have to hang their hat on for

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the prosecution. It's not much, and I do think most

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 4>people are going to look at this fairly and say,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's nothing here. But again, and that said,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, there may be other you know, the live

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 4>witnesses are going to provide different contexts. We don't know

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 4>what was said between these individuals. There have been all

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 4>kinds of allegations and hints that racial slurs were being

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 4>thrown around. We don't know that for a fact. That

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 4>may change kind of how some folks look at this.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there are there's an argument that that is

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 4>exceptionally disorderly. We do have this kind of concept of

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 4>fighting words in Ohio. But also it's very interesting. I

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 4>do think because of our new stand your ground laws.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 4>You know a lot of folks talk about those in

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 4>the gun context, but they also sort of apply here.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't really have a duty to retreat anymore. There

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 4>used to be this argument in Ohio law for self

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>defense that if you were under attack, you know, you

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 4>did have some sort of duty to retreat.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You really don't have that anymore.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 4>So I do think on balance, you know, he will

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 4>likely be found not guilty, but you know, again who knows,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 4>and there may be evidence that we're not.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, if he's sound that guilty, it just

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>gives more credence that the people got this wrong from

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the initial had a big press conference about it. We'll

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>just say, well, it goes to show you how racially

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>biased the court system is, despite of course, this case

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>being heard by a jury of their peers, who will

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 2>probably see the evidence. Ago Travinsky was the victim here

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and not the assailant. He was struck twenty eight times

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 2>in the head and face concussion syndrome PTSD. He owned

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a being in that fight and thrown the punch. He's

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 2>a victim in this case, as well as a defendant.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>How hard is that for the prosecutor to not violate

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>his constitutional rights. That's a pretty it seems to me

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to be a pretty narrow window to negotiate this.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Well. Yeah, I mean, frankly, if the city loses this case.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's one of the things that's important

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 4>to note here that there are two different prosecutors offices

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 4>inning able to count because the handle the county prosecutor's

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 4>office that handles all felonies and some misdemeanors and surrounding areas.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 4>The city still has its own small prosecutor's office that

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 4>only handles misdemeanors within the city limits, and they're the

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 4>ones bringing case. But the other prosecutor's office, hamilicuty prosecutor's office,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 4>are prosecuting all the other folks involved in this fight

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 4>because there's charged with felonies. So there is some some

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 4>real tension there. It's like, you know, the city is

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 4>prosecuting one of the key witnesses in the counties cases.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 4>So that's a that's a problem number one. Number two,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>I would predict that if he is acquitted by this jury,

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>that he probably already has counsel lined up to look

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 4>at a potential malicious malicious prosecution lawsuit and or a

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 4>civil rights claim, basically saying, look, I was prosecuted for

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 4>political reasons. I really didn't have a good faith basis

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 4>to bring this, and the city may be in a

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 4>position to pay out yet.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Another multi arty about settlement asual impact.

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a budget even Fritter, So is that stand?

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Is that the next is that hard?

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>After this gets I don't know if I'll get dismissed,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>but after this thing wraps up, and I think the

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 2>prediction is pretty good that Alex Stravinsky's going to walk,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and let's say that he does. He then turns around

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to a malicious prosecution case as a civil case against

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the city and civil claim outside of settlement. Though that's

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty ugly. Does that implicate the mayor to some degree

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>or at least the administration, because typically the mayor will

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>isolate himself and insult himself rather with the people like

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>sure along and other underlings that'll take the bullet for him,

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>so to speak. But does that turn around to be

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>problematic from a civil rights violation for the mayor of

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the City of Cincinnati, going, Hey, if it's proven that

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>we were able to influence the arrest and prosecution of

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Alex Stravinsky, then of course that's a civil rights violation there.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>That's a pretty serious charge against officers of the City

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of Cincinnati, the mayor notwithstanding.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, you're absolutely right. I'm going to try

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 4>to walk a fine line here because I'm trying to

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 4>be your legal analyst and not a standing critic of

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 4>the mayor, which i am. This is the part where

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 4>it gets really fun. If there's a malicious prosecution claim

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 4>and it survives the early stages, they will have the

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 4>ability to subpoena the documents and take demand documents, pull

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 4>documents out of the city, and they'll have the ability

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 4>to take depositions. And if, as one presumes, the city

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 4>manager and or the mayor were involved in any way

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 4>shape or forming the decision to charge Alex Treminsky, that's

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 4>going to come out and that is inappropriate, I mean

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 4>by any standard. I mean, they're not supposed to be

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 4>under our charter form of government. You know, the police

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 4>officers are supposed to be able to work independently and

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 4>without political pressure. And if he can show that political pressure,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 4>that is a real problem, not just in terms of

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 4>civil liability and monetary damages. That's a real problem politically,

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and it's a real sign of just how things may

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 4>have very well, really broken down by this. And you know,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 4>it sometimes can be a very minor thing like a misdemeanor.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 4>This misdemeanor charge. You know, there are over I think

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 4>ten to fifteen thousand misdemeanors filed every year, you know,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 4>in Hamilton County. But one of these, this little thing,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 4>this little tiny charge, it typically doesn't carry jail time,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 4>could have huge ramifications down the road if it leads

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 4>to a lawsuit that Chols there.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Was political involvement in this decision to.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Charge him, which common sense seems to indicate had to

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 4>be the fact case, because it's very rare for a

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 4>case like this to be charged many months after the fact.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>He is attorney Steve Gooden and a formal consulman. Thanks

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>for jumping on the show this morning. I think the

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>short rate here is it probably should this should end

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>rather quickly. But then it gets really interesting if Alex

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Stravinsky is exonerator, will find out what happens. But the

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>trial is set for today. Get some popcorn, baby, Steve

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>all the best.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks again, Take care shot. Thanks all right.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 2>News update here seconds away on the Big one seven

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred WLW. I'll get the very latest then we'll return

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>here on the show, we jump right in here. This

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. There's a case now that is coming out

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>against Sephora and Benefit they're cosmetic companies, and that they

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>are deliberately to This is on the heels of the metaverdict,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>by the way, targeting children under the age of ten

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to get them to buy makeup. Kids under ten are

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>now well, girls under ten are now using makeup makeup

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and the courts are trying to shut this down. We'll

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 2>get it that next on the show seven hundred wl

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Here we go slowly on seven hundred WLW.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 3>What we got going on today? Another crazy day?

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I think this is really interesting. Is you know we

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>always talking about kids becoming adults too soon, the adulting

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of the kid's although at the same time we complained

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>about kids not beingcome mature enough. Like when I was

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>your age, I had sixteen jobs, already fought in a

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>war and I'm only twelve years old. Today it's you know, ah, well,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>but maybe by the time you're thirty figure it out.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>You live at home till you're thirty. But after that,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>we gotta draw a lot, we gotta draw a light

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 2>in fan Uh. It's an interesting, interesting paradox. So this

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 2>is in Italy, but of course it's going to have

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>repercussions here in the state. So regulators in Italy are

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 2>investigating Sephora and benefit and I know Sephora, but I

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know what benefit is. Nonetheless, they're cosmetic companies, and

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the abligation there is that they are doing something called

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 2>cosmeticaurexia cosmeticourexia, which is a cross between cosmetics and anorexia.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>So wait, eyeliner makes you thin. No, no, no, no, no,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>they're complaining. They complain is that they are targeting children

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 2>in their marketing by having influencers, literally young micro influencers

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 2>marketing products to young people to encourage them to use cosmetics.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 2>And we're talking about kids under the age of ten,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 2>under the age of ten for seerms and masks and

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>anti aging creams and all this stuff. And I've always

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>push back this as the confusion that men largely have

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>about women with your fascination with shoes. Although a lot

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 2>of guys like you know, dunks and stuff like that.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 2>So all right, guys are the shoe thing, but the

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>makeup thing. I don't understand why it takes four hours

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to put megabond, Like, what are you trying to cover up?

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>People have taken a lot less time to try and

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 2>cover up murders they've gotten away with than to what

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>your makeup on. Don't know why it takes that long

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>and the other consideration does it actually work? So if

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you watch daytime TV at all, you're in a data

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 2>with commercials for all these new state of the art

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 2>beauty products that are going to make you look younger

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and make you feel younger, and it's going to delay aging.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>And I would say if that were successful, If that

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>were successful, we wouldn't need more new products, would we.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 2>They're selling you something that basically doesn't work or make

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 2>you feel better about yourself. What I'm all about? That's fine?

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>So I look at this and go, all right, are

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 3>they being over protective?

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Here?

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they seeing that we've normalized ourselves and what we're

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>blind to to some degree? I mean, look at it

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 2>this way. Why would a nine year old an eight

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>year old want to put makeup on? Where did they

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>get that from? It's these evil companies that are pushing that. No,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>they're seeing mom get botox or Instagram. Is it really

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>surprised at her nine year old. Is it's a four

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of buying retinal No.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So we are the.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Literally the first generation of parents, I'm talking to millennials now,

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 2>the first generation of parents who curated their faces for

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 2>public consumption and handed the kids got a front row

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>ticket to watch this whole thing. Right, you're having filters,

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 2>you're having injections, you're having face tuning, you're having a

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, a mommy makeover as it were, getting a

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>little procedure, got your lip fillers going on. We didn't

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 2>normalize cosmetic alteration. We just made it an aspirational type

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>of thing. So Sephorah, the tween Sephora obsession didn't come

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 2>from nowhere. It came from mom and dad. Is almost

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>always the case, is how did they turn out this way? Well,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>because we let them. They watched us and mimicked it.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the idea that a as crazy it

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>might sound outside of a Jean Benet like beauty pageant

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>contest and six years old wearing full makeup, which somebody

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>blinks and I had, I think that whole pageant thing

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>is really creepy.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>It's just creepy.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 2>You see that from time to ten it was you know,

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>John Bna back in the day, John Binney Ramsay and

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 2>it was honey boo boo. It goes honey booboo, and

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at it and go, it's just something weird

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 2>about that. It's like you've got a six year old

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 2>that looks like she's forty two. It's just a creepy look.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>But again, you know, whether it's that or other things

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>we debate in society, whether you think you're you know,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>your son is a girl or your girl as a boy.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's up to the parent to navigate that.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's just equally just you know, it's

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 2>just creepy, isn't the whole makeup on a five year old?

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>But historically you could see where we are today. It's

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 2>not like, oh my god, it's so different today than

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>it was when we were kids. Not really simply it's

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>just the newest thing. I mean, you go back to

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>what the nineteen twenties when you had flappers, and that

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>was literally the first big movement in America. There were many,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>but the first big movement in modern era of feminization

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>and also women gaining autonomy and having saying how they

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>look and not know necessarily pretty much doing their own thing,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and so somewhat of a sexual revolution of nineteen twenty.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So you had flappers and the beauty is responts because

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>rouge and lipstick became like an identity. It was a

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>thing in the nineteen fifties. If you look at some

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 2>pictures of women in the nineteen fifties, like model types,

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it's incredible how their waiste to hip to bust ratio

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>is insane, like Barbie, like the hourglass figure. In the

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>sixties and seventies, thinness was in, like the twiggy look,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and girls started counting calories and dieting at a very

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 2>very young age. In the eighties, the hair got much

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>bigger and supermodel set like an impossible genetic baseline, and

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the two thousand surgery came along, and so changing your

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>face and your body was new and peterre like, I

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think you know, God didn't make you that way

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you need And now today it's like, wow, I'm just

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>going to go in for a little procedure here. And

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>then you factor in social media. In the twenty tenths

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of this whole thing, and that just weaponizes all of it,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>delivers that right to your phone, and that would influence

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>kids too, So you know millennials and now gen zers,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the digital natives, if you will, it's really

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>nothing new to their offspring. So a nine year old

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>buying anti aging serum because the algorithm told her she

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be afraid of her own face it. You know,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it passes the sniff test right, it checks out. And

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the direction is travel is it's always been geared towards

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 2>younger girls and higher standards, and Italy is just drawn

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>a line in the sand. I guess, go No, it's

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>got to stop because you can't sell beauty products anti

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>aging creams to an infant. Well from the minute you

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>come out where you have that new baby smell right

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 2>out of the showroom, if you will, we start aging

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>now we grow, yeah we do, but it's part of

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the aging process. So you know, we recognize eating disorders

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 2>as a cultural problem, complex one at that, and it

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 2>took decades too. I don't know if we sorted that out,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>but I guess you don't hear about anorexia as much anymore.

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it occurs, but we accept it, there's streaming

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>for it, and the diet industry prayed on what women's

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 2>in security and impossibly high standard, manufactured standard marketing that

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>no one could meet, and then sold a solution to it,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 2>which is why you know we see every other commercial

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>on TV is for a diet product.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Because every other commercial is or something that's going to

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 2>make us fat? And so it just kind of evens

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>out right it's and this isn't like an ad on TV.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>It's someone who looks like them and talks like them

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and tell them they're pores are a problem at age

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>six or seven or eight or nine.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 3>It's engineered peer pressure.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 2>And you know there's some degree is it predatory, sure,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>because you're paying a young influencer to influence other ten

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 2>year olds to buy a product that they don't need.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know.

