WEBVTT - 1-3-26 Ken Broo

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Now your host Ken Brown on News radio seven hundred WLW.

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>There you murd it an extraction from Venezuela overnight. As

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>our Gary Jeff Walker said this morning, in this week

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of transfer portals in college football, Nicholas Medoro and his

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>wife have entered the transfer portal and they have a

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>visit in New York this week in front of a

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>in front of a jury, in front of a judge

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>on indictment charges. The legalities of all this are interesting.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>The political ramification of what has occurred is interesting. And

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>apparently now the United States is running Venezuela. I don't

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>know where to begin on this one other than the

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 2>guy was a thug and I'm glad he's gone by

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>hooker by crook.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>But on the other.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Standpoint, you're going to probably see a lot of legal

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>hoops that the United States is going to have to

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>jump through, and the howling on the left has already begun.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Things are getting crazy, And when things get crazy politically,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring in doctor bo Cabala. He is

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the tall estate professor of law and doctor how are

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>you on this glorious Saturday?

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Doing great?

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, ken Ye talk about an extraordinary day.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm saying I was enraptured by the whole extra

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>extraction of these two people. And then out of the blues,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump says, and we're going to be running Venezuela.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 3>How does that work? How can he do that well?

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 5>Direct?

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 4>And to the point of course Vice President now has

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>already been sworn in, and the noble laureate in Venezuela,

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Maria Machado, has expressed tremendous hope. So you know, I

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>think in the interim, to ensure an orderly transition of power,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 4>the US will be will be running things. I didn't

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 4>take that to be a sort of long term declaration

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 4>of conquest by any means.

0:01:59.720 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.639
<v Speaker 2>And he re sizes or will re seize the oil

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>operations in Venezuela, which we're taken.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I think this hasn't been pointed out yet.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Those oil operations were taken over by Hugo Chavez and

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>his protogy. Now Maduro, they seize those operations from American

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>oil companies. I think one company gave it back with

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>under the point of a gun saying you're either going

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 2>to give it to us or we're going to kill you. Yeah.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>So those are rightfully possessions of the major oil companies

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of the United States, which the United States government helped

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>fund all those years ago, twenty five years ago. So

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>that should not be murky ground, should it.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, it should not. You're talking about expropriation which also

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 4>detrimentally impacted, you know, the people of Venezuela when the

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 4>socialist inspired party of both Chaves and Maduro did that.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 4>So no, that's an absolutely fair point, you know, to me.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Ken to the extent that people are going to trying

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 4>to make hay out of this, it'll have to do

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.279
<v Speaker 4>with the UN Charter, uh and talking about state sovereignty.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 4>But I would say remember at that point, even the

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>UN Charter, the way it sort of sets up state sovereignty,

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 4>says states can do this when it's a question of

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>self defense. And I don't think there's too many questions

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>about just the amount of drugs that were being funneled

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 4>into the US, uh, you know, by this narco terrorist regime.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>So I agree with you. The point about the oil

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 4>companies and the broader point about you know, America defending

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 4>itself all relevant.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I would think, Yeah, the the old f A f

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>O applies here, I mean Trump, Trump was blowing up,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>blowing up these drug boats, and it was like a warning,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, you better stop, you better stop. And he

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>gave the guy several off ramps that he just chose

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>not to get the off ramp. Now, doctor, this is

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a exactly this exactly this is this is something else

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>that I think will be of interest. You can get

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>a judge to you anything in the United States, and

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that there are groups right now assembling judge

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>shopping to get this case in front of that judge

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>or having it challenged in the Southern District of New

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>York to try it, if nothing else in Barris Trump.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 2>But my question to you politically is why would the

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Democrats embrace a guy like Maduro? What would the pushback

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>be on Trump for this? Knowing full well that we

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>have a margarita sipping senator from Maryland that already has

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>cozied up to an MS thirteen gang member, what would

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the point be of the Democrats trying to push back

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>on this?

