WEBVTT - HR. 3 - Bingo

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.850
<v Speaker 1>That was as close as he got to this building

0:00:06.870 --> 0:00:12.190
<v Speaker 1>in this show, Zach. J.J. McCarthy said, you're listening to

0:00:12.210 --> 0:00:15.810
<v Speaker 1>the Power Tribune. Whatever. I'm not a fan. I can't

0:00:15.850 --> 0:00:16.740
<v Speaker 1>forgive you. That was it.

0:00:16.989 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't forgive you. I can't forgive Abbott. I mean,

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 2>with all due respect to everybody else and Egan. Yeah,

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>with all due respect. You couldn't have brought him over

0:00:27.580 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>here for a couple minutes. That's all we would have needed.

0:00:33.420 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:00:35.380 --> 0:00:39.090
<v Speaker 2>But I guess it'll never be the case because we're

0:00:39.100 --> 0:00:43.930
<v Speaker 2>not the flagship radio home of the Giants. What if

0:00:43.970 --> 0:00:49.350
<v Speaker 2>they trade for Colston Loveland? I mean, it's a consolation prize,

0:00:49.390 --> 0:00:49.710
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:00:49.729 --> 0:00:52.450
<v Speaker 1>What if the Twins sign Max Kepler? I was thinking

0:00:52.490 --> 0:00:54.290
<v Speaker 1>about him over the weekend. I'm sure you were.

0:00:54.410 --> 0:00:54.750
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:00:55.110 --> 0:00:58.230
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we got an announcement to make, right? We do.

0:00:58.350 --> 0:01:01.490
<v Speaker 1>We do? Yeah, it's really official. Do you have like

0:01:01.510 --> 0:01:16.350
<v Speaker 1>a drum roll or anything? New initials title sponsor, Treasure

0:01:16.410 --> 0:01:18.490
<v Speaker 1>Island Resort and Casino. Going to be doing some really

0:01:18.550 --> 0:01:21.180
<v Speaker 1>cool things on Social Media going forward. There's going to

0:01:21.190 --> 0:01:23.420
<v Speaker 1>be prizes to be won. There's going to be games

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.660
<v Speaker 1>to be given away. So starting this Friday when Nico

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Medved's in the building, initials sponsored by Treasure Island Resort

0:01:31.500 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and Casino. Like I said, they got some cool things

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.660
<v Speaker 1>up their sleeves moving forward.

0:01:36.780 --> 0:01:38.130
<v Speaker 5>Is one of them a.

0:01:40.850 --> 0:01:44.530
<v Speaker 5>K-F-A-N branded slot machine.

0:01:44.569 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, wouldn't it be initials branded? I mean, an initials deal.

0:01:47.950 --> 0:01:51.100
<v Speaker 5>An initials branded slot machine.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.140
<v Speaker 1>That would be great. That would be cool. Yeah, man.

0:01:53.740 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The sky's the limit. Yeah.

0:01:56.980 --> 0:01:59.290
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at least like pull tabs or something. The

0:01:59.310 --> 0:02:02.770
<v Speaker 2>slot machine, that might get a little tough logistically.

0:02:02.790 --> 0:02:04.170
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:02:05.340 --> 0:02:10.950
<v Speaker 1>Believe in the impossible. My dreams. Anything's possible.

0:02:11.930 --> 0:02:15.190
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to have... Poll tabs are easy.

0:02:15.210 --> 0:02:17.690
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we have some tabs down there?

0:02:18.110 --> 0:02:21.990
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Anyway, shout out to TI. Those guys

0:02:22.250 --> 0:02:24.250
<v Speaker 1>are the best. We're super pumped to be a part

0:02:24.310 --> 0:02:24.700
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:02:24.740 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 5>See you soon.

0:02:26.460 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>We're only like five weeks away.

0:02:28.220 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 5>TYTI.

0:02:29.620 --> 0:02:32.739
<v Speaker 1>Right around the corner. They got great bingo down there, too.

0:02:33.430 --> 0:02:33.750
<v Speaker 5>What?

0:02:33.930 --> 0:02:38.420
<v Speaker 1>I've never played competitive bingo. Obviously, we did growing up

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in school and things. By the way, somebody mentioned Walter White. Yes.

0:02:41.620 --> 0:02:43.980
<v Speaker 1>Chemistry teacher. Oh, yeah. You forget that he was a

0:02:44.020 --> 0:02:46.250
<v Speaker 1>teacher because he was a meth lord. But sure, technically,

0:02:46.290 --> 0:02:49.889
<v Speaker 1>he was a fictional teacher. Oh, yeah. Yeah, did a

0:02:49.910 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot for his students. He really did help Jesse a lot.

0:02:52.050 --> 0:02:54.250
<v Speaker 1>Did a lot for one specific one. So what was

0:02:54.310 --> 0:02:58.389
<v Speaker 1>I saying, though? Oh, never played competitive bingo. I've never

0:02:58.470 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>actually paid for a bingo card and sat at a

0:03:01.580 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>casino and played.

0:03:03.020 --> 0:03:03.839
<v Speaker 5>It's intimidating.

0:03:03.900 --> 0:03:04.619
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, me either.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 5>It's great. It's intimidating because the people in there know

0:03:07.340 --> 0:03:10.140
<v Speaker 5>what they're doing, and they are playing 8 to 12

0:03:10.139 --> 0:03:11.460
<v Speaker 5>cards at a time.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.579
<v Speaker 1>No offense, sure. 8 to 12, you've got to pay attention.

0:03:14.820 --> 0:03:18.140
<v Speaker 1>You're multitasking. If you have one card....

0:03:20.100 --> 0:03:21.140
<v Speaker 5>Nobody has one card.

0:03:21.180 --> 0:03:26.989
<v Speaker 1>I would say the barriers for entry is zero, right? Well,

0:03:27.030 --> 0:03:30.510
<v Speaker 1>hang on. You have to know letters and numbers. Paul,

0:03:30.530 --> 0:03:34.650
<v Speaker 1>your hand's up. All the ladies that play competitive bingo. Woodhawk.

0:03:36.290 --> 0:03:39.070
<v Speaker 1>For two reasons. Number one, they like to gamble. And

0:03:39.090 --> 0:03:43.850
<v Speaker 1>number two, they're probably by themselves. Okay. Okay. No, I

0:03:43.900 --> 0:03:47.900
<v Speaker 1>just mean they're taking it seriously. They're there to gamble.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.690
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there are people that won't go with friends and

0:03:50.710 --> 0:03:51.990
<v Speaker 2>family because they're distracting.

0:03:53.190 --> 0:03:56.750
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. They're there to focus. I don't go play poker

0:03:56.790 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with a group. I show up by myself. I'm there

0:03:59.160 --> 0:03:59.740
<v Speaker 1>to play.

0:03:59.940 --> 0:04:03.380
<v Speaker 3>Rip to the old Haskells and Excelsior that burned down,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:08.900
<v Speaker 3>but that spot, they had bingo on Saturdays. It's cutthroat.

0:04:09.060 --> 0:04:13.100
<v Speaker 3>We don't yell bingo. We pay attention. People take bingo

0:04:13.380 --> 0:04:15.119
<v Speaker 3>very seriously.

0:04:16.260 --> 0:04:19.420
<v Speaker 1>That's my contribution. That's being rebuilt, correct? I don't know.

0:04:19.660 --> 0:04:24.510
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't... I assume that's in the works. I mean, castles,

0:04:24.670 --> 0:04:25.690
<v Speaker 1>they're not just rolling over.

0:04:25.710 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a good piece of property, man. Oh,

0:04:29.220 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>that's a good point. It's a real good piece of property.

0:04:31.740 --> 0:04:34.900
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do Fan 5.

0:04:34.900 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:04:36.660 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:04:38.940 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 4>It's time for Fan 5, brought to you by Red

0:04:41.900 --> 0:04:42.660
<v Speaker 4>Wing Shoes.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, Red Wing Shoes. All right, I'm going to lead

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with it since I skipped it. The Lynx, Marnie, tonight

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>play the New York Liberty in New York down 0-1.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.419
<v Speaker 1>If they lose, their season is over. They had the

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>best record in the WNBA. They were the odds-on favorite

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.130
<v Speaker 1>to win it, right? Heavily, heavily favored. Everybody's like, the Lynx,

0:05:03.710 --> 0:05:07.529
<v Speaker 1>it's theirs to lose. Nafisa, when she joined back, what,

0:05:07.570 --> 0:05:10.469
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the year? They got the rock star starting five.

0:05:10.490 --> 0:05:12.630
<v Speaker 1>They got the rookie of the year. Who's going to

0:05:12.650 --> 0:05:14.510
<v Speaker 1>stop them? Well, so far, the Liberty. They blew them

0:05:14.550 --> 0:05:18.490
<v Speaker 1>out in game one. So game two tonight in New York, 730,

0:05:18.490 --> 0:05:21.490
<v Speaker 1>Lynx and Liberty. The Lynx on DraftKings are two and

0:05:21.510 --> 0:05:23.070
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites.

