WEBVTT - America's Truckin' Network -- 12/3/25

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>This is America's Trucking Network with Kevin Gordon.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome aboard, Thanks for tuning in on this Wednesday morning.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>We are finally starting to see a bit of a

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>decrease in terms of gasoline prices.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 3>We saw that right before.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The Thanksgiving holiday, and it's been interesting over the last

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 2>well since inauguration that generally what you see around vacation time,

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>what you see around holidays and even weekends, sometimes the

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>gas prices seem to go up just a little bit

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 2>right before those peak driving periods. And you know, the

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>justification has always been, well, you know, it's a matter

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of supply and demand. When there's a lot of demand,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the supply is pretty much the same. You can only

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>put so many gallons in the tank underground and go

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>on and that. If there's a lot of demand for that,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>then of course people are going to be you know,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the demands there, so the supply is less and of

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>course the prices go up. But over the last year

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>we've seen pretty much around the time of thinks well,

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Independence Day, Memorial Day weekend and there that gas prices

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>actually came down a little bit, were held steady right

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 2>up to the Thanksgiving holiday. A lot of people were

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about and actually in the news they were talking

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about this, which was kind of interesting

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>because it was positive news for the Trump administration, which surprise, surprise,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>they actually reported on, but talking about that gas prices

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>were approaching the lowest that they had been in over

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>four years.

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's that is not chump change.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>It's less than what I would want it to see,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>given the fact that we look at oil prices and

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>oil prices basically well just let's get to it. West

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Texas Centermedia crewed Carling is at fifty eight dollars and

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>sixty six cents a barrel. That's down sixty six cents

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>from yesterday, which since the beginning of the year, West

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 2>Texas Intermedia crews down eighteen dollars and twenty three cents

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a barrel, or twenty four percent. Rent crued sixty two

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>forty six, down seventy one cents. That is down seventeen

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>dollars and forty four cents since Inauguration Day, or twenty

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 2>two percent. And I've been talking most of the summer

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we actually since oil price has been falling, that we're

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>not seeing this reflected in gasoline prices. And I have

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>quized several people on that. We've had Phil Flint on

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 2>this program talking about that. And when they talk about

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>going into the summer season, you have the summer blends

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and you have to have certain additives to that for

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>pollution controls, and you know, the distillates and the processing

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>going through the refinery and the costs of that. Also

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>in the spring, when they start gearing up away from

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the heating oil and the decent you know, the heating

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>oil during the winter months and getting into the gasoline season,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>then you have the changeover and the refineries and the prices.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, the supply goes down because they're not refining

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>as much. And then at the end of the term

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>when the summer driving season is over and then shifting

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to the winter blends, that the maintenance goes down, and

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, all.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 3>That sort of stuff.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>But overall, the prices have not come down the way

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I would have expected them to see. I mean, given

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the raw material process going in there

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>is down fifteen to twenty twenty five percent over the

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.119
<v Speaker 2>previous just since January, and you're not seeing that reflected

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>in gasoline prices. We are starting to see a little

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of a decrease in gasoline prices generally because of

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>what they talk about. Towards the end of the season,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 2>after you get out of the summer driving season, when

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you have the peak gasoline demand, the demand isn't there

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>as much, and so then the prices come down. It

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>made the net well headlines from the National News talking

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>about the gasoline prices fall to a four year low

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>on cheap oil, flat demand. Now again, when I look

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 2>at gasoline prices and for the first time for a

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>long time, technically nationwide the average for gasoline is down

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>below three dollars a gallon. But you know, the way

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>they put the prices on the Marquee and whatever, it's always,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, two dollars and seventy five cents point nine.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>You might as we'll call it two dollars and seventy

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 2>six cents. But right now the national average is two

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars ninety nine cents point eight, so eight tenths, so

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>it averages out or you know, round up to three dollars.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>But it is technically below three dollars a gallon, which

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is a good thing. Uh, And prices are coming down.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 2>In the story they're talking about while gasoline prices tend

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to fall after the peak summer demand months, demand months

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 2>when drivers hit the rather on vacation. The cost to

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>fill your tank has been relatively flat this year, with

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 2>prices held down by cheaper cruit. Now on the plus

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>side of that, the gasoline prices haven't gone up. If

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you look at the prices as what they were last

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>year versus this year, they are relatively the same or

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 2>within a couple of pennies of each. So as far

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 2>as inflation is concerned, when you look at energy prices,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 2>where you look at gasoline prices, that isn't affecting your

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>your bank account or affecting your your you know, your

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>monthly payments, your budget for the year or for the

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>month on a on a major way, because again you're

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>paying the same amount basically this year as you were

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 2>last year, and depending upon how you drive, the fuel

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>efficiency and so on will make a big difference. But

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>it's been interesting that actually people are starting to talk

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>about that and the fact that I'm actually starting to

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>see this price is narrowing to the point where it's

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it's noticeable, but not as noticeable as it could be.

