WEBVTT - Flock Cameras Are Everywhere

0:00:03.190 --> 0:00:08.630
<v Speaker 1>Hosted by Michael Monks and Chris Merrill. This is Monks

0:00:09.070 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and Merrill On Demand.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll go to little TJ here in just a few moments. First,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.779
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have suggestions for where Michael Monks

0:00:16.820 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>can move. Do you think these are nice or not?

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.030
<v Speaker 3>Like, do they want me to be their neighbor? Monks!

0:00:22.150 --> 0:00:22.489
<v Speaker 4>Yo!

0:00:22.510 --> 0:00:24.669
<v Speaker 3>That sounds inviting.

0:00:25.250 --> 0:00:27.990
<v Speaker 4>I know you're scared to move the S-hole that you

0:00:28.030 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 4>call L.A., But the IE actually has some really bitchin' places.

0:00:32.500 --> 0:00:32.860
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:00:32.900 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think Redlands is one of those places that

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 4>you would really, really enjoy living. Why?

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of artsy, kind of funky, kind of stuck

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 3>in a time, but it's like super hipster at the

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:47.339
<v Speaker 3>same time.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 4>It's awesome. Redlands, California.

0:00:50.220 --> 0:00:52.100
<v Speaker 3>I love that. Thank you, Redlands.

0:00:52.300 --> 0:00:52.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:00:52.540 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll check you out.

0:00:53.500 --> 0:00:55.100
<v Speaker 5>Has the most trees in the Inland Empire.

0:00:55.650 --> 0:00:58.340
<v Speaker 3>How about that? Thanks for that little fact.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you should move right next door to her,

0:00:59.900 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and then you guys could have dinners together, and whenever

0:01:01.580 --> 0:01:02.660
<v Speaker 2>dinner's ready, she can call you.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:03.700
<v Speaker 4>Mom!

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:07.819
<v Speaker 5>Mom!

0:01:07.940 --> 0:01:12.630
<v Speaker 3>I think that's sweet that they're making such wholesome recommendations, because, yeah,

0:01:12.690 --> 0:01:13.370
<v Speaker 3>I may be looking.

0:01:14.770 --> 0:01:16.110
<v Speaker 6>Come out to Moore Park.

0:01:16.370 --> 0:01:16.530
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:01:17.150 --> 0:01:21.020
<v Speaker 6>They're revitalizing High Street, which is our downtown, and they

0:01:21.030 --> 0:01:25.429
<v Speaker 6>have some brand new apartments. which are beautiful and walking

0:01:25.490 --> 0:01:28.750
<v Speaker 6>distance to the train station where you can take the

0:01:28.810 --> 0:01:30.309
<v Speaker 6>train right to the studio.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>That's great. There you go. You're closer to Ventura. That's true.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I love that our listeners know that I like a choo-choo.

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>They know that I like it downtown. And they know

0:01:42.180 --> 0:01:46.500
<v Speaker 3>I like the arts. I mean, you're basically a little

0:01:46.540 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>walking socialist. Well, that's why I live in downtown LA.

0:01:50.420 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, once you start skiing barefoot on homeless human poo-poo,

0:01:54.740 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>you start thinking, what are my other options? Moorpark. Moorpark

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.730
<v Speaker 3>sounds lovely. They have mountain lion poo-poo. We've got some

0:02:01.750 --> 0:02:02.910
<v Speaker 3>really good recommendations today.

0:02:03.430 --> 0:02:05.890
<v Speaker 4>Monks!

0:02:05.950 --> 0:02:08.269
<v Speaker 2>Santa Clarita's not a bad place to be. They've got

0:02:08.310 --> 0:02:11.010
<v Speaker 2>a little area called Little Tijuana. It's a neighborhood.

0:02:12.230 --> 0:02:13.660
<v Speaker 3>And they've got a problem, though.

0:02:14.220 --> 0:02:17.260
<v Speaker 2>They say that we have flock license plate readers that

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 2>are being pointed at people's homes.

0:02:20.180 --> 0:02:21.060
<v Speaker 3>Why would they do that?

0:02:22.150 --> 0:02:26.030
<v Speaker 2>Well, they say they think there's some racial discrimination going on.

0:02:27.150 --> 0:02:29.930
<v Speaker 3>There's no evidence of that. Well, it's Little Tijuana. Who

0:02:29.950 --> 0:02:31.850
<v Speaker 3>do you think? Well, I mean, if there's enough Latino

0:02:31.870 --> 0:02:33.669
<v Speaker 3>people there for it to be called Little Tijuana, I

0:02:33.710 --> 0:02:36.330
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't think that there's any racism. Yeah, quit adding syllables.

0:02:36.490 --> 0:02:37.290
<v Speaker 3>It's Little Tijuana.

0:02:37.410 --> 0:02:37.750
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:02:38.660 --> 0:02:41.660
<v Speaker 2>They haven't proven any of that, but it is the

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.940
<v Speaker 2>only Santa Clarita neighborhood that gets this kind of surveillance,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>despite not having a higher crime rate than other places.

0:02:49.770 --> 0:02:54.100
<v Speaker 2>So why are these cameras being pointed at homes? ABC

0:02:54.100 --> 0:02:56.180
<v Speaker 2>7 was reporting on this. They said it's the only

0:02:56.220 --> 0:02:58.500
<v Speaker 2>place where the flock cameras have not been placed away

0:02:58.540 --> 0:03:00.930
<v Speaker 2>from major thoroughfares. Excuse me, where they have been placed

0:03:00.970 --> 0:03:03.390
<v Speaker 2>away from major thoroughfares. So the flock cameras, of course,

0:03:03.430 --> 0:03:05.710
<v Speaker 2>as we know, they're all to stop crime and certainly

0:03:05.770 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>not track ex-girlfriends of dirty cops. And so they have

0:03:11.139 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>these on most of the thoroughfares so that if someone

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.310
<v Speaker 2>has stolen a car or they've kidnapped people, then they

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.490
<v Speaker 2>can see those people fleeing the scene. And the license

0:03:18.510 --> 0:03:20.410
<v Speaker 2>plate readers can catch them immediately and they can try

0:03:20.430 --> 0:03:23.770
<v Speaker 2>to stop this from happening. Except in Little Tijuana where

0:03:23.790 --> 0:03:25.450
<v Speaker 2>they said, you know what, these side streets look like

0:03:25.470 --> 0:03:28.010
<v Speaker 2>a good place to start setting up cameras. One resident

0:03:28.050 --> 0:03:31.150
<v Speaker 2>says she walked outside, found the camera directly facing her

0:03:31.210 --> 0:03:34.109
<v Speaker 2>home on Ray Street. Her and her neighbors questioning why

0:03:34.190 --> 0:03:36.790
<v Speaker 2>there's a license plate reader pointed at their windows.

0:03:38.070 --> 0:03:41.350
<v Speaker 3>I would question that too. These cameras don't have like

0:03:41.390 --> 0:03:46.140
<v Speaker 3>a live feed, do they? Yeah. So this could be

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.940
<v Speaker 3>just somebody just watching this house? I mean, it could be.

0:03:49.220 --> 0:03:51.559
<v Speaker 2>Fox says the license plate readers are positioned toward roadways,

0:03:52.100 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and they capture still images of the backs of passing vehicles.

0:03:55.490 --> 0:03:59.770
<v Speaker 2>The company says the cameras don't provide live video. So

0:03:59.890 --> 0:04:03.030
<v Speaker 2>that's what the company says. I don't believe them. It

0:04:03.050 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>would just turn in a still shot of this person's house?

0:04:06.780 --> 0:04:06.980
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:04:08.050 --> 0:04:10.750
<v Speaker 2>According to a spokeswoman from the city, the cameras face streets,

0:04:10.850 --> 0:04:14.310
<v Speaker 2>not residences. They're not recording any homes or any residential property.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 2>And we had to put them on the streets all

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.020
<v Speaker 2>around Little Tijuana, but nowhere else in Santa Clarita.

0:04:19.060 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Why would we do that?

0:04:20.460 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 4>I see.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>City Council Canada says the neighborhood is not a higher

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.940
<v Speaker 2>crime area. Questions why those cameras being placed on the

0:04:25.980 --> 0:04:32.350
<v Speaker 2>residential streets and not elsewhere. That is Brett Haddock.

