1 00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:04,840 Speaker 1: Hey, Michael, I just got carted for a pack of cigarettes. 2 00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:09,960 Speaker 2: I think my civil rights were violated. That's Jim Crow. 3 00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:14,280 Speaker 2: I can't believe that discrimination against cigarette smokers. 4 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:17,040 Speaker 3: Is this Jim Crow three points Yeah, that's Jim Crow 5 00:00:17,079 --> 00:00:19,119 Speaker 3: three point oh because two point zero was during the 6 00:00:19,120 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 3: Biden administration when Georgia got less voting laws than where 7 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:28,000 Speaker 3: the president. So this would be three point zero. 8 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 2: Yes, well, actually they should quit. Just it should be. 9 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:33,560 Speaker 4: Jim Trump Crow. 10 00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:37,519 Speaker 3: Like he does, like to put his name on everything. 11 00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:40,120 Speaker 2: He names everything after himself. So let's just have Let's 12 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 2: just have Jim. Let's see Jim Crow Trump Trump, Jim Crow, 13 00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:50,199 Speaker 2: Jim Trump Crow. I think Jim Crow Trump. I think 14 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 2: that rolls off the tongue the past. Jim Crow Trump 15 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:58,520 Speaker 2: or just Jim Trump, Jim Trump, Jim Trump one point oh. 16 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:00,440 Speaker 4: Let me ask you a. 17 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,280 Speaker 2: Serious question, and I want you to sent with the 18 00:01:03,360 --> 00:01:06,160 Speaker 2: question before you answer it, because the honest answer is 19 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:09,040 Speaker 2: probably more interesting than the knee jerk reaction that you 20 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:12,559 Speaker 2: have when you hear the phrase the deep state. What's 21 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 2: the first thing that flashes into your head? Tom, Tom, Tom, Now, 22 00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 2: if you're being honest, there's probably a little bit of embarrassment, 23 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,720 Speaker 2: Maybe a little wins because for the past eight years, 24 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:27,800 Speaker 2: maybe the fucking more, that phrase has been treated by 25 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 2: the cabal a Saturday night Live like people at the 26 00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 2: dinner parties, at the swanking inter parties inside the Beltway, 27 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 2: by all the very serious people the real hou supposed 28 00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,520 Speaker 2: to look up to. It's been treated as the verbal 29 00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 2: equivalent of a tenfoil hat, the kind of thing that 30 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:45,959 Speaker 2: you don't really talk about in polite company, you know, 31 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:48,760 Speaker 2: the move somebody all mentioned the deep state, and suddenly 32 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 2: there's the theatrical eye roll, the performance of sophisticated skepticism, 33 00:01:56,360 --> 00:02:00,240 Speaker 2: as if the very idea that unlected government officials their 34 00:02:00,280 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 2: own agendas might take actions to protect their institutional interests, 35 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 2: that those people might even work to undermine a president 36 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 2: that they oppose, As if that idea is so self 37 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:17,200 Speaker 2: evidently crazy that you'd have to be a QAnon follower 38 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 2: or maybe a MAGA true believer that unless you're one 39 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:25,200 Speaker 2: of those, how could you ever possibly entertain the idea 40 00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:29,919 Speaker 2: if there's a deep state. Stick with me, because we're 41 00:02:29,919 --> 00:02:33,840 Speaker 2: going to build a case here with actual evidence and 42 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 2: actual documented facts, actual names, dates, tape, recording conversations, not 43 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,520 Speaker 2: with assertions, not with vibes, not with unnamed sources, but 44 00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:45,880 Speaker 2: with documented history. And it all starts because of something 45 00:02:45,919 --> 00:02:52,600 Speaker 2: that I read Sunday, February eight the New York Times, 46 00:02:52,600 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 2: of all places. Now that was in the opinion piece, 47 00:02:56,240 --> 00:03:00,760 Speaker 2: but it was written by James Rosen. And I have 48 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,080 Speaker 2: known each other for I don't know, I don't how 49 00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:05,200 Speaker 2: many times he's interviewed me, but he's but he's a 50 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:10,760 Speaker 2: he's an investigative journalist. And the title of the opinion 51 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 2: piece was seven pages of a sealed Watergate file sat 52 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:23,880 Speaker 2: undiscovered until now. Those seven pages are grand jury testimony. 