WEBVTT - Eric Conroy for Congress 

0:00:00.350 --> 0:00:02.670
<v Speaker 1>Voting and if you haven't done so already it's all

0:00:02.690 --> 0:00:05.029
<v Speaker 1>about the numbers everybody's saying it i think it's an

0:00:05.150 --> 0:00:07.610
<v Speaker 1>obvious thing doesn't take much to realize our country is

0:00:07.670 --> 0:00:10.890
<v Speaker 1>on the brink of maybe going on full socialist and

0:00:10.950 --> 0:00:12.650
<v Speaker 1>part of the help will come from greg landsman if

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he's uh elected and what we have a better choice

0:00:15.380 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>here in eric conroy who is not woke and dsa

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>member eric conroy for congress's website ericconroy.com welcome back eric

0:00:22.540 --> 0:00:24.810
<v Speaker 1>it's really good to have you on Hey.

0:00:24.890 --> 0:00:27.610
<v Speaker 2>Brian, good morning. Thanks for having me. And as you mentioned,

0:00:27.790 --> 0:00:30.810
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow is a huge day. It's Election Day here in

0:00:30.850 --> 0:00:33.310
<v Speaker 2>the tri-state. And here in Ohio, we've got several big

0:00:33.350 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>races on the ballot. We, of course, have the governor

0:00:35.659 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and the Senate races and my congressional race as well.

0:00:38.820 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So Ohioans and particularly Cincinnatians really have an opportunity here

0:00:42.659 --> 0:00:45.460
<v Speaker 2>to put Ohio on the right track for hopefully the

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:46.260
<v Speaker 2>next decade or so.

0:00:46.650 --> 0:00:49.130
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I mean, it is Election Day tomorrow, and

0:00:49.170 --> 0:00:51.270
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the integrity of the election. I think

0:00:51.530 --> 0:00:56.310
<v Speaker 1>Greg Lansman already came out against the SAVE Act. He

0:00:56.330 --> 0:01:00.770
<v Speaker 1>also apparently opposed requirements involving proof of citizen for federal elections,

0:01:00.850 --> 0:01:04.729
<v Speaker 1>even though that's the law. And I don't believe you

0:01:05.630 --> 0:01:07.649
<v Speaker 1>follow that. You're a fan of the SAVE Act. You're

0:01:07.670 --> 0:01:09.390
<v Speaker 1>a fan of the integrity of the elections. Getting a

0:01:09.410 --> 0:01:11.310
<v Speaker 1>photo ID is not that much of an ask, and

0:01:11.330 --> 0:01:12.610
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone agrees with that.

0:01:13.810 --> 0:01:17.670
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. And this is increasingly becoming a bipartisan issue. It's

0:01:17.730 --> 0:01:20.940
<v Speaker 2>actually over 80 percent of Americans believe you should show

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.459
<v Speaker 2>ID or proof of citizenship to vote. And we need

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that our systems are secure and they're

0:01:26.540 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>coming up with the right results based on who should

0:01:28.700 --> 0:01:30.900
<v Speaker 2>be voting. And I think this year will be a

0:01:30.940 --> 0:01:34.300
<v Speaker 2>big year. And what we've seen really with turnout so

0:01:34.340 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>far across at least the first congressional district is this

0:01:37.260 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>is a very high turnout rate. from both sides this year.

0:01:41.060 --> 0:01:44.220
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully we get a few more Republican votes, but in general,

0:01:44.260 --> 0:01:46.330
<v Speaker 2>it's a very high turnout from both sides that we've

0:01:46.340 --> 0:01:46.980
<v Speaker 2>seen so far.

0:01:47.330 --> 0:01:49.750
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm sure you probably got the news over the weekend.

0:01:49.790 --> 0:01:52.730
<v Speaker 1>We had a terrific amount of violence in downtown. People shot,

0:01:52.790 --> 0:01:55.650
<v Speaker 1>people killed. We had a riot on Short Vine that

0:01:55.690 --> 0:01:59.250
<v Speaker 1>spilled out. Police officers were beaten up. It's on video.

