WEBVTT - The Jay Weber Podcast #0019 6-9-26 

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That j Weber Podcast is presented by Creative Planning, helping

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>clients simplify their journey to financial wellness, one personalized plan

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>at a time. That Jweber Podcast is a production of

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio podcasts Good Day.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Jyweber Podcast. Lots to talk about today,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>including clear election rigging in California, the ways in which

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the Trump FBI and the federal government have helped lower crime,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and the sorts of Supreme Court decisions that are going

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to be handed down over the next few weeks. But

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>let's start by being clear. The Democrats just stole an

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>election out in California. I hear a flood of pundits

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>insisting that what happened out there is logical or reasonable

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>because it's a deep blue state. I hear them insisting

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>that anyone who would questioned the results is just a

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>sore loser, etc. But my friends, what just happened out there,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 2>with a candidate who was in distant third place strongly

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>surging days after the polls closed, is not only questionable,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>it's statistically impossible. The more accurate take would be if

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>you think this was a natural occurrence, if you think

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't vote fraud. You're a fool. The Washington Times

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>asked chat Gpt whether, in the history of this country's

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>voting patterns, whether we'd ever seen something like this with

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a third place candidate who was never even in the

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 2>race over the course of the campaign suddenly surging from

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>out of nowhere to finish second. AI's answer was no,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>We've never seen it. Quote chat Gpt could not find

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>one example in American history of a third place candidate

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>surging days after an election to overtake second place. Yet

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that's what we were seeing in the Los Angeles mayoral race,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>with Democratic socialist Nathia Rahman besting reality TV star Spencer Pratt.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 2>But that's just one result of this insane and impossible

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>post election movement by Raman. The Times notes that for

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>mail in ballots arriving before election day, Karen Bass, the

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Democrat who's currently the mayor, she received thirty eight percent

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of that vote. The ballots that came in by mail

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>before the election, Spencer Pratt received twenty eight percent of

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>that vote, and Raman only received twenty So that was

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the voting pattern for weeks and weeks before the actual

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>election day when it came to mail in ballots, which

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats are supposed to use more heavily. Correct, So

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>now we're supposed to believe that when it comes to

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the remaining uncounted mail in ballots, and very importantly, the

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>ballots collected from the drop boxes, Suddenly all of Raman's

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>supporters showed their strength. Suddenly, nearly every ballot opened after

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 2>election day was for the third place finisher, whose campaign

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>had shown no life before that point, Bullplop. According to

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the California Counters, Ramen magically collected thirty seven percent of

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the ballots that arrived after the election day. So she's

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>suddenly collecting four out of every ten ballots that are

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 2>coming in, as Karen Bass is collecting three. So Raman

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>collected even more ballots after election day than Karen Bass did.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, the most popular Republican candidate, Spencer Pratt, was

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>suddenly only getting about one out of every six new votes,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 2>as the Washington Times correctly characterizes that. Just to be clear,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>mail in ballots arrived after June second drop for everyone

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>except the person the Democrats needed to defeat, Spencer Pratt.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Come on, they say, this is simply not mathematically or

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>statistically realistic. Well, they're correct, and the Democrats and Lefties

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 2>vote in mail by larger numbers than Republicans. Yes, but

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't explain how or why a woman who was

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a complete afterthought throughout the entire election suddenly surged to

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>second place and into the general election runoff. What does

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>explain it cheating, a rigged game in which a system

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.559
<v Speaker 2>that can be easily manipulated with ballot stuffing was manipulated

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to ensure Pratt wouldn't be in the position to be

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Karen Bass in the general election. Folks, the results of

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>this race are so improbable that organized cheating is the

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>best explanation for the results. It really is. In fact,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the ballot drops late on election night, after

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the polls closed, Spencer Pratt received zero of the twenty

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>four thousand votes that were added to the total. Again,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>AI estimates that the odds of that occurring are less

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>than one in trillions. It is statistically impossible that vote

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 2>counters could says, twenty four thousand ballots in an election

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty four thousand and not come across a single vote

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>for Spencer Pratt. And it's interesting that that was the

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>first chunk of mail in ballots to be added to

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the total. It's almost as if someone at Central Planning

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>knew the Democrats would need a boost. They'd need to

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 2>boost Raman immediately while harming Pratt if they wanted to

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>ensure that he wouldn't appear on the final ballot. It's

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 2>almost as if they had a bunch of votes for

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Raman and Bass ready to go, isn't it then get this?

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>The Washington Times reports the most concentrated batches of mail

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>in votes for Raman came from skid Row, where tens

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of homeless people live with no address or

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>phone number to verify them, but they're still allowed to vote,

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and where ballot harvesting is legal. This is where third

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>parties can collect and turn in the ballots on the

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>voter's behalf. Mostly they drop them into a drop box

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and they're supposed to drop them into the drop box

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>before election day obviously, but if they're dropped into those

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>drop boxes, they're not postmarked. Right. These ballots could have

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 2>been created at any time, really and ended up at

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Central Counting. It's a very sloppy process. Moreover, the Washington

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Time says, in California, one of the nation's most powerful unions.

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>The Service Employees International Union engages in ballot harvesting and

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>get out the vote efforts, and I didn't realize this.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>They even help count and tabulate the ballots afterward, which

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>creates a clear conflict of interest. Other large Democrat institutions

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 2>also do that. So a simple explanation for Rahman's rise

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is that whoever was harvesting the votes wasn't just collecting

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>ballots but also controlling the votes. They either filled out

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 2>the ballots for her, or they threw out the ballots

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't like. And of course, none of this

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 2>is likely to be proved because, as The Times notes,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in May, Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, signed a

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>law that actually bans law enforcement and federal agencies from

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>accessing their voter roles in California, or investigating polling places

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 2>and election workers, or even verifying mail in ballots. This

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 2>system is designed for cheating. There is no other reason

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to pass a law that says you cannot look into

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>our elections unless you're cheating, and you look at it

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and you see the But this is why Gavin Newsom

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 2>could cryptically reassure reporters a few weeks ago that they

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>have ways of ensuring two Republicans won't end up in

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the runoff elections. Remember that I'm convinced that this is

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 2>what he was referring to. In California, Democrats have created

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 2>a system in which those in control can ignore the

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 2>will of the voting public and create the result they

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>want in any given election. Now, so the only question

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>now is will there be any genuine and lasting outrage

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>over it? My guess is, sadly no. Have you heard

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>about Creative Planning. This is the company that sponsors this