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there's probably probably of fifteen, sixteen, eighteen, and

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty year olds do the same thing. How there's probably

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of and there's certainly no shortage of fifty,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 2>sixty and seventy year olds that subscribed to the same thing.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, we got to keep going and keep buying

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the newest thing. I guess, so I guess the parents

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 2>should decide is a good Is it a good counter

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>argument here? Yeah, it's parents. We bear responsibility, we always do,

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>but we're inside that same warp culture. You know, if

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 2>mom normalizes her own face as content, I don't think

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>we're realizing that her daughter wants to do the same thing,

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 2>and you know they the market is going to go

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 2>after that, because hey, now we've got a new audience

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 2>of buyers and consumers of makeup and beauty products that

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>we didn't have before. It's like, you know, we're targeting

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 2>sixteen plus year old girls and now we can go

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 2>six to sixteen and other markets blowing up. So you know,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>we spent one hundred years lower in that age which

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>girls are taught their natural appearances is inadequate. And Italy

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>just looked at a nine year old buying anti agent

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 2>agreement said enough of this. Again, it's Italy their dynamic

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and their version of democers as much from our. But

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, we're still debating it, like at some

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 2>point are there going to be procedures You may lab

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>with this, but I think in the future you're going

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to be looking at some cosmetic procedures done at a child,

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>well not even a child, probably in utero, right while

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the baby is still cooking inside. Mom, it's like, yeah,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>we want to add dimples, and I'm sure there's going

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a lawmakers go okay, this is a bridge

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>too far and debated. Then you know you'll have this

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>procedure where a surgeon can go in and create dimples

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 2>on your unborn child or I don't know, some sort

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 2>of alted DNA altering. I mean, it's going to happen

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 2>at some point if it's not already. But that is

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the natural line we you know, and this is while

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 2>that's what you're talking about. Didn't happen when we were kids. Yeah,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 2>but if you remember, and if you're older too, I

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 2>would have to think that your mom and dad or

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>were particularly strict on you when it came to like

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>ear piercing. Right now, today infants are getting the ears

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>pierce but it's kind a big deal back in the day,

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 2>or tattoos or whatever. My wife as a couple butterfly

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>tattoos on her forearm tastefully done and it drives her

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 2>mom crazy. And I think you know that generation. I'm

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 2>talking baby boomers. I don't know if she's outraged by that.

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 2>That says, you know, you're destroying God gave you this

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>body and you're destroying it, to which iod counter is like, well,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 2>you wear makeup and you have your ears pierced, and

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you color your hair. How is that any do That's

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 2>entirely different. It's not permanent. The holes e rear are permanent. Well,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that's different. They're just earrings. Yeah, but earrings on a

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>woman were probably I don't know how long ago earrings

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>were a thing and when they first came out of

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the scene. But I would have to say, well, how's

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>that much different? You're altering your body to put jewelry

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in there, so there's an element of vanity there. Well

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 2>that was different, but well, of course it is, and

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 2>this is different today. And so God knows what kids

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>are going to do twenty years from now. I don't

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>know if I'll be around then or you'll be around then,

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 2>who knows, but it'll be something else at all. Just

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>it's another level of outrage, that's all. The kids aren't

0:27:58.000 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>just content to do what mom and dad did. They

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>want should take it one step further, as we did

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>when we were kids. And that's how this whole thing works.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>You're supposed to offend the sensibilities to the generation before you.

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 2>But Italy, I think it's just myself personally as a parent, like,

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>holy crap, does a nine year old need makeup?

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Be a damn nine year old.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>And if kids are getting makeup, not in many nine

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>year olds I know have a job other than micro

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>influencers or whatever the hell that means. But mom and

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>dad had to be complicit in this whole thing. You know,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>there's always a kid at school who's way out ahead

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of the others and what their parents or parent would

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 2>allow them to do, and you look at it, well

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 2>he's doing it had to be that way with cell phones. Yeah,

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>when twenty years ago when cell phones were still not

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 2>everyone has them, or probably thirty years ago when not

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone had same thing at but a kid gets a

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>cell phone and not everyone wants to have a phone.

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I remember that. My daughter going through this. Okay, well

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it's that age you get him a phone, and what's

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the right age for a phone? And well, her friends

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 2>have phones and that's how they stay in content. Not today,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, well, yeah, you get a phone when

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you're old enough to go to school. Kindergarteners have phones

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 2>for crying out loud. I know it's crazy, but again,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it's because that line that keeps constantly shifting and evolving

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to grow that market share. And that's what it's about.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we've got a time out and we've got

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>news on the way in about ten minutes here in

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the Big one seven hundred ww or our buddy. It

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>must be lawyer day. We had good None at nine

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>o'clock talking about the Chervinsky trial, which is I don't

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>know what to make it.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Who knows where it's going to go.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Jack Render's here with the meta verdict, and this ties

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>into what we're talking about here with makeup.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 3>It's the same thing.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Medigetting sued because the algorithms are causing young people much concern,

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>causing suicide rates there. I don't want to say they're up,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 2>but what's the role that meta and that would be

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 2>social media have in the mental health of your children?

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I think this case fits right into that, So we'll

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 2>ask them about this. So, yeah, it's a lawyer day

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 2>today and the show I mentioned Gooden was here at

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 2>nine o'clock. Today is the day that Alex Chevinsky will

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>have his day in court. Finally, it is the longest

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 2>running court case I think in the city. It seemed

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 2>like it was a no one's paying attention to it,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>and the city I think wanted it to go away.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to create it. And the same time, I'm like, well,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>it's got to go to trials. Is it going to

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>make it look good now? The mayor also, by the way,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>with all this stuff goings on vacation, so I don't

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 2>know if that's like he planned that on purposing. Okay,

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to misopening day, but this trial is supposed

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to start. Maybe I want to be out of town

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>for this, Maybe I do, But I know he's going

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to be back to help raise the transgender flag at

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 2>city Hall either today or tomorrow. I believe, Yeah, I

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 2>just I mean, you know, the cardboard mayor's like a

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 2>cardboard cutout of a mayor essentially, it's about that deep

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>like he's there for the photo ops, but the important

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff like crime and a text.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't really want to.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Get involved in that, at least not not forward facing anyone.

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Behind the scenes, yes, but in other ways no, and

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 2>other ways no. We'll see what happens today. I'm talking

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>off air with Goodin. I mean, I don't think it's

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be one of those a one day trial

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of things. Maybe it will be, I don't know,

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>but it seems like the evidence they have is completely overwhelming.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>For the prosecution in this case.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>And even the prosecutor came out and said, here's the

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>timeline of this thing, and he was acting in self defense. Now,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>the I think the part the wiggle room for those

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>people who wanted Chravinsky charge, not because he thought he

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 2>was a criminal necessarily, but essentially bit on social media

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and saw the videos that came out that showed him

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>assaulting and using the N word to black men, to

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a black man in particular. When it turns out that,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of epithets were thrown at him

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and punctions as well prior to what happened. But it

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>just emphasizes we live in and you know, we live

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in this crazy world that's absolutely so polarized right now.

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>You can't I don't know what we ever weren't, but

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you know what I'm saying, It's like, well, you know,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I would never use the N word at a black

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You probably deserve to get your ass whoop. But at

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the same time, when twenty eight blows are thrown in

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a much much and equally horrible things are thrown at

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>him and his friends for no reason whatsoever. You know,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>racism is not a one way street. We're we're conditioned

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to understand that racism only occurs when it's whites who

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>are denigrating blacks, not the other way around. And when

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 2>that apple cards turned upside down, this is what you

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>get quick time out. As I said, news happens in

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 2>minutes here seven hundred W. WELLWT, you want to be

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>an American, it's flunny here on seven hundred WALLW.

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 3>We have two juries.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>We have two massive lawses for Meta that's Mark Zuckerberg

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Facebook at all. And now Congress says it's time to

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 2>treat big tech like big tobacco. He's a First Amendment attorney,

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarrative FORCULA. Here in Cincinnati, it would be the living legend.

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Jack Reiner on the show, maybe the second biggest Reds

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>fan behind Randy Freaking.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 3>But that's debatable.

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>How you been, Well, that'll be argued in court. Who's

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the bigger Reds fan? Right there? Although you haven't written

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a book yet, you have not written your own book,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>have you?

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think he still gets the nod.

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, all right, all right, let's jump in

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 3>on this.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>And this is again one of those things that happened

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>on on Friday and made a little bit of news

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend, lost in the cycle, but I think

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 2>it's important because really what we're looking at is is

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the ability for companies like Meta to influence kids who

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>into young people. And we often talk about the algorithm

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and the like. So a jury ordered Meta is out

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>in New Mexico to pay three hundred and seventy five million,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 2>which is nothing for them, but for misleading users on

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>safety and failing to protect children. Now, a second phase

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 2>of this trial start early May, early next month that

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>could force design changes including age irrigation, encrypted messages, and

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a court appointed child safety monitor, which seems, wow, how

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the hell are you going to do this with a

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>company as big as as Meta is. So that's kind

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>of like the forty thousand foot view on this whole thing.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It's something called Section two thirty, which you here brought

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 2>up all the time. It's protected platforms for something like

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty years. So walk us through exactly what that shield does.

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>What section two thirty is and what the Planet's attorneys

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 2>figured it out to get around it.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Section two thirty says that a internet service provider such

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 6>as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, et cetera, it is not liable

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 6>for content did by third parties. That is different than

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 6>traditional law. Traditionally, newspapers have been liable for letters to

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 6>the editor. So if I write a letter to the

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 6>editor and I defame somebody, I can be held liable

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 6>for that, But so can the newspaper as the publisher.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So what.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 6>Section two thirty says is that the internet service provider

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 6>will not be deemed to be the publisher of third

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 6>party content. That's the most simple way of putting it.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's an easy way to frame this whole thing,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 2>And of course we'll see what happens in the second leg.

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>But the other part of this too is remember a

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>California Journey found them and YouTube negligent in that landmark

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 2>social media trial. Two thousand plus pending lawsuits me meaning damages.

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean three seventy five for Facebook for Suckerberk is nothing,

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 2>but damages could multiply pretty dramatically, I would think coming

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 2>up in this thing too. So the legal theory here

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>treat social media like it's a defective product rather than

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 2>speech and using a first amendment turning all about that

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 2>is a is that a solid argument?

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Does that hold up on appeal?

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 6>You know a lot of people have been comparing this

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 6>to the tobacco litigation, and in the idea that the

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 6>tobacco companies put out a product knowing that it was

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 6>addictive and even enhancing the addictive nature of the product

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 6>in some instances. In that respect, it's a decent analogy.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 6>The difference though, here is that the social media companies

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 6>this isn't just because they're tech. I mean the tech

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 6>is social media and that is speech. And so that

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 6>the question is, isn't I think I know what this was?

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 6>This was asserted as a defense that both in New

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Mexico and the California trust is that this is beat.

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 6>This is third party content that is posted not by Meta,

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 6>not by Facebook, not by Instagram, but by third parties,

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:18.240
<v Speaker 6>and therefore it should be shielded by Section two thirty

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 6>of the Communications Decency Act. It's very intertwined. So what

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 6>the planeifs did? Let's talk about California, which resulted in

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 6>a total of six million dollars in damages, three million

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 6>in compensatory damages, and another three million impunitive damages. The

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 6>plane by the plaintiff was that it was the features,

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 6>the algorithm, the infinite scroll, the notifications, auto play, beauty filters,

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 6>all contributed to the obsess or compulsive use of the

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 6>product by this twenty year old woman known as in

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 6>the in the lawsuits kg M. And that that isn't

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 6>about speech, that's about product design. But it's it's a

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 6>it's trickier, I think, than the tobacco cases because it

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 6>does it does intertwine closely with speech, and it's it's

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 6>a little hard to separate those two. There's no First

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 6>Amendment right to smoke. There is a First Amendment right

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 6>to speak. So I think that while the tobacco cases

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 6>are a decent analogy, they're not a complete analogy. You now,

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 6>you mentioned Scott, who was interesting. So the New Mexico

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 6>case was actually brought by the Attorney General of New Mexico.

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 6>And in this case it wasn't so much damages, it

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 6>was a fine that the It was brought under the

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 6>New Mexico Computer Consumer Product Safety Statue, and that statue

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 6>provided for a five thousand dollars per violation fine, so

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 6>which in the New Mexico case totaled up to three

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 6>hundred and seventy five million. I can't divide three hundre.

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Hundred five million, five thousand.

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Ver quickly, but it's a big no, you know. So

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 6>there were a lot of violations. Now, I think what's

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 6>interesting and as you say, three seventy five, three hundred

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 6>and seventy five million is kind of jump change to Meta,

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 6>and certainly six millions they have in their couch coushions probably,

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 6>But what I might be more concerned if I'm Meta

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 6>about the California case, because as you say, there could

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 6>be thousands, tens of thousands of follow on cases brought

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 6>by other young people and they may point to the

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 6>California judgment as settling the legal issue about the about

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 6>Meta's liability. And it could be that in future cases

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 6>it's just going to be how much damages are involved.

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 6>And so that's six million dollars to quickly escalate to

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 6>a billion, I mean it's not it's not outside the

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 6>realm of loss ability.

