WEBVTT - The Jay Weber Podcast #0018 6-5-26 

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That Jane Weber Podcast is presented by Creative Planning, helping

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>clients simplify their journey to financial wellness, one personalized plan

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at a time. That Jane Weber Podcast is a production

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio Podcasts.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to the j Weber Podcast. Today we'll

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about how the economy has improved by nearly every

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 2>measure over the last fourteen months, and I'm finding it

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>harder and harder to believe that most Americans aren't noticing,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 2>which is of course the claim from the left wing media. Also,

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the military action against Iran was never going to end

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 2>cleanly and we shouldn't expect it to. And some thoughts

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>on Scott Pelley, a pompous pretender who I believe really

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to retire but decided to make himself the

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 2>story and pretend that he's the last honestalist in America

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 2>as he goes out. But first producer, extraordinary, Gregory John.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you to give me a ratio,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, one in five, one and ten, one in

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty roughly, how many Americans do you think carry a

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>concealed weapon for protection pretty much every day or base

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>sickly whenever they leave the house.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>It got to be a low like one two percent.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>One two percent, Yeah, it's more like A new survey

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of a thousand Americans says it's more like thirteen percent.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 2>It's about one in ten. Wow, they say one in

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>ten Americans, about thirteen percent say they routinely are packing

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>heat as they go about their daily lives. I thought,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, one to two percent would be low, but

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought maybe seven eight. So it's a

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 2>double that that number doesn't really surprise me all that much.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>This one does. According to the same survey, nearly one

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.279
<v Speaker 2>in three people, nearly one in three say they carry

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>sometimes or somewhat regularly. Thirty percent of the people in

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>this country, or at least in this survey conducted last month,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>it was one thousand people say they carry a fire

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>firearm at times.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I have a I have a nephew that lives in

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 4>San Antonio, Texas, and he carries all the time. We

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 4>were down there a couple of summers ago, and yeah,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 4>he's packing.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>We go to the.

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Restaurant and everywhere we went, we went, we saw that,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 4>we went in the caves, he's still packing.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Is he carrying openly? Can you see the guy, Yeah,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you can see it openly. Yeah, well, I have a

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>few people that carry concealed and do it regularly. They

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>won't leave the house without their wallet, their keys, their gun.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 2>But this kind of these stats make it. I think

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>it's safe to say that basically, anytime you're in a

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>crowd or at a larger event, it means there are

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>at least a few people around you who are carrying guns.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>With the normalization of carry laws as they are, I mean,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>this is something now that the vast majority of us

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>simply never think about. But presumably at church, at the mall,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>out for dinner, at that kid's soccer game, in the

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>public park, whatever, you're sitting near and around people who

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>are packing some heat. So does that make you feel

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>more or less safe?

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>It makes me feel more safe because I know that

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 4>these people most likely have gone through training and don't

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 4>have the mindset a lot of these these thugs do.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>And be with you. These stats, I think prove that

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not about the gun, it's about the people who

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>are carrying them or and or using them. These are

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>people who are concerned about their own safety and you know,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>public safety in general. There, I'm with you. It kind

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>of is good for me, reassuring to me that, well,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>if something really goes down in this venue or whatever,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 2>and the off chance that it would, you might have

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>some people able to respond with like force. But you

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 2>know what the average lefty Karen or Kevin's response would be,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>They just be mortified at this.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you don't carry.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 4>I haven't had a gun since we moved down here

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 4>from up north, and that's like nineteen ninety. I left

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 4>all my guns up north because Dorothy didn't want him

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 4>around the kids, and then just never never got round

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 4>to It's funny that you bring this up, because we

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>were just talking about this about a month ago. It'saying,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe we should buy a gun just to

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>keep in the house.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if i'd.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Carry, though i'd carry occasionally. I don't carry all the time,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 2>but I do carry occasionally, and I will and I'll

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>do something that people say you shouldn't do when I'll

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>just sort of put one in the car if I'm

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>going in a place where I think that I think

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>might be sketchy. But John Lott is this famous name

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to guns and crime research, and he's

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>linking this tower to the lower crime rates that we're seeing.

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd really question that. Though crime seems to have dip

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>since Trump got back into office and voter and some

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>of these cities replace their woke DA's and demand that

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>they do better. But there's no obvious correlation between people

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>carrying guns for protection and lower crime rates. I think

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>these same people were probably carrying in the Biden era too, right,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like Trump got back into office in

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the third of the country said Okay, strap them up,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm a regular gun carrier now. In fact, this pollster

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>says thirty percent. That thirty percent figure is only up

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 2>about six percent since the last survey, So I don't

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 2>see the race and connection connection to dip in crime.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 2>But it is interesting to know that more than one

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 2>in ten Americans now say they don't leave the house

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>without their wallet, their keys, and their side arm. Also,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>they say about a third of the geographic area of

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the country is now working under constitutional carry, which means

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 2>they don't even need a license or a permit to carry.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, I was going to ask you, and I

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 4>never did ask you this, what would be an appropriate

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>gun for me to buy?

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Boy, that's a complicated question. It really kind of depends

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>what you want, just small for protection. I like glocks myself, Okay,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I like something with better than revolvers. Some people carry

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 2>revolvers well that depending on the size, either five or

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>six bullets. I would rather have a few more than

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that if something, if I really need them. But you

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 2>should look at the smaller clocks.

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Dorothy, the Father's Day just around the corner.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I would also point out before we move on here,

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>none of the anti gun crowds predictions have come true. Remember,

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be like the Wild West in America

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>if we start to legalize concealed carry or open carry.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 2>These are Americans who've decided they're carrying concealed just for

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>some peace of mind, and the Wild West has not

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>been the result. So i'd point that out. But now

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the big transition to the sponsor. Do you have peace

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>of mind when it comes to your retirement? Yea, I

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>do that every week. Here's where I pivot and promote

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the great sponsor to this program, Creative Planning. Have you

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>heard of Creative Planning. They're one of the nation's largest

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 2>independent wealth management firms, offering fully integrated financial and retirement

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>planning investment management, estate planning, tax strategies, business services, and

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>international wealth management, all in house and coordinated through your

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 2>wealth manager. Their fiduciary wealth manager are here to help

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you navigate every piece of your financial life. Visit creative

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Planning dot com to schedule our introductory meeting. That's creative

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Planning dot Com. Your team awaits paid for by Creative

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Planning and SEC registered investment advisor. The speaker's statements are

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 2>not an endorsement of the firm. My segment about how

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Pride events have crumbled over the last few years was

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a popular one, and I was explaining that the members

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Alphabet Army finally overplayed their hand with all

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the multiple genders transgender stuff, a movement that started out

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>as gays and lesbians demanding equal rights or to be

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 2>included in political conversations, has turned into a militant and

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>socially poisonous freak show. This is a few decades later,

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>most reasonable people are rejecting it. Coming after our kids

