WEBVTT - Dems Put the HIPAA in Hypocrite

0:00:00.350 --> 0:00:04.790
<v Speaker 1>A scary half hour at UW-Whitewater on the first day

0:00:04.830 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of classes and on the second day of classes at

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee Public Schools. There were no classes. All of that

0:00:12.940 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Plus, a couple of big exclusives here on

0:00:16.940 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dan O'Donnell Show. A Democrat congressional candidate demands increased

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:30.170
<v Speaker 1>access to health insurance and provides zero health insurance. for

0:00:30.250 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>her own campaign staff then a state senate candidate in

0:00:35.490 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>wisconsin touts herself as a small business owner someone who

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:44.769
<v Speaker 1>understands the plight of entrepreneurs here in this state well

0:00:44.850 --> 0:00:47.290
<v Speaker 1>it turns out for the past decade she has been

0:00:47.450 --> 0:00:51.890
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly unable to do even the basic work of keeping

0:00:52.010 --> 0:00:57.420
<v Speaker 1>her LLC compliant with the state of Wisconsin. Big show today.

0:00:57.500 --> 0:00:58.830
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to be a part of it,

0:00:58.860 --> 0:01:02.330
<v Speaker 1>the Carpetland USA Flooring Center Talk and Text Line is open.

0:01:02.350 --> 0:01:02.410
<v Speaker 2>414-799-1130.

0:01:06.310 --> 0:01:10.540
<v Speaker 1>You can also reach me via email, DOD at iHeartMedia.com,

0:01:11.020 --> 0:01:15.020
<v Speaker 1>at Dan O'Donnell Show on X, Facebook.com slash Dan O'Donnell

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.339
<v Speaker 1>Show as well. We're on Instagram, and you can find

0:01:18.420 --> 0:01:21.950
<v Speaker 1>us in podcast form on the Dan O'Donnell Show podcast

0:01:22.050 --> 0:01:27.690
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to podcasts. The jury

0:01:27.730 --> 0:01:30.490
<v Speaker 1>in the Clancy case sent home for the day the

0:01:30.550 --> 0:01:35.130
<v Speaker 1>judge saying, please, please, Try again tomorrow for a second

0:01:35.230 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>straight day. The jury handed Judge Sullivan a note saying

0:01:40.260 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we can't reach a decision. We have been deliberating for

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>nearly 30 hours across five days. We are potentially hung.

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>What happens if a judge declares a hung jury? The

0:01:53.100 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>case results in a mistrial. That does not mean that

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.180
<v Speaker 1>Clancy walks. It does not mean that she automatically gets

0:01:59.300 --> 0:02:02.710
<v Speaker 1>remanded to the custody of a mental health facility. The

0:02:02.770 --> 0:02:06.630
<v Speaker 1>state of Massachusetts, or excuse me, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

0:02:07.010 --> 0:02:11.010
<v Speaker 1>would then decide whether or not it's going to retry

0:02:11.110 --> 0:02:16.330
<v Speaker 1>Clancy or it's just going to not retry the matter

0:02:16.530 --> 0:02:19.829
<v Speaker 1>at all. My guess in a case this high profile,

0:02:19.870 --> 0:02:25.190
<v Speaker 1>there would almost certainly be a retrial and we will

0:02:26.190 --> 0:02:30.350
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Here's what happens when a jury tells

0:02:30.450 --> 0:02:33.570
<v Speaker 1>a judge that that it just can't come to a decision.

0:02:33.610 --> 0:02:39.190
<v Speaker 1>This actually occurs not super often, but more often than

0:02:39.230 --> 0:02:43.709
<v Speaker 1>you might think. The jury isn't automatically hung, nor can

0:02:43.750 --> 0:02:48.750
<v Speaker 1>a judge simply force a jury to keep working to

0:02:48.790 --> 0:02:52.180
<v Speaker 1>try to just get through to the one or two

0:02:52.250 --> 0:02:57.140
<v Speaker 1>remaining holdouts. Sometimes a judge will ask members of the

0:02:57.180 --> 0:03:01.140
<v Speaker 1>jury how many are holding out. Now, they're obviously not

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.670
<v Speaker 1>when they're sitting in the courtroom, when they're in open court,

0:03:05.690 --> 0:03:07.769
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to buy a show of hands. Who

0:03:07.830 --> 0:03:11.250
<v Speaker 1>thinks this crazy person is guilty? Who thinks she's actually

0:03:11.310 --> 0:03:15.290
<v Speaker 1>not guilty because she's so crazy. You don't do that,

0:03:15.330 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but you ask the foreperson maybe during a sidebar, a

0:03:19.340 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>judge can go into the jury's chambers and talk to

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>them privately. There are all manner of things, but, but,

0:03:26.790 --> 0:03:28.430
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times what a judge will do is

0:03:28.490 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out, okay, how many of you are

0:03:32.180 --> 0:03:38.420
<v Speaker 1>still dissenting from the main verdict? What can happen is

0:03:39.060 --> 0:03:43.100
<v Speaker 1>the judge can declare a mistrial. He can say, all right,

0:03:43.140 --> 0:03:46.740
<v Speaker 1>the jury is hopelessly deadlocked. They're not going to be

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.580
<v Speaker 1>able to agree on a verdict. I am declaring a

0:03:49.660 --> 0:03:55.230
<v Speaker 1>mistrial and we will meet to discuss next steps, uh,

0:03:56.250 --> 0:03:59.390
<v Speaker 1>Then the ball is essentially in the Commonwealth's court in

0:03:59.450 --> 0:04:04.190
<v Speaker 1>the jurisdiction in which this case takes place to determine

0:04:04.230 --> 0:04:06.250
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there is going to be a retrial.

0:04:06.350 --> 0:04:10.180
<v Speaker 1>It basically just stretches out the procedure. But what happened

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:15.580
<v Speaker 1>today is the judge basically lit a fire under the

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.099
<v Speaker 1>jury and said, look, There is no indication any other

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.900
<v Speaker 1>jury would have a better job or do a better

0:04:22.940 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>job of coming to a unanimous verdict than you are.

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.900
<v Speaker 1>So he gives what's known in federal law, at least,

0:04:30.140 --> 0:04:34.620
<v Speaker 1>as an Allen charge. When a jury says we're deadlocked,

0:04:34.740 --> 0:04:38.729
<v Speaker 1>we can't come to a decision, the judge says, all right,

0:04:39.290 --> 0:04:44.430
<v Speaker 1>try again. Re-examine the evidence. Try to reach a unanimous verdict.

0:04:44.610 --> 0:04:49.490
<v Speaker 1>This is also known as a dynamite charge. It's meant

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.910
<v Speaker 1>to blow up a deadlock, get it? Dynamite charge. Sometimes

0:04:52.990 --> 0:04:56.590
<v Speaker 1>it's called a hammer charge, something like that. It dates

0:04:56.650 --> 0:04:58.890
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the 1800s, a case called

0:04:58.910 --> 0:05:01.990
<v Speaker 1>Allen v. United States, which sets some parameters that are

0:05:02.010 --> 0:05:05.510
<v Speaker 1>still used today for how juries can be instructed. Because

0:05:05.550 --> 0:05:08.110
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, one of the most significant parts

0:05:08.310 --> 0:05:11.290
<v Speaker 1>of a trial, one of the parts that lawyers will

0:05:11.470 --> 0:05:15.589
<v Speaker 1>argue over endlessly if they're allowed to, is the actual

0:05:15.650 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>instructions given to a jury by a judge. Why is that?

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:24.210
<v Speaker 1>Why are jury instructions in almost every jurisdiction and federal

0:05:24.250 --> 0:05:28.950
<v Speaker 1>law pretty much standardized? Because how a judge instructs a

0:05:29.010 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>jury can have more of an impact even than the

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>evidence presented at trial because these are laypersons. These are

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.810
<v Speaker 1>not attorneys themselves. they're relying on people who are attorneys

0:05:39.950 --> 0:05:42.490
<v Speaker 1>and they're relying especially on the judge that the one

0:05:42.550 --> 0:05:45.070
<v Speaker 1>who has been presiding over the trial the one they

0:05:45.150 --> 0:05:47.790
<v Speaker 1>see as the authority figure the one who is the

0:05:47.850 --> 0:05:51.540
<v Speaker 1>authority figure in that courtroom and presiding over that trial

0:05:52.460 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're relying on him or her to know what they're

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.660
<v Speaker 1>talking about a okay if you find this then you

0:05:58.700 --> 0:06:01.380
<v Speaker 1>must come to this work if you find this this

0:06:01.430 --> 0:06:06.690
<v Speaker 1>is especially important when you have lesser included offenses lesser

0:06:06.770 --> 0:06:10.210
<v Speaker 1>charges that the jury can get a guilty verdict on

0:06:10.270 --> 0:06:12.810
<v Speaker 1>it for example like in this case they don't believe

0:06:12.870 --> 0:06:17.050
<v Speaker 1>that it's first-degree murder if instead they believe it's manslaughter

0:06:17.490 --> 0:06:21.950
<v Speaker 1>they can actually come to that conclusion if they are

0:06:22.050 --> 0:06:26.589
<v Speaker 1>convinced beyond reasonable doubt of certain aspects of the evidence

0:06:26.670 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>presented that lead up to it. They don't actually have

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Allen charges in many. In fact, I think it's about 50%

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.460
<v Speaker 1>of states in this country because oftentimes because the judge

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:45.700
<v Speaker 1>has such an outsized impact on jurors, if a judge says,

0:06:45.940 --> 0:06:50.020
<v Speaker 1>all right, you got to, blast through this deadlock and

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we have to have a verdict jurors can feel like

0:06:54.740 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there is undue pressure on them to change what their

0:06:59.060 --> 0:07:03.790
<v Speaker 1>conscience truly drives them to come to the conclusion if

0:07:03.850 --> 0:07:06.820
<v Speaker 1>it's guilty if it's not guilty the holdouts can be

0:07:06.900 --> 0:07:10.420
<v Speaker 1>put under a tremendous amount of pressure so that they

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have to, well, you know what, let's just give in.

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.570
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else thinks Lindsey Clancy is guilty. We'd better come

0:07:17.610 --> 0:07:19.810
<v Speaker 1>to the same conclusion, especially if it's an 11 to

0:07:19.810 --> 0:07:24.610
<v Speaker 1>1 and there is one holdout. Many states say, hey,

0:07:24.630 --> 0:07:27.610
<v Speaker 1>wait a second. The judge said, you better figure this out.

0:07:28.290 --> 0:07:31.290
<v Speaker 1>Could get the case to be decided against the defendant

0:07:31.730 --> 0:07:34.410
<v Speaker 1>based not on the evidence, but on the idea that

0:07:34.450 --> 0:07:38.690
<v Speaker 1>the judge might be mad at them. So in Massachusetts,

0:07:39.650 --> 0:07:44.790
<v Speaker 1>there are what is known as Tui Rodriguez instructions or

0:07:44.910 --> 0:07:49.750
<v Speaker 1>Tui Rodriguez charge. This is a version of the Allen charge.

0:07:50.370 --> 0:07:53.870
<v Speaker 1>And it says, hey, do your best to come to

0:07:53.910 --> 0:07:57.850
<v Speaker 1>a conclusion. And that is what Judge Sullivan told these

0:07:57.910 --> 0:07:59.190
<v Speaker 1>jurors about two hours ago.

0:07:59.270 --> 0:08:02.510
<v Speaker 2>In order to bring 12 minds to a unanimous result,

0:08:02.990 --> 0:08:06.930
<v Speaker 2>you must examine the questions submitted to you with candor

0:08:07.430 --> 0:08:10.650
<v Speaker 2>and with proper regard and deference and respect.

0:08:10.510 --> 0:08:11.990
<v Speaker 1>To the opinions of each other.

0:08:12.950 --> 0:08:16.380
<v Speaker 2>You should consider that it is desirable that the case

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 2>be decided and that you have been selected in the

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.140
<v Speaker 2>same manner and from the same source from which any

0:08:23.220 --> 0:08:27.620
<v Speaker 2>future jury would be. There is no reason to suppose

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that the case will ever be submitted to 12 persons

0:08:31.300 --> 0:08:37.140
<v Speaker 2>more intelligent, more impartial, or more competent to decide that.

0:08:37.070 --> 0:08:39.910
<v Speaker 1>More or clearer evidence will be produced.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And with this in mind, it's your duty to decide

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 2>the case if you can do it conscientiously.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's your basic Allen charge. The judge spoke for

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.229
<v Speaker 1>about three minutes, but that's the gist of it. Hey,

0:08:52.770 --> 0:08:56.990
<v Speaker 1>there is no guarantee that another jury could get it right.

0:08:57.770 --> 0:09:01.530
<v Speaker 1>You are just as competent. You are just as qualified.

0:09:02.070 --> 0:09:05.690
<v Speaker 1>as any other random group of 12 people in this state,

0:09:05.790 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in this Commonwealth, in this jurisdiction, in Plymouth, to be

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.059
<v Speaker 1>able to decide this case. And if another 12 people

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.700
<v Speaker 1>are picked, if we have to present months and months

0:09:15.740 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and months worth of evidence again, it's entirely possible that

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to this exact same point. So if you can, however, however,

0:09:25.380 --> 0:09:29.530
<v Speaker 1>do not betray your conscience. Do not think that another

0:09:29.670 --> 0:09:34.020
<v Speaker 1>juror's opinion, seeing the same evidence that you did, is

0:09:34.100 --> 0:09:39.140
<v Speaker 1>somehow better or somehow worse than your opinion. But if

0:09:39.220 --> 0:09:42.370
<v Speaker 1>there is something that can get you holdouts to change

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.709
<v Speaker 1>your mind, if you can, in fact, come to a

0:09:45.790 --> 0:09:48.949
<v Speaker 1>unanimous verdict, I would strongly urge you to do so.

0:09:49.010 --> 0:09:52.750
<v Speaker 1>You see how that can be seen as somehow coercive,

0:09:52.890 --> 0:09:57.250
<v Speaker 1>somehow getting inside a juror's head and saying, maybe this

0:09:57.330 --> 0:10:01.709
<v Speaker 1>is why there are some serious constitutional questions about Allen

0:10:01.809 --> 0:10:05.790
<v Speaker 1>charges to the jury. Because if a jury says to

0:10:05.820 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the judge, we are deadlocked. We have no hope of

0:10:09.860 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ever reaching a verdict. We are not going to, I'm

0:10:13.100 --> 0:10:15.740
<v Speaker 1>not sure the jury even knows at this point in

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.140
<v Speaker 1>the Clancy case that they have that power. If, The

0:10:20.220 --> 0:10:23.140
<v Speaker 1>judge says, I'm going to ask you to come back

0:10:23.179 --> 0:10:27.430
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow morning. They can do that and say, all right.

0:10:27.870 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>They go for an hour. First of all, they can refuse.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.020
<v Speaker 1>They can. It is impossible. shocking how much power juries

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.310
<v Speaker 1>have in our court system which is why no attorney

0:10:39.429 --> 0:10:42.670
<v Speaker 1>ever wants to go to a jury trial you always

0:10:42.710 --> 0:10:45.030
<v Speaker 1>want to get some sound like tiger woods for example

0:10:45.510 --> 0:10:49.420
<v Speaker 1>tiger woods just copped a plea deal to his dui

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.740
<v Speaker 1>case or driving under the influence of pills i don't

0:10:51.780 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think he was drinking but he was under the influence

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:58.030
<v Speaker 1>of painkillers and he reached a plea deal today Nobody

0:10:58.050 --> 0:10:59.929
<v Speaker 1>wants to put their fate in the hands of a

0:10:59.950 --> 0:11:02.140
<v Speaker 1>jury because you just don't know what's going to happen.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.870
<v Speaker 1>You could have jury nullification, most famous. form of that.

0:11:05.929 --> 0:11:08.450
<v Speaker 1>The most famous example of that was more than 30

0:11:08.450 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago now in the O.J. Simpson case, where the

0:11:11.270 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>jurors clearly heard all of the evidence, considered the evidence,

0:11:15.179 --> 0:11:18.979
<v Speaker 1>and said, well, this one cop who found the glove

0:11:19.340 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>once said the N-word, so that's going to invalidate everything.

0:11:23.780 --> 0:11:27.309
<v Speaker 1>And the jurors actually later admitted that this was just

0:11:27.910 --> 0:11:31.270
<v Speaker 1>as much about racial justice as it was about actual justice,

0:11:31.330 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>which should have been the single most horrifying thing this

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>country ever heard with respect to the criminal justice system,

0:11:38.500 --> 0:11:42.689
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to let a double murderer walk free

0:11:43.130 --> 0:11:46.829
<v Speaker 1>because we're still ticked off about the Rodney King beating

0:11:46.990 --> 0:11:50.689
<v Speaker 1>two years, three years earlier. But juries do have the

0:11:50.730 --> 0:11:54.340
<v Speaker 1>power to do that. There's nothing– Judge Lance Ito couldn't

0:11:54.500 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>overrule the jury and say, well, you people are freaking morons.

0:11:57.980 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>You deliberated for 45 minutes after hearing six months' worth

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:07.450
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. He could not overrule them. The jury's say

0:12:07.510 --> 0:12:10.370
<v Speaker 1>is final. If the jury said, no, judge, we're not

0:12:10.429 --> 0:12:13.809
<v Speaker 1>going to come back tomorrow, we cannot come to a decision,

0:12:13.850 --> 0:12:18.710
<v Speaker 1>we're hopelessly deadlocked, this case is essentially over. It would

0:12:18.750 --> 0:12:21.089
<v Speaker 1>be over and the judge would have no question. He

0:12:21.110 --> 0:12:25.350
<v Speaker 1>would have no choice but to declare a mistrial. All right.

0:12:26.150 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Does that kind of explain where things are? See, what

0:12:28.250 --> 0:12:30.660
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do with the Lindsay Clancy case is

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of doing the same tired talking points to try

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.660
<v Speaker 1>to get you a little bit more informed about what

0:12:37.860 --> 0:12:40.099
<v Speaker 1>actually is going on here with the jury. And the jury,

0:12:40.140 --> 0:12:42.580
<v Speaker 1>I think, is doing its due diligence because this is

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult question. about whether at the time of

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.750
<v Speaker 1>this triple murder, Lindsay Clancy was in fact unable to

0:12:50.950 --> 0:12:54.770
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the gravity of her consequences, unable to determine the

0:12:55.190 --> 0:12:58.689
<v Speaker 1>difference between right and wrong, unable to comport her behavior

0:12:59.250 --> 0:13:05.070
<v Speaker 1>with the law, with standard community standards about morality and

0:13:05.090 --> 0:13:07.510
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. It's not, yeah, okay, she's nuts.

0:13:07.550 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>She went crazy and killed her three children. She's a

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:16.050
<v Speaker 1>homicidal maniac. Yes, okay, great. Did she have the ability

0:13:16.530 --> 0:13:19.970
<v Speaker 1>to discern between right and wrong when she was killing

0:13:19.990 --> 0:13:22.150
<v Speaker 1>those kids? That's the only question that matters. It's a very,

0:13:22.190 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>very difficult question in this case. I, after examining all

0:13:28.890 --> 0:13:32.940
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence, as I said yesterday, insomnia has served

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.740
<v Speaker 1>me well in learning about this case because I stayed

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>up a couple of nights and just read a whole

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of transcripts and briefs in this case. And wow,

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.390
<v Speaker 1>this evidence really does suggest that she was doctor shopping,

0:13:44.429 --> 0:13:47.429
<v Speaker 1>that she was trying to get a specific diagnosis, that

0:13:47.470 --> 0:13:51.070
<v Speaker 1>she was actually planning to murder these kids, or she

0:13:51.110 --> 0:13:54.430
<v Speaker 1>was planning to do something dramatic and was trying desperately

0:13:55.090 --> 0:13:58.340
<v Speaker 1>to provide a mental health cover. She was looking, I think,

0:13:58.390 --> 0:14:01.670
<v Speaker 1>for a diagnosis of postpartum psychosis and didn't get it.