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 2>A billion dollar, five billion dollars in penalty, that's that's

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 2>her sharing. He is attorney Jack Ryaner first Amendon attorney,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about the meta verdict, what this all means for

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you and your kids especially. We do have some breaking news.

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Let me interrupt for just a second here, Jack, I'll

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 2>put you on hold.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 3>He is breaking news on news radio seven hundred WLW.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Brian Combs jumps in this morning with boy, this is

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a shocker.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 7>The Hamil and Kelly court case against Alex Schervinsky, the

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 7>man charged after the violence that happened on four Straight

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 7>Downtown last July, has been dismissed.

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Karen Johnson of WLWT in.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 7>The courtroom this morning to trial with to start with

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 7>jury selection at ten, and she is reporting that the

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 7>case has been thrown out. Don't know if it's a

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 7>case that could be refiled at this point. We do

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 7>know from discussions with the attorney for Travinsky ahead of

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 7>this trial that he fully anticipated that this might happen.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 7>Prosecution was having trouble getting some witnesses to cooperate since

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 7>they are facing charges as well, didn't want to tell

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 7>before their own trials happened. There were other problems with this,

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 7>including the two of the star witnesses for Travinsky. Our

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 7>police detectives who investigated this case and refused to bring charges,

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.439
<v Speaker 7>charges that were then later brought by Adam Henny, the

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 7>interim police chief now who was the captain in charge

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 7>of the district at the time where this occurred. So

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 7>the state is sparing him or the city of sparing

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 7>him having to testify explain why he brought the charges

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 7>when his detectives did not want to. We know that

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 7>these charges were somewhat suspect from the beginning because they

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 7>came well after all of the other people who were

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 7>charged in the beatings with felonies were charged, and came

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 7>after some African American leaders in town demanded that someone

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 7>they said who didn't look like them be charged as well,

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.800
<v Speaker 7>meaning someone who was white. And that was the charges

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 7>part against Stravinsky. There are six other defendants who are

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 7>facing felonies that could put them away for a long

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 7>time for beating Travinsky and for beating Holly, the woman

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 7>who was attacked. Their trials are all set for May,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 7>and we believe that Stravinsky will now become a witness

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 7>in those cases.

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 3>He's a defendant now he's a witness.

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And we'll be working with the prosecution though those

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 7>cases will be handled by the Hamilting County prosecutor instead

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 7>of Cincinnati prosecutors. So we don't have a whole lot

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 7>of details about what's behind this. Hopefully by ten thirty

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 7>maybe we'll have a few of the details revealed. The

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 7>judge this case did refuse to allow a live stream

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 7>of the proceedings, so that did not happen, so we

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 7>can't follow with that.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Very interesting, Yeah, is a judge dismissing it.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Did the prosecution just say, hey, we don't have witness

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 2>well dismissed.

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately the judge had to throw out the charge.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, we don't know yet at this point if

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 7>it was the prosecution who said we can't proceed, or

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 7>maybe some of their witnesses didn't show up.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Today.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 7>We know a couple of them were confidential police informants

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:32.280
<v Speaker 7>who were not very reliable and maybe did not appear

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.720
<v Speaker 7>in the past, and they had to ask for continuances

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 7>and the judge said, clearly the last time, if you

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 7>asked for another continuance, it's not happened. We're moving forward,

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 7>or we're throwing it out.

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay again, so just reset for somebody tuning in right now.

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 7>Brian Alex Dravinsky's a disorderly conduct trial is not going

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 7>to happen today over the brawl that happened in the

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 7>streets of Cincinnati last July. The charges against him have

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 7>been dismissed, waiting to find out if this they could

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 7>be filed later, or if they could be altered or changed,

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 7>or if he's truly off the hook. He was ready

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 7>to fight this and claim self defense, and his attorney

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 7>has made it very clear that once the criminal charges

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 7>against him are resolved and that he will be going

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 7>against the city for civil damage. My goodness, a lot

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 7>to unpack your Brian Combs, thanks again, well, I appreciate it, buddy,

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 7>Brian Colembs. The seven hundred newsroom, which by the way,

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 7>is not the news. We just came in the studio here,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 7>i'd say, bringing behind the scenes here the satellite news center.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to pivot for a second, guy, Jack Reiner.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 7>He's the First Amendment attorney, and we're talking about the

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 7>meta verdict and what all that means. But I got

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 7>to pivot a little bit here, Jack, if you allow

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 7>me that discretion. As an attorney, generally speaking here, I

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 7>don't think this is surprising, but as far as the

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 7>outright dismissal of the case, do you think that's that

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 7>the behest to prosecutors as the judge saying this is

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 7>frivolous and stupid, get out of my courtroom.

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of this?

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 6>I think it sounds like it was more a case

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 6>of just maybe the prosecution just couldn't get the witnesses

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 6>they needed, because I think if the judge was going

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 6>to dismiss the case for lack of merit, that would

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 6>have happened sooner. I think I would like to correct

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 6>something that Brian said. The judge had istree in order

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 6>for prohibiting live streaming, but we actually took that to

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 6>the first District Court of Appeals and got him to

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 6>allow live streaming.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So okay, so there would have been live streaming had

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 2>this actually gone. This all was dismissed before jury selection,

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 2>so there's nothing to say.

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Right and I, yeah, this this prop I don't know,

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 6>but this may very well have taken place in Judge

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 6>Johnson's chambers, the decision to dismiss.

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And that sort of thing.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 6>But I think, like I said, I think if it

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 6>was a question of that the case black legal merit,

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 6>that would have happened soon or so this this may

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 6>very well be just the prosecution saying you're on, I'm sorry,

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 6>we couldn't get the necessary witnesses.

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a tough case to begin with, and I

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think that there was a One of the.

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Issues was whether they could bring assault charges, and the

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 6>issue was that they did have mister Stravinsky on on

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 6>video slapping somebody. But assault requires the threat of serious

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 6>bodily injury, and the slap really didn't.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 5>It couldn't.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 6>They couldn't make the case. So I think it's my

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 6>recollections he was trying to disorder's content.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was just under the conduct.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 2>But I I was just curious on that note too,

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 2>because the beatings that he received were far worse than

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the open handed slap, And I guess technically that does

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.839
<v Speaker 2>not rise the lovely assault. But doesn't that further give

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 2>credence that this was these charges were bought for political

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 2>pressure as opposed to actual criminal pressure.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 6>It really I think it's going to depend on what

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 6>the judge. I don't know if the judge is going

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 6>to issue anything a written opinion on it, so it

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 6>sort of depends. But it was a yeah, there was

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 6>there was politics involved, I think for sure.

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that and that opens up a civil lawsuit.

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 2>I would think if Travinsky had the charges dismissed and

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 2>that just broke here on seven hundred WW that the

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 2>charges against els to the trial is supposed to start today,

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not even a jury selection yet, and the charges

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 2>were dismissed. We'll find out the details as that starts

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 2>coming out of Hamiltot Court. But in that regard, I

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 2>look at this and go, all right, well, it's dismissed,

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 2>and that would then set up some sort of civil climate,

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 2>imagine from Travinsky in that if they didn't have enough

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to bring this these charges, I don't make it to

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 2>make it to trial, I don't select a jury for

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 2>crying out loud. That give credence to the fact that

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you said that suggested some sort of political will power

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to legal ones. That opens the city and

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe even the mayor up to a civil rights violation lawsuit,

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't it.

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it potentially does, which would likely be heard in

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 6>federal court. So that is you know, that takes it

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 6>out of the local elected political sphere that you judges

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 6>are appointed for. Like several judges, they don't have to

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 6>stand for re election. So yep, that takes it into

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 6>a whole different direction. But we'll see, we'll see what

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 6>happens interesting here.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is an interesting case for sure. But it

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 2>seems like Jack, we we always have interesting cases in Cincinnati.

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 2>There's no shortage of legal drama here in Cincinnati, or

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 2>just nonsense that rises the level of national news. We're

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 2>really good at that here in Cincinnati, O Hio, aren't we?

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that should be this look right, crazy crazy story

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 2>and you can do like one a year basically because

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a gift that keeps on giving. Listen, I

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 2>know you came to talk about meta, but things do

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:40.800
<v Speaker 2>happen in the breaking news. Rom I appreciate you pivoting

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 2>with me. Jack Rynder, first Amendment attorney for Rookie Law.

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks again, buddy, appreciate the insight, No problem, Take care

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 2>there you go. Well, yeah, meta isn't there?

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>This?

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>This is more, This is sexier. I'm want to continue

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:54.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about that with you at five and three, seven four, nine,

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand.

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Now what do you think happened?

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 2>It's going to get damn interesting here too, and what

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 2>does it say about our legal system because often in

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 2>this case, people like aftat pureval Democrats scream about the

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 2>bias in the court system, how the courts are biased,

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and we need to fix that. We need to bond

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 2>and bell reform, we need to do own recognizance and

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 2>things like that. We had to be gentler to criminals

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 2>because they are victims too. We've tried that now for

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the last number of years. It doesn't seem to be

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 2>working in Cincinnati with some of the crime rates, not

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 2>all of them, but some of the crime rates risings,

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 2>particularly the violent ones, particularly the group of assaults and

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the like. We saw street takeovers and everything else downtown,

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and we saw what happening in the opening day most recently.

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 2>God knows what the summer is going to bring when

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the weather actually starts to cooperate with us here. But

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 2>relative to this discussion and what we just heard, the

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 2>news that broke about Travinsky's charges being dismissed, and what

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 2>that sets up legally speaking, the same people that scream

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>about a biased judicial system. I don't know about you,

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 2>but from my vantage point, it seems like those people

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 2>are complaining are the ones also guilty of it. We'll

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 2>get into that right after a news update where we're

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>sat and foind out the very latest from downtown next

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on seven hundred WLW, Scott's Flowing Show on seven hundred WWT.

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Always pivoting, always pivoting, because we got breaking news minutes ago.

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 2>You're here first yere on seven hundred WLW. And that

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 2>was the case against Alek Trevinsky, the man charged with

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 2>disorderly conduct in the July assault at Fourth and Elm,

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the trial that's been delayed and delayed and delayed again

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 2>after a last minute continuance. Today was supposedly the day

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and before jury selection even began, the judge dis missed

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the case. And now we're hearing it was the beause

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of the prosecution that again the prosecution's key witness that

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 2>failed to appeer, citing fear for his safety after information

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 2>let him believe the people believed to identified as an

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 2>FBI informant, which they say is not true. But nonetheless

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 2>that witness failed to appear, and therefore the prosecution's case

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:54.399
<v Speaker 2>fell apart. And so I think it's probably a case

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 2>of and pleating the fifth and saying, well, if I

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 2>testify for the prosecution against als Stravinsky, I am now

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.919
<v Speaker 2>implicated in what I saw, and now I'm implicating myself here,

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's what's going on in this really

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:12.240
<v Speaker 2>weird case. But nonetheless, the case completely and utterly dismissed

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 2>against al Stravinsky, which brings up a whole host of

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 2>other questions relative to Summer Slam Cincinnati twenty five. When

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at what just transpired here, it really is

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to unpack. I know at this point

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 2>because it was hell nine months ago that this crime occurred,

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:35.280
<v Speaker 2>or crimes occurred anyway, and initially at first blush, of course,

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 2>it was Alice Stravinsky as the assailant dropping the end bomb,

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 2>which even if you're the victim of a crime, I

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 2>don't recommend doing because it can make the beating even worse.

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 2>You shouldn't use the word. But nonetheless that's what transpired.

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this was led prior to this, we saw

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Holly get smacked down, and we still don't know what

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 2>she had anything to do with. It's is a woman

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 2>standing there and gets sucker puncher behind, as the case

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 2>may be with these street brawls. Nonetheless, the case of

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Ali Stravinsky is here's a guy who was hit at

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 2>least twenty eight times or he and others around him,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And this all started at the club found the music festival,

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and they're in the VIP area at a club and

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of African American clientele there, and a number

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 2>of them were I guess maybe a few of them anyway,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.280
<v Speaker 2>were hurling racial epithets and wondering what they were doing

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 2>at the Cincinnati Music festl last time I checked. Whether

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a black musician, a white musician, or any musician

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:28.879
<v Speaker 2>for that matter, music is certainly appreciated by most people.

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I would say, I'm a fan of some of the

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 2>acts that played there as well. But it makes one think, like, well,

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a white guy going to what's quote unquote

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a black show, is that going to be a problem

0:51:39.160 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 2>for me?

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 3>What it was for Aleis Stravinsky. Why that is, we

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:42.399
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 2>But it was all started by an individual with some

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>serious mental incompetencies going on. But that's not an excuse.

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not an excuse that he was egged on despite

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the fact that maybe had some learning difficulties or wasn't

0:51:56.680 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 2>all put together. Nonetheless, it happened, That's what occurred. But

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 2>we just doubled down to the stupidity. And now what

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 2>winds up happening is this opens up a civil suit.

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.959
<v Speaker 2>I would think on the part of Shavinskian's attorneys to say, look,

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty clear now that they didn't have a case

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 2>put together. Was I prosecuted because I've out of the law,

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 2>or was i prosecuted as a victim because well, I'm

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 2>white and white people are always the aggressor when it

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 2>comes to racially motivated crimes. Well, it's pretty clear that's

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 2>not true, and we know that's not true, but that

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 2>is the mantra I think, and we'll get into that

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in just a second. But it was kipt Guiding the prosecutor.

