1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,280 Speaker 1: Michael, as usually you appear to be at least one 2 00:00:03,279 --> 00:00:06,360 Speaker 1: step ahead of the rest of the people talking about 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 1: whatever's going on. And I appreciate that O K zero A, And. 4 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 2: I appreciate that you do appreciate it, because I tell 5 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 2: you there are some people who think I'm five steps 6 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:21,080 Speaker 2: behind what everybody else is talking about. 7 00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:23,759 Speaker 3: I appreciate that you appreciate that he appreciates it. 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 2: Yes, and we're all very appreciative of just everything today. 9 00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 2: I again, if you want me to read a text 10 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 2: message from you, and I know that many of you 11 00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:39,560 Speaker 2: obviously desperately want me to read your text messages, and 12 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:41,640 Speaker 2: you have to send it to three three one zero 13 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:45,880 Speaker 2: three keyword Mike or Michael, because I ain't reading the others. 14 00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 2: So just you got it. You know, I know life 15 00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:53,360 Speaker 2: is difficult. I know life is hard. I know that, 16 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:56,000 Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, I gotta punch in another number, which 17 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 2: you don't have to remember. You can put it in 18 00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 2: your list of favorites three three one zero three, and 19 00:01:03,160 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 2: then whenever I piss you off, you can just type 20 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 2: in Mike and tell you kissed me off, and I'll 21 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:13,720 Speaker 2: read it and then I'll not care. You're gonna have 22 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,400 Speaker 2: I'm telling you this audience is going to have to 23 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 2: learn that I. 24 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 3: Just don't care. Well, if you don't care, that you 25 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 3: don't care, and I. 26 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 2: Don't care that you don't care, nobody cares, and nobody 27 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 2: cares that we don't care. Early in the evening Friday, 28 00:01:31,800 --> 00:01:34,240 Speaker 2: the District Court Court of Appeals issued an order that 29 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 2: denied an on bank review of an earlier judge's panel 30 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 2: decision that halted efforts by Judge Boseburg to conduct the 31 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:47,560 Speaker 2: hearing on whether or not to hold certain Department of 32 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:51,680 Speaker 2: Justice attorneys in contempt because they had defied his order 33 00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 2: to bring back planes carrying alien enemies to Al Salvador, 34 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 2: all being done pursuant to a presidential order that invoked 35 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 2: the Alien Enemies Act. Now, just so you understand what 36 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 2: the the mechanics of the procedure what I just described, 37 00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:13,920 Speaker 2: a three judge panel of the DC Court of Appeals 38 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:19,720 Speaker 2: had reviewed a decision by Judge Boseburg that ordered these 39 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 2: planes to turn around in mid air and come back, 40 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:27,880 Speaker 2: all in violation of Donald Trump's presidential order and invoking 41 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 2: the Alien Enemies Act. So they peeled that decision from 42 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,680 Speaker 2: that three judge panel to what's called an en banc 43 00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:41,079 Speaker 2: review of the entire all of the judges. Well, they 44 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:46,600 Speaker 2: denied that hearing, so they just let us stand. Now, 45 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,520 Speaker 2: I've talked about this before. I've talked about Trump invoking 46 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 2: the Alien Enemies Act. Now I know it was over there, 47 00:02:52,160 --> 00:02:53,640 Speaker 2: so you'd have to go listen to that. But I've 48 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,000 Speaker 2: talked about him invoking the Alien Enemies Act. I've talked 49 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 2: about this dispute between the Trump administration and this particular 50 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,480 Speaker 2: federal judge over removing alien enemies from the country. I've 51 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:07,880 Speaker 2: talked about the Skota's decision on deporting alien enemies, which 52 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 2: is a win. I talked about the probable cause for 53 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:15,080 Speaker 2: this judge to try to find contempt for the Trump 54 00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 2: administration not following the orders precisely because the planes were 55 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 2: already in the air, and how the reversal of Judge 56 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:27,680 Speaker 2: Boseburg's contempt finding for not having moved the planes fast enough. 