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, and I.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Agree with you, and just like you know, those optics

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you know of sipping the margarita were incomprehensible to me,

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I would think this is incomprehensible as well. You've got,

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, clearly a dictator who is not there legitimately,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 4>who's pu untold numbers of Americans responsible for.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Death and destruction.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it possible that there are some people who are

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 4>sincerely objecting based on process?

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'm open.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 4>I work with people of different persuasions at a university.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I'm open to that.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 5>But I agree with you.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's most of the activists right now

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 4>who will be judge shopping. I think that's an attempt

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>to make political hay out of this, and to the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 4>extent that it's you know, Judge Alvin Hellerstein there on

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 4>the US District Court who is presiding. I don't know

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 4>that there's going to be a lot of judge shopping

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 4>to do based on what I know of his record.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, well there should not be. But I think

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>my point of finding a judge to take any case,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>because the judge is an activist judge and he aligns

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>himself with whatever wacko ideologically ideology that he embraces, I

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>think it could. I mean, the possibility of this thing

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 2>getting derailed between now and when and if it goes

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to trialle I think is remote. I think you're right,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 2>but you know, there's always hope out there.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just here's the other thing I was wondering about

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>when I watched this today. This seemed to be a full,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>full pronged event. Here you had Rubio, you had hag Seth, obviously,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you had the President. BONDI wasn't there, and I honestly

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>think that was a good thing. And then and then

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 2>you you also had the DEA, which actually carried out

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the arrest. So this wasn't you know, Trump sending in

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the seal team and saying, all right, get this guy

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>out of here. This was this was an entire government

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 2>effort here.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 3>No, that's right.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 4>And in terms of the intense phase of the extraction,

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, which took thirty five minutes, I think delta

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 4>forces were in play there. But I agree with you

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the justification I'm seeing at this point

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 4>for you know, why the US military had to be

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 4>involved protecting law enforcements absolutely, you know, seeing this as

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>a US criminal law matter essential. I absolutely agree with

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 4>you on that.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in his news conference, the President fired yet

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>another warning shot across the bow of the Columbian president.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>We already know that the Mexican president. She president of Mexico,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>she is. She's all up in arms about this thing

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>because Trump obviously knows. And in Mexico the cartels pretty

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>much run that country too.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Does this bring these these other people back to heal

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>or do you think that they're just going to go

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>merrily along? You know, it's kind of like doctor, It's

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, you know, you do your taxes. I

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>do my taxes, but if the guy across the street

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 2>from you gets audited by the IRS, we do our

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 2>taxes extra best. You know, we were really we're really

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>got to rye on the ball if that happens. What

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>do you think happens here with these other South American

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>countries that are, if not as complicit as Venezuela are,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly they certainly have their hands dirty in cartel business.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:07:59.559
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think the world is watching. And whether you're

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 4>talking about the Colombian president Gustavo Petro or you mentioned,

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, President Shinbaum in Mexico. It never ceases to

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>amaze me ken that the same folks who want to

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 4>talk about how interconnected of a world we live in,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 4>how globalized. It is, you know, pivot back at times

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 4>to emphasizing that we're all separate, disconnected nations.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 5>We are not.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 4>And so, you know, is Iran watching as well?

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 5>I think so.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 4>There to the extent that there's contested questions, you know,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 4>can something be done or not? Technically, I think the

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration showed there's no question that they can pull

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 4>this kind of operation off. I mean, compare it even

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 4>to what we did in Panama. You had twenty four

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 4>American casualties. No American casualties here, No Venezuelan casualties that

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 4>I saw.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 5>So my thought is, you bet.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Watching and people respond to incentives.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 5>So I agree with that.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't agree more.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you watch what happened in in Uh in

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Iran this this summer when Yeh Bomber's basically, if not

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>blew up, they certainly greatly curtailed Iran's nuclear capability.