0:01:59.310 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just hard to believe, although it wasn't reported by

0:02:01.940 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>local media. Had Signal 99 on earlier talking about that.

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But putting aside, I know Greg Lansman, not really tough

0:02:07.540 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on crime. I know he At least I recall him

0:02:09.940 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>supporting efforts to defund the police while he was on

0:02:12.190 --> 0:02:14.610
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Council as a member of the Gang of Five,

0:02:14.650 --> 0:02:18.690
<v Speaker 1>I'll interject, plus supported ending cash bail. Those are problems

0:02:18.730 --> 0:02:21.950
<v Speaker 1>we have in Hamilton County. Your take on that, Eric Conroy?

0:02:22.070 --> 0:02:25.020
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these are huge problems. And look, I'm a proud

0:02:25.060 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>downtown resident myself. I live actually right around the corner

0:02:28.380 --> 0:02:31.550
<v Speaker 2>from where the brawl happened yesterday. down here last summer.

0:02:31.650 --> 0:02:33.570
<v Speaker 2>And we have a crime problem. And I saw the

0:02:34.250 --> 0:02:37.290
<v Speaker 2>horrific clip this morning of the police officers assaulted up

0:02:38.190 --> 0:02:40.430
<v Speaker 2>on Short Vine. And this is a problem. And we

0:02:40.470 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>need to get a handle on this. And as you mentioned,

0:02:42.900 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 2>my opponent, Greg Lansman, was a part of the defund

0:02:45.060 --> 0:02:48.339
<v Speaker 2>the police crowds, crowding his younger days in city council,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.500
<v Speaker 2>and also voted no on DHS funding. And I really

0:02:51.620 --> 0:02:55.660
<v Speaker 2>want a Cincinnati where people feel comfortable walking from Finley

0:02:55.700 --> 0:02:59.090
<v Speaker 2>Market to Great American Ballpark at 11 o'clock at night.

0:02:59.190 --> 0:03:02.790
<v Speaker 2>And until we achieve that, we simply aren't doing it right.

0:03:02.930 --> 0:03:05.230
<v Speaker 2>So it's time to get back to the basics. We

0:03:05.250 --> 0:03:07.790
<v Speaker 2>need to staff CPD appropriately. We need to get them

0:03:07.810 --> 0:03:10.299
<v Speaker 2>the resources and the training they need and make our

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>city safer.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't understand his voting against the Department of

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.730
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security funding. Was he hoping to completely end ICE?

0:03:18.830 --> 0:03:21.549
<v Speaker 1>As an entity, someone has got to enforce federal law. Now,

0:03:21.590 --> 0:03:24.260
<v Speaker 1>he can advocate for changing federal law, but these are

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.260
<v Speaker 1>the laws on the book, and this administration is at

0:03:26.300 --> 0:03:30.459
<v Speaker 1>least working to uphold the laws. So he's no interest

0:03:30.500 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in enforcing the laws, apparently.

0:03:31.780 --> 0:03:35.830
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you're seeing a Democratic Party, including Greg Lansman,

0:03:35.870 --> 0:03:38.790
<v Speaker 2>who's moving further and further to the left. I saw

0:03:38.810 --> 0:03:43.940
<v Speaker 2>a poll. Earlier this summer, that's 60% of Democrats now

0:03:44.020 --> 0:03:48.430
<v Speaker 2>view socialism favorably. So even if your quote unquote favorite

0:03:48.490 --> 0:03:51.650
<v Speaker 2>Democrat is a moderate or you consider them a moderate,

0:03:52.260 --> 0:03:54.220
<v Speaker 2>They're now a vote for the far left because that

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.090
<v Speaker 2>whole party is going to vote together. And a vote