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.239
<v Speaker 2>great podcast, and I have to give them a shout

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>out here. They're one of the nation's largest independent wealth

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>management firms, offering fully integrated financial and retirement planning, investment management,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>estate planning, tax strategies, business services, and international wealth management,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>all in house and coordinated through your wealth manager. Their

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>fiduciary wealth managers are here to help you navigate every

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>piece of your financial life. Visit Creative Planning dot com

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to schedule your introductory meeting. That's Creative Planning dot com.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Your team, oh waits painful by Creative Planning and sec

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>registered investment advisor. The speaker's statements are not an endorsement

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>of the firm serious question, what percentage of Americans knows

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>that the Trump administration is building about five miles of

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>border wall per day? Now do you even think two

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>percent of Americans know this? Because aside from Byron York

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>including that fact in a piece last week, I haven't

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>seen it reported anywhere. And I've noticed that this is

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>a new technique or a new path that the members

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>of the left wing media are taking in Trump's second term.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>They did this somewhat in term one, but they've made

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>it a standard practice in term two. And it's the

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>technique of simply ignoring the fact that the Democrat side

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of the aisle and those on the left are losing

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on an issue. This is a great example of how

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump and Republicans have simply outlasted and out distanced the

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>left's phony outrage on an issue, and outlasted and out

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>distanced all of the left wing activists attempts to stop

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>or block an action. This is to the point that

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the left is simply lost the argument and in this

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>case has lost the battle folks on questions of both

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>immigration enforcement and building the southern border fence. The Democrats

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and their America Aiding activists have simply lost the argument,

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and so rather than continue to pitch fits on it

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and draw attention to the fact that they have lost

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that Trump and Republicans simply bested them on something, the

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Democrats and their accomplices who controlled the media have decided

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 2>to go dark on the matter and not draw attention

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to it. Shouldn't aoc or rasheta to lee be weeping

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 2>at the border as Trump commits the terrible atrocity of

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>erecting five more miles of border fence each day. After all,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>when Joe Biden allegedly won election in twenty twenty, both

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 2>he and Chuck Schumer promised that America wasn't going to

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>build quote one more effing foot of border fence. Well,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>here we are in twenty twenty six with Trump back

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in office, and the fence is being built to the

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>tune of five miles per day. And as they strongly

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>suggested to listeners when Trump won reelection in twenty twenty four,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 2>we will have all of the border fence that our

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>own border patrol agents say we need by the time

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump leaves office. This time, those who used to listen

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to my radio show will know that Trump's wall build

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>bilding in term one was a herculean effort. First, Trump

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>had to fight basically both parties in Congress to find

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the funding. Then he had to fight years of bogus

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 2>lawsuits and court actions the Democrats used to try to

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 2>stop the fence building. And as that was going on,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>he had to fight the permitting process and clear away

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 2>the obstacles there, then actually start the bidding process and

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>hire the contractors and organize the materials and the job sites, etc.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And still Trump and his team managed to put up

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>or replace about four hundred and fifty miles of border

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 2>wall in term one, And so when he was running

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 2>for a second term, one thing I was assuring my

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>audience was, if Trump gets a second term, the border

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>wall will get done. No guessing, no conjecture. If Border

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Control says we still need about five hundred more miles

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>of strategically placed border wall in order to make that

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>border secure, Trump will get it built in term two,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.479
<v Speaker 2>because at that point he had won all the lawsuits

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and could quickly ramp up the project again if he

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 2>got back into office. Well, huzza, huzzah. He has according

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>to Byron York stats, as no one's been w watching

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and twenty one miles of what was called

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 2>what's called primary smart wall are currently under construction. Contracts

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>have been awarded and design is underway for an additional

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and seventy miles and another forty four miles

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of replacement walls under construction, plus one hundred and eighty

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 2>three miles of secondary wall that provides backup security and

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 2>high traffic areas where there's already a primary wall. Yeah,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 2>on the first term, Trump's team put up about four

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred or four hundred and fifty miles of that high

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Ballard style wall, but it was an areas that already

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>had some sort of fencing, crummy, substandard. They were taking

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 2>down like six foot high centery fence in some areas,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>or simply a string of barbed wire sort of cow

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>fence in other areas, and they were putting up this

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 2>real Ballard style wall, but it was quote replacement fencing.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>And so that's what allowed the Democrats to claim Trump

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>wasn't really doing anything or fixing anything along the border.

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, two hundred miles of low center fence that

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>anyone could have climbed over, came down and was replaced

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>by a high wall, but unless you were paying attention,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Democrats could still claim, well, nothing is really being done.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump hasn't built a single new mile of border fence,

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 2>they were always trying to claim, but in fact he was. Well.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Now virtually all of the old, low substandard fencing in

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the high traffic areas has been replaced with real wall

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and even double wall, and hundreds of miles of completely

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>new wall is stretching off into the distances. Trump will

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 2>get this done and it will be another lasting and

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>real win for the American people. But will the left

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>wing activists who masquerade as journalists report this to the

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 2>American people or give Trump his due course? Not, so

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 2>they're intentionally ignoring the story. They don't want to report

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the win because they're propagandists for the Democrat Party and

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats themselves, I mean the Democrat office holders. They

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 2>don't want to draw attention to their myriad failures and

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to admit the loss for their side on this. So

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 2>this incredibly positive story is going largely unreported.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>But is there a.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Better illustration of how elections have consequences? Trump promised a

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>border wall in the twenty sixteen campaign than he won.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>He moved to keep that promise, only to have Joe

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 2>Biden allegedly win office and twenty twenty in stop construction

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and even go so far as to sell off surplus

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>wall and supplies for pennies on the dollar to ensure

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that it wouldn't be sitting around or be available, couldn't

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>even be available for future installation. The Biden regime tried

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to do whatever they could to buy god end any

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>talk of a wall, only to have then Trump win

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 2>reelection in twenty twenty four largely on the immigration issue. Actually,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>after four years of Biden's regime flooding the country with foreigners,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's now safe to say that by the time

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump leaves office, any needed border wall would be

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>completed and we the people will have won on that issue.