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>And I watched that.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I watched what happened during Iran and for for all

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>intents purposes, I'm sorry Israel, and for all intents and

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>purposes Iran and Gaza, I'm watching that. And then I

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>watched this, and it just leads me to wonder how

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 2>could the previous administration be so neutered when it came

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to international affairs. I I just, I just it' it's

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 2>it's astounding. Tony Blincoln could not have pulled this off.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Certainly Joe Biden could not have pulled this off. I'm

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>just wondering how neutered was that that that particular regime

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>in your opinion, uh, the last Biden administration.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, and certainly on top of what you mentioned the

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>treatment of Iran in terms of I mean, I think

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 4>it was actual, you know, cash payouts to go along

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 4>with the nuclear deal. The contrast could not be more stark,

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 4>and I think we can say so in fairness to

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, professionals across different administrations.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 3>There was a previous.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Attempt to remove Maduro. And you know it's not clear

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 4>the extent to which the Trump administration was involved the

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 4>private contractors in twenty twenties. So if we want to

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 4>be entirely fair, sure, you know, no administration is perfect,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 4>but yes, overall the Biden administration allowing the invasion of

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine to happen on their watch. I mean I was

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 4>reading a report and I think it was blinkin even

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Tony Blinken, saying, as much as he disagrees on process

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>grounds with how Trump operates, how the president does things,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 4>he wished is that he had the contacts and just

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 4>the ability to pull things off at that speed. So

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 4>I agree, it's not just a different vibe. I think

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>it's a different way of seeing the world. It's a

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 4>different philosophy and and and I think it has.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Very deep roots.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, doctor Cabala, we appreciate your rocket and rolling with

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>us today. It's been an eventful last ten hours or so.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how this plays out with the American population.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what the political wins look like in the

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 2>wake of this. But I would think so far, so good. Listen, well,

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>we can do this more in depth. I'll ring you

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>up this week and then we'll try and do it

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>more in depth at some point then, Will that be

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>all right with you?

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I would truly look forward to And I was just

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 4>going to say quickly, the way that these strikes are

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 4>carried out, and then it appears Trump doesn't fall for

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 4>the temptation of nation building. You know plenty to talk

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 4>about there, but certainly I'd be delighted. And like you said,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 4>so far, so good. And just a historic day.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>It seems like, well, you know what, you and I

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>could maybe be vacationing together in Venezuela next year. Right,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>he may turn it into another beachfront property. We could

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>all go down there and surf. Of course we'd have

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to find the beach front. But nevertheless, that could be

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.119
<v Speaker 2>what's on on the board next.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Or Gaza if things go at this threat who knows,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 4>who knows?

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 3>Gaza?

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Trump, Plaza Gazza. All right, doctor, thanks for tom.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Have a nice one, doctor Bocabala, Tarland State University, Professor

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of Law. Wow Wow, Wow, twelve fifty six on this Saturday,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>news radio seven hundred WLW.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Now your host Ken Brew on news radio seven hundred

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>wl W.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>It's what on nine and we're counting down to UC

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>basketball at the bottom of the hour. You see against Houston.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Houston is Houston is very good.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, we'll see how it plays out.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Dan Horde and Terry Nelson and Moeger with all the

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>coverage from fifth Third Arena tomorrow. It's the Browns and

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals. That's how the twenty twenty five now into

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six. That's how the twenty twenty five season ends,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 2>same way as it began. Brown's and Bengals up in

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland in Week one. And here we go today, the

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 2>day before the Browns and Bengals meet at pay Course

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Stadium tomorrow. The Browns of four and twelve, they seem

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a team adrift and possibly on the verge

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of a major shakeup. Yet again, inside that team, it's

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 2>amazing how instability leads to just lousy records. And I

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.479
<v Speaker 2>suppose if there's one criticism of Mike Brown that resounds

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>more than anything is that he is too patient. But

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing in Cleveland what lack of patients is over

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the course of the last twenty five years. And so