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>And as I've mentioned, if prices on gasoline were about

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent lower where I think they should be. We'd

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 2>be paying a national average of about two dollars and

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 2>fifty five cents a gallon, and there needs to be

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of Now. I know, these refineries are

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>working at massive amounts. I mean they are working at

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>ninety six ninety seven percent capacity, which is in efficiency,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>which is a lot higher than most businesses operate. And

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 2>so credit to that. But again, as I mentioned before,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 2>we have not built a major refinery in this country

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>in over forty seven years. We've upgraded some, we've expanded

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>some within the territory or within the location of these refineries,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of actually manufacturing a new or building

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a new refinery, it just hasn't been done. And then

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>you see the gasoline prices out in California, which are

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>more than two dollars, more than two dollars a gallon

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>than the cheapest gas in the country right now, Gasoline

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in California is at five four dollars and fifty four

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>cents a gallon, and at Oklahoma is two dollars and

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>forty cents. Folks, that is a two dollars and fourteen

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>cent difference. And you've got all these regulations on the

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 2>gasoline prices in producing in California. They put all this

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>mandates in terms of additives that have to go into

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the gasoline there to control, as they say, pollution in

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>that part of the country. Yet they will push all

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>these environmental controls in certain areas, but then allow these

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>wildfires to go crazy, which wipes out all the stuff

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>that they've done in terms of cleaning up the climate

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>or cleaning up the environment.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Out there, and it's all destroyed.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Twenty to thirty years of looking after, you know, trying

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>to reduce carbon footprint and to reduce pollution in California

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>were wiped out in twenty two when that wildfire went

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>through there. And when you look at the gat the

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>pollution that was caused by the.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Fire in January of this year that.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Wiped out the palisades, that pushed them back another ten

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen years. So everything they've done out there has

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>been useless based on their environmental policies as far as

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>clear cutting, making sure that they keep the brush low

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, if you've got fire hydrants, make

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>sure that they have water in them, filling the reservoir,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>doing the basic things that government are supposed to be

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>doing so on top of that, on top of being

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 2>a situation where you have a fire hazard on a

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>yearly basis, and then you've got these right now, what

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I think, I don't even think of the eleven thousand

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>structures out there. I think last count was that there

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 2>had been something like fourteen hundred applications that have been filed.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And again that number is down because of all the

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>restriction and all the requirements going into cleaning up the

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 2>site and making sure that it's ready to be built

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>on before you even apply for the application. So the

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>building permits that have been issued are paltry, the amount

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of applications are low because of all the government red tape,

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>remember the press conferences that we're going to streamline all

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>these things. So you've got this crazy situation out there,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and plus the fact that they're paying two dollars and

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>fourteen cents more per gallon because they have special refineries

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>out there, and then they criticize those refineries and put

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>more restrictions on them to the point where where the

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 2>refineries there that can actually produce the type of gasoline

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that is demanded by that state they're moving out. So

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>it's even more high because there's even less refineries that

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>are doing that. So this environmental policy out in California

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>is nuts. But at least across the country, what we're

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>seeing as far as gasoline prices, they're starting to come down,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and of course based on some of the more inexpensive

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 2>they keep calling it cheap oil, but it's just less

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>expensive oil that we have in this country. Coming up,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be talking about some manufacturing numbers that

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 2>we saw, which kind of a good news bad news situation.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kevin Gordon, America's truck a network seven hundred WLW.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What need this is the racing repord on America's drugging

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>network on seven hundred WLW.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 4>NASCAR's anti trust lawsuit got underway on Monday and North

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Carolina Jerry selections and opening statements took place twenty three

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 4>eleven in front Row suing NASCAR at October of twenty

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, claiming the sanctioning body runs a monopoly using

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 4>its charter system, supplier contracts, and track agreements and to

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>take it or leave it contracts to suppress competition and