53 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 2: Grand jury testimony from a former United States president, testimony 54 00:03:28,639 --> 00:03:32,000 Speaker 2: has been locked away, sealed, hidden from the public for 55 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:35,360 Speaker 2: fifty years. And what Nixon said in those seven pages 56 00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 2: under oath to Watergate prosecutors is, and I believe, without exaggeration, 57 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,880 Speaker 2: one of the most important pieces of historical evidence about 58 00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:52,680 Speaker 2: how our government actually works, something that hasn't surfaced. And 59 00:03:53,080 --> 00:03:57,320 Speaker 2: quite frankly, I am astonished at the lack of both 60 00:03:57,360 --> 00:04:02,320 Speaker 2: the left and the right blowing this story up. The 61 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:05,440 Speaker 2: reason you've probably never heard of it until now. Now, 62 00:04:05,480 --> 00:04:10,119 Speaker 2: parts of the underlying story that Rosen points out has 63 00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:13,840 Speaker 2: been available in the historical archives for years, that itself 64 00:04:13,920 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 2: is a story because the people who were supposed to 65 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 2: tell you about this story did not tell you about it. 66 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,200 Speaker 2: So I want to do what those people wouldn't do. 67 00:04:24,040 --> 00:04:26,720 Speaker 2: I want to lay it all out, the espionage and 68 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 2: the cover up of the cover up, the celebrated journalists 69 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,400 Speaker 2: that we all know about whose names you'll recognize, that 70 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 2: look the other way, And then we're going to connect 71 00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 2: it to what happened in twenty sixteen, and let you 72 00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 2: decide whether you're still embarrassed to use the phrase deep state. 73 00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 4: You shouldn't be. 74 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:49,360 Speaker 2: So let's go back nineteen seventy, Mixing as President, Henry 75 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 2: Kissinger national security Advisor, and together they are executing what is, 76 00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:58,919 Speaker 2: by any objective historical measure, a foreign policy revolution. I 77 00:04:58,920 --> 00:05:01,040 Speaker 2: don't do agree with all of the what they were doing, 78 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 2: but nonetheless it was a foreign policy revolution. There were 79 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:08,920 Speaker 2: secret back channel negotiations with the Soviet Union, There was 80 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:12,839 Speaker 2: a clandestine opening to communist China that, as we now 81 00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:16,480 Speaker 2: know in hindsight, literally reshaped the entire global order. It 82 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,599 Speaker 2: was a strategy also for trying to extract this country 83 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 2: from Vietnam. Big consequential genuinely historic moves, and guests who 84 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:36,039 Speaker 2: despised it and hated it. The Pentagon's Joint Chiefs of Staff, 85 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 2: those were hardcore told warriors. Admiral Thomas Moore, chairman of 86 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 2: the Joint Chiefs, they had not spent their career as 87 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:50,040 Speaker 2: fighting communism to watch some Harvard professor Waltson to start 88 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 2: shaking hands with Mousey Doom. They thought Nixon was soft, 89 00:05:54,520 --> 00:06:00,240 Speaker 2: they thought Dayton was dangerous, and critically, Nixon and Kissinger 90 00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:03,080 Speaker 2: they thought were deliberately keeping them out of the loop, 91 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 2: cutting them out of one of the most sensitive decisions 92 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:10,720 Speaker 2: because Nickxon didn't trust them, and as it turns out, 93 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:14,720 Speaker 2: he was right not to trust them. Seeing what the 94 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:21,480 Speaker 2: Joint Chiefs did, they planted a spy. His name was 95 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 2: Charles Radford, a twenty seven year old Navy yeoman, essentially 96 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:30,080 Speaker 2: just deenographer. He had been assigned to the National Security 97 00:06:30,120 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 2: Council to the White House. So his job was to 98 00:06:34,360 --> 00:06:36,720 Speaker 2: travel with senior officials. As he got assigned to different 99 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:40,280 Speaker 2: senior officials, he was to take notes, handle documents. It 100 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:43,640 Speaker 2: was the kind of and I don't mean this pejoratively, 101 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:45,240 Speaker 2: but it was a kind of a low level position 102 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 2: and nobody really pays much attention to. So for thirteen months, 103 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 2: for more than a year, from late nineteen seventy through 104 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 2: December of nineteen seventy one, Radford Charles Radford, systematically rifled 105 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 2: the briefcases of Henry Kissinger and General Alexander Haig, Kissinger's deputy. 106 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:08,240 Speaker 2: He went through the burn bags. Now, those are the 107 00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:12,560 Speaker 2: bags of documents that are usually classified, almost always classified, 108 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,960 Speaker 2: but burn bags. Always had one in my office. After 109 00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:18,120 Speaker 2: I would finish with a classified document or something I 110 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 2: didn't want anybody else to see, I'd put it in 111 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 2: a burn bag. Those burn bags get collected by our 112 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:26,480 Speaker 2: security officer every single day and then they get taken 113 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 2: out to literally be burned. That's why they're called burn bags. 114 00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:33,880 Speaker 2: He would raid those burn bags. He would go pull 115 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:37,280 Speaker 2: the documents out of those bags. He would go through 116 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 