1 00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:04,080 Speaker 1: Only Michael, You've got more grammar Nazis in your audience 2 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:06,359 Speaker 1: in Argentina in the nineteen nineties. 3 00:00:09,520 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 2: That's funny. 4 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:13,520 Speaker 3: That is funny. That's actually that's a that's a good 5 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:17,120 Speaker 3: comparison too. And the sad part is I is one 6 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 3: of them. I is one of them. That's that's that 7 00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 3: makes it even worse. The US Supreme Court is getting 8 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 3: ready to hear a really important case about American elections. 9 00:00:31,600 --> 00:00:34,959 Speaker 3: And no, it's it's it's not a case to do 10 00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:38,920 Speaker 3: what we wish could happen, and that is, you know, 11 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 3: like maybe throwing illegitimate office holders out by their hair. 12 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:46,840 Speaker 3: But if this case goes the right way, it could 13 00:00:46,880 --> 00:00:51,520 Speaker 3: have a very strong preventive effective, you know, speaking of which, 14 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 3: just use the word preventive. You know, there are two ways, 15 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,280 Speaker 3: preventative and preventive. 16 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:02,880 Speaker 2: You know that, dragon, I prefer the extra tea. Do 17 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 2: you preventative? 18 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 3: Yes, that's a good one. Bet everybody, no on that 19 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:11,680 Speaker 3: one for a moment. Anyway, it might have this preventive 20 00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 3: effect by making sure that these kind of detailed evections 21 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 3: of these officeholders, uh, maybe don't need to be undertaking 22 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 3: in the future. Well what I what do I mean? 23 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 3: By that, well, let's go back to the beginning. Well, 24 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:32,680 Speaker 3: but when I was a kid Judicial Watch Tom Fitten's 25 00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 3: Judicial Watch. I subscribe to Judicial Watches newsletters and the website. 26 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:43,240 Speaker 3: It probably is one of the most one of the 27 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:48,440 Speaker 3: most effective organizations in the entire country at exposing and 28 00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 3: pushing back on corruption, and they do it primarily through litigation. 29 00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 3: But I would also add that it's it's well, it's 30 00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:03,240 Speaker 3: all forms of litigation. It might be Freedom of Information 31 00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 3: Act requests, it might be you know, filing a meekus 32 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 3: briefs in the US Supreme Court, or intervening in other cases. 33 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:19,200 Speaker 3: But they use the legal system in a way that 34 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 3: when we bitch and moan about lawfare and everything that 35 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 3: the left does in terms of lawfare, judicial Watch is 36 00:02:29,880 --> 00:02:32,239 Speaker 3: out there on its own, not on its own. So 37 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:34,320 Speaker 3: there's lots of other organizations that do this too, but 38 00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:38,280 Speaker 3: I would put Judicial Watch in the top ten of 39 00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:42,959 Speaker 3: using the court system to obtain justice, to shine the light, 40 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:48,200 Speaker 3: the disinfecting sunlight on all the crap that goes on 41 00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:54,959 Speaker 3: behind the scenes. Well, they've struck again with oral arguments 42 00:02:55,160 --> 00:03:02,480 Speaker 3: for the lawsuit titled Michael J. Boast, Laura Pallastrini and 43 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:05,520 Speaker 3: Susan Sweeney versus the Illinois State Board of Elections and 44 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:07,679 Speaker 3: Bernadette Matthews. H. 45 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:09,200 Speaker 2: What the Hill's up, Michael. 46 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:14,519 Speaker 3: That's a lawsuit that's in response to a previous decision 47 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:21,160 Speaker 3: finding that this Republican representative, Congressman Boast, who's Republican from 48 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 3: Illinois's twelfth district, and the plaintiff electors lack standing to 49 00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:32,079 Speaker 3: sue the State of Illinois over its policy of counting 50 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:38,800 Speaker 3: ballots received as late as two weeks after election day 51 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 3: so long as they are postmarked in time. Kind of 52 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:49,920 Speaker 3: like some other states we know looking around. So as 53 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 3: long as you got your ballot postmarked on election day, 54 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 3: those ballots kind of dwindle in day after day after 55 00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:01,320 Speaker 3: day until you've got a ballots to count that, oh mat, 56 00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 3: your person's going to win. This is from Judicial Watch. 57 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,360 Speaker 3: Illinois counts mail im ballots received up to two weeks 58 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:15,920 Speaker 3: after election day. Petitioners who are candidates for federal office 59 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:20,159 Speaker 3: claimed that under controlling federal law, that is two weeks 60 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:24,919 Speaker 3: too long. As a result, Illinois is counting unlawful ballots 61 00:04:24,960 --> 00:04:30,800 Speaker 3: and producing inaccurate vote tallies while simultaneously hurting petitioners reached prospects. 