0:05:24.570 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was, that was, that's a tough draw for

0:05:29.380 --> 0:05:33.620
<v Speaker 5>any team. The Liberty being an eight seed is not

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.870
<v Speaker 5>a traditional thing. eight seed uh brianna stewart is still

0:05:38.070 --> 0:05:42.850
<v Speaker 5>one of the top i would say three players in

0:05:42.890 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 5>the entire wnba sabrina yonescu and yes that is how

0:05:47.500 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 5>you pronounce it though that's not how it's looks like

0:05:50.300 --> 0:05:53.300
<v Speaker 5>it's pronounced what's her name yonescu.

0:05:52.660 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah she's an actress okay.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.170
<v Speaker 5>She's actually a basketball player uh but she does commercials

0:05:57.580 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 5>you've probably seen her in state farm um She had

0:06:02.300 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 5>some injuries throughout the season, and so maybe that's why

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 5>they lost some games. I didn't pay as much attention

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:13.030
<v Speaker 5>to other teams in the regular season. This year, it

0:06:13.089 --> 0:06:16.070
<v Speaker 5>is not a traditional 1-8. That is not an excuse,

0:06:17.170 --> 0:06:20.380
<v Speaker 5>but it is the reality that whatever team drew the

0:06:20.420 --> 0:06:23.380
<v Speaker 5>Liberty was going to have a tough draw. And it

0:06:23.420 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 5>was the Lynx and the Liberty Bibberty.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.710
<v Speaker 1>And... You saw it.

0:06:28.860 --> 0:06:30.930
<v Speaker 5>And then the other thing is when you get to

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.909
<v Speaker 5>the playoffs, you can play a little bit more physical.

0:06:34.210 --> 0:06:39.570
<v Speaker 5>And that's exactly what happened. And the Liberty Bibberty have

0:06:39.589 --> 0:06:41.930
<v Speaker 5>a lot of length, a lot of tall players. And

0:06:42.150 --> 0:06:48.380
<v Speaker 5>that bothered some of our Lynx players and that physical physicality.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.230
<v Speaker 5>So what is the adjustment? How does it happen in a,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 5>in a best of three series that now goes one, one, one,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.550
<v Speaker 5>meaning one game in Minnesota, one game in New York,

0:06:58.830 --> 0:07:01.070
<v Speaker 5>one game in Minnesota, if necessary, it used to be

0:07:01.110 --> 0:07:05.870
<v Speaker 5>a two, one setup. And I changed it a handful

0:07:05.890 --> 0:07:08.529
<v Speaker 5>of years ago. Becky Hammond, head coach of the Las

0:07:08.550 --> 0:07:13.620
<v Speaker 5>Vegas aces sounded off on this format before the playoffs started.

0:07:15.220 --> 0:07:18.730
<v Speaker 5>And she, does not like this format. And so maybe

0:07:18.770 --> 0:07:19.730
<v Speaker 5>it'll change in the future.

0:07:19.750 --> 0:07:22.030
<v Speaker 1>Well, can I make the obvious suggestion?

0:07:22.150 --> 0:07:22.490
<v Speaker 5>You can.

0:07:23.790 --> 0:07:27.340
<v Speaker 1>If we're going to take the WNBA playoffs seriously, it

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>can't be best out of three.

0:07:29.220 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 5>In round one?

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.940
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be. Right. You can't play a whole

0:07:31.980 --> 0:07:36.330
<v Speaker 1>season and you're down to the, what, final eight teams.

0:07:37.270 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And we're essentially kind of kind of ripping pull tabs

0:07:40.780 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in round one. We're one weird game. I don't know.

0:07:43.660 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I just think.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 5>We're 25 years in and it's always been, I.

0:07:47.260 --> 0:07:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Feel like best of five should be pretty easy to do.

0:07:51.490 --> 0:07:52.930
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they should have gone to best of

0:07:53.010 --> 0:07:54.810
<v Speaker 2>five in the first round before they went to best

0:07:54.850 --> 0:07:56.030
<v Speaker 2>of seven in the final round.

0:07:56.090 --> 0:07:56.290
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:07:56.310 --> 0:07:56.850
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:57.910 --> 0:07:58.970
<v Speaker 5>You guys are not wrong.

0:07:59.250 --> 0:08:02.050
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, I'm not using that as an excuse

0:08:02.070 --> 0:08:04.050
<v Speaker 1>because the links, if they lose this series in two

0:08:04.090 --> 0:08:06.090
<v Speaker 1>games or in three games, no excuses, then you just

0:08:06.110 --> 0:08:07.810
<v Speaker 1>weren't good enough. Even though you're loaded and you had

0:08:07.850 --> 0:08:11.170
<v Speaker 1>an awesome regular season that you just You lost. That's inexcusable.

0:08:11.250 --> 0:08:14.130
<v Speaker 1>But I still think it's weird that you lose one

0:08:14.210 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>game and all of a sudden you're feeling like, oh,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.980
<v Speaker 1>my God, we're on the brink of elimination. Absolutely. That

0:08:19.020 --> 0:08:22.060
<v Speaker 1>should not be the case when you had a 33-11

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>regular season and you lose one game and you're already

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.540
<v Speaker 1>fighting for your life. Yeah. This isn't the NFL, right?

0:08:27.580 --> 0:08:31.180
<v Speaker 1>All these leagues have series that are worth a damn.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.020
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Best out of three seems really

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.050
<v Speaker 1>kind of cheesy to me. But let's see if their

0:08:37.070 --> 0:08:39.449
<v Speaker 1>championship caliber just win tonight and then win game three

0:08:39.470 --> 0:08:41.790
<v Speaker 1>and we'll move on. And we can complain about this

0:08:41.850 --> 0:08:46.620
<v Speaker 1>format in the future. What happens? What do you think

0:08:46.650 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>happens if they lose tonight? In terms of like, how

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>will the fans, how will the team react to a

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>season that was as awesome as it was? And obviously, again,

0:08:54.059 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a revelation in Olivia Miles. So she's going nowhere.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.300
<v Speaker 1>But what do we do if we have a team

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that was this good and we fall flat on our

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>faces in round one? Epically, theoretically, in two games.

0:09:06.370 --> 0:09:09.390
<v Speaker 5>Flat on our faces feels like a harsh.

0:09:09.990 --> 0:09:12.730
<v Speaker 1>If you go 0-2 and get bounced, that is a

0:09:12.890 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>massive disappointment. It doesn't matter how bad of a draw.

0:09:15.100 --> 0:09:18.500
<v Speaker 5>Did you see the way the regular season played out?

0:09:19.300 --> 0:09:25.770
<v Speaker 5>The Lynx lost one, two, three straight, and four of

0:09:25.809 --> 0:09:29.150
<v Speaker 5>their last six to close out the regular season. And

0:09:29.290 --> 0:09:35.030
<v Speaker 5>that came... within that break for FIBA, which was a

0:09:35.050 --> 0:09:37.790
<v Speaker 5>three-week break, which every team in the league had.

0:09:37.809 --> 0:09:38.750
<v Speaker 1>That's the comeback, right?

0:09:38.790 --> 0:09:44.860
<v Speaker 5>So maybe whatever... Let's see, where was the break versus

0:09:44.940 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 5>these losses? Maybe whatever momentum... So they lost two games

0:09:52.070 --> 0:09:55.230
<v Speaker 5>going into that break, and then two of the four

0:09:55.270 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 5>coming out. Whatever they had... they didn't have it at

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.420
<v Speaker 5>the end. If you lose one, two, three, four of

0:10:06.470 --> 0:10:10.670
<v Speaker 5>your last six games, do you still say this is...

0:10:10.929 --> 0:10:12.610
<v Speaker 5>How did you put it? Fall on your face or whatever?

0:10:12.790 --> 0:10:13.550
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a pretty.

0:10:13.590 --> 0:10:15.890
<v Speaker 5>If you lose four of your last six, close the

0:10:15.929 --> 0:10:16.569
<v Speaker 5>regular season.

0:10:16.590 --> 0:10:18.700
<v Speaker 1>That's bad, yeah. When most of those were.

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in a situation where they weren't going to move from

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.459
<v Speaker 2>the number one seed, where in the back of their heads,

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.900
<v Speaker 2>it was, I wouldn't say meaningless, but at that point.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Miles sat out a couple of games, right? Was it

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.490
<v Speaker 1>an ankle problem? Calf. Calf problem, okay.

0:10:33.610 --> 0:10:38.329
<v Speaker 5>It was not locked up, though. They had a pretty

0:10:38.350 --> 0:10:40.930
<v Speaker 5>good hold on the number one seed, but those last

0:10:40.950 --> 0:10:46.870
<v Speaker 5>two games against Indiana... Remember, they lost at Indiana, and

0:10:46.990 --> 0:10:50.910
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't until later that evening when I believe it

0:10:50.950 --> 0:10:54.780
<v Speaker 5>was Golden State lost. That secured the number one seed

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>for the Lynx. It was the day of the game,

0:11:00.059 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 5>the final game of the season, is the only one, Zach,

0:11:04.940 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 5>that did not affect their seeding. So up until then,

0:11:08.780 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 5>that number one seed was not locked up. So was it.

0:11:14.980 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 5>In real danger, I mean, they had a pretty good

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.540
<v Speaker 5>stranglehold on it, but it got smaller and smaller, and

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.580
<v Speaker 5>the lead got smaller and smaller and smaller as the

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 5>season went on. Maybe that was teams figuring out Olivia Miles.