2: people's desks. He made copies of everything he could get 117 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,679 Speaker 2: his hands on. And we're talking about and estimated five 118 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 2: thousand classified documents, secret documents, National Security Council documents, minutes 119 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:53,680 Speaker 2: of the most sensitive meetings in the US government. And 120 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 2: what would he do with those documents. He would secretly 121 00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:00,720 Speaker 2: send them to his Pentagon superiors and they would pass 122 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 2: them on to Admiral Moore, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs. 123 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:06,400 Speaker 2: And when I say the chain of command went straight 124 00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 2: to the top, I mean that literally. Radford later testified 125 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:13,920 Speaker 2: that he acted, in his own words, under the express 126 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 2: directions of his supervisors. So this wasn't some road operation 127 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:20,600 Speaker 2: by some young sailor acting on his own initiative. This 128 00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:25,760 Speaker 2: was an institutional espionage program conducted by the senior leadership 129 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:30,320 Speaker 2: of the United States military against the elected civilian government 130 00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 2: that they were supposed to answer to and serve. And 131 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 2: here's where it gets really surreal. June nineteen seventy one, 132 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:43,800 Speaker 2: Radford was selected. Actually, probably better said that Radford was 133 00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:49,000 Speaker 2: specifically chosen to accompany Kissinger on the tour of asion 134 00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:53,000 Speaker 2: capitals they saw from Pakistan. The press is told that 135 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:57,200 Speaker 2: Kissinger is sick and they can't travel. The truth behind 136 00:08:57,240 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 2: that story is Kissinger quietly he gets a board a plane, 137 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 2: he flies secretly to Beijing to arrange what will become 138 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:09,840 Speaker 2: Nixon's historic trip to China. That is, whether we like 139 00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:12,720 Speaker 2: it or not, one of the most consequential diplomatic events 140 00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 2: of the twentieth century. And Radford is there, right there, 141 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:20,720 Speaker 2: and before he left, his supervisor that Admiral Robert Wallander 142 00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 2: had a simple message for him, don't get cought. So 143 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:30,480 Speaker 2: what was Radford doing. He rifled Kissinger's briefcase while he 144 00:09:30,520 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 2: was in Pakistan. He collected so much material, so many documents, 145 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:38,119 Speaker 2: that he had to ship it back to the Pentagon 146 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:41,600 Speaker 2: through the US Embassy in New Delhi via a secure 147 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:45,360 Speaker 2: diplomatic pouch. Is his movie kind of stuff. Now, think 148 00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:49,680 Speaker 2: about what I'm describing. The most secret diplomatic operation in 149 00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:54,080 Speaker 2: the Nicks administration, the Opening of China was being actively 150 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:59,679 Speaker 2: penetrated in real time by the DoD that is supposed 151 00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 2: to reap Port two and follow the commands of the 152 00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:07,280 Speaker 2: commander in chief. They were spying on the president. Nixon 153 00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 2: found out in December nineteen seventy one. 154 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:11,840 Speaker 4: He found out. 155 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:19,120 Speaker 2: Not because anybody came clean, because the Nixon team was 156 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:27,679 Speaker 2: investigating a different league. So the investigative reporter Jack Anderson 157 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 2: had been publishing columns quoting directly from classified National Security 158 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:37,439 Speaker 2: Council meeting minutes. Nixon's people tracked it down, and when 159 00:10:37,480 --> 00:10:40,920 Speaker 2: they did, they discovered Radford, and then they discovered the 160 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 2: larger operation. So once they discovered this huge operation of 161 00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 2: the Pentagon, spying on the President, listening in on conversations, 162 00:10:50,559 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 2: getting documents, a naval officer, a yeoman actually, who's supposed 163 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:58,600 Speaker 2: to be there, just you know, as a gopher. I'll 164 00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:03,320 Speaker 2: just put it as a gopher is feeding classified information 165 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:08,480 Speaker 2: information this be kept within the Oval Office, within the 166 00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 2: West Wing, sending it over to the Pentagon. So on 167 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:17,560 Speaker 2: December twenty one, nineteen seventy one. December twenty one, just 168 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 2: before Christmas, Nixon had a meeting in the Oval Office 169 00:11:22,600 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 2: that night, and that meeting was captured on the Nixon 170 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 2: White House tapes. John Erlckman brief Nixon, the Attorney General 171 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:33,359 Speaker 2: John Mitchell, and Nixon's chief of Staff. 