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 2>with drag shows and trying to twist their adolescent minds

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>with gender treatments and gender reassignment surgeries was simply too

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>much for most reasonable people to find reasonable or continue

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 2>to support it has a lesbian on Acts named Cynthia

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>Holt posting something that I will clean up a bit

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>as a lesbian woman, I bleeping hate Pride Month with

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>every fiber of my being. He says, it makes us

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>look like absolute crap. The entire LGB has been hijacked

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 2>by groomers, men in cheap wigs with toilet paper tits, freaks,

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>duct taping their peanuts to their butts, pedophiles, fetish weirdos,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and every other kind of gross filth parading down the street.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>She says, real gay, lesbian and bisexual people want nothing

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>to do with the circus. We just want to be

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>left alone. The LGB community condemns these degenerates and every

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>organization pandering to them. These sentiments stood out to me

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>because it's the sort of thing that gay and lesbian

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>listeners to my radio show would share with me or

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>email me every June or nearly every Pride month. I

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>did a conservative talk show for decades, and over those decades,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I had gay and lesbian listeners tell me this exact

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 2>same sort of thing that the Alphabet movement does not represent.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Most gays and lesbians. Most gays and lesbians want to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>be seen as regular people who have all the same

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>sorts of interests and feelings and hopes as the rest

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of us, and simply don't want to be vilified or

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>shut out of society because of who they find sexually

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>attractive or choose to love. And yet this group of

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>people are never quoted or given any media attention because

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>their comments on the movement don't fit the left wing narrative.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>So I thought i'd pass that along. As another follow up,

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd point you to a Gallup pole that seems to

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>verify the points that I was making on the last podcast.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>This year's Gallup poll finds support for the so called

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>LGBTQ plus issues sliding backward. Polsters are calling this a

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 2>cultural shift, the average gay or lesbian would probably call

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 2>it proof that the perverts and the trans bullies have

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>ruined their brand. But Gallup found while a majority of

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Americans still support legal same sex marriage that's about sixty

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 2>five percent, that figures dropped six percentage points from its

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>peak in twenty twenty two and twenty three. Meanwhile, moral

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>acceptance of gay and lesbian relationships has dipped to sixty

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 2>two percent, which Gallup says is the lowest point since

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen. Public acceptance of gender transition has experienced an

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>even steeper decline over the last five years.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>They say.

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>As of today, just thirty eight percent of Americans believe

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>changing one's gender is morally acceptable, down eight points since

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, and a fifty seven percent majority view

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>it as morally wrong. Wow. This cultural shift is largely

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>driven by Republicans and in Independence, they say, while Democrats

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>views on these issues have remained steady. Also interesting, on

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 2>attitudes towards same sex marriage among Republicans, support for legal

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>same sex marriage has plummeted to thirty seven percent, down

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>from fifty five percent majorities recorded in twenty twenty one

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and twenty two. That is a significant decline. Independent attitudes

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>on gay marriage also saw a six point drop to

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven percent. Gallup says. Another stark contrast is seen

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>on the issue of gender transition. Just five percent of

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Republicans view changing one's gender as morally acceptable, compared to

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>forty two percent of Independence and sixty percent of Democrats.

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd point to those stats as some of the most

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>revealing out of the entire batch. Let's step back when

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>asked whether changing genders is quote morally acceptable. Now we're

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>dealing on the morality plane here, not whether it should

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>be legal or normalized or encouraged, or do you support

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>gender transitioning. This is on the question of is changing

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.599
<v Speaker 2>your gender moral? A whopping fifty eight percent of independence

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 2>say no, and even forty percent of Democrats say no.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 2>That is interesting and is so called enlightened age. When

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 2>it comes to how society should treat alphabet people and

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>gender issues, sixty percent of moderates and forty percent of

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Democrats considered gender transitioning immoral. Now that's interesting, and it

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>might explain why there's such a backlash to the trans

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 2>bullying and the they them wars and the pronoun bullying

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>when the leftists who launched the effort clearly thought they'd

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 2>have most Americans on their side. In short, this helps

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>explain the backlash to so called Pride Month and Pride

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 2>events over the last several years. The trans and gender

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 2>rights bullies absolutely co opted the movement and turned it

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>into an unappealing campaign that was nearly impossible for any

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>well meaning American to support. This poll also suggests that

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>our poster on AXSS correct the entire gay movement has

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>been hijacked by freaks and groomers that most decent people

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>can't support even when they're asked to. Interesting next topic

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 2>the American economy, which by every measure really does seem

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to be roaring now, even if the average American is

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 2>telling polsters they don't really feel it or see it.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm finding this increasingly interesting and increasingly hard to believe,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>because by nearly every measure, and certainly based on every

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>monthly governmental report, this Trump economy is really humming along.

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 2>And yes, gas prices have lifted the overall measure of

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>inflation higher. Some prices of some items at the grocery

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>store continue to creep up, but wages are starting to

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>outpace the cost of living again. Paychecks are growing, the

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>markets are on an incredible run. Layoffs are now rare. Heck,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>this week we learn that the number of job openings

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the country has is soaring again. There are suddenly around

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 2>seven point six million job openings in America, folks. That's

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the highest number of job openings in nearly three years,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's evidence that companies are starting to hire again

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and the demand for workers has intensified. Moreover, the biggest

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>chunk of new jobs available is in the manufacturing sector,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>meaning they're likely better paying jobs that actually add to

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a productive economy instead of jobs in government that only

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>drain tax payers and drain the economy, or even in

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 2>lower paying sector jobs like hospitality or retail. Folks, there

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>are nearly half a million job openings and manufacturing as

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of now. That's great, this is good stuff. This is

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>all good news. It had economic guru Larry Cudlow talking

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>about this with his panel members, which included Stephen Moore.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Both Cudlow and Moore have been advisors to President Trump

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and they helped create Trump's fantastic first term economy. They're

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>now beside themselves that according to the rest of the

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>news media, no one can see the incredible improvement in

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 2>this economy over the last year or so.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 5>I think the policy outlook is yes, it's very very positive. Yes,

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 5>But I just think it's interesting to me, as Steve Moore,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 5>that rampant pessimism which is promoted by the media, promoted

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 5>by Democrats maybe some Republicans, because all prices have jumped up,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 5>they bumped up temperate, but the numbers don't bear that out.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 5>And you know, business is in very good profitable shape

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 5>with lower taxes and deregulation. But look at the numbers,

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Steve Moore, that's the point. People don't take the time

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 5>to look at the numbers.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well we're blowing away the rest of the world too, Larry.

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 6>We're growing faster than everybody else. And look at our

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 6>stock market compared to China. We are winning because of Trump,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 6>andoviis no question about it. I would just add two

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 6>points to what Arthur Laffer just said, and that you

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 6>just said. The investment numbers. I just love those, Larry.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we've never seen such an investment boom in

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 6>this country maybe ever going on. And the's sircond one

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 6>is is you know, at unleashed posterity. We're monitoring each

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 6>month the Census Bureau numbers on what's happened to family income.