62 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 3: Those are the plaintiffs while hurting their prospects at the 63 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 3: ballot box and injuring their pocketbooks. Everyone from the United States, 64 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,679 Speaker 3: meaning the US government, to the American Civil Liberties Union 65 00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 3: and the ACLJ agrees that petitioners have standing Illinois disputes 66 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:57,039 Speaker 3: that remarkable consensus only by ignoring common sense and the 67 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,279 Speaker 3: dangers produced by the Seventh Circuit's rule, and by imagining 68 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:05,680 Speaker 3: nonexistent waivers that did not deter the Seventh Circuit from 69 00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:11,839 Speaker 3: denying standing because Congressman boasts electoral prospects were too bright 70 00:05:12,360 --> 00:05:16,920 Speaker 3: and his pocketbook injuries were too speculative. It is wrong 71 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 3: because candidates have standing to challenge the rules that govern 72 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 3: their elections, especially when their merits. Theory, which must be 73 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 3: credited for standing purposes is that the challenged rule produces 74 00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:38,719 Speaker 3: an inaccurate final tally. At a minimum, the candidate has 75 00:05:38,839 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 3: standing when as here, he plausibly alleges that the challenged 76 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 3: rule will harm his electoral prospects and reduce his bank 77 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 3: balance in his campaign coffers because he needs to pay 78 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 3: campaign staff in extra two weeks. And the decision is 79 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 3: dangerous because it forces judges to play political prognosticators, skews 80 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:08,440 Speaker 3: standing rules to favor certain kinds of candidates, and funnels 81 00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:15,440 Speaker 3: election disputes to the worst possible context, namely after the 82 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:20,479 Speaker 3: election judges or after the election, where judges are asked 83 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:26,599 Speaker 3: to declare political winners. This court, the Supreme Court should reverse. 84 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:31,560 Speaker 3: Now over just the News. That's the website run by 85 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 3: John Solomon. He is a good reading providing further detail. 86 00:06:36,839 --> 00:06:41,960 Speaker 3: You gotta go read it. Solomon writes, Currently fifteen states 87 00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:47,479 Speaker 3: in Washington, d C. Accept mail in ballots postmarked by 88 00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:52,480 Speaker 3: election day if they are received after the election. According 89 00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:59,320 Speaker 3: to ballot Pedia, the states are Alaska, California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, 90 00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:03,160 Speaker 3: New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and 91 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 3: West Virginia. Why does this matter because this case, this 92 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 3: case isn't going to invalidate the ridiculous laws that these 93 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 3: states have allowing late arriving ballots to be counted. Interestingly, 94 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:25,560 Speaker 3: Tom Finton has a separate case in front of the 95 00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:30,040 Speaker 3: Supreme Court on the late ballot issue. Now, if the 96 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 3: plaints in this case are given the desired relief, then 97 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:39,000 Speaker 3: the critical question of standing will get addressed and pave 98 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:41,360 Speaker 3: the way for those candidates who are set to be 99 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:45,320 Speaker 3: robbed in future elections to make their case before a 100 00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 3: court over what are widely perceived as unfair election laws, 101 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:56,440 Speaker 3: like in Colorado universal mail in voting, which has a 102 00:07:56,480 --> 00:08:00,720 Speaker 3: lot of low hanging fruit to use against. It amazes 103 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:04,520 Speaker 3: me that the President of the United States can somehow 104 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:08,960 Speaker 3: lack standing over his own race for the most important 105 00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 3: powerful office in the world. Yet every single activist group 106 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 3: under the sun can lodge a case in front of 107 00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 3: some cherry picked judge to challenge any executive order that 108 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:25,160 Speaker 3: Trump issues to address the widespread issues and electoral corruption. 