0:14:01.700 --> 0:14:04.900
<v Speaker 1>The fact, to me, that is most dispositive in this case,

0:14:05.540 --> 0:14:08.940
<v Speaker 1>that she heard a voice, she said, telling her to

0:14:09.100 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>kill the kids. That voice... only manifested at the time

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.939
<v Speaker 1>she was killing the kids, in the 18 minutes that

0:14:18.020 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>she was engaged in a triple murder. That was the

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.620
<v Speaker 1>only time. She didn't hear any voices. She didn't hear

0:14:23.700 --> 0:14:27.510
<v Speaker 1>any commands before the murders, before she sent her husband out.

0:14:28.970 --> 0:14:33.410
<v Speaker 1>And she didn't hear any after. That is very bizarre.

0:14:33.570 --> 0:14:37.430
<v Speaker 1>Not unheard of, but very bizarre. And points to someone

0:14:37.470 --> 0:14:41.230
<v Speaker 1>who is making this up after the fact. All right,

0:14:41.270 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that is not all that went on at the Lindsay

0:14:44.580 --> 0:14:46.820
<v Speaker 1>Clancy case, but we'll get to the rest of it

0:14:46.860 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the unhinged liberal of the day coming up later

0:14:49.660 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this hour when we come back from this commercial break.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>First day of school at UW-Whitewater didn't quite go according

0:14:56.730 --> 0:14:59.890
<v Speaker 1>to plan. Second day of school at Milwaukee Public Schools

0:15:00.310 --> 0:15:03.430
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen at all. That's why we're providing a little

0:15:03.450 --> 0:15:07.770
<v Speaker 1>bit different analysis than what you might be used to

0:15:07.790 --> 0:15:13.090
<v Speaker 1>if you're just scrolling through TikTok on the Lindsay Clancy case.

0:15:14.890 --> 0:15:17.910
<v Speaker 1>We will, of course, continue to discuss this. My very

0:15:18.010 --> 0:15:21.190
<v Speaker 1>strong suspicion now, folks, I know I told you after

0:15:21.710 --> 0:15:25.310
<v Speaker 1>the initial hung jury yesterday or after the initial note

0:15:25.350 --> 0:15:27.830
<v Speaker 1>from the jury saying, hey, we are deadlocked. We don't

0:15:27.870 --> 0:15:29.970
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to be able to come to a conclusion.

0:15:30.010 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I said, what happens generally is the jurors will get

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>together and say, okay, how many holdouts do we have?

0:15:38.780 --> 0:15:42.390
<v Speaker 1>Can we hammer through this? A lot of times there

0:15:42.530 --> 0:15:46.550
<v Speaker 1>is a verdict immediately afterwards because one of them just

0:15:46.650 --> 0:15:49.670
<v Speaker 1>sort of caves. If there's one holdout, this suggests to

0:15:49.750 --> 0:15:54.940
<v Speaker 1>me that there are multiple notes after a second day

0:15:54.980 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of deliberations. The jury is saying we're still deadlocked. We

0:15:59.060 --> 0:16:03.870
<v Speaker 1>still can't figure this out. It would not surprise me.

0:16:04.110 --> 0:16:06.070
<v Speaker 1>It would not surprise me if they say it for

0:16:06.110 --> 0:16:09.230
<v Speaker 1>a third straight day. And then finally, the judge says,

0:16:09.390 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, I really have no choice here. I've done

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:18.460
<v Speaker 1>my Allen charge or in Massachusetts, Tui Rodriguez charge. I

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.580
<v Speaker 1>sort of lit a fire under him. We've tried to

0:16:20.620 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>break the deadlock. It's not happening. Hung jury, mistrial, back

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to square one, essentially. And then we get to have

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this insane debate. over how women are reacting to the

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.180
<v Speaker 1>Clancy case, which I will admit is truly unhinged. Speaking

0:16:39.220 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of which, the unhinged liberal of the day, and yes,

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.470
<v Speaker 1>the nut who was arrested at the Lindsay Clancy trial

0:16:46.530 --> 0:16:49.750
<v Speaker 1>does appear to be a liberal. That's coming up later

0:16:49.770 --> 0:16:58.150
<v Speaker 1>this hour. UW-Whitewater today issued a shelter-in-place order. It calls

0:16:58.170 --> 0:17:04.140
<v Speaker 1>a An active threat to life safety alert. At about

0:17:04.140 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>10 after 11 this morning, there was a message sent

0:17:08.740 --> 0:17:11.980
<v Speaker 1>to all students. And in all buildings, there was an

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.139
<v Speaker 1>alarm that sounded with a voice saying there is an

0:17:16.369 --> 0:17:20.850
<v Speaker 1>active threat to life safety. Please shelter in place. This

0:17:20.950 --> 0:17:24.750
<v Speaker 1>is not a drill. went one of the text university

0:17:24.810 --> 0:17:28.889
<v Speaker 1>police asked the whitewater campus to remain sheltered in place

0:17:28.950 --> 0:17:32.010
<v Speaker 1>until told otherwise couple of minutes after that there was

0:17:32.090 --> 0:17:36.190
<v Speaker 1>another update there is an active threat to life safety

0:17:36.390 --> 0:17:42.090
<v Speaker 1>on the whitewater campus all caps run hide fight are

0:17:42.190 --> 0:17:46.580
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty terrifying especially since today was the first day

0:17:46.630 --> 0:17:51.210
<v Speaker 1>of class Well, alarms sounded across the campus for about

0:17:51.230 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a half hour while UW-Whitewater police and multiple jurisdictions all investigated.

0:17:58.140 --> 0:18:01.300
<v Speaker 1>Turns out it was a false alarm. This was the

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>statement sent by Chancellor Corey A. King and UW-Whitewater Chief

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:11.969
<v Speaker 1>of Police Matthew Keterlin today. Per our safety protocols, we

0:18:12.010 --> 0:18:15.970
<v Speaker 1>initiated our emergency communication system until police gave the all clear.

0:18:17.090 --> 0:18:21.070
<v Speaker 1>It was reported to UW-Whitewater police that an individual walked

0:18:21.250 --> 0:18:24.930
<v Speaker 1>into Anderson Hall with what people believed was a weapon

0:18:25.550 --> 0:18:30.610
<v Speaker 1>and was yelling. The individual left the office without incident.

0:18:34.410 --> 0:18:40.979
<v Speaker 1>So for about 27 minutes, the UW-Whitewater community was terrified

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that I was getting texts from parents who just sent

0:18:44.550 --> 0:18:49.570
<v Speaker 1>their kids to Whitewater a couple of days ago as freshmen. Hey, Dan,

0:18:49.609 --> 0:18:52.450
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Is there an active shooting? I said, sure,

0:18:52.570 --> 0:18:56.570
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it. 11.37 a.m., the school texted students, there

0:18:56.650 --> 0:18:58.929
<v Speaker 1>is no threat to life safety. Police have confirmed there

0:18:58.970 --> 0:19:01.030
<v Speaker 1>was no threat to life safety earlier today when the

0:19:01.090 --> 0:19:04.649
<v Speaker 1>alert system was activated. We will share more information as

0:19:04.770 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>soon as we are able. Then we waited for about

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.790
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a half until the statement from the

0:19:13.830 --> 0:19:16.949
<v Speaker 1>chancellor and chief of police. We are grateful for all

0:19:16.990 --> 0:19:19.669
<v Speaker 1>who responded to today's incident and work to ensure the

0:19:19.710 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>safety of everyone on the Whitewater campus. While we are

0:19:22.420 --> 0:19:25.660
<v Speaker 1>relieved there was no active threat, we understand how deeply

0:19:25.859 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>unsettling these situations could be for our university community, especially

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.250
<v Speaker 1>on the first day of classes. So they are now

0:19:33.450 --> 0:19:38.230
<v Speaker 1>offering counselors to help with the trauma of the half

0:19:38.270 --> 0:19:45.940
<v Speaker 1>hour of terror. That apparently they caused by thinking there

0:19:45.980 --> 0:19:48.909
<v Speaker 1>was an active shoot because what some guy looked weird.

0:19:50.950 --> 0:19:53.390
<v Speaker 1>It was a weird looking guy and he was, so was,

0:19:53.580 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>was he yelling? Did he have a weapon? What was

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Was it just your standard issue? First

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>day freak out. That said, you cannot take any chances

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.490
<v Speaker 1>with this sort of thing. you do have to take

0:20:09.650 --> 0:20:14.470
<v Speaker 1>proper precautions just in case there's an active shooter. But

0:20:15.170 --> 0:20:19.950
<v Speaker 1>we went real quick from weird dude yelling and he

0:20:20.050 --> 0:20:25.860
<v Speaker 1>may have a gun to everything is okay. The problem

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with that is sort of like with the, I think,

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.980
<v Speaker 1>increased frequency of the use of the emergency alert system

0:20:36.060 --> 0:20:41.179
<v Speaker 1>for severe weather. It's the chicken little phenomenon, right? The

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sky is falling. If enough warnings are given that the

0:20:46.060 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>sky is falling, when it actually does fall, people kind

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of silence their phones. Maybe they don't go in the basement.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they don't. I'm not saying that when there is

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.590
<v Speaker 1>a report of– and I'm also, also, just so we're clear,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.670
<v Speaker 1>not discounting the possibility that this was a swatting incident.

0:21:06.340 --> 0:21:09.620
<v Speaker 1>that this was somebody who called on the for that

0:21:09.660 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was actually my first inclination when it was report okay

0:21:14.140 --> 0:21:16.330
<v Speaker 1>there was no actual status oh well it's the first

0:21:16.350 --> 0:21:19.350
<v Speaker 1>day of school someone as a prank or someone as

0:21:19.369 --> 0:21:22.030
<v Speaker 1>with this by the way is not a prank and

0:21:22.130 --> 0:21:26.389
<v Speaker 1>you should be absolutely prosecuted to the fullest extent of

0:21:26.410 --> 0:21:29.310
<v Speaker 1>the law i think you should have prison time for

0:21:29.390 --> 0:21:32.250
<v Speaker 1>making false reports that said that for those who don't

0:21:32.270 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know what's watching is It's when– this for years was

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a common thing, and I mean real common thing on

0:21:41.260 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the political left. Every couple of months, you would hear

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.899
<v Speaker 1>a prominent conservative say, yeah, the SWAT team was at

0:21:47.980 --> 0:21:52.780
<v Speaker 1>my house because someone said that we were being held

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:58.230
<v Speaker 1>at gunpoint. Usually what happens, the call is someone help,

0:21:58.350 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm inside this house now. and they're holding us captive

0:22:02.820 --> 0:22:06.430
<v Speaker 1>or help. I just saw somebody rush into this house

0:22:06.450 --> 0:22:09.990
<v Speaker 1>with a gun. It's designed to send the SWAT team

0:22:10.210 --> 0:22:14.110
<v Speaker 1>in guns blazing and terrify whoever it is. I believe

0:22:14.150 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that SWATing should be punished by like a mandatory prison

0:22:17.540 --> 0:22:21.540
<v Speaker 1>sentence because it is dangerous for law enforcement officers. It's

0:22:21.700 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>dangerous for the targets of SWATing. It's dangerous for just

0:22:25.020 --> 0:22:30.330
<v Speaker 1>innocent bystanders. It's an incredible waste of law enforcement resources

0:22:31.010 --> 0:22:34.109
<v Speaker 1>and for some jackass to be cackling his head off.

0:22:34.170 --> 0:22:35.990
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's what happened here, but that was

0:22:36.010 --> 0:22:38.590
<v Speaker 1>my first thought. I'm not discounting that possibility. The other

0:22:38.630 --> 0:22:43.900
<v Speaker 1>possibility is are we really not verifying these tips too

0:22:44.180 --> 0:22:49.460
<v Speaker 1>closely before we're– so an unverified report of some dude

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.500
<v Speaker 1>who might or might not have had a gun, looked

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>creepy and was yelling– That triggers a campus-wide lockdown and

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>terrifies the entire Whitewater community? Not a great look on

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the first day of class. But again, until we get

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:13.010
<v Speaker 1>a full accounting of what exactly happened, how exactly the

0:23:13.150 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Whitewater police and campus community got it so wrong, We

0:23:17.900 --> 0:23:21.940
<v Speaker 1>just won't know. All right. Did Milwaukee Public Schools get

0:23:22.020 --> 0:23:26.340
<v Speaker 1>it wrong when it canceled classes on the second day

0:23:26.500 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of school? Folks, I had to run some errands today.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.110
<v Speaker 1>I was outside. I was at the gas station and

0:23:34.369 --> 0:23:36.430
<v Speaker 1>a woman who happened to be at the pump next

0:23:36.450 --> 0:23:39.210
<v Speaker 1>to me just totally unprompted. So we kind of made

0:23:39.230 --> 0:23:41.810
<v Speaker 1>eye contact and she's, you know, going to her cushion. Man,

0:23:41.850 --> 0:23:46.570
<v Speaker 1>it's hotter than hell out here. Yes, it certainly is.

0:23:48.350 --> 0:23:50.300
<v Speaker 1>And she told me she didn't want to go out,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but her 80-year-old mother wanted to go out and run errands.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, you got to get mom out

0:23:55.660 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the house. I can confirm. It was hot. It

0:23:59.540 --> 0:24:03.540
<v Speaker 1>was humid. It was real uncomfortable. I would not want

0:24:03.580 --> 0:24:07.429
<v Speaker 1>to sit in a building without air conditioning. Was it

0:24:07.690 --> 0:24:11.469
<v Speaker 1>so dangerous that kids couldn't be in school?

0:24:11.490 --> 0:24:11.550
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:24:12.310 --> 0:24:12.409
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:24:13.350 --> 0:24:17.190
<v Speaker 1>But the better question is, why is it that only

0:24:17.290 --> 0:24:22.460
<v Speaker 1>about half of MPS's buildings have air conditioning? Because you

0:24:22.500 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>won't believe how much money Milwaukee Public Schools has gotten

0:24:27.180 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>just in the last couple of years. We'll discuss when

0:24:29.470 --> 0:24:33.590
<v Speaker 1>the Dan O'Donnell Show returns. of our big exclusive stories

0:24:33.609 --> 0:24:39.460
<v Speaker 1>a democrat congressional candidate says health care for thee but

0:24:39.540 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>not for me well yes health care for me clearly

0:24:43.460 --> 0:24:48.950
<v Speaker 1>just not my campaign staff this is just so so

0:24:49.550 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>typical We are going to push that to the top

0:24:52.100 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of the four o'clock hour just after our daily Trump date.

0:24:55.540 --> 0:25:00.859
<v Speaker 1>President Trump meeting with representatives from the travel community to

0:25:00.940 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>celebrate another successful summer, buoyed, of course, by one of the,

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if not the, best World Cups in the history of

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that tournament. Just a huge success to celebrate America's 250th birthday.

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>That coming up in the four o'clock hour here on

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:23.910
<v Speaker 1>the Dan O'Donnell Show. Now, Milwaukee Public Schools announced yesterday,

0:25:24.630 --> 0:25:28.450
<v Speaker 1>the first day of school, that today, the second day

0:25:28.510 --> 0:25:32.990
<v Speaker 1>of school, classes would be canceled. We got the breaking

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>news alert right before the 5 o'clock hour yesterday. I

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.419
<v Speaker 1>had to read it twice because I wasn't sure it

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.940
<v Speaker 1>was real. I thought, there's no way. They're canceling for

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:49.430
<v Speaker 1>extreme heat. when the heat isn't going to be that extreme.

0:25:49.710 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>MPS policy says that when the heat index is above 95,

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.419
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to close. Well, the heat index

0:25:57.580 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly topped 100 two days ago, but today it didn't

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:12.730
<v Speaker 1>top 95. Now, can you accurately predict to a degree

0:26:13.430 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what a temperature or heat index is going to be. No,

0:26:16.670 --> 0:26:19.340
<v Speaker 1>of course you can't a day before it happens, but

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>somehow we can tell you exactly what the average global

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>temperature is going to be a hundred years from now

0:26:26.060 --> 0:26:30.820
<v Speaker 1>due to climate change. Figure out that paradox for me.

0:26:31.140 --> 0:26:36.180
<v Speaker 1>We can't figure out individual weather patterns because of all

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:42.490
<v Speaker 1>of the variability yet climate change produces no variability whatsoever

0:26:42.650 --> 0:26:46.450
<v Speaker 1>and the average global temperature in a century because if

0:26:46.590 --> 0:26:51.090
<v Speaker 1>human burning of fossil fuels is going to raise the

0:26:51.130 --> 0:26:55.550
<v Speaker 1>temperature a degree or two Celsius and all of the

0:26:55.690 --> 0:27:01.889
<v Speaker 1>sea levels will rise by the way I am still waiting.

0:27:01.950 --> 0:27:04.950
<v Speaker 1>I think we just crossed the 10-year anniversary of when

0:27:04.970 --> 0:27:08.660
<v Speaker 1>Al Gore said the sea levels were going to rise

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.580
<v Speaker 1>and it would be past the point of no return. No,

0:27:12.660 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he said very famously, I think it was 2015, in

0:27:17.460 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the documentary, he, believe it or not, won the Nobel

0:27:21.300 --> 0:27:27.710
<v Speaker 1>Peace Prize for An Inconvenient Truth, ironically. There was no

0:27:27.790 --> 0:27:31.830
<v Speaker 1>truth whatsoever to any of the doomsday predictions in an

0:27:32.010 --> 0:27:35.460
<v Speaker 1>inconvenient truth. He said the polar ice caps would be

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ice free. I think it was by 2014. Eric, can

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.580
<v Speaker 1>you check that out? The thing came out like 2006, 2007.

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:41.659
<v Speaker 3>And.

0:27:47.390 --> 0:27:51.430
<v Speaker 1>He said 2014 back then. It's been like a decade

0:27:51.730 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>since the polar ice caps were supposed to be ice-free. Now,

0:27:55.780 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you could predict that. You could predict with absolute certainty.

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:06.590
<v Speaker 1>But we don't have the ability to predict what the

0:28:06.670 --> 0:28:11.050
<v Speaker 1>heat index is going to be within 24 hours in

0:28:11.250 --> 0:28:14.629
<v Speaker 1>one specific place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Okay.

0:28:15.190 --> 0:28:15.410
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:28:15.530 --> 0:28:19.740
<v Speaker 1>If you say so. climate science, I guess we have

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>to believe you because you are the science. MPS clearly

0:28:26.980 --> 0:28:29.659
<v Speaker 1>did what it thought was in the best interests of

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the students. Second day of school, notwithstanding, if it felt

0:28:35.980 --> 0:28:38.620
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to be dangerous for students to

0:28:38.660 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be in classrooms that don't have air conditioning, then they

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.210
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be in classrooms that don't have air conditioning. And

0:28:46.290 --> 0:28:53.210
<v Speaker 1>in fact, While about 50% of buildings at MPS do

0:28:53.310 --> 0:29:00.310
<v Speaker 1>have air conditioning, only about 25% of classrooms across the

0:29:00.390 --> 0:29:06.630
<v Speaker 1>district are in fact air conditioned. What's the reason for

0:29:06.670 --> 0:29:13.610
<v Speaker 1>this discrepancy? Because there's one big difference. very highly populated

0:29:13.730 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>building in Milwaukee public schools that absolutely does have air conditioning.

0:29:20.620 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Can you guess what it is? That's right. Central office.

0:29:27.140 --> 0:29:34.210
<v Speaker 1>All the bureaucrats are just fine today. Nobody's sweating at all.

