WEBVTT - The Jay Weber Podcast #0011 5-12-26 

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That Jay Weber Podcast is presented by Creative Planning, helping

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>clients simplify their journey to financial wellness, one personalized plan

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at a time. That j Weber Podcast is a production

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio Podcasts.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Good Day, Welcome to the Jay Weber Podcast. Today. I

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about all sorts of things. How about

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the fight over our national identity as we mark America's

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fiftieth anniversary this summer. Also how New

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>York democrats obsession with race is going to hobble their

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 2>efforts to redraw their district map. That's an interesting story.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Also why gas prices will be a bigger issue than

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>normal this fall. But first, I see that our governor

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in the great state of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, has come

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to a deal with Republican leaders to finally, finally give

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>taxpayers some of their money back. Governor Evers, Robin Voss,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Devin Lemiheue. They're the Republicans in charge of the Assembly

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>and the Senate there. They're all retiring at the end

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>of the year, and so they obviously decided that they

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>have a rare window here to resolve a long time fight.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>What to do with all of the money that the

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>state government has taken out of our paychecks unnecessarily. Wisconsin,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Republican budgets for over a decade, has run

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>two to three million dollars or billion dollar surplus every year.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And this is money that they haven't needed to run

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>state government over the last decade. They've given it back

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>to us in different ways over the years, but there's

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>about a three billion or so dollar surplus, and I

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>think the level and they've decided now that they're going

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to give us some of that money back. I think

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the level of refund is pathetic given the size of

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the surplus. It would be three hundred dollars back for

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>individuals and six hundred dollars for married couples. But they're

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>also agreeing to dump even more money into Wisconsin public

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>schools and special ad while ending state income taxes and

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 2>taxes over time. So overall, both sides get something. I

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>understand Producer Gregory John that Congressman Tom Tiffany was on

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Benjamin the Ount Show on WISN this morning, and you

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>have a bit of an exclusive here. Tiffany was saying

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that he would not sign this agreement if he was governor.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't like the agreement because he thinks we could

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>do better. Is that right?

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 4>I would not vote for it. I think that Governor

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Evers has failed the people the state of Wisconsin once again.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, remember, he's got the ultimate authority here. The

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 4>governor in the state of Wisconsin had the most powerful

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 4>veto pen perhaps of any governor in these states. And

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.839
<v Speaker 4>plus with the Evers the market line decision, which gave

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 4>him even more executive authority. I mean, he really has

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 4>unrivaled authority amongst governors across the country. And he could

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>have put in here the repeal of the four hundred

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 4>year property tax increase, and he did not. All he

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>wanted in there for the relief was a sugar high

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>for a year. Now. I understand why Republicans may support

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 4>this because they're at least getting something and being in

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 4>a tough position with an executive that has so much power,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>some of it given to them by to the governor

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 4>by the state Supreme Court. I get it why they

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 4>would want to take a victory here. But we need

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 4>long term systemic tax relief here in Wisconsin, and it

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 4>starts by repealing the four hundred year property tax increase.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Which, by the.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 4>Way, remember when Governor Evers told us to deal with it.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's how he views the taxpayer's money. It's

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 4>ours in Madison, and we'll give you a little bit

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>for a year. We should have long term systemic relief,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 4>make no doubt about it. I want the money returned

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 4>to the taxpayers of the state of Wisconsin. But elect

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 4>me in November and you'll get far more than this.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>We will end the four hundred year of property tax increase.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 4>We'll get control of your utility bills that have went

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>up two billion dollars under Governor Evers. I think about

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>the livestock citing our livestock inspection fee where Governor Evers

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 4>proposed raising it from four hundred and fifty dollars to

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 4>seven thousand dollars. Now they settled for a little bit less,

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>but it was a huge increase. So they're nickel and

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 4>diming the taxpayers at the State of Wisconsin. And then

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>they want to give them a little bit of money back.

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 4>And this is ultimately where I have the objection. To

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 4>give people a little bit of money back temporarily, but

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 4>it is not long term. And the taxpayers of the

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 4>state of Wisconsin should expect to have tax relief, including

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 4>property tax relief, that continues not just this year, but

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 4>for the foreseeable future, so life can be affordable in

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 4>our state.

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Tom Tiffany makes a lot of good points there, I think,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>but this also strikes me. You know, this is a

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 2>deal where both sides get a little something, and you've

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>got guys that are retiring trying to be a little

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>more diplomatic and work together, as the taxpayers and the

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>voters always claim they want to see. So as a

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>politician running for office this year, you'd be pretty stupid

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to oppose this at the same time, wouldn't you. I

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>understand Governor Tiffany is pointing out that we can do

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot better. But on the other side of the aisle,

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats that are running to oppose him are shooting

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>this down because they don't want to give up the money.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>You'd think it's smart to stand in the way of

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>voters and taxpayers getting some of their money back in

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>an election year. So far, it's nearly all the Democrat

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>candidates for governor Kelda roy Is, Francesco Hong, David Crowley, etc.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Who have come out against this. Tom Tiffany isn't necessarily

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>against the tax return. He's just saying I could do

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>a better bill. I wouldn't sign this bill because we

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 2>could do better. I don't know, Greg. It's only six

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred bucks for you and Dorothy, but do you want

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 2>some of your money back?

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 5>I was teasing Ben earlier this morning about that. Sez

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 5>I liked about six hundred dollars, and we talked about that.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 5>In Tom's right, it's a sugar high. You still have

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 5>the four hundred year property tax increase in.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>This You're right. And the Democrats' reaction to it is

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that we shouldn't give anyone anything back. We got to

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>keep it all for ourselves. Is an interesting response, and

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>it just shows you again how this era's Democrats are

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>really moving right into socialism. They're big government socialists. The

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 2>deeper analysis here is the reflexive reaction by those Democrat

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>candidates to immediately oppose anything that's good for the taxpayers

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>or has big government loosening its grip on our wallets.

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I think is interesting. It's a great example of how

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>today's Democrats really are big government socialists. Past Dems would

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>have at least realized that this is the taxpayer's money

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>taken from them out of their paychecks. Unnecessarily, we took

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 2>too much. But today's Democrat leaders really do think that

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>all of your money is really their money, and people

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 2>like Hong and Calderoy's can't even pretend otherwise. If you're

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>a socialist like Hong or Roy's, why would the dumb

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>donkeys who send you a chunk of their paycheck every

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 2>week deserve any relief or consideration. This really is how

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 2>today's Democrat thinks. Since your money is really their money,

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they talk openly about heaping higher and higher taxes on you,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>and hell no, you don't deserve anything back. They get

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to decide how your money is spent. It's infuriating, and

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 2>it's why it's harder and harder to save for your

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 2>own retirement nest egg and plan for your own retirement.