109 00:08:26,600 --> 00:08:32,240 Speaker 3: If you recall, Trump had dozens of lawsuits tossed over 110 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 3: standing over the issue of standing, both before and after 111 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 3: the twenty twenty election. I hope I haven't buried the 112 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:44,200 Speaker 3: lead here. What is standing. Standing means that you have 113 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 3: a legitimate reason to be in front of a judge 114 00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:54,240 Speaker 3: and you have standing to bring that lawsuit, meaning that 115 00:08:54,960 --> 00:09:01,360 Speaker 3: you face irreparable harm. You have a actual case in controversy, 116 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:06,760 Speaker 3: meaning that there are facts that are taken as a whole, 117 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 3: mean that you have an issue that the court ought 118 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 3: to decide when I was involved in a lawsuit where 119 00:09:18,760 --> 00:09:21,400 Speaker 3: the lawsuit was kicked out because they claimed that I 120 00:09:21,400 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 3: didn't have standing. It was a lawsuit in Colorado where 121 00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 3: as a taxpayer, I was challenging that the bid process 122 00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:35,400 Speaker 3: that was going on because I didn't think the bid 123 00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 3: process was conducted in accordance with open meetings laws, the 124 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:43,600 Speaker 3: bid laws, blah blah blah, all sorts of reasons. The 125 00:09:43,679 --> 00:09:47,600 Speaker 3: trial judge threw it out because while the lawsuit was 126 00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:51,079 Speaker 3: in one county, I was the resident of another county. 127 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,840 Speaker 3: Now the lawyers wanted to appeal it because clearly a 128 00:09:55,960 --> 00:10:01,960 Speaker 3: taxpayer in Colorado ought to have standing to challenge anybody 129 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:08,480 Speaker 3: in anywhere in the state because if corruption or illegal bidding, rigging, 130 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 3: or not following the proper procedures in awarding bids, whatever, 131 00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 3: any taxpayer ought to have the ability to challenge that 132 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 3: that activity. But the judge said I did not. I 133 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 3: believe that I did, because I'm a taxpayer who has 134 00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 3: a vested interest to see that the laws of this 135 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 3: state are followed. Because these laws are, while they may 136 00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:37,400 Speaker 3: be conducted by a group of county commissioners, are nonetheless 137 00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 3: established by state law. And I'm a citizen of this state. 138 00:10:42,400 --> 00:10:48,280 Speaker 3: That's what standing is. Now. We've probably talked a lot 139 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 3: in detail about some of these twenty twenty post election 140 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:56,040 Speaker 3: challenges which took place while President Trump was fighting to 141 00:10:56,040 --> 00:11:01,720 Speaker 3: stay in the White House, and I've outlined the difficulties 142 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:05,840 Speaker 3: in assembling that people have had in assembling high quality 143 00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 3: cases with so little time to compile the information and 144 00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 3: file the suit on time. Take Kerry Lake down in Arizona. 145 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 3: The Kerry Lake team found this out two years later 146 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 3: and still managed to put up the best fight against 147 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 3: the corrupt courts that I've seen since everybody found out 148 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,000 Speaker 3: that elections had gone to hell in a handbasket. Now, 149 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:35,760 Speaker 3: a lot of President Trump's lawsuits were tossed because the 150 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:40,480 Speaker 3: courts went heavy on calling everything to generalized or not 151 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:44,360 Speaker 3: specific enough. Wait a minute, it's too generalized or it's 152 00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:48,319 Speaker 3: not specific enough. And this was also the fate of 153 00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:53,760 Speaker 3: of the most important and most strongly constructed suit. Texas 154 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:59,440 Speaker 3: Attorney General Keim Paxton's team filed a lawsuit Texas versus Pennsylvania. 155 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 3: Filed that case with the Supreme Court that December. It 156 00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 3: alleged that Pennsylvania's failure to abide by its own election 157 00:12:07,880 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 3: laws which handed the state's twenty electors to Joe Biden 158 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:18,680 Speaker 3: had disenfranchised texas thirty eight electoral votes. How did Paxton 159 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:23,200 Speaker 3: get stand How did Paxton approach it? I think exactly 160 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 3: the right way. He made the issue about equal protection. 161 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:35,240 Speaker 3: Eighteen other states signed on to put it in very 162 00:12:35,320 --> 00:12:41,440 Speaker 3: layman's very basic terms. If one cheat, if one state cheats, 163 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:49,199 Speaker 3: or one state doesn't follow election law, and that act 164 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:54,520 Speaker 3: or those acts result in the election being given to 165 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:58,880 Speaker 3: someone other than who, though other states believe was the 166 00:12:58,880 --> 00:13:03,559 Speaker 3: real winner. Giving the electoral College votes to Joe Biden 167 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 3: instead of Donald Trump, well that disenfranchises the electors in 168 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:14,959 Speaker 3: all those other nineteen states because now their electoral votes 169 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,800 Speaker 3: don't really count because they voted for the guy that 170 00:13:18,920 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 3: would have won but for Pennsylvania cheating. So when you 171 00:13:24,080 --> 00:13:28,720 Speaker 3: make the issue about equal protection, that's pretty good, and 172 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:32,400 Speaker 3: I think that's a very legitimate basis on which to challenge. 