0:11:26.740 --> 0:11:28.740
<v Speaker 5>I mean, maybe that was part of it. Like, she

0:11:28.780 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 5>was just this phenom that no one had ever seen before,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.699
<v Speaker 5>the way that she played, and she was racking up

0:11:34.740 --> 0:11:38.870
<v Speaker 5>these crazy numbers, and maybe teams finally figured out, like, oh,

0:11:39.090 --> 0:11:43.010
<v Speaker 5>this is how you slow her down or counter her.

0:11:46.740 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:11:47.220 --> 0:11:53.220
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see. I think massive pressure tonight to not

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.260
<v Speaker 1>get swept in round one. That'd be bad.

0:11:56.140 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 5>And let's not forget what happened at Barclays Center.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.500
<v Speaker 5>A couple of few years ago. The dress.

0:12:04.860 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:12:05.420 --> 0:12:09.470
<v Speaker 5>The call, the free throws, the Brianna Stewart. Brianna Stewart,

0:12:09.490 --> 0:12:12.010
<v Speaker 5>by the way, on Sunday, I have the box score

0:12:12.050 --> 0:12:15.030
<v Speaker 5>right in front of me. She shot 12 free throws.

0:12:15.330 --> 0:12:18.690
<v Speaker 5>The Lynx as a team shot 13. That is not

0:12:18.710 --> 0:12:21.990
<v Speaker 5>a complaint or saying the referees were unfair. That is just,

0:12:22.450 --> 0:12:28.059
<v Speaker 5>she is so good still and so difficult to guard

0:12:28.420 --> 0:12:31.780
<v Speaker 5>for any team. It's going to be a problem. It's

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:32.420
<v Speaker 5>going to be a challenge.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.820
<v Speaker 1>It was a heist. Yeah, it was. They were You

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.340
<v Speaker 1>just fall over. Still not happy about that. I'm sorry.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Nice dress. So speaking of heists, right? The Angel Reese

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.420
<v Speaker 1>trade ended up getting us Olivia Miles, right? That pick

0:12:49.460 --> 0:12:53.260
<v Speaker 1>turned into Olivia Miles. People made this point yesterday on Twitter,

0:12:53.300 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>and they're right. The best thing that came out of

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.070
<v Speaker 1>the J.J. McCarthy trade, right? All those picks that we

0:12:58.850 --> 0:13:01.250
<v Speaker 1>used to move up to one pick, right? From 11

0:13:01.250 --> 0:13:05.230
<v Speaker 1>to 10 to get J.J. McCarthy. We also, in that trade,

0:13:05.470 --> 0:13:11.990
<v Speaker 1>got pick 203, and that turned into Will Reichard. Oh, wow. Wow.

0:13:12.110 --> 0:13:16.990
<v Speaker 1>So the J.J. McCarthy trade to the Vikings technically also

0:13:17.030 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>got us Will Reichard. Now, maybe the Vikings would have

0:13:19.150 --> 0:13:21.010
<v Speaker 1>used one of their own picks on Will Reichard, but

0:13:21.050 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not what happened. They needed pick 203, and they

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>got it. So it worked out for Olivia Miles. It

0:13:27.500 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>worked out for Will Reichard. Hell, yeah. Hell, yeah, it did.

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:32.780
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

0:13:33.770 --> 0:13:37.890
<v Speaker 5>And maybe the fifth round pick that we're going to

0:13:37.929 --> 0:13:41.290
<v Speaker 5>get in this next JJ McCarthy is.

0:13:41.250 --> 0:13:44.970
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback of our dreams. And they have three of

0:13:45.050 --> 0:13:48.980
<v Speaker 1>them in the draft next year. So three fifths. Yeah.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:54.540
<v Speaker 1>Dealer's choice, man. Maybe one of those three is Drake

0:13:54.640 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay of the Minnesota Golden Gophers. With PJ's blood all

0:14:00.580 --> 0:14:04.699
<v Speaker 1>over his face. Ah, Walk into the podium, hugging Roger Goodell.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Gets PJ's blood all over Goodell's jacket. Yeah, PJ would

0:14:09.860 --> 0:14:11.540
<v Speaker 1>walk to the podium. No, no, no, I'm just saying

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on Drake's face. And then he rubs, you know, when

0:14:14.059 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he hugs Goodell, he gets PJ's blood all over the jacket.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.620
<v Speaker 1>And then, like, the blood looks like the New York skyline.

0:14:21.300 --> 0:14:21.980
<v Speaker 1>What's happening?

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:30.780
<v Speaker 5>Oh, speaking of the skyline. Yesterday, when the... Award announcement

0:14:30.980 --> 0:14:33.980
<v Speaker 5>became official for Coach of the Year and Rookie of

0:14:34.020 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 5>the Year in the WNBA. It was indeed Kathy Engelbert,

0:14:39.300 --> 0:14:42.990
<v Speaker 5>the commissioner of the WNBA, who presented those awards in

0:14:43.020 --> 0:14:46.250
<v Speaker 5>person to Cheryl Reeve and Olivia Miles.

0:14:46.270 --> 0:14:50.090
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that wasn't awkward at all. I don't know.

0:14:50.270 --> 0:14:52.110
<v Speaker 5>She was wearing just a plain suit.

0:14:52.990 --> 0:14:53.070
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:14:53.350 --> 0:14:55.150
<v Speaker 5>Plain suit. No, not a faux shade tower.

0:14:55.170 --> 0:14:57.310
<v Speaker 1>And she bought on Fifth Avenue. Wow.

0:14:57.330 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:14:58.820 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 5>What if she had bought a Nicolet?

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>No, you'd get it at Mall of America. Yeah, man.

0:15:02.740 --> 0:15:06.220
<v Speaker 1>Like a real Minnesotan. Headlines next. Marnie Gellner is here.

0:15:06.260 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Power to Morning Show fan.

0:15:11.540 --> 0:15:15.820
<v Speaker 4>Don't miss the Vikings and Dolphins Sunday afternoon on the

0:15:15.980 --> 0:15:18.020
<v Speaker 4>audio home for Vikings football.

0:15:18.220 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 3>FM1.

0:15:31.860 --> 0:15:33.380
<v Speaker 2>I want to chime in on what's happening with your

0:15:33.460 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>favorite KFAN program. Make your voice heard on the Bradshaw

0:15:37.020 --> 0:15:39.820
<v Speaker 2>and Bryant text line. Let us know what you have

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:45.070
<v Speaker 2>to say by texting your message 64686. That's 64686, standard

0:15:45.110 --> 0:15:46.350
<v Speaker 2>message and data rate supply.

0:15:46.370 --> 0:15:50.650
<v Speaker 1>Hey, one last thing in sports, since it's super important

0:15:50.670 --> 0:15:52.150
<v Speaker 1>and super cool, and Zach, I want you to speak

0:15:52.210 --> 0:15:54.130
<v Speaker 1>on this. Yesterday, the Wild and a bunch of local

0:15:54.170 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>reporters announced the Jesse Pierce Media Beauty Award. which is

0:15:59.580 --> 0:16:03.970
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the wild player who best exemplifies professionalism, accessibility,

0:16:04.250 --> 0:16:07.570
<v Speaker 1>and respect with the local media and the local media

0:16:07.610 --> 0:16:09.990
<v Speaker 1>interactions in honor of Jesse Pierce and in honor of

0:16:10.030 --> 0:16:12.750
<v Speaker 1>her three kids. That's pretty cool, right?

0:16:12.770 --> 0:16:12.990
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:16:13.290 --> 0:16:16.100
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful. Very cool move by the wild and everybody else involved.

0:16:17.630 --> 0:16:21.730
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Pierce media beauty award given out yearly moving forward.

0:16:22.010 --> 0:16:22.310
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:16:22.750 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Um, it's, it's so cool to see her, her legacy

0:16:25.740 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>continue to, uh, and it will be continued to be

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 2>remembered for forever and ever. I mean, she is, uh,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.229
<v Speaker 2>she obviously is really good at her job from a,

0:16:34.220 --> 0:16:39.660
<v Speaker 2>a public facing standpoint, wrote some, some amazing stuff for, uh,

0:16:39.740 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>plenty of publications.

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.380
<v Speaker 1>Of course, her, her main gig is NHL.com.

0:16:43.980 --> 0:16:49.910
<v Speaker 2>Um, but the, the, Her on the podcast side, off

0:16:49.950 --> 0:16:54.180
<v Speaker 2>the air, in person, she was just such a true

0:16:54.220 --> 0:16:58.140
<v Speaker 2>light and such a true professional. The players absolutely loved her.

0:16:58.460 --> 0:17:03.780
<v Speaker 2>And that is, again, between this award, between the Jesse

0:17:03.820 --> 0:17:08.310
<v Speaker 2>Pierce Community Cup coming up this winter. and maybe other

0:17:08.650 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>tributes in the future. I mean, it's really, really cool

0:17:11.460 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>to see and well-deserved. It was her birthday yesterday. Some

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:20.340
<v Speaker 2>media members got together and celebrated that as well. And yeah,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>it just, and this was such a cool announcement to

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.230
<v Speaker 2>be made that Jesse Pierce media beauty or what a

0:17:26.330 --> 0:17:27.510
<v Speaker 2>perfect name for it as well.

