1 00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: This story is what was that I had some cue 2 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 1: up and then didn't work very well? Was that for Goose? No? Oh, 3 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:28,040 Speaker 1: I couldn't tell who that was. For the next segment, 4 00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:30,200 Speaker 1: all right, maybe we'll get for the next segment a 5 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:32,400 Speaker 1: couple of texts. LOUA Goose is are in studio guests. 6 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 1: His new book is out today, Mastermind, a true story 7 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:41,479 Speaker 1: of obsession, survival and justice. Let me get to a 8 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:48,360 Speaker 1: couple of uh texts uh that I already reacting to 9 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 1: our conversation of the last thirty minutes. Some about the books, 10 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 1: some others. Lou had book events for Vanished and Vermilion. 11 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 1: Will you do the same with this book? Way to go, Lou, 12 00:00:56,920 --> 00:01:00,240 Speaker 1: you make us, make all us lose look good. That's 13 00:01:00,280 --> 00:01:02,639 Speaker 1: low in Plymouth. Who is taking I guess ownership over 14 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 1: the fact that that's your first name and it's not 15 00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:06,720 Speaker 1: your stage name. No, it's real that last time we 16 00:01:06,760 --> 00:01:08,960 Speaker 1: did go after that, it's like the perfect TV name. 17 00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:13,280 Speaker 1: So we talked about this. I think off air book 18 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:15,880 Speaker 1: events yet to come, anything yet announced or will that 19 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: becoming a. 20 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 2: Lot of them like to wait until the book is 21 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 2: actually out, even schedule stuff ahead of time. So yeah, 22 00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 2: that is all to come, but definitely especially I like 23 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:24,920 Speaker 2: speaking to libraries, so that that'll be a big one. 24 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:27,800 Speaker 1: Who's the publisher on this book. It's called Post Hill Press. 25 00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:31,399 Speaker 1: That's a close circuit for Andy Lueger listening and wanted 26 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 1: to get that part of it. Yeah, our good buddy, 27 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 1: all right, no questions for lou this time, at this time, 28 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:42,120 Speaker 1: rights Ryan in Mina Trista, I just want to say 29 00:01:42,120 --> 00:01:44,839 Speaker 1: thank you for his work. Tough to find real journalism 30 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 1: that follows stories and doesn't support a political party a 31 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: particular storyline line. I find lose work. Through lose work, 32 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 1: I can actually stay in form and understand what is 33 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:57,120 Speaker 1: happening in the Twin Cities and not just supporting the 34 00:01:57,160 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 1: left of the right. Thank you for holding everybody accountable. 35 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:00,880 Speaker 1: I assume it's music to your ears. 36 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:05,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what the shoot for every day. And I mean, 37 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:08,639 Speaker 2: and I think that there's a craving for that because 38 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,200 Speaker 2: things have gotten so far left and far right. Is 39 00:02:11,240 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 2: that I just want somebody who's going to present it 40 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 2: down the middle with starting from a point of neutrality 41 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 2: and just see where the story goes from there. 42 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 1: Here's I think the way it goes and maybe it's 43 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:24,400 Speaker 1: the way it kind of went for you. When you 44 00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 1: were doing a lot of good, hard reporting on Feeding 45 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 1: our Future scandals and some of those that followed, there 46 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: were people, at least to a text us on the 47 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 1: right side of the aisle who are just this is 48 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:42,360 Speaker 1: terrific reporting work. But then when you follow the story, 49 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:46,520 Speaker 1: maybe some ice stories and some stories where suddenly the 50 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,520 Speaker 1: folks on the right are saying, well, wait a minute, now, 51 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 1: hold on a second. That's lewer ghose was he was 52 00:02:51,560 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 1: my guy and feeding our future, you suddenly become the enemy. 53 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:57,359 Speaker 1: And that's what's sad about this that they look at 54 00:02:57,360 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: you differently, even though you're the same guy, who are 55 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: the same reporter. It's just that they don't like a 56 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,120 Speaker 1: particular outcome. That's what it comes down to. I mean, 57 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:08,239 Speaker 1: for many people, it's sad but true. 58 00:03:08,320 --> 00:03:11,519 Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of people gravitate to the content that 59 00:03:12,080 --> 00:03:15,959 Speaker 2: will reaffirm what they already believe. And occasionally my reports 60 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 2: might do that, depending on what the story is. 61 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,119 Speaker 1: But that's not how I approach it. No, not even 62 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 1: close to how you approach it, that's for sure. And 63 00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:26,679 Speaker 1: we talked a little bit of this off here. I 64 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:28,760 Speaker 1: don't think we have on air. I felt there was 65 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:33,720 Speaker 1: a stretch of time where you were not as present 66 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: on X on Twitter the old like I would forget 67 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 1: what your handle is and then I would try to 68 00:03:38,720 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 1: type it in. It wasn't coming up as easily. I'm going, 69 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 1: what's going on? Well? There was a story behind that, correct? 70 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:45,119 Speaker 1: Can you talk about that? Yeah? 71 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:48,280 Speaker 2: I mean I started getting a lot of messages that 72 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 2: I wasn't covering well, and ironically it was that I'm 73 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 2: not covering the fraud enough because this came after the 74 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 2: whole Nick Shirley videos and stuff like that. So the 75 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:00,640 Speaker 2: vitriology started getting worse and worse and worse and more 76 00:04:00,680 --> 00:04:03,280 Speaker 2: personal and more personal. And then they started, you know, 77 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 2: looking up like my wife and targeting her business. She's 78 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 2: a successful real estate agent. And that's when it was like, whoa, 79 00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 2: this is not worth it, And so I backed out 80 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 2: for a little bit, and like most things, it blew 81 00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 2: over and then I came back on. 82 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 1: And to a certain extent, no matter how big a 83 00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,720 Speaker 1: sesspool X can be, you sort of have to be 84 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 1: in the cesspool, right, I mean, it's still given your position, 85 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:31,480 Speaker 1: you almost have to participate, do you know. 86 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:34,039 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, and I do put my stuff across 87 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:38,320 Speaker 2: all the socials now, including Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, which I 88 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:41,719 Speaker 2: was never on before, and then YouTube shorts now as well, 89 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 2: and including X or Twitter, which I was always on. 90 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:49,200 Speaker 1: I was always very active on Are you on Blue Skill? 