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 4>limit teams in commercial freedom. The twenty twenty five Formula

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 4>One season will come down to one race. Following the

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 4>action over the weekend at Abu Dhabi, Max verstapp And

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>won the race and a championship leader Lando Norris fishing

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 4>fourth for a staff and is now Norris's closest rival

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 4>heading into next weekend, just twelve points behind.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Norris mentioned it before, it's US, of course, nailing weekends,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 5>maximizing points, not making mistakes where others do make mistakes.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 5>If that's driving mistakes, the mistakes, but we're in it

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 5>and it will keep it interesting.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 4>Oscar Piastre slipped the third place in the standings with

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the second place finished, he's sixteen back.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Pretty pretty gut wrenching, to be honest, I think you know,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 6>it felt like I drove probably the best weekend I've

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 6>had this year, if not in F one. So to

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 6>not have the to not have the results US is painful.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 4>And Norris clinging to the top spot with a race

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 4>to go.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Car was good.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 7>Oscar finished second and he was very quick, so nothing

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 7>to complain about, just strategy as the second car is

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 7>always just a bit worse, and how do you know

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 7>it today? So no, not even that well and even

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 7>the fight for a second call, we we should have

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 7>done what we did, so simple as that one.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the breathing repoard on America's Drugging Network on

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred WLW, say Dennison for a t N.

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kevin Gordon, America's struck in Network, seven hundred WLW yesterday,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>actually the day before yesterday, I guess since we're into

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a new day the ism. The Institute's supply Management came

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>up with their numbers for manufacturing sector in November, and

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the top number doesn't look so good, but some of

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the stuff underlying that looks pretty decent. The US factory

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>activity shrank in November the most in four months, as

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>orders weekend, indicating manufacturers are struggling to break free from

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 2>the extended period of malaise. Now, if there are less orders,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that means that they're that, you know, the customers have

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>slowed down. And why has the customer slowed down? Have

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>they slowed down because of pricing or because of demand?

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>And if it's demand, could it possibly be because the

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 2>interest rates are too high? If people are wanting more

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>products and they're going to go out and have some

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of this stuff manufactured and provided for them, that maybe

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the market isn't there yet because of waiting on interest

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>rates to come down. And it was funny yesterday going

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>into actually going into Monday, all I saw, as far

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 2>as the headlines Jerome Powell to speak. And this was

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the thing is if some you know, you're waiting for

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the Messiah or somebody to stand on a mountaintop and

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>give some sort of a grand and glorious speech in

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>terms of what's going on as the economy is concerned.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's been.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Proven time and time again that lion Jerry Powell doesn't

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>have a clue as far as what's going on in

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the economy. He's not a supply side economist. And I'm

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>not really sure that easy knowledgeable in terms of what

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>goes on as far as the economy is concerned at

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>all in the first place. But again, you know, and

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I backed that up by the fact that when you

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>look at his track record during the Biden administration, when

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you had inflation month after month after month after month

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>going up and up and up, he kept saying, well,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you know this, this inflation is transitory, and no, we

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>don't see in a situation where we need to raise

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>interest rates in order to slow the economy. Down any

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>or to slow the inflation rate down, none of this

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of stuff until it got to a point in July,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>in June of twenty twenty two, when we hit a

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>nine point one percent I can't emphasize that enough. Nine

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 2>point one percent inflation rate. It was the highest in

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>forty years. Let that sink in for a moment. And

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>yet the Federal Reserve kept talking about transitory inflation. This

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>is only temper, it's not you know, it's not going

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to be there forever. Well, the problem is, and I

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>keep pointing, and I kept pointing it out at the time,

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>even and even today given some of the numbers, is

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>that it's not a matter if you're starting off at

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at you know, if you're talking about a dollar today,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not as if the inflation for that month bumps

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>up and then you start all over back down to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a dollar. So if your inflation goes up three cents,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>then the next month you've got a dollar three, and

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>then if it goes up three percent from there, then

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 2>it's now up to a dollar six, but a little

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>bit higher than a dollar six, because you're taking three

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>percent of a dollar three, not not three percent of

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a dollar. And so then the following month, if it

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 2>goes up three percent, it's not going up three percent

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>based on that dollar. It's going up based on what

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>has already been layered on top of that. And then

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in the month at June when it went up nine percent,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't come back down from that. The only way

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that that comes down is if you increase activity, you

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>increase the purchases, and you increase the economy to the