0:29:34.970 --> 0:29:39.170
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they're probably chilling. Like, do you remember when

0:29:39.570 --> 0:29:43.140
<v Speaker 1>at New York City Hall after Zoran Mamdani in the

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.030
<v Speaker 1>middle of July said, hey, New Yorkers, you should raise

0:29:47.070 --> 0:29:51.090
<v Speaker 1>your temperature in your apartments to 78 degrees to save

0:29:51.130 --> 0:29:54.830
<v Speaker 1>the planet. And then people went into City Hall in

0:29:54.870 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>New York and and found that the temperature was like

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>65 degrees. I'll bet you central office has it extra

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>cold today because it's just so doggone hot outside. And

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I've just taken a wild guess that a lot of

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:15.980
<v Speaker 1>the people who work at MPS, I don't want to

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:21.620
<v Speaker 1>cast dispersions, but I'm just guessing, just guessing a lot

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.860
<v Speaker 1>of those people don't do well when it's hot. Because,

0:30:25.100 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they're carrying a little extra insulation. Maybe

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:34.370
<v Speaker 1>that's my own stereotypes about educational bureaucrats. Those poor teachers,

0:30:34.570 --> 0:30:38.390
<v Speaker 1>those poor kids are sweltering in the classroom. And you've

0:30:38.410 --> 0:30:46.490
<v Speaker 1>got 270-pound curriculum coordinators. pushing paper around at central office

0:30:46.970 --> 0:30:49.930
<v Speaker 1>who are doing just fine. Thank you very much. By

0:30:49.950 --> 0:30:52.650
<v Speaker 1>the way, do we know, did central office have a

0:30:52.750 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>work day today or even if it's air conditioned because

0:30:56.980 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody else was up, did they just say, ah, it's

0:30:59.660 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a beautiful 90 degree day. Let's go

0:31:03.740 --> 0:31:07.460
<v Speaker 1>to work at Bradford beach today instead of our glorious

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:14.290
<v Speaker 1>air conditioned palace. Apparently, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,

0:31:15.170 --> 0:31:19.050
<v Speaker 1>Ayesha Carr, if you remember her, the former Milwaukee school

0:31:19.090 --> 0:31:24.530
<v Speaker 1>board member who suggested that, hey, maybe we don't need

0:31:24.590 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a billion dollar tax referendum to fund

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:35.420
<v Speaker 1>MPS after we just got $ 770 million in federal ESSER grant.

0:31:37.980 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You're kidding me. Eric Paulson, they were all closed. All

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:52.390
<v Speaker 1>schools and district offices were closed. All right, he's checking

0:31:52.430 --> 0:31:53.930
<v Speaker 1>to see if it was a different day. That just

0:31:53.970 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>popped in my mind. So help me God. If the

0:31:59.700 --> 0:32:04.580
<v Speaker 1>central office staff didn't go to work today because the

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:10.910
<v Speaker 1>students were sweltering, but they were perfectly fine in their

0:32:11.130 --> 0:32:17.610
<v Speaker 1>air-conditioned central office palace, I may never stop talking about that, actually.

0:32:18.030 --> 0:32:23.110
<v Speaker 1>When I illustrate the different, like, people say conservatives, like Republicans,

0:32:23.130 --> 0:32:25.710
<v Speaker 1>conservative talk show hosts, Belling always got a bad rap for, like,

0:32:25.750 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hating teachers. I love Teachers absolutely love what they do.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:37.150
<v Speaker 1>I can count on one hand probably any teacher that

0:32:37.190 --> 0:32:40.430
<v Speaker 1>my kids ever had that I didn't think was absolutely excellent.

0:32:41.310 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. Okay. District, you dodged a bullet, MPS. Good decision.

0:32:48.380 --> 0:32:53.180
<v Speaker 1>District offices were open because if they took off, even

0:32:53.260 --> 0:32:57.540
<v Speaker 1>though they had air conditioning, oh, with that event, that

0:32:57.740 --> 0:33:01.810
<v Speaker 1>would have fueled my soul for this entire semester. Every

0:33:01.870 --> 0:33:04.330
<v Speaker 1>time MPS would have been in the news, guess what

0:33:04.410 --> 0:33:07.670
<v Speaker 1>I would have brought up? So good. At least they

0:33:07.710 --> 0:33:10.390
<v Speaker 1>were forced to go to work. I know how difficult

0:33:10.430 --> 0:33:13.490
<v Speaker 1>the first day back must have been, although central office,

0:33:13.590 --> 0:33:18.350
<v Speaker 1>many of those employees do go year round. Ayesha Carr

0:33:19.310 --> 0:33:24.870
<v Speaker 1>was actually criminally charged because she wasn't living in the

0:33:25.050 --> 0:33:29.190
<v Speaker 1>district that she represented as an MPS board member. And

0:33:29.310 --> 0:33:33.090
<v Speaker 1>this was only discovered after she spoke out. She actually

0:33:33.190 --> 0:33:36.740
<v Speaker 1>came on this show to speak out. against the referendum. Now,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>what did we learn about that MPS referendum as soon

0:33:39.700 --> 0:33:44.210
<v Speaker 1>as it passed? Well, MPS was totally noncompliant in reporting

0:33:44.290 --> 0:33:46.130
<v Speaker 1>how it was spending $ 772 million in federal COVID relief

0:33:46.190 --> 0:33:55.140
<v Speaker 1>ESSER grants from 2020 to 2024. And they kept delaying

0:33:55.660 --> 0:33:58.460
<v Speaker 1>reporting how they were spending the money. We still don't,

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, have an accurate enough accounting for how

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.090
<v Speaker 1>that money was spent. So we got a billion dollars

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:10.649
<v Speaker 1>of cash in addition to property tax levies, state aid,

0:34:10.830 --> 0:34:14.350
<v Speaker 1>everything else flowing into MPS. And even though it was

0:34:14.450 --> 0:34:18.270
<v Speaker 1>estimated that to air condition 28 existing MPS buildings, it

0:34:18.290 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>would cost $ 128 million. They had a billion dollars to

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 1>spend a billion. You don't think keeping kids safe from

0:34:30.460 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>heat stroke when, you know, you're starting. They actually tried

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to start earlier in August for a couple of years.

0:34:41.570 --> 0:34:45.100
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that the reason that MPS largely abandoned

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.219
<v Speaker 1>that early start was because in August it's just way

0:34:48.260 --> 0:34:50.820
<v Speaker 1>too hot. They were losing too many days due to

0:34:50.860 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the heat. Not only that, public schools in Wisconsin will

0:34:55.300 --> 0:34:59.610
<v Speaker 1>typically go into early to mid-June when it can get very,

0:34:59.650 --> 0:35:02.930
<v Speaker 1>very hot. You also have the occasional odd day or

0:35:03.110 --> 0:35:05.890
<v Speaker 1>odd week in May or even April where the temperature

0:35:05.930 --> 0:35:09.940
<v Speaker 1>can get up to 85 degrees just randomly. spring in

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.109
<v Speaker 1>wisconsin is pretty much all seasons rolled into about two

0:35:14.150 --> 0:35:16.430
<v Speaker 1>and a half months that that sort of how we

0:35:16.530 --> 0:35:20.989
<v Speaker 1>roll you're telling me that it was a what the

0:35:21.210 --> 0:35:25.969
<v Speaker 1>hell has mps been spending money not only are they

0:35:26.010 --> 0:35:29.660
<v Speaker 1>the best funded school district in wisconsin by a country

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.779
<v Speaker 1>mile on a per pupil basis and also in terms

0:35:33.820 --> 0:35:40.969
<v Speaker 1>of the total money that they've gotten they got a Yes,

0:35:41.219 --> 0:35:45.930
<v Speaker 1>MPS is a billionaire. Yes, they are a billionaire. Same people,

0:35:46.410 --> 0:35:50.730
<v Speaker 1>same people. who invariably say billionaires shouldn't exist, right? Isn't

0:35:50.750 --> 0:35:55.930
<v Speaker 1>this the talking point from the teachers' union left? Billionaires

0:35:55.950 --> 0:35:59.390
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't exist. If billionaires didn't exist, then maybe if we

0:35:59.410 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>just took all that money from the trillionaire Elon Musk

0:36:01.780 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and gave it to schools, maybe our schools would have

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 1>enough money. NPS had a billion dollars. A billion dollars

0:36:06.820 --> 0:36:09.340
<v Speaker 1>plus what they're bringing in every single freaking year in

0:36:10.219 --> 0:36:15.180
<v Speaker 1>tax levies. And you're telling me That, of course, they

0:36:15.219 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can provide air conditioning to the fat cats, literally fat cats,

0:36:20.020 --> 0:36:24.930
<v Speaker 1>in MPS central office. But for the kids who are

0:36:25.070 --> 0:36:29.710
<v Speaker 1>sweltering in classrooms and much more vulnerable to the heat,

0:36:31.150 --> 0:36:38.969
<v Speaker 1>they get no air conditioning. I am continually floored at

0:36:39.050 --> 0:36:45.230
<v Speaker 1>just how dysfunctional, poorly run, and frankly embarrassing this school

0:36:45.270 --> 0:36:48.230
<v Speaker 1>district is. You're listening to The Dan O'Donnell Show, unhinged

0:36:48.489 --> 0:36:52.140
<v Speaker 1>to The Dan O'Donnell Show each and every day. We

0:36:52.340 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>name the unhinged liberal of the day. And today it

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is the woman who at the Lindsay Clancy case was

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:05.140
<v Speaker 1>arrested and and criminally charged with juror intimidation. Her name

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:09.090
<v Speaker 1>is Dawn Light. She was arrested outside the courthouse last night.

0:37:09.610 --> 0:37:13.009
<v Speaker 1>She claimed that she's a Lindsay Clancy superfan and was

0:37:13.030 --> 0:37:15.489
<v Speaker 1>just trying to take a picture of Lindsay. Well, they

0:37:15.670 --> 0:37:18.529
<v Speaker 1>searched her phone and found a ton of pictures of

0:37:18.550 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the jurors. Now, why is she the unhinged liberal of

0:37:22.300 --> 0:37:25.580
<v Speaker 1>the day? Well, turns out she's a frequent donor to

0:37:25.980 --> 0:37:30.730
<v Speaker 1>Act Blue. She now faces upwards of 20 years in prison.

0:37:31.350 --> 0:37:34.310
<v Speaker 1>It is a very, very serious crime to attempt to

0:37:34.370 --> 0:37:37.450
<v Speaker 1>intimidate a jury by taking pictures of them, especially from

0:37:37.510 --> 0:37:43.230
<v Speaker 1>a restricted area. Dawn Light, your unhinged liberal of the day.

0:37:43.250 --> 0:37:45.650
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back after the news. What are the

0:37:45.770 --> 0:37:51.710
<v Speaker 1>two things that Democrats are really hammering in the 2026

0:37:51.710 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>midterms and state elections here in Wisconsin? One, affordability, right? Affordability,

0:37:58.300 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that Trump and the Republicans have made everything unaffordable. David

0:38:02.420 --> 0:38:05.850
<v Speaker 1>Crowley has made this sort of the centerpiece of his

0:38:05.910 --> 0:38:11.870
<v Speaker 1>gubernatorial campaign, that Tom Tiffany and the MAGA Republicans following

0:38:11.930 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump off the fiscal cliff have made everything more affordable.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:23.870
<v Speaker 1>He also signed into law a tax increase. that increased

0:38:23.910 --> 0:38:28.170
<v Speaker 1>the price of literally everything you buy in Milwaukee County.

0:38:28.550 --> 0:38:35.100
<v Speaker 1>He nearly doubled the county's sales tax, increasing it from 0.5%

0:38:35.100 --> 0:38:39.940
<v Speaker 1>to 0.9% on top of a brand new 2% city

0:38:39.980 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of Milwaukee sales tax that he and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:49.110
<v Speaker 1>Johnson begged, almost literally got on their hands and knees

0:38:49.290 --> 0:38:53.430
<v Speaker 1>and begged the state legislature to allow them to enact

0:38:54.590 --> 0:38:57.690
<v Speaker 1>probably by the way even after getting a hundred million

0:38:57.730 --> 0:39:00.810
<v Speaker 1>dollars plus per year in new sales tax revenue over

0:39:00.830 --> 0:39:05.010
<v Speaker 1>the past several years because act 12 he's still running

0:39:05.070 --> 0:39:07.690
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty million dollar debit how is that

0:39:07.910 --> 0:39:12.270
<v Speaker 1>even pot you made everything less affordable you took from

0:39:12.750 --> 0:39:17.950
<v Speaker 1>every county taxpayer gave to government and you still can't

0:39:17.989 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>balance your budget that that is like incompetence on steroids

0:39:23.250 --> 0:39:28.989
<v Speaker 1>That is like the East German swim team of incompetent

0:39:29.130 --> 0:39:33.700
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats who in david crowley's milwaukee county so affordability is

0:39:33.739 --> 0:39:36.819
<v Speaker 1>the one thing right what's the other health care right

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>health care health care we need to expand health care

0:39:41.140 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>would you believe that crowley is out saying i'm not

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.779
<v Speaker 1>going to let anyone slip through the cracks and not

0:39:48.860 --> 0:39:54.580
<v Speaker 1>get health insurance I will explain later this hour how ironic...

0:39:54.540 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That statement actually is. Plus, a Democrat congressional candidate who

0:39:59.180 --> 0:40:04.070
<v Speaker 1>has made access to affordable health care the central attack

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:08.390
<v Speaker 1>on the incumbent Republican that she's challenging. She's not even

0:40:08.469 --> 0:40:12.690
<v Speaker 1>providing any health coverage for any member of her campaign staff.

0:40:12.710 --> 0:40:17.330
<v Speaker 1>I actually dug through the finance reports. I dug through.

0:40:17.630 --> 0:40:24.489
<v Speaker 1>She finally, she finally released the required spending reports. Didn't

0:40:24.510 --> 0:40:28.549
<v Speaker 1>spend a single cent on health care. That's coming up

0:40:28.670 --> 0:40:31.089
<v Speaker 1>in the 4 o'clock hour here on the Dan O'Donnell Show.

0:40:31.130 --> 0:40:36.190
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to it. 414-799-1130 on our Carpetland USA Flooring

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:41.629
<v Speaker 1>Center talk and text line. Email, always, dod.iheartmedia.com. If you

0:40:41.670 --> 0:40:43.930
<v Speaker 1>have got a tip, if you have got something you

0:40:43.969 --> 0:40:46.629
<v Speaker 1>want me to investigate, best way to get in touch

0:40:46.670 --> 0:40:51.969
<v Speaker 1>with me, dod.iheartmedia.com. I promise I read every email. Don't

0:40:52.010 --> 0:40:54.250
<v Speaker 1>always have time to respond to everyone because there is

0:40:54.410 --> 0:40:57.910
<v Speaker 1>so much spam that I have to sift through, but

0:40:57.989 --> 0:41:01.580
<v Speaker 1>I will read every single email. That is my promise

0:41:01.820 --> 0:41:04.790
<v Speaker 1>to you. I used to say when I first started

0:41:04.850 --> 0:41:07.290
<v Speaker 1>out that I would respond every, and I did, I

0:41:07.570 --> 0:41:10.109
<v Speaker 1>responded to every single email. That was a valid email

0:41:10.150 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>from a listener. Now there's just way too many. And yes,

0:41:13.460 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a humble brag. That is a backhanded way

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of me telling you just how popular I am. I'm

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:21.860
<v Speaker 1>saying like, I can't, a lot of people react to

0:41:21.900 --> 0:41:24.940
<v Speaker 1>the show live, you know, as, as it's going on,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.339
<v Speaker 1>they'll email. I can't always get back. But if you've

0:41:27.380 --> 0:41:29.930
<v Speaker 1>got a tip, if you've got something, I will almost

0:41:30.130 --> 0:41:32.490
<v Speaker 1>always get back to you to see if it's something

0:41:32.530 --> 0:41:34.700
<v Speaker 1>worth following up on. You can also follow the show

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at Dan O'Donnell show on X Facebook, Instagram. And if

0:41:38.500 --> 0:41:42.029
<v Speaker 1>you miss a single second, you definitely want to download

0:41:42.070 --> 0:41:45.009
<v Speaker 1>and listen every day to the Dan O'Donnell show podcast.

0:41:45.570 --> 0:41:50.870
<v Speaker 1>on iHeartRadio or wherever you listen to podcasts. Daily Trump Daytime.

0:41:50.910 --> 0:41:55.710
<v Speaker 1>President Trump welcoming travel executives from across the country to

0:41:55.750 --> 0:41:59.989
<v Speaker 1>the Oval Office today to talk about another successful summer

0:42:00.090 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 1>travel season.

0:42:00.739 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 3>In the last three months, travelers logged 290 billion miles

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 3>on American highways. Our national parks welcomed 78 million visitors,

0:42:10.820 --> 0:42:14.460
<v Speaker 3>all records. And on 11 separate days, more than 3

0:42:14.460 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 3>million travelers flew through the American flies. American skies were

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.219
<v Speaker 3>loaded up with planes and loaded up with a lot

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:24.980
<v Speaker 3>of happy people.

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear that? Eleven different days this summer, we

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:32.189
<v Speaker 1>set records for the number of people flying the friendly sky.

0:42:32.550 --> 0:42:36.210
<v Speaker 1>Big reason for that, of course, the World Cup, which

0:42:36.310 --> 0:42:40.980
<v Speaker 1>started in mid-June, ended on July 19th as Spain defeated

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.420
<v Speaker 1>Argentina to hoist the cup. Many people are saying, to

0:42:45.500 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 1>borrow a popular Trump phrase, but it is absolutely correct.

0:42:48.500 --> 0:42:52.180
<v Speaker 1>Many people. In fact, the consensus is this summer's World

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.950
<v Speaker 1>Cup in the United States was the most successful, was

0:42:55.010 --> 0:42:59.090
<v Speaker 1>the best run, was the most fun in the history

0:42:59.130 --> 0:42:59.710
<v Speaker 1>of this tournament.

0:42:59.750 --> 0:43:02.910
<v Speaker 3>In June, America welcomed visitors from all over the globe

0:43:03.390 --> 0:43:07.969
<v Speaker 3>for the 2026 Fever World Cup. And Andrew Giuliani did

0:43:08.050 --> 0:43:12.810
<v Speaker 3>a fantastic job. Andrew's with us also. Thank you. match

0:43:12.989 --> 0:43:17.490
<v Speaker 3>day spending at local restaurants rose 80% and across 11

0:43:17.489 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 3>host cities the tournament added more than $ 18 billion to

0:43:21.620 --> 0:43:26.219
<v Speaker 3>our economy and supported more than 160,000 jobs and there

0:43:26.260 --> 0:43:31.420
<v Speaker 3>literally wasn't a riot or a fight or any problem

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.730
<v Speaker 3>at all it was amazing from the standpoint of law

0:43:34.750 --> 0:43:38.970
<v Speaker 3>enforcement what law enforcement did working along with the National

0:43:39.010 --> 0:43:42.630
<v Speaker 3>Guard in certain cases and others we had a A

0:43:42.670 --> 0:43:48.290
<v Speaker 3>summer of real freedom and great entertainment and great soccer.

0:43:48.870 --> 0:43:51.529
<v Speaker 1>And do you know how great it was? FIFA is

0:43:51.770 --> 0:43:55.430
<v Speaker 1>already talking about the United States hosting the Cup again

0:43:56.090 --> 0:44:01.340
<v Speaker 1>in 2038. 2030, it is, weirdly enough, going to Spain.

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>The defending champions are going to host. I believe it's

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Spain and Portugal submitted a joint bid. And then it's

0:44:07.219 --> 0:44:11.569
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Saudi Arabia. The rumor is that

0:44:11.630 --> 0:44:15.770
<v Speaker 1>the Cup is going to expand to 64 teams. So

0:44:15.810 --> 0:44:20.100
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be like the NCAA tournament. And that's

0:44:20.140 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in 2034. Saudi Arabia is building a

0:44:25.380 --> 0:44:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stadium on top of a skyscraper, on top of like

0:44:30.300 --> 0:44:34.870
<v Speaker 1>a 100-story skyscraper. There's going to be a soccer stadium.

0:44:34.910 --> 0:44:37.049
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be the centerpiece. That's going to be

0:44:37.090 --> 0:44:39.790
<v Speaker 1>where the final, the opening match, the opening ceremony are

0:44:39.810 --> 0:44:43.859
<v Speaker 1>going to be. They're concerned, however, that they're not going

0:44:43.900 --> 0:44:47.940
<v Speaker 1>to be finished with that stadium in time. Obviously, these

0:44:47.980 --> 0:44:49.980
<v Speaker 1>things take a long time to build, that they're just

0:44:50.020 --> 0:44:52.830
<v Speaker 1>not going to have the infrastructure ready. The rumor in

0:44:52.870 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the international football community, is that the United States is

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be awarded the 2038 World Cup, which is

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:06.540
<v Speaker 1>basically right now seen as a foregone conclusion given the

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>success of this year's tournament. But then the U.S. would

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.990
<v Speaker 1>immediately trade years with Saudi Arabia. It is entirely possible

0:45:16.489 --> 0:45:19.689
<v Speaker 1>the World Cup is back on American soil in eight years,

0:45:19.850 --> 0:45:23.620
<v Speaker 1>in 2034. I'm not putting a ton of stock in

0:45:23.660 --> 0:45:25.569
<v Speaker 1>this rumor, but it does make a whole lot of sense.