0:17:27.650 --> 0:17:30.810
<v Speaker 1>And she was a true beauty as well.

0:17:30.869 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And again, I'll sponsor with, with her husband, Mike and,

0:17:34.510 --> 0:17:37.690
<v Speaker 2>And then, of course, her three children, Hudson, Kaden, and Avery.

0:17:38.550 --> 0:17:42.620
<v Speaker 2>Just such a horrible, horrible story, but cool to see

0:17:42.650 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>them remembering her in such a unique way.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, no transition out of that, so let's just

0:17:47.380 --> 0:17:47.860
<v Speaker 1>go into this.

0:17:48.020 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 3>And now it's time for headlines presented by Treasure Island

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.220
<v Speaker 3>Resort and Casino.

0:17:53.340 --> 0:17:56.820
<v Speaker 1>And TI is all over this Power Shirt Morning Show, right? Initials,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.050
<v Speaker 1>and they're hosting us a couple times a year to

0:17:59.090 --> 0:18:01.090
<v Speaker 1>do big shows down there, like in November, and they

0:18:01.130 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>also host and sponsor headlines. They're just everywhere. All right,

0:18:05.270 --> 0:18:07.310
<v Speaker 1>I got some random stuff. But first, I wanted to

0:18:07.330 --> 0:18:09.370
<v Speaker 1>start with this because this is kind of crazy. Marns,

0:18:09.390 --> 0:18:10.530
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see how you do on this.

0:18:10.770 --> 0:18:11.070
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:18:13.270 --> 0:18:15.910
<v Speaker 1>They're saying a lot of 80s hairstyles are coming back.

0:18:16.090 --> 0:18:16.990
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no!

0:18:17.650 --> 0:18:23.070
<v Speaker 1>Specifically for women. So according to Glamour magazine, there are

0:18:23.109 --> 0:18:27.250
<v Speaker 1>some recognizable hairstyles from the 80s making a comeback. And...

0:18:28.190 --> 0:18:31.250
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to name the hairstyle, and I want to

0:18:31.290 --> 0:18:34.090
<v Speaker 1>see if you can guess who they claim made it famous.

0:18:34.430 --> 0:18:36.490
<v Speaker 1>So this is in my opinion. I don't even know

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if these are correct. I just want you to see

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.940
<v Speaker 1>if you can get this. Let's see how well you do.

0:18:42.020 --> 0:18:43.860
<v Speaker 1>So we can have Marnie guess first. If she gets

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.420
<v Speaker 1>it wrong, then I'll let everybody else jump in. How

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about just the ponytail?

0:18:50.060 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 5>The ponytail?

0:18:51.380 --> 0:18:56.300
<v Speaker 1>Just the ponytail. Made famous by blank, according to Glamour magazine, apparently.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:57.220
<v Speaker 5>Olivia Newton-John.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Not a bad guess, but no. Anybody else from the

0:19:01.580 --> 0:19:05.889
<v Speaker 1>80s that you think is connected to the ponytail? You

0:19:05.910 --> 0:19:07.290
<v Speaker 1>can debate this. I'm just going to tell you what

0:19:07.310 --> 0:19:07.530
<v Speaker 1>they said.

0:19:07.590 --> 0:19:08.990
<v Speaker 5>An actress or a singer?

0:19:09.390 --> 0:19:09.650
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:19:13.510 --> 0:19:13.910
<v Speaker 5>Which one?

0:19:14.350 --> 0:19:14.609
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:19:15.830 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, Olivia Newton-John was both, so that would have worked. 80s?

0:19:21.940 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Way more famous for singing, but she definitely did both.

0:19:26.420 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Singing, ponytail, 80s.

0:19:30.810 --> 0:19:32.150
<v Speaker 1>Don't overthink it. Can I guess?

0:19:32.250 --> 0:19:32.450
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:19:32.630 --> 0:19:33.310
<v Speaker 1>Paula Abdul?

0:19:33.350 --> 0:19:33.530
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:19:35.250 --> 0:19:35.910
<v Speaker 1>That's a great guess.

0:19:35.950 --> 0:19:36.370
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, Zach.

0:19:36.890 --> 0:19:39.310
<v Speaker 1>Did she act? I don't know.

0:19:40.570 --> 0:19:41.330
<v Speaker 5>Give me something else.

0:19:41.910 --> 0:19:42.150
<v Speaker 3>Pop?

0:19:42.810 --> 0:19:43.310
<v Speaker 5>Pop music?

0:19:43.750 --> 0:19:45.790
<v Speaker 1>Talk about your all-time favorite movie.

0:19:48.390 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 5>A League of Their Own. Gina Davis. Rosie O'Donnell. Madonna?

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:56.659
<v Speaker 1>They say Madonna. What?

0:19:57.300 --> 0:20:01.750
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that I've... Ever seen Madonna in a ponytail.

0:20:01.770 --> 0:20:04.830
<v Speaker 1>That's why I said I can't verify this, but they

0:20:04.890 --> 0:20:08.169
<v Speaker 1>claim the ponytail was made famous by Madonna in the 80s.

0:20:08.150 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to Google Madonna in a ponytail.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.580
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I can't verify this. You guys can.

0:20:14.750 --> 0:20:16.510
<v Speaker 1>Try this one, though.

0:20:16.530 --> 0:20:20.859
<v Speaker 5>Oh, okay. The blonde ambition high ponytail.

0:20:20.890 --> 0:20:21.500
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay, sure.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.300
<v Speaker 5>That is not what I think of.

0:20:23.340 --> 0:20:23.940
<v Speaker 1>No, me either.

0:20:23.980 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 5>But, okay.

0:20:25.220 --> 0:20:30.750
<v Speaker 1>How about the side part blowout? The side part blowout. Now,

0:20:30.770 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I would not associate... The blowout. Yeah, Louis has stars

0:20:40.859 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while. By the way, I'm going

0:20:42.020 --> 0:20:46.090
<v Speaker 1>to stop. Before we go on. With 80s. Before we

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>go on, some of this is definitely bleeding into the 90s.

0:20:50.010 --> 0:20:52.169
<v Speaker 1>So I would say this is 80s slash 90s. I

0:20:52.270 --> 0:20:53.929
<v Speaker 1>don't know why they're specifically saying 80s. But even then,

0:20:53.950 --> 0:20:54.170
<v Speaker 1>we crimped.

0:20:54.230 --> 0:20:55.670
<v Speaker 5>Everything was crimped and curled.

0:20:55.690 --> 0:20:58.570
<v Speaker 1>Right, but some of these answers are definitely 90s themed,

0:20:58.630 --> 0:21:01.630
<v Speaker 1>not 80s. So I would just think, let's just go pre-2000.

0:21:01.650 --> 0:21:03.770
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that helps you get closer to the right answer.

0:21:03.790 --> 0:21:05.150
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was still crimping and curling.

0:21:05.170 --> 0:21:05.390
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:21:05.510 --> 0:21:09.020
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a question? Yep. What's a blowout? It's

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>what Louie has in his diaper. Yeah, NFC.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:13.580
<v Speaker 5>But it's like.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:20.020
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's Lynx, Liberty, Game 1. Brilliant. 41 Donut. Mississippi State, Gophers,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.619
<v Speaker 1>Week 2. When it comes to hair, what is the blowout? Oh,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>side part blowout. Explain it, Marns. Because I don't know.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, for me, it's like hair dryer. We'll use the

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:40.450
<v Speaker 5>term hair dryer. And a brush... or like a round brush.

0:21:41.369 --> 0:21:46.139
<v Speaker 5>But it's typically straight. And again, I don't associate 80s.

0:21:46.230 --> 0:21:47.670
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be straight.

0:21:48.130 --> 0:21:51.870
<v Speaker 5>I don't associate the 80s or 90s with straight hair,

0:21:51.930 --> 0:21:53.390
<v Speaker 5>but side part.

0:21:53.430 --> 0:21:55.530
<v Speaker 1>Can you think of anybody famous that did the side

0:21:55.609 --> 0:21:56.550
<v Speaker 1>part blow out?

0:21:58.730 --> 0:21:59.100
<v Speaker 5>Actress?

0:22:00.420 --> 0:22:01.020
<v Speaker 1>Not really.

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:01.780
<v Speaker 5>Singer?

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>She dabbled in acting, but she is definitely not famous

0:22:05.619 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for acting.

0:22:07.460 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 5>Is she famous for singing?

0:22:08.670 --> 0:22:09.300
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not.

0:22:09.390 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 5>Is she famous for being famous?

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:22:12.300 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Monica Lewinsky. Not that kind of fame.

0:22:14.660 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 5>A Kardashian?

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Nope. She's not a singer. Pre-2000. Not an actress. She's

0:22:21.980 --> 0:22:23.900
<v Speaker 1>just famous for being hot. Let's just call a spade

0:22:23.940 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a spade. She's famous for being beautiful. Olivia Newton-John. Is

0:22:29.380 --> 0:22:32.850
<v Speaker 1>it a model? Farrah Fawcett. That's too early.