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So this is where I say, have you heard about

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Creative Planning? They're one of the nation's largest independent wealth

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>management firms, offering fully integrated financial and retirement planning, investment management,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>estate planning, tax strategies, business services, and international wealth management,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>all in house and coordinated through your wealth manager. Their

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>fiduciary wealth managers are here. To help you navigate every

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>piece of your financial life. Visit creative Planning dot com

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to schedule your introductory meeting. That's Creative Planning dot com

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>your team always. Thanks for by Creative Planning and SEC

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Registered Investment advisor. The speaker's statements are not an endorsement

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of the firm. We are moving into the summer of

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six and moving closer and closer to the

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>official two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the founding of

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>this nation. President Trump and Congress are promising all sorts

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of special and wonderful celebrations related to it. And I love,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I really love and appreciate the fact that Donald Trump

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>happens to be our president right now because he's put

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>an importance on cleaning up, renovating, and doing long term

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>deferred maintenance on our new national monuments and institutions and

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Washington d C in general. Sincerely, if Kamala Harris or

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>any other Democrat or Republican leader was sitting in the

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>White House right now, do you think we'd have seen

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>an effort to get Washington d C all spruced up

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>for the two hundred and fiftieth underway. I convertually guarantee

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you we wouldn't, and we wouldn't because sadly, no one

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>else would have thought of it. I don't think anyone

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 2>else alive or in politics today really thinks this way.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>It had to be Trump. Only Trump would drive through

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>DC and say, my god, we need to fix these fountains.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 2>It's an embarrassment that they sit in decay. My god.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 2>How can this be the road leading to the White House.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>It's all rutted and crumbling. We must replace this, my god.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>How can the reflecting pool in the National Mall not

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>be holding water some days and covered over with LGA

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 2>other days. We thank god President Trump is restoring some

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>pride and dignity to our important public spaces. I can

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>guarantee you Kamala wouldn't be doing it, neither Barack nor

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>old Dementia Joe drove around in the decay and decided

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>we should really do something about this. We are president,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>after all. It had to be Trump. But at a

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>deeper level, having at last four or five administrations simply

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 2>allow our national monuments to decay along with our national pride,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>it should be disturbing to all of us. The physical

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 2>decay seems to mirror a general decay when it comes

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 2>to American pride and greatness. It just disturbs me. We're

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>such a divided and very different country now than we

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>were back in nineteen seventy six when the country celebrated

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>its bi centennial. A lot of us were around to

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 2>see that and the display of greatness and independence that

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 2>was celebrated back then too. Yeah, I was a kid,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 2>but I can firmly say, based on both personal experiences

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>at the time and the history I've read about it since,

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 2>the bi centennial celebration in nineteen seventy six was genuinely

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a moment of great national pride and a coming together

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:47.239
<v Speaker 2>of both parties as everyone, regardless of political affiliation, race, ethnicity,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone celebrated the greatness of this country, celebrated the promises

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of the constitution, proudly waived the American flag, not because

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>we were a perfect country, but because we had gotten

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>closer to achieving that than any other country or society

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and human history. That is the promise of the nation

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>after all. Right. In the most important founding document, the

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>founders make it clear this is an effort to form

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a more perfect union, a more fair and perfect society, etc.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And right through the nineteen seventies, I'd say, actually, right

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>up until about nineteen ninety, we had people on both

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 2>sides of the isle, both leaders and voters on both

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat and Republican side of the isle, who really

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>loved and appreciated the greatness of this country and the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>promises of this country, and they only really argued over

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the best ways in which to achieve that more fair

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>or perfect union. Then came the modern left, and now

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>we find ourselves a country battling over a national identity.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 2>And trust me, if Donald Trump wouldn't have won in

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, we'd be seeing a very different version

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>of America two hundred and fifty years later. If Kamala

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Harris would have won, many of us would have marked

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>America's two hundred and fiftieth year and been wondering, is

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>this as long as America lasted? Because we'd have a

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 2>nitwit in the White House who liked Abigail Spanberger or

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Kathy Hokl or Chuck Schumer wouldn't have been strong enough

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>to push back on the socialism. Kamala would have been

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>giving into every last one of their radical activist ideas.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And there'd be no doubt that this country was on

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 2>a path to socialism as it marked two hundred and

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 2>fifty years of existence. There is no doubt in my

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 2>mind that had Kamala won, we in the pundit class

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 2>would have spent the entire summer and fall this year

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>mulling over those questions. The Roman Empire lasted nearly fifteen

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred years, the Egyptian Empire lasted nearly three thousand. The

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>American Republic only lasted about two hundred and fifty years. Really,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>we started down the clear path towards socialism in twenty

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, and so market the most important promises of

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights were

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 2>taken away from us in less than two hundred and

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty years. That's all the longer we would sustain it.

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And I'm simplifying and amplifying to some extent here. A

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris regime wouldn't have meant instant socialism, but the

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>destruction of another four years of having the bullying America

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>haters of the Obama and Biden eras in charge would

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 2>have very likely meant this a significant amount of destruction

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that the public couldn't have bounced back from as it is.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>The socialist made gains. You've got Zorn Mamdani, an open

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>socialist in charge of New York City and all sorts

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>of council seats and mayorships at the local level in

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>the Blue States, turning socialist. Back in nineteen seventy six,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 2>when we were all wearing our red, white and blue

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and celebrating this wonderful thing we were gifted from our founders,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>no one would have imagined the sort of divided and

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>angry and disparate country that we've become in the decades.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Since this really is a nation battling over a national

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>identity right now. And what's making everything more difficult is

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 2>that nearly half of the people in this country no

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>longer seem to believe in God, family, and education, or

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that they make for a stronger society. I found this

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>blurb not long ago and set it aside. I'd credit

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the author if I still had his or her name,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 2>but I couldn't agree with it more. The most grievous

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>cultural wound has been the loss of a shared moral order.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>We told multiple generations to come up with their own

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.599
<v Speaker 2>individual values. It has left us morally inarticulate and uninformed.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 2>It created a naked public square where there was no

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>broad agreement about what was true, beautiful, and good. Without