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>point where those prices do come down because there's so

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>much being it costs less to manufacture the facility, the

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>items that you're producing, or the amount of items that

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you're buying. Look at a truck. I mean people in

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the trucking industry, you know all about this. If you're

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 2>driving a truck and the truck is full, then you're

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>getting the most bang for your buck in terms of

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 2>those items in there, and it's costing you. It costs

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 2>you the same to run that truck. But if the

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>load is full, then you're spreading that over the total

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of what's in the truck itself. So if your truck

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>is empty, then you're costs for skyrocketed because obviously you've

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>got no revenue on the other side. But the more

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>revenue you have to offset that that cost of operating

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that truck comes down per mile based on what you

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 2>have in terms of you know, the cost. The cost

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 2>is the same per mile, but it spread over a

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 2>larger amount of revenue, and so it doesn't look as

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 2>bad and it's and it helps your bottom line.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Same thing in the economy.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>If you don't have the goods being manufactured, and you

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 2>have only a few amount of goods being manufactured because

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of things slowing down, but the demand is there, the

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>price of those items are going to go up. But

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the more that it's available, then those prices come down.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 2>So and then on top of this, and I've been

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>talking about this at nauseum here for several months, is

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>that if you once you factor in not only you

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>have the prior inflation of the Biden administration that you're

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 2>dealing with. Now now you can you know, control that

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to a certain extent by lower energy prices and those

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>types of things, cutting out some of the government regulations

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't cost you so much in terms of compliance,

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>which adds to the cost of the thing, the item

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 2>that you're selling. So those prices will come down. But

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 2>when you have so much activity going on, then it

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 2>increases the amount of items available. So the only way

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 2>to get those prices down is more volume. And if

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 2>you have more volume and more people buying, then you

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>wind up having the prices come down tremendously. But what

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 2>they're not talking about is when you look at how

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 2>many contracts have been negotiated the UAW, the railroad workers, ups,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the dock workers. I mentioned railroad who else the well,

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned auto workers, and there's a couple other ones,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 2>But there's been some major contracts the dock workers on

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>both the East Coast and the West coast. When you

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>factor in those those prices in terms of the increase

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to produce those items or to move those items, that

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>adds to the cost of the item itself. And so

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 2>when you have added prices in terms of payroll is concerned,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 2>those prices are going to go up. You're not going

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>to go back in at some point in time and say, okay,

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, in this contract UAW or railroad workers, you

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 2>are getting a ten percent increase in your salary each year.

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And then when inflation starts coming down, you're not going

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>to go back in there and say, well, we're going

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 2>to take a percentage or two percent off of your pay. No,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that pay is in there, and that's already baked in.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Now again, I'm not criticizing, I'm not saying that people

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>don't deserve higher wages, and especially when you take into

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>consideration that there was such a freeze on wage increases

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 2>going back to some of the pre pandemic some of

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>these government some of these contracts with these union workers,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>it was locked into place and didn't come up for

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 2>negotiation until twenty twenty, And of course they're not going

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to do anything to go siations during twenty twenty during

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, So whatever contract expired in twenty twenty was

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>pushed off and wasn't negotiated on until twenty twenty one,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 2>and even into twenty twenty two when they finally hashed

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>out all the deals, because again, when you had the

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>supply chain issues and that going on, it was no

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>time to go back in and renegotiate these contracts. So

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these contracts were on hold and people

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>had not had some of the workers had not had

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 2>a pay increase since twenty nineteen. So when you factor

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that into that twenty twenty three contract, of course that

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>number has got to be made up. You've got to

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 2>try to increase that a little bit because they have

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>been basically losing money because if your price is fixed,

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>if your hourly rate is fixed, and the inflation that

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 2>was during the Biden administration was going up and up

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and up, you're actually losing money on a daily basis.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So catching that up. But once that contract is in there,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and that is part of what it costs to either

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 2>move these goods, manufacture these goods, sell these goods, import

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>these goods, export these goods, that's all going to factor

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>in and that price is not going to come down.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So if that's and that is in the inflation number now,

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and rather than trying to blame it off on tariffs

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 2>or blame it off on other things, be specific about

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 2>where these increases are coming from and be straight with

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the American.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Public so that they get a full picture of.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>What's going on. And that's the thing that I've been

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about. Now, getting back to manufacturing, we'll pick this

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>up coming up, because manufacturing numbers are down again. Is

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it because of the consumer demand or is it because

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of the weight and see in terms of people not

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 2>wanting to jump in and have that increase as far

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>as the interest rates being high and what that does

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to your operating costs. I'm Kevin Gordon, America Struck a Network.