0:04:32.700 --> 0:04:36.210
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me. I don't mean to mispronounce the name. He's

0:04:36.270 --> 0:04:39.310
<v Speaker 3>running for city council. Yeah.

0:04:39.650 --> 0:04:42.110
<v Speaker 2>They're like, huh, this is weird. We happen to be

0:04:42.210 --> 0:04:44.830
<v Speaker 2>a little Tijuana and all of a sudden we've got

0:04:44.850 --> 0:04:47.430
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of security surveillance cameras that are popping up

0:04:47.450 --> 0:04:48.110
<v Speaker 2>all over the place.

0:04:48.330 --> 0:04:51.229
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sure because of the demographics of the neighborhood,

0:04:51.270 --> 0:04:54.909
<v Speaker 3>there are concerns about any images that could be turned

0:04:54.970 --> 0:04:56.890
<v Speaker 3>over to, let's say, federal officials.

0:04:56.910 --> 0:05:00.250
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what they're concerned with. Well, they're not concerned

0:05:00.270 --> 0:05:01.969
<v Speaker 2>that they could be turned over. They're concerned that this

0:05:02.070 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 2>is part of.

0:05:03.210 --> 0:05:06.020
<v Speaker 3>That's ICE surveillance. border patrol or.

0:05:05.940 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>That you've got some zealous politicians that or law enforcement

0:05:09.660 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that want to put them up there in an effort

0:05:11.980 --> 0:05:15.940
<v Speaker 2>to assist in uh suspicion of illegal.

0:05:16.180 --> 0:05:19.060
<v Speaker 3>Activities yeah there is there's suspicion that immigration agents have

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>frequently appeared in that area since the camera was installed

0:05:23.020 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 3>um that would be race-based profiling wouldn't it we have

0:05:26.980 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 3>heard repeatedly in the arguments about flock which by the

0:05:30.100 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 3>way these arguments are happening all over the country But

0:05:32.339 --> 0:05:37.020
<v Speaker 3>in Southern California, where passions are inflamed by immigration enforcement,

0:05:37.500 --> 0:05:40.700
<v Speaker 3>this has been the issue, is what is FLOC doing

0:05:40.740 --> 0:05:45.700
<v Speaker 3>in terms of cooperating with federal immigration officials? Yeah, even LAPD. Right,

0:05:45.750 --> 0:05:48.270
<v Speaker 3>but the argument is always we're not— cooperating with them.

0:05:48.290 --> 0:05:50.550
<v Speaker 2>We're not doing anything except well, and they did acknowledge

0:05:50.589 --> 0:05:54.289
<v Speaker 2>that some California agencies, camera networks were inadvertently accessible to

0:05:54.390 --> 0:05:57.510
<v Speaker 2>out of state agencies last year, but they've added strong

0:05:57.550 --> 0:06:00.339
<v Speaker 2>controls and ice doesn't have direct.

0:06:00.180 --> 0:06:04.140
<v Speaker 3>Access to their cameras or their databases. We know in

0:06:04.260 --> 0:06:07.340
<v Speaker 3>LA they've suspended the flock cameras.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:06:08.420 --> 0:06:12.340
<v Speaker 3>Fullerton imposed a six month moratorium on its system. I mean,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.260
<v Speaker 3>it seems like every day you open up any newspaper

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.860
<v Speaker 3>in this region, Or anywhere across the country. And whatever

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.820
<v Speaker 3>small town or large city, this is front and center.

0:06:22.700 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 3>People backtracking on these flock cameras after installing them. And

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.170
<v Speaker 3>it seems to be one of those rare bipartisan issues

0:06:32.529 --> 0:06:35.370
<v Speaker 3>where it doesn't polarize anyone.

0:06:35.390 --> 0:06:38.290
<v Speaker 2>Because there's been enough abuse of it that's affected a

0:06:38.330 --> 0:06:41.150
<v Speaker 2>number of people. Whether it's bad cops tracking their ex-girlfriends,

0:06:41.790 --> 0:06:43.780
<v Speaker 2>or from the left they're upset that ICE is being

0:06:43.820 --> 0:06:46.620
<v Speaker 2>able to use these things to just track people. that

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.580
<v Speaker 2>they suspect, whether or not they have evidence or reasonable suspicion,

0:06:49.610 --> 0:06:51.810
<v Speaker 2>that they say basically, let's go see if they're illegal.

0:06:52.170 --> 0:06:54.070
<v Speaker 2>So they're upset about it. Although there is one city,

0:06:54.089 --> 0:06:55.470
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about this a little bit later on this hour,

0:06:55.490 --> 0:06:57.630
<v Speaker 2>there is one city that's putting those cameras up.

0:06:58.370 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>To watch the ladies. What ladies? You'll have to wait, Michael.

0:07:03.020 --> 0:07:06.260
<v Speaker 3>Let's call the tees. It's coming up after 2.30. Okay, fine.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>We can get to that. So what are these folks

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.300
<v Speaker 3>in Santa Clarita going to do about this? Are they

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>going to take the cameras down? Is there a call

0:07:11.820 --> 0:07:12.540
<v Speaker 3>to remove them?

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.670
<v Speaker 2>They're going to fight about it. You're going to have

0:07:15.690 --> 0:07:17.890
<v Speaker 2>a city council member that's going to turn– the city

0:07:17.930 --> 0:07:20.950
<v Speaker 2>council candidate that's turning it into a campaign issue. And

0:07:20.970 --> 0:07:22.750
<v Speaker 2>then you're going to have others that are basically going

0:07:22.790 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to say everything's on the up and up.

0:07:24.030 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 3>What's the problem? It seems to be a pretty easy

0:07:26.650 --> 0:07:29.300
<v Speaker 3>issue politically. Like you are finding a lot of elected

0:07:29.340 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>officials across the country who are just like, yeah, let's

0:07:31.580 --> 0:07:34.180
<v Speaker 3>just do away with these things. They're not always unanimous

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.380
<v Speaker 3>votes on these various bodies across the country, but they

0:07:37.420 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>do tend to come out in favor of getting rid

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.380
<v Speaker 3>or suspending or covering– The flock cameras. So I would

0:07:44.420 --> 0:07:45.220
<v Speaker 3>imagine that that's.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>This comes back to that age old question about privacy

0:07:48.260 --> 0:07:49.980
<v Speaker 2>versus or liberty versus security.

0:07:53.310 --> 0:07:56.030
<v Speaker 3>It does. I also think that we're often overreacting about

0:07:56.050 --> 0:07:57.830
<v Speaker 3>these cameras. I think that they can do a lot

0:07:57.850 --> 0:08:00.090
<v Speaker 3>of good and it seems to be like the hot,

0:08:00.630 --> 0:08:01.670
<v Speaker 3>easy issue for folks.

0:08:02.150 --> 0:08:02.370
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:08:02.510 --> 0:08:04.270
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind if it's poking. They can do a

0:08:04.290 --> 0:08:06.540
<v Speaker 3>lot of good. Yeah, they can.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.140
<v Speaker 2>And I happen to believe that firearms can do a

0:08:09.180 --> 0:08:10.900
<v Speaker 2>lot of good, too. But we have a lot of

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.340
<v Speaker 2>people in California that are like, they're killing machines. The

0:08:14.420 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>cameras aren't killing anyone.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.450
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah. The cameras aren't killing anybody. You don't know that.

0:08:19.070 --> 0:08:21.190
<v Speaker 3>They're probably passing out cancer like windmills are.

0:08:21.210 --> 0:08:22.410
<v Speaker 1>Mom!

0:08:23.910 --> 0:08:27.530
<v Speaker 3>Yes. These cameras are something that we can see in

0:08:27.550 --> 0:08:32.660
<v Speaker 3>Little Tijuana. But what's happening behind the scenes, right? Oh,

0:08:32.700 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>now this is another question. Who looks at the data?

0:08:35.179 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 4>Mm-hmm.

0:08:36.500 --> 0:08:39.340
<v Speaker 3>And why were they looking at it? We'll talk about

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.780
<v Speaker 3>the group who's trying to pull the plug on Flock

0:08:41.850 --> 0:08:44.310
<v Speaker 3>and Santa Clarita. That's next on Monks in Maryland.

0:08:44.850 --> 0:08:49.790
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Monks in Maryland on demand from KFI

0:08:49.970 --> 0:08:50.510
<v Speaker 1>AM 640.

0:08:50.510 --> 0:08:54.630
<v Speaker 3>More stimulating talk. Yes, it's Monks in Maryland. So glad

0:08:54.650 --> 0:08:56.010
<v Speaker 3>to have you with us on this Friday. We were

0:08:56.050 --> 0:08:58.650
<v Speaker 3>talking about those cameras in Santa Clarita. Goodness knows we've

0:08:58.670 --> 0:09:02.110
<v Speaker 3>been talking about Flock cameras all over the place. Very controversial.

0:09:02.500 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 3>You can open up any newspaper in the country, probably

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>right this moment, and find one suburb or one large

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.610
<v Speaker 3>city somewhere debating this, and more and more are deactivating them,

0:09:12.970 --> 0:09:16.730
<v Speaker 3>suspending them, covering them up, doing further study on how

0:09:16.770 --> 0:09:19.610
<v Speaker 3>the data is used. We were talking specifically about Little

0:09:19.630 --> 0:09:24.100
<v Speaker 3>Tijuana in Santa Clarita Valley, in Santa Clarita specifically, and

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 3>there are folks there who say, these cameras are not

0:09:27.250 --> 0:09:30.110
<v Speaker 3>pointing at high traffic intersections no they're pointing at my

0:09:30.340 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>uh living room yeah this is my armada's bedroom i'm

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.060
<v Speaker 3>what we got to do something about these cameras what's

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 3>going on well jay chan lee is the founder of

0:09:38.820 --> 0:09:43.620
<v Speaker 3>d flock scv joins us now on the phone jay

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for being with us what are your

0:09:45.380 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 3>big concerns about these these cameras.

0:09:48.780 --> 0:09:53.230
<v Speaker 4>Hi. Well, first off, I'd say the cameras are, in

0:09:53.250 --> 0:09:57.270
<v Speaker 4>Santa Clarita especially, just not pointed strategically if you're Warflock

0:09:57.350 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>or the city. Like you mentioned, the one in U-Haul

0:10:01.580 --> 0:10:05.610
<v Speaker 4>is facing right into people's living rooms. We went there

0:10:05.660 --> 0:10:07.890
<v Speaker 4>actually today just to check it out once more, and

0:10:08.010 --> 0:10:12.270
<v Speaker 4>it's still there. And it's actually pointed at, like, there are,

0:10:12.290 --> 0:10:17.339
<v Speaker 4>there's a hydrant, It's a street behind that street that

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.819
<v Speaker 4>is a lot more active and would make a lot

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.180
<v Speaker 4>more sense to install there. So I don't know why

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>it's in the middle of that neighborhood.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.209
<v Speaker 2>Have you talked to the sheriff's department or the police

0:10:28.230 --> 0:10:28.569
<v Speaker 2>in the area?

0:10:28.610 --> 0:10:29.630
<v Speaker 3>What are they saying?

0:10:30.970 --> 0:10:34.770
<v Speaker 4>Well, the sheriff's department... We've tried to reach out to

0:10:34.780 --> 0:10:38.189
<v Speaker 4>them through records requests, but they've kind of been stalling

0:10:38.250 --> 0:10:40.609
<v Speaker 4>on that. I mean, yesterday I called them up and

0:10:40.670 --> 0:10:44.510
<v Speaker 4>asked them where my records request from July is, and

0:10:44.550 --> 0:10:47.069
<v Speaker 4>they told me that it's still under legal review. So

0:10:47.090 --> 0:10:49.850
<v Speaker 4>I think it might take some time to get documentation

0:10:49.910 --> 0:10:51.290
<v Speaker 4>from the Sheriff's Department, at least.

0:10:51.510 --> 0:10:55.429
<v Speaker 3>The cameras in the Little Tijuana neighborhood have raised concerns

0:10:55.490 --> 0:10:59.860
<v Speaker 3>because this is a neighborhood that is predominantly... Latino, do

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>you all have any evidence to support the claims that

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.660
<v Speaker 3>these cameras were placed in an area motivated by racism, maybe?

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.780
<v Speaker 4>We can't say for sure that it was motivated by racism,

0:11:13.860 --> 0:11:19.020
<v Speaker 4>but what I can say is that it definitely produces

0:11:19.210 --> 0:11:22.750
<v Speaker 4>racist and unequal outcomes, right? Even if the city didn't

0:11:22.830 --> 0:11:26.630
<v Speaker 4>intend on that being the case, you won't see cameras

0:11:26.730 --> 0:11:31.290
<v Speaker 4>that are faced into people's houses like that anywhere else

0:11:31.330 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 4>but New Hall in Santa Clarita. I mean, if you

0:11:33.510 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 4>go to the shopping mall, you won't see any cameras there.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 7>Why? I don't know.

0:11:38.500 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 4>If you go to Valencia, you won't see much. If

0:11:40.900 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>you go to the Chinese country, you won't see much.

0:11:42.420 --> 0:11:46.980
<v Speaker 4>I can keep going. In this particular area, for some reason,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.370
<v Speaker 4>there's cameras looking into people's houses. And I think that

0:11:50.990 --> 0:11:55.010
<v Speaker 4>it has something to do with the stigma that little

0:11:55.030 --> 0:11:56.870
<v Speaker 4>Tijuana is known for.

0:11:57.190 --> 0:11:59.510
<v Speaker 3>What is that stigma? Just having a Latino population?

0:12:01.230 --> 0:12:04.290
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there have been some shootings in the past,

0:12:04.390 --> 0:12:07.310
<v Speaker 4>but to my knowledge and according to residents there, it's

0:12:07.330 --> 0:12:10.630
<v Speaker 4>gotten a lot safer in the last few years. They

0:12:10.650 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 4>did a renovation on Old Town and that's brought in

0:12:14.030 --> 0:12:16.239
<v Speaker 4>a bit more business. You know, it's date night in

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 4>New Hall, in Old Town, New Hall now. And from

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 4>what older folk are telling me, that's not what it

0:12:22.020 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 4>used to be. But Nowadays, I don't think that the

0:12:28.460 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 4>crime in the area, which when I visited, it was

0:12:32.220 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 4>very safe. I didn't feel unsafe at all.

0:12:36.940 --> 0:12:41.429
<v Speaker 3>Our guest is Jay Chan Lee, the founder of D-Flock SCV,

0:12:41.570 --> 0:12:44.470
<v Speaker 3>Santa Clarita Valley. He's the founder and the president of

0:12:44.530 --> 0:12:49.330
<v Speaker 3>that organization, and their organization is upset about flock cameras

0:12:49.410 --> 0:12:53.650
<v Speaker 3>that are primarily concentrated in a specific neighborhood. I'm wondering, Jay...

0:12:54.630 --> 0:12:57.410
<v Speaker 3>Are we against these cameras in general or just the

0:12:57.460 --> 0:13:00.260
<v Speaker 3>way that they've been deployed specifically in your neck of

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:00.780
<v Speaker 3>the woods?

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.020
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's a general thing. Just because of

0:13:06.059 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 4>how national and how many cameras there are across the country,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:19.910
<v Speaker 4>I think that removal and banning these large-scale mass surveillance systems,

0:13:19.950 --> 0:13:21.190
<v Speaker 4>we shouldn't have those at all.

0:13:22.260 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Jay Chan Lee, founder and president of Deflock SCV.

0:13:26.370 --> 0:13:29.429
<v Speaker 2>And what are the residents? How long have you known

0:13:29.450 --> 0:13:31.589
<v Speaker 2>about this? Has it been going on for like a

0:13:31.630 --> 0:13:33.490
<v Speaker 2>long time? You said you put in an open records

0:13:33.530 --> 0:13:35.870
<v Speaker 2>request back in, what, June, July?

0:13:35.910 --> 0:13:40.050
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in July. So in 2024, the city installed 35

0:13:40.050 --> 0:13:47.020
<v Speaker 4>or so cameras. In June, they decided to allocate some

0:13:47.070 --> 0:13:51.170
<v Speaker 4>money to expand that system. So it's been going on

0:13:51.270 --> 0:13:53.770
<v Speaker 4>for about two years. People haven't really brought it up

0:13:53.970 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 4>until I did back in July, and that's when my

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 4>organization began.

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.660
<v Speaker 3>What is the information that you're seeking from the sheriff's department?

0:14:04.950 --> 0:14:07.190
<v Speaker 4>I have to pull up, but what I'm looking for

0:14:07.390 --> 0:14:11.860
<v Speaker 4>is an electronic export of all the logs. They specifically

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 4>say that they do have annual audits that they have

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.949
<v Speaker 4>to do within their own privacy policy. I want to

0:14:16.970 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 4>see those. I want to also see the cases that

0:14:20.020 --> 0:14:24.860
<v Speaker 4>they use to justify expanding the system, just to see

0:14:25.140 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 4>how valid that is, whether or not flock actually contributed

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 4>to those arrests. Right. I mean, I haven't gotten any

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:33.700
<v Speaker 4>of that from the sheriff's department.

0:14:33.820 --> 0:14:35.540
<v Speaker 3>And they're saying that it's because of legal review. I

0:14:35.580 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>know sometimes that governments can play hardball with open records requests,

0:14:39.260 --> 0:14:42.430
<v Speaker 3>whether from the media or from a concerned citizen. What

0:14:42.470 --> 0:14:45.230
<v Speaker 3>are they saying specifically? Just legal review generically?

0:14:46.390 --> 0:14:50.430
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, they say that it's, you know, I

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.980
<v Speaker 4>did one big one and then a smaller one specifically

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.740
<v Speaker 4>just for the export logs. And they told me for

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.420
<v Speaker 4>both of those that they cannot even provide me a

0:14:59.500 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 4>date in which I expect.

0:15:02.380 --> 0:15:03.220
<v Speaker 7>A response, right?

0:15:04.590 --> 0:15:07.130
<v Speaker 4>They didn't provide me with an analyst name that I

0:15:07.170 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 4>can contact. They didn't provide me... I asked them if

0:15:10.250 --> 0:15:12.340
<v Speaker 4>they could provide documents on a rolling basis. They said

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 4>they could not. So it just seems very, I don't know,

0:15:16.580 --> 0:15:20.580
<v Speaker 4>like either... It seems like the process is a bit

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 4>too slow, especially if you compare it to other records

0:15:22.860 --> 0:15:25.740
<v Speaker 4>requests that have been made with departments across California. And

0:15:25.780 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 4>those have been a lot faster for those people that

0:15:28.540 --> 0:15:28.980
<v Speaker 4>did those. Yeah.

0:15:29.790 --> 0:15:31.910
<v Speaker 2>Jay Chan Lee, the founder and president of DFLOC, SCV,

0:15:31.930 --> 0:15:34.210
<v Speaker 2>the Santa Clarita Valley. Jay, thank you so much for

0:15:34.250 --> 0:15:37.310
<v Speaker 2>your time, and keep us up to date on your progress.

0:15:36.990 --> 0:15:37.430
<v Speaker 3>On this, okay?

0:15:37.450 --> 0:15:38.750
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:15:38.910 --> 0:15:43.020
<v Speaker 3>All right, yeah, absolutely. You know, sometimes open records requests

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>can be too broad. You know, they'll come back and say,

0:15:47.260 --> 0:15:49.460
<v Speaker 3>can you narrow this down? It's returned so many of

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.700
<v Speaker 3>these documents, it's really an unreasonable request. It sounds like

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.100
<v Speaker 3>they're not even getting back to him. And that just

0:15:55.140 --> 0:15:59.650
<v Speaker 3>raises my Well, yeah, either the open records request is

0:15:59.690 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 3>too broad and it needs to be narrowed. But they

0:16:02.660 --> 0:16:04.700
<v Speaker 3>would need to notify him of that, wouldn't they? Exactly.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>They have to tell you, hey, this isn't, we've got

0:16:07.780 --> 0:16:10.700
<v Speaker 3>the records, but your request turned up way too many

0:16:10.740 --> 0:16:15.190
<v Speaker 3>documents because it's so broad. Narrow it down and we'll

0:16:15.230 --> 0:16:17.690
<v Speaker 3>happily get it back to you. But the law is

0:16:17.750 --> 0:16:21.130
<v Speaker 3>such that you have to respond within a certain amount

0:16:21.150 --> 0:16:23.350
<v Speaker 3>of time, even just to acknowledge that you received, you

0:16:23.370 --> 0:16:25.750
<v Speaker 3>don't have to produce the documents immediately. You have to

0:16:26.130 --> 0:16:28.530
<v Speaker 3>obviously scour for it on the search, but you have

0:16:28.550 --> 0:16:31.660
<v Speaker 3>to at least acknowledge within a certain amount of time that, hey,

0:16:31.700 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>we got your request, we're working on it. I think

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:39.020
<v Speaker 3>if you made a request and it's now four months

0:16:39.100 --> 0:16:41.260
<v Speaker 3>later and they haven't given you a single document, that's...

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.530
<v Speaker 3>Or even said why they haven't given them a single document.

0:16:44.570 --> 0:16:44.870
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:16:45.730 --> 0:16:51.750
<v Speaker 3>That's where it feels fishy to me. But listen... This

0:16:51.830 --> 0:16:52.110
<v Speaker 3>is one.

0:16:52.070 --> 0:16:55.510
<v Speaker 2>Of those things where if we're skeptical of the technology,

0:16:55.580 --> 0:16:57.820
<v Speaker 2>we're skeptical of the use of the technology. And then

0:16:57.860 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 2>when we want to do audits, when you have these

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.300
<v Speaker 2>groups that want to audit the technology and you're being

0:17:03.380 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>shady with delivering the information, that doesn't help. restore confidence

0:17:08.700 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>in the people who have skepticism going into it.

0:17:10.910 --> 0:17:11.750
<v Speaker 3>And I agree with that.

0:17:11.869 --> 0:17:15.290
<v Speaker 2>This is no different than we talk about the homeless

0:17:15.310 --> 0:17:17.850
<v Speaker 2>industrial complex. We go, why aren't there audits? And then

0:17:17.869 --> 0:17:19.629
<v Speaker 2>they go, oh, yeah, but we can't really audit. The

0:17:19.670 --> 0:17:22.020
<v Speaker 2>fact that you're not auditing makes us think that there's

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 2>something to audit. The fact that you're not turning these

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>requests over in a timely fashion makes us think there's

0:17:26.900 --> 0:17:27.540
<v Speaker 2>something in there.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.739
<v Speaker 3>The homeless one is even worse because they often don't

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 3>even have the documents to turn over. They've got absolutely

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.219
<v Speaker 3>no record of anything. But I tend to still be

0:17:35.350 --> 0:17:38.910
<v Speaker 3>sympathetic towards the law enforcement agencies that want these cameras

0:17:39.150 --> 0:17:43.310
<v Speaker 3>because I know that, especially in jurisdictions like L.A. where

0:17:43.330 --> 0:17:47.010
<v Speaker 3>there aren't enough officers, these can supplement that. But I

0:17:47.090 --> 0:17:52.870
<v Speaker 3>also am receptive to these concerns, privacy, data collection, all that.

0:17:53.750 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Law enforcement agencies, they say that these types of cameras

0:17:57.100 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 3>can help us with investigative leads in big-time cases, small-time cases.

0:18:02.220 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:02.900 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Stolen vehicles.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.700
<v Speaker 2>I would feel a lot better if it wasn't something.

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.379
<v Speaker 2>If it's something where you go, we are looking for

0:18:10.260 --> 0:18:13.419
<v Speaker 2>this car with this license plate. And then as it's

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.689
<v Speaker 2>scanning the tens of thousands and millions of cars that

0:18:15.730 --> 0:18:19.790
<v Speaker 2>drive by it, it's immediately going, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope.

0:18:20.580 --> 0:18:23.050
<v Speaker 2>I would be okay with, I wouldn't be necessarily okay

0:18:23.070 --> 0:18:24.889
<v Speaker 2>with that, but I would be better about that. Instead,

0:18:24.910 --> 0:18:27.429
<v Speaker 2>what it's doing is it's recording every single car that

0:18:27.450 --> 0:18:30.629
<v Speaker 2>goes through every single minute of every single day, and

0:18:30.650 --> 0:18:31.410
<v Speaker 2>then it throws.

0:18:31.190 --> 0:18:33.010
<v Speaker 3>It all in a database. And does what with it?

0:18:33.109 --> 0:18:34.050
<v Speaker 3>I guess that's the question, right?

0:18:34.070 --> 0:18:36.130
<v Speaker 2>It sits in a database until you come by and say, hey,

0:18:36.190 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 2>we might have had a crime. Was there this car

0:18:38.460 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>in the last 30 days? So is it like the

0:18:41.500 --> 0:18:44.820
<v Speaker 2>collection of fingerprints that they have? And you haven't committed

0:18:44.859 --> 0:18:45.820
<v Speaker 2>a crime today?

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.710
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't have a problem with that. What's the problem?

0:18:48.890 --> 0:18:50.209
<v Speaker 3>Turn over your fingerprints. What am I missing? Why don't

0:18:50.230 --> 0:18:51.210
<v Speaker 3>you turn over your DNA?

0:18:51.490 --> 0:18:51.949
<v Speaker 6>I have.

0:18:53.210 --> 0:18:58.370
<v Speaker 3>I mean, voluntarily to the police. All right, you. That's

0:18:58.410 --> 0:19:00.270
<v Speaker 3>strike two today, by the way. Have you a documentary

0:19:00.330 --> 0:19:01.770
<v Speaker 3>of your time here, fella? I was talking about a

0:19:01.810 --> 0:19:08.020
<v Speaker 3>French dip sandwich, by the way. Well, if you missed it. No, Jesse,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.460
<v Speaker 3>destroy that audio.

0:19:10.619 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Tune in for the end of the show.

0:19:12.380 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going to hear that audio again.

0:19:13.950 --> 0:19:14.030
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:19:14.109 --> 0:19:15.310
<v Speaker 3>Oh, you're going to want to stick around.

0:19:15.330 --> 0:19:16.609
<v Speaker 2>If you missed it in the last hour, you're going

0:19:16.630 --> 0:19:17.109
<v Speaker 2>to want to hear this.

0:19:17.130 --> 0:19:17.530
<v Speaker 3>Strike two.

0:19:17.550 --> 0:19:19.970
<v Speaker 2>All right, we just talked about those flock cameras that

0:19:19.990 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>are watching the residential neighborhood. Pomona is taking the technology

0:19:24.300 --> 0:19:26.659
<v Speaker 2>in a different direction. Police are using the cameras to

0:19:26.700 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 2>keep track of something and someone.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.899
<v Speaker 3>Other than cars. For a good flock, call Pomona.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.139
<v Speaker 2>Next on Monks and Merrill, KFI AM 640, live everywhere

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:37.790
<v Speaker 2>on the iHeartRadio.

0:19:38.590 --> 0:19:43.740
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Monks and Merrill on demand from KFI

0:19:44.020 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>AM 640.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>All right. We're talking about flock license plate readers. These cameras. Okay.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 3>You and it seems to be one of those weird

0:19:56.460 --> 0:19:59.620
<v Speaker 3>issues that's crossing over ideologies, party lines and all that.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.430
<v Speaker 3>And folks are just fired up about these cameras.

0:20:01.770 --> 0:20:01.950
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:02.030 --> 0:20:04.770
<v Speaker 2>And I, you know, we get the normal feedback in

0:20:04.790 --> 0:20:06.189
<v Speaker 2>this whenever we bring this up. And this is the

0:20:06.230 --> 0:20:07.790
<v Speaker 2>only people that oppose this are people that are breaking

0:20:07.810 --> 0:20:10.100
<v Speaker 2>the law. And I just don't think that that's the case. No,

0:20:10.140 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's true. I don't think that. I'm

0:20:11.580 --> 0:20:13.300
<v Speaker 2>not breaking the law. I don't like the idea that

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm being watched.

0:20:13.980 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 3>There are privacy advocates.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:17.580
<v Speaker 2>Jesse and I were just talking about this during the

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:17.980
<v Speaker 2>commercial break.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't talk to Jesse at commercial without me present.

0:20:19.980 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>So not only did we plot to get you fired,

0:20:22.859 --> 0:20:25.580
<v Speaker 2>but also Jesse and I were talking about how there

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.659
<v Speaker 2>are different companies that now will take your Bluetooth information

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and cross-reference that with some of these surveillance camera information.

0:20:33.420 --> 0:20:34.980
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean? So they don't even have to

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.699
<v Speaker 3>have you on camera anymore. This is kind of what

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:37.260
<v Speaker 3>we're saying, right?

0:20:37.500 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so they'll take your radio frequency and Bluetooth information

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.780
<v Speaker 5>and pair it with the video so that other systems

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.030
<v Speaker 5>don't need a camera. They could just ping your phone

0:20:46.090 --> 0:20:47.450
<v Speaker 5>and know who the phone belongs to.

0:20:47.750 --> 0:20:48.870
<v Speaker 3>If you're using your Bluetooth?

0:20:48.890 --> 0:20:52.350
<v Speaker 5>No, as you're walking by. So you walk by whatever.

0:20:52.630 --> 0:20:54.590
<v Speaker 3>But wouldn't the Bluetooth have to be activated to be

0:20:54.730 --> 0:20:55.410
<v Speaker 3>sending out a signal?

0:20:55.430 --> 0:20:57.460
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes it's your phone's RFD or radio.

0:20:57.500 --> 0:21:02.060
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, stuff. Which I don't like.

0:21:02.100 --> 0:21:03.780
<v Speaker 2>And I keep hearing, this is another excuse I keep

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.219
<v Speaker 2>hearing is, there's already other stuff going on. But that

0:21:07.570 --> 0:21:09.810
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean I like that stuff. Simply because I don't

0:21:09.830 --> 0:21:11.970
<v Speaker 2>like the flock cameras and simply because I have a

0:21:12.010 --> 0:21:13.969
<v Speaker 2>cell phone doesn't mean I like the idea of the

0:21:14.010 --> 0:21:16.590
<v Speaker 2>cell phone monitoring my whereabouts.

0:21:16.710 --> 0:21:19.390
<v Speaker 3>But it is. But I don't like that either. I know.

0:21:19.450 --> 0:21:21.250
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of where I landed on this. We've

0:21:21.270 --> 0:21:24.030
<v Speaker 3>talked about this before. And my response is, my goodness,

0:21:24.830 --> 0:21:28.110
<v Speaker 3>we already hand over so much of our information voluntarily

0:21:28.170 --> 0:21:29.540
<v Speaker 3>or unwittingly.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:21:30.609 --> 0:21:33.770
<v Speaker 3>By blindly signing on these terms of service. But how

0:21:33.810 --> 0:21:37.790
<v Speaker 3>much is it voluntary? What is the alternative? Well, you

0:21:37.810 --> 0:21:39.590
<v Speaker 3>have to have a phone. To drop out of society. Yeah, exactly.

0:21:39.869 --> 0:21:40.090
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:40.369 --> 0:21:43.330
<v Speaker 2>So is it really voluntary if to be successful in society,

0:21:43.690 --> 0:21:45.490
<v Speaker 2>I have to abide by these norms?

0:21:46.190 --> 0:21:46.330
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:21:46.350 --> 0:21:47.869
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, I have to go move to a cabin in

0:21:47.890 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Montana and everybody thinks I'm the Unabomber. You already look

0:21:50.100 --> 0:21:51.900
<v Speaker 2>like it. I am getting that look.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.950
<v Speaker 3>You're giving that vibe. You're giving me a hoodie. Police

0:21:54.990 --> 0:21:58.190
<v Speaker 3>in Pomona are using a mix of flock license plate

0:21:58.260 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 3>readers and live feed cameras along Holt Avenue.

0:22:02.020 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Why?

0:22:02.300 --> 0:22:04.379
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I know what goes on on Holt.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.100
<v Speaker 4>Why? Hookers.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.909
<v Speaker 3>Why do you know? Everybody knows. Okay. Yeah, that's it.

0:22:11.180 --> 0:22:15.460
<v Speaker 3>It's prostitution. It's human trafficking. Now, it seems like if

0:22:15.540 --> 0:22:19.270
<v Speaker 3>Pomona has all this going on, why doesn't the A-line

0:22:19.310 --> 0:22:22.570
<v Speaker 3>train stop there? Well, it does stop there. I know

0:22:22.609 --> 0:22:24.990
<v Speaker 3>it does. I know it does, but we talked earlier

0:22:25.010 --> 0:22:27.150
<v Speaker 3>in the show about Azusa kind of getting the short

0:22:27.190 --> 0:22:29.510
<v Speaker 3>end of the stick with some of the derelicts.

0:22:29.550 --> 0:22:31.490
<v Speaker 2>The hookers know you've got to be to Pomona before

0:22:31.490 --> 0:22:36.890
<v Speaker 2>1 a.m. Otherwise, you get dumped in Azusa. Nobody wants that.

0:22:36.990 --> 0:22:39.869
<v Speaker 3>The police department there says, look, this strategy's working. We

0:22:39.890 --> 0:22:43.260
<v Speaker 3>have seen a reduction in activity on the Holt Avenue corridor,

0:22:43.950 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and arrests are way up. So, now what, Chris? Well,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:50.129
<v Speaker 3>first of all.

0:22:50.630 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Show me that the correlation equals causation.

0:22:56.020 --> 0:22:56.260
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:22:56.380 --> 0:22:59.420
<v Speaker 2>Which, by the way, I'm not debating that another tool

0:22:59.460 --> 0:23:02.740
<v Speaker 2>in the box is being used to curtail crime. I'm

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>not going to do that. But what else is going on?

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.590
<v Speaker 2>And why was prostitution on the rise? Why weren't you

0:23:08.630 --> 0:23:11.310
<v Speaker 2>enforcing the law prior to putting these cameras up?

0:23:11.609 --> 0:23:15.310
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know. I don't know. But it may, again,

0:23:15.330 --> 0:23:18.369
<v Speaker 3>it could be a resource issue. And now you have

0:23:18.410 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 3>this supplemental tool. that allows you to monitor, to track

0:23:22.460 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>people who are engaging in this type of activity. The problem, apparently,

0:23:27.380 --> 0:23:29.820
<v Speaker 3>some critics of this work that's going on in Pomona

0:23:29.859 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 3>is they're concerned about how the technology is being used.

0:23:33.140 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 3>They say the police are not just checking the license

0:23:35.540 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 3>plates and the database that they have of stolen cars.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>They say they're identifying vehicles associated with suspected sex purchases,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.379
<v Speaker 3>and then they're tracking them in real time and sending

0:23:47.100 --> 0:23:52.690
<v Speaker 3>warning letters to the registered owners. So, like, if you're married.

0:23:53.570 --> 0:23:53.730
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:23:54.390 --> 0:23:54.970
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's one thing.

0:23:56.450 --> 0:23:58.650
<v Speaker 2>Look, if you're married, don't go to Holt Avenue picking

0:23:58.670 --> 0:24:01.250
<v Speaker 2>up a hooker. Well, I agree with you. Let me

0:24:01.270 --> 0:24:02.030
<v Speaker 2>give you that advice.

0:24:02.150 --> 0:24:02.370
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:24:02.530 --> 0:24:05.570
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. That's kind of embarrassing. But this was something they

0:24:05.590 --> 0:24:07.470
<v Speaker 3>were going to do on Figueroa Street as well. I

0:24:07.490 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 3>believe D.A. Nathan Hockman and one of the city council

0:24:09.980 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 3>people in the police department in L.A. said the same thing.

0:24:12.060 --> 0:24:13.820
<v Speaker 3>We're going to take your picture and we're going to

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 3>send a letter to your home. And that could be embarrassing.

0:24:16.859 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Mm-hmm.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.620
<v Speaker 3>And that seems to be the ploy here. Embarrassing, because

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.340
<v Speaker 3>have you seen the hookers on Figueroa? Okay. It's not

0:24:24.380 --> 0:24:26.379
<v Speaker 3>to degrade folks who are in the worst period of

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>their lives. It's the worst period of their lives. Maybe

0:24:29.260 --> 0:24:29.669
<v Speaker 3>they love it.

0:24:30.700 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Maybe.

0:24:30.940 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>They're not missing any meals. Okay.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 2>77 of this year's arrests in Pomona came under their

0:24:36.940 --> 0:24:40.230
<v Speaker 2>tougher public indecency ordinance. So while we talk about how

0:24:40.330 --> 0:24:42.609
<v Speaker 2>the arrests have gone up since the surveillance went in,

0:24:42.990 --> 0:24:45.890
<v Speaker 2>it also tends to coincide with new laws to crack

0:24:45.930 --> 0:24:46.610
<v Speaker 2>down on that.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Huh.

0:24:47.859 --> 0:24:49.379
<v Speaker 3>So now we have a new way to arrest people.

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:53.139
<v Speaker 3>Arrests go up and we say, it's the cameras. It's

0:24:53.180 --> 0:24:53.850
<v Speaker 3>the cameras.

0:24:54.390 --> 0:24:56.109
<v Speaker 2>But would the cameras have made a difference if they

0:24:56.150 --> 0:25:01.030
<v Speaker 2>hadn't also introduced new laws that crack down on hooking?

0:25:02.430 --> 0:25:05.340
<v Speaker 3>If this is the device that is being used to

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 3>collect the evidence to prosecute those crimes, then I would

0:25:08.540 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>say that they go together.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.540
<v Speaker 2>But if it wasn't a crime prior to... Prostitution wasn't

0:25:14.580 --> 0:25:14.899
<v Speaker 2>a crime?

0:25:15.980 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 4>The.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.100
<v Speaker 3>Standing on the street corner wearing what they were wearing

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.300
<v Speaker 3>was not a crime. Now it is.

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.540
<v Speaker 2>And so now they can say, oh, now that this

0:25:23.580 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is a crime, we're going to put a camera up

0:25:24.980 --> 0:25:27.420
<v Speaker 2>so we can watch scantily clad women prancing around on

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:28.060
<v Speaker 2>the sidewalk.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Whose job is it?

0:25:29.420 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way, they hired two people to be quote

0:25:31.180 --> 0:25:34.570
<v Speaker 2>unquote analysts to watch live video of scantily clad women

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.070
<v Speaker 2>dancing around on the sidewalk.

0:25:36.390 --> 0:25:39.050
<v Speaker 3>If I wanted a prostitution corridor cleaned up in my

0:25:39.090 --> 0:25:42.530
<v Speaker 3>community and it happened, I'm thankful for whatever tools they

0:25:42.630 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>use to do it. I'm sorry, I didn't hear what

0:25:45.740 --> 0:25:49.770
<v Speaker 3>you said. I was filling out a resume. Okay. Well,

0:25:49.810 --> 0:25:51.250
<v Speaker 3>don't put me down as a reference.

0:25:51.369 --> 0:25:52.810
<v Speaker 2>I want to go be one of the data analysts

0:25:52.830 --> 0:25:55.190
<v Speaker 2>who watches women dance around scantily clad all day.

0:25:55.210 --> 0:25:57.530
<v Speaker 3>You were just complaining about their bodies. So not only that,

0:25:57.570 --> 0:25:59.310
<v Speaker 3>but no, no, no, the Figueroa ones. Oh, you think

0:25:59.330 --> 0:26:02.530
<v Speaker 3>they're better in Pomona? Oh, are you kidding me? All

0:26:02.550 --> 0:26:03.570
<v Speaker 3>the pretty girls go to Pomona.

0:26:05.190 --> 0:26:10.170
<v Speaker 2>They hired two data analysts and a drone operator and

0:26:10.190 --> 0:26:12.950
<v Speaker 2>a dispatcher. So you were talking about resources. They found

0:26:12.970 --> 0:26:15.230
<v Speaker 2>the resources to pay for the cameras or the leases.

0:26:15.630 --> 0:26:17.490
<v Speaker 2>They found the resources to get the drones. They found

0:26:17.510 --> 0:26:21.830
<v Speaker 2>the resources for four more people. And then they instituted

0:26:21.910 --> 0:26:25.230
<v Speaker 2>new laws. By the way, I'm not opposed to hiring

0:26:25.270 --> 0:26:27.659
<v Speaker 2>more law enforcement and strengthening the laws in order to

0:26:27.690 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 2>reduce prostitution and trafficking.

0:26:30.380 --> 0:26:31.020
<v Speaker 3>Sure sounds like it.

0:26:31.020 --> 0:26:34.179
<v Speaker 2>By the way, when they talk about trafficking, whenever they

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.980
<v Speaker 2>talk about sex trafficking, in my mind, I'm thinking you're

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.899
<v Speaker 2>kidnapping somebody off the street and then you're putting them

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.460
<v Speaker 2>in the back of a van and you're holding on

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to Epstein Island. No, in this case, it's a hooker

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.950
<v Speaker 2>with a pimp, but because she's got a pimp now

0:26:46.690 --> 0:26:49.409
<v Speaker 2>she's being trafficked by this other person, which again, it's

0:26:49.430 --> 0:26:52.750
<v Speaker 2>not okay, but it just kind of breaks the, I

0:26:52.770 --> 0:26:55.430
<v Speaker 2>guess my image when I hear the phrase sex trafficking.

0:26:56.470 --> 0:26:56.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:56.770 --> 0:26:59.090
<v Speaker 3>It's, it's not my daughter being kidnapped happening in front

0:26:59.109 --> 0:27:01.580
<v Speaker 3>of your face. Yeah, you're right.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 5>It's also sex worker, not hooker.

0:27:04.020 --> 0:27:07.740
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Jesse, that's your turn. His mic off. Who controls

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.100
<v Speaker 3>the mics? He's in charge of his mic.

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Oh, great.

0:27:10.300 --> 0:27:14.300
<v Speaker 3>I don't like any of that. That's unfortunate. By the way,

0:27:15.060 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Pomona also shares that information with 248 agencies.

0:27:18.020 --> 0:27:19.770
<v Speaker 4>Good. Oh, okay.

0:27:19.940 --> 0:27:25.989
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The police department says trafficking adjacent crime, which would

0:27:26.030 --> 0:27:29.189
<v Speaker 3>include gang activity, stabbings, and shootings all down around that corridor.

0:27:30.070 --> 0:27:33.470
<v Speaker 3>But also they're enforcing new laws. From a grateful community,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:27:35.390 --> 0:27:36.810
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to put one of these cameras right outside

0:27:36.830 --> 0:27:38.429
<v Speaker 2>your place to stare inside, and we're going to find

0:27:38.470 --> 0:27:40.369
<v Speaker 2>out what you do in the darkest of your corners.

0:27:40.430 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 3>You may occasionally see me light up a smoke. Bet

0:27:43.180 --> 0:27:46.580
<v Speaker 3>you're sitting there watching inappropriate things on Twitter all night long.

0:27:46.900 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Only by accident.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:48.140
<v Speaker 4>Monks!

0:27:49.940 --> 0:27:54.330
<v Speaker 3>By accident. The algorithm put me here. How did that

0:27:54.369 --> 0:27:57.810
<v Speaker 3>video start playing? LA has backed away from its flock

0:27:57.830 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 3>cameras over the concerns that You hear from Chris Merrill, privacy, right?

0:28:01.390 --> 0:28:03.660
<v Speaker 3>But now the LAPD wants to put a different brand

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.590
<v Speaker 3>of license plate reader on city streets. So it's not flock,

0:28:08.570 --> 0:28:10.890
<v Speaker 3>but they're still going to be watching you. It's next

0:28:10.930 --> 0:28:11.590
<v Speaker 3>on Monks in Maryland.

0:28:12.100 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Monks and Meryl on demand from KFI

0:28:17.220 --> 0:28:17.859
<v Speaker 1>AM 640.

0:28:17.859 --> 0:28:21.060
<v Speaker 3>Available anywhere on the iHeartRadio app. It is Monks and

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.850
<v Speaker 3>Meryl here on KFI AM 640 with you till the

0:28:23.890 --> 0:28:25.870
<v Speaker 3>top of the hour. And it is Friday.

0:28:25.890 --> 0:28:28.030
<v Speaker 2>Top of the hour on a Friday. Hope everyone's having

0:28:28.090 --> 0:28:30.570
<v Speaker 2>a great Friday. It's a jumpstart weekend.

0:28:30.690 --> 0:28:32.810
<v Speaker 3>Twin spin from Tommy and the Shondells. Back at the

0:28:32.850 --> 0:28:35.550
<v Speaker 3>top of the hour. Okay, shut up. Why is it

0:28:35.609 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 3>okay when you do it? Why are you always so violent?

0:28:37.940 --> 0:28:39.140
<v Speaker 3>I'm ready to get it. I can tell that it's

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 3>time to go. Because Jesse's got me upset. You've got

0:28:41.630 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>me upset.

0:28:42.130 --> 0:28:42.540
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys.

0:28:42.970 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 3>How are you doing? And Tommy James and the Shondells

0:28:46.900 --> 0:28:49.380
<v Speaker 3>are still not in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame,

0:28:49.780 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 3>and they should be. Yeah, there you go. We got

0:28:52.820 --> 0:28:56.300
<v Speaker 3>them fired up over that song. Love that. Let's get

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.300
<v Speaker 3>out of here, though, because it's a beautiful day. I'm

0:28:59.340 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>ready to get out and enjoy this Friday, but we

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.420
<v Speaker 3>got one more segment to do. So let's talk about

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 3>how the L.A. City Council is kind of, I don't know,

0:29:04.780 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 3>it feels like they're kind of getting around the flock controversy.

0:29:08.050 --> 0:29:11.580
<v Speaker 3>by not using Coca-Cola, but switching to Pepsi. Everybody's mad

0:29:11.620 --> 0:29:14.940
<v Speaker 3>at Coca-Cola, so we'll just switch Pepsi in, ignoring the

0:29:14.980 --> 0:29:16.700
<v Speaker 3>fact that everybody's actually mad at soda.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.020
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's exactly right. And this is the thing that

0:29:21.060 --> 0:29:24.260
<v Speaker 2>I think people need to be aware of. If you

0:29:24.460 --> 0:29:27.610
<v Speaker 2>are a fan of the automated license plate readers, then

0:29:27.630 --> 0:29:29.610
<v Speaker 2>you probably don't care if it's Flock or if it's

0:29:29.790 --> 0:29:30.710
<v Speaker 2>from Axon or wherever.

0:29:30.740 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Bring them on. Or from my phone. Or from your phone, right.

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:39.270
<v Speaker 2>But if you're against Flock, chances are you're probably against

0:29:39.310 --> 0:29:41.660
<v Speaker 2>the automated light. plate readers in general. But the city

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of LA captured headlines a while back where they said,

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.500
<v Speaker 2>we're going to suspend our contract with Flock. But now

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.810
<v Speaker 2>they're planning on something that is exactly the same thing.

0:29:53.180 --> 0:29:55.470
<v Speaker 4>You guys have no idea who's.

0:29:55.210 --> 0:29:56.270
<v Speaker 3>Using these cameras, do you?

0:29:57.010 --> 0:29:57.270
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:29:58.610 --> 0:30:00.750
<v Speaker 7>I suspect that sooner or later it will come out.

0:30:00.990 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 7>There's many other people besides police using it. And it's

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 7>not always a good thing. So I think these cameras

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 7>are a big mistake. I think people are giving into

0:30:10.140 --> 0:30:13.660
<v Speaker 7>it too easy. And I'd like to see the privacy

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 7>people win in this case.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think those, again, I'm receptive to those concerns.

0:30:19.180 --> 0:30:23.270
<v Speaker 3>I don't dismiss them outright. I like the advantages that

0:30:23.330 --> 0:30:27.459
<v Speaker 3>the cameras offer. to supplement police departments that are often

0:30:28.050 --> 0:30:32.470
<v Speaker 3>overwhelmed or under-resourced. And especially in areas, we were just

0:30:32.490 --> 0:30:35.430
<v Speaker 3>talking about the whole Avenue corridor in Pomona. Yeah. We

0:30:35.450 --> 0:30:40.190
<v Speaker 3>mentioned Figueroa in LA. These are areas where, gosh, if

0:30:40.250 --> 0:30:43.580
<v Speaker 3>these tools can be used, I wonder though, if that's

0:30:43.660 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>all they were doing, like, Hey, here is a tool

0:30:46.060 --> 0:30:48.260
<v Speaker 3>you can use in high crime areas.

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.500
<v Speaker 2>So, so, I think Pomona is a great example of

0:30:51.540 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>how this has gone from we're tracking stolen vehicles or

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 2>we're tracking kidnapping to we're using this as active surveillance

0:30:58.180 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>to try to find crimes that may be happening. In

0:31:01.220 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>other words, here you are walking down the street and

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.030
<v Speaker 2>you're being monitored in case you do something wrong. That

0:31:07.110 --> 0:31:10.510
<v Speaker 2>goes from something has gone wrong and we're trying to

0:31:10.550 --> 0:31:14.770
<v Speaker 2>solve a case to now we're getting more into the whole–

0:31:16.730 --> 0:31:18.990
<v Speaker 2>minority report stuff where we're just going to start keeping

0:31:19.010 --> 0:31:20.469
<v Speaker 2>an eye on people to make sure that they're not

0:31:20.530 --> 0:31:22.350
<v Speaker 2>doing anything untoward, something that we don't like.

0:31:22.610 --> 0:31:24.470
<v Speaker 3>And speaking of minorities, that was one of the concerns

0:31:24.550 --> 0:31:29.210
<v Speaker 3>in Santa Clarita was that you've chosen a minority majority neighborhood.

0:31:29.390 --> 0:31:29.620
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And you've pointed cameras at our homes. So I can

0:31:32.860 --> 0:31:34.500
<v Speaker 3>see that being abused that way. But what's happening in

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.940
<v Speaker 3>LA is different because yes, they went through the whole

0:31:36.980 --> 0:31:40.100
<v Speaker 3>flock controversy. They say we're done with this and they

0:31:40.260 --> 0:31:43.260
<v Speaker 3>have decided that they want to pursue they being the LAPD.

0:31:43.300 --> 0:31:45.860
<v Speaker 3>They want to no cost. This is just a trial run.

0:31:46.540 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 3>free trial, three-month pilot using 30 Axon connected cameras on

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.140
<v Speaker 3>city streetlights. So- How do they have power in city streetlights?

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.100
<v Speaker 3>I thought we stole all the copper. Exactly. So I

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>guess they just need the height, not necessarily the power

0:32:02.290 --> 0:32:04.070
<v Speaker 3>that's running through them. No, they're going to draw power

0:32:04.110 --> 0:32:09.010
<v Speaker 3>from the streetlight system. Oh, that's hilarious. So good news,

0:32:09.030 --> 0:32:11.150
<v Speaker 3>they won't be on the Sixth Street Bridge. Yeah, these

0:32:11.170 --> 0:32:14.610
<v Speaker 3>cameras will be out of commission in two hours. How

0:32:14.630 --> 0:32:17.500
<v Speaker 3>did I miss that? Police commission did approve the pilot

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in September.

0:32:18.060 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>City council, though, jumped in there, and the public safety

0:32:20.300 --> 0:32:23.300
<v Speaker 2>committee voted 3-2 to recommend vetoing the cameras.

0:32:23.900 --> 0:32:26.590
<v Speaker 3>And this is what pains me. Yeah, here's your company.

0:32:26.810 --> 0:32:29.910
<v Speaker 3>Here's the company you're joining, mister. Say their names. It's

0:32:29.970 --> 0:32:32.870
<v Speaker 3>the DSA. It's Hugo Soto-Martinez. It's Nithya Raman.

0:32:33.170 --> 0:32:37.050
<v Speaker 2>And soon-to-be prison-bound Curran Price. Yeah, supporting the opposition to

0:32:37.090 --> 0:32:39.990
<v Speaker 2>the motion. The full council expected to consider it this week.

0:32:40.030 --> 0:32:44.350
<v Speaker 2>That vote, however, has been extended until next week. So

0:32:44.810 --> 0:32:49.910
<v Speaker 2>they do use the license plate readers already. So they

0:32:49.990 --> 0:32:52.970
<v Speaker 2>use Axon and Motorola license plate technology. Police commission recently

0:32:52.990 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 2>approving a 10-year, $ 235 million deal with Axon, including more

0:32:57.580 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>than 1,600 patrol car cameras capable of reading plates. Now,

0:33:03.100 --> 0:33:05.140
<v Speaker 2>if you're a cop and you've got the camera that's

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 2>reading plates while you're driving down the street, and it

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 2>pings on something that is cross-referenced in a database that says, hey,

0:33:11.020 --> 0:33:14.300
<v Speaker 2>this car is reported stolen, First of all, I want

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you to have appropriate response to that because there are

0:33:16.300 --> 0:33:18.460
<v Speaker 2>horror stories about people being hauled out of their cars

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.940
<v Speaker 2>for being car thieves and come to find out it

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:23.820
<v Speaker 2>was the Secretary of State that screwed it up or

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the DMV that screwed it up somewhere, right? So first

0:33:26.460 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 2>of all, appropriate response. But second, why are you hanging

0:33:30.460 --> 0:33:32.250
<v Speaker 2>on to that data for 30 days? And I know

0:33:32.290 --> 0:33:35.050
<v Speaker 2>it's in case there's a kidnapping that comes out later.

0:33:35.510 --> 0:33:36.430
<v Speaker 2>And I don't like that.

0:33:36.950 --> 0:33:40.170
<v Speaker 3>Well, I keep coming back to the fact that right

0:33:40.210 --> 0:33:42.270
<v Speaker 3>now we're on a camera. When you walk out of

0:33:42.290 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 3>this building, you're on camera. When you go down to

0:33:44.100 --> 0:33:45.780
<v Speaker 3>the parking garage, you get your car, you're on camera.

0:33:45.940 --> 0:33:48.100
<v Speaker 3>When you're on the freeway, you're on camera. When you

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 3>pull up to your apartment building, you're on camera. We

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 3>are on camera. Well, then why does this all the time?

0:33:52.940 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Why are my taxes going to pay for more of them?

0:33:56.420 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Now that's a better question.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.090
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there you go. They do have an alternative that

0:34:03.140 --> 0:34:04.900
<v Speaker 2>they can subpoena those records if they need to.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.710
<v Speaker 3>Or they have networks that people can opt into to

0:34:08.750 --> 0:34:11.370
<v Speaker 3>share their, if you're a private citizen and you've got

0:34:11.510 --> 0:34:15.330
<v Speaker 3>one of those doorbell cameras, then you can opt into

0:34:15.370 --> 0:34:17.810
<v Speaker 3>a program. If you're a store operator and you've got surveillance,

0:34:17.830 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>you can opt into a program in some jurisdictions, and

0:34:20.700 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the police can have access to it. I'm opting out

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 3>of here.

0:34:22.860 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 2>The great John Coble, the godfather of talk radio, steps

0:34:25.739 --> 0:34:28.379
<v Speaker 2>into the studio next. We're back again Monday, noon-ish. Monks

0:34:28.420 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 2>and Merrill, KFI, AM 640, live everywhere in the iHeartRadio app.

0:34:33.450 --> 0:34:36.390
<v Speaker 3>I mean, somebody in 1910 Los Angeles could have been

0:34:36.450 --> 0:34:38.710
<v Speaker 3>sucking down a French dip there. And I was sucking

0:34:38.750 --> 0:34:39.549
<v Speaker 3>one down last week.

0:34:39.610 --> 0:34:42.870
<v Speaker 4>Okay. This is KFI On Demand.

0:34:43.989 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 3>You've been listening to Monks &amp; Merrill. Hear the show

0:34:46.300 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 3>live weekdays from noon to 3 on KFI AM 640

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.750
<v Speaker 3>and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.