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 2>shared standards of right and wrong, it's impossible to settle disputes,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>it's impossible to maintain social cohesion and trust. Every healthy

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>society rests on some shared conception of the sacred, sacred heroes,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>sacred text, sacred ideals. And when that goes away, anxiety, atomization,

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and a slow descent toward barbarism are the natural results.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 2>And if that doesn't describe America and the Western world today,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what does. Where a nation founded on

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>individual freedom, equality and self determination, specific principles and moral values,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and now only half of the country seems to believe

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>in those things. The very lessons of the founding documents

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>have been lost on today's younger generations and leaders. It's

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>clear that Alexandria Ocassio Cortez has no idea zero, how

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>or why our nation was founded. You've probably heard the

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 2>clip in which she claims America's founders were trying to

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 2>get away from the controlling billionaires of their day.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 6>The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 6>and we were declaring independence from such an extreme marriage

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 6>of wealth and power and the state.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>That is some of the dumbest crap I've ever heard

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in an elected official utter. And I'm not kidding. All

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 2>sorts of people hopped on social media and blasted her

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>for naked ignorance, and I was one of them. Yeah,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I pointed out what actually motivated the Founders was they

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>wanted to break away from an intrusive, abusive, highly taxing

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>government of the sort that AOC and her party members

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>want to force onto us. Talk about irony. The Founders

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>wanted to break away from a bullying monarch that, by

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>modern standards, was laughably meek. If you want to compare

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>King George and his reign to Marxism and the socialist

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and communist desires to control absolutely every aspect of our lives,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>there's no comparison. Give me England in the seventeen seventies

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>over modern socialism or communism any day. And if AOC

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>repris sence a young, spoiled, arrogant, ignorant class of Americans,

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>and she does, then yeah, this country is battling over

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>its national identity. IPSOS just conducted a poll and found

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>only thirty nine percent of millennials and gen zers agree

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that being an American is an important part of how

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think about myself, compared to sixty five percent of

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 2>baby boomers. In a twenty twenty three Gallop pole, only

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent of Americans aged eighteen to thirty four said

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>they were extremely proud to be an American. That compared

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to fifty percent of adults over fifty five. Asked by

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Democracy Fund if the Founders would be better described as

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>villains or heroes, forty percent of gen Zers picked villains.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Only ten percent of boomers did I guess those are

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the old crackpot hippies. But in a Ugov pole, nearly

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>one third of young voters agreed that quote democracy is

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>no longer a viable system and Americans should explore alternative

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>forms of government. Only five percent of those over the

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>age of sixty five did you can say these are

0:15:55.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 2>just misguided youth? But who misguided them? This is reflective

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of a country whose educational system was taken over by

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>left wing America haters decades ago and is now indoctrinated

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>at least two generations of young people into hating or

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>at least putting no value on the founding ideals of

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 2>this country or anything that is seen as American. And

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>they do this even though the country has never been greater,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>or more prosperous, or more fair. This is a nation

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 2>of grievance mongers and complainers, even though the country has

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>by and large greatly lived up to the promises the

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>founders made sure. There are social inequities, and there always

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>have been. But trust me, despite what the leftists and

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>America haters tell you, the social inequities here in America

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>aren't even close to those that you'd find virtually anywhere

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 2>else on the globe. There are one hundred and ninety

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>countries on this planet, and in the vast majority of

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 2>them you'll find a rich dictating class, a poor underclass,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and very little in between. Even better, you'll also find

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that the promises of this nation are as possible and

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>there as happening as regularly as ever. Two hundred and

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty years later. The left and their accomplished media members

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>don't want you to know this or hear this, but

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority of Americans are still moving up and

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>through the social classes, and just a generation or two

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 2>in this country every day, every year every decade. We

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>still see people moving from poverty into the lower middle

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>class or firm middle class. We still see people moving

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>from the lower middle class to the upper middle class,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>people moving from middle class to rich, etc. It is

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 2>still the untold greatness of America occurring every day, and

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 2>it drives the America haters so crazy they need to

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 2>lie about it and try to indoctrinate our children into

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a different, false reality. Bernie and AOC and virtually all

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of today's Democrat officeholders and pundits genuinely believe that America

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 2>has a shrinking middle class because the so called super

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>rich have sucked up all of the money in the

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 2>resources from the middle class, and so we have more

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Americans in poverty than ever. Everything about that is false everything.

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 2>First of all, we simply don't have true poverty in

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>America anymore. And if you doubt that, just do some

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>traveling and look around. We don't have acres and acres

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 2>of wooden shacks built on muddy hillsides with starving children

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>hanging around every door. We don't have one room cabins

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in the woods with no running water and six dirty children,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>barefoot and nearly naked, hanging out on the porch looking

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 2>at the world through dead eyes. America's so called poor

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 2>have on average twelve hundred square feet of living space, food, clothing, heat,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>and power. Some of that they paid for themselves, a

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of it's been provided by us, the taxpayers. But

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 2>no one is poor or starving in America anymore. We're

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 2>the only country that has a terrible obesity problem among

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>our poor. Sincerely, in America, the larger obesity problem is

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>among those on the lowest rungs, not the highest. In short,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>it isn't our so called rich who are fat, it's

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>our poor people. Only in America would leaders say our

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 2>fattest class of people are starving or food insecure. Earlier

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this year, a study at the American Enterprise Institute got

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>some attention, and it did because it showed that, yes,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>America's middle class has been shrinking, but only because more

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 2>so called middle class Americans are moving up into the

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>higher classes, not because we have more poor people or

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>because we have a hollowed out middle class. And this

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 2>is the truth, not the crappier average lefty teacher or

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>morons like AOC are telling you. These researchers divided households

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>into five categories poor or near poor, lower middle class,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>core middle class, upper middle class, and rich. Technically, the

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 2>middle class has been getting smaller, they say, but that's

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 2>only because more families have ascended the income ladder.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Quote.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 2>We find that the core middle class has shrunk, but

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 2>so too as the share of Americans with income too

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>low to reach the middle class. The authors say the

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>shrinking core middle class is due to a booming upper

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 2>middle class. They say, in nineteen seventy nine, the upper

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 2>middle class was ten percent of all families. Now it's

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty one percent. One third of the country is upper

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>middle class. That's impressive, they say. Over the same period,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>between nineteen seventy nine and twenty twenty four, quote, family

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>incomes rose significantly across the entire income distribution, pushing more

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>families into higher income categories. Other studies show similar patterns. Quote. Yes,