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Assistant prosecutor for the county said his office had been

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:37.879
<v Speaker 2>working on this was back last year. They were doing

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 2>a compilation of videos to turn over to the defense attorneys,

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and they established a clear timeline of what happened. They

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.399
<v Speaker 2>took the citizen video too, off the interwebs, but also

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 2>there were at least two non public cameras that were

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 2>capturing a timeline a little bit better, and so they're

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 2>able to piece this all together. And they discovered, of course,

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 2>after the flop about hey you got to prosecute the

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 2>white guy because it's racism if you don't that the

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 2>slap that Alex Stravinsky threw wasn't the beginning of the fight.

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 2>And now prior to that N bomb being dropped in

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Schevinsky's slapping, which is a misdemeanor, not a felm me

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 2>by the way, the state says Jermaine Matthews was the

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 2>main instigator of the man I was talking about, and

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 2>he had been harassing the best victims and he was

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 2>egged on by others in the crowd. He was saying,

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 2>you're at the wrong corner at the wrong party, and quote,

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 2>they were going to make sure they got off that corner,

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and some were struck and beaten prior to the N

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 2>word coming out in the slab coming out said a

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of it was ww east dug and sucker punch

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 2>him behind, and Travinsky looked like a pretty good big guy,

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 2>had enough of it and went and slapped this gentleman.

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Now Clyde Bennett, the defense attorney I had on the

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 2>show and probably had them not again as standing by

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the initial narrative that was started by the white guys,

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and his quote was a blind man conceited and never been.

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The city knows if you remove racing roof politics, this

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:55.799
<v Speaker 2>is a fistfight and a brawl that was fueled by

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 2>alcohol consumption and that was initiated by some of the

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 2>alleged victims. That's a quote of end. Well it turns

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 2>out and the case being dismissed and all. I guess

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 2>we will never know the fact pattern here, but it's

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty clear that the uh, the behavior was dominantly and

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 2>predominantly black folks in the crowd, and not all of them,

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 2>because we saw a number of folks say, man, this

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is stupid. Cut this noise out. It's like anything you

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 2>get a group of people together, there's knuckleheads of all colors.

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But I guess that's my point is now this whole

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:24.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is set up, and this may wind up costing

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:26.279
<v Speaker 2>you even more money if you live in the city

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 2>of Cincinnati. In that if this becomes a civil case,

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and the two detectives who refuse to testify basically for

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution of this game, they wind up getting called

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to the stand and they will they'll they'll be uh,

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>they'll testify for the defense saying listen, there was nothing

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 2>there to justify charges being filed against Alex Stravinsky. That's

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of a smoking gun. You've got two detectives that

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 2>are willing to state that and go, yeah, we didn't.

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 2>We had no reason to charge this guy because he

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:56.280
<v Speaker 2>was a victim. But they made us anyway. And who's

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the day? How high does it go? That's the allegation

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 2>will be made if this and it should go to

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a civil rights claim. This would be a civil case.

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:07.399
<v Speaker 2>But I don't even know the civil rights violation here.

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 2>How much money is not going to cost you the

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer to settle this and what is it all predicated on. Look,

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm a realist. I understand that there are a lot

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of white people who are racist, but I would also

0:55:18.800 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 2>have to realize that a lot of Asian black and

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 2>male female gays, a lot of people have issues as well.

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:28.919
<v Speaker 2>So to think that racism in this country is one side,

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the fallacy that this whole mess is

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 2>standing upon. The narrative that black folks can't be racist

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is not true. It's not like whites don't have a

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 2>shortage of racism. The Klan, we've got flyers, we've got

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Lincoln Heights, we got the you know, the guy burning

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the Pride flag, anti gay. I get all that, and

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 2>it's sickening because you should be junched on what you

0:55:53.040 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 2>do and not who you are. But nonetheless that has

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 2>always been and always will be a component of our society.

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:01.959
<v Speaker 2>I know there's people out there going, wow, it's fine,

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 2>let it go. You know, we should always try to

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 2>get better from one day to the next, self improvement

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and such. But they have others believing there's a utopia

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 2>out there and if everyone can just get along and

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:12.799
<v Speaker 2>there's no wars and no fighting, and it turns into

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:13.799
<v Speaker 2>a John Lennon song.

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 3>That's not reality either.

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 2>But the problem here is that the progressive narrative from

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 2>aftab on down that blacks being the victim of whites

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 2>are a daily occurrence, and you stick up for people

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 2>who are committing crimes, no matter how vicious.

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 3>That the optics of this is.

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Terrible and it's been terrible, and it's not it's going

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to wind up maybe costing somebody some money, some serious

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 2>money here, that only one side is the oppressor and

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea here. And we saw this with Iris Roli,

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 2>We saw this with the Advanced Peace Movement from Jan

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Michelleman Kearney and others that believe that all criminals somehow

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 2>are victims themselves, and what does that let us. It's

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 2>led us to a very bloody winter, if not spring,

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and possibly summer. At this point, the mayor wouldn't e

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 2>of acknowledge the murder of Patrick Harringer, which really started

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 2>this whole thing a year ago. The assault on Holly

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:11.799
<v Speaker 2>has just been gone by the wayside, the idea that

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.320
<v Speaker 2>right now. In City Council yesterday, as a matter of fact,

0:57:15.280 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they asked Chief Interim Chief Adam Henny what the department

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 2>would look like if they took a five percent haircut.

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 2>He said, well, if we had to cut five percent

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of our budget roughly eleven million dollars, we would have

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of officers, what loss cops, laws enforcement?

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I had Damon Lynch on the show, and

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the most vocal black leaders in the community.

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:42.080
<v Speaker 2>For sure, he saw it one way, and that is

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the black folks are the victim here. Well, I shouldn't

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 2>say that to be fair to the Damon Lynch. It

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 2>would be more along the lines like, well, you know,

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 2>we realize that there's some people involved in this, but

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you have to charge everyone the same. I mean, if

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 2>we're the other way around there, there'd be outrage if

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it was a bunch of white folks beating up a

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 2>black guy, and we probably meet the front line going

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that's wrong, you shouldn't do that. But in this case, like, well,

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 2>let's say there's a nuance here. It's like, I guess

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 2>what black folks can be racist? I think we should

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of admit that not just a white thing, it's

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 2>an everyone thing. Yeah, we were the rest of the

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:22.440
<v Speaker 2>community who wants to hear okay, the community what you know,

0:58:22.480 --> 0:58:25.439
<v Speaker 2>you kind of lost credibility there. But we're just gonna

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 2>double down and say no, no, no, no, this guy

0:58:27.640 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 2>should have been charged and this is gonna be a

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 2>miscarriage of justice and goes to show you how broken

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the system is, and so everyone will wind up leaning

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 2>into that. It's just, uh, it's just predictably insane, is

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 2>what it is.

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately.

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And so we'll get more details coming out. Of course,

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're just joining the show. What about half hour

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 2>ago here on the show, Brian Combs broke in and

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it was our buddy Karen Johnson over at

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Wody OLDWUT who actually was in courtroom and broke the

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 2>story that the charge against al Travinsky have been dismissed.

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 2>We don't know, I guess we do now that the

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor said, look, our witness is not going to show,

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 2>so we have no choice but to ask for dismissal

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of this case because our key witness here doesn't want

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to testify because they are also charged. In What winds

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 2>up happening is you have a right to not incriminate

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 2>yourself under the Fifth Amendment. And I've guess that's sugguessing

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 2>in my limited legal knowledge here that that's what occurred

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in this courtroom. And so well, I guess we'll never

0:59:22.960 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 2>know what the conclusion is, but you almost be certain

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 2>that a civil suit is going to be filed on

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.439
<v Speaker 2>behalf of Al Stravinsky because he's been jammed up now

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 2>for the better part of a year in this whole thing.

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 2>And the story that just continues. And by the way,

0:59:33.560 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna point this out. So the two detectives that

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 2>would testify for the defense Alec Stravinsky and say, yeah,

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 2>there was nothing here to charge this guy, and I

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 2>was going to sign it, and Adam Henny did. The

0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:48.400
<v Speaker 2>same guy who is now the interim chief on the

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:50.800
<v Speaker 2>same day, by the way, that the contract with Frost

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Brown Todd expires. The city has investigating why they fired

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Terry Thiji in October, and here we are now almost

0:59:57.600 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 2>into April. Tomorrow's April, and we're still investigating why we

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>fired her back six months ago. Doesn't make any sense

1:00:03.520 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to me, but maybe downtown it does. So now, what

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>happens if Henny signs this If Henny signs this thing

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and he did, and they go, well, we've got the

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>charges dismissed because this is political pressure. What happens to him?

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Could it very well be that they decide, well, we

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't fight anything on on Thiegi, they will too, because

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the attorneys came out and pretty much said that already

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to take the take it out of play and maybe

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>tamp down expectations there, but why not bring Fiji back

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>van and Henny is signing arrest words that were motivated politically.

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>The whole thing stinks, is what it does. And the

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>bigger question, the bigger thing is I think we deserve

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>better than this. Is Cincinnati is now. I don't live

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>in the city per se for obvious reasons, and maybe

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you do, But I like to frequent downtown. I like

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to think it's fairly safe. I know in times you

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>have big groups down there, there's gonna be problems, but

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the problems seem to be increasing, not decreasing. And now

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>we've got a racial opponent this whole thing that could

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>make it worse because now you're going to have the

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>leaders of quote unquote leaders screaming about the process, how

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy can walk away and that the system is

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>broken and it's racist when it's clearly not. And the

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>other element then, too, is that that then fuel more

1:01:17.160 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>animosity towards folks when they go downtown. This is not

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a good look for the city of Cincinnati, and there's

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of repercussions that are going to be felt.

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing Willie's going to pick us up today at

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>twelve oh six here on seven hundred ww's we continue

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>on the Scotsland Show at five, three, seven, four, nine, seven,

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 2>eight hund the Big one hit talk back on the

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app So we'll continue to follow the developments here

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>from the dismissal of the Alex Travinsky case and what

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>all this means, because it's like an octopus, it's like

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:46.760
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of OCTOPI I guess tentacles in all directions,

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the repercussions could be felt, and probably many things I

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:53.080
<v Speaker 2>even considered are part of this mix. Now that this

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:56.480
<v Speaker 2>case has been dismissed, not with prejudice, but just rather

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>dismissed because the witnesses aren't shown up because they're locked

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>up themselves. You got a guy who is a victim

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:06.320
<v Speaker 2>but also a defendant, and now we witness Alex Kravinsky.

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a full time job just being Alex Dravinsky. I

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>guess now you did throw I will say, you throw

1:02:11.520 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the end bomb out, You're gonna get punched in the head.

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I've made that clear to be able to disagree with me.

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like you drap the end bomb and somebody hears

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>that they're gonna knock you the bleep up as well

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you should and I get it. I understand there's a

1:02:23.800 --> 1:02:26.840
<v Speaker 2>double standard there. It can be used, and I always

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>contend when it comes to the N word. Myself is like, well,

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I got a problem with the N word being used

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 2>in the conton depending on the context of the used

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>because in the course of a hip hop song, it's fine,

1:02:37.240 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>but if a white guy sitting along with a hip

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>hop song like I like to.

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem. I don't think it should be, but

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a problem.

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>The other element of this, too is Okay, well, we

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>could talk about the use of the N word in

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the light, but racial epithets were hurled at white people,

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and I guess we want to look the other way

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>on that. Look, if we're gonna stamp out racism, and

1:02:56.720 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>God knows, in this town where we have the Freedom

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Center and we have marches and we have doctor Martin

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Luther King's statues and everything else and about quality and

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:07.560
<v Speaker 2>opportunity and all these wonderful concepts, then you got to

1:03:07.560 --> 1:03:10.800
<v Speaker 2>be as outrage if not more outraged about what transpired

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>with this case than you would with most others. But again,

1:03:15.280 --> 1:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>asking for people, or maybe not you, but others, to

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>be consistent in this is not going to happen. There's

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>no consistency anymore. We've completely lost that. We get a

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 2>time out and we got news. In a minutes, we'll

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>recap this entire story. Alex Tchravinsky's case being dismissed by

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Judge Johnson at the behest of the prosecution because I

1:03:33.120 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>guess the witness one of the witnesses said, I'm not

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>showing up. I'm not going to do this because I'm

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>going to incriminate myself. What a story on seven hundred

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>wlwod since nonat do want.

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>To be an American?

1:03:44.640 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 6>Foods?

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Going back on seven hundred w olw rolling through it

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>today and Democrats a fear ice. We saw the no

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Kings protests over the weekend. I was celebrating little Kings myself,

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>but not part of the No King's protests.

1:03:58.560 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Fear Ice.

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>It's the three letters that should instill concern in every American.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But you know there's three other letters I think we

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>should fear more and on that is Holly Adams. Holly

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 2>is a candidate for Ohio wan So running against Greg Landsman,

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and she's out of Hamilton. Also a fellow Falcon from

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the Bolden Green State University. Holly Adams, Holly, welcome, are you?