57 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:32,799 Speaker 2: But any contempt finding might be short lived. Now, that's 58 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 2: a pretty long list, but to save you to give 59 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:39,360 Speaker 2: you a summary, let me just give you a quick summary. 60 00:03:40,440 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 2: Back on March fourteen, on a Saturday afternoon, Judge Boseburg 61 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,960 Speaker 2: had an emergency heard an emergency motion for a temporary 62 00:03:50,120 --> 00:03:53,840 Speaker 2: restraining order trying to stop the deportation of various illegal 63 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 2: aliens from Venezuela and El Salvador who were being prepared 64 00:03:57,800 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 2: that day for transportation out of the country. At the 65 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 2: end of the hearing, Judge Boseburg decided that he had jurisdiction. 66 00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:08,520 Speaker 2: He certified a provisional class of plaintiffs. He did that 67 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 2: because he was trying to comply with the Supreme Court 68 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 2: decision that says you can't enter these nationwide injunctions unless 69 00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:18,159 Speaker 2: you have a true class action. And the Supreme Court 70 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:22,039 Speaker 2: warned these trial judges, if you're going to certify a class, 71 00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:25,719 Speaker 2: you better follow the statute about certifying a class. So 72 00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 2: this trial judge tried to do that, and he tried 73 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:34,359 Speaker 2: to include in the class everybody, every individual being deported 74 00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:38,799 Speaker 2: under the president's order invoking the Alien's Alien Enemies Act. 75 00:04:38,960 --> 00:04:43,280 Speaker 2: And then he ordered any deportations of anybody that fit 76 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 2: that class to be halted, and he also ordered that 77 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,599 Speaker 2: any planes in the air with those members on the 78 00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:53,120 Speaker 2: planes to be turned around. Two planes went on to 79 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 2: El Salvador, where about two hundred were held in custody 80 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:02,479 Speaker 2: of the Salvadoran government pursuant to our agreement with Salvadoran government. 81 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:05,480 Speaker 2: Two days later, on March sixteenth, the same judge held 82 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:09,200 Speaker 2: its hearing to gather information about the events after he 83 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:13,840 Speaker 2: had issued his temporary restraining order. Then, on April ninth, 84 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 2: the DC Court of Appeals declined to hear the Justice 85 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:22,799 Speaker 2: Department's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The Supreme Court 86 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:26,840 Speaker 2: granted to stay, meaning they said, look, your temporary restraining 87 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,000 Speaker 2: order doesn't have any effect. And it also found the 88 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,160 Speaker 2: Supreme Court did that this judge didn't have any jurisdiction 89 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:35,640 Speaker 2: over the complaint filed by the Plainists who were still 90 00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:39,920 Speaker 2: being held in Texas prior to their removal. But that 91 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:43,280 Speaker 2: Supreme Court decision didn't address the issue of whether they 92 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:48,000 Speaker 2: had unlawfully denied his temporary restraining order. So I mean, 93 00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 2: that's a legal issuer just understand they didn't do that. 94 00:05:51,960 --> 00:05:54,559 Speaker 2: Then on April fourteenth, the same judge holds a hearing 95 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:59,120 Speaker 2: to further explore again the events going back to March fifteen, 96 00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 2: and what did the Department of Justice attorneys understand his 97 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:10,280 Speaker 2: order to be, who they communicated with, what steps were 98 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:13,039 Speaker 2: taken to comply with the order. Two days later, he 99 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 2: issues a probable cause finding that justified a trial and 100 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:22,440 Speaker 2: actual trial of the Department of Justice lawyers, which he 101 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:25,800 Speaker 2: ordered the Department of Justice to identify every lawyer that 102 00:06:25,839 --> 00:06:29,040 Speaker 2: made part of this decision, and he was going to 103 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:32,760 Speaker 2: he was going to have them tried on charges of 104 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:37,760 Speaker 2: criminal contempt for willfully defying his March fifteen order that 105 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:41,520 Speaker 2: the planes be turned around. Then fast forward to August, 106 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 2: a three judge panel of the DC Court of Appeals 107 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 2: granted a ride mandamus which set aside his probable cause 108 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:53,040 Speaker 2: finding for the criminal contempt charge that was the basis 109 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 2: to be the trial of these Department of Justice lawyers. 110 00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:00,280 Speaker 2: The panel had two Trump appointees when Obama a point. 