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Seven hundred WLW.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 8>Here's your trucking forecast that Tri State. It in the

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 8>rest of the country and the tri sit overnight, mostly cloudy,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 8>the low down to twenty mostly sunny. Wednesday, highs in

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 8>the mid thirties, partly Sunday. Thursday high of thirty one,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 8>partly sunny. Friday a high of thirty five Nationally more

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 8>moderate to heavy snow moving across the interior New England

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 8>States through tonight. Arctic air forecast over the Midwest Thursday,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 8>while snow showers linger across the Great Lakes region along

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 8>with the Great Basin and the Rockies. Moderate to heavy

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 8>rain emerging along the western to central Gulf Coast.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Seven hundred WLW. I'm Kevin Gordon. This as America Struck

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a Network. If you miss any of our previous segments

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 2>or any of our other shows, hit up that iHeartRadio

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>app and of course brought to you by our friends

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>at Ross Truck Centers. Came back to this manufacturing slump

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 2>deepens in November again. There's some mixed bag of information

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in here. Again getting back to the original paragraph, US

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>factory activity shrank in November, is most of the most

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and four months as orders weekend, indicating manufacture are struggling

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to break free from the extended period of Melee's Institute

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 2>for Supply Management Index eased point five percent basically, well,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 2>actually a half a percentage point to forty eight point

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>two according to the data release December first, the measure

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 2>has been below fifty, which indicates contraction for nine straight months. Again,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>even at forty eight percent, going down, going, let me see,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 2>going to fifty forty eight point seven percent, down to

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 2>forty eight point two.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 3>It's still a little bit.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Of a drop, but I'm not a major bottom falling

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>out type drum. Survey suggestination manufacturing base remains bogged down

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>by trade policy uncertainty and elevated production costs. Production costs

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>based on what could it possibly be salaries. Of course,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to talk about that USMISM. Manufacturing prices

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>paid for materials picked up for the first time in

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>five months and is about eight points higher than a

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 2>year year ago. Now again based into that could possibly

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.719
<v Speaker 2>be terrorists also could be baked into those numbers, is

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>the cost or the salary increases from the employees that

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 2>actually make up those raw materials, mine those raw materials,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 2>gather those raw materials, or ship those those raw materials.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 2>So again, there's all kinds of factors that go into that.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not straight terriffs as far as that's concerned. And

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>if it were teriffs, based on the numbers that they've

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 2>been telling us, that eight percent, that eight points higher,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>is a lot lower than what they were predicting. Customer

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>demand has largely been uninspiring as well. Orders contracted in

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 2>November as the fastt paced since July, while backloads shrank

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 2>for the most in seven months. Well that's with the

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>backlogs shrinking, that's not so bad. I mean, that's good

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 2>on the one hand, because if you've got a bunch

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>of orders that you're not getting to, then those people

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 2>get a little frustrated because they're not getting what they're wanting,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>getting what they were requesting, and if they're not getting that,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 2>it's possible that they may choose to go someplace else

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 2>and you wind up losing that customer. So if you're

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 2>working off the backlogs and getting those down to the

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 2>point where they're more manageable. Then you don't have as

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>much in the pipeline. The problem is to get down

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>too low, then you don't have anything coming in that pipeline,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>so that pipeline draws down, you wind up with zero,

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and then you wind up having the lay people off

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 2>because you just don't have the business. Susan Spence, chair

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 2>of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, said uncertainly about

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 2>tariffs is driving the pullback because customers are holding off

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 2>on orders until there's more clarity as to the cost

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 2>on the cost of goods. Well, you know, if the

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>demand is there, if your customer base is looking for

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>those items, and if they need those items, then based

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 2>on the law of supply and demand, if the prices

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 2>go up a little bit, they're still going to pay

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 2>for that. But again, if the customers are holding off

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 2>because they're expecting to see interest rates go down so

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>that the cost of them buying those goods come down,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 2>that's a whole nother story and something that not a

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of people. People are just not talking about it

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>as much as I would like them to talk about it,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>because every time we talk about every time I pick

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>up the news on oil prices. They'll talk about, you know,

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>leading up to the Federal Reserve, as to whether or