173 00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 3: But they made but thanks to the issue of standing, 174 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 3: the Supreme Court tossed it out and with it any 175 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,640 Speaker 3: real hope of Trump's staying in power. The Supremes wrote 176 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:49,400 Speaker 3: that Texas had quote not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest 177 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:52,880 Speaker 3: in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. 178 00:13:53,559 --> 00:13:56,360 Speaker 3: Now I disagree with the reasoning, but then again, I'm 179 00:13:56,400 --> 00:13:59,320 Speaker 3: not the Supreme Court. I'm not even a Supreme Court justice, 180 00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 3: so I don't get a vote. But I think their 181 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:05,040 Speaker 3: reasoning was wrong in that case because it does affect 182 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:10,480 Speaker 3: them how other states conduct their elections, and whether you 183 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:13,480 Speaker 3: can show or not, you can at least allege that's 184 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:16,559 Speaker 3: the way they're conducting their elections is unfair, that that 185 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:22,880 Speaker 3: disenfranchises the voters in the other states. Put it very simply, 186 00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:27,560 Speaker 3: all states need to play by the same rules, and 187 00:14:27,680 --> 00:14:31,640 Speaker 3: they need to play fairly. And if they don't play fairly, 188 00:14:32,080 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 3: then all the other states ought to have the option 189 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 3: to challenge that state's way of conducting elections. Now, ultimately, 190 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:43,120 Speaker 3: I think the Spring Court will take this case, and 191 00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:48,040 Speaker 3: I think ultimately the Supreme Court will decide in judicial 192 00:14:48,040 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 3: watches favor, and I think this standing issue will be resolved. 193 00:14:53,320 --> 00:15:01,160 Speaker 3: Now both the congressman his judicial watch lawsuit is not 194 00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:03,800 Speaker 3: going to give another state's attorney general the standing silver 195 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:08,480 Speaker 3: elections half the country away. But if candidates are deemed 196 00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 3: to have standing to bring election lawsuits before the injury occurs. 197 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 3: That will serve as a deterrent for those who think 198 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:21,040 Speaker 3: they can cheat on elections and then hide behind the 199 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:26,880 Speaker 3: difficulty in challenging those results. When when some of these 200 00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 3: antiquated election laws came into existence, election rigging, well that 201 00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 3: was done the way that Boss Tweed would do election rigging. 202 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:44,840 Speaker 3: For example, the Tweed Ring manipulated elections in a variety 203 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 3: of ways. It would hire people to vote multiple times, 204 00:15:48,760 --> 00:15:51,520 Speaker 3: and of course they had sheriffs and temporary deputies protect 205 00:15:51,560 --> 00:15:57,760 Speaker 3: them while they were doing that unlawful voting. Tweed the 206 00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:02,280 Speaker 3: Tweed mahab with stuff boxes with fake votes, and then 207 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:06,240 Speaker 3: bribe or arrest election and inspections who questioned the methods. 208 00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:12,120 Speaker 3: As Boss Tweet himself later admitted, the ballots made no result. 209 00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 3: The counters made the result. Sometimes the ring simply ignored 210 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 3: the ballots and falsified the election results. Tammany Hall candidates 211 00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:26,880 Speaker 3: often received more votes than there were eligible voters in 212 00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:32,480 Speaker 3: a district. Well, where have we heard that before? Now? 213 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 3: Fast forward to today, Tammany Hall, is it really gone? 214 00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,200 Speaker 3: Or is it taken on? A new form? Voted voter 215 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:47,160 Speaker 3: rolls universal, no excuse mail in voting ballot harvesting concentrated 216 00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:50,680 Speaker 3: power and corruption seated inside mega counties large enough to 217 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,320 Speaker 3: overwhelm the rest of the state, or a group of 218 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 3: counties located in something that may be called the front range. 219 00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:06,879 Speaker 3: CHALLENGEUS election malfeasans is not easy. Finding advocacy groups and 220 00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:10,479 Speaker 3: parties who have standing and then assembling a case that 221 00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:14,920 Speaker 3: fits the letter of the law is exceedingly difficult, even 222 00:17:14,960 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 3: before you think about or consider the high bar set 223 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:21,160 Speaker 3: by the courts who don't want to be responsible for 224 00:17:21,240 --> 00:17:24,159 Speaker 3: impacting major elections, either on the front or the back end, 225 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:28,520 Speaker 3: or even when warranted, even when they should be deciding 226 00:17:28,560 --> 00:17:37,640 Speaker 3: those cases. In some states, law stipulates that the challenging 227 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:41,400 Speaker 3: party must be able to pinpoint as many fraudulent ballots 228 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:45,919 Speaker 3: as separate