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the rich have gotten richer over the decades, but so

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 2>have the non rich. Everybody is doing better, and yet

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the relentless lying by Democrats like Joe Biden and Bernie

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Sanders have most Americans convinced that we have a hollowed

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 2>out middle class. And it's a terrible thing. It means

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>more people in poverty, etc. It doesn't and that isn't

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 2>what has happened. The Democrats have been lying to you

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 2>for decades, and now that flat out socialists are leading

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 2>their party, the perpetual misinformation machine is only going to

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 2>get worse. Is it any wonder that more and more

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Americans are leaving the negativity and dysfunction of the Blue

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>states and moving into the Red states. We've been talking

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 2>about this on the podcast, and Kim Strassel of The

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal has a good blurb on it this week,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>saying the contrast between New York living and Florida living

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>has never been greater, and she's correct. She says in Florida,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Miami Dade County has experienced booming growth, with working people

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>flocking to chase an explosion of business, jobs and better lives.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Its schools are better than New York's, Its housing and

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>rent half as expense of its utilities, more affordable, it's cleaner,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 2>it isn't teeming with vagrants, and you can even visit

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a Walmart. Miami residents get all this because of not

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in spite of zero state income taxes, zero with state

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>taxes and manageable seven percent sales tax, reasonable property taxes,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>and corporate taxes. Those policies drive growth and revenue. Strassel says,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 2>New Yorker's, by contrast, stagger under tax and cost burdens

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a combined state and local income tax of as much

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>as fifteen percent, a state and city sales tax of

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 2>nearly nine percent, property taxes, a heaving corporate income tax,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 2>all for the joy of crummy schools, insane rent, costly utilities,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 2>and a collapsing transit infrastructure. More than one hundred thousand

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>people fled the Big Apple last year. Strassel correctly says,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 2>this is the divide and at accelerating. It's accelerating across

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the country. Red states are racing each other to compete

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 2>for growth, cutting taxes, slashing regulations, and acting government union reforms.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina is the latest to join the flat or

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 2>zero tax movement, the ninth state to do so since

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one. Those cities are vying to become finance

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and tech hubs, she says. By contrast, progressives are doubling

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>down on taxes and redistribution. At least eight states now

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 2>have a millionaire's tax, while at least a dozen more

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 2>sprint to adopt one Blue states are promising even bigger handouts,

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>more crackdowns on business, greater union power, fewer cops, even

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>as crime rages, schools fail, and the cost of living

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 2>keeps increasing. She concludes, the chasm between these two approaches

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 2>is now too wide for businesses or average Americans to ignore.

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 2>She's right, and she says, is what's providing those fascinating

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>real time results. Whereas working folks in the past mainly

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 2>relocated for weather or the occasional job switch, Americans are

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>moving aggressively on the basis of economic policy. Now they're

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>flocking to Florida, Texas, Utah, Tennessee, Georgia, and the Carolinas.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 2>They're draining out of New York, Illinois, New Mexico, Massachusetts,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, California, and Hawaii. The obvious success of one

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 2>model and the obvious failure of the other is documented

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 2>with every one way you hold rental. Kim Strassel could

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 2>not be more right about that, and some of us

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 2>have been pointing this out for decades now. There is

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>no contest between these two models of government control and taxation.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Then consider what we covered last week that with proud

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>socialists like Zoororn Mamdani winning elections and taking over America's

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 2>biggest cities. The speed of decay and social rot is

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 2>only going to accelerate and push even more people to

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the Red States. I'll end here with about two minutes

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of Stuart Varney on Fox. Remember, over the last three

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 2>years alone, nearly a million people have fled Florida, Illinois,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and New York, the Democrats' three most populous blue states.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 2>That's just over the last three years. Varney is talking

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 2>about an estimate that says nearly that number, about eight

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand people are going to leave every year. Now,

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred thousand people are expected to flee from the

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Blue States to the Red States over the next three

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 2>or four years alone.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 7>Let the exodus begin. Oh, actually it started already. We're

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 7>talking about mass migration within the United States from one

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 7>group of states to an This is America, and we move.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 3>But you ain't seen nothing yet. Consider this.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 7>In each of the next three years, eight hundred thousand

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 7>people will leave California and New York. That's eight hundred

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 7>thousand a year. Another five hundred thousand will leave Connecticut,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 7>New Jersey and Minnesota. These numbers are from economists Art

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 7>Laffer and Stephen Moore quote, millions of people, thousands of businesses,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 7>and tens of billions of net income will flee high

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 7>tax blue states for low tax red states.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the important point.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 7>People and money and jobs moving out of Democrat states

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 7>and moving two Republican states.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Taxes are what's doing this.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 7>As we've said many times, you make good money in

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 7>a high tax Democrat state and this new tax law

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 7>will kill you financially. This is terrible news for blue states.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 7>It is a bonanza for low tax Texas, Florida, Nevada, Arizona, Tennessee,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Utah and others. Imagine what this migration actually means. Strong

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 7>demand for real estate of all kinds. In low tax areas.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 7>People with money will be flooding in, more jobs and

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 7>business openings, stronger state revenues. They may even be able

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 7>to cut taxes. Imagine that. But for the high tax

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 7>states it is a disaster. Would you move to say,

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 7>New York to take a new job if you'll get

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 7>hit with a tax fike, you will think twice. For

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 7>years we've been seeing migration. Now get ready for mass migration.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 7>I'll conclude the way Laugher and more end their article

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 7>quote delusional liberal interest groups want blue states to respond

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 7>by soaking their rich residents even more.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>If that happens, Our.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 7>Best advice to blue state residence is simple, get while

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 7>the getting's good.