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>here come the Browns with Shador Sanders's quarterback, with Jerry

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>as their number one wide receiver. Think about that for

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>a second. Here come the Browns who traded Joe Flacco

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>inside the division to the Bengals in the middle of

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the season. And here come the Bengals who are trying

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to finish the season at seven to ten. If you

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>think it's been bad down here this year, it has

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 2>been a circus in Cleveland once again, and when it

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>comes to circuses standing by to join us as a

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>man who covers the Browns for Theathletic dot Com. And

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I've said this many times and I'm going to say

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>it again. The best investment you can make in sports

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>journalism is the Athletic. There are no junk ads, no

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>roll up videos, just good solid sports journalism. And somebody

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>who is a part of that is Zach Jackson, beat

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>writer Cleveland Brown. Zach, how are you on this glorious

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>day before.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 5>The game when I'm with you? Because you and my

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 5>mom are my fan club, I'm always good. It's been

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 5>a long season since Week one deeps first tangled.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>As you guys know, is it fair to say this

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 2>season didn't go as planned for either team?

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's pretty much fair to say.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, certainly for the Bengals. You know, the Browns had weird,

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 5>mixed expectations that certainly weren't as high as the other teams.

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 5>But they did have a defense that's, you know, elite.

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I hate to throw that word around, but I think

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>it's fair to say it's Penny Lee. But yeah, the

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 5>quarterback thing has been a mess. You know, they come

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 5>into Sunday and out of Sunday with uncertainty around almost

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 5>every level of the franchise, you know, not just the

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 5>normal roster thing, and you know, it's it's been disappointing,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 5>sure because they this is a team that could be better,

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 5>right like this is this is the franchise isn't a

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 5>bad spot. But nobody looked at the product on the

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 5>field and said this is as bad as the Jets

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 5>and the Raiders. You know, so we'll see. I mean, now,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 5>the offense has been that bad, but the defense has

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 5>been has been really good for most almost all.

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, the fact of the matter is, you should have

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>won the first meeting of the season. I mean, the kicker,

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, apples up on a couple of kicks that

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>look like Gimmey's, and all of a sudden the Bengals

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 2>skate out of Cleveland with a win, and that might

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>have started the spiral.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I kind of look at Cleveland as you know, they're

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>really good in spots. I think their defense is terrific.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I think their front seven is really good. Obviously in

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 2>their secondary, they've got veteran talent and Ward and Delpit.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 2>They they acquired Campbell. I mean it looks like they're

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to do and are accomplishing things on defense, but

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>on offense, I mean it's it's just does Kevin Stefanski

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>has even delta fair hand offense Shaan Watatson thing, and

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 2>they're now having wide receivers to throw two. I don't

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's I think that's as much a problem as anything,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>is it not?

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Oh, for sure, the construction of the offense is deplorably back.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 5>You know when you talk about Week one, Yes, the

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 5>kicks are, but really it's the two interceptions off guys

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 5>just by catching the ball. That's kind of the story

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 5>of the season. You know. The offensive line, I think

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 5>it's been nine different offensive line combinations and that makes

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 5>it harder. It's from three different quarterbacks that they at heart,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 5>So there's been glimpses, but yeah, just been overall disappointing products. So,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, good play out of the rookies, but but

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 5>this receiving corps is bottom of the league, This offensive

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 5>line is the bottom of the league. And none of

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 5>them are under contract. None of the original starters anyway,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 5>are under contract for next year, so a lot of uncertainly.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, that's kind of the discussion of my way ken,

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the fairness of this. You know how much losing was

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 5>expected versus how much has gone on. You know what's

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 5>next for Kevin Stepaint. We don't know any of that.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 5>Snor Sanders has made some strides, He's made some awful throws.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 5>He's not surrounded by a great group. You mentioned Delpin

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 5>in Ward. Those guys would start for any team in

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 5>this league. And obviously Miles Garrett is in a galaxy