172 00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:33,800 Speaker 4: Bob Haldeman. 173 00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 2: Erlman's summary was this, Radford had quote systematically stolen documents 174 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 2: from Kissinger's briefcase, Haig's briefcase, people's desks, any place in 175 00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:51,720 Speaker 2: every place within the National Security Council apparatus, and has 176 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:55,000 Speaker 2: duplicated them and turned them over to the Joint chiefs. 177 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:56,200 Speaker 4: Now. 178 00:11:56,240 --> 00:12:02,160 Speaker 2: Interestingly, Nixon's response was unambiguous. He called it, quote a 179 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:05,200 Speaker 2: federal offense of the highest order. Can't you hear Trump 180 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:10,000 Speaker 2: saying something like this? He demanded in that Oval Office 181 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:13,560 Speaker 2: meeting that night that Admiral Moore by prosecuted under the 182 00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:20,440 Speaker 2: Espionage Act, and Kissinger's reaction was equally unambiguous. His exact words, 183 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:25,760 Speaker 2: also on tape, were, I think more should be in jail. 184 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:30,600 Speaker 2: Nobody went to jail. None of these yeah whos went 185 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:34,439 Speaker 2: to jail. So the Attorney General John Mitchell taught Nixon 186 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:39,120 Speaker 2: out of prosecution and his argument and now follow his 187 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:42,600 Speaker 2: lodging because it tells you everything you need to know here. 188 00:12:43,440 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 4: The Attorney General's argument was that any. 189 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 2: Prosecution would expose Nixon's own secret Cambodia bombing operations and 190 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:56,880 Speaker 2: other secret covert op activities going on in Southeast Asia. 191 00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,320 Speaker 2: In other words, we cannot Here's what's going out in 192 00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 2: the Oval Office. The Oval Office is saying, we can't 193 00:13:03,080 --> 00:13:07,200 Speaker 2: prosecute the generals for spying on us because the trial 194 00:13:07,320 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 2: would reveal what we were hiding from the generals. Wow, 195 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:18,720 Speaker 2: this spy versus spy. So Nixon covered it up. He 196 00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 2: had Radford transferred to Oregon or maybe it was Seattle, 197 00:13:22,679 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 2: I forget, but either Oregon or Seattle anyway, he got 198 00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:28,559 Speaker 2: the boot out of DC. So he had the JSC 199 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 2: liaison office to the NSC close, so the Joint Chiefs 200 00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:36,600 Speaker 2: of Staff liaison office located in the old Executive Office 201 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:39,199 Speaker 2: building where the National Security Council is located. He had 202 00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:43,000 Speaker 2: that shut down, and then he quietly reappointed Admiral More, 203 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:47,640 Speaker 2: the man he'd wanted prosecuted for espionage. Nixon actually appointed 204 00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:49,120 Speaker 2: him to a second term as the chairman of the 205 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 2: Joint Chiefs. Now, if that's not a deep state, then 206 00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 2: I generally don't know what words mean. Then you get 207 00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:02,880 Speaker 2: to cover up of the cover up. Now before we 208 00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:05,880 Speaker 2: get to the Bob Woodward part, because that one is 209 00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 2: generally jaw dropping hold of wake. One more point about 210 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:14,640 Speaker 2: the structure of what I've just described, because there's something 211 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:17,600 Speaker 2: about this episode that I think is getting under sold 212 00:14:17,920 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 2: even by the people who are very rarely reporting on it. 213 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:27,360 Speaker 2: The Joint Chiefs of Staff were not liberals, They were 214 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:31,239 Speaker 2: not left wing. They were not the kind of bureaucrats 215 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:34,960 Speaker 2: that show up later as later as heroes of some resistance. 216 00:14:35,960 --> 00:14:38,960 Speaker 2: In fact, the Joint Chiefs were the most hockey, the 217 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:44,080 Speaker 2: most anti communist senior military officers in the entire country. 218 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 2: Their ideological objection to Nixon wasn't that he was too tough. 219 00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:53,280 Speaker 2: It was that he wasn't tough enough. So they were 220 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:57,640 Speaker 2: spying on him from the right, not from the left. 221 00:14:57,720 --> 00:15:00,920 Speaker 2: And why does that matter? Because of what James Rosen 222 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 2: reports and publishes, and that the historical record establishes is 223 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 2: not a partisan deep state, It's an institutional administration after 224 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:21,720 Speaker 2: administration after administration deep state. What those generals shared was 225 00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 2: not a political party. What they shared I would describe 226 00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:31,520 Speaker 2: as an institutional interest in their own power, their own prerogatives, 227 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 2: their own vision of American foreign policy. They wanted their 228 00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:39,280 Speaker 2: foreign policy, not the president of the United States foreign policy. 