WEBVTT - 12-5-25 America's Truckin' Network

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This is America's Trucking Network with Kevin Gordon.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Lulhaba more.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for tuning in on this Friday morning America's truck

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 3>in Network, the show that is the exception to the

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 3>rule that nothing good happens after midnight. There is a

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of good news out there, so let's just

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 3>jump right into it. I've been watching over the last

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 3>several weeks. We've been hearing people talking about gas prices

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 3>getting down towards three dollars a gallon. They're talking about,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, they've had to tweak the numbers a little

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>bit to say that, well, you know, twenty seven states

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 3>are below three dollars a gallon, this, that and the

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 3>other thing, and then you know thirty states or below

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>three dollars a gallon. Well, for the first time since

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>May of twenty twenty one, the national average for gasoline

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 3>dips below three dollars a gallon. National average for a

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>gallon a regular gasoline hit a milestone this week when

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>it dipped below three dollars a gallon for the first

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>time in four years now. I see back in May

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty one. That was right after the Trump

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 3>administration and before the Biden administration had a chance to

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>really screw things up. But back during the Trump administration,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>gasoline was well below as a matter of fact.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 2>On this date in twenty twenty.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Back during that period of time, gasoline in twenty twenty

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 3>was at two dollars and twenty five cents a gallon,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>and it was a national average, and the diesel was

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>at two dollars and fifty three cents a gallon. Now,

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing the prices of gasoline coming down, but we're

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>not quite seeing the decrease in diesel the way I

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 3>would like to see it. As a matter of fact,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>we're paying a little bit more per gallon this year

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>for diesel than we were this time last year. As

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>far as gasoline's concern, it's down about five cents a gallon. However,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>again dip below three dollars a gallon for the first

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>time since May of twenty twenty one. Crude oil prices

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>remained on the lower side around sixty dollars a barrel.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Sluggish gas demand and cheaper to produce winter blend gasoline

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>are also contributing to the drop at the pump.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 3>Today's national average is two dollars and ninety nine cents

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a gallon. Now, the last couple of days have been

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>like two dollars at ninety nine. And you know when

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>you go to the gas pump and you look at

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the signs there and it always says like two dollars

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>and seventy five cents a gallon, But you have looked

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 3>in the upper right hand corners two dollars and seventy

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 3>five cents point nine nine tenths of a cent, So

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 3>it's actually two dollars and seventy six cents. But that

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>two dollars seventy five cents looks a lot better. And

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>for the last last week or so, it's been at

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>two two dollars and ninety nine cents, you know, two

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars ninety nine point five, so you round that up

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 3>to three dollars.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 2>So I haven't been comfortable talking about that.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>But now we are officially below that three dollars a gallon,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 3>which is heading in the right direction. You know, we

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 3>started we keep hearing all this crap from the liberals

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 3>and the Democratic Party talking about affordability.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>All of a sudden, where the hell were.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>These people during the trumpet or by the Biden administration

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 3>when gas went from as I said, at the end

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of the Trump administration in December of twenty twenty at

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>two dollars and twenty five cents a gallon, and then

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>by May actually got up to three dollars a gallon.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>So even though.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 3>We are down below where we were four years ago,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>it was already up seventy five cents a gallon just

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>in a four or five month period of time in

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the first four or five months of the Biden administration.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 3>By the time Russia invaded Ukraine, gas had already gone

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 3>up to about a dollar twenty five higher than what

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>it was during the Trump administration. Where was the affordability

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 3>comments back then? All we heard from the people with

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 3>as far as that when they started seeing the inflation, oh,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>it's transy, it's gonna it's you know, which means it's temporary,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna go away.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>What was transitory?

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess in May, June, July, August, September of twenty

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty one on into twenty twenty two, and then finally

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>in March, I guess the Federal Reserve line Jerry Powell

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>decided that, well, you know, it isn't transitory. We need

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>to start cutting interest rates. But by then most of

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>the damage have been done. Once Russia invaded Ukraine in

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>February of twenty twenty two, then gas prices started spiking.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 2>As a matter of fact, in June.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's not forget, in June of twenty twenty two, the

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>national average across the board for gasoline short term memories,

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 3>right was it five dollars five dollars and two cents

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>a gallon? Five dollars and two cents a gallon? Where

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>were the calls for affordability back then? Gas price has

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>already gone up a dollar twenty five a gallons prior

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>to the invasion, and then right after the invasion it

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 3>went up to right around four dollars and fifty cents,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>and people were asking the Biden administration how long do

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>you expect people to pay this amount of money? Because

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, when they first came in office, they started saying, Okay,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to drill in the golf, we're not

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>going to drill in Alaska, We're going to stop selling

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 3>oil leases, even though that by law they were supposed

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>to do that. So you know, again, where was the

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 3>calls for following the law. And so the prices of

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>gasoline we started importing more gas. We became the final

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 3>year of the Trump administration, Let's not forget, we were

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>energy independent for the first time since nineteen forty nine.