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 2>That about says it all, and it helps illustrate this

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 2>divide as America hits his two hundred and fiftieth birthday

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 2>and fights over a national identity. The divide is along moral, ethical, political,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>and social lines, and increasingly it's between the faithful and

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the godless, And in the short term, it's likely to

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 2>get worse before it gets better. Somewhere along the line,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>when we weren't looking, Ukraine started to win this war

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>with Russia. This is the sort of conflict that's easy

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>to lose sight of or lose interest in, since it's

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 2>half a world away and it really doesn't affect America

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 2>much directly. But it's the sort of thing that's really

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 2>easy for the news media to start ignoring as sexier

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and more interesting news events push it further and further

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 2>out of the back page. It's pretty safe to say

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>that nearly all Americans have lost sight of what's going

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>on over there. Well, it sounds like Ukraine has gotten

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 2>the upper hand since its leaders finally started to engage

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 2>in missile strikes into Russia. For the bulk of this war,

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine's western allies, the countries providing nearly other weapons and

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 2>war supplies, insisted that as one condition Ukraine basically only

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>played defense, don't take the war into Russia, and that

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 2>at some point that changed and Ukraine was allowed to

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 2>start sending drones and missiles into Russia in certain instances, etc.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Long story short, it turns out that at this point

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of the war, Ukraine has started to do better again,

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 2>win territory back rattle Putin. In March and April, the

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Ukrainian army actually took more ground and had more battlefield

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>success than the Russians did, which hasn't happened since the

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 2>war started. In April, Russian forces recorded their first territorial

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>losses in years, apparently. Quote The Institute for the Study

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 2>of War assessed that Moscow seated control of about forty

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 2>five square miles across the front in April. In the

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>first four months of twenty twenty five, Russian forces seized

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 2>an average of about four square miles per day. In

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty six, that figure fell to about one square mile

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.239
<v Speaker 2>per day. Now Ukraine is taking more land back than

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it's giving up. Moreover, they say, Ukraine's drone campaign has

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>expanded into a sustained strategic instrument, reaching deep inside Russian territory.

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Strikes on drilling platforms and pumping stations, oil depots, and

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 2>repeated hits on the Black Sea export terminal have allowed

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine to bring the war to Russia territory. Reuters says

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>these cumulative strikes have cost Russia access to roughly forty

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>percent of its possible oil export revenues, with Ukraine degrading

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the capacity to move at least two million barrels per day.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 2>That is a significant blow to Putin and the Russian economy.

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 2>And as for the human toll, estimates are that Putin

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 2>was handed more than thirty five thousand Russian casualties in

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 2>April alone, and the Ukrainians claim more than sixty percent

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 2>of that number represents deaths, as in, they're killing sixty

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>percent of the fighters Russia is marking as casualties in war. Obviously,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>dead means taken off the battlefield permanently. There's no chance

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 2>that those soldiers are going to be sent back to

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Moscow for rehab and then sent back to Ukraine to

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 2>rejoin the fight. That is a high death rate, and

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>it's significantly higher than most war analysts expected to see.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 2>This recent Ukrainian success has Putin in an increased panic,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>if you believe various news reports. Not only is he

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>fearing more and more for his own safety and now

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>sheltering himself behind more, behind more and more walls for safety,

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>but he's downplaying Russia's Victory Day celebrations this year. This

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 2>yearly display of Russian military might normally plays a huge

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>part of his political propping and the machine. Apparently not

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>this year. This year, they saw generic threats and saber

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 2>rattling from the Ukrainian side, suggesting there might be a

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>military strike on Putin's big parade. Ukrainian leaders went so

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 2>far as to warn political leaders and dignitaries in other

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>countries you might want to decline Putin's invitation this year,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and at the very least, now they're in Vlad's head.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>There's no doubt that Ukraine's reach in. Ukraine's recent successes

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 2>have Putin rattled. And here's an interesting bit of trivia.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>This war for Russia has now lasted longer than their

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>military campaign did in World War II, and we're entering

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 2>here four of this quagmire that Putin's generals insisted would

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>only take a matter of days, maybe a week. Remember,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Russia's war planners were certain they'd invade Ukraine and they'd

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 2>be rolling into Kiev just a few days later, having

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 2>taken control of the country. It was an easy the

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>first step in Putin's grand plan to reconstitute Mother Russia

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>before he dies. What was supposed to take three or

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>four days is now entering year four. Meanwhile, back at home,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's war with Iran is only in its third month,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>but everyone's freaking out over how long it's taking. Why

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't this wrapped up yet? Really? Trump and Netanya, who

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>have already raised a forty five year old global terror

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>threat in about three months, and that's not fast enough

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>for people? Good grief. It's worth noting that even as

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 2>better than expected jobs numbers were released last week, the

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>lefty media was insisting more doom and gloom is coming

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>for the US economy because of this war, especially if

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump doesn't wrap up his war soon. His war, let's

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>emphasize the numbers first, because yet again they were surprising

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to the so called experts who are supposed to be

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the great predictors of our economy. One hundred and fifteen

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand jobs were added in April, which isn't a huge number,

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's more than double what the so called experts

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 2>were expecting to see. The prognosticators, who are heavily left

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 2>in if they're associated with the media outlet, they were

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 2>predicting only fifty five thousand jobs would be created in

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Trump's horrible economy in April. Instead, one hundred and fifteen

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand jobs were and not in government. Let's stress this too.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Not only were the Obama and Biden eras significant for

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>creating mostly low paying and part time jobs, but it

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>was government hiring that seemed to be the biggest chunk

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of the full time jobs that were being created in

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>those presidencies. Well, government work isn't work that's productive to

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>an economy. Now under Trump, he's already fired three hundred

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>thousand federal workers and isn't hiring new and so it's

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 2>worth noting that these one hundred and fifteen thousand jobs

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that were added in April were mostly full time and

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>in good private sector parts of the economy. And they

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>come on top of one hundred and eighty five thousand

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 2>such jobs added in March, and it means something that

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>their jobs that are being created in nearly all sectors

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>of the economy. April and March saw tens of thousands

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of jobs added in healthcare and manufacturing and transportation and

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 2>warehousing and retail across the board. Tech continues to be

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 2>slow due to the transition to AI. Also, the percentage

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of people who are working part time but want to

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>be working full time is also up, which the Left

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to spin as well, there aren't enough full

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>time jobs. What it really means is we have increasing

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>numbers of Americans wanting to work full time Again, We've

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>got fewer Americans lazing around on food stamps and or

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>wanting to only do the minimum post COVID. But this

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>is positive stuff. And still these experts can only see

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the doom and gloom ahead. And yes, we're still in

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 2>an era of unsettled employment as we transition from the

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>fraudulent Biden economy to a more honest and stable Trump economy. Yeah,

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 2>we're still in a period in which many employers are

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>still reluctant to hire more full timers.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>First Trump's tariffs and now Trump's war with Iran have

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 2>kept the economy from more fully stabilizing as promised. But

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 2>we are going in the right direction.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 3>People.