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Seventy to eighty percent of Americans have said forever that

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>they want closed and controlled borders, and something like sixty

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>five percent of Americans in twenty twenty two, in the

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 2>midst of Biden's flood of illegals, supported the physical southern

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>border wall. Yes, build a wall. Trump will absolutely make

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 2>that happen in his second term. Fantastic, And no, that

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that the next Democrat president can't just throw

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>open the gates at the border cross and let any

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 2>flood of illegals in any way. But it does mean

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that under any new pro illegal president, at least we

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>won't have thousands and thousands of illegals crossing into the

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 2>country along remote parts of the border and then just

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 2>melting into the interior. It does mean that our national

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>security agencies will have a far better handle on controlling

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>cartel operations moving forward. And it also does mean that

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 2>any future president who wants to flood this country with

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>foreigners and wants open borders will have to be honest

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>about it and admit it. They will because the notion

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that this is just happening on its own will no

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>longer be a valid one. Right, Any future president who

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 2>wants to swamp the country with illegals will have to

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>take intentional and overt steps to make it happen. You

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean. That president will have to order

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that the gates along the southern border should be opened

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 2>and agents should be made to stand back and let

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the illegals flow in, or that new president will have

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>to take very intentional steps to try to recreate Joe

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Biden's open borders app and set up a system in

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>which foreigners can fly into this nation's airports directly and

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>then be allowed to flood into the interior illegally. Folks.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>The border wall doesn't solve all the country's immigration problems,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>not by a long shot, but it does solve some

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 2>of them, and it takes away the biggest way that

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>illegals have been flowing into this country for the last

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>two hundred years or more, simply walking across the US

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Mexican border. Moreover, the Biden era showed the nation the

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>danger of a reckless and a moral border policy, meaning

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>that the next president who wants to champion open borders

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>lawlessness isn't as likely to find supporters for it. Another

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>significant win that the President and the Republicans are wrapping

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>up on this week also isn't getting the attention it deserves.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Folks.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>The Republicans just ensured federal funding for ICE and border enforcement,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and funding continues for this deportation process through twenty twenty nine.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>This is another major loss for Congressional Democrats, whose leaders

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>have been insisting for probably a year now that by God,

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>they will not allow these evil Republicans to continue funding ICE.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>In its mass deportation efforts. Well, Republicans hold both Houses

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of Congress, and so when they can get their members

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to cooperate, there's nothing Chuck Schumer or Hakim Jeffreys can

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>do to stop them. And so the Democrats, who've been

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>siding with the illegal aliens and have been working against

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the American people for years now on this question of

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 2>immigration enforcement, have just suffered another major loss. The continued

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>financing of these government operations has just been finalized through

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty nine, meaning the robust deportation effort's going to

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>continue at least so long as Donald Trump is in office.

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>That's why the passage of this reconciliation bill to fund

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>ICE and Border Patrol is so important. The Republicans in

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Congress just ensured that President Trump and his team have

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the money that they need to keep our borders secure

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and to continue the mass deportations right through the end

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of Trump's term. Big win. Moreover, as a former director

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>of ICE noted, just the argument over this reconciliation bill

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>exposed where today's Democrats stand on borders and immigration. He says, quote,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Democrats gave up the game on this thing with their

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 2>list of demands, because when there were situations where the

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Republicans were willing to concede or give them some of

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the things they wanted, they rejected that in favor of

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>just shutting down the agency. He says, Democrats don't care

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>about ICE and ICE operations. They just want to stop

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>ICE from doing what they're required to do, which is

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to port illegal aliens. Yeah, that's a good point, Chuck

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Schumer and the Democrats could have engaged in responsible or

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 2>reasonable arguments to put limits on ICE operations, etc. They

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>could have argued for more reasonable things. Instead, they went

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>all in on the open borders rhetoric and spent months

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>insisting ICE agents where racist thugs and that agency should

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>be shut down. In fact, there was a great moment

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 2>on Capitol Hill last week that the vast majority of

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Americans will never hear about Trump's new Homeland Security Director,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Mark Wayne Mullen was appearing before a Senate panel, and

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>just as they settled in to get the hearing started,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Democrat Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut called ICE quote unconstitutional.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>He claimed that every day ICE agents are breaking the

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>law and wasting billions of tax dollars. He said they're

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>making up the laws as they go. Well, none of

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>that's true, of course, and having those sorts of intentional

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>lines and misrepresentations coming out of an elected senator's mouth

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is really unconstable. So Secretary Mullen put his notes aside

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and just blasted the senator for four minutes straight. I

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>have a few highlights here that every voting American should hear,

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and you should know that I edited some of this

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>together from a larger chunk of audio from that Senate hearing.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Senator Murphy, the outlineish claims you made there is just

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 4>flat wrong. You start saying we're breaking the law, and

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 4>you really start looking at it, and we're enforcing the

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 4>laws that Congress did pass. That's reckless when you start

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 4>saying it's unconstitutional. What's unconstitutional that we're doing. We swore

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 4>up all the Constitution, just like you swore to hold

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 4>the constitution. For you to throw my two hundred and

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 4>seventy five thousand employees underneath DHS and with a broad

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 4>stroke like that is reckless and irresponsible in your part.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 4>We're doing the job that Congress gave us the authority

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>to do, and our men and women out there every

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>single day is enforcing laws. If you don't like the laws,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 4>you can change them. We're not picking and choosing what's

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the laws we enforce. We're simply enforcing the law, period,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>full stop. When you start looking at assaults on our officers,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 4>they're up by thirteen hundred percent. Sinna Murphy, is that

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 4>what you want? I don't think it is. I really don't.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 4>But I understand the political theater. I understand wanting to

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 4>get sound bites. And that was obvious because the whole

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 4>time he was given your testimony, he wasn't looking at me.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 4>He's looking at a camera.

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I get that.

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 4>I get it.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>If you have.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Bigger political ambitions, fine, just say it. And it's our

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 4>job to protect the homeland. And we do that every

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 4>single day. Every day I walk into that office. I

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 4>feel so blessed a President Trump gave me this opportunity

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 4>because I protect my backyard as hard as I protect

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 4>your backyard, and I do it with pride in every

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>one of the employees, all two hundred and seventy five

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 4>thousand employees at DHS, they do it with pride too,

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 4>And they don't separate a blue state from a red state.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 4>We look at it as a whole. But your reckless

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 4>tone is getting people hurt and it's got to stop.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Mark Wayne Mullen's statements there on the legitimacy of ICE

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and what they're doing is just wonderful. It's sad that

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>we have to remind the American people and the Democrats

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 2>who've been elected to office that we are, in fact

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a nation of laws, and in order for the Republic

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>to survive and thrive, we need to follow those laws.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It's sad Mullen even needed to remind Senator Murphy of this,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 2>But it was also important for Mullen to remind Murphy

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and the country about what the process is. If you