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm good, Scott, Thanks so much for having me.

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:24.520
<v Speaker 8>On your show.

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you bet, thanks for taking time out. So Democrats

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 2>say they want to abolish ice because it's dangerous, it's abusive,

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and make the case what does a community without ice

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>actually look like?

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 5>That's interesting. You know, everybody that follows Greg Landsman and

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 5>knows that we need to replace him here in the district.

1:04:43.200 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 5>So he describes ICE as a non law abiding agency,

1:04:50.160 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 5>which is exactly the opposite of.

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 8>What they are.

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 5>And we need them to remove these criminals from our

1:04:56.240 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 5>streets and the people want that, and it's you know,

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to accomplish and what we kind of know why,

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 5>but the Democrat Party and people like Greg Lansman want

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 5>to procast the criminals on the street and be fond ICE.

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 5>So we really need to support, you know, all of

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 5>our law law enforcement to make our city safe. We

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 5>have a safety problem here already in Cincinnati and Hamilton County,

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 5>and you know, ICE is just and another resource that

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>can help us make our city favor.

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the problem, of course, you know, it's politics,

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and so it's it's one side v. The other, and

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>so there's there's no gray area. But I think the

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>gray aer for both sides. You know, if you're a Democrat,

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand you know that some of these number

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>of these people who are being picked up are active, there's

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>active warrants on them. I mean, why are you out

1:05:44.000 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 2>there defending someone who might very well be a I

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know, rapist or a murderer or you know what

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you committed a serious crime.

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh, that's why ice needs to exist.

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:57.280
<v Speaker 2>The other side, of course, is you know, when I

1:05:57.320 --> 1:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>see people who are caught up in home depot or

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>they're I don't know, some kid who was brought here,

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>who is now now in his early thirties or twenties,

1:06:04.920 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>who's brought here as a child, and we're sweeping them

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>up too. We have cases here as you know in Cincinnati.

1:06:09.320 --> 1:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>As an American that's troubling. Why why can't we get

1:06:11.480 --> 1:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>this right? It doesn't seem that hard.

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, it's different. I mean, we are a country

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:20.520
<v Speaker 5>of laws. Some people want them to be enforced. We

1:06:20.680 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 5>know that if we break the laws, we're going to

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 5>go to jail, or if we broke the immigration law,

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:29.120
<v Speaker 5>we be deported as well. So, you know, Americans just

1:06:29.280 --> 1:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>expect you know, our government. One of the key reasons

1:06:34.000 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 5>that government is to protect the people. And our money

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 5>is going everywhere else but protecting the people. You know,

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 5>even you see Great Landsman has been you know, vigorous

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:49.439
<v Speaker 5>as far as taking money away from the local law

1:06:49.520 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 5>enforcement for other pet projects. So we we just need

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 5>to make sure that we're you know, and what I

1:06:56.560 --> 1:06:59.720
<v Speaker 5>hope to do when I get to Congress is that

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 5>a budget and put the tax dollars that are collected

1:07:03.960 --> 1:07:07.280
<v Speaker 5>towards what is good and just and helped all American families,

1:07:07.400 --> 1:07:08.800
<v Speaker 5>including the baty on our streets.

1:07:09.640 --> 1:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>That's also part of the problem too, that you know, great,

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you're runing against Greg Landsman, and where's he specifically stood

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>on on you mentioned stood where on ice? But there's

1:07:19.680 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a huge contrast here. I also look at it and go,

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>all right, well, there are people who are getting jammed

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>up who have been here for years illegally, yeah, certainly,

1:07:27.840 --> 1:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>but have contributed to society owned businesses, started families, have

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>never been in trouble whatsoever. Is there a way? Is

1:07:34.400 --> 1:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>there is there a password for them in this whole thing,

1:07:36.440 --> 1:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>because I feel like that's the one being squeezed out.

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I think our sense of fair play as Americans says, okay,

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you came here illegally, but how have you conducted yourself

1:07:43.680 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>ever since?

1:07:44.360 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that a Is that a non qualifier for you?

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that that should be considered as something

1:07:51.120 --> 1:07:54.920
<v Speaker 5>that you know, again, they they jumped ahead of people

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 5>that are you know, inline following our legal immigration process,

1:07:59.600 --> 1:08:02.120
<v Speaker 5>but certain they should be at the top of the

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 5>list to stay in the country with proven you know,

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 5>assimilation and being part of this part of our country

1:08:10.440 --> 1:08:13.600
<v Speaker 5>and part of our communities and giving back to the communities.

1:08:13.640 --> 1:08:17.320
<v Speaker 5>That those are the type of immigrants grids that we

1:08:17.400 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 5>want in our country. So they you know, it's there

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.839
<v Speaker 5>should be a VA team process and that those people.

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:27.439
<v Speaker 5>But at the same time, I don't think they should

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:30.880
<v Speaker 5>get their citizenship and put be put ahead as people

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:33.519
<v Speaker 5>that are legally in the process. And I think there

1:08:33.600 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 5>is room for both. I just think each case needs

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:40.639
<v Speaker 5>to be considered, you know, carefully. But what's very clear

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 5>is that people that are here illegally, that haven't assimilated,

1:08:45.240 --> 1:08:52.800
<v Speaker 5>that are multiple defenders of product need to go. So yeah,

1:08:52.960 --> 1:08:57.200
<v Speaker 5>so actually hear that. I you know, we're a very

1:08:57.240 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 5>compassionate society. You know, we want to take care of people,

1:09:00.520 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 5>and we want people to be treated with respect. And

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:06.960
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate those those immigrants that have come to our

1:09:07.000 --> 1:09:09.559
<v Speaker 5>country and worked hard and become part of what makes

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:10.719
<v Speaker 5>our cities great.

1:09:11.760 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Holly Adams on that.

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, the way I kind of think of it

1:09:14.960 --> 1:09:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is all right, you came here across the border illegally

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in search of something you couldn't get where you're from,

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>or to escape poverty and violence and everything else, have

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a chance at building a life. That to me is

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the American dream. You know, if we turn a blind

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 2>eye towards immigration policies under Obama and under Biden, I'd

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:33.639
<v Speaker 2>have to say we also did the same under George

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Bush and Ronald Reagan. And so if that's the case,

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 2>if that's the government going, we don't really care. I

1:09:39.479 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much of this is at the feet

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:42.920
<v Speaker 2>of the immigrants now in twenty twenty six, when it

1:09:42.960 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a big deal ten, fifteen, twenty thirty years ago.

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I mean for decade. You know, other presidents

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:53.439
<v Speaker 5>have in Congress have pushed the can down the road

1:09:53.479 --> 1:09:55.719
<v Speaker 5>to the point that, you know, we've got a big

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:58.280
<v Speaker 5>problem to deal with, especially after the four years and

1:09:58.360 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 5>Joe Biden and the open border or so, it does

1:10:01.479 --> 1:10:03.760
<v Speaker 5>need to be addressed. And like I said, you know,

1:10:04.200 --> 1:10:07.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm willing, you know, as a taxpayer to fund the resources,

1:10:07.800 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 5>whether it be ice or you know, uh uh betteam

1:10:13.000 --> 1:10:16.000
<v Speaker 5>of these other citizens that are here and been living

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:19.200
<v Speaker 5>here for a long time and our law citizens of

1:10:19.240 --> 1:10:22.760
<v Speaker 5>our communities to see how they could have a past

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:26.320
<v Speaker 5>the citizenship while staying here. I think that is a

1:10:26.320 --> 1:10:28.960
<v Speaker 5>totally fair thing to do. What I don't know, Scott,

1:10:29.000 --> 1:10:31.320
<v Speaker 5>and maybe you do, but it's worth looking up statistics.

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:34.519
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what the uh the ratio of those

1:10:34.520 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 5>people is, but I do believe that, you know, we

1:10:37.320 --> 1:10:40.120
<v Speaker 5>need to get those people a chance again. I just

1:10:40.200 --> 1:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>want to respect that. You know, we are a nation

1:10:42.280 --> 1:10:45.080
<v Speaker 5>of laws and we just haven't enforced followed them for

1:10:45.120 --> 1:10:47.639
<v Speaker 5>so long. We have to get back to the four

1:10:47.720 --> 1:10:50.760
<v Speaker 5>component that you know. We have laws, we follow them,

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 5>and we want everybody that's in our country to be

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:53.880
<v Speaker 5>following them.

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>The only stat I guess I have is I know

1:10:56.120 --> 1:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that immigrants tend to be more a law abiding than

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.960
<v Speaker 2>than natural born citizens here. But I want to move

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:04.719
<v Speaker 2>on because I think it is really good. Someone who's

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a more libertarian I think myself, is that the cry is, hey,

1:11:08.520 --> 1:11:10.559
<v Speaker 2>we're worried about the wrong three letters. It shouldn't be

1:11:10.560 --> 1:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the ice that we fear. It should be the irs.

1:11:14.200 --> 1:11:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Abolish the irs, which I absolutely love. Break that down.

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:20.679
<v Speaker 2>So what's your plan for eliminating the irs? Holly Adams

1:11:20.720 --> 1:11:23.559
<v Speaker 2>and how do you and what replaces it for that matter.

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:27.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean the fact is, and you know, the

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:30.759
<v Speaker 5>country America existed for one hundred and fifty years without

1:11:30.880 --> 1:11:34.680
<v Speaker 5>income past and at our roads, in our hospitals, in

1:11:34.720 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 5>our schools, and how we paid for those were through

1:11:38.040 --> 1:11:42.040
<v Speaker 5>revenue of Paris and taxes on goods and services. So

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:44.920
<v Speaker 5>we have all of those same news streams right now,

1:11:45.240 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 5>but we're additionally taking money out of the pockets and

1:11:49.880 --> 1:11:53.160
<v Speaker 5>the bank accounts of hard working American citizens. And it's

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:57.760
<v Speaker 5>really we've overburdened them with taxation in this country. The

1:11:57.840 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 5>advocate of eliminating the federal income packs, you know, I

1:12:02.160 --> 1:12:05.599
<v Speaker 5>think a lot of because I do feel like I've

1:12:05.640 --> 1:12:08.880
<v Speaker 5>always enjoyed math. I love a good spreadsheet. I feel

1:12:08.880 --> 1:12:10.559
<v Speaker 5>that if we go back and we look at the

1:12:10.600 --> 1:12:14.720
<v Speaker 5>Constitution and we see the enumerated responsibilities of Congress and

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:17.840
<v Speaker 5>where Congress is supposed to be spending money, where our

1:12:17.880 --> 1:12:21.719
<v Speaker 5>government is supposed to be spending money, we are over

1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:25.240
<v Speaker 5>spending to the level that once we cross off that

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:29.400
<v Speaker 5>over spending, that we can pay for everything with tarifs,

1:12:29.840 --> 1:12:33.160
<v Speaker 5>taxes on goods and services that we're already paying. And

1:12:33.320 --> 1:12:37.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, the average The median income in Cincinnati is

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 5>about fifty three thousand dollars, So the income pack would

1:12:42.960 --> 1:12:46.639
<v Speaker 5>put fifty six hundred dollars back in their pockets each year.

1:12:46.800 --> 1:12:49.679
<v Speaker 5>That's fifty six thousand over ten years. That's a lot

1:12:49.680 --> 1:12:52.840
<v Speaker 5>of money for a family that is struggling to you know,

1:12:53.840 --> 1:12:54.960
<v Speaker 5>pay their energy bills.

1:12:55.000 --> 1:12:56.479
<v Speaker 3>Well sure, sure, yeah, Holly.

1:12:56.479 --> 1:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I know you want to go to Congress and represents

1:12:58.240 --> 1:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>at the federal level, but you know, the limited government element,

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:04.360
<v Speaker 2>it's tough for me as in you you live in Hamilton,

1:13:04.960 --> 1:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>is an Ohioan. I look at what's happening in the

1:13:06.960 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 2>state House right now. I don't believe we have limited

1:13:09.600 --> 1:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>government in the de Wine administration. The latest example of that,

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and I can cite many. The most latest one, of course,

1:13:15.080 --> 1:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>is this banning of THC infused beverages. That was a

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>huge boon to the beer industry, and there's fighting this

1:13:22.080 --> 1:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>in court. But simply because Mike de Wine doesn't think

1:13:24.840 --> 1:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>people should be drinking THHC, that doesn't seem limited government

1:13:29.360 --> 1:13:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to me. If it's literally hundreds of thousands of people

1:13:32.400 --> 1:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>enjoy this in millions across America enjoy this beverage responsibly,

1:13:35.960 --> 1:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>why would it be up to the governor. Simply they'll

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>take his pen and veto all this and go no,

1:13:40.040 --> 1:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't like it, therefore.

1:13:41.000 --> 1:13:43.560
<v Speaker 3>You shouldn't have it. That's exact opposite of limited.

1:13:43.280 --> 1:13:47.559
<v Speaker 5>Government, absolutely, and I don't agree with that, Scott. I mean,

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 5>I feel that we need to get rid of both

1:13:50.479 --> 1:13:54.479
<v Speaker 5>government overreach in every aspect of our life. And you know,

1:13:54.600 --> 1:13:56.920
<v Speaker 5>we need we need to go back to what our

1:13:56.960 --> 1:13:58.280
<v Speaker 5>founding fathers intended.

