WEBVTT - The Jay Weber Podcast #0003 4-14-26 

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That Jay Weber Podcast is presented by Creative Planning, helping

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>clients simplify their journey to financial wellness, one personalized plan

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time. The Jay Weber Podcast is a production

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio Podcasts.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to the jo Erra Podcast. So glad

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 2>you've decided to listen today. We have all sorts of

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>things to talk about, including whether the news media is

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>going to tell the American people about the additional chunk

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of money that's going to be in their tax returns

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>this year thanks to the Big Beautiful Bill. We'll talk

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 2>about Congressman Eric Swallwell's implosion and why it was so

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>swift and devastating. You know, the short answer is because

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and all of today's top

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Democrats have known he's a sexual predator and a scumbag

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>all this time, fourteen years, and they didn't care so

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>long as he could be a useful tool for them.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>We have some thoughts on home distilling and the price

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>of stamps getting close to a dollar, and how the

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>leftist media is going to spend the next three years

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to convince the American people that they've made a

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>mistake in not electing Kamala Harris, and we didn't. And

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>no matter how hard they try to polish up that turn,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>she's not going to be the twenty twenty eight Democrat nominee.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So you can see that's a pretty good show. It's

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>all coming up.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 2>This podcast is podcast number three. Now we're starting to

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 2>hit a groove. I should mention that my longtime radio

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>producer Gregory John is with me on this venture too.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>He agreed to produce this for me. So how are

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>you doing today?

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Fine? And we're actually in the studio together.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is nice. And we've had we don't have

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 2>to go into the fits and starts that we've had,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the technical fits and starts we've had to try to

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 2>get these podcasts together. But are you missing me in

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the morning?

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm missing you. Yeah, you're like you're like an old

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>an old friend.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't say that I miss all the work and

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>all the getting up early, but yes, I kind of

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>missed the connection to the to the guys.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people were saying that.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>On the podcast, on the Internet and Twitter and all that,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>saying that, yeah, it is like hearing my old friend again.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the podcast. So that's I think a lot of

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 4>people are showing up that way.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I got to tell you, we got a very strong

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>start to this podcast. The first two episodes have thousands

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of listeners to thanks so much for that. And we'll

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>dive into content in a minute after a quick shout

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>out to my fantastic sponsor for this podcast, Creative Wealth Management.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just going to admit here we're we're skimming

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>this ad from Friday's podcast and inserting it here because

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any power at home in Erin, so

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I actually had to come into the state. This is

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 2>real radio, this is human So this is something that

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>we need to slip in here. Go ahead, Greg, Do

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you have a financial planner and is he or she

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 2>really meeting your needs? Have you heard of Creative Planning.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 2>They're one of the nation's largest independent wealth management firms,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>offering fully integrated financial and retirement planning, investment management, estate planning,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 2>tax strategies, business services, and international wealth management, all in

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>house and coordinated through your wealth manager. Their fiduciary wealth

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>managers are here to help you navigate every piece of

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>your financial life. Visit Creative Planning dot com. To schedule

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>your introductory meeting. That's Creative Planning dot com. Your team awaits.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Paid for planning and sec registered investment advisor.

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 4>The speaker statements are not an endorsement of the firm.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 2>There's some proof for doing this live, I guess, or

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 2>at least live to tape. Let's dive into the content.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with this. I gotta say, this

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 2>takedown of Eric Swalwell is one of the most brutal

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I've seen in quite some time, and there's a reason

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>for it. The reason is it's Democrats themselves who orchestrated

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>this lynching of one of their own. Make no mistake,

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what went on here is the Democrats in California and

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Washington d C. We're using every scummy thing about Eric

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Swalwell that they've always known about for the fourteen years

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>he's been in Congress, and they used it in order

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to knock him out of the California governor's race. It's

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a desperate attempt to keep Republicans from winning the governorship

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>out in California. And unless you know how California runs

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>at statewide races, you can't fully appreciate what went on here.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I know some of you people are aware of this,

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think most people are. California runs a

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>so called jungle primary in its governor's races, in which

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the top two candidates to emerge out of the primary

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>get to run off against each other. Normally that turns

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>out to be at least one Republican and one Democrat.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they set it up so that they were

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>hoping they could have two Democrats running off in the

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>general this year, though two Republicans are currently leading the

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>primary because there are so many Democrats running. The Republicans

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 2>are Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco, and they've both been

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>pulling around fourteen percent, and they've been polling, most importantly

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 2>a few points ahead of Eric Swalwell. Meanwhile, there are

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>eight Democrats running for governor out there eight, and they're

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 2>splintering the left wing vote obviously, So for weeks now

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the polls have shown the two Republicans are running ahead

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrat who's doing best, and the Democrat doing

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>best is Eric Swalwell. This is the other big problem

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats in California had until they knocked him out.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>None of them wanted to admit it, but this is

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a field of terrible candidates, and Swalwell was among one

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of the worst, and he rose to the top. No

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 2>one expected that the scummy debag Eric Swalwell was going

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to emerge as the top as the voter's top choice

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 2>on the left. But the other most promising candidates are

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a woman named Katie Porter, who's genuinely an unstable lunatic

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>who's famous for screaming at and verbally abusing her staffers

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and people around her. Moreover, she can't hide her inner lunatic.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Her inner lunatic shines through in interviews and on social media,

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 2>so she's a big risk as the top candidate. And

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>then the other somewhat popular Democrat candidate out of the

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>eight is Tom Steyer, the longtime billionaire climate activist. He's

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>not exciting to anyone really either among the California voters.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>So by default, this scummy and useless dbag Eric Swalwell

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 2>was leading the race on the Democrats side. But you

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>see the situation. First, the Democrats need an appealing candidate

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 2>atop their ticket in the November runoff with the Republican

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and if all the dirt on Swallwell would have come

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>out after he had won the primary after he advanced

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>to the general election, that would have been bad. That

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 2>would just destroy his chances that there was any way

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>for this party, or it destroyed the chances of the

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>party leaders to rectify the situation or pivot to a

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 2>different candidate. Right. So, whereas in a normal situation out

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 2>there with two Republicans leading in Swalwell and seven other Democrats,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>in any other situation, the state and national Democrats would

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>have simply gotten behind the most popular Democrat, well it's Swalwell.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>They would have worked to encourage and extort the other

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>seven Democrats to drop out of any normal primary and

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>then try to promote the guy who is naturally leading.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 2>The Democrats have a situation here in which the scummy,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 2>least competent, easiest to beat candidate though was actually leading.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Hence Operation Destroy Eric had to occur. And this is

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>what's gone on here. Swawall's political career has imploded because,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 2>in all sincerity, because Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Newsom and the other top California Democrats have organized

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the smear campaign to take him out. Remember, Pelosi built him.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Pelosi made Eric Swalwell. She if you don't know, represents

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, and as does Swalwell. It's that area of California,

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>so they're very close. And it was Pelosi who basically