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>not they're going to cut interest rates. They'll say that, well,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>with interest rates high, that lower interest rates spurs the economy,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>builds the economy, and that thus makes more demand for oil,

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and that would boost the price of oil because against

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>are more demand based on the supply. But they recognize

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and then and all these other stories that I read,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>they always refer to lower interest rate increases business activity,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>puts more money in the pockets of the people that

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>are looking to buy these things. They have more disposable

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 2>end come to spend, and therefore they spend more, they

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>buy more, which then boosts the economy. So again, the

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>interest rates are a factor here, and you know, only

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>rarely are people focusing on it except here on america'struck

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a network looking at some of the other things in here.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>The soft demand conditions help explain a deeper contraction in

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>factory employment. Last month, Roughly twenty five percent of respondents

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>reported lower employment, the largest share since mid twenty twenty. Meanwhile,

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the group's production index rebounded in November, expanding at the

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>fastest clip in four months. Despite the advanced output this

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>year has been uneven. Again the term uneven. It hasn't

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>been that the numbers that the fastest clip, that the

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>production numbers have fallen dramatically. It's that they have been

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>uneven throughout the year. They're not saying that they're down,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 2>they're not saying that they're up. They're not saying that

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 2>there's been these large peaks or large valley It's just

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>been uneven during the year, which bottom line, isn't all

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that bad given the dire predictions that we're receiving back

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 2>on Independence Day, a liberation day, i should say, back

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>in April, when these terraffs were put into place. Eleven

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing industry contracted in November, led by apparel, wood and

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 2>paper products, and textiles. Four industries, including computer and electronic products,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>reported growth, the fewest in a year. Survey also showed

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the supplier delivery times of materials for manufacturers quickened for

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the first time in four months. So the ability to

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 2>get the goods to manufacture the raw materials in has

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>picked up considerably, so that end of the supply chain

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 2>has improved. If the activity getting that in there has

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>been building up and is available, then you not having

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to pay higher prices because that truck or whatever delivering

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>those goods isn't busy someplace else. So if you're having

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to get those goods in the door, that's

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a good thing.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Producers and customers.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Inventories continue to shrink, although the slower paces than a

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>month early, so people will have these inventories, and generally

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 2>what you do is you have enough inventory to get

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you through or you know, they just in time ordering,

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>which has been very popular over the years, is that

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 2>you have only the amount of inventory on hand that

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 2>you need in order to conduct sales, and so that

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>if the timing is right, when the last item comes

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>off the shelf, the next item is right behind it

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>getting loaded onto the shelf, and so you keep that

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 2>supply chain going. And then what we experienced during the

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>pandemic and there shortly after, because you had this interruption

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 2>and because you had a break there, you had some

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of the shelves that were empty. But then gearing up

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and then restocking those shells became an issue. And also

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>because of people being available to stock those shelves, people

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 2>being able to transport those goods, all of that stuff

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>was backed up, getting people back into the workforce. People

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 2>were being available to come back to work. Companies hiring,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>whether or not they were hiring back to the same

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>number of employees, trying to take a look at what

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>their orders were, to see what their business was and

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>adjust it accordingly, because you don't want to bring everybody

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>back at one time. You had to layer that in

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 2>otherwise you would have your employee costs way high and

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you don't have a whole lot at revenue. And on

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>top of being shut down and not having any revenue

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 2>during that period of time and barely getting by now,

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>suddenly you throw into that more losses and that would

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 2>push a couple of companies, would push companies under into bankruptcy.

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 2>So again, with all that in mind, the fact that

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>people are having inventories not only at the wholesale but

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>at the retail level, that those inventory levels are shrinking,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>that to a certain extent to a you know, at

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>some point is good when it gets down to the

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>level of where that can be replenished on a regular basis,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 2>you don't run out of anything. But it's not they're

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>not talking about that being in a dangerous level at

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 2>this point. So some good news, bad news in the

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>report and hopefully we can see again.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't I can't stress enough.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I am feeling so good in terms of what's going

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 2>on as far as our economy is concerned. I see

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things on the on the horizon that

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>are looking very good. The problem is is that we

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 2>just don't have the Federal Reserve on board helping along

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the line. And it doesn't help that the spoon fed

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>regurgitators in the mainstream media every opportunity they have, they

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>will talk down the economy. They will talk down the

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 2>economic policies of this president, even though they know what

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the track record was. They knew what the track record