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, a country where you know, people you know,

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:05.759
<v Speaker 8>go to work, they're personally responsible for themselves as their families,

1:14:06.320 --> 1:14:08.960
<v Speaker 8>and the government stays you know, out of their health

1:14:08.960 --> 1:14:12.760
<v Speaker 8>care and out of their pocketbooks and allows them to

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:13.839
<v Speaker 8>live you know, freely.

1:14:13.920 --> 1:14:17.080
<v Speaker 5>And again both parties, I think we have an epidemic

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:24.320
<v Speaker 5>of an epidemic of constitutional overreach, right and government overreach

1:14:24.400 --> 1:14:28.280
<v Speaker 5>across our country. And again it's across both parties. But

1:14:28.600 --> 1:14:32.640
<v Speaker 5>if you're looking at somebody to come in and be

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:37.240
<v Speaker 5>a fisful responsibility both person you know, those people right

1:14:37.280 --> 1:14:40.360
<v Speaker 5>now are within the Republican Party and that's what I

1:14:40.400 --> 1:14:42.760
<v Speaker 5>want to do. But you know, to accomplish what we

1:14:42.840 --> 1:14:45.120
<v Speaker 5>need to in Congress, we need about three hundred and

1:14:45.160 --> 1:14:50.919
<v Speaker 5>eighty more people that's dedicated to and again not shrinking

1:14:50.960 --> 1:14:53.439
<v Speaker 5>our government to what it's not supposed to be, but

1:14:53.520 --> 1:14:54.320
<v Speaker 5>right sizing it.

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:56.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I could see. I could see it while

1:14:56.600 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>at the job.

1:14:57.040 --> 1:14:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Holly, it doesn't seem like from this from my perch,

1:14:59.560 --> 1:15:01.759
<v Speaker 2>you're kind actually does any much of anything.

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>It seems like a pretty easy job. I mean, show

1:15:04.080 --> 1:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>it up.

1:15:04.640 --> 1:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>You're shutting government down and essentially rule by executive order

1:15:08.880 --> 1:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>seems to be the flavor of the day.

1:15:11.040 --> 1:15:14.439
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, you know, you've mentioned the overspending, and you

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:17.680
<v Speaker 5>mentioned being a libertarian, and you know we want, you know,

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:20.840
<v Speaker 5>freedom from the government. We want a limited government. And

1:15:21.160 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm a follower of the John Bird Society and I

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:26.719
<v Speaker 5>love the Freedom Index they put out. Well, I recently

1:15:26.760 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 5>looked at their and again that evaluates, just for your

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:34.280
<v Speaker 5>listeners that might not know, they go a couple of

1:15:34.320 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 5>kids a year and they evaluate all the Congressmen and

1:15:37.120 --> 1:15:40.719
<v Speaker 5>senators on their last ten votes and how those votes

1:15:40.760 --> 1:15:44.800
<v Speaker 5>aligned with constitutional the Constitution was a constitution or not

1:15:45.280 --> 1:15:48.920
<v Speaker 5>and a four hundred and thirty five members of Congress,

1:15:48.960 --> 1:15:53.479
<v Speaker 5>only fifty five are getting a's or b getting eighty

1:15:53.560 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 5>percent or aligned with the constudents. That means like you

1:15:57.600 --> 1:16:01.559
<v Speaker 5>just said, people sit around doing nothing, not doing the

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:03.800
<v Speaker 5>work that needs to be done to protect the American

1:16:03.840 --> 1:16:08.200
<v Speaker 5>people and make things affordable gainst you know what seventeen

1:16:09.120 --> 1:16:13.880
<v Speaker 5>what I say, seventeen percent eight thirteen percent, So that's

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 5>thirteen percent eighty seven of Congress that both sides are

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 5>getting seas and out. We're paying these people six figures

1:16:23.160 --> 1:16:25.679
<v Speaker 5>about two hundred thousand dollars a year and free health

1:16:25.720 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 5>care to fail us. So we really need to step

1:16:30.200 --> 1:16:33.559
<v Speaker 5>up as a country, you know, as citizens and both

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:37.400
<v Speaker 5>in people that truly understand what it's going to take

1:16:37.840 --> 1:16:41.920
<v Speaker 5>to get the government out of our business and decres

1:16:41.920 --> 1:16:45.439
<v Speaker 5>spending so the cost of living goes down and we

1:16:45.520 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 5>have more opportunity for our family. So I'm one of

1:16:49.520 --> 1:16:52.679
<v Speaker 5>those three hundred and eighty people that want the philiity

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 5>to do that. But until the vote right and some

1:16:56.360 --> 1:17:00.120
<v Speaker 5>constitutionalists and fisicily conservative people to Congress, it's not to

1:17:00.320 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 5>get done. And the Republicans need to replace the people

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:10.080
<v Speaker 5>in our party that are over spending and not getting

1:17:10.080 --> 1:17:13.680
<v Speaker 5>the work done too. I mean, but at least you know,

1:17:14.000 --> 1:17:15.680
<v Speaker 5>I know what I stand for, and I know what

1:17:15.720 --> 1:17:17.759
<v Speaker 5>I want to do, and I'll align with other people.

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, Congressman Warren Davidson already has legislation that suggest,

1:17:23.439 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 5>you know, repealing the sixteenth Amendment, repealing Act, and I

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 5>would love to get on board with that.

1:17:29.040 --> 1:17:31.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, right, we'll leave it there. I'm about out

1:17:31.720 --> 1:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>of time.

1:17:32.400 --> 1:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Holly Adams will be running against Greg Landsman and this

1:17:35.560 --> 1:17:38.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting and very very heated, a very difficult district because

1:17:38.960 --> 1:17:41.120
<v Speaker 2>it's both Democrat and Republican. I know the way they

1:17:41.120 --> 1:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>do the lines there, But Holly lovely having it back

1:17:43.280 --> 1:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>on the show at some point. Thanks again for joining.

1:17:45.040 --> 1:17:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Good luck, it's got.

1:17:46.560 --> 1:17:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Am I allowed to pitch my website.

1:17:48.439 --> 1:17:52.559
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, We're seven hundred wible are all about advertisements, come

1:17:52.560 --> 1:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on now.

1:17:53.439 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much, so thanks listeners. You can go

1:17:56.400 --> 1:17:59.760
<v Speaker 5>to Hollyadams for Congress dot com. Learn as much as

1:17:59.800 --> 1:18:02.479
<v Speaker 5>you about me there. If you have any questions at all,

1:18:02.840 --> 1:18:05.080
<v Speaker 5>reach out to me by email. I'd love to hear

1:18:05.120 --> 1:18:07.920
<v Speaker 5>from you, learn more about your family, what your priorities are,

1:18:08.400 --> 1:18:10.960
<v Speaker 5>and you know, be honored to earn your vote on Nathan.

1:18:11.439 --> 1:18:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Holly all the best, Thanks for joining, Thanks so much, Scott,

1:18:14.840 --> 1:18:16.799
<v Speaker 2>take care of be well and good luck with a campaign.

1:18:16.800 --> 1:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>We've got a news update and run a little bit

1:18:18.160 --> 1:18:20.120
<v Speaker 2>late here sloanly on seven hundred w Well.

1:18:20.080 --> 1:18:23.800
<v Speaker 3>The time to talk about money, how to make it,

1:18:24.000 --> 1:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>how to keep it, and how to keep others off

1:18:27.040 --> 1:18:33.839
<v Speaker 3>your stack. This is all Worth Advice with Andy Shaeffer.

1:18:34.320 --> 1:18:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Tuesday morning, I mean Shaeffer drops in, mister money

1:18:37.360 --> 1:18:42.080
<v Speaker 2>bags is here? Interest and principle. That's what is all

1:18:42.120 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>about with Andy at Allworth Financial. Good morning son, How are.

1:18:45.120 --> 1:18:46.320
<v Speaker 9>You good, Scott?

1:18:46.360 --> 1:18:46.920
<v Speaker 3>How's it going on?

1:18:47.000 --> 1:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Everything is great, everything is good, everything is well, well,

1:18:49.880 --> 1:18:50.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's not.

1:18:50.439 --> 1:18:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know you.

1:18:51.240 --> 1:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. I look at the markets. It's all

1:18:53.240 --> 1:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>doom and gloom. You know, the the Dow and the

1:18:56.000 --> 1:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>S and p R. Down's gonna be the worst year

1:18:57.800 --> 1:19:01.599
<v Speaker 2>I think, and probably three years at sha the worst

1:19:01.640 --> 1:19:02.960
<v Speaker 2>month I guessed in three years.

1:19:03.840 --> 1:19:06.400
<v Speaker 3>And I talk to you and you say everything's great.

1:19:06.840 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Why Why am I? Why am I listening to you?

1:19:08.560 --> 1:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I need doom and gloom here ratings and revenue. Baby,

1:19:11.200 --> 1:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>fear drives listenership. Don't you know that everything is with you?

1:19:15.160 --> 1:19:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Everything's calm, everything is fine, It'll be fine.

1:19:18.120 --> 1:19:20.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, I know fear and greed are good for the show,

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:22.720
<v Speaker 9>but you know I want to keep it in perspective,

1:19:22.760 --> 1:19:25.160
<v Speaker 9>and I want to make sure that people understand that

1:19:25.240 --> 1:19:27.240
<v Speaker 9>you don't need to panic. I mean, there is some

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:30.280
<v Speaker 9>optimism in the markets right now, and I think every

1:19:30.280 --> 1:19:32.719
<v Speaker 9>investor is really hanging on the words of Donald Trump

1:19:32.760 --> 1:19:35.759
<v Speaker 9>and the Trump administration, and you know, it changes daily

1:19:35.800 --> 1:19:38.720
<v Speaker 9>and it changes even hourly, and essentially, you know, the

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:41.439
<v Speaker 9>markets are feeling pretty good this morning because Trump said that,

1:19:42.200 --> 1:19:45.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, we might see an end to this conflict

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:48.280
<v Speaker 9>in Iran even before the straight of war moves is open. Now,

1:19:48.800 --> 1:19:51.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, we did see a couple shipping tankers from

1:19:51.400 --> 1:19:52.759
<v Speaker 9>China that we're able to get through.

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Now.

1:19:53.240 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 9>China is a partner with Iran generally, So you know,

1:19:56.560 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 9>does that tell us a lot?

1:19:57.720 --> 1:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Not really.

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:00.880
<v Speaker 9>But I think when you look at the markets in

1:20:00.920 --> 1:20:04.040
<v Speaker 9>general and you look at the fundamentals, you know, overall

1:20:04.200 --> 1:20:06.760
<v Speaker 9>we haven't seen a lot of change in the fundamentals

1:20:06.760 --> 1:20:10.439
<v Speaker 9>from a market standpoint. The technical analysis is still pretty good.

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:13.360
<v Speaker 9>The fundamental analysis is pretty good. And the other thing

1:20:13.360 --> 1:20:16.439
<v Speaker 9>that you've seen is that the Brent crude oil has

1:20:16.520 --> 1:20:18.840
<v Speaker 9>dropped below one hundred and ten dollars a barrel, and

1:20:18.880 --> 1:20:20.280
<v Speaker 9>a lot of people say, well, you know, what is

1:20:20.320 --> 1:20:22.280
<v Speaker 9>Brent crude. You know, why is that a thing? Well,

1:20:23.240 --> 1:20:26.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, here in the United States, we basically mark

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:28.920
<v Speaker 9>our prices to the West Texas creud, and that's what

1:20:28.960 --> 1:20:31.080
<v Speaker 9>we generally see here in the United States. But the

1:20:31.080 --> 1:20:34.559
<v Speaker 9>Brent crud is more of a national and global type

1:20:34.600 --> 1:20:37.960
<v Speaker 9>of benchmark, and that comes from the North Sea, which

1:20:38.000 --> 1:20:43.800
<v Speaker 9>is near Norway, Sweden, Finland, those types of areas, and

1:20:43.880 --> 1:20:46.680
<v Speaker 9>that's a sweeter crew that is used more globally. And

1:20:46.720 --> 1:20:48.720
<v Speaker 9>so what you're seeing is is that a lot of

1:20:48.720 --> 1:20:50.680
<v Speaker 9>these other nations are starting to say, hey, we have

1:20:50.720 --> 1:20:53.519
<v Speaker 9>a decent amount of supply. We think that we can

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:55.599
<v Speaker 9>you know, manage a lot of this and really kind

1:20:55.600 --> 1:20:57.280
<v Speaker 9>of get through it. And that's why you've seen Brent

1:20:57.320 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 9>crud start to go down to one under uneath a

1:21:00.040 --> 1:21:02.719
<v Speaker 9>hundred and dollars barrel, and the markets responded favorably.

1:21:03.320 --> 1:21:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think we were seeing actually the price

1:21:06.200 --> 1:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of gas drop a little bit here.

1:21:07.280 --> 1:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>I believe it.

1:21:07.760 --> 1:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw it what like three three forty or something yesterday.