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 5>of his own, and he's coming to get the NFL

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 5>stack records on Sunday, and he probably will get it.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 5>But you know, nobody also thinks that the Browns can

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 5>score more than ten points because Erhold Fannon is not

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 5>going to play, and this offensive line is a mess,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 5>and unless they get up early and can win a

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 5>thirteen ten type game for this that history week, and

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 5>then there's going to be real trouble for this office

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 5>trying to keep up de Ice.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 2>I think that you know, you'd have to be an

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>idiot not to understand that what saves his job, it's

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>certainly not winning this game this week. What would, if anything,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>would save his job, and.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 5>An internal commitment and decision that it wasn't his fault

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 5>right that he he has been a good coach. I

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 5>think the last two years to me have shown that

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 5>he's not a great coach. He's not one of the

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 5>better coaches. Like, look what Seohn Payton's done. What's in

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the hand he was delt. You know, look what Kyle

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Shanahan has done with the team this year that didn't

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 5>have it guys for seventy five percent of the season.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 5>You know, my gut field canons that decision has been

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 5>made and he's going to be out. I think there's

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 5>a little more cloudiness with the front office. But you know,

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about an organization that's never been normal. We're

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 5>talking about an organization that's been back for three decades

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 5>and has only had four winning seasons. And this ownership

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 5>group is going on fifteen years and was the one

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 5>that really signed off on the de Shaun Watson thing

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 5>that sunk everything. So in terms of firm predictions, until

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 5>we know it on Sunday night or Monday, I don't know.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 5>And so when you ask that question, it's a fair

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 5>one and it's a valid one. But I could probably

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 5>tough for forty minutes that might give you a straight answer,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 5>because there is a lot of gray area here, and

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 5>it really comes down to what what do you decide

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 5>with the biggest reason that the offense didn't get any

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 5>better this year?

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:22.479
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 5>And then whatever your answer is on that turns into well,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 5>what the heck gives you hope for it being better

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 5>next year? Because you remember one receivers Jerry Judy, you

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 5>have no offensive linement under contract, who have ever really

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 5>been in your A plans? And their quarterback, I mean,

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 5>you can make a case to Shador pretty easily deserves

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 5>more development, but it gets much harder to make a

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 5>case that he's actually the guy that you feel really

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 5>good about going forward.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and if indeed you go through a regime change

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>front office, head coach, you go through coaching staffs, you

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 2>probably lose a guy like Jim Schwartz, who it seems

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to me has done a hell of a job up there.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 2>But the fact of the matter is you're you're going

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>to go through all that change again and as the

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>next group been really going to be married to Shardoor

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Sanders and if they're not, then you're going through that

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>process again. And since the Browns came into the league,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>they've been nothing but change in the front office and

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>in the coaching staff. This is the coach here is

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 2>probably about as stable as any coach has been since

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>they came back.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 5>Right, yeah, oh six years. Yeah, that's that's sixty years

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 5>by Brown standards. They're a guy Joel Beatonio the guard

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 5>for twelve years, and he's been good enough as a

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 5>guard on bad teams that you know him at Cincinnati, right,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 5>they know him across the league, certainly in the anfty doors.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 5>When Joel plays what might be his last NFL game

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 5>on Sunday, can he's been playing with the twenty second

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 5>different quarterback that he's blacked, four starting quarterback that he's

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 5>blacked for since twenty fourteen.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that's crazy.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how do you how do you expect to

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 2>have any kind of success with that kind of turnover.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I know everybody has draft busts and everybody goes through

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 2>head coaches, but my gosh, after a while you land

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>on go, don't you?