0:22:34.750 --> 0:22:35.270
<v Speaker 5>Tyra Banks.

0:22:36.850 --> 0:22:41.990
<v Speaker 1>Cindy Crawford is the right answer. I think those are tough.

0:22:42.010 --> 0:22:43.930
<v Speaker 1>A couple of these are gettable. I think if you

0:22:43.970 --> 0:22:47.660
<v Speaker 1>lock in, you can get this one. Messy Curls.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:50.060
<v Speaker 5>Messy?

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Think of somebody famous in the 80s and 90s that

0:22:53.180 --> 0:22:58.540
<v Speaker 1>kind of made Messy Curls famous. I think you can

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.220
<v Speaker 1>get this one. This one's possible.

0:23:01.109 --> 0:23:03.810
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure when I see it, I'll be like, of course!

0:23:03.910 --> 0:23:10.859
<v Speaker 1>Specifically one movie, but Oh, one movie. I mean, I

0:23:10.900 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>think that that hairstyle stands out to me in my

0:23:13.540 --> 0:23:15.940
<v Speaker 1>mind in one movie, but it's multiple movies for this person.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Blonde hair or brown hair?

0:23:17.300 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Not blonde.

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:20.139
<v Speaker 5>Not blonde.

0:23:21.500 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Whitney Houston.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.140
<v Speaker 6>Oh, um.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.500
<v Speaker 5>Brown, messy curls.

0:23:29.530 --> 0:23:32.250
<v Speaker 1>Sauce, you almost said something. I think it's the.

0:23:32.270 --> 0:23:35.490
<v Speaker 3>Is it the Lady and Breakfast Club?

0:23:37.390 --> 0:23:41.670
<v Speaker 1>No. Molly Ringwald or Ally Sheedy or something?

0:23:41.730 --> 0:23:41.910
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:23:41.930 --> 0:23:45.410
<v Speaker 1>Just the way he answered it wasn't blonde hair. Tia Mowry.

0:23:45.430 --> 0:23:46.980
<v Speaker 1>Big time actress.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:48.700
<v Speaker 5>Julia Roberts.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Julia Roberts is the right answer. You got there. Well done, Barnes. Well, thanks.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Pineapple Updo?

0:23:58.060 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Marge.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:00.820
<v Speaker 1>That's the B.

0:24:00.859 --> 0:24:03.179
<v Speaker 5>Marge's sister. Marge's other sister.

0:24:03.330 --> 0:24:05.850
<v Speaker 1>You know who did the Pineapple Updo apparently better than

0:24:05.910 --> 0:24:09.220
<v Speaker 1>anyone else? I don't even know what that is. I

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>don't either.

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.150
<v Speaker 5>I mean, literally, Marge Simpson is the hairdo that comes

0:24:15.190 --> 0:24:15.590
<v Speaker 5>to mind.

0:24:16.830 --> 0:24:18.850
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:24:18.930 --> 0:24:21.030
<v Speaker 3>Is it Amy Winehouse?

0:24:21.130 --> 0:24:27.659
<v Speaker 1>Nope. Actress. Was famous in the 80s and 90s, but

0:24:27.700 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>she really blew up late 90s with a TV show

0:24:30.660 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>on HBO. Jessica Parker got it Sarah Jessica Parker's the

0:24:34.660 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>right answer how about all right now if you guys

0:24:37.580 --> 0:24:40.020
<v Speaker 1>you got Julia Roberts after a hint or two if

0:24:40.060 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't get this one then I don't think you're

0:24:41.740 --> 0:24:49.500
<v Speaker 1>getting any of them take your time lock in permed curls.

0:24:52.390 --> 0:24:56.310
<v Speaker 5>Permed curls which is different than the Julia Roberts.

0:24:56.170 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That was messy curls curls The next one is natural curls.

0:25:01.340 --> 0:25:01.859
<v Speaker 5>Jesus Christ.

0:25:01.900 --> 0:25:04.140
<v Speaker 1>This one is permed curls. You can do this.

0:25:06.220 --> 0:25:07.980
<v Speaker 5>Permed curls.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:08.070
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:25:08.140 --> 0:25:08.770
<v Speaker 1>That is correct.

0:25:09.270 --> 0:25:10.629
<v Speaker 5>My Aunt Judy.

0:25:10.890 --> 0:25:16.469
<v Speaker 1>That is the right answer. Hawk and moonshine. Nope. Is

0:25:16.530 --> 0:25:18.510
<v Speaker 1>it male or female? Female.

0:25:19.350 --> 0:25:24.420
<v Speaker 5>Great question. Young still? Like, is it a young woman?

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Nope.

0:25:24.619 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 5>Or because perm is.

0:25:25.740 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Nope. Is it Dolly? Dolly Parton. Got it, Sauce.

0:25:30.980 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Wow, Sauce.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Great job, Sauce. Dolly freaking Parton. Thanks, Daddy. The last

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.859
<v Speaker 1>two I think are tough. Natural Curls.

0:25:39.790 --> 0:25:40.610
<v Speaker 5>Natural Curls.

0:25:41.390 --> 0:25:50.270
<v Speaker 1>This is an iconic singer from the 70s and 80s. 70s?

0:25:50.369 --> 0:25:52.350
<v Speaker 1>Part of a group and then went solo. Cher? No.

0:25:54.580 --> 0:26:02.929
<v Speaker 1>Who had famously straight hair. Super, super famous. Did she

0:26:03.810 --> 0:26:06.209
<v Speaker 1>even maybe dabble in the 60s? I wish I knew

0:26:06.230 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the timeline better. 70s for sure. 80s for sure. Reba?

0:26:11.910 --> 0:26:13.540
<v Speaker 1>It might even be 60s. I wish I was a

0:26:13.900 --> 0:26:18.300
<v Speaker 1>better music historian. Yeah, good guess.

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm just naming women's singers.

0:26:21.940 --> 0:26:24.300
<v Speaker 1>Think of an iconic female singer. Okay.

0:26:27.570 --> 0:26:27.790
<v Speaker 4>Um....

0:26:33.980 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 5>How could we not think of more singers? Barbara Mandrell.

0:26:38.540 --> 0:26:40.459
<v Speaker 1>Her first name starts with the letter D.

0:26:41.050 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Diana Ross.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.190
<v Speaker 1>Got it. Well done. That took you two seconds once

0:26:44.230 --> 0:26:45.169
<v Speaker 1>I said the initial.

0:26:45.190 --> 0:26:45.630
<v Speaker 5>Dang.

0:26:45.650 --> 0:26:47.430
<v Speaker 1>All right, last one in this bit that I thought

0:26:47.470 --> 0:26:49.090
<v Speaker 1>was going to take 30 seconds has taken 37 minutes.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The person that made the outward flipped out ends famous.

0:26:56.180 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Outward.

0:26:56.810 --> 0:27:01.650
<v Speaker 1>The outward flipped out ends. Let's just say a couple

0:27:01.670 --> 0:27:04.850
<v Speaker 1>of these words are unfortunately chosen.

0:27:05.750 --> 0:27:07.910
<v Speaker 5>Well, was it Jennifer Aniston?

0:27:07.970 --> 0:27:08.230
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.820
<v Speaker 5>Because she was very much associated with famous hair.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.100
<v Speaker 1>I would say the phrase flipped out end is a

0:27:15.220 --> 0:27:18.020
<v Speaker 1>terrible choice of words for this person specifically.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 5>What years? Like, what genre?

0:27:24.180 --> 0:27:24.230
<v Speaker 4>90s?

0:27:24.220 --> 0:27:26.570
<v Speaker 1>Flipped Out End is, again... Brittany!

0:27:26.970 --> 0:27:27.210
<v Speaker 4>Nope.

0:27:27.550 --> 0:27:33.169
<v Speaker 1>It's poorly chosen words. So.

0:27:33.570 --> 0:27:37.850
<v Speaker 5>Whitney.

0:27:38.430 --> 0:27:42.870
<v Speaker 1>Houston. Zach's gonna get this. Is it OJ related? No,

0:27:42.930 --> 0:27:46.570
<v Speaker 1>but now your brain's thinking the right way, though. Shoot.

0:27:50.090 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Ted Bundy. Got it. No way. Princess Diana. Oh, yeah.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:06.620
<v Speaker 1>Ted Bundy.

0:28:08.020 --> 0:28:09.460
<v Speaker 5>Well, he's at O.J. Simpson.

0:28:09.500 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Who's the serial killer Zach was attracted to? Richard Ramirez

0:28:12.820 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because he had abs.

0:28:13.580 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 5>Oh.

0:28:15.460 --> 0:28:18.270
<v Speaker 1>If you are a protein maxer out there, first of all,

0:28:19.180 --> 0:28:22.390
<v Speaker 1>these phrases with the maxing. Stop doing that. But protein

0:28:22.450 --> 0:28:27.250
<v Speaker 1>maxers apparently are geeking out about protein Cheez-Its that now

0:28:27.270 --> 0:28:31.889
<v Speaker 1>have seven grams of protein per serving. I haven't had

0:28:31.970 --> 0:28:35.379
<v Speaker 1>any of the protein-added products since this new wave of

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>protein thing. It's like everybody's losing their minds over these

0:28:38.060 --> 0:28:41.590
<v Speaker 1>protein things. Is anybody... Onto one that is actually good,

0:28:41.650 --> 0:28:45.030
<v Speaker 1>that tastes the same or better, but it's jacked with protein.

0:28:45.670 --> 0:28:47.950
<v Speaker 1>You guys had any of them yet? And how does

0:28:47.990 --> 0:28:50.260
<v Speaker 1>that work? Everybody's just adding protein to stuff.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:50.620
<v Speaker 4>Coffee.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Where do you get protein from?

0:28:52.100 --> 0:29:01.830
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. It's usually the protein powder. I feel

0:29:01.870 --> 0:29:04.890
<v Speaker 5>like is the added ingredient because a lot of these

0:29:05.150 --> 0:29:06.830
<v Speaker 5>things you can taste it in there.

0:29:07.070 --> 0:29:07.310
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:29:07.370 --> 0:29:09.190
<v Speaker 5>It's like that dry.

0:29:09.230 --> 0:29:10.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:29:10.130 --> 0:29:12.940
<v Speaker 5>Grainy. Well, now like.

0:29:12.660 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Protein Mac and cheese is all the rage, right?

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:16.700
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:29:16.740 --> 0:29:17.630
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I had a protein bar.

0:29:21.130 --> 0:29:24.180
<v Speaker 5>On the way in here, and I feel like there's

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 5>a nice little range for those, but you can't, I

0:29:28.820 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 5>personally don't like the ones that are heavy protein, because again,

0:29:31.580 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 5>that's all you taste.

0:29:34.090 --> 0:29:35.330
<v Speaker 1>But I had the- But then if you go the

0:29:35.350 --> 0:29:37.150
<v Speaker 1>other way, then they have to add so much sugar

0:29:37.190 --> 0:29:38.950
<v Speaker 1>to make them taste good. It's hard, it's like a

0:29:38.970 --> 0:29:39.870
<v Speaker 1>weird sweet spot.

0:29:39.970 --> 0:29:42.710
<v Speaker 3>A lot of them are basically just candy bars right

0:29:42.810 --> 0:29:45.100
<v Speaker 3>which is why they taste good yeah correct no i

0:29:45.100 --> 0:29:45.690
<v Speaker 3>know what you mean.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.170
<v Speaker 1>But yeah all right try this one according to a

0:29:48.230 --> 0:29:50.460
<v Speaker 1>recent report i don't know how they got this study

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.580
<v Speaker 1>i don't know how they figured out this scientifically but

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.730
<v Speaker 1>they're they're going with it the average american swears their

0:29:56.810 --> 0:29:59.970
<v Speaker 1>first curse word of the day at what time? Ooh.

0:30:01.770 --> 0:30:04.690
<v Speaker 1>I mean. On average, the average American swears for the

0:30:04.750 --> 0:30:08.870
<v Speaker 1>first time for the day at what time? Yeah. Yeah.

0:30:09.050 --> 0:30:12.450
<v Speaker 3>Either in traffic or when they wake up and realize

0:30:12.490 --> 0:30:13.930
<v Speaker 3>how early they have to get up.

0:30:14.930 --> 0:30:16.510
<v Speaker 5>When the effing alarm goes off.

0:30:16.510 --> 0:30:16.729
<v Speaker 3>7 a.m.

0:30:16.790 --> 0:30:23.830
<v Speaker 1>This is the average American. 8.30. That's a 30 stick

0:30:23.850 --> 0:30:25.650
<v Speaker 1>with eight. She got to factor in all the people

0:30:25.690 --> 0:30:29.290
<v Speaker 1>that don't get up anywhere near seven or eight. The

0:30:29.310 --> 0:30:32.270
<v Speaker 1>answer is 10 54. Cause I think it's like what

0:30:32.310 --> 0:30:34.670
<v Speaker 1>I just said. It's sure. If you get up at six,

0:30:34.690 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you're probably swearing pretty early, but if you're a person

0:30:36.580 --> 0:30:38.780
<v Speaker 1>that gets up at eight or nine or 10, you

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:40.380
<v Speaker 1>probably got to wait for something.

0:30:40.420 --> 0:30:41.700
<v Speaker 5>And you get up at four.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But I don't swear before the show. I can't swear.

0:30:45.020 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I swear during the commercial breaks for the show.

0:30:48.180 --> 0:30:52.010
<v Speaker 1>I don't talk to anybody before the show in your car. No,

0:30:52.030 --> 0:30:54.050
<v Speaker 1>I'm just listening to poker podcasts.

0:30:54.190 --> 0:30:57.330
<v Speaker 5>You're putting on your shoes. Yeah, you're putting on the rits.

0:30:57.750 --> 0:31:00.510
<v Speaker 5>Your sock has a hole in it. You don't say OS.

0:31:01.250 --> 0:31:01.450
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:31:01.470 --> 0:31:05.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You don't say OS? No. Stubbed your toe in

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the morning? I mean, it's happened. Not daily. Almost slip

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in the shower. You don't need to know what I'm

0:31:12.540 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>doing in the shower. Yeah, man. Today's National Coffee Day.

0:31:15.740 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Hell yeah. I love coffee.

0:31:20.180 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 6>I do.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's great. I have two cups a day during the week.

0:31:27.180 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Interesting.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.250
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. One right away and then.

0:31:31.190 --> 0:31:34.190
<v Speaker 3>One about 7 a.m., 6.45.

0:31:34.190 --> 0:31:38.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Give me the percentage of Americans that claim they

0:31:38.590 --> 0:31:42.030
<v Speaker 1>have at least one cup of coffee a day. What

0:31:42.050 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>percentage of Americans... say they have at least uh my

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>guess is that's what they're saying yeah it just says

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:56.020
<v Speaker 1>americans but let's just assume it's adults that were surveyed 80.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:32:02.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah 65 almost nailed it two-thirds 66 percent wow yeah

0:32:02.260 --> 0:32:06.170
<v Speaker 3>that's up seven percent from six years ago you don't

0:32:06.210 --> 0:32:09.860
<v Speaker 3>drink coffee do you zach uh no sir yeah We

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.020
<v Speaker 3>have a few people here who don't.

0:32:12.100 --> 0:32:12.300
<v Speaker 6>I do.

0:32:12.340 --> 0:32:13.540
<v Speaker 5>You're Americano. Yep.

0:32:13.620 --> 0:32:15.310
<v Speaker 1>I just like black coffee. Cause I used to drink

0:32:15.350 --> 0:32:18.750
<v Speaker 1>all the, the Frappuccinos that have like a bazillion calories.

0:32:18.810 --> 0:32:20.870
<v Speaker 1>And it's much like we just talked about the protein

0:32:21.010 --> 0:32:24.030
<v Speaker 1>bars where it's like, it was so much sugar and

0:32:24.090 --> 0:32:26.590
<v Speaker 1>caramel and whipped cream. There was barely coffee in there.

0:32:26.610 --> 0:32:29.390
<v Speaker 1>It tasted amazing, but it was terrible for me. Yeah.

0:32:29.830 --> 0:32:30.290
<v Speaker 1>Good for you.

0:32:30.390 --> 0:32:31.970
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Matt doesn't drink coffee either.

0:32:32.450 --> 0:32:33.710
<v Speaker 6>Who? Matt.

0:32:34.150 --> 0:32:34.750
<v Speaker 1>Who's that?

0:32:36.330 --> 0:32:36.730
<v Speaker 5>My husband.

0:32:37.210 --> 0:32:40.500
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Oh, whatever. It doesn't matter. Yeah. He's not famous.

0:32:41.140 --> 0:32:43.610
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys want a creepy chat GPT story or

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.070
<v Speaker 1>a creepy Instagram story?

0:32:45.090 --> 0:32:46.610
<v Speaker 5>Uh, obviously.

0:32:46.650 --> 0:32:47.330
<v Speaker 1>Why not both?

0:32:47.470 --> 0:32:47.590
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:47.630 --> 0:32:49.969
<v Speaker 1>Why not both? Yeah. All right. Let's go with this

0:32:50.050 --> 0:32:52.530
<v Speaker 1>one first. Um, so I'm on Instagram. I think you

0:32:52.550 --> 0:32:54.350
<v Speaker 1>guys are all on Instagram. I don't know how, I

0:32:54.390 --> 0:32:56.010
<v Speaker 1>don't know how hands on you are, but here's a

0:32:56.030 --> 0:32:58.390
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that I didn't know about Instagram. So

0:32:58.430 --> 0:33:01.380
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of months, meta, which owns Facebook

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:05.140
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram has been rolling out their Instagram plus subscription,

0:33:05.180 --> 0:33:09.170
<v Speaker 1>which is three 99 a month. It includes a lot

0:33:09.210 --> 0:33:11.590
<v Speaker 1>of features that are really only useful if your entire

0:33:11.630 --> 0:33:13.790
<v Speaker 1>life revolves around your Instagram account. But here's a couple

0:33:13.830 --> 0:33:16.730
<v Speaker 1>of things. One online review from one woman just went

0:33:16.750 --> 0:33:19.380
<v Speaker 1>viral because she argues that the Instagram Plus is so

0:33:19.450 --> 0:33:22.020
<v Speaker 1>creepy that it makes her want to quit Instagram altogether.

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's something you might not have known about people that

0:33:24.420 --> 0:33:29.100
<v Speaker 1>have Instagram Plus. The main perks involve a Stories feature.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.660
<v Speaker 1>As a Plus subscriber, you make your Stories last two

0:33:32.700 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>days instead of one. Because if you post something on

0:33:35.550 --> 0:33:37.250
<v Speaker 1>your Stories, it stays up for 24 hours and it

0:33:37.270 --> 0:33:41.660
<v Speaker 1>disappears forever. So if you have Instagram Plus, it's two days.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.490
<v Speaker 1>All right, whatever. Okay, yeah. And it also boosts them

0:33:45.650 --> 0:33:48.170
<v Speaker 1>in people's feeds. So they stay up longer, and you're

0:33:48.190 --> 0:33:50.650
<v Speaker 1>going to have more people see them. Here's where it

0:33:50.670 --> 0:33:52.330
<v Speaker 1>gets a little bit creepy and a little bit weird.

0:33:53.850 --> 0:33:56.690
<v Speaker 1>But you can also see when people are viewing them.

0:33:57.510 --> 0:34:00.130
<v Speaker 1>So theoretically, if you look closely enough, if you track

0:34:00.190 --> 0:34:03.950
<v Speaker 1>it closely enough, you could tell if people are re-watching

0:34:03.990 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>your stories over and over. Ooh. And over. So for example,

0:34:08.570 --> 0:34:10.859
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're a gal that, or a guy that

0:34:10.900 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>dabbles with like gym pics or swimsuit pics or, and

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.850
<v Speaker 1>you see, oh my God, I have a coworker that

0:34:17.890 --> 0:34:22.970
<v Speaker 1>has watched this 42 times. So she's saying Instagram plus people,

0:34:23.860 --> 0:34:27.130
<v Speaker 1>would know if friends or neighbors or coworkers are essentially

0:34:27.270 --> 0:34:30.930
<v Speaker 1>creeping out on your stories by rewatching them over and over.

0:34:30.950 --> 0:34:33.220
<v Speaker 1>Because everybody can see if you watch it once with

0:34:33.260 --> 0:34:35.060
<v Speaker 1>a normal thing, you can be like, oh, so-and-so saw

0:34:35.100 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>this post or that post. She's saying you can see

0:34:37.980 --> 0:34:40.820
<v Speaker 1>how many times people are going back to the same picture.

0:34:41.300 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That's creepy. Yeah. It also says, as an Instagram Plus subscriber,

0:34:46.390 --> 0:34:51.650
<v Speaker 1>you can preview other people's stories without your view being logged.

0:34:51.670 --> 0:34:54.310
<v Speaker 1>So it's the exact opposite. So it's essentially, I can

0:34:54.370 --> 0:34:56.589
<v Speaker 1>look at somebody's story over and over and over again,

0:34:56.630 --> 0:34:58.390
<v Speaker 1>and they never know that I look at it once,

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>let alone dozens of times.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 5>That is actually more concerning.

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:07.890
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Instagram Plus, good for stalkers. Exactly. Yeah. I think

0:35:07.910 --> 0:35:09.709
<v Speaker 1>they're both kind of creepy, but you're right. The second

0:35:09.750 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one is, in a lot of ways, a little bit

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.500
<v Speaker 1>even scarier because now you're truly hiding in the weeds

0:35:14.780 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and nobody knows that you're there.

0:35:17.100 --> 0:35:17.700
<v Speaker 5>Me no likey.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.190
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was like early on with Twitter. And I

0:35:21.230 --> 0:35:23.489
<v Speaker 3>think you were in this boat, Corliss. There were a

0:35:23.530 --> 0:35:26.529
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who didn't even, they just had accounts,

0:35:27.310 --> 0:35:28.070
<v Speaker 3>never posted.

0:35:28.610 --> 0:35:31.340
<v Speaker 1>Just read other people's stuff. I did that forever. For years.

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I just read the news and just watched and didn't

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:36.180
<v Speaker 1>engage for years.

0:35:36.300 --> 0:35:38.609
<v Speaker 5>You can do that and not be creepy, though.

0:35:38.620 --> 0:35:41.370
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he was. I was doing it just

0:35:41.430 --> 0:35:43.390
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of sports news and see what my

0:35:43.410 --> 0:35:46.270
<v Speaker 1>friends were posting. That's essentially what I still do. I

0:35:46.739 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>post like twice a year on my account, on Twitter

0:35:49.340 --> 0:35:52.009
<v Speaker 1>at least. So, yeah, there's no way of knowing who

0:35:52.190 --> 0:35:56.250
<v Speaker 1>is and isn't an Instagram Plus subscriber. So regular users

0:35:56.310 --> 0:35:58.810
<v Speaker 1>would not know what their obsession with your stories is

0:35:58.850 --> 0:36:01.310
<v Speaker 1>being shown. So essentially, like, just the fact that you

0:36:01.489 --> 0:36:05.390
<v Speaker 1>are even an Instagram Plus person is also secretive. So

0:36:05.410 --> 0:36:07.330
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of, like, you don't know that somebody

0:36:07.370 --> 0:36:09.509
<v Speaker 1>even has the ability to hide themselves.

0:36:09.930 --> 0:36:13.110
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't show up. Your profile doesn't look any different

0:36:13.210 --> 0:36:16.529
<v Speaker 5>if you're on Plus. Interesting.

0:36:18.350 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Sorry. Somebody just texted us basically saying, well, here, you

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>read it, Marnie. Marnie, you're on it.

0:36:25.060 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 5>Oh.

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.060
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say a member of the Power Trip Morning

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:31.589
<v Speaker 1>Show is not happy that other people might know that

0:36:31.630 --> 0:36:38.010
<v Speaker 1>they are being watched now. Yep. So somebody's Instagram habits

0:36:38.050 --> 0:36:40.609
<v Speaker 1>are going to. Yep, correct. Yeah, the listeners would never

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:45.830
<v Speaker 1>guess who's panicking. All right. Last but not least. We

0:36:45.870 --> 0:36:47.489
<v Speaker 1>all know the dangers of AI. We don't need to

0:36:47.530 --> 0:36:49.230
<v Speaker 1>go down that rabbit hole. But once in a while,

0:36:49.250 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>stories like this pop up, and it's just good to

0:36:51.219 --> 0:36:54.779
<v Speaker 1>remind yourself how weird AI can be. Not that we

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.740
<v Speaker 1>don't know that, but here's a quick little small reminder. Hey, CORE.

0:36:58.780 --> 0:37:04.060
<v Speaker 1>Brian O'Neill. Oh, my God. That's good. It's Tuesday. Hey,

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian O'Neill. Good morning.

0:37:07.219 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Good morning.

0:37:07.700 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>What's up, man?

0:37:08.300 --> 0:37:10.299
<v Speaker 6>Not much.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 5>How are you guys?

0:37:11.260 --> 0:37:13.779
<v Speaker 1>Good. We completely spaced and didn't know that you were

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.460
<v Speaker 1>going to call. That's fantastic.

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.500
<v Speaker 6>And called at eight 40 instead of eight 30 this morning.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right. That's good. Then we still have like five minutes.

0:37:24.060 --> 0:37:25.890
<v Speaker 1>We got plenty of time to get the, the important

0:37:25.910 --> 0:37:27.669
<v Speaker 1>stuff out of the way. You guys are three and Oh,

0:37:28.030 --> 0:37:32.129
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely killing it. The defense is playing lights out. What, what,

0:37:32.290 --> 0:37:34.210
<v Speaker 1>what needs to get better on offense though? You guys

0:37:34.270 --> 0:37:36.589
<v Speaker 1>are winning, but obviously not putting up a lot of yards,

0:37:36.650 --> 0:37:38.350
<v Speaker 1>not putting up a lot of points. What, what needs

0:37:38.370 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to get better against Miami? Yeah, for sure.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.899
<v Speaker 6>I think, uh, we need to start getting a lot

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.090
<v Speaker 6>more yards and points. Um, I think there's been a

0:37:48.910 --> 0:37:53.590
<v Speaker 6>times where there's been nine or 10 out of 11.

0:37:53.190 --> 0:37:54.150
<v Speaker 1>Guys doing their job.

0:37:54.310 --> 0:37:56.910
<v Speaker 6>And then there's, you know, maybe one, everybody's kind of

0:37:56.930 --> 0:37:59.209
<v Speaker 6>taking a turn. And one of the things we talked

0:37:59.250 --> 0:38:00.109
<v Speaker 6>about yesterday is.

0:38:00.250 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>No more taking turns.