229 00:15:40,520 --> 00:15:46,160 Speaker 2: They placed that above their constitutional obligation to the civil 230 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:51,080 Speaker 2: government that they were supposed to be serving serving. So 231 00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:53,240 Speaker 2: James Rosen, this peace of the New York Times sums 232 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 2: it up this way. You can read the New York 233 00:15:55,160 --> 00:15:57,760 Speaker 2: Times piece until my ex timeline right now. There's a 234 00:15:57,800 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 2: free link to it right there. 235 00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:01,080 Speaker 3: Quote. 236 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:05,880 Speaker 2: When excluded from their spheres of interest in trenched bureaucratic 237 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:14,760 Speaker 2: forces will almost as if a biological reflex, respond aggressively again, 238 00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:21,320 Speaker 2: almost as a biological reflex. So Rosa's not describing conspiracy, 239 00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 2: He's describing a feature. It's a feature of how large, 240 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:33,040 Speaker 2: powerful institutions behave when they feel threatened. That's probably a 241 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,560 Speaker 2: far more disturbing conclusion than if he were describing a conspiracy, 242 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:43,239 Speaker 2: Because a conspiracy, you can prosecute that an institutional reflex, 243 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:48,080 Speaker 2: a biological reflex within the institution. That's something that's in 244 00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:51,560 Speaker 2: the carpet, in the walls, in the ceiling, it's in 245 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:55,160 Speaker 2: the very being of that bureaucracy. 246 00:16:55,920 --> 00:16:58,320 Speaker 4: So then you get to Bob Woodward. 247 00:16:58,680 --> 00:17:04,600 Speaker 2: Alexander Haig, Kissinger's deputy, he was the man who, according 248 00:17:04,600 --> 00:17:10,680 Speaker 2: to scholars anyway, he's the one that tacitly encouraged Radford's 249 00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:16,159 Speaker 2: document theft because hay had a strong allegiance to the Pentagon, 250 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 2: he specifically disagreed with Nixon's vietimization policy. He had picked 251 00:17:21,640 --> 00:17:24,480 Speaker 2: Radford to go travel with Kissinger, and when the more 252 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:27,439 Speaker 2: Radford affair blew up Hey, who had then become Nixon's 253 00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:30,600 Speaker 2: chief of staff after Haldeman had resigned, he worked behind 254 00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 2: the scenes to try to bury the story, to make 255 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,600 Speaker 2: sure that nobody ever went to trial, to make sure 256 00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 2: that his own role was never uncovered or never examined. 257 00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:42,440 Speaker 2: So that gets this to Bob Woodward. The Washington Post reporter, 258 00:17:43,040 --> 00:17:47,480 Speaker 2: the most celebrated journalist of the twentieth century. His Watergate 259 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,439 Speaker 2: reporting with Carl Bernstein brought down Nixon. His source, the 260 00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 2: famous deep throat, was Mark Felt, the deputy director of 261 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:58,159 Speaker 2: the FBI. The man who fed Woodward the information that 262 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 2: drove the Watergate story was himself, a senior official in 263 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 2: the most powerful domestic law enforcement agency the entire country, 264 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:08,760 Speaker 2: using a journalist as a weapon against a president that 265 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 2: he disliked. But that's the story for another day. So 266 00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 2: what we know, and what Rosen has documented, and what 267 00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:21,840 Speaker 2: a book from nineteen ninety one called Silent Coup established, 268 00:18:22,720 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 2: is that Woodward and Bernstein knew about Moore and Radford 269 00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:33,919 Speaker 2: and their spying on their civilian seniors. They had the 270 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:37,800 Speaker 2: story and they passed on it. This hour's chanced to 271 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:39,920 Speaker 2: when that thousand bucks. It's coming up in the next 272 00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 2: five minutes thanks to Mercedes Beins of Littleton. This Mercedes 273 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:44,520 Speaker 2: of Littleton, not Tom. 274 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:48,640 Speaker 3: This is a great moment in your life. You're listening 275 00:18:48,680 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 3: to Michael Brown and his dumbassory. Pay attention. 276 00:18:56,160 --> 00:19:03,880 Speaker 2: That's right, Wake up and pay attention. This story published 277 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:07,280 Speaker 2: by James Rosen and The New York Times on February eighth. 278 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:10,160 Speaker 2: You can find the link on my ex account at 279 00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:10,639 Speaker 2: Michael D. 280 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:11,040 Speaker 4: Brown. 