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to give you.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>The scoop on this.

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 6>So we just did the April numbers. Since Trump came

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 6>into office in the second term, above inflation, the average

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 6>family has three dollars more of income. So even this

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 6>affordability crisis is kind of overrated. People have more disposable

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 6>income today than ever yeap.

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>People have more disposal income now than they did under

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden, certainly, and every governmental and private sector measure

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is proving it. And yet in today's media, everything's got

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to be terrible news, even if they have to lie

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>about it. In fact, Larry Kudlow went on to make

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a point that today's news media is just an arm

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>of today's America hating left. It's one thing to have

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>me saying these same things as a regional influencer. They're

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>going to sound familiar, But to hear Cudlow say them

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>this bluntly at a national media level is fun to see.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Cudlow said, everything's got always got to be terrible for

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>today's liberal and they have their priorities really out of whack.

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Today's Democrats don't mind Nazi tattoos. They want the southern

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 5>border to be open. Everything's always about racism or DEI

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 5>cashless bail, biological men and women's sports, arrest violent fouons

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 5>and then put them back out on This reads radical

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 5>abortion on demand and virtually no place for God in religion.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 5>For some reason, these left wing Democratic Jacobins have completely

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 5>lost touch with working class folks, working class folks of

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 5>all colors, of all shapes, of all sizes, which is

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 5>why Donald Trump has whooped them two out of the

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 5>last three elections, maybe three out of the last three elections.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I love that last suggestion by Cudlough that Trump might

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 2>have actually won in twenty twenty. That's what he's referring to.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>But when it comes to the economy, any honest examination

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>of the question are you voters better off than you

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>were four years ago? Has got to conclude yeah, you are.

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Clay Travis posted some stats from twenty twenty two, which was,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, Joe Biden's midterm. In June of twenty two,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 2>gas prices averaged over five dollars a gallon. Inflation was

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>nine point one percent, the murder rate was six people

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>per one hundred thousand. The S and P five hundred

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>was at thirty six seventy five. Four years later, you

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 2>have gas cheaper, inflation is roughly three three and a

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>half percent, the murder rate is down to four people

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>per one hundred thousand, and the S and P five

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred is at seventy six hundred. That's more than double

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>four years ago. Those stats represent real progress. The editors

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of Issues and Insights also looked back and say, let's

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>turn the dial back to June of twenty twenty two.

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden had been occupying the White House for a year.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>And a half.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Democrats controlled Congress. They handed him his two trillion dollar

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>bill back better spending extravaganza, and the economy had more

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>than recovered the ground it lost from COVID lockdowns. The

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>country should have been booming instead nine point one percent

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>inflation and stagnation, they say. In twenty twenty two, real

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>hourly wages were falling. Four years later, workers' incomes have

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 2>climbed out of that Biden hole, and wages are up

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>two percent, and unlike twenty twenty two, they're going up,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>not down, so they're continuing to go up, they say.

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 2>The latest jobs data shows that there are six million

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>more private sector jobs today than there were a year ago.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the good news. The better news is that there

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>are one hundred and ninety thousand fewer federal workers than

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>there were in twenty twenty two. In April twenty twenty two,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the border patrol quote encountered two hundred and thirty four

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand illegal border crossers, and of course they released almost

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>all of them into the US. In April of twenty

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty six. Four years later, now they encountered about thirteen thousand,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and none were led into the country under Trump's administration.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 2>These editors say the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 2>about thirty three thousand at the end of May of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two and was moving sideways. This year, it's

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 2>at fifty one thousand. That's an increase of fifty six percent,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's been climbing for most of Trump's second term.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>And they say, despite all the hue and cry over

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>gas prices, they're almost identical to where they were in

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, and I would note trending downward. Yeah,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>gas prices are something the Democrats are glombed on too,

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to try to flog right through the

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 2>elections because they're one of the few negatives that they

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 2>can actually spin and make sound terrible to the average voter.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 2>They're also, frankly one of the few negatives when it

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>comes to the Trump economy. Over the last fourteen months,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Trump had gas price down to about two dollars and

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>forty cents a gallon until he decided we needed to

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 2>deal with Iran. We couldn't delay anymore because they're so

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 2>close to creating a nuclear bomb. And so it was

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 2>the Iran war that had gas prices skyrocketing back up

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 2>to about four to sixty a gallon on average before

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 2>they've started to slide back down again now, So the

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>honest caveat on gas prices has got to be Trump

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and his team new gas prices were going to jump again,

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>but they had to do the hard work of eliminating

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian nuclear threat. Now they have, and prices are

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 2>already coming down again. And so if voters really want

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>to hold a grudge against Trump and Republicans for that,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of silly. But of course the Democrats will

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>spin and lie as much as they can on that

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 2>one because it's the one economic attack they think they

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>can get voters to believe and get angry about. And yes,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 2>as these editors continue, there are still soft spots in

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 2>the labor market, sure, but the economic turnaround that was

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>so desperately needed after Biden trashed up things has begun,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>In fact, just fourteen months later. It's well under way.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.479
<v Speaker 2>If you're upset about that, you're really being foolish. I

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>agree with these editors at Issues and Insights as they

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 2>conclude we have always maintained that climbing out of the

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Biden hole would be an arduous journey. And while we'd

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>argue that Trump could be doing a better job of

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 2>communicating as wins and staying focused on issues that every

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>day Americans care about, who's willing to claim that they're

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>better off in twenty twenty two than they are now.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So the question voters need to start asking themselves is

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 2>do they really want to hand control of anything back

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to the Democrats, knowing the misery they caused four years ago.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 2>The answer to that should obviously be no. And if

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 2>we had an honest media, one that was both cataloging

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the economic wins that we've been seeing in this new

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>era of Trump as they've occurred, and as also honestly

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 2>asking and answering that question for voters, is this country

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 2>better off economically than it was under Joe Biden? If

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>today's news media was doing their jobs as any past

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>era of news editors and reporters would have been more fairly,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the majority of the American people and Fall voters would

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 2>already know that there's no reason to vote Democrat in

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Fall and put these clowns back in charge. You'd actually

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>be a dope to do so if your own paycheck

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 2>and cost of living are at all important to you.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 2>The truth is things are going good in America right now,

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and that Trump and his team have rather quickly turned

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Biden's terrible economy around with more growth and prosperity on

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the horizon. I just hope more of the message gets

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>out before people start to early vote in September. You

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>are listening to the Jayweber podcast. The Wall Street Journal

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>had a fun blurb on Elon Musk, and since only

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a small sliver of people read The Wall Street Journal,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I thought I'd pass it along to my podcast listeners.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>This comes up because Elon Musk is going to be

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the world's first trillionaire. The expectation is that this will

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>come after the initial public offering for SpaceX, because, as

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it is, Musk's net worth is estimated to be about

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred and seventy billion dollars nine hundred and seventy billion,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>holy cow. So he only needs to see his wealth

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>increase by another thirty billion dollars and he hits one trillion.