0:38:01.989 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Um, it's time for all of us to be completely

0:38:05.820 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 6>dialed in on what the play is, what the defense

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.730
<v Speaker 6>is and what we're trying to do. And, um, you know,

0:38:11.890 --> 0:38:13.230
<v Speaker 6>we got to, we got to hold up our end

0:38:13.250 --> 0:38:14.910
<v Speaker 6>of the bargain because at some point the defense is

0:38:14.930 --> 0:38:17.850
<v Speaker 6>going to need us. And at some point the games

0:38:17.890 --> 0:38:20.750
<v Speaker 6>are going to matter. I mean, they all matter now,

0:38:20.850 --> 0:38:22.870
<v Speaker 6>but you know, the idea is to get to the

0:38:22.950 --> 0:38:25.299
<v Speaker 6>ones that really matter. Whereas when you go home and

0:38:25.340 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 6>you're going to need all three units to be firing

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 6>on all cylinders. So we got some work to do

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 6>and we're, we're, we're working through it this week for sure.

0:38:33.460 --> 0:38:37.300
<v Speaker 3>Hey Brian, how much changes when the best wide receiver

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.900
<v Speaker 3>in the game goes out after a few plays?

0:38:43.219 --> 0:38:46.620
<v Speaker 6>Somebody asked me that yesterday. My answer was, for me,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:51.049
<v Speaker 6>I have no idea in terms of what plays are

0:38:51.070 --> 0:38:58.010
<v Speaker 6>called or what defenses we might get or how coach

0:38:58.090 --> 0:39:01.569
<v Speaker 6>might call the game. The thing I do know is

0:39:01.590 --> 0:39:03.969
<v Speaker 6>that Jordan Addison has to step up big time, and

0:39:04.010 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 6>he did in the game. And then if we're an

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:12.430
<v Speaker 6>11 personnel with three wide receivers– Ty Felton came into

0:39:12.469 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 6>the game and he hasn't played a ton. And the

0:39:15.180 --> 0:39:20.220
<v Speaker 6>communication between those three wide receivers with Jawan Jennings was

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.990
<v Speaker 6>on point and they were dialed in and ready to go.

0:39:24.090 --> 0:39:26.310
<v Speaker 6>And so for a young guy like Ty to not

0:39:26.370 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 6>have many reps uh during a week in practice and

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 6>come in and know his assignment and be able to

0:39:31.620 --> 0:39:35.300
<v Speaker 6>do his job is pretty cool and then i was

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 6>capable of and it was good to see him starting

0:39:37.940 --> 0:39:39.660
<v Speaker 6>to get going a little bit this year because we

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.180
<v Speaker 6>we know how special he is i think you guys

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 6>know how special he is so um it's good to

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 6>see him.

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Getting going Brian, when we as fans look ahead to

0:39:52.230 --> 0:39:55.589
<v Speaker 5>the game against the Dolphins, when we look at the

0:39:55.630 --> 0:40:00.770
<v Speaker 5>Dolphins record and statistics and performance, it's very easy for

0:40:00.890 --> 0:40:03.990
<v Speaker 5>us as fans to go, yeah, this team is terrible.

0:40:05.219 --> 0:40:09.060
<v Speaker 5>It is very dangerous as a player to do that.

0:40:09.739 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 5>And I know you guys are not doing that. But

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:20.620
<v Speaker 5>it might be tempting. How do you, as players, absorb

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:25.140
<v Speaker 5>the numbers, the statistics, whatever, look at film? Because on film,

0:40:25.340 --> 0:40:27.660
<v Speaker 5>you might also go, oh, these guys are not very good.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 5>But you cannot afford to take that attitude into a game.

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:33.620
<v Speaker 5>How do you look at a team that is not

0:40:33.660 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 5>performing well and not take that attitude onto the field

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:37.410
<v Speaker 5>with you?

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think from an offensive perspective, it's pretty easy

0:40:43.540 --> 0:40:49.130
<v Speaker 6>to not have that mindset because we have some of

0:40:49.180 --> 0:40:50.930
<v Speaker 6>our own things we need to fix and get better.

0:40:51.670 --> 0:40:54.669
<v Speaker 6>If we had been putting up 30, 40 points and

0:40:56.690 --> 0:40:58.969
<v Speaker 6>setting records and scoring a whole bunch of points every

0:40:59.010 --> 0:41:04.770
<v Speaker 6>week and lighting up the yardage and the scoreboard, then

0:41:05.750 --> 0:41:08.819
<v Speaker 6>it might be a little bit more difficult, but Um, our,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 6>our offensive play hasn't been up to what the standard

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.660
<v Speaker 6>we hold ourselves to. So there's certainly no, we got

0:41:15.700 --> 0:41:19.420
<v Speaker 6>it figured out, um, attitude on our end from the

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:20.779
<v Speaker 6>offensive side of the ball for sure.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.190
<v Speaker 1>So, um, there, that is.

0:41:23.219 --> 0:41:26.330
<v Speaker 6>Certainly not going to happen with us on offense and knowing,

0:41:26.530 --> 0:41:30.150
<v Speaker 6>knowing flow and knowing, uh, he's playing against the team that, uh,

0:41:30.910 --> 0:41:32.970
<v Speaker 6>He used to coach for, I don't think the defense

0:41:33.010 --> 0:41:35.150
<v Speaker 6>is going to be feeling that way either. I think

0:41:35.170 --> 0:41:38.170
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be plenty of motivation for both, for

0:41:38.210 --> 0:41:42.250
<v Speaker 6>both sides of the ball. And you know, and we'll

0:41:42.290 --> 0:41:44.569
<v Speaker 6>record is going to do we'll record as he always does.

0:41:44.650 --> 0:41:46.610
<v Speaker 6>So I don't think we're going to get much of

0:41:46.650 --> 0:41:48.350
<v Speaker 6>that at all. I don't think we're going to get.

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Any of that.

0:41:48.700 --> 0:41:51.549
<v Speaker 1>Speaker 2, Brian, 30 seconds. You get it all. Give

0:41:51.570 --> 0:41:55.180
<v Speaker 1>me your quick Twitch thoughts on what you learned about

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the JJ McCarthy trade and your thoughts when you first

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:57.660
<v Speaker 1>heard the news.

0:42:00.870 --> 0:42:03.589
<v Speaker 6>You know, part of the business, part of what we

0:42:03.630 --> 0:42:07.190
<v Speaker 6>all sign up for, certainly going to miss the guy.

0:42:07.210 --> 0:42:10.379
<v Speaker 6>He was one of the good guys in the locker room. But,

0:42:10.820 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, this is the life he chose. This is

0:42:13.300 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 6>the life we chose. And life goes on. I was

0:42:16.420 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 6>able to give him a big hug. I thought, you know,

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 6>throughout this whole season, the situation he was put in

0:42:22.860 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 6>or the situation that he was in, he handled it phenomenally.

0:42:28.060 --> 0:42:31.609
<v Speaker 6>He was a great teammate through it all. And he

0:42:31.670 --> 0:42:35.029
<v Speaker 6>had some great examples of different quarterback paths the last

0:42:35.050 --> 0:42:37.270
<v Speaker 6>couple of years. He was in a room with Sam

0:42:37.290 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 6>Darnold for a year. He's had a different journey. Kyler

0:42:39.739 --> 0:42:43.049
<v Speaker 6>Murray's had a different experience around Carson Wentz. He's been

0:42:43.070 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 6>on a bunch of different teams. So he's got some

0:42:45.780 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 6>good real-life examples that he's been able to watch for

0:42:48.100 --> 0:42:50.300
<v Speaker 6>the last year. And he's made of the right stuff.

0:42:50.420 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 6>I think he'll do just fine. And everybody's path is

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.660
<v Speaker 6>not linear. And, you know, obviously it's not ideal. how

0:42:57.739 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 6>it ended for him. And I wish it would have

0:42:59.660 --> 0:43:01.899
<v Speaker 6>gone better, but yeah, that's the world.

0:43:02.140 --> 0:43:04.780
<v Speaker 1>That's, that's what happened, you know? Yeah, for sure. All right, Brian,

0:43:04.820 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>congrats on the three and O star. Let's make it

0:43:06.500 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>four and O on Sunday against the dolphins. We'll talk

0:43:08.300 --> 0:43:10.779
<v Speaker 1>to you next Tuesday. Best of luck, buddy. Thanks, man.

0:43:12.469 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good, guys.

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:13.549
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

0:43:14.270 --> 0:43:17.870
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to mesh, Besher and Spence. Nine to noon

0:43:18.150 --> 0:43:21.570
<v Speaker 1>is next. We power to morning show returns five 30

0:43:21.570 --> 0:43:23.070
<v Speaker 1>to nine tomorrow. Marnie. See you Friday.

0:43:23.090 --> 0:43:24.370
<v Speaker 5>See you Friday.

0:43:24.390 --> 0:43:24.529
<v Speaker 1>Bye.

0:43:26.090 --> 0:43:28.710
<v Speaker 4>To listen back to today's Power Trip Morning Show or

0:43:28.730 --> 0:43:31.940
<v Speaker 4>to hear previous shows, podcast us on the iHeartRadio app

0:43:32.540 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 4>or KFAN.com.

0:43:35.020 --> 0:43:39.460
<v Speaker 1>From the 1-800-ASK-GARY Traffic Center, this report is sponsored by

0:43:39.540 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Choice Bank.

0:43:40.500 --> 0:43:40.950
<v Speaker 5>Good morning.

0:43:41.090 --> 0:43:44.450
<v Speaker 6>We have delays on the crosstown eastbound from Gleason to

0:43:44.510 --> 0:43:45.129
<v Speaker 6>Valley View.