111 00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:06,159 Speaker 2: But remember it was a three to zero decision. But 112 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 2: now each of them had different reasons for their decision, 113 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 2: but they all came to the same conclusion. Yesterday, order of 114 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 2: the full Appeals Court, which be I think a total 115 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 2: of eleven judges for the DC's Circuit, they denied a 116 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 2: review of that earlier panel's decision. Now, contrary to reports 117 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:29,400 Speaker 2: in the media and consistent with the practice of all 118 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 2: the other appellate courts, the order does not give the 119 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 2: result of any vote taking. It only says that the 120 00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:39,160 Speaker 2: majority of the votes in favor of having the all 121 00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 2: eleven judges review the decision, there were not enough votes 122 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 2: to do that. What the order does show is that 123 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 2: three specific judges wrote a dissent from the denial to 124 00:07:52,880 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 2: allow them to proceed. Judges Pan and childs now, it's 125 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:00,400 Speaker 2: curious the Judge Pillard, who descended, we were in a 126 00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 2: fifty page opinion as part of the panel, he did 127 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 2: not vote in favor of all eleven judges reviewing it 128 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,960 Speaker 2: because she thought it was wrong to do so. Judge 129 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 2: Pillard authored a statement joined by Wilkins and Garcia, the 130 00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 2: other two judges, that rest on Judge Row's opinion part 131 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 2: of the original panel, the opinion that did not include 132 00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:24,560 Speaker 2: the dismissal of the criminal contempt proceedings. So that accounts 133 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 2: for three judges in the descent. It also accounts for 134 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 2: three judges who did not vote for the full eleven 135 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:32,840 Speaker 2: judges reviewing him. The remaining five judges didn't say anything. 136 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 2: All we know is they did not vote in favor 137 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 2: of the en banc or the all eleven judges reviewing it. 138 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:46,000 Speaker 2: So compare that. So they In essence, here's what's happened. 139 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:51,720 Speaker 2: They agreed the probable cause finding by this judge Boseburg 140 00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 2: should be vacated. In other words, he should not be 141 00:08:55,800 --> 00:09:00,439 Speaker 2: able to proceed with criminal contempt charges against the Department 142 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:06,960 Speaker 2: of Justice attorneys. Now, think about what one judge wrote 143 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:12,320 Speaker 2: near the end of her concurrence. Lastly, she writes a 144 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 2: word about the appropriateness of the specific mandamus remedy we 145 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:19,840 Speaker 2: grant today in issuing the writ we vacate. In other words, 146 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:25,080 Speaker 2: we set aside the trial judge's probable cause order, but 147 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:27,680 Speaker 2: we do not grant the government's request to terminate the 148 00:09:27,720 --> 00:09:33,959 Speaker 2: criminal content proceedings. In the end, this judge agreed with 149 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:38,040 Speaker 2: Judge pillar that the criminal content proceedings should be sent 150 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 2: back to Joe's Burgh for further proceedings. But the judge 151 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:48,320 Speaker 2: that just said what I told you agreed with another 152 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:52,720 Speaker 2: judge that the probable cause order already entered has to 153 00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:57,640 Speaker 2: be set aside. In fact, Judge raw, the judge I'm 154 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:01,200 Speaker 2: speaking of, would allow the trial judge to just start 155 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 2: all over again. And that is exactly what those three 156 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:08,520 Speaker 2: judges relied upon. Based upon the statement by Judge Pillard 157 00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 2: and joined by those two other judges. Their reasoning is 158 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:19,200 Speaker 2: absolutely absurd. Judge Bosberg's order was that compliance with the 159 00:10:19,280 --> 00:10:22,800 Speaker 2: remedy purging the contempt would put an end to the matter. 160 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:25,439 Speaker 2: In other whereas there would be no further contempt proceedings, 161 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:29,440 Speaker 2: either civil or criminal, it wouldn't be necessary. Now, criminal 162 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:33,520 Speaker 2: contempt proceedings are not about complying with the court's order. 