the winner from the loser, so that a 229 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:49,800 Speaker 3: candidate losing by ten thousand votes must be able to 230 00:17:49,920 --> 00:17:55,840 Speaker 3: identify all ten thousand votes, not ninety nine to meet 231 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:58,960 Speaker 3: the bar, and would them need to have more on 232 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:05,520 Speaker 3: tap to deal with any challenge HI filing deadlines, difficulties 233 00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:10,200 Speaker 3: associated with challenging electure results. No, this case might fix 234 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:10,520 Speaker 3: some of that. 235 00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:14,400 Speaker 1: Good morning doom, Good morning gloom. Hey, Michael, I think 236 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:18,080 Speaker 1: there's a phrase called something like take to win or 237 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 1: something like that. It's raining today, so apparently you can't 238 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 1: truck in the rain. 239 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:23,400 Speaker 2: I get to. 240 00:18:23,359 --> 00:18:26,159 Speaker 1: Listen to you guys live where I usually listen on 241 00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 1: the podcast. So I just wanted to say hey and ask. 242 00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 2: You how you're doing. 243 00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:36,400 Speaker 1: I never hear any goobers ask you how you are doing. 244 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:39,600 Speaker 1: So I hope you and the red beard guy are 245 00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:40,240 Speaker 1: doing well. 246 00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 3: Well, that's nice, And then I think about it. They 247 00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:50,880 Speaker 3: never leave a talk back like good to hear from you. 248 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 3: How are you doing everything? Okay? 249 00:18:53,119 --> 00:18:55,880 Speaker 2: They're always asking questions of you and demanding things of you. 250 00:18:56,200 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 3: Right like talk about this, do this? 251 00:18:58,400 --> 00:18:59,479 Speaker 2: Correct this grammar? 252 00:18:59,680 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, we mispronounced that word. Or you didn't put 253 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:05,960 Speaker 3: the comma you you don't believe in the Oxford comma. 254 00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 2: Blah blah blah blah. Did you really take your dog 255 00:19:07,880 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 2: to the dry cleaners? 256 00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 3: That's right? Oh that was the best one of all. Yes, 257 00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:17,080 Speaker 3: I take the dogs with the dry cleaners. Yeah, my god, 258 00:19:16,760 --> 00:19:19,280 Speaker 3: is expensive mistaking them the dry cleaners too? 259 00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:22,639 Speaker 2: How are you, Michael? 260 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:25,520 Speaker 3: You know Dragon, I'm doing pretty good. How are you here? 261 00:19:25,600 --> 00:19:25,800 Speaker 2: Yeah? 262 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 3: Same here? 263 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:30,119 Speaker 2: So real complaints still employed badge work this morning so 264 00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:30,880 Speaker 2: I'm good. 265 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:36,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's see, I've learned more than I ever thought 266 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 3: I would know about Florence. I think I've been through 267 00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:41,400 Speaker 3: Florence a couple of times in my lifetime. 268 00:19:41,480 --> 00:19:42,840 Speaker 2: Oh, we know about all the restaurants. 269 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:47,320 Speaker 3: Yes, uh fifty five ninety Michael and Dragon. Quincy Steak 270 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:51,920 Speaker 3: This sounds like Columbine Steakhouse up in Federal Quincy Steakhouse 271 00:19:51,920 --> 00:19:56,640 Speaker 3: in Florence is awesome. That's all they serve. Monday through 272 00:19:56,680 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 3: Thursday is is Filet Mignon. They have Philip mignons on. 273 00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:06,800 Speaker 2: I hear that's a really good cut. I love Philip 274 00:20:06,920 --> 00:20:08,880 Speaker 2: mignons So. 275 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 3: You know, I guess why as a snob, I'd say 276 00:20:11,880 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 3: Phile Mignon. But I'm not a snob. Monday through Thursday 277 00:20:17,119 --> 00:20:19,720 Speaker 3: is Filet Mignon. Why do you through Sunday is prime Rib? 278 00:20:20,160 --> 00:20:21,360 Speaker 3: Are you a prime rib guy? 279 00:20:21,960 --> 00:20:23,720 Speaker 2: I can get down. I get down with both, for 280 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 2: Flake Mignon or prime Rib. 281 00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 3: I'm just not a prime rib guy. I think it's 282 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:31,920 Speaker 3: because I've had too many prime too much prime rib 283 00:20:32,560 --> 00:20:36,919 Speaker 3: at like parties where you know, or you go to 284 00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:40,520 Speaker 3: conventions and there's always a buffet line and they're slicing 285 00:20:40,520 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 3: the prime rib at the end of the end of 286 00:20:43,040 --> 00:20:45,160 Speaker 3: the line, and it's never really. 287 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:47,320 Speaker 2: That good, well because it's been sitting out on there 288 00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:48,680 Speaker 2: cooking for however long. 289 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 3: Yeah, so you know, I'm just like, can I have 290 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:53,679 Speaker 3: a piece that's at least somewhat peak. 291 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 2: If you're gonna get one, you've got to get one 292 00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:58,600 Speaker 2: made for you, not for everybody. 