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen forty nine.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Seventy plus years, we were independent, energy independent for the

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 3>first time. It took us longer to get to that

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>than Queen Elizabeth sat on the throne of England as

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>long as the USSR was in existence. It took us

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 3>longer than that to get to energy independence. And it

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 3>was during the Trump administration in his first term, and

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>we were heading in that direction. At least. We are

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>now driving the oil markets and we are driving the

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 3>energy prices worldwide, which is a good thing. But back

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>then it was, oh, you know, gas price is one

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>up the average national average across the board of five

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>dollars per gallon. Where was the cause for affordability? Then now,

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, the Democrats are concerned about affordability

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>when they had inflation at nine point one percent in

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 3>June of twenty twenty two. It just fries me that

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the people that create the problem are the people that

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 3>are now tweaking and that are criticizing how it's done.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 3>And I heard the analogy the other day that Okay,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>you have a party and somebody gets.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Drunk, and the homeowner whatever.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Gets drunk and he gets out of control and he

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>winds up throwing up on the carpet. And then when

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 3>the person comes in to clean the carpet and is

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>down on their hands and knees cleaning up the spots

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to get the stink out of the carpet. They

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>are standing there telling them, well, you need to do this,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>this is how you need to do this, and criticizing

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the way that they're.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Doing the cleanup.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, give me a break, so you know, I'm

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>just it just bothers me that, you know what I

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>keep hearing from the Democrats and when they start talking

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>about affordability and so on. I'm going to post this

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>story on Facebook because it's actually from the Triple A

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>and they talk about they go through, you know, the

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 3>national average and so on, but then they also give

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 3>some statistics in terms of ev charging. The national average

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>per kilowatt hour of electricity at public ev charging stations

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>stayed the same this past week.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>At thirty eight cents.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>They talk about the states the ten most expensive gasoline,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of course California.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And what blows me away, is that California is.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Higher, is actually seven cents higher than Hawaii. Okay, there

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>is not a refinery in Hawaii, aren't gas There aren't oil.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Wells in Hawaii.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 3>They have to import everything, and you know, the gasoline

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>has to be transported across the Pacific to get to Hawaii.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>And even with the transportation costs and the cost of

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>that that Hawaii's prices are still lower than California.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's see.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, anyway, I'll put this on Facebook, but it's amazing California, Hawaii, Washington, Nevada,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Alaska again up there in Alaska that California is the

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>highest in the country and then of course they go

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>into the lowest. So I'll post that on Facebook so

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 3>that you can take a look at that weekly's Jabas claims,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 3>which we'll get to.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Coming up in the next segment.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Again, all this talk that we heard since Liberation Day

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>on April the second, that we're going to have rampant inflation,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to go into a recession, that the

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>economic policies of this administration are horrible, and all this

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff, and yet everything is starting to turn

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>in the right direction. And yet all of a sudden,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 3>we're hearing about affordability, and it just frosts me that

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the people that and of course they're not going to

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 3>come up and say, here's how we would solve the problem,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 3>here's what we need to do to affordability. No, they

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>just want to say, well, he's just not making things

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>more affordable. Give me not cleaning up the vomit properly

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the way that you guys did when you soiled the carpet.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm Kevin Gordon, America's truck at Network seven hundred WLW.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I need this is the racing repard on America's truck

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and needwork on seven hundred WLW.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 4>The court case between twenty three eleven and front Row

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Motorsports suing NASCAR continued Friday in Charlotte, North Carolina. During

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 4>the questioning of front Row Motorsports owner Bob Jenkins, NASCAR

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 4>was called out by Judge Kenneth Bell during the trial.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Day three ended when stern warnings from Bell came after

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>NASCAR's legal team violated court orders and evidentiary rule. Chris

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Gabeart has left Joe Gibbs Racing, and he was the

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 4>director of competitions for JGR rumors are Gaye part is

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 4>moving to Spire Motor Sports next season. The Indianapolis Motor

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 4>Speedway is releasing a four part mini series documenting its

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 4>historic repay that uncovered the Spiedsway's iconic brick race surface

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 4>and the original crush stone tar track surface. The series

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 4>will run December eighth through the eleventh and be available

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 4>on the IMS social media channels including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok x,

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 4>and YouTube. On Sunday, Formula one will crown the twenty

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty five world champion.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Will it be Lando Norris? Will it be.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Max for Staffan or Oscar Piastre. Those three are split

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 4>by just sixteen points heading into Sunday's finale. Norris on