91 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 1: I'm on it. 92 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 2: There's just not enough people on it to make it 93 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 2: worth the time to go and keep posting on it. 94 00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:58,479 Speaker 2: But with when it comes to X when I was, 95 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:01,240 Speaker 2: I would I would to just say just turn it 96 00:05:01,279 --> 00:05:03,440 Speaker 2: off and say no. But then I'll hear from very 97 00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 2: influential people off the record that contact me about stories 98 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 2: and stuff, and like I saw your video on X 99 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:11,400 Speaker 2: and I'm like, on X or do you see it 100 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 2: on Facebook? Do you see that on TikTok? Maybe they're 101 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:15,599 Speaker 2: like no on X I'm like, well, that means like 102 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 2: I can't belave it. These people are not gonna you know, 103 00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:20,479 Speaker 2: I'm going to lose something if I leave it. 104 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,600 Speaker 1: You have created something of an identity beyond just the 105 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:27,640 Speaker 1: care leven reporting you've done with those videos, right, And 106 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 1: I don't know how what's the average length of the 107 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: two minutes three minute less? One minute probably is an average, 108 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:35,279 Speaker 1: which is probably conscious. You do that very deliberately. How 109 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:39,279 Speaker 1: did you come to that and are you surprised at 110 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 1: how effective it's been and how big it has become 111 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 1: because it's given you, i think, an identity above and 112 00:05:44,360 --> 00:05:46,360 Speaker 1: beyond covering stuff on Caro Leven. 113 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:49,280 Speaker 2: It actually was a care leven initiative, and so they 114 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:51,320 Speaker 2: want us to do more of these so that we 115 00:05:51,320 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 2: can use them on our care leven app the vertical 116 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:57,159 Speaker 2: videos and or reels or whatever people want to call them. 117 00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:01,240 Speaker 2: But I was taken am back by the reaction, you know, 118 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:04,359 Speaker 2: probably mainly because of the type of stories that I 119 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:08,119 Speaker 2: do that they just were spreading and my follower count 120 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 2: was rising, and so then I kind of figured out, 121 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 2: you know, like how to tell stories in this new format. 122 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 2: It was a new challenge for me, and I started 123 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 2: to really enjoy it. So now I look forward to that. 124 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 2: I mean, you could look at it like it's, oh, 125 00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:20,839 Speaker 2: we're being forced to do yet another new thing at work, 126 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:22,440 Speaker 2: you know, like that's that. You could look at it 127 00:06:22,480 --> 00:06:23,920 Speaker 2: like that. But I look at it as we are 128 00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 2: definitely reaching a new audience and I and I see 129 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:27,960 Speaker 2: it when I'm at the Mall of America and someone 130 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:30,560 Speaker 2: comes up to me, Hey, I love your videos, and 131 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:33,360 Speaker 2: I'll hear you know, either TikTok or Instagram or acts 132 00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:34,880 Speaker 2: like you know, from different people. 133 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, I'm reaching people that never reached before. So 134 00:06:38,120 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 1: how I mean, are you just that good speaking extemporaneously 135 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:45,479 Speaker 1: because I don't I assume you don't have uh, you 136 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:46,479 Speaker 1: don't have a prompter, do you? 137 00:06:46,640 --> 00:06:48,680 Speaker 2: I did I script it out or or at least 138 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 2: or at least outline it out. 139 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, But because you the key on that length is 140 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:54,800 Speaker 1: you got to you gotta there's there's there can be 141 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 1: no fat right, it's got to be you get to 142 00:06:57,600 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 1: it really fast. But a lot of the stuff you're 143 00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:02,400 Speaker 1: talking about is complicated and it's not These aren't always 144 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:04,800 Speaker 1: easy stories. I think that's another thing you've been very 145 00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,159 Speaker 1: successful at is you distill them in a way that 146 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,440 Speaker 1: everybody can understand them where they don't feel like, wait 147 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:11,200 Speaker 1: a minute, I need a lot more. After the minute 148 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 1: and a half, you do have a sense of wherever 149 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 1: you're going on that specific day. 150 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, And that's kind of been you know, something 151 00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 2: I've been good at for much of my career is 152 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:21,320 Speaker 2: making something complicated easy to understand. 153 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 1: Shorten it up, shorten it up. 154 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 2: And so that just kind of played naturally into some 155 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:26,760 Speaker 2: of my strengths when it came to that kind of thing. 156 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 2: But I enjoy like sitting down and there's no time limit. 157 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:32,600 Speaker 2: If you find it in two minutes, I can and 158 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 2: just here's how I would explain it to family member, 159 00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 2: so you understand this issue. 160 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,640 Speaker 1: Text from ed in Saint Paul excited to pick up 161 00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 1: and read the book. Whill you ask Lou if if 162 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:44,840 Speaker 1: it's not a spoiler, what the outcome for Atlas was 163 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: in court? 164 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 2: How far do you want to go? I'm completely fine. 165 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:49,119 Speaker 2: It's in the news. 166 00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:50,840 Speaker 1: He's in prison right now, and. 167 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 2: So there's plenty of other twists along the way, you know, 168 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:55,360 Speaker 2: to there's a lot of ground about cover. 169 00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:56,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure. 170 00:07:56,120 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 2: So we didn't give away you'll still very much enjoy 171 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 2: the book knowing that he is currently in prison. 172 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 1: Did he cooperate at all in a book? Was there 173 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:05,880 Speaker 1: any I assume you tried. 174 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,280 Speaker 2: Yes, and I and I tried harder with Colleen. 175 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:13,480 Speaker 1: Who it was Willane Larson's girlfriend, cor exactly and unfortunately 176 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 1: I think that she's still in love with with Tim 177 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 1: And what's her backstory? 178 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 2: Just you know, came from a good family, like you know, 179 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 2: she has parents and siblings. They're involved with the taekwondo, 180 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 2: and she just started to get groomed by Atlas, you know, 181 00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 2: at a pretty young age, and just believed everything he said. 182 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 2: She went to college, she has a degree, and she 183 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 2: was twenty four years old when this whole attempted murder 184 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:43,200 Speaker 2: plot came to fruition, so she was old enough to 185 00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:43,640 Speaker 2: know better. 186 00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 1: This book sounds fascinating. I will order it. Can Lou 187 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 1: talk about what the first book, Vanished in Vermilion is 188 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: all about. For those not familiar, it's a. 189 00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 2: Cold case that I covered when I was in South Dakota. 190 00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:57,400 Speaker 2: It was in nineteen seventy one. Two high school juniors 191 00:08:57,400 --> 00:08:59,320 Speaker 2: disappeared on their way to and ended the year party. 192 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:02,240 Speaker 2: And it was a mystery in Vermilion, South Dakota for decades, 193 00:09:02,760 --> 00:09:04,959 Speaker 2: and it went a lot of different directions. A man 194 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:09,599 Speaker 2: was falsely charged with murdering them, and eventually it was 195 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:11,680 Speaker 2: found that there was no murder at all. And so 196 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:14,920 Speaker 2: I explore all of that and get answers for the 197 00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:17,360 Speaker 2: people of why certain things happened along the way. 198 00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,120 Speaker 1: Do you have time for one more segment? Are you hurting? 199 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 1: I mean, you tell me if if you gotta go, 200 00:09:21,480 --> 00:09:23,880 Speaker 1: you gotta go. Yeah, okay, all right, Well then we'll 201 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:26,320 Speaker 1: leave it there. I because next time we have you on, 202 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,760 Speaker 1: I want to get to some of the stories that 203 00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:31,800 Speaker 1: are current, some of them you're involved with, some of 204 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: them you have been involved with. Because I feel like 205 00:09:34,040 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 1: there's still so much meat on the bone, I'll leave 206 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: you with one more text. Why does it seem many 207 00:09:39,000 --> 00:09:44,440 Speaker 1: in mainstream media want to discredit Nick Shirley. Well, Nick Shirley, 208 00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:46,559 Speaker 1: he didn't actually prove anything. 