293 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:04,159 Speaker 3: Yeah, so I just so, I just it's it's kind 294 00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:09,000 Speaker 3: of like ordering Ruben sandwiches unless you're in a true 295 00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:15,159 Speaker 3: Jewish New York style deli. Ordering a Ruben sandwich in 296 00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:18,879 Speaker 3: a like a bar or a restaurant anywhere else is 297 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:19,960 Speaker 3: a crap shoot. 298 00:21:19,640 --> 00:21:21,080 Speaker 2: Like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're 299 00:21:21,080 --> 00:21:22,080 Speaker 2: gonna get exactly. 300 00:21:22,520 --> 00:21:24,679 Speaker 3: So I had a client meeting with some of the 301 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:28,440 Speaker 3: salespeople on Wednesday. I forget what day it was, but anyway, 302 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:31,960 Speaker 3: one day this week and I ordered a I'm looking 303 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:33,919 Speaker 3: at the menu. It's it's a sport We were at 304 00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:37,080 Speaker 3: a sports bar, and I'm looking at the menu and 305 00:21:37,160 --> 00:21:39,639 Speaker 3: I see the Ruben and I'm thinking, I really like 306 00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:41,760 Speaker 3: to have a Ruben sandwich, but I'm not willing to 307 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:42,919 Speaker 3: take the crap shoot. 308 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:44,120 Speaker 2: Just can't take that risk. 309 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:47,600 Speaker 3: I can't you know what? My life is more important 310 00:21:47,600 --> 00:21:49,280 Speaker 3: than taking the crap shoot on a Ruben at a 311 00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:53,480 Speaker 3: sports bar. So, of all things, what I stand? Now? 312 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:55,480 Speaker 3: Wait a minute. First of all, think about how stupid 313 00:21:55,520 --> 00:22:00,879 Speaker 3: this was a shrimp. No. I had on a white shirt. Surprise, right, 314 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:03,880 Speaker 3: you're shot? Yeah, I had on a white shirt. And 315 00:22:03,920 --> 00:22:08,520 Speaker 3: I'm having a lunch meeting with a client. You know 316 00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:11,000 Speaker 3: how I am in food? Most of my food. You 317 00:22:11,040 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 3: can you know what I had because you can look 318 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:14,520 Speaker 3: at my shirt. It's on your shirt, right, So on 319 00:22:14,520 --> 00:22:17,040 Speaker 3: my shirt. So I'm looking at the menu and I'm like, 320 00:22:17,040 --> 00:22:19,720 Speaker 3: I don't want a burger. You know there's another damn burger. 321 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,440 Speaker 3: I don't want that. Oh they have hot dogs. 322 00:22:23,160 --> 00:22:25,000 Speaker 2: You can go after like wings. 323 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 3: So I order a chili dog. Oh boy, Now I'm 324 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:35,840 Speaker 3: the first to order the last No, yeah, the last 325 00:22:35,880 --> 00:22:40,560 Speaker 3: person order. She the the white person, is walking around 326 00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:44,960 Speaker 3: the high top and she just casually mentions, my favorite 327 00:22:44,960 --> 00:22:47,479 Speaker 3: thing on the whole menu is our Ruben. Our Rubens 328 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 3: is the best ever. Like, you know, I don't like Rubens, 329 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:54,120 Speaker 3: except this is a really good Ruben. What what unsolicited? 330 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:57,719 Speaker 3: I'm solicit advice? So she comes back around with you wait, 331 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 3: a minute, I'm gonna change my order. Are you serious 332 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:03,879 Speaker 3: about the ruben? Mm hmm, all right, give me the ruben. 333 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:10,360 Speaker 3: The ruben comes out, and what's the scale? One to ten, 334 00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:15,160 Speaker 3: one to one hundred? What scale you were in? Seven 335 00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:15,880 Speaker 3: and a half? Eight? 336 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:16,800 Speaker 2: Well that's pretty good. 337 00:23:16,880 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 3: Yeah, right it was edible for for bar food. Yes, 338 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:23,520 Speaker 3: it was edible. So she was right, So I had 339 00:23:23,560 --> 00:23:29,200 Speaker 3: a ruben. Still not it's not like the Bagel Deli 340 00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:30,120 Speaker 3: or New York. 341 00:23:30,280 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 2: I mean it's it's clearly not Jewish jelly food. Right, 342 00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:34,639 Speaker 2: you know it was with seven out of ten. That's 343 00:23:35,359 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 2: that's impressive for the bar. 344 00:23:36,800 --> 00:23:40,560 Speaker 3: Yes. Back to Florence. Quincy Steakhouse in Florence is awesome. 345 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:43,720 Speaker 3: That's all they serve. Monday through Thursday is for day Mignon. 346 00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:48,560 Speaker 3: I want to they say for Mignon and Monday or 347 00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:52,000 Speaker 3: Friday through Sunday's prime rib. You get a wedge salad. 348 00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:55,280 Speaker 3: That's actually a step up because usually it's just the 349 00:23:55,359 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 3: bags of salads they get at King Soupers and they 350 00:23:58,359 --> 00:23:59,919 Speaker 3: just dump it in and stop. 351 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:02,520 Speaker 2: With the wedge salad, you just cut a head of 352 00:24:02,600 --> 00:24:04,640 Speaker 2: lettuce in half, put it on a plate and said 353 00:24:04,680 --> 00:24:09,040 Speaker 2: this is a salad. No, it's not stop it. You're 354 00:24:09,080 --> 00:24:12,160 Speaker 2: being cheap, not fancy. 