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>was back in twenty seventeen when he took office, what

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the economy was humming along in twenty twenty, and the

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>disaster that we had during the Biden administration. You would

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>think that for the basis of their customers and because

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>they concern about the American public in general, that they

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 2>would be rooting for the economy to be strong. But again,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to have a group of people that actually

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 2>liked this country. I'm Kevin Gordon, America's truck a Network

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred w from the spoon Fed regurgitators. In the

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media, we hear about all the dire predictions and

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the unrealistic predictions that they make, even though we have

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>kept seeing you unexpectedly low employment, unemployment unemployment claims, we've

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>seen unexpected job increases, we've seen unexpected retail sales, we've

0:32:56.080 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>seen unexpected generally on the good side, and yet we

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 2>don't hear. All we hear from the spoon feeder regurgitators

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 2>is bad news. They keep talking about how the trade

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>policies with the terriffts, that is, that is hurting the

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 2>American public, that is hurting our businesses. When you take

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 2>into consideration the purpose of the terriffs that they were

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 2>retaliatory against countries that have been taking advantage of US

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 2>dumping their cheaper goods into our economy because they either

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 2>subsidize those or there are lower terraffs on their products

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 2>coming in here, and there are barriers to our products

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>going into their countries, so that they have the best

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of both worlds. They have cheaper products coming into this country,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>which is better competitive with our goods, then they are

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 2>blocking their entry of our goods into their country. So

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>all they have is what's produced by their manufacturers, so

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>there are a tremendous advantage. Trump tried to lower that,

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 2>lower that playing field and make sure that we had

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 2>fair trade, not necessarily free trade. And what is happening

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is that you know, any of these countries that started

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about having economic problems or that it was affecting

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 2>their economy because of the tariffs, it's a very simple fix.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Come to negotiating table, Negotiate with the president, negotiate with

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>his team, get the prices down, get the tariffs down

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>so that we have a better flow of goods and

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 2>so that there's more competition out there, and that your

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>people are not standing by the sidelines not working because

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs coming into the United States.

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 3>You are in control of that.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>You can actually sit down at the negotiating table and

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 2>get that down.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 3>But it's interesting to see.

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I saw the story Canadian steelmaker al Goma Steel Group Inc.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Will let go one thousand employees and close its blast

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 2>furnace in northern Ontario within months as it seeks to

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 2>stem losses resulting from US teriffs. Now, if they're manufacturing

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 2>steel there, and they're manufacturing steel at a cheaper price

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 2>and bringing that into our country, which an and then

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they have an unfair trade or a balance of trade

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 2>or unfair cost of their steel to our steel in

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 2>the United States, then of course they're going to have

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 2>more sales here. But if we level that playing field,

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>then that puts them on part with our steel manufacturers

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 2>in this country, and so people are inclined to buy

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 2>more American steel. And which has happened, and the fact

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 2>that Algoma Steel is now laying off one thousand employees

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 2>because they're not selling as much into the United States.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're selling something, if you're selling the

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 2>same item, the same exact item, into a particular country

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and you can produce it cheaper because you're paying your

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 2>employees less us you're subsidizing those country companies and propping

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 2>them up, then their prices coming into our country are

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be cheaper. And so if you've got the

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>same item, the same quality, you're going to choose the

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>item that's the cheapest. But now if you've now put restrictions,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and then on top of that, you know it's cheaper

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 2>coming into this country, but then our goods are being

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 2>prevented from going into their country, so they're definitely in

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>an unfair advantage. So if you then put up the

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 2>barriers and prevent their items coming in here or the

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 2>items that do are now on par with ours, people

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are going to pick and choose which ones are going

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 2>to buy, and a lot of times don't wind up

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 2>buying whichever one is manufacturing in the United States.

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 3>But not necessarily. I mean, you have customer loyalty and

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 3>so on.

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that there's been this barrier, there's not

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 2>as been as much purchasing and much orders going into Canada.

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 2>They have had to now cut back and they're looking

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 2>to lay off a thousand people. But what is interesting

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 2>when you dig deeper into the story, the company, based

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in the city of Sault Saint Marie, is also shuttering

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 2>its coke making operation as it plans to transition to

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 2>making steel solely by electric arc furnace in early twenty

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty six, a year ahead of schedule. Al Gooma said

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 2>December first in an email statement, they don't say in here,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 2>but I'm wondering if the coke making operation, if there

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 2>are these coke fired plants, that if those are more

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 2>labor intensive as opposed to these electric plants, could that

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 2>be part of the reason that they're laying off employees.

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>They want to blame it on tariffs, They want to

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>blame it on the United States. But is it true?

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And I guess we'll have to see coming in the

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>next few days, or at least maybe I have to

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 2>dig into it and find out for myself. Spokesperson for

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the company, Devone, the Trump administration's fifty percent tariffs on

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 2>foreign steel have fundamentally altered the competitive landscape and sharply

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 2>limited our ability to access the US market. So again,

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 2>raising the barriers on par with their barriers on our

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 2>goods are leveling the playing field and they are finding

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it difficult to compete. Well, you know, if you've had

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 2>an advantage all these years and now suddenly you don't

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 2>have that advantage, yes, it does make it difficult free

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to compete. Algoma sales dropped thirteen percent in the third

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>quarter and it's reported a direct tariff expense and they

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 2>it was like eight eighty nine point seven million Canadian dollars,

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 2>saying the US steel market had become largely closed to US.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The company, which currently has about twenty five hundred employees,

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 2>was given a five hundred million Canadian subsidy in emergency

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>loans from the governments of Canada onto. So again they're

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 2>subsidizing their companies up there, whereas you know, our country

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 2>companies are having to compete with that. Let's see the

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 2>layoffs come into effect on March twenty third. Also in

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the statement, they said transition is necessary to protect Algama's

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 2>future in the face of these extraordinary and external marketing forces,

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and we will continue to advocate for competitive and fair

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>trading environment for Canadian steel. Well, talk to your government,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 2>talk to the people that are in charge of negotiating

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 2>up there. Make sure that they're doing the things that

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 2>make you more competitive with what's going on as far

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 2>as the United States is concerned, and that you're not

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 2>charging less as far as teriffs, or that you're charging

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 2>more on tariffs on our goods coming in there and

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 2>not so much on your goods coming in here, so

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that we are now on a more competitive basis.

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 3>So again, interesting, I.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Saw this story FedEx to slash eight hundred and fifty

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 2>six Texas jobs after a customer moves its business. Now

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 2>this isn't a well, it's a reduction of processing in

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that particular location because a particular company, a particular client

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>has moved, So it's not something that FedEx has done

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>or anything that the employees have done. It's been the

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>company that they were that they were providing these services

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 2>for has moved. FedEx Corporation plans to cut hundreds of

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 2>jobs in Texas after a third party logistics customer opted

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to move its operations to a new location in a

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 2>different company. Memphis, Tennessee based courier will discontinue operations.

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 3>At Copple, Texas.

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 2>FedEx said that it will close its facility layoff eight

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty six workers after customers shifted its business.

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Company attributed the costs of the customer's relocation decision and

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>noted they will occur in phases through late April, so

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 2>that going on. FedEx said some of the employees may

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 2>move into other roles or receive assistance as the firm

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 2>continues a broader restructure of its shipping operations. Now, the

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing with us is the fact that a company

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 2>moved away and moved their operations and chose a different

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>carrier in a different location. So this isn't necessarily something

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>that's bad as far as FedEx is concerned, or the

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 2>products that they're doing or how they're moving things. FedEx said,

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>notify the employees at the site will move in advance,

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and that some workers are eligible to other positions. Let

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 2>me see they talk, and again they have to throw

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 2>this in here just I guess as a dig. The

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 2>move comes towards the end of the turbulent leayer with

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 2>a logistics company which has been jolted by President Donald

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Trump's trade policies and have strained key shipping lanes, especially

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 2>between US and China. Again, how can you squawk at

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>a country that we're basically are, that is not a

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 2>friend of the country and is an enemy of ours,

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that is trying to unfairly compete with us on the

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 2>world stage, and for some of the disruptions that they're

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 2>causing around the world. I mean, are you so concerned

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 2>about your bottom line that you're willing to deal that

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 2>you care more about dealing with an enemy of the

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 2>country rather than cheering for our country to be on

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 2>a competitive basis with them. Again, the way people look

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 2>at these trade policies and the way they look at

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>these teriffs is just mind boggling to me. Well, folks,

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:27.760
<v Speaker 2>does it for us? Stay tuned for Red Eye Radio

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>at the Top the Hour, I'm Kevin Gordon, America's Trucking

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Network seven hundred WLW