163 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:39,680 Speaker 2: Criminal contempt proceedings are intended to result in criminal punishments 164 00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:45,240 Speaker 2: of the offender, including jail or monetary funds. The purpose 165 00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 2: is to vindicate the authority of the court and to 166 00:10:49,720 --> 00:10:54,400 Speaker 2: ensure compliance with the Court's orders in the future. That 167 00:10:54,520 --> 00:11:02,120 Speaker 2: has been in essence these judges, that these eleven judges 168 00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 2: that looked at the three panel judges have said, based 169 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:15,440 Speaker 2: on a majority, no, you cannot go forward. Now, I 170 00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 2: know the statement speaks for only certain of the judges, 171 00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:22,880 Speaker 2: but here's what it really boils down to. That is, 172 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:28,080 Speaker 2: we're in the middle of a constitutional stress test. Donald 173 00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 2: Trump won a second term on a promise to restore borders, 174 00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:35,839 Speaker 2: to disentangle the federal government from all this social engineering 175 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:39,640 Speaker 2: going on by progressives, and to return power to voters 176 00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:44,480 Speaker 2: rather than bureaucrats. Now you can't do that if one 177 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:48,440 Speaker 2: single federal district judge city in Washington, d C. Can 178 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 2: repeatedly entangle the entire administration in lawsuits while sitting on 179 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 2: cases that overlap with his own family's income streams and 180 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 2: with their ideal logical projects. In other words, this judge's 181 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 2: family is getting money from Democrat NGOs, and some of 182 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:18,560 Speaker 2: his family members work for the Democrats. This judge needs 183 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 2: to go. The problem is not Trump's policies. The problem 184 00:12:24,120 --> 00:12:28,600 Speaker 2: is the judge. And that point has been reached with 185 00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:35,080 Speaker 2: Chief Judge James Boseberg of the DC District Court. He's 186 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:40,000 Speaker 2: not a neutral technocrat who happened to just get a 187 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 2: few controversial cases. He has gotten almost every single controversial cases. Now, 188 00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 2: there is a random assignment process for cases to be 189 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:56,720 Speaker 2: assigned to judges. We don't know how, but that random 190 00:12:56,800 --> 00:13:01,680 Speaker 2: process has been abandoned in the DC, in the DC 191 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:05,480 Speaker 2: Trial Court, and this same judge they I'll tell you 192 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:08,480 Speaker 2: more about it in just a minute, has gotten every 193 00:13:08,800 --> 00:13:15,360 Speaker 2: controversial case, and in every controversial case, has decided against 194 00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:19,280 Speaker 2: Donald Trump. So let me tell you about Judge Boseburg. 195 00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 2: He's an Obama appointed Democrat. His family is woven into 196 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 2: progressive nonprofits into the abortion industry, and his rulings have 197 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:40,800 Speaker 2: repeatedly protected the very policy policies that feed that progressive pipeline. 198 00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:43,319 Speaker 2: In other words, if you took all of the progressive policies, 199 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:45,960 Speaker 2: as I talked about the homeless industry, if you took 200 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,040 Speaker 2: all of the progressive policies and said there was a 201 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:54,600 Speaker 2: progressive politics industry. His family is in the midst of that. 202 00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:57,400 Speaker 2: That's how they make their living. And here he is, 203 00:13:57,440 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 2: as an Obama appointee's sitting over here making all of 204 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 2: these decisions with these clear conflicts of interest. His wife 205 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:09,960 Speaker 2: runs a Medicaid funded abortion clinic. His daughter manages a 206 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:16,000 Speaker 2: Usaid supported anti deportation nonprofit let that sink in. His 207 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:24,520 Speaker 2: daughter runs a federal taxpayer funded nonprofit that fights deportations. 208 00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:32,960 Speaker 2: What are his rulings stopping deportations? His household, his wife, 209 00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 2: his daughter, and himself have poured thousands of dollars into 210 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 2: Democrat campaigns that depend on medicaid expansion, generous foreign aid 211 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:47,000 Speaker 2: through Usaid, and Lucy Goosey immigration enforcement. He has then 212 00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 2: taken and kept cases that directly affect that flow of 213 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 2: money and that power base, often in ways that later 214 00:14:56,880 --> 00:15:01,200 Speaker 2: get trimmed back or vacated by higher courts. There is 215 00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:08,480 Speaker 2: something called the appearance of impartiality. Judicial ethics requires the 216 00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 2: appearance of impartiality. When you cross that threshold and you're 217 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:19,400 Speaker 2: now engaged in what the judicial canon ethics canons would 218 00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 2: call the appearance of partiality, it becomes very troubling. It 219 