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 4>any chance he holds the points lead, but barely.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, nothing does change, Like I mean, he gets treated

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 5>the same from everyone inside the team, just more excitement

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 5>I guess for eye at the same time. So but

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 5>apart from that, the work and how you approach it

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 5>all remains the same.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I need.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the racing repard on America's Drugging Network on

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred WLW, everybody have a great weekend, segnetis and

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>at night news Radio seven hundred WLW and iHeartRadio station

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Guarantee Human seven hundred WLW, HI Heard Radio.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 6>It's former Bengal and Pro Football Hall of Famer Anthony Munoz.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>You know me from my skin for good news.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Here us weekly jobless claims tombow to the lowest level

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>in more than three years. All right, we now have

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 3>gasoline prices that are the lowest level nationwide that they've

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>been in four years. We now have the weekly jobless

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 3>claims the lowest in three years.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Huh. You know what?

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, I've been talking about how the spoon fed

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>regurgitators of the mainstream media have been trying to talk

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>down the economy, trying to manufacture a recession, that all

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the lies that they're telling about the negative coverage of

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the administration the economic policies are wrong. And now we're

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 3>seeing some of these numbers coming out. And you know what,

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind being right all the time. You know

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the fact that you listen to this show and you

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 3>know what's going on, you hear what's going on, and

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 3>push out all the negativity from the spoon federal regurgitators.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You were so far ahead of the curve. They don't

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 2>even see your tail lights. The number of.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Americans finally for new application front employment benefits dropped to

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the lowest level in more than three years last week,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 3>allaying fears of a sharp deterioration in the labor market

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 3>conditions and potentially arguing against another interest rate cut from

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Reserve, which I say is a bunch of crap.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Also because again when we had the numbers yesterday, we

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>were talking about retail sales and we were talking about

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the economy in Europe that they had been seeing. They've

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>been experiencing a boom or you know, at least an

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>increase in their economy there, and prices or shoppers going out,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 3>retail sales up because of the what do they call

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 3>how do they put it, the series of interest rate

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 3>cuts since last year. Interest rate lower interest rates put

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 3>more money in your pocket, which means that then you

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 3>could determine how you spend your money. If you want

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to put some of that money aside in the savings account, fine,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 3>if you want to go out and spend that money, fine,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 3>But it puts you in control of your money and

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 3>making the decisions that you make instead of the policymakers

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 3>like Lion Jerry Powell making sure that interest rates are

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>so high that you're having to pay more in order

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to finance certain things on your credit cards, either on

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>your home, buying a house, buying a car, buying a truck,

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 3>expanding your business, and so on. So let the people decide,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and lowering interest rates is not going to lead to inflation.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, here we go week.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Out Employment claims reported by the Labor Department on Thursday,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the most timely on the economy's health, following on the

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>heels of the ADP Employment report on Wednesday showing private

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 3>payrolls decrease the most more than two and a half

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 3>years in November. But again, as we talked about yesterday,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the ADP numbers when they come out, generally the so

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>called experts say that, well that's kind of an interesting report,

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's not very reliable and it's not one that

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the Federal.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Reserve pays much attention to.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 3>And especially within the report itself that we were talking

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 3>about yesterday, they started talking about the adjusted numbers. Well, again,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're a payroll processing firm and you process X

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>number of paychecks on a weekly, bi weekly, monthly basis,

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>then you know how many checks you have processed. If

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 3>those numbers go up, if they go down, you should

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 3>know that number in real time. Why the following month

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 3>would those numbers be adjusted shocks me. I mean if

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 3>I go into if I go into a grocery store

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 3>and I have I have fifty dollars in my pocket

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and I spend forty and I have ten dollars left

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>in my pocket, I know in real time that.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I just spent forty dollars.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't go back later on the next day or

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 3>two days later and say, gee whiz, I'm going to

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>adjust my grocery purchases up to forty two dollars because

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>they still have ten dollars in my pocket. I don't

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>get this. So if they're processing the payroll and they

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 3>know on a weekly, bi weekly, monthly basis how many

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>payroll checks that they have processed compared to last month,

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 3>they should have that number in real time. But again

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>they have to throw that in here. The job losses.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>This is now, this is interesting. Usually this guy, Christopher Rupky,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 3>chief economists at Forward Bonds, generally comes up with some

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>really stupid comments, But this time around I got to

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>give him credit. Those job losses from other alternative measures

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 3>alternative measures of labor statistics may be overstating the weakness

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of the nation's employment market. In other words, what they're

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>saying is that all these calls that the labor market

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>is weak is not apparently are not accurate, and he's

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>actually finally seeing the writing on the wall. The t

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 3>leave readers at the Federal Reserve may need to recheck

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 3>their figures because it certainly does not look like economic