209 00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:49,080 Speaker 2: He raised suspicion, and so I think a lot of 210 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 2: people are jumping to the conclusion that he proved something 211 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:53,680 Speaker 2: with what his video showed. 212 00:09:54,400 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 1: He didn't. 213 00:09:55,280 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 2: He didn't exactly proven it, and so there hasn't been 214 00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:59,439 Speaker 2: any charges that have come from it. I don't I 215 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:01,480 Speaker 2: wouldn't say that people. I mean, yeah, maybe some people 216 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:03,839 Speaker 2: do want to discredit him, but I don't know that. 217 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:06,720 Speaker 2: That's the thing that I want people to realize is 218 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 2: what you're seeing is somebody, you know, making a scene 219 00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 2: and raising suspicion, and just know that that's not the 220 00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,640 Speaker 2: same as proving that something happened. The investigations into the 221 00:10:15,640 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 2: fraud takes surveillance multiple mornings. See how many kids are 222 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 2: coming into these daycares and then comparing it to what 223 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 2: they're billing. 224 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: So and ultimately court case. 225 00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 2: And if I if I tried to do the same 226 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 2: thing and it turned out that they were closed that 227 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 2: day that I was in front of their place filming, 228 00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 2: I'd get in huge trouble. So maybe that's the motivation 229 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 2: for some people I wanted to do. 230 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 1: It's the great irony of it is that it's not 231 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:38,599 Speaker 1: it's not even a matter to discrediting. It's like you say, 232 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 1: we had all these other cases that were proven in court, 233 00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:46,240 Speaker 1: and that's a lot of what you covered, but it 234 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:49,640 Speaker 1: wasn't as sexy as that that you know, that moment, 235 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:52,320 Speaker 1: the video that you got him walking up to a 236 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 1: to a storefront, and as you say, some of it 237 00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 1: might indicate there were there was fraud taking place, but 238 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,559 Speaker 1: none of it was proven on the basis just because 239 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 1: somebody is shouting it loudly and proclaiming, well, here's what 240 00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:07,679 Speaker 1: I saw and here's who came in here and who 241 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:11,000 Speaker 1: didn't came in here. I'm still flummixed by why. Well, 242 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 1: I guess I'm not because it's a TV world in 243 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:15,160 Speaker 1: which we it's very visual, But that I think is 244 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 1: I don't think that's anything to do with discrediting him. 245 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:22,160 Speaker 1: It's saying it's not as persuasive and conclusive as cases 246 00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:25,200 Speaker 1: that were reported on over a period of time, developed 247 00:11:25,480 --> 00:11:29,120 Speaker 1: in a courtroom and ultimately led to convictions, many of 248 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:29,920 Speaker 1: which you covered. 249 00:11:30,280 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 2: And I think sometimes like say, leaders like to say 250 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:36,360 Speaker 2: there's only X amount of fraud because that's the only 251 00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 2: ones that have been prosecuted. Obviously there's more fraud than 252 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:42,760 Speaker 2: what has been prosecuted, but the process to get there 253 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:45,520 Speaker 2: is important, and that's the way that these investigators. 254 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:48,800 Speaker 1: Last thing, I promise the ongoing debate about was it 255 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 1: is it multimillions or is it billions? I think you 256 00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:56,240 Speaker 1: and I have gotten into that occasionally, but it still 257 00:11:56,280 --> 00:12:00,360 Speaker 1: seems to be this debate where the start debutne has said, well, okay, 258 00:12:00,600 --> 00:12:02,720 Speaker 1: it's we've come up with I think they said two 259 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:06,360 Speaker 1: hundred million in that range. There have been other other 260 00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: reporting very differently. Where are you on that whole issue? 261 00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 2: I think that we sat down and we showed a 262 00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 2: path where it gets to a billion or over a billion, 263 00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:16,959 Speaker 2: and I'd be comfortable reporting that. Officials say that it's 264 00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:18,680 Speaker 2: more than a billion. We can see how it's going 265 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 2: to get there. It hasn't literally been convicted over a 266 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 2: billion yere right, but that's what we see, whether it's 267 00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 2: nine billion, like Joe Thompson said, I have no way 268 00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:28,240 Speaker 2: of knowing. I don't have that in those internal numbers. 269 00:12:28,240 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 2: That's what he says. But two hundred million would be 270 00:12:30,920 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 2: lower than. 271 00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:33,199 Speaker 1: What we know it's going to be. Is the office 272 00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:35,839 Speaker 1: as it's currently gutted, you know, with the numbers who 273 00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:39,760 Speaker 1: have left, does that make it far less likely that 274 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:42,559 Speaker 1: in short order we're going to get as many prosecutions 275 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:46,160 Speaker 1: as we otherwise might have in many of these cases 276 00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 1: and those that have been developed more late, more recently, 277 00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:49,439 Speaker 1: for sure, in short order. 278 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,559 Speaker 2: But the Trump administration is really helping them now with manpower, 279 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:54,560 Speaker 2: and so I think we will see batches of fraud 280 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:55,160 Speaker 2: cases come. 281 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:57,440 Speaker 1: I just don't know how soon it'll be. The new 282 00:12:57,520 --> 00:13:01,719 Speaker 1: book is called Mastermind, A True Story of Obsession, survival 283 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:05,679 Speaker 1: and Justice. Caro Levin's lure Goose best of Luck. I'm 284 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 1: sure it's going to do well. The last one did great, 285 00:13:07,520 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 1: and it's it's good to have you in studio. I 286 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 1: thank you. I'm waiting for it to reach a point 287 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:14,040 Speaker 1: though it becomes, you know, a national best seller, and 288 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:16,079 Speaker 1: then you said to me this, Carol sense, I'm just 289 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:16,880 Speaker 1: going to become a writer. 290 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:19,720 Speaker 2: Well for the foreseeable future. I am at Caro level. 291 00:13:19,960 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 2: So that's good news for our state here. 292 00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 1: I think. Good to see him, man, Thank you, Thanks 293 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:27,439 Speaker 1: Louer Goose. We'll get a pause in Louis in about 294 00:13:27,440 --> 00:14:18,800 Speaker 1: an hour and fifteen minutes. Do we have any more 295 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:22,720 Speaker 1: Vikings free agency news to discuss anything hot off the presses? 296 00:14:22,800 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 1: Right now? 297 00:14:23,160 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 3: I've seen that we've well, i've seen. Unless I miss 298 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 3: something during rote. 299 00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 1: Tomorrow might be the day at quarterback, but maybe not. 300 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:32,680 Speaker 1: Who's to say, Oh, by the way, I don't think 301 00:14:32,680 --> 00:14:37,440 Speaker 1: we got to this yesterday. Who is the Packers backup 302 00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:41,480 Speaker 1: quarterback that everybody loved, Malik Willis? He ends up in Miami? 