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>If you remember four or six months ago, the big

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 2>question was, well, how much does the Fed need to

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 2>cut interest rates in our to stabilize the shaky jobs market.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>No one's asking that question anymore. We don't have a

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 2>shaky jobs market. Instead, we have a rather stable and

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 2>slightly rising stock market that should have these so called

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>experts more worried about inflation than jobs losses. It brings

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>us back to the political reality that even with the

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 2>bold tariff gambit and the hard decision to finally deal

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 2>with Iran, Trump's team has been improving the economy. It

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 2>also brings us to the harsh reality that we've been

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about over the last few weeks, that the American

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 2>voters need to see and feel their personal financial situations

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>improving or they're going to vote Republicans out of office

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and fall. And so far, the early going in Trump's

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>second term here has been so unsettled that the vast

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 2>majority of Americans aren't seeing it. Most Americans don't perceive

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>their economic situation is getting better because we still have

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 2>high gas and grocery prices. And hey, given all of

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the economic promises that Donald Trump and the Republicans gave

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>to the American people when they were running for office

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, wrong for voters to want to

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>see and feel progress. It's one reason I said it

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>was stupid to promise lower grocery prices in twenty twenty four,

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 2>because inflation doesn't work that way. The high prices tend

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to stick and they don't go back down quickly. As

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 2>for gas, Trump's moves did have gas prices dropping rapidly.

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 2>The three p fifty or four dollars per gallon gasoline

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that was the hallmark of the Biden presidency was suddenly

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>backed down under three dollars and hanging around more like

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 2>two point fifty. Fantastic. Trump had won some goodwill from

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the voters with that move. Then came the Iran War

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 2>and now gases around four to fifty a gallon, and

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 2>most Americans are viewing this as worse than Biden. It's not,

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>by the way, It's temporary, but it's hard to rationalize

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>with the American people because most of them don't really

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 2>follow along or pay attention. It's why I've been saying

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump needs to explain this directly to the American people.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I've suggested he make a prime time address to be

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 2>followed up by his team of cabinet members and other

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Republicans doing several rounds of interviews, explain the high gas

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 2>prices to the U American people, reassure them it's temporary,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 2>ask for their help because, frankly, in the absence of

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 2>anything else for Democrats to moan and whine about, over

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the next few months, gas prices are going to become

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>amplified as important to voters. And I know it's unfair.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>The double standard here is infuriating and it's glaring. When

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.479
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat is in office, we're told to ignore gas

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>prices or just deal with it. But when a Republican

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is in office, gas prices are suddenly the big issue.

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 2>But in Fall, a couple of things are working to

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>make this the case. A couple of things are working

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to amplify this issue and elevate it as a key

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 2>consideration for voters. The first is Trump promised lower gas prices.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>He even gave them to us temporarily. He and the

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>gup ran on them and promised relief. Voter perception will

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 2>be we aren't getting it, promise not kept. The second is, honestly,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 2>everything else in the second Trump era is going so well.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing else for the Democrats to moan and whine

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.479
<v Speaker 2>about that might actually move voters that I know. Any

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 2>liberal listening now has their hair on fire curious about this.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Democrats are always going to whine and moan, and their

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 2>media accomplices are always going to make a huge deal

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 2>about something to bash Trump. But Trump has lowered crime,

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 2>defund the police's idiotic Trump has ended DEI and trans bullying.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 2>The people are with him on that. The economy hasn't crumbled.

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 2>The stock market is bouncing around fifty thousand. My god,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 2>what is there to complain about? Really? Again, they'll complain

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and moan and spin and trash and bash, But what

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 2>is there to complain about? What can the Democrats possibly

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>find to rally around as an issue that the American

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>people might really care about? What promise hasn't Donald Trump kept?

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Gas prices. It's why I've been saying President Trump shouldn't

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>just blow this off or think that saying it's the

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Iran war is enough of a message to voters. Hold

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the prime time speech. Explain how you were finally dealing

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 2>with a global tara threat that the past five presidents

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 2>allowed to grow more dangerous. Explain how close Iran was

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 2>to getting nuclear weapons, and how this global threat could

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 2>no longer be ignored. Then ask the American people to

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 2>make this simple sacrifice. And I really do believe this

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>is a messaging win. This is messaging that could bring

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 2>the country's voters together because a sense of collective sacrifice

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 2>can do that. And it starts with Trump acknowledging this

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't much of a sacrifice. We're not putting troops on

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 2>the ground in Iran. We're not putting your sons or

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 2>daughters in harm's way. We aren't asking that of you,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 2>Thank Heaven. In World War Two, Americans back home, we're

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>asked to cut back, collect metal and rubber, put up

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 2>with blackouts at night to help the war effort, etc.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>All we're asking this time is please put up with

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the temporarily high gas prices. Trump could easily say prices

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>will be back down by Thanksgiving or Christmas, maybe even Halloween.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 2>But please make this little sacrifice as we deal with

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>a nearly fifty year global terror and national security threat.

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I strongly believe the American people would embrace that and

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 2>screw the Democrats and their lefty media members and how

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they'd spin it. Let them spin that whichever way they're

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 2>going to it. Who cares. There is still power in

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>having a president speak directly to the American people and

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>ask for their help. Trump should do it, and then

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>have his cabinet members and other Republicans carry the message

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 2>out all summer. I've been suggesting this for a while.

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Now I see that the Great Molly Hemingway from the

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Federalist is now suggesting it on Fox. But it also

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 2>occurs to me that this is another good example of

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 2>how living within our system of government makes it often

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>harder to deal with the problems that we face and

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 2>the crises that pop up. It's far easier for dictators

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to get things done than it is for democracies to

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 2>get things done. And it isn't only because well, presidents

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 2>can't just order it be done like dictators can. Presidents

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 2>can't just ignore the will of the people. It's far

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 2>more complicated than that. It's mostly because in democracies, elected

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 2>leaders are now constantly worried about the next election. History

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>is replete with instances of US and European lawmakers not

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 2>going bold, not doing the right thing because they were

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 2>worried about upsetting voters and losing the next election. And

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Donald Trump is overly worried about it

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 2>or obsessed over those calculations. But he needs to be

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 2>at least somewhat cognizant of it as someone who wants

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to keep Congressional control in his final two years in office,

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and as someone who is trying to build a political

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 2>legacy for the party beyond him. And so of course

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a consideration. And so far Trump's kurt and

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>somewhat grumpy explanations on high gas prices are falling flat.