355 00:24:12,920 --> 00:24:15,560 Speaker 3: I like wedd salads, but I always have to have 356 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:19,600 Speaker 3: them change because I hate blue cheese. So I get 357 00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:21,359 Speaker 3: the wedge salad, but can you alter it, like no 358 00:24:21,440 --> 00:24:24,400 Speaker 3: blue cheese within ten miles? And then I don't care. 359 00:24:24,520 --> 00:24:28,040 Speaker 3: You got a really nice Italian dressing, or you got 360 00:24:28,040 --> 00:24:29,720 Speaker 3: a really nice ranch dressing or something. 361 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:31,400 Speaker 2: Give me a good caesar salad. 362 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:34,840 Speaker 3: Or if caesar salad, of course, I'll do caesar salad. 363 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:37,880 Speaker 3: Of course, I'll do the caesar salad. That's the entire menu. Oh, 364 00:24:38,160 --> 00:24:40,639 Speaker 3: wedg salad and baked potato, that's the entire menu. No 365 00:24:40,800 --> 00:24:44,840 Speaker 3: chicken nuggets, just a cut of dead cow. I'd request 366 00:24:44,920 --> 00:24:46,880 Speaker 3: a day passed from Canyon City and meet you all 367 00:24:46,920 --> 00:24:47,520 Speaker 3: in Florence. 368 00:24:48,320 --> 00:24:49,560 Speaker 2: You buried the head line. 369 00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:54,679 Speaker 3: I'm thinking we can have a listener gathering in Florence, Colorado. 370 00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:59,040 Speaker 3: There'd be at least two, which is more than United stand. 371 00:24:59,080 --> 00:25:00,640 Speaker 3: But we'd have two listeners. 372 00:25:00,720 --> 00:25:01,920 Speaker 2: Almost half the audience. 373 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:05,840 Speaker 3: That's right, Half the audience is in Florence, which really 374 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:09,000 Speaker 3: kind of bothers me. But I think about it. Half 375 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:11,440 Speaker 3: our audience. And by the way, he says, I could 376 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:13,439 Speaker 3: get a day pass from Canyon City. 377 00:25:13,560 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 2: As I said, you you buried the lead here. 378 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 3: Really, yeah, is that a day pass because you're on 379 00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:31,359 Speaker 3: some sort of like special incarceration or you're a guard. 380 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:36,160 Speaker 3: I think it's a When he said day pass, I'm 381 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:41,600 Speaker 3: thinking you're on a work release program. Yeah, okay, So 382 00:25:41,920 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 3: we would have the truck driver that scares the crap 383 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,600 Speaker 3: out of us because we think that's right, because we 384 00:25:48,600 --> 00:25:52,359 Speaker 3: think he's that crap crazy. And then we're going to 385 00:25:52,440 --> 00:25:56,680 Speaker 3: have somebody that's an inmate with the day pass, and 386 00:25:56,840 --> 00:26:00,320 Speaker 3: you and I are going to be in Florence, where 387 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:02,800 Speaker 3: half the people in Colorada have no idea where Florence is. 388 00:26:03,800 --> 00:26:06,919 Speaker 3: And we're gonna get a tour of supermacs by his 389 00:26:07,359 --> 00:26:08,119 Speaker 3: brother in law. 390 00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 2: As long as you've got your backpack with you, I'm fine. 391 00:26:10,400 --> 00:26:13,159 Speaker 3: Okay, all right, I'm not sure they're gonna let me 392 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:17,679 Speaker 3: in that's with the backpack. Yeah yeah, so we go 393 00:26:17,800 --> 00:26:22,960 Speaker 3: in completely unharmed. So I don't but it might be fun. 394 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:27,400 Speaker 3: Or this one fifty five sixty six, Mike put Harris. 395 00:26:27,640 --> 00:26:30,719 Speaker 3: I assume you mean Kamala Harris. Maybe you meet Richard Harris. 396 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:33,359 Speaker 3: I don't know. And the leaders of Hamas in the 397 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:40,560 Speaker 3: same room, they'll commit suicide. Uh there was another one here, 398 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:47,680 Speaker 3: but boom boom boom boom boom boom. Yeah that's enough. 399 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 3: That's enough. Just take a break early, I'll be right 400 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:51,480 Speaker 3: back right. 401 00:26:52,040 --> 00:26:54,679 Speaker 2: Sounds like plans are coming together, Like Peas. 402 00:26:54,480 --> 00:26:57,120 Speaker 3: And Carris, we just got to figure out a take. 403 00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:04,240 Speaker 2: About the twelfth Tuesday of next month. 404 00:27:08,880 --> 00:27:13,439 Speaker 3: There. You know, I have that personality that is just 405 00:27:13,920 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 3: really curious and is also somewhat masochistic. 406 00:27:20,040 --> 00:27:21,640 Speaker 2: You want to know, but it'll hurt. 407 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,200 Speaker 3: It's like, I know this is gonna hurt, but wow, 408 00:27:26,320 --> 00:27:29,040 Speaker 3: that really sounds fascinating. 409 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:34,439 Speaker 2: H Maybe he can make you a good Ruben. 410 00:27:36,280 --> 00:27:41,080 Speaker 3: I wouldn't eat anything that he fixed. He could open 411 00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:43,159 Speaker 3: a can of pork and beans and hand it to 412 00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:44,680 Speaker 3: me and I wouldn't touch it. 413 00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:47,359 Speaker 2: It happens a lot less now, but we used to 414 00:27:47,440 --> 00:27:50,520 Speaker 2: get a lot of food delivered to the building. Oh yes, 415 00:27:50,720 --> 00:27:53,280 Speaker 2: And we would have notes and signs up saying listener 416 00:27:53,320 --> 00:27:58,400 Speaker 2: food And it's just basically saying don't touch or eat 417 00:27:58,400 --> 00:27:59,679 Speaker 2: at your own risk pretty much. 418 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, And so while we like, you know, Dragon, 419 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:14,560 Speaker 3: I love crumble cookies. Someone brings us crumble cookies which 420 00:28:14,600 --> 00:28:19,800 Speaker 3: people have in the past. Or donuts, I still think 421 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:20,199 Speaker 3: about that. 422 00:28:20,520 --> 00:28:23,520 Speaker 2: And and cake what's the cake place? The gluten free 423 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 2: cake place? 