303 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:46,400 Speaker 1: Correct with pretty good for pretty good money. That's always 304 00:14:46,480 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: the most crucial question, isn't it a quarterback will play 305 00:14:55,320 --> 00:15:01,240 Speaker 1: and impress just enough in snippets as a backup to 306 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:08,320 Speaker 1: where in a quarterback starved league. People start projecting, sometimes 307 00:15:08,360 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 1: because they think it's the right thing to do on 308 00:15:10,560 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 1: a given player. Sometimes I think it's because they have 309 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:17,240 Speaker 1: to because the options just there aren't enough good options 310 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: out there at the position. So you have to say, well, 311 00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:22,760 Speaker 1: what about Malik Willis? Can he be the guy again? 312 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:25,600 Speaker 1: Because he wasn't once very good at it. Now in 313 00:15:25,600 --> 00:15:28,960 Speaker 1: this new you know, after maturing a little bit, because 314 00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 1: we're not asking him to come in, you know, twice 315 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:35,520 Speaker 1: a season. We're asking him to come in and be 316 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:38,600 Speaker 1: our starting quarterback. We're building this thing around him, right, 317 00:15:38,640 --> 00:15:43,120 Speaker 1: So we'll see how that goes. If you've not heard earlier, 318 00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:46,560 Speaker 1: Geno Smith now off the table is a Vikings option 319 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:52,040 Speaker 1: because he's been traded from the Vegas Raiders to the 320 00:15:52,080 --> 00:15:55,520 Speaker 1: New York Jets. Back to New York with the Jets 321 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,840 Speaker 1: for I believe you said a sixth round draft pick. 322 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:02,960 Speaker 1: If I'm not mistaken, I got some Wolf stuff I 323 00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 1: want to get to. We may be able to get 324 00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:06,360 Speaker 1: to it now, or I think I'm gonna try to 325 00:16:06,400 --> 00:16:09,240 Speaker 1: squeeze in news on the March at the bottom of 326 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:11,640 Speaker 1: this hour, Louis at five thirty top five at five 327 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 1: yet to come. 328 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:15,680 Speaker 3: Percent chance you watch the Wolves game tonight at ten o'clock, 329 00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:19,080 Speaker 3: the whole game, Yeah, five percent. 330 00:16:19,960 --> 00:16:23,280 Speaker 1: I mean, my guess is I'll I'll get there, I'll start, 331 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 1: But my guess is I will Uh I don't think 332 00:16:25,800 --> 00:16:29,680 Speaker 1: I can make it. Well, that's more of a that's 333 00:16:29,760 --> 00:16:32,960 Speaker 1: that's more of an indictment on you than me, because 334 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: I'm so old, and so the assumption is at my 335 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:36,800 Speaker 1: age you got to have the teeth in the glass 336 00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:39,400 Speaker 1: by nine thirty, although frankly I was just as capable 337 00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:42,000 Speaker 1: of being in that position at age forty. Yeah, like 338 00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 1: me as I am now, which is you? That's that's 339 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:48,360 Speaker 1: a very good point. Unlikely, maybe something juicy happens. Is 340 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:51,400 Speaker 1: Lebron gonna play? Do we know? Because again, the Lakers 341 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:53,840 Speaker 1: have tended to be better off when one of their 342 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:57,920 Speaker 1: Big three, it's crazy, doesn't play right. So I don't 343 00:16:57,920 --> 00:16:59,520 Speaker 1: know if we should be if you're a Wolf's fan, 344 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:03,120 Speaker 1: if you're rooting for Lebron to play or rooting him 345 00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 1: to stay for him to stay out, because the latter 346 00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:08,520 Speaker 1: might mean the Lakers sometimes play better. 347 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 3: He's listed as a game time decision with his hip injury. 348 00:17:11,400 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 3: Are we full strength as far as we know? 349 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: Yeah? 350 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 3: In fact, like everybody's on board, even like a baby 351 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:21,480 Speaker 3: Baguette because the Iowa Wilder playing the South Bay Lakers. 352 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 3: Oh okay tomorrow, I really so all of our G 353 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:26,560 Speaker 3: league guys can actually be around if we want. 354 00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:31,800 Speaker 1: This, that's outstanding. What do you think the odds? If they? 355 00:17:31,960 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 1: If they they post odds on everything? Yeah? Could they? 356 00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:39,840 Speaker 1: If they? If they posted odds that at some point 357 00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 1: during the twenty twenty five twenty six NBA season, Luke 358 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:53,840 Speaker 1: Cornett would become a lightning rod name a basically you 359 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:57,919 Speaker 1: could say, a whipping boy. Yeah. For those upset with 360 00:17:57,960 --> 00:18:00,399 Speaker 1: a couple of the comments he made was this was this? 361 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:00,639 Speaker 2: No? 362 00:18:00,720 --> 00:18:02,320 Speaker 1: I guess he wrote. Wasn't this in a blog? He 363 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:03,919 Speaker 1: did a big statement. Yeah. I don't know if it 364 00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:04,760 Speaker 1: was a blog or something. 365 00:18:04,800 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 3: I just saw it online, a big open letter basically 366 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 3: to ask the Hawks to reconsider one of their promotional nights. 367 00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:16,200 Speaker 1: Correct, that is correct. Lou Cornett is a Spurs guy. Correct, 368 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: And so the basics, as I understand it, is they 369 00:18:24,040 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 1: This was getting a lot of attention on the NBA network, 370 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:31,680 Speaker 1: a serious XM. The Hawks had announced a promotional night 371 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:37,600 Speaker 1: in conjunction with a I guess you would call it 372 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:44,880 Speaker 1: a well established, hugely successful gentleman's club, strip club, gentlemen's club, 373 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:45,560 Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it. 374 00:18:45,680 --> 00:18:48,119 Speaker 3: As Louis called him a couple of months ago, one 375 00:18:48,160 --> 00:18:50,520 Speaker 3: of those dancing bars, one of those dancing bars, those 376 00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:54,520 Speaker 3: dancing bars, and it became famous in part because if 377 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:57,919 Speaker 3: you remember, remember when Louis Williams I was about, say 378 00:18:57,960 --> 00:18:59,840 Speaker 3: lou Hudson, No, that was he played here. 379 00:19:00,440 --> 00:19:05,320 Speaker 1: Lou Williams escaped the bubble and went to Atlanta and 380 00:19:05,480 --> 00:19:10,000 Speaker 1: hung out at is it called Magic City, a metic city, 381 00:19:10,320 --> 00:19:13,679 Speaker 1: And the big joke was they got great lemon pepper wings. 382 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:15,679 Speaker 1: He just went there for the wings. That's all was about. 383 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:18,320 Speaker 1: He was hungry, which, by the way, apparently was verified. 384 00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:20,879 Speaker 1: Wings are tremendous y. Yeah, there's no question about that. 385 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 1: So apparently there's gonna the Hawks were gonna have this 386 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:33,200 Speaker 1: promotional night celebrating the place, including they're gonna be hoodies, 387 00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:36,200 Speaker 1: there are gonna be some presentations, the whole bit. There 388 00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:40,720 Speaker 1: was not gonna be any dancing. We're gonna be the wings. 389 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:45,119 Speaker 1: It to okay, so as I understand it. Then he 390 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:50,720 Speaker 1: u puts up a blog or writes in a in 391 00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:56,560 Speaker 1: a blog, he being Luke Cornett, that he believed that 392 00:19:57,960 --> 00:20:02,879 Speaker 1: the Hawks, if the Hawks didn't get to a better place, 393 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:07,240 Speaker 1: as in rethink their position, that the league should step 394 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:13,879 Speaker 1: in because he felt it was quote disrespectful to women, 395 00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:19,160 Speaker 1: what I didn't expect. I'll be honest, I you know 396 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:21,080 Speaker 1: it's not. This isn't one of those where I actually 397 00:20:21,160 --> 00:20:23,400 Speaker 1: have that strong of an opinion either way. I tend 398 00:20:23,440 --> 00:20:25,919 Speaker 1: to be a live and let live guy on that 399 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:31,239 Speaker 1: sort of thing. But what I was gobsmacked by is 400 00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:35,760 Speaker 1: the amount of blowback and pushback he got. There is 401 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:38,840 Speaker 1: a segment of the media that is absolutely and some 402 00:20:38,920 --> 00:20:45,080 Speaker 1: players that's absolutely pilloried Luke Cornett, how dare he? He 403 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:50,040 Speaker 1: knows nothing of the Atlanta culture. He knows nothing of 404 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:53,760 