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>He clearly believes an end to this Iran stand office close,

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 2>but he can buy himself some time by giving the

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 2>speech and making it clear I am not going to

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 2>half ask the end of this war because gas prices

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 2>will stay higher until it's over. That's what the Democrats

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.479
<v Speaker 2>and their media accomplices, as well as a growing number

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 2>of squishy Republicans want him to do. They're pressuring him

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to accept any resolution to this war just to get

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>gas prices back under four dollars a gallon again before

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the election. That's silly. President Trump appears to understand that,

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So give the speech boy another week. Another series of

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>twists in the redistricting saka over the last few days.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 2>The Virginia Supreme Court shot down the democrats bullying move there,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously as I suggested they would. Meanwhile, the Trump administrations

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 2>expanded its notion of which red states should redraw their maps.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Following the Supreme Court's decision that ends racial jerrymandering, Trump's

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 2>team is now pushing South Carolina and Indiana to maybe

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 2>redo their maps for twenty twenty eight at least. And

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 2>we've reached a point at which even left wing Politico

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 2>is admitting the Democrats have lost the twenty twenty six

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 2>redistricting wars. We'll get to that, but I want to

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 2>start with the Virginia Supreme Court decision only to clarify something.

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Clarify what it is they decided and why the Virginia

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court shot down that map. I'm doing so because,

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 2>based on what I've seen in the way of news

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:46.399
<v Speaker 2>media coverage and social media posts, the average American isn't

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 2>clear on what those court justices did and didn't do. Apparently,

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 2>it's just an article of faith on the left that

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the members of the Virginia Supreme Court have ignored the

0:40:55.600 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 2>will of Virginians and taken away rights. Boloney a single

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Virginia voter who doesn't still have every one of the

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>voting rights that they had before this Supreme Court decision.

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>The Court also didn't ignore the will of the people,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and very importantly, this court also didn't specifically reject that

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>ten to one heavily jerrymandered map. What the Virginia Supreme

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Court did, on a four to three decision was reject

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the process by which Virginia's unhinged, bullying democrats rammed that

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>map into place. The justices ruled that Virginia's democrats ignored

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the state's constitutional process, ignored a map's commission that the

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 2>people of the Commonwealth said should be used to draw

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 2>these maps, ignored various legislative procedural hurdles to get a

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 2>rigged quickie map. The Virginia Supreme Court justice is ruled basically,

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 2>you can't cheat on process. They did not reject either

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the extreme gerrymander or that specific ten to one map,

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 2>which means by the way that if the Democrats controlling

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Virginia really wanted to double down and by God force

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that map into place, all they need to do is gee,

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 2>take a step back and actually follow the slower and

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>more careful procedure in order to make their actions more

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 2>legal and defensible. Folks, something not being emphasized is that

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats in Virginia could do a reset here and

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>still try to force this map onto the people of Virginia.

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming that at some point they will. But

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 2>for now their scummy attempt to ram a new map

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 2>into place has failed. And yes, that State Supreme Court

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 2>ruling is going to stand. I know Hakim Jeffreys wants

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to insist it won't. I know volumes of angry lefties

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 2>on Blue Sky and x and other social media are

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 2>insisting Virginia's lawmakers simply ignore the ruling, which is, genuinely,

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 2>by the way, a republic killing move. I'll say something

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 2>I've said for years, America won't fall to the Chinese

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 2>or some sort of outside invading force. America falls when

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 2>one side of the aisle or the other decides that

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>they on their side just aren't going to follow the

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 2>rules of the Republic that our founders and our generations

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 2>of forefathers have laid out for us. This country crumbles

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 2>if the Democrats decide they simply don't like the rules

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and the laws that we're all being asked to live

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 2>by and go rogue. And so to have even a

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 2>small legion of people on Blue Sky saying just ignore

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the ruling should be shocking and unacceptable to all of us.

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 2>There's also an effort underway by the Democrats to move

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 2>this all into the federal court system and or get

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 2>the U. S. Supreme Court to block or strike down

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the Virginia Supreme Court's decision. That's not going to happen either,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 2>and not because it's a conservative federal Supreme Court, but

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 2>because our US Supreme Court, since its founding, has always

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 2>made it clear the states have their own constitutions and

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Courts, and they govern themselves, and they govern their

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>own elections. The U. S. Supreme Court is not going

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to step in and decide that the Democrats in Virginia

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 2>don't need to follow their own procedures or state constitution,

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and that a group of state judges got it all

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong when they said follow the procedure. Come on so

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that's also not going to happen. As one column put it,

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats in Virginia blew by any number of legal

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 2>obstacles to draw the most absurdly lopsided map in the

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>country and then congratulated themselves on their audacity. That's a

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>pretty good summary. These Democrats were so smug in their

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 2>self satisfaction after ramming that map into place a few

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago that it makes their defeat all the more delicious. Now.

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 2>They took a map that was actually quite fair and

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 2>representational for the voting patterns of that state. There was

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 2>a six or five Democrat advantage, and they tried to

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>force total Democrat dominance and a ten to one map.

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'll emphasize again that they actually could have gotten

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 2>away with it if they'd followed procedures. Look around. There

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 2>are nine blue states, nine that don't have a single

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 2>Republican congressional district, even though their voters vote at about

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 2>a forty to forty five percent Republican level. There are

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 2>several more Blue states and at least a few red

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 2>states that only have one or two Democrat districts. So

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 2>we already have extremely gerrymandered statewide maps but we do

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 2>because the lawmakers who drew them in those states followed

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 2>the laws and the constitutions when they drew them and

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.479
<v Speaker 2>put them into place. That is not what Virginia did.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 2>And now that the map has been shot down, now

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 2>we learn that Virginia's new horrid socialistic governor, Abigail Spanberger

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and her new team knew they were ignoring all procedures

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 2>and the Virginia Constitution, and they even argued about it

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes. But the Trump derangement bullies won out,

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and they rammed ahead, and they spent tens of millions

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of dollars and exhausted all sorts of credibility and political capital,

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>only to be slapped back and embarrassed. Fantastic, and they

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 2>blew through so many barriers that it's why I said

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the day after the map was put into place, the

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 2>members of the State Supreme Court are out of their

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>mind if they ignore all the procedural cheating and allow

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 2>this to stand. My contention was, no one can call

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>themselves a fair minded judge and allow this map to

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 2>be put into place. And it turned out to be right.