0:45:25.590 --> 0:45:29.630
<v Speaker 1>In fact, almost certainly the thinking is that FIFA is

0:45:29.670 --> 0:45:32.870
<v Speaker 1>going to award the next World Cup to the U.S. Remember,

0:45:32.890 --> 0:45:37.310
<v Speaker 1>the U.S. went 32 years without hosting a World Cup,

0:45:38.070 --> 0:45:41.170
<v Speaker 1>and now they're going to have two certainly within 15 years,

0:45:41.410 --> 0:45:46.450
<v Speaker 1>and because other nations, again, I know it's great. You

0:45:46.489 --> 0:45:48.610
<v Speaker 1>want to host an Olympics. You want to host a

0:45:48.630 --> 0:45:51.460
<v Speaker 1>World Cup. You want to host these big, incredible events

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:56.660
<v Speaker 1>and welcome the entire world. Nations bankrupt themselves because they

0:45:56.700 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>build stadiums for the Olympics. They build venues that are

0:46:01.020 --> 0:46:03.900
<v Speaker 1>never used again. I can remember when I was a

0:46:04.020 --> 0:46:09.590
<v Speaker 1>kid going to the Montreal Natatorium, the big swimming arena.

0:46:09.660 --> 0:46:12.830
<v Speaker 1>It was totally empty. They opened it up for kids

0:46:12.930 --> 0:46:17.430
<v Speaker 1>to swim. What was that? The 76 Olympics were in Montreal.

0:46:18.090 --> 0:46:21.570
<v Speaker 1>I think I was probably there in 93, 94. My

0:46:22.630 --> 0:46:24.860
<v Speaker 1>dad used to do business in Montreal, so we'd come up.

0:46:24.890 --> 0:46:28.620
<v Speaker 1>It would be like a Business trip. I love Montreal.

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.060
<v Speaker 1>If you ever get a chance, it is like a

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>European city very close to home. I cannot say enough.

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I know we're supposed to hate Canada right now, but

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>God help me. Vancouver is a beautiful city. I've only

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:46.130
<v Speaker 1>been there once. Love Montreal. Love Toronto. Toronto is always

0:46:46.150 --> 0:46:49.129
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun to go to. And I love

0:46:49.170 --> 0:46:52.090
<v Speaker 1>the Canadians. We all love them. It's impossible to hate

0:46:52.670 --> 0:46:56.690
<v Speaker 1>Canadian people. So why is it that the prime minister

0:46:56.850 --> 0:46:59.990
<v Speaker 1>is just a tool? Why is he such a jerk?

0:47:00.690 --> 0:47:04.410
<v Speaker 1>He said, hey, U.S. Prime Minister Mark Carney yesterday, stop

0:47:04.469 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>throwing shade, y'all. So President Trump today shot some shade

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:12.580
<v Speaker 1>right back at him.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.299
<v Speaker 3>Canada has been ripping off the United States for many,

0:47:15.340 --> 0:47:20.410
<v Speaker 3>many years, for decades, many decades. We lost anywhere from

0:47:20.410 --> 0:47:24.490
<v Speaker 3>60 to 100 billion dollars with Canada. We traditionally lose

0:47:24.530 --> 0:47:30.350
<v Speaker 3>that for the last 15 years. It's a very unfair deal.

0:47:30.370 --> 0:47:33.490
<v Speaker 3>They charge tremendous tariffs to our farmers. They take advantage

0:47:33.530 --> 0:47:36.529
<v Speaker 3>of our farmers. They take advantage of our tourists. They

0:47:36.570 --> 0:47:40.670
<v Speaker 3>take advantage of airlines, something that nobody brought up. I'll

0:47:40.690 --> 0:47:42.830
<v Speaker 3>bring it up right now. They think it's so sensitive,

0:47:42.850 --> 0:47:45.610
<v Speaker 3>but I don't find it sensitive. Canada has all of

0:47:45.690 --> 0:47:48.350
<v Speaker 3>its major banks here, and we're their biggest source of income,

0:47:48.390 --> 0:47:51.660
<v Speaker 3>far bigger than they are in Canada. They basically don't

0:47:51.820 --> 0:47:55.810
<v Speaker 3>allow banks of America to be in Canada. That's sort

0:47:55.850 --> 0:47:58.110
<v Speaker 3>of emblematic of the way they treat us. Think of it.

0:47:58.510 --> 0:48:02.009
<v Speaker 3>So they have their banks here. Bank of Canada, all

0:48:02.030 --> 0:48:05.190
<v Speaker 3>of their big banks, big, beautiful banks. I think they

0:48:05.210 --> 0:48:08.049
<v Speaker 3>have six or seven major banks here. We don't have

0:48:08.110 --> 0:48:08.750
<v Speaker 3>our banks there.

0:48:08.790 --> 0:48:09.190
<v Speaker 1>You know why?

0:48:09.210 --> 0:48:09.980
<v Speaker 3>They don't allow it.

0:48:10.370 --> 0:48:12.770
<v Speaker 1>You know why? Because our banks would put their banks

0:48:12.870 --> 0:48:16.030
<v Speaker 1>out of business because ours are much better. And this

0:48:16.050 --> 0:48:21.700
<v Speaker 1>has been President Trump's stance on basically his entire business

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:27.299
<v Speaker 1>posture towards the international community is what are you so

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:32.020
<v Speaker 1>afraid of if you have the very best, let's say Canada,

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the very best maple syrup in the world, right?

0:48:36.020 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody would dispute that. What is the harm of an American?

0:48:39.980 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 1>What is the harm of letting Aunt Jemima come in

0:48:44.510 --> 0:48:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And sell her. I'm sure they have Aunt Jemima in Canada.

0:48:47.340 --> 0:48:50.060
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm doing a thing here. Why are you

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>so racist against Aunt Jemima Canada? What Trump is saying is,

0:48:55.219 --> 0:48:58.140
<v Speaker 1>why are we making it all but impossible for American

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>products and American services, American businesses to compete on a

0:49:02.100 --> 0:49:06.230
<v Speaker 1>level playing field? This protectionist racket. that the rest of

0:49:06.290 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the world has engaged in specifically to limit the economic

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>might of the United States. You're doing a hell of

0:49:14.260 --> 0:49:19.890
<v Speaker 1>a job, fellas, because our GDP still dwarfs pretty much everybody.

0:49:20.070 --> 0:49:25.580
<v Speaker 1>China included and if we actually had truly fair trade

0:49:25.620 --> 0:49:29.260
<v Speaker 1>agreements with the rest of the world our our economic

0:49:29.340 --> 0:49:32.460
<v Speaker 1>power would increase exponentially so what President Trump is trying

0:49:32.500 --> 0:49:35.180
<v Speaker 1>to do is to get us to a position where

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the American product where the American business person can compete

0:49:41.820 --> 0:49:48.419
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, in Mexico, in France, across the globe and say, okay, yes, great. Hey,

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.940
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to tariff. We want the American people

0:49:53.340 --> 0:49:58.250
<v Speaker 1>to have access to the very best French product. Pause

0:49:58.290 --> 0:50:02.730
<v Speaker 1>for laughter here. I assume the French actually make something worthwhile.

0:50:04.230 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not deodorant. Okay, I couldn't, I could not resist.

0:50:08.780 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That is a joke. I know I have got a

0:50:11.140 --> 0:50:16.529
<v Speaker 1>lot of French Americans. The old joke about the smelly French,

0:50:16.590 --> 0:50:18.489
<v Speaker 1>was that like the stereotype back in the day? I

0:50:18.610 --> 0:50:22.250
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was like Pepe Le Pew, right? They

0:50:22.290 --> 0:50:26.430
<v Speaker 1>made a freaking cartoon skunk French because the joke was

0:50:26.510 --> 0:50:30.930
<v Speaker 1>the French smelled. Well, Andy's a romantic, but he's also

0:50:30.969 --> 0:50:35.469
<v Speaker 1>a skunk, right? They could have very easily done, I

0:50:35.469 --> 0:50:39.810
<v Speaker 1>don't know, a Chinese skunk you know, but they did

0:50:39.830 --> 0:50:43.170
<v Speaker 1>a French skunk. I don't even know where that stereotype

0:50:43.210 --> 0:50:45.630
<v Speaker 1>came from that the French don't wear deodorant. It was

0:50:45.650 --> 0:50:49.590
<v Speaker 1>just like ingrained in our minds as kids watching Looney Tunes.

0:50:50.870 --> 0:50:53.250
<v Speaker 1>They don't, I see, I was in France a couple

0:50:53.270 --> 0:50:57.549
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, never noticed, did not, I, I was

0:50:57.570 --> 0:51:00.069
<v Speaker 1>there in the middle of August too. I honestly, now

0:51:00.210 --> 0:51:05.060
<v Speaker 1>then again, There are very few native French people who

0:51:05.100 --> 0:51:07.830
<v Speaker 1>still live in Paris. I mean, but I'll tell you,

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:13.569
<v Speaker 1>the Moroccans and Algerians who now call France home, they

0:51:13.650 --> 0:51:17.910
<v Speaker 1>smelled very nice. President Trump, of course, taking a ton

0:51:17.930 --> 0:51:21.569
<v Speaker 1>of questions today on Iran. The most pointed one from

0:51:21.890 --> 0:51:23.250
<v Speaker 1>Peter Doocy of Fox News.

0:51:23.270 --> 0:51:26.310
<v Speaker 5>He posted today on Truth Social, when are the Iranian

0:51:26.430 --> 0:51:30.169
<v Speaker 5>people going to rise up and fight? Well, if that's

0:51:30.210 --> 0:51:33.419
<v Speaker 5>what you want. Will you send the CIA in to

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 5>arm Iranians?

0:51:34.700 --> 0:51:36.299
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wouldn't want to say that to you, Peter.

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:38.140
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to tell you that, but it wouldn't be

0:51:38.180 --> 0:51:41.970
<v Speaker 3>appropriate to say. But I mean, I understand their plight,

0:51:42.410 --> 0:51:45.589
<v Speaker 3>their being shot. Right now, you know, these gentlemen sit

0:51:45.630 --> 0:51:47.870
<v Speaker 3>here in the lap of luxury and they see things,

0:51:47.930 --> 0:51:52.010
<v Speaker 3>but over there it's not so luxurious. As of three

0:51:52.050 --> 0:51:55.340
<v Speaker 3>months ago, they had 52,000 protesters were killed. Can you

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.410
<v Speaker 3>imagine this, fellas? And now I hear the numbers, probably 20,

0:51:58.390 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 3>25,000 more. They have close to 65,000 protesters killed. So

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 3>when I ask that question, I ask it sort of

0:52:08.940 --> 0:52:12.140
<v Speaker 3>knowing the answer. The only answer is that they're being shot.

0:52:13.380 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 3>The regime is getting weaker and weaker by the day.

0:52:15.700 --> 0:52:18.140
<v Speaker 3>And at some point, they're not going to be able

0:52:18.180 --> 0:52:21.379
<v Speaker 3>to shoot so easily because I think the people aren't

0:52:21.420 --> 0:52:24.700
<v Speaker 3>going to take it. But I did pose that question

0:52:24.739 --> 0:52:29.069
<v Speaker 3>because You know, it would be time, but unlike most,

0:52:29.140 --> 0:52:31.740
<v Speaker 3>most people can't kill their people like that. Most people

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 3>try and reason, they talk, and then there might be

0:52:34.300 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 3>an overthrow. In Iran, they kill the people. When they

0:52:37.580 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 3>get out to protest, they kill them. They shoot them

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:40.299
<v Speaker 3>right between the eyes.

0:52:42.290 --> 0:52:45.529
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, President Trump got a little bit more descriptive of

0:52:45.770 --> 0:52:49.630
<v Speaker 1>how Iran kills protesters. Two methods, the machine gun and

0:52:49.670 --> 0:52:51.649
<v Speaker 1>the sniper. I'm not going to get into that because

0:52:51.670 --> 0:52:53.069
<v Speaker 1>I know I've got a lot of kids in the car.

0:52:53.250 --> 0:52:55.270
<v Speaker 1>Not MPS kids because they didn't have to go to

0:52:55.310 --> 0:52:57.109
<v Speaker 1>school today because it was too hot and they don't

0:52:57.130 --> 0:52:59.469
<v Speaker 1>have air conditioning. But of course, the MPS bureaucrats do.

0:52:59.870 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going to like soccer practice or something,

0:53:01.780 --> 0:53:03.569
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into all of that. But

0:53:03.910 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands, we actually have no idea how many

0:53:08.100 --> 0:53:16.130
<v Speaker 1>protesters were killed. It could be 5,000, 10,000, 50,000. We

0:53:16.170 --> 0:53:19.390
<v Speaker 1>just have no idea. And those were the people I

0:53:19.489 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>think the US government expected to overthrow the regime following

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the decapitation, the bombing that killed the Ayatollah and most

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of his top command support staff on February 28th. I

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.950
<v Speaker 1>think one of the big reasons that we're still dragging

0:53:36.350 --> 0:53:39.590
<v Speaker 1>on with this is there hasn't been a protest movement

0:53:40.050 --> 0:53:44.710
<v Speaker 1>that the remains of the Ayatollah's regime, whoever is still alive,

0:53:44.770 --> 0:53:48.370
<v Speaker 1>we honestly don't really know because we need to negotiate

0:53:48.410 --> 0:53:53.100
<v Speaker 1>through third-party negotiators because the Iranians will not let us

0:53:53.140 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 1>know who's in charge because, well, Trump would be very

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to kill them if they don't comply with the

0:53:59.940 --> 0:54:03.910
<v Speaker 1>terms of the deals that they originally initially agreeing to

0:54:03.950 --> 0:54:06.150
<v Speaker 1>and then, of course, backing out. Now, it was apparently

0:54:06.190 --> 0:54:10.310
<v Speaker 1>a very, very good day through the Strait of Hormuz

0:54:10.350 --> 0:54:15.020
<v Speaker 1>with respect to oil exports and getting commerce flowing through

0:54:15.060 --> 0:54:19.969
<v Speaker 1>that region. Energy Secretary Chris Wright this morning.

0:54:19.989 --> 0:54:24.390
<v Speaker 4>So Monday was our record ever since the conflict began.

0:54:24.430 --> 0:54:28.300
<v Speaker 4>Over 17 million barrels of oil flowed through the Strait

0:54:28.340 --> 0:54:29.360
<v Speaker 4>of Hormuz.

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:30.720
<v Speaker 1>On ships on Monday.

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:35.259
<v Speaker 4>If you add the bypass export pipelines, more than left

0:54:35.300 --> 0:54:39.020
<v Speaker 4>the region in the pre-conflict. So is Iran trying to

0:54:39.060 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 4>challenge that?

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:39.940
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:54:40.100 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Are there challenges? Yes.

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.720
<v Speaker 4>But this is the United States Navy and President Trump

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 4>taking the one card out of Iran's hands.

0:54:47.900 --> 0:54:50.340
<v Speaker 1>Which is to try to hold the world economic hostage.

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:52.610
<v Speaker 1>That's what they've got. They're all in on it.

0:54:52.780 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 4>They're causing some disruption, but they are losing that card.

0:54:57.350 --> 0:55:01.390
<v Speaker 1>That, ladies and gentlemen, is your Daily Trump Date. Coming

0:55:01.610 --> 0:55:05.930
<v Speaker 1>up in just three minutes, quite possibly the biggest health

0:55:06.050 --> 0:55:12.250
<v Speaker 1>care hypocrite in Wisconsin. It's an exclusive to... Welcome back

0:55:12.650 --> 0:55:18.569
<v Speaker 1>to it. Now, an exclusive story we first broke at

0:55:18.650 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the Heartland Post. This is the big media company that

0:55:25.620 --> 0:55:29.860
<v Speaker 1>we started about, I would say, three, four months ago.

0:55:29.940 --> 0:55:33.029
<v Speaker 1>We timed it with the start of the spring election,

0:55:33.870 --> 0:55:37.690
<v Speaker 1>and it is what we're calling And I think with

0:55:37.870 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>good reason, backed up by the available data, the single

0:55:41.300 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest conservative news and analysis site, and I believe the

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:49.219
<v Speaker 1>biggest political site in the state of Wisconsin, one of

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:56.820
<v Speaker 1>the biggest in the Midwest, heartlandpost.com. An exclusive story, Rebecca Cook,

0:55:57.100 --> 0:56:01.739
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat candidate in the third congressional district challenging Republican

0:56:01.890 --> 0:56:06.250
<v Speaker 1>Derek Van Orden for the second time, has spent years

0:56:06.750 --> 0:56:11.089
<v Speaker 1>telling voters that health care is too expensive. Health care

0:56:11.150 --> 0:56:17.370
<v Speaker 1>coverage must be dramatically expanded. She even racked up a

0:56:17.530 --> 0:56:23.590
<v Speaker 1>very powerful endorsement. from Bernie Sanders, the lead advocate for

0:56:23.780 --> 0:56:29.509
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for All. But I searched her federal campaign finance

0:56:29.750 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 1>records and showed that her campaign has not paid for

0:56:36.420 --> 0:56:41.359
<v Speaker 1>health insurance or even a health care stipend for her

0:56:41.460 --> 0:56:47.830
<v Speaker 1>campaign staff. this woman's campaign has taken in millions of dollars,

0:56:48.469 --> 0:56:53.690
<v Speaker 1>but according to her filing with the Federal Election Commission, which, remember,

0:56:54.210 --> 0:56:59.050
<v Speaker 1>was delayed until after the primary on August 11th, lists

0:56:59.489 --> 0:57:04.130
<v Speaker 1>a number of staff salaries, but not a single disbursement

0:57:04.530 --> 0:57:09.450
<v Speaker 1>for health insurance or a health care stipend. I went

0:57:09.550 --> 0:57:14.820
<v Speaker 1>back and looked at FEC records of her previous filings,

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:22.660
<v Speaker 1>she stopped paying for workers' compensation insurance last October. Even

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:27.940
<v Speaker 1>as she was raising millions of dollars promising to expand

0:57:28.100 --> 0:57:33.169
<v Speaker 1>health care, she is not providing health care for her

0:57:33.470 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>own workers. Now, I am very strongly of the opinion

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is one of the main reasons that Cook

0:57:44.300 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>did not want her finance reports released until after this primary,

0:57:48.940 --> 0:57:53.390
<v Speaker 1>because she had an opponent, Emily Berge, who was running on.

0:57:53.950 --> 0:57:57.290
<v Speaker 1>expanding Medicare for all. She wanted universal health care. Cook,

0:57:57.490 --> 0:58:01.470
<v Speaker 1>of course, understands that if you say, hey, we want

0:58:01.510 --> 0:58:05.810
<v Speaker 1>the Affordable Care Act, but to cover everybody because that's

0:58:05.830 --> 0:58:10.050
<v Speaker 1>been going so swimmingly well over the last 15 years.

0:58:10.670 --> 0:58:14.470
<v Speaker 1>It is remarkable. To me, that Democrats can destroy the

0:58:14.570 --> 0:58:17.940
<v Speaker 1>health care system in this country and then say, well,

0:58:18.100 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem is we didn't go far enough. Give government

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:26.240
<v Speaker 1>more control of health insurance. Put government in charge of

0:58:26.420 --> 0:58:28.620
<v Speaker 1>all of it. And prices, of course, will go down.

0:58:28.980 --> 0:58:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Care will, of course, get better. If you like your doctor,

0:58:32.940 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you can keep your doctor. If you like your plan,

0:58:35.530 --> 0:58:38.189
<v Speaker 1>you can keep your plan. It's just as true now

0:58:38.270 --> 0:58:43.010
<v Speaker 1>as it was when Barack Obama said it. Again, pause

0:58:43.430 --> 0:58:50.300
<v Speaker 1>for laughter. In one of their final primary debates, Cook said,

0:58:50.820 --> 0:58:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if I'm elected and Democrats win a majority in the House,

0:58:54.880 --> 0:59:00.180
<v Speaker 1>hopefully with me, they're going to have to prioritize health care.