0:03:56.100 --> 0:03:59.790
<v Speaker 2>for Greg Lansman is a vote for a Hakeem Jeffries-led

0:04:00.170 --> 0:04:03.530
<v Speaker 2>House of Representatives. Brian, can you imagine Hakeem Jeffries as

0:04:03.610 --> 0:04:06.850
<v Speaker 2>Speaker of the House with now a radical left element

0:04:07.010 --> 0:04:09.830
<v Speaker 2>of that party? It would be absolutely insane for the

0:04:09.870 --> 0:04:11.410
<v Speaker 2>next two years and beyond.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.380
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't agree with you more on that. But then again,

0:04:14.420 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you have my vote, Eric. I sure hope so. All right. Well,

0:04:20.540 --> 0:04:24.700
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, again, dwelling on Greg, gang of five landsmen,

0:04:24.779 --> 0:04:26.820
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he did violate the laws when he was

0:04:26.860 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>council member. I wish people would keep that in the

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>forefront of their mind. It's a monster of the man's character,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.290
<v Speaker 1>I would argue. But what about the stock transactions? A

0:04:34.310 --> 0:04:38.390
<v Speaker 1>lot of swirling concerns, them engaging in perhaps some questionable

0:04:38.450 --> 0:04:41.529
<v Speaker 1>stock trading, maybe unethical. What's your take on that, Eric Conroy?

0:04:42.430 --> 0:04:44.669
<v Speaker 2>There's more than a few, Brian. As you mentioned, not

0:04:44.730 --> 0:04:47.410
<v Speaker 2>only did he have the Gang of Five incident during

0:04:47.430 --> 0:04:50.950
<v Speaker 2>his time on city council, but those unethical ways have

0:04:51.010 --> 0:04:55.060
<v Speaker 2>followed him to D.C. He broke the Stock Act in 2025,

0:04:55.060 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 2>which is a federal law against insider trading, and then

0:04:59.180 --> 0:05:00.900
<v Speaker 2>went back and tried to cover it up. He went

0:05:00.940 --> 0:05:04.810
<v Speaker 2>back and rewrote three years' worth of financial disclosures. covering

0:05:04.830 --> 0:05:08.310
<v Speaker 2>up dozens of trades, totaling over a million dollars. His

0:05:08.370 --> 0:05:12.150
<v Speaker 2>net worth has literally tripled, tripled in less than four

0:05:12.210 --> 0:05:16.130
<v Speaker 2>years in DC. And now I saw last week, there's

0:05:16.190 --> 0:05:18.170
<v Speaker 2>even another report out there that some of that money

0:05:18.210 --> 0:05:22.110
<v Speaker 2>that he earned in the markets was through Chinese military companies.

0:05:22.970 --> 0:05:26.590
<v Speaker 2>So this is simply a guy who doesn't only not

0:05:26.630 --> 0:05:29.570
<v Speaker 2>share our values here in Southwest Ohio, but is there

0:05:29.610 --> 0:05:31.630
<v Speaker 2>for the wrong reasons. And we need to get people

0:05:31.670 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>there for the right reasons who actually want to serve

0:05:34.420 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>this community.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.550
<v Speaker 1>Well, another issue that is bizarre from my perspective, that

0:05:38.570 --> 0:05:40.530
<v Speaker 1>we even have a conversation in this nation, but I

0:05:40.550 --> 0:05:42.710
<v Speaker 1>know you and Greg Lansman are on different sides of

0:05:42.750 --> 0:05:45.990
<v Speaker 1>the equation of protecting women's sports. Um, there's quite a few, uh,

0:05:46.370 --> 0:05:52.210
<v Speaker 1>States voting on transgender questions. I know Washington state, Colorado, Arizona, Nebraska,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.420
<v Speaker 1>all are, have all have ballot initiatives on to prevent

0:05:55.460 --> 0:05:59.870
<v Speaker 1>this type of mutilation, transgender surgeries, et cetera. Um, I

0:05:59.910 --> 0:06:02.230
<v Speaker 1>guess Greg Lansman's on the left side of that argument

0:06:02.310 --> 0:06:03.289
<v Speaker 1>as well, Eric Conroy.