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 2>Sounds weird to speak in terms of only thirty billion,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>but when we're talking about these sorts of numbers. It's fit,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it fits, it's accurate, and given how difficult it is

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>to even understand what a trillion dollars is for the

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>average person, it starts to sound like fake money. The

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal estimates that Elon Musk, over the course

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of his career, has made about one thousand dollars per

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>second nine hundred and ninety two dollars per second. More accurately,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Musk's wealth includes SpaceX, which is valued at about five

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion dollars, his Stakes and Tesla, of course,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>they're worth about one hundred and seventy billion, and he

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 2>also has another one hundred and fifty billion dollars in

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>stock options to those companies that he could exercise at anytime.

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the cutting edge boring company which drills tunnels

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>that's five billion. Oh, the brain implant firm that he

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>founded that's worth about one hundred billion. Then you've got

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to toss in the properties that he owns, personal assets

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>like his plane, et cetera. You get to about nine

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy billion dollars. To put this into perspective,

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>the next richest guy in the US is Jeff Bezos,

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 2>who is worth about two hundred and seventy six billion dollars.

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 2>So imagine Elon Musk is so rich, he is so

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 2>far ahead of any other wealth giant on this planet

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that he could buy out the next guy on the

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 2>list three times over easily. Working the math another way,

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the Wall Street Journal says that Musk has made about

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>three point six million dollars per hour for the last

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 2>thirty one years. He's made about fifty nine thousand dollars

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>per minute, or three point six million an hour. And

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 2>obviously he wasn't making that much early in his efforts.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 2>But this is the average over the course of his

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>working adult life. By the way, that works out to

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>about eighty five million dollars a day. If you want

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>that figure. Elon Musk makes about eighty five million dollars

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a day, two point six billion per month, thirty one

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>billion per year. And so, as the Wall Street Journal

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>article points out, it would take the average American who

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>makes about eighty four thousand dollars a year currently, it

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>would take the average American eleven million years to match

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Musk's current wealth. That is mind boggling, unfathomable. That's how

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 2>rich Elon Musk is One of the thoughts that I

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>had on this was Elon Musk is proving that you

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>really can't hit a point at which money's irrelevant. He's

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the perfect person to really prove that, or display that. Musk,

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>by all appearances, is a pretty average guy who doesn't

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>put much importance in all the money that he has.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>He's not like.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Bezos or Gates or Zuckerberg, who've shown off how rich

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 2>they are by buying half billion dollar yachts building half

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar homes. They're all so rich that they have

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>clearly by now figured out that there's only so much

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>you can spend your money on, and that no amount

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of money makes you infallible or untouchable or immortal, which

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 2>led to the other thought I had. Musk's level of

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>wealth is proving the cliche you still can't take it

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.239
<v Speaker 2>with you is true. He and all these other very

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 2>very rich men are still all going to die someday.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>In fact, in every era there seems to have been

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>at least some sliver of wealthy people who were chasing immortality,

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to find ways to extend their lives or make

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>themselves immortal. None have yet. They've tried sleeping in cryogenics

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>and blood doping, gene manipulation, they've all still died. In fact,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk has said more than once that he's convinced

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 2>at some point humans will be able to essentially download

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 2>their consciousness into a computer hard drive, and that would

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 2>be at least a form of immortality. We've all seen

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>science fiction movies in which that's the plot. Some dead

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>villain's brain is downloaded into some other person's body, or

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 2>some blank that was lab grown. Musk would probably tell

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>you we're closer to that first step of downloading someone's

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>consciousness onto a hard drive than you'd think, But at

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>least in this age, you still can't do it, and

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>you still can't take it with you. Whether it's ten

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>bucks or a trillion dollars, money is useless to you

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>when you're dead. This Wall Street Journal story has a

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>list of things you could buy with Musk's current nine

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy billion dollars. You could buy two point

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 2>four million houses in the US using the average price

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of a house. You could buy thirty two NFL teams

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 2>and every NBA team. You could buy a fleet of

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 2>over ten thousand Gulf Stream jets and pay for five

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 2>years of their operating costs and one finals when adjusted

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>for inflation, Elon Musk is wealthier than even John D.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Rockefeller was in his day, easily. This means that even

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 2>before SpaceX goes public or Musk hits a trillion dollars

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of wealth this moment in history, already Elon Musk ranks

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 2>as the richest American who has ever lived. That's the

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing that I think is too good to

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 2>stay behind a firewall in the Wall Street Journal website,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so I thought i'd share it with you now to

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 2>longtime CBS anchor in Sixty Minutes hack Scott Pelly being

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 2>fired after going on an explosive rant against the network's

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 2>new news chiefs. This is fun. This has been the

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>talk of social media over the last few days, and

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>it probably proves that social media isn't real life. I

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know who actually watches sixty Minutes anymore, or who

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 2>knows who Scott Pelly even is. If you're going to

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>pull the average American, I don't think they know. But

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 2>it's been all over social media, and my takes on

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Scott Pelly included. First, he's always struck me, as Ted Baxter,

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>a parody of a newsman. Pelly is clearly playing a

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>role when he's in front of the camera. I assume

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>he's a big fake, and he acts and sounds completely

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 2>different off here. I've always assumed that he's a less

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 2>funny Ted Baxter, the fraud of a newsman that Ted

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Knight played on The Mary Tyler Moore Show. And yes,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 2>I think Pelly is that fake, even if he's not

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that much of an idiot. My second take on Pelly's

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>firing is, and this is a complete guess, but I

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 2>just think what I think. I think he just wanted

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to retire, but being the self aggrandizing, performative jackass that

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>he has always been, he decided to go down in

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>a blaze of glory and pretend that he was taking

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 2>a stand and defending journalism as a whole and defending

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 2>his journalistic integrity individually. This is what I think motivated

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 2>his insane performance in that all staff meeting earlier this week.

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 2>This was all ego. Trust me, that much is for certain.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Pelly wouldn't have done this if he wouldn't have planned

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 2>it first, correct, And so what we can say is

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that part of this is certainly intentional. What his motivations

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 2>were more questionable. Did he really think he could speak

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 2>to the CBS execs that way and survive it? Or

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>after thirty seven years and at the age of sixty eight,

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>was Pelly looking to go out in a blaze of

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>glory and hope to go down in history as the

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>last real journalist in a rapidly changing world. Put me

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 2>down for that second option.

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I would bet anyone that Pelly really just wanted to

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 2>retire but saw a chance to go out in a

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 2>blaze of glory and hey, there is a way to

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 2>test whether I'm correct. Does Scott Pelly feel the need

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to turn around and start some podcast like Megan Kelly

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and Tucker or Mark Helprin did Is he going to

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>be another one of these media figures who either quits

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 2>or gets fired from a larger media company only to

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>feel that he needs to start some sort of sub

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>stack or start his own podcast and continue his work.