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Looking past all the cheating was something that at least

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 2>four of the seven Virginia Supreme Court justices simply couldn't

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 2>bring themselves to do. And by the way, the justice

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 2>who wrote the opinion was appointed by a Democrat governor

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and is a fellow lefty, a lefty with some personal integrity,

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:11.879
<v Speaker 2>as it turns out. But that leaves us with Republicans

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Red States and the Trump political team angling

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to create somewhere between five and fourteen new Republican seats

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 2>before twenty twenty eight. And since we know the Democrats

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 2>are going to triple and quadruple down on their efforts

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to engage in even more extreme gerrymanders in their states,

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 2>we may as well talk about the projections on their

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 2>side as well. How many of these new seats are

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:33.959
<v Speaker 2>actually in place by fall is a big question mark,

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 2>given that every attempt to redraw a map is going

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to lead to litigation and court delays and legal jockeying.

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So the level of Republican advantage by fall is still

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 2>in question, but I can't imagine that it's going to

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 2>be more than four or five seats. If we look

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 2>at twenty twenty eight, well we could see as many

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 2>as fourteen new Republican congressional districts and as many as

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 2>six or seven Democrat districts, if you believe the experts.

0:46:57.280 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about, how most Democrat run states are all

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>ready so extremely gerrymandered that there aren't as many options

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 2>for them, in contrast to the southern red states, whose

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 2>leaders have literally been forced for decades by federal law

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to make sure there are at least a few deep

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 2>blue districts that minority candidates could win. And this is

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the most basic difference here when you start to look

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 2>at it. The Voter Rights Act worked to guarantee that

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Democrats had a certain number of freebe districts handed to

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>them by the courts in the Red States, even as

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 2>those same Democrats had free reign to draw Republicans completely

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>out of the picture any way they wanted to in

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 2>other states. And so, of course a releveling of this

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 2>playing field is going to mean a Republican advantage. But

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 2>by twenty twenty eight we could have as many as

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 2>twelve or fourteen new Republican congressmen. And then comes the

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty census, which is going to more formally count

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the number of citizens who have migrated out of the

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Blue states and into the red states. The twenty thirty

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>census is terrifying the Democrats right now. The twenty thirty

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 2>census is expected to cause several Blue star states to

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 2>lose at least one or two congressional seats and hand

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 2>even more seats to Republicans. So I think you can

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 2>see why the Democrats and their strategists are having absolute

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 2>meltdowns over this map war and the fact that they're

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 2>losing it. It's also why I assume Virginia's Democrats are

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 2>going to be under heavy pressure to put aside their

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.479
<v Speaker 2>SmackDown regroup and try to actually follow procedure to get

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that different map into place by twenty twenty eight. We'll

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 2>see how it plays out. The only other solid blue

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 2>state that seems to have any real room for adjustment

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>is New York, and this is fun. The California and

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Illinois maps are already extreme gerrymanders. Obviously, nine of the

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:41.760
<v Speaker 2>other blue states are completely blue, as in, they couldn't

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 2>find a Republican congressman to steal a seat from if

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 2>they'd tried. All of New England. All those states are

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 2>already shockingly unfair. Their state constituents vote around forty to

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.400
<v Speaker 2>forty five percent Republican, but not a single Republican is

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 2>sent to Washington to represent them. New England's already a

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 2>sea of blue cheating, as is Hawaii. And so it

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 2>turns out that the state of New York is really

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the only other state that could be used to create

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 2>several new Democrat districts as in three four five. Right now,

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the New York state map includes nineteen Democrats and seven Republicans.

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And so, as a lefty you look at that and

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 2>you say, oh, you know, we could erase virtually every

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Republican seat and pick up five or six more. The

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 2>problem is, and again this is just delicious. The problem

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 2>with that notion is several of the current Democrat districts

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 2>only exist because of the race based jerrymandering that the

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court just shot down. Fantastic, folks, It turns out

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that the district of Haakim Jeffreys is a racially jerrymandered district. Well,

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 2>he's the clown who's the Democrat leader in the House.

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 2>His district is a racial cheat. So what are Kathy

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Holkal and New York Democrats going to do? Take away

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the black guys district and he isn't the only one

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>in jeopardy. If these New York Democrats decide to start

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 2>really drawing their map for political advantage instead of racial advantage.

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a wonderful iron a twist that over the years

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 2>New York Democrats have based their map so heavily on

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 2>racial cheating that if they actually try to do it

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 2>now in favor of a map that is nakedly political

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 2>instead of nakedly racial, they're going to be erasing all

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 2>sorts of racially protected Democrats. Tell me, this isn't fun.

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 2>This has political reporting that Kathy Holkl and other Democrats

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 2>who run the state of New York are not inclined

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to step into this racial minefield, and if they don't,

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it's going to limit how much they can really further

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 2>cheat that map. Could Hokal and New York Democrats come

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:34.479
<v Speaker 2>up with a map that gives them three or four

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 2>more seats? Yeah, but six or seven?

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we want to roll back protections for

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 2>minority communities in New York, a state Senate leader said

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.280
<v Speaker 2>this week. Okay, well, there are at least three districts

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 2>that are protecting a black congressman, including Hakeem Jeffreys, their

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 2>House leader. There's at least one protecting a female Asian congresswoman.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Just try to take that one away. And then there's

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 2>at least two or three protecting Hispanics congressmen, including AOC's district. Now,

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 2>come on, do you think that New York State Democrats

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 2>are going to draw one of their parties so called

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 2>superstars out of her district? Are Kathy Hochl and state

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Dems in New York going to put AOC out of

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a job and force her back into bartending?

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Not a chance.

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 2>And so this is the wonderful jam that the Democrats

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 2>in New York are in as the one state that

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 2>could actually redraw its maps again and provide multiple new

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Democrat seats. I hope you have a better sense of

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 2>why even Politico is saying the Democrats have lost the

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 2>maps war, and that's just the map's war for twenty

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty six and twenty eight. These lefty insiders know what

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty and the new census will bring, and they

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.280
<v Speaker 2>are mortified. It is increasingly likely that the twenty thirties

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 2>are an era of conservative control in DC, or at

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 2>least shared control in DC, where the Liberals can't move

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 2>their radical left agenda, and it's because the Democrats of

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the early two thousands have increasingly been pushing working class

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and productive voters out of their states and into the

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Republican led states. That's fantastic. The coming maps crisis of

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the twenty thirties is all the Democrats fault, and most

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 2>of them know it.

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The Jayweber Podcast is a production of iHeartRadio podcasts, produced

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and engineered by Gregory John. The Jayweber Podcast is presented

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>by Creative Planning, helping clients simplify their journey to financial wellness,

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>one personalized plan at a time. Listen to all of

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Jayweber's podcasts, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.