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>At some point? It's amazing how this team is just

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>go yeah.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 5>And that's kind of the evaluation of this year is like, Okay,

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 5>it was never going to be good. Okay, there's some

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 5>rokis that it's certainly a better draft class than they had.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 5>But you have to look at what was the plan

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 5>because they pulled the plot on Joe Flacco after four

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 5>weeks and then traded him to a division rival, which

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 5>is a though no, and he could still play and

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't working here, and like I said, he clearly

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 5>turned the ball over in a couple of games. It

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 5>didn't get help from his receivers. But it was like,

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 5>what was next Dyllan Gabriel who immediately was diagnosed as

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 5>this guy can't play, you know, and certainly didn't get

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 5>any help. If there is another team in the NFL

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 5>that liked still and Gabriel, or likes still in Gabriel,

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 5>they might be willing to give him a chance because

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 5>they can look and say he didn't have the receivers,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 5>he didn't have the offensive line. You know, there there

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 5>was a good quarter here and there. But when any

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 5>time you play three different quarterbacks over the course of

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 5>the year, you know you're probably in a bad, bad spot,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 5>right and there are teams that make it work. And

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 5>when the Browns made the playoffs two years ago, they

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 5>played five quarterbacks from week one to week seventeen. More

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 5>times than that, it's you know, one was an injury

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 5>related move to put somebody in a bad spot. One

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 5>was a desperation move to somebody else feels. And then

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 5>when you're making the natural changes that you make along

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the way, you know you're left to sit in evalue

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 5>eight what what was organically good, what could have worked better,

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 5>and what just flat out didn't work? And frankly, when

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 5>you finish the season for the second straight year ranked

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 5>in the bottom three or four in every single major

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 5>offensive category, then it's hard to give an offensive head

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 5>coach another year.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Zach Jackson the Athletic dot Com. You know, it's funny.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals have, I think, without question, the best wide

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>receiver quarterback combo in the division, maybe in the entire FC.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 2>But they've got that. The narrative down here, which I

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 2>think is hilarious, is Okay, you've got that, But the

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>defense is such a disaster despite nice pieces, that it's

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>going to take one, maybe two off seasons to fix

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it to get it to a point where it can

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 2>contend for a Super World championship. Again, I guess my

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>question to you, knowing that for a team that has

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the offensive proficiency that Cincinnati has, what do you I mean,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you've seen this, this this act play out. How many

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>how many off seasons is Cleveland before Cleveland? Is any

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 2>work close to contended?

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean I think I just said that someone earlier today,

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 5>and I've probably said it ten times over the last months.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 5>The situation that this franchise is in the next time

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 5>you're really taking it of temperature check is about Halloween

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 5>of twenty seven ten. Next year is going to be

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 5>worse talent wise because a lot of these older guys

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 5>who have produced, whether they're still doing it or not,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 5>are going out the door. You know, it's a completely

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 5>blank played at quarterback in less shit or somehow becomes

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 5>your answer, like as t easier quarterback for first four

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 5>games next year? What does That's all?

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 5>The receiver group needs remade, the offensive line group needs remade,

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 5>and the defense turn as good as the event has

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of older guys, and if there's a new

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 5>coach and a new coordinator, it's not going to be

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 5>the same defense. And even if it is is it's

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 5>hard to replicate what Schwartz has done. So Schwartz has

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 5>been phenomenal and in the small chance that there is

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 5>a head coaching change in Cincinnati has the first guy

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 5>I would call Jim Schwartz because this defense continually shows up.

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 5>It played under these circumstances, and in the six years

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 5>of the head coach and GM from Cleveland, the one

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 5>thing they really have built the identity of the way

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Schwartz's defense is play right. And it's not just Hey,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Miles garretta because he is he was that before. Schwartz guy.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 5>I think he's playing the best now. But they really

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 5>built that identity and they showed it last week. They

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of got to take a whole victory lap against

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 5>the Steelers like that. I think they'll come out and

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 5>they'll give burrough Fits something that I just don't know

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 5>that the Browns can score enough to even begin to

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 5>keep up.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, their front line is terrific, and like I said,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the second or.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's good too.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you can make an argument for Cleveland

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>being one of the top four or five defenses in

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the leg and statistically higher than that.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Zach, thanks for your time.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll say enjoy the season finale, but the

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>enjoyment will be it is the season finale, and then

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>the real starts. The story's never ended in Cleveland. Do

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 2>they simply don't know?