Speaker 1: the tradition that goes beyond what any of you might 405 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:58,560 Speaker 1: think of. In fact, who is the TV talk show 406 00:20:58,600 --> 00:21:03,080 Speaker 1: Michelle Beadle can't even say? What she said in defending 407 00:21:03,520 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: the club, that it was more than a bleak bar 408 00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:08,760 Speaker 1: is what she said? Got it? And a lot of 409 00:21:08,760 --> 00:21:12,680 Speaker 1: people feel that way that it is has become, whether 410 00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: it should or not, it has become part of the 411 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:20,919 Speaker 1: civic fabric of Atlanta, Georgia. Now we can argue about 412 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:22,879 Speaker 1: that I spent I lived one year in Atlanta. I 413 00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:25,040 Speaker 1: don't think it existed then, I'm not. I don't believe 414 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: that was a long time ago. Not the police, what's that? 415 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:34,879 Speaker 1: I'm not the police women let live. But here's the 416 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:40,200 Speaker 1: part that I will say, surprise me, is it fair 417 00:21:40,240 --> 00:21:44,000 Speaker 1: to say? And I'd love to hear from some women 418 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:50,120 Speaker 1: about this via the Bratchean Brian Kafan text line that men, 419 00:21:50,440 --> 00:21:54,440 Speaker 1: especially because it's considered a gentleman's club, right, a men's 420 00:21:54,480 --> 00:22:00,480 Speaker 1: bar basically, and it's naked women, I think have been 421 00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 1: educated and schooled into thinking that what's being done there 422 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:12,320 Speaker 1: is not illegal, but that in a perception world, it's 423 00:22:12,359 --> 00:22:16,840 Speaker 1: a bad look, right, and it is object There are 424 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:21,840 Speaker 1: there are many leaders who said, yeah, again it's legal, 425 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:24,719 Speaker 1: but it's the objectification of women. I mean, we've got 426 00:22:24,760 --> 00:22:27,080 Speaker 1: people out there who say, you got to apologize if 427 00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:30,320 Speaker 1: you go to a hooter's, let alone a club like this. 428 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:34,119 Speaker 1: So I would say, and again I didn't read everything 429 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:40,639 Speaker 1: that Cornett wrote, but I would say that I'm surprised that, 430 00:22:40,920 --> 00:22:45,520 Speaker 1: given what we've been conditioned to believe is a position 431 00:22:45,560 --> 00:22:48,399 Speaker 1: that a lot of individuals, especially women, hold on this 432 00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:53,240 Speaker 1: whole concept that I'm surprised he would be getting pilloried 433 00:22:53,960 --> 00:22:57,840 Speaker 1: for his own opinion. Part of it was, well, where 434 00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:02,040 Speaker 1: were you on domestic abuse issues? Where were you on this? This? 435 00:23:02,040 --> 00:23:04,880 Speaker 1: This is this example which I didn't I don't think 436 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:07,679 Speaker 1: is a very good argument, because we get into that 437 00:23:07,800 --> 00:23:11,560 Speaker 1: mode of who decides that's again, that's more of a 438 00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:16,000 Speaker 1: purity test where you're going, who decides how many different 439 00:23:16,720 --> 00:23:21,640 Speaker 1: part kinds of subjects that you are obligated to discuss 440 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:24,359 Speaker 1: on any issue. I mean, he has a right to 441 00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: that opinion. I would say you have a right to 442 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:31,160 Speaker 1: disagree with him. But everything I think we've been led 443 00:23:31,200 --> 00:23:34,600 Speaker 1: to believe is that at the very best, this is 444 00:23:34,600 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 1: an this would be an uncomfortable union. Right of of 445 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:43,920 Speaker 1: that that you know doesn't perhaps convey the best message 446 00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 1: if you believe in general that you are then participating 447 00:23:48,680 --> 00:23:54,720 Speaker 1: in or tacitly endorsing objectification. Now you can say, well, 448 00:23:54,760 --> 00:23:57,000 Speaker 1: the leagues, they're frauds on this, how they decide what 449 00:23:57,040 --> 00:23:58,920 Speaker 1: they go after what they don't. And then there are 450 00:23:58,960 --> 00:24:03,160 Speaker 1: examples of domestic abuse brought up, but I'm not sure. 451 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 1: I mean, in many of those cases players have been suspended, 452 00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:09,840 Speaker 1: the league has acted. In this case, I'm assuming part 453 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:12,119 Speaker 1: of the reason Cornette was bringing up was nobody was 454 00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:14,840 Speaker 1: acting on it, or nobody even seemed to be discussing it. 455 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: So you tell me again, I don't have I don't 456 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:25,359 Speaker 1: know that I would even have known about this. He 457 00:24:25,480 --> 00:24:29,080 Speaker 1: became though, but the Lightning Rod guy, and he's sort 458 00:24:29,080 --> 00:24:32,640 Speaker 1: of been dismissed because, let's face it, he's white. That's 459 00:24:32,680 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 1: part of the reason, if we're being honest, he's being dismissed. 460 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 1: And he doesn't know anything about He never played there, 461 00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:40,080 Speaker 1: he doesn't know anything about the culture there, he's never 462 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:43,880 Speaker 1: been there. I'll ask again, if if is it good, 463 00:24:43,920 --> 00:24:45,760 Speaker 1: it can be so it can be grandfathered in just 464 00:24:45,760 --> 00:24:48,439 Speaker 1: in the basis of tradition. Is it as simple as 465 00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:50,719 Speaker 1: that in one city as opposed to another. Is there 466 00:24:50,720 --> 00:24:55,359 Speaker 1: any chance? What would be the staying power if the 467 00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:59,000 Speaker 1: Wolves announced today they were in partnership, they're gonna give 468 00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:01,600 Speaker 1: out hoodies too. I don't even know Buns and Roses 469 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:05,440 Speaker 1: doesn't exist anymore. Yeah, I say, we're gonna, we're gonna, 470 00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:09,879 Speaker 1: we're gonna celebrates and they got great wings, and then 471 00:25:09,920 --> 00:25:12,440 Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna sell hoodies or giveaway hoodies, Buns 472 00:25:12,480 --> 00:25:17,040 Speaker 1: and Roses hoodies. I have to believe the reaction would 473 00:25:17,080 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 1: be rather swift. Swift is the word for it, would 474 00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:21,639 Speaker 1: be what are you doing? You can't again, I'm not 475 00:25:21,680 --> 00:25:23,520 Speaker 1: here to be a puritt end goal wherever you want 476 00:25:23,520 --> 00:25:26,200 Speaker 1: to go, but an organization can't share in that. Now 477 00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 1: you can again say, the difference is it has been 478 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,200 Speaker 1: embedded in the culture in Atlanta. It has been around 479 00:25:32,200 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 1: for a long time, forty years. Forty years. So there 480 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 1: you go. But I'm still stunned with how harshly Luke 481 00:25:40,800 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 1: has been has been hammered because I'm guessing I don't 482 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:47,000 Speaker 1: even know if he said this where he's kinda be 483 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:49,960 Speaker 1: wildering to going, Wait a minute, this is what I've 484 00:25:50,119 --> 00:25:54,280 Speaker 1: been understandably educated to try to a better understand and 485 00:25:54,280 --> 00:25:57,520 Speaker 1: believe that this is just not a good fit for again, 486 00:25:58,160 --> 00:26:01,480 Speaker 1: presumably a sport in which you kids going, et cetera, 487 00:26:01,520 --> 00:26:04,240 Speaker 1: et cetera. That it's great that it exists. No wady 488 00:26:04,240 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 1: is saying it should be shut down, But does the 489 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,920 Speaker 1: league want to have this sort of engagement with it, 490 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:12,159 Speaker 1: even if in a place where it has become part 491 00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:13,000 Speaker 1: of the tradition your thought. 492 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:15,160 Speaker 3: I did hear Marins today, Marnie Gellner on the Power 493 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:17,000 Speaker 3: Trip when I was driving the kids back from school. 