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>growth is in danger of stalling out again, disproving all

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the negativity from the spoon federal regurgitators in the mainstream

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 3>media trying to manufacture a recession, all the indications that

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 3>they had, all the stuff that they've been talking about

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 3>for the last well actually since Trump came into office.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And let's not face I mean, let's face it. I mean,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>you go back to the ten years since Trump came

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>down the escalator, the Golden escalator there at Trump Towers,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>nothing but ninety some percentage negative coverage of Donald Trump,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety some percentage negative coverage of his first term, ninety

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>some percentage against Trump while he was out of office,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and then ninety some percent negative coverage since he's been

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>in office, and ninety some percent negative coverage of his

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>economic policies, even though we know what the statistics were

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>back in five years ago at the end of his term.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 3>But again, you know, apparently they think that we're stupid

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and we can't go back and look these numbers up.

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 3>But I finally, it's interesting that Christopher Rookie had some

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 3>positive things to say, because, like I said a lot

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>of times, he has kind of a bit off, should

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>I say, Initial claims for the state unemployment benefits fell

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:27.239
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven thousand to a seasonally adjusted one hundred and

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 3>ninety one thousand for the week ended November twenty ninth. Now,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 3>remember what we've been saying over the last several weeks

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>or actually several months, that the range of unemployment claims

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>has been going between about two hundred and ten thousand

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 3>up to two hundred and fifty thousand over pretty much

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of years, and they have been and

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 3>the economists have been talking about that that is somewhat

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 3>of a comfortable range for them, that anything above that

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 3>is put the caution light on. Anything above two hundred

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and fifty thousand in a week period of time should

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 3>be looked at and as kind of put the flashing

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 3>yellow lights on it.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Why do I keep bumping my microphone anyway?

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 3>And then we have in the low end of that

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>at two hundred and ten thousand, that anything less than

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that is good news.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>If these numbers have dropped twenty.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Seven thousand in one week down to one hundred and

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety one thousand for the week, that should be considered

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 3>very good news. Lowest level since September of twenty twenty two.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Economists pulled by rutters had forecasts that the unemployment claims

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 3>were going to be two hundred and twenty thousand, So

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 3>they missed their analysis and their forecast by thirteen percent.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Unadjusted claims plunged n forty nine thousand, forty nine thousand,

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 3>four hundred to one hundred ninety seven thousand, two hundred

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 3>last week. The decline was more than double the twenty

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 3>one thousand drop that had been anticipated by seasonal factors,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the model that the government uses to strip out seasonal

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 3>fluctuations from the data. So in other words, it has

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>more than doubled what they had anticipated it to be.

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 2>The drop that.

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 3>Is, and so this is going to change things as

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 3>far as the Federal Reserve is concerned. They keep saying

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 3>that their mandata is to keep inflation low and to

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 3>make sure that the job market is strong. Well, if

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 3>the job market is strong, all this talk that they've

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>been talking about as being weak over the last period

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of time, last several months, then with these numbers, it

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>looks like the job market is steady and strong. And

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>rather than them looking at that and saying, gee whiz,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>things are pretty good, We're going to give a break

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 3>to the American public. We're going to give a break

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 3>to the people, and we're going to lower interest rates

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 3>so they have more money in their pocket. Don't count

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 3>on it. It'll be interesting to see what they do. I

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 3>hope they lower the interest rates, but I don't know.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>You never know. With Lyon Jerry Powell, Una justin claims plunged.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I already said and said that last week's sharp drop

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 3>and applications.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Did not change the narrative of a stagnant labor market.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Job cuts are prevalent most segments of the economy, and

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 3>hiring is.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Teppe at best.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 3>A separate report from global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Christmas showed planned job cuts in the US based employers

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 3>declined fifty three percent to seventy one thousand in November now,

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the previous month, if my memory is correct, they were

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 3>talking about that number being around one hundred and fifty

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand that they were anticipating as job cuts.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that they.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Blew that by well, the number dropped by fifty three percent,

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 3>that should be a good sign and people should be

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 3>applauding that rather than just throwing that number out there

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>and just letting it hang. I we'll cover a little

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 3>bit more of this coming up. I'm Kevin Gordon, Merica's

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 3>truck at Network seven hundred WLW.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Eight and the rest of the country. In the Tri

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 7>State overnight mostly Claude, need the load dropping down to

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 7>sixteen mostly Sunday. Friday high at thirty four going into

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 7>the weekend Saturday, mostly Claude, with the chance of flurries,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 7>highs in the upper thirties, mostly Claudia, the chances of snow.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 7>Sunday a high of thirty five Nationally, snow continuing to

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 7>win back the Great Lakes region, interior Northeast Pacific, Northwestern Rockies,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 7>and then into the northern Plains over the next couple