0:59:00.220 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeful that we.

0:59:00.950 --> 0:59:04.300
<v Speaker 6>Win back the House majority this fall. And day one,

0:59:04.350 --> 0:59:07.950
<v Speaker 6>when Democrats win back the House and we have gavels, H.R.

0:59:07.950 --> 0:59:11.300
<v Speaker 6>1 has got to be focused on health care. One

0:59:11.340 --> 0:59:12.940
<v Speaker 6>of the first things that we need to do, which

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.350
<v Speaker 6>is what Democrats tried to do this last fall, was

0:59:15.430 --> 0:59:18.570
<v Speaker 6>expand the ACA tax credit premiums for three more years.

0:59:18.870 --> 0:59:22.610
<v Speaker 1>OK, here we go. We're expanding access to care. There

0:59:22.650 --> 0:59:26.900
<v Speaker 1>we go. becky cook yeah yeah more people need access

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to get more tax credits yes yes hr1 by the

0:59:29.780 --> 0:59:32.340
<v Speaker 1>way she's talking about a budget reconciliation bill so she

0:59:32.380 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>can do this democrats can do this without any fear

0:59:36.220 --> 0:59:41.820
<v Speaker 1>of uh uh senate filibuster but of course if democrats

0:59:41.840 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 1>take control of the senate they're going to get rid

0:59:43.460 --> 0:59:48.140
<v Speaker 1>of the filibuster immediately trust me immediately now the the

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.020
<v Speaker 1>the only caveat i'll give to that is they may

0:59:51.140 --> 0:59:54.430
<v Speaker 1>wait until there's a democrat president And they have the House,

0:59:54.510 --> 0:59:58.050
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and the presidency. And then Katie barred the

0:59:58.130 --> 1:00:02.670
<v Speaker 1>door because everything the socialists promised to do, pack the

1:00:02.710 --> 1:00:05.380
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, get rid of the filibuster, just add a

1:00:05.420 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of new states. Hell, we can even do

1:00:07.460 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>away with the Constitution. They're going to do it. Now,

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:15.740
<v Speaker 1>during that same debate, Rebecca Cook, who is not paying

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for health insurance for any of her employees on her

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>campaign staff, said, Yeah, I want to expand Medicare to

1:00:25.480 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cover vision and dental.

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.620
<v Speaker 6>Things that I believe in are expanding Medicare to cover vision, dental,

1:00:30.640 --> 1:00:33.530
<v Speaker 6>and hearing. The things that deteriorate as folks age. I

1:00:33.550 --> 1:00:36.690
<v Speaker 6>see a lot of seniors here in this crowd.

1:00:37.790 --> 1:00:39.130
<v Speaker 3>And you should be able to age with dignity.

1:00:40.050 --> 1:00:43.290
<v Speaker 1>You should. Just not if you happen to be working

1:00:43.350 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for Rebecca Cook's campaign, because... You don't get basic health insurance,

1:00:49.180 --> 1:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>let alone vision, hearing, and dental. So she wants taxpayers.

1:00:54.420 --> 1:00:59.860
<v Speaker 1>She wants you to pay for expanded coverage for everybody else.

1:01:00.570 --> 1:01:04.370
<v Speaker 1>When she can do this as an employer, as somebody

1:01:04.730 --> 1:01:11.030
<v Speaker 1>who has a business, the Rebecca Cook campaign that has employees,

1:01:12.010 --> 1:01:15.450
<v Speaker 1>campaign staffers, she doesn't do any of it.

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Any of it.

1:01:18.780 --> 1:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>She also says, yeah, by the way, I also want

1:01:21.240 --> 1:01:24.790
<v Speaker 1>a public option. We also totally need universal health care,

1:01:24.850 --> 1:01:26.870
<v Speaker 1>even though I can't say we need universal health care

1:01:26.910 --> 1:01:30.490
<v Speaker 1>because I'm trying desperately to pretend that I'm not actually

1:01:30.530 --> 1:01:30.990
<v Speaker 1>a socialist.

1:01:31.030 --> 1:01:33.950
<v Speaker 6>In addition to expanding Medicare, I want to make sure

1:01:33.990 --> 1:01:35.810
<v Speaker 6>that we have a public option so that people can

1:01:35.850 --> 1:01:37.870
<v Speaker 6>afford the health care that they need and deserve.

1:01:39.270 --> 1:01:39.510
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Public option, by the way, for those who forget the

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:48.830
<v Speaker 1>battles over Obamacare in 2010 and 2011, that would be

1:01:48.930 --> 1:01:54.830
<v Speaker 1>the government-backed insurance plan that competes on a quote-unquote level

1:01:54.890 --> 1:02:00.260
<v Speaker 1>playing field with private insurance companies. How quickly do you

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:02.939
<v Speaker 1>think the government is able to just kind of get

1:02:03.260 --> 1:02:07.110
<v Speaker 1>every other business out of whatever business It competes.

1:02:07.390 --> 1:02:07.590
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:02:07.610 --> 1:02:11.970
<v Speaker 1>So that was Rebecca Cook about a month or so

1:02:12.050 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ago in the debate that she had with Emily Berge. Now, Berge,

1:02:20.220 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>who didn't do too badly in this primary, even though

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Cook was clearly the establishment. Of course she is.

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:32.910
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she has been a high powered Democrat lobbyist

1:02:32.990 --> 1:02:37.340
<v Speaker 1>and campaign consultant forever. Did you know that she actually

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:42.270
<v Speaker 1>worked for the psychopath brewery owner, Kirk Bangstad, the Minocqua

1:02:42.310 --> 1:02:45.470
<v Speaker 1>Brewing Company guy when he was running his scam pack?

1:02:46.090 --> 1:02:49.050
<v Speaker 1>And did you know that Kirk Bangstad in one of

1:02:49.090 --> 1:02:52.380
<v Speaker 1>his unhinged rants on Facebook a couple of months ago

1:02:52.950 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>actually accused Rebecca Cook of stealing his fundraiser donor list? Boy,

1:02:59.700 --> 1:03:02.780
<v Speaker 1>would I love a copy of that list. to see

1:03:02.860 --> 1:03:07.310
<v Speaker 1>who is just nuts and dumb and rich enough to

1:03:07.410 --> 1:03:11.810
<v Speaker 1>give to Kirk Bangstad. Like, who cuts a check to Kirk?

1:03:12.090 --> 1:03:15.230
<v Speaker 1>You know what? The guy who is going to sell

1:03:15.330 --> 1:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>free beer when Trump dies and constantly posts himself saying

1:03:22.060 --> 1:03:25.820
<v Speaker 1>increasingly insane, I like the cut of his jib. I'm

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:29.260
<v Speaker 1>going to write him a check for five grand. I just,

1:03:29.660 --> 1:03:33.940
<v Speaker 1>I want to know. Who, besides Soros and the LinkedIn

1:03:34.100 --> 1:03:38.660
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein buddy, who have been funding the Democratic Party

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:42.860
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin forever, I want to know who's just that

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:47.979
<v Speaker 1>nuts to write a check to Kirk Bangstad. And who's

1:03:48.140 --> 1:03:51.540
<v Speaker 1>nuts enough to go to work for this idiot to

1:03:51.660 --> 1:03:58.570
<v Speaker 1>fundraise for him? Well, it's Rebecca Cook. Bergey. rather obviously

1:03:59.030 --> 1:04:02.850
<v Speaker 1>would have used the information that Rebecca Cook isn't paying

1:04:02.970 --> 1:04:07.650
<v Speaker 1>health insurance to her own campaign staff in the primary

1:04:07.830 --> 1:04:12.490
<v Speaker 1>against her. This is one of the major reasons, I believe,

1:04:12.990 --> 1:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that Cook filed a 90-day extension for her campaign finance

1:04:19.260 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>reports back in April, because she knew this information was

1:04:23.060 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get out. She knew it was only if

1:04:25.240 --> 1:04:30.230
<v Speaker 1>Dan O'Donnell can find it, Well, I may be giving

1:04:30.370 --> 1:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a left-wing Democrat from western Wisconsin too much credit in

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:37.380
<v Speaker 1>saying Emily Berge would have been able to find it,

1:04:38.460 --> 1:04:42.180
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think she might have, but I found it.

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:48.030
<v Speaker 1>And I think Rebecca Cook might actually be the single

1:04:48.110 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest hypocrite in this state. As one of our texters

1:04:52.180 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Carpetland USA Flooring Center Talk and Text Line

1:04:54.880 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>put it very hilariously, Democrats put the HIPAA in hypocrite.

1:05:02.420 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>That.

1:05:03.270 --> 1:05:07.470
<v Speaker 1>Dear listeners, is a fantastic lie. Who else is a

1:05:07.890 --> 1:05:11.750
<v Speaker 1>health care hypocrite? Who else is putting the HIPAA in hypocrite? Well,

1:05:12.050 --> 1:05:15.700
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats' gubernatorial nominee, of course, David Crowley. He doesn't

1:05:15.740 --> 1:05:19.540
<v Speaker 1>want anyone to fall through the cracks and not get

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:23.580
<v Speaker 1>health insurance, except, of course, for the thousands of Milwaukee

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>County employees who saw their coverage lapse because David Crowley

1:05:28.320 --> 1:05:33.780
<v Speaker 1>is an incompetent county executive that story next here on

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:37.980
<v Speaker 1>the dan o'donnell show member of the state assembly and

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:43.070
<v Speaker 1>a candidate for the state senate touts her success running

1:05:43.130 --> 1:05:47.430
<v Speaker 1>a small business a photography llc which she has had

1:05:47.470 --> 1:05:52.010
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen years over the past ten years it has

1:05:52.070 --> 1:05:59.270
<v Speaker 1>been repeatedly delinquent in paying required fees and filing annual reports,

1:05:59.650 --> 1:06:04.310
<v Speaker 1>so delinquent, in fact, that it was actually dissolved by

1:06:04.370 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the state of Wisconsin's Department of Financial Institutions. It's a

1:06:10.280 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>remarkable story, and you will hear it only here on

1:06:14.340 --> 1:06:17.250
<v Speaker 1>the Dan O'Donnell Show coming up at 5.06. Once again,

1:06:19.580 --> 1:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrats saying, trust us, we know how to run government.

1:06:25.740 --> 1:06:31.830
<v Speaker 1>Just look at how we run our businesses. Yes, we are. Terribly.

1:06:32.890 --> 1:06:35.730
<v Speaker 1>Francesco Hong immediately comes to mind. Yes, I'm a small

1:06:35.790 --> 1:06:39.630
<v Speaker 1>business owner. I was a restaurateur. Yeah, your ramen shop

1:06:40.190 --> 1:06:46.730
<v Speaker 1>failed pretty spectacularly. If you can't run a photography LLC.

1:06:48.370 --> 1:06:52.470
<v Speaker 1>You are not qualified and you are certainly not to

1:06:52.530 --> 1:06:57.130
<v Speaker 1>be trusted. If you can't be bothered to fill out

1:06:57.170 --> 1:07:00.910
<v Speaker 1>the required compliance forms with the state of Wisconsin and

1:07:00.990 --> 1:07:05.020
<v Speaker 1>pay the very minimal annual fee to keep your LLC current,

1:07:05.740 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>how can you possibly be trusted to read and pass

1:07:10.440 --> 1:07:14.340
<v Speaker 1>complex legislation as a member of the state Senate? You

1:07:14.380 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to want to miss this. It is an

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:19.910
<v Speaker 1>exclusive story. Coming up on the Dan O'Donnell Show at

1:07:19.950 --> 1:07:22.970
<v Speaker 1>about 5.06, when also we are going to give you

1:07:23.070 --> 1:07:25.010
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win a trip for two to Las

1:07:25.050 --> 1:07:28.500
<v Speaker 1>Vegas in our iHeartRadio Music Festival Fly Away Contest. You

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can also get a $ 1, 000 gift card, our biggest, biggest

1:07:34.620 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>prize of the entire year. Just a couple of days left.

1:07:38.020 --> 1:07:41.820
<v Speaker 1>The contest ends on Friday. I'm taking a wild guess, though.

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:47.460
<v Speaker 1>What would you say? Producer Eric, by September 15th, We'll

1:07:47.500 --> 1:07:51.220
<v Speaker 1>probably be in the Fall Fortune Cash Contest. Again, usually

1:07:51.260 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it starts mid-September, maybe late September. And we run that

1:07:54.890 --> 1:07:58.070
<v Speaker 1>one for like two months. That's until almost Thanksgiving. So

1:07:58.630 --> 1:08:03.490
<v Speaker 1>tons of chances to win $ 1, 000 trip to Vegas all

1:08:03.690 --> 1:08:11.310
<v Speaker 1>on the line coming up at 5.06. Democratic gubernatorial candidate

1:08:11.430 --> 1:08:15.980
<v Speaker 1>and Milwaukee County executive David Crowley put out one of

1:08:16.100 --> 1:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the least self-aware posts I have ever seen anyone post

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:24.900
<v Speaker 1>on X. It's a video clip of him talking to

1:08:24.939 --> 1:08:29.700
<v Speaker 1>a Madison TV station about how if he's elected governor,

1:08:30.260 --> 1:08:34.290
<v Speaker 1>no one will slip through the cracks of And fail

1:08:34.330 --> 1:08:35.870
<v Speaker 1>to have health care coverage.

1:08:35.890 --> 1:08:37.210
<v Speaker 7>We need to make sure that no one falls through

1:08:37.229 --> 1:08:38.330
<v Speaker 7>the cracks when it comes to health care.

1:08:38.970 --> 1:08:40.770
<v Speaker 8>And for me, it's really about how do we make

1:08:40.810 --> 1:08:43.870
<v Speaker 8>sure we can expand a badger care, have mobile crisis

1:08:43.970 --> 1:08:46.849
<v Speaker 8>units in many of our rural communities all across this state,

1:08:46.870 --> 1:08:49.810
<v Speaker 8>but continue to bridge the gap between getting that care

1:08:49.850 --> 1:08:52.510
<v Speaker 8>that they need and making sure people know what exactly

1:08:52.550 --> 1:08:53.229
<v Speaker 8>is in their community.

1:08:54.150 --> 1:08:58.150
<v Speaker 1>Wait a second. Wait a second. He wants to make

1:08:58.210 --> 1:09:02.010
<v Speaker 1>sure no one sucks. slips through the cracks. Did I

1:09:02.070 --> 1:09:02.970
<v Speaker 1>hear this correctly?

1:09:02.990 --> 1:09:04.309
<v Speaker 7>We need to make sure that no one falls through

1:09:04.330 --> 1:09:05.400
<v Speaker 7>the cracks when it comes to health care.

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:08.900
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I wanted to make sure that I heard that.

1:09:09.189 --> 1:09:13.189
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make sure that those words, those specific words,

1:09:13.630 --> 1:09:17.509
<v Speaker 1>came out of the mouth of David Crowley, the Milwaukee

1:09:17.530 --> 1:09:18.350
<v Speaker 1>County Executive.

1:09:18.370 --> 1:09:19.729
<v Speaker 7>We need to make sure that no one falls through

1:09:19.750 --> 1:09:20.849
<v Speaker 7>the cracks when it comes to health care.

1:09:21.350 --> 1:09:27.809
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good. How exactly do you explain the fact that

1:09:27.900 --> 1:09:33.790
<v Speaker 1>the contract with UnitedHealthcare that David Crowley's office itself has,

1:09:34.610 --> 1:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>David Crowley himself signs off on this. There's no passing

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:42.979
<v Speaker 1>the buck here. There is no, oh, well, it was

1:09:43.020 --> 1:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>someone else's responsibility. The contract lapsed with UnitedHealthcare for all

1:09:50.650 --> 1:09:53.970
<v Speaker 1>of the county's workers and all retirees who were still

1:09:54.189 --> 1:09:57.010
<v Speaker 1>on the county's health care plan. It expired at the

1:09:57.130 --> 1:10:03.570
<v Speaker 1>end of 2025. UnitedHealthcare had been sending email after email

1:10:03.790 --> 1:10:08.890
<v Speaker 1>after email saying, hey, guys, we need to re-up this contract.

1:10:08.970 --> 1:10:11.350
<v Speaker 1>It's going to lapse. Your coverage is going to lapse

1:10:12.210 --> 1:10:16.150
<v Speaker 1>in January if we don't do this. Our contract is done.

1:10:17.620 --> 1:10:21.710
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until late January that the Milwaukee County Board

1:10:22.150 --> 1:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>was even aware. Now, Crowley says, well, it's no big deal.

1:10:26.990 --> 1:10:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Nobody lost health care coverage. No harm, no foul. How

1:10:34.400 --> 1:10:39.550
<v Speaker 1>exactly do you let something like that happen? When you

1:10:39.650 --> 1:10:42.700
<v Speaker 1>are going to tout your experience providing health care and

1:10:43.200 --> 1:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as a competent executive, he leads the biggest county in Milwaukee.

1:10:48.380 --> 1:10:51.500
<v Speaker 1>He has made that a central focus of his campaign.

1:10:52.200 --> 1:10:55.830
<v Speaker 1>And because of that experience, because he has the executive experience,

1:10:56.590 --> 1:10:59.390
<v Speaker 1>he is the best candidate to lead Wisconsin. Take that

1:10:59.470 --> 1:11:07.630
<v Speaker 1>next step. Well, he's led Milwaukee pretty terribly. County supervisors

1:11:08.050 --> 1:11:14.610
<v Speaker 1>said that procurement rules for how exactly the contract negotiation

1:11:14.750 --> 1:11:20.750
<v Speaker 1>process went down were not followed. There was a top

1:11:20.850 --> 1:11:25.010
<v Speaker 1>county employee who was fired. He has claimed that he

1:11:25.189 --> 1:11:30.070
<v Speaker 1>is merely a scapegoat for the incompetence of the Crowley administration,

1:11:30.210 --> 1:11:35.580
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, there were ample opportunities for Crowley's office

1:11:35.600 --> 1:11:38.300
<v Speaker 1>to get involved and say, hey, we definitely need to

1:11:38.360 --> 1:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>re-up this contract, but never did. This was a $ 450

1:11:48.780 --> 1:11:52.500
<v Speaker 1>million deal. This equates to about $ 90 million a year,

1:11:52.500 --> 1:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>$ 450 million over, I think it was five years. That

1:11:55.420 --> 1:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>covers more than 5,100 employees, their spouses and children, dependents,

1:12:02.920 --> 1:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and retirees. The contract lapsed. So for a month, it

1:12:10.620 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was entirely possible that you would have had skyrocketing out

1:12:14.360 --> 1:12:19.300
<v Speaker 1>of network costs just by the good of United, just

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:24.189
<v Speaker 1>in case, just in case we are on this United Healthcare.

1:12:24.320 --> 1:12:27.950
<v Speaker 1>And remember, the CEO was actually murdered by a socialist

1:12:28.090 --> 1:12:31.330
<v Speaker 1>lib on the streets of New York, Brian Thompson. in

1:12:31.370 --> 1:12:35.269
<v Speaker 1>December of 2024 because of how evil and awful UnitedHealthcare is.

1:12:36.150 --> 1:12:40.590
<v Speaker 1>UnitedHealthcare could have said, we don't have a contract, so

1:12:40.850 --> 1:12:44.380
<v Speaker 1>all of your employees do not have health insurance with UnitedHealthcare.

1:12:45.340 --> 1:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It was only by virtue of the good and just

1:12:51.100 --> 1:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>business practices of UnitedHealthcare that coverage did not lapse. It

1:12:54.640 --> 1:13:01.179
<v Speaker 1>was not David Crowley. UnitedHealthcare saved David Crowley's ass. Because

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:03.340
<v Speaker 1>he didn't bother to tell the county board. He didn't

1:13:03.360 --> 1:13:08.150
<v Speaker 1>bother to tell anybody that for three, as long as

1:13:08.290 --> 1:13:11.929
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, and it goes well beyond that, for months,

1:13:12.910 --> 1:13:19.540
<v Speaker 1>UnitedHealthcare is sending notices, phone calls, begging people in Crowley's office, hey,

1:13:19.620 --> 1:13:21.740
<v Speaker 1>we need to re-up this contract. We need you guys

1:13:21.800 --> 1:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to re-up this contract. They didn't do it. 5,100 people

1:13:27.840 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>literally fell through the cracks in David Crowley's Milwaukee County.