494 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 3: Thankfully I wasn't listening to this portion of the equation 495 00:26:19,800 --> 00:26:22,520 Speaker 3: while I was driving them to school because that's part 496 00:26:22,520 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 3: of it too. You go to Magic City Night and 497 00:26:24,640 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 3: you got a nine year old, you gotta talk to 498 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:26,960 Speaker 3: you do that? 499 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:27,640 Speaker 1: Now you do? 500 00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 3: You probably don't back into Magic City Night. You're probably 501 00:26:32,160 --> 00:26:33,959 Speaker 3: I had a hard time believing you wouldn't have heard 502 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:36,159 Speaker 3: about it. But she was talking about how apparently the 503 00:26:36,200 --> 00:26:39,639 Speaker 3: Hawks kind of did this and didn't really inform the 504 00:26:39,720 --> 00:26:43,440 Speaker 3: league that they were doing this. Which was a point 505 00:26:43,480 --> 00:26:45,040 Speaker 3: that she brought up. Where I think this got some 506 00:26:45,080 --> 00:26:47,680 Speaker 3: attention is I don't know how it works in the 507 00:26:47,720 --> 00:26:50,320 Speaker 3: promotion game. If you have to get them all approved 508 00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:52,240 Speaker 3: of the league, I would assume you do a little 509 00:26:52,240 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 3: bit or at least they have to have an idea. 510 00:26:55,600 --> 00:26:57,080 Speaker 3: And that was part of it too, is that the 511 00:26:57,160 --> 00:26:59,000 Speaker 3: league wasn't really filled in on this, and I think 512 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 3: they did have some issue with it, and that's why 513 00:27:01,600 --> 00:27:03,719 Speaker 3: it's Yeah, Luke Cornett is getting a lot of attention, 514 00:27:04,000 --> 00:27:06,320 Speaker 3: and well, I think the league had some reaction to it. 515 00:27:06,480 --> 00:27:10,840 Speaker 1: What's interesting is the I don't know if at any 516 00:27:10,880 --> 00:27:14,359 Speaker 1: point the Hawks wanted to reconsider, but to a certain extent, 517 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:17,360 Speaker 1: the League did the right thing in taking them off 518 00:27:17,359 --> 00:27:20,080 Speaker 1: the hook. The league is the bad guy here and 519 00:27:20,200 --> 00:27:22,600 Speaker 1: it may well be that the Hawks prefer it. Now 520 00:27:22,640 --> 00:27:25,520 Speaker 1: maybe the Hawks weren't even having any having any second thoughts. 521 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:27,880 Speaker 1: I'm not sure, because I think there's also a connection 522 00:27:28,680 --> 00:27:34,960 Speaker 1: between one of the owners and a documentary that that's 523 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:36,120 Speaker 1: been done on this. 524 00:27:36,359 --> 00:27:38,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, establishment well I'm looking at it right now. Is 525 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:40,159 Speaker 3: Shaquille o'nel's a part of it? Yes, and some other 526 00:27:40,200 --> 00:27:41,000 Speaker 3: people are a part of it. 527 00:27:41,080 --> 00:27:43,680 Speaker 1: Again, And I don't have a problem with the documentary. 528 00:27:43,720 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 1: I would say, look, that's just real. You could it 529 00:27:46,840 --> 00:27:48,879 Speaker 1: may be cringe worthy, you may not like it, you 530 00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:52,399 Speaker 1: may whatever. I I'm more live and let live on 531 00:27:52,840 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: that sort of activity. But I'm still surprised, like I 532 00:27:56,840 --> 00:28:00,240 Speaker 1: said that, when when Cornett, for whatever reason, come out 533 00:28:00,240 --> 00:28:03,960 Speaker 1: of nowhere just to express frustration about now he's getting 534 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 1: ripped like, well, the commissioner is caving in to Luke Cornett, 535 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,879 Speaker 1: which would be hard for me to believe that that 536 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:14,879 Speaker 1: was indeed the case. But the position he takes, the 537 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:19,960 Speaker 1: idea that he has to explain himself for a position that, 538 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 1: as I said, most men have tried to be educated 539 00:28:23,920 --> 00:28:26,879 Speaker 1: on in some cases need to be educated on about 540 00:28:26,960 --> 00:28:29,639 Speaker 1: a lot of the larger ramifications. To the point where 541 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:33,960 Speaker 1: as I said, you got to whisper about going to Hooters, right, 542 00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:36,479 Speaker 1: let alone a strip club because of just the feeling 543 00:28:36,520 --> 00:28:39,120 Speaker 1: that there is. You could talk about the wings all 544 00:28:39,160 --> 00:28:41,000 Speaker 1: you want, You can talk about the Rissian tradition all 545 00:28:41,040 --> 00:28:42,920 Speaker 1: you want. I heard somebody call into one of the 546 00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:47,680 Speaker 1: shows this morning to say, but you can't pretend that 547 00:28:47,760 --> 00:28:49,760 Speaker 1: at the base of it, there are not, you know, 548 00:28:49,880 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 1: naked women dancing at this particular place. And if that's 549 00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:56,160 Speaker 1: your cup of tea again, fine, And I'm sure there 550 00:28:56,160 --> 00:28:58,760 Speaker 1: are some women who say who have no problems going 551 00:28:58,800 --> 00:29:00,360 Speaker 1: to those places. And I'm not even going to say 552 00:29:00,400 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 1: all the women who are participating in the dancing are victims, 553 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:05,360 Speaker 1: because that gets into that whole issue. Right, I'm not 554 00:29:05,360 --> 00:29:08,240 Speaker 1: going to presume any of that, but that he's become 555 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 1: the villain in this thing. Well, where was he on 556 00:29:11,480 --> 00:29:14,600 Speaker 1: some of those domestic abuse issues. Well, I'm assuming on 557 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:18,840 Speaker 1: several of them he allowed the NBA to meet out 558 00:29:19,080 --> 00:29:21,480 Speaker 1: punishment and they often have no We can argue about 559 00:29:21,480 --> 00:29:24,120 Speaker 1: whether they've done it enough, whether they've been harsh enough, 560 00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:27,280 Speaker 1: whether you know, there's some people who think that even 561 00:29:27,280 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 1: if you serve a punishment, you shouldn't be allowed to play. 562 00:29:31,240 --> 00:29:33,120 Speaker 1: We can have that debate. Do you take away somebody's 563 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:35,400 Speaker 1: right to work forever on that basis? I don't know, 564 00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:37,480 Speaker 1: but I think the reason he was bringing it up 565 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:40,040 Speaker 1: wasn't that there weren't other things that are more important 566 00:29:40,080 --> 00:29:43,320 Speaker 1: in the pecking order, but because no one was really 567 00:29:43,440 --> 00:29:46,479 Speaker 1: pushing back and for whatever reason, he was attempting to 568 00:29:46,480 --> 00:29:50,680 Speaker 1: do exactly that Magic City. 569 00:29:50,760 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 3: Was that where Bryant McKinney made his calls to help 570 00:29:54,840 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 3: with the love Boat because we brought we brought in 571 00:29:58,720 --> 00:30:01,000 Speaker 3: the love Boat women from it Atlanta, right, that was 572 00:30:01,040 --> 00:30:03,640 Speaker 3: one of the allegations. Yeah, that was it Magic City 573 00:30:03,640 --> 00:30:05,320 Speaker 3: specifically or was it other people? 574 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:07,440 Speaker 1: I don't know that. Well, that's a good question. I 575 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 1: don't remember, but it was it was al Yeah, that's true. 576 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:12,600 Speaker 3: And if you're going to Atlanta, where you're going, you're 577 00:30:12,680 --> 00:30:14,520 Speaker 3: on to Magic City probably. 578 00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:19,000 Speaker 1: Six five one guy Rights director of the FBI, drinking 579 00:30:19,000 --> 00:30:21,960 Speaker 1: beers is unacceptable and sad, But the NBA endorsing strip 580 00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:23,640 Speaker 1: clubs at what should be a family event can drive 581 00:30:23,720 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 1: an opinion out of Dan Classic. Well, first of all, 582 00:30:26,560 --> 00:30:30,080 Speaker 1: I didn't say a word about him drinking beer, and 583 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:32,400 Speaker 1: I didn't say it was unacceptable. I said was embarrassing 584 00:30:32,520 --> 00:30:36,920 Speaker 1: the fact that he made himself, he presented himself as 585 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:41,240 Speaker 1: if he want to medal. That was my issue with him. 586 00:30:41,760 --> 00:30:45,160 Speaker 1: That's not that difficult, I would say for the league. 587 00:30:46,720 --> 00:30:50,280 Speaker 1: The position I am taking is actually defending Luke Cornett's 588 00:30:50,720 --> 00:30:54,880 Speaker 1: questioning exactly how much sense this relationship makes. That's not 589 00:30:54,960 --> 00:30:59,920 Speaker 1: exactly endorsing it. But I'm not. I'm not here necessary 590 00:31:00,360 --> 00:31:03,880 Speaker 1: in general to I don't feel strong enough about it 591 00:31:03,920 --> 00:31:05,240 Speaker 1: to say, well, here's what you have to do in 592 00:31:05,280 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 1: all these situations. I'm actually here more standing up for him, 593 00:31:08,560 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 1: which is not exactly refusing to take a stand on it. 594 00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:17,320 Speaker 1: If an NBA team wants to celebrate domestic violence, I 595 00:31:17,320 --> 00:31:20,320 Speaker 1: expect Luke's speak up then too. I see the point 596 00:31:20,320 --> 00:31:23,959 Speaker 1: that he's making there. But I've seen a lot of reporters, 597 00:31:24,520 --> 00:31:30,840 Speaker 1: male and female, say come on now. I saw Courtney 598 00:31:30,880 --> 00:31:33,440 Speaker 1: Cronin once the story broke that the commissioner was stepping in. 599 00:31:33,440 --> 00:31:36,760 Speaker 1: I think she said, oh, come on, yeah. And the 600 00:31:36,800 --> 00:31:44,400 Speaker 1: old comman is interesting to me because it's contrary to well, again, 601 00:31:44,440 --> 00:31:46,760 Speaker 1: what I think has been for the last twenty five years, 602 00:31:47,360 --> 00:31:53,480 Speaker 1: an attempt to constantly hold people accountable for these sorts 603 00:31:53,520 --> 00:31:56,640 Speaker 1: of associations in terms of any kind of official associations 604 00:31:56,640 --> 00:32:01,240 Speaker 1: involving teams and the message that's conveyed. So the contradiction 605 00:32:01,400 --> 00:32:03,520 Speaker 1: is what interests me, and I don't know again if 606 00:32:03,520 --> 00:32:07,840 Speaker 1: it's just because this place is so popular and it's 607 00:32:07,880 --> 00:32:09,920 Speaker 1: been around so long that it's almost viewed as well. 608 00:32:09,960 --> 00:32:12,320 Speaker 1: Know this, Yeah, you're right on all that stuff's true 609 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:16,560 Speaker 1: about objectifying women, But it's okay to have this official 610 00:32:16,600 --> 00:32:21,720 Speaker 1: relationship because this place gets grandfathered in on the basis 611 00:32:21,720 --> 00:32:23,920 Speaker 1: of the fact that it's been it's just considered it's 612 00:32:23,920 --> 00:32:28,120 Speaker 1: just part of the landscape in Atlanta, Georgia. So there 613 00:32:28,120 --> 00:32:30,080 Speaker 1: you have it. I do want to try to get 614 00:32:30,080 --> 00:32:35,120 Speaker 1: into