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 7>of days. The Gulf Coast scene moderate to heavy rain

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 7>with isolated flash flooding possible. Some wintry precipitation expected north

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 7>into the Appalachians and mid Atlantic. Friday. Aretic air fore

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 7>tasks to challenge record low temperatures across the northern mid

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 7>Atlantic to New England Friday.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Seven hundred w lw IM This American Stark Network. I'm

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Gordon taking a look at this. I am just

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I am absolutely amazed by this report.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>This weekly job was claims. The initial job was Claims Report.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Because you know, all we've been hearing about is, you know,

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the weakness of the economy, that things aren't looking as

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>good as they should, and the consumer confidence level being down. Well,

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you keep being bombarded by negative coverage,

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>negative information, and you have a tendency of thinking that, well,

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe what I'm seeing is not what I'm seeing,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, our spoon fed regurgitator's mainstream meter

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>are basically gaslighting is And what we're seeing as far

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 3>as the retail sales, which we'll get to here shortly,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>is the fact that people are comfortable within what they

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>are doing as far as their individual economies. They know

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>where they stand, they know what they're bringing in what

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 3>they're paying out, what their discretionary income is, what they

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 3>have left over after the government gets finished confiscating their wealth,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>what they have left over after they pay their bills

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>and can go out.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 2>And have some fun.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yet all the negativity that they hear, they're thinking of, well,

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 3>gee whiz, I wonder how my neighbors are doing. I

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>wonder how the people up the street. I wonder how

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>everybody else is doing. I'm hearing the things are going bad.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 3>So my confidence level in the economy is down, but

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>my confidence level in my own economy is fine. So

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>again they've got these mixed signals, which again is being

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 3>created by the spoon fed regrigislators in the mainstream media.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Let me see they were talking about. Let's see after

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 3>they got.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>We picked this up.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>We ended in the last segment that the Challenger, Gray

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and Christmas showed planned job cuts in the US based

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>employers decline fifty three percent from what they had originally predicted.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 3>But employers have announced about one point one seven one million,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and seventy one thousand million, one million, seven

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>one hello, one million, one hundred and seventy one thousand

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 3>jobs cuts so far. This year, up fifty four percent

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>versus the first eleven months of twenty twenty four. Most

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 3>of the layoffs have been in technology sectors as companies

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>integrate artificial intelligence in some roles. Now what we've been

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 3>hearing as far as the job market and what's going

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>on as far as that, oh, tariffs, poor economic policy

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 3>on the part of the Trump administration, No, the layoffs

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>mostly had been in technology. So the people that are

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 3>creating AI and the people that are jumping on board

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>with this and jumping in with both beet are basically

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>putting themselves out of business. So it's kind of interesting.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 3>The Bureau of Labor Statistics closely watched employment report for

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 3>November originally do on Friday, has been delayed, so the

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>number of jobs that were created last month. They've delayed

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 3>that report until December the sixteenth because of the forty

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 3>three day Schumer shutdown, So it'll be interesting to see

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 3>how that plays out. But in the meantime, you're going

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>to have the Federal Reserve, which on December the ninth

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 3>and the tenth, they are going to be meeting and

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 3>making a determination what they're going to be doing with

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 3>job with interest rate cuts before the end of the year,

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 3>which is going to.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Kind of muddy the waters.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>But maybe the Federal Reserve should take the twenty three

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 3>thousand employees take a look at that, have them do

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of you know, sharpening their pencils and

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 3>come up with some numbers and come up with some

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 3>accurate information so that they can give them to the

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Board of Governors so they can make an accurate decision

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>on what they should do with interest rate cuts. But

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 3>if they talk to the experts here on america'struck a network,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>cut those interest rates by at least a quarter, if

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>not a full half percentage point, you'd see the housing

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>market increase.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>You'd see people.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Spending more, You'd see businesses expanding, people buying more vehicles,

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>people buying trucks, people expanding their business and so on.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's okay, that's.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's my opinion, and you know I have

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 3>an opinion and I'm not afraid to use it.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Condomists view the.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Labor market as remaining in a no no higher state.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, again, that's been the situation for most of the year.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 3>As many as five of the twelve voting policymakers on

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the Central Bank's rate setting Federal Open Market Committee have

0:25:55.440 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 3>voiced opposition to or skepticism about cutting rates further, while

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 3>a core of three of the members Washington based Board

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of Governors want rates to fall as well.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>They should take a look at what's going.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, not everything going on in Europe, but at least

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 3>what their economy is doing as a result of the

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>series of rate cuts that began last year by their

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>central banks over there.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I love this paragraph.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Labor market status has been blamed for reduced labor and

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I had to look that.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I said that they put the wrong word in there.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 3>But of course, you know, when these people decide that