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>don't like the laws of this nation, you need to

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>go through the legislative process and change them. It gets

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 2>back to how Schumer and Murphy and these Democrats in

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the US House and Senate have been comporting themselves over

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the last year or so on this issue. Ever since

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump ordered our ICE agents to start enforcing the nation's

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>immigration laws again, the Democrats have been insisting to crack

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>down is wrong or illegal. They're insisting that it's the

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>agents who are engaging in lawless business, insisting this is unconstitutional, thuggery, etc.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 2>They've been great at bomb throwing and rhetorical thuggery, but

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't made a single honest move to try to change

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the law or negotiate a less aggressive process with the president. Nothing.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just been a bunch of hollow whining and constant

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 2>attempts to put targets on the backs of our ice agents.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Mullin was right to say, basically, all lawmakers like Chris

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Murphy have done is in danger the lives of those

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>who the federal government has hired to enforce our laws.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>You just heard Mullen say it. He said, when you

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>throw out reckless terms and you start referring to our

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.239
<v Speaker 2>agents as being dangerous, unconstitutional, and lawless, that's why our

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>agent's death threats are up by eight thousand percent, he said,

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 2>your political theater, that's what it causes. When you start

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>looking at assaults on our officers, they're up by thirteen

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent. I've been a rather cynical and skeptical person

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 2>for my entire life, which is what made me such

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 2>a good reporter and show host. You question everything, be

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a critical thinker. But even so, I never would have

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>predicted that the members of one of our two major

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 2>political parties in America would be calling for open borders

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>and lawlessness, no prisons. They'd be supporting the spread of

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>decay and chaos in this country. But that's what today's

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Democrat lawmakers and their activists are doing seemingly every day

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 2>now in this country. Chris Murphy is going to accuse

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Ice agents of lawlessness. Come on, I mean, what a stooge.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 2>But back to my original point of how the Democrats

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and their activists left have simply lost on this issue

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 2>of border enforcement and mass deportations. I'd note that even

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the protests going on outside of that New Jersey ICE

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>facility that the Left has been trying to get so

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 2>much media attention to, even that has been mostly a

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>regional story. Maybe they're getting big coverage in New Jersey

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and New York and their media outlets, but nationally, yeah,

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 2>there's been some coverage, but not anything that's really grabbing

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the attention of the American people or getting voters excited.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>It's almost as if the American people finally realize that

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>all this hysteria about Ice and mistreatment of illegals is

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 2>ginned up, because it is, and it has been from

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 2>the very beginning the vast majority of the American people

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>know that our government and its agents aren't going to

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 2>mistreat fellow human beings. These illegals aren't being deprived of

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 2>food and water or mistreated physically. We all know that,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>if anything, our government agencies are going to be overly

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>kind and overly generous and deferential to the people who

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>we have in government custody. This isn't county lock up

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>in a Southern sheriff's jail cell back in nineteen thirty.

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 2>This is people caught in this country illegally in twenty

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty six, who will be treated extremely well, far better

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>than necessary, until they're deposited back in their country of

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 2>origin or until a bleeding heart US judge says they

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 2>can stay. And so by now, after more than a

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 2>decade of the leftist hysteria and false accusations, when it

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 2>comes to isis treatment of illegals, I don't think it

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>even registers with the American people. The leftists can organize protests,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 2>and they can fight and bite ICE agents if they

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 2>want to, but their activities aren't moving the American people

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>in any way anymore. I was going to say they

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>aren't moving people in any significant way. But I think

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>we're even beyond that. These leftists make themselves look like

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 2>lunatics with these riots and protests, and not only are

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 2>they not winning the American people over to their cause,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're moving the American people at all anymore.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 2>This has been going on so long. I think that

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the vast majority of the American people are just rolling

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 2>their eyes at it. Nearly all of us are rooting

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>for the Ice, agents of anything. We know who's really

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 2>keeping the peace and protecting our communities. And we're happy

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to finally see many of our country's laws being enforced again,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>especially our immigration laws, and especially after decades and decades

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of non enforcement of those immigration laws. Last podcast, we

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 2>talked briefly about the nation's crime rates being down. Researcher

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>John Lott wanted to link it to the number of

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>people who now carry concealed in America, and I dismissed

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>that completely, given that nearly the same number of people

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 2>carried for protection during the Biden era. Right, it's not

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>like Trump got back into office and suddenly one third

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>of the country was arming themselves for a protection. Now,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the reason overall crime is down is because some voters

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>in our larger cities finally got fed up enough to

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 2>demand better and vote out the Week on Crime Soros

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>funded das that had been running their state DA's offices

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 2>and refusing to punish criminals. Also, it's because after years

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>of Joe Biden era apathy in general lawlessness, President Trump

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and his administration did get back into office and made

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the lowering crime a priority. In general, the level of

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 2>lawlessness or enforcement of the laws depends on local leadership.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>The question is are your mayor police chief and or

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>sheriff interested in finding and prosecuting criminals or not? Are

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 2>your local leaders making a safe community a priority or not?

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Because in general it's the cops and the judges at

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 2>the local and the county levels that keep the peace

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>or create a safe community. The federal government does have

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement agencies and duties, obviously, but they're geared toward

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 2>national security or prosecuting federal crimes. That's why any given

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 2>change of presidential administration doesn't normally have much of an

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 2>impact on local crime rates. But as is the case

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 2>with just about everything else, Donald Trump is different. He

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>ran for a second term on lowering the nations out

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of control murder and crime and so far, just fourteen

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>months into that second term, we're genuinely seeing that's the case.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Community to community, red state or blue state, crime is lower.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 2>That's because Donald Trump and his team came in with

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a plan to do whatever they could at the federal

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 2>level to reduce crime more locally. Since Washington d C

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>is run by the Feds, it meant that Trump could

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>literally take over the street enforcement of Washington d C.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>And he did with the National Guard. He was the

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 2>National Guard in a few other select cities where mayors

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 2>asked for help. But beyond that, there was a far

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>more serious and organized effort by Trump and his Department

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 2>of Justice to get federal agents into the high crime

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>areas and offer to help out the locals where they could.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 2>One major factor is, yeah, our ICE agents have literally

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 2>taken tens of thousands of criminal illegals and gang members

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>off of the streets of America and deported them. The

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Left would never admit it, but this has been a

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 2>significant help to local law enforcement. Next week, the Department

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of Homeland Security said that they are still ICE is

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 2>still running into and going after criminal illegals. They're still