1:13:31.700 --> 1:13:36.020
<v Speaker 1>The people that work for David Crowley, just like Rebecca Cook,

1:13:36.420 --> 1:13:39.939
<v Speaker 1>can't be bothered, even though she calls for Medicare for

1:13:39.960 --> 1:13:42.939
<v Speaker 1>All and expand, or excuse me, the public option. She

1:13:42.970 --> 1:13:49.010
<v Speaker 1>wants government-run health care in addition to expansions of government-backed

1:13:49.210 --> 1:13:52.770
<v Speaker 1>health care, Medicare for That should cover vision and dental

1:13:52.810 --> 1:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and all of this stuff. We need new ACA tax credits,

1:13:56.180 --> 1:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>expanded tax credits. We need that to go. She wants

1:13:59.300 --> 1:14:02.750
<v Speaker 1>all of it, provides no health insurance whatsoever for her

1:14:02.950 --> 1:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>own campaign staff. David Crowley said, yes, I am going

1:14:08.020 --> 1:14:09.660
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy to make sure that nobody falls

1:14:09.720 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>through the cracks on health insurance when 5,000 people that

1:14:14.960 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>David Crowley employs as Milwaukee County executive quite literally fell

1:14:20.150 --> 1:14:25.370
<v Speaker 1>through the cracks because of his own bureaucratic incompetence. Truer

1:14:25.470 --> 1:14:30.870
<v Speaker 1>words were never spoken than our texter who said Democrats

1:14:31.350 --> 1:14:36.830
<v Speaker 1>put the HIPAA in hypocrite. Welcome back to the Dan

1:14:36.910 --> 1:14:42.730
<v Speaker 1>O'Donnell Show, conservative thought, not just talk. Coming up next hour,

1:14:43.270 --> 1:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>another exclusive story about another Democrat just being a complete

1:14:50.580 --> 1:14:53.620
<v Speaker 1>and total hypocrite. You have got a member of the

1:14:53.660 --> 1:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Assembly who is currently running for state senate. She

1:14:58.240 --> 1:15:02.530
<v Speaker 1>runs a photography business. I actually had no idea how, uh,

1:15:04.580 --> 1:15:07.180
<v Speaker 1>what she did for a living outside of drawing a

1:15:07.240 --> 1:15:11.140
<v Speaker 1>government check. Uh, but apparently she has run a photography

1:15:11.360 --> 1:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>LLC and she has not run it well because it

1:15:16.100 --> 1:15:21.509
<v Speaker 1>has not been in compliance with the very minimal requirements

1:15:21.590 --> 1:15:24.370
<v Speaker 1>to keep an LLC active. I believe you have to

1:15:24.410 --> 1:15:29.470
<v Speaker 1>pay an annual fee and you know, I run an

1:15:29.670 --> 1:15:34.310
<v Speaker 1>LLC and, We have a business. It's called the Heartland Post.

1:15:34.330 --> 1:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>You should check it out, heartlandpost.com. Your one-stop shop for

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:44.820
<v Speaker 1>all things conservatism here in Wisconsin. We have got that

1:15:44.880 --> 1:15:49.269
<v Speaker 1>exclusive story about Rebecca Cook. not paying health insurance for

1:15:49.350 --> 1:15:52.730
<v Speaker 1>her employees on her campaign. And we have got the

1:15:52.890 --> 1:15:59.570
<v Speaker 1>exclusive story about, uh, Dem who shockingly isn't very good

1:15:59.770 --> 1:16:01.950
<v Speaker 1>in the private sector. Who would have guessed that's coming

1:16:01.990 --> 1:16:05.110
<v Speaker 1>up next year on the Dan O'Donnell show. Big show

1:16:05.210 --> 1:16:08.610
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, uh, this, this year.

1:16:08.870 --> 1:16:09.050
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:16:09.189 --> 1:16:11.190
<v Speaker 1>Big show. It's been, it's been a big show this year.

1:16:11.210 --> 1:16:14.070
<v Speaker 1>It has been a big, I'm sorry. I'm, I've got

1:16:14.490 --> 1:16:19.460
<v Speaker 1>half an eye on, uh, the Fox News monitor in

1:16:19.680 --> 1:16:25.970
<v Speaker 1>our studio as I was watching Tiger Woods barefoot doing

1:16:25.979 --> 1:16:31.930
<v Speaker 1>the sobriety test after his DUI arrest. He pleaded guilty today.

1:16:32.150 --> 1:16:33.930
<v Speaker 1>He reached a plea agreement. I'm not sure if there

1:16:33.950 --> 1:16:36.090
<v Speaker 1>was actually a guilty plea or a no contest, but

1:16:36.130 --> 1:16:38.610
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there was anybody in the world who

1:16:38.670 --> 1:16:41.450
<v Speaker 1>thought that Tiger was going to take this to trial.

1:16:42.570 --> 1:16:46.430
<v Speaker 1>He went to rehab out of the country, apparently. He

1:16:46.470 --> 1:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>has been horribly addicted to painkillers for years and years

1:16:50.820 --> 1:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and years. And frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if in

1:16:56.920 --> 1:17:00.780
<v Speaker 1>the previous car crash, you might remember a couple of

1:17:00.840 --> 1:17:05.370
<v Speaker 1>months ago, this was spring, maybe early spring, he flipped

1:17:05.410 --> 1:17:08.370
<v Speaker 1>his car over in a residential neighborhood. Well, a couple

1:17:08.390 --> 1:17:10.429
<v Speaker 1>of years ago when he got in a bad crash

1:17:10.870 --> 1:17:14.450
<v Speaker 1>that nearly resulted in the amputation of his leg, believe

1:17:14.490 --> 1:17:18.090
<v Speaker 1>it or not, in California. When he sped away at

1:17:18.130 --> 1:17:20.030
<v Speaker 1>a high rate of speed because he needed to film

1:17:20.070 --> 1:17:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a commercial or something like that, he was going down

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:26.700
<v Speaker 1>a winding road and the car just flipped over and

1:17:26.840 --> 1:17:31.100
<v Speaker 1>he was badly hurt. I don't think he's come back

1:17:31.160 --> 1:17:35.940
<v Speaker 1>to competitive golf since that last car crash. I'm actually

1:17:36.020 --> 1:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>surprised that he wasn't tested for prescription painkillers. Maybe he was.

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:45.700
<v Speaker 1>You never know. Because it would not shock me if

1:17:45.740 --> 1:17:50.090
<v Speaker 1>he was under the influence of painkillers. Just knowing the

1:17:51.110 --> 1:17:57.330
<v Speaker 1>ravages that prescription drug addiction can have. I've known a

1:17:57.610 --> 1:18:02.770
<v Speaker 1>number of people who were addicted. Fortunately, almost miraculously, were

1:18:02.790 --> 1:18:04.549
<v Speaker 1>able to get clean. They went to rehab.

1:18:04.710 --> 1:18:05.429
<v Speaker 3>It stuck.

1:18:06.950 --> 1:18:11.790
<v Speaker 1>And thank heavens because that is just a terrible, terrible,

1:18:11.890 --> 1:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>terrible addiction. to try to shake. So, sorry, I was

1:18:16.260 --> 1:18:21.010
<v Speaker 1>a little distracted. It has been a great big show. Today,

1:18:21.790 --> 1:18:25.970
<v Speaker 1>the Wednesday Dan O'Donnell Show, we broke the story. Rebecca Cook,

1:18:26.570 --> 1:18:31.340
<v Speaker 1>Democrat congressional candidate, and she is the great white hope.

1:18:32.160 --> 1:18:33.940
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should call her the great red hope.

1:18:34.660 --> 1:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>She's a redhead, and she's taking on Derek Van Orden.

1:18:38.080 --> 1:18:43.410
<v Speaker 1>They desperately want to take out our friend D.V.O., in

1:18:43.450 --> 1:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this third congressional district. In fact, a lot of Democrats

1:18:47.560 --> 1:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>think that this is going to be the key bellwether

1:18:50.729 --> 1:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in the entire country of whether Democrats are going to

1:18:54.160 --> 1:18:57.260
<v Speaker 1>be able to take over control of the Congress. What

1:18:57.380 --> 1:18:59.759
<v Speaker 1>if I were to tell you there is a truly

1:18:59.979 --> 1:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>shocking poll out today from Harvard University showing that it's

1:19:06.260 --> 1:19:11.860
<v Speaker 1>not Democrats but Republicans leading the generic ballot. Now, it's

1:19:11.880 --> 1:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>very likely this is an outlier, but there is some

1:19:15.900 --> 1:19:20.090
<v Speaker 1>data that is trending the right way for Republicans that

1:19:20.510 --> 1:19:25.260
<v Speaker 1>may not portend a huge surprise that Republicans keep control

1:19:25.300 --> 1:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the House and You know, they actually do very,

1:19:28.600 --> 1:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very well this year. But there are some signs that

1:19:34.500 --> 1:19:37.549
<v Speaker 1>Republicans aren't going to do as bad as might be

1:19:37.700 --> 1:19:41.510
<v Speaker 1>expected in a Trump midterm. We will get to that

1:19:41.550 --> 1:19:43.470
<v Speaker 1>later this hour here on the Dan O'Donnell Show. But

1:19:43.510 --> 1:19:48.430
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Cook, she's been calling for expanded access to Medicare.

1:19:48.470 --> 1:19:51.189
<v Speaker 1>She wants more health insurance. She wants you to pay

1:19:51.229 --> 1:19:53.229
<v Speaker 1>for it in the form of your tax dollars, of course.

1:19:54.010 --> 1:19:57.150
<v Speaker 1>She won't pay for it. out of her campaign dollars

1:19:57.570 --> 1:20:01.050
<v Speaker 1>at all. We went back and looked at her FEC

1:20:01.270 --> 1:20:05.690
<v Speaker 1>filings and found that while she does list staff salaries,

1:20:06.250 --> 1:20:10.730
<v Speaker 1>she does not list a single disbursement for a single

1:20:10.930 --> 1:20:15.740
<v Speaker 1>employee for health insurance coverage. In other words, she is

1:20:15.960 --> 1:20:20.300
<v Speaker 1>not providing health care coverage for her campaign staff. She

1:20:20.340 --> 1:20:25.490
<v Speaker 1>didn't even provide workers' comp. If somebody is I don't know,

1:20:26.270 --> 1:20:30.130
<v Speaker 1>run over by a car while knocking doors for Rebecca Cook.

1:20:30.330 --> 1:20:33.350
<v Speaker 1>That's too doggone bad because they don't have workers comp.

1:20:33.689 --> 1:20:36.410
<v Speaker 1>You don't get a red cent and they stopped doing

1:20:36.430 --> 1:20:41.070
<v Speaker 1>that in October. So for nearly a year, absolutely no

1:20:41.510 --> 1:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>coverage at all. No healthcare stipend, no nothing. If you

1:20:46.320 --> 1:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>work on the Rebecca Cook campaign, meaning you are fighting

1:20:50.600 --> 1:20:56.060
<v Speaker 1>for healthcare for all while you, Do not have health

1:20:56.100 --> 1:20:59.660
<v Speaker 1>care because you're working for the woman who is promising

1:21:00.140 --> 1:21:06.890
<v Speaker 1>health care for all. Again, I do hope whoever it

1:21:06.950 --> 1:21:10.889
<v Speaker 1>was that texted, Democrats put the HIPAA in hypocrite. Please

1:21:10.950 --> 1:21:13.350
<v Speaker 1>identify yourself. I'm not going to read your full first

1:21:13.410 --> 1:21:14.730
<v Speaker 1>and last name. I've got to know who said it

1:21:14.750 --> 1:21:20.860
<v Speaker 1>because that is just a fantastic line. HIPAA, the Privacy Act.

1:21:20.880 --> 1:21:21.200
<v Speaker 7>You get it.

1:21:21.460 --> 1:21:25.729
<v Speaker 1>It's a joke. HIPAA, hypocrite. Okay, just heard it. iHeartRadio

1:21:25.740 --> 1:21:30.090
<v Speaker 1>Music Festival Flyaway Contest. Word this hour, win, W-I-N. You

1:21:30.110 --> 1:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have got until 5.55 to text the word win to 200-200.

1:21:36.630 --> 1:21:39.450
<v Speaker 1>If you are the lucky winner, you will win a

1:21:39.770 --> 1:21:42.910
<v Speaker 1>trip for two to the festival. It is in fabulous

1:21:42.950 --> 1:21:46.710
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas, September 18th and 19th. You get round-trip airfare

1:21:46.750 --> 1:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for $ 2. You get two nights hotel stay, ground transportation,

1:21:50.040 --> 1:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and tickets to both nights of the iHeartRadio Music Festival,

1:21:52.780 --> 1:21:56.500
<v Speaker 1>plus a $ 1, 000 gift card. If you enter this contest,

1:21:56.520 --> 1:21:59.900
<v Speaker 1>you will get a confirmation text and information. Standard data

1:21:59.960 --> 1:22:02.860
<v Speaker 1>and message rates apply in this nationwide contest. We actually

1:22:02.900 --> 1:22:07.049
<v Speaker 1>had the nationwide winner on Monday. Eric from Waukesha is

1:22:07.120 --> 1:22:09.770
<v Speaker 1>headed to Las Vegas. Wouldn't you like... No, not our Eric,

1:22:09.820 --> 1:22:14.460
<v Speaker 1>not producer Eric. Eric H. from Waukesha. He's headed to

1:22:14.500 --> 1:22:16.460
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Wouldn't you like to be on his flight?

1:22:16.680 --> 1:22:19.380
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't you like to strike up a conversation and say, hey,

1:22:20.080 --> 1:22:21.990
<v Speaker 1>I won on the Dan O'Donnell Show. And you can say,

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I did too, Eric. Congratulations. Well, congratulations to you, 5

1:22:27.439 --> 1:22:32.230
<v Speaker 1>o'clock winner on Wednesday, September 2nd. Make sure you are

1:22:32.400 --> 1:22:34.350
<v Speaker 1>that winner. Text the word win to 200-200. Democrat Robin Vining.

1:22:40.990 --> 1:22:42.849
<v Speaker 1>who is a member of the Senate. She is currently

1:22:43.030 --> 1:22:47.550
<v Speaker 1>running for the state Senate seat that is being vacated

1:22:47.610 --> 1:22:52.309
<v Speaker 1>by the retiring Rob Hutton against the very, very good

1:22:52.560 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Republican Dr. Mike Roberts. Vining has for 15 years been

1:22:59.080 --> 1:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>running a photography business, Robin Vining Photography LLC. she has

1:23:06.300 --> 1:23:10.820
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly touted her success and her experience as a small

1:23:10.880 --> 1:23:14.940
<v Speaker 1>business owner as a big reason that voters in that

1:23:15.020 --> 1:23:18.300
<v Speaker 1>district should elect her, should give her a promotion from

1:23:18.340 --> 1:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the state assembly to the state senate. Here's what we found, however.

1:23:27.800 --> 1:23:34.229
<v Speaker 1>The Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions has repeatedly marked Robin

1:23:34.300 --> 1:23:43.180
<v Speaker 1>Vining Photography LLC as delinquent and once actually dissolved the

1:23:43.360 --> 1:23:52.910
<v Speaker 1>company after she repeatedly missed annual filings. Folks, anyone who

1:23:52.990 --> 1:23:59.350
<v Speaker 1>has a business or anyone who runs an LLC knows

1:23:59.430 --> 1:24:03.059
<v Speaker 1>that there are annual reports that you have to file.

1:24:03.530 --> 1:24:07.930
<v Speaker 1>there are annual fees that you have to pay. If

1:24:08.010 --> 1:24:13.420
<v Speaker 1>you don't, the DFI, Department of Financial Institutions, will mark

1:24:13.479 --> 1:24:19.700
<v Speaker 1>your LLC delinquent. If the report stays unfiled for about

1:24:19.740 --> 1:24:26.590
<v Speaker 1>a year, DFI may publish a notice of administrative dissolution

1:24:27.210 --> 1:24:32.830
<v Speaker 1>and then actually dissolve the entity. What if I told

1:24:32.890 --> 1:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you that twice Vining was given this notice of administrative dissolution.

1:24:40.520 --> 1:24:47.259
<v Speaker 1>Once in 2017, once in 2023. In 2017... She ignored

1:24:47.560 --> 1:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>every single file. Now, this wasn't like this was the

1:24:50.800 --> 1:24:54.809
<v Speaker 1>first time that she had ever had to make this file.

1:24:54.890 --> 1:24:58.310
<v Speaker 1>She has run, or at least she registered, Robin Vining

1:24:58.370 --> 1:25:02.150
<v Speaker 1>Photography LLC in 2011. She, by the way, has been

1:25:02.189 --> 1:25:05.650
<v Speaker 1>the registered agent every single year. So it's not like

1:25:05.770 --> 1:25:08.390
<v Speaker 1>someone else was running it while she was busy being

1:25:08.410 --> 1:25:10.430
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Wisconsin Assembly. No, no, no, no, no.

1:25:10.890 --> 1:25:13.090
<v Speaker 1>She is the registered agent. When you are the registered agent,

1:25:13.520 --> 1:25:16.860
<v Speaker 1>You are responsible. Oftentimes, the registered agent will not be

1:25:16.880 --> 1:25:22.099
<v Speaker 1>the one filing the reports on behalf of the LLC. However,

1:25:22.500 --> 1:25:27.390
<v Speaker 1>since Robin Vining Photography was almost certainly just Robin Vining

1:25:27.570 --> 1:25:31.389
<v Speaker 1>and a camera, she would probably be the one who

1:25:31.450 --> 1:25:34.710
<v Speaker 1>would be expected to make these files. She did not.

1:25:35.250 --> 1:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So in 2017, DFI, first in 2016, the DFI... submits

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a notice and says, hey, Robin, you're a delinquent. You

1:25:47.979 --> 1:25:53.210
<v Speaker 1>have to pay your fee. You have to file your report.

1:25:54.270 --> 1:26:00.830
<v Speaker 1>She did not. In 2017, she gets repeated notices of

1:26:00.890 --> 1:26:06.030
<v Speaker 1>the delinquency of her LLC. Then she gets a notice

1:26:06.070 --> 1:26:14.260
<v Speaker 1>of dissolution. Then the company is actually dissolved. Now, this

1:26:14.340 --> 1:26:18.180
<v Speaker 1>does happen. This does not mean that it's– when I

1:26:18.220 --> 1:26:22.470
<v Speaker 1>think of like administratively dissolved, when it's dissolved, I don't

1:26:22.510 --> 1:26:25.150
<v Speaker 1>know why, but I sort of had an image of

1:26:25.330 --> 1:26:30.010
<v Speaker 1>the film Who Framed Roger Rabbit where the judge played

1:26:30.070 --> 1:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>by Doc Brown from Back to the Future, Christopher Lloyd.

1:26:34.680 --> 1:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>created this, what was it, goo or gack or whatever.

1:26:37.390 --> 1:26:41.070
<v Speaker 1>It's this slime where you could actually permanently kill cartoons.

1:26:41.150 --> 1:26:44.550
<v Speaker 1>If you have never seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it

1:26:44.630 --> 1:26:47.650
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best movies of the 1980s. I

1:26:47.689 --> 1:26:50.710
<v Speaker 1>think it is an absolutely fantastic film. You're looking at

1:26:50.750 --> 1:26:55.460
<v Speaker 1>me very, very weird in there, Eric. You are like Mr.

1:26:55.860 --> 1:26:55.910
<v Speaker 3>1980s.

1:26:56.320 --> 1:26:59.820
<v Speaker 1>You are like every stereotype of Gen X I have

1:27:00.100 --> 1:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ever known. Oh, it was 88? Did I say 89?

1:27:05.520 --> 1:27:05.849
<v Speaker 3>88, 89.