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 3>they're going to write an article, why use a twenty

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 3>five cent word when you can use a five dollars word. Right,

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 3>Status a period of or state of inactivity or equilibrium. So,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 3>in other words, the labor market equilibrium has been blamed

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>on reduced labor supply amid the reduction of immigration that

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 3>started during the final year of the former president Joe

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Biden's term and accelerated during Donald Trump's administration. Yeah, like

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 3>the last month of the Biden administration, Suddenly they decided that, oh,

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>you know what, after ten to fifteen million people invaded

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 3>this country. Maybe we should stop that flow. So they

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>got that message of the last month of the administration.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Integration of artificial intelligence some job roles is also a

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>routing demand for labor, with entry level positions taking the

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>most of the hit. Economists also say Trump's trade policies

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>have created uncertain economic environment that has hamstrung the ability

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 3>of business, especially small enterprises, to hire. Really, where's the

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 3>evidence of that. Where is the evidence that the economic

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 3>policy in terms of expenses or inflation has created people

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>to stop expanding or not hiring. Not mentioned in here anywhere.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Our interest rate cuts the interest rates that people are

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 3>paying to expand their business. And when they do the

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 3>looking at their expansionary plans and do their rate of return,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the rate of you know, the ROI return on investment,

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 3>And when they look at that and they say, well,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 3>gee whiz, I don't know that I could make up

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that money because when I factor in the interest rates,

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 3>it puts this thing out of out of sight or

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 3>out of our way that we would actually review the

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 3>policy to make it go forward. But with those interest

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 3>rates coming, if they came down, maybe we could pull

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 3>the trigger on that number of people receiving unemployment benefits

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 3>over the initial week after the initial week of aid,

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a proxy for hiring slip four thousand. Wait a minute,

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought, I thought the job market was weak. I

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>thought people weren't going back to work. I thought, you know, so,

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 3>if the people that have been on unemployment are going down,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 3>even though it's four thousand, it's not skyrocketing the way

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that they had anticipated it to. So again, how how

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>accurate is the information we're getting from these people? The

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>elevated so called continuing claims suggests a steady rise in

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 3>the unemployment rate A week hiring was confirmed by Challenger Report,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 3>which again their report indicated that there was going to

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 3>be X number of layoffs and they cut that by

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>fifty three percent, which showed planned hiring by US companies

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 3>total four hundred and ninety seven almost five hundred thousand

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 3>in the first eleven months of the year, the lowest

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>year to date total since twenty ten, again down thirty

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 3>five percent from the same period last year.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>But again, are their numbers accurate?

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Because if they keep flipping back and saying, well, unemployment

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 3>is going to be x and such, and these companies

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 3>are going to be laying off one hundred and fifty

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>thousand over the next month, and they cut that back

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty three percent. Amazing. You know how far off they

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>can be. Now, some additional good news we'll get to

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>here shortly. As I was talking about retail sales and

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 3>so on the five days straight, let me see the

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>National Federation of National Retail Federation sites a record two

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred and three million shoppers for the extended weekend period

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>of time.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll bring this up coming up.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Kevin Gordon, America struck In Network seven hundred w LW,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>warming you up for.

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>This year's crossdown shootown explanation point I must.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Be care of.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a Crosstown shootdown memory out by three, brought

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to you by Pinstation in East Cosa. Now your host, Moeger.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 6>February eighth, twenty fifteen, the d Davis Game Savior senior

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 6>guard entered the shootout at UC shooting just twenty six

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 6>percent from behind the three point line, but with the

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 6>Bearcats almost daring him to shoot, Davis drilled all five

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 6>of his three point shots, each one of them silencing

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 6>the deafening fifth third arena crowd. The winning points for

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 6>Xavier came from Trey von Bluer, who's two free throws

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 6>with less than twelve seconds to go, gave XU.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Lead for go be listing for the next Crosstown shootdown

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Memory on seven hundred wlw renned, We've been.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Covering over the last couple of segments, So if you

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:13.479
<v Speaker 3>missed any of that or any of our shows, hit

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>up that iHeartRadio app and everything's there, brought to you

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 3>by our friends at Rush Truck Centers. I mentioned this

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 3>in the previous segment. National Retail Federation sites record two

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and three million shoppers for extended weekend and RF

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 3>annual consumer survey December second found two one hundred and

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 3>two point nine million customers shopped during the holiday weekend

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>from Thanksgiving Day through Cyber Monday. The figure is up

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>from one hundred and ninety seven and ninety seven million.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Shoppers last year. That's up three percent, my friends.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 3>The previous record was two two hundred point four million,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>set in twenty twenty three. They also are predicting that

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be the first holiday season to

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>break one trillion dollars in sales, and our f president

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Say said, we still believe we're on track to

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>meet that forecast. Shay said during a meeting briefing after

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the survey was released. We feel very confident based on

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the results of this weekend and the way in which

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 3>consumers are engaged, and so we think that a good

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 3>foundation for going forward and we're seeing real growth. Shay

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>pointed out that the uptick and inflation increased the cost

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 3>of goods.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Over the now this paragraph.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>When I read this, I'm basically was scratching my head

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 3>because where this comment comes from.

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I have no clue, but this is what he said.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Pointed out that the uptick in inflation increased the cost

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>of goods over the past few months, but he described

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>the ten of the trend as a modesty increase that

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 3>followed about two and a half years of flat goods inflation.

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Two and a half years of flat price increases. What

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 3>planet is this guy on?

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>He did?

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>He not pay attention to the nine point one percent

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 3>inflation in June of twenty twenty two, the four point

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 3>three percent inflation over the on average during the Biden

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Urnament office. What's he looking at? And they don't explain

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>it in here. There are times a year when we

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 3>were engaged in commerce that is purchases out of necessity replenishment,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the normal nay, day to day, week to week shopping

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 3>that we do. Shay kept saying or mentioned, but holidays

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 3>are really much more emotional purchases. Families plan for it,

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.239
<v Speaker 3>families save for it, and they invest in it.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's talking about how people.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Start doing and have been kind of spacing out their

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 3>holiday purchases where they basically start, you know, over several months.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 3>They do concentrate when they bart when the bargains are there,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 3>and they anticipate what the bargains are going to be

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 3>on Black Friday and then Cyber Monday. But again they

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 3>are doing some of their purchases throughout the year. So

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 3>when we start seeing holiday sales increase, which is the

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 3>five day period or the holiday buying season, and those

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 3>numbers are up. If what he's saying is true that

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 3>people started buying months ago, then that would have boosted

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 3>those retail sales there and any retail sales increased now

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 3>during this period of time is going to be icing

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>on the cake. Top items purchase clothing and accessories, but

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty one percent, toys, thirty two percent, media, twenty eight percent,

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 3>and gift cards twenty six percent. It exceeded our initial

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 3>expectations by approximately sixteen million consumers. Shayse said, I think

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a rarity of variety of reasons why people see

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 3>let me seevity, variety of reasons why we see people

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 3>out over the weekend. Certainly, many customers are looking for

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 3>attractive deals that are out there. Others are there for

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 3>social experience or as holiday tradition, and many others see

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 3>this as an opportunity to get ahead of their gift shopping.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Logistics Managers Index slipped to a rating of fifty five

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 3>point seven for November after two consecutive months of fifty

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 3>seven point four. But then they start going into some

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 3>of these statistics about let me see downstream respondents and

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 3>what's going on.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>But overall, I mean the numbers.

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Robust in store sales, which is interesting because we've seen

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 3>this trend over the last several years of where they're

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've seen all these different malls closing, these

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 3>big box stores and brick and mortar businesses going by

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the wayside because people are.

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Doing more on online shopping.

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 3>And I've seen this over this oh, I guess last

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 3>decade or so, and the generation whatever that falls. But

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 3>what's interesting is I've noticed with our grandchildren is that

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 3>they are going to the malls now, or they are

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 3>going out shopping. They're not sitting at home doing their

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 3>purchases online. They're actually interested in going to the mall, touching, feeling,

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 3>looking at certain things.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's a situation, Well I don't.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 3>My wife buys a lot of stuff online for the house,

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 3>but every time it seems that she buys clothes, she

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 3>has to kind of figure out, Okay, this manufacturer from

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 3>what I've had in the past, is their sizes you

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 3>have to buy the size up or in this manufacturer

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you got to buy the size down, and then you

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 3>got to kind of pick and choose and kind of

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 3>figure out to the minefield which ones are going to fit,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 3>what aren't going to fit. Now, for the first time

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 3>in a long time, this past year, well actually for

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 3>the first time ever, I've bought some clothes online and

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 3>almost every one of them had to go back because

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 3>they don't fit. And so what makes me curious about

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 3>this is how are some of these you know, online

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 3>companies actually making money Because not only do they give

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 3>free shipping depending upon how much you buy and it's

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a good price based on what you could get in

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the store, So it's a it's a you're getting a bargain,

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 3>But then also you're not paying for shipping, and then

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.879
<v Speaker 3>if it doesn't fit, you got to send it back

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and so they're stuck with the item and they've paid

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 3>for shipping twice. So I you know, it's it's amazing

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 3>that and especially if you're buying anything having to do

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 3>with a manufacturer in China, you know, how how does

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 3>you know a fifty inch chest size as far as

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 3>a jacket or a shirt or extra extra large, how

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 3>does that equate to a thirty two chess or a

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 3>forty four chess with the Chinese economy, I mean, or

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 3>they're numbers. I thought they were supposed to be somewhat

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 3>smart in terms of math. Fifty inches is not forty

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 3>four inches is not forty eight inches. And so when

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 3>they say something and you go to a sizing chart

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 3>and you do the measurements, and you say, okay, this

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>is my signs, and then they come and you're buying

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 3>an extra two x, extra large, extra extra large, and

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 3>then what you get is about either a large or

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe a one x. So it's just I don't know,

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 3>it's just kind of nuts. But again, National National Retail

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Federation seeing some very positive statistics as far as the

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 3>holiday season and how that is kicking off. A couple

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 3>of other stories well kind of related to that. CNBC

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 3>had their story talking about this. They're talking about will

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 3>consumers and this is a kind of an interesting line.

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 3>While consumer sentiment has tumbled and the growing number of

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>major companies have laid off thousands of employees, retail sales

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>data remained solid. So if there's been major layoffs, why

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 3>isn't the unemployment rate going up? Why isn't the weekly

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 3>initial jobless claims going up? And why isn't the overall

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 3>unemployment rate going up? You know, I just it's amazing

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 3>when you dig into these numbers and see what they're

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 3>talking about and trying to figure out where in the

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 3>heck they're coming up with their numbers. Again, when I

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>was talking about previously, total of one hundred and twenty

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 3>nine point five million consumers shopped in stores over the

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 3>five days, a three percent year to year increase. The

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 3>survey found as more Americans have done more of their

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Black Friday shopping online in recent years. The online shopping

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 3>turnout jump up even more by nine percent, but then

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 3>the in store traffic has gone up three percent. So

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting to see the trends that in some instances

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 3>not only are the online purchases going up, but then

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 3>again also the in store purchases are going up and

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the in store traffic is going up, which is good news.

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Now the Trump administration and some other more good news

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 3>before we have to get out of here, The Trump

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>administration yesterday pushed major cut to the miles per gallon standard.

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Just kind of hitting the highlights here. Trump administration proposed

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 3>cutting the Biden era twenty thirty one fuel economy standards

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 3>from about fifty miles per gallon to thirty four point

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 3>five miles per gallon and ending the credit trading, starting

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 3>credit trading starting in the twenty twenty twenty eight model year.

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 3>So again, the EPA during the Biden administration, in the

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 3>last year of the Biden administration, raised these fuel standards

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 3>to an unreasonable level. And if the mandates are there

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 3>and the mechanics necessary to get to that isn't there

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and hasn't been developed yet, then these car companies are

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 3>a disadvantage if they don't meet those standards, then they

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 3>wind up paying billions and billions of dollars in fines

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to the federal government. This is one of those dirty

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 3>little secrets that people don't know a lot about, is

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 3>that because of these carbon credits.

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And this fact that you're not making these fuel standards,

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you're paying.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Billions of dollars to the federal government for what are

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>they taking those profits?

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Are they taking those billions of dollars.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 3>And turning them into some sort of non pollution fund

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 3>or something like that, or funding other mechanisms. No, they're

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>just confiscating the wealth. And who pays for that? You

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>think the car companies are going to absorb that that

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to pour that back into the cost

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 3>of a manufacturing a car. No, wonder, the cars have

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 3>gone up on average and now some of the app

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 3>of buying a new cars around forty seven thousand, fifty

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars, pushing the price of these cars up. And

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 3>in order to meet those fuel standards, they have to

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 3>push evs on people that they don't want. And again

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 3>they claim there's no EV mandate, But when you look

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>at the factors that if you don't sell more evs,

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be fined even more so, lowering these

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 3>standards or lowering these miles per gallon goes within those

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and would cut the number of fines that are And

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.880
<v Speaker 3>people may say no. Stay tuned here. Officials say the

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 3>rollback and save Americans one hundred and nine billion over

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 3>five years, while the environmental groups warned it will increase

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 3>gasoline use and boost oil into sea profits. What are

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 3>they not saying there? They are not saying that it's

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 3>going to cause pollution. Wouldn't you think the environmentalist would

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 3>be concerned about whether or not it's going to cause pollution.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't you think that that would be the top of

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 3>their list. No, they're worried about the profits of the

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 3>oil companies.

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Who doesn't like capitalism? Who doesn't like profits? Oh?

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 3>That would be communists? So are environmentalists more aligned with

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 3>the communists? And as I call them, climmunists. Now kind

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of makes you wonder, doesn't it. I'm Kevin Gordon. Stay

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 3>tuned for REDI Radio the top of the hour. I'm

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Gordon, America's truck in Network seven hundred WLW