281 00:19:12,000 --> 00:19:14,680 Speaker 2: I really would encourage you to read it. It's it's 282 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:18,840 Speaker 2: it's heavy, and it's deep, and it's astonishing to me 283 00:19:19,000 --> 00:19:23,439 Speaker 2: that this is not getting more widespread coverage. Then I realized, oh, 284 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:25,680 Speaker 2: the cabal would have to cover it, So of course 285 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:30,919 Speaker 2: it's not going to get widespread coverage. So we're just 286 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:33,679 Speaker 2: getting into the point, so to kind of reset it. 287 00:19:34,800 --> 00:19:40,080 Speaker 2: Nixon's being spied on. Nixon, who you know, no Angel 288 00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 2: himself is being spied on by his own military, by 289 00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:48,520 Speaker 2: people that the Joint Chiefs of Staff have put into 290 00:19:48,680 --> 00:19:52,640 Speaker 2: the Oval Office, into the National Security Apparatus in order 291 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:57,480 Speaker 2: to in order to literally steal documents and to literally 292 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:02,280 Speaker 2: dig through burn bags, literally dig through briefcases to go 293 00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:06,919 Speaker 2: travel and while Kissinger's asleep, to steal documents, put them 294 00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:08,920 Speaker 2: in a diplomatic pouch and send them back to DC 295 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:17,760 Speaker 2: because the Joint chiefs disagree with the president. Huh, where 296 00:20:17,760 --> 00:20:21,240 Speaker 2: have we heard that before? And then everybody says the 297 00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:28,480 Speaker 2: Trump is crazy. Now, what Rosen's documented, and again what 298 00:20:28,560 --> 00:20:31,680 Speaker 2: that book Silent Coup is established, is that Woodward and 299 00:20:31,760 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 2: Bernstein the Holy Grail of reporters, the holy Grail of 300 00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 2: investigative reporters, knew about all of this that was going on, 301 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:44,639 Speaker 2: and they said nothing. And the reason they said nothing, 302 00:20:44,680 --> 00:20:46,800 Speaker 2: the probably reason, anyway, from my point of view, is 303 00:20:46,840 --> 00:20:50,280 Speaker 2: not hard to find. That reason is Alexander Haig, the 304 00:20:50,359 --> 00:20:53,120 Speaker 2: man deeply implicated in the spy operation, the man who 305 00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:57,240 Speaker 2: was working to bury it. Alexander Haigh was one of 306 00:20:57,280 --> 00:21:01,520 Speaker 2: Woodward's key sources. Had met Hag when Woodward was a 307 00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:05,000 Speaker 2: Navy intelligence briefer to senior White House officials during Nixon's 308 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:09,680 Speaker 2: first term. The relationship got established before Watergate. So Haig 309 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:14,200 Speaker 2: is protecting himself by keeping Moore and Radford out of 310 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:18,000 Speaker 2: the press, and Woodward wittingly or not, I'm not sure 311 00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:23,240 Speaker 2: accommodated that. And in the article, Rosen notes that even today, 312 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:27,120 Speaker 2: even with all this historical record, Woodward continues to avoid 313 00:21:27,160 --> 00:21:28,920 Speaker 2: the subject of Moore and Radford. 314 00:21:29,080 --> 00:21:30,480 Speaker 4: Now remember Radford is. 315 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:32,760 Speaker 2: More is the chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, 316 00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 2: Admiral Moore, and Radford is the yeoman naval kid that 317 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:43,600 Speaker 2: is assigned to the NSC to go spy on the 318 00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 2: president because the Pentagon doesn't like the President's foreign policy. 319 00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:55,400 Speaker 2: If you think that the deep state is something that's 320 00:21:55,520 --> 00:22:00,680 Speaker 2: just been discovered since Trump became president, it's much worse 321 00:22:00,720 --> 00:22:08,520 Speaker 2: than you ever thought. Rosen knows it even today, that 322 00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 2: Woodward is just avoiding all of this. Is Woodward a villain? 323 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:18,919 Speaker 2: I don't know, But I'm saying something more uncomfortable than 324 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:21,879 Speaker 2: whether or not Woodward is a villain. I'm saying that 325 00:22:21,920 --> 00:22:27,439 Speaker 2: even the most celebrated accountability journalism in American history operated 326 00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:33,679 Speaker 2: inside a web of source relationships that had institutional actors 327 00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:36,760 Speaker 2: who had their own agendas. That the people who were 328 00:22:36,760 --> 00:22:40,359 Speaker 2: supposed to tell you about the Pentagons spy operation on 329 00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:43,600 Speaker 2: the White House actually had a reason not to tell 330 00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:47,919 Speaker 2: you that, and they didn't. That's not a conspiracy theory. 331 00:22:48,359 --> 00:22:53,639 Speaker 2: That's apparently journalism the way that the cabal sees journalism. 332 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 2: So let me wrap it up, let me bring it home. 333 00:22:57,840 --> 00:23:01,560 Speaker 2: In twenty sixteen. In twenty seventeen, the deep state in 334 00:23:01,680 --> 00:23:05,159 Speaker 2: it are of vernacular, and the institutional response to that 335 00:23:05,200 --> 00:23:08,560 Speaker 2: phrase was swift, unified, and in light of everything we've discovered, 336 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:13,920 Speaker 2: almost comical, comical. Corporate media treated it as a conspiracy theory. 