424 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:24,440 Speaker 1: Oh? 425 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:28,240 Speaker 3: Yes, yes, good, yes, because you don't know what happens 426 00:28:28,240 --> 00:28:30,119 Speaker 3: from the time they pick it up until they actually 427 00:28:30,119 --> 00:28:30,600 Speaker 3: deliver it. 428 00:28:30,840 --> 00:28:33,320 Speaker 2: If it's if the box is still sealed from like 429 00:28:33,400 --> 00:28:37,200 Speaker 2: Crumble or the donut place, I think I can probably 430 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:38,000 Speaker 2: how easy is. 431 00:28:37,960 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 3: It to unseal and reseal a box of cookies from? 432 00:28:40,640 --> 00:28:44,760 Speaker 3: Come frump, you dumb ass, Come on, use your use 433 00:28:44,840 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 3: that brain a little bit. Among the many privileges that 434 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:53,400 Speaker 3: are enjoyed by those who do not identify as members 435 00:28:53,440 --> 00:28:58,400 Speaker 3: of the disfavored race like Caucasian, you can now add 436 00:28:58,560 --> 00:29:04,520 Speaker 3: lower gym fees. Our Studios, a trendy wellness gym based 437 00:29:04,560 --> 00:29:07,120 Speaker 3: in Halifax, Nova Scotia. So I know many of you 438 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:12,600 Speaker 3: will be going openly promoted a thirty dollars drop in 439 00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:18,240 Speaker 3: rate for white visitors while offering a heavily discounted fifteen 440 00:29:18,360 --> 00:29:25,440 Speaker 3: dollars rate exclusively for BIPOC customers. Michael, what's buypuck? That's 441 00:29:25,480 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 3: for black, Indigenous and people of color customers. Now I 442 00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:35,520 Speaker 3: know just enough about Canadian anti discrimination laws to know 443 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:39,080 Speaker 3: that that's a violation of them, and I discriminate discrimination laws. 444 00:29:39,280 --> 00:29:43,680 Speaker 3: But however, you know, with dumbasses firmly in control in Canada, 445 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:49,080 Speaker 3: the law only cuts one way. It only applies one way. 446 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:52,560 Speaker 3: When racism has finally been overcome, which I thought it 447 00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:56,680 Speaker 3: has but apparently not, then only Caucasians will have to 448 00:29:56,720 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 3: even pay gym fees at all. I'm looking at the 449 00:30:01,720 --> 00:30:06,080 Speaker 3: menu from our studios. Class passes thirty dollars a Class 450 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:10,680 Speaker 3: one studio drop in Canadian thirty for one Class one 451 00:30:10,920 --> 00:30:15,000 Speaker 3: X class pass to be used at any studio. Rest 452 00:30:15,040 --> 00:30:19,200 Speaker 3: not included, Valid at all studio rest not included for 453 00:30:19,240 --> 00:30:24,840 Speaker 3: six months. Oh but right below that is the bipunk 454 00:30:25,080 --> 00:30:30,560 Speaker 3: drop in rate Canadian fifteen dollars one class BIPUP drop 455 00:30:30,600 --> 00:30:35,120 Speaker 3: in rate parentheses black Indigenous person of color of course 456 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:40,200 Speaker 3: color is col Oh you are collude, valid at all studios, 457 00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:45,680 Speaker 3: rest not included for six months. Wow, even the Canucks 458 00:30:45,720 --> 00:30:49,960 Speaker 3: have gone crazy, totally crazy. But we shouldn't be surprised 459 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:56,840 Speaker 3: by that whatsoever? Right I told you about I've ever 460 00:30:56,920 --> 00:31:00,320 Speaker 3: done that one. Let's see. Oh yeah, this someone it 461 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:06,760 Speaker 3: was pretty good, because we're gonna read you do taxpayer 462 00:31:06,760 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 3: relief shots let me do sheriff for Grady Early, Sheriff 463 00:31:10,440 --> 00:31:11,040 Speaker 3: Grady Judd. 464 00:31:11,600 --> 00:31:16,760 Speaker 4: I've spent my entire adult life in law enforcement, and 465 00:31:16,800 --> 00:31:21,720 Speaker 4: I have never heard of one law enforcement agency not 466 00:31:21,920 --> 00:31:26,800 Speaker 4: helping another when they call for help. Until this weekend, 467 00:31:27,240 --> 00:31:30,840 Speaker 4: when a chief of patrol or the Chicago Police Department 468 00:31:31,320 --> 00:31:36,040 Speaker 4: instricted the police officers not to run in and help 469 00:31:36,400 --> 00:31:40,000 Speaker 4: their colleagues who were calling for help, who were under 470 00:31:40,040 --> 00:31:45,080 Speaker 4: attack by a bunch of people clearly violating the law. 471 00:31:47,520 --> 00:31:51,040 Speaker 3: That's scary. Let me give you the antithesis of that. 472 00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:56,640 Speaker 4: We had a single man resists ICE agents and get 473 00:31:56,680 --> 00:31:58,200 Speaker 4: away from them in our community. 474 00:31:59,200 --> 00:31:59,960 Speaker 3: We sent a. 475 00:32:00,040 --> 00:32:06,680 Speaker 4: Helicopter, a Drone K nine, and fifty law enforcement officers 476 00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:10,600 Speaker 4: to surround an area and we found that guy who 477 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:15,480 Speaker 4: violently resisted ICE and we locked him up in jail 478 00:32:15,520 --> 00:32:16,400 Speaker 4: where he should have been. 479 00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:18,920 Speaker 3: If you allow. 480 00:32:18,760 --> 00:32:25,240 Speaker 4: Anarchist and criminals to run wild in your community, people 481 00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:28,040 Speaker 4: will die, people will be shocked. 482 00:32:29,400 --> 00:32:32,000 Speaker 3: Now, let me say this for other law. 483 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:35,680 Speaker 4: Enforcement leaders across this state and nation. You need to 484 00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 4: be standing up saying the same exact thing that I am, Amen, 485 00:32:40,560 --> 00:32:44,040 Speaker 4: Because when you have a breakdown of the rule of law, 486 00:32:44,360 --> 00:32:50,680 Speaker 4: when you allow anarchist criminals to take over the streets 487 00:32:51,520 --> 00:32:55,000 Speaker 4: and attack law enforcement officers and then not send them help. 488 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:02,000 Speaker 3: That's a slippery slope. A real superty slightly text Bay 489 00:33:02,120 --> 00:33:03,840 Speaker 3: the Shots coming up next