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>collecting murderers, rapists, child molesters, burglars and deporting them. Sadly,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the number of foreign thugs and scumbags that Obama and

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Biden's open borders allowed into this country was massive and immeasurable,

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>and so far, even a year into President Trump's efforts

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to round up the worst of the worst, ICE is

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>still routinely running into them and going out of their

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>way to find them. But there's no doubt that ICE's

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>activities have helped lower crime across the country and especially

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>in the larger cities. Also, though, listen to Cash Patel,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Trump's FBI director. He's telling Fox News that just since

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>he and Trump took over and reprioritized at the FBI,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>they've arrested nearly thirty five hundred child predators and traffickers.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 5>And as we noticed, and as we reference in our introduction,

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the lowest homicide rate since the nineteen thirties, A lot

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 5>of people didn't think that was possible. I also want

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 5>to ask you about this children that you have rescued

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 5>at the FBI.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 6>Let's pull this up.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Twenty nine hundred alleged abusers arrested. This is up by

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 5>seventy percent and identified or located seven thousand children up

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 5>by one hundred and forty four percent. How did you

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 5>do this?

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, Kelly, As you know so well and as you

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 3>advocate so much for our youth, there are most precious treasure.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 3>And we made it a priority to go off the

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 3>villains and the terrorists and gangbangers that are targeting our kids.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>And what we did was we utilize intelligence driven operations.

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 3>We took fifteen hundred employees from the FBI in DC

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 3>and put them in the field permanently, working with our

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>state and local law enforcement partners, and we went after

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the worst of the worst. And those stats, while those

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>stats are meaningful, and those stats are truly historic, just

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>think about the seventy two hundred kids that we found

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>that got to go home. Just think about the thirty

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>four hundred. Actually, when you take the numbers for this year,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 3>we're at thirty four hundred child predators and traffickers arrested.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 3>That's up ninety nine percent from the best year Biden

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 3>ever had. That means kids are being protected at levels

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>that are simply on heard of, and that means this FBI.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's another thing.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 3>We didn't just do the physical work on the streets.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>We went to the cyber community, and we dismantled three

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 3>million pedophile accounts off the tour network where these predators

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>prey on our children and think they can hide from

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 3>this FBI. They can't. We are going to the ends

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 3>of the earth and the cyber realm to make sure

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 3>our most precious commodity, kids are safeguarded. And the numbers

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 3>speak for themselves because the FBI are putting kids first.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 2>So Trump's new FBI is also a reason that overall

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 2>crime is down, which makes you wonder what was the

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden FBI doing. I guess they really were trying

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to criminalize parents who didn't cave to the trans bullies

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>in their schools and trying to prosecute the Catholic church.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Next topic, the state of California is insane way of

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>counting votes. I told you this is what Gavin Newsome

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>meant when he said a few weeks ago that they

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>had ways of ensuring the two Republicans wouldn't end up

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the primary results. Remember this, for

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 2>a period of time, two Republican candidates were outpolling the

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Democrat ones in the governor's race out there, and the

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>way their jungle primary works is everyone runs on the

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 2>same ballot without party affiliation, and whichever candidates end up

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>being numbers one in two, they then have a runoff

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in the general election. Well, when a reporter asked scummy

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Governor Gavin Newsom what it would mean if two Republicans

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>ended up in the general election runoff, his response was basically,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>we have ways of ensuring that won't happen. He basically

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 2>admitted that the Democrats, who've had an iron grip on

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>California state government for decades, can manipulate the system and

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>ignore the will of the voting public if they need to,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>but a Democrat will end up in control of the

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 2>governor's chair. That was basically what Newsom was saying, wink wink,

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>not non, Well, I give you the California vote counting system.

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 2>What of farce?

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>This is?

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 2>The primary election was held a week ago, and yet

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the people in charge still can't tell the voters who

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>actually won the important races, especially for governor and mayor

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of LA Why not, Well, because the Republican candidates in

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>both of those races did really well, and it's going

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to take weeks to manipulate the results behind the scenes.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 2>That's what I would say. The answer is to that question,

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats want to insist, no, no, no, it's because California

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>receives so many mail in ballots, and because those mail

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in ballots are considered valid for a week after the

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>election date. So what sort of crummy system is this?

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 2>In short, it's one that is designed by cheaters so

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>they can cheat, isn't it. I don't see any way

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that you can claim this is an honest system or

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the fairest way to run an election if you're an

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>honest person, And that leaves the truth Democrats who run

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the system want a system that they can manipulate and cheat.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Meghan Kelly had Sean Davis of The Federalist on her

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>podcast and he explained it perfectly. No one would create

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>a system like this if they wanted people to have

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>faith in the results.

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's kind of a fascinating little system they've set

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 6>up here where you've got three ways to vote. You

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 6>can go, you know, vote in a voting location, you know,

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 6>pull the lever, push the button, whatever you want to do.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 6>You can vote by mail. So when you vote by mail,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 6>the post office gets your ballot and they postmark it,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 6>or you can do this amazing new invention called the

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 6>vote drop box where it doesn't get postmarked. You just

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 6>put your vote in there and they'll come and collect

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 6>your votes and then they add them all together and

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 6>then ah, you have all the votes you need. And

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 6>what I find fascinating about this system is that in

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 6>the first one, where you vote in person, we know

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 6>when that vote was made when you put it in

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 6>the mail. We know when it got put in the

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 6>mail because it gets postmarked. But there's this magical new

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 6>third category of votes that don't really have a date.

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 6>And California law, by the way, says if a ballot

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 6>doesn't have a legible postmark, as long as you know

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 6>they have a good faith reason to believe that it

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 6>was cast in time, they have to count it. And

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 6>so in this magical new California system, which is like

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 6>totally safe and secure and not at all like designed

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 6>to be rigged, you get counts on election night, so

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 6>that tells you, hey, this is how much votes this

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 6>guy has. And then we have the system where there's

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 6>no way to date a ballot and they're going to

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 6>collect ballots for weeks and we're supposed to believe that

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 6>that's somehow a credible, secure, like normal way to do elections.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 6>There is only one reason to design an election in

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 6>this way, and is to control the outcome. Like I'm

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 6>sorry if that makes people mad to hear, but nobody

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 6>would create a system like this if they wanted people

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 6>to have faith in results. They created a system like

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 6>this because they wanted to be able to engineer results.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Folks, The government of California mails out ballots to every

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 2>citizen of voting age in that state. That means they

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 2>mail out twenty three million ballots even though not a

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>single person requested them, and they know a huge number