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Or is this essentially the last we see of Scott Pelley.

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Does he maybe pop up on a few Sunday shows

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>or as part of some other network's election coverage, but

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 2>otherwise disappear. That would be the litmus test. This is

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 2>a sort of move that would indicate to me that

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>he really just wanted to retire, or whether he really

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>did think he could just speak to CBS execs this

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>way because he has a contract. But either way, he

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>goes down as a guy who has fired from CBS twice.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>As John Podharitz pointed out, quote, this is the second

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 2>time Scott Pelley has been fired by CBS. The last

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>time was for being a lousy anchorman. This time it

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>was for being a performative jerk. And he didn't say jerk,

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>he used a word that rhymes with trick. But I've

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>decided to keep my podcast relatively clean because I assume

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of people will be listening to it in

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the car or in the house with little ears around.

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 2>I might be a little looser with the language on

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the podcast now that I no longer have to meet

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>FCC requirements for over the year content, but I'll keep

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>it relatively clean for you. This explosion of emotion and

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>invective by Pelly was directed at a guy named Nick Bilton,

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>who has been hired as the new top producer of

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>sixty Minutes, and in that rant, Pelly trashed the woman

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>who hired him Bari Weez. This is the relatively new

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 2>head of the CBS News product overall, and he told

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Bilton right to his face that he had no resume

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 2>or qualifications for producing sixty minutes. He accused Wes of

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>quote murdering the show and told Bilton that he was

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 2>basically a bad joke with no qualifications. And so is

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Pelly so arrogant and foolish that he thought he could

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>speak to management that way and get away with it?

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Or was he trying to get himself fired? I would

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>opt for trying to get fired. You might be asking yourself, well,

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 2>who would want to go out that way or who

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>would want to put a stain on his career right

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 2>at the end of it this way? My answer would

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>be because Pelly is not seeing this as a stain

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>on his career or his reputation. He's seeing it as

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>a capper on his career and reputation. He was the

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>last great, honest, unbiased, fair journalist. In his mind, Scott

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Pelley is one of the last great journalists standing who

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>spoke truth to power and stood up for the institution

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 2>right until the bitter end. As a former journalist myself

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and knowing how most guys like Pelly view themselves in

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that profession. I can guarantee you that that's how Pelly

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 2>views this week's events. In fact, one good hint here

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>is how Pelly portrayed himself at his time at CBS,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>acting as if he had seen combat. Did you see this?

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 2>The statement Pelly put out right after his firing is

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 2>mockable quote. I have been in combat in Afghanistan. I've

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>been in combat in Iraq. I've been in the war

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>zone in Ukraine multiple times, risking my life and the

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>happiness of my family because of my devotion to the broadcast.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Folks.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Scott Pelly has not been in combat. He's been a

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 2>reporter working in war zones, sure, and there's an amount

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of risk in romance that comes with that, but not

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>much in the modern times. In today's war zones, the

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>risk to reporters is very low. And I can tell

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>you for certain that Scott Pelly was never anywhere near

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the fighting or in any real risk. Pelly might have

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>been two Afghanistan and Ukraine while they were at war,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>but he wasn't embedded with any troops. He and his

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>cameraman and producers were at a comfortable hotel in Kiev,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>filing reports once a day or once a week, and

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>for Pelly to portray himself as having been in combat

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't only disingenuous, it's insulting to those who have seen

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>actual combat, including war reporters in past wars that were

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>embedded with troops and were on front lines with nothing

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 2>except for their camera and their notepad. This isn't really

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 2>stolen valor because Pelly isn't pretending to have served a

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>military role, but it's still a form of stolen valor

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to suggest that he put his life at risk on

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 2>behalf of journalism and informing the American people. That's nonsense.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Helly put out a longer statement about half a day

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 2>later and included a few things that were also suspect

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>in that letter, including a claim that this new management

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 2>team at CBS told him to put false facts and

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 2>intentional biases into his stories now that they're in charge.

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>That's nonsense. It's clearly belooney, and based on what other

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 2>CBS employees who are close to Pelly and close to

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>these projects are saying, they're verifying that most people don't

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 2>know that it's really the producers and writers and all

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>sorts of people behind the scenes who put together the

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>stories that Scott Pelly voices. He or Leslie Stall. Sure,

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>they might sit down and do a live interview to

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 2>get some tape on a couple of interview subjects, but

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it's people behind the scenes that are doing all the

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 2>hard work. Scott Pelley is basically the face of that

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>story and the script reader that's it. In fact, it

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>sounds like the behind the scenes. CBS employees are pretty

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>split on the question of what Pelly did here and

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 2>whether it's helpful. As one CBS insider put it, quote,

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>what did he accomplish? He embarrassed the company in leadership.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Worse than that, Pelly confirmed for the non crazy majority

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of the country that legacy journalists are narcissistic megalomaniacs with

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a wildly overinflated sense of their own importance. That's true,

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that is what Pelly did. And maybe his fellow arrogant,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>self important newspeople who are working at the big networks

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 2>along with him think that Pelly did a bold and

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>courageous thing here, But the rest of America thinks he

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 2>looks like a Putts. Oh, and then there's the chance

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.479
<v Speaker 2>that Pelly's explosion was really just over a suggestion that

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 2>his new boss had made that they'd all be working harder. Honestly,

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 2>those who were in the meeting said that Pelly seemed

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to really get upset after this new guy, Nick Bill

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 2>said that based on the size of the staff and

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the new era of streaming, they would be producing more content.

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Bilton said, basically, what all new bosses say, we can

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 2>do better. I'm going to ask you to work a

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>little harder. We can generate more product and have more success.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.959
<v Speaker 2>That's what seemed to set off Pelly as much as anything,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>according to people in those meetings. Well, consider it, Scott

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Pelley sixty eight. He's been coasting along for a decade

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>or more, doing one story a week if that, and

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 2>getting paid millions of dollars a year to do it. Suddenly,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>right at the end of his career, and when he's

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.719
<v Speaker 2>really been enjoying this coast, this great glide path for

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>years where he's not working hard but he's making all

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 2>sorts of money. Now it's coming to an end. Of course,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>he'd be upset. That's one of the things that has

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>me thinking Pelly really just wanted to retire. He had

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>worked himself into a great position at CBS in which

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>he was making a huge amount of money for doing

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 2>virtually no work. This is similar to an agent, college professor,

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>or a brilliant brain surgeon. You have these professions in which,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>at your oldest and your wisest, you have the most value,

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>so you can make the most money. Institutions will pay

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>you a lot to do very little work. This is

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the position Scott Kelly and Leslie Stall and these other

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>ancient CBS hacks had worked themselves into. And suddenly management

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 2>changes at the top, and they're demanding more of you.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Right when you want to do less work. Management's outlining

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 2>an energetic new era that's being launched, and you're a

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 2>fossil from the old era. No no, no, no, no no,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to work harder. Suddenly retirement looks pretty good.