1:21:11.120 --> 1:21:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, wow, that dropped a lot really quickly. Is

1:21:12.920 --> 1:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>when it was driving that whole thing and you know,

1:21:15.120 --> 1:21:16.640
<v Speaker 2>hero those doom and gloom, you know, it's gonna be

1:21:16.640 --> 1:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>as a it's a rough month for Wall Street, and

1:21:18.920 --> 1:21:21.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, food and groceries. The war's pushing up prices

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for farmers because the fertilizer costs are going up, and

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:27.400
<v Speaker 2>then we have the tariffs and energy going in there too,

1:21:27.600 --> 1:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>leading the bigger bills at the grocery store. We're going

1:21:29.840 --> 1:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk mortgage rates here in a second, and we're

1:21:32.080 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 2>supposed to turn a corner this year, but now there's

1:21:33.920 --> 1:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a big question mark there and Asia in Europe, as

1:21:36.720 --> 1:21:39.559
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned too, it's kind of a black Swan event

1:21:40.360 --> 1:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>because no one's immune to this whole thing. Gods to

1:21:43.280 --> 1:21:46.920
<v Speaker 2>where you're standing with Iran, everyone's getting hurt by this

1:21:47.000 --> 1:21:47.799
<v Speaker 2>around the globe.

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and you've seen some complacency across the markets. There's

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 9>really not a whole lot of capitulation whatsoever to be

1:21:54.080 --> 1:21:58.560
<v Speaker 9>found in flows or volumes or fundamentals or technical analysis.

1:21:58.560 --> 1:22:01.479
<v Speaker 9>And despite you know, some of these things that are

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:04.360
<v Speaker 9>going on, you know that investors generally are just looking

1:22:04.400 --> 1:22:05.000
<v Speaker 9>for clues.

1:22:05.439 --> 1:22:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And what we're trying to figure out is, you know,

1:22:07.240 --> 1:22:07.599
<v Speaker 3>what does.

1:22:07.520 --> 1:22:10.559
<v Speaker 9>It look like in Iran? Does it feel like it's coming,

1:22:11.040 --> 1:22:12.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, to a crescendo? Does it feel like that

1:22:12.920 --> 1:22:15.120
<v Speaker 9>we're coming to some type of agreement with Iran, and

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:17.080
<v Speaker 9>I think generally over the last couple of days, the

1:22:17.120 --> 1:22:19.920
<v Speaker 9>answer is yes. And so when you have stock prices

1:22:19.960 --> 1:22:23.240
<v Speaker 9>that have fallen so significantly over the last few weeks,

1:22:23.520 --> 1:22:26.360
<v Speaker 9>you're starting to see a lot of bargains. And history

1:22:26.400 --> 1:22:31.040
<v Speaker 9>shows if you're smart about understanding volume, volatility, et cetera,

1:22:31.160 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 9>if you're able to buy the dip, it's going to

1:22:32.880 --> 1:22:34.320
<v Speaker 9>pay off for you in the long run. And so

1:22:34.400 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 9>I think that's what we're seeing right now is that

1:22:36.520 --> 1:22:39.040
<v Speaker 9>investors are thinking, Okay, well, the fundamentals are still good.

1:22:39.320 --> 1:22:41.320
<v Speaker 9>If we can get this wrapped up, this is probably

1:22:41.360 --> 1:22:43.160
<v Speaker 9>a good place to buy. And that's why you've seen

1:22:43.160 --> 1:22:45.600
<v Speaker 9>the markets run, you know, a little bit yesterday, and

1:22:45.640 --> 1:22:47.320
<v Speaker 9>we're starting to see that a little bit today as well.

1:22:47.400 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense, And it's as you said, it's

1:22:50.160 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 2>so hard to believe what the truth is because Trump

1:22:52.360 --> 1:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>says he's negotiating, and Pakistan says we're going to do

1:22:55.120 --> 1:22:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and then Iran says, well, you're negotiating with yourself.

1:22:57.200 --> 1:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>You're not talking to anyone.

1:22:59.000 --> 1:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>At one point, hey, it looks optimistic they're going to

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>wind you know, pulling, not maybe getting troops on the

1:23:03.720 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 2>ground there, although we've brought about ten thousand more to

1:23:06.120 --> 1:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the region. But at the same time, then we're talking

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:13.519
<v Speaker 2>about maybe bombing their power plants, which would probably, I guess,

1:23:14.120 --> 1:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>cause gas and oil to skyrocket, would it not? So

1:23:17.439 --> 1:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street right now is bullsh and believing what the

1:23:20.240 --> 1:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>White House says at this point. If that turns out

1:23:22.960 --> 1:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to be untrue, what happens then.

1:23:25.280 --> 1:23:27.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, and I think if if that becomes untrue, then

1:23:27.880 --> 1:23:30.160
<v Speaker 9>we can start to see inflation, you know, creep in

1:23:30.360 --> 1:23:33.160
<v Speaker 9>you know, more systemically, And I think that's what everybody

1:23:33.200 --> 1:23:34.840
<v Speaker 9>is trying to bet on right now. Does it look

1:23:34.960 --> 1:23:36.320
<v Speaker 9>like this is going to be a problem for the

1:23:36.360 --> 1:23:38.800
<v Speaker 9>next few months. Does it feel like it's going to

1:23:38.800 --> 1:23:40.639
<v Speaker 9>be wrapped up in the next four to six weeks?

1:23:40.640 --> 1:23:43.599
<v Speaker 9>Like the Trump administration continues to say that, you know

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:45.960
<v Speaker 9>that that's their timeline, and you know, if it does

1:23:46.000 --> 1:23:49.640
<v Speaker 9>continue to continue on, you know, we can see the

1:23:49.680 --> 1:23:51.720
<v Speaker 9>FED start to take notice on this. And you know,

1:23:51.760 --> 1:23:54.160
<v Speaker 9>we we've heard FED chairman pout basically say, hey, we're

1:23:54.200 --> 1:23:56.680
<v Speaker 9>not really you know, too concerned about it right now,

1:23:56.720 --> 1:23:58.880
<v Speaker 9>but if it continues, we might have to switch gears

1:23:58.880 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 9>and start to raise interest rate, and certainly that's not

1:24:00.920 --> 1:24:03.960
<v Speaker 9>what anybody wants. When we look at futures and we

1:24:04.000 --> 1:24:06.800
<v Speaker 9>look at what it looks like from an interest rate standpoint, Yes,

1:24:06.840 --> 1:24:09.960
<v Speaker 9>it's probably still likely that we see an interest rate

1:24:10.000 --> 1:24:13.400
<v Speaker 9>cut maybe in June, maybe one or two this year.

1:24:13.600 --> 1:24:16.320
<v Speaker 9>But you know, if this continues to go on and

1:24:16.360 --> 1:24:19.040
<v Speaker 9>the Trump administration doesn't have a way to get out

1:24:19.080 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 9>of this, we can see interstrates maybe even tick up,

1:24:21.800 --> 1:24:23.479
<v Speaker 9>and you know that's going to have an impact on

1:24:23.479 --> 1:24:25.599
<v Speaker 9>the housing market. That's going to have an impact on borrowing.

1:24:25.680 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 9>It's also going to have an impact on corporate spending

1:24:28.280 --> 1:24:30.800
<v Speaker 9>as well, because money becomes a little bit more expensive,

1:24:30.840 --> 1:24:33.599
<v Speaker 9>and you know, if that happens, we can probably see

1:24:33.640 --> 1:24:36.320
<v Speaker 9>the potential for a recession risk continue to creep up

1:24:36.360 --> 1:24:36.639
<v Speaker 9>as well.

1:24:36.720 --> 1:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to be optimistic inside with the President

1:24:39.040 --> 1:24:40.840
<v Speaker 2>on this and Withdlald Trump and say, look, I think

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's going to be an amicable solution here. What

1:24:42.720 --> 1:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that looks like down the line, if it makes the

1:24:44.360 --> 1:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>region more unstable to run more and stable, we don't know.

1:24:46.520 --> 1:24:50.480
<v Speaker 2>But a more peaceful settlement then just comes completely obliterating

1:24:50.600 --> 1:24:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the entire country or the region it's not going to

1:24:52.640 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>be good for anyone, and it's going to make things

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:57.360
<v Speaker 2>much much worse. It's just a this is a classic

1:24:57.400 --> 1:24:59.400
<v Speaker 2>foggle war moment, is what this is, right.

1:24:59.560 --> 1:25:02.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it and I think that you know, the you know,

1:25:02.880 --> 1:25:04.720
<v Speaker 9>as Americans, we have a lot of leverage over there.

1:25:04.800 --> 1:25:07.200
<v Speaker 9>Right now, it's pretty secure. I mean, we have a

1:25:07.320 --> 1:25:10.840
<v Speaker 9>ten warthog over there, we have Apache helicopters. They're trying

1:25:10.920 --> 1:25:12.840
<v Speaker 9>to secure the straight of Horror moves. Right now, we're

1:25:12.880 --> 1:25:15.080
<v Speaker 9>starting to see some ships be able to get in.

1:25:15.280 --> 1:25:17.599
<v Speaker 9>There's still a delay as far as what Donald Trump says,

1:25:17.680 --> 1:25:21.360
<v Speaker 9>until at least April sixth before we start hitting their infrastructure.

1:25:21.400 --> 1:25:23.400
<v Speaker 9>And you know, what we don't want to do is

1:25:23.520 --> 1:25:26.639
<v Speaker 9>impact the civilians in Iran. And we start to hit

1:25:26.720 --> 1:25:30.160
<v Speaker 9>the energy infrastructure of Iran, that will certainly impact the

1:25:30.200 --> 1:25:33.040
<v Speaker 9>civilians over there. So the clock is ticking.

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

1:25:34.040 --> 1:25:37.320
<v Speaker 9>Investors generally right now are feeling that there is you know,

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:39.439
<v Speaker 9>an end of this tunnel and we're starting to see

1:25:39.439 --> 1:25:40.920
<v Speaker 9>the light at the end of it and.

1:25:40.760 --> 1:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how it goes.

1:25:41.880 --> 1:25:43.360
<v Speaker 9>But right now, I think there is a little bit

1:25:43.400 --> 1:25:46.080
<v Speaker 9>of optimism and you know, obviously the markets are reflecting

1:25:46.080 --> 1:25:46.800
<v Speaker 9>that all.

1:25:46.760 --> 1:25:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Right, So in the last what roughly twenty five plus years,

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:52.439
<v Speaker 2>we saw a tech bubble, we saw financial crisis, we

1:25:52.479 --> 1:25:56.120
<v Speaker 2>saw the housing meltdown, we saw COVID, and all sorts

1:25:56.160 --> 1:26:00.759
<v Speaker 2>of geopolitical events that in history is always as indicator

1:26:00.800 --> 1:26:04.439
<v Speaker 2>of future behavior. That's a very very true statement in

1:26:04.479 --> 1:26:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that regard. What do we see here?

1:26:06.680 --> 1:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>What?

1:26:06.840 --> 1:26:09.480
<v Speaker 2>What are the average pullbacks in those rough times?

1:26:09.840 --> 1:26:12.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean we usually see somewhere between ten and

1:26:12.200 --> 1:26:15.880
<v Speaker 9>twenty percent. You know, a correction is defined by a

1:26:15.920 --> 1:26:18.800
<v Speaker 9>ten percent pullback in the markets in general. You know,

1:26:18.880 --> 1:26:21.160
<v Speaker 9>right now we're probably about eight percent down from where

1:26:21.160 --> 1:26:24.200
<v Speaker 9>we were in January, you know, so you know, in

1:26:24.240 --> 1:26:26.120
<v Speaker 9>the big scheme of things, it's not really that much.

1:26:26.160 --> 1:26:28.439
<v Speaker 9>If you have a moderate portfolio, let's say a sixty

1:26:28.439 --> 1:26:31.760
<v Speaker 9>percent stock portfolios, forty percent bonds, you know, maybe you're

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:33.680
<v Speaker 9>only down three percent for the year. And so you

1:26:33.680 --> 1:26:37.120
<v Speaker 9>don't want to overreact to these types of geopolitical turmoil

1:26:37.160 --> 1:26:39.400
<v Speaker 9>events because we go through these all the time. I've

1:26:39.400 --> 1:26:42.120
<v Speaker 9>been doing this for twenty seven years, and I've been

1:26:42.120 --> 1:26:44.040
<v Speaker 9>through a lot of it. I started in the late nineties,

1:26:44.080 --> 1:26:46.360
<v Speaker 9>you know, during the tech boom and nine to eleven

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:49.879
<v Speaker 9>et cetera. You know, even more recently when Russia invaded Ukraine.

1:26:50.240 --> 1:26:51.719
<v Speaker 9>You know, that's kind of a blip on the radar

1:26:51.800 --> 1:26:53.840
<v Speaker 9>right now, but that's still going on. And at the

1:26:53.920 --> 1:26:55.840
<v Speaker 9>end of the day, it's about the consumer in the

1:26:55.920 --> 1:26:58.320
<v Speaker 9>United States. As long as unemployment is low and we

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:00.800
<v Speaker 9>have the ability to earn a way age, you know,

1:27:00.880 --> 1:27:03.600
<v Speaker 9>we're really what drives the market, Scott's and as you know,

1:27:03.640 --> 1:27:06.200
<v Speaker 9>as long as we continue to be productive here, you know,

1:27:06.400 --> 1:27:09.519
<v Speaker 9>small geopolitical issues really don't move the.