0:06:04.310 --> 0:06:07.070
<v Speaker 2>He is, and he's voted in favor of those initiatives

0:06:07.150 --> 0:06:09.790
<v Speaker 2>as well. And we need to get back to common

0:06:09.830 --> 0:06:13.690
<v Speaker 2>sense values, common sense conservative values here in Southwest Ohio.

0:06:13.770 --> 0:06:16.550
<v Speaker 2>And Greg Lansman is a guy who supports men and

0:06:16.589 --> 0:06:19.620
<v Speaker 2>women's sports and sex changes for kids. And this is

0:06:19.630 --> 0:06:21.380
<v Speaker 2>just not what we need right now. We need to

0:06:21.420 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 2>get back to the basics of focusing on people's pocketbooks

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.300
<v Speaker 2>and what matters to them on a day-to-day basis. and

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.060
<v Speaker 2>not focusing on some of these issues that affect less

0:06:31.100 --> 0:06:33.659
<v Speaker 2>than one half of 1% of the population. And I

0:06:33.700 --> 0:06:36.350
<v Speaker 2>really want to focus on some of these bigger picture

0:06:36.380 --> 0:06:40.469
<v Speaker 2>issues like the economy, like crime, and like education. And unfortunately,

0:06:40.510 --> 0:06:44.230
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats keep pushing these other agenda issues because they

0:06:44.270 --> 0:06:47.170
<v Speaker 2>have no real ideas of their own on the real issues.

0:06:47.870 --> 0:06:51.750
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned education, one of my favorite topics to talk about.

0:06:51.770 --> 0:06:53.990
<v Speaker 1>I can't let it go by without doubling down on it.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.700
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the idea of choice in education. Seems

0:06:56.730 --> 0:06:58.969
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the few things that Democrats don't like.

0:06:59.010 --> 0:07:00.750
<v Speaker 1>They like choice when it comes to whether your baby

0:07:00.790 --> 0:07:02.510
<v Speaker 1>dies or not. But in terms of whether your own

0:07:02.589 --> 0:07:04.530
<v Speaker 1>live children go to a school that you want them

0:07:04.570 --> 0:07:06.310
<v Speaker 1>to go to versus the one they want to force

0:07:06.330 --> 0:07:08.690
<v Speaker 1>you to go to, there's no choice in that. They're

0:07:08.730 --> 0:07:11.010
<v Speaker 1>wed to the teachers' union, which are entities that are

0:07:11.030 --> 0:07:16.510
<v Speaker 1>designed to protect the teachers, not the children. So you

0:07:16.630 --> 0:07:17.450
<v Speaker 1>on education.

0:07:18.940 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>A couple of things. One, I think the Department of

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.660
<v Speaker 2>Education is too big and we need to consider downsizing it.

0:07:24.700 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a sad day. when we have a

0:07:26.900 --> 0:07:30.620
<v Speaker 2>large federal bureaucracy and bureaucrats in D.C. who are making $ 160,

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.830
<v Speaker 2>$ 170 a year, and our teachers back here in the

0:07:34.870 --> 0:07:37.750
<v Speaker 2>tri-state are making $ 30, 000 and $ 40, 000 a year. So I'm

0:07:37.830 --> 0:07:40.210
<v Speaker 2>a big fan of putting a lot of these resources

0:07:40.850 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>back at the local level in the hands of parents

0:07:43.060 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>and teachers who, frankly, know how to use it a

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>lot more efficiently than the federal government. And then secondly,

0:07:49.140 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 2>I've I've talked quite a bit about trade schools here

0:07:52.460 --> 0:07:56.620
<v Speaker 2>on the campaign trail and advocating to them to high schoolers.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.460
<v Speaker 2>And we all have a lot of friends who maybe

0:08:00.490 --> 0:08:01.990
<v Speaker 2>we went to high school with. I know I did

0:08:02.050 --> 0:08:04.730
<v Speaker 2>on the West side. Instead of going through the typical

0:08:04.810 --> 0:08:08.230
<v Speaker 2>four-year college program, they went into the trades and they

0:08:08.270 --> 0:08:10.610
<v Speaker 2>got educated in the trades. They learned a skill set.