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of people won't use them. So any California election starts,

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 2>it starts with twenty three million blank ballots floating around

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in a sloppy, unsecured process. Good grief. Now, consider how

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Sean Davis just explained how the ballot drop boxes work.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>You could have all sorts of people collecting unused ballots,

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 2>filling them out the way they want the election to go,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and then shoving dozens of them, hundreds of them at

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 2>a time, into those ballot drop boxes. Then the process

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to count those ballots goes on for weeks in secretive

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 2>locations with only occasional announcements of who's leading now or

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>how many votes they have. Every poll before this primary

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>day showed a Republican candidate named Steve Hilton leading the

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>race for governor. But after a week of behind the

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>scenes counting, Wow, somehow, now Steve Hilton is running third

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>in the election results.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What a shock.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The California Secretary of State keeps urging people to have

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>patients exercise patients, folks, Voters should not have to exercise

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>patients after an election is held. They should be able

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to expect the results by the next day at the latest. Honestly,

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 2>there's no reason, none, that we in America can't hold

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 2>elections and have the results of those elections by the

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>end of that day or the day after, depending on

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>how many ballots were cast, etc. Even a presidential race

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in this country with about one hundred and fifty million

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 2>people voting at a time, should be able to be

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>concluded within twenty four hours, barring any extreme circumstance or

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>close vote. But certainly any state wide race should be

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 2>tallied with we the people knowing the results of it

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>within hours. And so any state that's doing it like

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 2>California is doing it, is doing it wrong and or

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 2>is intentionally cheating.

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Period.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Forget this crap about how ballots need to be counted

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>for up to a week or two after they come in.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 2>That should be illegal. I mean, imagine, with twenty three

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 2>million blank ballots floating around California, how hard would it

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 2>be to simply wait to see the initial results and

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 2>then manufacture the number of votes you needed to have

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>your side win later. The answer is that would be

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 2>extremely easy. California's voters deserve better, and given how much

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>California's policies influence the rest of the nation and influence

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the rest of US America's voters deserve better than to

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>have states running intentionally effed up elections like this. I'd

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 2>strongly suggest that California's sloppy system affects US all based

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 2>on how influential the thirty million people in that state

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and their radical nutty leaders affect national policy. The editors

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 2>at Issues and Insights call this a laughably inept system

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of voting that California has, and they're right. Quote two

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 2>full days after the polls closed, they say, just sixty

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 2>percent of voters for governor in less than two thirds

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 2>of the votes for La mayor were counted As a result.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 2>None of the Republicans running for governor or mayor even

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>knows if he's going to qualify for the general election November.

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Ballots are mailed to every eligible voter, twenty three million

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of them, and the state has permissive rules for returning them.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Ballots will be counted if they're postmarked by election day

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and they arrive at an election office within seven days.

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 2>These editors say, mailing out twenty three million ballots throws

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 2>the door wide open to fraud. How many of those

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>ballots get sent to the wrong address, to people who've died,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to people who've left the state? Yeah, and I would

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 2>add how many of those ballots are then re used

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>by someone else cheating the system, putting them in a

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>dropbox as I suggested? These editors say, Judicial Watch claims

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that there are more than eight hundred thousand people on

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 2>the CALIFORNI your voter registration roles who shouldn't be there yet,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 2>mail and ballots go out to each and every one

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 2>of them. Where do those ballots end up? They say? Worse,

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>California also allows ballot harvesting, which lets third parties deliver

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a limitless number of mail in ballots another open invitation

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 2>to fraud, and California voters are supposed to believe that.

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Ballot counters then meticulously study every mail in ballot that

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>arrives days after the election to make sure signatures match

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 2>those on file, the postmarks are correct, etc. They ask

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 2>why would Republicans an a state dominated by far left

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Democrats trust this system, especially when they watch their leads

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 2>slowly evaporate as these late arriving ballots are counted by

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 2>people who have a vested interest in keeping Republicans out

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:45.399
<v Speaker 2>of office. These editors conclude, even if the system isn't

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>rife with fraud, California voters deserve better than this, because

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the appearance of fraud is just as bad as actual

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 2>existence of fraud. I agree with that completely, as ninety

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 2>five percent of Americans probably would. There is nothing related

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.720
<v Speaker 2>to this California system that it seems reasonable, or rational

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 2>or fair. Oh, and I wanted to be sure to

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 2>get to this next item too, at least briefly. We're

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>now moving into the middle of June, and that means

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 2>important Supreme Court decisions are going to start dropping like crazy.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 2>And let's hope that these drive the left crazy. The

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Court always closes out at spring term by releasing decisions

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 2>through the end of June, and there are about a

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 2>dozen important decisions to be handed down here over the

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>next two or three weeks. Several of them will be

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 2>related to President Trump's illegal immigration crackdown. One will decide

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 2>if he can roll back the so called humanitarian protection

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 2>programs that past presidents have put into place. This is

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>like Obama and Biden protecting say the Cubans or the

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Nicker roguins from deportation and insisting that they shouldn't be

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 2>forced to return to their home countries due to some

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 2>strife there. Can Trump end that protection and send them

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 2>back is the question in front of the Court that'll

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 2>be decided. It's known as temporary protected status, and pro

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 2>illegal advocates and presidents have been abusing that status for generations.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the decision on birthright citizenship. We assume Trump's

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 2>going to lose on this question, but I'm glad that

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 2>he and his team are pushing the issue and setting

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 2>up the parameters for possible future actions or alterations. Trump

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and his team argued to the justices that actually, the

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Fourteenth Amendment does not allow anyone born on US soil citizenship.

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump himself told reporters the expects to lose this, But

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 2>as I say, the first step in any modification or

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 2>restriction to the fourteenth Amendment would start with a clear

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 2>ruling on what it actually says and what it doesn't say.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Another case to be decided deals with the president's authority

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 2>to fire federal officials and appointees. Trump fired and replaced

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 2>a number of people at so called independent agencies, and

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the lefties took him to court over it. That question

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 2>should be answered too, And in this instance, I'm thinking

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the justices will probably side with Trump because someone atop

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 2>one of our three branches of government needs to have

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate authority on people like this, don't they. Our

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 2>constitution would suggest it's either the executive or a vote

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 2>of Congress that would be able to replace this head

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of Independent Commission. Because the way our system is set up,

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 2>any appointee would need to be answerable to someone, wouldn't they.