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 2>promoted him and put him into office in the first place,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so she knows all the dirt and always has this devastating,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 2>just devastating. One of the big tells here, related to

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the fact that this is a Democrat hit on one

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of their own people, is that not a single Democrat,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>not a single Democrat, labeling Swallwell a disgrace and demanding

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>he drop out of the governor's race, was also demanding

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that he gave up his seat and give up a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>seat in Congress, because a rapist pig like this shouldn't

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>serve in Congress either. It took three or four days

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>before Democrat leaders decided that they really couldn't save his

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>congressional career either, and that trust me, they were trying.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Top Democrat leaders never did insist he resigned from Congress. Pelosi,

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to my knowledge, still hasn't insisted he resigned from Congress.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>It was some rank and file Democrats who finally started

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to step up and complain. It was kind of the

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>alien omars and the Rasheeta Telibs who started to insist

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>if he's a pig, he should resign from Congress too.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>But Hakim Jeffries, this guy is the leader of the

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Democrats in the House. He has the power to demand

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>an investigation into one of his members. He has the

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>power to punish Eric Swalwell or push him out of Congress.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Hakim Jeffries put out statement on social media initially saying

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Swalwell needs to drop out of the governor's race, but

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't say a thing, made no mention of the fact

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>that Swawell is a sitting congressman and he Jeffries could

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>have kicked the pig out of Congress or at least

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>moved to investigate him. It proved again today's Democrats don't

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>really have any actual morals or values. It's just all

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>about what suits them at the time. If any of

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>these Democrats actually cared about the female victims or had

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a working moral compass, they'd have been demanding Swawell resigned

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>from Congress immediately and would have been calling for an

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>immediate House investigation as well. And by the way, they

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>would have been calling for local prosecutors to investigate Swalwell's

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>alleged crimes while in those communities. I know the Manhattan

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>DIA's office has actually opened an investigation based on one

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>woman's accusations. Now, but if Eric Swallwell was really this

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>much of a pig and he victimized this many women,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and if the Democrats across the country really cared about

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 2>standing up for the victims and not tolerating this behavior

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>as they always claim, well, then Eric Swalwell should be

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 2>facing three or five or ten criminal court cases by

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the end of this week, shouldn't he? But do you

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>think he will? I doubt it because this is a

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 2>naked political hit. And hey, you know, Hakeem Jeffreys and

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats might still need Swalwell's vote in the House,

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 2>so we got to keep them in that seat. That

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 2>is how they initially hoped to work this. There was

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>just too much pressure in the end and he decided

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to resign. But do you see how scummy this all was.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the most devastatingly effective mafia style hit that

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>we've seen in modern top politics in quite some time.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>And there's a reason for it. The only motive here

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>is to make sure two Republicans don't win the primary

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.599
<v Speaker 2>ensuring a Republican governor in California next And because the

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media members are virtually all leftists themselves, they share

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.479
<v Speaker 2>in this desire to manufacture who win for the Democrats

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>out there. It's why they hopped on these allegations and

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 2>relentlessly dug into them and ran with them. California's leftist

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>newspapers have been all over this with the details over

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. Over the weekend Saturday, a CNN sat down

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>with four or five of Swalwell's accusers and they gave detailed,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>specific accounts of the sexual abuse, harassment, even alleged rape.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>These were stories that anyone would have a hard time

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>making up. I mean, from what I've heard and read,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>they're very believable women. Moreover, all of Washington, d C.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And Sacramento, at least on the Democrat side, have known

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>who Eric Swalwell really is forever. Over the last few days,

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 2>select Democrats at all levels of government have said, oh, yeah,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>everyone knew Swawell was a predator. Yeah, Democrats knew, they knew,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>And let's specifically emphasize Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Hakim Jeffries knew they're the leaders of the party and

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Pelosian shift represent California. They knew, they've known all this time.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>They didn't care. Swalwell was a useful idiot. And if

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you think that's too cynical, it's not. DC insider Jonathan

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Turley has a good article calling Swalwell Pelosi's monster. He says,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the fact is that Swallowell was always a notorious figure

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 2>in Washington who was constructed by Pelosi and others to

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>serve their interest. As Pelosi and her other allies now

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>seek to destroy him, they cannon escaped their hand in

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.119
<v Speaker 2>his creation. Turtley goes on to talk about how Swalwell

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>was caught having an affair with a staffer of his

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>who was a Chinese spy, the infamous Fang Fang. Remember

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>how Pelosi, and who was Speaker at the House at

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 2>the time, leapt to defend him. She was the head

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrat Caucus and she protected him. Pelosi blocked

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 2>any inquiry into Eric Swalwell and Fang Fang. She lashed

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>out in anyone who suggested Swalwell was a risk to

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the nation, etc. Pelosi refused to remove him from the

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 2>House Intelligence Committee. Turley says for years, the democratic establishment

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of the media ignored many rumors surrounding Swalwell because he

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 2>was their useful monster, someone who was an attack dog,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>always trained a streaming on the leash. But he says,

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 2>it's now a pilon as Swalwell's formal enablers run for cover.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>The Irnan knee is that Swalwell's scandal will remove a

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>candidate who is allegedly physically assaulting staffers in favor of

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a candidate who was verbally assaulting staffers. That's true. He's

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>reference and Katie Porter here, who is most likely to

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>benefit by Eric s well wells ouster, She's most likely

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to benefit from swall Weoll's inmplosion. But this was really

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 2>a remarkable few days in the history of American politics, really,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 2>and so I thought we had to talk about it

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the next thing. It is my contention that one of

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>the greatest examples of how Trump derangement syndrome makes it

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>sufferer is completely crazy, is continuing lawsuits over the White

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>House ballroom. Oh my god, this is silly. There's long

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 2>standing historical precedent for presidents being able to alter the

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>White House grounds as they see fit. We've been over

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>all of this, you know, but several levels of the

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 2>courts have already made this clear during the initial round

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of lawsuits. Trump can buy in large change that area

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>as he wants, and not having a large enough ballroom

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>has been a regular complaint from every modern day president

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>for generations now, we've actually had to, at great taxpayer expense,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>put up a large tent or tents on the White

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 2>House lawn and bring in chairs and folding tables, etc.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>To have larger state dinners. These dinners have had the

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>look and feel of some summer wedding venue out in

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>your backyard. But I stress every time the tent was

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 2>rented and put up, large expenses to the taxpayers came

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 2>with it. So finally President Trump decided to do something

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>about it, and having spent his entire adult life as

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a developer, there's no better president to do it right.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>He and his team have put together a very classy

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and appealing model for this addition too. It's going to

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>be quite impressive. Let's also stress this is all going

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to be built and paid for with private donation money.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Not a single expense related to this White House addition

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to fall onto the backs of the US taxpayer,

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and that's just fantastic. If Obama would have wanted a

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>new ballroom, the same left wingers would have said, oh

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>my god, we got to do it at any expense.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Half a billion dollars, let's do it. Trump and a

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 2>bunch of his rich friends can come up with two

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty three hundred million that this is going

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to take to build on their own fantastic. So there's

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 2>no financial ding to the taxpayers here either. This is

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 2>all upside. There's literally no reason to oppose this project

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 2>unless you're a Trump hater, and only the most rabbit

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of Trump haters would sincerely, the question of whether this

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 2>project was going to proceed was settled long ago. The

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>former East Wing has been demolished, the important infrastructure work

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>is underway. We've since learned that a significant amount of

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>secret underground work is being done first, because they're actually

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>creating new bunkers in emergency workspaces too. This isn't just

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a new ballroom, which was already a necessity. This is

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>improving the national security of the presidency. We the people

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and our enemies weren't supposed to know that there was

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>secret underground work going on, but of course, the Nitwitz

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>who keep suing to stop this project force that information

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>out in the public too. None of their actions are helpful,

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 2>and we're at the point that there's absolutely no reason

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that they still need to be fighting this in court.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>At this point, what do you think they're going to gain?

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 2>What do they think their legal win is going to

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 2>be here? Do they want to force their own plans

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>through a new ballroom or east wing onto the country.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Do they want the project filled in and turf put

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>down for a dog park instead, or do they just

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>want to fight Trump because they just hate his f

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and guts. You know it's the last one, because there's

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>no reason to keep fighting this in court. The initial

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>round of lawsuits were over whether President Trump had the

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>authority to do this just as this project is being done,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Can he just order the project done? And the courts

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in that first round said yeah, he can. Then the

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>next thing, and it's my contention that one of the

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>greatest examples of how Trump arrangement syndrome makes it suffer

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>as completely crazy is that we have continuing lawsuits over

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>this White House ballroom. We're in like round number three now,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and my god, this is silly. There's long standing historical

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 2>precedent for presidents to be able to alter the White

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 2>House crowns as they see fit. Several levels of courts

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 2>have already made this clear during the initial round of lawsuits.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Not having a large enough ballroom has been a regular

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>complaint from every modern day president for generations. We've had to,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>at great expense, put up those tents. Then, in a

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>second round of lawsuits, a court decided that Trump needed

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to get permission from the National Capital Planning Committee. All right,

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>he did. Trump actually stacked that commission with his loyalists

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>and guys them to officially sign off by the ballroom. Great,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>all right, we move forward, only to have a lower

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>court judge decide out of the blue Trump moved ahead

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>on lawfully he needed congressional approval, after all. It was

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a bogus ruling from a Trump hating judge in round

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 2>number three of lawsuits, and there are a lot of

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>those Trump hating judges around Washington, d C. But the

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>judge put an injunction into place, obviously and stopped the work.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Fast forward to last week, when a federal appeals court

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>determined that work could continue after all. While this lower

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>court judge's decision was appealed and hashed out, and in

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>most instances that sort of determination from a higher court

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>means that the lower court judge got it wrong and

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>his silly ruling is likely to be overturned, but we

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know that for sure. None of this legal nonsense

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>is necessary. Moreover, there's no reason for any rational person

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>or group to still be filing or arguing lawsuits over this.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just the Trump haters hating the fact that the

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>President is moving ahead with this project without a bunch

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>of outside oversight or input. Bottom line, this is a

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>bunch of nasty bullying Karen's and Kevin's who just cannot

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>stand it when they don't get to butt into something,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>when they aren't being heard on something, when they aren't

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>asked their opinion on something, because you know they're smart

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and everyone needs to value their opinion. No, and by

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the way, this is what hacks them off most of

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>all when it comes to this. Trump ballroom is what

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 2>some people like the most about Trump. He doesn't care

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>what they think. He doesn't have to ask Congress, he

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't have to ask the American people for funding. He

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>gets to do what he wants to do and complete

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 2>his vision without their interference or input, and that infuriates them.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Well too bad. And it's that part of Donald Trump's

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 2>personality that appeals to so many average people. It's the

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>screw you don't get to bully me. I don't care

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 2>what you think. That part of Trump's personality is what

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>really appeals to all sorts of people and all sorts

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 2>of us average Americans. We two are sick and tired

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>of all of the whining and moaning and nanning, nannying

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>and bullying from the left and from the slaves to

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 2>big government. Next thing, this is interesting, Greg. You know

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 2>there's an appeals court in New Orleans that just struck

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>down a nearly one hundred and sixty year old ban

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 2>on making liquor at home. Oh really, Yeah, if you

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>think about it, you can distill. People make wine at

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>home for fun, right, and craft beers at home for fun, right. Yeah,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>you could not distill at home. This law was related

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 2>to moonshining and distilling liquor without government permission, and it

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 2>dates back to the Reconstruction era, which is the post

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Civil War period. Ban was put in place by Congress

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>way back in eighteen sixty eight as a way to

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>make sure the federal government was collecting liquor taxes?

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 4>Can we do that here in Wisconsin? Can we distill liquor?

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we can now as a result of this rule. Okay,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I know that we have smaller liquor companies that have

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>popped up in Wisconsin. Sure, yeah, yeah, but you know

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they can't. They weren't doing it at home obviously, like

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 2>my new hobby. There you go. I was wondering about

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 2>this because you're not as much of a beer guy

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>anymore as you are a whiskey guy. Oh yeah, maybe

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 2>you could make whiskey at home. But this was to

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>make it easy for the government to collect liquor taxes.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Back after the Civil War, of course, they needed to

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>raise funding to rebuild, but it was easy to make

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 2>your own liquor at home to avoid the new federal taxation.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>So in eighteen sixty eight, Congress banned home distilling, and

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty eight years later, the Fourth Circuit

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Court of Appeals has finally struck it down as the

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>result of a lawsuit filed by the quote Hobby Distillers Association.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know this existed. I have to google that,

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>but it amounts to apparently thirteen hundred hobby distillers who've

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>organized into activist groups, and they insist that Americans have

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>the right to distill spirits at home, either as a

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>hobby or for personal consumption, obviously not for sale. Congress

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>does have the ability to ban that, but to drink

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 2>yourself and to share with friends.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, hang on, they can you can grow your own pot, right,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 3>that's true in some states.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, why can't we distill our own booths?

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>That's that's good, true. I mean that's true as well.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 2>You can't sell pot out of your house. I don't think, no, no, but.

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 4>You can grow your own pillot.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the only thing there, you go, The only

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 2>thing that is banned here now is liquor. Think about

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals just overturned it.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>But it was a libertarian special interest group, really, the

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Competitive Enterprise Institute, that backed this lawsuit, and now they've

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>won it both the district and the appeals court's levels,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>which is fantastic. And you know, Washington Times story says,

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>writing for a three judge panel, the Circuit judge who

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 2>wrote the decision Edith holand Jones argued that the prohibition

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>not only failed to generate tax revenue, but also overstepped

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>federal authority by criminalizing private activities without a clear constitutional basis.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>She's right, Judge Jones noted, the government's logic would theoretically

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>allow Congress to outlaw any in home activity such as

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>remote worker small businesses that might evade taxation. Also true,

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the court found the tax cod's home distilling ban goes

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>beyond Congress's taxation powers and is not necessary and proper

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 2>to carry out that function. So pretty clear ruling. And

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't see Trump's Department of Justice and Treasury pushing

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this further and trying to appeal to the court. Apparently

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 2>after the decision, the Department of Justice and the Treasury

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Department lawyers who were on the losing end of this

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 2>didn't have any comment afterward. Now, No, they've lost now

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 2>at both the district and the appeals court level. I

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think they'll push this under Trump any way to

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court level. I doubt it, given the agreement

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>between the lower and the appeals court judges on the issue.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 2>First of all, and it's the fact that it's Trump's

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>White House and they're ultimately running the Justice and Treasury

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 2>departments now rather than Biden or Obama. I have zero doubt,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>no doubt that if our federal government had lost this

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>appeal under a bullying president on the Democrat side like

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Obama or Biden, Yeah, they'd just turn around and appeal

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>to the Supreme Court. I don't see Trump's Department of

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Justice or Treasury Department doing this, and if they try it,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be surprised if someone in Trump's White House

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 2>quashes it. Republicans are supposed to be the party of

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 2>smaller government, less taxation, fewer limits on our liberty. I

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>assume the Trump White House would view things that way

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 2>when it came up came to this archaic law. But Greg,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>you can go home today and start setting up your still.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Start get a bag of corn on the way home,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 2>start setting up the still. There's also this I'm going

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to sound ancient here. I know you remember the ten

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>cent stamp, right well? Sure, yeah, I remember the three

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 2>and the five cent stamps. What is it even well?

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was like sixty five. It's seventy eight cents.

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Fir a stanp Yeah, oh man, But I am old

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 2>enough to remember it took ten cents to send a letter.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>I had to look this up because I remember the

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>three and five cent stamps still for sale. So when

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I ran across as what were stamps? What did stamps cost?

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 2>When I was a kid and I thought you could

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>mail a letter four five cents, Well you couldn't. It

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>was actually ten. According to the Internet, mailing your average

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>piece of mail in the nineteen seventies, which is when

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I would have been a young child, it costs somewhere

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>between ten and thirteen cents. The three and five cent

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 2>stamps were still around, though, in case you needed to

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>cobble together thirteen weight.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 4>They would for the weighty right.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's when we were children born, and I

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>was born in nineteen sixty six. I clearly remember the

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 2>cost of mailing a letter when it was ten cents.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I also remember the conversations when it was raised to

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>thirteen cents. By god, this is highway robbery.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 4>All the old folks were upset.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>So now the cost of a postage stamp is seventy

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>eight cents. This is according to a CNBC story that

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 2>claims the Post of Service wants to boost this to

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty two cents this July.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, we normally just we use the stamps for

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 3>on Christmas. When we did get the Christmas cards, and

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't individually buy them, I just buy them by

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the book.

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Was it thirty five dollars?

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you don't really do the math. It's just yet,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>what do you need here at twenty twenty two? Yes,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 2>that's the same thing. So they're gonna want to boost

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>that eight to eighty two cents this July. And I

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 2>thought we were still paying about sixty five. So I

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>read this and.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I was shocked. What what?

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Two thoughts on it. Really, First, doesn't this prove

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 2>how well the so called F stamp has worked to

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>keep the American people in the dark, yes, about how

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 2>much they're paying for stamp rush Limbrov for years said

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>the American people should have to write out a check

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and send in their taxes. It shouldn't come automatically out

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>of your paycheck. You should know how much you're being

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>stolen from, and then we'd all demand lower taxes and

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we'd mean it same thing here. Why did they move

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to the F stamp? Why did they stop taking the

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 2>price off of the stamp well, because they were jacking

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>it up so frequently. Oh yeah, it had to be

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>at thirty thirty, thirty three to thirty five stamps for

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.239
<v Speaker 2>thirty five cents for a very long time. And then

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, the post office troubles got so

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>financially bad that they just started to regularly boost it up.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 2>But the cost, I think most people in this audience

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>probably remember, it used to be printed right in the stamp.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 2>It was right there in the corner. This is a

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty three cent stamp. But a decade or two ago,

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the post Office and our congressman decided it was going

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to be smarter to take the cost of the stamp

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>off the front because they claim, you know, every time

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 2>we increase the price, we have to burn the old,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>unused stamps. That was just an excuse. The reason is

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to make take the price off the stamp

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 2>so that they get less blowback from the public as

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>they increased prices more regularly. And it's worked brilliantly for them,

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>hasn't it. The average Does the average American know what

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the cost of a postage vamp is these days?

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>You or I didn't. I didn't know if I was

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 2>on who wants to be a millionaire and that was

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the final question that would get me the million dollars,

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I could not have come up with seventy eight cents.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 4>I would have thought a sixty or something like that.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I thought we were still in the sixties.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>And I just guarantee you that the most frugal among

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 2>us could answer that question correctly, and only the most

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 2>frugal among us. So it's seventy eight cents going to

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 2>go quietly to eighty two cents in July, and the

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>vast majority of us will never notice. The Post Office

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 2>also is asking for an eight percent increase. They're calling

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it a fuel surcharge to be added for package delivery

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and express mail. And at this rate, those of us

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 2>who remember the three cent stamp are also going to

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 2>live long enough to see it cost a full dollar

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>in order to send a simple piece of mail.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just thinning out the Christmas card list.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 3>That's what I think we're going to be doing.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 2>That is, But I mean, this is quite a milestone.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that milestone when when a postage stamp caught

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 2>hits a full dollar. Yeah, it has to be probably

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 2>just a year or two away is based on how

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>often and how regularly the postal service has now started

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>to increase the cost. And I also assume that that

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>milestone a dollar will get national attention and will finally

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>cause all sorts of people to move to paperless building

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>as much as possible. You know, some of us, I'm

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 2>one of them. I don't know what you and Dorothy do,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 2>but some of us would would still rather have a

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>paper bill come in the mail and send out a check.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And in my case, it's just a better way to

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 2>keep track of what's in my bank accounts, what bills

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 2>have actually been paid. So I still fight going paperless

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 2>where I can, but it's going to cost five do

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 2>If it's going to cost five to ten dollars a

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>month just to send out the checks, it's a pretty

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>good sign. Yeah, Yeah, it's time it's time to go paperless. Moreover,

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I haven't told you about this. Aside from the forever

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 2>word sing financial crisis that the post office is in,

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 2>there also seems to be more fraud occurring within and

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 2>surrounding the mail system. About three weeks ago, my bank

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>alerted me to a fraudulent check. Someone had intercepted one

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 2>of my checks in the mail and then tried to

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>scrub it blank before filling it in to themselves and

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 2>forging my signature to cash it.

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And luckily this gal was not a master criminal and

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a bank caught it. They could tell And if thank

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>heavn the bank caught it, or I would have been

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 2>out about two thousand dollars just stolen out of my checket.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And it sounds like in this instance it was

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 2>a scumming employee at the credit card company who was

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 2>sifting through the company mail and see what's easy one

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to do, right, so she was she went stealing that way.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 2>This was not the credit card company, It was a

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't a criminal postal carrier. But I mean, this

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 2>did have me thinking, maybe it is time to just

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 2>go paperless if the scammers are focusing on the paper

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 2>mail in this manner, and apparently they are. In ballots

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>member that that story this week. Absolutely more of the

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Jwebber podcast after this. Hey, who's going to tell the

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>country that the average tax refund this year is a

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>whopping twenty four percent higher than it was the year before.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a solid stat The tax relief included in the

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Big Beautiful Bill is making a very real, big beautiful

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>difference on our taxes this year? But does anyone know it?

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>If the accomplished media outlets refuse to report on it,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Will the average American know that their refund is larger

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 2>than it would normally be? And why? I highly doubt it.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 2>People don't pay that close attention. The average person has

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 2>no clue as to what they should get back or

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>how much they would normally get back as compared to

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the refund they'll get back this year. It's important because

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>it's another significant promise. It's being kept by Trump and

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans, and they'll get no credit for it because

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the left wing news outlets will refuse to report on this.

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>You watch so far, there's a virtual blackout on this story.

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if it gets any mainstream coverage as we

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>hit official tax Day this week Pril fifteenth, but I

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 2>doubt it will. This is the first chance Americans have

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to see the effects of the no tax on tips

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>or overtime provisions that were in the Big Beautiful Bill,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 2>or the new tax breaks for seniors on Social Security,

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Those new tax breaks kick in this filing period.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>The Trump White House says they expect the biggest tax

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>refund season ever based on these new rules. They're saying

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that the average refund will increase by about one thousand

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars this year. At least that might be puffery. The

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>final totals aren't in yet. Of course, the IRS has

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>just scratched the surface on most refunds, so this will change.

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>But so far, the latest IRS data claims that the

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>quote average refund is about thirty five hundred dollars this year,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>which is up from thirty two hundred last year. And

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>it's news like this that makes me furious. We have

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>an activist news media now which is really just a

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>leftist propaganda machine. For most of our modern history here

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>in America, this would be a legitimate and interesting news

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>story that most media outlets would have run. Okay, interesting tidbit.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice reminder that the big beautiful B Bill

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 2>was passed by Congress and signed by Trump. Promises were

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>made within it. Are the American people seeing the benefits

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of the bill? In years past, that would have been

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a very appropriate, legitimate and reasonable news story for every

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 2>news outlet in America. But now with today's so called

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>news media, having given up all pretense of fairness and

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>more accurately, having given up their long standing core mission,

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>which was to be fair and unbiased, now their activist

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>propagandas for the left, there's no way the pro left

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 2>news media is going to run this story or alert

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the American people to the fact that the President and

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Congress have done a good thing here. You

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>simply will not see tax savings related to this big,

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>beautiful bill reported on or discussed. Because it would be

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 2>a win for Trump. It would be proof Republicans and

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump saved you money and a significant chunk of

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>money with their tax reform. You're not going to see

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>this reported in any of the traditional corporate mainstream news outlets.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Trust me. Next item, I'm happy to see President promised

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to preemptively pardon all of his close advisers and administration

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 2>officials when they leave office in twenty twenty nine. Now

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy to see it because this is just yet

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>another thing that the Democrats have started. And if this

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>is now going to be the new standard for the

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>left for Democrat administrations, it should be for Republican administrations too.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I also want to be clear, just in terms of

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 2>wanting clean, transparent, responsible government. This is a terrible thing.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Trust me. This is a sort of news that is

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>going to have constitutional scholars and purists writing long columns

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.719
<v Speaker 2>on social media and blasting Trump again for doing something terrible,

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Yeah, put it this way. I can already

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 2>hear Rick Esenberg and Dan Lennington and the guys at

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty clacking away on

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 2>their keyboards on this one. It is a terrible thing

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to erase any chance of lawbreaking amongst the most powerful

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>people in any administration being held accountable and prosecuted for

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>their crimes. And yeah, it's a terrible thing that the

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>preemptive pardon itself even works to discourage any investigation of

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>possible wrongdoing in the future administration. Why investigate and spend

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of time and energy and money on it

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 2>if this person's going to get a pass anyway. So,

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>as a common sense, profounding, father's pro first principal sort

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of guy, I shouldn't be happy to hear Trump saying

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>this about his preemptive pardons. But I am, and I

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 2>am because this is yet another terrible and awful thing

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that the Democrats are fine with and if it protects

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>their scumming actors and their political party, they're good with it.

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 2>So they're going to keep doing this, even as they

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>make every effort to launch investigations and attacks on every

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Republican administration possible, to the point that if Donald Trump

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't protect his own people by issuing these preemptive pardons

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 2>as he leaves office, he'll be one of the dumbest

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 2>presidents and dumbest people ever. We know that today's rabid

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 2>leftists are going to keep going after President Trump and

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone who dares to be involved in the Trump administration. Right,

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>this isn't up for debate. If Donald Trump leaves an

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 2>avenue open for Democrats to bully and smear and destroy

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 2>his people post presidency, the Democrats and their rabbit activist

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>class are going to take that opening. So just to

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>be a good boss and protect his own people, Trump

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>needs to take this avenue and issue those blanket pardons

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 2>as he leaves flat out. It's the no brainer decision

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 2>given the realities of Washington, d C. And modern day

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>left wing politics. This shouldn't even be a tough decision

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>for Trump as the end of his term nears and

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like he's already made up his mind. The

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>other day he said to a crowd, I'll pardon everyone

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>who's come within two hundred feet of the oval. One

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 2>report says several aids say Trump raises the pardons so

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>regularly that some of his advisers now laugh about it.

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>But it follows Joe Biden's sweeping and preemptive end of

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>term pardons to multiple top officials and family members. They

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 2>say that included, of course, his son Hunter and doctor

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Fauci. Yep, the Democrats started this. It was their

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>party that once again broke the long standing norms and

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>decided to a nakedly scummy thing. They set the precedent,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 2>so don't be surprised when Trump follows it, simply to

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>ensure that both sides are playing by the same rules.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Democrats shouldn't be able to break every norm in every

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>law or rule when they're in charge and then turn

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 2>around and use those same laws and rules to invent

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>smear campaigns against members of Republican administrations to ruin them. No,

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>and this is worth noting. As hard as the Democrats

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>came after Trump and his team members after term one

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and then included two bogus impeachments, and as hard as

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats went after anyone associated with Trump and term one,

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump did not issue a bunch of pardons as

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 2>he left office, certainly didn't issue any blanket preemptive pardons.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>He probably should have done so in certain instances, but

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>he didn't. Now, this scummy I'm protecting every scumbag in

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 2>my administration from prosecution thing came from Joe Biden and

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 2>his fellow Democrats cheered as he did it. They can't

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 2>turn around and pretend Donald Trump is doing something shocking

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and precedent setting and terrible.

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Now no.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Next item. The relentless and mindless Trump bashing really into

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Iran continues this despite the fact that anyone with a brain,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 2>and anyone who has followed a law and knows anything

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 2>about the Iranian regime knows they weren't going to agree

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to a peace deal. The big headlines are the negotiations

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 2>fell apart. Well, of course they did. They did because

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 2>those remaining Iranian leaders have no interest in cooperating with

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the West. They have no interest in peace with the West.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 2>They can't be trusted to live up to an agreement anyway.

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 2>The most likely outcome here is that the bombing is

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>going to have to continue until Iran's leaders can finally

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>be cowed into agreeing to turn over their thousand barrels

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 2>of enriched uranium to a UN team of experts. They'll

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 2>never agree to turn it over directly to America, and

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 2>at the very least they'll try to save face by

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>turning that over to some nebulous UN team with Russians

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 2>and Chicoms involved. That's probably how we get that enriched

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>uranium out of Iran's hands, if we do. And by

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the way, the leftists and the Trump haters are trying

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to have it both ways on this one too.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 2>In this era, they want to blast Trump and celebrate

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Iran still has enriched uranium, and Trump

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 2>and Bebe's bombing hasn't led to them giving it up.

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>But in the Obama era, if you remember these Verry saying,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 2>people were telling us that President Obama and John Kerrey

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 2>had ended Iran's nuclear program and had them giving up

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 2>any enriched uranium. These dolts on the left cannot say

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Obama ended Iran's nuclear program and got them to turn

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 2>over their uranium without the need for war, which is

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>what they're saying on social media, and they're saying that

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 2>in one breath and then giggling over Trump's failure to

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>get the uranium back. Well, you can't do that without

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 2>ever explaining why and how Iran still has enriched uranium.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 2>If Obama and Kerrie ended this, they told us that

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Obama and his team, in their brilliance, had ended Iran's

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>nuclear program without having to resort to force. You hear

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that sort of nonsense daily and daily since this started

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on social media. Folks, today's events are proof that Obama

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and his team didn't do diddley. Ever since the bogus

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Obama Cary agreement was put in place, most of us

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>on the right have said, and by the way, most

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>of the international monitors have said, it's a farce of

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>an agreement that Iran never intended to live up to. First,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 2>it would have only delayed Ron's nuclear program by a

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>few years. And second, as weak as Obama's agreement was,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the Malla is never intended to live up to it anyway,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 2>international inspectors said at the time, and they still say

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to this day. Iran's Mulla's never stopped working on their

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 2>nuclear or their rocket programs. Ever, not in the years

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 2>that Obama and John Kerrey spent negotiating the agreement, not

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>after the agreement was done, Not if the agreement was

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>allegedly in place, Not after Obama left office and Trump

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 2>took over, Not after Trump left office and Biden took over.

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 2>The global community knows Iran just kept running its rocket

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>in nuclear programs the entire time. The Obama Carey nuclear

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 2>accord was a complete farce beginning to end. Just a farce.

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 2>But I have no doubt that the Trump team gives

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 2>us our best chance at finding a way for Iran

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>to give up those nuclear materials. It's going to take

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 2>some level of additional military action, most likely. Trump has

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 2>now closed the Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormones.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 2>That too, was just grossly reported all sorts of misleading

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>headlines and reports. Donald Trump didn't move to close the

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Strait of Hormuz to ship traffic. He moved to close

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Iran's ports in the Strait of Hormuz. The rest of

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the shipping lanes will be open, but it's going to

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>take some level of additional military action here, most likely,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and Trump isn't going to give up on this or

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 2>pretend he did something like Obama did. Meanwhile, the New

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 2>York Times itself is reporting that one reason Iran hasn't

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 2>reopened the Strait of Hormuz more fully is that they

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 2>can't remember where they place some of the mines that

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 2>they peppered around the waters there. Good grief, you know,

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 2>some people think that they didn't actually mine the straits,

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 2>they were just pretending they put mines in the water. Well,

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.959
<v Speaker 2>now Trump and the American team have to figure this out.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>This has the US military going into the strait now

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 2>with mine sweeping ships in an effort to have us,

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the US yet again step up and do the work.

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>As Trump put it on th truth Social, We're now

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 2>starting the process of clearing out the Strait of Hormuz

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 2>as a favor to countries all over the world, including China, Japan,

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 2>South Korea, France, Germany, and many others, he said. Incredibly,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>they don't have the courage or the will to do

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the work themselves. Very interestingly, however, empty oil carrying ships

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 2>from many nations are heading to the United States of

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 2>America to load up with oil, he said untruth Social.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 2>The first part of that, obviously is meant to make

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it clear that even though the oil that America uses

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't need to come through the Strait of hormuves, it's

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the US and our military who are once again stepping

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 2>up to help the global community get their oil more cheaply.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 2>The second part of his is a reference to how

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 2>much more American oil is being sold as a way

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>to make up for the shortages coming out of the

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Persian Gulf. This is Trump, the perpetual business man, pointing

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 2>out that America and America's oil industry is profiting from

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Iran's little stunt here, and he's right. By weaponizing the

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Strait of Hormuz as a strategy, Iran's malas are only

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>pushing an even greater shift toward Western oil, aren't they.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 2>They don't seem to see this yet, nor do the

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>pundits and the Trump haters who just want to claim

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 2>America is on the losing end of every city situation.

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 2>But with the trouble in Ukraine, we've seen all sorts

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of countries shift away from Russian oil and natural gas

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and start buying it from America, which has harmed the

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Russian economy greatly. Right well, now we have ironzmull As

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>thinking that they're being smart by forcing their new batch

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of countries into shifting their purchasing agreements over to American

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 2>producers too. How exactly is this harming America or the

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 2>West long term? It's not. The most likely outcome here

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.439
<v Speaker 2>is that if the Persian Gulf sales remain choked off

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 2>like this for any amount of time, it's going to

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 2>have more and more buyers shifting over to purchasing from

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.760
<v Speaker 2>American and Western produced oil and natural gas companies because

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 2>it's just a more stable and a more reliable way

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 2>to do it, and they're going to stay there long term.

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Why not stay because this is a more stable and

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>reliable way to fulfill your energy needs. My point is,

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>even as Trump haters on both sides whine about how

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 2>terrible it is that Iran still controls the straight of hormones, etc.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 2>The fact that they do is harming them and helping us.

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 2>The Trump haters just can't see it, or they refuse to.

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 2>At this point in the war, two problems remain related

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 2>to that strait. The first is that the Iranian military

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>apparently cannot remember where they've laid some of the mines

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 2>that they've been using to control traffic through there. And

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>then second, our military has sunk every major ship in

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian army, but there's still a bunch of smaller,

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 2>nimble speed boats that the Iranians are using to menace

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 2>some of the traffic on the water. These evil dopes

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 2>can still intimidate commercial captains and shoot rockets at ships

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 2>from those smaller boats, and they could still collish problems

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that way, And so Pete Hegseth and the Trump Pentagon

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 2>are going to have to come up with a plan

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to blow them out of the water every time they emerge, too.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 2>And because the Mullas are still in charge of Iran,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we on our side are going to have to get

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to a point at which any remaining Iranian military cannot

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 2>menace boats on the open water. Trump's White House claims

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>they've eliminated Iran's ability to shoot ballistic missiles at anyone

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>or produce any more ballistic missiles. Great, but they need

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to find a way to eliminate Iran's ability to launch

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 2>shoulder held rockets or use heavier weaponry against commercial ships

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 2>from those small boats. That is the challenge now. But

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 2>of course the peace talks broke down. Iran's leaders were

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 2>never serious about them, and they owe their very existence

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 2>to combating the West, fighting the Great Satan, et cetera.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Vice President Vance said it on Sunday, Iran won't even

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>agree to not pursue nuclear weapons. I mean, all this

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>could be cleared up if the leaders of Iran simply

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 2>vowed they were done trying to get the nuclear bomb,

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 2>just give up your nuclear materials and program and move on.

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like an easy concession at this point, but the

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Mullahs will not do it. They just have to fight

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the Great Satan. It's why they exist. This, meanwhile, is

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 2>the main goal of the US military effort, isn't it.

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 2>So President Trump isn't going to agree to anything short

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 2>of that, at least not this early in the negotiations.

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 2>He's done a good thing here now moving to block

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 2>traffic out of the Iranian ports. That ratchets up the

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 2>pressure on Iran. They can't sell the oil, get it

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to market. It also ratchets up the pressure on the

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Chinese because they apparently get like eighty percent of their

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>oil through that strait of horror moves. So we'll see

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 2>how they react. But President Trump clearly wants Iran to

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 2>give up their uranium without more fighting, if possible. But

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to agree to a deal that doesn't

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 2>include that uranium period. And so that's where we are

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 2>now on the Iran question. I love how the leftist

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 2>media is back to promoting Kamala Harris as an exciting

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight contender. My god, it's a replay of

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 2>their never ending attempt to force Hillary Clinton onto us.

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Over the years, this left wing news media spent two decades,

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 2>at least two decades being the hype men for Hillary.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It was twenty years of glowing personality profiles and gushing

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 2>praise about how smart and wonderful and capable she is,

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and the bulk of the American people never bought it.

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Now those same accomplished media members are trying to do

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the same with Kamala, and in an era in which

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 2>they no longer feel like they need to pretend they're

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 2>unbiased either. So it's really bad.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.720
<v Speaker 2>At least back in the Clinton Bush and Obama eras,

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the people running these news outlets felt like they had

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to hide their bias and at least try to be

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 2>sort of fair or sound sort of fair. That's no

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>longer the case. These major news outlets are all open

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 2>cheerleaders for the left.

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>If you doubt that, look at the complete hysteria and

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 2>implosion currently underway at CBS News because corporate execs dared

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>to hire Bari Weese to run the news operation. Weese

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 2>isn't even close to being a conservative. She's a left

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 2>winger herself, and their beef with her is that we

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Se decided that as a liberal, she's also still interested

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 2>in a more balanced news product or more balanced coverage.

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 2>CBS News employees are in a full mutiny against her

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>because she wants them to be fair. But here we are,

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 2>three years away from the next election and about a

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>year away from any real candidate declarations on anyone who

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>wants to run, and these news outlets are back to

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 2>focusing on Kamala Harris. They're starting the effort early to

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 2>try to make her palatable to the American people again,

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And I say again, but the truth is, Kamala Harris

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 2>was never appealing to the American people. And I was

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the first to point it out out back

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty when Cammi ran for the first time.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I said, this woman is an incompetent fraud, and she

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 2>thinks that because she's black, she can get the nomination.

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Or you know, she's fooling someone that had black listeners

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 2>to my radio show calling in and emailing and telling me,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 2>oh no, no, we don't like her either. The black community

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 2>hates her because she's passing herself off as an African

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 2>American who's lived our shared experience, and she hasn't. Kamala

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 2>grew up rich with an accomplished Indian mother and a

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Jamaican father. She has no idea what it means to

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>be black in America. My callers were right. In twenty twenty,

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Kamala only polled at about seven percent among South Carolina's

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>black voters, and she had to drop out before the

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 2>voting started in the primary in Iowa. The country, including

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.720
<v Speaker 2>America's black voters, knew she was a fraud in twenty twenty.

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 2>So what's changed. Well, you know, despite her unpopularity, Joe

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Biden chose her to be his running mate solely do

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on skin color. He'd promised the racist on the left

0:45:57.200 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 2>that he would choose a black woman as veep, and

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 2>he did so. Yes, Kamala has served as vice president

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.720
<v Speaker 2>for four years now, and she was a bad one.

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 2>And during that time, Kamala Harris has been even more

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 2>fully exposed as the lightweight and pretender that she is.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 2>This is just not a smart woman. During that four years,

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it became apparent that Kamala Harris only pretends to know things,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 2>and moreover, she refuses to do the harder work of

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 2>actually learning the material and turning herself into a competent,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 2>learned individual. Kamala Harris is now famous for not reading

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the notes she's been given to prep for an event,

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 2>or even before she speaks to a crowd. She's now

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 2>famous for rambling, drawn out incoherent sentences and an attempt

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to sound smart. If anything, Americans are going to be

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.919
<v Speaker 2>even less interested in Kamala in twenty twenty eight. It's

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>clear that she and her minions in the media think

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be a hunger for Cami in twenty

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight. They clearly believe the American people are going

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to know that they made a mistake by not electing

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 2>her in twenty twenty four. And that's simply not going

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 2>to be the case. You know, just because people think

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump is awful, we made a mistake doesn't mean they'll

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 2>think they made a mistake in rejecting Kamala. And to

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 2>be clear, I don't think Trump is awful. I am

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 2>very impressed with his second term. I think Trump is great.

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 2>But even if more Americans than ever think that they

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 2>made a mistake in voting for Donald Trump, it doesn't

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 2>mean they're going to think they made a mistake in

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 2>not voting for Kamala. Those are two different things. Trump

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 2>could have disappointed us, but Kamala can still be an

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>idiot who should never hold office again. Correct, And so

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I stand by my prediction that Kamala Harris will not

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 2>be the Democrats twenty twenty eight nominee, and I'm more

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 2>certain than of it than ever. Kamala is having another

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 2>little moment again, and it had Frank Lunz, the polster, saying,

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, Kamala Harris has led ten of the last

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 2>fifteen polls taken on who the Democrat nominee should be

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty eight. Okay, And those results are honest

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to god, people, because the average American can't name anyone

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 2>else on the Democrat side of the aisle who might

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 2>be running for president in twenty eight off the top

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 2>of their heads when the pollster calls. I used to

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 2>explain this routinely on my radio show. This happens in

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the early polls, and it's why they're useless. There is

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a deep political ignorance in this country, and can be

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the aisle, but there's a deep

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:09.919
<v Speaker 2>political ignorance in this country. And at this point, most

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 2>people have at least heard of Kamala. After all, she

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 2>was on the ticket last time, so she's the Democrat

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 2>who they can name. When the pollsters ask then this question,

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 2>the respondents give Kamala's name. That's all that's going on here.

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like if I asked you which cotton swab brand

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you prefer, your answer would be what Q tip because

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you can't name a single or the company that makes

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>cotton swabs.

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 2>That's how most Americans are when it comes to naming

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 2>candidates or naming the Supreme Court justices, etc. You've all

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 2>seen the jay walking segments on Leno's old show. You've

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 2>all seen the man in the street interviews on social

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 2>media where people are asked about politics just off the cuff.

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Nearly all of them sound like idiots because so few

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 2>of them actually follow politics. So who should be the

0:48:55.280 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Democrat nominee in twenty twenty eight? Kamala Newsom. Last week

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 2>we had this a poll from the Center Square that

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 2>found Harris remains the potential frontrunner for the twenty twenty

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 2>eight presidential race. They say thirty one percent of Democrats

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and left leaning independence said they would vote for Harris

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>if the Democrat presidential primary were held today. Eighteen percent

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 2>say they were unsure, while another sixteen percent say they

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 2>would support California Governor Gavin Newsom. Ooh, Kamala's so popular. No,

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 2>not really, most people could name Kamala as a Democrat

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 2>who might run for president. I would ask you to

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 2>notice that I don't know came in second. I don't

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 2>know came in second. That means that nearly two in

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 2>ten respondents couldn't even name a single Democrat contender off

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the top of their heads other than Kamala and coming

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 2>in third. About one in ten could name Gavin Newsom.

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 4>That's it.

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 2>That's a test of people's political knowledge more than it

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 2>is an interesting twenty twenty eight poll. It's not. It's

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 2>what any political insider would expect to see at this point.

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But Oh, Kamala appeared in an Al Sharpton race fest,

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and Oh the crowd loved her, did they? This was

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Reverend Al Shopton's National Action Network Convention, which is an

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 2>annual gathering of black civic leaders, activists, and voters in

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 2>New York. A piece says it serves as the first

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 2>major informal audition for potential twenty twenty eight Democratic candidates

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to pitch themselves for one of the party's most powerful constituencies.

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 2>They say Former Vice President Kamala Harris packed to the

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 2>hall to capacity and was met with multiple standing ovations

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and chance encouraging her to run again. Listen, she said,

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 2>I might, I'm thinking about it. In fact, I've got

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the cut here, But if you heard it, it was

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 2>a long, drawn out, stumbly tortured Kamala Harris. This was

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:40.800
<v Speaker 2>a three minute response that exposed again what a pretender

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 2>she really is.

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Listen, I'm I'm I'm thinking about it. I'm thinking about it,

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 5>but let me say this. Let me let me say this.

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 5>I am thinking about it, but let me let me

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 5>also say this. Look, I I served for four years

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 5>being a heart beat away from the presidency of the

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 5>United States. I spent countless hours in my West wing office,

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 5>footsteps away from the Oval office. I spent countless hours

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 5>in the Oval office in the situation room. I know

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 5>what the job is and I know what it requires.

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And she rambled down like that for another two minutes

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 2>and actually said nothing. The accomplice press really really had

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 2>to clean up the quote in order to run these

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 2>stories about how O Kamala might run. Kamala's appearance at

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the Sharpton event was as embarrassing as any other Kamala appearance.

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.280
<v Speaker 2>She sits there and pretends to know what she's talking about,

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and she stretches, and she hems, and she rolls that

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 2>right hand of hers in the air as her brain overheats,

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and what comes out is the most incoherent crap imaginable,

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 2>only to have the crowd kind of applaud and pretend

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 2>they understand her. In fact, anyone who saw this larger

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 2>event and saw more of her could hear very light

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 2>and confused smatterings of applause at times that some people

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>in the crowd thought might be an applause line, or

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:19.320
<v Speaker 2>thought maybe I should clap here. We she stopped talking,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:22.279
<v Speaker 2>and I didn't really understand that but I'm supposed to

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 2>clap here, right. I have another perfect example of Kamala

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Harris for you. She's simply asked about how she would

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>combat inflation.

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Else, are you going to do to fix this problem

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 3>with inflation?

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 5>Thank you? Well, let's start with this. Prices have gone up,

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 5>and families and individuals are dealing with the realities of

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 5>that bread costs more, that gas costs more, and we

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 5>have to understand what that means. That's about the cost

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 5>of living going up. That's about having to stress and

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:08.880
<v Speaker 5>stretch limited resources. That's about a source of stress for

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 5>families that is not only economic, but is on a

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 5>daily level, something that is a heavy weight to carry.

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 5>So it is something that we take very seriously from

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 5>the history of this issue in the United States that

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 5>when you see these prices go up, it has a

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 5>direct impact on the quality of life for all people

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 5>in our country. So it's a big issue and we

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.320
<v Speaker 5>take it seriously and it is a priority.

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 2>There for now, an idiot might think she actually said

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 2>something there, but especially if you watch the video, it's

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 2>apparent you can hear the gears start to slowly turn

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 2>after she's asked the question, and then she scrambles for

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 2>an answer, and she tells you what you already know.

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 2>She's telling you the obvious and presenting it to you

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 2>as though you're a first grader. But I think that

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 2>she is going through her own mental catalog there and

0:53:56.520 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 2>telling you what she knows about any given topic, and

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not much. So she talks to you like a

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 2>third grader. She rambles for over a minute, and she

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 2>never does answer the question. Classic Kamala Harris. She's more

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of an airhead idiot than ever. And if the voters

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Democrat Party really can't see it in twenty

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:15.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, God help us all. But they can see it,

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 2>which is why they rejected her. In twenty twenty and

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. The two easiest predictions in the world

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 2>to make are Kamala Harris will not be the twenty

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight Democrat nominee, and the leftist media are going

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 2>to spend the next three years relentlessly trying to convince

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.280
<v Speaker 2>the American people that she should be. But if Hillary

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Clinton was a tird that they never could polish up

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to look appealing to us, Kamala Harris is even a

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 2>bigger pile of dung and there is zero chance her

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 2>fans in the media will be any more successful selling

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 2>her than they did selling Hillary.

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>The Jay Webber Podcast is a production of iHeartRadio podcasts,

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 1>produced and engineered by Gregory John. The Jay Webber Podcast

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is presented by Creative Planning, helping clients simplify their journey

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to financial wellness, one personalized plan at a time. Listen

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to all of Jay Weber's podcasts, available on the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.