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 2>So this is my theory. Pelly wanted no part of

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 2>helping to launch some energetic new era of journalism and

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>storytelling blah blah blah blah blah, and he formulated his

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>own way to go out. In fact, I can virtually

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>guarantee you that's what really went on here in Pelly's head.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>So we'll wait a few days in a few weeks,

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll see if the Pelly podcast is announced, because by god,

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Scott Pelly still has a fire in his belly for

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>good stories, or we'll see if he's done and we

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 2>never really see much of Scott Pelly again. I'm guessing

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be that second option. Listeners seem to

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 2>enjoy my segment about how President Trump is beautifying and

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 2>restoring our nation's capital and how he would be getting

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan praise for it in any other political era, and

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 2>as a follow up, I just wanted to pass along

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 2>some new stats that I ran across that aren't likely

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to get much attention in the mainstream news media. According

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to the Department of Interior, just up to this point

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 2>in the Trump restoration effort, the Trump administration has restored

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty two fountains and cleaned up twenty eight statues, as

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 2>well as removed hundreds of instances of graffiti. They've restored

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>several public ponds around d C, and of course are

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 2>very close to completing the restoration of the massive reflective

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>pool between the Capitol and the Washington Monument and also

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 2>included in this list from Interior rat proofing DC's trash

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>cans and clearing out a few homeless encampments from federal grounds.

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic. And as Doug Bergham and Donald Trump have

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 2>both been saying, decay is a choice, the Democrats are

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 2>allowing and even seem to be encouraging the decay in Washington,

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>d C. In in our big cities, we shouldn't have

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>to put up with it. And by the Trump White

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>House's reckoning, decline was a choice, but not anymore. That

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 2>was posted on a White House account along with this line.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>In just fourteen months, potus has restored our nation's capital,

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>making it both safe and beautiful. And Trump really has

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>That isn't one of these Trumpian boasts that is sometimes

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 2>inflated or overblown in its characterization. Washington really is far

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 2>more safe and now more beautiful than it was when

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden left office, and really, for the first time

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 2>after decades of decline, and I'll just emphasize again, Donald

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump didn't even run on cleaning up Washington DC. Cleaning

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 2>up DC wasn't among the top priorities that Trump and

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Republicans were touting in twenty twenty four as they ran

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 2>for office. Lowering crime was, yes, but Trump wasn't promising

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to restore the fountains and the monuments in Washington, DC.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 2>He never mentioned the reflecting pool. This is just an

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 2>effort that Trump decided to take on as a personal

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 2>project once he got back into office and after seeing

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the sort of neglect indicay that had been allowed to

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 2>happen under past presidents and congresses. So good for Trump.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I have zero doubt that after he's out of office

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>and some time has passed, only then will people on

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the isle and their media outlet's admit

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump did a good thing here, and it will happen,

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 2>but it could take years. The passage of time normally

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 2>has nearly everyone admitting to a simple truth at some point.

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Two great examples are after the Clinton's left office, everyone

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Democrats side of the aisle could immediately flip

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and tell you how awful they were and in truth,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 2>how terrible their scandals were for the party in the country.

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Another good example, now that the Bidens are out of

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>office and their political careers are clearly over now already

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 2>the truth about what corrupt liars they have always been

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 2>is starting to be acknowledged.

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Folks.

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 2>It says something that the harshest criticisms related to Jill

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Biden's new book and how she's trying to rewrite history

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 2>are coming from her own side of the aisle. The

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 2>average American doesn't care about her book. They're not going

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 2>to read it. They're not really paying attention to what's

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>going on in Washington. But over the last week or so,

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Washington d C has been obsessed with how the Bidens

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>are going to try to redeem themselves with one last

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 2>rush of lies in book form. Now it's the talk

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>of the DC insiders and elites, and they're nearly all

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Democrats and legacy media members who are obsessing over this

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>because now they feel like they can tell the truth.

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Joe and Joe Biden have always been scumbags. They've always

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 2>been corrupt. They ran a corrupt, pay to play family

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 2>enterprise for decades, and DC insiders knew it. A lot

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of DC insiders were running some sort of pay for

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 2>play or corruption scheme. But when the level of the

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Biden family corruption was really exposed, they were shocked that

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 2>the Bidens were managing to collect millions and millions of

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.959
<v Speaker 2>dollars doing this. Anyone listening to Mark Helpern's podcast should

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 2>note how cavalierly they're all now on the left admitting

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>that Biden Inc. Was a corrupt and perhaps criminal enterprise,

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and we can admit it. Now they're admitting the Bidens

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 2>are broke. They can't send Hunter and Jim around to

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.720
<v Speaker 2>extort money out of people and foreign country reason collect

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 2>bribes for the family anymore. History will get this right eventually,

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is a good point to transition to the

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 2>next topic, because history will eventually get this right too.

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Donald Trump and Benjamin netanyahuo did a stunning,

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 2>heroic and historically unique thing by wiping out the military

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 2>of another major or foreign country in a matter of

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>days and solving a forty or fifty year global problem

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 2>and terror threat with virtually no loss of life and

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 2>no wider warfare. This is another thing that in any

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 2>other political era would have been marvelous and celebrated in

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 2>a bipartisan manner. But because it's Trump, and because it's

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 2>this hyperpartisan in bitter era, we're getting very different and

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 2>very unfair coverage out of the leftist media. President Trump

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 2>and his team have delivered an incredible military victory over

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 2>in Iran and it's one that can't be taken away

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 2>or explained away by Trump's political enemies, but they sure

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 2>are trying hard to do that by obsessing over some

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 2>quote peace deal that, in truth, Trump and Israel don't need.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 2>For months now, the actors involved and the Trump hate

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 2>media have been obsessing over getting some sort of official

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 2>deal in place that allows Trump to withdraw our military

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 2>from the region and cleanly walk away. But that's not

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 2>going to happen because it's not a realistic expectation. And

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I've been telling you this since my first podcast in April.

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>The truth is, we don't need a deal with Iran

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 2>because these Iranian mulas and politicians never ever live up

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 2>to deals. They've never lived up to a past deal

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 2>they've ever made with the West. Dealing with the Iranian

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>regime is useless. We either need regime change or we

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 2>need to simply keep them boxed in until their economy

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>completely collapses and they're no longer a threat to anyone

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 2>outside of their own borders. If these mullas remain in place,

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 2>that's how Trump has to handle this. This is what

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 2>needs to occur here, and if that means that gas

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 2>prices come down a little bit more slowly as the

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 2>global markets shift away from oil out of the Persian

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Gulf even more, well, then so be it. But the

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 2>price of gas is already coming down, and ironmous evil

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Mullas are still pinned in. So what actually needs to

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 2>change when it comes to deal with Iran? From America's perspective?