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 2>It'll be interesting to see what the justices say on that.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh and we were just talking about California's sloppy voting system,

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 2>which allows for late ballots to be counted. A ruling

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 2>on a Mississippi case is expected. The RNC actually sued

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the state of Mississippi for counting ballots that came in

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 2>up to a week late. If the Supreme Court says, hey,

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>election day is the election deadline, as many as thirty

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 2>states would have to change their election laws and count

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 2>only the mail in ballots that were in their possession

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 2>at the end of election day. I'm all in favor

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 2>of that change. Again, it simply reduces the chances of cheating,

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 2>but it also reinforces the important notion that we have

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>an election day and not some sort of election week

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>or election season. It's important the American people know the

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>results of any given election and know it quickly. Also,

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the Court is due to rule on a case related

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 2>to whether transgenders can participate in women's and girls' sports.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Any ruling there is bound to lay the groundwork for

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure another round of court cases related to transgender

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 2>bathroom and locker room usage. So we have a very

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>consequential few weeks coming here as it relates to the

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, and given that we have a genuine constitutionally

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>minded court, the assumption is that a number of these

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 2>decisions are going to infuriate today's Democrats and their activist left,

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>resulting in another round of calls for court packing and

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 2>left wing cheating in order to try to regain ideological

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 2>control of the Court for the left. As it is.

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 2>For weeks now, scummy Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Hakim Jeffreys,

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and Jamie Raskin have been making noise about stealing back

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 2>liberal control while pretending that they would be doing it

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 2>out of fairness or for the good of the country.

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Both Jeffries and Schumer have been saying everything is on

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the table if Democrats retake control of the House and

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 2>the Senate in fall. That's code for past legislation that

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 2>changes the number of justices on the Court so that

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>liberals dominate the majority again is just cheating. The thing is,

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 2>they would need to do that with a Democrat president

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 2>in the White House, so he or she could appoint

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>all the new liberal justices. Right, if they change the

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 2>number of justices on the Court and they pass something

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty seven or twenty eight, it would be

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Trump that would be stacking the Court with new members. Right,

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>So this threat isn't as immediate as Schumer, Jeffreys and

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 2>these Democrats are making it sound, but it is a

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 2>threat they're making, and have no doubt. Please have zero

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 2>doubt that the next time the Democrats find themselves fully

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 2>in charge of Washington, DC, they will do whatever it

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 2>takes to add members to the Supreme Court so they

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 2>can retake control of it. And they will, because forcing

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 2>socialism onto America doesn't work unless they can a ignore

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the Constitution and b have a Supreme Court that lets

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 2>them do it. You are listening to the Jweber podcast.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 2>There's something in political circles a term that they use

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 2>when dealing with a scandal. It's called a catch and kill.

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 2>It is, in short, finding a reporter or a news

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>outlet that your campaign is chumming with and intentionally intentionally

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>leaking a scandal on your own candidate so that you

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 2>can manage and limit the fallout. You get it as in,

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 2>we know Graham Platner has a big problem with being

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 2>an abusive pig with women and cheating on his wife,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 2>So let's leak a small, narrow version of a sex

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>scandal to the New York Times so that after a

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 2>few days of controversy, we can claim that everything else

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 2>that comes after it related to Platner being a pig

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.720
<v Speaker 2>is old news. This allows the accomplice left wing media

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to claim that, oh, we've already covered that, we already

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>told reporters Platner is a sexist pig, so there's no

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>real reason to keep doting on it or keep reporting

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 2>on it. Get it. This is the technique of catch

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and kill. Have an accomplice of years in the media,

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 2>release the story, and that way you can manage it

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and manipulate it. The reporter or news outlet will just

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 2>love to have the exclusive right. They'll willingly go along

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>with your spin and your parameters, etc. They'll allow you

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to massage and control the message and the story because

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 2>they're getting the exclusive, and their help allows you to

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 2>get out the scandal as framed by your team and

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 2>very helpfully allows you another accomplished news outlets to ignore

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 2>the follow up stories that come as a result. Get it.

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 2>If the story is Graham Platner abuses women, well, then

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the second, the fifth, and the tenth woman who steps

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>forward to tell her story of abuse can be dismissed

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 2>as yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, everyone already knows Platner has

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that reputation. Let's move on. This is what The New

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 2>York Times is being accused of doing when it comes

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to Graham Platner's history with women, and the evidence is

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 2>stacking up that this is in fact the case. Platner is,

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of course, the racist, sexist monster who's running for the

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 2>US Senate in Maine against Susan Collins. And by the way,

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 2>today is primary election Damy. Later today we should learn

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 2>whether this nightmare of a human being, much less nightmare

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of a candidate, is going to officially be the Democrat

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Party's nominee for this Senate seat in Maine. And given

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>that nearly every big name Democrat has continued to defend

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>the indefensible nature of Plattner's campaign, the assumption is that, yeah,

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 2>he's going to win today. The current governor of Maine,

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 2>At Mills, was also going to run for the seat,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>but she suspended her campaign weeks ago. Well, her name

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 2>is still on the ballot, and so there's at least

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 2>a chance that Maine's Democrat voters will do the right

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 2>thing and at the very least shift their support over

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to Mills check the box for her instead today, But

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not likely to turn out that way. After watching

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 2>politics and election days for forty years, I can tell

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you that last minute schemes like that never work, so

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll be shocked if it does today. But several days

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 2>into this latest scandal related to Platner's abuse of women,

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 2>there is no doubt, no doubt that The New York

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Times didn't come across this story. Honestly, they didn't drop

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>a bombshell here that they themselves discovered and decided to

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 2>report on. It's clear that the Times reporter and editors

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 2>were instead participating in one of these catch and kill schemes.

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 2>That's evident because now we know the woman that the

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Times chose to make the focus of their story is

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 2>saying that they left out the most outrageous and damaging

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 2>parts of her story. The Times generically recounted the stories

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 2>of three women who have stepped up to say that

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Platner is a disgusting pig who victimizes women, in cheats

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 2>on his wife, etc. But they mostly focused on one

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 2>woman because she now claims she didn't want her name

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 2>to be known, didn't want to go public in any

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 2>major way. In fact, she says she was reluctant to

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 2>even talk to The New York Times, but she did

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 2>because the reporter suite talked her into telling her story

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to help other women, and then the newspaper refused to

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 2>tell the real story she discovered. The most significant and

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>damaging parts of her story were simply left out of

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the article when it came out. Gee, it's almost as

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>if the New York Times editors were trying to minimize

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the damage to Graham Platner. Huh see. For days and

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>weeks before The New York Times ran this story, rumors

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>had been circulating around the other major newsrooms that another

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Platiner scandal was coming of this sort. Democrat operatives were

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about this amongst themselves and even on social media.