337 00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:17,520 Speaker 2: The pundits who considered themselves serious people you know, performed 338 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:20,360 Speaker 2: the elaborate eye rolls. The New York Times, a very 339 00:23:20,520 --> 00:23:23,720 Speaker 2: same newspaper that published James Rosen this past week, The 340 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:28,200 Speaker 2: Washington Post, CNN. They spent years telling you any suggestion 341 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,680 Speaker 2: that unelected officials in the intel community or the military 342 00:23:32,840 --> 00:23:37,240 Speaker 2: might be using their institutional tools to undermine a elected 343 00:23:37,280 --> 00:23:43,800 Speaker 2: president Donald Trump, Well that's the that's somehow, the exclusive 344 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:50,320 Speaker 2: province of the paranoid and the deranged. And now February eighth, 345 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 2: twenty twenty six, The New York Times is publishing the 346 00:23:55,000 --> 00:24:00,840 Speaker 2: historical proof that they were wrong. Not editorially wrong, they 347 00:24:00,880 --> 00:24:07,520 Speaker 2: were factually wrong. The documented, taped grand jury sworn evidence 348 00:24:08,119 --> 00:24:11,320 Speaker 2: that the exact thing they told you was a conspiracy 349 00:24:11,359 --> 00:24:16,399 Speaker 2: theory had in fact happened before it within our living 350 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 2: memory with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 351 00:24:21,440 --> 00:24:28,560 Speaker 2: That is extraordinary. Now does the documented history of the 352 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,800 Speaker 2: Joint chiefs and Radford proof that everything claimed about the 353 00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:36,000 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen seventeen intelligence community behavior was true? Well, of course, 354 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:40,240 Speaker 2: and I'm not claiming that that is not how evidence works, 355 00:24:40,440 --> 00:24:42,760 Speaker 2: and I wouldn't insult you by suggesting that it does. 356 00:24:43,240 --> 00:24:46,959 Speaker 2: But what the historical record proves is the premise that 357 00:24:47,040 --> 00:24:51,240 Speaker 2: the institutional apparatus of the American national security state is 358 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:57,000 Speaker 2: indeed capable of and has actually committed covert operations against 359 00:24:57,000 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 2: an elected president in order to sabotage policies that those 360 00:25:01,680 --> 00:25:08,640 Speaker 2: institutions opposed. The New York Times has, in essence, by 361 00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:12,480 Speaker 2: publishing James Rosen's piece and all of the evidence that 362 00:25:12,520 --> 00:25:19,560 Speaker 2: goes with it, admitted, is admitting that, yeah, yep, we supported, 363 00:25:19,680 --> 00:25:25,040 Speaker 2: remember the Intel officers in their letter Hunter Hunter Biden 364 00:25:25,160 --> 00:25:31,200 Speaker 2: Laptop Russian disinformation. The point is that once you accept 365 00:25:31,200 --> 00:25:35,840 Speaker 2: the premise as proven, and this evidence forces you to 366 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:41,440 Speaker 2: accept the premise as proven, the question changes because now 367 00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:45,200 Speaker 2: it's not is this deep state real? That's now been answered. 368 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:49,760 Speaker 2: The question now becomes what did those specific actors do 369 00:25:49,960 --> 00:25:54,240 Speaker 2: specifically in twenty sixteen, in twenty seventeen and was it appropriate? 370 00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:58,600 Speaker 2: And on that question, the documented record is pretty damning, 371 00:26:02,000 --> 00:26:04,960 Speaker 2: paid for by the Clinton campaign, assembled by a former 372 00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:09,439 Speaker 2: intelligence operative built largely on Russian sources, then uses the 373 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:15,240 Speaker 2: primary predicate for a phizas surveillance warrant on an American citizen, 374 00:26:15,400 --> 00:26:18,679 Speaker 2: Carter Page, who oh just happened to be affiliated with 375 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:23,800 Speaker 2: the Trump campaign. The Justice department's own inspector General confirmed 376 00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 2: that the FBI knew of serious problems with Steele's credibility 377 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:33,159 Speaker 2: but failed to disclose that to the Phizi court. Then 378 00:26:33,280 --> 00:26:37,879 Speaker 2: senior FBI officials were communicating explicit anti Trump animus and 379 00:26:37,920 --> 00:26:42,200 Speaker 2: official communications. That's not speculations, those are Peter Struck's actual 380 00:26:42,280 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 2: text messages obtained through official government processes for you. The 381 00:26:47,320 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 2: investigation to consume the first two years of the Trump 382 00:26:49,800 --> 00:26:54,760 Speaker 2: presidency was opened on a thinner evidentiary predicate than any 383 00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:59,879 Speaker 2: comparable counter intelligence inquiry in the modern history of the FBI. 384 00:27:00,960 --> 00:27:06,600 Speaker 2: John Durham spent years documenting this. The prosecutorial results were 385 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:11,439 Speaker 2: pretty limited, primarily because the relevant statute of limitations had 386 00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:15,119 Speaker 2: run and evidentiary standards for criminal charges are correctly high, 387 00:27:15,480 --> 00:27:19,320 Speaker 2: but the factual findings were not limited. The conduct that 388 00:27:19,400 --> 00:27:24,240 Speaker 2: he documented was real and believable. Now, now the people 389 00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:26,880 Speaker 2: who will push back on this argument, and they will 390 00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:30,639 Speaker 2: will have two moves, and I'll tell you precisely what 391 00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:31,719 Speaker 2: those two moves are. 392 00:27:32,560 --> 00:27:56,879 Speaker 1: Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, Brownie, brownie, brownie, brownie, brownie, brownie. 393 00:27:56,960 --> 00:28:03,639 Speaker 4: I thought brownie, brownie, brownie thirty seconds right there, that 394 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:08,639 Speaker 4: was thirty seconds. Yep, that's interminable, interminable. 