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 2>In truth, we don't need some sort of clean but

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 2>fraudulent deal between Trump and the Mullas to end this

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 2>and make everyone feel better about it. We don't need

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a deal with Iran. Why go back to some false

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Obama esque deal that means nothing? Why even empower the

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 2>current batch of Iranian leaders with a deal? As David

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Harsanyi correctly points out over at the Washington Examiner, the

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 2>fact that democrats and isolationists have successfully demoralized the American

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 2>public doesn't change the fact that the US and Israel

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>decapitated leadership and institutional knowledge within the Iranian regime, set

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 2>back its nuclear program vastly, to grade its ballistic missile capabilities,

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and stunted its ability to prop up proxy militias. He says,

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Iran will never be in a weaker position. We will

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 2>never have more leverage if clerics refuse to strike a

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 2>suitable deal while their economy is being pounded by a

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 2>US blockade. What in the history of the regime makes

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>anyone believe they'll be more amenable when given an economic lifeline.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Correct Harsanyi crystallizes things when he says, in the long term,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 2>clerics believe they can eke out survival until a Democrat

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 2>or a non interventionist Republican becomes president in twenty twenty eight.

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 2>In the short term, they're counting on the president not

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 2>having the courage to resume widespread military engagement. Iran understands

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.760
<v Speaker 2>that American domestic patience is negatively correlated to high gas prices.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>They understand that Trump is under political pressure with the

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 2>midtern elections coming, etc. But what they don't realize, and

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 2>what most DC insiders and so called experts don't realize,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>is that Trump doesn't really need a deal. President Trump

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be stepping in to save any more Husbalah leaders

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 2>from Israel's wrath. For example, Trump should be encouraging Netanyaho

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead and deal with Hasbellah. As long as

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 2>we're doing this and so long as Iran's leaders refuse

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to capitulate that would be the smarter way to play this,

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and as for oil prices, launch an even more overt

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>campaign globally to get the other oil producing countries to

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 2>pump more and ship more. It's not like Iran's level

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of production can't be replaced. Trump and his team are

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>making few simple demands. They should insist Iran agree to

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 2>those before any pressure is relieved on them, and that

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 2>includes turning over all enriched uranium and ending its nuclear

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and missile programs permanently period. It should also be forced

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to end any funding or assistance to the groups like

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 2>Hesbellah and Hamas and the Huthis which they've been using

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>as their proxies for spreading Islamist terrorism in the Middle

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 2>East and globally. Until or unless Iran agrees to those

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 2>there should be no talk of any sort of deal

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that eases the pressure on Iran and has the US

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 2>ending our current ability to strike back at them militarily

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 2>as they continue to throw little tantrums. Because the bottom

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 2>line has to be as long as Iran's regime has

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 2>the ability to create a nuclear bomb within a matter

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of weeks or months and deliver it via a missile,

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 2>this conflict can't be resolved. No, that's the bottom line

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 2>that the leftists, their accomplices in the media, and their

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 2>accomplices on Capitol Hill are intentionally deciding to ignore so

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 2>they can make up stories about Trump's weakness here and

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 2>how this war has actually made Muran Moore power powerful.

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 2>That's the most idiotic narrative out of a number of

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 2>idiotic narratives that the Trump haters have come up with

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 2>over the last few months. And sadly, most Americans didn't

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 2>hear or see any of Marco Rubio's performance this week

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in front of a panel of theater kid Democrat senators

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 2>who thought they could call him in front of their

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 2>panel in order to try to embarrass him and mock

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 2>this president. I hope that at least some of you

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.720
<v Speaker 2>saw some of this. I have a two minute clip

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 2>here of Secretary of State Rubia reacting to Senator Corey Booker,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>who trotted out this foolish claim that we've only made

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Iran stronger.

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.280
<v Speaker 3>And now we're begging to get back into a deal

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:38.439
<v Speaker 3>that you all trashed in the first place.

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 7>There's no one begging.

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Clearly, this is sen Booker. Booker times up want to

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 3>as fines.

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 7>Because they go to the heart of the matter. No

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 7>one's begging for anything here. The Iranians might be begging

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 7>because there are economies losing hundreds and millions of dollars

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 7>a day that they are losing. Understand, Iran had street

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 7>protests going on before all of this started.

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 3>All of those factors.

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Economic factors in Iran are far worse today than they

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 7>were six months ago when those protests were happening. They

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 7>have hyperinflation, their currency is completely devalued. They're struggling to

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 7>make payroll for their government workers. Iran is in a

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 7>very serious situation. And if it was up to the

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 7>political class there, and I understand everybody there is sort

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 7>of radical in some way, but if it was up

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 7>to the people that actually like go to elections and

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 7>wear the suits and you see on TV, they probably

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 7>make a deal tomorrow. It's the issue they're facing is

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 7>that the supreme leader in the IRGC corps are a

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 7>little bit more immune from those pressures until they can

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 7>be convinced otherwise. And I think that's the direction that

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 7>they're moving in because the reality, I don't know where

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 7>you're getting this perception that Iran is stronger Iran has

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 7>no navy left. They've lost the substantial percentage of their

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 7>defense industrial base that Iran has lost a substantial percentage

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 7>of their missile launchers, and their economy is far worse

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 7>today and I mean far worse today than it was

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 7>six to nine months ago, and they are looking at

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 7>hundreds of billions of dollars of reconstruction costs just to

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 7>get to where they.

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Were drua you keep telling, Rubio alludes to one of

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the biggest challenges here. Iran's leadership has been so fractured

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that it's still not clear who's in charge or who

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 2>we'd be making a peace deal with. As he said,

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 2>if it was up to the politicians who are pretend

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 2>elected to office over there, the deal would already be done.

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 2>But it's really up to the evil mullows and the

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:13.919
<v Speaker 2>leaders of the so called Revolutionary Guard, the military wing

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 2>of that regime, and they're the ones still hiding in

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 2>the shadows and refusing to give up because they want

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to remain in power over that country and its people.

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:23.839
<v Speaker 2>We have another instance here in which the left wing

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 2>accomplices in the US and global news media are pretending

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.959
<v Speaker 2>to not know what America is even asking for here,

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 2>what are even Trump's demands? They keep asking, They keep

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>asking this even though Trump, Rubio and Nettanna, who have

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>made those demands clear. It reminds me of the Bush

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 2>era when President Bush went into Iraq and he would

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 2>answer the same question three times a week, only to

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:46.959
<v Speaker 2>have the Democrats and their media whores insist we still

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what the President's trying to accomplish here.

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 2>The point of this war is still unclear. What's his mission?