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's a good indication that this was all

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 2>pre planned, or at the very least, some news outlet

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 2>was going to run some sort of negative story. So

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:02.840
<v Speaker 2>this was a nudge to the New York Times to

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>break the story for the Platiner campaign. They could break

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it and then manage it on their own terms. Both

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 2>sides of that equation would have known the accusations were legitimate.

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Two right. I mean, Platner himself hasn't denied any of

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the allegations related to him engaging in extramarital sexting or

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 2>being a pig to women. He hasn't denied that he

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 2>posted racist and pro Nazi posts on social media in

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 2>the past, etc. It's all evident and provable, So both

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 2>sides of this equation would have known the accusations were true,

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and it looks more and more like the two sides

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 2>then colluded to try to get the scandal out there

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 2>in the least damaging way possible for the left. They

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>could then pretend from here on out, this has already

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 2>been reported, this has been examined. This is old news.

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So yet another woman saying he's a pig. Big whoop,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not newsworthy. This is what the New York Times

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 2>clearly engaged in along with the Platiner campaign, because the

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 2>credible investigations since seemed to prove. The New York Times

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>had at least three women who were ready to level

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:05.760
<v Speaker 2>sexual assault allegations against Platner, not just that he talked

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>like a pig or he treated them poorly, that he

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.760
<v Speaker 2>actually assaulted or raped them. But those accusations somehow didn't

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 2>make it to print, and the story that did pulled

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the worst of its punches. Come on, this isn't the

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 2>New York Times and the left wing media breaking a story.

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.720
<v Speaker 2>It's them concocting a cover up. The New York Times

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 2>reporter and the editors clearly engaged in a propagandist's cover up. Here.

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Lindsey Feifeld is the woman who the story was based on,

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 2>and she now says, it's evident to me that I

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 2>was being set up all along the entire time. She says,

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 2>they never really wanted to tell my story or hear

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 2>the truth. That's obvious now in retrospect. Fifield says that

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times violated the trust of Platner's victims

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and shattered the trust that she placed in them with

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the most vulnerable story of her life. That is what

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they did, yes, all to help the Democrats somehow get

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 2>a man who has clearly been revealed to be a

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>piece of human garbage elected to the US Senate. It's shameful.

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.479
<v Speaker 2>And if anyone in the audience still has ended question

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 2>as to whether the folks at the New York Times

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 2>are honest journalists. If you have any question as to

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 2>whether the people in that newsroom are doing honest and

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 2>fair journalism, I think you have your answer now. No.

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 2>And they aren't even trying to. These are far left

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 2>propagandists masquerading as journalists, and any way they can help

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the left wing cause, they will. Heck, the people atop

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times are now basically revictimizing the survivors

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 2>of domestic abuse in order to help the left retake

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>control of Congress. That's pathetic. They are deliberately withholding more

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 2>explosive stories and accusations of sexual assault against Graham Platner

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.360
<v Speaker 2>as a way to help out the Democrat party. That's shameful.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 2>And folks, eight years after every Democrat in Congress and

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.760
<v Speaker 2>in all of Washington, d c. And on both coasts,

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 2>eight years after they railed against Brett Kavanaugh as a

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court justice based on false stories about his youth,

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 2>they were certain those stories just as qualified him, and

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 2>they were made up. And only a few years after

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 2>all of these same Democrats ran around looking for me

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 2>two scalps to take to have nearly every single one

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 2>of them. Now those same Democrats endorsing and defending Graham

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Platner and excusing away the very real scandals being leveled

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.760
<v Speaker 2>against him. It's just too much. If this was a cartoon,

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 2>this would be when my head explodes. For decades, some

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 2>of us on the right have been insisting that this

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 2>era's Democrats are nothing but nasty, immoral, gameplaying hypocrites. And

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 2>here they are again proving us right, and in spectacular fashion.

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 2>After all, if they're still defending and protecting Graham Platner,

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 2>after all that has come out about him, and after

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 2>all that we know to be true, now, how are

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 2>they anything other than the scummiest hypocrites and the most

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 2>terrible people in leadership roles in America? How can Liz

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Warren or Bernie Sanders, or Chuck Schumer or ro Kanna

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 2>or any of them who continue to endorse and defend

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Graham Platner be taken seriously? Ever? Again, if I was

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a liberal or a woman, or I voted Democrat, I

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 2>would be asking myself and my friends that question constantly.

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 2>This week, Liz Warren and AOC were among the Democrats

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.320
<v Speaker 2>who insisted that you either believe the female accusers, or

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 2>you're protecting abusers and rapists. Now they're doing exactly that,

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 2>And I would stress now they are doing exactly that,

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 2>even though there have been clear opportunities for them to

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 2>bail on Graham Platner. In fact, Warren AOC all of

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 2>them would have more credibility if they simply admitted that, Okay,

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 2>look the new information that has come out on Graham

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Platner as a deal breaker, I can no longer support

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>this man. I withdraw my endorsement. If they did that,

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.719
<v Speaker 2>they'd actually have more credibility with the voters and with

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the country at large. Nope, Today's Democrats are all about

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:47.439
<v Speaker 2>doing anything to win, anything to win, anything to win,

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that includes supporting a Nazi supporting woman abusing socialist, racist extremist.

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 2>As one pundit put it on x that Senator Schumer

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>prefers a Nazi sympathizer, racist, com munist, and misogynist like

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Graham Platner over all well respected senator who votes like

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a centrist Democrat, tells you how far left the Democrat

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Party has moved. Yep. This is, after all, the race

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 2>for Susan Collins's seat, and she's the most moderate and

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 2>politically reasonable member of today's Senate. So it's not even

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 2>like these Democrats are supporting Platner because his opponent is

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 2>an even bigger monster. No, no, no, monsters don't get

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 2>much bigger than Graham Platner. They're supporting him against the

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Republican and the Senate who sides with Donald Trump the

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 2>least and who causes the most amount of heartburn and

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.720
<v Speaker 2>disappointment for her own leadership team.

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It's really indefensive that Jay Webber Podcast is a production

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio Podcasts, produced and engineered by Gregory John. The

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Jay Webber Podcast is presented by Creative Planning, helping clients

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>simplify their journey to financial wellness, one personalized plan at

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a time. Listen to all of Jay Weber's podcasts available

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite five cast