some news on the March things as well, right 615 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:36,720 Speaker 1: se on Brian Kafe in text line, We've got a 616 00:32:36,720 --> 00:32:42,880 Speaker 1: lot of good texts, good texts coming in, Alex writes, 617 00:32:42,920 --> 00:32:44,880 Speaker 1: and this has come up. Would you rather have to 618 00:32:44,880 --> 00:32:47,600 Speaker 1: explain the Karl Ma Loan statue in Utah or Magic 619 00:32:47,640 --> 00:32:53,600 Speaker 1: City to your kids? The assumption is that it's an 620 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:57,600 Speaker 1: either or, The assumption is that there's no point. It 621 00:32:57,680 --> 00:33:00,480 Speaker 1: becomes a silly way to dismiss the issue at hand, 622 00:33:00,560 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned. Now can you say there 623 00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 1: are cases where there's hypocrisy. Maybe, but we're back to 624 00:33:08,880 --> 00:33:12,560 Speaker 1: court cases, We're back to what has been indeed proven, 625 00:33:13,600 --> 00:33:18,360 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. And so for me, that doesn't 626 00:33:18,440 --> 00:33:23,920 Speaker 1: take away from some pushback regarding this particular activity. It's 627 00:33:23,920 --> 00:33:28,200 Speaker 1: become one of the main pushbacks. The other, like I said, 628 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:31,040 Speaker 1: is well, where these same individuals when it comes to 629 00:33:31,800 --> 00:33:36,480 Speaker 1: more serious issues, And there are more serious issues than this, 630 00:33:36,640 --> 00:33:39,800 Speaker 1: one hundred percent true. I also think the punishment and 631 00:33:39,840 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 1: the visibility, the understanding of holding individuals accountable for domestic 632 00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 1: abuse has gotten. We've gotten to a much much better place. 633 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 1: Are we as good at place as we should be? 634 00:33:50,240 --> 00:33:54,600 Speaker 1: I don't know, but I'm just scratching my head. You're 635 00:33:54,680 --> 00:33:59,760 Speaker 1: lying if you say in general culturally there has not 636 00:33:59,880 --> 00:34:01,960 Speaker 1: been in an attempt over a period of decades to 637 00:34:02,040 --> 00:34:07,480 Speaker 1: say to almost have to explain if you have tried 638 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:12,680 Speaker 1: to create any kind of again professional connections between organizations 639 00:34:12,960 --> 00:34:16,640 Speaker 1: and institutions like this one. It's just it, As I 640 00:34:16,680 --> 00:34:21,359 Speaker 1: mentioned here, it would get hammered. I think almost from 641 00:34:21,400 --> 00:34:23,200 Speaker 1: the beginning, I don't know what the distinction is other 642 00:34:23,239 --> 00:34:25,759 Speaker 1: than history. I guess let's make get a pause in 643 00:34:26,360 --> 00:34:28,200 Speaker 1: do we need to pause here? No, we do, we do. 644 00:34:28,280 --> 00:34:29,680 Speaker 1: That's right. I got behind because I went along with 645 00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:32,239 Speaker 1: Lure Goose top five and five yet to come. I 646 00:34:32,239 --> 00:34:33,719 Speaker 1: got a couple of news on the March issues to 647 00:34:33,920 --> 00:34:37,560 Speaker 1: get to as well, one involving the Minneapolis City Council 648 00:34:37,640 --> 00:35:22,880 Speaker 1: state tuner. No, that's not what I wise. That's the 649 00:35:22,920 --> 00:35:26,360 Speaker 1: follow up, sounder. Where's news on the march page? Is 650 00:35:26,400 --> 00:35:26,680 Speaker 1: that on? 651 00:35:27,160 --> 00:35:27,319 Speaker 2: Here? 652 00:35:27,360 --> 00:35:37,920 Speaker 1: It is? Let me give you a couple of headlines 653 00:35:37,960 --> 00:35:43,120 Speaker 1: here that got my attention, including this one via CBS News. 654 00:35:43,320 --> 00:35:45,640 Speaker 1: I don't know if this has been fleshed out since 655 00:35:45,960 --> 00:35:50,799 Speaker 1: this reporting earlier today, US intelligence assets have begun to 656 00:35:50,800 --> 00:35:56,840 Speaker 1: see indications Iran is taking steps to deploy mines in 657 00:35:57,160 --> 00:36:01,239 Speaker 1: straight of Hormuze shipping lane Iuran has used smaller crafts 658 00:36:02,040 --> 00:36:06,120 Speaker 1: that can carry two to three minds each well, Iran's 659 00:36:06,120 --> 00:36:10,000 Speaker 1: mindstock isn't publicly known. Estimates over the years have ranged 660 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:15,880 Speaker 1: from roughly two thousand to six thousand naval minds of Iranian, Chinese, 661 00:36:16,520 --> 00:36:21,640 Speaker 1: and Russian made variants. Now, we talked about the possibility 662 00:36:21,640 --> 00:36:24,800 Speaker 1: at any moment the President, regardless of the ramifications of it, 663 00:36:24,800 --> 00:36:30,120 Speaker 1: could say we're done. It's over. We won. War's over 664 00:36:30,200 --> 00:36:33,200 Speaker 1: and we're we're moving on. We've made our point, but 665 00:36:33,280 --> 00:36:35,680 Speaker 1: that doesn't necessarily mean it is done because of what's 666 00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:39,600 Speaker 1: already taken place in the larger ratifications of it. This 667 00:36:39,640 --> 00:36:41,840 Speaker 1: would be what they in the business call a game 668 00:36:41,920 --> 00:36:46,440 Speaker 1: changer if this story is accurate, and that's the road 669 00:36:46,600 --> 00:36:50,399 Speaker 1: and that Iran attempts to go down, because there were 670 00:36:50,760 --> 00:36:53,160 Speaker 1: some big shot military types who used to serve in 671 00:36:53,200 --> 00:36:56,640 Speaker 1: the US military in positions of great authority, who warned 672 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:59,920 Speaker 1: of this, and we're worried about it, the old, you know, 673 00:37:00,440 --> 00:37:04,160 Speaker 1: unintended consequences thing that you think you have control over it, 674 00:37:04,200 --> 00:37:07,759 Speaker 1: and maybe not so much so. If there's anything new 675 00:37:07,800 --> 00:37:10,560 Speaker 1: on that, we'll let you know. But that most assuredly 676 00:37:12,400 --> 00:37:15,800 Speaker 1: got my attention. Did you see the Peggy Noonan description 677 00:37:16,560 --> 00:37:18,280 Speaker 1: of your guy Pete Hegseth. 678 00:37:19,200 --> 00:37:21,640 Speaker 3: I may have, because I've seen a couple of things 679 00:37:21,640 --> 00:37:23,400 Speaker 3: folding around. I don't know if it's specific to her, 680 00:37:23,440 --> 00:37:24,000 Speaker 3: but go ahead. 681 00:37:24,400 --> 00:37:29,120 Speaker 1: He's something between an excitable morning TV anchor and the 682 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:33,160 Speaker 1: rooster who thought he brought the dawn ouch. It's a 683 00:37:33,200 --> 00:37:35,799 Speaker 1: hell of a line. She's great, even if yeah, you 684 00:37:35,880 --> 00:37:38,720 Speaker 1: love heckseeth. That's unfair. You got to you gotta smile. 685 00:37:38,760 --> 00:37:42,839 Speaker 1: That's I would I would suggest that's pretty accurate. And 686 00:37:42,880 --> 00:37:47,880 Speaker 1: it's one hell of a line as as well. 687 00:37:49,360 --> 00:37:52,120 Speaker 3: In LA I need to close out of I was 688 00:37:52,120 --> 00:37:54,040 Speaker 3: doing some Magic City due diligence. 689 00:37:54,200 --> 00:37:56,000 Speaker 1: Oh no, in trouble. No. 690 00:37:56,120 --> 00:37:59,160 Speaker 3: Oh, it looks like an interesting place. Huh, But I 691 00:37:59,239 --> 00:38:01,359 Speaker 3: just got a message popped up on my computer. Hi, 692 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:04,719 Speaker 3: I'm fancy Magic City's AI service agent. What can I 693 00:38:04,760 --> 00:38:08,239 Speaker 3: help you? Yeah, so they have AI at Magic City. 694 00:38:08,280 --> 00:38:11,720 Speaker 3: You can make reservations. It's not They ain't messing around. 695 00:38:12,040 --> 00:38:15,880 Speaker 3: They know what they're doing. Yeah, Hi, I'm fancy fancy. 696 00:38:15,880 --> 00:38:17,480 Speaker 3: How's that spelled with a why? 697 00:38:17,640 --> 00:38:18,080 Speaker 1: With a why? 698 00:38:18,160 --> 00:38:18,279 Speaker 3: Not? 699 00:38:18,360 --> 00:38:18,839 Speaker 1: I no? 700 00:38:18,880 --> 00:38:22,560 Speaker 3: I E yeah, I thought it might be c I fancy? Yeah, 701 00:38:22,640 --> 00:38:24,759 Speaker 3: it's just see why? Okay, So I'm gonna close. Are 702 00:38:24,800 --> 00:38:26,440 Speaker 3: we done talking about Magic City? I can get out 703 00:38:26,440 --> 00:38:26,600 Speaker 3: of this. 704 00:38:26,640 --> 00:38:27,879 Speaker 1: I think you can get out of this for now. 705 00:38:27,920 --> 00:38:34,320 Speaker 1: I think that will indeed work. New York Times reporter 706 00:38:34,400 --> 00:38:40,080 Speaker 1: to the President. Yesterday, you just suggested that Iran somehow 707 00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:42,200 Speaker 1: got its hands on a tomahawk and bombed its own 708 00:38:42,239 --> 00:38:45,120 Speaker 1: elementary school on the first day of the war. Why 709 00:38:45,160 --> 00:38:48,920 Speaker 1: are the Are you the only person saying this, it's 710 00:38:48,920 --> 00:38:53,359 Speaker 1: a good question for New York Times guy, and there 711 00:38:53,480 --> 00:38:57,160 Speaker 1: was a Trump Sir Wanga. He basically shrugged his shoulder 712 00:38:57,200 --> 00:38:58,920 Speaker 1: and said, because I just don't know enough about it, 713 00:38:59,600 --> 00:39:03,840 Speaker 1: which is not a real good answer from the President 714 00:39:03,880 --> 00:39:05,920 Speaker 1: of the United States. I'm gonna throw a tomahawk in there, 715 00:39:05,920 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 1: because he said the committeion, you'll have tomahawks. We sell 716 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:13,399 Speaker 1: some of them, people buy them from us. And there 717 00:39:13,480 --> 00:39:17,000 Speaker 1: is in that tragedy. You know, it's been said before. 718 00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:22,000 Speaker 1: It's a horrific outcome. If indeed we are responsible, you 719 00:39:22,040 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 1: are better off just owning up to it. It's not unprecedented. 720 00:39:26,400 --> 00:39:29,600 Speaker 1: It's awful. Uh, it's part of it is part of war, 721 00:39:29,680 --> 00:39:32,399 Speaker 1: which is further evidence that this is a war. And 722 00:39:32,800 --> 00:39:36,319 Speaker 1: I think you don't take away your responsibility by owning 723 00:39:36,400 --> 00:39:38,160 Speaker 1: up to it, but I think you end up looking 724 00:39:38,239 --> 00:39:40,680 Speaker 1: worse by by attempting to run from it. You can 725 00:39:40,719 --> 00:39:43,279 Speaker 1: say all the obvious stuff, This is not something we 726 00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:48,480 Speaker 1: do deliberately. This is stuff that the Iranian administration we 727 00:39:48,520 --> 00:39:50,600 Speaker 1: would do as a matter of a matter of course, 728 00:39:50,640 --> 00:39:52,560 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. And I think that to me, 729 00:39:52,640 --> 00:39:56,160 Speaker 1: that would be a much better approach to take on 730 00:39:56,480 --> 00:40:01,239 Speaker 1: this particular story. Also, let me see if I can 731 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:10,680 Speaker 1: get to we had homemade bombs thrown outside of the 732 00:40:10,719 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 1: New York the News New York City Mayor's home. Was 733 00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:17,799 Speaker 1: it just over the weekend? I believes ago a couple 734 00:40:17,840 --> 00:40:23,560 Speaker 1: of days ago. This would be under the classification of 735 00:40:24,680 --> 00:40:29,160 Speaker 1: you cannot be taken seriously as a news outlet if 736 00:40:29,160 --> 00:40:31,520 Speaker 1: this is how you frame the story. Did you see 737 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:37,000 Speaker 1: the CNN framing No. Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New 738 00:40:37,080 --> 00:40:39,360 Speaker 1: York Saturday morning for what could have been a normal 739 00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:42,640 Speaker 1: day enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather, but in 740 00:40:42,719 --> 00:40:45,680 Speaker 1: less than an hour, their lives would drastically change, as 741 00:40:45,680 --> 00:40:51,640 Speaker 1: the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs. That's insulting, 742 00:40:52,560 --> 00:41:00,520 Speaker 1: that's attempting to trivialize or to somehow minimize a terrorist act, 743 00:41:00,960 --> 00:41:06,799 Speaker 1: and it's frankly exactly what ends up costing the so 744 00:41:06,960 --> 00:41:10,719 Speaker 1: called mainstream media. That who are you trying to protect? 745 00:41:11,520 --> 00:41:15,799 Speaker 1: And would you be as protective if it was you know, 746 00:41:16,840 --> 00:41:22,359 Speaker 1: some far right lunatic presumably trying to state whatever his 747 00:41:22,440 --> 00:41:25,480 Speaker 1: case might be. The answer is no, you wouldn't. And 748 00:41:25,520 --> 00:41:29,800 Speaker 1: by the way, the message got to CNN. Let me 749 00:41:29,840 --> 00:41:34,839 Speaker 1: see if I can find it. They ultimately, I don't 750 00:41:34,840 --> 00:41:37,560 Speaker 1: see it in front of me, but they ultimately all 751 00:41:37,640 --> 00:41:40,759 Speaker 1: but apologized for the framing and said it doesn't even 752 00:41:40,760 --> 00:41:45,799 Speaker 1: meet our standards journalistically, and it's too bad that they 753 00:41:45,840 --> 00:41:48,720 Speaker 1: probably had to do that, one could say under pressure. 754 00:41:48,960 --> 00:41:52,319 Speaker 1: I don't know if they otherwise would have. But come on, 755 00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:58,160 Speaker 1: is that following the story? No, that's in some odd 756 00:41:58,160 --> 00:42:03,680 Speaker 1: way like you're protecting some one. You're doing the exact opposite, 757 00:42:03,719 --> 00:42:07,120 Speaker 1: and you're making people feel that you're somehow trying to protect. 758 00:42:07,920 --> 00:42:11,520 Speaker 1: There should be no protection, no matter who's responsible for 759 00:42:11,560 --> 00:42:15,080 Speaker 1: it when bombs are involved. Here's the CNN update. A 760 00:42:15,120 --> 00:42:18,640 Speaker 1: post regarding the two individuals arrested for throwing homemade bombs 761 00:42:18,680 --> 00:42:20,600 Speaker 1: outside of the New York City Mayor's home failed to 762 00:42:20,600 --> 00:42:23,600 Speaker 1: reflect the gravity of the incident, thereby breaching the editorial 763 00:42:23,600 --> 00:42:26,760 Speaker 1: standards we require for all our reporting. Is therefore been deleted. 764 00:42:26,840 --> 00:42:28,319 Speaker 1: I mean, I'll give him credit for at least going 765 00:42:28,360 --> 00:42:34,080 Speaker 1: that far, but it's ridiculous locally. Did you see this too? 766 00:42:34,520 --> 00:42:35,960 Speaker 1: And try to squeeze in a couple more news on 767 00:42:36,000 --> 00:42:42,720 Speaker 1: the March items, Chief O'Hara was putting the meat grinder 768 00:42:43,080 --> 00:42:49,120 Speaker 1: at from the community, the Community Commission on Police Oversight. 769 00:42:49,440 --> 00:42:52,160 Speaker 1: I think this took place yesterday, is a public meeting, 770 00:42:52,600 --> 00:42:56,799 Speaker 1: and in the meeting he was accused, I should say, 771 00:42:56,800 --> 00:42:59,640 Speaker 1: the city's police department was accused along with him as 772 00:42:59,640 --> 00:43:02,280 Speaker 1: a leader, of failing to protect people during the surge 773 00:43:02,360 --> 00:43:07,680 Speaker 1: of ice operations in the Twin Cities, that Minneapolis police 774 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:10,279 Speaker 1: officers did not intervene when federal agents used excessive force 775 00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:15,239 Speaker 1: and prioritized crowd control over community safety. Blah blah blah. 776 00:43:15,360 --> 00:43:19,880 Speaker 1: You want to talk about a disconnect here, name me 777 00:43:19,920 --> 00:43:28,160 Speaker 1: an individual. I mean, the original demand in many parts 778 00:43:28,160 --> 00:43:33,319 Speaker 1: of the community was don't you get near these ice operations. 779 00:43:34,360 --> 00:43:38,040 Speaker 1: Don't you even get near the idea of creating perimeters 780 00:43:38,560 --> 00:43:40,680 Speaker 1: that will make it easier for them to do their job. 781 00:43:41,080 --> 00:43:46,359 Speaker 1: Stay away. Wasn't that the warning? How disingenuous is it 782 00:43:46,440 --> 00:43:49,960 Speaker 1: now to say, well, where were you when things got 783 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:56,040 Speaker 1: out of hand? As the chief pointed out, Whatever we 784 00:43:56,080 --> 00:43:58,560 Speaker 1: think of the ice operation, and we've certainly on this 785 00:43:58,600 --> 00:44:04,920 Speaker 1: show think it was illegal, it was dramatically over the line, 786 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:10,480 Speaker 1: it was destructive, it was unnecessary, it was pathetic. But 787 00:44:10,560 --> 00:44:16,480 Speaker 1: whatever you believe of that, that the notion that now 788 00:44:16,719 --> 00:44:19,960 Speaker 1: it was up to the police, that the Minneapolis police 789 00:44:19,960 --> 00:44:24,080 Speaker 1: are supposed to be an open confrontation with federal authorities. 790 00:44:24,400 --> 00:44:28,279 Speaker 1: Who wins in that? Where does that go? All that 791 00:44:28,320 --> 00:44:30,720 Speaker 1: would do, would have done is drawn another five probably 792 00:44:30,719 --> 00:44:34,920 Speaker 1: five thousand troops into this town. Makes no sense. It 793 00:44:34,960 --> 00:44:37,239 Speaker 1: was we talked with this on TV and we never 794 00:44:37,280 --> 00:44:40,200 Speaker 1: talked about it on radio. The performance stuff that goes 795 00:44:40,239 --> 00:44:43,239 Speaker 1: on in Minneapolis sometimes, and it was laid out very 796 00:44:43,320 --> 00:44:49,240 Speaker 1: nicely in a start debune piece I think by Roper, 797 00:44:49,600 --> 00:44:51,960 Speaker 1: and this goes back a couple of weeks ago where 798 00:44:52,760 --> 00:45:00,320 Speaker 1: he noted that the progressive majority of the Minneapolis City Council, 799 00:45:01,600 --> 00:45:04,440 Speaker 1: at least for a period of time until cooler has prevailed, 800 00:45:05,800 --> 00:45:09,719 Speaker 1: attempted to perform on the subject of we're going to 801 00:45:09,760 --> 00:45:14,440 Speaker 1: scrutinize the liquor license renewals of two hotels that allegedly 802 00:45:14,480 --> 00:45:18,520 Speaker 1: housed ice agents during the searge. Now, ultimately they gave 803 00:45:18,560 --> 00:45:21,000 Speaker 1: in on that, but not before there was a lot 804 00:45:21,040 --> 00:45:23,719 Speaker 1: of performance on it, which falls under the classification of 805 00:45:24,320 --> 00:45:30,120 Speaker 1: cutting your nose to spite your face. As Roper writes, 806 00:45:30,400 --> 00:45:33,840 Speaker 1: progressors on the council in an ironic bit of performative politics, 807 00:45:33,840 --> 00:45:38,440 Speaker 1: seem keen on kneecapping the very places those visitors would stay. 808 00:45:39,280 --> 00:45:45,160 Speaker 1: The notion that city leaders have been imploring people to 809 00:45:45,239 --> 00:45:50,600 Speaker 1: come visit to help revive the economy, and now you actually, 810 00:45:51,320 --> 00:45:54,440 Speaker 1: because performance politics is so important to you, you're going 811 00:45:54,520 --> 00:45:56,719 Speaker 1: to pound your fist and say, should we really give 812 00:45:56,760 --> 00:46:00,440 Speaker 1: them those liquor licenses? That was to the Renaissance Apolis 813 00:46:00,520 --> 00:46:05,200 Speaker 1: Hotel at the Depot and the Canopy by Hilton, And 814 00:46:05,239 --> 00:46:08,120 Speaker 1: as he points out, the hotels are in a pretty 815 00:46:08,120 --> 00:46:10,480 Speaker 1: tough spot during the search right in terms of what 816 00:46:10,520 --> 00:46:15,160 Speaker 1: you're supposed to do. But the notion that the city 817 00:46:15,280 --> 00:46:19,720 Speaker 1: wins with this kind of performance politics kind of tells 818 00:46:19,760 --> 00:46:23,680 Speaker 1: you where their minds are of these individuals, at least 819 00:46:23,680 --> 00:46:26,759 Speaker 1: some of these individuals on the city council. And it 820 00:46:26,840 --> 00:46:30,480 Speaker 1: looks cool to beat your chest and say we got 821 00:46:30,480 --> 00:46:35,360 Speaker 1: to hold them accountable. How about we we'll show them 822 00:46:35,560 --> 00:46:39,280 Speaker 1: who wins and who loses in that environment. And ultimately, 823 00:46:39,280 --> 00:46:42,040 Speaker 1: I think they must have even been brought to it 824 00:46:42,160 --> 00:46:45,920 Speaker 1: or had finally figured it out, not before time was 825 00:46:45,920 --> 00:46:49,400 Speaker 1: wasted on the performance aspect of this whole thing that 826 00:46:49,520 --> 00:46:53,120 Speaker 1: made absolutely no sense that we're gonna we're gonna take 827 00:46:53,160 --> 00:46:58,680 Speaker 1: it out on businesses caught between a rock and a 828 00:46:58,719 --> 00:47:02,080 Speaker 1: hard place. It made absolute no sense whatsoever. But it's 829 00:47:02,120 --> 00:47:06,520 Speaker 1: all to me part of the same piece. I I 830 00:47:06,600 --> 00:47:09,560 Speaker 1: look the city. The city cops were in a no 831 00:47:09,640 --> 00:47:12,400 Speaker 1: win situation. There was no way out. None of it 832 00:47:12,440 --> 00:47:14,279 Speaker 1: was easy, and I'm not even here to say they 833 00:47:14,280 --> 00:47:19,200 Speaker 1: did everything one hundred percent great. But I just find 834 00:47:19,239 --> 00:47:21,879 Speaker 1: it curious that if on the front end you're told 835 00:47:21,880 --> 00:47:24,880 Speaker 1: don't get near this, don't aid in a bet, but 836 00:47:24,960 --> 00:47:27,000 Speaker 1: you better be there in case things go bad to 837 00:47:27,040 --> 00:47:30,160 Speaker 1: take care of us, that that's way too easy after 838 00:47:30,160 --> 00:47:34,320 Speaker 1: the fact, and it's not putting the onus or keeping 839 00:47:34,400 --> 00:47:38,120 Speaker 1: the onus on where it belongs. The Feds who came 840 00:47:38,160 --> 00:47:42,920 Speaker 1: in irresponsibly, criminally and did what they did over a 841 00:47:42,960 --> 00:47:46,000 Speaker 1: period of time. You're you're You're just just stay on 842 00:47:46,040 --> 00:47:48,920 Speaker 1: the high road and don't spend as much time on performing. 843 00:47:49,320 --> 00:47:50,920 Speaker 3: Top five to five give you the latest in the 844 00:47:51,000 --> 00:47:53,920 Speaker 3: National Football League, including some quarterback stuff, and get you 845 00:47:53,960 --> 00:47:56,480 Speaker 3: ready for a late night in Los Angeles.