0:08:11.030 --> 0:08:13.310
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they started their own practice. And by the time

0:08:13.330 --> 0:08:16.590
<v Speaker 2>they were 30, they were millionaires because they've took the

0:08:16.750 --> 0:08:21.460
<v Speaker 2>electrician's trade or the plumbing trade and just ran with it.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>And I even got to tour a defense company here

0:08:24.900 --> 0:08:27.420
<v Speaker 2>on the east side this week, and they make specialized

0:08:27.500 --> 0:08:30.810
<v Speaker 2>gears for Navy ships. And I was talking to some

0:08:30.830 --> 0:08:33.050
<v Speaker 2>of their workers and their leadership, and they can't get

0:08:33.130 --> 0:08:37.650
<v Speaker 2>enough qualified machinists to make these very specialized gears for

0:08:37.690 --> 0:08:42.190
<v Speaker 2>Navy ships. I'm thinking, wow, this is a great opportunity

0:08:42.230 --> 0:08:44.689
<v Speaker 2>for young people to have a skill, to have a trade,

0:08:45.090 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 2>and have very successful careers and happy lives. A lot

0:08:50.340 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>of these trade positions are not going to get automated

0:08:52.820 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>by AI anytime soon, like some of these entry-level white-collar

0:08:56.900 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 2>jobs as well. I'm a huge advocate for trade schools

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:00.740
<v Speaker 2>in the region.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Eric Conroy, we'll take a quick break. Bringing back is

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.540
<v Speaker 1>one of the most prominent issues swirling around right now, AI.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.059
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it will be regulated on a federal level.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The question is to what degree, but that's a lot

0:09:10.020 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of where these trade jobs are coming from. We'll let

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:18.179
<v Speaker 1>you comment on AI as we... KRC, the talk station. K52, KRC,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.580
<v Speaker 1>the talk station. I'm Thomas with Eric Conroy. You got

0:09:21.620 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a choice, Conroy or Lansman. And you mentioned the Department

0:09:24.470 --> 0:09:25.870
<v Speaker 1>of Education salaries. You mentioned $ 175, 000.

0:09:25.730 --> 0:09:25.870
<v Speaker 2>Chris.

0:09:27.990 --> 0:09:29.770
<v Speaker 1>Eric, I got to tell you, Joe just reminded me,

0:09:29.790 --> 0:09:31.929
<v Speaker 1>I have an entire list here. Sensei Public Schools is

0:09:31.950 --> 0:09:36.750
<v Speaker 1>looking for a levy. They have 12 employees, 12, that

0:09:36.790 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>make more than $ 175, 000, one of which actually makes $ 272, 000,

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.140
<v Speaker 1>almost $ 273, 000. So I had to get that out just

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>so my listeners know. But over to artificial intelligence, I

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>think everyone can agree there's going to be some sort

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.949
<v Speaker 1>of federal regulation, probably if for no other reason than

0:09:52.970 --> 0:09:56.740
<v Speaker 1>to rein in the disparate state regulations that are going in.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.420
<v Speaker 1>I think by you know federalizing and claiming commerce clause

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.660
<v Speaker 1>uh they'll be able to you know trump whatever state

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.100
<v Speaker 1>laws exist if you are a part of ai regulation

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.700
<v Speaker 1>process eric conroy where are you on this are you

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.490
<v Speaker 1>a stop dead in its tracks bernie sanders position or

0:10:10.550 --> 0:10:12.650
<v Speaker 1>are you a let a complete market force kind of