1:27:05.850 --> 1:27:09.220
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I said 80s. I was going to say, it

1:27:09.260 --> 1:27:11.700
<v Speaker 1>was at the end of the decade. 88, 89, somewhere

1:27:11.740 --> 1:27:16.020
<v Speaker 1>in there. It was the one time that Bugs Bunny

1:27:16.320 --> 1:27:20.610
<v Speaker 1>and Mickey Mouse appear together in a full-length feature film.

1:27:21.170 --> 1:27:25.250
<v Speaker 1>They are together in one scene. It is where the character,

1:27:25.450 --> 1:27:30.070
<v Speaker 1>it was Bob Hoskins. was the hard-boiled detective. He's a real-life,

1:27:30.150 --> 1:27:32.689
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a... And he has to solve a

1:27:32.810 --> 1:27:39.650
<v Speaker 1>murder in Toontown that the superstar Roger Rabbit is framed for,

1:27:40.439 --> 1:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's got to solve the mystery. And there is

1:27:43.439 --> 1:27:46.300
<v Speaker 1>this judge who is trying to kill all the... Because

1:27:46.320 --> 1:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>when you kill a cartoon, they can just come back, right?

1:27:49.900 --> 1:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They have the little angel wings, and, you know, it's like...

1:27:52.300 --> 1:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It was just a fantastic... It was based off of

1:27:55.800 --> 1:28:00.700
<v Speaker 1>a book... called who something roger rabbit which was way

1:28:00.760 --> 1:28:03.519
<v Speaker 1>darker i read it years and years actually when i

1:28:03.540 --> 1:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kid and probably too young to read it

1:28:05.260 --> 1:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>because i thought the movie was just absolutely spectacular who

1:28:10.220 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>censored roger rabbit that was it that was it really

1:28:13.520 --> 1:28:17.759
<v Speaker 1>really well done book um I am way far afield.

1:28:18.120 --> 1:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>We started talking about Robin Vining being terrible at running

1:28:21.520 --> 1:28:23.740
<v Speaker 1>a business, and now we're on who framed Roger Rabbit.

1:28:23.760 --> 1:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what you get here on the Dan O'Donnell. When

1:28:25.430 --> 1:28:30.189
<v Speaker 1>you say talk radio done different, it's actually talk radio

1:28:30.270 --> 1:28:33.429
<v Speaker 1>done just like Mark Belling and going off on tangents.

1:28:33.590 --> 1:28:36.650
<v Speaker 1>Now I will talk about my horse racing picks. Thank

1:28:36.670 --> 1:28:40.670
<v Speaker 1>you very much. So all I can think of, the

1:28:40.729 --> 1:28:44.509
<v Speaker 1>business is like administratively dissolved. Like I'm seeing Tony Evers,

1:28:44.970 --> 1:28:47.509
<v Speaker 1>like the evil judge in Who Framed Roger Rabbit, holding

1:28:47.590 --> 1:28:51.530
<v Speaker 1>Robin Vining over the vat of slime to dissolve her. No, no,

1:28:51.750 --> 1:28:54.470
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the business is permanently dissolved. You can

1:28:54.530 --> 1:28:57.729
<v Speaker 1>restore it. All you need to do is pay the

1:28:57.870 --> 1:29:02.769
<v Speaker 1>stupid fee and file the annual report, which should take

1:29:02.830 --> 1:29:11.610
<v Speaker 1>about 10 minutes. In 2018, The DFI lists Robin finding

1:29:11.710 --> 1:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>photography as restored to good standing. I think you can

1:29:16.439 --> 1:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>guess what happens next by 2021. She's marked as delinquent again.

1:29:23.420 --> 1:29:24.419
<v Speaker 1>Then she's restored.

1:29:25.240 --> 1:29:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1:29:25.600 --> 1:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>This has got clearly, it has been five years of

1:29:29.960 --> 1:29:32.690
<v Speaker 1>this woman just having to, is it 26 bucks? I,

1:29:32.729 --> 1:29:35.790
<v Speaker 1>that sounds right. I had to, I had to do

1:29:35.830 --> 1:29:39.260
<v Speaker 1>it with, Yeah, 25 plus it. I was going to

1:29:39.300 --> 1:29:42.340
<v Speaker 1>say it's like a $ 25. I don't remember what it was.

1:29:42.880 --> 1:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>We had to register the LLC behind the Heartland Post.

1:29:47.200 --> 1:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty nominal. Then, of course, you have to pay

1:29:52.600 --> 1:29:55.849
<v Speaker 1>your tax. How much was she actually paying taxes? This

1:29:55.910 --> 1:29:59.250
<v Speaker 1>would be the next. I just checked DFI after getting

1:29:59.310 --> 1:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a tip. So you would think, after five years of

1:30:04.380 --> 1:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Robin Vining Photography LLC being delinquent and actually getting dissolved,

1:30:10.700 --> 1:30:14.019
<v Speaker 1>she was dipped in the vat of dip. That was it.

1:30:14.340 --> 1:30:17.189
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, all of my Gen X listeners texting it.

1:30:17.729 --> 1:30:20.589
<v Speaker 1>The stuff in Who Framed Roger Rabbit that would permanently

1:30:20.650 --> 1:30:23.110
<v Speaker 1>kill cartoons was called dip. That was it.

1:30:23.490 --> 1:30:23.710
<v Speaker 3>Dip.

1:30:25.070 --> 1:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, if you're looking, it's... If you're looking for a

1:30:27.860 --> 1:30:32.019
<v Speaker 1>film to watch, younger kids, the themes are pretty adult.

1:30:32.040 --> 1:30:36.540
<v Speaker 1>Like Jessica Rabbit, the wife of Roger Rabbit, who's like

1:30:36.560 --> 1:30:40.220
<v Speaker 1>a silly bunny. She is like played up as like

1:30:40.260 --> 1:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this sexy bombshell. I mean, it's adult themes. I think

1:30:43.400 --> 1:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it was rated PG-13 when it came out. But, you know,

1:30:48.360 --> 1:30:51.570
<v Speaker 1>it's silly. I seriously cannot recommend this film highly enough.

1:30:51.630 --> 1:30:54.330
<v Speaker 1>It is that good. The book, too. Who censored Roger Rabbit?

1:30:54.350 --> 1:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I might reread that. Um, currently reading, uh,

1:31:00.160 --> 1:31:03.139
<v Speaker 1>a night to remember about the sinking of the Titanic

1:31:03.280 --> 1:31:07.500
<v Speaker 1>much to my wife's delight. She thinks it's hilarious because

1:31:07.560 --> 1:31:12.550
<v Speaker 1>periodically I get obsessed with just random historical events. Like

1:31:12.790 --> 1:31:15.810
<v Speaker 1>for a while, it was the Manson family murders. I swear.

1:31:15.830 --> 1:31:18.370
<v Speaker 1>I am not a psychopath. I just, I think at

1:31:18.410 --> 1:31:20.870
<v Speaker 1>that moment in history, the Manson family murders like that,

1:31:20.990 --> 1:31:24.770
<v Speaker 1>that changed the culture permanently. Titanic I've just been forever

1:31:24.810 --> 1:31:28.010
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with even before the movie. I think I might

1:31:28.070 --> 1:31:30.350
<v Speaker 1>read Who Censored Roger Rabbit again because I don't think

1:31:30.390 --> 1:31:34.469
<v Speaker 1>I read it since I was like 12 maybe. And

1:31:34.490 --> 1:31:37.070
<v Speaker 1>that was, let me tell you, friend, really inappropriate for

1:31:37.110 --> 1:31:40.380
<v Speaker 1>a 12-year-old. Sometimes I wonder like did my parents just

1:31:40.400 --> 1:31:42.220
<v Speaker 1>like buy me stuff? I said, yeah, I really want

1:31:42.260 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this book because the movie was fun and it was

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about cartoons. It's like I remember reading it and being like, hmm, well,

1:31:49.200 --> 1:31:52.259
<v Speaker 1>I may be traumatized. That was also the same summer

1:31:52.300 --> 1:31:54.509
<v Speaker 1>I snuck in and saw Pulp Fiction when I was

1:31:54.550 --> 1:31:58.350
<v Speaker 1>like 12 years old. Oh yeah, by myself. Fortunately, I

1:31:58.390 --> 1:32:02.429
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand the bad scene, but I understood the scenes

1:32:02.510 --> 1:32:06.050
<v Speaker 1>where they're like shooting each other. The gimp scene. That was,

1:32:06.979 --> 1:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>did not understand what was going on there.

1:32:09.300 --> 1:32:09.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:32:09.900 --> 1:32:12.370
<v Speaker 1>And I'm, I am definitely not going to describe it.

1:32:13.960 --> 1:32:14.140
<v Speaker 3>So.

1:32:17.140 --> 1:32:24.420
<v Speaker 1>Robin Vining. I just want to tie this to Robin Vining.

1:32:24.540 --> 1:32:29.060
<v Speaker 1>Bring out the GIMP. Photograph the GIMP. GIMP sleeping, Robin. Well,

1:32:29.080 --> 1:32:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're going to have to wake him up then. Okay,

1:32:31.460 --> 1:32:34.700
<v Speaker 1>so Robin Vining. It's 2021. Spent the link when she's

1:32:34.770 --> 1:32:40.850
<v Speaker 1>had the stupid LLC. In the administrative dip and dissolved.

1:32:43.229 --> 1:32:48.950
<v Speaker 1>In 2023, would you believe? I wish I could make

1:32:48.990 --> 1:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this up. She was hit with another notice of dissolution.

1:32:54.680 --> 1:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>She just, for two straight years, ignores the fact that

1:32:57.840 --> 1:33:03.860
<v Speaker 1>she's delinquent again. She finally said, oh, well, probably should

1:33:03.979 --> 1:33:07.679
<v Speaker 1>pay my fees, probably should fill out the report. She's

1:33:07.720 --> 1:33:13.750
<v Speaker 1>restored to good standing in 2024. That's the end of it, right? Wrong.

1:33:14.830 --> 1:33:15.550
<v Speaker 4>Wrong.

1:33:16.729 --> 1:33:23.790
<v Speaker 1>As recently as this January, Robin Vining Photography LLC is

1:33:23.950 --> 1:33:29.670
<v Speaker 1>again listed as delinquent. Now, of course, Robin was at

1:33:29.710 --> 1:33:33.299
<v Speaker 1>the time running for state Senate and probably realized, uh-oh,

1:33:33.640 --> 1:33:37.100
<v Speaker 1>this looks bad. I should get this thing restored. So

1:33:37.220 --> 1:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>later that month, she was restored to good standing. How

1:33:45.060 --> 1:33:52.310
<v Speaker 1>is it? that for two-thirds of this company's existence, it

1:33:52.350 --> 1:33:56.940
<v Speaker 1>has not been in compliance with the very basic requirements

1:33:57.380 --> 1:34:01.270
<v Speaker 1>of the state of Wisconsin. I would love to know

1:34:02.530 --> 1:34:08.229
<v Speaker 1>How Robin Vining, who is currently employed as a state representative,

1:34:08.270 --> 1:34:11.350
<v Speaker 1>she's from Wauwatosa, by the way, this district was one

1:34:11.400 --> 1:34:14.700
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that Dems were able to gerrymander, or

1:34:14.760 --> 1:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, they were able to restore a fair map.

1:34:18.420 --> 1:34:23.099
<v Speaker 1>They drew a ton of Wauwatosa into this Senate district

1:34:23.620 --> 1:34:26.730
<v Speaker 1>that Rob Hutton was going to have to defend. Hutton,

1:34:26.900 --> 1:34:29.190
<v Speaker 1>I think, said it's kind of a tall order. He

1:34:29.229 --> 1:34:32.110
<v Speaker 1>decides not to seek a new term. Democrats have been

1:34:32.189 --> 1:34:37.150
<v Speaker 1>grooming Robin Vining for this seat since even before I

1:34:37.210 --> 1:34:41.189
<v Speaker 1>think she was first elected to the state assembly. And oh,

1:34:41.229 --> 1:34:44.650
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, she's a small business owner. She's still a

1:34:44.689 --> 1:34:54.009
<v Speaker 1>hardcore lefty. She's an incompetent. How can you not? file

1:34:54.390 --> 1:35:06.210
<v Speaker 1>the very simple, very basic thing. I myself have, I chose, right?

1:35:08.479 --> 1:35:12.020
<v Speaker 1>So I think technically I made my law license may

1:35:12.120 --> 1:35:16.630
<v Speaker 1>technically be suspended. Because for 20 years, the Supreme Court

1:35:16.689 --> 1:35:20.350
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin and I have had a fierce debate over

1:35:20.430 --> 1:35:24.530
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be a non-practicing attorney. So I said, no,

1:35:24.610 --> 1:35:27.570
<v Speaker 1>I am non-practicing. I want to go on basically reserve status.

1:35:27.890 --> 1:35:30.230
<v Speaker 1>And they said, no, you still need to do continuing

1:35:30.290 --> 1:35:32.639
<v Speaker 1>legal education. Well, at the time, I was working full

1:35:32.650 --> 1:35:35.939
<v Speaker 1>time in radio and I wasn't making a lot of money.

1:35:36.140 --> 1:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And those classes were hundreds and hundreds of dollars. I

1:35:38.700 --> 1:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>had just had a baby who is now off to college.

1:35:41.410 --> 1:35:42.870
<v Speaker 1>And I said, no, I don't want to do CLE.

1:35:42.910 --> 1:35:45.410
<v Speaker 1>I'm not practicing law. I don't plan to practice law

1:35:45.430 --> 1:35:47.490
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Wisconsin. So I am going to

1:35:47.550 --> 1:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>go to inactive status. They said, no, you still have

1:35:50.810 --> 1:35:53.700
<v Speaker 1>to do CLE. And I said, no, I don't. I'm inactive.

1:35:54.740 --> 1:35:57.020
<v Speaker 1>I swear this was a dispute I think that goes

1:35:57.060 --> 1:36:03.939
<v Speaker 1>back to Shirley Abramson's days on the court. I pleaded

1:36:03.990 --> 1:36:06.849
<v Speaker 1>my case and I said, fine. I took my ball

1:36:06.910 --> 1:36:10.550
<v Speaker 1>and left the state bar of Wisconsin and I haven't practiced.

1:36:11.420 --> 1:36:15.049
<v Speaker 1>If I wanted to practice, I would probably have to

1:36:15.270 --> 1:36:18.010
<v Speaker 1>take continuing legal education. I don't know if I'd have

1:36:18.030 --> 1:36:23.470
<v Speaker 1>to make up 20 years of not taking CLE. But no,

1:36:23.530 --> 1:36:25.270
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was stupid. I'm like, well, why do

1:36:25.330 --> 1:36:29.910
<v Speaker 1>I have to? I am non-active. I'm non-practicing. Why do

1:36:29.970 --> 1:36:32.990
<v Speaker 1>I still have to? I'll pay the stupid dues. So

1:36:33.010 --> 1:36:34.380
<v Speaker 1>then I said, you know what? The hell with it.

1:36:34.410 --> 1:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You can suspend me. So I probably owe like $ 10, 000.

1:36:36.939 --> 1:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, That's why I always add a non-practicing attorney.

1:36:42.900 --> 1:36:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm trained as an attorney, but whatever. If I was

1:36:47.600 --> 1:36:53.780
<v Speaker 1>actually practicing as an attorney and then ran for the state,

1:36:53.820 --> 1:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I got myself elected to the state assembly on the

1:36:56.979 --> 1:37:03.580
<v Speaker 1>strength of my skills as a lawyer. But then I

1:37:04.560 --> 1:37:08.090
<v Speaker 1>was just not doing the very basic thing that I

1:37:08.150 --> 1:37:12.070
<v Speaker 1>am expected to do. Like, hey, take CLE credits, pay

1:37:12.130 --> 1:37:18.340
<v Speaker 1>the annual dues, keep your license current. You would say, hmm,

1:37:19.240 --> 1:37:23.059
<v Speaker 1>I think we should probably think twice about promoting that

1:37:23.120 --> 1:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan O'Donnell character to the state Senate.

1:37:26.939 --> 1:37:27.299
<v Speaker 3>Because.

1:37:28.650 --> 1:37:32.830
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't seem like he is really a one who

1:37:33.330 --> 1:37:37.050
<v Speaker 1>pays a lot of attention to detail. This is not

1:37:37.490 --> 1:37:41.140
<v Speaker 1>a totally, this is not an irrelevant thing for a

1:37:41.220 --> 1:37:46.340
<v Speaker 1>state legislator. A state legislator, first of all, is the

1:37:46.620 --> 1:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one who sets the rules for the state of Wisconsin.

1:37:52.439 --> 1:37:58.019
<v Speaker 1>Robin Vining for years has been, writing the laws that

1:37:58.380 --> 1:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody else in the state is bound by law to follow.

1:38:04.520 --> 1:38:07.179
<v Speaker 1>She is the one, as a member of the state legislature,

1:38:07.200 --> 1:38:11.330
<v Speaker 1>who sets the parameters for the executive branch to promulgate

1:38:11.550 --> 1:38:18.310
<v Speaker 1>rules like the Department of Financial Institutions to regulate businesses

1:38:18.370 --> 1:38:24.450
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin. So rules are promulgated under the lawmaking authority

1:38:24.490 --> 1:38:28.770
<v Speaker 1>that is Granted slightly to– there was a big dispute

1:38:28.870 --> 1:38:32.500
<v Speaker 1>over this during COVID. state Supreme Court case and so forth.

1:38:34.900 --> 1:38:39.260
<v Speaker 1>What this means is that she is a rulemaker for

1:38:39.320 --> 1:38:44.950
<v Speaker 1>the state of Wisconsin who has refused for a decade

1:38:45.610 --> 1:38:51.250
<v Speaker 1>through either willful refusal to– pay dues and fill out

1:38:51.270 --> 1:38:53.650
<v Speaker 1>reports because I don't know. She thinks it's beneath her.

1:38:54.010 --> 1:38:56.689
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't have a spare 25. If all it was

1:38:56.810 --> 1:39:00.330
<v Speaker 1>was 25 bucks for the stupid CLE credits, I would

1:39:00.370 --> 1:39:03.809
<v Speaker 1>have done it. It's like 400, 500 bucks. And this

1:39:03.830 --> 1:39:08.930
<v Speaker 1>was in like 2008. Jeez. Well, that was going to

1:39:09.070 --> 1:39:17.220
<v Speaker 1>diaper funds. Thank you very much. But just think about

1:39:17.240 --> 1:39:23.540
<v Speaker 1>it for a second. She, is writing rules and not

1:39:24.590 --> 1:39:32.590
<v Speaker 1>following them. That's remarkable. And that suggests to me, at least,

1:39:33.170 --> 1:39:36.710
<v Speaker 1>not only does she not deserve a promotion, but we

1:39:36.770 --> 1:39:41.780
<v Speaker 1>should seriously think about whether Robin Vining actually belongs in

1:39:41.840 --> 1:39:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the state legislature at all. You're listening to the Dan O'Donnell.

1:39:45.860 --> 1:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>To one of my friends who texted me, not on

1:39:49.439 --> 1:39:52.780
<v Speaker 1>the Carpetland USA Flooring Center talking text line, but rather

1:39:52.860 --> 1:39:56.240
<v Speaker 1>my personal cell phone, that when he heard that I

1:39:56.340 --> 1:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>snuck into Pulp Fiction during the summer of 1994, I

1:40:00.800 --> 1:40:03.660
<v Speaker 1>was 12, about to turn 13. I think I told

1:40:03.720 --> 1:40:06.780
<v Speaker 1>my mom I was going to see Forrest Gump or something.

1:40:07.700 --> 1:40:10.419
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I snuck that one past the goalie,

1:40:11.420 --> 1:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but she had no idea I was going to see

1:40:13.660 --> 1:40:16.620
<v Speaker 1>Pulp Fiction, but I did. I think I biked to

1:40:16.640 --> 1:40:23.410
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater. My buddy said he snuck into Striptease

1:40:23.770 --> 1:40:26.570
<v Speaker 1>starring Demi Moore back in the day. So that was

1:40:26.630 --> 1:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>his big takeaway, was the core memory of seeing Demi

1:40:31.580 --> 1:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Moore in Striptease. I bet you everybody in this audience.