00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 2: becomes the appearance of a rigged game. Now, to start 220 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:37,160 Speaker 2: with his wife, Elizabeth Manson, she is not an arms 221 00:15:37,240 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 2: linked spouse who just happens to vote Democrat. She's a 222 00:15:41,600 --> 00:15:46,720 Speaker 2: political actor in her own right. After Dobbs Dobbs decision 223 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:50,600 Speaker 2: that sent the abortion issue back to the States, she 224 00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:55,080 Speaker 2: founded something called Metal Reproductive Health and Wellness. That's an 225 00:15:55,120 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 2: abortion clinic in Tyson's corner of Virginia. It openly advertises 226 00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:02,880 Speaker 2: clinic abortion up to fourteen weeks, and it takes Virginia 227 00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 2: Medicators payment now all according to public Reporting. Public reporting 228 00:16:08,560 --> 00:16:13,800 Speaker 2: describes her as serving women traveling from restrictive states. So 229 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:16,840 Speaker 2: if you live in a restrictive state and yet you 230 00:16:16,920 --> 00:16:21,200 Speaker 2: want to get an abortion outside that state's restrictions, her 231 00:16:21,280 --> 00:16:27,400 Speaker 2: clinic specifically serves you and they take money, with fees 232 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:31,040 Speaker 2: approaching nine hundred dollars and a business model built in 233 00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:35,800 Speaker 2: part on public insurance and the broader ecosystem of government 234 00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:42,000 Speaker 2: supported reproductive health funding. She's been photographed guiding Doug Imhoff, 235 00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 2: the second Gentleman of guiding former HHS Secretary Javier Makara 236 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:53,120 Speaker 2: giving them tours of the clinic. What's that. It's a 237 00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:56,840 Speaker 2: visual reminder that this is not a neutral, neighborhood public 238 00:16:56,920 --> 00:17:01,040 Speaker 2: health practice. It is a node in the Democrat Party's 239 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:06,119 Speaker 2: abortion infrastructure. Now, I don't care what your position is 240 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:11,520 Speaker 2: on abortion. This is a direct conflict of interest. Whether 241 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:13,520 Speaker 2: you're for against abortion doesn't make any difference to me. 242 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:20,000 Speaker 2: She's actively engaged in Democrat politics, saying to after the 243 00:17:20,040 --> 00:17:23,320 Speaker 2: Dobbs decisions. But right after the Dobbs decision, Hey, let's 244 00:17:23,359 --> 00:17:26,679 Speaker 2: go open to clinic in Virginia and let's take Medicaid funding. 245 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:29,760 Speaker 2: We'll take Virginia for Medicaid funding, and we will target 246 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:33,800 Speaker 2: and market to people who want abortions who live in say, 247 00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 2: red states that have restrictive abortion rules. Now, recall what 248 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:45,160 Speaker 2: Judge Boseburg did to medicaid. So when the Trump administration 249 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 2: approved work requirements for able body adults in Kentucky and Arkansas, 250 00:17:50,720 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 2: now remember he's a judge city in DC. He struck 251 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:58,719 Speaker 2: them down not once, but in a series of decisions 252 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 2: on the theory that Health and Human Services had not 253 00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 2: adequately considered coverage losses in playing language. He did what 254 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:09,760 Speaker 2: I'll tell you next. 255 00:18:09,640 --> 00:18:12,440 Speaker 4: Mad you change your time zone, because for me, it's 256 00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:15,720 Speaker 4: the best thing ever. I always had to listen to 257 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:18,160 Speaker 4: your podcast because of what I have to do on 258 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:20,520 Speaker 4: my farm and ranch and when I do it, and 259 00:18:20,560 --> 00:18:22,960 Speaker 4: now I can listen to you live, and I'm outside 260 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:25,159 Speaker 4: doing all my chur So thank you and have a 261 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:26,720 Speaker 4: great day, and. 262 00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:29,080 Speaker 2: We can hear the chickens and everything in the background, 263 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 2: like a goose or a dog. That was fantastic. You see, 264 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:37,399 Speaker 2: we don't have We have no clue what you said. 265 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 3: I think it was nice. 266 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:43,840 Speaker 2: She gets to listen to no podcasts anymore, just listens live. 267 00:18:44,760 --> 00:18:47,480 Speaker 2: But oh, we love the chickens and stuff. I love it. 268 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:50,040 Speaker 2: So let's go back to Judge Bowsburg for a moment. 