0:10:12.670 --> 0:10:15.250
<v Speaker 1>thing go out there and what do you think eric.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, firstly, I think a lot of folks will agree

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that AI in itself is extremely impressive. And to me,

0:10:23.710 --> 0:10:26.590
<v Speaker 2>this debate kind of reminds me of the debate for

0:10:26.610 --> 0:10:29.810
<v Speaker 2>the Internet and regulation for the Internet 20 and 30

0:10:29.809 --> 0:10:32.969
<v Speaker 2>years ago. If you're going to have regulations for a

0:10:33.030 --> 0:10:36.750
<v Speaker 2>technology that clearly goes across state lines, then you're probably

0:10:36.770 --> 0:10:39.770
<v Speaker 2>going to need some kind of federal guidance. When we

0:10:39.809 --> 0:10:42.590
<v Speaker 2>have the Internet, there's nothing stopping it from going from

0:10:42.670 --> 0:10:46.220
<v Speaker 2>Ohio to California. So AI, I think it would be

0:10:46.250 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 2>a similar concept if we're talking about regulation. I don't

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.859
<v Speaker 2>like to use the term regulation. What I like to

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.940
<v Speaker 2>use is the term guardrails, because I think what we

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>have is terrific. And the amount of opportunities for advances

0:10:59.660 --> 0:11:02.980
<v Speaker 2>in things like medicine is terrific. At the same time, though,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.540
<v Speaker 2>we need to make sure we're protecting people's privacy, protecting

0:11:05.610 --> 0:11:09.739
<v Speaker 2>our kids. and hopefully limiting the disruption in jobs and

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.250
<v Speaker 2>the economy in the near term as well. So I

0:11:12.330 --> 0:11:15.209
<v Speaker 2>am a fan of looking at industry by industry and

0:11:15.230 --> 0:11:18.709
<v Speaker 2>just seeing in general if there's some guardrails that might

0:11:18.750 --> 0:11:21.550
<v Speaker 2>be appropriate as we adapt this new technology.

0:11:22.150 --> 0:11:25.970
<v Speaker 1>EricConroy.com. Check out where he is on all the issues.

0:11:26.050 --> 0:11:30.490
<v Speaker 1>And I'm certainly satisfied myself, Eric, and demonstrably better candidate

0:11:30.510 --> 0:11:32.970
<v Speaker 1>for a multitude of reasons than Greg Lansman. I really,

0:11:33.010 --> 0:11:35.090
<v Speaker 1>truly hope you win tomorrow. We'll keep our fingers crossed

0:11:35.130 --> 0:11:37.890
<v Speaker 1>and prayers going your direction and Remind my listeners, get

0:11:37.950 --> 0:11:38.470
<v Speaker 1>out and vote.

0:11:38.690 --> 0:11:42.459
<v Speaker 2>Eric? Yeah, Brian, thank you again for having me. This

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 2>race is going to come down to the wire tomorrow,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>probably late into the night. We're in a margin of

0:11:48.140 --> 0:11:49.980
<v Speaker 2>error race in the polls, and we need everyone to

0:11:50.020 --> 0:11:51.940
<v Speaker 2>get out there and vote. The early vote has been

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>looking pretty good. for Republicans in this district, but we

0:11:55.980 --> 0:11:58.750
<v Speaker 2>need to push it through the finish line tomorrow. So everyone,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.150
<v Speaker 2>please get out there and vote. We had the Speaker

0:12:01.170 --> 0:12:03.350
<v Speaker 2>of the House in town last week promoting the race

0:12:03.390 --> 0:12:06.070
<v Speaker 2>as well. So this is still a top 10 race

0:12:06.110 --> 0:12:08.980
<v Speaker 2>in the country this year, but it's your decision. So

0:12:09.020 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>everyone get out and vote. Take your friends, take five

0:12:11.780 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 2>of their friends, and let's get this thing done.