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 5>No, Hey, you have to get two things. Can You

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 5>have to get past the point where everything you hear

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 5>is believable about wild stuff that goes on. And you

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 5>have to get past the point where the off season

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 5>is the season. You know, you build in the off season,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 5>you set the groundwork, but it has to be to

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 5>where you're playing in games and evaluating guys and going

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 5>in a straight line. And they just have not gone

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 5>in any kind of straight line. When you play twelve

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 5>different quarterbacks over three seasons, there's no straight line. Right

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 5>when you look at mid season and say we're pretty

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 5>hopeless that wide receiver and offense client, there's no straight line.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 5>It's just what it's beat.

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Keep up the good work.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 2>You're one of the reasons why I subscribe, and I'm

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 2>sure a lot of other people out there as well.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Zach, take care of Happy new year. We'll talk down

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the road.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Thanks, all right, We'll see you too.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And the other thing about tomorrow is the sack record.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Does Miles Garrett, defensive lineman extraordinary, best in the business.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Does he get the sack record? Sack record in the

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>NFL is twenty two and a half, twenty two and

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a half sacks in one season. That of course set

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 2>by Michael Strahand in the calendar year twenty eight thousand

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and one, actually twenty twenty one. TJ one equal that

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. Strahan, who was shut out from a sack

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.239
<v Speaker 2>last week by the Steelers and they admitted that was

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>one of their top goals. Strayhan needs just half a

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 2>sack half a sack to equal twenty two and a

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>half on the season, and if he gets one, then

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>he has the record. He has sacked Lamar Jackson twelve

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 2>times in his career. He has sacked Joe Burrow twelve

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>times in his career. Somebody asked him if he knew

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that stat going into this game.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>What I've known absolutely.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 5>I've seen his face on the ground looking up at

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 5>me saying high Miles and Hi Joe.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 3>Too many times. So yeah, I think you'd be at

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll see tomorrow. I mean, it's one of the subplots.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>The other subplot is is what happens going forward with

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>this Bengals franchise. It needs so much. I think there's

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 2>a tendency to get caught up in recent events the

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>last month of the season, get caught up in exactly

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>what is transpired against weaker opponents. Come on, they haven't

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>played anybody the last couple of weeks. In games that mattered,

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't win. Joe burrowed down for a majority of

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the season. Okay, if you want to rely on that

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 2>as an argument, great, Okay, fall back on that. All

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I know is this, Joe Flacco came here and put

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 2>up some decent number. Is good enough to win the

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Jets on October the twenty six. Defensively, you give up

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and two yards two hundred and fifty four

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 2>yards on the ground, and fuddle that up with another

0:27:55.560 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>home game against the Chicago Bears five hundred and seventy

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 2>six total yards, two hundred and eighty three on the ground.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, okay, Burrow not being here major factor. Flacco

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>comes in Flaco, puts up numbers that are winnable in

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 2>at least two games, and then who knows what the

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 2>temper and the UH and the demeanor of that team

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>is if you win against Chicago and you win against

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 2>the Jets.

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 3>We'll never know, But I do know this.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 2>They need a more than just a makeup, touch up

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>on offense on defense going into the twenty twenty six season.

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So the Browns have major, major problems, and at least

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>on one side of the ball, the Bengals have significant problems.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And that sets the scene for tomorrow when we will

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>reconvene at nine oh six from the Holy Grail to

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 2>preview the Bengals and the Browns season finale at pay

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Course Stadium. Stand by coming up in just a couple

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of minutes from fifth Third Arena, it'll be the University

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>of Cincinnati against the University of Houston in what ought

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to be what should be a major attraction on the

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 2>UC schedule this year home game against Houston.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to seven hundred WLW