1:40:36.120 --> 1:40:39.100
<v Speaker 1>has a story about sneaking into a movie that they

1:40:39.120 --> 1:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely not going to be allowed to see. Now,

1:40:43.620 --> 1:40:48.139
<v Speaker 1>the big takeaway should be that Robin Vining, state representative

1:40:48.180 --> 1:40:53.710
<v Speaker 1>from Wauwatosa, candidate for the state Senate, has had her

1:40:53.930 --> 1:41:00.570
<v Speaker 1>photography business, Robin Vining Photography, LLC, repeatedly. And not, look, folks,

1:41:02.070 --> 1:41:04.820
<v Speaker 1>I show a lot of grace here. Believe it or not,

1:41:05.000 --> 1:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I always try to give people the benefit of the doubt.

1:41:07.600 --> 1:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>If Robin Vining Photography was delinquent once or twice, I

1:41:11.920 --> 1:41:17.380
<v Speaker 1>would say, okay, I have on the various cars that

1:41:17.500 --> 1:41:21.450
<v Speaker 1>my wife and now kids and I drive, I have missed,

1:41:21.910 --> 1:41:24.770
<v Speaker 1>I have been pulled over a number of times because

1:41:24.830 --> 1:41:29.330
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to put the sticker on or I forgot

1:41:29.410 --> 1:41:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to re-register. It slips your mind. It happens. I have

1:41:34.770 --> 1:41:40.740
<v Speaker 1>never had my car impounded because I couldn't be bothered

1:41:40.820 --> 1:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay the, what is it now?

1:41:44.040 --> 1:41:45.240
<v Speaker 5>$ 80, $ 100.

1:41:44.640 --> 1:41:52.460
<v Speaker 1>To re-register your license or your license plate every year. Yeah,

1:41:52.620 --> 1:41:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that's about right. Yeah. 85 in Waukesha County says producer Eric,

1:41:56.479 --> 1:42:00.910
<v Speaker 1>125 because of the wheel tax in Milwaukee County. We

1:42:00.990 --> 1:42:05.099
<v Speaker 1>actually had an issue. I'm not even sure how this happened.

1:42:06.300 --> 1:42:09.510
<v Speaker 1>I got pulled over. My wife got pulled over constantly

1:42:10.189 --> 1:42:12.690
<v Speaker 1>in an old van that we had. This was right

1:42:12.810 --> 1:42:17.050
<v Speaker 1>after 2020. It was right during the pandemic. Because for

1:42:17.210 --> 1:42:21.030
<v Speaker 1>some reason, there was no record with the state DMV

1:42:21.170 --> 1:42:26.580
<v Speaker 1>of our vehicle existing. Yes, that was the darndest thing.

1:42:26.680 --> 1:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We could not figure... Many different police departments were utterly

1:42:31.260 --> 1:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>baffled by this because they said, Mr. O'Donnell, whose car

1:42:36.740 --> 1:42:40.219
<v Speaker 1>is this? I said, mine. Here's the registration. Here's the–

1:42:40.439 --> 1:42:44.690
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah. I'm telling you, between the two of us,

1:42:44.729 --> 1:42:46.530
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I, we were pulled over at least

1:42:46.650 --> 1:42:48.809
<v Speaker 1>six or seven times. We'd go back to the DMV.

1:42:49.390 --> 1:42:54.370
<v Speaker 1>We would– hey, so can you like prove our car exists?

1:42:54.430 --> 1:42:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Like this is not a ghost car. But yeah, I

1:42:58.840 --> 1:43:01.540
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what the snafu was. It was something during

1:43:01.660 --> 1:43:06.170
<v Speaker 1>COVID with the registration process itself. It wasn't like, oh, hey,

1:43:06.210 --> 1:43:09.750
<v Speaker 1>you have it. Oh, don't worry. We were continuing to

1:43:09.810 --> 1:43:13.550
<v Speaker 1>pay to have our license plate updated. That didn't matter.

1:43:13.689 --> 1:43:16.189
<v Speaker 1>It was the vehicle registration. It was like the vehicle

1:43:16.229 --> 1:43:19.060
<v Speaker 1>registration did not exist, which we always thought was funny

1:43:19.100 --> 1:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because we were paying to register a vehicle that wasn't

1:43:22.360 --> 1:43:26.150
<v Speaker 1>actually a registered vehicle in the state of Wisconsin. My wife,

1:43:26.650 --> 1:43:29.010
<v Speaker 1>I wish she was, she just dropped my daughter off

1:43:29.050 --> 1:43:32.150
<v Speaker 1>at soccer. Hon, if you're listening, can you please text

1:43:32.210 --> 1:43:35.259
<v Speaker 1>me with what the heck was going on with that van?

1:43:36.340 --> 1:43:38.500
<v Speaker 1>Because I'd like to tell the people on the radio.

1:43:39.960 --> 1:43:43.299
<v Speaker 1>So I get it. I get it. You're busy. You're

1:43:43.760 --> 1:43:48.260
<v Speaker 1>doing stuff. It can slip your mind. When you go

1:43:48.500 --> 1:43:53.340
<v Speaker 1>years without taking care of it, that's an issue. And

1:43:53.380 --> 1:43:58.050
<v Speaker 1>when this happens, For a decade, she's had this LLC

1:43:58.110 --> 1:44:01.870
<v Speaker 1>for 15 years. For 10 of those years, she has

1:44:01.930 --> 1:44:09.990
<v Speaker 1>been delinquent or she has been dissolved. I'm actually kind

1:44:10.050 --> 1:44:15.900
<v Speaker 1>of in awe at either the negligence, incompetence, or just

1:44:16.960 --> 1:44:22.559
<v Speaker 1>sheer refusal to do the basic requirements of the law.

1:44:24.160 --> 1:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Either way, is this a good look or is this

1:44:27.500 --> 1:44:32.150
<v Speaker 1>appropriate from someone who has spent several years now writing

1:44:32.189 --> 1:44:37.070
<v Speaker 1>the laws that we're all expected to follow? Let's say

1:44:37.410 --> 1:44:41.550
<v Speaker 1>the libs finally get their wish and there is a

1:44:41.770 --> 1:44:48.290
<v Speaker 1>gun registry in Wisconsin. And I don't register my gun.

1:44:48.370 --> 1:44:52.530
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a gun license. Sort of like Kurt Cobain.

1:44:52.550 --> 1:44:54.690
<v Speaker 1>And I swear that I don't have a gun. You

1:44:54.710 --> 1:44:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like that reference, Mr. Gen X producer in there? He

1:44:59.800 --> 1:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>says whatever. See, I'm telling you, you are the ultimate

1:45:02.220 --> 1:45:09.810
<v Speaker 1>Gen Xer. You are Mr. Gen X. Whatever. That is

1:45:09.830 --> 1:45:14.530
<v Speaker 1>the best possible Gen X answer. I'm like Gen X adjacent.

1:45:14.870 --> 1:45:17.970
<v Speaker 1>I'm what's known as an Xennial. I think I was

1:45:18.229 --> 1:45:21.980
<v Speaker 1>born in 81, which is considered like the first year

1:45:22.140 --> 1:45:24.939
<v Speaker 1>of the millennials. If you were born in 1980, you

1:45:24.979 --> 1:45:27.100
<v Speaker 1>were a Gen Xer. So we have this like little

1:45:27.220 --> 1:45:29.580
<v Speaker 1>mini generation. And you're a little bit older. You were

1:45:29.620 --> 1:45:33.429
<v Speaker 1>born in like, what, 77? You were born in 70.

1:45:33.430 --> 1:45:33.820
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

1:45:34.350 --> 1:45:36.490
<v Speaker 1>Again, we've been through this before. You have really good

1:45:36.650 --> 1:45:43.189
<v Speaker 1>skin for being– You do beef tallow bomb and beer.

1:45:43.229 --> 1:45:45.030
<v Speaker 1>That's what does it. Well, you got to put the

1:45:45.050 --> 1:45:47.350
<v Speaker 1>beer on your face. You can't just drink it. You see, that's,

1:45:47.470 --> 1:45:53.350
<v Speaker 1>that's a key. Sometimes. All right. So let's say though,

1:45:53.990 --> 1:45:58.900
<v Speaker 1>that Robin Vining gets her gun registry passed. Dan O'Donnell,

1:45:59.060 --> 1:46:04.100
<v Speaker 1>either through negligence or willful refusal, doesn't register his gun.

1:46:05.220 --> 1:46:08.060
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't fill out the required. I have a gun form

1:46:08.500 --> 1:46:12.059
<v Speaker 1>that the libs make you fill out. doesn't pay the

1:46:12.439 --> 1:46:18.229
<v Speaker 1>annual $ 10, 000 gun registry fee. This, by the way, is

1:46:18.290 --> 1:46:21.810
<v Speaker 1>the real reason you should oppose gun registries. Yes, it's

1:46:22.470 --> 1:46:26.110
<v Speaker 1>most likely a Second Amendment. But the costs that they

1:46:26.150 --> 1:46:30.310
<v Speaker 1>will associate with you owning a gun will be astronomical.

1:46:30.930 --> 1:46:32.510
<v Speaker 1>I'm told it is now $ 145 to register your car

1:46:32.550 --> 1:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in Milwaukee. What the hell do you think it would cost?

1:46:37.500 --> 1:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>What if David Crowley and Robin Vining had their way?

1:46:41.580 --> 1:46:45.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? You as a law-abiding, responsible gun owner,

1:46:46.160 --> 1:46:49.350
<v Speaker 1>not like the people who have guns, would never register

1:46:49.390 --> 1:46:52.470
<v Speaker 1>them because they're stolen in David Crowley's Milwaukee County. What

1:46:52.490 --> 1:46:54.349
<v Speaker 1>do you think they would charge you on an annual

1:46:54.390 --> 1:47:01.559
<v Speaker 1>basis to register your gun? $ 1, 000? $ 2, 000? You got the

1:47:01.600 --> 1:47:05.010
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Supreme Court. there to say, nah, that's not a

1:47:05.110 --> 1:47:10.490
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment violation at all. No. $ 10, 000 a year to

1:47:10.550 --> 1:47:16.650
<v Speaker 1>register your gun. What do you think would happen if

1:47:16.770 --> 1:47:21.820
<v Speaker 1>I didn't pay my gun registration fee and I didn't

1:47:22.320 --> 1:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>comply with the annual requirements of owning my gun? Do

1:47:26.640 --> 1:47:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you think there's any chance that Robin Vining would allow

1:47:29.650 --> 1:47:33.150
<v Speaker 1>me to keep that gun? Or would that gun be seized?

1:47:33.630 --> 1:47:38.670
<v Speaker 1>Would Dan O'Donnell's gun ownership privileges, I do have a

1:47:38.790 --> 1:47:43.530
<v Speaker 1>CCR permit, would that be immediately dissolved? Would I ever

1:47:43.590 --> 1:47:47.250
<v Speaker 1>be able to get my gun ownership privileges back? Of

1:47:47.390 --> 1:47:53.410
<v Speaker 1>course not. But for a decade, she has her camera

1:47:53.510 --> 1:48:00.670
<v Speaker 1>privileges removed. Revoked, restored, revoked. She's got the business dissolved

1:48:00.870 --> 1:48:03.269
<v Speaker 1>by the state of Wisconsin. This is the thing that

1:48:03.300 --> 1:48:07.700
<v Speaker 1>just boggles my mind. While she is in the legislature,

1:48:08.240 --> 1:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the state of Wisconsin is taking steps to dissolve her

1:48:11.420 --> 1:48:15.950
<v Speaker 1>LLC because while she's writing rules for everybody else to follow,

1:48:16.590 --> 1:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>she can't be bothered to follow the state's rules. herself.

1:48:21.260 --> 1:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And isn't that just Democrats in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen,

1:48:27.700 --> 1:48:30.490
<v Speaker 1>the dad, the Robin finding story going to be up very,

1:48:30.570 --> 1:48:34.990
<v Speaker 1>very shortly at the heartland post heartland post.com. We will

1:48:35.010 --> 1:48:38.030
<v Speaker 1>get it out. It boggles my mind. We'll get it

1:48:38.090 --> 1:48:42.800
<v Speaker 1>out on social media that for 10 years, a member

1:48:42.840 --> 1:48:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of the state legislature, somebody who wants to be a

1:48:45.660 --> 1:48:49.720
<v Speaker 1>state Senator could not do the absolute basic minimum to

1:48:49.780 --> 1:48:54.130
<v Speaker 1>keep her business in good standing with the state of Wisconsin. Now,

1:48:55.060 --> 1:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I did call my wife during that commercial break. She

1:48:57.760 --> 1:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't remember the specifics of our vehicle. She said it

1:49:01.280 --> 1:49:04.370
<v Speaker 1>wasn't with the license registration. It was with the title.

1:49:05.250 --> 1:49:08.630
<v Speaker 1>And because of COVID, you couldn't go into the DMV

1:49:09.010 --> 1:49:12.390
<v Speaker 1>to take care of it in person. And you couldn't

1:49:12.450 --> 1:49:14.450
<v Speaker 1>do it online. So she was trying to do it

1:49:14.490 --> 1:49:18.350
<v Speaker 1>at various police stations. Well, they couldn't do it because

1:49:18.890 --> 1:49:20.979
<v Speaker 1>You needed to go into the DMV to do it,

1:49:20.990 --> 1:49:23.900
<v Speaker 1>but the DMV was closed. So it was basically like

1:49:24.300 --> 1:49:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we were paying for a license plate that was not

1:49:27.800 --> 1:49:31.740
<v Speaker 1>attached to an actual car because the car was not

1:49:31.840 --> 1:49:35.070
<v Speaker 1>titled to us and the car was not actually titled

1:49:35.170 --> 1:49:38.309
<v Speaker 1>to anyone. To this day, I still have no idea

1:49:38.330 --> 1:49:43.099
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Eventually, this was like a multi-year thing, too.

1:49:44.120 --> 1:49:47.340
<v Speaker 1>And we tried our damnedest to get it fixed and

1:49:47.520 --> 1:49:51.889
<v Speaker 1>simply could not. It was a very weird situation. I

1:49:51.930 --> 1:49:55.950
<v Speaker 1>have a difficult time believing. And if the, uh, Vining

1:49:56.070 --> 1:50:00.830
<v Speaker 1>campaign or Vining assembly office would like to explain how

1:50:01.170 --> 1:50:07.639
<v Speaker 1>for 10 years, Robin Vining photography LLC, uh, was not

1:50:07.800 --> 1:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>able to do the very basic work of paying a

1:50:10.740 --> 1:50:14.300
<v Speaker 1>nominal fee and filing an annual report, which should take

1:50:14.320 --> 1:50:17.900
<v Speaker 1>you a grand total of about 10 minutes. I'm all ears.

1:50:19.189 --> 1:50:26.290
<v Speaker 1>But this does not bode well for the core competency

1:50:26.370 --> 1:50:29.650
<v Speaker 1>test that voters should. But then again, if it's a

1:50:29.770 --> 1:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of libs in Wauwatosa, maybe it doesn't matter. Meanwhile,

1:50:33.920 --> 1:50:40.150
<v Speaker 1>she's running against a doctor. who yeah, probably has the

1:50:40.229 --> 1:50:44.350
<v Speaker 1>most stringent. I don't know about Wisconsin. My brother's a

1:50:44.390 --> 1:50:48.349
<v Speaker 1>pediatrician down in Texas and he says the compliance stuff

1:50:48.790 --> 1:50:53.530
<v Speaker 1>and continuing education they have to do there is insane.

1:50:54.350 --> 1:50:56.170
<v Speaker 1>Take it a wild guess. He's not going to let

1:50:56.210 --> 1:51:00.870
<v Speaker 1>his medical license just kind of be delinquent for several years.

1:51:00.930 --> 1:51:07.940
<v Speaker 1>Like Robin Vining's photography license. Uh, So that's an exclusive story.

1:51:08.100 --> 1:51:11.580
<v Speaker 1>Earlier in the show, we also broke the story that

1:51:12.340 --> 1:51:17.260
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Cook, running for Congress, you talk about negligence. Now,

1:51:17.300 --> 1:51:21.500
<v Speaker 1>this is just willful. She wants universal health care. She

1:51:21.540 --> 1:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>won't say she wants universal health care because, you know,

1:51:24.760 --> 1:51:28.180
<v Speaker 1>she's running in a pretty conservative district in western Wisconsin,

1:51:28.200 --> 1:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but she wants universal health care. She wants as many

1:51:30.720 --> 1:51:34.400
<v Speaker 1>people to have health care as possible, except apparently, for

1:51:34.520 --> 1:51:39.550
<v Speaker 1>her own campaign staff, which she is refusing to provide

1:51:39.930 --> 1:51:46.849
<v Speaker 1>health care coverage for. This is the best and brightest Democrat.

1:51:47.170 --> 1:51:50.030
<v Speaker 1>This also is why I spent a lot more time

1:51:50.070 --> 1:51:51.769
<v Speaker 1>than I thought I was going to this hour on

1:51:51.810 --> 1:51:54.330
<v Speaker 1>the Robin Vining story, because it was so entertaining to me.

1:51:55.810 --> 1:52:00.950
<v Speaker 1>This is why a Harvard-Harris poll out today actually shows

1:52:01.450 --> 1:52:07.610
<v Speaker 1>Republicans leading the generic ballot question by two points. Generic

1:52:07.640 --> 1:52:10.860
<v Speaker 1>ballot asks, if the election were held today, regardless of

1:52:10.920 --> 1:52:12.820
<v Speaker 1>who is running, would you vote for the Republican or

1:52:12.860 --> 1:52:17.099
<v Speaker 1>would you vote for the Democrat? Democrats led by four

1:52:17.180 --> 1:52:21.900
<v Speaker 1>points in April, by two points in July, today, September.

1:52:22.900 --> 1:52:27.130
<v Speaker 1>In that same poll, Republicans lead by two. It's one poll,

1:52:27.590 --> 1:52:30.219
<v Speaker 1>but that is a trend. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll discuss

1:52:30.260 --> 1:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further. Harvard-Harris poll released today in the field,

1:52:35.680 --> 1:52:41.350
<v Speaker 1>August 28th through the 30th, shows Republicans leading the generic

1:52:41.410 --> 1:52:47.130
<v Speaker 1>ballot 51% to 49% over Democrats. Yes, this is just

1:52:47.390 --> 1:52:51.470
<v Speaker 1>one poll, but it does show a trend. There are

1:52:51.670 --> 1:52:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of other generic ballot polls which show are

1:52:56.720 --> 1:53:01.099
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty predictive at this stage of the game that

1:53:02.000 --> 1:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>are showing Republicans not doing as badly as you might think.

1:53:08.210 --> 1:53:15.610
<v Speaker 1>In 2022, at roughly the same point, Democrats, or excuse me,

1:53:16.130 --> 1:53:21.889
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were leading the generic ballot by two and a half, okay?

1:53:22.990 --> 1:53:26.370
<v Speaker 1>Two and a half points. The actual House popular vote,

1:53:27.050 --> 1:53:34.469
<v Speaker 1>Republicans won by about 2.8%. That's kind of remarkable. In 2018,

1:53:34.470 --> 1:53:43.790
<v Speaker 1>the early generic ballot showed Democrats up 8.3 points, 2018.

1:53:43.790 --> 1:53:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Democrats won the popular vote in the House by 8.6%.

1:53:47.520 --> 1:53:57.339
<v Speaker 1>That's actually kind of eerie how close the generic ballot

1:53:57.479 --> 1:54:01.820
<v Speaker 1>questions have been relatively early in the cycle. Does this

1:54:01.860 --> 1:54:05.580
<v Speaker 1>mean Republicans are going to keep control of the House? No,

1:54:06.100 --> 1:54:09.309
<v Speaker 1>but it is a trend that is worth watching. Out

1:54:09.320 --> 1:54:11.929
<v Speaker 1>of time for tonight's show. Talk to you tomorrow, 3.06 p.m.

1:54:11.970 --> 1:54:13.390
<v Speaker 1>right here on the Dan O'Donnell Show.