1:27:09.479 --> 1:27:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Needle that much.

1:27:10.120 --> 1:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, He's Andy Schaeffer from all Worth Financial jumping

1:27:13.360 --> 1:27:15.640
<v Speaker 2>on this Tuesday Marning just a little bit of a

1:27:15.720 --> 1:27:19.080
<v Speaker 2>voice of reason and an over concerned world. It'll all

1:27:19.120 --> 1:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>balance out in the end, is what you're saying. Just

1:27:21.200 --> 1:27:23.000
<v Speaker 2>give it a little bit of time, a little bit

1:27:23.000 --> 1:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of time on that I mentioned earlier. They fed left

1:27:26.280 --> 1:27:29.599
<v Speaker 2>interest rates unchanged. They've been kind of creeping higher lately

1:27:29.640 --> 1:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>because of inflation and rising all prices. But what do

1:27:33.040 --> 1:27:34.880
<v Speaker 2>economists believe the longer term rates are going to?

1:27:35.720 --> 1:27:37.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that it's likely we see maybe a

1:27:37.800 --> 1:27:40.559
<v Speaker 9>quarter percent cut this year, maybe two by you know,

1:27:40.720 --> 1:27:44.040
<v Speaker 9>Midsummer next year. You know, some of those expectations have

1:27:44.120 --> 1:27:46.920
<v Speaker 9>shifted though. I mean just four weeks ago, markets were

1:27:46.960 --> 1:27:49.679
<v Speaker 9>pretty confident that we would see two quarter percent cut

1:27:49.720 --> 1:27:52.880
<v Speaker 9>rates this year and that's kind of flipped to about

1:27:53.040 --> 1:27:55.840
<v Speaker 9>maybe a twenty five percent chance that we get one hike.

1:27:56.360 --> 1:27:59.240
<v Speaker 9>So you know, that big swing right now is based

1:27:59.280 --> 1:28:01.280
<v Speaker 9>on you know, what's going on in the straight horror moves,

1:28:01.280 --> 1:28:04.360
<v Speaker 9>the concerns with energy prices, you know, from a global standpoint,

1:28:04.439 --> 1:28:06.559
<v Speaker 9>and so you know, it's it's a good example of

1:28:06.560 --> 1:28:09.679
<v Speaker 9>how marcuts really try to process uncertainty in real time.

1:28:09.720 --> 1:28:11.680
<v Speaker 9>And we can see this happening if you watch the

1:28:11.720 --> 1:28:14.080
<v Speaker 9>markets on a daily basis, or you hear what the

1:28:14.080 --> 1:28:15.920
<v Speaker 9>FED has to say, and a lot of the Fed

1:28:15.920 --> 1:28:18.519
<v Speaker 9>Committee members they like to you know, have their press.

1:28:18.320 --> 1:28:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Conference as well.

1:28:19.479 --> 1:28:21.760
<v Speaker 9>This is ongoing and I think the I think the

1:28:21.840 --> 1:28:25.320
<v Speaker 9>takeaway here is, you know, really stick to your financial

1:28:25.320 --> 1:28:27.160
<v Speaker 9>plan and what you're trying to get accomplished. A lot

1:28:27.200 --> 1:28:29.720
<v Speaker 9>of times when we look at, you know, our expectations

1:28:29.840 --> 1:28:32.719
<v Speaker 9>or assumptions for you know, our clients, you're you're figuring,

1:28:32.800 --> 1:28:35.679
<v Speaker 9>you know, in a modern portfolio about seven percent average

1:28:35.680 --> 1:28:37.599
<v Speaker 9>hand of your return per year well over the last

1:28:37.640 --> 1:28:38.200
<v Speaker 9>three years.

1:28:38.280 --> 1:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, those.

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:42.519
<v Speaker 9>Accounts have probably returned thirteen, fourteen, fifteen percent over the

1:28:42.600 --> 1:28:45.000
<v Speaker 9>last three years equally. And so if we do go

1:28:45.080 --> 1:28:47.080
<v Speaker 9>down a little bit this year, and I still believe

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:49.240
<v Speaker 9>that we'll probably end up on the higher end of

1:28:49.280 --> 1:28:51.040
<v Speaker 9>that by the end of the year. But if we

1:28:51.080 --> 1:28:53.120
<v Speaker 9>do go down a little bit this year, that's figured

1:28:53.120 --> 1:28:56.240
<v Speaker 9>into most financial plans. You have to understand that. You know,

1:28:56.280 --> 1:28:58.559
<v Speaker 9>that's something that we take into account, and it's something

1:28:58.760 --> 1:29:00.519
<v Speaker 9>you should make sure that you stick to and not

1:29:00.560 --> 1:29:03.040
<v Speaker 9>get caught up in the minutia of the data day

1:29:03.080 --> 1:29:04.599
<v Speaker 9>headlines because it'll drive you crazy.

1:29:04.800 --> 1:29:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just it's trying to process an uncertainty on

1:29:07.920 --> 1:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>an hourly byerly basis. Should be day to day now

1:29:10.040 --> 1:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>it's like minute by minute.

1:29:11.560 --> 1:29:15.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, And you know, and Donald Trump really likes

1:29:15.080 --> 1:29:17.559
<v Speaker 9>to say a lot of things. You know, it makes

1:29:17.760 --> 1:29:19.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, it's like, you know, it makes my job

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:20.679
<v Speaker 9>a little bit harder.

1:29:20.720 --> 1:29:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, things are going pretty good.

1:29:22.640 --> 1:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>None, they're not.

1:29:23.400 --> 1:29:25.200
<v Speaker 9>You know, we can't you know, we're bombing again.

1:29:25.320 --> 1:29:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we're not. Well.

1:29:26.680 --> 1:29:29.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, investors are generally irrational by nature, and they

1:29:29.439 --> 1:29:30.439
<v Speaker 9>respond to these things.

1:29:30.720 --> 1:29:34.559
<v Speaker 2>So the two thirty pm Trump in the White House

1:29:35.160 --> 1:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>should talk to the two thirty am trump On on

1:29:37.840 --> 1:29:39.760
<v Speaker 2>social media, on driven through social.

1:29:39.680 --> 1:29:41.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think he probably wills to talk to me

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:44.639
<v Speaker 9>on mondays I can give him some advice.

1:29:44.680 --> 1:29:46.000
<v Speaker 3>The swings are unreal.

1:29:46.920 --> 1:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>So once it settles down and enery places are stabilizing,

1:29:50.080 --> 1:29:50.880
<v Speaker 2>we're shifting back.

1:29:50.800 --> 1:29:53.200
<v Speaker 3>To rate cuts basically as the bottom line, I think so.

1:29:53.600 --> 1:29:56.400
<v Speaker 9>And you know, as we do come to some sort

1:29:56.479 --> 1:30:00.559
<v Speaker 9>of resolution here, you know, we'll probably see somewhere rate cuts.

1:30:00.640 --> 1:30:02.960
<v Speaker 9>If it's likely that oil prices start to fall, if

1:30:03.000 --> 1:30:05.400
<v Speaker 9>we start to get into the low nineties, that probably

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:07.960
<v Speaker 9>will continue on into maybe we see sixty dollars a

1:30:07.960 --> 1:30:11.000
<v Speaker 9>barrow again in the summertime. And if we do see that,

1:30:11.040 --> 1:30:13.360
<v Speaker 9>the markets are going to rebound quite a bit. You know,

1:30:13.400 --> 1:30:15.559
<v Speaker 9>when we look at the price earnings ratio on stocks,

1:30:15.600 --> 1:30:17.720
<v Speaker 9>and that's a measurement of value, and you know how

1:30:17.760 --> 1:30:20.719
<v Speaker 9>expensive is the stock versus you know, what they're really earning.

1:30:21.000 --> 1:30:23.920
<v Speaker 9>The forward looking pet right now is about twenty and

1:30:24.280 --> 1:30:26.920
<v Speaker 9>that is a pretty good moniker of saying, hey, things

1:30:26.960 --> 1:30:29.080
<v Speaker 9>are you know, a pretty good bye right now. And so,

1:30:29.760 --> 1:30:32.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, people are trying to find deals in the marketplace,

1:30:32.840 --> 1:30:36.200
<v Speaker 9>whether it's a specific sector in technology or energy or

1:30:36.520 --> 1:30:39.599
<v Speaker 9>consumer staples. And I think that you know, if you're

1:30:39.640 --> 1:30:41.240
<v Speaker 9>not in the market, now is the time to get

1:30:41.240 --> 1:30:41.519
<v Speaker 9>back in.

1:30:41.680 --> 1:30:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, very good.

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>And of course coming up this I believe Friday is

1:30:44.760 --> 1:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the jobs report comes out.

1:30:46.280 --> 1:30:48.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we got a lot of you know, information that

1:30:48.320 --> 1:30:49.840
<v Speaker 9>comes out this week. You know we're going to have

1:30:49.920 --> 1:30:54.719
<v Speaker 9>jobs report. Certainly, you know we're going to get retail sales.

1:30:54.760 --> 1:30:57.280
<v Speaker 9>That's going to be a delayed report that's coming out tomorrow.

1:30:57.560 --> 1:31:00.679
<v Speaker 9>That's going to be important ism manufacturing. Know, we probably

1:31:00.760 --> 1:31:03.680
<v Speaker 9>are looking at a little expansion there, which is also good.

1:31:04.320 --> 1:31:06.760
<v Speaker 9>And really Friday is the big big one. We're going

1:31:06.800 --> 1:31:10.439
<v Speaker 9>to get us hourly wages, the unemployment rate, and so

1:31:10.560 --> 1:31:12.040
<v Speaker 9>that's going to be important to tell us, you know,

1:31:12.080 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 9>where we are from a labor standpoint, because at the

1:31:14.160 --> 1:31:15.479
<v Speaker 9>end of the day, as long as we have the

1:31:15.520 --> 1:31:18.960
<v Speaker 9>ability to make money that contributes to consumer spending and

1:31:19.000 --> 1:31:19.920
<v Speaker 9>also retail sales.

1:31:19.960 --> 1:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, So your guess, good as anybody's, what the

1:31:21.960 --> 1:31:23.080
<v Speaker 2>job report is going to show.

1:31:23.720 --> 1:31:26.000
<v Speaker 9>I think it's probably going to be somewhere where we are.

1:31:26.040 --> 1:31:27.680
<v Speaker 9>I think that's probably we're going to be about four

1:31:27.720 --> 1:31:30.320
<v Speaker 9>point four percent in the unemployment rate. We're probably going

1:31:30.400 --> 1:31:33.160
<v Speaker 9>to look at a little bit of additional jobs, maybe

1:31:33.240 --> 1:31:37.360
<v Speaker 9>fifty nine thousand additional jobs. Hourly wages will probably rise

1:31:37.400 --> 1:31:40.120
<v Speaker 9>a little bit, maybe point three percent, maybe forty percent.

1:31:40.479 --> 1:31:42.840
<v Speaker 9>And if that's true, if that holds true, that's going

1:31:42.880 --> 1:31:45.160
<v Speaker 9>to be positive for the markets as well, because it

1:31:45.240 --> 1:31:47.719
<v Speaker 9>basically represents a stable economy.

1:31:47.800 --> 1:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I got it all right. So that is

1:31:49.439 --> 1:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>on Friday, all those things as well.

1:31:51.600 --> 1:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>He's Andy Shaeffer at all Worth Financial, our weekly money

1:31:54.400 --> 1:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>tune up here, and he's got you covered. And of

1:31:56.680 --> 1:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>course their show airs at six o'clock over in fifty

1:31:59.160 --> 1:32:02.479
<v Speaker 2>five KRC. It's six o'clock every weeknight, and that is

1:32:02.520 --> 1:32:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a simpling money Andy over at all Worth all the best, brother,

1:32:05.360 --> 1:32:07.559
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate you, Okay, Scott, talk to you next week.

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>All right.

1:32:07.920 --> 1:32:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Red's on a roll right now. That's three straight, baby,

1:32:10.000 --> 1:32:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I was the game last night was awesome to nothing.

1:32:12.040 --> 1:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Jase Spurns looked absolutely amazing. We'll see if we can

1:32:14.320 --> 1:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>get it done today a little bit. Well, that wind

1:32:16.800 --> 1:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>was blowing in pretty good. Not many long balls. I

1:32:18.400 --> 1:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know how we're gonna get today. We're expecting forty

1:32:20.840 --> 1:32:23.200
<v Speaker 2>mile in our winds on Wednesday, though. We'll see how

1:32:23.240 --> 1:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>that works, how that works out in some storms too.

1:32:27.000 --> 1:32:29.200
<v Speaker 2>But hey, you know what, you got schemes I believe

1:32:29.240 --> 1:32:32.920
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday, So hey, get it done today, right or tonight?

1:32:32.960 --> 1:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess I should say here on the Home of

1:32:34.680 --> 1:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the Red seven hundred W DOWT, since that