269 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:52,199 Speaker 2: And yes, some of you are kind of figuring out 270 00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:58,120 Speaker 2: where I'm headed with this. Surprise, surprise, surprise, You're doing 271 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:04,120 Speaker 2: a good job there. He when when states like Arkansas 272 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:08,920 Speaker 2: and Kentucky decided to put a work requirement for able 273 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 2: bodied adults in place. He struck those down from DC 274 00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 2: not once, but in a series of decisions. In just 275 00:19:19,200 --> 00:19:23,760 Speaker 2: Layman's terms, he used the Administrative Procedure Act to preserve 276 00:19:23,880 --> 00:19:28,200 Speaker 2: Medicaid as an open bodied or an open ended entitlement 277 00:19:28,840 --> 00:19:32,280 Speaker 2: for non working adults. He blocked states that wanted to 278 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:37,199 Speaker 2: connect Medicaid benefits to a work requirement. Now, obviously his 279 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:41,919 Speaker 2: ruling didn't name his wife's clinic by name, but the 280 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:48,639 Speaker 2: financial financial implications are direct. Clinics that would build Medicaid 281 00:19:48,720 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 2: for abortion related care are obviously better. Often, Medicaid eligibility 282 00:19:53,880 --> 00:19:57,920 Speaker 2: is very broad, generous, and it's not conditioned on anything. 283 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:03,600 Speaker 2: So if you're the judge judge's wife, you've built a 284 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:10,359 Speaker 2: practice that is taking Medicaid for abortions, Well, he should 285 00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 2: never have settled that case, much less kept it for 286 00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:19,840 Speaker 2: himself as a repeat assignment while he was the chief judge. 287 00:20:20,040 --> 00:20:24,440 Speaker 2: Now they rotate his chief judges, you know, every every 288 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:28,520 Speaker 2: so often, But that's exactly what this judge did, So 289 00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:32,119 Speaker 2: taking everything else that he's done in terms of taking 290 00:20:32,160 --> 00:20:35,800 Speaker 2: away the random selection of judges, taking all the controversial 291 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 2: cases for himself, holding Department of Justice lawyers in criminal contempt, 292 00:20:42,560 --> 00:20:46,920 Speaker 2: having the entire eleven judges on the DC Court of 293 00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:52,959 Speaker 2: Appeals say Nope, can't do that. Still proceeding anyway, this 294 00:20:53,080 --> 00:20:59,240 Speaker 2: guy's got to go. And they have introduced articles of impeachment. 295 00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 2: The real test will be whether or not Republicans have 296 00:21:03,320 --> 00:21:08,520 Speaker 2: the cajones to at least hold hearings. Just let me 297 00:21:08,560 --> 00:21:13,119 Speaker 2: give you a quick overview of impeachment proceedings. So someone 298 00:21:13,200 --> 00:21:17,479 Speaker 2: introduces articles of impeachment in the House against not against Trump, 299 00:21:17,960 --> 00:21:19,719 Speaker 2: everybody thinks, oh, it's gonna be in Trump. Now I'm 300 00:21:19,720 --> 00:21:22,560 Speaker 2: talking about Judge Boseburg. And this is not this is 301 00:21:22,560 --> 00:21:27,640 Speaker 2: not unprecedented. Other federal judges have been impeached before. So 302 00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:32,200 Speaker 2: this the articles will be introduced in the House. Per 303 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:38,000 Speaker 2: the Constitution, they will hold an impeachment inquiry. That's not 304 00:21:38,080 --> 00:21:42,000 Speaker 2: really a full fledged hearing. That's more of Okay, let's, 305 00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:46,399 Speaker 2: you know, conduct some depositions, Let's do some investigation, Let's 306 00:21:46,560 --> 00:21:49,920 Speaker 2: talk to some people, Let's do some interviews. Let's conduct 307 00:21:49,960 --> 00:21:53,040 Speaker 2: an inquiry to see whether or not there is a 308 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:57,440 Speaker 2: valid reason to take the next step, which is an 309 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:03,320 Speaker 2: impeachment hearing. Then the House Judiciary Committee would then hold 310 00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:09,280 Speaker 2: a full fledged hearing, depositions, witnesses, public hearings. The entire 311 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 2: gamut is. You can imagine of a public hearing if 312 00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:18,280 Speaker 2: if the majority, which Republicans have a majority on the 313 00:22:18,320 --> 00:22:22,280 Speaker 2: House Judiciary Committee, if all Republicans, maybe even a couple 314 00:22:22,280 --> 00:22:25,280 Speaker 2: of Democrats, but I doubt it, But if all Republicans 315 00:22:25,359 --> 00:22:29,760 Speaker 2: voted to proceed with impeachment, it would then go to 316 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,840 Speaker 2: the floor of the House for a vote. Once it 317 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:35,520 Speaker 2: gets to the House floor, it'll be all sorts of 318 00:22:35,520 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 2: wrangling going on. Democrats will try to oppose it, they'll 319 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:41,400 Speaker 2: try to block a procedure. You know, it'll just be 320 00:22:41,560 --> 00:22:43,840 Speaker 2: it'll be a cat fight on the floor of the House. 321 00:22:44,400 --> 00:22:47,639 Speaker 2: It will eventually get to a floor vote. Once it 322 00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:51,959 Speaker 2: gets to a floor vote, if a majority votes in 323 00:22:52,040 --> 00:22:54,959 Speaker 2: favor of impeachment, then gets set to the US Senate 324 00:22:55,640 --> 00:22:59,840 Speaker 2: and the Senate will hold a trial. It needs to 325 00:22:59,880 --> 00:23:05,359 Speaker 2: be done the same pattern that I've outlined of what 326 00:23:05,520 --> 00:23:11,119 Speaker 2: he's been doing repeats on immigration. I hated to use 327 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:15,160 Speaker 2: the abortion example because many people's heads will either explode 328 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:17,760 Speaker 2: or they'll quit listening because I use the term abortion. 329 00:23:19,119 --> 00:23:22,119 Speaker 2: But it was clear that what he was doing was 330 00:23:22,160 --> 00:23:26,159 Speaker 2: making certain that the foe of money, that pipeline to 331 00:23:26,280 --> 00:23:31,320 Speaker 2: his wife's clinic remained open because they were very specifically 332 00:23:31,400 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 2: targeting people who wanted abortions in states who had restrictive rules. 333 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:40,480 Speaker 2: They target they market to those people. So he made 334 00:23:40,520 --> 00:23:44,240 Speaker 2: sure that Medicaid money kept flowing even though the cases 335 00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:48,359 Speaker 2: arose out of Kentucky in Arkansas, not the district of Columbia. 336 00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:55,280 Speaker 2: That same pattern in abortion you find on immigration cases 337 00:23:55,680 --> 00:24:00,199 Speaker 2: and Usaid cases, but this time it doesn't overlap up 338 00:24:00,800 --> 00:24:06,560 Speaker 2: with his wife. It overlaps with their daughter, Catherine. She 339 00:24:06,680 --> 00:24:10,359 Speaker 2: works as something called a capacity builder. She's an associated 340 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:15,439 Speaker 2: at a non government organization and NGO called Partners for Justice. 341 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:20,960 Speaker 2: She's embedded in the public defender offices and they advertise 342 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:27,919 Speaker 2: holistic defense for indigent clients well that includes illegal aliens 343 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:31,080 Speaker 2: and including some who are members of criminal migrant gangs, 344 00:24:31,119 --> 00:24:35,640 Speaker 2: including MS thirteen and Trendo Ragua. Partners for Justice is 345 00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:41,800 Speaker 2: not a charity funded by church base sales Nope. By 346 00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:45,880 Speaker 2: their very own description and by looking at their nine nineties, 347 00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:49,719 Speaker 2: roughly three quarters of the seventy five percent of their 348 00:24:49,720 --> 00:24:56,040 Speaker 2: budget comes from government grants, meaning taxpayer money. A substantial 349 00:24:56,080 --> 00:24:59,720 Speaker 2: share of that flows through federal channels and programs that 350 00:24:59,760 --> 00:25:04,639 Speaker 2: are directly into the USAID ecosystem. It's just in the 351 00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 2: same orbit of decarceration, you know, let people out of prisons, 352 00:25:11,520 --> 00:25:18,200 Speaker 2: open borders advocacy, all these progressive philanthropies, sorows, align foundations 353 00:25:18,240 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 2: that have spent decades constructing where legal services blurs into 354 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:28,920 Speaker 2: political pressure, all with a goal of what to keep 355 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:32,840 Speaker 2: criminal aliens in this inside the country and inside the 356 00:25:32,960 --> 00:25:35,640 Speaker 2: US court system. Why do you want to keep them 357 00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:40,480 Speaker 2: inside the US court system? Because now you can claim 358 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:44,680 Speaker 2: and constitutionally so the right to do process and go 359 00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:48,080 Speaker 2: through all of the immigration hearings before you ever get 360 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:52,679 Speaker 2: an order of deportation. Don't get me wrong, I think 361 00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 2: they're entitled to that. You may disagree with that, but 362 00:25:55,640 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 2: I think that once you're in the country, even if 363 00:25:57,760 --> 00:25:59,680 Speaker 2: you come illegally, now there is a one hundred mile 364 00:25:59,800 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 2: route that says they can if they catch you coming 365 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 2: in illegally within one hundred miles of the border, they 366 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 2: can spin you around and send you right back. But 367 00:26:08,040 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 2: once you make it to Denver, once you make it 368 00:26:10,520 --> 00:26:13,639 Speaker 2: to Chicago or New York or LA no, you're in 369 00:26:13,680 --> 00:26:16,080 Speaker 2: the country illegally, and now you're entitled to all the 370 00:26:16,200 --> 00:26:20,040 Speaker 2: due process rights, both procedurally and substanty, that any other 371 00:26:20,119 --> 00:26:24,439 Speaker 2: criminal person would be entitled to. Well, they blur that 372 00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:29,920 Speaker 2: those legal services into political pressure because at the same 373 00:26:29,960 --> 00:26:34,560 Speaker 2: time that they represent these people, they also advocate, and 374 00:26:34,600 --> 00:26:39,760 Speaker 2: they advocate within the court system. So it gainst that backdrop. 375 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 2: That's the entirey backdrop. What I want to do next 376 00:26:45,080 --> 00:26:49,480 Speaker 2: is I want to look at his clash with Trump's 377 00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:52,600 Speaker 2: second term, and then you can make up your own mind. 378 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:58,160 Speaker 1: Michael, this Bozburg guy seems worse by the day. And 379 00:26:58,200 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: now I believe you said that his wife has and 380 00:27:02,520 --> 00:27:03,840 Speaker 1: runs an abortion clinic. 381 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:07,640 Speaker 2: I feel gross. 382 00:27:08,600 --> 00:27:10,040 Speaker 1: I have nothing to do with any of it, as 383 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:11,920 Speaker 1: the whole thing makes me build ill. 384 00:27:14,280 --> 00:27:20,080 Speaker 2: It's really a denigration of our judicial system. And I 385 00:27:20,119 --> 00:27:24,520 Speaker 2: think he is one of those judges that should be removed. 386 00:27:25,320 --> 00:27:28,919 Speaker 2: He needs to be impeached. By the way, somebody mentioned 387 00:27:28,960 --> 00:27:33,399 Speaker 2: and I double checked, he is the brother of former 388 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:40,639 Speaker 2: Denver Public School superintendent Tom Boseburg. Yes. Uh. He became 389 00:27:40,680 --> 00:27:46,080 Speaker 2: superintendent after Governor Ritter appointed Bill Michael Bennett. After Bill 390 00:27:46,119 --> 00:27:50,399 Speaker 2: Ritter appointed Michael Bennett to be a US Senator. Now, 391 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:52,399 Speaker 2: let's think about the backdrop of everything I've told you 392 00:27:52,400 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 2: about the wife and the daughter. In March of this year, 393 00:27:57,480 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 2: Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to port a bunch 394 00:28:00,760 --> 00:28:05,160 Speaker 2: of Venezuelans that were identified as members of Trenda Arragua. 395 00:28:06,119 --> 00:28:11,640 Speaker 2: The point was very straightforward, treat the cartels that aligned 396 00:28:11,640 --> 00:28:15,040 Speaker 2: with foreign nationals from a hostile regime as enemy aliens 397 00:28:15,320 --> 00:28:18,160 Speaker 2: and remove them quickly to protect you and I from 398 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:23,520 Speaker 2: all of their criminal activity. The lawsuits landed, and by 399 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:31,200 Speaker 2: random draw or otherwise, they landed on Chief Judge Bozburg's dees, 400 00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:36,480 Speaker 2: so he issued a temporary straining order halting the deportation flights, 401 00:28:37,080 --> 00:28:38,720 Speaker 2: went so far as to tell the government and open 402 00:28:38,760 --> 00:28:41,600 Speaker 2: courts to turn the planes around mid air, and then 403 00:28:41,800 --> 00:28:46,040 Speaker 2: started contemp proceedings when the administration continued to send the 404 00:28:46,080 --> 00:28:50,200 Speaker 2: deportees to a prison the l Salvador. While the tro 405 00:28:50,480 --> 00:28:53,200 Speaker 2: was an effect. Now, what do you think about the 406 00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:58,080 Speaker 2: practicality of that? For a moment, once the plane leaves 407 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:02,400 Speaker 2: American airspace and it's in the Gulf of America or 408 00:29:02,440 --> 00:29:06,480 Speaker 2: whatever their flight plan was, once they're outside the jurisdiction 409 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:11,920 Speaker 2: of the United States, I would argue that the judges 410 00:29:12,080 --> 00:29:18,920 Speaker 2: jurisdiction stops at that border. They've already started, They're already 411 00:29:18,960 --> 00:29:24,000 Speaker 2: in flight. They're exercising, pardon me, they're exercising Trump's powers 412 00:29:24,040 --> 00:29:27,880 Speaker 2: of foreign policy, and he wants to step in and 413 00:29:28,800 --> 00:29:39,800 Speaker 2: charge the lawyers with criminal contempt. It just strikes that 414 00:29:40,040 --> 00:29:46,920 Speaker 2: these lawsuits aren't landing by random. They're landing because he's 415 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 2: looking for them, and as chief Judge, he's directing that 416 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:54,880 Speaker 2: those cases be assigned to himself. Now, the Supreme Court 417 00:29:54,960 --> 00:30:00,000 Speaker 2: ultimately vacated his injunction on jurisdictional grounds. The DC circuits, 418 00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:04,920 Speaker 2: i explained earlier, vacated his contempt findings, but the damage 419 00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:09,600 Speaker 2: gets done for weeks. Boseberg uses his power of the 420 00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 2: chambers to slow walk a core plank of the administration's 421 00:30:13,840 --> 00:30:18,800 Speaker 2: border security campaign. Now, for a judge whose daughter draws 422 00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:22,480 Speaker 2: a paycheck from government funded anti deportation organizations working with 423 00:30:22,600 --> 00:30:26,440 Speaker 2: members of Trenda Arragua, that is precisely the kind of case, 424 00:30:26,480 --> 00:30:30,080 Speaker 2: in my opinion, where a refusal should have been automatic. 425 00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:36,640 Speaker 2: Partners for Justice and similar nonprofits thrive. They thrive and 426 00:30:36,880 --> 00:30:41,280 Speaker 2: grow when mass deportation is made difficult and when illegal 427 00:30:41,320 --> 00:30:45,120 Speaker 2: alien defendants remain within the US borders because now they're 428 00:30:45,160 --> 00:30:49,200 Speaker 2: available to be represented, They're available to get social services. 429 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:52,040 Speaker 2: They're available to be used as test cases to try 430 00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:56,920 Speaker 2: to expand the rights of illegal aliens within the country. Now, 431 00:30:57,360 --> 00:31:01,240 Speaker 2: those same illegal aliens are badly heard when a president 432 00:31:01,360 --> 00:31:05,280 Speaker 2: or the executive branch can lawfully move dangerous foreign nationals 433 00:31:05,280 --> 00:31:10,640 Speaker 2: out of the country and not have to have individualized hearings. Now, 434 00:31:11,320 --> 00:31:13,600 Speaker 2: I don't think anybody needs to prove a whispered phone 435 00:31:13,640 --> 00:31:16,880 Speaker 2: call between the father and the daughter. The question is 436 00:31:17,240 --> 00:31:20,960 Speaker 2: what an objective citizen would think. What would you think 437 00:31:21,520 --> 00:31:25,480 Speaker 2: when learning that the judge blocking the president's deportation flights 438 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:30,840 Speaker 2: has a daughter whose professional mission is to stop deportations 439 00:31:31,160 --> 00:31:34,360 Speaker 2: and those and that stopping a deportations is backed by 440 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:37,280 Speaker 2: the very stream of federal money that the administration is 441 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:41,120 Speaker 2: trying to discipline and reign in. He needs to be impeached, 442 00:31:42,520 --> 00:31:44,160 Speaker 2: or at least the court needs to step in and 443 00:31:44,320 --> 00:31:47,840 Speaker 2: the Supreme Court needs to slap him down. No more 444 00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:54,280 Speaker 2: national injunctions. Only people who are within your jurisdiction can 445 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:57,800 Speaker 2: you enforce an injunction against Now, eventually to make it 446 00:31:57,840 --> 00:32:01,640 Speaker 2: to the Supreme Court, but until then, somehow it's got 447 00:32:01,720 --> 00:32:02,040 Speaker 2: stopp