395 00:28:08,680 --> 00:28:11,720 Speaker 3: I loved it. Oh god, probably my favorite one of 396 00:28:11,760 --> 00:28:12,040 Speaker 3: the day. 397 00:28:13,240 --> 00:28:16,200 Speaker 2: Well, that's not saying a lot. Remember we had Goober's 398 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:17,959 Speaker 2: making fun of other goobers, so that was pretty good. 399 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:18,400 Speaker 4: That's true. 400 00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:22,280 Speaker 2: That was pretty good. So I think there's two reactions 401 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:25,760 Speaker 2: to this. But Michael, Russia really didn't interfere in the election. Yeah, 402 00:28:25,800 --> 00:28:30,960 Speaker 2: Bob Muller documented that Russia had a real influence campaign. Yep, 403 00:28:31,720 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 2: it was pretty much on social media, a bunch of bots. 404 00:28:35,600 --> 00:28:36,960 Speaker 4: But guess what. 405 00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:42,240 Speaker 2: Russia did something and the FBI and intelligence community behaved 406 00:28:42,280 --> 00:28:46,480 Speaker 2: appropriately and without political motivation. Are two completely separate propositions. 407 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:49,480 Speaker 2: Both can be true and both can be false. They're 408 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:53,840 Speaker 2: not logically connected. The document abuses in the Pfiser process 409 00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 2: are not justified by Russian activity, And the second argument 410 00:28:57,880 --> 00:29:00,000 Speaker 2: would be Trump is dangerous, So whatever the intel community 411 00:29:00,360 --> 00:29:04,800 Speaker 2: was justified. That's the most dangerous argument of all. It 412 00:29:04,880 --> 00:29:07,280 Speaker 2: sounds reasonably service, but notice what it actually says. It 413 00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:11,640 Speaker 2: says that unelected institutional actors, the deep state. They get 414 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:14,760 Speaker 2: to make the determination that an elected president is sufficiently 415 00:29:14,880 --> 00:29:17,920 Speaker 2: dangerous to justify covert action against him, whether it be 416 00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:21,240 Speaker 2: Rutchard Nixon or Donald Trump, and that we ought to 417 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:23,240 Speaker 2: be comfortable with that as long as we agree with 418 00:29:23,280 --> 00:29:26,600 Speaker 2: their assessment of the president. Do you understand what you're 419 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:29,240 Speaker 2: signing up for? If you buy into that argument, you're 420 00:29:29,280 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 2: signing up for exactly what the Joint chiefs did back 421 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:35,120 Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy. They thought Nixon's deston was dangerous to 422 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:39,560 Speaker 2: national security. They had their opinions, they had their experience, 423 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:42,560 Speaker 2: they had their institutional authority, but they did not have 424 00:29:42,640 --> 00:29:46,959 Speaker 2: the constitutional authority be doing what they were doing. So 425 00:29:47,000 --> 00:29:48,760 Speaker 2: when you hear somebody tell you that the deep state 426 00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:52,200 Speaker 2: is a conspiracy theory, ask them if they've ever heard 427 00:29:52,240 --> 00:29:56,640 Speaker 2: about Yeoman Radford. Ask them about Admiral Moore, Ask them 428 00:29:56,680 --> 00:30:00,320 Speaker 2: about the five thousand stolen documents. Ask them about since 429 00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:05,800 Speaker 2: grand jury testimony that sat sealed for fifty years. And 430 00:30:05,840 --> 00:30:08,520 Speaker 2: then that's why the most celebrated journalists of the Watergate 431 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:12,520 Speaker 2: era never told their readers about the Pentagon spy ring. 432 00:30:13,160 --> 00:30:16,239 Speaker 2: Because the deep state isn't a theory, it's history, and 433 00:30:16,280 --> 00:30:18,400 Speaker 2: now it's in of all places, in New York Times. 434 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:22,160 Speaker 2: And I think there's a real bitter irony in the 435 00:30:22,200 --> 00:30:25,800 Speaker 2: fact that the newspaper publishing James Rosen's piece, the paper 436 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:28,120 Speaker 2: that spent years rolling its eyes of the deep state, 437 00:30:28,560 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 2: is the same paper whose Watergate coverage was itself potentially 438 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:38,480 Speaker 2: compromised by the source relationships of its most famous competitor, 439 00:30:38,520 --> 00:30:41,920 Speaker 2: of the Washington Post. It saw the same institutional world. 440 00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:45,440 Speaker 2: It's the same web of relationships between journalists and the 441 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:48,760 Speaker 2: officials that they are supposedly going to hold accountable because 442 00:30:48,800 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 2: otherwise democracy dies in the darkness. Right, James Rosen's piece 443 00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 2: is genuinely important. And I say it because the lessons 444 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:00,880 Speaker 2: of all of this, of more rapid for the Watergate 445 00:31:00,920 --> 00:31:04,720 Speaker 2: of Russia Gate, is that these dynamics are not aberrations, 446 00:31:05,160 --> 00:31:08,760 Speaker 2: they're features. And now we have a historical record going 447 00:31:08,880 --> 00:31:15,280 Speaker 2: way back into the seventies. Journalism, intelligence, the military, the bureaucracy. 448 00:31:15,600 --> 00:31:19,160 Speaker 2: These are all institutions populated by human beings with their 449 00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:22,680 Speaker 2: own interants, their own alliances, their own views of what 450 00:31:22,760 --> 00:31:26,360 Speaker 2: they believe America should be doing. And sometimes those interests 451 00:31:26,440 --> 00:31:29,479 Speaker 2: conflict with the elected people that you and I elect, 452 00:31:29,480 --> 00:31:32,880 Speaker 2: and when they do powerful people with access to powerful 453 00:31:32,880 --> 00:31:33,560 Speaker 2: tools are going. 454 00:31:33,480 --> 00:31:35,760 Speaker 4: To use them, and your. 455 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 2: Job and you do this better than you give yourself 456 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:42,720 Speaker 2: credit for, is to know that, to hold the frame, 457 00:31:43,320 --> 00:31:47,400 Speaker 2: to refuse the invitation, to decide in advance which institutions 458 00:31:47,400 --> 00:31:49,720 Speaker 2: to trust based on whether you like the president that 459 00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 2: they're targeting, because the next time, Hey, Democrats, guess what 460 00:31:54,520 --> 00:31:56,160 Speaker 2: it might be your guy