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 2>What's Bush calling a victory? President Bush couldn't have been

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 2>more clear when the Trump era President Trump could be clearer.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>But it's not like he hasn't repeatedly said what we're

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.720
<v Speaker 2>after here. Give up the nuclear dust, end your nuclear

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 2>in ballistic programs, stop funding terror, and stop harassing or

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 2>blackmailing ships floating through the Strait of Hormuz. This is

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 2>what we're demanding, and Secretary Rubio made that clear again

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 2>this week in front of that Senate panel. Rubio said

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Step one is getting Iran to reopen the Strait of

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Hormuz and end their harassment of commercial ships. Only after

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 2>they agree to that will negotiators move to Phase two

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 2>or issue too, which is getting Iran to give up

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 2>its existing stockpiles of enriched uranium, because as long as

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 2>they have that stuff, it's at least feasible that Iran

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 2>could resume an effort to create a nuclear bomb in

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 2>short order weeks or months, if they just organized it

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 2>correctly and kept it hidden. Then phases three and four

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 2>are presumably ending any ability for Iran to deliver that

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 2>nuclear bomb via a warhead on a missile, etc. But

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 2>none of this is going to happen quickly. You know.

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 2>One thing being missed here and intentionally by the Trump

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 2>hating media is that any compliance of a deal is

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 2>going to take an extended period of time. Turning over

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the stockpiles verifying programs have been ended, Any compliance of

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a deal is going to take time and require a

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 2>large amount of monitoring and verification if we're going to

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 2>ever ensure the Mullas are forced to honor any deal

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 2>they make, and so either way, this doesn't end quickly.

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I know it's not just the Democrats and Trump haters

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 2>in their mouthpieces who want this war wrapped up cleanly

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and quickly. All sorts of Trump supporters and average Americans

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:28.320
<v Speaker 2>do too. Yep, but it's not going to happen quickly

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 2>or cleanly, at least not if Donald Trump. It really

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is a different sort of president who refuses to do

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 2>what Barack Obama did and only pretend that he's actually

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 2>accomplished something here, or pretend he has dealt with Iran.

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Obama and John Carey were only pretending. Trump, with his

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 2>military actions here, has already proven he's not screwing around.

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 2>He genuinely finally wants to deal with a dangerous and

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 2>belligerent Iran, and in that regard, he and BB have

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 2>already dealt a few devastating blows and made the globe safer.

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But there isn't going to be a neat and tidy

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 2>end to this ung as the evil and lying Mullas

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>are involved. No, a regime change would be a clear

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and definitive end to this. But any genuine deal made

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 2>with the same evil Mullas and West hating religious zelots

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 2>in charge now won't. No, then there's the possibility that

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 2>regime change still occurs due to an internal uprising. Secretary

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Rubio wasn't lying when he said Iran's economy is in

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 2>desperate shape. Inflation was high even before the military strikes

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and It's now hit the highest levels in eighty years

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 2>in that country, highest levels since World War II. In May,

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 2>the annual inflation rate in Iran hits seventy seven point

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 2>two percent. Economic problems have been a source of considerable

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 2>civil unrest obviously inside that country, and skyrocketing costs could

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 2>lead to even more protests. And so as long as

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 2>no agreement is reached, Iran's economy, which is based heavily

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 2>on oil sales, is going to remain under the stranglehold

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of this US blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. There's

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a reason that the Mullas have been ordering thousands of

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Iranians jailed and killed over the last few months. They're

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to ensure that any dissidents are dealt with quickly

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 2>before any larger internal opposition can organize. It would be

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 2>silly to ease up on our western pressure points now

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and give them all his more breathing room. And Trump

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 2>knows that the way that Iran survives this is with

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 2>delay and deception. And Trump needs to make it clear

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 2>he has three more years in office, and you can't

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 2>outlast me, and you can't deceive me. As Victor Davis

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Hansen says, Iran is unlikely to ever abandon its pursuit

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 2>of the bomb voluntarily. He says, as such, the Iranian

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 2>regime has never viewed negotiations as a path leading to

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 2>an ultimate deal. At best, the regimes supposedly elected government

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 2>plays good cop, while the bad cop, theocratic henchman, periodically

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 2>violate whatever understandings have been reached with the Western world.

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, of course, these talks aren't going to go anywhere.

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 2>As Victor Davis Hanson also correctly states, Iran does not

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 2>necessarily regard overwhelming military defeat on the battlefield as a

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 2>strategic loss. The regime believes its own advantage lies in

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the long term and beyond the battlefield itself. For nearly

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 2>half a century, this wicked regime has revived through propaganda,

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 2>blood curdling threats, slaughtering civilians at home and abroad, terrorist

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.280
<v Speaker 2>proxies and clients, and a mastery of the internal policies

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 2>of its adversaries, especially the US and Europe. Hanson says

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Iran's leaders are like the crazy assailant on the subway

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 2>who feels he can do anything he wishes, since most

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 2>people either fear his antics or won't wish to stoop

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:31.240
<v Speaker 2>to his level to stop him, and so Hanson concludes,

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:34.319
<v Speaker 2>the more left leaning American presidents like Clinton, Obama and

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Biden they reached out to dialogue and normalized with Iran,

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and the more Iranians lothe those presidents for being weak,

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 2>he correctly says magnanimity. They interpret his weakness to be exploited.

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Never is kindness to be siprocated, and so it is

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 2>that playing field that Trump and Rubio need to navigate.

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 2>This isn't one country's dignitaries dealing with another country's dignitaries.

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 2>This is closer to a group of orderlies at a

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 2>metal hospital trying to deal with a group of metal

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>patients who have now taken over the TV room. How

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 2>are we going to get these lunatics in line and

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>back to their rooms? What can we bribe them with

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 2>or promise them? Because we can't rationalize with them. That's

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a better analogy. Obama and John Carey wanted to befriend

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Iran's mulla's and mainstream them into global society. Trump and

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Rubyo know the Iranians are dangerous metal patients who will

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 2>only respond to threats or bribes. You can either calm

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>down and cooperate and have your pudding, or you can

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 2>keep throwing your tantrum and lose your ice cream after

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:34.399
<v Speaker 2>dinner tonight too. That's who Trump's team is negotiating with here,

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a dangerous cuckoo's nest of deranged but crafty individuals. And

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of course Americans just want gas to be under three

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 2>dollars a gallon again, and Republican strategists and candidates want

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to see that before Labor Day. That only increases the

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 2>pressures that Trump and Ruby are dealing with. But I'm

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.919
<v Speaker 2>telling you they don't need to deal with Iran. Any

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 2>deal would be useless anyway.

0:52:55.600 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>The Jay Weber Podcast is a production of iHeartRadio podcasts,

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>produced and engineered by Gregory John. The Jayweber Podcast is

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>presented by Creative Planning, helping clients simplify their journey to

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>financial wellness, one personalized plan at a time. Listen to

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:18.439
<v Speaker 1>all of Jayweber's podcasts, available on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts.